Point Village
- This topic has 558 replies, 100 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
EIA340600.
- AuthorPosts
- November 2, 2006 at 5:50 pm #760702
GregF
ParticipantIf that’s what the finished articles are gonna look like either side in the picture well then they look shite. The Point Tower looks stumpy and very isolated. I’ve given up on the Dublin Docks!
November 2, 2006 at 11:07 pm #760703GrahamH
ParticipantThe Watchtower is an apt description – a place to look out from, not something to look at. The top is awful, and the glazing generally uninspiring.
What a missed opportunity 🙁The new look Point by contrast sounds fantastic; the capital will finally have a decent large scale performance venue. The seating sounds very similar in arrangement and capacity to the Globe Arena in Stockholm.
November 2, 2006 at 11:49 pm #760704paul h
ParticipantThe render Darkman provided does not look good, drab, uninspiring, dull etc etc…..
Also, the high rise building on the south of the liffey is the U2 tower???
If so it also does not look good. hopefully not final deign!November 6, 2006 at 6:57 pm #760705Pepsi
Participanthopefully some pictures of the tower’s progress will be posted over the coming months.
November 6, 2006 at 7:53 pm #760706Frankie Boy
ParticipantThis is very exciting, I for one will definitely post photo’s of progress over the coming months. This will really give the city a new dimension.:)
November 6, 2006 at 8:17 pm #760707Pepsi
Participanti wonder was this skyscraper featured on the news recently? i saw nothing. i thought ireland’s first skyscraper would be in there somewhere.
November 6, 2006 at 10:21 pm #760708Keen
Participant@Pepsi wrote:
i wonder was this skyscraper featured on the news recently? i saw nothing. i thought ireland’s first skyscraper would be in there somewhere.
Thats because this is something you just expect to find to find in a 21st century city. I was in both Brussels and Amsterdam recently and for cities not even the size of Dublin i was constantly looking up at their glassy towers. The recently built Dexia tower in Brussels in particular
November 6, 2006 at 10:30 pm #760709alonso
Participantit’s also not “news”… this has been on the cards for years and another 32 storey tower is under construction near heuston plus a 20 storey block was granted out in Sandyford and of course the U2 tower was recently approved. This really is no big deal..
November 6, 2006 at 10:41 pm #760710Pepsi
Participanti know there has been talk of these towers for quite some time but i just thought that they might of had something on the tv regarding the construction of ireland’s first skyscraper. i’m glad i missed nothing so.
November 7, 2006 at 10:38 am #760711The Denouncer
ParticipantOriginally posted by Keen
Thats because this is something you just expect to find to find in a 21st century city. I was in both Brussels and Amsterdam recently and for cities not even the size of Dublin i was constantly looking up at their glassy towers. The recently built Dexia tower in Brussels in particularThats because those cities, like others in Western Europe, have been richer far longer than Ireland, until very recently an island isolated off the West coast, the poor man of Europe. Why build gleaming office blocks when there was no work, and why build tall apartments in a country with mass emigration? Now that has changed of course, and the building boom will lead to skyscrapers – a whole change of attitude is required amongst city planners – they know tourists love the low skyline (yes, they do!), but are finally coming around to the idea that ‘Urban Sprawl’ does not work, and will hopefully now build up in the docks.
November 23, 2006 at 7:20 pm #760712paul h
Participant@The Denouncer wrote:
Thats because those cities, like others in Western Europe, have been richer far longer than Ireland, until very recently an island isolated off the West coast, the poor man of Europe. Why build gleaming office blocks when there was no work, and why build tall apartments in a country with mass emigration? Now that has changed of course, and the building boom will lead to skyscrapers – a whole change of attitude is required amongst city planners – they know tourists love the low skyline (yes, they do!), but are finally coming around to the idea that ‘Urban Sprawl’ does not work, and will hopefully now build up in the docks.
I dont know if emmigration is so much of a factor because i read somewhere that they are currently planning to build the tallest res tower in europe in poland somewhere, also warsaw has a long history of high rise. Just check out the latest plan here ]http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=783[/url]
I was driving down lexington ave here a while ago and spotted this really ugly building at 425 lex av, while this alone is not news, the fact it reminded me so much of this watchtower is! i really hope that this turns out better than the renders, if not it may kill the chance for any future higher building plans
[ATTACH]3512[/ATTACH]
why couldnt we design something more in the vain of the majestic chrysler (pictured behind)
with the top coming to a natural point rather than thisDecember 19, 2006 at 7:28 pm #760713stira
ParticipantProperty developer Harry Crosbie will submit new proposals next week for his proposed Watch Tower skyscraper on Dublin’s North Wall Quay, opposite the new U2 Tower on the southern side of the Liffey.
Property developer Harry Crosbie will submit new proposals next week for his proposed Watch Tower skyscraper on Dublin’s North Wall Quay, opposite the new U2 Tower on the southern side of the Liffey.
Crosbie has hired a British company to help him revamp the design of the architects Scott Tallon Walker building, after the docklands authorities said the original design was too bland. The tower, which will be as tall as the Spire on O’Connell Street, is designed to complement the U2 tower on the opposite side of the river, which has a more radical design.
Crosbie’s tower is part of a €800 million development around The Point which received planning permission in November from the Dublin Docklands Development Authority (DDDA).
However, the DDDA was concerned that the tower was not radical enough in appearance for a structure that would act, along with the U2 tower, as a visual ‘‘gatepost’’ to Dublin.
At 36 floors, the tower will dwarf all buildings around it.
As things stand, the structure is designed to look like two glass posts with the top six floors protruding outwards to make way for an enclosed roof garden.
A spokesman for Harry Crosbie said a ‘‘fenestration’’ company had been hired in Britain to re-work the look and new plans were on the way.
‘‘The DDDA made a couple of negative comments about the tower, so Harry decided to have a second look at the whole thing and to redesign. We can’t say anything more at this stage, but the new design will go in in about a week’s time,†he said.
Planning permission was granted on the grounds that the Watch Tower building was amended, and construction of other parts of the scheme has already started.
The tower will include apartments, offices and a rooftop bar and restaurant with views over Dublin city and bay.
The scheme includes a new shopping centre, a hotel, underground car park and 12-screen cinema. Both the DDDA and Scott Tallon Walker declined to comment, directing all calls to Crosbie.
December 19, 2006 at 8:22 pm #760714Anonymous
InactiveGOOD ! don’t know why he had to look to an english firm for help though, plenty of young firms here capable of producing something interesting.
December 19, 2006 at 9:49 pm #760715NeilA
Participant@Peter FitzPatrick wrote:
GOOD ! don’t know why he had to look to an english firm for help though, plenty of young firms here capable of producing something interesting.
Isn’t this the 3rd attempt? 1st was bland and the 2nd one (i.e. current version) wasn’t any better…
December 19, 2006 at 9:50 pm #760716Cathal Dunne
ParticipantIs there any pictures of the re-designed Point Village Tower?
December 19, 2006 at 10:17 pm #760717GrahamH
ParticipantYes it would be the second attempt to alter this tower.
It really is a hideous building though with that top-heavy capital. It is as if it’s attempting an ironic take on early 20th century skyscrapers, placing the wide pedestal base at the top instead.

Notably a new firm of architects haven’t been brought in that would ruffle STW’s feathers – rather a ‘fenestration company’ is to undertake the reordering. Surely they couldn’t undertake any major structural alterations?
March 3, 2007 at 9:37 pm #760718darkman
ParticipantBetter then previously in my view but is it good enough?:)
http://www.pointvillage.ie/overview.html
Is it just me or does this look taller then 120m?

Looks like the equivilent of 40 storeys high IF you take into account the Gardens on top. I am definatley not a fan of that cage like structure on top. I hope they are not implying they are going to tinge the windows green!:(

Its still hard to picture this on the skyline though without better renders. Otherwise I think we should be happy the other plan was dropped. Still looks rather bland despite the improvement. So 3rd attempt and still nothing great.
March 3, 2007 at 10:20 pm #760719Anonymous
Inactivean improvement i suppose but nothing special, looks quite familiar really …

this ‘gateway’ idea is a little basic, oh i know lets put a big high rise on this side & better still one to match on this side ! i have visions of driveway pillars with cast concrete eagles…
there needs to be some scaling up around both & preferably not exactly symmetrical DDDA ! otherwise its just gonna look like two big dicks :rolleyes:
March 3, 2007 at 10:25 pm #760720darkman
Participant@Peter FitzPatrick wrote:
an improvement i suppose but nothing special, looks quite familiar really …

this ‘gateway’ idea is a little basic, oh i know lets put a big high rise on this side & better still one to match on this side ! i have visions of driveway pillars with cast concrete eagles…
there needs to be some scaling up around both & preferably not exactly symmetrical DDDA ! otherwise its just gonna look like two big dicks :rolleyes:
Could the Heuston Gate tower look any more basic? Nothing inspiring about that at all. As for PV, its better then Heuston Gate, but the idea does indeed look very similar. Also I find the lack of glass in HG a little disturbing – Hawkins House round 2? Neither tower though is a patch on the proposed U2 tower.
March 3, 2007 at 10:42 pm #760721Anonymous
InactiveI don’t mind Heuston Gate, think it will sit quite well, although obviously a lot depends on final materials spec etc, quite a safe design. However, it does look as if its basic outline is being replicated here, not sure if its the design or more this gateway concept that i have a problem with.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

