Motorways in Ireland
- This topic has 233 replies, 44 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 1 month ago by
Rory W.
- AuthorPosts
- May 26, 2005 at 7:15 pm #707871
patty
ParticipantAre there any three lane motorways in Ireland? Are there any projects? Is the project to upgrade all main routes to motorway status? I don’t think that should be done, this country has already been ruined enough! 😡 🙁 🙁 :confused:
May 26, 2005 at 8:44 pm #756038jimg
ParticipantHi patty. The M50 is due to be upgraded to three lanes in each direction. The N7/M7 is three or four lanes near Dublin. There could be others; I dunno.
Motorways are great for travelling between cities and towns and I view it as a positive thing for the country to have motorways linking the major cities/towns: Dublin, Belfast, Cork, Limerick, Waterford and Galway. Motorways are terrible for commuting; the experience in other countries has proven this but we seem intent on copying their mistakes. The M3 is an example of a commuter motorway which is a big mistake in my opinion whatever your views on heritage. The M50 has become a commuter route.
May 27, 2005 at 10:05 am #756039dave123
ParticipantI agree totally with Jimg, its totally the norm to have motorways connecting all the main cities of ireland, not just all to Dublin Which i think is a big mistake , it will cause major commuter problems and everything will filter out of the countryside as the as all the motorways will lead to Dublin .it takes hours and hours to get to any of the cities on a good day? its ridiculous that you have to snarl through towns that not need not to go through.
we have been blessed that you can go from Dublin to the bogs of ireland without gettin stuck in kildare town anymore !!!!
when you have a fantastic motorway !!!May 27, 2005 at 10:06 am #756040Richards
ParticipantThe Naas Road (N7) is being upgraded to 3 lanes either direction from Rathcoole to Naas and all juctions being replaced with flyovers, graded juctions and the removal of traffic lights. However, when finished, it will not be classed as a motorway because there is no alternative road or non motorway serving the route. As some one who drives on this road the odd time, this change should be welcomed as the Naas Road has been dangerous for many years.
May 27, 2005 at 10:53 am #756041dave123
ParticipantRichar
i have to agree with you on the reasons you stated as the N7 was not to be Motorway standard ,the main reasons is that a dual carrigeway is cheaper than a motorway as their are different designs and speeds.
there is a alternate route, as their are building a road from Naas to Castlewadern near Rathcoole there. which is for regional and traffic travelling that not need to use the N7,
the Road is served by a motorway route the M7 and M50…how can you explain the reasons for supposed to be M7 Nenagh to limerick section which was planned long before the national roads plan was carried out . the road has an alternate route (the old N7) and on greefield site and has a lot of traffic for a motorway to be built but yet it s now going to be a dual carrigeway!
May 27, 2005 at 10:56 am #756042dave123
Participanti meant to agree to dissagree..
May 27, 2005 at 2:58 pm #756043Andrew Duffy
ParticipantIt would be impossible to upgrade the N7 from Naas to the M50 to motorway standard because too many properties have access on to it. The upgrade will remove a lot of these, but not all.
The other section you mentioned is similar to several other “high-quality dual carriageways” which are in the National Development Plan. I haven’t managed to find a good reason why these won’t be classified as motorways and the NRA has been criticised by county councils and government for the inconsistency. The roads are of motorway standard with a design speed of 130km/h, and do not obstruct the old route, with the exception of the N1 from North of Dundalk to the border. The only difference between a high-quality dual carriageway and a motorway in the design handbook is that a dual carriageway is allowed “a limited number of left-on, left-off accesses”, presumably for access to farmland. Why these aren’t allowed on a motorway is unclear; they are in other countries.May 27, 2005 at 3:17 pm #756044Leesider
Participantwatergrasshill and carrigtwohill in cork are 2 prime examples of motorway standard roads assigned dual carriageway status!
May 27, 2005 at 5:16 pm #756045jmkennedyie
ParticipantDon’t know of 3 lane motorways, but there are 3 lane dual-carriageways including
- N4 from ~M50 (Liffey Valley) to ~Lucan
- N7 from ~M50 (Naas Road / Red Cow) to ~Rathcoole
There are plans for more 3 lane roads:
- Much of M50 to be upgraded to 3 lanes (motorway)
- N4 from M50 to Leixlip junction
- N7 from Rathcoole to Naas
You can get status and some maps for all the major road projects at the NRA website.
I support 2 lanes in each direction on all major routes, bypassing the towns and cities. The current situation is not acceptable. Decent roads are safer, business friendly, local friendly. In time they should encourage businesses to cheaper premises outside of Dublin, which will bring jobs, then families, helping to strengthen vulnerable communities.
I don’t like the trend of all all main roads leading into Dublin: The Outer Orbital Route currently being explored (possibly from Drogheda to Navan to Maynooth/Kilkock to Naas and maybe even Wicklow) sounds like a good idea to me. I also like the idea of a decent North/South road in the West. Something like Sligo to Galway to Limerick to Cork (and maybe Wexford).
Building these roads does have a cost, financially and arguably to heritage and the local environment. But I think the cost is worth it: lives saved, the hours waiting in traffic avoided (these hours are wasted forever!!!), the towns and cities that can breath, the communities that will get a new lease of life. Public transport (rail etc.) will help reduce cars, but we need to get jobs out of Dublin, not just the people.
May 27, 2005 at 5:29 pm #756046Richards
ParticipantLike it or not, I think it is better to widen the N7 (Naas Road) and upgrade junctions as planned. The cost of providing a new 4 or 6 lane highway close to Dublin would be huge and undesireable from an enviromental aspect. The new planned motorways to Limerick, Cork and Waterford will all merge on the N7/M7 and eventually end at Newlands Cross. Are there any plans to place a flyover at this junction?
May 27, 2005 at 5:50 pm #756047jimg
ParticipantI support 2 lanes in each direction on all major routes, bypassing the towns and cities.
Personally, I’d have a problem with blanket policies like this. I support motorway construction when the case has been proven with regard to benefits to justify the massive capital spending required and the accrued environmental costs. From my personal experience, I’d say that motorways were definitely required to replace large sections of the N7, N4 and N1. These routes had terrible bottlenecks and the motorway upgrades have improved journey times considerably. I’m sure there were other similar routes in the country which justified upgrading to motorway. On the other hand, the Shannon bypass (on the Limerick to Galway Route) or whatever it’s called seems to me to be a monumental waste of money. At best it has reduced journey times by 5 or 10 minutes on a route that was never that congested to begin with. Sure it looks nice on a map, but I don’t think any cost/benefit analysis could have justified such expenditure and this is my worry; motorways are being built for ideological or perversely aesthetic reasons (nice lines on maps) rather than for sound economic reasons.
May 28, 2005 at 12:53 am #756048PTB
ParticipantTheres 3 lanes on the south link road in cork for 1 and a half kilometers. Almost 4 if you count the turning off lane. Then it goes straight down to 2 lanes with no hard shoulder. Like the M50 the road was’nt very well designed when first built and now lanes are being added flyovers being built and overpasses extended with no particular order.Already the Jack Lynch tunnel is running at the capacity that it is supposed to be running at in 2015.As for leesiders comment thats a governent thing done to indicate that if your not near Dublin you wont recieve the same privliges as the pale.
May 28, 2005 at 12:57 am #756049Jack White
Participant@PTB wrote:
As for leesiders comment thats a governent thing done to indicate that if your not near Dublin you wont recieve the same privliges as the pale.
I agree you Cork folks don’t have the privilage of two hour commutes, I’m sure it can be arranged.
May 28, 2005 at 4:28 pm #756050A-ha
ParticipantHas the motorway linking Cork and Limerick to Dublin been given some sort of green light or is it still some urban myth? Also, isn’t the bypass in Fermoy a motorway? I haven’t seen it yet, but I thought I heard it was. I think more emphasis should be put on public transport e.g. rail, instead of on roads. Ireland must be the only country in Europe (after Moldova) that still uses diesel engines to run it’s rail network. We were better off in the 1950’s when almost every town in Ireland was connected to a railway line, since then all of these stations have been dwindling away. I was so delighted to hear that the railway line will be extended to Midleton from Cork, providing a commuter service that is heavily needed. But an extension of the service isn’t good enough, it should be happening nation wide. My biggest disappointment is that we only have one railway provider, compared to countries such as England and Germany where they have 5 or 6 companies operating trains. What does everyone else think??
May 28, 2005 at 5:59 pm #756051Boyler
Participant@A-ha wrote:
Has the motorway linking Cork and Limerick to Dublin been given some sort of green light or is it still some urban myth? Also, isn’t the bypass in Fermoy a motorway? I haven’t seen it yet, but I thought I heard it was. I think more emphasis should be put on public transport e.g. rail, instead of on roads. Ireland must be the only country in Europe (after Moldova) that still uses diesel engines to run it’s rail network. We were better off in the 1950’s when almost every town in Ireland was connected to a railway line, since then all of these stations have been dwindling away. I was so delighted to hear that the railway line will be extended to Midleton from Cork, providing a commuter service that is heavily needed. But an extension of the service isn’t good enough, it should be happening nation wide. My biggest disappointment is that we only have one railway provider, compared to countries such as England and Germany where they have 5 or 6 companies operating trains. What does everyone else think??
that’s a good idea
May 28, 2005 at 6:00 pm #756052Boyler
ParticipantI still haven’t gotten used to this website.
May 28, 2005 at 6:02 pm #756053Frank Taylor
Participant@A-ha wrote:
Has the motorway linking Cork and Limerick to Dublin been given some sort of green light or is it still some urban myth?
Approval has been given to build a collection of road segments and upgrades that, once strung together will form a road of at least dual carriageway standard between Dublin and Cork by 2010. A lot of it is built already or under construction.
Also, isn’t the bypass in Fermoy a motorway? I haven’t seen it yet, but I thought I heard it was.
Yes it is 17.5 km of tolled motorway, due to finish by summer 2007.
We were better off in the 1950’s when almost every town in Ireland was connected to a railway line, since then all of these stations have been dwindling away.
We were of course much worse off in every other way. The extensive rail network only existed because there was no competition from cars. Had we maintained the rail network we would have spent the last 40 years running trains that nobody used at huge expense. Rail infrastructure only lasts about 30-40 years so we would have had to renew the network by now anyway.
Increased employment and car congestion have made commuter rail systems a welcome prospect in Ireland. Watch the price of property along the MIdleton line shoot up over the next few years.
My biggest disappointment is that we only have one railway provider, compared to countries such as England and Germany where they have 5 or 6 companies operating trains. What does everyone else think??
It didn’t seem to work out so sweetly for the Brits. Ireland’s rail network may be too small to generate any interest in competition. However, allowing Connex to run the luas seems to have been a good idea. Their ticketing is about a million times better than the DART and Irish Rail have something to live up to now.
May 28, 2005 at 9:35 pm #756054Anonymous
Inactive@Frank Taylor wrote:
Had we maintained the rail network we would have spent the last 40 years running trains that nobody used at huge expense. Rail infrastructure only lasts about 30-40 years so we would have had to renew the network by now anyway.
I totally agree the only successful tourist railway I know in the World runs from Cusco to Agus Calientes it generates seven full trains in each direction per day for about 200 random days per year. Some of the existing rail network is losing cash fast and where renewal programmes have been instigated in some circumstances the underlying engineering issues have not be adressed. This has resulted in situations where new track has been laid at great expense on alignments that have serious structural and drainage issues that will require regular replacement.
@Frank Taylor wrote:
Increased employment and car congestion have made commuter rail systems a welcome prospect in Ireland. Watch the price of property along the MIdleton line shoot up over the next few years.
Again I totally agree, the only sucessful rail system is a busy rail system, Midleton will deliver benefits for everyone and this investment should be a model for other lines in Cork as well as Limerick, Galway, Sligo, Navan and Waterford. The Luas effect will be the subject of many a thesis as will Midleton in time too.
@Frank Taylor wrote:
Ireland’s rail network may be too small to generate any interest in competition. However, allowing Connex to run the luas seems to have been a good idea. Their ticketing is about a million times better than the DART and Irish Rail have something to live up to now.
I disagree I believe the Luas ticketing system is a complete waste of time and the Smart cards are a joke if you pay 10 euro you get a card that costs 3 euro (once off) then there is a 4 euro reserve that effectively can’t be used. I genuinely believed that the idea was to get people off the already congested roads and that rail was the carrot in the equation.
May 28, 2005 at 10:15 pm #756055A-ha
ParticipantGlad to hear that the Cork-Dublin “motorway” is getting built piece by piece. At least it should cut down the time spent on the road.
May 29, 2005 at 12:53 am #756056PTB
Participant@A-ha wrote:
Glad to hear that the Cork-Dublin “motorway” is getting built piece by piece. At least it should cut down the time spent on the road.
Not really as that way it takes longer to complete the whole road. Whats being done between Athlone and Kinnegad is better. When completed the cork-dublin road will have been done in about 12 sections over 45 year. In France that would be 3-4 sections in 20 years max.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

