Without wishing to awaken the debate about the use of the computer for the profession in general, I would disagree with Paul and say that computer generated images can be extremely atmospheric. I think that too many ‘young’ architects tend to apprpoach a 3d model as a finite piece. One can, I believe, achieve that vagueness/ richness by trying to be more abstract. There is nothing worse than a 3d rendering that longs to be a photograph.