LOB
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The Project Architects are “Project Architects”!!!
http://www.cityoffices.net/static/properties/__Fleming_Court__Flemings_Place__449.cfa
The McCullough mulvin website has some photographs
Originally posted by alan d
Time to move on……….I respectfully suggestIn this case I totally agree
Good luck with the appeal Alan
“The properties relate to sixteen important buildings and habitats, they charge no admission to these sites they are free to the people of Ireland.”very laudable it is-I note you say 16 Important buildings. Do you accept that there exist other buildings of limited architectural merit which should not be protected for merely surviving this long?
“The education is a partenership with local authorites and local businesses to educate children to recylcle and carry out tidying up in their own areas.”
again of merit, but I believe we are discussing An Taisce’s view of Development.
“As for other development County and City plans are clear,
Permissable Use
Site density
Plot Ratio
Standard of design
Protected Structure
Not An Taisce’s system but the local Authorities and ABP
If AT were so incorrect why are their objections listened to?”
Not quite as clear cut as you might think & An Taisce’s views are not always treated as sacrosanct by Local Authorities & ABP
“As for philistines it is not a word that AT would ever use”
or consider to be the case?
“Of course An Taisce will have an interpretation as will the applicant.”An Taisce are rarely so keen to awknowledge the validity of others opinions
“However when applicants ignore the fact that a specific building is a protected structure it is they who are in contravention of the regulations.”
I do not know enough about the specific application to comment but I believe that they viewed the building as not having sufficient merit.
I do not know if an application to remove it’s protected structure classification was submitted. I think you might agree that when the various classes of listings transferred to protected structures some buildings of dubious importance were elevated to a ridiculous extent.“To make An Taisce redundant in the planning process do not apply to demolish protected structures.”
That would be fine if an Taisce restricted their objections to protected structures; They seem to see themselves as the guardians of good planning in the face of the philistine advance & not just as another special interest pressure group.
“Then they can concentrate on managing their property portfolio and educating the next generation”
We really are not worthy
.
Originally posted by Diaspora
The 2000 planning act sets out very clear guidelines following these guidelines saves everybody a lot of pain. If the rules are followed An Taisce has nothing to object to nor do they wish to.Don’t you mean An Taisce’s interpretation of the planning acts.
Originally posted by Diaspora
Hey the decision was madeenough about starting witch-hunt for an organisation that is around a lot longer than you have been. Has had the patronage of many much greater than you
Take it to Europe if you have a problem.
That comment is just extraordinary!
Speaks volumesTry here
https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?s=&threadid=417&perpage=15&highlight=smithfield&pagenumber=1
There are many other forums on this site where smithfield was discussed.Correct paul
more info here
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_mobility/documents/page/dft_mobility_503283-13.hcspWaterways ireland are probably doing the work.They have responsibility for the canals.
Good to see it being reclaimed.Try this site’s vast information on Busaras including text of an interview with Wilfred Cantwell
He designed a synagogue in terenure after leaving scotts
Also was involved in the JFK memorial garden in Eyre Square in Galway afaikOriginally posted by phil
It is fair to say that they chip away at the stone, this is however normally quite minimal and normally all that is left are black marks from the wax which they rub on the surface to allow them slide along. Last year whilst studying this phenomenon I found one area where the skaters had actually attached protective metal to stop the wooden benches wearing down. Although they make noise I still think that they are a healthy addition to city life. The noises they make sound better than that of a truck or a car and I have not heard of any pedestrian being seriously injured by a skateboarder.
nothing short of Vandalism
they should be billed for repair/cleaning (or their parents)may help
http://burohappold.temp.marketingnetdemo.com/explore/projects/Hawkins.php?THIS_AREA=
also the murray O’Laoire link mentioned earlier
If you’re that interested check the planning desk at Dublin City Council. There was a planning application lodged a year or two ago which as far as I remember included the construction of a 2-3 block in the surface car park onto Poolbeg st.
