tommyt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 118 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #766360
    tommyt
    Participant

    @Paul Clerkin wrote:

    I heard a rumour that the building is under threat – structurally not sound.

    Are Principle Management still in there? I presume they will go to the U2 tower if it ever happens-was a very nice renovation on the inside (better than the Not-Us office ran out of a
    garden shed on the Merrion Road before they decamped offshore with Bono and the boys’ billions;)

    The rear part of the building was also occupied by several music biz offices – that did seem in bad nick the last time I was there 4/5 years ago…

    in reply to: Dublin Historic Stone Paving disbelief #764169
    tommyt
    Participant

    @GrahamH wrote:

    Nit-picky perhaps, but I was just passing watching the tourists scrambling about vieing for space with passing hoards of pedestrians, and observed firstly how utterly ridiculous these yokes look, secondly how ugly they are, thirdly how insensitively positioned they are in a tourist hotspot, and fourthly the obstacle they presented right in the middle of the busiest footpath in the city. Just no thought.

    Going back to the title of the thread, having recently heard a speech (though more of a passionate rant) on Irish limestone from one of the two producers left in Kilkenny, the extraordinary fact emerged that at least 50% of their output goes straight onto boats to the Netherlands. They cannot get enough of Irish limestone, and are willing to pay for it in spite of their own native resource – albeit somewhat inferior. Irish limestone is proving particularly popular for sea defences, but also for paving and quite highly engineered interlocking municipal paving systems that are expensive to produce. They spend significant sums on paving in the Netherlands, deeming it to be an improving, cost-eflective, long term investment.

    And yet we don’t even use the stuff here! Indeed in Kilkenny there’s a row brewing over proposals to use Chinese granite from the other side of the world to repave the city centre, rather than native limestone from the outskirts of the town. It was noted that too often municpal authorities in Ireland just see figures on a sheet and the bottom line, and nothing of the wider costs – social, economic and environmental – of trucking the alternative half way across the planet from potentially dubious sources. Once these factors are considered, our own little narrow world of penny-pinching dissolves into insignificance.

    Apparently there’s also a reluctance to use limestone for paving: it often being deemed to be too slippery and not abrasive enough, whereas it is generally more than adequate in its natural state and especially so if a machine-punched finished is given.

    It’d be great to see more native limestone paving the capital’s streets. You see the odd freak blue limestone kerb that stands out beautifully even against concrete, but that’s about the height of it. We really need to take both the longer term and wider view on this issue.

    I may have mentioned it here before but I was flabbergasted to hear the same anecdote from a Tobermore sales rep a few years ago. He also stated that chineses granite is cheaper than ANY locally produced paving material. Prompts the obvious speculation about the lack of labour costs in chinese quarries… I know it is easier to cut as it is such a uniform material but if tonne for tonne it’s cheaper than even the crappest suburban driveway material it is going to appeal to the pple who control the purse strings in local authorities,

    in reply to: National Gallery Extension #718671
    tommyt
    Participant

    is it this building or the one next door that is supposed to have a ballroom on the first floor? would be great to see it come into some kind of public use if it is in this one…

    in reply to: Dublin’s Ugliest Building #713246
    tommyt
    Participant

    @Blisterman wrote:

    Whereabouts, and what type if you don’t mind me asking?

    1950s built estate in Dun Laoghaire- Had its problems but nothing major in my eyes-suppose I am from an era when artisan families still got social housing- In fact all social housing in DL could be considered a ‘success’ IMO- notwithstanding some typical societal problems involving drugs and crime-due to their proximity to wealthier, mixed use and recreational areas. That was the major problem with all the westside corpo housing built from the 60s onwards-no opportunities for the proles to mix with the posho crowd out in Blanch and Tallaght.

    in reply to: Dublin’s Ugliest Building #713244
    tommyt
    Participant

    @Blisterman wrote:

    The real question is has there ever been a succesful social housing project anywhere? If so, how come that succeeded, while most others failed?

    er-I grew up in one, am sure a few other posters on here have too.

    in reply to: Point Village #760883
    tommyt
    Participant

    @paul h wrote:

    Yea, great big glass dome would be sweet, but the high cost would be a factor im sure

    Great pictures Overworked thanks, any shots of the planned interior??

    I would imagine and hope the acoustic engineering necessities dictated the form, wouldn’t a dome be a nightmare sound wise?. Dublin’s never had a purpose built arena sized venue for concerts so hopefully it’s a marked improvement soundwise…

    in reply to: Pearse St / Sandwith St proposal #777903
    tommyt
    Participant

    @notjim wrote:

    why ravaging tommyt: it isn’t such a bad building, a good one i’d say and tcd, one of the towns great assets, does need space to expand.

    It’s more to do with the numerous missed opportunities to develop proper high density transit hubs at the rail station in town along the Dutch model.
    People on here who get the horn for any tall structur proposed in the city should be disappointed by this bulky effort also. Perfect site for something slender , c.15 storeys with a public transport concourse than the site gobbler shown in the photomontages.

    TCD just keep getting it wrong again and again re: Pearse street. I hold them wholly responsible for the area’s demise

    in reply to: Pearse St / Sandwith St proposal #777901
    tommyt
    Participant

    Decision due on this any day now. This site should heave been CPO’ed decades ago by CIE-but seein’ as they’re up to their oxters in property development too it’s no surprise we get TCD ravaging Pease St. as usual.

    in reply to: Dublin Airport Metro to have unconnected terminus? #749675
    tommyt
    Participant

    @AndrewP wrote:

    Jesus those drawings look grim. This is total false economy. It will send a clear signal out to the junkies and winos to move in and within months the costliest piece of infrastructure in the country will be an underground toilet. Would you spend a million euro on a new house, then not paint the walls to save a few quid?

    The Bilbao metro has the spec you are referring to and is quite acceptable visually IMO. No doubt though interiors will be blitzed with advertising.

    in reply to: Henrietta Street #775308
    tommyt
    Participant

    http://www.etenders.gov.ie/search/search_show.aspx?ID=OCT093130

    Closing the stable door after the horse (in fact the whole mews!) has bolted.

    in reply to: D’Olier & Westmoreland St. #713951
    tommyt
    Participant
    in reply to: Vertigo? U2 tower to be taller #750333
    tommyt
    Participant

    @paul h wrote:

    I’m a fairly liberal person with most issues,
    but its preposterous to think that any group of people can set up and move in,
    anywhere,on any piece of real estate
    Especially a prized chunk of land like in docklands
    Why should i have to work my ass off saving and working?
    Maybe i should head to woodies or somethin pick up some ply wood and nails
    and build my own little house in Stephens green

    That would be an ecumenical matter. What other way has land come into private ownership over the centuries in that area other than the method you outline above?
    Maybe Sir John Rogerson’s descendents should go down there and reclaim their stone that’s keeping the place from becoming a salt marcsh once again:)

    in reply to: Vertigo? U2 tower to be taller #750330
    tommyt
    Participant

    @notjim wrote:

    I think it is a shocking failure on the part of the DDDA that they have made no attempt to develop culturally appropriate urban accommodation for travellers in this area. Although there is no existing model for traveller accommodation in a medium or high rise urban context, I do not accept that this means that it could not be acheived and, I feel, it was the responsibility of the DDDA to be at the vanguard in this regard.

    Although halting sites are acceptable in principle in nearly every statutory zoning context in every Development Plan I think any travellers hoping to settle legitimately in the Docklands only hope is that they get shunted down Poolbeg between the incinerator and the water treatment plant. They’re not quite there yet but that would be par for the course. I guess it’s the same family grouping that have been drofting ever Eastwards as the Docklands develop, they’ve been around the South Docks at least 10 years at this stage.

    in reply to: Beresford Place #748629
    tommyt
    Participant

    @PVC King wrote:

    Any progress 12 months on?

    There was a tender awarded recently for the public realm/urban design, I presume based on the fact they want to pedestrianise Custom House Quay. If i find out more I will post it up your plasticness.

    in reply to: Macken St Bridge – Santiago Calatrava #744367
    tommyt
    Participant

    Isn’t this what the victorian cast Iron contraption on Jon Rog Quay was designed for?riverbed investigation?- Should be pressed back into commission to save a few quid:)

    in reply to: St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin #739841
    tommyt
    Participant

    Lord Ardilaun will be spinning on his plinth!

    in reply to: St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin #739837
    tommyt
    Participant

    @Seamus O’G wrote:

    And it doesn’t stop there.

    There’s say, the Lower Leeson Street pattern, which goes 1-ca. 50 from the Green up to the kiosk, then ca. 50-ca. 100 back from the canal to the Green on the other side. And the all-odd/all-even option. Both of which you mention.

    Then on Lower Mount Street, the numbers start on the southern side of the street at the Merrion Square/Holles Street End and go sequentially (1, 2, 3, etc.) up as far as the canal (around number 45/50, I think). Then it’s back to the Holles Street end, where the numbers go (for example) 50,51, 52 all the way back to the canal.:confused:

    There may be others.

    As far as I know there does not seem to be a pattern. What an interesting city!:)

    It’s also very confusing for a rookie courier as well as you could imagine-You learn very quickly from your mistakes!

    in reply to: St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin #739831
    tommyt
    Participant

    Hartigans is 101 and the numbers run normally (i.e. not odds and evens )so it would be part of the Dept. of Marine/Coillte building accessed on Leeson lane or the catholic University School

    in reply to: St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin #739824
    tommyt
    Participant

    Colm 07-PermannetTSB are still there AFAIK- It is a large complex with the main reception on Leeson Lane-Thta side of the Green heading towards Leeson St. Contains the OPW HQ in number 51, that girls school is still there and then I think PermTSB own all the rest to the junction with Lwr Leeson (Canada house is number 69 I think so you can imagine it is a sizable chunk of real estate.

    Eircom HQ whilst not an attractive building definitely occupies the max amount of floorspace one could hope to get on that site-Block C is indeed massive as PVC King points out and is not in 100% usage as far as I know (up to last summer anyway). It is worth a wander into the courtyard there for a scooch around-You get a great view of the 4 bed semis that are built off Cuffe St-none of these ever seem to come on the market which has always surprised me-there’s not many of them and they look like they would be more at home in an English Home counties/commuter town. A very desirable little enclave

    in reply to: Dublin Historic Stone Paving disbelief #764126
    tommyt
    Participant

    Apologies to Devin et al if this has been covered in this thread already but the west side of merrion square from the national gallery entrance to the junction with clare st is in an awful state and worthy of pictorial commentary at the moment-the usual globs of tarmac around new water mains ,cement bodges etc. on what is one of the few remaining extant ‘carpets’ of wicklow granite paving apart from the southside of Molesworth st.and the southside of fitz sq.that I am aware of.

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 118 total)

Latest News