trace

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 174 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: sean kenny #755613
    trace
    Participant

    Thanks, Doug C.

    Would be great to hear more.

    in reply to: sean kenny #755611
    trace
    Participant

    The man himself http://www.life.com/image/50547640, who died in 1973 in his early 40s.

    A not so happy personal life story related by his former wife http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1043138/I-Peter-Cooks-wife–thats-Dudley-Moore-wanted-me.html. The reference to Sean being in Canada relates to his work on the 1967 World Expo in Montreal http://www.flickr.com/photos/iqbalaalam/2663550572/ and http://www.domusweb.it/en/from-the-archive/expo-67-/. There was a happier ending http://www.flixster.com/photos/judy-geeson-to-sir-with-love-judy-geeson-6263917, tho’.

    And here’s a curious account, inspired by the famous Ituna voyage to America and Frank Llloyd Wright in 1950 http://www.wexfordecho.ie/news/mhauojmhql/ for which Sean Kenny apparently wrote a daily log that was published in The Irish Independent.

    in reply to: Dublin 1660-1860 #718282
    trace
    Participant

    The Irish Times – Saturday, May 21, 2011
    Architectural historian inspired people to cherish city’s heritage

    MAURICE CRAIG, the distinguished architectural historian, writer and poet, who has died at the age of 91, did much to persuade Irish people that our historic buildings were of national importance and should be saved from demolition.

    Almost a lone voice at the time, his masterly, comprehensive and elegant book, Dublin 1660-1860: The Shaping of a City , was published in 1952. It took 13 years to sell the 2,000 copies of the first edition, by which time many buildings had been pulled down without comment or protest.

    As Craig once wrote: “Architecture is the most accessible of the arts; yet paradoxically, it is the least noticed by people at large and is commonly thought by them to be arcane mystery.”

    He was born in Belfast, the son of a successful ophthalmic surgeon, whose father had had a business in Ballymoney of ironmongery, hardware, building materials, watches and clocks. “James Craig Ballymoney” is occasionally still to be seen on clock faces.

    After school at Castlepark in Dalkey, Shrewsbury in England and a few months in Paris, he took up the scholarship he had won to Magdalene College Cambridge, where he lived in the rooms Parnell once had.

    Returning to live in Dublin and meeting Patrick Kavanagh in the street, he told him he was going to write a book on the poet Walter Savage Landor. Kavanagh said he should do it as a doctorate at Trinity College Dublin, and he did.

    In 1952 he joined the Inspectorate of Ancient Monuments in England. He once went to No 10 Downing Street in connection with door knobs. Having finished his business, he came out of the front door, stood for a few seconds so the curious crowd could speculate on who he could be, and then put on his bicycle clips and pedalled off.

    In 1969 he was appointed full-time executive secretary to An Taisce for the year that it had obtained funding.

    He wrote several books including The Volunteer Earl, a biography of Lord Charlemont who built the Casino at Marino – “small, perfect and almost totally unaltered . . . it is great fun even if it is not much use.”

    Others included Dublin City Churches, Classic Irish Houses of the Middle Size – which was widely acclaimed, though sometimes called Country Houses for the Middle Class – and The Architecture of Ireland from the Earliest Times to 1880. He also wrote books of poetry.

    His volume Irish Bookbindings 1600-1800 came out in 1954. He was extremely knowledgeable on the subject, and had spent many hours in the Long Room at Trinity searching along the shelves on the long summer evenings with the librarian, Billy O’Sullivan, looking for special bindings.

    As a child, Craig had wanted to be a painter, but he realised he could not draw. He had a great interest in music and would have liked to be a composer, but was not good at playing. At the age of 18, he fixed on becoming a writer.

    He was a fine builder of large ship models – he made a magnificent model of Guinness’s SS Clarecastle. The man who had commanded her, after looking over the model very carefully, said, “It is exact.”

    Another interest was motor cars, and for a time he drove a D8 4-litre Delarge with Figonie coachwork.

    Among those who acknowledge his influence and inspiration is Frank McDonald, Environment Editor of The Irish Times. “Long before I met Maurice Craig, I had read his great Dublin book – Dublin 1660-1860: The Shaping of a City – and, as for so many others, it opened my eyes to the value of our architectural heritage. It’s to him that I owe the inspiration to begin writing about it myself when it was still under attack in the 1980s. I can never imagine him other than being surrounded by books.

    “He was undoubtedly Ireland’s leading architectural historian and one of the most important chroniclers of Dublin’s heritage and history.”

    He was married three times; to Beatrix Hurst, Jeanne Edwards and to Agnes Bernelle. He is survived by his son Michael and daughter Catherine by his first marriage.

    Maurice James Craig: born October 25th, 1919; died May 11th, 2011

    in reply to: Convention centre #713778
    trace
    Participant

    http://www.arcspace.com/architects/dinkeloo/convention/convention.html includes plans and a cross section supplied by the architects.

    in reply to: So what’s the story in Limerick? #748334
    trace
    Participant

    An Taisce scathing over state of Limerick planning http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/0416/1224244811989.html
    And the politicians are still only talking about extending the city boundary. Heaven help us.

    in reply to: Vertigo? U2 tower to be taller #750533
    trace
    Participant

    Foster in firing line over U2 Tower…
    Published on http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/dailynews/foster_in_firing_line_over_u2_tower.html
    02 November 2007 11:46 Author: Richard Waite

    The never-ending controversy surrounding the proposed U2 tower in Dublin has taken yet another twist after conservationists warned of potential legal action over the latest plans by Foster + Partners. An Taisce, the National Trust of Ireland, said it had ‘serious concerns about the behind-the-scenes process’ adopted by landowner Dublin Docklands Development Agency (DDDA), which picked the 120m-tall scheme by Foster following a developer-led contest last month. The trust is claiming that neither itself nor the public has been consulted on the new tower, and that it has not seen any environmental impact assessment reports – even though the scheme could have a detrimental impact on a key Georgian area of the city and is 40m-taller than previous ditched proposals by Dublin-based Craig Henry Architects and Burdon Dunne Architects. Such reports had been supplied to support the DDDA’s original masterplan for the area, however a trust spokesman told the AJ he feared the ‘dramatically different’ proposals could be given the go-ahead without either renewed consultation or a revised environmental statement, because of the authority’s special planning powers. The trust did not rule out instigating legal proceedings to force the DDDA to carry out a new environmental report which could hold up the development, backed by Ballymore Properties. Ian Ritchie’s Spire on the other side of the city was similarly delayed to allow for a full environmental impact assessment.

    An Taisce’s heritage officer Ian Lumley said: ‘We were taken completely by surprise by this dramatically different scheme. We are not getting the information and the city is being kept in the dark. We welcome the likes of Foster but there is a right way to do things and there has been a lack of explanation of the legal process.’ He added: ‘We were happy with height of the previous scheme, but we see this as deviating from the DDDA’s original masterplan and so these proposals must be subject to an environmental impact assessment.’

    However a spokesman for the DDDA rubbished the claims, saying: ‘The development of the Docklands masterplan and the planning schemes included extensive consultation and the public and local residents had plenty of opportunity for involvement in the process. ‘There was a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) report on the U2 Tower conducted as part of the recent amendment to the Planning Scheme for the Grand Canal Dock area. This was made available during the public consultation process and was submitted with the amended Planning Scheme by the Docklands Authority to the Minister for approval under Section 25 of the Dublin Docklands Act 1997.’

    in reply to: house in dalkey #721126
    trace
    Participant

    The architect was Joe Kennedy of Smith Kennedy Architects from Dun Laoghaire.

    in reply to: Save E.1027 #713055
    trace
    Participant

    There is an exhibition of wooden models of several of Eileen Gray’s architectural projects on display in the entrance hall of the Irish Architectural Archive (45 Merrion Square) at present. Worth seeing!

    trace
    Participant

    Really good overview of recent history in this article by Emer O’Kelly from last weekend’s Sunday Independent

    Wherefore art thou Abbey Theatre?

    THE Abbey Theatre is currently in a state of chassis, to take Sean O’Casey’s immortal words in vain. It’s closed, and the interior has been ripped out. When it opens again on April 10, three quarters of a million euro will have been spent on a new configuration for the auditorium. And there is very little doubt that the money will have been very well spent . . . in the short term.

    Anyone who goes to the theatre in Ireland knows that the Abbey building is a theatrical disaster. Its stark modernist frontage was already out of date when it was built and opened in 1966. (It had been designed more than 10 years earlier, but as with most things cultural in Ireland, building it had been put on the long finger.)

    But it’s the interior of the theatre which has always been the sticking point: a fan-shaped auditorium that prevents any intimacy between the audience and what is happening on stage, lousy acoustics with several spots where you hear almost nothing, a deadness at stage front which forces actors to strain to project their voices, frequently damaging them seriously. And woefully inadequate technical facilities and backstage accommodation.

    So the promise of a new building for the centenary of the National Theatre Society in 2004 wasn’t an extravagant gift to the theatre-going population of Ireland; it was long overdue when the promise was made during the Millennium celebrations.

    But we’re still waiting, seven years down the line. The promise was first made to us by the last Minister for Arts, Sile de Valera. She expressed a preference for building the new theatre on the site of the current building, which in turn replaced the theatre burned down in 1951.

    The then Artistic Director of the Abbey, Patrick Mason, agreed with her. He was already on the record with a passionate plea for the continuation of tradition and history, as well as pointing out practical concerns like the central location and the impending arrival of one of the Luas lines.

    Consultations began. Properties around the current building were available (and have been since). But the word was out, it seems, and the projected prices started to rise. The government couldn’t be held to ransom, we were told. Back to square one.

    The Taoiseach was lobbied, and met the interested parties. He seemed to accept the necessity of keeping the theatre on the original site. Nothing happened. Then the new Artistic Director at the Abbey, Ben Barnes, stated that he was in favour of a greenfield site, a greenfield site having been made available “free of charge” in a development along the south bank of the Liffey basin. That was the terminology used: effectively, the proposal was to move the National Theatre out close to Ringsend.

    The Taoiseach was annoyed that, having been lobbied, and having agreed in principle to the theatre remaining in Marlborough Street, his time had been taken up to no good purpose.

    Back to minus square one, with costs rising all the time, and the centenary of the Old Lady of Marlborough Street approaching. Whispering got louder, of political jockeying: “Bertie” wasn’t going to see a major cultural institution moved out of his constituency; it was a matter of territory, even though he couldn’t care less about any kind of theatre. (I quote the gossips, not Mr Ahern himself.)

    Well, there was another site, and it was in Mr Ahern’s constituency: the old Carlton cinema in O’Connell Street, together with the more or less derelict buildings behind it.

    Not entirely unsuitable, was the verdict among those whose interest was theatre, rather than personal vendetta or empire-building. The political powers seemed to favour it, as did the City Council who saw such a positioning of a major institution as a much-needed boost for the tourist potential of the about-to-be-revamped O’Connell Street of the fast-food honky-tonks. Once again, other concerns were coming before the welfare and future of Irishtheatre.

    But the freeholds were in a mess, it turned out, and the site would not become available in the foreseeable future. Back to minus square two.

    There was a brief frisson about the Parnell Square site of Colaiste Mhuire. Not bad, mused the theatre-going public. Central, and the idea of the city’s two major theatres being close neighbours would be attractive, with the addition of the gracious cultural partner of the Hugh Lane Gallery creating a nice little cultural district, again a boost for the north city.

    Aw, but there was a small property in private hands in the middle of the proposed site. Once again, official jaws were set; nobody was going to get rich on the backs of the Irish government. (The price reputed to be asked for the site would now buy two decent suburban houses, or would have provided a few lavatories in the newly gold-plated Croke Park.)

    Then the property developer Dermot Desmond donned his pink taffeta frock with the green sash and decided to come to the ball. He offered a site at George’s Dock. The George’s Dock development is financial, glamorous, and glass-bound. But it’s anything but ideal. And perhaps significantly, Harvey Nichols, originally to move into the area, decided against siting a store there.

    However, it has apparently been decided upon as the site for the new Abbey Theatre. It’s set in stone; the debate is over.

    In its favour is the fact that the current Abbey Artistic Director, Fiach Mac Conghail, feels he (or his successor) can make it work, with three stage spaces and all facilities available on site. He has been assured by all parties involved, including Government and the Docklands Development Authority, that the new theatre will be up and running in five years. Privately, he is known to believe that this is distinctly optimistic.

    And he has felt it necessary to spend three quarters of a million on reconfiguring the auditorium in the interim. He has already overseen a major modernisation and overhaul of the above-stage system known as the flies, so that lighting and sound equipment as well as complex sets, can be “flown” on and off stage. That refurbishment has already been seen to extraordinary advantage in the recent production of Julius Caesar which featured a splendid set by Jon Bausor. And with the international theatre design consultant Jan-Guy Lecat working with architect John Keogan on the new auditorium, things there will probably have improved spectacularly when audiences come back on April 10.

    The money is not going down the drain; but it should be. It should be a total waste, because the new Abbey Theatre should be close to completion already. We were, remember, promised it for 2004. And the international design competition for the new building is not evenunder way.

    Fiach Mac Conghail is doing an impressive job at the Abbey, and it’s part of his brief to be optimistic. I, on the other hand, am profoundly pessimistic. I don’t believe that the new Abbey Theatre will be completed in my lifetime, because once again we have talked ourselves hoarse and consulted ourselves to death because we’re such a “culturally aware” nation.

    The only thing we’re not is a culturally active nation: as in building the damn thing.

    in reply to: ruining pubs #716842
    trace
    Participant

    JFD’s Dublin in the Afternoon (a 1990s pub crawl): http://roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~jfdoyle/dubpubs.html

    in reply to: Pearse St / Sandwith St proposal #777899
    trace
    Participant

    It’s a Sumo.

    in reply to: Big Red Barns #716489
    trace
    Participant
    in reply to: Arts Lives: Michael Scott #766927
    trace
    Participant

    Thanks, Graham, but Jaysus! Who put that windmill there? And the pond looks kinda empty, methinks.

    in reply to: Arts Lives: Michael Scott #766920
    trace
    Participant

    Got a pic, Graham? And have they re-filled the pond with the Gerda Froemmel sculpture?

    in reply to: Arts Lives: Michael Scott #766918
    trace
    Participant
    in reply to: Opus Architecture & Construction Awards 2005 #762927
    trace
    Participant

    Did Ciaran O’Connor not lead the OPW architectural team designing the State Laboratory at the 200m Backweston complex? http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/property/2005/1103/771522777RPARCHNOV3.html

    in reply to: Rte Radio Centre #761691
    trace
    Participant

    There is no such book as the one you mention. A major STW book is due later this year from Gandon, however. A quick search at Paddi.net turns up two published references (with plans and sections): Iris (March 1974, pp2-9) and a pamphlet from around the same time by Peter Wildbur & Associates. Get your librarian to request an inter-library loan from UCD. And why not ask Niall Scott of Scott Tallon Walker directly?

    in reply to: Trees Cut Down On O’Connell Street #759839
    trace
    Participant

    From today’s Sunday Times (Sue Denham):
    Fair play to Dublin city council for finally knocking down those ghastly plane trees on O’Connell Street. Now we can proceed with the refurbishment of Ireland’s main thoroughfare, and the Green TDs who chained themselves to the foliage can sell their shackles on eBay.
    The council workers shouldn’t put their chainsaws into cold storage just yet, though. Now that the humour is on them (and wasn’t it amazing to see council employees working after 6pm?), they should axe the rest of the unnecessary trees around the city centre that clog up the streets and obscure buildings of architectural merit.
    As contributors to Archeire, an online architectural appreciation society, noted last week, a veritable forest hides the face of Trinity College during the summer, while one side of Westmoreland Street, one of the busiest in the capital, is an obstacle course of random woodwork.
    It’s not that Sue is against trees. They’re fine in their place (er, in the forest). It’s just that sticking down a birch or a poplar has become the lazy urban planner’s way of relieveing rows of concrete. So chop 😎 chop, council. Timber!

    in reply to: developments in cork #757519
    trace
    Participant

    How about sticking to ARCHITECTURE and development, for a change, instead of planning and development on this thread? There is a difference, you know.

    in reply to: New award to support young architects #718224
    trace
    Participant

    The AR has a new sponsor for their awards for emerging architecture http://www.arplus.com/ard/arawards05/arawards05.pdf Entries are due September 13, 2005.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 174 total)

Latest News