The Abbey Theatre – should it stay or should it go
- This topic has 53 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 23 years, 7 months ago by
d_d_dallas.
- AuthorPosts
- June 29, 2000 at 6:54 pm #717706
dc3
ParticipantJust heard that Sile De Valera, of the well known family, is considering three options relating to the Abbey Theatre.
Option one – minor refurbish
Option two – new theatre on a green field site.Option three- demolish and rebuild on the same site.
It is said that she favours the latter!. Well that takes the biscuit as the site is too restrictive. Poor old Michael Scott, who fought Ernest Blyth to find that he would not move from the present site, leading to the present design which is so constricted. First the Ritz Cinema goes, next the Abbey. And Scott was an Abbey actor too.June 30, 2000 at 10:09 am #717707MG
ParticipantThere’s no point in redeveloping there unless they get the couple of building behind it. But then no doubt An Taisce will be shouting about vernacular buildings of Abbey Street.
Mind you, I’ve never been that impressed by the Abbey Theatre anyways. It’s a poor enough brick box by Ronnie Tallon.
June 30, 2000 at 8:49 pm #717708Anonymous
InactiveI hear that they still have the facade of the original stacked up somewhere. If they need to build another auditorium thye could put it behind that, in an Ark-style design. But they should alter the brick box if necessary, because buildings are there to last, not to replace when they become slightly inconvient.
July 1, 2000 at 2:37 am #717709Anonymous
InactiveIs it true that originally, the Scott building was intended to occupy the whole block right down to the river and that the sites couldn’t be assembled or something?
How feasible would this be today – not necessarily at this site, but maybe further down river? Wouldn’t the National Theatre sit very nicely with the National Courts of Justice, the Corpo headquarters and the Custom House, as part of Dublin’s riverine frontispiece?!
July 1, 2000 at 11:08 am #717710Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThe original facade was indeed stored by someone, his name escapes me for the moment.
Scott wanted the building to follow further down Abbey Street by acquiring the last few houses before the church. Taking the building to the quayside would be magnificent, demolish the lot and turn the building 90 degrees so the foyer is on the river……
July 1, 2000 at 5:48 pm #717711dc3
ParticipantI think it was Daithi Hanly who has the facade in his garden.
Yes there were plans to build two theatres for the Abbey with stages back to back, on an expanded site running out to the river. A removable wall would have allowed both to join together with the audience at either end. However site accumulating skills were not as developed then as they are now.
July 17, 2000 at 1:43 pm #717712Anonymous
InactiveThe original facade is in the garden of former Dublin City arcitect Daithi Hanly, who has been trying for many years to get it restored.
July 18, 2000 at 1:46 am #717713CTR
ParticipantI must say that if the interior of the Abbey was better, more spacious and less cinema-like, then the poor exterior could be accepted. However, the whole thing is not at all what a National Theatre should be. It would be impressive if it was of the rank of a small independent theatre company or a town hall or municipal theatre, but as the country’s most important venue for staging Drama, it falls short of its players’ reputation.
Ive spent many pleasant, often memorable nights in the current Abbey & Peacock and would be slightly sad to see it go. But I would prefer that it was totally rebuilt on an enlarged site, for the sake of national pride and the fostering of Dramatic Arts. The current edifice seems to have no lasting architectural importance.
July 18, 2000 at 2:08 am #717714CTR
ParticipantFor viitors to this site who have not been to this building:
http://www.abbeytheatre.ie/images/history2.jpg
The Abbey as seen from the corner of Abbey St. looking down Marlborough St.http://www.abbeytheatre.ie/images/abbeyplans.gif
Cross section plan from front to rear of building.http://www.iued.uni-heidelberg.de/platform/ilr/images/01_abbey.jpg
Frontal view from Marlborough St.http://www.abbeytheatre.ie/images/oldabbey.jpg
The old Abbey, before the 1951 inferno.July 18, 2000 at 10:18 am #717715Anonymous
InactiveStyle-wise is’nt it a pity that we are over a hundred years on from times when we could probably have something like Garnier’s notable opera house in Paris gracing the Liffey. Such imperial building styles of times then conveyed the sense of the ‘national’To rebuild the old Abbey today would be perhaps anachronistic and as it was such a small and modest building. Maybe as already said it’s old facade could be incorporated into a new design either on the exterior or interior…..how about putting it within a glass atrium. Sad to think that Scott had his chance and blew it.His product amounting to a featureless concrete block which dated badly. However we will probably get something resembling the new Project Art’s Theatre which is a fine modern building but would’nt evoke a sense of the ‘national’, especially when one thinks of Yeats, Lady Gregory, ‘republican rebellions’ etc…. and times of old and the grand. Now, that would be a challenge for an architect. (Come to think of it the national theatre in London on the banks of the Thames is a hideous 60’s mass too.)
February 7, 2001 at 7:50 am #705155Paul Clerkin
KeymasterMEANWHILE the landmark Abbey Theatre on Abbey Street in Dublin 1 looks set to move to the south side of the city. This decision is likely to be revealed at a press conference today outlining the programme of events for the next few months. The theatre is expected to outline that its preference is for a move to a site offered to the theatre company by the Dublin Docklands Development Authority. The new site is located in the Grand Canal Basin.
February 7, 2001 at 9:45 am #717692Hugh Pearman
ParticipantWould this be the death knell for Michael Scott’s Abbey theatre? It was always a bit of a cost-paring brick box, but would it now be demolished?
February 7, 2001 at 9:47 am #717693GregF
ParticipantWell if they do it why not build a landmark ‘state of the art’ high tech muti-purpose theatre and they could reconstruct the old original Abbey facade within a glass atrium. Sounds good?
February 7, 2001 at 10:05 am #717694Paul Clerkin
KeymasterI would imagine so Hugh.
February 7, 2001 at 10:07 am #717695Paul Clerkin
KeymasterActually someone on another one of my websites has suggested that the Abbey may be listed because of its interior.
Never heard this before – any ideas?
February 7, 2001 at 10:30 am #717696LOB
ParticipantIt is not listed in the Dublin City Development plan (1999)
February 7, 2001 at 12:42 pm #717697Rory W
ParticipantYes the present building is awful but the wider sonsideration must be given to the fact that it is one less cultural institution on the Northside. Surely this will impact on the O’Connell Street renewal!
February 7, 2001 at 12:46 pm #717698MG
ParticipantIts a pity that there wasn’t a site on O’Connell Street for it.
February 7, 2001 at 2:14 pm #717699alastair
Participantthe irish times on saturday suggested that the calton site might be a possibility.
It seems their ‘designer mall’ plan isn’t working out so far
seems like a better plan than moving southside. I’d sacrifice the nice waterfront location for helping out the rejuvination of o’connell st.
February 7, 2001 at 5:24 pm #717700Jas
ParticipantWould be brilliant on the Carlton site, reusing that magnificent facade. It would also help add life to the street, theatre goers, people going to the bars in the theatre, and perhaps build one or two good restaurants in the development.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

