alonso

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 309 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Public Space for Docklands #765329
    alonso
    Participant

    ctesiphon, as we all know , Royston Vasey was inspired by Residents Associations in nearby Sandymount!!! This is a local low-density, upmarket, unchanging, obstinate, obstructionist nimby suburb for local low-density, upmarket, unchanging, obstinate, obstructionist nimby people… I think we should demolish housing on Strand Road as they obstruct the view from the multicoloured council housing off Sean Moore Road.

    I heard Tesco want to redevelop in Sandymount Green to a (gasp) 3-5 storey apartment and retail development. 2 chances lads, 2 chances. I await the “High Rise Horror” headline in Lifetimes or the Southside News. They’re fcking apoplectic about the S2S cycleway as well. How offensive can a cycletrack be?? anyway I rant…

    in reply to: Where is all the Work! #776574
    alonso
    Participant

    I went to a meeting in Bolton St in 2001 all about bringing Planning Aid to Ireland. Nothing seems to have come of it though. I don’t think there’s the time or will to do such a thing here. But if graduates could do it, I guess it would make sense. But it would give lie to the “conspiracy against the laity” aspect of the planning system, and we can’t have that now can we…

    The larger private sector companies are more varied, especially at the lower levels. It’s the difference between writing EIS’s or an appeal for a major retail/residential scheme or driving around checking site notices and assessing extensions… There is a moral dimension to it too. All that matters is the client. However, I’m not 100% concerned about that. At the end of the day, the Authorities make development plans and are the guardians of the built environment. Planners merely give effect to those plans. What needs to happen in my opinion is the major planning consultants who represent the largest developers, need to show leadership to their clients and show them that doing the right thing is better in the long term for the development industry, their clients ie homeowners, and the environment in general.

    in reply to: New Public Space for Docklands #765326
    alonso
    Participant

    Rinsend is a place to live not for outsiders to visit. Calling a spade a spade is not the same as calling in the bulldozers…

    in reply to: New Public Space for Docklands #765324
    alonso
    Participant

    the days of gentrification by removal are long gone. Anyone suggesting otherwise has not been paying attention to patterns of urban development in the post war period. This policy failed (see west Tallaght for example) and should never happen again. There is nothing wrong with those flats as far as I’m aware. Some LA housing of that era is far superior accomodation than many of the private apartments built in Irishtown/Ringsend since, both space wise and visually. Ringsend is a living inner suburban district with a long history. Obviously it’s not all good, (I remember goin through from the Point years ago with a few mates and being chased through the town, they caught one of my mates and mugged him at knife-point, so I’ve first hand experience of these “scangers” so eloquently referred to earlier.)

    Some of the posters here belong in Thatcher’s London Docklands, not our Dublin Docks. Darkman please define “world class quarter”? What’s a world class place to live in if it is devoid of character, history and it’s people, wholly populated by a transient, single class?

    in reply to: New building beside City Hall #724613
    alonso
    Participant

    I think you’ve all been very harsh on this building. The plaza fulfils a vital social function in a heavily urbanised location. For example last night as I was staggering along Dame street, I noticed that no-one was sitting in the plaza at all, or even walking through it. However some old homeless bloke was kneeling on the ground leaning over one of the lighted seat things. He’d arranged all his change on it and was counting it up. So it’s not entirely useless 😉

    Perhaps this is an example of ”design energy” which Dick Gleeson referred to recently…

    btw blurred vision doesn’t make this building any better

    in reply to: Where is all the Work! #776571
    alonso
    Participant

    I had the same story. It’s impossible to get into the LA’s as graduate opportunities are rare. I was very lucky to get a job in planning, it was just through a friends’ leave of absence. (Taking 2 years off after graduating to p1ss about in a band didn’t help either!!!). Anyway the consultancies are easier to get into so yeh blanket bomb and obviously check the jobs on the IPI website…

    But it’s a classic irish situation. The system is overstretched and under funded. There’s no planners in the Local Authorities and dozens of unemployed graduates?? genius. I’m sure you’re sick of people telling you how everyone’s looking for planners. I know I was…

    in reply to: Mr Voting Machine’s Transport Plan #762925
    alonso
    Participant

    yeh funnily enough i was on that site the other day and came to the exact same conclusion. He’s not a Minister for Transport, He’s a publicity hungry egotistical incompetent fckwit whose achievements can be collated on a postage stamp and whose mistakes would require another internet to discuss:

    Cullen forgets the Bray Metro in T21
    Cullen omits Tallaght-City Metro
    Cullen takes almost a year to approve the Kildare Route Project
    Cullen takes 6 months to read a 30 page report on the DTA
    Cullen then forgets the DTA for a while
    Cullen farts about with BX
    Cullen gives Dublin Bus 20 buses in 5 years
    Cullen allows property developers to determine Transport Strategy
    Cullen likes roads
    Cullen opens roads
    Cullen gets re-elected

    in reply to: Lansdowne Road Stadium #726000
    alonso
    Participant

    @NeilA wrote:

    Does anyone know what the time scale is after this week when the oral hearing finishes? How long do An Bord Pleanala take to come to a decision generally?

    They’re supposed to decide within 18 weeks of an appeal but they can take as long as they want, but I’d expect an outcome in early spring

    in reply to: Lansdowne Road Stadium #725994
    alonso
    Participant

    Shamrock Rovers are the most successful club in LoI history and if the people via SDCC have to pay for their housing, so be it. The death of the domestic game would be a damning indictment on our society. I’d rather see them get my money than the FAI, GAA or IRFU. Dodger, do thomas davis need this ground? If the answer is yes, then how come this need only arose after SDCC said they’d take the ground in charge. Having a LoI club in Tallaght will be absolutely brilliant for the kids out there, if it’s done correctly. The local GAA are just engaging in their age-old tradition of complete paranoia and insecurity …”oooh i’m scared the bold boys and their garrison game are comin to town…” nonsense

    for a very lively debate on this issue see here:
    http://www.politics.ie/viewtopic.php?t=15575

    btw Cute Panda’s post wasn’t merely offensive. It was also ill-informed, naive and ignorant as well.It’s the type of commentary that does nothing to further the objective of sport and sporting organisations in this country

    in reply to: Henrietta Street #775271
    alonso
    Participant

    Wednesday 13th December 2006: The Henrietta Street Conservation Plan will be launched today by Lord Mayor Councillor Vincent Jackson and the Dublin City Manager, John Tierney at the King’s Inns, Henrietta Street at 6pm. The Conservation plan re-affirms Henrietta Street as one of the principal architectural and urban ensembles of this country.

    “This conservation plan is essential in highlighting the architectural vulnerabilities on Henrietta Street and will help to re-affirm its significance through the implementation of appropriate policies”, said the Lord Mayor.

    http://www.dublincity.ie/press_news/press_releases/conservation_plan_launch_for_ireland_s_first_georgian_streetscape.asp

    in reply to: Lansdowne Road Stadium #725987
    alonso
    Participant

    yeh I overheard them getting very excited about producing human rights documentation that would help their case. They’re already talking about judicial review so the Bord has to ensure that due process is done and seen to be done. I’m not aware of any possible contravention of EIA legislation, or the substance of any such claims, if they exist, in regard to the applcation and DCC decision. It’s very flawed technically but legally all seems above board. It’s not like this applcation appeared out of thin air…

    in reply to: Lansdowne Road Stadium #725985
    alonso
    Participant

    “It’s not just high relative to the existing stadium, it’s high relative to other similar stadiums. It’s about 13m higher than Croke Park, and just a little shorter than Liberty Hall. The reason for the height is that the new stadium will have lots of extra floor space devoted to corporate boxes, restaurants and meeting facilities which aren’t in the current stadium.”

    the reason it’s so high is also due to the shape which was necessary for the northern end. I’m also sick of hearing the Liberty Hall comparison. As we all know, it’s irrelevant given the proposals around the city. It’s just a hackneyed cliche.

    I agree that the other uses should not be part of it. They do take up a lot of space, but if they were removed it wouldn’t make that much difference to the height. restaurants and conference facilities are within the super-structure of the main stands which are defined by their capacity. What it does show is that the current stadium is underutilised. These facilities are in all modern stadiums, but they may not be necessary here. After all the HQ’s of the FAI and IRFU will be at Abbotstown and they should use these facilities rather than Lansdowne Road

    “A lot of people in the area still can’t get insurance against flooding because of the major flood events in 2002, so I don’t see how you can say “the river is very controlled”. The plans for the stadium don’t include any specifics on flood defences.”

    it is not the duty of the applicant to undertake flood control for the Ringsend/Sandymount area. The proposed development will not cause extra flooding, therefore this issue is a red herring. It’s up to the City Council to sort this issue out, and so far they’ve been utterly negligent, as far as i can tell.

    in reply to: Lansdowne Road Stadium #725976
    alonso
    Participant

    the thing about the height is a bit misleading. The reason it’s so high is because the north stand is so low, as low as it is now, to accomodate residents.
    Parking was a major talking point today (I was there, but I ain’t sayin why) as was flooding, even though the hearing began with a letter from the OPW stating that flooding would not occur. The development of conferencing and restaurant non-event day facilities was a major issue as is the lack of a limit on the number of events… fair enough i reckon. The demolition of no. 70 Shelbourne road is a vaild objection, as I’m sure many archiseekers will agree. There are a number of spurious objections, my favourite was one bloke who said it should be in Abbotstown, where there’s no traffic problem (yeh, the same abbotstown on the M50)

    Most of the appeals were very well constructed and delivered very well. It will be granted imo but the conditions will be way more far-reaching, as far as maybe reducing capacity, height, a curb on certain uses and a definite limit on the number of events.

    btw George Redmond attended most of todays proceedings. Must have been lookin for tickets, or breakin into the old council offices across the road

    in reply to: Carlton Cinema Development #712000
    alonso
    Participant

    no 16 Moore street has just been declared a national monument. The saga goes on and on

    in reply to: Irish Rural Dwellers Association #767136
    alonso
    Participant
    in reply to: New street and redevelopment for Dublin ? #764577
    alonso
    Participant

    Decision details available now: AI requested unsurprisingly. If this link doesnt work, the file no. is 5170/06

    http://www.dublincity.ie/swiftlg/apas/run/WPHA … 2&backURL=Search%20Criteria%20>%20<a%20href='wphappsearchres.displayResultsURL?ResultID=416185%26StartIndex=1%26SortOrder=APNID:asc%26DispResultsAs=WPHAPPSEARCHRES%26BackURL=Search%20Criteria‘>Search%20Results

    in reply to: Dublin Airport Metro to have unconnected terminus? #749621
    alonso
    Participant

    stephens green will be an interchange with Luas, Metro and the undeground Dart tunnel, pending the upgrading of the Luas to metro, when the line will go underground at ranelagh and head straight to the airport so there is a plan to connect the green line

    in reply to: Dublin Airport Metro to have unconnected terminus? #749619
    alonso
    Participant

    stira, eventually that LUAS line from bray to town will be a Metro so all that line from Bray to Swords via the airport will be seamless. ALso it’s not the planners to blame it’s retarded governance by the gombeens voted in by the people. each element is being built one at a time and will all link up.Sadly the most critical element, the interconnector, is the last thing to be done

    in reply to: Point Village #760709
    alonso
    Participant

    it’s also not “news”… this has been on the cards for years and another 32 storey tower is under construction near heuston plus a 20 storey block was granted out in Sandyford and of course the U2 tower was recently approved. This really is no big deal..

    in reply to: UCD Belfield Campus #775868
    alonso
    Participant

    eh just to clarify, the “realigned foster’s avenue” is the ecological and environmental gift that is the Eastern bypass. This 4 lane urban motorway from the M50 at Sandyford will occupy part of UCD’s lands and will connect with the N11 via a flyover before going underground alongside the Radisson and under Booterstown and Sandymount before linking up with the port tunnel. (well if the PDs get their way we’ll need it…)

    as for the substantive issue, I went to Trinity first before UCD so my view is so utterly biased (correct mind you, but biased nonetheless) that to offer anything would be unhelpful. Anything I would have to say would involve words like scratch, from, start, again and the like heh heh

    seriously though, the keyword is cohesion. UCD needs to be knitted together like a sweater that’s been mangled by a dog. Also a sense of place and a human scale… the concept of a street sounds good. One good thing about TCD is that most of the buildings front onto the pedestrian space, be it a footpath or a square. There;s very little setback or big steps leading up to them as far as i can remember…

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 309 total)

Latest News