Zap the childrens shop – High Street
- This topic has 48 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 3 months ago by urbanisto.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 2, 2001 at 7:36 pm #704964Paul_9000Participant
As a person who walks frequently along High Street, between Christchurch and Thomas St., I really want to see the pram shop building removed. What would be left would be a great street scape betweens Molloys Pub and St.Audeons Church. It would mark a great beginning to Thomas St which the government has such great plans for, doing as much as the StoreHouse at the other end and StCatherines restoration in the middle do to improve the Liberties.
-
March 5, 2001 at 10:31 am #715778GregFParticipant
Hi Paul,
Can you remember High Street before it was a dual carriageway….when it was a compact little street before the road developers got their hands on it in the 1970’s /1980’s.When it was a more uniform street …..where buildings once stood on St.Audeons landscaped park and the back of Tailors Hall was hidden. There are photographs of how it once looked. -
March 5, 2001 at 1:34 pm #715779Paul ClerkinKeymaster
My earliest memories of High Street is with both sides pulled down or about to be for the new dual carriageway. I agree with Paul on the pram shop that it should be removed btw.
-
March 6, 2001 at 1:07 pm #715780Paul_9000Participant
My earliest memory would have been after
most of the building were cleared,
Interesting that it’s been called a dual
carriageway, resonates with industrial
landscapes rather that a city street.I’m not sure there’s a need for the divide
in the road. Take Champs Elysses in Paris,
far more traffic, wider road plus proabably
more aggresive driving style, but there not
a divide in the centre.
I believe the corporation should do away with
these and instead make a real effort to make
the likes of Patrick st and Cuffe St. tree
line avenues. The visual affect of trees just
does not seem to be understood by the powers. -
March 7, 2001 at 9:47 am #715781Paul ClerkinKeymaster
Primarily the central island seems to act as a refuge for pedestrians trying to cross the road. My sister works in Tailor’s Hall and the complete area is a nightmare for pedestrians, the traffic islands at Cornmarket are a warren, to cross the street involves about three traffic islands and 10 minutes.
I agree that removal of the central island, widening of pavements and planting of mature trees would be a definite improvement.
-
March 8, 2001 at 7:26 pm #715782JLParticipant
The whole place is a tragic disaster area – this was the heart of the medieval city after all. Ripped out by a dual carriageway – and then the replacement buildings – aargh. that cuckoo clock beside tailors hall (Ambrose Kelly I think), the BKD Jury’s hotel
Unfortunately bad architecture has a long half life
-
March 9, 2001 at 11:51 am #715783Paul_9000Participant
The place may be a disaster but it can still
be improved,
the new Coombe bypass will give the opportunity to make it more Pedestrian
friendly.
As for the central Island being a refuge
for pedestrians, It just encourages people
to dash accross the road at any point
rather than at the crossings.As for Jurys, they may find a critical
structural fault and have to pull the
whole thing down.
Otherwise let Ivy run free on it’s exterior. -
March 9, 2001 at 12:07 pm #715784DrawingboardParticipant
Do you know something about Jury’s that we don’t?
-
March 13, 2001 at 12:43 pm #715785Rory WParticipant
I remember the derelict buildings of Christchurch place from when I was younger. Does anybody remember a factory/warehouse where Jury’s Inn is now. It had “BE_AB__” on the side the _ indicate where the letters had fallen off – the font it was in was very 50s sort of like the old ESB lettering. Any answers to that one.
I also remember Wood Quay/Winetavern Street being just hoardings. Dublin was so grim then wasn’t it?
-
March 25, 2001 at 3:40 am #715786SiobhParticipant
Nooooo, not Murphy’s!!! Don’t do it!! That’s where my Mum & Dad bought my pram when I was born!!!
Sob!!
Siobh
-
July 18, 2003 at 5:22 pm #715787AnonymousInactive
I remember the building which was located on the site of the current Jury’s Christvhurch. A quite horrible 1950’s building that for its last years (or certainly all I remember) was derelict. Beside it was the site of the vehicle imound lot – amazing to think they the Corpo sited this opposite the oldest building in Dublin!
Anyway, don’t remember the letters on the building but its image is ingrained in my head – I always thought it was awful even as a child and was quite relieved when Jury’s replaced it (bad as it is, it was a whole lot better!).
The building resembled the ugly Corpo offices right beside the Fitzsimons hotel on the quays.
-
July 19, 2003 at 3:25 pm #715788alastairParticipant
the typeface on the building was Profil if memory serves:
http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/linotype/profil/I was just remarking a couple of weeks ago how the ‘old city’ part of temple bar had changed from it’s days as the mobile library yard.
-
July 21, 2003 at 10:04 am #715789paul_moloneyParticipant
I’m amazed that the Pram Shop inspires such hatred. I think it’s kinda cute, and a hangover from Old Dublin. I’d love to see it preserved in some fashion, while every modern building on High St is reduced to rubble. Am I simple contrary?
On this note, does anyone have an old pictures of the area? (High St, Christchurch Place, etc). I’m now living on Castle St, and would love to know how the area looked years ago. I’d be specially curious to see pictures of where Jury’s now stands, and also if any exist of Archbishop Usher’s house, where the Castle Inn now is (I believe it was only knocked down in the 40s, after remaining their for 500 years).
Cheers,
P.
-
July 21, 2003 at 12:56 pm #715790AnonymousInactive
In the book Heart of Dublin, there are engravings of the site of Jury’s Inn, which I think held the name Skinners Row.
The Pram Shop is due to be demolished shortly – the Planning Application is already on the build stating that a residential block is to replace it.
-
August 29, 2008 at 11:22 pm #715791gunterParticipant
Thanks for the directions, notjim.
If this isn’t the right place, it can be moved yes?
I started a bit of a file on High Street in the early 90s, when I hadn’t much else to do, and I just found it again under something, so before I loose it again, here are some of the photographs I had accumulated.
High Street c. 1975. The four bay building on the left is the ‘Bedding Manufacturer’ from the earlier (How well do you know Dublin) pic.
Aerial view of the same terrace from c. 1984 -
August 30, 2008 at 12:06 am #715792notjimParticipant
Amazing pictures and terribly sad; I love when churches are sunk like that into a streetscape, it so medieval, so atmospheric, so true to a folkish religion knotted up in quotidian demands of secular life.
-
August 30, 2008 at 12:42 pm #715793gunterParticipant
@notjim wrote:
. . so true to a folkish religion knotted up in quotidian demands of secular life.
I was just going to say that!
Here’s another photograph of the east end of High Street in 1963 with, if I’m not mistaken, ctesiphon’s dad on his bike off to buy icecream for the chizzlers in the local shop.
-
August 30, 2008 at 1:09 pm #715794newgrangeParticipant
What is that structure out from the front of one of the buildings?
-
August 30, 2008 at 2:50 pm #715795gunterParticipant
That was the way they used to do scaffolding newgrange, back in the day. Floor joists would be taken out, put on edge and stuck out the windows, the inside end wedged under the floor above and out you went, with your life in your hands.
The date of that one is slightly wrong, must have been late 1964 at the earliest, because there is a firm date of Sept. 1964 on this Paddy Healy photograph of the same houses from the top of Nicholas Street showing no. 3 High Street (the house with the scaffolding) still intact while the rest of the street looks like a bomb hit it.
Apologies for adding a couple of years onto ctesiphon’s dad.
-
August 30, 2008 at 3:53 pm #715796Pot NoodleParticipant
I know this is off topic but can anyone tell me about the Iron bridge over the Strawberry Beds on the Castleknock side
Many Thanks in advance
-
October 19, 2014 at 10:38 am #924686AnonymousInactive
Can’t believe that photo taken at the top of nicholas street was taken in 1964. Anyone have any photos of what was there just prior to this?
This pic gives you a partial view of it.
-
-
August 30, 2008 at 4:11 pm #715797notjimParticipant
https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?t=824
control-k to get into your google search window and then “site:https://archiseek.com strawberry beds”
-
August 30, 2008 at 6:24 pm #715798newgrangeParticipant
@gunter wrote:
That was the way they used to do scaffolding newgrange, back in the day. Floor joists would be taken out, put on edge and stuck out the windows, the inside end wedged under the floor above and out you went, with your life in your hands.
Crikey.
I was a 1963 baby – I hope my ma kept me well away from those things.
Thanks gunter. -
August 31, 2008 at 7:47 am #715799Pot NoodleParticipant
@notjim wrote:
https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?t=824
control-k to get into your google search window and then “site:https://archiseek.com strawberry beds”
Cheers for that;)
-
August 31, 2008 at 10:13 am #715800DevinParticipant
@gunter wrote:
High Street c. 1975.Thanks for these pictures gunter. Fine Wide Streets Commissioners terrace. The existence today of Murphy’s Prams on the same building line shows that there was no need to demolish it at all.
We know that the terrace was built in the early 19th century because there’s a map dated 1817 published in McCullough’s An Urban History showing the Commissioners’ ‘hitlist’ in the Christchurch & St. Patrick’s area, and a straggly group of buildings in this location are included.
Murphy’s Prams got permission in 2005 for demolition and new 4-storey glazed building – Search%20Criteria%20>%20Ref. 1697/05. Elevations in ‘View Documents’. No sign of anything happening.
@gunter wrote:
this Paddy Healy photograph of the same houses from the top of Nicholas Street showing no. 3 High Street
Paddy Healy was taking pictures of crucial streets at a crucial time. Some of the most interesting photos in Pearson’s The Heart of Dublin are his. His photos of Winetavern Street, Bridge Street, the south quays and High Street show a whole city that’s simply gone …
-
August 31, 2008 at 10:49 pm #715801gunterParticipant
@Devin wrote:
Fine Wide Streets Commissioners terrace. The existence today of Murphy’s Prams on the same building line shows that there was no need to demolish it at all.
That’s a good point Devin. Three of these houses had some rough repairs to their upper facades with some pretty dodgy window replacements, but, in general, the photographs show that they were in sound condition with not a hint of settlement to the roofs or back walls.
The loss of this terrace removes any definition to the north side of the space that once was Cornmarket. Tinkering around with the traffic islands is not going to restore a sense of place here. I keep hearing that DCC have a plan to ‘improve’ Cornmarket, but until the Bridge Street junction is reduced to maybe a third of it’s present sweeping width and a building line restored from here to the forecourt of St. Audoen’s (R.C.), I think they’re wasting their time (and our money).
This is a copy of Brownrigg’s map of 1799 with medieval Cornmarket still clearly defined as an urban space.
-
September 1, 2008 at 9:48 am #715802ctesiphonParticipant
@gunter wrote:
Here’s another photograph of the east end of High Street in 1963 with, if I’m not mistaken, ctesiphon’s dad on his bike off to buy icecream for the chizzlers in the local shop.
Close! It’s actually Uncle George. Very similar looking, ’tis true, but my dad always rode a single speed, whereas George was a fan of the three-speed- ‘A power for the hills,’ he’d say.
PS Great photos. I’ve only ever seen the ‘After’ pics in The Destruction of Dublin, which give the feeling of expansive openness without the sense of the enclosure that was lost.
Reminds me of the Ivor Cutler poem (possibly not quoted accurately- I’m doing it from memory, but it’s close):
He laughed in a manner I can only describe by showing you a picture of my thumb before it was broken.
-
September 1, 2008 at 12:11 pm #715803gunterParticipant
It’s one thing to try and get a physical picture of a street like High Street before it became a windswept duel carriageway, but it’s also possible (just) to get some feel for the street as a faded hub of the commercial / social life of the city. We know from sources like ‘Whalley’s News Letter’ and ‘The Dublin Post Man’ that there were a good number of pubs and inns in the High Street area in the early 18th Century. ‘The Sign of the Parrot’ in High Street has a nice pirate feel to it and there was ‘The Sign of The Sugar Loaf” in Back Lane, near Taylors’ Hall. They were a bit more up-market in Skinners’ Row (Christchurch Place) where their equivalent of Starbucks was ‘Darley’s Coffee House’ in 1715.
At random, I looked up the ‘Freeman’s Journal’ for a date in may 1780 to search for references to High Street, and a couple of snippets turned up:
Leasehold interest for sale:The house and concerns in High Street at no. 64, opposite St Michael’s Church (i-e the derelict site in front of the Synod Hall in Paddy Healy photograph), formerly occupied by Mr Wilson, Shoemaker. The house is one of the best situations for business in the city, comodious and extensive having three large rooms on a floor, with brass locks and grates and every other necessary fixture. There are also good vaults and cellerage in excellent order. The purchaser or tennant will not have the least turn of money to expend; and there cannot be a better standing for the linen, wollen or haberdashery business.
Apply at no. 3 High Street. (i-e. the local auctioneer in the big three bay house with the dodgy scaffolding on the opposite side of the street).
Mr. Wilson Shoemaker! There was also a James Molloy, Shoemaker advertising for business at no. 62 High Street. How’s that for continuity, remember all the medieval shoes and soles dug up in the High Street excavations.
The same edition of the newspaper (27th May 1780) had notice of the forthcoming meeting, at 48 High Street, of ‘The Universal Free Debating Society’. In this case ‘free’ didn’t extend to the admittance charge, which was listed as ‘a British sixpence’.
The topic for discussion:
‘Whether man or woman discovers more weakness under the dominion of love’and, if time permits:
‘Whether the British Parliament is authorised to exercise a legislative power to bind the people of Ireland’.Obviously time didn’t permit, because the latter topic was up again for discussion on 12th June, with the reserve motion a provocative: ‘Whether the Divine or the Physician is of more utility to mankind?’.
Debates started at 8.00 pm and were to be concluded by 10.00.
I do realize that this is totally useless information.
-
September 1, 2008 at 12:17 pm #715804GrahamHParticipant
*wipes spluttered coffee off monitor*
Great stuff, gunter.
-
September 1, 2008 at 9:32 pm #715805gunterParticipant
The street numbers appear to have been up-dated in the 19th century, but from what I can make out, there were no more than 65 or 66 houses on High Street in the 18th century, which would mean that Mr. Wilson’s Shoemakers premises at no. 64 would have been one of the four High Street houses that we can see in Malton’s view of the Tholsel.
Excepting the corner house on Nicholas Street, these houses were clearly Georgian masked ‘Dutch Billys’ which would accord with the auctioneer’s description of three room on a floor, i.e. front room, back room and return room. Malton incidentally refers to High Street as ‘a very ancient commercial street’.
Of course, somebody has to park a bloody carriage in the way. -
September 2, 2008 at 2:02 pm #715806GrahamHParticipant
Glad to see even Malton didn’t have the time to wait around till his 18th century equivalent of a yellow cliff on wheels moved out of shot. To think it sat there for the full two weeks it took him to compose that.
Talking of different worlds:
Nicholas Street c.1900.
Nicholas ‘Street’ today.
Both taken from exactly the same position at Christchurch. I never knew the remains of St. Nicholas Within were moved back to accommodate road widening. Difficult to gather if that’s more surprising than the fact the remains were even kept at all.
The Dublin Corporation block was also extended/altered to the left since the original picture was taken.
-
September 2, 2008 at 2:35 pm #715807GrahamHParticipant
-
September 2, 2008 at 4:37 pm #715808Paul ClerkinKeymaster
Very interesting Graham – I hadn’t seen photos of Nicholas Street before it was demolished. J.J. Carroll’s looked like my kind of pub too.
-
September 2, 2008 at 5:45 pm #715809DevinParticipant
Whao, unrecogniseable!
More evidence here of the street-pattern genocide that occured in the area in the late 20th century:
-
September 16, 2008 at 10:46 pm #715810gunterParticipant
Here’s a few more photographs from the 1960s.
This view looks east from Cornmarket. The vacant edge in the foreground would have been the site of the two corner properties shown on Devin’s 1909 map which defined the east edge of Cornmarket, with High Street to the left and Back Lane to the right. Taylors Hall peeping up to the right of the billboard.
A detail of the shops on High street. Murphy’s is behind the bus with The Magnet’ newsagents next door and the ‘Yankee Bookshop’ next to it.
St. Audoen’s Church from Back Lane, seen through a gap in the streetscape caused by the demolition of houses on High Street.
A clearer photograph of the east end of High Street with Fitsgerald’s shop at no. 1 & 2 beside the Synod Hall. Fitzgeralds also had a shop on Thomas Street, recently a Chinese grocery, and presently under threat of demolition as part of the Frawleys proposal. Fitzgerald’s were reputed to be the only shop in Dublin to hang their clothes outside the shop. -
September 17, 2008 at 1:06 am #715811DevinParticipant
@gunter wrote:
Here’s a few more photographs from the 1960s.
This view looks east from Cornmarket. The vacant edge in the foreground would have been the site of the two corner properties shown on Devin’s 1909 map which defined the east edge of Cornmarket, with High Street to the left and Back Lane to the right. Taylors Hall peeping up to the right of the billboard.Wow, where are you getting these from gunter? It’s the most intriguing and most changed part of the city but there are fewest old photos of it.
Another sad aerial picture here from a few years later, probably about 1970, with the whole of the south side of High Street now down, except for that bizzare long billboard. I’m just going to have a little cry here that the main street of the medieval city was turned into a motorway! 🙂
The oblong shape of about-to-be-obliterated-for-all-time Cornmarket still clear on the left. There is a great view looking west on Cornmarket pre-demolition published in Frank McD’s Saving the City, but one view of the city I’ve never seen is the view of Cornmarket in the opposite direction pre-demolition, with those two houses at the junction of Back Lane and High Street. Would love to see that, drool! am I sad?
Also, interesting gabled warehouse-type building to the left front of Tailors’ Hall. Wonder what it was?
-
September 17, 2008 at 12:16 pm #715812gunterParticipant
@Devin wrote:
. . one view of the city I’ve never seen is the view of Cornmarket in the opposite direction pre-demolition, with those two houses at the junction of Back Lane and High Street. Would love to see that,
That has proven to be an illusive view.
A slightly older Aerofilm shot than your one shows the corner house (no. 25 High Street) still intact, but again it’s taken from the rear.
The following shots are as close as I got, they were published (for the want of a better word) in a little Fas pamphlet called ‘Aspects of Saint Audoen’s, the parish with three beginnings’ in 1993. From what I recall, it took a year to track down any decent photographs of High Street and in the end, it was G. A. Duncan on the Cabra Road who turned up trumps with those shots of the buses and the billboard.
This is a copy from the booklet with the 1960s Duncan photograph superimposed on a 1952 photograph from the same direction, which shows the corner onto Cornmarket with those ellusive building still there. The lamp post is the same in each picture.
25, 26 and 27 High Street in 1952
A detail of that picture with a glimpse of old Cornmarket beyond the corner of no. 25. Substantial four storey brick buildings with Victorian gabled facades!The 1952 photographs were tracked down to a photographic archive in RTE of all places. Not sure who the photographer was, could have been G. A. Duncan again.
-
September 17, 2008 at 4:24 pm #715813DevinParticipant
Excellent, thanks.
-
September 18, 2008 at 12:13 am #715814GregFParticipant
Great photos…….didn’t the uniformity of the street look so much better too when compared to now. The park that’s there today with the overgrown wild plants looks a bit shit as well as the piecemeal developments across the dual carriageway road. The charm and character that surrounded Christchurch has been long lost. It’s a great pity Dublin became so poor, even a greater pity we had an appaling history and everything suffered!
-
September 18, 2008 at 6:41 pm #715815lostexpectationParticipant
if someone suggested now to build buildings back along that line in front of st audeons they’d be accused of blocking the view of the church… !
i don’t know why anybody would want to build something new there its so stuck on its own, its not near any other shops.
it such a wide road to cross, how about a lightweight X shaped pedestrian bridge that meets in the middle to act as viewing platform for medieval city.
-
September 19, 2008 at 3:42 pm #715816Rory WParticipant
@lostexpectation wrote:
if someone suggested now to build buildings back along that line in front of st audeons they’d be accused of blocking the view of the church… !
i don’t know why anybody would want to build something new there its so stuck on its own, its not near any other shops.
it such a wide road to cross, how about a lightweight X shaped pedestrian bridge that meets in the middle to act as viewing platform for medieval city.
How about a reduction in street width to human/city scale rather than dual carriageway scalwe
-
September 19, 2008 at 3:53 pm #715817AnonymousInactive
I think I am with you on that Rory. What I find about this street, and general intersection of streets is that it divides this part of the city from the Temple Bar/Parliament Street/Castle area of town in a really negative way. This can both be read visually and experienced as a pedestrian in terms of trying to negotiate it from day-to-day.
-
February 28, 2011 at 10:49 pm #715818GrahamHParticipant
28/2/2011
Probably the last photograph ever taken of our dear pram shop, snapped on the 9th of February.
The truncated remains of an end building of a Wide Streets Commission terrace that formerly fronted High Street, the building was declared dangerous a few weeks ago and was demolished over the past few days – apparently by the OPW.
A week later in the morning mist.
The spine wall.
The next day.
-
February 28, 2011 at 10:57 pm #715819GrahamHParticipant
The wide spacing of its windows would make one wonder if this was an earlier building. A substantial beam straddled the front room, while in the fourth and fifth pictures above, the wall between the staircase and the back room appears to have been entirely timber stud.
Lots of salvaged timbers.
24th of February.
All of the building now appears to be down. It has to be said there is now a much more coherent relationship between the two St. Audeon’s, and much more picturesque views of both also. One wonders how this space will not be resolved – more car parking?
-
February 28, 2011 at 11:01 pm #715820Paul ClerkinKeymaster
A good few years ago, when this thread was started, I had emails from interested parties demanding its removal…..
-
March 1, 2011 at 12:53 am #715821huttonParticipant
@Paul Clerkin wrote:
A good few years ago, when this thread was started, I had emails from interested parties demanding its removal…..
@Paul Clerkin March 03, 1999 wrote:
My earliest memories of High Street is with both sides pulled down or about to be for the new dual carriageway. I agree with Paul on the pram shop that it should be removed btw.
>wink<
-
March 16, 2011 at 12:55 pm #715822Rory WParticipant
So do we know what we’re getting here or is it just an extension to the windswept ‘streetscape’ of High Street
-
March 16, 2011 at 1:31 pm #715823kefuParticipant
Maybe a statue of Sean Dunne, Sean Fitzpatrick and Michael Fingleton.
-
October 21, 2014 at 4:58 pm #924700urbanistoParticipant
You cant see the former Zap shop here. This looks towards the steeple of whats now Dublinia. The building dead centre is now roadway I suppose.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.