DOC

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Were You a victim of Grant? #751987
    DOC
    Participant

    From Sunday Business Post (19.06.11):

    Developer and landlord David Grant will see his former home on Haddington Road in Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 go under the hammer for less than €400,000, a quarter of its original asking price, at the Allsop/Space auction of distressed properties next month.

    Number 61 Haddington Road failed to sell at auction in 2006 with an advised minimum value of €1.6 million, but now it’s likely to be sold for about a quarter of the price next month.

    The mid-terrace building is being auctioned ‘‘on the instructions of the mortgagee in possession’’ with a reserve not to exceed €395,000, according to the auction catalogue. Grant’s former home is situated on the south side of Haddington Road, just off Baggot Street.

    The accommodation is arranged over lower ground, raised ground and first floors beneath a pitched roof. Internally it’s arranged as two-self contained residential units.

    It is being sold with vacant possession. In October 2009, the Dublin County Registrar’s Court heard that Grant owed the Bank of Scotland (Ireland) an outstanding balance of just over €1.3 million on a house on Haddington Road, Ballsbridge. The bank was seeking possession of the property on foot of an unpaid mortgage.

    Grant was the subject of an RTE Prime Time programme in 2007 that questioned his claim to be an architect. Afterwards he had set up business as Inspire Design in east London.

    But in May 2009 he was charged and ordered by Stratford London magistrates court to pay a total of €6,000 in fines and costs for falsely listing himself as an architect in the telephone directory and on his company website.

    in reply to: ESB Headquarters Fitzwilliam Street #775504
    DOC
    Participant

    Sweet baby jesus! I’m sure the IGS would love that one!

    Obviously ESB breif for accomodation is probably/possibly more that the site can handle given it’s context.

    in reply to: Convention centre #713793
    DOC
    Participant

    @GrahamH wrote:

    Ha, this is brilliant……..Sean O’Laoire on Vincent Browne employing every trick in the book to avoid stating his opinion on it.

    Sean O’Laoire should be in politics! I had to laugh, no matter how much Vincent asked the question, Sean avoided giving an answer twisting and turning the subject.

    in reply to: Is this the same John Graby? #721257
    DOC
    Participant

    @onq wrote:

    ……but John Graby remains constant, a one man-civil service.
    In that regard John Graby is more like Sir Humphrey Appleby in Yes Minister – the real power behind the RIAI throne.

    I mightn’t agree with all you say, but this did make me laugh (probably because it’s true!). :p

    I’ll never be able to look at Graby with a straight face again – all I can see in my mind now is Jim Hacker (or Sean O’Laoire, Paul Keogh, or whoever it might be) with Sir Humphrey (or Graby) hovering, spinning, etc.

    in reply to: Were You a victim of Grant? #751983
    DOC
    Participant

    Can only be!

    I know Kieron Wood (the auther of that article). Must give him the lowdown on registration. Can’t imagine Grant is an ‘architect’ any more!

    in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #766584
    DOC
    Participant

    A Peter Murray

    B Phibsboro Shopping Centre

    C That brickwork is really familiar!

    in reply to: Macken St Bridge – Santiago Calatrava #744511
    DOC
    Participant

    @Paul Clerkin wrote:

    How many days before it’s tagged?

    …the lyre over the mire…?

    in reply to: Shopfront race to the bottom #776073
    DOC
    Participant

    Pram Boutique – nice! 😉

    in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #766099
    DOC
    Participant

    Or possibly the little church opposite?

    in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #766098
    DOC
    Participant

    Is No.1 DIT Cathal Brugha Street?

    DOC
    Participant

    Building without planning permission is a criminal offence – building without submitting a commencement notice is a civil offence (wrap on the knuckles and fine – if the council were to take proceedings – which they are very unlikely to do).

    I checked recently with a council on a devepment where planning permission was granted but the developeer didn’t submit a commencement notice or the commencemnet notice was not registered by the council – the council were not in anyway phased or concerned by this.

    in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #765968
    DOC
    Participant

    Is F McKee Barracks on Blackhorse Avenue ?

    in reply to: architect fees for court appearance #775818
    DOC
    Participant

    Hi Section 4

    I asked around about this recently as I, as an architect, am attending court soon on a similar issue and wanted to know what was the going rate in terms of charges/fees. Charges also depended on what court you were at. The most concise response I got was as follows:

    For the District Court – report € 484.00 – attendance at court € 484.00 – copies of photos € 63.00 – preparation of sketch € 63.00.

    For the Circuit Court – report € 890.00 – attendance at court € 690.00 – copies of photos € 90.00 – preparation of sketch € 90.00.

    These figures would be exlclude VAT at 21% (I think ?)

    Looks like No. 2 sort of tallies with your costs?

    You have to remember, while it looks like an excessive charge, there is a huge amount of work that goes on in the background, even from the architects/expert witness side, to get to the court in the first place.

    I have gone for an alternative option of just charging an hourly rate for this type of service.

    in reply to: Harassment from Planning Enforcement officer #762756
    DOC
    Participant

    Just to add to the comprehensive reply above. The Enforcement Officer only has a remit with regard to planning issues.

    The boundary wall issues are a civil matter – the Local Authority should not make any comment with regard this. The form of construction is a Building Control/Regulation issue – nothing to do with Enforcement – you can use cavity blocks (as with regular cavity wall construction) as long as suitable insulation complying with current Building Regulations is provided internally.

    Where you prabably have a ‘clear’ problem with the Enforcement Officer is that you have gone beyond the 12.0 sq.m. limit for the first floor extension. The simple solution to this is either to apply for planning retention or alter your plans/construction to comply with the allowed floor area.

    I have had experience previously where, within the same Local Authority, a Planner and Enforcement Officer have differed over the interpretation of the Exempted Development Regulations. Planning and planning exemption can in some cases be very grey and not black and white! I always advise clients now to seek a declaration from the Local Authority prior to carrying out exempted development works so at least they have a piece of paper to wave around to nosy or interferring neighbours!

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

Latest News