developments in cork

Home Forums Ireland developments in cork

Viewing 2,179 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #707960
      lexington
      Participant

      Ladies & Gentlemen,

      in repsonse to recent issues concerning the Look at de state of Cork, like! thread – with the consent of the Archiseek Webmaster – I hope to begin this fresh thread to continue the positive elements of the aforementioned thread.

      The thread has been a very positive effort for all those involved and concerned – and, I would hope that we can build on that.

      However, in this thread, though active discussion and constructive arguments/contributions are most welcome – I would very much like to see that all contributing posts are ‘positive’ in nature. Now, that’s not to say honest criticism cannot be dictated, indeed, it should as part of any proper debate. If CSD are unfair, then so let it be mentioned. If CCC make a critical mistake, let it be known – but that does not mean such critiques should descend to levels of low-blows.

      I would hope, that as well as development – that a continually greater emphasis on architecture should be stressed. After all this is a primarily architectural resource website and this must be highlighted in conjunction with any development discussion.

      A link to the LADSOCL thread is provided at the bottom of this post for purposes of reference (e.g. images, dates, previous information).

      Would this be an acceptable routeway to other contributors?

      It is the reponsibility of thread particpants to monitor their own input – and to highlight any inappropriate contributions by others. We actively encourage all members concerned to particpate in a healthy debate – that includes CSD members, CCC Planning members, Architects, Developers, Engineers and general interested parties.

      Referal link:
      Look at de state of Cork, like!

    • #757514
      pier39
      Participant

      sounds good to me dude!

      we can start fresh! let the party commence!!! huzzah!

    • #757515
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      cool

      any official announcement on eglinton street yet

      anyone got a copy of inside cork and the story on pairc ui caoimh?

    • #757516
      lexington
      Participant

      As par my post at -> https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?p=36510#post36510

      Eglinton Street was granted subject to 25 conditions. A positive day for Cork architecture and progressive development.

    • #757517
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I don’t see why we had to move from the LATSOC thread but anyway, here goes….

      Saw the article in the Inside Cork this morning. It suggests that discussions might be ongoing with a view to transferring Cork’s GAA headquarters to a site near Blarney and opening up the existing site for redevelopment. Apparently the GAA are stuck for ways of re-developing the existing stadium due to the cramped nature of the site and some subsidence issues on the river side of the stadium. All very sketchy at the moment and of course denied by GAA themselves.

      I for one would be against the movement of Pairc Ui Caoimh. It currently has the best public transport network you can get – i.e. it’s within walking distance of the City Centre. Moving it to a greenfield site at Blarney would be bad for Cork-based GAA supporters and for business in the city as a whole. The space is there to accomodate a new stadium but perhaps those involved would prefer the green field option with a handsome sum of money for the riverside site.

    • #757518
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Thanks R-man

    • #757519
      trace
      Participant

      How about sticking to ARCHITECTURE and development, for a change, instead of planning and development on this thread? There is a difference, you know.

    • #757520
      satanta99
      Participant

      Planning is an essential part of the development of Cork City. It is not and should not be alien to the architecture and development of the city! These three factors affect the city and make it what it is. i don’t see the point in being smart about the content of the tread in relation to the title. Why do people have such a problem with looking at The City with such a wholistic perspective. This forum and the LADSOC thread offer a true opportunity to exchange information and ideas which I believe leads to a wholistic discussion of Architecture, development and Planning in Cork City.

    • #757521
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      let’s just keep the thread going as it has all along… there is a great momentum and I for one would hate for this to change

    • #757522
      genario
      Participant

      I agree with mickeydocs. This Cork forum is very popular and generally I think is a very positive thing. It helps me and the other peoples in this firm focus on the design standards we must improve and comptetion on. I read the newpapers and read the forums and of only two comments I think of are bad. Overall it is just democracy and opinions no more than of the corksouthwest.com website expresses. Do not be bullied out of a good thing. It is important to be careful of the future when phrasing these things but also we must protect the good names of this website from unfair newspapers articles.

      genario

    • #757523
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The owners of the Woodford on Paul Street have been refused permision by CCC to link the neighbouring Loco Cafe premises to the Woodford pub (which is a listed building).
      The plans would have extended the Cafe area into the pub and provided extra toilet facilities. However, since no guarantee the plans would not lead to the extension of the pub, the plans were refused because they may have led to the creation of a “superpub”.


    • #757524
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      In all that rucus about the other ‘issue’ – we forgot the really good news……..

      …Eglinton street is after getting the go ahead! A really decent architectural statement is set to be made and should act as a novel gateway into the revived docklands and city. Well done OFlynns! I think a newspaper report said it would get started straight away but my buddy in City hall said that there might be a festival there (at the Eglinton st site) for the end of the year of culture??? So i’d say lex’s report of 2006 start date could well be true. Either way its great news. The standard of building design should be encouraged by this movement.

    • #757525
      redabbeyredux
      Participant

      Yep, best news this year for Cork’s cityscape!

    • #757526
      lexington
      Participant

      :rolleyes: How long has this thing been going on??? 😮 Finally, the Cork School of Music (CSM) designed by architects Murray O’Laoire, looks set to roll. Originally, the 110,000sq ft + project was proposed back in 1999 and has since suffered a number of severe setbacks from planning to funding to contractual misendeavours. Jarvis had originally been appointed to the PPP educational project – at one point in 2004, movement looked set when Jarvis signed a contract with John Sisk & Sons Construction to build the project on their behalf, however, when Jarvis ran into financial difficulties, its PPP wing was sold to German-firm Hochtief. The Dept. of Education has since been in negotiations with the firm about commencing work on the belated building – now, an agreement would seem to have been reached. If all goes well, a construction date is set for sometime in September of this year with an 18 month build-period. The project should be functional and open to the college’s 3,000+ music students in time for the 2007 semester.

      This indeed, is another positive development (following yesterday’s announcement regarding Eglinton Street) in Cork’s architectural and educational wilderness. It is believed Sisk Construction will still remain appointed to the contract.

      Any opinions on its design?

    • #757527
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Well, better than a surface car park!

      Is there an additional pedestrian bridge going in?

    • #757528
      Ronan C
      Participant

      Does anybody have images of the new building on Elgin St or even who the architects were so I can look on their website ? Thanks in advance …

    • #757529
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @Ronan C wrote:

      Does anybody have images of the new building on Elgin St or even who the architects were so I can look on their website ? Thanks in advance …

      The architects are Wilson Architects. Visit them at http://www.wilsonarchitecture.ie

      Can’t seem to put pictures up on this post-weird…

      Will try again later.

    • #757530
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Can a basic level of behaviour be provided on this thread?

      I.E. No-one being demeaned or defamed or misrepresented?

    • #757531
      lexington
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      Can a basic level of behaviour be provided on this thread?
      I.E. No-one being demeaned or defamed or misrepresented?

      Thomond Park – I do not believe that is a very fair comment to make. As far as the LADSOCL thread goes, the general standard of ‘behaviour’ was/is very high. Yes opinions were expressed, yes positions were argued – but I would expect nothing less of a open forum which supports such discussion.

      If you refer to the the statement posted by Paul Clerkin regarding the publication articles – it becomes evident that the ‘misrepresentation’ has predominantly come from the press with respect to the users of this forum and the website itself.

      Alleged statements have been highlighted in that they were presented in a misleading and inaccurate manner. Now, indeed comments were made – but of the 1800+ posts on that thread alone, the subject posts represented approximately 3 or 4 of these.

      If CSD for example, given that they are the topic group at issues, act in a clearly imbalanced or unfair manner, than indeed this may and will be highlighted by users of this thread. Equally, the CSD website readily points out its issues with certain developments. The issue at hand, in terms of the behaviour you speak of, is where posts are ‘insults’. As mentioned, those points were 0.0016% of the total posts made. Supporters and members of groups like CSD have always been free to counter-argue their perspectives and as far as I am aware, have at all times been treated with respect and welcome.

      In the article statement, it was noted that those comments made and deemed inappropriate have resulted in the action of membership removal.

      I hope this thread avails of all the positive aspects of the LADSOCL thread – that it encourages and supports active discussion regarding architecture within the city, the architecture and their effects of new projects in the city, the development backgrounds and how the designs and proposals are affected through the planning process – the process which ultimately brings these design additions to ‘reality’. The outcomes of these projects are affected by planning submissions and it is perfectly reasonable to include mention of the nature of these submissions so that a greater empirical sense of the projects development to life is accounted for. As we know too often, the planning process can have consequences on the end design result.

    • #757532
      dowlingm
      Participant

      If I may say without being branded ageist, it is a pity that certain groups wish to put Cork in some kind of suspended animation when they claim to represent people of an agegroup who were responsible for the electrification of Ireland and the boom years of Lemass and Whitaker. Instead they prey on the fears of elderly people about being dispossed and sent god knows where, to be replaced by whom I wonder?

      The fact is that Cork has had unsatisfactory development in the past which led to the decline of the City’s population even while the rest of the county and country increased in numbers. LATSOCL was a barometer of how far Cork had come since and how close it came to screwing it up as it did and where it might go.

      I think such groups if actively involved in the transformation of Cork could actually do a world of good and it is up to Cork City Council to find a way out of their dog in the manger attitude to provide an inclusive process of evolution for the City while still allowing people to make a few bob in making Cork a bigger, better place.

      Finally, of course Architecture and Planning are different. There is nothing stopping people creating threads to discuss pure architecture and leave those of us who enjoy the holistic (and more accessible to the layman such as myself) discussions of State of Cork to continue on here. To suggest that State of Cork was all about planning was to deny all the swishy scans Lexington provided!

      I do think the new forum title is a bit dry. State of Cork was a great title and I’m sure drew a lot of views from the bantering headline alone. In a way it seems the knockers have won by this change alone. Let’s try and retain the humour while softpedalling the acid?

    • #757533
      altuistic
      Participant

      well said Mark.

      Could somebody please explain something to me because i’m not sure i’m up to date on something, why was it necessary to issue a new webpage when the other state of cork webpage was perfectly fine? I dont need to remind you how popular and important it has become as a resource. one of the things that attracted so many first time users to the archiseek.com website as a whole was its extensive depth and detail. Days on end could be spent exploring it and each day one could find something new and wonderful. If the culprit(s?) have been addressed shouldnt we continue on with the good work as it was? Why should the comments of 1 or 2 and the outrageously unfair and incorrect paper articles disbenefit the rest of us and the website? I myself am not a solicitor (thats my sons job) and when i discussed this issue with him he said the wise thing for the paper to do was to issue a well seen apology to the website. whatever of it i dont know it’s not got to do with me but I do feel the loss of the other thread will disbenefit us.

      On that note I am most pleased to hear some progress is being made for the music school. The design i suppose represents that the term of landmark building does not mean highrise. I do think however it looks far more intriguing by nightime. The use of light seems most interesting and the materials used in the buildings design seems to allow a rich tapestry of effects under nightime lights which gives the building much more character.

    • #757534
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      Contrary to what the Examiner said, they obviously didn’t examine too closely and were too keen for a headline suggesting a result, the original thread is still online here. It is not lost.

    • #757535
      genario
      Participant

      So can we use it again yes/no????? This good if we can continue.

      genario

    • #757536
      dave123
      Participant

      this is all confusing?? read into to much i think.
      i have nothing against the cork thread, the old thread was good and now this ???
      but i do think that there is enough threads going for cork and its all hypep a bit
      although i do enjoy reading it..

      my point is could they not just have one decent thread???

    • #757537
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @Ronan C wrote:

      Does anybody have images of the new building on Elgin St or even who the architects were so I can look on their website ? Thanks in advance …

      As promised

      Maybe go to O’Flynn Construction’s website for more images… Haven’t looked throught the whole website yet.
      Thanks Lex…

    • #757538
      Ronan C
      Participant

      Thanks a lot, should be a nice addition to Cork

    • #757539
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Question for Dowlingm

      I’ve been offered a position in Mississauga… would you recommend Toronto and its environs as a good place for a young family looking to leave the strains (commuter and other) of Dublin behind?

      thanks for any insights (btw, would you choose to live in Mississauga or in the metropolitan area?).

    • #757540
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 I made a visit to The Marquee last night at the Munster Agricultural Showgrounds (yes, to see a sell-out Tommy Tiernan), and I have to say that its presence pushes the need only further that the city needs and could do most well from a permanent such event centre. The temporary nature of the facility ensured that air-conditioning and the solid service facilities were lacking (believe you me, air-conditioning was never so badly needed), but the venue provides a physical indication that such a centre could well be a success. Over 5000 persons packed the over-sized circus tent – but the atmosphere was very positive.

      3 projects are currently ploughing ahead with their proposals for such an event centre. The Showgrounds, however, still, in my eyes seems the most ideal location long-run.

      An application for Horgan’s Quay is not too far away and I will bring you details of its contents before its lodgement please God.

      (Marquee images later tonight).

    • #757541
      lexington
      Participant

      Paul Kenny has submitted Significant Further Information on his plans to build new offices for the Revenue Commissioners along St. Patrick’s Quay. The office development designed by Wilson Architecture would home approaximately 127,000sq ft of office space and 15,000sq ft of retail over 2 linked buildings. The revised plans will now consist of one building fronting St. Patrick’s Quay between 4 and 6 storeys (as oppose to 4 and 5 storeys) with the 2nd building 4 to 6 storeys facing the Lower Glanmire Road, changed from 5 to 7 storeys. The double-deck basement car-park will now house 216 car spaces and 50 cycle spaces, instead of 235 spaces of car-parking originally submitted. It should be mentioned that the basic design (i.e. the curved quayside facade) will remain the same. A decision date is now set for the 8th August 2005.

    • #757542
      lexington
      Participant

      You will remember earlier (back in the LADSOCL thread) a post was issued noting Frinailla had entered planning for a 25-unit residential development over commercial facility and basement car-parking. The development, planned for the former Plumbing Utilities Store bordering Ashbrook apartment complex and Top Car Motor Dealership, was designed by Geraldine McNamara of Richard Rainey & Associates and ranges in height between 6 and 7-storeys. Apartments will range in size between 55m sq for one-bedroom units, 90m sq for 2-bedroom units and a 190m sq duplex penthouse with 4-bedrooms (these scale apartments have been actively encouraged by CCC and its nice to see more of these units come in to circulation). Each apartment will have 2 basement parking spaces and basement storage facilities.

      In my opinion, a generally quality project – its seems a difficult site to work with, but I do think that this project will compliment the area in the long-run given prospective and current proposals shaping up nearby. The Utilities Store is currently being used by Heberger Construction/Aras Developments as their ‘Site Office’ for the Victoria Station student residence development directly across the road. This project will rise to 5 storeys.

    • #757543
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      A decision is due this Wednesday on Ellesmere Properties Ltd. ‘s seven storey Hotel, retail unit, basement carpark and Coffee shop at Lavitts Quay and Half Moon Street (Lex has previously posted images of same).
      If i remember correctly, the general opinion on this site was that the architectural merit of the building fell far short of that required for this prestigous location adjacent to Cork Opera House.
      Anybody got any ideas how CCC are leaning with this one? Further info. was submitted in mid-June.

    • #757544
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      A decision is due this Wednesday on Ellesmere Properties Ltd. ‘s seven storey Hotel, retail unit, basement carpark and Coffee shop at Lavitts Quay and Half Moon Street (Lex has previously posted images of same).
      If i remember correctly, the general opinion on this site was that the architectural merit of the building fell far short of that required for this prestigous location adjacent to Cork Opera House.
      Anybody got any ideas how CCC are leaning with this one? Further info. was submitted in mid-June.

      Indeed the decision is due tomorrow. Only one objection was submitted to the Significant Further Information submitted – which effectively redesigned the hotel building, with a minor height reduction (over 1m), room numbers reduction (125 to 114) and facade alterations. It has to be said that the original propopsal was not up to much – the new design is an improvement somewhat. The architect is Geoff Butler of Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects and developers are Howard Holdings. An image is posted below and I will have some information on its decision tomorrow evening.

      Though the revised design incorporates a number of improvements, including better use of the site shape and better incorporation and relation of the new project to No.16 Lavitts Quay (a PS) – I wonder if this is really the best design that RORSA could have come up with for the 20m euro project which is set to house the Comfort Inn brand. Perhaps its just me – maybe its a sort of New York-esque ‘Art Deco’ style I’m just not use to :confused: . Its not a bad project, the usage is most welcome, but it just doesn’t seem up to scratch in comparison to the likes of 21 Lavitts Quay, recently complete next-door to the west. However, the variety of styles may indeed enhance the quayside over-all in the future. It’s just that in such a delicate location, a new development should first and foremost add to an area – this building, I believe, adds nothing.

    • #757545
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      You will remember earlier (back in the LADSOCL thread) a post was issued noting Frinailla had entered planning for a 25-unit residential development over commercial facility and basement car-parking. The development, planned for the former Plumbing Utilities Store bordering Ashbrook apartment complex and Top Car Motor Dealership, was designed by Geraldine McNamara of Richard Rainey & Associates and ranges in height between 6 and 7-storeys. Apartments will range in size between 55m sq for one-bedroom units, 90m sq for 2-bedroom units and a 190m sq duplex penthouse with 4-bedrooms (these scale apartments have been actively encouraged by CCC and its nice to see more of these units come in to circulation). Each apartment will have 2 basement parking spaces and basement storage facilities.

      In my opinion, a generally quality project – its seems a difficult site to work with, but I do think that this project will compliment the area in the long-run given prospective and current proposals shaping up nearby. The Utilities Store is currently being used by Heberger Construction/Aras Developments as their ‘Site Office’ for the Victoria Station student residence development directly across the road. This project will rise to 5 storeys.

      I agree lexington that it isnt a bad project and the site is a difficult one but i think it should be stated that it is difficult for more than one reason. For a start, its size means that any development on it would have to have some height to be viable. Other than that the nature of surrounding buildings like Farranlea hall and Victoria station across the Wilton road are residential and have been designed with the usual residential features like balconies, roof gardens etc. Frinillas other project at Dennehys cross up the road is gonna be residential too and any redevelopment of the Cork farm centre will be of a similar height as this project in question. The design has to consider all these elements – it has to be befitting of the area, allow viablity, provide for residential aspects and be relatively ‘pretty’ while its at it. While i dont think its an offence or ugly design (I like the glass commercial unit (is a commercial unit???) to the front of the site), I dont think its anything particularly spectacular either. Its colouration use of finishings seems varied, neutral colors that smile at, rather than attack the senses, so its not offending anyone. I especially like the penthouse element. The one problem i see staring me in the face however is that 4 storeys wall to the north of the site. It seems unnecessarily bland despite the color. I’m sure the architects had their reasons, but, even a window or 2 to break the repetitiveness up a little? Maybe Top car are looking to redevelop their site that we dont know about. As far as I know windows in the Frinilla projects wall wouldnt be overlooking anything other than a workshop. The L shape of the development gives a bit of variety to the design which otherwise I could just envision walking up along the road and being greet by nothing other than a 4 storey wall! If the penthouse can have windows at this side of the building, can the rest of the north elevation not have them either???

    • #757546
      Devin
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      That thing is absolutely woeful!! It is bland, overscaled and makes monkeys of the remaining older buildings on the quayfront. I suppose it’s following the precedent of the oversized lump that’s already built on Lavitt’s Quay? This is the problem – once one mistake occurs it’s easier for more to be made…

      For those who don’t know Cork, this is not in a remote area where there are just scraps of historic buildings left and you could go taller]right in the centre[/I], where there is an established scale.

      The 3-storey, 4-bay building on the quayfront is a Protected Structure, right? Well under the Planning & Dev Act 2000 (Part IV), the setting of a P. S. is protected as well as the structure itself. So the impact of new development proposals on the integrity of a P. S. has to be taken into account. You can’t just shove a load of rubbish up behind a P. S. once the building itself has been secured.

      This image is misleading anyway. A wider image is needed that properly shows the proposal in its location, with the Quays & Emmet Place etc.

    • #757547
      pier39
      Participant

      ive tried to like this building on so many levels and though it is a vast improvement on the original id be lying to myself if i said i liked it. for such a respected firm rorsa could have done so much better. a shame really.

    • #757548
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      the architect needs to be sent back to college

    • #757549
      lisam
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Maybe Top car are looking to redevelop their site that we dont know about. As far as I know windows in the Frinilla projects wall wouldnt be overlooking anything other than a workshop. The L shape of the development gives a bit of variety to the design which otherwise I could just envision walking up along the road and being greet by nothing other than a 4 storey wall! If the penthouse can have windows at this side of the building, can the rest of the north elevation not have them either???

      I have heard from a good source that Top Car are planning to relocate.

    • #757550
      lexington
      Participant

      @lisam wrote:

      I have heard from a good source that Top Car are planning to relocate.

      It was only March 1st this year (2005) that Top Car received permission to vertically extend their showroom, with Colman Cotter Consulting Engineers working on the project. I had heard they were looking at one of the Motor Mall locations (at either EastGate or John Cleary Developments’ project at Mahon Point) but nothing in stone. The Victoria Cross site would certainly be a highly valuable land deal for them should they decide to relocate. No doubt a number of offers would leap at the opportunity.



      Also I am awaiting details on Howard Holdings’ plans for Lavitts Quay, as posted above – Michael Lynch is the planner. It will be most interesting to see how this one fairs – the design is controversial to say the least. But not controversial good in my books. 🙁

    • #757551
      rodger
      Participant

      It is hard to judge the quality of the building from the image shown,its quite distorted or maybe its my cataracts again.

      I will reserve my opinion (for what its worth) pending review of the file and indeed clear images.
      Nice work on the Victoria cross images Lexington,I agree with you on the design.

      That blank gable is very bland I would think its to allow for the future development of Top Car ,whom I understand are in negotiations with Cleary Doyle in Mahon for a new car showroom.

      Any way what the f*** am I doing on this thing I should be out topping up on the suntan.

    • #757552
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      ……seems a difficult site to work with, but I do think that this project will compliment the area in the long-run given prospective and current proposals shaping up nearby. The Utilities Store is currently being used by Heberger Construction/Aras Developments as their ‘Site Office’ for the Victoria Station student residence development directly across the road. This project will rise to 5 storeys.

      Sorry Lexington, it was this project I was talking about….

    • #757553
      lexington
      Participant

      Just for your own interest – here are a selection of images on the various projects proposed for the 16 Lavitts Quay site over the years. All designed by RORSA.


      The original proposal of new Irish Examiner/Evening Echo HQ – applied for back in late 2001.


      After the land swap deal with Howard Holdings (under the SPV Ellesmere Properties) the developers retained RORSA and designed this 7-storey 125-bedroom hotel for the Comfort Inn brand.


      CCC Planning Dept. sought Significant Further Information on the project following reservations concerning the projects design, layout and height. In June, RORSA submitted revised plans which featured a reduction in height, bedroom numbers, better site utilisation, revised basement features and revised aesthetics.

      The decision is due tomorrow. I had expected news tonight, but unfortunately it will have to wait until tomorrow morning.

      Sincere apologises related to the scan qualities.

    • #757554
      Devin
      Participant

      Are you saying that because these equally terrible proposals were made earlier on for the Lavitt’s Quay area, that the current situation – with an existing overscaled building on the quayfront and an overscaled proposal behind the quayfront – is somehow justified?? – That is complete nonsense.

      At the end of the day, the only thing that should be considered is the proper planning and development of the area, and in no way could any of these proposals or the existing building at 21 Lavitt’s Quay be construed to be proper planning and development.

      For those who don’t know Cork & are presuming that Lavitt’s Quay is in an outer area where bland montrosities and discontinuity of scale might happen, the arrow on the map shows where it is; right in the central core with a dense fabric of older buildings all around and the incredibly historic Paul Street area just behind:

      And the existing yoke – euphemistically named “No. 21 Lavitt’s Quay” .…….serious, serious integration problem………:

    • #757555
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      That hotel’s been granted by the Council…..I think that they have changed the elevation by droping a couple of units……as for the integration of No 16, I don’t think O’Callaghans wanted to keep that, I think that they were encouraged to do so by the Council. Personally I think it allows for a beter architectural statement (not saying that Lavitts Quay is award stuff) if some of those older buildings are demolished; I accept that there is a balance to be struck, I just think that sometimes older buildings irrespective of merit / condition / potential reuse are seen as being important. I mean, just have a look at the recent NIAH for Cork, some classic stuff in there but there is also somerelatively recent (1950’s) building that personally I wouldn’t look twice at (from a preservation viewpoint – record yes, preserve no).

      Anyway, I think the problem with Lavitt’s Quay is the Opera House, anything else is an improvement……

    • #757556
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Howard Holdings (Ellesmere Properties) have been greenlit by CCC to develop the former TCH lands at Lavitts Quay to the west and rear of No.16 Lavitts Quay. The protected structure at No.16 (which still possesses a run-down but remarkably intricate interior detail) will be integrated into the new development with ground-floor cafe usage and upper floor office usage. The revised design for the 7-storey hotel proposed 114 bedrooms (as oppose to the 125 in the original submission), however some of these units have since be conditioned. Although Comfort Inn stated that 114 represented the minimum number of rooms necessary to allow hotel viability, it yet remains to be seen whether they will settle for the conditions or seek appeal. The hotel will also allow for retail space and a basement parking facility. The development will provide a degree of continuity to the quayside, along with 21 Lavitts Quay and a redeveloped Cork Opera House (in the works). R. Arthur’s corner premises on Half Moon Street and Lavitts Quay, may be subject to sale in the coming months (as rumours have it). More details later.



      Devin – if you read my earlier posts, I think you should be able to determine my feelings on the design of this development. The only reasons I posted the above images of the various developments proposed for this site was to allow for those interested to note the other options that had existed, as a matter of record. I don’t believe I express one opinion over the other on that post – rather just a summary of the alterations made. Howard Holdings have produced better material than this before and so have RORSA and I really think much more could have been achieved.

      – also just as a matter of clarity, so that no confusion is created between the subject buildings, OCP’s HQ building is 21 Lavitts Quay, with its former HQ facade incorporated into the new building. No.16 Lavitts Quay is the PS which is part and to be integrated into the Howard Holdings development. Thanks for the image Devin, it gives another interesting perspective on the site as is and its relationship to 21. However, also consider the quayside prior to 21’s development – if you have any comparitive images of that it may be interesting to assess. Also, 21 should not be viewed as a stand-alone project, but rather as part of a quayside masterplan which includes the Opera House, No.16 and the Coal Quay buildings to the west. Thats not a justification or anything, but rather an alternative perspective. 🙂

    • #757557
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Devin,
      from your image, yes the OCP development looks monstrous, yet the Opera House is just out of sight to the left which puts the quayside in perspective. Also there is a hideous multistory carpark just behind the OCP development which was quite visible prior to this construction. This quayside along with Patricks Qy and Merchants Qy can accommodate a slightly larger massing than the older structures provide. That said they should fit in. I disapprove of the impact of the OCP building when viewed from Academy St where it’s overbearing nature becomes quite apparent.

    • #757558
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 You may remember sometime ago I noted that Killarney-based Oyster Developments were pushing further into the Cork market, and that they were in preplanning for another large-scale development. Well, again using Sabine Wittman’s Dungarvan-based The e-Project Architects, Oyster Developments look set to lodge an application for a 7-storey office development along Deane Street, directly across the road from the landmark 9-storey office development in planning by DAT Partnerships, and designed by Coughlan de Keyser. The site borders the rear of the newly refurbished Bus Station at Anderson’s Quay, and adjoins No.8 Parnell Place, a protected structure.

      The office development will stem to a height equal to nearby No.6 Lapps Quay, but will not be higher than CentrePoint, the DAT Partnerships building.

      It is building will house office space over retail facilities. I will have images soon (unfortunately I didn’t receive them sooner, but I think that’s on account of my opinions expressed regarding The e-Project’s design for the Capitol Cineplex redevelopment – oops! :rolleyes: – by way of interest, the Further Information requested on the Capitol redevelopment is expected to be lodged within the next month).

      Below are some site images, and an image of the DAT Partnerships building across the road from the Oyster Developments proposal. I have not yet seen the application design for the Oyster project, but I should hope, at the very very least, it is of or above the standards set by CentrePoint and other nearby projects.


      No.8 Parnell Place – I have some concerns at how the development will dominate this important protected structure, but I will wait until I see the final design, who knows, I may be surprised.


      1st Image shows perspective from Bus Station – looking West to East toward City Quarter (seen in background) 2nd Image – shows relationship of the site (right) to No.6 Lapps Quay in background, with CentrePoint (9-storey DAT Partnerships building) site seen to the left (with billboards).

      The application will request permission to demolish the structures to the rear of No.8 Parnell Place, among which includes a pleasant brick former-bakery chimney. Although I welcome the site’s redevelopment, the design will have to be something special to add rather than detract from this sensitive site. We’ll wait and see.


      The innovative CentrePoint, 9-storey office development by DAT Partnerships. To give you some perspective, this image is shows the western elevation, with No.6 Lapps Quay to the left (south), the Bus Station to the right (north) and Oyster Developments proposal to the west (behind the CentrePoint building). It will be important for the Oyster proposal not to detract from this new building either.

    • #757559
      who_me
      Participant

      I was a bit wary of No 21 Lavitt’s Quay, but seeing it now complete, it’s one of my favourite new developments in Cork. That entire quayside has looked dreadful for decades – with the nearby Opera House one of the worst of a bad lot. Any redevelopment of the area would be welcome in my book, and No. 21 is one of the best in Cork.

      As for the greater height, bring it on. If it leads to other buildings nearby of a similar height, is that a bad thing? Would buildings such as the Roches Stores, Brown Thomas buildings etc. ever have been built if we had the same attitude towards height then as we do now?

      And if the height differs, is that a problem either? I think (provided new developments are top-notch) a contrast in heights between new and old side-by-side can be quite striking. To be honest, I think much of Dublin and Limerick’s riverside developments have been quite dull, with endless adjoining buildings of the same or similar height.

      Having said all that, I think the proposals for No. 16 Lavitt’s Quay are very poor; being big is ok, but being big and bland isn’t. IMO.

    • #757560
      Devin
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      And if the height differs, is that a problem either? I think a contrast in heights between new and old side-by-side can be quite striking.

      Provided they can integrate and co-exist happily…….which is not the case on Lavitt’s Quay in my opinion.

    • #757561
      pier39
      Participant

      ill probably be a lone voice here but i actually like 21 lavitts qy. its impact to the rear a far less significant that the impact the new howard holdings hotel will have. the nice thing about paul street and its tributary lanes is that the seem to be pleasantly isolated in their own timewarped microcosm and i think thats part of their appeal.

      it is a pity howard didnt just move onto a different practice, not that ive anything against rorsa but clearly effort was lacking from the no16 design. imagination could have immensely enhanced this site and quayside. i suppose it was a matter of taking advantage of rorsa site knowledge and getting an application in there fast. i fear this building will be another one of those designs people will throw their eyes to heaven each time they pass it in coming years. i dont think 21 lavitts qy beckons the same. its actually quite a clever well finished building and seems to embrace a variety of scales, curvatures and materials which given a bit of variety to what could quite easily have been another bland office building. paddy cashman and clan did a good job. the blandness of the elevations at no16, which tries to embrace a seemingly 1930s-esque deco style using those odd windows, is disappointing. at the very least, greater care to elevational treatements and their vertices could have been afforded with very little cost differentials. pity. but then again maybe we’ll all be fooled on its completion and itll surprise us all.

      i personally am aware of proposed designs for phase 3 of the opera house redevelopment with a private developer on board and in fairness, the plans are showing promise and imagination. hopefully the entire quay front will allow for some powerful statements come the next few years. also i hear a private developer is chatting with joe gavin et al about kyrls quay – ooo!

    • #757562
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I have to agree with you, I think its good as well but perhaps a bit to busy in places. Interesting thing for that area along the Quay is what happens to the William Clarke Building (I think thats what the red brick yoke adjacent to the entrance to the Paul Street Car Park is called).

      As for the opera house, I know that Murray O’Laoire did a fair enough job with the front of the building but I always fear that trying to fix what was a bad looking building is a bit like putting lipstick on a pig…..

      @pier39 wrote:

      ill probably be a lone voice here but i actually like 21 lavitts qy. its impact to the rear a far less significant that the impact the new howard holdings hotel will have. the nice thing about paul street and its tributary lanes is that the seem to be pleasantly isolated in their own timewarped microcosm and i think thats part of their appeal.

      it is a pity howard didnt just move onto a different practice, not that ive anything against rorsa but clearly effort was lacking from the no16 design. imagination could have immensely enhanced this site and quayside. i suppose it was a matter of taking advantage of rorsa site knowledge and getting an application in there fast. i fear this building will be another one of those designs people will throw their eyes to heaven each time they pass it in coming years. i dont think 21 lavitts qy beckons the same. its actually quite a clever well finished building and seems to embrace a variety of scales, curvatures and materials which given a bit of variety to what could quite easily have been another bland office building. paddy cashman and clan did a good job. the blandness of the elevations at no16, which tries to embrace a seemingly 1930s-esque deco style using those odd windows, is disappointing. at the very least, greater care to elevational treatements and their vertices could have been afforded with very little cost differentials. pity. but then again maybe we’ll all be fooled on its completion and itll surprise us all.

      i personally am aware of proposed designs for phase 3 of the opera house redevelopment with a private developer on board and in fairness, the plans are showing promise and imagination. hopefully the entire quay front will allow for some powerful statements come the next few years. also i hear a private developer is chatting with joe gavin et al about kyrls quay – ooo!

    • #757563
      sw101
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      The innovative CentrePoint, 9-storey office development by DAT Partnerships. To give you some perspective, this image is shows the western elevation, with No.6 Lapps Quay to the left (south), the Bus Station to the right (north) and Oyster Developments proposal to the west (behind the CentrePoint building). It will be important for the Oyster proposal not to detract from this new building either.

      i can’t get my head around this thing at all. any better images?

    • #757564
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Yes, indeed might I respectfully ask in the earlier context of improving on LATSOCL if it is possible to post better resolution images here that those often going up. Considering it is such an image-rich thread, and effort and time is already put into scanning images, it’s not much more difficult to get a better res. Or invest in a better scanner, they’re only 50 quid in Aldi you know!
      More often than not it is more irritating to have a poor quality image than no image at all. It’d improve the thread no end to have higher quality images.
      Thanks.

      Oh go on then, here’s a smilie 🙂

    • #757565
      sw101
      Participant

      it looks like an art gallery i did in second year. or at least a bad elevation of what i designed. and what’s with the go-faster fin on the right hand side?

    • #757566
      GrahamH
      Participant

      It makes it go faster you see.

    • #757567
      Devin
      Participant

      Like the amps that go up to 11 😀

    • #757568
      lexington
      Participant

      @Graham Hickey wrote:

      Yes, indeed might I respectfully ask in the earlier context of improving on LATSOCL if it is possible to post better resolution images here that those often going up. Considering it is such an image-rich thread, and effort and time is already put into scanning images, it’s not much more difficult to get a better res. Or invest in a better scanner, they’re only 50 quid in Aldi you know!
      More often than not it is more irritating to have a poor quality image than no image at all. It’d improve the thread no end to have higher quality images.
      Thanks.

      Oh go on then, here’s a smilie 🙂

      Point accepted. I genuinely am looking into improving their quality – for a long time I couldn’t get the images up at all or at least compressed to a capable size, so the next stage is adjusting clarity. I agree that it will form an important part of improving the quality of this thread. There’s nothing worse than trying to assess a piece of architecture and not being able to view it clearly.

    • #757569
      altuistic
      Participant

      That Centrepoint building seems to me like a wave or an olympic torch perhaps??? i know the site and i am perplexed as to how they intend to construct such a complicated looking building on such a tiny plot. I read somewhere, here?, that it hung over the pathways. I would think more photographs are needed to understand how the building looks from the quayside and how it affects the other buildings in the area.

    • #757570
      Pug
      Participant

      I’m sure I saw very similar deisgn building in Brussels or Strasbourg, its one of the European Commission Buildings, or the European Court of Human Rights (Basically the European something or other!!)

    • #757571
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      lexington – is the DAT Partnership image shown an Eastern elevation? With No. 6 Lapps Quay +Oliver Plunkett St to the left and bus station to the right +behind?

      What do people think of this? As much as can be understood of the building from the image anyhow? I think it has some potential – although i would have preferred something a little sharper and triangular – with a bit more definition – in relation to the specific nature of the site – this building looks like its trying to escape the site, as opposed to reflecting its particular configuration – however i would be fairly positive – but would love to see more images – as well as more impressions of the E-Project’s proposals next door

    • #757572
      pier39
      Participant

      @sw101 wrote:

      it looks like an art gallery i did in second year. or at least a bad elevation of what i designed. and what’s with the go-faster fin on the right hand side?

      all it needs now is a bass tube and some bling bling rims!!!!! ‘pimp my office building’, y’all.

      like bunch i was expecting a flatiron building type structure on the site given its triangular shape and though i think such a sharp styled structure could have risen higher given its sharper punctuation of the skyline, i have to say i was pleasantly surprised when i saw this image. ive also seen a montage perspective of the building from eglinton st and from that viewpoint its looks a little bulky. from a birdseye perspective the go-faster fin actually teardrops the building off nicely.

    • #757573
      securityman
      Participant

      I also think 21 lavvitts quay is a great development and adds to the city the thing is we need to move forward with innovative and appealing buildings. The city needs to get rid of the derilict buildings and at last that seems to be happening. When they revamped the front of the opera house they should have looked at the wall facing the quay because as they say dont judge a book by its cover the inside could do with a major revampl aswell.

      Does anyone know where Rockfell Investments are based as I cannot seem to find a number for them in connection with the guy building.

      Did you see that Tom McCarthy has got the go ahead for a major development in Macroom does anyone know who is going to build it.

    • #757574
      lisam
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      I also think 21 lavvitts quay is a great development and adds to the city the thing is we need to move forward with innovative and appealing buildings. The city needs to get rid of the derilict buildings and at last that seems to be happening. When they revamped the front of the opera house they should have looked at the wall facing the quay because as they say dont judge a book by its cover the inside could do with a major revampl aswell.

      Does anyone know where Rockfell Investments are based as I cannot seem to find a number for them in connection with the guy building.

      Did you see that Tom McCarthy has got the go ahead for a major development in Macroom does anyone know who is going to build it.

      Rockfell Investments is owned by the O Donoghue Ring family who own Munster Joinery in Ballydesmond. The address used in the planning application is Lacka Cross, Ballydesmond.

      Tom McCarthys job in MAcroom hasnt gone out for tender yet so no contractor has been selected.

    • #757575
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      I’m sure I saw very similar deisgn building in Brussels or Strasbourg

      Not sure what building in Cork you’re referring to, but the building currently seeking planning for Revenue looks very similar to one on Rue Belliard (on the left as you head from Froissart towards town (or the European Parliament) in Brussels, right down to large wooden beams running vertically inside the glass front. As for as I know its a Commission building of some kind.

    • #757576
      lexington
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      Does anyone know where Rockfell Investments are based as I cannot seem to find a number for them in connection with the guy building.

      Did you see that Tom McCarthy has got the go ahead for a major development in Macroom does anyone know who is going to build it.

      Rockfell Investments,
      c/o Munster Joinery,
      Lacka Cross,
      Ballydesmond,
      Cork

      As far as I know, and I’m open for correction on this, so feel free – but Munster Joinery’s construction (Darragh Dubh – is it?) element are constructing the project themselves…anyone???



      bunch – yes the image is taken from an eastern perspective looking west. The bus station is right and No.6 Lapps Quay is to the left.

      I’ll do my best to get more images in the future – the project is now in Further Information.



      sw101 – do you have an images you could share of the ‘Gallery’ you design which helms some resemblance to the DAT Partnerships building? :confused: 😮

    • #757577
      who_me
      Participant

      @Devin wrote:

      Provided they can integrate and co-exist happily…….which is not the case on Lavitt’s Quay in my opinion.

      That’s fair enough. Though given the dreadful multi-storey car parks just behind the quayside, I think that area is a prime candidate for some taller buildings to mask them. With those in place, No.21 shouldn’t look so out of place.

      I do agree with you on No. 16 wholeheartedly, I don’t care much for it at all.

    • #757578
      Pug
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      Not sure what building in Cork you’re referring to,

      i was talking about the one proposed by DAT partnerships

    • #757579
      sw101
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      sw101 – do you have an images you could share of the ‘Gallery’ you design which helms some resemblance to the DAT Partnerships building? :confused: 😮

      i threw out that portfolio years ago. utter rubbish. who are DAT partnerships, architects?

    • #757580
      redabbeyredux
      Participant

      DAT – drug action teams – they are big buzz across the water. Maybe that explains why the building looks like the bowl of an enormous hash pipe.

    • #757581
      lexington
      Participant

      A large residential development site near Curraheen Greyhound Stadium at Riversdale in Bishopstown is believed to have been sold for a figure in excess of 11m euros to Declan O’Mahony’s BrideView Developments. The 6-acre site, abutting the new Ballincollig By-Pass, had been guiding at a figure of around 10m euros through auctioneers Irish & European. The site comes with full planning permission (attained by former owner Jerimiah Lynch) for a high-density residential scheme of 123 units, creche and community centre designed by Murray O’Laoire Architects.

      “The accommodation is comprised of dual aspect apartments, own door access duplex units and ‘empty nester’ units, designed to appeal to persons downsizing from larger dwellings in the area,” according to MOLA. “The proposed development will articulate the transition in scale from the domestic scale of the suburban housing to the grand scale of the new Bypass. The design will form a landmark when viewed from the roadway, denoting the western extent of the greater Cork conurbation. Buildings are planned around the perimeter of the site, enclosing a parkland type interior which terminates in a boardwalk running parallel to the Twopot River.”


      I’ll try and get some better images sometime in the future so that the design can be assessed in better detail.

    • #757582
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Okay I know this is a little off the canter, but it’s nice to see O’Callaghan Properties are thinking outside the box. They are shortly applying for permission to change use, partly, of the ‘Tall Order’ restaurant which consumes a vast majority of the upper floor at their North Main Street Shopping Centre, for use as a skating rink! Whether that’s ice, skateboarding or a hark back to those classic days of 1970s roller-discos, I don’t yet know – but it should make for an interesting addition. At least their thinking beyond the standard residential, retail or office box – there’s a whole other market out there that seems completely untouched, and its not associated with the aforementioned uses. OCP seem to be, with this plan, to be tapping into a shrapnel of this market.

      Looks like I had better raid that dusty old cupboard for my old skates! – and look a right fool when I’m the oldest person there and everyone else has a skateboard. :p

    • #757583
      altuistic
      Participant

      I see Mick Murphy wasted no time in getting an objection in on the Frinilla building next to Top Motors.

      i’ll be honest with you, and I’m not living so far away, i’ve no problem really with this building, its not stunning by any means but its not a bad design. I wont be putting on an objection to this after all this road is starting to suit these buildings and not with any great loss. However you can be darn sure if another student accommodation buildings like that lego brick along Victoria Cross was ever again proposed the council can have my twenty euros because that standard is not acceptable in this area or in any area at all. Also i would like to think that the plans for Dennehys garage at the crossroads – does anyone know who is behind that? – should be more befitting of the height of other buildings in this area. Maybe it could be higher facing the health board building but certainly closer to the junction it should be no more than three possibly four floors – that would depend on how well it looks. It would be nice for that development to be a gateway into the Victoria Cross area and the rest of the city and provide a nice border to the residential areas along Wilton road and Model Farm Road which should be preserved in their plesant suburban state. I would be most heartfelt about that.

    • #757584
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Riga Limited, the O’Callaghan Properties SPV, has lodged plans for a new pedestrian and vehicular bridge spanning between its Jurys Hotel redevelopment site and the Western Road. Under condition by ABP regarding the redevelopment, OCP were requested to re-apply for permission regarding the bridge connection. A decision date is set for September the 8th 2005. The bridge is designed by Henry J. Lyons & Partners. Although construction is permitted, no persons occupying the apartment elements of the redevelopment will be permitted to habitat the new units until the bridge is complete. OCP plan to have the bridge up and ready well in advance of the Phase 1 completion.



      🙂 Lyonshall Ltd (Kieran Coughlan and Claire Riordan) have been granted permission to develop an 80,000sq ft (approx) 3 to 4-storey mixed use building designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects as part of the Ursuline Convent redevelopment. The 1st Phase of the 500 residential unit development is set to begin in co-operation with Pierse Construction in the near future. The permitted building will provide a new discount retail store, library, 8 office units, basement car-park and 3 additional retail units.

    • #757585
      lexington
      Participant

      Following UL’s recent adventure into the provision of a new School of Architecture, it would seem that UCC and CIT are assessing the feasibility of such a school for Cork. 4 sites are currently being evaluated, one near the grounds of CIT and UCC’s Business Technology Hub near Curraheen, a further Northside site and 2 other locations. More details on that when/if I hear them.

    • #757586
      DublinLimerick
      Participant

      Aerial photo of Cork

    • #757587
      DublinLimerick
      Participant

      Sorry….. can’t seem to attach pic – will try later.

    • #757588
      lexington
      Participant

      :p Indeed, the aforementioned ‘skating rink’ planned for the North Main Street S.C., which saw OCP set to lodge an application, is intended for use as a 2000sq ft, synthetic ice-rink! Bill Cremin and a partner are hoping to bring the SKIDZ ice-rink to Cork in an innovative venture destined for the ‘Tall Order’ restaurant on the 1st floor of the S.C. The remaining restaurant will provide an associated theme dining ‘experience.’

      You can thank the press for that info because to be honest, I didn’t know anymore beyond what was on the intended application for this one. Thanks!



      Anyway, enjoy the weather – I’m off for a while so take care all!

    • #757589
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I was driving by Blackpool today and saw that PJ Hegartys are after putting up another tower-crane at Blackpool park – its the second one at a development that seems to be flying up. Does anyone know which this tower crane is working on? Is it the hotel? Or offices? The section with the first really tall tower crane seems to be constructing a building of 9 storeys high.

      (Enjoy lex! :))

    • #757590
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As far as i’m aware, the Hotel portion of Blackpool Park is long dropped after planning wrangles.
      The crane now in place is working on a huge extension to the office space already in position. Apparently it is being considered for the Revenue relocation. Although i personally believe it is too far out for OPW to go for.


    • #757591
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Any news on the paperboy statue that was due to be reinstated?

    • #757592
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’ve got no news on it i’m afraid. As I mentioned in a post a few months back, it was due to be put in place opposite the old examiner office entrance on St. Patrick Street. But something must have happened because on the appointed day- no paperboy.
      But, maybe the less said about ‘d paper’ on here these days the better :p


      My sources tell me that City Planners are investigating complaint (s ?) against Frinailla Ltd. with regard to their Lady’s Well development. They had issued letters to residents in the area informing them that they intended to demolish parts of their sizeable complex of buildings in and around Watercourse Road, out in Blackpool.
      This would (i’m told) be prior to a decision by An Bord Pleanala which is due in August on the future of the site. The company have plans for a mixed use development of apartments, underground parking, retail, gym and creche.
      See here for an image of the proposed development. Frinailla’s Lady’s Well

    • #757593
      theblimp
      Participant

      “Any news on the paperboy statue that was due to be reinstated?”

      Probably been sold to someone in Dublin’s docklands so that it can sit alongside the ‘Cill Airne’ and the ‘Jeanie Johnson’!

    • #757594
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Another example of unbuilt Ireland?

      In 1995, UCC asked O’Donnell Tuomey Architects to draw up a development plan for the former Good Shepherd Convent and its lands at Sunday’s Well in Cork. The site was to accommodate a humanities campus for 1,500 students in Phase One. The project was ultimately abandoned but not without leaving us with these interesting ideas on transforming an institutional building.

      The ultimate faith of the convent building is now anybody’s guess.

    • #757595
      Anonymous
      Participant

      A very interesting proposal I wonder will a more contemporary scheme emerge along the same proportions with a newer outer skin?

    • #757596
      securityman
      Participant

      Does anyone know who is behind the new leisure facility on the Old Mallow road that flemings is building and what is actually going in there.

    • #757597
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The leisure centre on the Old Mallow Road near Fitz’ Boreen is by Blackpool Bowl & Leisure Ltd.
      It consists of a Family Recreation Centre, Health & Fitness Club & Day Care Centre compr. 6203sqm. over 4 storeys (ground & first being semi-basement) incl. 2 vehicular entrances, car parking for 154 cars, bicycle parking, service yard, ESB substation & switch room, associated plant, boundary wall & fence, associated landscaping & site works.
      It was granted permission by CCC early in 2002.
      Consists of bowling alley, gym, creche and (I believe) a swimming pool.

    • #757598
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Where’s Lexington these days

    • #757599
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The EchoBoy is Back!!!!

      The Echo Boy statue which had been missing from Cook Street for so long has now been returned to the Streets of Cork.
      It’s situated on St. Patrick’s Street, outside the old Cork Examiner Offices doorway and was unveiled today.
      Since i’ve got this wrong before, here’s a picture to prove it 🙂

    • #757600
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Thanks for that Radioactiveman it was an interesting episode

    • #757601
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Cork COunty Cricket Club have appealled to ABP Cork City COuncil’s decision to grant permission to UCC for the construction of an Outreach and Access building on its lands at MArdyke Gardens adjacent to the new MArdyke Bridge.

    • #757602
      securityman
      Participant

      I see that O’sheas builders are starting work at the back of the wilton shopping centre is this more shops or offices because I know Tesco were turned down planning permission for a petrol station.

      What is happening with East Gate, Little Island I see that they are finnished a major building down there for a while but nobody seems to be moving in I thought Homebase were launching there at the beginningof the year have they pulled out with the number of DIY superstores in the city.

    • #757603
      pier39
      Participant

      blackpool seems to be coming on no end. i think it was lisam was saying that the retail park there is far better than the one at mahon pt given all the hype and i have to agree. its a nice change. the leisure centre should just add to it all.

      anyone hear about any activity along kennedys qy with iaws???

      this place seems a little quiet these days…almost eerie! oooo!

      hey radioactiveman sweet pics there on sundays well. hear frinilla have oriordan staheli working on a nice housing project there.

    • #757604
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Hello!!!

      I see McCarthy developments have had the appeal against their office building for the south docklands (Monahan road/Centre park road???) withdrawn. Thats good news right? Does anyone know whether it will begin construction anytime soon?? 🙂

    • #757605
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Just an update on the new Mardyke Bridge:
      Inside Cork quote CCC sources as saying the bridge will not be open to the public until late October at the earliest!!!!! Still waiting for the paths to put in place. And who’s responsible for putting the paths in place?? That’s right you guessed it: CCC.



      Anybody hear todays news on one on Radio 1? The Irish Examiner (or as he continued to refer to it: The COrk Examiner 🙂 ) got lambasted by Minister Michael McDowell, and rightly so in my opinion.
      But back to architectural matters. Todays Examiner has some splendid images of the proposed new development behind MAhers outdor shop near the Bus station. Importantly they seem to suggest that the old red brick chimney will be preserved. The article also suggest that a planning application will be made in the next few weeks for an office development in the listed building currently occuppied by Mahers.
      The development focused on in the article and images looks impressive. Modern but certainly following a form of the listed building to which it is adjacent. The incorporation of the chimney is crucial and I don’t know has it been done to my satisfaction, but that’s a personal opinion.



      It is very quiet here. But it is the silly season after all! And Lexington I believe is away sunning himself!


      PS regarding Blackpool shopping centre/retail park: It beats Mahon hands down. for diversity of stores, ease of access, and down right Northside charm it comes up thrumps everytime.
      There is simple nothing to attract anyone to Mahon for a second visit. The Farmer’s Market is a great idea, but does smack of desperation- trying to make up fior the fact that there isnt a cake shop, bakery, butchers, deli, etc. in Mahon Point (Tesco Aside).
      I believe Mahon Management have plumbed for the star clothing retailers and therefore reduced the attractiveness of the centre as an all round shopping experience.

    • #757606
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:2mvje3ht]So glad to here that the Echo Boy is back Radioactiveman, you've been talking about him for so long, you must be really chuffed. And Re: Homebase Securityman, I heard they were looking for a place in the Carrigtowhill area (but it might be only roumour). Fire at the new airport terminal, I hope it wont slow down the construction of it.[/font:2mvje3ht] 😉

    • #757607
      securityman
      Participant

      I think a lot of people expected Mahon to wipe the floor with everyone when it opened and it did for the first month when people were fascinated with new stores such Debenhams, Zara, Bershka, Best Menswear etc. which were not anywhere else however they forgot that people spend there money on more than just clothes. An example I give you is that i’m in the process of getting a house at the moment so it was time to check out what to get for the inside of it. Mahon is useless in this area besides B&Q which is a good walk from the centre mind you. On the other hand Blackpool comes up trumps as you have Soundstore for all your appliances, Dunnes Stores is better than TESCO for Bed clothes, cutlery, curtins etc, you also have two options for furniture in Reid and Land of Leather, Argos, maplin Electronics, Carpet Right and not to mention Atlantic Homecare. Aswell as this Blackpool has a fruit and veg shop, butchers, cake shop, shoe repairs, Costa Coffee is class and a pictures that wont leave a big hole in your pocket the prices in the Omniplex are way over the Top.

      There is a couple of big names moving into Ballincollig and i expect this to be a good mixed development with Dunnes, Easons and Carrig Donn so far in there anyone know who else is going in there.

      I see in the Examiner today that Harvey Norman are looking for someone in Cork are they eying up a new store I heard a rumour a while back that they were looking to buy the old Woodies Store??

    • #757608
      pier39
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Todays Examiner has some splendid images of the proposed new development behind MAhers outdor shop near the Bus station. Importantly they seem to suggest that the old red brick chimney will be preserved. The article also suggest that a planning application will be made in the next few weeks for an office development in the listed building currently occuppied by Mahers.
      The development focused on in the article and images looks impressive. Modern but certainly following a form of the listed building to which it is adjacent. The incorporation of the chimney is crucial and I don’t know has it been done to my satisfaction, but that’s a personal opinion.


      got any pics of that new office development? any scans? i was kinda semi dreading this when i heard about it given that the eproject architects havent really impressed me so far. if anyone could get a scan it would be well sweet. im an irish times person myself sorry!!! hehe

      the chimney is very important i would have been really p***ed off if that was lost.

    • #757609
      corkhack
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      I see that O’sheas builders are starting work at the back of the wilton shopping centre is this more shops or offices because I know Tesco were turned down planning permission for a petrol station.

      What is happening with East Gate, Little Island I see that they are finnished a major building down there for a while but nobody seems to be moving in I thought Homebase were launching there at the beginningof the year have they pulled out with the number of DIY superstores in the city.

      Its the new library

    • #757610
      jungle
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      I see in the Examiner today that Harvey Norman are looking for someone in Cork are they eying up a new store I heard a rumour a while back that they were looking to buy the old Woodies Store??

      Noooooo!!!! Does that mean we’ll be getting their ads on local radio too… 🙁

    • #757611
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:3n9n6b7z]It was front page news on the Echo today, PC World and Currys are opening within the next few months in Mahon Point. I didn't even here rumours that they were opening up in Cork and what a shock I got when I saw it on the frontpage. Thats some good news for Mahon, should balance things out between there and Blackpool. Didn't here that Harvey Normans wanted to buy the old Woodies, but they want to open up 3 new stores in Ireland over the coming years. I've been in one or two of their shops in Australia, didn't think they were that great though.[/font:3n9n6b7z] 😉

    • #757612
      lexington
      Participant

      Hello,

      and what beautifully depressing weather to return to. Ah well, home sweet home – albeit a very wet one. At least now I look like a lobster on a skewer. 😀

      Anyway,

      I hear interesting news came of Academy Street, Paul Street and Cornmarket Street while I was away. Must look up on that. Hope you’re all well.

      Also, I’ve taken on board what many of you have said, and I am looking into improving image qualities soon – so that blurry type images can be improved on, but it may be a few weeks away yet – but progress should be on the way.

    • #757613
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      great to have you back Lex. Seriously, this is a great site and thanks to you, RM, and all the regular posters, and to Paul at HQ. A great resource for info from afar. Just to let you know that it is certainly appreciated on my side of the pond.
      Interestingly, was looking at Cork and Dublin on Google Earth…seems like they have the major cities covered (partially at least). Well worth checking out if you guys get the chance.

    • #757614
      lexington
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      great to have you back Lex. Seriously, this is a great site and thanks to you, RM, and all the regular posters, and to Paul at HQ. A great resource for info from afar. Just to let you know that it is certainly appreciated on my side of the pond.
      Interestingly, was looking at Cork and Dublin on Google Earth…seems like they have the major cities covered (partially at least). Well worth checking out if you guys get the chance.

      Thanks corcaighboy – that really does mean a lot, and I’m sure all those who so very importantly contribute to this thread and to the headhonchos that keep this site so valuably alive are always pleased and appreciative to hear such words! 🙂

      I agree, the Google Earth resource is a most interesting resource – it may be a little out of date, but it certainly is addictive and wonderful to behold.

      The next few weeks and months look set to bring some very interesting developments and additions to the Cork architectural scene so I’m looking forward very much to seeing them evolve. Academy Street isn’t too far away with a lodgement believed to be set for late September/early October – plus plans to link the retail centres at Paul Street and Cornmarket Street look set to again be on the cards. You may remember a few months back I indicated that Paul Street SC was in line for a complete overhaul – well, from what I’ve heard since I returned, that indeed looks set to be true. As far as I know, and I am open to correction on this, 2008 looks set to be the completion date for the new linked and refurbished complexes in their entirety for Cornmarket, Paul and Academy Streets.



      Parnell Place Hotel Plan

      🙂 Also, I was delighted to hear that Monaghan-based Pitwood Ltd have lodged (at long last) their Further Information (Revised Plans) for the almost famous site at 17/18 Parnell Place and Beasley Street. The site, owned by Corbett Bros., saw plans lodged last December for a 5-storey, 121-bedroom hotel with underground car-park and basement spa. The plans for the luxury hotel saw Further Information requested of them last February by CCC – seeking an address on issues including those of height at the southern elevation and its impact on 93 South Mall (a PS). This site has been subject to numerous planning applications and left vacant for years – the big thing about it are the facades at Parnell Place (both PS) at No.17/18. An image is linked below and compliments of d_d_dallas – the site is to the rear and the development will tastefully incorporate these facades (after they receive badly needed treatment). I haven’t seen the Significant Further Information yet, as I was away, but I felt the original plan was good and hopefully the impact on 93 South Mall has been successfully addressed. Further Info was received on the 20th of July 2005 and has a due date set for the 16th of August 2005. Now, hopefully, long overdue work can begin on refurbishing the aforementioned facades. Niall Fitzsimons & Co. are the Consulting Engineers on the project.

      Parnell Place Facades – posted by d_d_dallas

    • #757615
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Thanks corcaighboy – that really does mean a lot, and I’m sure all those who so very importantly contribute to this thread and to the headhonchos that keep this site so valuably alive are always pleased and appreciative to hear such words! 🙂

      I agree, the Google Earth resource is a most interesting resource – it may be a little out of date, but it certainly is addictive and wonderful to behold.

      The next few weeks and months look set to bring some very interesting developments and additions to the Cork architectural scene so I’m looking forward very much to seeing them evolve. Academy Street isn’t too far away with a lodgement imminent – plus plans to link the retail centres at Paul Street and Cornmarket Street look set to again be on the cards. You may remember a few months back I indicated that Paul Street SC was in line for a complete overhaul – well, from what I’ve heard since I returned, that indeed looks set to be true. As far as I know, and I am open to correction on this, 2008 looks set to be the completion date for the new linked and refurbished complexes in their entirety for Cornmarket, Paul and Academy Streets.

      ocp are also looking to include the North Main Street shopping centre in their upgrade/academy street plans!

    • #757616
      altuistic
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      The next few weeks and months look set to bring some very interesting developments and additions to the Cork architectural scene so I’m looking forward very much to seeing them evolve. Academy Street isn’t too far away with a lodgement imminent – plus plans to link the retail centres at Paul Street and Cornmarket Street look set to again be on the cards. You may remember a few months back I indicated that Paul Street SC was in line for a complete overhaul – well, from what I’ve heard since I returned, that indeed looks set to be true. As far as I know, and I am open to correction on this, 2008 looks set to be the completion date for the new linked and refurbished complexes in their entirety for Cornmarket, Paul and Academy Streets.


      Yes i agree that this (Academy St) will be an “interesting” development as you put it, most certainly it could provide a very important element to the city centre but what i’ll be watching for in particular is the impact such a large building will have on such an important and historic quarter of our city. this huge building seems to be laced with and touching important architectural buildings like the steps outside that corner bar on Pana and is near the Crawford. Also the view from Emmett Place will be very visible and I am concerned that a poor design will adversely affect this area. I am counting heavily on a strong and good design is submitted. also the old Cork Examiner offices along Academy street are very unique and historic too, a little ugly, but the detail seems rare and important. The building such do its best to compliment them.

      as for the links? How exactly to the intendto link Academy street with Paul Street and Cornmarket street and Northmain street shopping centres??? Underground?? I cant imagine any over street links. This would be disastrous for the street scapes. Also if its underground especially from Paul street to Academy Street how could such a sensitive street area be affected? I would presume the link would go under Pauls Lane, maybe under Matthews centre (my son tells me they are seeking to redevelop soon? any truth in this?) and across to Academy Street? If this is the case this may explain why the corporation are hesitating to fix the awful road works damage that has plagued Half Moon Street for years. It was a lovely new pedestrian area and is now ripped up with cheap tarmac filling and potholes.

    • #757617
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 It would seem masterplans that were believed to have been assessed by the Ford Motor Co. for their 11-acre docklands site in the Marina Park area have been shelved and the land now (across the road to the north from the Munster Agricultural Showgrounds) looks set to be put on the market – this important site is expected to fetch in the region of 20m euros for the motor company and will offer any prospective developer one of the most important docklands site in Cork ever to hit the market. The development potential is huge and will require substantial investment – however educational/institutional uses have been touted. Of course this will be subject to negotiation. The site is one of the largest single land holdings in the central docklands area to come available.

    • #757618
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 It would seem masterplans that were believed to have been assessed by the Ford Motor Co. for their 11-acre docklands site in the Marina Park area have been shelved and the land now (across the road to the north from the Munster Agricultural Showgrounds) looks set to be put on the market – this important site is expected to fetch in the region of 20m euros for the motor company and will offer any prospective developer one of the most important docklands site in Cork ever to hit the market. The development potential is huge and will require substantial investment – however educational/institutional uses have been touted. Of course this will be subject to negotiation. The site is one of the largest single land holdings in the central docklands area to come available.

      This project would represent the end of an era for the Marina, away from manufacturing and onwards to bigger and better things.

      This area of the city has so much undeveloped potential… riverside walk, mature treescaped, an within easy reach of the city.

      Pity about the esb power plant though.

    • #757619
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      This project would represent the end of an era for the Marina, away from manufacturing and onwards to bigger and better things.

      This area of the city has so much undeveloped potential… riverside walk, mature treescaped, an within easy reach of the city.

      Pity about the esb power plant though.

      It would certainly be a vital step. CCC are currently tendering for consultants on preparation of a South Docklands Area Plan, similar to the one already published for the Northern Docklands. The successful developer for the Ford site will undoubtedly be subject to some of the guidelines CCC intend to initiate here – however, given empirical developments, I would hope they will afford imagination and flexibility with respect to this site in particular. As far as the South Docklands go, I think among the many important sites therein, Kennedy Quay (IAWS lands) and Marina Commercial Park, stand out. The ESB seem to have no intention of moving as far as can be seen – which is unfortunate from a development perspective – but clever architecture and client imagination will be able to minimise even ‘mask’ the unsightly power-station to some effect.



      Also, got my first look at Oyster Developments office development plans for Deane Street – only Phase 1 of the e-Project designed proposal of 7-storeys. In my own opinion, in does absolutely nothing for me, but that’s simply my belief. The northern elevation is merely a bland red-brick wall and I don’t think the project compliments No.8 Parnell Place – but before I decide my mind, I’ll await to see the full plans in Phase 2. I should have images up soon – not the good quality ones yet I’m afraid, that issue is still a work in progress I can assure you. 😉

    • #757620
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      wrt to ESB plant – I quite like it and think attempts to mask it should be resisted. It has the one downside of being an actual working power plant and therefore any expectations that the ESB will move any time soon are highly unrealistic (and against public interest).

    • #757621
      lexington
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      wrt to ESB plant – I quite like it and think attempts to mask it should be resisted. It has the one downside of being an actual working power plant and therefore any expectations that the ESB will move any time soon are highly unrealistic (and against public interest).

      I suppose I should have chosen my words more carefully – rather than the idea of ‘mask’ it, I should have more specifically outlined that I mean for any new developments that spring up around it, should incorporate as I said “clever architecture” to reduce the impact the new proposals may adversely attain from the power-station. Indeed d_d_dallas I can see the charm the plant sort of has – in a sort of really toned down Battersea way – and it has huge potential alternate uses in a redeveloped project which maintains the ‘hull’ – but to me, it still looks boxy. Point taken however. 🙂

    • #757622
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Battersea Liteâ„¢

    • #757623
      lexington
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      Battersea Liteâ„¢

      Here’s a link to a 360degree internall look-about of the power station – if anyone is interested. What I’m really hoping to find is an up-to-date image of the station as view from Horgan’s Quay, or better still the Lower Glanmire Road approach roach to the city centre. It should give a nice perspective of the power-station and its relationship to the docklands/city centre. It’ll also provide a view of one of Cork’s more interesting industrial building styles – as is quoted above, Battersea Lite :p – still ugly though!!! 😀

      If anyone has any images of the above before I get them, please post them, it would be well appreciated! Thanks!

    • #757624
      St Luke
      Participant

      Good to have you back, Lex. 😉

      For what they are worth, here are some maps, illustrating distribution privately rented and public housing accomodation in the City according to the 2002 census.

      URL=http://img327.imageshack.us/my.php?image=housesprivatelex4yf.jpg][/URL]

      Also a look at the public housing in the city –

      [/URL

    • #757625
      lexington
      Participant
      St Luke wrote:
      Good to have you back, Lex. ]

      Thanks a million St Luke, and thanks for the graphs.

      It’s most interesting – and will make a very valuable and interesting comparison come the next Census. With the current level of activity in the Cork market, I’m anxious to see how things will have changed over the years. Could we be in for some surprises??? 😮 Any predictions?

    • #757626
      lexington
      Participant

      This is in part a mix-match of extracts from the little ‘report’ I compiled called Cork: Has it’s time come? – I had hope to publish extracts from it over time – but as with anything like that, it was excessively long-winded, and unfortunately the news changes so fast its hard to keep it up-to-date. Also this section, concerning development in the city, is pretty routed in things like market forces and projections, lots of boring economic speak. I’m basically patching some of this together to tie-in with issues concerning the South Docklands, due to the increased volume of talk about it lately – especially with the announcement that the Ford site is coming up for sale and that another project is taking up shape very smartly.

      “…with Manor Park, Werdna and the like making powerful strides in the north docklands – the south docklands would seem to be formulating their own equally impressive ‘masterplans’…”

      “…almost hot off their City Quarter project, largely credited with kicking off the docklands rejuvenation symbolically – Howard Holdings are now preparing a masterplan for a large scale docklands vision which they intend to submit to the powers that be in Cork City Council…” [Howard Holdings have, since, actually submitted this plan. “…the plan sets the ambition bar high. Though details are not wholly clear at the time of writing, it is expected that should CCC take note of the plan, Howard intend to be heavily involved in the plans enactment giving them a powerful say in the shape and form that the southern docklands will take in the years to come,,,”

      “…of course there have been consistent rumours designed over the Munster Agricultural Showgrounds and Pairc Ui Chaoimh. The GAA indeed had looked (and it can only be assumed, are still noting) a hotel and stadium refurbishment plan. However, in the shadows it would seem even bigger plans may be afoot”

      “…Gerry Wycherly’s Marina Commercial Park offers a vital step in the rejuvenation of the docklands. Mr. Wycherly has involvement with Omnistone & Brooklyn Properties, who are involved in developing the highly successful Cork Airport Business Park. The Park is complex from a development perspective in many dimensions, not least the numerous tenants which occupy it and foundation issues…” “…but what could prove more interesting and perhaps earlier, is the nicely positioned 2-acre site to the west of Marina Commercial Park which sold quietly last year through Cohalan Downing & Associates for an estimated €8m…”

      There is more, but this post is long enough.

      Just note that this was written nearly 3-months ago and many details may need updating and alteration as new information has become available. Don’t take it too seriously, just as a bit of light reading and partial insight – I’ve tried to keep most of the info there-in based on information that has already in some part been allowed into the public domain. I will update any new or needed details when/if these projects come to fruition and alter them appropriately to comply with accuracy and any revelated transfigurations the projects may have endured in the time that has since gone. What’s important here is for you to be able to see the designs and ideas are being formulated for the area – and that these ideas will substantially alter this environment. Given their scale, strong architectural values must be stressed and met – their nature demands high quality and innovation.

    • #757627
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      Originally Posted by securityman
      I see in the Examiner today that Harvey Norman are looking for someone in Cork are they eying up a new store I heard a rumour a while back that they were looking to buy the old Woodies Store??

      Noooooo!!!! Does that mean we’ll be getting their ads on local radio too… 🙁

      Word is they’re fitting out the old Woddies site on Kinsale Road… thats the rumour anyway…

    • #757628
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:8hwqcj4q]When completed, will Eglington Street replace Cork County Hall as Ireland's tallest building, or is there some other building in Dublin going to steal the proud title???[/font:8hwqcj4q] :confused:

    • #757629
      redabbeyredux
      Participant

      From what I’ve read, the Eglinton Street tower will be taller than Cork County Hall, so if it gets built before some of those yokes proposed for Dublin, it will briefly have that title. I reckon that that location could take an even higher structure anyway, which would help to slim down the slightly squat appearance of the east and west elevations.

    • #757630
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      [font=Arial:1migufx2]When completed, will Eglington Street replace Cork County Hall as Ireland's tallest building, or is there some other building in Dublin going to steal the proud title???[/font:1migufx2] :confused:

      Eglinton Street will top 70m – whereas the newly revamped Cork County Hall will edge just above its current 66m in height.

      Paul Keogh’s Tall Building planned for the OPW project at Heuston Gate is 32 storeys and is expected to touch on 117m – I’m not clear on the construction dates for this project. If Eglinton Street is completed prior to the Dublin projects it should become the country’s tallest building – however it should be noted that Eglinton Street & Water Street are not the only high-rise plans for Cork and Eglinton Street is not the tallest planned (that is of course unless other proposals are to face alterations or are simply not proceeded with),

    • #757631
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      OPW 32 storey will be the tallest (by far) but project unlikely to proceed for years. Note 100m planned for point village and south docks so Eglinton (and indeed County Hall) will feature far down any list. Assuming Eglinton commences in near future it will have the crown for a while.

    • #757632
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:2ww910eb]Oh my god, I've never heard of a building in Cork topping 100m. Can someone give me more info. about the other “high” rise projects of the city. I've only heard of the names but thought they were like some urban myth or something. Where are they going to be built if/when they get the go ahead (or have they already recieved the green light, I cudda been living like a hermet under a rock while all these projects came about)?? And sorry if ye gotta repeat what I missed out on.[/font:2ww910eb] :confused:

    • #757633
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      [font=Arial:2a5vzk5u]Oh my god, I've never heard of a building in Cork topping 100m. Can someone give me more info. about the other “high” rise projects of the city. I've only heard of the names but thought they were like some urban myth or something. Where are they going to be built if/when they get the go ahead (or have they already recieved the green light, I cudda been living like a hermet under a rock while all these projects came about)?? And sorry if ye gotta repeat what I missed out on.[/font:2a5vzk5u] :confused:

      A-ha I think d_d_dallas was actually referring to the projects in Dublin not Cork. The high-rise projects in Cork that have been through or in planning are O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street project which rises 17-storeys and is 70m – this Wilson Architecture designed project has been greenlit by CCC. Images are located in this thread and in the Look at de State of Cork, like! thread also. Images can also be found there of the Murray O’Laoire designed project for Water Street by Werdna Limited – this 17-storey tower rises 56m and is currently in appeal after CCC conditioned out the tower.

      Additional high-rise plans for Cork are in the pipeline with the docklands being the focus. I will update you on those when the respective developers decide to go public with them – if they do that is. Manor Park may have something interesting at Horgan’s Quay. 😮

      Other proposals that have been put before Cork have been a 59m 15-storey tower by O’Brien & O’Flynn Ltd designed by Dennehy + Dennehy Designs which had been proposed for Silversprings in Tivoli. The tower was refused by both CCC and on appeal to ABP.

      Hope that clarifies any confusion. 😉

    • #757634
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:qmov11i1]Thanks for the info. Yeah, thought buildings in excess of 100m was too good to be true for Cork. Shame the Water Street development was changed, I prefered it when the tower was in the middle, it looked more symetrical and very classy. Another botched job by the planning authorities! It looks very similar if not identical to some apartments that were built in London's docklands last year (don't ask me the name, I'm after forgetting).
      And whats this I read in the Echo today…… Cork's two airbridges still in consideration by the DAA, fools. Maybe their plan is to turn Cork into a little regional airport like Waterford or Sligo so we'll be forced to use Dublin Airport to leave the country. What will the people from New York think when they arrive into Cork airport only having to find they have to sprint across the tarmac! First world country, third class facilities!
      [/font:qmov11i1] 😡

    • #757635
      sw101
      Participant

      oh mein eyes.

    • #757636
      lexington
      Participant

      @sw101 wrote:

      oh mein eyes.

      Ach mein leibe! Yeah some pretty funky colours there! :p But at least it livens the text up a little. Why not! (Kind of ‘Swinging Seventies London-ish’ don’t you think? 😀 )

      @A-ha wrote:

      Thanks for the info. Yeah, thought buildings in excess of 100m was too good to be true for Cork. Shame the Water Street development was changed, I prefered it when the tower was in the middle, it looked more symetrical and very classy. Another botched job by the planning authorities! It looks very similar if not identical to some apartments that were built in London’s docklands last year (don’t ask me the name, I’m after forgetting).
      And whats this I read in the Echo today…… Cork’s two airbridges still in consideration by the DAA, fools. Maybe their plan is to turn Cork into a little regional airport like Waterford or Sligo so we’ll be forced to use Dublin Airport to leave the country. What will the people from New York think when they arrive into Cork airport only having to find they have to sprint across the tarmac! First world country, third class facilities!

      I agree Water Street was more symmetrical in its original form – I also think the design was a little more fussy, but not in a strictly negative sense. Either way, the revised form isn’t all that bad either. I think it’s a good scheme, I take the CCC point about the repetitiveness of the scheme, in most cases I would agree, but I think in the individual context of this scheme, it is actually suited and hence Water Street does seem to work in a nice way. I wholly agree about creating distinctive landmark buildings, and a point has been made that any highrise must be of a strong and complimentary aesthetic nature, I endorse that – I loathe the idea of monotonous highrise blocks which supposedly given skyline distinction based on their height. I don’t buy that, if a highrise is going to be proposed, it has to earn its right to add to the skyline in terms of strong, distinctive aesthetics. I still feel the nautical looking Water Street scheme works – but we’ll see how the appeal works out.

      Also, regarding height, I don’t think we should look at the height of a building as being a reason for joy, it should more be the nature of its design we should look at. Indeed I agree and support the promotion of some highrise in the docklands area – I think the city stands to earn no harm from a little skyline distinction – but as said before, the building must be judged on the quality of its design and usage first and foremost. A building could be 120m for all I care, but if it doesn’t add positively, it shouldn’t add at all.

      I think with each new project, better standards need to keep being pressed. Eglinton Street and Water Street seem to have been a positive start, but it can’t stop there. Hopefully, the docklands development will support this ideology increasingly so as it unfolds.

      Also, I agree the airport does need airbridges. Yes I know about Ryanair and Aer Lingus – but I don’t think that should be the issue at heart. I was literally soaked through to the skin from the run between aircraft and terminal the other day after arriving home! Shannon seems to be getting another 3 airbridges interestingly enough. From what I do know, despite the chat, Cork will be getting its 2 airbridges with an option on a 3rd and 4th, at the CAA’s expense in the future.

    • #757637
      jackwade
      Participant

      Lex, forgive my ignorance, but what is the stadium located to the right of the highlighted docklands site? Is it Pairc Ui Chaoimh or Turner’s Cross? Or something else? It’s really been bugging me.

    • #757638
      lisam
      Participant

      @jackwade wrote:

      Lex, forgive my ignorance, but what is the stadium located to the right of the highlighted docklands site? Is it Pairc Ui Chaoimh or Turner’s Cross? Or something else? It’s really been bugging me.

      It’s Pairc Ui Chaoimh

    • #757639
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Speaking of Turner’s Cross, the Munster FA just got funding for the re-development of the ground. This mainly involves rdemolotion of the exisiting structure and changing rooms at the Shed End and roofing the St. Anne’s end. The drawings are available for download/viewing from the Cork City FC site http://corkcityfc.ie/home.htm.
      Not the most inspiring of designs, but I guess to someone who spent many a rain-sodden Sunday afternoon standing on a muddy grass bank at ‘the Box’ all those years ago, it is a mighty improvement!
      Functional is proabbly the best way to desribe it. Will bring the ground up to 7,000 all seated capacity once complete. Presently the Shed End is a terrace and thus not open when City play European matches. I do hope, however, that the seats are laid out in such a way that there is some degree of leg-room. The seats at the St. Anne’s end are great if you are a mouse!

    • #757640
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:w8gt124f]Ich bin sehr erbärmlich, wenn mein farbenfreudiges Schreiben Ihren Augen nicht anpasst, aber ich versuche, einer Konversation ein Licht zu bringen.
      Glad ye all noticed, thx lex, I was going for the Carnaby Street boho look alright. As long as we get our 2 airbridges, I'm happy! The CAA has no problem forcing the DAA to pay for these new air bridges, but I doubt the third and fourth will come as easily as the CAA themsleves will have to pay for them.
      Es tut ich Leid, den mein Deutsch nicht gut ist. (Sorry my German isn't any good).[/font:w8gt124f]
      :rolleyes:

    • #757641
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:1awng546]And it just clicked to me, why am I the only one using colours….. it isn't the middle ages you know, we're allowed to bring light to a conversation without being flogged by the local church for having some amount of fun! Lets make the other forums envious of us!![/font:1awng546] 😮

    • #757642
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      [font=Arial:2s6qesyq]Ich bin sehr erbärmlich, wenn mein farbenfreudiges Schreiben Ihren Augen nicht anpasst, aber ich versuche, einer Konversation ein Licht zu bringen.
      Glad ye all noticed, thx lex, I was going for the Carnaby Street boho look alright. As long as we get our 2 airbridges, I'm happy! The CAA has no problem forcing the DAA to pay for these new air bridges, but I doubt the third and fourth will come as easily as the CAA themsleves will have to pay for them.
      Es tut ich Leid, den mein Deutsch nicht gut ist. (Sorry my German isn't any good).[/font:2s6qesyq]
      :rolleyes:

      It’s better than mine, Halt Swine-hunt!!! Auchtung etc…… 😀

    • #757643
      lexington
      Participant

      Well as I promised, here are some images of the Oyster Developments plan for Deane Street, which forms part 1 of a 2 phase initiative. The 7-storey office development is designed by Sabine Wittman of The e-Project and is ultimately expected to house up to 50,000sq ft of office space. Interestingly, David Crowe’s Oyster Developments originally planned a 16-storey office building/tower (I kid you not) for the site – however consequent of discussions with City Manager Joe Gavin, the site was deemed unsuitable. The plan had been to shift the focus away from Merchant’s Quay S.C. and the Bus Station nearby as the main source of visual contact on the eastern end of the city centre island. However, Oyster and Mount Kennett Investments may indeed be seeking to develop a high-rise structure elsewhere (and not too far away geographically) at some point in the future – supposedly. Should the project be greenlit, Lisney are expected to handle sales. The building from what I understand, will either be sold whole, or on a floor-by-floor basis.

      The 1st Image views the development from Parnell Place/Anderson’s Quay.

      The 2nd Image provides a perspective of the Northern Elevation, facing the Bus Station, from Clontarf Street.

      The final image is kinked I’m afraid, my own fault for not properly flattening the image during the scan. But it offers a perspective nonetheless from Clontarf Street-City Quarter looking toward the development’s Eastern elevation. This will ultimately be masked by DAT Partnerships’ CentrePoint designed by Daniel Luxton of Coughlan de Keyser, whose site can been seen in the foreground.

      My own personal opinion? Well, I welcome the development, but I question its design and relation to the protected structures at No.8 Parnell Place (which can be seen in the 1st image) and the former industrial chimney to the south of this project. The northern elevation is excessively bland and dominating with its red-brick/(sandstone homage?) facade facing the Bus Station. But, in the interests of fairness, I’ll seize my judgement until I see the full scheme – including Phase 2.



      😀 I have been plaguing certain individuals regarding Manor Park Homes (MPH) plans for Horgan’s Quay, in conjunction with CIE. Persons involved with €500m redevelopment project I think are finally ready to flip, so to shut me up, they have been releasing some tid-bits on their plans for me to post up on this thread. I should hope, that in the time leading up to the planning application, I may be able to afford you more details – all subject. The planning date is now earmarked for September/October of this year – I’ll let you know if that changes in the meantime.



      😮 I can’t remember who asked this sometime ago, but it just hit me that I never answered – it was a question regarding the due date for the Water Street appeal, well ABP’s earmarked date is September 19th 2005 for anyone interested.



      :rolleyes: Also, just re: image qualities – the equipment I want to get is on the market next week so I’ll see what the story is then. It would indeed be nice to upgrade the quality.

    • #757644
      fkearney
      Participant

      It was announced this afternoon (27 July 2005) that the Lewis Glucksman Gallery has been shortlisted for the Stirling Prize.

      William Hill are offering 7-2 odds.

      The shortlist includes six buildings including Zaha Hadid’s BMW factory in Germany and the new Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh. More on this story on Guardian homepagehttp://society.guardian.co.uk/urbandesign/story/0,11200,1537128,00.html

      The Lewis Glucksman Gallery is the RIAI Best Public Building in Ireland 2005

      RIBA 2005 Award winner in European category

      2005 Project of the Year, UK Buildings Services Awards

    • #757645
      pier39
      Participant

      good for the glucksman! the plan should be to get the city’s name up into those nominations more often!

      im not as technically apt as some of the feckin whizzs on here so my pic above aint great but i cant say this is a pretty creature. this is the oyster developments office building for dean st on the old obrien premises right??? look at the chimney (my skills in full show as i highlight it with a circle), its totally dominated by the new block. and whats with all the brick? faceless. dont know about this. even after consultations when my yang-yang spirtual guide thing and all that, im finding it hard to give it my love. is it too plain or something? the chimney seems lost, like its trying to scrap or climb up the side of the wall of the new building to get some sunshine. arent there some houses just to the south of this? and a adult shop…not that i know anything about that…or have a tab with the place. 😀 hey its natural to be curious anyway! i know a few of the houses and the adult store have been the subject of some big buys lately. could it be oyster on a spree again with some further intentions? or someone else? anyone?

      also may i just add in the spirit of all this german that ich hatte eine sehr gestörte kindheit und ich versuche noch, über ihr zu erhalten, followed by my deepest arnold schwarzenegger laugh – ha – ha – ha.! 😉

    • #757646
      A-ha
      Participant

      Sorry about your disturbed childhood pier39, i’m glad to see your trying to cheer yourself up with laughter ha ha ha. I like that Oyster building thingy, it looks as if it will suit the area, it’s a contrast with that white canopy (which looks to be going brownish now) at the bus depo. Gotta go to Tesco, I’ll be back! (Gawd, its Arnie night tonight)

    • #757647
      BEETLE
      Participant

      Hi there, any idea what the commercial unit will be used for in the Frinailla’s Victoria Cross development? I have to say, I’m a bit taken aback by the overall height seeing as the last planning application for site was granted permission for 5 storeys, and with the condition of some apartments and roof terrace to be removed…any opinion on this.? Much appreciated by enquiring student with a lot to learn![/font] @lexington wrote:

      You will remember earlier (back in the LADSOCL thread) a post was issued noting Frinailla had entered planning for a 25-unit residential development over commercial facility and basement car-parking. The development, planned for the former Plumbing Utilities Store bordering Ashbrook apartment complex and Top Car Motor Dealership, was designed by Geraldine McNamara of Richard Rainey & Associates and ranges in height between 6 and 7-storeys. Apartments will range in size between 55m sq for one-bedroom units, 90m sq for 2-bedroom units and a 190m sq duplex penthouse with 4-bedrooms (these scale apartments have been actively encouraged by CCC and its nice to see more of these units come in to circulation). Each apartment will have 2 basement parking spaces and basement storage facilities.

      In my opinion, a generally quality project – its seems a difficult site to work with, but I do think that this project will compliment the area in the long-run given prospective and current proposals shaping up nearby. The Utilities Store is currently being used by Heberger Construction/Aras Developments as their ‘Site Office’ for the Victoria Station student residence development directly across the road. This project will rise to 5 storeys.

    • #757648
      lexington
      Participant

      @BEETLE wrote:

      [font=Arial Black:3m0xrb7i]Hi there, any idea what the commercial unit will be used for in the Frinailla's Victoria Cross development? I have to say, I'm a bit taken aback by the overall height seeing as the last planning application for site was granted permission for 5 storeys, and with the condition of some apartments and roof terrace to be removed…any opinion on this.? Much appreciated by enquiring student with a lot to learn![/font:3m0xrb7i]

      Personally, I’m not really put out by the height when considered in an empirical context. The general height of buildings under development is not far off this project – and the prospect of further development at the adjoining Top Car site to the north and speculative redevelopment of the Cork Farm Centre (HSE offices) to the south, not forgetting Frinailla’s other plans to at Dennehy’s Cross. I think this route can accommodate such buildings but I would generally feel that any development approaching the residential areas near Dennehy’s Cross must be toned down. This height of building at this location would be unsuitable. The big thing with Robert White’s plans for a student development at the site, in a former application of 100-bedroom over 17-apartments at 5-storeys was indeed overshadowing. My memory of this application is not as precise as I’d like it to be, but if I remember correctly, the project exhibited a roof garden which allowed for overlooking back onto residencies at Ashbrook and Orchard Road. As far as I know, any terraces/balconies in the subject development are generally west facing onto Victoria Cross Road. In the 2003 application 2 units at the 4th floor were removed indeed from Kevin O’Keefe’s design – I personally feel the Frinailla design is a little better and though it peaks on 7-storeys, it doesn’t do so to any excessive effect. The adjoining development prospects at Top Car and Cork Farm Centre were not speculated at the time of the 2003 application, neither was the Justin Canty site now under development by Aras Developments. In that context, the Robert White plan was very imposing and did standout. I would posit that planners will address the Frinailla plan with a strategic outlook. As for the commercial unit, I don’t know what the intended usage is for sure beyond speculation. What are your own feelings on the design?

    • #757649
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      A quick snapshot of the 6 nominees for the Stirling Prize on the following link. http://society.guardian.co.uk/gall/0,9730,1537169,00.html

    • #757650
      ooshi
      Participant

      Anyone have pics of the €100m Dairygold commercial and retail development in Mallow? 🙂 would be much obliged!

    • #757651
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I dont know about anyone else but do you ever look forward to hearing about the next big project for the c ity? You know those ones that get you really excited???? For me I think the last one was Paul kenny’s plan for St. patricks qy or the other plan for Clontarf street.

      I’m looking forward to hearing what is proposed for Horgans quay and also that site that sold recently for what I read at least was 8 million on Alberts quay. Maybe because with a development planned there it will given the area both sides of the river a full developed frontage. Also the Reliance building plans will be interesting. Hope they include the sports shop there and the surrounding properties. it will be really interesting to see if they do something with the Simon community centre next door as well. It should be a really good design to mark the beginning of Clontarf st too. Anyone else got anything theyre looking forward too??

      Hope the Gluckman gallery does well. When it was being built i kept thinking it was the biggest waste of money considering the college was already short of funds and staff had to be messed about with to sort out funding. The college was short something like 9 million and the gallery cost 11m. I dont know how utilised it is by students, I only ever took a look around to see what all the talk was about twice. But now that its there its a nice addition to the college and the city I think. Maybe the gallery will recoup its value in the future and maybe contribute to the college.

    • #757652
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Um… isn’t the Glucksman called after Lewis Glucksman for a reason? I don’t think the €11m was borne exclusively by the University.

      ps That Deane St proposal? Not too sure. Destined to become street wall paper when (if) the other proposals in the vicinty kick off.

    • #757653
      altuistic
      Participant

      Am i wrong in saying that the gallery was named in honour of Mr Glucksman because of the donation made on his behalf to the university to assist in the completion of the second phase of the O’Rahilly building. The funding for the gallery was made from the universitys own resources, a grant from the dept of Education and Arts, Culture and the Islands, plus other sources. ?

    • #757654
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/magazine/2004/1009/3640492252MG0910GLUCK.html

      Amazing space

      ARCHITECTURE: Cork’s new gallery is a work of art itself. Gemma Tipton meets Loretta Glucksman, who, with her husband Lewis, has given Ireland this extraordinary building.

      Third-generation Irish-American, Loretta Brennan Glucksman divides her time between Ireland and the US. A prominent supporter of Irish cultural studies, she is in Cork to celebrate the opening of the new €10 million art gallery, which bears her husband’s name. I asked her why it is that, in Ireland, the visual arts have always lagged behind literature, music and theatre in terms of profile and international recognition. One of the reasons, she suggests, was purely practical. “It has to do with the ease of transmission, and economics; people could support themselves by playing an instrument or telling stories.”

      Loretta is something of an expert when it comes to Irish culture and its economic basis. Chairwoman of the American Ireland Fund, she is also founding patron, with her husband Lewis, of Glucksman Ireland House, the centre for Irish Studies at New York University. Located at the bottom of Fifth Avenue, Glucksman Ireland House is a small Victorian mews house, sitting in incongruous defiance of the skyscrapers that rise up to define the avenues of Manhattan.

      There is a disparity, too, between the kind of Ireland that Irish-Americans expect to find when they come to this country, and the reality of our rapidly changing culture. Irish Studies departments in American universities focus on literature, traditional music, and social and political history. Loretta describes the “ephemeral link that Irish-Americans feel with the land of their forebears, in many cases a land they have never even visited themselves. Irish culture provides Irish-Americans with a link to their own histories.”

      In fact, it also represents a kind of cultural security blanket, an unchanging place of traditional values, and literary lyricism.

      Contemporary visual art tends not to fit comfortably into this mould and is low on the Irish Studies agenda, despite the fact that artists such as Sean Scully, James Coleman and Patrick Ireland, for example, have attained such international status and acclaim.

      So why have the Glucksmans now sponsored this new contemporary art gallery here? “The short answer,” Loretta laughs, “is that Lew had already done a library [at University of Limerick]. But seriously,” she adds, “in the past number of years, Lew has become increasingly interested in contemporary Irish artists, and visual art is a beautiful way to learn about the country and its culture.”

      Set in a linear park on the banks of the river Lee, the Lewis Glucksman Gallery has been designed by architects O’Donnell & Tuomey. It will be opened next week by President Mary McAleese, nearly three months ahead of the official commencement of Cork’s year as European Capital of Culture.

      It is an instantly striking building, and yet one which pulls off the tricky feat of both blending in with, and standing out from, its surroundings. So how have the architects managed it? How does this 2,000 sq-metre building not so much fit into, as belong to its surroundings, when so many other attempts at contemporary architecture seem to stamp so aggressively on their sites?

      The traps into which many of our more recent buildings have stumbled, seem often to have been created by a lack of confidence. Complicated by a lingering ambivalence to the built legacy of the period of British rule here, we have struggled to define exactly what our architectural heritage actually looks like. Urban planning policies limiting the heights of buildings in our cities have also led to blocks which appear as failed skyscrapers, cut off at the knees, their heavy bases clumsy with nothing to support. In other instances, a misplaced urge to “fit in” results in façades which bear no relationship to the spaces behind them, or in pick-and-mix architectural features glued onto buildings – architraves, columns and cartouches. Architecturally speaking, we seem to have no more idea of what contemporary Ireland is really like than do those Irish Studies students who look to this country for a Celtic Twilight land of Riverdance made flesh.

      The design of the Lewis Glucksman Gallery represents a more grown-up Ireland; a country where the first question is now “what do we want?” rather than “what do others want from us?”

      Architects O’Donnell & Tuomey’s ongoing transformation of a former industrial school into the Furniture College at Letterfrack, Co Galway, is a project which has won them acclaim at this year’s Venice Architectural Biennale, where they are currently representing Ireland. Among their previous projects, they have also designed the Gallery of Photography and the Irish Film Institute, both in Temple Bar.

      The new gallery is an instantly arresting construction. From the outside, it seems to be part a series of limestone and glass boxes, twisting around a central axis, and part a massive curving wooden structure, cantilevered out from the main building, and resting lightly on slender stilts. Ireland has never seen a space quite like it for looking at art.

      One of the reasons it sits into its site so well is that it sidesteps the obvious route of building low along the river bank. As John Tuomey puts it, “if you build horizontally across the site, you extinguish the very site that you have chosen to protect.” Instead, the building occupies a relatively small “footprint”, and acts as a focal point for the park, rather than an obliteration of it.

      The architects took the surrounding mature trees as a reference for the height of the building, and care was taken to preserve them, consequently avoiding that barren look that so many new developments suffer. Use of materials also works in the building’s favour, with the lower levels defined by limestone, and the upper areas in American oak. The same separation continues inside, and while this may seem like an architectural conceit, it actually works to give a harmonious sense of space and presence. Horizontally, a flight of steps leads to the podium on which the galleries stand and where the restaurant is sited, and then flows away again down to the river, where a bridge is planned to link the gallery to the road beyond the campus.

      Purpose-built contemporary art galleries are relatively rare in Ireland. In Dublin, there are the Douglas Hyde Gallery, the Royal Hibernian Academy, and various spaces in Temple Bar. Then there are the multi-use venues, such as Draíocht in Blanchardstown, An Grianán in Letterkenny, and the Island Arts Centre in Lisburn, where the galleries share space and facilities with theatres, workshops and studios. When it comes to building art galleries and museums, however, many of our spaces (such as the Irish Museum of Modern Art) are conversions, dictated to by the templates of historic buildings.

      In fact, our idea of what art galleries ought to look like comes from the original meaning of the word gallery: the connecting apartments and offices in such grand buildings as the Louvre, the Uffizi and the Vatican, which even before their conversion to art museums were decoratively hung with portraits, paintings, and sculptures. These sequential spaces allowed museum curators to hang their collections in chronological order, telling stories of art history or antiquity which generally led the visitor to the conclusion that the present society represented the culmination and apotheosis of civilisation.

      In terms of the history of art spaces, the first great breaks from this tradition came in Vienna with the Secession Building (the original “white cube”) at the end of the 19th century; and then with the spiral rotunda of the Guggenheim Museum in New York in the 1950s. The Guggenheim is exciting, as is its much younger sister, the Guggenheim Bilbao, but while they may pull in the tourists, innovative shapes and spaces just aren’t as conducive to hanging, and looking at, works of art as are the plain white cubes.

      Here, O’Donnell + Tuomey’s building is different again. Apart from a pair of central cubed spaces (two jewel boxes which are climate-controlled to facilitate the showing of the most valuable pieces), the larger galleries, one on each of the building’s two upper floors, wrap around the core of the structure. In each, the external walls are curved, their sweep being punctuated with windows.

      The reactionary in me asks: why change something that works? And yet, the nature of art has changed from that which was shown in those early galleries, the ones that defined how we think art spaces ought to look. We inherited the form of an art gallery, without ever really questioning how it should, or may, change over time.

      Loretta agrees. “I love the National Gallery, and I do think there’s so much to be gained from that model, but I don’t think it’s the only one.”

      At the Glucksman, there is a mould-breaking flavour to the architecture which encourages you to think: here is a place where I can see things differently, here is a place where my ideas about art – or how I relate to it – will be challenged; an un-boxlike gallery, where one can think outside of the box.

      In many ways, I will always love pristine art spaces where there is nothing to see but the art itself, and yet I welcome this experimentation. The Glucksman allows visitors to make their own routes through, and associations within each exhibition; it won’t always be perfect for looking at all kinds of art, and yet when it does work, the particularly beautiful qualities of light and movement in the galleries will really sing.

      The different form of the Lewis Glucksman Gallery creates a place in which the ways we read art and culture can be examined and reassessed. This is an idea which the gallery’s director, Dr Fiona Kearney (wrongly described as curator in last week’s Irish Times Magazine), plans to exploit for the programme, offering the opportunity for artists to work on collaborative projects with the various academic departments at UCC. “One of Lew’s dreams,” says Loretta, “was to help create an institution where ideas could be fully explored.”

      The opening of the gallery, next Friday, will feature a series of Dürer etchings, as well as an exhibition of American painting drawn from the New York University collection. These include works by Willem de Kooning, Philip Guston, Grace Hartigan, Ad Reinhardt, Jim Dine and Robert Rauschenberg. The show intends to challenge accepted notions of American contemporary art history.

      Next year will see 40 Shades of Green, a reassessment of Irish art and design; while curator of exhibitions and projects René Zechlin, originally from the Frankfurter Kunstverein, will be working on Investigations, a series of projects with six international artists.

      Supported also by donations from generous sources, including the Sisk family, the Lewis Glucksman Gallery is an intellectually as well as architecturally challenging place. It has already been nominated for the prestigious European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture, the Mies van der Rohe Award.

      The Lewis Glucksman Gallery opens on October 15th, on the UCC campus

    • #757655
      sw101
      Participant

      paul could you paste that article in here? i can’t get into that site

    • #757656
      macm
      Participant

      will post up picture of the mallow/dariygold venture tomorrow. pretty impressive from images on front of echo on tuesday nite.

    • #757657
      lexington
      Participant

      Keep your eye off it for one second and it gets granted! 😀

      O’Flynn Construction have been granted planning by Cork County Council for the development of over 527 houses on the 63.7-acres of land to the rear of Dunkettle House (bounded to the west by the Dunkettle Estuary). Originally, the plan consisted of having over 600 houses on the land, but the €220m project was conditioned out of 100 houses by planners in their 65 or so attached conditions. The house and its immediate surrounding lands will be retained and refurbished for use as a visitor centre among other things. A horse-riding facility, sports grounds and leisure facility will also be provided.

      Anyone who reads my posts regarding this sort of development will know I’m not very in favour of seeing old country estates lost over to more housing estate developments but at least some proportions of lands around the house remain preserved which I feel is very important.



      😉 By the way, just an update on a report Tommy Barker had today (29th July 2005) regarding Butlers Irish Chocolates – the location of their store is believed to be at the former Buckley Bros store/cafe on Oliver Plunkett Street. Edward Moriarty and Butlers had been in discussions for sometime and Mr. Moriarty even went so far as to seek planning on facade alterations to allow for Butlers Chocolates signage (which may be specifically sought in a subsequent application I believe – up for correction on that). Unless Butlers have sought a different location since that I’m not aware of – thats the intended location. Buckley Bros store actually possesses considerable expansion room to the rear of the seating area in the cafe section. The store was the subject of discussion of the “architecture of cork city ” thread not so long ago, specifically its vitrolite facade.



      d_d_dallas – what do you mean by ‘wallpaper’ exactly re: the Deane Street project? :confused: Wallpaper can be pretty or ugly? Or just un-noticed? 😀

    • #757658
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      can it be ugly and un-noticed at the same time?!?

    • #757659
      fkearney
      Participant

      Thanks to Archiseek for hosting this discussion and for all the good wishes to the Glucksman.

      FYI, the Glucksman’s capital costs were funded by a number of private donors, some of whom wish to remain anonymous. The Glucksmans and Sisk family have building and one of gallery spaces named after them respectively.

      The programme funding for the Glucksman is provided from a number of sources including Arts Council.

      Since opening on 15 October, we have had 55,000 visitors (projected visitor numbers for the year were originally 40,000). 5000 of those are children in dedicated art workshops and courses – a key aim of the Glucksman is to introduce primary and second level students to visual culture. Many of the schools have little or no tradition of placing students in third level, the Glucksman may contribute to changing things a little in that regard.

      Check out our website for information on current shows, projects and events.

      Or help us win the BBC online poll by voting for us at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4722143.stm

      Fiona Kearney
      Director, Lewis Glucksman Gallery

    • #757660
      Pana01
      Participant

      A report on yesterday’s Examiner stated that the busman’s hut on Patrick Street will remain there until at least September, as new plans for it’s replacement were not yet ready. It was described as an ugly eyesore.
      Can anybody out there tell me why we need a hut on Patrick Street at all? Surely these busmen could have been housed at the redeveloped bus station at Parnell Place, which must be all of 2 minutes walk from the Statue. What value is it adding, by having it in the middle of our most prestigious street? Any time I walk past, the lads are having a chat and making tea. I can’t recall seeing a similar farce on O’Connell Street, Oxford Street or the Champs-Elysees. Someone at City Hall should have the balls to stand up to these busmen, and just demolish the thing.

      Does anyone have any civic pride left??

    • #757661
      pier39
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Sorry about your disturbed childhood pier39, i’m glad to see your trying to cheer yourself up with laughter ha ha ha.

      thanks a-ha, im just taking it one day at a time!!!! 😀

      now i know not to take urban legend to seriously and i know this thread (or its older sister) dealt with it before but i keep hearing bad news about debenhams in mahon pt – and something to do with penneys replacing it or somewhat? i just keep thinkin no smoke without fire…..anyone know anything??? (lex???)

      by the way if anyones interested my firm (well, not mine, i wish i just work there on occassion – well until they find out im hoarding the comapny pens! hehe) are actively involved in a little known kennedy qy site. its been goin on for a while now and things seem to be pretty positive. ooooo! exciting! i luv when my borthday comes early. hehe

      pana01 as for the busman bin yeah its annoying but if its got to do with any state body it always takes ages. at least we know itll be replaced. but tis true tis ugly tis true.

    • #757662
      lexington
      Participant

      On the 14th of July 2005, I posted information stating that Declan O’Mahony’s BrideView Developments had purchased the 6-acre lands of Jeremiah Lynch at Ballinaspig Mor near Bishopstown. These lands had FPP for 123 residential units designed by Murray O’Laoire. The site was guiding at €10m euro and was being sold through Irish & European.

      I now wish to correct that post – as the land concerned was confused for a nearby site (in 2 lots of predominantly non-residentially zoned land and which was suspect to believed BrideView interest) also guiding at approximately €10m and also sold through Irish & European. The site by Jeremiah Lynch was subject to a deal with St. Patrick’s Hospital who will now seek planning for a 100,000sq ft development containing a 75-bed hospital, 44-bed hospice and a seperate 10,000sq ft convent. The developments will be between 2 and 3-storeys and contain full amenity landscaping.

      The information attained by me was from that of a media source close to one of the developers in question and I posted the information without verifying it independently myself – worse, the particular source had provided inaccurate info to me previously (which I had assessed myself and decided not to post in the end) – so I should have known better anyway. The source will in future not be used for any information unless I have scrutinised first myself. Apologises, for a very genuine mistake and genuine confusion between 2 close proximity and similar sales. It won’t happen again.

      Hey, you can’t win them all. But to make up for it, I will hopefully be letting you know details of a new city development due for lodgement shortly.



      Also thanks to another gentleman for informing me of some more accurate details on the above subject about 2 weeks ago. Thanks!

    • #757663
      A-ha
      Participant

      awww, i hope debenhams don’t close (espically if it’s to make way for a pennys), they got really nice stuff and it’s competiton for brown thomas. anyone hear anything else about when pc world and currys are moving into mahon point, any dates pencilled in??:confused:

    • #757664
      A-ha
      Participant

      sorry, should replace :confused: with a 😎 you’ll need ’em to read last message!

    • #757665
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 As previously posted, in the LADSOCL thread, Lush will be opening a store in Cork – the location is destined for 96 Oliver Plunkett Street (former In House store). A planning application has been lodged with CCC for associated signage and store alterations with a due date expected for the 21st September 2005. The interior of this particular building is actually of some significant note (particularly the upper floors) and it’ll be interesting to how the alterations affect or do not affect the building. It may simply be a makeover.



      😮 Paul Kenny’s The Treasury office development for the Revenue Commissioners at St. Patrick’s Quay is scheduled for a due date of August 8th 2005 (as posted previously). The revised plans, which were submitted on July 11th 2005, have effectively reorganised building floorspace layouts. The project once consisted of 2 linked buildings fronting 4-5 storeys at St. Patrick’s Quay and 6-7 storeys on the Lower Glanmire Road – the revised plans have altered the design little and now consist of 2 linked buildings peaking at 6-storeys each. Basement car-parking spaces (across 2 levels) have also been reduced as previously mentioned. Michael Lynch is the planner responsible and it is generally believed CCC have found favour with the design – though some questions were raised over the impact on the PS facades at St. Patrick’s Quay. A positive decision is hoped for. It is believed, that should the OPW designate the development as the successful candidate for the RC in September (assuming no appeal follows – no additional submissions were lodged by An Taisce in response to the FI lodged, however both BellScott Engineering & the McLaughlin Family lodged further objections – they must be pretty miffed), work is expected to commence almost immediately with a tight completion date set for late 2007.



      😮 Carew Kelly’s design for the Aldi Stores Development at Tory Top Road (the Heiton Buckley facility across the way from Musgrave Park) is scheduled for a decision on Monday 1st August 2005. The predominantly residential development saw a new application made in June after an earlier plan was withdrawn. The new plans call for demolition of existing structures & construction of mixed used devt scheme with overall gross floor area of 5775.40m2 comprising an Aldi discount foodstore,2 retail units,medical centre,creche & 41 dwelling units.Single storey Aldi discount foodstore with gross floor area of 1,560m2, incl. upper level mezzanine floor space,all assoc. signage (to include 1 internally illuminated wallmounted sign to the proposed Aldi store & 1 free-standing internally illuminated doublesided sign at proposed entrance to car park & adjacent to Tory Top Rd) & 127 associated car spaces; 1 3-storey block fronting Tory Top Rd comprising 1 basement level retail unit;creche;medical centre at ground floor; 5 2-bed duplex apts with balconies at 1st & 2nd floor level;all assoc. signage & 12 car park spaces;18 2-bed tce hses arranged in 3 blocks;1 3-storey block of 9 1-bed at ground floor & 9 2-bed duplexes at 1st & 2nd floors incorporating roof terraces & balconies.52 residential car park spaces will be provided.

      I think the idea of these discount stores maximising the value on their lands by providing ancillary and alternate development uses away from their core competencies is an interesting one and it’ll be interesting to see the impact such trends have on Irish urban landscapes.



      A-ha and ewankennedy – I wouldn’t read too much into the gossip. I genuinely myself haven’t heard anything but if anyone else has other info please let us know.

    • #757666
      A-ha
      Participant

      and any dates for pc world and currys?

    • #757667
      lexington
      Participant

      :p City Properties Limited, who have recently completed what has become a very successful little venue hosting restaurants Wagamama and Captain America’s along South Main Street – are now in the final stages of completing a new bar and nightclub at the former Classic Bar premises (right next-door to Wagamama). Ridge Developments are working on the project and City Properties have launched a new website entitled “Name The Club”. The idea is that Cork’s citizens (or anyone at all) are invited to submit ideas for the new nightclub name – could be interesting, care to have your idea immortalised in Cork’s nightlife? 😮 The design of the Wagamama/Captain America’s facility seems to have been very well received – and it seems the design behind the new nightclub and bar is equally interesting. The upper level of facility is now home to a new bar called ‘Suas’. The 3rd storey bar (above Captain America’s) overlooks South Main Street with an amply spaced balcony facility. The unique timber feature which scales the building’s South Main Street facade begins at this location tipping downwards at the balcony edge. The interior design work seems to be minimalist focused (not unlike the interior of Wagamama) – with Dan Mulvihill & Co. involved in the blueprints.


      Notice how the logo design mimics the timber-scale feature on the building facade.

      Here are 2 images of the interior design work of the new bar.



      Also, if you’re interested -> Name The Club – it may pass away a boring minute or two in the office. :p

    • #757668
      A-ha
      Participant

      Looks nice, I love the modern contemporary look. And I know it was announced weeks ago, but I don’t think that Grand Parade should be done in the same style as Patrick St. It should be made to look different, those lights will NOT suit that area! 😡

    • #757669
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I like the designs for Grand parade. I think it’ll add continuity to the city centre and i especially like the way the pedestrian area to the west is being enlarged with the traffic lanes moved to 1 side.

      Has anyone seen the new building on Copley street under construction by Coffey builders it looks so cheap and boring! 😡

    • #757670
      lexington
      Participant

      I know I posted these scans a few months ago – that’s sort of why I didn’t bring the subject back up around the time of the ‘official’ launch – but here they are anyway. I have more (better quality) and will post them here at some stage. Grand Parade is, in my view, one of Cork’s most important streets. Not least its width and important link-role, nor the fact it possesses many fine buildings and an interesting perspective on its surrounds – but because it is central to the day-to-day activity of the city centre, and offers a true grand city centre street in any urban area’s books. It’s redevelopment is essential to the continued growth and aesthetics of the city centre as a core area of commercial and social activity. I would agree that the Beth Gali proposal is actually pretty pleasant – but then again, everyone has their own views on elements of Studio Gali’s plans (i.e. the controversial lights!). At least 4 (2 in pre, 1 in planning, 1 with planning) major proposals on Grand Parade will be interacting with this news street-scape and its important that they jointly work to maintain the history and future of this street in a quality foundation.



      Just throwing back to the talk above on Debenhams and Mahon Point etc – I was talking with a well-up individual today about the centre, and according to him at least, recent figures are encouraging. Now I expected he would say that, so I pressed him further on certain issues such as Debenhams – and he said not to get caught up in “flim-flam”, Mahon Point was performing as expected. The initial surge in activity was an inevitable response to the opening of such a major new centre. However, as with most such projects anywhere, the centre suffered an initial ‘association saturation’ – i.e. people became over-familiar and opted for alternatives. However now the centre was finding itself into a particular ‘niche’ – with customers adopting the centre into the regular patterns as a place of convenience and a genuine alternative. The launch projection for annual movements was 10m pax p.a. – this has been revised down slightly since, with early weekdays proving expectedly slower, but mid-week to weekend activity progressive and steadily improving. Certain retaillers like Bershka, Gasoline, Easons and Omniplex have reported above satisfactory levels of trading. Nothing was said of Debenhams other than that trading levels were on par with the chain’s Jervis Centre store and that the store was there for the ”long-haul”.

      Indeed, my recent excursions to Mahon Point, did seem to signal the centre had picked up traffic volumes. Perhaps ventures such as the Thursday morning ‘Market’ and now a Circus I believe( 😮 ) are paying off.

      I also asked about whether talk of an extension to the centre, earmarked possibly for 2009, was still on the cards, and the reply was “the centre has been designed for such an accommodation. The northern car-park area has plenty of room for scope, however I am not aware of anything being set in stone. Our concern is focused on the job at hand and we’ll deal with any such further developments when the time comes.”

      (by the way the quote is the jist of what was said – not word for word perfect).

      So that’s what was said, make of it what you will, and I’ll leave it at that.



      🙁 Oh, and the building on Copley Street is actually 2 (linked) 5-storey blocks, one housing 60.000sq ft of office space, the other 38 apartments. The scheme is being developed by Corbett Bros., constructed by Coffey Construction & was designed by PRC Architects. I agree – it’s not great. The original plan seemed much nicer with a far higher quality material finish but subsequent of a further planning application regarding a change in elevational treatment, the cladding seems to have been replaced with a sort of cheap zinc panel coating and lemon-yellow paint. I have images of the block under construction but will try and get a more up-to-date image for the thread’s consideration.

    • #757671
      A-ha
      Participant

      I like the Farmers Market in Mahon Point, they seem to becoming more trendy then going to the nearest Dunnes or Tesco (which is ironically right next door). They’re popping up everywhere. Midleton, Cobh and Youghal all have markets selling local produce and crafts. Shame it’s only on one day a week though. 🙂

    • #757672
      lexington
      Participant

      Coffey Construction are putting the final touches to their €20m Copley Street development designed by PRC Architects. The project includes 85 (incl. student extension) basement car-parking spaces, 60,000sq ft of Third Generation office space and 38 mixed apartments in 2 linked 5-storey buildings over commercial facilities to include a gym and restuarant. The developers are also proceeding with an adjoining development on Stable Lane of 8 student apartments over extended basement and retail unit. The Copley Street site was purchased in 2001 by Corbett Bros’ Michael & Kevin from Irish Interational Trading Corp. for €5m – they also purchased a further site from the company on the South City Link nearby for €2m where plans for a 266 room student development were turned down, a new application will be sought for that site in the prospective future.

      The developers also have activity (in conjunction with Monagahan-based Pitwood Ltd) at Beasely Street/Parnell Place for a new 121-bedroom hotel (which recently saw Further Info submitted) and may seek a new scheme at their Henry Street site. A further large-scale city development is currently under review.

    • #757673
      A-ha
      Participant

      Everyone must be gone away for the bank holiday week-end, it’s been so quiet on here these last few days. And I know I mentioned it before, but who da f*cking hell do I have to go to about the public transport in this city, or should I say the lack of it. It’s so unbeliveable. I am so serious, the city needs some sort of trolleybus or tram. The buses smell up the city and all a trolleybus would need is a ‘lil old wire. I’ll say it again, monorails would be ideal for Cork, and don’t laugh like the last time I mentioned it, making jokes about the Simpsons, it’s so childish. If anyone can give me any names of who would take note of the bad transportation system in Cork, then let me know. :confused:

    • #757674
      A-ha
      Participant

      Oh, and didn’t I hear ages ago that the taxis were to be made uniform in the city? Ya know, like the London Cabs or the New York yellow, all that sort. Whats the story with that? Is it happening or wot?

    • #757675
      securityman
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      :p City Properties Limited, who have recently completed what has become a very successful little venue hosting restaurants Wagamama and Captain America’s along South Main Street – are now in the final stages of completing a new bar and nightclub at the former Classic Bar premises (right next-door to Wagamama). Ridge Developments are working on the project and City Properties have launched a new website entitled “Name The Club”. The idea is that Cork’s citizens (or anyone at all) are invited to submit ideas for the new nightclub name – could be interesting, care to have your idea immortalised in Cork’s nightlife? 😮 The design of the Wagamama/Captain America’s facility seems to have been very well received – and it seems the design behind the new nightclub and bar is equally interesting. The upper level of facility is now home to a new bar called ‘Suas’. The 3rd storey bar (above Captain America’s) overlooks South Main Street with an amply spaced balcony facility. The unique timber feature which scales the building’s South Main Street facade begins at this location tipping downwards at the balcony edge. The interior design work seems to be minimalist focused (not unlike the interior of Wagamama) – with Dan Mulvihill & Co. involved in the blueprints.

      Would I be right in saying one of the guys in city properties also has shares in Pizza Republic, Raven, Cleavers, The Bailey, Bru, The new bar in Mount Oval and the western star?

    • #757676
      ooshi
      Participant

      Anyone have any images of Paul Kenny’s Treasury Office Development? Or the Dairygold complex for Mallow? Thanks 🙂

    • #757677
      jungle
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Everyone must be gone away for the bank holiday week-end, it’s been so quiet on here these last few days. And I know I mentioned it before, but who da f*cking hell do I have to go to about the public transport in this city, or should I say the lack of it. It’s so unbeliveable. I am so serious, the city needs some sort of trolleybus or tram. The buses smell up the city and all a trolleybus would need is a ‘lil old wire. I’ll say it again, monorails would be ideal for Cork, and don’t laugh like the last time I mentioned it, making jokes about the Simpsons, it’s so childish. If anyone can give me any names of who would take note of the bad transportation system in Cork, then let me know. :confused:

      I wouldn’t support trolley buses in the city. They have all the disadvantages of trams – inflexibility of route – and none of the advantages – ability to carry a large volume of people. I would fully support the introduction of Light Rail into the city.

      At one point there was a thread on the Platform 11 forums about a possible route for Light Rail from the city to Ballincollig. I haven’t visited there since they made the forums only readable by members though.

    • #757678
      jungle
      Participant

      I saw the new Montessori school on the Skehard Road for the first time over the weekend. I quite like it. It seems to rise above the banality that is often associated with educational buildings.

      Anyone have any pictures or comments? It was hard to form a full impression when going past it on a crowded bus.

    • #757679
      A-ha
      Participant

      I think the last thing that should be brought into the city is a light rail network. Trams would be ideal for the suburbs but look at all the trouble the Luas caused. Drilling, digging and more noise in our newly renovated city centre isn’t very ideal for a transport system. And trolley buses can carry more then a standard bus, even more if it is a double decker trolley bus, and even better, no tracks to lay, more routes available and a clean, reliable form of transportation. Sorry if yeer all sick of listening to me, or reading me whatever, but we really need more varieties of transport in Cork.

    • #757680
      jungle
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I think the last thing that should be brought into the city is a light rail network. Trams would be ideal for the suburbs but look at all the trouble the Luas caused. Drilling, digging and more noise in our newly renovated city centre isn’t very ideal for a transport system. And trolley buses can carry more then a standard bus, even more if it is a double decker trolley bus, and even better, no tracks to lay, more routes available and a clean, reliable form of transportation. Sorry if yeer all sick of listening to me, or reading me whatever, but we really need more varieties of transport in Cork.

      There is an alternative that I saw was being trialled (in France I think). It was a trolley bus that charged a battery that could carry it for up to 20km. It meant that the bus wasn’t restricted to where there were cables and it also meant that unsightly cables could be kept out of sensitive areas.

    • #757681
      A-ha
      Participant

      Sounds like a good idea jungle, at least it would get dirty diesel buses outta the city centre. 😉

    • #757682
      lexington
      Participant

      @ooshi wrote:

      Anyone have any images of Paul Kenny’s Treasury Office Development? Or the Dairygold complex for Mallow? Thanks 🙂

      Images are posted of The Treasury earlier in this thread and in the Look at de state of Cork, like! thread also. As for the Alchemy Properties development in Mallow, I’ll try and have some images up by Friday for you.



      As for public transport in Cork –

      the ideal in my view would be to pedestrianise the city centre almost entirely. The city centre island is novel in that it is relatively compact and easily covered by foot. Even the concept being applied to St. Patrick’s Street, Grand Parade, Oliver Plunkett Street and Cornmarket Street is positive in my view – that is were traffic lanes are reduced or sidelined and pedestrian areas are given priority. The thing is, cars in their current form aren’t the way to go in the long run. Maybe new fuel-cell eco-efficient alternatives will be the hopeful next step. I think the streets of the city centre need to be given back to the people and less subserviant to the vehicle. Streets like Patrick’s Street and Cornmarket Street I believe should also be given hours exclusive to pedestrians – i.e. 9am to 9pm Thursdays, Fridays, Saturdays and 9am to 6pm Mondays to Wednesdays etc. I agree light-rail is not suited for the existing city centre – but in an extended city centre, to include docklands regions – I think there is room for scope – especially along Kennedy Quay, passed Pairc Ui Chaoimh and linking up with the old Blackrock line out to Mahon Point and Rochestown. Also the South City Link could be utilised to travel via Black Ash P&R and out to Bishopstown and Ballincollig. People forget that Cork was once latticed in trams and rail. Even its bridges are testimony to that history – and to be honest, I think we’ll have to look to an efficient service returning in the future. Especially along the southern docklands. With cars still around, underground parking facilities may be provided at locations in the suburbs connected by main traffic routes and transfer services into the city centre. I gasp at the thought of all those unsightly overhead powerlines – just look at Vancouver, San Francisco and Frankfurt!

      Luckily the wheels are very very slowly in motion on some of these concepts.

    • #757683
      A-ha
      Participant

      lex, I have to say that I like your idea of a pedestrianised city centre, it’s so continental. And the docklands is a great place to start for building a new public transport system. London also has big plans for trolleybuses going from the south suburbs directly to the north suburbs with stops along the way at tube stations. Here is a picture of one of the trolleybuses that will be rolled out in London over the coming months and years.

      As you can see, the over head cable’s aren’t all that big. Can’t you just see it gliding down Patrick St. and across the Lee?

    • #757684
      lexington
      Participant

      Sorry for not getting to this sooner – but life is hectic at the moment –

      😎 Aldi Stores Developments Limited have had Further Information requested of their plans for a new residential and retail development at the Heiton Buckley site on the Tory Top Road, Ballyphehane. The details of the project are mentioned in a previous post above. A decision had been due for yesterday.



      🙂 Frinailla will be shortly lodging their plans for their Dennehy’s Cross sites – which they have gathered over acquisitions, most notably that purchased from Dennehy’s Garage (which will now be relocating to a new premises) for a price-tage estimated in the 20m euro region. O’Mahony Pike Architects have designed the new residential and commercial scheme – more details will follow soon.

    • #757685
      A-ha
      Participant

      Interesting link courtesy of The People’s Republic of Cork website on an underground system for Cork. It’s a long way off, but none the less interesting. http://www.peoplesrepublicofcork.com/images/articles/Subway/SubwayBig.gif
      Oh, and don’t forget to click on the enlarge button when you open the link. 😀

    • #757686
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Paul Kingston (Douglas) has lodged plans for the development of a full-service 96-berth marina at Castlepark in Kinsale. The plan seeks to build on the town’s nautical heritage and lifestyle – allowing for an increased capacity for private vessel berthings. The €4m euro project will also include car-parking, landscaping and quayside alterations, as well as administration and caretaker accommodation.



      🙂 As mentioned in a previous post, St. Patrick’s Hospital at Marymount have lodged their plans for a new Hospice and Convent at the lands formerly controlled by Jeremiah Lynch & Family. A deal was closed through auctioneers Irish & European for a undisclosed figure, estimated at approx. €11m. The 75 bedroom hospital and 44 bed hospice will be joined by a 1,000sq m convent over 2 and 3-storey buildings – with the 6 acre site availing of full landscaping. St. Patrick’s Hospital have formally withdrawn from a scheme lodged with Rosridge Properties and Enable Ireland on lands near the Bandon Road Roundabout. The new proposal is estimated at apprx. €50m.

      – also, you may remember many months ago I indicated that a new private medical development for the city centre was under review. I hope to bring you formal details of the €55m project within weeks.



      🙁 I know this is a little old, but the plans by Frinailla for Springmount, Glanmire have been stalled with an appeal brought against the 65 unit development of 25 apartments and 40 duplexes. The development had been greenlit by Cork County Council for the high-density zoned, 4-acre, steeply sloping site – which had been sold through auctioneers Global Properties. The Kiosk-designed scheme is being appealed by the Ballincrossig Resident’s Association (among them former C.I.F. buzzman Joe O’Brien).

      Frinailla Springmount Project



      :confused: It would seem O’Flynn Construction (OFC) are looking to iron-out issues with the grant for their Eglinton Street scheme – as predicted – the project has been lodged with ABP on a 1st-party basis. I’ll return with details tomorrow. 😮 🙁



      😎 Mark Kelleher’s intentions for the controversial project at Westend, designed by Frank Ennis & Associates, have seen the appeal withdrawn. The project has been one of the most talked about proposals in the area and was the subject of much debate.

    • #757687
      rodger
      Participant

      good evening all.i haven’t posted in a while, I’m sure I was missed?

      I believe the springmount project was designed by those multi talented,gifted, handsome architects pat and tony of kiosk.

      its unfortunate as the scheme started out with 65 units.the planning received was for 47!
      that is 12 units per acre?

      the appeal is signed by none other than .joe o brien.mr.o brien has done some great work in getting the coco to increase densities.
      maybe he’s had a change of heart and will try to reverse all the great work he has done for the construction industry durring his distinguished career.
      the design is of a very high standard I think.

      maybe its a case of the gamekeeper becoming the poacher?

      is mr. o brien still in the cif.

    • #757688
      A-ha
      Participant

      lex, will you be able to post some pics. of the marina planned for kinsale later on in the week? please and thx 🙂

    • #757689
      lexington
      Participant

      Unfortunately – over the past few weeks I have been pretty tied up with a great many things and haven’t been able to put the same consistency into the thread as previous. I hope I can address this when the manic perplexities calm down – so apologises for any slippage. Hope to bring the thread back up to speed, accuracy, insights etc. Improvement will come.

    • #757690
      Leesider
      Participant

      Did anyone see the article in the Independent yesterday regarding Cork airport and Ryanair?? Ryanair have expressed an interest in using the old terminal building as a low cost hub when the new one is up and running. Hopefully the airport authorities and Ryanair might be able to iron something out, it would be great for Cork!

    • #757691
      securityman
      Participant

      First of all I really hope that Ryanair can strike a deal with Cork airport authority cos its a pity that you have to go out of shannon for the cheap flights plus it would have a great knock on affect for tourism in the region.

      Has anyone heard about a so called renovation of Mallow railway station by a UK company I think they are doing a number of stations throughout the country.

      On a final point does anybody else here ever wonder how they are going to fill these offices and retail units that are being proposed. At the moment you have a lot of buildings Idle look at patrick st, the roundy on cornmarket st, bachelors on the quay and the places next door next to the GATE cinema, the new building on georges quay Trinity House, the office building in Angelsea St where Anglo Irish Bank is, Owen O’Callaghans new building on Lavitts Quay, The numerous places on the new Mallow road and on the watercourse road, Wilton shopping centre has a few spots, the old tsb in wilton and many more I just worry that there is going to be a lot of derelict places around our city before were finished.

    • #757692
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      First of all I really hope that Ryanair can strike a deal with Cork airport authority cos its a pity that you have to go out of shannon for the cheap flights plus it would have a great knock on affect for tourism in the region.

      Has anyone heard about a so called renovation of Mallow railway station by a UK company I think they are doing a number of stations throughout the country.

      On a final point does anybody else here ever wonder how they are going to fill these offices and retail units that are being proposed. At the moment you have a lot of buildings Idle look at patrick st, the roundy on cornmarket st, bachelors on the quay and the places next door next to the GATE cinema, the new building on georges quay Trinity House, the office building in Angelsea St where Anglo Irish Bank is, Owen O’Callaghans new building on Lavitts Quay, The numerous places on the new Mallow road and on the watercourse road, Wilton shopping centre has a few spots, the old tsb in wilton and many more I just worry that there is going to be a lot of derelict places around our city before were finished.

      It’s a very good point Securityman, but I suppose from the developers point of view there are a lot of housing units coming on line in the next couple of years, this is where the “critical mass” kicks in, commercial feeds off residential and vise versa…

      I would be worried if we weren’t getting high densities in the city center, but fortunately our friends in the City Council have finally grasped the concept of reverse urbanisation. A city cannot and indeed won’t survive without a “critical mass” population.

      A recent trip to Detroit is proof of this, a budy said I wouldn’t belive it and he was right, it is actually unbelievable to see such a great city and it’s derelict. I admit they have gang problems, decline in motor industry etc., but the city center is practically vacant, so there is no incentive for business, it’s definetly not a case of “if you build it they will come”.

      An amazing place Detriot, scarey by day, i wasn’t brave enough by night!!! Well worth a visit if your in that neck of the woods…

      Getting back to our city, you may have noted in that many retail spaces have struggled, especially the leisure sector, this should hopefully be reversed by an increase in footfall population. A cheaper pint might help, but thats an argument for my puplican friends… :rolleyes:

      Nightlife in Dublin has never been better, even with the scarey thought of buying a round for five people…

    • #757693
      lexington
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      On a final point does anybody else here ever wonder how they are going to fill these offices and retail units that are being proposed. At the moment you have a lot of buildings Idle look at patrick st, the roundy on cornmarket st, bachelors on the quay and the places next door next to the GATE cinema, the new building on georges quay Trinity House, the office building in Angelsea St where Anglo Irish Bank is, Owen O’Callaghans new building on Lavitts Quay, The numerous places on the new Mallow road and on the watercourse road, Wilton shopping centre has a few spots, the old tsb in wilton and many more I just worry that there is going to be a lot of derelict places around our city before were finished.

      Fleming Construction’s Trinity House scheme has a commercial unit on the ground-floor up for sale/lease through Cohlan Downing & Associates. The scheme is only after completion and the unit had been awaiting some amendments via a further planning application. This was only recently granted. Considering the unit is just on the market, I think the location is actually good for a decent sized convenience store or the like given the recent number of developments in the area, the College of Commerce across the bridge and lack of such facilities in the immediate vicinity. One also must remember that many of these schemes are subject to planning policy set by CCC which calls for ground floor commercial units in an attempt to keep lively street-level/ground floor activity among other things. I’m sure in many cases developers don’t mind sacrificing such a unit in the advent of a larger development being granted.

      Howard Holdings’ Anglesea Street office development (Copley Hall), has let a good deal of its space already with tenants including Scott Tallon Walker, C.S.R. Planning Consultants and Anglo Irish Bank. Further spaces are under negotiation.

      21 Lavitts Quay, is occupied at the upper floors by OCP itself – while a semi-state body is set to take offices in other floors of the building. The commercial units are currently on the market – but I know that talks are on-going. Like ‘Bachelor’s on the Quay’ at Bachelor’s Quay (amazingly!) – these developments were constructed in-line with policy, but these locations face away for the core commercial area of the city centre and are generally by-passed by pedestrians who are set on the city centre]must[/U] be seen and establish itself to be seen as a top, desirable location to set up, expand or establish a business, institute, R&D etc.



      *UPDATES*

      😎 The Shipton Group (Blackpool Developments) have been granted a change use from their permitted office building (Block D) of their Blackpool Park development, currently under Phase 2 construction, to ‘general’ office usage – which essentially broadens their permit of the building’s usage in an office context. However, the grant has come with a hefty development contribution levy. Hmmm.

      😮 Meanwhile, Omniplex have been granted an additional McCabe Design pencilled signage to the southern elevation of Mahon Point S.C. facing the South Ring Dual-Carriageway. An original concept had been refused based on it’s ‘distracting’ nature to passing motorists.

      🙂 Also. Cork Univerity Hospital (CUH) have been permitted to realign its internal road network to cater for an extended 200 parking spaces – helping meet existing demand among other things. The permission will now also allow better filteration of traffic volumes and allow for management of such volumes and parking in light of the construction of the hospital’s new €80m euro Renal/Cardiac Unit – which extends west from the existing main hospital entrance toward the current main CUH car-parking facility. The new Renal/Cardiac facility is designed by Watkins Gray International.


    • #757694
      securityman
      Participant

      Thanks for the good replies lads and I suppose your right on a lot of the issues. As for the Wilton SC Lex did I hear a while back that BT 2 wanted to move in there? A good move for them would be to remove the supervalue as I think Tesco want to happen and make a bigger roches stores or BT 2 like Patrick St. As it is I think Wiltin has a lot of good shops and other services within the centre to make it top of the pile.

      Anyone know if Tesco has received planning permission for a new store in Kanturk yet?

    • #757695
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Lexington

      any chance you could look into the feasibility of the old Cork airport terminal being retained for low-cost use? It’s unlikely it will ever happen but one of the first reactions on another board was “well the old terminal’s PP expires when the new one is commissioned” – odd then that the Airport Authority chairman wouldn’t immediately rule it out.

      thanks

    • #757696
      lexington
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      Thanks for the good replies lads and I suppose your right on a lot of the issues. As for the Wilton SC Lex did I hear a while back that BT 2 wanted to move in there? A good move for them would be to remove the supervalue as I think Tesco want to happen and make a bigger roches stores or BT 2 like Patrick St. As it is I think Wiltin has a lot of good shops and other services within the centre to make it top of the pile.

      Anyone know if Tesco has received planning permission for a new store in Kanturk yet?

      First, re: Tesco in Kanturk, F.I. was only received on the application on the 28th July 2005, a due date isn’t scheduled until 11th September 2005.

      BT had originally considered a BT2 move to compliment their existing A-Wear store at Wilton (this would have made sense given the affluent consumer base in the area). The move was subsequently ruled out for a number of reasons – among these, the unit size and apparently another deal(?). An upgrade had been scheduled for the original A-Wear store in the centre, but instead was moved to the new unit and intentions for BT2’s first expansion out of the Dublin-area were stalled. The information I received regarding the above at the time, came from a lady with company and I think was a little dated when it was received. The ‘other deal’ info makes me wonder however, did the company spy Academy Street and think it more attractive??? We’ll have to wait and see. It would seem like an interesting idea.

      securityman, Wilton S.C. is now co-owned by Howard Holdings and Joe O’Donovan – Roches Stores/SuperValu (SuperValu had operated the grocery element of Roches’ under agreement – but this has now by acquired by the McCarthy Group – along with the city centre grocery element in Merchants Quay) is now the centre’s largest single tenant as the Tesco extension was not part of the €126m euro deal to purchase the centre last year. The location itself is one of the best in the city – and the expansion possibilities are enormous. However, anything major extension would have a significant impact on retail activities in the city. Rumours had been adrift long-ago that NMA had been approached to consider an enhancement of the Roches Stores department store at the centre – but nothing, involving NMA (to my knowledge at least) has since been heard. However that does not mean the centre may gain something in the future. Howard Holdings & Joe O’Donovan have maintained that their purchase was merely for investment purposes only. 😮



      dowlingm – I don’t think PP is any reason to rule out such an idea. But I’ll do my best to look about. 🙂

    • #757697
      altuistic
      Participant

      I think the idea of Ryanair operating from the old terminal would be a good idea and great for the city but am i the only one concerned at how this may impact on the new terminal and the considerable investment that has been made on it??

      as for Wilton, as a nearby resident i would have some concerns at how any expansion would impact on what is already one of the most heavily trafficked regions of the city. Also with mahonpoint and the new shopping centre in Ballincolllig I would think there is a significant presence of new centres in the south region. Of course it would be handy for me to pop up to every morning but i’m trying to think of it in a holistic sense.

      Thank you also for the photographs of the regional hospital. I had not seen these yet. Have you any idea when construction will begin?

    • #757698
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      I would also add to Lex’s comments about Cork’s image… It is highly important that Cork is seen as a serious location for any business to operate, there are two aspects to this the first being a sustained redevelopment of the City areas to increase density in both commercial space and more importantly residential space. I would think that the drive from Cork Airport, when completed is relatively clean and impressive, until you actually hit the city. The city dump is well disguised, the Blackash facility always impresses and the new flyover at the magic roundabout will be mind blowing!!!

      I would see the second key point being the expansion of the, in my view extraordinary limited city boundaries. If the city is to provide decent services it need cash. It’s that simple. I must admit I pay approx €1600 for a ~550 sq ft office in town, thats crazy, but understandable given the shallow pockets of the city when compared to thier greedy neighbours in the County Council.

      I must admit to being compared to Statler and Waldorf for my constant cribing about the general state of the city center.

      😡 The general lack of bins (ridiculous), count them its mad, there are more bins on Main Street Mallow than Oliver Plunkett Street. Patrick street is filthy, I think this might be an Irish problem though, but until littering is taken seriously in this country people will have no respect for thier surroundings. Why do litter wardens only seem to tackle sloppy business owners and not the slobs who simply drop litter allover our lovely main street…

      😡 The lack of commitment to the pedestrianisation of Oliver Plunkett Street and surrounding areas (mind boggling, we could have an area that would surpass Grafton Street or Oxford Street!!!). I believe there has recently been a decision made to pedstrianise Princess Street between the hours of 11am and 5pm!! Thats right for six hours a day. Would somebody please explain this to me as I laughed out loud when I heard this. Which was followed by the usual “go back to Dublin ya Jackeen” comments muttered by my friends. I love it…

      😡 Derelict buildings are my pet hate. If some pratt is hoarding a derelict / semi derelict building in a key location waiting for a kings ransom it should be taken from them at market value less a “greedy bastard tax” at 95% donated to the City coffers. These are the people who are stiffling progress in Cork, not the planners!! I think this is the most annoying thing about buying property here, you have to be almost sneaky in your approaches for fear of being branded a golden goose. It’s hard enough to aquire a decent land mass anywhere in the short term due to the crazy boundaries involved in most inner city properties, but when one person decides to hold out!!! Pass me my Valium…

      😡 The river, the beautiful Lee, the most under valued and developed resource in the city. As Lex says give use boardwalks, water buses, Viking tours etc…. Again to be fair to the City, they definetly need more rates for thier budget, none of these things come free…

      😡 Telecoms people… I think were all in agreement here. Finish a road, dig it up, lay cable, back fill it and watch it fall apart!!

      😡 Princes Street / Southmall junction, I’ve counted four times now that this has been dug up and reconcreted, dont mention the footpath on Marlboro Street. This level of incompetence would not be tollerated on a private site!!!

      :rolleyes: The roads, in Berties words “A lot done, a lot more to do”, they have made genuine and impressive efforts here, I must commend the roads department, damb it!!!

      Rant over, the Valium is taking effect now, fluffy white clouds… fluffy white clouds… fluffy white clouds… fluffy white clouds… fluffy white clouds… fluffy white clouds… 😀

    • #757699
      lexington
      Participant

      I would indeed agree with much of what you say –

      most especially the issue of city boundaries. It seems ridiculous (and as plain as the nose on anyone’s face) that a boundary extension is needed for the city limits. Areas such as Douglas, Rochestown, Little Island, Ballyvolane, Curraheen and even, dare I say it, Ballincollig (to some extent) – should all be lined up for consideration. I won’t express any personal beliefs on the reasons why this hasn’t been the case so far. But all I will say is that the decision not to extend the boundaries in the aforementioned areas (with the possible exception of the last mention) is not constructive to the development of Cork as region, let alone city or county. It reminds of a scene in a movie I only recently saw called ‘Finding Nemo’ (don’t ask!) were a bunch of seagulls are standing over food prospects and the only mutter each creature can afford is “Mine! Mine! Mine!”

      I hope a positive assessment and conclusion can be reached by both involved parties – both of whom can and often do work so well together. Perhaps, among the best of any authorities in any county in some cases – when the will is there.

      However, should an extension be accommodated in the future – I would stress CCC to maintain and value their greenspace.

    • #757700
      A-ha
      Participant

      This is so wierd, the last few days, the only posts I’ve been reading were my own….. I miss one day and suddenly the forum is jammers with new messages. Where have ye all been at??? lol. Anyways, I dont think that the city bounderies should be extended just yet, the local councils know whats best for the local area, and not just one big corporation dictating what goes where and when in an area unknown to themselves. On the other hand, it has very attractive and good points going for it, the main thing being that Douglas and Little Island etc. are all suburbs of Cork, yet are classed as part of the county as opposed to the city. The population of Cork City is 124,000, however, this does not include the suburbs, which shape and form Cork as it is today. The population of Cork City including the suburbs if the bouderies were extended would be in and around 200,000, thus almost doubles the size of the “city”. Also I heard ages ago that Midleton was to apply to extend it’s bounderies, making it a city bigger then both Galway and Waterford, and also making the County of Cork the only Irish county with more then one city. But this is pointless, now that Midleton it’s self has become more and more of a suburb/satellite town of Cork. Also, I was so delighted to read about Ryanair’s plans or whatever you want to call it about using the old terminal building in the airport (presumably it’s gonna be called Terminal 1??? hmm, how fancy) as a low-cost hub for the Cork region, I deteste Aer Lingus’ “Only €9.99 one way ex. taxes of €112.50”, it’s so rubbish, I wouldn’t fly with them to save me life and I’d be really greatful if anyone can get me a link on where to read the article on the internet, I tried looking but my head and big words don’t match. Hope ye all had a good break over the long week-end/summer holidays, where-ever it was ye all were. Ohh, and if anyone knows if the millionaire woman in Limerick has a daughter, give us a ring, it seems like a nice family to marry into, eh? Cah ching €€$$££ :rolleyes:

    • #757701
      A-ha
      Participant

      Also, me thinks that if BT2 opened in the former Iárrnrod Eirean thingy office at the top of Patrick St. it would do well (considering on the size of the place, I was never in there) but it’s been vacant for ages. Sorry about Irish spelling, but I’m not from a gaeltacth.

    • #757702
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The HSE will soon be applying to Cork County Council (CorkCoCo) for the development of a 2-storey, 24-hour medical services/health centre in the Glanmire-region of Cork. Located near the Crestfield Centre in Riverstown, the project will comprise of 928sq m of treatment, staff, clerical and assessment space – design is by SDA O’Flynn. The news should come as a positive boost for the rapidly expanding north-eastern suburbs of the city.



      🙂 Work on the €10m redevelopment of the Oriel House Hotel in Ballincollig is nearing completion, with a target set for mid-to-late October 2005. The redeveloped hotel will be operated by Ambassador Hotel Management (of Military Hill in the city centre) headed by William & Angela Savage. The historic old hotel has seen Hudson Associates appointed to handle design elements of the project – which, when completed will house 78 bedrooms, 250 parking spaces, restaurant, conference and banqueting facilities (up to 300 delegates), a leisure centre including 25m swimming pool, gym & treatment rooms. The hotel is currently seeking staff – and interestingly, lies within a very close proximity to one of the hotel sites earmarked by O’Flynn Construction as part of it’s Ballincollig Town Centre (BTC) project. It’ll be interesting to see how the hotels fair against one another.

    • #757703
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 The largest single office development ever proposed for Cork has been given the go-ahead by CCC. With 17 Conditions, planner Michael Lynch has approved Paul Kenny’s The Treasury development destined to home the new offices of the Revenue Commissioners who are seeking to relocated for their current accommodation at Government Buildings on Sullivan’s Quay. The huge development (with media reports tagging it at €100m and other independent sources putting it closer at between €50m – €60m) was designed by Paud O’Mahony, Glen Barry et al of Wilson Architecture will include 12686sq m of office accommodation in 2 linked 6-storey buildings with a unique quay frontage at St. Patrick’s Quay and extending north to the Lower Glanmire Road, over 1398m sq of retail space with 216 undergound car-parking spaces (resulting from F.I. submit – however the report states the 150 spaces should be seen as adequate enough given current CCC policy) on double deck levels. Ship Street provides the eastern border with Brian Boru Street lining the western elevation – the site includes Mr. Kenny’s Citi Car-Parks site as well as premises formerly owned by Pendrix Display and Stephen Kirwan. If Mr. Kenny’s tailor-made development is selected in September 2005 (appeal aside) – the project is scheduled to under-go construction almost immediately.

      Among the conditions imposed, the 5th floor of the service lift and stairwell located on the western elevation and the fifth floor of the open plan offices and their associated terrace, toilets and stairwells will be omitted.

      The project would make a fine addition to the Cork architectural landscape and seeks to retain the important PS facades at St. Patrick’s Quay whilst making a vital contemporary architectural statement. A good day for Cork’s development and hopefully we will see it in the flesh in the future. It is not known yet whether Bell Scott Engineering or The McLaughlin Family intend to appeal the decision as they were the only 2 parties to submit objections to the project following Further Information.

    • #757704
      dave123
      Participant

      😀 A-ha , Midleton another city within cork……. 😮
      That is a load of baloney….
      It has a population less than 10,000 (including boundaries environs)
      And anyway Mallow is bigger , its so stupid to think Midelton is a city, 😮

      A Population centre of at least 30,000 is recogised as a City in Ireland , In European standards itrs 50,000 minimum 🙂

      Anyway just wanted to get that straight. 😀
      As for Cork city- I think the boundary extenion should go ahead , it has more reasons and less inhibitation than to go against it ,

    • #757705
      A-ha
      Participant

      That building is totally fantastic, it just shows that a building doesn’t have to be tall to make an impact on the city landscape. Do we know what restaurants/shops will occupy the new terminal at the airport, I heard talks of WH Smith and O’ Briens Sandwich Bar making a presence at the airport, has anyone else heard of this. Also I read plans of a railway line connecting Shannon Airport to the main Limerick-Ennis line. I would have thought connecting Dublin to a railway line of some sort would have been a first priority.
      Ohh and dave123, a boundary extension of that size in Midleton would make it have a population in excess of 35,000. I know it’s hard to believe, but they were the facts and figures I heard. In saying that, Carrigtohill would become a suburb of Midleton, which is projected to have a population of 15,000 by 2015. When you add the other environs of Midleton, it wouldn’t be hard to come up with 35,000

    • #757706
      pier39
      Participant

      @dave123 wrote:

      😀 A-ha , Midleton another city within cork……. 😮
      That is a load of baloney….
      It has a population less than 10,000 (including boundaries environs)
      And anyway Mallow is bigger , its so stupid to think Midelton is a city, 😮

      A Population centre of at least 30,000 is recogised as a City in Ireland , In European standards itrs 50,000 minimum 🙂

      Anyway just wanted to get that straight. 😀
      As for Cork city- I think the boundary extenion should go ahead , it has more reasons and less inhibitation than to go against it ,

      hey stupid is a strong word…sure we all make mistakes, but i still tell my son i love him. 😀

      midelton aint no city but if it keeps goin the way it is…in a coupla years, who knows??? anyway, ballincollig is bigger than either mallow or midelton with a projected pop. of 40000 for 2010 (or 2018 cant remember which!) but then again like glanmire i kinda consider ballincollig as a suburb anyway at this stage. midelton to cork is kinda like what bray is to dublin.

      great news bout paul kennys building. looks great! well done to the lads over at wilson. lets just hope it becomes a reality.

      im gettin all tingly and its not just because ive been sitting on my leg for half the day its cos a bud of mine with a certain practice has been quietly telling me the sca on a certain project involving a certain crown from malla! dunno how advanced it tis but i’ll be lookin forward to it. anyway im off to do whatever it is i do. bye!

    • #757707
      A-ha
      Participant

      Who still says baloney? I mean, come on like! Anyways, as I was talking about Carrigtwohill, it just clicked, but aren’t they supposed to be building a condom factory in the IDA park. It’s no joke, I actually read it a few weeks back, but heard nothing of it since. Can anyone gimmy an update on it, big employment opportunities to be had! 🙂

    • #757708
      pier39
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Who still says baloney?

      baloney salesmen???

      anyway as for the condom factory as exciting as the prospect of a condom manufacturer in cork is (perhaps to compliment the manufacture of viagra in pfizers not far away) – arent there better topics of discussion than that?? that is unless the building housing the facility is shaped like a condom itself, now thats interesting architecture…and i think norman foster already gave it a shot in london! 😉

      between viagra, condoms and diaphragms, corks got the whole gig wrapped up! (no pun intended) the city is the source/cause and prevention to a successful pregnancy it would seem. 😀

      if your looking to get a job in the factory, as an electronic tester???. can i suggest checking it out with adecco first! :p job prospects are good with condom manufacturers at least 97% of the time.

      god you crazy college kids crack me up! go on ya scamp ya! hehe

    • #757709
      A-ha
      Participant

      Who says I’m in college??? Ohh, now I feel all sophisticated and such. And I didn’t mean me when I said the whole job in the local condom factory thing. I meant the local community in general. Smart thinking with the Norman Foster pun, I would never have thought of it, although, the building would stick in my head more if it was compared to a condom rather then a gherkin. I better not talk about such things on a forum where children may read it. Forgive me. 🙁 And also, yes there are better topics of discussion, but I’m all out. You’ll have to tell lexington to stop living in the real world and come to Cyberville more often. He is like our local newspaper.

    • #757710
      pier39
      Participant

      your profile says occupation = student. i had that job once too and man was i damn good at it. i was diligent about it – up every morning at 12pm, in for a nice additional sleep at my lecture at around 1pm (usually about an hour), then skipped the rest of the lectures to go drinking til about 3am where id end up back in bed with some girl called rodney…too bad i got fired into a real job! i was voted most likely to become a politician!….now what do i do, i design things! oooo! big whoop! hehe.

      come to cyberville MORE often??? god thats a scary thought! he seems to practically have a tent set up on his modem. no disrespek bruv! peace out! but seriously tis a mighty good thing, i come here more often than i read the paper (cos usually and no offence to the good people at the irish times, indo and stuff) this is more fun!

      im really looking forward to horgans qy. i hear omp have got a hand in that one, or am i wrong? castlelands construction seem to be planning something big and im freakin out waiting to hear what theyve lined up. ooo the anticipation. lex any input??? (ignoring my above comments 😉 )

      ….at least she told me her name was rodney!!!!

    • #757711
      lexington
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      come to cyberville MORE often??? god thats a scary thought! he seems to practically have a tent set up on his modem. no disrespek bruv! peace out! but seriously tis a mighty good thing, i come here more often than i read the paper (cos usually and no offence to the good people at the irish times, indo and stuff) this is more fun!

      ….at least she told me her name was rodney!!!!

      I’m actually awaiting planning permission on a dormer dwelling – the tent wore out fast. :p

      And it’s okay pier39, we’ve all been there – waking up with a ‘Rodney’, at least you’ve an excuse, I don’t drink!….hmmm, I should probably delete that! 😀

      Trying to get my form back with the thread – have been genuinely run ragged these past few weeks. Slowly getting there I hope.

      I suppose, as for myself, I’m looking forward to the outcomes of Water Street, Ladyswell and Eglinton Street by ABP. Whether Paul Kenny comes out trumps with The Treasury and the OPW. And CCC decisions on CentrePoint (Clontarf Street), the Capitol and Deane Street. In terms of lodgements, a few big ones, Manor Park’s plans for Horgan’s Quay (hopefully September/October), Academy Street, Albert Quay, Reliance Building and perhaps a site further down the docklands ( 😉 ). It’ll be really interesting to see how the Ford site outcomes and whether Omnistone decide to leap with Marina Commercial Park, or make intentions known. Also the plan for CHQ will be an exciting one. Really looking forward to seeing work on the Kino get a move on.

    • #757712
      A-ha
      Participant

      Occupation…. I never heard the word before I signed up to Archiseek, but I had to put in something, ohh I’m so rebelious. Your college years sound so interesting, you should write those things down, they might be worth money some day. And I have to say that you make me laugh so so much. Your really funny. Maybe you should ditch your design job and take up being a full time comedian. I’m still smiling from you last post, lol. But I do agree pier39, lex puts in more then he gets out of this website! Gawd look at the time. I better go, I’m bidding on a pair of sunglasses on eBay. Nite Nite all. 😎

    • #757713
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      The Ford site is 11 acres according to your last post on it. Clearly a site that big and in such a prominent location will require big imagination and big pockets. What developer do ya think could be up for taking such a project on????

      I’d say the big want will be waterfront sites but Fords site seems pretty exciting too.

    • #757714
      POM
      Participant

      Just as a matter of clarity, the details regarding square footage of Paul Kenny’s development on Saint Patrick’s Quay are more accurate in post #191 than in today’s Irish Examiner. Those approximations concern the square footage of only one sectiion of the development.

      Interesting site, keep up the good work.

      POM
      Cork

    • #757715
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      The Ford site is 11 acres according to your last post on it. Clearly a site that big and in such a prominent location will require big imagination and big pockets. What developer do ya think could be up for taking such a project on????

      I’d say the big want will be waterfront sites but Fords site seems pretty exciting too.

      There are a number of possibilities – both locally and nationally who may be interested and well capable of a landmark redevelopment of what is some very ‘developable’ land.

      Apparently, I’m told (with a little salt) that there are at least 4 bids on the site which comes in a just over 11 acres and which is guiding at approx. €20m. I personally wouldn’t particularly value the site at anything grossly in excess of the guide – but, given the potential scale of development with which the site may afford, that’ll be the decision of the successful bidder(s) to determine.

    • #757716
      A-ha
      Participant

      What would be the most likely thing to be put there if the area is redeveloped, apartments? On a scale of such size in a prime location of the city, money is to be made. But I can’t see developers rushing to the opportunity, it’s on a very big scale, who would be willing to take it on?

    • #757717
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      What would be the most likely thing to be put there if the area is redeveloped, apartments? On a scale of such size in a prime location of the city, money is to be made. But I can’t see developers rushing to the opportunity, it’s on a very big scale, who would be willing to take it on?

      Manor Park Homes are redeveloping just under 17-acres with CIE along Horgan’s Quay. 2 other major developers (1 has had considerable speculation, with good cause, airing about it in recent times) will be tackling large scale sites in the southern docklands – and Howard Holdings have drawn up a masterplan and presented it to CCC regarding the south docklands, with the company in discussion to take on a considerable development opportunity estimated in the hundreds of millions of euros.

      At 11-acres, the Ford site is not the biggest single docklands holding. Tedcastles have designed plans for their sizeable riverside holding – although among their masterplans (their favoured scheme) is predominantly residential – up to 550 units along with commercial and educational elements (however, other plans are being assessed as well and Tedcastles may even decide to develop the site themselves given their development track record in places like the USA). The problem with residential development in the southern docklands spine is that the for any major exercise to be demonstrated, a rezoning may be needed to do so. Therefore, predominantly (but not strictly) commercial, institutional, leisure/commercial, retail etc developments are encouraged. I don’t see this as being a long-term rule – flexibility will likely be demonstrated on individual presentations, depending. That is to say, development according to each consultation and each individual proposal, may be acceptable for residential elements within a broader context. Developmentally, it makes viability more acceptable.

      A number of developers are more than capable of taking on the site – in fact, it offers a very valuable holding. In any event, the prospect of its development – or lot-by-lot sale – will prove very attractive. These sites, especially of such ripe development quality, do not come on the market every day.

      A list of local & national developers could adequately acquire the site. Adjoining sites are currently being assessed with notice on those sites expected to be issued by the year end. The preferential usage on the Ford site has been ‘educational/institutional’ but any proposal will be subject to consultation and is not strictly limited to this effect. UCC and CIT have expressed preference for further development in plentiful lands nearing Curraheen – that’s not to say they would rule out the Ford location, but does make it unlikely (lest I be proved wrong). Besides the usual suspects – groups like O’Brien & O’Flynn Limited have more than adequate ability to redevelop such a site to a high standard, it will be interesting to see if they would be willing to take a departure from their predominantly residential base and embark on a significant mixed-use proposal. Whatever way this site proceeds, a high standard of design is vital to ensure Cork’s docklands continue to promote the high standards already being set and do not fall into the lazy profit-driven, ill-considered schemes on display at other cities’ dockland developments. ‘Landmarks’, in the true sense of the word, incorporating strong, innovative design bring their own rewards beyond but including immediate returns – they can generate longer-term revenues.

    • #757718
      A-ha
      Participant

      I never knew that the CIE area on Horgans Quay was so big…. at most I would have said 10acres, 17 was at the other end of the line.

    • #757719
      pier39
      Participant

      the tedcastles scheme that i saw looked like a communist tool-shed!!! think a pic of it was posted in the other look at the state of cork thread. but thankfully i hear its not the final design and they have been talkin with the council about other plans. theres my little insightful input.

      anyone know how event centre plans for the showgrounds are proceeding? its been a while since we heard anything on it and i figure with manor park hoping to lodge plans in october the pressure will be on the rivals to get something in.

    • #757720
      pier39
      Participant

      by the way got this great email the other day called “auctioneer lexicon revealed” and thought i might share some of the hidden meanings our good friends in the estate agents offices seem to use in their daily lingo.

      cosy = small, cramped, ceiling a foot lower than the average human height.
      handyman’s dream = at least 2 of its walls are still standing
      rustic = see above
      ideal first step on the property ladder or starter home = young people are so gullible
      up and coming area = border up your windows with reinforced steel
      within a stone’s throw… = using a catapult and a jet-pack
      partially renovated = brand new 40w bulb in the kitchen
      sought after = blank cheques only
      easy access = new flyover being constructed directly over the house

      i thought it was funny! and before anyone gets offended it came from an auctioneer so relax! hehe 🙂

    • #757721
      A-ha
      Participant

      hehehehe, lol. It’s funny cos it’s true. 😀

    • #757722
      satanta99
      Participant

      I’ve been out of the country for the last two months but I keep up to date with forum almost religously. What I am most excited about in the Cork Area is the Ballincollig Town Centre development. The shopping centre is due to come on stream in October, yet there has been very little information forthcoming about it. This would lead me to believe that maybe there is some trouble in filling all the 34 units. This is just my assumption but what does anyone else think? Can Ballincollig become a higher order retail centre?

    • #757723
      lexington
      Participant

      @satanta99 wrote:

      I’ve been out of the country for the last two months but I keep up to date with forum almost religously. What I am most excited about in the Cork Area is the Ballincollig Town Centre development. The shopping centre is due to come on stream in October, yet there has been very little information forthcoming about it. This would lead me to believe that maybe there is some trouble in filling all the 34 units. This is just my assumption but what does anyone else think? Can Ballincollig become a higher order retail centre?

      80% of the units (SC units) were reserved as of June 2005. Including tenants Dunnes Stores, Easons, New Look, Hallmark et al. More info will be made available concerning the SC in the next few weeks. The SC is a ‘healthy’ mix of UK and Irish tenants, with one or two international names for good measure. Undoubtedly other remaining units will fill up over time. The opening date for the Shopping Centre is set for October 16th 2005.

      I can see BTC SC falling into a category somewhere between Blackpool S.C. (unfortunate news that Mexx at Blackpool S.C. are seeking to wind-up operations at the centre with a potential relocation – according to staff – Mexx is a good name but would perhaps trade better in a location like Academy Street) & Wilton S.C. – with relatively good names, serving a predominant area interest, perhaps with some effective ‘pull’ names. The centre falls short of Mahon Point by some 70,000sq ft + (on that note, I was visiting MP today and was taken aback by just how much trade seems to have picked up at the centre, the word ‘jointed’ sprung to mind – this should be taken as a postive sign for OFC) at just touching on 170,000sq ft, hosting 34 units and 3 anchor stores.

      OFC seem to have been careful to go for big, but not too big – the centre can fit into the niche nicely of town centre shopping facility – as well as a draw from further afield. The mix of tenants seems fine, but nothing exceptional thus far – the announcement of Dunnes Stores as main anchor tenant was a bit of a let down, but it should serve the area interest well and the other tenants should boost the attractiveness. Pity about the SC logo however – either way, I hope the centre will prove a success for OFC and have no doubt it will be.

      The overall 500m euro BTC project will take until 2008 to complete, with over 130,000sq ft office space, 200,000sq ft retail, over 800 new houses, parks, walks, multi-storeys and so on. 4 design teams were involved in the project’s conception including The Building Design Partnership, Reddy O’Riordan Staehli, Hogan Associates and Wilson Architecture – the idea was to allow for varying styles and influxes of ideas to allow for a genuine town centre feel.


    • #757724
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Hughes & Hughes Book Co. – the Irish-owned newsagents and book-retailler, with a strong Dublin-base – are seeking to open a new store in Cork over the coming future. Locations are currently under review and negotiation with an announcement expected in the coming months. Although a city centre location would be ideal, the exact area is still up for review.



      A recent travel through the Centre Park Road area gives one a greater sense of the potential of the docklands, but also a sense of the level of investment that will be required. Huge, practically vacant sites – such as the Goulding Fertilisers site – offer wonderful opportunities on what are essentially very well located and very ready-to-be-developed lands.

      Also – the image below is just a partial perspective (east-to-west) of Horgan’s Quay (outline in yellow), giving you some idea of the wonderful quay frontage Manor Park Homes have to play with in their 500m euro redevelopment, and also, it can be conveyed, a sense of how important this scheme is in that it essentially creates a new urban quarter and extended city centre all the way down to Water Street – no mean feat. (for reference – image looks from POV of southern docklands; Water Street is further east, approx. 70m from image end on RHS).

    • #757725
      A-ha
      Participant

      It’s such a shame that Dunnes is the anchor tenant in Ballincollig, like there aren’t enough in Cork already. Do you have a last of the tenants that have secured or that are interested in opening in the shopping centre?

    • #757726
      lexington
      Participant

      A few names – but I’ll try and get a half-decent list up soon enough (with those I can put up).

      On the bright side however, Dunnes are looking to redevelop their original store along St. Patrick’s Street/Bowling Green Street soon – in a €30m scheme involving some buildings to the rear, backing onto Drawbridge Street as well. Such significantly increase floor-space, possibly a few new units and enhance the awfulness that is Bowling Green Street (in it’s current state at least).



      Pothole-o-rama

      This is up for debate – but am I the only one who can feel the bill for a new suspension arriving in my letterbox everytime one drives along Merchant’s Quay, Lavitts Quay (outside 21 Lavitts Quay is a joke! The patchy roadworks have left a surface not suitable for a Hummer), Cornmarket Street – to name but a few! Also Victoria Cross – not long after resurfacing and the road leading to Sunday’s Well, just before Shanakiel – has been ridiculously dug up and fixed up with half-respectable enthusiasm. Why spend millions on resurfacing only to dig up the roads a few months later and not repair them to the same standard as intended??? 😡 It’s amazingly frustrating.

    • #757727
      A-ha
      Participant

      I wish I too could say lexington, that I need a new suspension, but I haven’t got a car yet. Anyways, they’ve been saying that for ages about doing up the Dunnes on Patrick St. but I still don’t go in there, for the simple reason, it’s worse then the one in Ballyvolane. Well, almost anyway!

    • #757728
      satanta99
      Participant

      Thanks for the info and images Lexington. I agree that this centre will probably serve the area quiet well, and its town centre setting could make it an attractive area to shop in. I really do hope OFC efforts at creating a new town centre work out, it would show that there is a definate alternative to the enclosed suburban mall, surrounded by blocks and blocks of apartments. The mixture of the shopping centre and the retail/commercial streets provides the balance between public and private spaces. OFC have done a good job of creating a pleasant and aspirational image of what the town can be, besides the tacky Signage.
      Besides Dunnes Stores and Easons, I am aware that O’briens is set to open and I know Carrig Donn is too. I suppose when the full list is released we will know for certain.

    • #757729
      A-ha
      Participant

      Has anyone been to the shopping centre in Dungarvan? I went a few weeks back, just to see what it was like. I was so unimpressed it wasn’t even funny. The building is an architectural disaster, looks more like a big pre-fab rather then a shopping centre, and the shops ain’t great either. Small choice of stores, only a Dunnes and Sasha keeping the whole place together. 🙁

    • #757730
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As has been mentioned, the Glucksman Gallery is up for the prestigous Stirling Prize in the UK.
      You can cast your vote for the Gallery (or any of the other nominated buildings) at the link below to the BBC website.

      The Glucksman is currently in second place and it would be nice to see Cork Arcitecture honoured across the water- in this of all years. So, you’ve no excuse, GET VOTING and tell your friends to do the same.

      Click here to vote

    • #757731
      lexington
      Participant

      @ooshi wrote:

      Anyone have any images of Paul Kenny’s Treasury Office Development? Or the Dairygold complex for Mallow? Thanks 🙂

      By the way ooshi – not forgetting Alchemy Properties’ plan for Mallow – just got caught up with things and am still seeking to get images up! 😉 Am doing my best. If I can’t I’ll let you know by mid-week.

    • #757732
      lisam
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      As has been mentioned, the Glucksman Gallery is up for the prestigous Stirling Prize in the UK.
      You can cast your vote for the Gallery (or any of the other nominated buildings) at the link below to the BBC website.

      The Glucksman is currently in second place and it would be nice to see Cork Arcitecture honoured across the water- in this of all years. So, you’ve no excuse, GET VOTING and tell your friends to do the same.

      Click here to vote

      Its now in the lead!!

    • #757733
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lisam wrote:

      Its now in the lead!!

      Woohoo!!

      Anybody have anynews on how ABP are leaning as regards Frinailla’s Lady’s Well?

      On the subject of Watercourse Road, the press keep mentioning a 20 million Euro Office development there which is in the running for the Revenue re-location (although less so I guess, owing to the news last week).
      I’ve still not worked out where exactly they are refering too, despite noble attempts by Lexington to enlighten me. Can anybody shed some light on the subject?

    • #757734
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Have you not seen the 9 storey office development currently in construction alongside the blackpool retail park and sc?

    • #757735
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Have you not seen the 9 storey office development currently in construction alongside the blackpool retail park and sc?

      That is the Shipton Group entry – however the Watercourse Road proposal (Blackpool By-Pass) concerns a project site by Joe Carey & Frank Sheahan near their Sheann Muillean development currently under completion.
      Although I appreciate Paul Kenny’s proposal has much going for it – the completion of the other developments would be well ahead of the St. Patrick’s Quay proposal – that is an enticing factor for the OPW.

    • #757736
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Have you not seen the 9 storey office development currently in construction alongside the blackpool retail park and sc?

      Yes i have mickey but this is

      (a) Not on Watercourse Road, and

      (b) mentioned in the same articles as an alternative to the Watercourse road site.

      Either the press reports are mistaken, or there is another site on Watercourse road capable of housing the tax office!

      Update:
      Thanks Lex, I’ve got the general area sorted now alright, but I think most people would call that the New Mallow Road and not Watercourse Road. Is the office development on the city or Mallow side of the apartments?

    • #757737
      securityman
      Participant

      Would I be right in saying that the development you are on about on the watercourse road is where the 147 snooker club was and trotters second hand shop next to the garda station as far as I know all that part of the street is being redeveloped.

    • #757738
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      Would I be right in saying that the development you are on about on the watercourse road is where the 147 snooker club was and trotters second hand shop next to the garda station as far as I know all that part of the street is being redeveloped.

      147/trotters/mac’s meat is all part of a proposed development by Frinailla Ltd. (called LadysWell) which recieved permission from CCC but was appealled to ABP with a (favourable??) decision due mid August. Builders/engineers have already been onsite marking out.

      The Sean Muillean/ Office development is almost parrallel but on the Blackpool Bypass/ New Mallow Road- big red brick things, almost complete.

      🙂 Aaaahh, I love it when I get to start a new page 🙂

    • #757739
      A-ha
      Participant

      Heya City of Cork forum. Ok, I’ll just ask in here since I got no reply in the Fermoy bypass forum, but has anyone else heard of a by pass being built in Castlematyr? If anyone can give me some facts and figures, knock yeer selves out! Thx. 😉

    • #757740
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      147/trotters/mac’s meat is all part of a proposed development by Frinailla Ltd. (called LadysWell) which recieved permission from CCC but was appealled to ABP with a (favourable??) decision due mid August. Builders/engineers have already been onsite marking out.

      As far as I know it will be August 17th (the scheduled ABP decision) – see Frinailla’s website for details on the development here. Werdna’s Water Street plans are due a decision in the following month – I’ve the date quoted earlier in this thread, the 19th September 2005 as best I remember.



      Just as Seann Mhuillean was mentioned earlier – here are some more recent images of the Section 23 development designed by J.E. Keating & Associates, developed by Frank Sheahan & Joe Carey, built by PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd (Phase 1) and Rohcon (Phase 2). The ultimate development provides for approx. 169 apartment units varying between 1, 2 and 3-bedroom residencies. The buildings are located beside Hewitt Mills along the Blackpool By-Pass.

    • #757741
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Well the rumour has it that architects/planners O’Mahony Pike may be invited to draw up a brief on the South Docklands Area Plan. The task is a mammoth one, of that you can be sure, but may lay an interesting foundation for the development of this vital and strategically important region. OMP have experience in the docklands, having drawn up a masterplan for Horgan’s Quay after being appointed by CIE in late 1998 to do so. OMP are currently working on another new significant plan of which details will be made in the coming months…I’ll look into that report and get back to you with more when I can…

      🙂 Plans for another docklands project are shaping up nicely in a prime location not far from many recent development activity moves in the city – the scheme is indeed set to arouse a lot of interest come its application which is anticipated (but yet to be confirmed) before the year end. I hope I can bring you details soon.

    • #757742
      altuistic
      Participant

      Obviously developing in the docklands is something of a status coup for development companies operating in Cork but what i’m curious about is which development company is going to be the one the steps forward and develops THE ‘jawdropper’ the one that stands out above all others. One would think one of the cork boys would be the one willing to put the jewel in the crown of its own backyard.

    • #757743
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Corbett Bros. are seeking to lodge an application for a 22-unit apartment development over basement car-park with CCC soon. The 3-storey, roof terraced development is destined for Carmelite Place, off the Western Road and is designed by James Leahy & Associates. The site was bought quietly in August of 2003 from vendor Dermot O’Keefe, who had previously sought permission for a 4-storey, 20-unit student apartment development over basement car-park (designed by PRC Architects) and was refused on appeal. As part of the project, the 6-terraced houses at Carmelite Place, and Carmelite Stores, will be demolished.

      These images are a few months old – details of backyard space, comparitive perspectives and other shots are also available, if needed.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Work has got well underway at the Mercy University Hospital on the €2m vertical extension of its Theatre Department. The project includes the development of new staff facilities, storage, CSSD and a new theatre to replace the existing ‘Doctor’s Lounge’. The design is by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli and John Sisk & Sons Ltd are on site.

      😎 A substantial (approx. 297 units & 6 serviced sites – tbc) mixed housing project is set to be lodged with Cork County Council for lands near Cobh town imminently. The project, back by investors, inlcuding JJ & Mary Frahill – will comprise of mixed terraced, semi-detached, detached, duplex and apartment units all at lands in Ballyleary.

    • #757744
      A-ha
      Participant

      It’s good to hear of such enthusiasm for the south docks area.

    • #757745
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Did anyone actually hear confirmation regarding the semi-pedestrianisation (phew!!) of Princes Street, or is this another chinese whisper….

      I was in Galway this weekend (intentional), and all I can say is WOW, if we had the same level of commitment to tourism / shoppers / pedestrians we would be laughing as a real destination…. Not one gaurd in sight, as opposed to urs insisting all street furniture be removed by our cafes /bars as early as nine o’clock… Friggin’ police county… (Sorry just got two points today!!!) 😡

      By the way I hope were not all in for a little pasting in the next couple of weeks on Rip Off Republic… It made very interesting viewing, he certainly has a point about stamp duty and VAT…

    • #757746
      securityman
      Participant

      Just coming back to an earlier post Harvey Norman are moving into the old Woodies site in Kinsale road so thats interesting that they didnt go into little island, blackpool or mahon considering the rest of their stores are in retail parks and this one is on its own but this must be good news for woodies as there will be two major stores in the area along with DPL, Brooks, Irish International and Cork Builders. I also believe that Turners cross motors are building a new showroom as well.

    • #757747
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 Corbett Bros. are seeking to lodge an application for a 22-unit apartment development over basement car-park with CCC soon. The 3-storey development is destined for Carmelite Place, off the Western Road and is designed by James Leahy & Associates. The site was bought quietly earlier this year from vendor Dermot O’Keefe, who had previously sought permission for a 4-storey, 20-unit student apartment development over basement car-park (designed by PRC Architects) and was refused on appeal. As part of the project, the 6-terraced houses at Carmelite Place, and Carmelite Stores, will be demolished.

      It’s a terrible indication of the state of our planning controls that 6 well built, decent family homes can be bought up, left to rot and demolished like this. I followed the previous application with interest. It was a substandard design for the location.
      The fact remains though that there is no reason for demolition of these properties. The terrace as a whole represents a transition from the built up student accomodation area near college to the more permanent residential areas of Sunday’s Well. 😡

      Incidently, i probably shouldn’t be saying this given my stance on their demolition BUT, if they were to be demolished I’m surprised AIB next door didnt come on board to develop a larger scale mixed use development with the bank on the ground floor.

    • #757748
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      It’s a terrible indication of the state of our planning controls that 6 well built, decent family homes can be bought up, left to rot and demolished like this. I followed the previous application with interest. It was a substandard design for the location.
      The fact remains though that there is no reason for demolition of these properties. The terrace as a whole represents a transition from the built up student accomodation area near college to the more permanent residential areas of Sunday’s Well. 😡

      Incidently, i probably shouldn’t be saying this given my stance on their demolition BUT, if they were to be demolished I’m surprised AIB next door didnt come on board to develop a larger scale mixed use development with the bank on the ground floor.

      In some respects I am inclined to agree with you. Personally, I feel the houses possess notable architectural merit (though they are not PS) and suit the area nicely – I accept the marked transition point, they do this most adequately. I’m hoping to have images up by the end of next week and will leave the design open to judgement from there-on in. Indeed, a larger scheme incorporating the AIB would have given the development a nice corner frontage on what is a primary routeway in and out of the city – a nice curve-linear glazed feature could have gone down nicely here – it would have helped feature the development is a far more positive and dramatic way, allowing it take full advantage of its environs. AIB would have had a good new premises (perhaps on the ground-floor), the basement car-park could have been extended and more units could have been added without increasing height beyond neighbouring structure brims.

      It should be noted the proposal by Dermot O’Keefe on the original proposal stood a 4-storeys – it was marked by both CCC planners and ABP inspectors that a 3-storey (max) proposal would have been more appropriate – clearly Corbett’s have responded to this.

    • #757749
      jungle
      Participant

      For those of you following the progress at the airport, I managed to get a nice image of some Aer Lingus and Servisair trucks with a glimpse of the new terminal in the background…

    • #757750
      lexington
      Participant

      Whoa – check out the rims on that baby! 😀

      Thanks jungle – how do you feel about it’s look in the flesh? (Well flesh in the making).

    • #757751
      BEETLE
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Personally, I’m not really put out by the height when considered in an empirical context. The general height of buildings under development is not far off this project – and the prospect of further development at the adjoining Top Car site to the north and speculative redevelopment of the Cork Farm Centre (HSE offices) to the south, not forgetting Frinailla’s other plans to at Dennehy’s Cross. I think this route can accommodate such buildings but I would generally feel that any development approaching the residential areas near Dennehy’s Cross must be toned down. This height of building at this location would be unsuitable. The big thing with Robert White’s plans for a student development at the site, in a former application of 100-bedroom over 17-apartments at 5-storeys was indeed overshadowing. My memory of this application is not as precise as I’d like it to be, but if I remember correctly, the project exhibited a roof garden which allowed for overlooking back onto residencies at Ashbrook and Orchard Road. As far as I know, any terraces/balconies in the subject development are generally west facing onto Victoria Cross Road. In the 2003 application 2 units at the 4th floor were removed indeed from Kevin O’Keefe’s design – I personally feel the Frinailla design is a little better and though it peaks on 7-storeys, it doesn’t do so to any excessive effect. The adjoining development prospects at Top Car and Cork Farm Centre were not speculated at the time of the 2003 application, neither was the Justin Canty site now under development by Aras Developments. In that context, the Robert White plan was very imposing and did standout. I would posit that planners will address the Frinailla plan with a strategic outlook. As for the commercial unit, I don’t know what the intended usage is for sure beyond speculation. What are your own feelings on the design?

      Hi there again. Thanks for your opinion recently on the Frinailla planning app. at Victoria Cross – I was away since and never got a chance to reply until now. I took a drive around the area – making this area in and around County Hall my summer study – and I have to say that I am really very divided with regard to how the area is shaping up. The Victoria Mills apartments look dire – just my opinion – but by God, the whole area from there upward towards Dennehy’s cross is under development. There are quite a lot of established residential dwellings nearby such as across from old Statoil station, Orchard Road and The Grove (Orchard Road), and then further up you have the homes on Model Farm Road and Wilton Road, There’s going to be a whole lot of people on the move there once college starts and this will increase over the next couple of years by the looks of things. Personally, I still think that the proposed Frinailla structure is too high and I’m not overly gone on the design either. But that’s just me, I wouldn’t particularly like the design of Farranlea Hall across from the Farm centre either, although the site works much better. The Frinailla site is very small and exiting could be dodgy, particularly if going in a northerly direction (probably would not be allowed). Still don’t know what the commercial unit is for – would prob guess some sort of shop or restaurant/cafe?? But the big question in my mind is regarding the future – what happens if the apartments in general don’t occupy fully? Rumour suggests that Victoria Mills has never filled completely during term-time – Can students afford this type of living? Fellow students tell me that rented houses are still cheaper and better craic. I still feel that ther area has had too many large apartment blocks constructed in a small general area. Personally, I feel that Frinailla won’t get the 6-7 proposed development, although CCC will possibly grant it or something not far off, but I wonder if Pleanala will uphold this, if it goes that far? Sorry for being so long winded. ALSO, I would love to see plans of the new proposed development near AIB at Victoria Cross/Western Road, How big is this site? Thanks very much. This site is unreal for gathering information – fantastic.

    • #757752
      lexington
      Participant

      @BEETLE wrote:

      Hi there again. Thanks for your opinion recently on the Frinailla planning app. at Victoria Cross – I was away since and never got a chance to reply until now. I took a drive around the area – making this area in and around County Hall my summer study – and I have to say that I am really very divided with regard to how the area is shaping up. The Victoria Mills apartments look dire – just my opinion – but by God, the whole area from there upward towards Dennehy’s cross is under development. There are quite a lot of established residential dwellings nearby such as across from old Statoil station, Orchard Road and The Grove (Orchard Road), and then further up you have the homes on Model Farm Road and Wilton Road, There’s going to be a whole lot of people on the move there once college starts and this will increase over the next couple of years by the looks of things. Personally, I still think that the proposed Frinailla structure is too high and I’m not overly gone on the design either. But that’s just me, I wouldn’t particularly like the design of Farranlea Hall across from the Farm centre either, although the site works much better. The Frinailla site is very small and exiting could be dodgy, particularly if going in a northerly direction (probably would not be allowed). Still don’t know what the commercial unit is for – would prob guess some sort of shop or restaurant/cafe?? But the big question in my mind is regarding the future – what happens if the apartments in general don’t occupy fully? Rumour suggests that Victoria Mills has never filled completely during term-time – Can students afford this type of living? Fellow students tell me that rented houses are still cheaper and better craic.

      With regard to Victoria Mills – and I have criticised it myself often (I still think it’s horrible) – one must remember that, when blaming the developers and architects – CCC’s Planning Department were issued with a variety of design concepts in pre-planning discussions, and the one granted and subsequently constructed, was the design agreed upon by both developers and planners. That should be kept in mind when discussing the development of the Victoria Cross/Wilton Road area.

      I agree that there are many fine residencies in the area – and I would support outright their security – however, the development of Victoria Cross as a student centred location is borne out of CCC policies concerning such development. Intentions were laid by the council to focus student accommodation in purpose built accommodations, in part, to make available city centre housing to family activity/owner-occupiers. There is a degree of very positive logic to this – and in many ways, I do support it. The fact is, if you take accommodations in places like College Road or Connaught Avenue – the proximity to UCC Main Campus, the relative ‘freedom’ that comes attached and on-par rents are always going to draw an element of the student population. Moreover, these locations have seen house prices soar in response to their associated markets – the average house price along College Road as of March 2005 was just under €445,000 (the assessment included many of the larger expensive houses with the smaller, less expensive houses and the average ended up mid-way I suppose! :confused: ) with many houses peaking at €675,000 and up. These figures are well above the levels of affordability for the majority of young or even mature families and punters at large – given they could easily afford a house twice the size with extensive gardens along the city limits somewhere for the same price.

      A shift is coming into effect in the Victoria Cross area re: student residencies – indeed, many of the developments that got the early greenlight (the majority UCC backed efforts) have been somewhat lacking in the desired realms of design. Farranlea Hall works because of the topography site and masking of the project by tree-cover – so that the bulk of the structure is cleverly hidden, and Patrick Cashman & Associates didn’t do such a bad job at the end of the day at all. Unfortunately, it would seem one of the better designed student projects in the area,Tom McCarthy’s plans (designed by Murray O’Laoire) adjacent to the Kingsley Hotel, will not be proceeding (perhaps because of Mr. Montgomery’s efforts nearby???). As for occupying these schemes, I think there will be an initial oversupply of accommodation (over the next year to 2 years?) but this will gradually fall in line with demand as more student based activities emerge to satisfy the occupancies and projected increases in student attendances at both UCC & CIT are met. Also, there is a trend factor which has to be accounted for.

      As for Frinailla and crew, it should be noted that Frinailla’s projects are not student targeted – and in fairness to the company, they have aimed at a higher standard of design (and I expect they will continue to do so more and more). CCC have been given ‘bookmarks’ on their required design standards now, and are luckily in a position to enforce these demanded standards nowadays more and more. That’s not to say some bloopers still slip through now and again.

      Policy has supported much of the reshaping of the Victoria Cross/Wilton Road area – and indeed the investment should be welcomed, but the important thing will be to earmarked the appropriate zones for such schemes (like adjacent to the main roadways stated above) and not allowing them physically intrude into the important residential areas nearby. The stretches of sites aligning the Wilton Road and the southern side of Victoria Cross, I would believe are suitable for such developments. There will however, inevitably, always be borders – it’s a matter of properly defining these borders.

      One project that bugged me for a while was the proposal to construct a student block on the site of the former Orchard House Hotel (along Orchard Road) – this is an example of poor planning and consideration in development – dropping an out of context building slap-bang in the middle of a predominantly residential community of low-rise detached houses (neatly shaded from development nearby thanks to the curvature of the road and tree-linings) is a mistake.

    • #757753
      jungle
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Whoa – check out the rims on that baby! 😀

      Thanks jungle – how do you feel about it’s look in the flesh? (Well flesh in the making).

      From the outside it looks like so many other airports I’ve seen the world over. It’s not a bad design, but there is little originality.

      I can’t imagine that the inside will show any hugely original touches either, but as long as it cleans up the situation where 8 flights are trying to use 2 baggage belts at 9pm on a Friday evening I’ll be pretty happy as one of the airport’s most regular users.

    • #757754
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 You may remember I promised details on a docklands project not so long ago – well I’m reliably informed that the project will now seek planning.

      Destined for the Nat Ross premises along the Monahan Road, in the South Docklands, Niall & Sheila Doris (owners of the Beverly Smyth Group – which owns Nat Ross) are seeking permission to construct 104 residential units and 3567sq m of business/technology facilities over a large basement car-parking facility. A creche will also be included in the development, valued at approx. €40m. The architects for the project are SDA O’Flynn, now based along Skehard Road – the layout of the proposal will form 5 linked buildings with 2 @ 4-storeys, 1 @ 6-storeys, 1 @ 8 storeys and 1 @ 10-storeys. I understand that 5 2-storey terraced houses will also be included in the plan.

      The project, along with McCarthy Developments’ plan for a new 8-storey office building (designed by Murray O’Laoire) along Centre Park Road, issue the first concrete steps in the redevelopment of Cork’s South Docklands.

      A decision on the development is expected for the 6th October 2005.

      Images soon.



      *UPDATE*

      😎 Also worth noting today is Tom O’Riordan and his plans for the Western Star pub along the Western Road. Mr. O’Riordan intends to construct 12 new medical suites following a partial-demolition of the infamous student bar – the proposal will link up with the access route in place to the Bons Secours Hospital across the river. Wilson Architecture are behind the design.

    • #757755
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Cork Heritage Open Day will see nearly 30 of Cork’s most fascinating buildings many of which have never been by the public before, open their doors free of charge for one day only on Saturday September the 10th 2005. The Lord Mayor Councillor Deirdre Clune, will open this exciting event at 9.30 a.m. by visiting the historic home of the Lord Mayor of Cork at the Mercy Hospital Mansion House.
      Cork Heritage Open Day is a unique event which will be held on Saturday the 10 th of September 2005, celebrating the amazing architecture and history of the Built Heritage in the Cork City Region.
      Cork’s Built Heritage tells the tale of wars and peace, learning and praying, high living and humble beginnings through buildings such as Collins Barracks, Blackrock Castle, The Life time Lab, The Unitarian Church, The Clarion Hotel Penthouse and Frank O Connor House to mention a few.
      Many of these breathtaking buildings have never been open to the public in this manner before and are relatively unknown to visitors and the citizens of Cork. Cork Heritage Open Day invites you to explore Cork’s hidden treasures and enjoy the unique story of Cork’s Built Heritage.

      http://www.corkheritageopenday.ie

    • #757756
      A-ha
      Participant

      wow jungle, impressive picture. how did you manage to get so close? 🙂

    • #757757
      jungle
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      wow jungle, impressive picture. how did you manage to get so close? 🙂

      It was taken from my camera phone when I was boarding a flight to Amsterdam.

    • #757758
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Howard Holdings have been taken to appeal by David Matthews (Matthews Centre) regarding their plans for a new 7-storey Comfort Inn at No.16 Lavitts Quay, design by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli. The €20m project was recently greenlit by CCC – images are featured of the development earlier in this thread. The project, which was subject to substantial revisions, features 7-storeys to the rear of No.16 Lavitts Quay (which will be incoprorated for cafe and office use), a retail unit, basement parking and just under 114 rooms (following CCC conditions).



      🙂 Atlas Developments (a John Cleary Developments enterprise) has been greenlit for a noteworthy light industrial/business proposal along the Old Mallow Road. 21 units are to be constructed over 3 floors and a 54-space basement car-park. The building will equal 2292sq m in floor space. Niall Fitzsimons were Consulting Engineers on the scheme,



      😮 The appeal against the Country Club Hotel in Montenotte, which was seeking to extend with a development of 18 no. executive suites, leisure and fitness centre and 19 no. holiday units, has been withdrawn – this paves the way for progress on the hotel’s expansion.

    • #757759
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😎 Howard Holdings have been taken to appeal by David Matthews (Matthews Centre) regarding their plans for a new 7-storey Comfort Inn at No.16 Lavitts Quay, design by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli. The €20m project was recently greenlit by CCC – images are featured of the development earlier in this thread, which I will try and get back up for this post later tonight. The project, which was subject to substantial revisions, features 7-storeys to the rear of No.16 Lavitts Quay (which will be incoprorated for cafe and office use), a reatil unit, basement parking and just under 114 rooms (following CCC conditions).

      As well as being a god awful design, this Hotel will block out one of the very few views on Shandon from St. Patrick Street.
      Next time you’re outside River Island look straight up Maylor Street – its pretty impressive.
      I know the Development Plan protects views of listed buildings so thats another reason why i’d support David Matthews appeal.



      Speaking of St. Patrick Street, the new shopfront on the AIB adjacent to Penneys is a beauty. In particular the side of the building heading down along Robert Street is beautiful- really sleek and very well finished in limestone. It was worth the wait!
      AIB at the other end of the street (adjacent to Waterstones) will close when this one opens. This will leave another vacant store on the Street! Unlike some of the others though, this is of a more attractive size for retailers i’d imagine.


      What do people think of the new apartments gone up on Blarney Street- the rear of which are most visible from Bachelors Quay, etc. They certainly make a big impact on the skyline in this sensitive area. Thank god they used pitched roofs- architects (or maybe that should be accountants?) seem to have an obsession with nasty flat roofs even when pitched roofs dominate in a particular area.
      I’ll try to post some pictures of the Blarney Street development in the next few days.


      Below are the current figures for the Stirling Prize vote on BBConline.
      If you haven’t voted already you can do so here.

      BMW, Leipzig
      7.43%
      Lewis Glucksman Gallery, Cork
      33.06%

      Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh
      17.62%
      McLaren Centre, Woking
      25.88%

      Jubilee Library, Brighton
      9.16%
      Fawood Children’s Centre, Harlesden
      6.86%

      17622 Votes Cast

    • #757760
      securityman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😎

      🙂 Atlas Developments (a Noel O’Flynn enterprise) has been greenlit for a noteworthy light industrial/business proposal along the Old Mallow Road. 21 units are to be constructed over 3 floors and a 54-space basement car-park. The building will equal 2292sq m in floor space. Niall Fitzsimons were Consulting Engineers on the scheme,
      .

      Is this a seperate building to the warehouse being built at the moment on the old mallow road next door to Flemings development for Blackpool Bowl & Leisure

    • #757761
      jungle
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      AIB at the other end of the street (adjacent to Waterstones) will close when this one opens. This will leave another vacant store on the Street! Unlike some of the others though, this is of a more attractive size for retailers i’d imagine.

      I can see that being demolished and something new built there. A store won’t easily go into an old bank. Also, (from memory) a lot of the building is only one storey.

    • #757762
      Leesider
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      I can see that being demolished and something new built there. A store won’t easily go into an old bank. Also, (from memory) a lot of the building is only one storey.

      How about a bar?? Doubt if they would allow it on Patrick’s St though!

    • #757763
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      I can see that being demolished and something new built there. A store won’t easily go into an old bank. Also, (from memory) a lot of the building is only one storey.

      I think you’re confusing the AIB Bank with the Bank of Ireland nearby- this was refurbished about 3 years ago.
      There is no chance of AIB being demolished it is almost definately a listed building.

      Here it is:


      Seems a shame if this was to turn into another monsoon or some other foreign fashion shop.



      On a totally unrelated subject: as was discussed recently on this thread, The Grand Parade is being re-modelled. It’ll be interesting to note what is done with the bollard located near the entrance of Bishop Lucey Park. I hope the powers that be have the good sense to leave it where it is. It’s made from the inverted barrel of a canon and is one of my favourite little gems on the streets of Cork. It’s apparently unknown where it comes from, but for my money, i’d say its a remnant of the statue which used to be positioned where the National Monument is now. They’re circled in this Cork Camera Club image. Can anybody shed any more light on the subject?
      Note the horse in the centre of the pcture is where the street gets its Irish name Sraid an Capaill Bui (Yellow Horse Street), although that particular shade of yellow is slightly exagerated 🙂
      There’s a great story about the statue. Apparently it was always a bit on the wobbly side and began leaning over soon after it was constructed – you can see the struts supporting it in the image below. One night some “tired and emotional” inhabitants manages to push King George off his perch and into the river. The bronze statue was apparently melted down but it’s head remains somewhere in England- or so the story goes.

      Sorry for this little aside- but it is the silly season after all! 🙂

    • #757764
      A-ha
      Participant

      A while back, someone posted a message about a crematorium being built on Howbouline island? Anyone got some updates on this? And securityman, any idea when Harvey Norman are due to open it’s doors to the public?? I expect it will create a huge amount of competion between both PC World and Soundstore.

    • #757765
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Oyster Developments are to now seek permission for the 2nd Phase of their Deane Street/Parnell Place office development. Previously, architects The e-Project, applied on behalf of the Killarney-based development company, to develop a new 7-storey office building on the former O’Brien premises to the rear of No.8 Parnell Place – the latest application will seek to incorporate No.8 Parnell Place (a PS) calling for permission to change usage of the premises from retail and storage, to office on all 4 floors. The lodgement includes proposals for changes (replacement) of the central windows along the western elevation (fronting Parnell Place), creation of space for a roof-light area and 4 large openings on the northern (Bus Station) elevation.

      The images below show 1. No.8 Parnell Place (western elevation) fronting the street. and 2. The new office building in relation to No.8 (which can be seen to the right of the office building) – this is a perspective of the northern elevation which will be subject to the 4 new light opening features.

      1.
      2.



      Nat Ross Redevelopment

      For the life of me, I have no idea why my images of the Nat Ross site won’t upload – however, the project by Niall & Sheila Doris – seeks (as mentioned previously) to construct 104 residential units over 3 4-storey blocks, a 7-storey block and 10-storey tower all interlinked – over 2 floors of business/technology accommodation and basement car-parking. A creche and 5 2-storey terraced houses will also form part of the project – I believe Johnathan Horgan (open for correction on that) with SDA O’Flynn was involved in the project design. The site is not far removed from Centre Park House and the Goldcrop site now being redeveloped by McCarthy Developments as an 8-storey, 100,000sq ft office scheme. The actual Nat Ross is not as large as you may actually think, but indeed sufficient. I wonder how planners will judge the scheme – though I believe the docklands are more than sufficiently capable of hosting buildings of this height (peaking a 10 storeys) and certainly perhaps, some taller buildings closer to the waterfront – the Nat Ross site borders close to residential areas and this may have some impact on the project in terms of submissions, conditions etc. The lower height buildings will edge closer to the residential areas – however the site is adequately well shielded by groupings of relatively tall trees to the south of the site – which should help minimise any negative impacts residents may be concerned about.

      As I said, images will come soon and in the event of their absence, and the further absence of site images (for the time being) – a simple map outlining the approximate (not dead-on) location of the Nat Ross site (and the McCarthy Developments scheme nearby) is posted below. Sorry – it’ll have to do until I can get someone more technically apt than myself to sort out the problems with uploads. 😮


    • #757766
      jungle
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I think you’re confusing the AIB Bank with the Bank of Ireland nearby- this was refurbished about 3 years ago.

      My mistake. You are correct.

      My excuse is that I bank with Ulster Bank and don’t need to know which is which 😀

    • #757767
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Ridge Developments are today erecting a new tower crane over Paul Montgomery & Edmund Kenneally’s Phase 2 site of Victora Mills, designed by Derek Tynan & Associates. The 2nd Phase development will range in height between 5-storeys to the rear (south) and 4-storeys fronting Victoria Cross – over an extended basement. A large commercial unit will occupy much of the ground floor area and 31 student apartments will form the remainder of the project.



      🙂 Frinailla Developments have donated a six-figure sum to the Cork2005 fund – joining the likes of OCP, Bowen Group and Shipton Group, who have also donated generously. As recognised by Director of Cork2005, John Kennedy ( 😉 ), members of the development & construction community in Cork have been among the most vehement and generous supporters of the Capital of Culture reign. Good show.


    • #757768
      securityman
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      A while back, someone posted a message about a crematorium being built on Howbouline island? Anyone got some updates on this? And securityman, any idea when Harvey Norman are due to open it’s doors to the public?? I expect it will create a huge amount of competion between both PC World and Soundstore.

      Id say by October is the plan, they will bring major competition to the area considering that pc world are moving into Mahon aswell. Id say you could see someone else of that nature moving into the second phase of Blackpool when its open aswell. Anyway its all good for the consumer in Cork.

    • #757769
      A-ha
      Participant

      Thx securityman, I heard Dixons are keeping an eye on a Cork location, but I believe more of a city centre property, Acadamy St. or the Coal Quay perhaps? And for anyone in the know, what about the crematorium?? 😉

    • #757770
      lawyer
      Participant
      A-ha wrote:
      Thx securityman, I heard Dixons are keeping an eye on a Cork location, but I believe more of a city centre property, Acadamy St. or the Coal Quay perhaps? And for anyone in the know, what about the crematorium?? ]
      Dont worry, A-ha.
      It will be there in time for you.
    • #757771
      A-ha
      Participant

      Oh my buddah, I love a sense of humour, but I am being totally serious. I really need some information on it and can’t get any on the web, I dont even know if I’m spelling the name of the island correctly! Oh, and there was one supposed to be built in Ovens a few years back (don’t even get me started on the ironic side of it), but the plans fell through. 🙁

    • #757772
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      T&C partnership have been given permission by CCC for the complete demolition of what remains of the old Capuchin Church on Blackmore lane (which the company illegally demolished last year).
      Both the company involved and Cork City Council should be ashamed of themselves.

      It seems it is now a free-for-all.

      If anybody wants me i’ll be up at St.Finbarres Cathedral with my wrecking ball — I fancy some student apartments and lets face it, who’s going to stop me??

    • #757773
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah, it’s something I have somewhat of an issue with as well. It’s sort of like Jim Mansfield starting working on his Citywest Convention Centre without formal permission, then being granted permission after all that. Only, in my opinion, this is worse in that a part of history has been lost. I knew when I heard the news a bit of controversy would be sparked by this decision – and rightly so. Not only were T&C’s actions illegal and not only has history been lost – but such moves are bad news for others who adhere to the whole planning process properly. It makes a mockery of the planning system and a mockery of those who comply with the law.

      I probably wouldn’t go so far as to say a ”free for all” I don’t believe that to be true – and in all fairness to the planner, his job was to assess the application on the basis of the proposal, it’s imapcts, scale etc etc. The Local Authority as a power was vested with the responsibility to address the situation of legality, considering the occurence happened outside an application (legal issues within a lodgement are subject to the planning process/planner etc).

      It’s not a particularly fair result in that respect – and I do know it has ticked off a number of citizens, developers and the like.

    • #757774
      A-ha
      Participant


      I know we are all sick of looking at this picture, but what type of metal will the pillars be made out of in front of the airport. Everyone takes the piss out of the Spire because it’s so dirty. I hope this wont be the case in our ass smacking brand new terminal! 😀

    • #757775
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 You may remember I promised details on a docklands project not so long ago – well I’m reliably informed that the project will now seek planning.

      Destined for the Nat Ross premises along the Monahan Road, in the South Docklands, Niall & Sheila Doris (owners of the Beverly Smyth Group – which owns Nat Ross) are seeking permission to construct 104 residential units and 3567sq m of business/technology facilities over a large basement car-parking facility. A creche will also be included in the development, valued at approx. €50m. The architects for the project are SDA O’Flynn, now based along Skehard Road – the layout of the proposal will form 5 linked buildings ranging in height between 4, 7 and 10 storeys. I understand that 5 2-storey terraced houses will also be included in the plan.

      The project, along with McCarthy Developments’ plan for a new 8-storey office building (designed by Murray O’Laoire) along Centre Park Road, issue the first concrete steps in the redevelopment of Cork’s South Docklands.

      A decision on the development is expected for the 6th October 2005.

      Images soon.



      good news! cant wait to see the pics. heard about this sometime ago and glad to see it in the planning run.

      also what of the western star, or the star, to its alumni. many a pleasant evening spent i there – is it being torn apart for some unexciting medical plan? what a shame. 🙁

    • #757776
      lexington
      Participant

      With the excavations on the project well underway, the Frank Ennis & Associates designed scheme is set to hit primary construction in September 2005. The 6-storey redevelopment project will include 65 apartments, 66 basement car-parking spaces and a new 170,000sq ft retail mall of 9 large units. Rockfell Investments (Michael O’Donoghue) had been in discussions with OCP to link up their project with a refurbished Paul Street S.C., Academy Street and others – a subsequent application will be lodged at some future date to achieve this.

      Below are long-awaited images of the development, the 1st looks south down along Cornmarket Street from Kyle Street (I hope they are something of an improvement on the former images I had posted), the 2nd is a drawing of the Cornmarket Street elevation.

      Note the extensive copper canopy added subsequent of Significant Further Info/Revised Plans – the curvelinear canopy is intended to break any blocky elevational dimensions allowing for a smoother form to the overall structure. The new project incorporates/retains a number of existing structures and facades – most notably the Musgrave Building’s striking red-brick Cornmarket Street elevation. Further back the building is divided into sections allowing for open-spaces, like landscpaed courtyards for residents. I think the copper canopy immeasurably adds to the overall form of the new building and allows for a smoother fitting into the current street scape – as oppose to what could alternatively been another blocky 6-storey structure. The canopy also gives the building a little more distinction as a stand-alone project.

      – worth noting, as a comparitive, the 2nd image includes an outline of the original 1999 proposal by Michael O’Donoghue, for a 400-bedroom 9-storey hotel. The scheme was also designed by Niall Coffey of Frank Ennis & Associates, and though granted by CCC, was refused on appeal. The scheme would have also included a substantial commercial and conferencing element. It’s roof-top design seemed to hark at the famous Roches Stores building along Patrick’s Street.

      Rockfell may also be seeking to acquire adjoining buildings in the near future to allow for an extension of the development giving them a Daunt Square frontage/footfall.



      Also on Cornmarket Street, though it may be a little while off yet, hopes are high that another significant development may take shape over the coming months. An important, recently purchased location – may see the historic facades retained with a vertical extension, sympathetically designed, rising from the premises. I’ll say no more for now.

    • #757777
      A-ha
      Participant

      Does no-body not care about my crematorium? Come on, someone out there must know at least a teeney weeney bit of information on it! I wont let the subject go that easily. And the idea of connecting all the shopping centres sounds so odd for Cork. It’s like a giant step into the future or something. It’s so continental. :p

    • #757778
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Pitwood Limited have been granted permission for a new hotel development at Beasley Street and Parnell Place, subject to 18 conditions. The original plan called for the development of a 5-storey, 121 bedroom hotel over spa and double-deck basement car-park – however, a number of concerns were raised by the Planning Dept.in response to the application. Among them issues of height, relation to the former Provincial Bank (now TCH HQ), traffic management, ground floor usage at Parnell Place and design quality. Concerns were also issued on how the protected structures of No.17 & 18 Parnell Place (facades) were to be incoporated into the new development. A substantial redesign was requested through Significant Further Information – which, when received was considered adequate. The revised plans, submitted in July, will now host 116 bedrooms over 4 and 5 floors. The resulting design will given Cork something of a limestone “Guggenheim Museum” inspired (???) elevation at Beasley Street and South Mall, which is, I must say both unusual and impressive.

      The 0.18 hectare site is owned by Corbett Bros., Pitwood Limited’s backers are involved with other hotel ventures in Ireland – including Setanta House Hotel and Carton House in Kildare – and are based in Monaghan.

      James Leahy & Associates were involved in the project with Niall Fitzsimons Ltd acting as Consulting Engineers.

      The image below offers a perspective looking down Beasley Street from South Mall – this western elevation forms the rear of the hotel with access to the basement car-park. The eastern/Parnell Place elevation is formed by the No.17 & 18 protected facades. This elevation is a unique and unusual mix of angles and shapes cladding with varying sizes and colourations of limestone.

    • #757779
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Does no-body not care about my crematorium? :p

      As far as i know, the crematorium is planned for Rocky Island in Cork Harbour. This is surprise surprise, a small rocky outcrop between the mainland (at ringaskiddy) and Haulbowline (containing the former Irish Steel site and Irish Naval Headquarters).
      As for who’s behind it, im not sure.

      It’ll be interesting to see what becomes of the Irish ISPAT site after the eventual clean up. Is it State property now?


      Those images of Cornmarket Street make me a lot happier than the previous images. I’d agree with lexington- the structure on the roof makes the building.
      Lex, I presume your hinting at a redevelopment of The Loft furniture store. Thats my guess at least. The cornmarket bar next door has been well done and if this is done along the same lines i’d be very happy. Less is more here i think!!


      Great news too about Beasly Street/ Parnell Place. Lets hope no more time is wasted. Those protected facades are looking weaker and weaker every week.

    • #757780
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Great news too about Beasly Street/ Parnell Place. Lets hope no more time is wasted. Those protected facades are looking weaker and weaker every week.[/QUOTE]

      Nice to see alot of activity on Parnell Street… it has been ignored for far too long.

    • #757781
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      It’s worth taking a look at the Cornmarket Street Area Development Plan on the CCC website for some interesting insights into the way people are thinking about the future development of the area.
      In particular, it deals in depth with the Guys site, The Loft site and the Kyrls Quay sites (the subject of a recent competition).

      Some interesting visuals from the plan are set out below:

      Sites for development in the area:

      A possible park at the Northern end of the area:

      The improved street market:

    • #757782
      A-ha
      Participant

      Thumbs Up Thanks for that information. I knew someone would give me something in time. Rocky Island…. and here’s me thinking that it was on Haulbowline Island (I knew I was spelling it wrong). Thanks again.

    • #757783
      Tucholsky
      Participant

      Affordable Housing
      Does anyone have any information regarding the way that Part V of the Planning and Development Act is being enforced by CCC. According to the Dept of Enviroment statistics they have only acquired 6 housing units and no land under it during the last 4 years even though they state that this is their preference. Instead in all other cases they are taking money and the amounts seem very small. What is the reason for this policy given that there are 750 on the affordable housing waiting list and the Dublin authorities are doing the opposite i.e they are requiring developers to hand over housing. Are they trading affordable housing for favours in other areas or is there some other explanation?

    • #757784
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      All I can say about the Rockfell plan is that I’m impressed (from what’s posted anyway). I hadn’t seen much on this other than the initial plans. A tremendous improvement. Hopefully it’ll materialise in the flesh well.

    • #757785
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 McCarthy Developments are currently in preplanning discussions with CCC regarding a further, significant city centre-ish development. The plans, at this early stage, seem pretty impressive – I hope to bring you more details shortly.

      🙁 Riga Limited (OCP) – who in accordance with their ABP grant to redevelop Jurys Doyle Cork Hotel and its lands along Lancaster Quay, recently (as posted) resubmitted plans for a new pedestrian and vehicular bridge at the Western Road, connecting to the development site. The application also included plans for revised finishings to the hotel element’s elevations etc. However, and one could probably have predicted this, Bridget Healy (of Cafe Paradiso and Sunday’s Well) is again objecting to the plans – along with another gentleman. Traffic is cited as a cause for objection. Personally, I think it’s a pretty inappropriate objection given that the development is now under construction – having been greenlit by ABP, and centralising the input and output of traffic movements from the development through one bridge would have a dire consequence on the area. The additional access point is in part designed to aid congestion, if anything. The details on the material finishes seem fine. But there you have it I suppose. Personally, and this is said with all respect – I think Ms. Healy would be better focused on getting CCC to amend the disastrous rearrangement of traffic lanes on the quay – I know she has been vocal on it – but the workings of the new routes seem to have disbenefit the streets more than anything…but then again, maybe there is some far seen logic to it all. :confused:



      @Tucholsky wrote:

      Affordable Housing
      Does anyone have any information regarding the way that Part V of the Planning and Development Act is being enforced by CCC. According to the Dept of Enviroment statistics they have only acquired 6 housing units and no land under it during the last 4 years even though they state that this is their preference. Instead in all other cases they are taking money and the amounts seem very small. What is the reason for this policy given that there are 750 on the affordable housing waiting list and the Dublin authorities are doing the opposite i.e they are requiring developers to hand over housing. Are they trading affordable housing for favours in other areas or is there some other explanation?

      CCC have been active in a number of Section V provisions. A number of developments, including those by O’Brien & O’Flynn, and excess-provision schemes by Coleman Brothers/Fleming Construction, McInerney and Barry Supple/Paul Montgomery are currently catering for Affordable/Social needs – combined, the units should make available in excess of 350 high-quality units for these such requirements. I’m not familiar with the DoE figures, perhaps you could post them or offer a link to the details. The total social/affordable list held by CCC is actually in excess of 4,000. It is expected the forthcoming application by Manor Park Homes for Horgan’s Quay which proposes over 1,000 new homes, will also be subject to the 20% Section V requirement.



      d_d_dallas – agreed, Frank Ennis & Associates have taken what could have been another blocky, so-so scheme and jazzed it up a great deal by adding simple touches. I think it represents the sign of a good architect/developer relationship where a degree of pride in both their work activities was displayed and accommodation was made to facilitate improvements and enhancements in their project.

    • #757786
      Tucholsky
      Participant

      Quote:
      Originally Posted by Tucholsky
      Affordable Housing
      Does anyone have any information regarding the way that Part V of the Planning and Development Act is being enforced by CCC. According to the Dept of Enviroment statistics they have only acquired 6 housing units and no land under it during the last 4 years even though they state that this is their preference. Instead in all other cases they are taking money and the amounts seem very small. What is the reason for this policy given that there are 750 on the affordable housing waiting list and the Dublin authorities are doing the opposite i.e they are requiring developers to hand over housing. Are they trading affordable housing for favours in other areas or is there some other explanation?

      CCC have been active in a number of Section V provisions. A number of developments, including those by O’Brien & O’Flynn, and excess-provision schemes by Coleman Brothers/Fleming Construction, McInerney and Barry Supple/Paul Montgomery are currently catering for Affordable/Social needs – combined, the units should make available in excess of 350 high-quality units for these such requirements. I’m not familiar with the DoE figures, perhaps you could post them or offer a link to the details. The total social/affordable list held by CCC is actually in excess of 4,000. It is expected the forthcoming application by Manor Park Homes for Horgan’s Quay which proposes over 1,000 new homes, will also be subject to the 20% Section V requirement.

      Really !!! Thanks for the information. If this is the case there seems to have been a change of policy. Do you have any idea when these developments will be completed. The official govt figures are available on

      http://www.environ.ie/DOEI/DOEIPub.nsf/wvNavView/RegularPublications?OpenDocument&Lang=en#I2

      Housing units acquired under Part V by Cork City Council.

      2003 0
      2004 0
      2005 (to Apr) 6 ( in progress 0)

      The Council recently accepted a payment of €9,000 in lieu of housing units from Coleman brothers. I think that there are currently about 4000 on the social waiting list and about 750 on the affordable waiting list, but that will probably increase dramatically if the Council begins acquiring housing units.

    • #757787
      A-ha
      Participant

      When is work due to get started on Eglington Street? More importantly, when is it to be finished? I can’t wait to see it in Cork’s skyline. Hehee, I’m so excited now.

    • #757788
      Anonymous
      Participant

      if they go as slow there as they do here in dublin it’ll be a few years. lol. 🙂

    • #757789
      A-ha
      Participant

      Ohh god, I hope not. I want to be still young enough to run up all the stairs and back down again.

    • #757790
      Anonymous
      Participant

      i agree. i would love to see ireland embrase skyscrapers in my lifetime too. i know a few have been agreed upon, 32 storeys and so on but i can’t help thinking it’s too good to be true. i’ll believe it when i see it. 🙂

    • #757791
      A-ha
      Participant

      Same here, they say they’ll build it, but they wont say when. I love some of the new sky scrapers in London. Alot of thought is put behind them and it shows. Good, high quality design….. you just can’t beat it.

    • #757792
      Anonymous
      Participant

      some of the buildings in london are nice yes. i love the easter egg one but can never think of it’s name.

    • #757793
      A-ha
      Participant

      London Bridge Tower is also a fantastic design. I can’t wait to see it when it’s built. Is the Easter Egg one that your referring to the Gherkin/Swiss Re building by Norman Foster? I think you can climb up it from the outside. Some tourist attraction! Why can’t people just stick to normal things like Big Ben or Madame Tussauds.
      Swiss Re. Building
      Swiss Re. Building
      London Bridge Tower

      Big Ben

    • #757794
      Anonymous
      Participant

      yes that’s the one i’m talking about.

    • #757795
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The County Hall is still the tallest building in the country. Any news on when it is due for completion?

      Also, anybody know the latest on the School of Music debacle?

    • #757796
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Didn’t Jarvis run into some financial troubles? So much for PPP in the education sector.

    • #757797
      lexington
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      Didn’t Jarvis run into some financial troubles? So much for PPP in the education sector.

      German firm Hochtief acquired the Jarvis PPP division and were scheduled to sign contracts on the Cork School of Music by the end of July – but so far, I’ve heard nothing yet. Construction was then scheduled for September with John Sisk & Sons Ltd. My optimism is being consistently dented with this debacle – but I’m holding tight for an August contract finalisation.

      RM – Cork County Hall’s redevelopment is on schedule for a November 2005 completion.

    • #757798
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😀 Pitwood Limited have been granted permission for a new hotel development at Beasley Street and Parnell Place, subject to 18 conditions. The original plan called for the development of a 5-storey, 121 bedroom hotel over spa and double-deck basement car-park – however, a number of concerns were raised by the Planning Dept.in response to the application. Among them issues of height, relation to the former Provincial Bank (now TCH HQ), traffic management, ground floor usage at Parnell Place and design quality. Concerns were also issued on how the protected structures of No.17 & 18 Parnell Place (facades) were to be incoporated into the new development. A substantial redesign was requested through Significant Further Information – which, when received was considered adequate. The revised plans, submitted in July, will now host 116 bedrooms over 4 and 5 floors. The resulting design will given Cork something of a limestone “Guggenheim Museum” inspired (???) elevation at Beasley Street and South Mall, which is, I must say both unusual and impressive.

      The 0.18 hectare site is owned by Corbett Bros., Pitwood Limited’s backers are involved with other hotel ventures in Ireland – including Setanta House Hotel and Carton House in Kildare – and are based in Monaghan.

      James Leahy & Associates were involved in the project with Niall Fitzsimons Ltd acting as Consulting Engineers.

      The image below offers a perspective looking down Beasley Street from South Mall – this western elevation forms the rear of the hotel with access to the basement car-park. The eastern/Parnell Place elevation is formed by the No.17 & 18 protected facades. This elevation is a unique and unusual mix of angles and shapes cladding with varying sizes and colourations of limestone.

      holy testicle tuesday! almost missed this one!!! saw the original plans on one of me rare trips down to the planning office and cant say it did the biz for mise but the revised plan looks pretty wow! very impressed – pity the image isnt any clearer, lex when you get those improvements will ya please post up a pic a little clearer? thanks mate 😉 – either way the facade looks pretty good on beasly st elevation. i see james leahy is making a bit of a niche for his firm with this style of design – i think it suits them – their camden qy design seems like to be prep for this with its curved canopies and strange shapes. the parnell hotel plan here seems to have abandoned the trad 90degree idea in exchange for varying angular aspects. the use of variations in the limestone claddings color and size adds to the inconsistent effect and the support column at the ground floor of 93 south mall almost seems gehry-esque – position at a 70degree angle(?) rather than boring old 90. ooooo im all excited! keep these kinda ideas up jimmy! tis mighty and will do the city no harm to have a bit of ooo lala! 😀

    • #757799
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      ……….the parnell hotel plan here seems to have abandoned the trad 90degree idea in exchange for varying angular aspects. the use of variations in the limestone claddings color and size adds to the inconsistent effect and the support column at the ground floor of 93 south mall almost seems gehry-esque – position at a 70degree angle(?) rather than boring old 90. ooooo im all excited! keep these kinda ideas up jimmy! tis mighty and will do the city no harm to have a bit of ooo lala! 😀

      If it’s not a right angle, it’s a wrong angle – seems a little too much for me. What does the view from Parnell Street look like? Almost missed those images as well.

    • #757800
      A-ha
      Participant

      Congratulations! Our superior forum has finally hit the 20,000 mark in terms of views. Has anyone got any pictures of the old City Hall before it was burned down? Who built it and what did it look like? Also, can’t wait to see the County Hall when it is completed. It was so hidious before they started to fix it up. Talk about 1970’s office block!

    • #757801
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      If it’s not a right angle, it’s a wrong angle – seems a little too much for me. What does the view from Parnell Street look like?

      I would have to argue that sentiment RM, and I’m sure you’ll find many of the world’s top architects such as Libeskind, Gehry and Calatrava – have in part, earned their positions in response to the decision not to follow this ideology. As Libeskind himself has said, “…there are 359 other degrees out there, why must we always follow one?…”

      Following the idea that anything other than a right angle is wrong, would never have led to works like the Guggenheim, Valencia Opera House – even the Swiss Re building, all regarded as being among the best examples of contemporary architecture in the world today. Of course opinions can and do differ.

      The Pitwood hotel proposal adds something interesting to a streetscape that could otherwise be yet another boring example of ‘backstreet’ architecture – keep it boring because no-one will ever see it, so no-one should care. Had the same philosophy been adhered to when the Crawford Gallery was constructing it’s extension onto Half Moon Street, Cork would have been left with perhaps another ‘so-so’ backstreet. I think the hotel’s elevation adds a little character to its surrounds.

      The Parnell Street elevation has been altered so that the originally proposed mansard roof has been removed in respect of the facade’s intergrity, with a step-down in height, and mild step-back of the new structure from the facades so that they remain linked and part of the new development, without compromising their history. A reduction in height to the rear of the TCH HQ has also been afforded to reduce any excessive over-scaled elevation and damage to the important corner structure (formerly the Provincial Bank/AIB). 🙂



      @A-ha wrote:

      When is work due to get started on Eglington Street? More importantly, when is it to be finished? I can’t wait to see it in Cork’s skyline. Hehee, I’m so excited now.

      At the current moment, it would seem as though OFC are not set to begin construction on the Eglinton Street scheme until early 2006 (Feburary-ish). The Eglinton Street site may see some prepartory works commence on the site before then – but at this point in time, a number of issues make it unlikely that we will see construction on the project until then. That is of course, unless these issues fall through or readdressed elsewhere.

    • #757802
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      anyone know when the Douglas s/c extension is meant to start and just wondering what peoples views are on the citys border extension are and does anyone know if its going to happen any time soon?

    • #757803
      A-ha
      Participant

      Feburary 2006 isn’t that bad. I was expecting to hear something along the lines of October-Novemberish 2006. I have a fear that something will go wrong and we’ll end up with the tower part ending up at 5 stories or something, as opposed to the original 17. I know it sounds odd, but thats my feeling. The sooner they get a crane on that site, the better. And what about Water Street, whats the story with the planning application? :confused:

    • #757804
      A-ha
      Participant

      And yes, my trademark BOLD Italic posts have come to an end. Sorry if they bothered ye. Paul told me to lose ’em or I’m out of Archiseek. Oh well, end of an era and I’m so close to my 100th post aswell. 🙁 At least I still got me smilies 🙂

    • #757805
      lexington
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      anyone know when the Douglas s/c extension is meant to start and just wondering what peoples views are on the citys border extension are and does anyone know if its going to happen any time soon?

      You are referring to Douglas Village S.C., correct? Wilson Architecture were enlisted by The Love Family to design a 60m euro redevelopment of the centre – which was granted. My understanding now is that The Shipton Group are now addressing plans to create a new urban scape spanning a redeveloped Douglas Village S.C. to Douglas Court S.C. nearby. The link will form across roads and lands occupied by Cinema World, Shell Petrol Station and the Permanent TSB. Recently, the group were denied planning for an 8-storey hotel on part of these lands. New plans are in preplanning talks with Cork County Council, and Cork City Council. A new roadway will link the Douglas/South Ring slip-road in the west across to a point linking to the Rochestown Road. The routeway will cause significant traffic congestion during construction no doubt, but will be a traffic management godsend come completion. The Cinema World will be redeveloped – supposedly undergound – with the ground occupied by a series of commercial and residential units, effectively an extended and new town centre area. A part bridge link will connect the 2 shopping centres it is believed.

      No indication of the city border extensions yet daniel7.



      A-ha – I don’t see Eglinton Street facing a tower reduction. The project has currently been appealed by OFC on a first party basis concerning conditions on a number of technicalities, including reductions on the Eglinton Street elevation. OFC are confident in having the 2 Phase project in full swing by next year. And you can expect 2 tower cranes on site, not 1! 😉

    • #757806
      A-ha
      Participant

      Thats good to know, and looking at the extension being put onto the City Hall, it looks as if it’s coming along nicely.

    • #757807
      altuistic
      Participant

      The hotel plan looks interesting, i only hope it materialises well in the flesh.

      Any news of the Dennehys cross plans yet? i await them anxiously.

      I also have taken an interest in the new regional hospital cardiac extension. i saw the photos of it earlier in this forum – but when does it start??

      And i dont know if anyone else has been following the plan by Manorpark Homes to redevelop Mr Haugheys estate in Kinsealy, Dublin but the planning authority criticised the quality of the projects design. what does that mean for Horgans Qy? Will Manorpark produce muck or take heed of the councils request that any application for the site must be of agood architecture level??

    • #757808
      lexington
      Participant

      @altuistic wrote:

      And i dont know if anyone else has been following the plan by Manorpark Homes to redevelop Mr Haugheys estate in Kinsealy, Dublin but the planning authority criticised the quality of the projects design. what does that mean for Horgans Qy? Will Manorpark produce muck or take heed of the councils request that any application for the site must be of agood architecture level??

      Never actually saw the Abbeville proposal, but I did read extracts of the Planners Report noting such issues. MPH have been in discussions for quite sometime with CCC concerning the Horgan’s Quay project – input was afforded the company in the creation of the North Docklands Area Plan, recently published. The desired layout of the Horgan’s Quay site, as stated in the plan, has been noted by MPH’s Planning Consultants Tom Phillips & Associates and the strongly stated request regarding design quality by Joe Gavin (City Manager) and others in CCC has been explicitly expressed. A new precedent has been set in the city, with regards to design standards, I think MPH know, that if they want to see their application pass as much as possible, strong design will have to be administered. Otherwise they will face some unwanted ‘issues’ in planning – and perhaps more work (such as expensive redesigns) than is necessary. The application is important, yes – CCC know this, and I don’t think they would be eager to let it slide, but I don’t think they will be pushed on their demands either. The quayside is so prominent and so strategically important that only a high design standard will click when it comes to permission. Of course we will await the results with anticipation – and keep those fingers crossed. This is a big project for MPH too you must remember, among their flagship projects and certainly the flagship in Cork – I don’t think they’ll be interested in screwing up their own intentions as well, so a win-win situation is hoped for. Plus I hear, for afficianados of the ‘taller building’, one or two components may keep them smiling.

      Manor Park Homes is jointly owned by Joe Moran and DCC, with UCC-graduate Michael O’Driscoll as the company’s CEO.

    • #757809
      Frog1
      Participant

      Any info on a development on Popes road, Blackpool?

    • #757810
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 John Sisk & Sons Ltd hope to be smiling come decision day (tomorrow – August 18th 2005) on their plans to construct a new 93-bedroom, 6-storey hotel on their lands along the Kinsale Road. The site is located just east of their existing Cork HQ offices and will include conferencing facilities, 112 car-parking spaces, dining area and bar. The hotel was designed by New Zealand-based firm David van Ryswyk Architects and will be operated by innovative new chain AbsoluteHotel.com with core designs on the business traveller market. The contemporary style ‘landmark’ hotel has been designed with the intention of acting as a gateway into the city – and is strategically located less than 2km from the main Cork Airport entrance, and 2km from the city centre. The hotel’s hillside location will offer it commanding views north over the city – especially from the upper floors.

      Should no appeal follow within the given 4 weeks following Cork County Council’s decision – Sisk expect to get to work on the project by late September.

      The images below provide a perspective of the south-western (airport facing) facade by day, and the hotel building illuminated by night. Material finishes include black tinted glass panels & limestone cladding.

      A clear outcome on the decision is expected for tomorrow.

    • #757811
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 O’Brien & O’Flynn Limited have been refused planning on appeal for the development of a 35 unit apartment block near the SilverSprings Hotel, running close to a RPZ. The block was previously refused by CCC, and was designed by Dennehy + Dennehy. The units would have been spread over 6 floors, above 2 basement levels and comprised of an area over 55,000sq ft. Previously OBOF had applied for the development of a 15-storey residential tower on the same site – but this was refused last year also on appeal based on its overbearing height and the apparent visual disruption to the locale and RPZ. The tower was also designed by Dennehy + Dennehy – and occupied a small area of the designated site. In part, compensating for a loss of height, the 6-storey application increased it’s occupancy of the area to allow for adequate unit numbers to be accommodated. Unfortunately this was regarded as an overdevelopment of the site and is in part the reason for the project’s refusal by both CCC and ABP.



      😮 Frinailla’s plans for Ladyswell were due a decision by ABP today – however no word has yet reached the realms, the decision (as often the practice with ABP) may yet be deferred for a few more days.

    • #757812
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I believe a decision is due on LadysWell on 20th of August.

    • #757813
      pier39
      Participant

      i actually tawt it was today too radioactiveman (the goggles do nothing!!!) 😉 but im open to be corrected on that too. if im wrong i will drag myself out of the office, whack myself across the head with a 4×4 no fewer than 7 times and then handcuff myself to the bumper of the next car i see parked outside a church with a cheap homemade sign in its rear window saying ‘just married’. hmmm….sounds like my bachelor party!

      whatever date it is the ladyswell project will add tremenduously to what has become a pretty rundown area of da ‘pool, a buddy of mine says that all going well (when the bord do decide to make up their mind) that the project will get moving immediately. think the developers are anxious just to get this baby off the ground. and maybe the grand parade project will f-f-f-finally get buzzing! puhlease! i pass that site everyday in visual anticipation of seeing a william o’briens parked outside and bits of a green tower crane waiting to be assembled!!!!!!!!! hehe

      (oh and sorry bout the gratuitous violence portrayed above in me first paragraph – i grew up watching tom & jerry, it’s all i know – now if you’ll excuse me, i’m off to sellotape a frying pan to my pet mouse’s paw and a baseball bat to my pet cat’s paw…and watch the comedy ensue!) :p

    • #757814
      Pug
      Participant

      any more news on the decision due on the apartments for tramore road at the former Keatings Bakery?

    • #757815
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 @Pug wrote:

      any more news on the decision due on the apartments for tramore road at the former Keatings Bakery?

      John Keating’s plans for the former Keating’s Bakery along the Tramore Road, which were due a decision yesterday (17th August 2005) have now been pushed back to mid-December decision date. The proposals for the project include the construction of 40 apartments over a 60-space basement car-park. The scheme is designed by Colum Murphy & Company and is proposed to be arranged over 4 individual blocks.



      🙁 Frinailla, who were due a decision yesterday (August 17th 2005) from ABP regarding their Ladyswell (or City Square as I believe it will be called) development along the Watercourse Road – will now have to wait a little longer for news to be made of their plans. The Bord have pushed the due date on the project back until October.



      😎 Also, Niall & Sheila Doris (of the Beverly Smyth Group) will have to reapply to CCC with their application for 104 residential units and a 30,000sq ft business/technology centre at their Nat Ross premises along the Monahan Road in the South Docklands. The SDA O’Flynn design (J. Horgan & team) will arrange the development over 5 linked buildings ranging from 4 to 10 storeys (1 6-storey, 1 10-storey, 1 8-storey and 2 4-storey blocks) – over basement car-parking. Also included in the application will be plans for a creche and 5 2-storey terraced houses. The original application was proved ‘invalid’ and a new application will be lodged soon – with a rescheduled due date.



      😮 Finally, Dixons are believed to be taking up residency at a 2,000sq ft store in Ballincollig Town Centre, OFC have finalised a deal on the electrical goods retailler’s first Cork store – however, sister-stores Currys & PC World will be locating to Phase 2 of Mahon Point’s Retail Park.

    • #757816
      lexington
      Participant

      In my opinion, one of the most significant and impressive developments to hit Cork has been The Shipton Group’s Blackpool Retail & Commercial Park. Since the Love-family controlled group acquired the 11-acre Polefield (which was once nothing much more than a mix of marsh and wasteland) in Blackpool – this northern suburb has been dramatically altered, and thanks may be largely attributed to The Shipton Group.

      In 1997, the group’s subsidary Blackpool Developments applied to develop a 10,993sq m on a triangular site to the south of the Polefield, bordered by Dublin Street and the routeway of what was then the proposed link-road (which ultimately became the Blackpool By-Pass). Kelly Barry O’Brien Whelan (KOBW) were the architects and the project was greenlit by CCC on March 4th 1998 – it would be one of the most important strategic decisions the then Corporation would make in many years. After a brief scare of an appeal threat (which was later withdrawn), construction was rapid on the shopping centre, completing ahead of schedule. The Shipton Group were careful in choosing their tenants – they provided a healthy mix of local services/need provisions while maintaining a quality backbone. Dunnes Stores anchored the 65,000sq ft main tenant unit, with other strong names like Peter Mark, O’Briens, The Jean Scene, Golden Discs and Adams all included in the blend. The S.C. was a regenerative catalyst to a historic area that had been subjected to years of neglect and economic troubles. Aided by the newly opened By-Pass, the ‘Old Centre’ of Blackpool was freed of it’s horrific traffic congestion and allowed for more pedestrian friendly environments to be developed. It also encouraged a rejuvenation of the historic core area, much due at first to CCC, but later by lines of private developers and brought back in a stronger presence of residential tenants to newly refurbished or constructed schemes. Much was made of the ‘Living over the Shop’ style arrangements – allowing for local stores, butchers, hairdressers etc retain an active presence in the historic core – whilst allowing for bulkier service elements and traffic flows divert to the S.C. – which was now a powerful service and employment driver in the area.

      The success of the shopping centre was something of a calculated coup for The Shipton Group and encouraged their progression on a new €100m scheme which took the shape of the Blackpool Retail & Commercial Park – work began in late 2003. The multiphased development has continued to strengthen the economic, social and leisure conditions of the region – and in little doubt, the entire project (including S.C.) have been encouragement for the host of other schemes that have materialised, and continue to materalise in this once jaded suburb. Joe Carey & Frank Sheahan’s large-scale apartment development, Blackpool Bowl & Leisure’s new facility, Sidney McInheney’s new plans – to name but a few ~ all this positive investment led Cork City Manager Joe Gavin to state that within 10 years, he predicts that Blackpool will be one of Cork’s most sought after addresses!

      Blackpool Park has attracted strong quality tenants such as Argos, Atlantic Homecare, Maplin, Reid’s Furniture, Land of Leather, Lifestyle Sports, Costa Coffee and so on – it is widely compared, and favoured to the similar scheme at Mahon Point. Why is this? Perhaps because what The Shipton Group have done is created a new community, perhaps, a new town centre of sorts with a healthy balance and quality design – there is leisure (Reel Multiplex, new Public Park etc), well planned accessible car-parking and link routeways, residential elements (under construction), offices (more under construction) and the obvious retail – all within a tight, closely knit area so that there is a healthy interaction between all aspects of life. A recent visit to the Park confirmed this to me, the place was a hive of activity – and not simply beneath the 2 dizzying tower cranes working on Phase 2 – of consumers, diners, cinema-goers and so on. Discussions with some of the tenants have confirmed good trading.

      The Shipton Group continue to contribute to the Blackpool community – recently, they donated €250,000 to Cork2005, under condition that over half would be focused on cultural uses within the Blackpool community – such as the Fado Fado exhibition currently running at the Blackpool S.C. Commercial Building.


      Phase 2 of Blackpool Retail & Commercial Park – under construction, as visible from Blackpool By-Pass (city bound).

      Talk that The Shipton Group are bidding for the new Revenue Commissioners offices are true, however, I believe (in my personal opinion) perhaps the RC would be better located at somewhere such as Paul Kenny’s St. Patrick’s Quay plan. The Group have been successful thus far in attracting tenants for their office schemes – recently a large number of high-profile tenants, among them DL Safety and KOBW announced their intentions to relocate to the Park. I understand it is the intention of the Group to seek to fill their office space on-going irrespective of the RC designation – and with such a strong product on offer, I believe they will be better served and highly successful in this route – and deservedly so. 🙂

    • #757817
      lawyer
      Participant

      Compliments to Lexington on his excellent ‘review’ of Blackpool Shopping Centre and Retail Park. It does leave Mahon Point way behind.
      To my mind, one of the greatest features of the area, is that the old part of Blackpool, Thomas Davis Street, Great William O’Brien Street and such, have still been able to retain their character whileall around them, things have changed beyond belief.

    • #757818
      A-ha
      Participant

      Yes, very impressed by all the information on Blackpool lex. Dixons coming to Cork, I thought as much when I heard PC World was opening. I would have expected Dixons to look for a city centre location though, but opening in Ballincollig might balance things out. PC World and Currys in Mahon, Maplin and Soundstore in Blackpool, Harvey Norman at the former Woodies and now Dixons in Ballincollig. What a perfect layout! 🙂

    • #757819
      lexington
      Participant

      Just on the little add-on mentioned in my last post about Paul Kenny’s St. Patrick’s Quay project – should he be successful in attaining the enviable tenancy of the Revenue Commissioners next month (September 24th 2005 – as far as I know, feel free to correct) – as part of the deal, Mr. Kenny will also attain the Government Buildings premises on Sullivans Quay ( a 3/4 acre site). This is a highly desirable site in many respects (although some foundational issues need first to be addressed), especially for Mr. Kenny considering the proximity of his Citi-Car Park site at 50 Grand Parade across the River Lee’s South Channel. Scope exists here for a substantial development – which could ring ‘bonanza’ across the board for the Kenny Group. Mr. Kenny who previously applied for a development of apartments, offices, hotel and multi-storey car-park on the 50 Grand Parade site (among other intentions) was granted permission following appeal for his 2000 application, but subsequently withdrew 2003 plans for a student element on the premises – PRC Architects had been attached to the design. Revisions had been assessed on the site – and not so long ago either. Mr. Kenny had hinted the site would be nice for a large city centre hotel – I agree that it would – however with the Clarion, Jurys, Parnell Place, Crosses Green, new Radisson, Hilton Hotel @ MP, extended Kingsley Hotel all present/under development or to be developed – plus with hotels greenlit for the Heiton Buckley site bracing the Ballincollog By-Pass and AbsoluteHotel.com for the Airport Road, a calculated approach will need to be adopted should this route be taken. However it may indeed work very well as part of a larger mixed use project – and what are the possibilities of a link up with the Sullivans Quay premises? The Government Buildings site offers the possibility of a high-density landmark building/complex (reaching up to 9-storeys – city centre ceiling height). Retail, leisure and residential all present options here – however any development to be undertaken on this site will have MAJOR pressure on it to create a high quality design given the disdain that seems embedded toward the existing structure. Big imagination will be needed – I would stress thinking outside the normal boxes. Here exists the opportunity for a development that would bring Cork it’s own Metreon (such as that in SF) style development.



      @lawyer wrote:

      Compliments to Lexington on his excellent ‘review’ of Blackpool Shopping Centre and Retail Park. It does leave Mahon Point way behind.
      To my mind, one of the greatest features of the area, is that the old part of Blackpool, Thomas Davis Street, Great William O’Brien Street and such, have still been able to retain their character whileall around them, things have changed beyond belief.

      @A-ha wrote:

      Yes, very impressed by all the information on Blackpool lex. Dixons coming to Cork, I thought as much when I heard PC World was opening. I would have expected Dixons to look for a city centre location though, but opening in Ballincollig might balance things out. PC World and Currys in Mahon, Maplin and Soundstore in Blackpool, Harvey Norman at the former Woodies and now Dixons in Ballincollig. What a perfect layout!

      Thank you both. 😮

    • #757820
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      C’mon lads! Cant we get this thread the 5 stars it deserves?? give it yer vote! hehe

      I do hope St. patricks qy gets the Revenue commissioners. It makes sense location wise and would be a great addition to the city centre.

      On Blackpool I agree, i live nearby and its a great asset to the area. Far better than Mahon point.

    • #757821
      A-ha
      Participant

      I have voted, it doesn’t make a difference, I think someone like PaulClerkin must do it….. And some of ye should give a post now and then in the Most beautiful building in Cork forum. 😀

    • #757822
      Anonymous
      Participant

      i voted too. my first time to vote actually since i joined in oct 2004. 🙂

    • #757823
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’d agree with Lexington as regards Blackpool SC/RP. It’s far supperior than Mahon Point but just doesn’t get the hype.
      One of the big problems facing the area now is the lack of a decent public transport system. The number three is the lifeline for most public transport users- the number 5 timetable was britally butchered a few years ago. Even now, with the re-generation of Watercourse road, number 3 is severely diverted- albeit temporarily.
      Of course the area has been promised the return of the train station at KIlbarry, however without onward links from Kent Station to other areas of the city, this will be next to useless for residents.

      —The ABP decision on Frinailla’s Lady’s Well is now due on the 13th of October.–

    • #757824
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      O’Callaghan properties have indicated that the space used as a temporary Gallery in their new Lavitts Quay development (21 Lavitts Quay) may become a permanent fixture after Cork 2005 ends.
      The exhibition space is currently playing host to Sebastião Salgado and Simon Norfolk exhibitions. They gallery is a huge success and has been praised for its location and the bright, simple space it makes available to artists.


      Keeping with things cultural, a temporary Scaffolding has been erected in the River at the North Mall to facilitate the start of THE LEE SWIM which takes place this Saturday at 4 pm.



      Blackpool Developments have applied for permission to alter a previously granted scheme (TP: 05/29320) which was to demolish a period house at 45/46 Dublin Street in order to construct a childcare centre on the ground floor and an apartment at the first floor.
      The proposed changes seek to allow the option of the use of the new building for a creche at both the ground and first floor and importantly, access from Blackpool Shopping Centre (which is immediately to the rear of the house. The creche would serve a total of 50 children aged 0 to 6 years and would have opening hours of 8am to 7pm. The total gross floor area of the proposed development is 279m.sq

      As I mentioned above, I believe Blackpool Shopping Centre /Retail Park has been largely beneficial for the Blackpool area as a whole. One of the main reasons for this is that the developers made use of barrren wasteland which was made accessible by the Blackpool bypass. This development is totally different as it seeks to ‘eat in’ to the historic streetscape in the area. The house to be demolished is a fine example of period housing in the area and permission should never have been granted for its demolition.


    • #757825
      lexington
      Participant

      :confused: John Sisk & Sons Ltd, who had been in planning for a 6-storey, 93-bedroom hotel on their lands along the Kinsale/Airport Road at Ballycurreen have withdrawn their application. A decision had been scheduled for August 18th 2005, but was instead withdrawn from the planning process after months with Cork County Council. Operator AbsoluteHotel.com had been gearing up to operate the business focused hotel within close proximity to both the city centre and Cork Airport. It remains to be seen whether a fresh application will be sought – though no word seems to be of it, at least yet.

      See Post #298 for further details of the project.

    • #757826
      securityman
      Participant

      Great review on Blackpool Lexington, I think they have done a fantastic job in creating somewhere that has something for everyone aswell as creating plenty of jobs also. As I live five minutes away I would have loved it when I was younger with so many things to do now down there and I was always envious of douglas cos they had everything now its the other way around and Douglas is envious of Blackpool. I am also looking forward to Ballincollig and Mallow because they will create new centres for people to socialise and shop in. Does anybody know of any tenants going into mallow as I’m moving nearby in the new year I know that Pizza Hut and Costa Coffee are going in there and I think Tesco are the main tenants plus I heard that Penneys are looking for a spot but who else is going into John Flemings Market Square.

    • #757827
      A-ha
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I’d agree with Lexington as regards Blackpool SC/RP. It’s far supperior than Mahon Point but just doesn’t get the hype.
      One of the big problems facing the area now is the lack of a decent public transport system. The number three is the lifeline for most public transport users- the number 5 timetable was britally butchered a few years ago. Even now, with the re-generation of Watercourse road, number 3 is severely diverted- albeit temporarily.
      Of course the area has been promised the return of the train station at KIlbarry, however without onward links from Kent Station to other areas of the city, this will be next to useless for residents.

      Don’t even get me started on public transport in this city again. It get’s me into all sorts of trouble. Although my ingenious plan of a tolleybus using the subway map courtesy of the Peoples Republic of Cork was brilliant. Have a look back in page 7 of this forum. TolleyBuses are the way to the future! :rolleyes:

    • #757828
      A-ha
      Participant

      Also, Penneys would be good in Mallow. It’s a good shopping town as it is, but the Dunnes is tiny (like people cant drive to the next Dunnes in half and hour anyway). securityman, forgive my ignorance, but I didn’t know there was a Pizza Hut opening in Mallow. I don’t recall ever seeing a McDonalds there, and I would have thought they would have got first dibs.

    • #757829
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 As one Bowen Construction tower crane descends over SHUL’s Tellenganna Lodge 60,000sq ft office development in Blackrock (near the south docklands), designed by Wilson Architecture – another is set to be erected, the first over OCP’s Lanacaster Quay (Jurys) redevelopment. Pieces are being compiled around the new 182-bedroom 6-storey Jurys Hotel site – readying to be lifted into the skyline soon.



      😮 I can now confirm, the earlier speculation, that the Muskerry Service Station (Esso) along the Western Road, and just across the river from the Jurys redevelopment was indeed sold for a price tag in excess of €8m. The .6 acre site will continue operating as a service station until December 2005 (originally it was scheduled to close and be dismantled in October) – an application is currently being designed on the site.



      🙂 Niall Doris has re-applied to CCC with the €50m Nat Ross redevelopment plan including 104 residential units in 5 linked blocks ranging between 4 and 10-storeys, with business centre of over 3500sq m, creche and basement car-parking. A decision is now due for October 13th 2005. SDA O’Flynn are the architects.


    • #757830
      securityman
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Also, Penneys would be good in Mallow. It’s a good shopping town as it is, but the Dunnes is tiny (like people cant drive to the next Dunnes in half and hour anyway). securityman, forgive my ignorance, but I didn’t know there was a Pizza Hut opening in Mallow. I don’t recall ever seeing a McDonalds there, and I would have thought they would have got first dibs.

      There is a McDonalds there already across the way from that tiny dunnes you are on about plus they have O’Briens. I read a while back that Pizza Hut and Costa Coffee were going in there because MBCC foods the scottish company who own the rights to these outlets are basing themselves in Little Island and seem to like Cork considering that the first two Costa Coffees in this country are in Cork so fair play to them for not choosing Dublin first for a change.

    • #757831
      A-ha
      Participant

      hmm, I never noticed the McDonalds there, although I went into the O’Briens. I always rate towns on what shops and restaurants they have in them. Thats why I’m not much of a fan of Waterford. Only one shopping centre in the city centre and no Marks and Spencers. Like I shop there (yeah right). But you know what I mean. It also must rely on McDonalds as it’s only source of fast food and I’d die without a Virgin Megastore or an FCUK shop….. die! But i have to say, Waterford did beat Cork to the punch in having a PC World first along with Limerick. I’m pleased aswell about Costa Coffee’s decision to open in Cork first. It’s a nice change rather then Dublin.

      I hit 100 posts…. Now I’m all grown up!

    • #757832
      lexington
      Participant

      For those of you anxious to take a look at the finished product – below, please find a link to the Scott Tallon Walker website, detailling the new Howard Holdings WebWorks on Albert Quay – to the rear of Albert House. The project is currently ripping through construction with John Paul Construction on site – and will front the quayside with OFC’s impressive Wilson Architecture designed Eglinton Street project to the rear – which peaks with a stylish 17-storey, 70m tower in the south-western corner of the 3-acre former An Post site.

      WebWorks

      Howard Holdings are developing the WebWorks project on lands ‘leased’ from CCC – the office units will be subsequently leased back out to appropriate start-up IT and Business enterprises appointed by Enterprise Ireland.

    • #757833
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Well with Frinailla’s Ladyswell (City Square) project now having seen it’s ABP decision due date pushed back until October 13th 2005 (as best I know) – the suburb of Blackpool and the developers themselves will have to spend another few weeks on their seat edges.

      Frinailla originally applied for development on the Watercourse Road site back in 2003 – then, the proposal peaked at 9-storeys over basement parking with approx. 258 residential units, numerous commercial units (= 3379m sq), a Montessori School, resident gym, roof gardens etc. On Thursday 18th December 2003, the 3 seperate applications that comprised the overall project were all refused by CCC, even following revised submissions which involved residential unit and height reductions – subsequently an appeal to ABP was also refused. Scale, height, character, visual obtrusiveness and so on, were all among the reasons cited for refusal.

      On the 19th November 2004, Frinailla reapplied with 2 applications for their Watercourse Road/Ladyswell sites. This time, the proposal centred about a 5-storey (peak) linked development over basement car-parking and community/commercial units. 153 residencies were proposed in this new scheme. Although the planner’s report recommended a further refusal, this decision was overturned – even though the planner, under instruction to outline conditions, imposed a further reduction in height and subsequent units. The conditions were appealed, and so was the project on a 3rd party basis, a move backed by a number of individuals including public representative Kathleen Lynch.

      In my own opinion, the project represents an important step in Blackpool’s revitalisation – this area of Blackpool, along the Watercourse Road is in dire need of a revamp and is plagued by ill-maintained, derelict buildings. The Frinailla proposal seeks to breathe new life into the area with a strong community focus. Should the appeal be favoured, it is my understanding the developers intend to begin construction work on City Square almost immediately. Fingers crossed on the outcome – and I’ll do my best to keep you updated on any further developments regarding this project. Below find some images of the scheme – more available on request (if I can).

      (Forgive me if I’ve left out any details but trying to explain each and every twist and turn would take forever and a very very long post!) 😉

    • #757834
      pier39
      Participant

      hmmmmuh very inktresting!

      i’ve no doubt the ladyswell plan will add to the place. i always tawt were it not for the nice like canopy additions and variations in colouring and finishes the design could have been quite boring and boxy, however never saw the recreational space graphics before and i have to say it looks very well, like the little water feature. what will be a telling sign will be if frinailla actually show real ingenuity and cover the repaving of the roadway and pathways a la the 1st 2 pics above. i think it will help their scheme on a whole, make the corporation smile and shut the mouths of a few critics in the area while their at it. look forward to seeing if the presentation pics match the flesh in that sense. the watercourse road could do with a little imagination and input, hope frinailla seize the opportunity. still, good job lads.

      anyone got pics of how that stretch of road is now? would be a really interesting comprative and highlight just how much the ladyswell blocks would add.

    • #757835
      altuistic
      Participant

      The Blackpool project seems suitable for the area. I am originally from near Assumption Road and I have fond memories of the place. It has been depressing to see the decay that has been onset along the Watercourse rd over the years. The whole suburb seems to have changed and when i return to visit I often fail to recognise much of it. I am glad however that the old centre of Blackpool has been carefull timecapusled, but not in a negative sense. Its a credit to those involved in the suburbs regeneration have allowed the place develop on such a large scale but without injuring or intruding on the old areas. I also love what theyve done on the old Blackpool flats, I think RESPONSE! were behind this with the corporation and murnane and O’Shea builders. The flats have been wonderfuully redeveloped for new elderly housing and social uses. Well done to all involved!

      Though i like the Blackpool plans, I hope the developers who i understand will be seeking to develop Dennehys Cross will offer the area a very considerate approach. The housing in the area must be respected. I have no problem with a redevelopment of the sites involved, frankly i think the existing warehousing and worksheds and showrooms are an eyesore but i would ask the developers to offer a decent fitting design. I dont oppose their 7 floors plan near Top car, the height is clearly a product of trends in the area and that is fine along this routeway but anything over 4 or 5 floors fronting Dennehys cross in my opinion would represent a gross overdevelopment. I await the plans anxiously,.

    • #757836
      pier39
      Participant

      agreed the redeveloped flats are a job well done. its hard to think that the were once modelled on a stack of shoe boxes! 🙂 seriously word is the original blackpool flats were designed by a member of the store-room staff at a shoe shop. hehe. the new facility is a real excellent redevelopment. anyone got pics?

    • #757837
      lexington
      Participant

      Thanks to phil for informing me of this very interesting article on Cork2005, but more specifically, The Lewis Glucksman Gallery at UCC.

      Guardian Article: Lewis Glucksman Gallery

    • #757838
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Any news on the Ford site?? Has it been sold?

    • #757839
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Any news on the Ford site?? Has it been sold?

      Bids are on-going. One bidder was rumoured to have been attached to another prominent docklands premises not so long ago – however that report is unconfirmed. The 11-are site is guiding at 20m euros.

    • #757840
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I always rate towns on what shops and restaurants they have in them. Thats why I’m not much of a fan of Waterford. Only one shopping centre in the city centre and no Marks and Spencers.

      Thats a really depressing thought A-ha, SHould you not rate towns on the friendliness of the people, the variety of open spaces, the quality of schools, cultural activities and places of worship? Or am I just fooling myself?


      With regard to Frinailla’s Lady’s Well, (nice images lexington!) I think everyone agrees that that area of Watercourse Road in particular is in urgent need of a revamp. It was left to rot by stakeholders for far to long and up to a very short time ago, the City Council had no interest in the site.
      Despite this, I know the local community would not be willing to accept a situation where an inappropriate development is slotted in – based on the pre-conception that anything at all is better than what is currently there.
      The original plans, way back when were totally unsuitable for the site. The individual pieces were too tall (and I LOVE tall buildings :)) and the overall look was as if it had been parachuted in. This is certainly been a long drawn out process (extended even further now by ABP) but I think if we look at what was originally proposed and what is now proposed, we see what could have been achieved (and much faster) if the developers had realised how locals would react to the development.
      As it stands now, I would be flabergasted if ABP did not back-up Cork CIty Council’s decision to grant permission. I’ll look forward to seeing how the plan envisaged is realised in bricks and mortar.

      Incidently, Lexington, I dont understand how Frinailla can link the decision at Blackpool to the start up of their City Square development. Surely these are individual projects and the CIty Council/ABP should not be held to ransom like this.

    • #757841
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Cado Systems Ireland are to apply for the construction of a 3-storey, 4580sq m office building over basement car-park at their Bessboro Road site off the Skehard Road in Blackrock. The new building will feature new office units for business and technology uses and is situated close to an area of the city undergoing substantial redevelopment with MahonPoint not far away.

      😎 Michael Drummond & Dan Carroll’s plans for Blarney Street have been rejected. The partners had employed architects Magee Creedon to design a 36-unit scheme with 17 houses, 9 apartments and 10 duplexes. However CCC ruled that the plan represented a gross overdevelopment of the site. A previous plan for the same site at and to the rear of 257 Blarney Street, albeit on a fractionally smaller site scale, was also refused for 32 residential units in 2003 for reasons similar to the above refusal.

    • #757842
      A-ha
      Participant

      Thats a really depressing thought A-ha, SHould you not rate towns on the friendliness of the people, the variety of open spaces, the quality of schools, cultural activities and places of worship? Or am I just fooling myself?

      No, I do take into account what you have mentioned. That’s why Cork is such a great city. People are friendly and always funny. Even when I’m on the bus or in a queue somewhere, I always end up laughing to myself at other peoples conversations. It’s a Cork persons nature to be funny. As for Cultural activities… European Capital of Culture and quality of schools… the only three people to recieve straight A’s in the leaving cert. were all from Cork. That’s what makes a city, all those factors. But I always brief a city on it’s shops. If major retailers won’t locate there and local shops can’t survive, there is something seriously wrong with the city. Just a walk down Oliver Plunkett street will show you how vibrant our city is. Most of the shops are still family owned and manage to thrive as they always have done. This isn’t the case in other cities!

    • #757843
      altuistic
      Participant

      With the most sincere intentions Aha, i would say ‘stop right there’. I understand what you are saying but think it may be lost in a hole you may not want to dig in. 😉

    • #757844
      A-ha
      Participant

      Hmmm, not quite sure I know what you mean. Are you against what I said or something?

    • #757845
      macm
      Participant

      post withdrawn

    • #757846
      A-ha
      Participant

      Post withdrawn too.

    • #757847
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Post withdrawn

    • #757848
      A-ha
      Participant

      Post withdrawn

    • #757849
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Post withdrawn

    • #757850
      A-ha
      Participant

      Post withdrawn

    • #757851
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      “but don’t you dare call my posts a waste if (sic) time” [A-ha, Post #334 above]
      This quote suggests that you are blaming someone and as if you are saying it was someones fault.

      “people were more tolerant” [A-ha, Post #336 above]
      I doubt whether the people of Waterford would be happy about the suggestion that they were ever less tolerant (than Cork at least) of other religions at the time.

      Finally, It was I who suggested that towns should be rated on a number of things, including “the quality of schools, cultural activities and places of worship” [RM, Post #328, above] however the variety of places of worship cannot be changed by some sort of artificial intervention.
      Places of worship are, by their nature constructed by communities of faith, generally living in a particular area. It is not the job of a city to construct place of worship for all religions in order to atttract that religion to the city. Therefore, a city cannot be faulted for a lack of religious diversity, especially given the country we are living in.

      That will be my final comment on the matter. Let’s not get distracted from the job in hand.

      My Great Grandmother was the child of an immigrant Jewish Family that settled in Cork because of religious tolerance practised in the city that wasn’t evident elsewhere in the province. However this was a very long time ago and I would hope that Waterford and Limerick today are at least tolerant to those of other persuasions.

      Waterford, Limerick, Galway all seem to be very vibrant and thriving centres. In fact Cork’s recent economic boom was quite belated when you consider what had been happening in those other towns. All three cities represent prosperity and positivity, as well as citizens with keen wit and humour.

      I love Cork and am an extremely proud Corkonian, but I see no need to slag off Waterford on this site.

    • #757852
      A-ha
      Participant

      I’m not slagging the Waterford off. I just dislike the city. I’m sorry if that offends people, but I’m sure people from Waterford, Limerick or any other place dislike Cork. They’re allowed have an opinion too.

    • #757853
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’m happy to withdraw the two posts above as they were directed at one contributor to the thread rather than the thread in general.
      As we’re in the mood for it, will you be removing post #330 A-ha, since it started this whole conversation?

    • #757854
      A-ha
      Participant

      I’ll edit it. I don’t see a reason to delete the message all together. Will you be deleteing #328? After all, it was the start of this whole debocle.

    • #757855
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      No, I won’t be editing or removing any more of my posts. I am quite happy to stand by their comments which are in no way controversial. To do that would lead to the childish situation where I could then ask you to edit post # 319, and then we’d go down a road of altering previous texts until the cows come home.
      I believe it was altuistic who advised you to ‘stop right there’ after #330 and that you may have been digging a hole for yourself. I think I may have given you the shovel!!
      This really is my final word on the matter.

    • #757856
      A-ha
      Participant

      Fair enough. But at least altuistic was mild about it. I don’t like harsh and over the top reactions to a post that really didn’t mean much to anybody. Thought everyone could have an opinion in Ireland. My mistake.

    • #757857
      jungle
      Participant

      Guys->I don’t know what was even said in these posts, but can we stop, it doesn’t benefit the thread at all.

      I was just reading lexington’s post there about new offices off the Skehard Rd. in Blackrock. Going down the Skehard Rd. over the weekend I saw another new development describing itself as being in Blackrock.

      Is it just me or does anyone else have a problem with the renaming of areas. Skehard Rd is in Mahon. At a push you could describe it as being in Beaumont or Ballinlough, but there is no way it is in Blackrock. Similarly, we have seen areas of Togher drift into being in Wilton or Glasheen and an area called Doughcloyne, which as far as I’m aware only existed as the name of a pub 20 years ago.

      In Dublin the same thing has happened with the disappearance of areas like Irishtown.

      Does anyone else think that there should be a requirement to use the actual address for developments? Presumably, they have a correct postal address.

    • #757858
      A-ha
      Participant

      Anyway, moving on from the matter. I hear Cork is too get more security cameras in city buses to prevent any vandalism.

    • #757859
      A-ha
      Participant

      Maybe if postal codes were initiated it would help solve the problem. Has it anything to do with bouderies. Surely old ones must have existed to define seperate areas.

    • #757860
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Incidently, Lexington, I dont understand how Frinailla can link the decision at Blackpool to the start up of their City Square development. Surely these are individual projects and the CIty Council/ABP should not be held to ransom like this.

      I’m not quite sure what you mean here – ‘the decision at Blackpool’, do you mean the decision by CCC/ABP to refuse the original part 9-storey plan??? :confused:



      Gentleman, I’m almost afraid to ask what the whole debate was about – but I don’t think this is the medium for it. 🙁



      Should have some nice posts coming up over the next few days – I hope. 😮

    • #757861
      pier39
      Participant

      why are mommy and daddy fighting??? whoa…sorry bout that, my supressed childhood keeps popping up now and again at the hint of conflict! hehehe. peace people.

      anyway jungle, i suppose you gotta think hypothetical: if you had 50 euros and 2 choices to buy a house (yeah right! thatll be the day!) both identical, both with the exact same services blah blah blah – one in classytown, one in notasclassybutstillnice town – where would you buy?

      same principle with office developments, aprtments etc. i do think its becoming less important though as the scale of some individual developments literally carve their own address and redefine and area based on that – i.e. mahon point. however their will always be a sort of prestige for example have an office in a place like, say the cork docklands over say ringaskiddy! 🙂 its a status thing in that respect i suppose and developers etc can cash in on that – so be it. its the way of the market. if people are willing to buy gucci over penneys, gucci aint gonna move their prices as long as there is a sufficient market. but as i say i do sense its becoming slightly less important, at least in cork anyway and with the exception of the docklands/city centre which will always have a sort of status over other locations.

    • #757862
      who_me
      Participant

      Anyone know if there is a ‘co-ordinated’ plan for the Kennedy Quay area? Assuming different developers are going to buy it in sections, are the river front boardwalks/pavements going to be developed into one cohesive design, or a collage of differing ones? Am I right in assuming it will be pedestrianised, and thus you’ll be able to walk along the river from the city centre along the quays to the marina, and onwards? Or is it possible some of the quayside won’t be accessible to the public?

      Couldn’t sleep the other night, so got off my bum at first light, and went for a walk along the marina, past Blackrock, around Mahon Pt. and back up via the old railroad track – what a wonderful resource that route is, either for pedestrians, cyclists or even “green” commuters. The only pity is you have to suffer the gloomy Centre Park Rd. to get there! Once the South Bank is redeveloped, it’ll connect this area nicely to the city centre.

      I’d love to see the quays developed something along the lines of South Bank in Melbourne, though perhaps the casino there is a little overbearing and tacky.

    • #757863
      lexington
      Participant

      who me – as you know all too well, the South Docklands Area represents the largest, perhaps most challenging piece in creating a world-class docklands. Effectively, the South Docklands equates to developing (practically) a new ‘city’ – two and half times the existing city centre. To achieve it’s development, a number of factors are essential – these include, but are not strictly limited to: 1. big money 2. big commitment 3. sufficient population 4. co-ordination 5. favourable market conditions and 6. a core, critical mass of business.

      Part of the idea behind CCC’s drafting of a South Docklands Area Plan (which unconfirmed rumours claim may involve O’Mahony Pike Architects) is to lay a framework for developing a co-ordinated, viable/sustainable structure to the docklands development. I was perhaps a little critical of the NADP, but in hindsight, I understand CCC’s rationale for proceeding with it – despite the fact that 3 developers had applications already on or pending on the 3 main NADP sites. Generally, the standard seemed and still seems positive with respect to the North Docklands – however there will be inevitable hitches and many more areas for development within that zone yet to be forwarded with, especially along Alfred and Railway Streets.

      The SADP is a mammoth task by any account – the South Docklands area represents an exciting investment opportunity for developers – so exciting, it’s actually pretty intimidating! However, it will have to proceed in a manner that is balanced and thoughtful with sufficient core market support. More than the actual development process – the task of promoting and achieving this core support is perhaps the greater challenge; significant responisbility will fall on CCC, Enterprise Ireland, the DoETE, the CBA, Cork Chamber of Commerce and general Corkonian population to see that this core is accompolished. This will mean patience, a lot of leeway (often reluctant I’m sure), calculation and a little bit of pride for good measure (which I’m sure Cork will have no problem in mustering). Equally as important is promoting Cork as a distinctive investment opportunity – unique and different, better from the rest of the country or Europe – we must not fail to forget that development on this scale will need an international notice and thus an international promotional platform. The SADP will allow for the aforementioned co-ordinational framework to be put in place – but CCC and all of us should remember, a ‘framework’ does not mean a ‘rule-book’. As mentioned, leeway must be shown where projects distinguish themselves as being overwhelming and contributively positive.

      In the main, the core south docklands sites are owned by about 8 individual private landowners. The possibility of the South Docklands should not translate into the possibility of greed – this, strategically will not run in the favour of the landowners. Healthy returns should be distinguished versus greedy returns – perhaps a naive wish to make, but practical in the strategic outlook for Cork and landowners alike.

      I could write all day about what I’d like, what’s happening, what ideas have been floating about, what’s planned, the difficulties, prospects, uses etc etc – but to close this post up: perhaps most notably (known in the public domain), Howard Holdings have submitted a substantial ‘masterplan’ regarding the south docklands. Those plans currently reside at Navigation House and are generally off limits to the public – however, Howard have been making numerous steps to secure their involvement in future docklands opportunities in Cork. The plans seem ambitious and Howard have a generally positive track record on Docklands projects. Though they cannot be expected to be involved ‘whole-scale’, it is believed their input will be “significant and influential”.

      Projects that have been made concrete for the South Docklands include those of Niall Doris for his Nat Ross premises along the Monahan Road – a high-density residential, business & technology venture. Monahan Road is zoned for such high residential proposals. Jonathan Horgan with SDA O’Flynn Architects was principally behind the design elements of this project which includes 99 units over 5 linked blocks ranging from 4 to 10 storeys – over basement car-parking, office elements and adjoining 5 terraced houses. McCarthy Developments also have planning for an 8-storey 100,000sq ft office building along Centre Park Road – with Oisin Creagh of MOLA leading design there. Other projects are at preplanning and conceptual stages.

    • #757864
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I’m not quite sure what you mean here – ‘the decision at Blackpool’, do you mean the decision by CCC/ABP to refuse the original part 9-storey plan??? :confused:

      In the original frinailla post (#321 i think) you said ” should the appeall be favoured, it is my understanding the developers intend to begin work on City Square almost immediately”.

      I took this to mean that the ABP reault to be announced in October had a bearing on when City Square was started.

      Sorry if i’m getting the wrong end of the stick.

    • #757865
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      jungle, notice how Mahon has become Ballinure for the purposes of selling Jacobs Island

    • #757866
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      In the original frinailla post (#321 i think) you said ” should the appeal be favoured, it is my understanding the developers intend to begin work on City Square almost immediately”.

      I took this to mean that the ABP reault to be announced in October had a bearing on when City Square was started.

      Sorry if i’m getting the wrong end of the stick.

      😉 No problem – I think what was meant was, the developers hope to get this scheme off the ground as soon as possible.

    • #757867
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      jungle, notice how Mahon has become Ballinure for the purposes of selling Jacobs Island

      location, location, location……its still Mahon with a lovely view of the Examiner print works (now is that the most beautiful building in Cork or what!)….

    • #757868
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      I love the corrugated steel glistening in the sun… also the curved facade in an Aldi-esque wink at the Indo’s Citiwest magnificence.

    • #757869
      lexington
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      I love the corrugated steel glistening in the sun… also the curved facade in an Aldi-esque wink at the Indo’s Citiwest magnificence.

      Funny you should say that d_d_dallas – because it looks like Webprint Concepts were trying to replicate the wonderful RKD designed Indo printing press but not only failed miserably, they also must have run out of budget. It makes the retail warehousing next-door look like a palace. It’s highly prominent position doesn’t help either. Probably one of the more noteworthy planning disasters in Cork’s recent times. :rolleyes:

    • #757870
      redtape
      Participant

      The City Council have requested a photomontage of the scheme………………….. : 😮

      Cant wait to see what its like. Maybe I should reserve judgement until then.

      I’ve checked the plans on my last visit to the planning dept. The scheme includes 16 duplex apartments, similiar to the adjoining buildings…………………………… Cant say I like the design however, I mean have you looked around Blackpool lately, very innovative/ contemporary designs going up around here.

      This building is just replicating whats gone before, no imagination whatsoever………………………………… : 🙁

      QUOTE=Frog1]Any info on a development on Popes road, Blackpool?[/QUOTE]

    • #757871
      CORKBATMAN
      Participant

      QUOTE=Frog1]Any info on a development on Popes road, Blackpool?[/

      redtape wrote:
      The City Council have requested a photomontage of the scheme………………….. : 😮

      Cant wait to see what its like. Maybe I should reserve judgement until then.

      I’ve checked the plans on my last visit to the planning dept. The scheme includes 16 duplex apartments, similiar to the adjoining buildings…………………………… Cant say I like the design however, I mean have you looked around Blackpool lately, very innovative/ contemporary designs going up around here.

      This building is just replicating whats gone before, no imagination whatsoever………………………………… : 🙁

      I’ve also seen these plans, and I strongly disagree with Redtape…………. I think the architecture is in harmony with the surrounding townhouses and I must commend the architect on being so brave to do so, in the face of so many modern contemporary buildings springing up around the area. Watch this space………………… 🙂

    • #757872
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anyone have an image of the new Examiner Printing Press building in Mahon?

      Also, does anyone know the due date for the ABP decision with regard to AIB Blackpool?



      Interesting article in yesterday’s Irish Times Sports Pages regarding Pairc Ui Chaoimh. A spokesperson for Cork County Board that a move away from the current site was not on the cards when considering the much needed redevelopment of the city’s major GAA stadium. Previous reports had suggested a move to the Blarney area might have been a possibility.

      Also, todays Examiner had an article by Tommy Barker detailing moves by Port of Cork to move its operations out of the Docklands and into the Ringaskiddy area of Cork Harbour.
      In particular he mentions the cork bonded warehouse site and says there is currently a legal disput ongoing with regard to this site. Any body have further details?

    • #757873
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      em… SARCASM!

      “Aldi-esque”

      Cheap as chips and in such a prominent location. TCH acquire a magnificent premises on South Mall for their own and then inflict this! Corporate image obviously only applies in the City Centre.

    • #757874
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Also, todays Examiner had an article by Tommy Barker detailing moves by Port of Cork to move its operations out of the Docklands and into the Ringaskiddy area of Cork Harbour.
      In particular he mentions the cork bonded warehouse site and says there is currently a legal disput ongoing with regard to this site. Any body have further details?

      The dispute regarded rights over the Cork Bonded Warehouses premises which is held by J.W. Green (along the Monahan Road) on a leasehold basis. The actually freehold is held by Port of Cork – the dispute has been a long one with Oakeridge Limited (not entirely sure on how they spell it!). However, the freehold was subject to negotiations with one of Cork’s better known developers and rumours of a sale have been discussed. The details are still shady at this early stage but preplanning discussions were believed to have already, in part, discussed.



      d_d_dallas – TCH acquired the MahonPoint following their deal with OCP in which the developers acquired the Irish Examiner offices and printing press along Academy Street. The MP printing press is being funded by Webprint Concepts who will print all of TCH’s titles except the UK-based Irish Post. Webprint Concepts have the land on lease from TCH.


    • #757875
      lexington
      Participant

      Nat Ross Redevelopment

      This is the best I could get it I’m afraid – an image of the Monahan Road (northern) elevation, this is the 10-storey block which occupies about a quarter of the road frontage. The design is by Jonathan Horgan with SDA O’Flynn. Details of Niall Doris’ redevelopment project can be found in previous posts.



      😎 Frinailla have seen Further Information requested of their 6/7 storey, 25 unit over basement car-parking apartment development at Victoria Cross. The project is designed by Geraldine McNamara of Richard Rainey & Associates and will be located only a stone’s throw away from the developers’ other project, soon to be submitted, at Dennehy’s Cross.


      (not a thumbnail, sorry! see earlier post on this development)



      😎 Meanwhile, OFC have seen their massive Dunkettle House scheme brought before ABP following 3rd party appeals by persons including the Glounthaune Community Association. The original plan for 63-acres of the estate’s grounds including 629 new homes, a retail unit, equestrian centre, sports facilities, creche, garden centre etc. However, CorkCoCo permitted only 527 of these new homes and included a number of conditions on the developers which included issues of road access and an emphasis on the recreational aspects of the development.



      😮 And a small development I had been following, given it’s unique location – that of retailler Ann Clifford’s plans for her store and the Westbourne Houses along College Road – has been granted following appeal and despite the recommendation of the inspector’s report. The plan proposes the construction of 4 two storey terraced houses on Highfield Avenue, extension to shop and demolition of portion of existing residential to construct 4 apartments on 3 floors at 1, 2 and 3 Westbourne on College Road. Mrs. Clifford had submitted previous plans for the premises, comprising of 8 student apartments, but they were refused by both CCC and ABP. The grant that came with this application was appealed by Westbourne Park and Magazine Road Residents Association.



      Also, the Corbett apartment development for Carmelite Place (22-units, mix of 1,2 & 3-bedroom apartments over 28-space basement car-park) seems like a clever design – a little boxy and not necessarily the ‘best’ James Leahy & Associates’ work – but clever all the same. Some nice courtyard landscaping. The scheme seems to make much better use of the space afforded it than the previous student apartment application on the site and at 3-storeys (with roof section “secret” 4th floor) seems more more befitting the site in terms of height and massing. The development peaks to the north, along Mardyke Walk, but steps down nearing the single-storey AIB Bank to the south.



      😀 And by the way, I’ve updated the images on Pitwood Limited’s plans for their 5-star hotel at Parnell Place & Beasley Street (another James Leahy & Associates project!), as promised. I will in due process get around to upgrading all the light stained or blurry images – so if you want to check out those images see the post concerning this recently granted hotel (Post #266). But if you couldn’t be bothered looking for those images, here are the improved quality images below! 😀

      Construction on the Parnell Place Hotel is set for this Winter, with the operators of Setanta House Hotel and Carton House (both in Kildare), likely to operate this new 5-star venture.

    • #757876
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 If you follow my posts, you may have been taking note of some points I’ve made – often indirectly – about various plans under assessment for Cork and it’s docklands. Now sometimes they bare fruit, other times not, but it’s always subject to planning, markets, discussions etc etc. If you noted that in a recent post, I referred again to the fact that Paul Kenny had been thinking over new plans for his 50 Grand Parade site (the Citi-Car Park), and among those plans had been an idea for a new landmark hotel – well then, this may interest you!

      Mr. Kenny has a history of planning efforts regarding his valuable 50 Grand Parade site, the premises fronts Grand Parade with the shell of a former red-brick Georgian, now used as an entrance to a car-parking facility. In 2000, Mr. Kenny applied and was refused for permission to develop a 7-storey mixed use development consisting of a 22-bedroom hotel, multistorey car-park, offices, retail and apartments. The plan was designed by PRC Architects and subsequently granted following appeal. In 2003, a further application was submitted to CCC seeking the development of student apartments on the site – as part of the previously granted 2000 development, this application was later withdrawn, and until now the site has lain idle, continuing to operate as a car-parking facility. Next door, Frinailla commenced work on their 50 or so unit Grand Parade Plaza development – a project incorporating retail elements, reaching to 7-storeys also and designed by Richard Rainey & Associates.

      Architects James Leahy & Associates were approached in 2004 about designing a proposal for a new hotel and mixed use complex at the 50 Grand Parade site. The scheme called for a 180 bedroom hotel with leisure facilities, offices, retail, public boardwalk and parking. The result produced a 14-storey, oval shaped, riverside landmark. Beyond this, it is not known exactly what the Kenny Group now foresee for the site – information on pre-planning discussions are not clear, although it is assumed the proposals in this form were rejected – I’m open for correction on that. Indeed, a hotel and mixed-use plan is probably still on the cards (unless Mr. Kenny is swayed by other issues) – but perhaps not on this scale. One could only imagine the impact it would have had on views of St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral – and to think they were worried about Jurys! 😀 However, this proposal goes to show you that there are exciting schemes been worked at in the background – and some of these are indeed high-rise, mostly earmarked for areas in and around the docklands. Simply because not every scheme bares fruit, does not mean it isn’t being thought of. Mr Kenny has recently shown a willingness to allow his appointed design teams produce innovative schemes such as that granted at St. Patrick’s Quay – hope that frame of mind amongst all Cork’s developments continues and successfully grows. The good news is that there are more high-rise and more interesting proposals afoot – and when I can info will be brought to you on them. 😉

      Click thumbnails to enlarge images.


      View of the Proposal from Sullivan’s Quay, looking West toward South Main Street Bridge.


      View north-to-south down along South Main Street. Rear of Bishop Lucey Park may be seen on the left.

    • #757877
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      WOW!!!

      Are they serious though?? maybe if Mr. kenny is successful in getting the Revenue comissioners and I hope he does cos i really love the St. patricks qy building he proposed, maybe he could use the Sullivans quay site for that hotel proposal. That site could probably accomodate a building of that height a bit better and provide a dramatic backdrop when viewed down along Grand parade.

      But really, do ya think that building at the location seen in the pictures is really that bad? It could make for a nice punctuation of the citys skyline with County hall in the west, that hotel in the city centre, Eglinton street in the east and leading out to highrise in the docklands.
      i dont think St. Finbars would be too dirupted by that cos the hotel is stepped to the side of the vista and not actually in its path like that other hotel proposal at Crosses green, yeuck!

    • #757878
      A-ha
      Participant

      I think it looks a really nice building, but what is with all that timber or whatever it is on the outside. It looks as if all the windows are boarded up. It would look miles better if it were to be removed. I like the shape of it and it would be a nice feature to the area’s skyline. The BMW sports car at the rear of the park in the second picture isn’t so bad either. :rolleyes:

    • #757879
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Development possibilities are potentially ripe for the former Coca-Cola Bottling facility along the Carrigrohane “Straight” Road. Lisney are in the final stages of closing a deal on the 1.7 acre premises which is expected to ultimately sell for approx. €5m. The Coca-Cola site adjoins an existing 0.3 acre printworks which may offer further development potential. The site falls just within the area zoned by CCC for developments suitable of a high-rise nature and may offer potential for an imaginative design opportunity. However, any development here will be required to respect the gateway, and amazingly Protected Structure status, of Cork County Hall nearby. That will mean no visual disruption – however, a clever design may allow for an unobtrusive, complimentary slim high-rise development. Who knows??? 😉 :confused:

    • #757880
      Devin
      Participant

      That’s hilarious (above images for Gnd Parade site). It would never in a million years get planning permission.
      Equivalent to O’Connell Bridge House, Dublin, in inappropriateness.

    • #757881
      pier39
      Participant

      hmmmm where to begin???

      first off does the nat ross development remind anyone of a caramac bar??? or one of those caramel cup desserts only taller? i just keep looking for that novel gigantic silver spoon feature to extend out of the rooftop.

      and im sorry, but i still think that parnell place hotel scheme looks very exciting and glad to see construction dates have been set.

      as for the kenny group hotel idea on south main street, i believe wayne campbell of waynes world once put it, ‘scheeeeyaw right!’ (now we’ve established the level of my cultural intake.) it reminds me of the hotel concorde in paris not far from the arc de triomphe. the location is totally unsuited, however by established the development bulk to one end of the site, it allows for visual and breathing space to residents of the frinailla project who i think have balconies facing toward the river. otherwise the kenny proposals on this site will have to consume a greater area with a dispersed bulk to compensate for any loss otherwise achieved by height. that means the frinailla residents will be looking out to a concrete wall, well not quite, but sort of. even so this type of project is better suited for the docklands but i still wouldnt be too happy with the design. it does nothing for me and could do with a little more form and imagination. nice pics all the same.

    • #757882
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Yeah, nice pics lexington and great to see what we’re being saved from by a bit of common sense. What we have to wonder about is the fact that Mr. Kenny actually paid people to come up with this totally innappropriate design for the area which they themselves must have known would never even get close to Navigation House. I’m all for pushing the boundries, working outside the box and all the rest of those catchphrases but people have to be realistic about it.

      The design itself is let down by the timber cladding and the rear of the development (first image) towards Grand Parade, along the river looks boxy and badly thought out.
      No, No, No.

    • #757883
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      But really, do ya think that building at the location seen in the pictures is really that bad?

      See image below and decide for yourself.


      Drawing shows Kenny Hotel idea on the South Main Street (western) elevation with Grand Parade Plaza project to left.



      @Frog1 wrote:

      Any info on a development on Popes road, Blackpool?

      Are you referring to the Eileen Daly project, designed by PRC Architects?

    • #757884
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Can anyone confirm whether Vibes and Scribes are moving into one of the OCP units at lapps quay?

    • #757885
      who_me
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      But really, do ya think that building at the location seen in the pictures is really that bad? It could make for a nice punctuation of the citys skyline with County hall in the west, that hotel in the city centre, Eglinton street in the east and leading out to highrise in the docklands.
      i dont think St. Finbars would be too dirupted by that cos the hotel is stepped to the side of the vista and not actually in its path like that other hotel proposal at Crosses green, yeuck!

      I actually really like the design – far, far, faaar better than the hotel which has received planning permission at Cross’s Green.

      However, I can see why it wouldn’t go ahead. Particularly, the view of St. Finbarr’s from along the South Mall or Lapp’s Quay would be completely obscured.

      That said, I personally would still not be opposed to it – Main St (South Main St. in particular) still looks incredibly run down Anything would be an improvement, and it might bring some life to the area.

    • #757886
      who_me
      Participant

      lexington – Thanks for the detailed response regarding the South Docks! You also succeeded in cutting a few of my next questions off at the knees! 😉

      The only plans/designs I’ve yet seen for the area is the masterplan pdf, which I’d assume is a rough, aspirational plan rather than the final shape. What really impressed me about it though were “extras” for want of a better word – the boating basin, preserving/restoring the waterways, the numerous parks, the public access to the riverfront walkways etc. Fortunately, it seems that developers are putting increasing effort not just into the quality of their designs, but into the recreational areas and other facilities in the area.

      I wondered too how an area this size is going to affect the commuter patterns/levels in the city. Has anyone projected how many people might work in a rejuvenated dockland development? Can you imagine an extra 40 or 50 thousand people commuting every day to the South Docks through Blackrock, Mahon, Douglas? It could be a nightmare – hence I’d guess the hope is that it be reasonably self-sufficient. I.e. a good number of people working in the docklands will live there too.

      It’s good to hear about the Nat Ross plans, as it shows it’s not just the riverfront sites which will be cherry-picked for the prestigious projects. Plus, the fact that they’re going for up to 10 stories bodes well for higher buildings closer to the fiver/further from the established residences. (Sorry, but I’m a big fan of tall (but pretty) buildings)

      Interesting, if uncertain, times. I just wish they’d get on and start knocking/building something!! At least with Webworks and Eglington St. on the way, they’re moving in the right direction.

      It was no surprise either to hear Howard Holdings mentioned, I remember reading Greg Coughlan’s comments around the opening of Lapp’s Quay, and he seems more enthusiastic/ambitious about the docklands than the council or most Corkonians!

      Keep up the bean spilling!

    • #757887
      securityman
      Participant

      I see that H&M are going into the crescent shopping centre in Limerick its amazing that they are going there before Cork just like Dixons, Foot Locker, TK Maxx etc.. Unless O’Flynn Construction are trying to get them for Ballincollig as Marks and Spencers dont seem to be interested now. That would be a big boost to Ballincollig SC and give Owen O’Callaghan something to worry about. To date Iknow that Dunnes, Eason, Carrig Donn and Art and Hobby are moving in but they arent going to set the world a light are they??

    • #757888
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 John F. Supple Contractors seem to be storming ahead with Phase 2 of the €30m Camden Court project being developed by OSB Group. Phase 1, designed by James Leahy & Associates, which comprised of 44 apartments, was acclaimed for it’s respectful and innovative, limestone & copper clad design. Phase 2 will see the development of over 50 further apartments, extensive roof-gardens, a new home for the Cork Arts Theatre and new Pa Johnson’s Pub premises. Below find images of Phase 1, now completed, and Phase 2, under construction (note the images display a variation on the actual resulting material finish and colouration – which will be limestone, as par Phase 1).


    • #757889
      A-ha
      Participant

      I didn’t know that Cork was waiting for TK Maxx and Foot Locker to open. I’ve never been to the Crescent shopping centre, but has it been extended or has a shop closed to make way for H&M. It’s such a shame that they are opening in Limerick first, but no doubt they’ll open in Cork soon after (Cornmarket Street maybe???) Why do I have a feeling that Ballincollig will turn into another Douglas Court, just newer. Next time a shooping centre opens in Cork, Dunnes should be banned by the city council!
      Oh and I really like the roof top garden, shame it wont be seen from the ground, and copper cladding sounds different.

    • #757890
      Anonymous
      Participant

      i quite like the look of the roof garden. it looks nice.

    • #757891
      Boyler
      Participant

      Let’s hope we will see more architecture of this quality around the country in the near future.

    • #757892
      A-ha
      Participant

      I’ll keep my fingers crossed.

    • #757893
      Devin
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      it reminds me of the hotel concorde in paris not far from the arc de triomphe. the location is totally unsuited

      The effect on Cork’s ‘signature’ view – the view from Nano Nagle Bridge to St. Finbarr’s with South Gate Bridge and the terraces of Sullivan’s/Proby’s Quay in the foreground – would’ve been terrible.

      As said it’s a docklands type building.

    • #757894
      securityman
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I didn’t know that Cork was waiting for TK Maxx and Foot Locker to open. I’ve never been to the Crescent shopping centre, but has it been extended or has a shop closed to make way for H&M. It’s such a shame that they are opening in Limerick first, but no doubt they’ll open in Cork soon after (Cornmarket Street maybe???) Why do I have a feeling that Ballincollig will turn into another Douglas Court, just newer. Next time a shooping centre opens in Cork, Dunnes should be banned by the city council!
      Oh and I really like the roof top garden, shame it wont be seen from the ground, and copper cladding sounds different.

      The crescent is after building on a new extension from what I gather, I’ve been there twice and its similar to mahon point except longer and only on one level. As for Ballincollig I agree with you the last thing you need is another Douglas court all that place seems to be good for is coffee with O’Briens, BBs, Costa Coffee, Gloria Jeans all under one roof. I heard last night that OFC are looking for too much on the rent for the outlets because a large music store in this country had a look but thought the rent was to high in comparison to recent store openings.

      Thats great that the cat club will get a new premises and that the old pub Pa Johnsons will get a new home it should be good for the area I’m amazed how long its taking Camden wharf to open its doors that place seems to be in the building process for years now.

    • #757895
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Hi, just talking about the 2 developments either side of Carrolls quay, you have the James leahy designed Camden court on the western side of the road and the J. Keating designed Camden wharf on the eastern side. Both are new and under sale at the moment. As far as i know, phase 2 of Camden wharf is under sale – There are 59 apartments here in total. Camden court is seeing its 2nd phase now under construction, i think it totall there will be something like 90 apartments there. Which do you think is the better design? I have 2 pics below (thanks for info too lex) so which do you think ended up the superior development? in terms of design i mean!!


      Camden wharf. J. Keating and associates. and developed by the Hornibrook holdings.


      Camden court. James Leahy and associates. developed by OSB group.

      ????????

    • #757896
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      New super prison planned for Spike Island site

      by Ralph Riegel, Irish Independent 26th August 2005

      SPIKE Island is to be the site for a huge multi-million euro prison.
      Following the long-awaited wage agreement between the Irish Prison Officers Association and Justice Minister Michael McDowell, the Government is to consider proposals for a new prison in Cork Harbour.
      This would cater for upwards of 600 inmates – more than four times the design capacity of the existing Cork prison on Rathmore Road.
      Critically, the new super-prison would not only ease pressure on jails in Limerick and Dublin, but would also transform prison security and allow officers eliminate the flow of drugs and contraband into the jail.
      The proposed new Spike Island prison is also likely to cater for both male and female prisoners, thereby resolving the crux of female Cork inmates having to be transferred to either Dublin or Limerick jails.
      Last night, the Irish Prisons Service (IPS) confirmed that studies are already underway into how to develop the existing Fort Mitchell prison on Spike Island. A key element of the plan is the construction of a new bridge, which would be controlled by the IPS. A senior government source added funding is expected to be sought for 2006/2007.

    • #757897
      altuistic
      Participant

      Pity about Spike,

      Would have been nicer to see it contribute rather the detract from the economy’s resources, the proposed ‘Alcatraz’ style attraction would have been of far greater benefit. the Super Prison idea is a carelessly flawed one.

    • #757898
      mhenness
      Participant

      @altuistic wrote:

      Pity about Spike,

      Would have been nicer to see it contribute rather the detract from the economy’s resources, the proposed ‘Alcatraz’ style attraction would have been of far greater benefit. the Super Prison idea is a carelessly flawed one.

      Why is the plan for a super prison on Spike Island flawed?

    • #757899
      A-ha
      Participant

      securityman, are TK Maxx and Foot Locker due to open in Cork?

    • #757900
      altuistic
      Participant

      @mhenness wrote:

      Why is the plan for a super prison on Spike Island flawed?

      I think the idea of large scale all encompassing institutions represent a poor option with regard to penal accountability, such institutions have little to no categorisation in terms of the prisoner arrangements. in many cases the man serving a month for traffic offences is mixed with the fellas serving 20 for manslaughter or murder. what about rehabilition?? Is such an arrangement truly of benefit to the offender? I would prefer to see smaller specialised institutions, i.e. minor crimes, severe etc etc should the man guilty of a minor offence not be offered an environment that positively works to see his restoration into society as a productive member?

      my family at one stage sought to adopt a young boy (12 at the time) but which ultimately failed given numerous legal circumstances. His mother died at an early age, his father was an alcoholic and cared not if at all for the condition of his son whom he would often beat in a drunken rage. His sisters were in foster care. We did our best to offer him alternative paths, getting him jobs, summer work, funding for schooling but because we had no legal guardianship often he would disappear for weeks, months on end – in which time he associated with the wrong crowds. As the years went by, this innately good hearted young fella, was arrested for snatching a pickpocketing offence, an improper offence but a minor in comparison. Now the law is the law, I accept that but he was sent to Spike at 18 and it did him no world of good. I wont bore you the ins and outs but at 21 he was found dead in his flat after O.D.’ing. im not saying this was the institutions fault, you may argue it was an inevitability of some sorts, but i can assure you, were a proper insitution dealing with fellas like himself put in place and he may have had a better shot. I’m skipping so many details i know my argument sounds flawed itself but trust me that i know the details.

      i just dont see Superprisons as the way to go.

    • #757901
      A-ha
      Participant

      I’ll support anything that will replace the current city jail. It’s absolutley horrible. Went there before on school trip. It’s so old and dated and the cells don’t even have toilets in there (only chamber pots). Nobody deserves to be sentenced to a place like Cork Prison. Half the windows are bust and by the looks of it, the place hasn’t been painted in years. It’s obvious no money is put into the place, but I do remember seeing an extension being built to provide a new “school” for the inmates. A school with iron bars, it sounds like mine. Alcatraz High! :rolleyes:

    • #757902
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 John F. Supple Contractors seem to be storming ahead with Phase 2 of the €30m Camden Court project being developed by OSB Group. Phase 1, designed by James Leahy & Associates, which comprised of 44 apartments, was acclaimed for it’s respectful and innovative, limestone & copper clad design. Phase 2 will see the development of over 50 further apartments, extensive roof-gardens, a new home for the Cork Arts Theatre and new Pa Johnson’s Pub premises. Below find images of Phase 1, now completed, and Phase 2, under construction (note the images display a variation on the actual resulting material finish and colouration – which will be limestone, as par Phase 1).

      I have to say, it looks great in the photos, but in real life I think it just looks quite drab. I don’t really understand the acclaim.

      (Plus, every time I see it, I’m reminded of the comments made about its interior in another thread here! 😉 )

    • #757903
      who_me
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Can anyone confirm whether Vibes and Scribes are moving into one of the OCP units at lapps quay?

      Lapps? Do you mean Lavitts? If so, it could be a good move – I only recently realised the lane alongside links with the Hugenot quarter, so it might see more foot traffic.

      Incidentally, the existing Vibes and Scribes building is actually really attractive, or it would be if all the advertising was torn down.

    • #757904
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I am glad to see that some people finally agree with me that Cork needs to do something about attracting the big name stores as i wrote about it before and people started going on about how Cork is such a great place to shop because it still has all its indigenous businesses going.I also agree with this but as Irelands second city and in order to be recognised as a modern european city as the city councillers are always saying, you need to attract this kind of business!I noticed this recently when i was in Galway and Waterford and it just made me wonder why this is?It just makes you wonder why stores such as homebase,footlocker,eddie rockets,currys etc locate in Waterford before Cork when the area i live in alone is around the same size as Waterford? :confused:

    • #757905
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I didn’t know that Cork was waiting for TK Maxx and Foot Locker to open. I’ve never been to the Crescent shopping centre, but has it been extended or has a shop closed to make way for H&M. It’s such a shame that they are opening in Limerick first, but no doubt they’ll open in Cork soon after (Cornmarket Street maybe???) Why do I have a feeling that Ballincollig will turn into another Douglas Court, just newer. Next time a shooping centre opens in Cork, Dunnes should be banned by the city council!
      Oh and I really like the roof top garden, shame it wont be seen from the ground, and copper cladding sounds different.

      I wish TK maxx was comming to Cork, As an ex member of TJ Maxx I was told back in 1991 they were comming to Ireland, What slowed it down was the size of the shops, they were looking for 35,000 sq ft. I agree no more Dunnes Stores , give us a change. New shopping centres must have new mix of retailers and not the same old shops.

    • #757906
      A-ha
      Participant

      Yea, why foreign retailers locate to places like Galway and Waterford first is beyond me. I can accept Dublin and Limerick, but why Galway? Cork caters for a big catchment area and it’s only in the last year that foreign stores locate here! It’s about time too. Cork is soon to get a PC World and Dixons, but they have been in Limerick and Waterford for years. Whats the hold up? Did Cork have a shortage of retail parks or something? daniel 7, Homebase were due to come to Cork a few months back, but since B&Q and Atlantic Homecare opened up and Woodies got a new store, I guess they decided to hold back. But on the otherhand, alot of the stores in Mahon Point are believed to be found only in Cork or Dublin, Debenhams located it’s first store outside Dublin in Cork, so that has to count for something. I think we are picking out the stores we don’t have, rather than the stores that we do. (p.s. hope TK Maxx and H&M come to Cork too).

    • #757907
      lexington
      Participant
      who_me wrote:
      I have to say, it looks great in the photos, but in real life I think it just looks quite drab. I don’t really understand the acclaim.

      (Plus, every time I see it, I’m reminded of the comments made about its interior in another thread here! ]

      I love the expression ABP used to describe the design of Phase 2, “interesting if not a little fussy(!)” :p

      I think it will add character to the street and takes a direction other than the standard, boring vertical lines and 90 degree edges which is very much welcome. The use of copper is tasteful.


    • #757908
      dave123
      Participant

      A-ha , where is TK max going up in Cork and what is it ? , there is one going in Limerick too 🙂 why is it shame that Limerick is getting H&M? 🙂 I have not been in Cork in a while, so hows the Mahon point gettin on ? trade and shops taken .. I like the development of those apartements that lex posted above. 🙂

    • #757909
      A-ha
      Participant

      It isn’t a shame that Limerick is getting a H&M. I was just pointing out that it’s a same Limerick and Galway get some stores before Cork (especially TK Maxx, there is even one in Tralee!). Don’t know where TK Maxx are going (that’s if they do come to Cork, you’ll have to ask securityman). Mahon Point is getting on quite well. Debenhams is very popular and trade has leveled out over recent months in the other stores like Jane Norman, Bershka and Lacoste. I like the shopping centre, it feels so spacious and really bright, but I think I will stick with the city centre for the time being.

    • #757910
      securityman
      Participant

      There is no sign of TK Maxx or H&M making an arrival in Cork yet but with the retail park in Blackpool opening phase 2 before christmas I wouldnt be suprised if we see TK Maxx ansdsomeone like Harry Corrys moving in as the the rest of the stores seem to be doing very well. As for Mahon Point it seems to be ticking along nicely and I’ve no doubt they will do well on the run up to christmas but one thing I have noticed is that none of our shopping centres in the city have a proper toy store. I’m suprissed smiths wouldnt go for blackppol, mahon or ballincollig or maybe its in the pipeline. I hear that Starbucks has opened in Dublin I wonder will they make the move to cork somewhere like the CIE office on Patrick st might be a good location for them.

      Did anyone see the write up on Eastgate on the Evening Echo on Saturday too me it looked like an advertisement to get bigger names in there as the ones they have wont attract anyone besides the employees that are working nearby with the exception of Pizza Hut. I went into the Raddison yesterday for the first time, for me it is very plain and does nothing for me I suppose its aiming for business travellers. Where I was impressed with though was the BK2 bar in Glanmire very modern and stylish for a suburban bar along the lines of the Plaza in Killarney but better. Well done to the shelbourne group on that one.

    • #757911
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      Lapps? Do you mean Lavitts? If so, it could be a good move…

      Yeah, I did mean Lavitts. Sorry for the confusion. Still no nearer to finding out whether its true or not.



      I have no idea what TK maxx is but i’ve a feeling if it doesn’t open somewhere in Cork soon a couple of members of this thread could explode with anticipation :p

    • #757912
      securityman
      Participant

      Has anyone heard the rumour that the Brog and Qube complex is to be sold on oliver plunkett st to the developers of the new shopping centre where the capitol cineplex is now. I also hear that Arnotts is rumored to be looking to be anchor tenants in this new development.

    • #757913
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Yeah, I did mean Lavitts. Sorry for the confusion. Still no nearer to finding out whether its true or not.



      I have no idea what TK maxx is but i’ve a feeling if it doesn’t open somewhere in Cork soon a couple of members of this thread could explode with anticipation :p

      TK Maxx has just opened in Sligo (sorry Cork). Must say it is a peculiar shop – Calvin Klein boxer shorts sit side-by-side with things that quite obviously just arrived in on the latest ship from Taiwan. What is the back ground to the shop? Are they German – they have a certain Lidl/Aldi style to them. Anyway – Corkonians, don’t hold your breath, it isn’t exactly awe inspiring. H & M though will stir Dunnes Stores up – no harm.

    • #757914
      lexington
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      I also hear that Arnotts is rumored to be looking to be anchor tenants in this new development.

      ]hopefully[/I] let you know more when I can.

    • #757915
      who_me
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Yeah, I did mean Lavitts. Sorry for the confusion. Still no nearer to finding out whether its true or not.

      I was passing the Lavitt’s Quay building yesterday, and one of the (large) ground floor retail units has pictures of a book store on its windows, inscribed (in quite small writing) Vibes and Scribes.

      So, I’m guessing.. yes. 😉

    • #757916
      lisam
      Participant

      @PDLL wrote:

      TK Maxx has just opened in Sligo (sorry Cork). Must say it is a peculiar shop – Calvin Klein boxer shorts sit side-by-side with things that quite obviously just arrived in on the latest ship from Taiwan. What is the back ground to the shop? Are they German – they have a certain Lidl/Aldi style to them. Anyway – Corkonians, don’t hold your breath, it isn’t exactly awe inspiring. H & M though will stir Dunnes Stores up – no harm.

      I dont think H&M will have any effect on Dunnes Stores Trading. The clothing range in Dunnes is totally different.

      TK Maxx is an american company.The TJX Companies, Inc. is the leading off-price apparel and home fashions retailer in the U.S. and worldwide. TJX operates eight businesses — T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, HomeGoods, A.J. Wright, and Bob’s Stores in the United States, Winners and HomeSense in Canada, and T.K. Maxx in Europe.

      Never mind TK Maxx when is Matalan coming?

    • #757917
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I dont think H&M will have any effect on Dunnes Stores Trading. The clothing range in Dunnes is totally different.

      H&M tends to cater for the ‘cheaper’, less exclusive end of the clothes retailing market – surely it will provide some competition to Dunnes. Regardless, opening the market up to outside competition is always welcome – it might help Ireland get out of the spiral of excessive costs that it has gotten itself into.

    • #757918
      dave123
      Participant

      Tk Max is also building there store on the parkway ro, in limerick soon , but not in a hurry! at least Limerick and Cork are not to far from each other, to shop . I’m surprised to see Sligo get one ! 😮 , Is debenhams moving out of the Mahon point ?

      I thought they were doing well, at least cork has Debenhams and M&S can’t complain to much! 🙂

    • #757919
      theblimp
      Participant

      small issue of the English Market between the two, securityman!

    • #757920
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @dave123 wrote:

      Tk Max is also building there store on the parkway ro, in limerick soon , but not in a hurry! at least Limerick and Cork are not to far from each other, to shop . I’m surprised to see Sligo get one ! 😮
      )

      Having checked out TK Maxx I am a bit amazed that any town would actually want to have own – think of a Pound Shop – same tacky crap, just trades in euros and doesn’t confine its prices to single units of currency as was the traditional wont of the Pound Shop.

      As the tourist brochures state ‘Sligo is surprising’.

    • #757921
      lisam
      Participant

      Being a total shopaholic theres a big difference in the clothes you get in Dunnes compared to H & M. Dunnes Stores caters more for the house wife than H & M would. The more shops the better though!

      As for TK MAXX you can get some good quality merchandise and some poor quality too. The same goes for most stores even BT!!

    • #757922
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lisam wrote:

      Being a total shopaholic theres a big difference in the clothes you get in Dunnes compared to H & M. Dunnes Stores carers more for teh house wife than H & M would

      a salient if perhaps slightly sexist point – it might be best not to pidgeon hole the fashion sense of the average house-wife though – I am sure that there are plenty of young Irish house wives out there who like to slip into a nice goose-pimple arousing belly top prior to frying up a wholesome pan of extra juicy sausages, provided though that they have bought their pan-cover in the Dunnes Stores House and Home section. Nothing worse that a skite of hot oil in the navel region.

    • #757923
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Sensibly, CCC have refused permission for the change of use of the ground floor of a listed building a 16 North Mall from living accomodation to office use. A sign was also to be erected on the exterior of the building.
      With the exception of the Franciscan Well (Public House) and an office at the Sunday’s Well end, all this terrace of three-storeys are in residential use. However the City Council would do well to instruct the new student accomodation provider at the Sunday’s Well end of the street to remove the unsightly plastic signs attached to the doors. Afterall, the owner is pretty well known to them 🙂



      CCC have also refused permission for James Ronayne’s 3 storey retail (3 units) and apartment (8) building on Thomas Davis Street, Blackpool. The report found that the proposed development would result in “over-development of the site (and) would produce a living environment of low amenity value.”


      This place is quickly turning into the shopping channel 🙁

    • #757924
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      This place is quickly turning into the shopping channel 🙁

      Yeah, I’m all for discussing relevant tenants and so-called ‘signature’ tenancy developments – after all they sometimes have crucial impacts on development successes and viability etc etc (and God knows I do it myself a bit) – but I think the conversation has strayed a little. It’s no intended jibe at anyone, but aren’t there other forums to discuss the latest styles? :p



      ]*UPDATES*[/B]

      😎 Just may be worth noting, given the level of controversy around this project – that Bernard Crowley & Gerald Paul’s plans for a 5 to 7 storey apartment building with 67 units, gym and 49 space basement car-park destined for the Riverside Farm site along the Model Farm Road, and designed by Dennehy + Dennehy, has seen it’s due date pushed back until October 21st 2005. The design slopes south to north peaking at 7-storeys. The developers have had previous applications for a student development on the site. This application has received over 30 seperate objections – including that of a member of the CCC Planning Dept. Issues of traffic management are also a further concern. It’ll be interesting to see how this outcomes.

      🙂 Also a strategically located apartment development for Cork city centre is expected to be lodged imminently, the project was previously indicated in an earlier post (possibly in LADSOCL) and I will bring full details of that shortly.

    • #757925
      A-ha
      Participant

      What surprised me more about TK Maxx then the one in Sligo is that there is also one in Letterkenny. It must have been a godsend for the local people of Donegal. And there is a huge difference between H&M and Dunnes, the main one being that there isn’t a H&M on every corner in Ireland and H&M do more trendier type stuff. And whoever mentioned Matalan (I can’t see where it was written) I thank you. I go over to England every year around Christmas with my cousins to stock up on stuff from Matalan. Clothes, electronics and most importantly…. big tubs of sweets. I wish Woolworths were still in Cork, why did they have to close!! Also, the main reason I am obsessed with TK Maxx is cos I can’t afford to go to Brown Thomas every day of the week, like someone my age can afford to buy FCUK jeans for €90 a pop whenever they feel like it. I spend my money on other things, like saving for a car 🙂 We’ll see who’s laughing when I drive past Brown Thomas in a 1967 rust coloured Ford Fiesta.

    • #757926
      A-ha
      Participant

      Was very impressed with the progress being made with County Hall, I saw it yesterday for the first time in about two or three months. The bottom third of the side facing towards Ballincollig was done in the new glass they are putting on it. Very modern, although, anything would look modern compared to what it was. Ireland’s tallest building should become Ireland’s nicest, lol. I can’t wait to see what it look’s like when completed. It will be like a completly new building.

    • #757927
      A-ha
      Participant

      Sorry for typing my third message in a row, but I prefer it rather than editing a previous post and doing this, that and the other to it, but what is the height of R&H Hall, it’s quite tall for Irish standards, or else it just looks taller cos it hasn’t any windows, but all the same…. is there an official height on it?

    • #757928
      sw101
      Participant

      i make it 45 metres to the shoulder of the front section closest the river. 55 at the highest point on the back section. i’ll dig up some survey drawings if you want.could take a while.

    • #757929
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Does anyone know what’s the story about the appeal for Eglington Street……I heard that they were appealing the fact that they have been charged development contributions for basement car parking…..a bit odd as the Development Plan makes them provide parking?

    • #757930
      lexington
      Participant

      @yorktown wrote:

      Does anyone know what’s the story about the appeal for Eglington Street……I heard that they were appealing the fact that they have been charged development contributions for basement car parking…..a bit odd as the Development Plan makes them provide parking?

      My understanding is that it is in part due to reductions made to the Eglinton Street elevation. As for the basement car-parking, I would agree that development contributions should not be charged for providing parking spaces which CCC have called for themselves. But as you know, OFC faced a bit of a sticking point with the Planning Dept. on the quantity of spaces they wished to provide at basement level (553) – the developers claimed the numbers were crucial to the overall viability and attractiveness of the development, I would tend to support the argument in this case and for other arguments beyond viability issues. Generally such spaces facilitate a development (and the immediate surrounds). OFC were granted the spaces ultimately subject to a rearrangement of space usage. Predominant usage of the car-park is for long-term residents, therefore traffic generation should generally be minimised with respect to the development. Spaces are however also available on a short-term basis for retail & office associated uses.

      I know however, a friend of mine, would argue that if the developer intends to market these spaces, they should be included in consideration of the overall development and thus liable to development contributions. But I’ll leave you consider that yourself. OFC, I am told, remain optimistic about an early 2006 start to the project. 🙂

    • #757931
      Anonymous
      Participant

      A Fianna Fáil junior minister has described as unintentional his use of ministerial notepaper from the Department of the Environment for a letter supporting a land rezoning in Co Cork.

      Batt O’Keeffe, Minister of State with responsibility for environmental protection, made the submission on behalf of a developer to the draft action plan for Fermoy last January. It was received almost a week before the plan was published.

      His intervention caused concern among officials in Cork County Council, one of whom warned of “difficulties in the future” if the council accepted a submission made via a politician before the plan went on public display.

      Mr O’Keeffe wrote in support of plans by Hollycourt Developments, one of the largest house-builders in Munster, to have lands at Watergrasshill zoned for housing and commercial use. As a TD for Cork South-Central, he does not represent Watergrasshill.

      The Minister for the Environment has the power to reverse any rezoning made by councilllors and is usually loath to intervene directly in local planning issues in case he is accused of a conflict of interest.

      Yesterday, Mr O’Keeffe agreed that his use of ministerial notepaper for the submission was open to misinterpretation. “In the normal run of events, I would have sent it on TDs’ stationery. I’m surprised it happened that way. If it had gone through the department, they would have stopped it.” The Minister, who is in China, said he would have been aware that the documents would be made public. “I’m not that stupid to leave myself open to that interpretation. But then maybe I am.”

      County councillors will next week finalise 13 local area plans for Cork in the aftermath of a process marked by intense lobbying by developers for land rezoning. The county manager’s recommendation that Hollycourt’s submission be rejected has already been accepted by councillors.

      No mention of the politician’s involvement was made in the manager’s report to councillors last April, which listed the two submissions on the Watergrasshill land as coming from Hollycourt.

      A council spokesman said that there was “nothing unusual” about representations being made by TDs and even ministers on planning issues. Asked how a submission could have been made before the plan was published, he said: “People would have had a fair idea what was coming up.” The plan had been with the printers for four months before it was published.

      According to the council’s file, Donal Herlihy, of Hollycourt Developments, wrote to Mr O’Keeffe on January 4th, enclosing a map of the lands he hoped to get rezoned for housing. He suggested that three of the 15 acres be developed for a 60-bed nursing home and a number of sheltered housing units. It appears Mr O’Keeffe sent this letter on to the assistant manager, John Deasy, on the same day. However, the Minister’s letter is not on file.

      The draft plan went on display on January 10th. On January 18th, Mr Deasy wrote to Mr O’Keeffe, acknowledging receipt of the letter, which he said he was forwarding to a senior planner in the planning policy unit, Paul Murphy.

      On January 27th, another official at the unit wrote to Mr O’Keeffe, acknowledging receipt of his “submission/observations” and assuring him that it would be taken into account before the plan was finalised.

      However, in a hand-written note to Mr Murphy on February 9th, a council official says he/she is “a bit concerned re the implications of accepting this submission”.

      The writer, whose signature is not legible, says this is because it was sent to Mr Deasy on January 4th, before public display began, and because it was not sent as a submission directly, but “via Batt O’Keeffe”.

      “In order to avoid difficulties in the future, Batt O’Keeffe TD should be written to [ to] submit this as part of the process before February 21st [ the closing date for submissions] or to advise the landowner to write in before the end of the public display period.” In a note appended to the memo, Mr Murphy expresses agreement and suggest a phone call to the developer “will do”.

      Two days later, Ms Susan Leahy, a council official, wrote to Mr O’Keeffe, saying “it has come to my attention that this was not a submission and the acknowledgment was made in error”.

      On February 15th, Mr O’Keeffe replied on notepaper marked Office of Minister of State, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, stating: “I would advise that I did intend my letter to be a submission.”

      In a replying letter to the Minister, Ms Leahy then confirmed that his letter would be treated as a submission.

      © The Irish Times

    • #757932
      A-ha
      Participant

      sw101, thanks for that, but no need to go to any more trouble, I just wanted a rough idea of it’s height. If it is 55m at it’s highest, does that make R&H Hall Ireland’s third tallest building (after Liberty Hall 59m in second place)??? Some people don’t regard it as a building…. but what else could it be called only a building!

    • #757933
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I was just reading the plan for cornmarket street on the city councils website and it sounds good but a long way of yet, but i was just thinking is it just me or is there a furniture store on the loft site that they talk about in the plan that should be redeveloped,cause it says in the plan it should be redeveloped for higher order retail in accordance with the guys site at the latest? And does anyone know what the story is with the kyrls quay site is, are they trying to get that off the ground?And one last thing, does anyone have any news on the wharehouse site adjoining the eglinton site or the reliance building?

    • #757934
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      News that will bring a smile to any true Cork Person:
      The new terminal being built at Cork International Airport will be serviced by Lennox’s Fish and Chip Shop!!
      Yes, according to this evening’s Echo, Lennox’s will be one of the restaurants taking up residence in the terminal’s Food Hall, along with Mahers Coffee, Arbutus Bread and Belvelly Smoked Salmon.
      Also included will be Lir Cafe, Subway, a Hughes and Hughes Bookshop, a Londis Outlet and a new bar: The Red Bar.
      Kylemore and other concession holders in the old terminal will loose out.

    • #757935
      jungle
      Participant

      Any chance they’ll let us buy a newspaper after we’ve gone through security, or is that too much to ask?

    • #757936
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Pierse Construction are working away on site at the lands of the former Ursuline Convent in Blackrock. Along with Firestone Developments, Pierse Construction have initiated a joint venture with Kieran Coughlan & Claire O’Riordan (Lyonshall Limited) on the €200m plan they succeeded in attaining permission for; a scheme of ultimately 550 residential units comprising a mix of houses, duplexes and apartments designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects. The overall development is planned in phases, with the 1st Phase set to constitute approx. 180 new homes – Pierse had originally signed to commit to the 1st Phase, however it is now understood that they are set to embark on full project particpation. Lisney Cork and Hooke & MacDonald in Dublin will be handling sales, which are due to be launched in September 2005 – with first completions on the scheme expected for Autumn 2006. The project is to be marketed as “Eden”.

      😉 Just on O’Mahony Pike Architects’ schemes in Cork, the firm are set to have their presence felt strongly across the city over the coming years. Long ago, I remarked in a post regarding the practice’s opening of a Cork office, that the move would allow the firm facilitate what would be a busy time for them throughout Leeside – well with Frinailla expected to lodged plans for their Dennehy’s Cross scheme soon, and proposals supposedly on schedule for an October lodgement regarding Manor Park Homes’ Horgan’s Quay redevelopment – we can be sure OMP will be having a significant impact on some of Cork’s most noteworthy developments. And that’s not all either…

      🙂 You may remember I mentioned not so long ago that bookshop/newsagents Hughes & Hughes were looking to push into the Cork market – well, it would now look as if this is set right to proceed with the retailler operating 2 new stores at the new €140m terminal at Cork Airport – which is scheduled to open to traffic in Spring 2006.

      😉 And also, news from a respectable inside party, informs that plans for a new, predominantly office, building is being planned for the Doyle Warehouse 0.2 acre premises along Albert Quay which sold, ultimately, for a figure over €8m after months of to-and-fro between 2 rival bidders. Speculation is now abound regarding the fate of the premises which lies between the Doyle site and Albert Quay House (now being redeveloped as a new WebWorks by Howard Holdings), it is believed the 2 centre properties (including Twill Ltd premises) may be controlled by O’Flynn Construction and Ascon Gable Holdings – however the party couldn’t offer any details into that issue. It is expected that an application may be made on the premises before the year end, unfortunately, nothing more specific could be offered from the source at the time, other than keep your eyes on it. But I’ll keep checking up! :p



      I recently was asked about images of the new Victoria Cross student scheme under construction by Fleming Construction, on behalf of UCC. The scheme will provide for 45 new student apartments over 5 blocks ranging from 4/5 storeys over basement car-park. The design is by Bertie Pope & Associates. The image below was formulated in a time before Victoria Mills and does not incorporate either Phase 1 (completed) or Phase 2 (under construction). I actually did post an alternative image of the project in the LADSOCL thread but here’s a view of the road-frontage, it’s a pretty big image – so when you click on the thumbnail, beware! I’ll let the image speak for itself…

    • #757937
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Has anybody got any images of Cork County Hall? I would like to see pictures of how it is at right now and what it will look like when completed. I can’t seem to find images of County Hall anywhere. Cheers.

    • #757938
      lexington
      Participant

      @paul lite wrote:

      Has anybody got any images of Cork County Hall? I would like to see pictures of how it is at right now and what it will look like when completed. I can’t seem to find images of County Hall anywhere. Cheers.

      Most recent image of it’s construction I have available can be found at Deconstruction of Cork County Hall thread – with images of the proposed finish available at Shay Cleary Architects. Obviously CCH’s redevelopment has significantly advanced from the time of the first image’s capture.

    • #757939
      A-ha
      Participant

      Noticed aswell in the Echo that Jet2 are starting a new service to Newcastle from €14 one way inc. taxes from mid October. This is also the airline that briefly operated the Cork-Belfast flight before stopping the service early this year. For more info. check out the Jet2 website. 🙂

    • #757940
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Thanks for the info lexington. I like how it will look when completed but I must say I’d prefer it without the extension. The tower would look way better standing alone.

    • #757941
      A-ha
      Participant

      When is it that Vibes and Scribes are planning to move? Also, just coming back to the airport, great news that someone like Subway is going into the airport. I heard ages ago that WH Smith were to open up in there, but I guess Hughes & Hughes beat them to the punch. Have we an update on wheather or not Ryanair will take control of the old terminal? It would be fantastic if they did. Was I right in presuming that R&H Hall is Ireland’s third tallest building…. I can’t find any sort of Top Ten list anywhere on the internet.

    • #757942
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Was I right in presuming that R&H Hall is Ireland’s third tallest building…. I can’t find any sort of Top Ten list anywhere on the internet.

      Nope even to start with you have Georges quay plaza in Dublin which is the same height as Liberty hall at 56m and then theres Riverpoint in Limerick which is being completed and Millenium tower in Dublin too.

    • #757943
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      that victoria cross student accommodation thing is vile! and is that suppose to be teak? please! :rolleyes: ccc havent done a good job supporting strong design concepts on this stretch of road. its plans like these that make it harder for better lookin and more decent designs to pass planning like the one further up the road, the 7 floor apartment complex posted somewhere earlier on this thread. clearly the architects were tripping to legoland when they designed this.

      its a pity tom mccarthys plan across the road, which was probably the best looking student proposal for the area, never went ahead.

    • #757944
      Anonymous
      Participant

      RATHCORMAC AT LOGGERHEADS WITH LOCAL COUNCILLORS

      – Councillors warned ‘don’t come back for votes’ –

      The message is clear! Rathcormac community will keep on fighting against the proposal by local county councillors to zone a further 23 acres of land just outside the village boundary.

      This message was issued following a meeting last Tuesday night between local county councillors and concerned members of Rathcormac community.

      Despite the pleas of many concerned locals who are opposed to the proposed zonings, Cllrs Aileen Pyne and Kevin O’Keeffe reiterated their intentions to vote for the three proposed zonings at the local area plans meeting in September.

      The local area plans meeting on September 12 will decide the zoning and development of the village for the next five years. But the local community feels that there has been enough development in the village already and it needs time to settle down and adjust to this enormous change.

      The proposed zonings for every community in Cork County will be voted on by all 48 county councillors come September. But Rathcormac Community Council feel that if the local councillors will not support them, they have no chance.

      “If you’re not willing to support our wishes by voting against these zonings, then we have no chance,” said PRO Frank Buckley.

      Treasurer Batt O’Connell also questioned the councillors’ logic.

      “There will be big social problems in Rathcormac, with a big population and no sports or community facilities. You must know that this decision will be the wrong one, yet you are still going to go ahead. Why make a big problem worse?”

      The local community is upset at the way in which Rathcormac is being overdeveloped, with no provision being made for proper infrastructure and amenities, such as sewage, water and community facilities such as sheltered housing, playgrounds, car parks and sporting facilities.

      The three zoned areas in question form a total of 23 acres just outside the village boundary, this in a village where 520 new houses have been built since 2002. Rathcormac has tripled in size in three years, and the current school was built in 1948 to cater for 30 to 40 pupils. Today it is struggling to cater for up to 150, with some children being taught in portakabins due to lack of space.

      The community council met with the councillors earlier in the year, expressing their fears. They did not wish for any further land in Rathcormac to be zoned for development until a new school was built and proper provision made for adequate infrastructure to be put in place, to cope with the demands that a growing population will put on the village.

      Yet despite their requests, local councillors went ahead and zoned further land. Councillors also went against the recommendations of county planners and the county manager, who were also worried at the over-development in Rathcormac.

      Eamonn Power said that the community felt ‘stabbed in the back’.

      “You went off and did the exact opposite. I’m asking you to focus on the problem, don’t divert from the reality”.

      He also went on to question the logic of the councillors’ stance.

      “With the pressure that the village is under, the last thing we need is more houses. There’s no logical commonsense reason for the three extra zonings. You have done sweet F.A. for the community. If there is nothing in it for us, and nothing in it for you, then why are ye voting for it?”

      Another person from the floor said that the councillors appeared to have ‘tunnel vision’ and did not appear willing to listen to the wishes of the local community.

      “As councillors, you represent all the people of Rathcormac and not just three landowners,” he added.

      PRO Frank Buckley said that Rathcormac is an example to many other local communities of a ‘disaster area’.

      “Rathcormac is their argument against overdevelopment. We’ve had 520 houses with planning granted already, and with more to come within the village boundary”.

      He went on to say that the councillors were committing ‘political suicide’ by continuing ‘bull headed’ with the intention of the voting for the extra 23 acres to be zoned.

      “Ye need not bother to come back here looking for votes at the next election,” he warned.

      Cllr Kevin O’Keeffe said that because of problems with once off housing, people needed to live somewhere.

      “A lot of communities, not just Rathcormac, have had a lot of land zoned for housing in the last few years. A lot of people are willing to live in a village such as Rathcormac, which is becoming a very vibrant place.

      “With regard to amenities, the council have a definite strategy in place. All the councillors are under enormous pressure with regard to the local area plans. But once the development contributions are in place, the amenities will follow.”

      Cllr Pyne reiterated this view, adding that Cork County Council handles nine to ten thousand planning applications a year.

      “The planning department are understaffed, so the situation is very difficult for both planners and councillors”.

      Cllr Aileen Pyne went on to say that they had tried to have a balanced look at the whole situation.

      “We met previously with the community council and the school board of management in the Spring. We are trying to rectify all the infrastructure problems in Rathcormac, but finance is a problem. The County Council budget is very constrained and we are not in a position to allocate further funding to the village at present.

      “It’s a chicken and egg situation. Because of the general development contributions scheme, North Cork will be receiving €3.7 million in development charges. The allocation of €40,000 for the new playground, for example, came from this”.

      But Frank Buckley said that there appeared to be ‘more chickens than eggs’.

      “We’ve had problems for the last four years in relation to rational and reasonable planning. Councillors are saying that amenities will be provided in the future, but we are talking about now. Rathcormac has already contributed enough.

      “For amenities we need space in the village centre. But if you allow all the land to be built up, there will be nothing left. Who wants to have a community centre in Mondaniel?”

      Eamonn Power said that the local community had been giving for years, but there was nothing coming back.

      “The playground and school should not come out of Cork County Council funds, but should be provided by the developers. Developers are building at the expense of taxpayers like the people of Rathcormac. One developer gave a small contribution of €5,000. Another developer made millions out of Rathcormac but only gave €100 to the community, which is an insult”.

      Cllr Pyne agreed with Eamonn Power, but she explained that this was the current reality.

      “The reality is that amenities come from the Cork County Council development fund, and not from the developers. We should work on our Oireachtas members to change the legislation with regard to this. But from now we have to be practical and work within the system.”

      “It’s a difficult situation to balance to tell the truth,” Cllr Liam O’Doherty said.

      “I have a lot of people out in the countryside, who are having enormous difficulty with once off housing, so I’m undecided which way I’m going to vote”.

      The intentions of Cllr Frank O’Flynn on the Rathcormac zoning issue are unknown, as he is currently away on holidays. Cork County Councillors are due to vote on the local area plans on Monday September 12.

      Community council chairman, Peter Quirke vowed that the community would keep on fighting against the three controversial zonings till then.

      “We have a contact list for all the other 44 county councillors. We intend to contact every one and make our voices heard.

      “There’s a meeting planned for Watergrasshill on September 1. We hope to have the 12 councillors from Midleton, Mallow and Blarney there. Maybe they will listen to us”, he concluded.

      http://www.avondhupress.ie/5story1.html

    • #757945
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 As previously mentioned, John & Michael O’Dwyer are preparing to lodge 2 seperate applications to develop 23 new 1 & 2 bedroom apartments over a commercial unit and with parking on their premises at Hanover Street. The buidling is designed by James Leahy & Associates and will stretch to 6-storeys with ancillary roof gardens. The project adjoins another interesting project, currently in planning, that of a 7-storey office building (recently requested further information) at Clarke’s Bridge, designed by Coughlan de Keyser Associates, being developed by Adrian Power and marketed by DNG Harris Commercial.



      Thanks for the 2 article recently posted Thomond Park! Makes for interesting reading. 😉

    • #757946
      A-ha
      Participant

      Thanks ewan, that means that R&H Hall is still one of Ireland’s tallest, shame it’s so fu*king ugly though. And what about the airport… update….ryanair… take control….. old terminal… If the airline does not use the existing terminal…. what use will it be put too, office or will it continue to be used as a terminal. I think they should shove all the charter airlines in there during the summer. Don’t want them running the new terminal with their long delays and such!

    • #757947
      Angry Rebel
      Participant

      Doubt anything will happen on Ryanair and the old terminal very fast. For a start, the original plan called for it to be turned into offices, and they will need to make alternate arrangements if that changes (can’t imagine they need that much office space though!) You know the speed these bodies tend to move at…..

      Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, Ryanair will need to add a large number of routes to Cork to get the passenger numbers that would justify the refurb and rent of the old terminal. There is no guarantee that this will happen as they would be looking for a “suicide” deal similar to the one they got at Shannon (this involves shannon paying a net €1 for every passenger that flies instead of receiving several euro). You’d need to sell an awful lot of batter burgers and newspapers in the new terminal to make up the shortfall in revenue!!!

    • #757948
      jungle
      Participant

      I have a feeling that Ryanair’s interest in Cork Airport is to put the wind up the DAA about the new terminal in Dublin.

      As mentioned by Angry Rebel they’d need a deal similar to the one at Shannon. Even then it is doubtful. From a business perspective, could Ryanair justify 2 bases in Munster? I doubt it, so the deal would have to be so good that they would close the Shannon base. Remember that Shannon can afford to cross-subsidise because of the fees it gets from the stopover. In those circumstances could Cork even consider offering such a deal.

    • #757949
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As i mentioned here before, Cork’s Heritage Open day takes place on 10th September.
      The website is now online where you can view images of the buildings which will be open to the public, as well as times, etc.

      The list of buildings includes:

      Blackrock Castle

      (note the fancy new astronomy centre adjacent to it),

      Frank O’Connors House on Douglas Street

      (just recently refurbished),

      The Clarion Hotel Penthouse

      (let’s face it, it will be the nearest any of us get to stay there!),

      Elizabeth Fort

      (That’s a lot of limestone!)

      And amazingly, Victoria Cross Student Apartments

      Presumably the final building is open to allow the public the chance to point and laugh!
      Then again, it ain’t that funny 🙁

      Check out the website for the rest of the buildings open to the public on September 10th.

    • #757950
      lexington
      Participant

      I love the lighting scheme along Lapps Quay at night, No.5, No.6 and City Quarter really bring life to this area of the city at night and is a fine example of how clever, effective lighting can really make a building look its best come the night. It’s something I hope more future developments incorporate. It works to effectively promote a structure/development and also enhances the aesthetics of a locale if done intelligently.

    • #757951
      who_me
      Participant

      The lighting on City Quarter is very well done, improves greatly on what might otherwise be a rather bland building. The Clarion’s lighting is nice too (apart from when they animate it – a little too Las Vegas for my liking!). The No.6 lighting is piercingly bright – you could take someone’s eye out with light that bright!!! 😀

      But the quayside/boardwalk lighting is first rate! The way they highlight the trees, the railings, the shelter supports, even the stonework on the sides of the “cafe boxes”, is superb. (Incidentally – does anyone know when those cafes are due to open?)

      On another note – isn’t a pity the Elizabethan fort isn’t similarly spotlighted? I know it was just recently de-ivyed, but it could look great lit up at night, with St. Patrick’s as a backdrop.

    • #757952
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As far as i’m aware, the Elisabeth Fort is spotlighted at night.

      Passed Jury’s (the former) on Western Road today. The first signs of the new buildings are appearing with re-inforced concrete pillars in place at the western end of the site. Also I noticed that there are a number of large trees which have been felled at the same end of the site, on the river bank, close to where the railway bridge used to be. I thought there were conditions in planning that trees adjacent to the river were to be protected 🙁

    • #757953
      Jim Comic
      Participant

      anybody hear anything about apartments going in where the brog bar/gorbys complex currently is on oliver plunkett st? apparently the brog building is for sale for 10 million (approx)

      also, any thoughts on the ‘lisin’ development on strawberry hill?

    • #757954
      who_me
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      As far as i’m aware, the Elisabeth Fort is spotlighted at night.

      Err… really? You’d think I’d have noticed that, given that I live in the apartment building next door! 😮 I really need to get out more..

      Still, looking forward to getting a look at a few interiors that day. I’m not sure why the Clarion penthouse is included, but I’d be very curious for a look.

    • #757955
      A-ha
      Participant

      Wow, that picture of Lapps Quay looks fantastic, hard to believe that it isn’t a plan on a few sheets of paper any more (someone should post it in the Most beautiful building in Cork forum!). I definetly think that multicoloured lights should be used to illuminate city attractions more at night. I think that the white canopy on the bus stop would look nice if it was lit up with different coloured lights.

    • #757956
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Well despite Paul Kenny’s confidence that his The Treasury office development for St. Patrick’s Quay, designed by Wilson Architecture, would not be taken to appeal by the McLaughlin Family and Bell Scott Engineering – it would seem the two have lodged individual 3rd Party Appeals against the proposed new home of the Revenue Commissioners (RC). The landmark office development is in the running for the RC with a decision scheduled from the OPW on the preferred location on September 24th 2005. Mr. Kenny had lodged his own 1st Party appeal regarding certain CCC imposed conditions – however the prospect of a 3rd Party Appeal (which may delay the project by another 4 months minimum – should a resolve not be found in the meantime) may also damage the proposals hopes for a successful outcome on attaining RC tenancy.



      😎 It seems Fleming Construction look set to purchase the 136 acre lands gracing the Ballincollig By-Pass near Curraheen. It’s a bit of a gamble considering the lands, which were guiding at approx. 10m euro through auctioneers Irish & European, are not zoned for development and probably won’t be for some time. It is rumoured that the lands are being sold for approx. 17.5 to 17.75m euros. This is a long term investment it would seem – unless a certain speculation regarding a certain national sports organisation and their valuable site were to materialise! 😉 :confused:



      😮 O’Callaghan Properties (Classes Housing) have attained permission for a community related development at their Classes Lake housing development near Ballincollig. The new development will include retail, restaurant, take-away, offices, 3 apartments, a pharmacy, library, medical centre and petrol station.


    • #757957
      A-ha
      Participant

      Why would someone lodge an appeal against such a gorgeous building. It would completly transform the area…. I wouldn’t change a thing about it.

    • #757958
      pier39
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Why would someone lodge an appeal against such a gorgeous building.

      oh..oh dear god…where, where do i even begin to start pointing out whats wrong with that question… ya see…no…havent you ever heard of…no…whats it…ugh i give up. 😀

      only messing aha. its not about the look of the building sometimes, its got to do with issues of property rights, or value fears, entitlements to rights etc etc etc and sometimes just plain arrogance or petty hidden agendas. but hey thats for the inspectors to decide. and also remember lex said that paul kenny lodged a 1st party appeal himself anyway. 3rd parties just make it a little trickier-rer-rer-rer.

      but yes i agree its unfortunate. im really routing for this building and i agree it would transform this particular quayside immensely. suppose all we can do is hope for the best. 😉

    • #757959
      brainscan
      Participant

      @Jim Comic wrote:

      anybody hear anything about apartments going in where the brog bar/gorbys complex currently is on oliver plunkett st? apparently the brog building is for sale for 10 million (approx)

      WHAT! The Brog.. Gorbys … Gone! 😮
      Where are we going to go now when we want to relive our twenties :confused:

      And for apartments, hardly a suitable usage in a prime trading area. It would be much better for CCC to take it and extend the English Market which has the potential to be a major tourist attraction in the city.

    • #757960
      securityman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      :



      😮 O’Callaghan Properties (Classes Housing) have attained permission for a community related development at their Classes Lake housing development near Ballincollig. The new development will include retail, restaurant, take-away, offices, 3 apartments, a pharmacy, library, medical centre and petrol station.


      Has this development started yet lex or am I thinking of another development by them in ballincollig. Who is doing the work on this one cos lately its seems that Bowens are doing all their work I wonder is this because the rest are in direct competition with them elsewhere with their own developments I.e Flemings, O’Flynn Construction, O’Brien O’Flynn, Rohcon, Murphy construction, Murnane O’shea etc..

    • #757961
      lisam
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      Has this development started yet lex or am I thinking of another development by them in ballincollig. Who is doing the work on this one cos lately its seems that Bowens are doing all their work I wonder is this because the rest are in direct competition with them elsewhere with their own developments I.e Flemings, O’Flynn Construction, O’Brien O’Flynn, Rohcon, Murphy construction, Murnane O’shea etc..

      I think O Callaghan Properties are building them themselves

    • #757962
      lexington
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      Has this development started yet lex or am I thinking of another development by them in ballincollig. Who is doing the work on this one cos lately its seems that Bowens are doing all their work I wonder is this because the rest are in direct competition with them elsewhere with their own developments I.e Flemings, O’Flynn Construction, O’Brien O’Flynn, Rohcon, Murphy construction, Murnane O’shea etc..


      Classes Lake is well under way – I believe the final phase is now about construction. It is located on the Ovens side of Ballincollig. OCP have a good working relationship with the Bowen Group – however, Bowen do not handle all of OCP developments, for example, Rochelle College apartment developent along the Old Blackrock Road, which is being handled by John Paul Construction. One may cite a similar relationship between Howard Holdings and PJ Hegarty & Son Ltd, Frinailla with John Paul Construction etc – however I believe at the end of the day, it’s a project by project matter.

    • #757963
      who_me
      Participant
      pier39 wrote:
      but yes i agree its unfortunate. im really routing for this building and i agree it would transform this particular quayside immensely. suppose all we can do is hope for the best. ]

      Each to their own I guess.. of all the quays, that’s one I’d rather was left alone (well, given a cleanup, but naught more). Now, if the RC building was to replace, say, the rear of the Metropole, or the god-awful Penrose Wharf building, then I’d really be in favour of it.

    • #757964
      pier39
      Participant

      @brainscan wrote:

      WHAT! The Brog.. Gorbys … Gone! 😮
      Where are we going to go now when we want to relive our twenties :confused:

      em….yeaaah, “twenties”, thats what i told the bouncers too… 😀 more like my early teens that place!
      havent heard anything of it being bought, is this another one of those brown thomas bought scotts rumours??? and apartments?? doubtful.

    • #757965
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Does anyone else thing that generally Fleming constructions developments are somewhat lacking in the design department? just looking at some of their schemes I can’t get over how boring and bland they are. The most they seem to have ever input into design has been with Trinity court or the hotel in their Fota island development. For such a seemingly successful company youd think they could afford the time and effort to push for good design.

    • #757966
      Caesar
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Does anyone else thing that generally Fleming constructions developments are somewhat lacking in the design department? just looking at some of their schemes I can’t get over how boring and bland they are. The most they seem to have ever input into design has been with Trinity court or the hotel in their Fota island development. For such a seemingly successful company youd think they could afford the time and effort to push for good design.

      Lets not forget that only few years ago, John Fleming was doing nothing else then bridges. The Fota Hotel that we see now on site is a mere resemblance of the original scheme proposed by Hogan Associates but that is not Fleming fault. The valuable input and the magnificent architectural knowledge of few of the planners involved in this project brought the hotel to what we see today on site. Knowing the people in Fleming and working with them for a long time I could say that they have been very open minded with regard to this project.

      To answer your question…yes. They do lack in design. But I would ask something else. Since when is a planner allowed to make comments and to impose changes in the design of a project considering that they don’t have any architectural qualification. :confused: What if a mechanic would go and give advices to a neurosurgeon in how to do its job!!! After 7 years in Ireland, this is still a question that puzzles me. :confused:
      So I would say, don’t blame (entirely) the developer, shoot the planner. 😡

    • #757967
      lexington
      Participant

      Thank you Caesar for those interesting images of the Fota Resort Hotel. Hogan Associates have shown an ability to display strong imagination on many of their projects. I agree that planners, who are not architects, sometimes impose conditions that may adversely affect the quality of design in a project – and in perhaps some cases, improve the design (perhaps by putting a proverbial ‘gun’ to the developers head saying “If you don’t improve, you don’t get the clear”) – and maybe that’s a debate you would be willing to contribute to in the thread The Effects of Planning on Design, I think a good debate was started on the topic there and I personally would be most interested to hear your input.

      Generally, my opinion is, that it’s a multi-layered effort – and I whole heartedly agree, planners have an important input which sometimes is not always positive from a design perspective, but they have other considerations too – although I accept that this does not always justify their own causes. However, I do believe a big big part is clearly the responsibility of the architects and the developers. Fleming Construction have provided some positive steps I think with Trinity Court, but I would agree that quite a few of their other development efforts are wanting in the design department and I think they should be more forcefully encouraging of promoting better aesthetics. Design/Build efforts like that at Victoria Cross and Victoria Lodge are very disappointing. Their schemes at Rushbrooke, Stepaside etc are also not quite what they could perhaps otherwise be. I would hope to see the company take more proactive steps when considering design. But that’s just a personal feeling regarding design and is not in anyway an attack on the company, which has been most admirable in it’s growth strategy – they have shown to be generally open-minded indeed, but perhaps they could apply this mentality to a more positive design policy. Then again, if they keep getting planning for some of the more substandard designs, who is to tell them otherwise? :confused:

    • #757968
      lexington
      Participant

      Bowen Construction Apartment Development for Musgrave Park

      🙂 Long term followers of this website may remember that I indicated in the LADSOCL thread that Bowen Construction would be seeking to develop approx. 50 apartments on lands abutting Musgrave Park – fronting the Kinsale and Tramore Roads. Well it now seems Bowen Construction are ready to lodge that application to build on the narrow strip of land beside (east of) the famous rugby grounds with permission to be sought for 55 apartments, 10 townhouses, roof gardens, 93 ground floor parking spaces, a retail unit just under 3,000sq ft and 2 new office units. The development blocks will stem between 3 and 6-storeys high with Wilson Architecture responsible for the design (Wilson have also been involved in another prospective, high-profile project very close by).



      Massive OFC Housing Development near Glanmire

      😎 Meanwhile, O’Flynn Construction (OFC) currently in appeal for their 629 unit housing development on the lands of Dunkettle House, will now seek to develop another 700 units on a 77-acre site they purchased at Ballinglanna near Glanmire. The 200m euro + development is to be built on the lands which OFC purchased for a believed 30m euros and will comprise of 393 two, three and four bedroom terraced houses, 166 two, three and four bedroom semi-detached houses, 79 detached houses of three and four bedrooms each and 62 one and two bedroom apartments. Also included are plans for a 2-storey creche, 3 commercial units, new vehicular access and a new roundabout from the Dunkettle Road. 2 tennis courts, play areas and public spaces are also proposed.

    • #757969
      Caesar
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      ………. Design/Build efforts like that at Victoria Cross and Victoria Lodge are very disappointing. Their schemes at Rushbrooke, Stepaside etc are also not quite what they could perhaps otherwise be. I would hope to see the company take more proactive steps when considering design. But that’s just a personal feeling regarding design and is not in anyway an attack on the company, which has been most admirable in it’s growth strategy – they have shown to be generally open-minded indeed, but perhaps they could apply this mentality to a more positive design policy. Then again, if they keep getting planning for some of the more substandard designs, who is to tell them otherwise? :confused:

      Good morning lexington

      Unfortunately I do not have much time this morning to discuss this “planner = GOD” issue. Loads of site meetings. I said planner = GOD because most of the senior planners are acting like God. They have the power to build or to destroy and nothing could stay in front of them. But there is a conflict here. God is only one, while planners are more then one. One could easily see the conflict here and thus the personal issues arising from this inside every planning department.
      Strange is also the fact that while they act like Gods, they are also proving a fear of their own decisions. I don’t blame them. It is hard to “read” and understand an architectural proposal if you don’t have any architectural background. Thus their “comfort” in accepting a scheme that is easy for them to read and comprehend. I would really want to see some of the old planners in Cork trying to study and come to a decision for one of Libeskind’s proposals. That would be funny.
      Rusbrooke is one of the developments considered by Nicolas Mansergh as one of his biggest mistakes and that from a visual impact point of view. I would dare to gainsay you when you use the development in Rusbrooke as an example of Fleming’s incapacity to produce good quality design. The layout has been changed by the above mentioned planner for a reason that keeps eluding me. The facades may not be of a good design but Fleming should be praised for few things. Good quality and innovative solutions (I would dare to say that Pat Stack from Fleming had a huge input in this). The metal frame structure used by Fleming is a great idea. I was personally concerned at the beginning when this metal frame system has been presented to me, but I can see now that it is a great thing. The houses are incredible warm and there are no cracks in the plaster, proving that there is virtually no expansion or contraction at the structural level. Thumb up for John and his team.
      Well that would be all for today.
      I apologise for the broken English. Hope it made some sense.
      I promise to have a look at the topic you mentioned and to express my view.
      A nice weekend to all of you.

    • #757970
      A-ha
      Participant

      When is work on City Hall due to be completed? I like what they’ve done so far. What is it that will be housed in there, offices?

    • #757971
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      When is work on City Hall due to be completed? I like what they’ve done so far. What is it that will be housed in there, offices?

      See below.

      Look at de state of Cork, like! Post #655

    • #757972
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Ceaser

      “What if a mechanic would go and give advices to a neurosurgeon in how to do its job!!! After 7 years in Ireland, this is still a question that puzzles me. :confused:
      So I would say, don’t blame (entirely) the developer, shoot the planner. :mad:[/QUOTE]”

      Bit harsh, there’s nothing wrong with a mechanic giving advice to a neurosurgeon, OK the patient may die but still, if the neurosurgeon is mad in the first place what’s the harm………

    • #757973
      A-ha
      Participant

      Ohh, I’m so confused… mechanics, planners, neurosurgeon, I’ll come back later. p.s. thanks lex, but when is the completion date?

    • #757974
      pier39
      Participant

      @yorktown wrote:

      Bit harsh, there’s nothing wrong with a mechanic giving advice to a neurosurgeon, OK the patient may die but still, if the neurosurgeon is mad in the first place what’s the harm………

      hey! my mechanic is a surgeon…well sort of, hes got a sign over the garage door saying ‘free colonic irrigation while you wait’. i went in to get my transmission sorted recently and both me and my car came out feeling fresh and revitalised!

      i dont buy that planners think their god argument, sorry. i know all too well the problems some planners cause but as an architect i will tell you first off that a good design takes an empirical view and pre-empts planner queries. indeed i have found some planners quite arrogant but that should not overshade a number of other generally reasonable characters – hey, i’ll be first to admit theres quite a lot of arrogant persons in our profession too! i have had cases though were planners have been outright ill considerated and domineering and i empathise in such cases. in cork i have been watching some of the planners progress and conditions…a few moves have boggled me, others i can see their point. but hey its the cards we’re dealt with and theres always the appeal board. in conclusion, i need sleep.

      if anyone was down in horgans qy today you may have seen some very curious activity…oooo exciting. my friend bet me 20 they were taking backgrounds for a photomontage!!!!! :p

    • #757975
      A-ha
      Participant

      hey! my mechanic is a surgeon…well sort of, hes got a sign over the garage door saying ‘free colonic irrigation while you wait’. i went in to get my transmission sorted recently and both me and my car came out feeling fresh and revitalised!

      hehehehe, pier39 I told ya that you should do stand up comedy 😀 Ohh, heard on the news that there was supposed to be abit of a fuel shortage, fill up your cars before they charge €2.50 a litre.

    • #757976
      Jammyd
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Yea, why foreign retailers locate to places like Galway and Waterford first is beyond me. I can accept Dublin and Limerick, but why Galway? Cork caters for a big catchment area and it’s only in the last year that foreign stores locate here! It’s about time too. Cork is soon to get a PC World and Dixons, but they have been in Limerick and Waterford for years. Whats the hold up? Did Cork have a shortage of retail parks or something? daniel 7, Homebase were due to come to Cork a few months back, but since B&Q and Atlantic Homecare opened up and Woodies got a new store, I guess they decided to hold back. But on the otherhand, alot of the stores in Mahon Point are believed to be found only in Cork or Dublin, Debenhams located it’s first store outside Dublin in Cork, so that has to count for something. I think we are picking out the stores we don’t have, rather than the stores that we do. (p.s. hope TK Maxx and H&M come to Cork too).

      was just wondering what you ment by “why galway?”and then i realised u must have ment because we are the fastest growing city in western eurpoe, we have a larger catchment area than limerick aswell as more of the foreign multinational stores like footlocker etc aswell as many indigenous outlets on our well known shop street also we are the largest urban centre on the west coast ( with regards to limerick which is about the same size give or take shannon) we just got our first of 2 m&s stores with four new huge centre’s after recieving planning permission with debenhams anchoring one. galway has nearly everything cork has with the exception of a few which are on the way anyways and in some cases have stores that cork doesn’t even have eg the only louis copeland store outside of dublin aswell as the only bt2 store.. also 90% of our stores are located in the city centre or on its periphery unlike limerick which is gone retail park crazy and suffering from the doughnut effect with everything being located around the city outskirts and cork which had to build a large american style mall on its fringes to attract some decent stores to there city.. sorry for the long post but it really annoys me when i hear people from limerick or cork city making comments that galway isnt worthy of having decent shops or putting it down just because its smaller than cork just because it only really developed into irelands third city in the last 20 years. we don’t comment about how cork as european culture capital was the biggest joke of 2005..

    • #757977
      dave123
      Participant

      The Cork and Limerick threads were not about Galway bashing! I the comments on Galway were due to people like you bragging on about it,
      You should have notice there were positive points made about Galway too.
      I myself have a lot of connections there so it’s not something I enjoy to brag about Galway. I will lead to say I don’t
      In architectural terms it is less significant than to Cork or Limerick.
      Comments made about Limerick were un =called for! The reason why retail developments are been pushed outside is because of the abnormal high rates and the boundary crises. Limerick and Cork are regenerating there cities centres and in my opinion are not making the same mistakes or well not to the extent Galway has in terms of planning and development. and your comments on Cork are also riduclous.
      I’m not going to explain further because it’s not worth it.

      You do seem a bit of the hook here. Galway has been brought up on so many occasions, and the results of it were dead ending going no where .I can’t believe, 😮 you have sparked more city slinging; Keep your opinions a little more friendlier and less aggressive. Stick to the topics above! Have you read earlier posts regarding your comments? stop bringing up issues up that have cause stirred debates.
      Your comments are nearly entirely rubbish, inappropriate and not relevant to the thread, 😡 As far as I’m concerned go create a Galway thread and stop throwing these comments into other threads and put it into the Galway thread if you really wish to express your “FACTS”

      This Galway thing is getting a bit annoying really, sorry folks for coming on here to explain this but enough is enough.

    • #757978
      Jammyd
      Participant

      talk about aggresive!!! :rolleyes:

    • #757979
      theblimp
      Participant

      guys – thread is ‘Cork: Architecture & Development’ …. can we try to keep it on topic wherever possible? 🙂

      With regard to Fleming Construction I’ve got to add that I also find their work stupendously lazy – with the new houses on Fota being particularly poor. Sure, it’s a sellers market at the mo’ – particularly for something based around a high-end golf development but the market changes and sadly we’ll be left with these things for a long time to come.

      right, rant over, excuse me while I sod off on me Summer hols (yup, it know it’s Sep. 4th :confused: )

    • #757980
      lexington
      Participant

      It seems controversy is already consuming the masses regarding OFC’s plans to lodge a €220m, 700 unit housing development at a 77-acre site in Ballinglanna near Glanmire. The development is within easy reach of the company’s other proposal for Dunkettle House, currently in appeal, for 629 units (though CorkCoCo only granted 527 of these units). Should the 2 proposals be granted, it would bring a total of 1329 new homes to the suburb of Glanmire, among the fastest growing in Ireland. Murphy Construction & Frinailla also have significant plans for the region. Question marks have been drawn over whether or not Glanmire as a community can sustain should a rapid increase in population. It is projected, should all the proposed units be filled, the area’s population is expected to grow by an estimated 5,000 over the next 7 to 8 years. A gentleman with CorkCoCo I had talked with yesterday said he was anxious on the successful growth of the Glanmire region – and developers will be pressed to make contributions to the development of community services to sustain the residential growth, i.e. extend school facilities, amenity grounds outside of contribution fees – much of which will now be geared for infastructural development over the coming years.

      On a seperate note, Glanmire is unusual in that, for an area of its increasing size – it has no real town centre as such. Perhaps now is a ripe opportunity to provide the community with a significant and imaginative town centre development.

      When I questioned the aforemntioned gentleman on whether CorkCoCo would ever consider allowing Glanmire to be bounded by CCC administration given its development and relation to the city – the answer was, ‘never say never, but unlikely’. A new public transport system would work very well in the area, linking it to the city centre over the coming years, I would posit a light-rail system (even connecting with the Glounthane/Midelton Arrow Lines) would work very well strategically and should be considered for development in tangent with new infastructural projects – which may, long-term, include a dual-carriageway connecting Glanmire with the Tivoli Dual-Carriagway, which may see an upgrade in the strategic future. This will ultimately link with the new National Route along Horgan’s Quay as part of Manor Park Homes’ €500m redevelopment project.

      -> Regarding Horgan’s Quay, the project seems on schedule for a late October submission. It will, if successful be developed in 3 Phases, with a projected completion date of 2011/2012 (possibly later subject to planning). An event centre element may not be included as part of the initial application, but may follow subsequent (depending on the outcome of feasibility and design studies). Richard Collins is leading the design on the Horgan’s Quay redevelopment with architects O’Mahony Pike Architects. Tom Phillips Associates are the acting Town Planners, with John Gannon heading up consultations and Manor Park Homes will develop the project. CIE aim to submit a tandem application for a €20/25m redevelopment of Kent Station and adjoining new Bus Terminus.

    • #757981
      Leesider
      Participant

      Just wondering Lex as regards Horgan’s Quay when is the earliest you would envisage construction starting?? Presume we are talking late 2006 start of 2007?

    • #757982
      A-ha
      Participant

      nuh uh jammd! i ain’t being brought back into the “which city is better” situation, sorry. but i do agree with dave123 on a number of items and agree with theblimp in regards to go to a galway forum. but don’t kid yourself, firstly, it wouldn’t be very hard for galway to become western europes fastest growing city since it’s only in the last 5-10 years that people outside of ireland have heard of it’s name and secondly i think that galway lacks alot of infrastuctre that a modern city really needs. anyway, just forget everything i said….. moving on from all that, i read in the paper that another carphone warehouse is to open in cork, this time in ballincollig (new shopping centre presumably). and as regards for glanmire, definetly new roads and transport links will have to be added, the area is full of traffic as it, not to mention the amount of cars from all of the new houses and other developments being built, god bless the suburban rail, at least it’s getting people off the roads.

    • #757983
      A-ha
      Participant

      we don’t comment about how cork as european culture capital was the biggest joke of 2005

      Oh, and p.s. i believe you just did comment on it, dumbass! cork deserved what it got, and unlike you, we don’t consider three pubs and a ceilí agus craic (however it’s spelled) the right to be given such a proud title.

    • #757984
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Oh, and p.s. i believe you just did comment on it, dumbass! cork deserved what it got, and unlike you, we don’t consider three pubs and a ceilí agus craic (however it’s spelled) the right to be given such a proud title.

      If every dig is followed by a kick and a spit – then it is not welcome on this thread. If people wish to be immature and descend to this level, private message if you must, but don’t drag the thread down with this type of attitude. City bashing is not assessed critique – defend your home and pride by all means, but that doesn’t mean it has to stoop low. Be the bigger person.

      Also, simply because I’ve quoted on name, does not mean this post is specifically aimed at anyone in particular, it should apply across the board – myself included.

      Matter closed – there should be no need to respond/justify etc etc, just bite the bullet and please return to the subjects at heart.

      Thank you. 😮

    • #757985
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      It seems controversy is already consuming the masses regarding OFC’s plans to lodge a &#8364]real[/U] town centre as such. Perhaps now is a ripe opportunity to provide the community with a significant and imaginative town centre development.

      When I questioned the aforemntioned gentleman on whether CorkCoCo would ever consider allowing Glanmire to be bounded by CCC administration given its development and relation to the city – the answer was, ‘never say never, but unlikely’. A new public transport system would work very well in the area, linking it to the city centre over the coming years, I would posit a light-rail system (even connecting with the Glounthane/Midelton Arrow Lines) would work very well strategically and should be considered.

      Cork more so than any other Irish City (not that we have very many) contained sprawl better than most; it has one of the most logical retail cores I’ve ever seen and is a very pleasant user experience.

      These proposals for Glanmire are overscaled and represent extremely poor land use they are a slap in the face to the CASP document which is possibly one of the most logical forward plans ever written with an unprecedented level of co-operation between Local Authorities. The genesis of the plan is the link between land use and transport planning; these proposals fly in the face of all the principles of developing self sustaining satelites. To propose a Luas line to connect with the heavy rail system for Glanmire would I fear represent little more than a patch and I can’t see the cost benfit analysis being favourable for a line to service low density housing. Large Scale Retail would not be appropriate for the Glanmire area at all and would only serve to accelerate the sprawl and related pressure on the Jack Lynch Tunnel which is already quite severe.

      The strategy of Cork County Council is obviously to grant permission for a number of large car dependent housing estates to make the local road network enter gridlock so that they have an excuse to build the proposed ‘Northern Ring Road’. If they do future generations will not look favourably on this generation and how the special character of Cork was destroyed for short term gain.

    • #757986
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Leesider wrote:

      Just wondering Lex as regards Horgan’s Quay when is the earliest you would envisage construction starting?? Presume we are talking late 2006 start of 2007?

      Horgans Quay in my view will be a good deal longer than that, say 2010…..An application there can’t really move untill Irish Rail decide what they want to do with the station. Its suggested that two applications will be lodged together but Manor Park are not really happy with the Draft North Docks Area Plan so expect a fight, big development proposed – Council cuts the life out of it – appeal – nobody satisfied……….another applicaiton, plenty of objections etc……….

    • #757987
      lexington
      Participant

      :confused: A number of city centre acquistions in recent times have sparked rumours of a landmark project in the making. It seems that a number of investors, of whom Joe O’Donovan is believed to be among them, have acquired a number of properties from Oliver Plunkett Street (The Qube complex) through to Patrick’s Street. It is believed a project is now being assessed to link these properties together – including Mount Kennett Investments & John Costello’s plans for the Capitol Cineplex. The precise nature of the development is not yet clear – although it is understood talks are on-going with CCC regarding the project’s impact on the English Market which may indeed be included in some form, in the link. Also, Pound City on Patrick’s Street has recently been sold quietly through Lisney auctioneers – this may yet prove to be a further addition to plans, perhaps? More details on all the speculation soon.


      Also Thomond Park, I agree about Cork’s management of urban sprawl – indeed it is one of it’s more attractive features in terms of urban planning. Throughout my time on Archiseek, I have regularly expressed my dismay at some of the housing project proposed around the city’s environs. I recognise the requirement for such projects, but in many cases I can’t justify the endless monotonous patterns of housing estates that stain much of our country’s land. Indeed, that’s not to say there are some very fine efforts in place – and there are – but quite often, this is not the case. Regarding Glanmire, I believe naturally – given it’s proximity to the city and a strong infastructural network – the region’s development is somewaht inevitable, however, although I generally believe OFC have demonstrated themselves as, perhaps, one of Cork’s more design conscious developers – the nature and scale of their developments at Dunkettle & Ballinglanna have me a little apprehensive – especially in light of the existing infastructure in Glanmire (and I mean schools, shops etc as well as transport). I do not think a town centre development would be out of the question at all, were in integrated and respectful (OFC’s BTC project is a good example of how a town centre can integrate into the existing framework of a town – however I accept Ballincollig is a whole different ball-game to Glanmire). I suppose I posited such a development in light of the such inevitable development – if CorkCoCo are going to continue endorsing it, a proper infastructure needs to be put in place. To argue against such a startegy and still see these estates spring up irrespective creates more long term damage regarding the management of the area. The town centre project should be a focused community based development – where the town to develop under its current layout, it would actually put greater strain on traffic management issues given the dispersed nature of the area and its commercial activities ie. Sallybrook to the north, Hazelwood mid-way and Glanmire village to the south. Utilisation of the roads is required to afford linkage between these locales – a centralised town centre focus with appropriate infastructure could allow for a better strategic management of this situation long-term. However, I can also seek argumentative issues to this. As for public transport, a track-based bus system could be a sustainable option – I wouldn’t specifically advocate a LUAS style system – as you say the CBA would not be favourable.

    • #757988
      lisam
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      A number of city centre acquistions in recent times have sparked rumours of a landmark project in the making. It seems that a number of investors, of whom Joe O’Donovan is believed to be among them, have acquired a number of properties from Oliver Plunkett Street (The Qube complex) through to Patrick’s Street. It is believed a project is now being assessed to link these properties together – including Mount Kennett Investments & John Costello’s plans for the Capitol Cineplex. The precise nature of the development is not yet clear – although it is understood talks are on-going with CCC regarding the project’s impact on the English Market which may indeed be included in some form, in the link. More details soon.

      Some shopping centres in the UK have incorporated existing markets into them so hopefully something like that will happen here

    • #757989
      securityman
      Participant

      I think the idea of including the english market would be a great idea and a totally different shopping experience possibly even calling the whole development the english market. Its a pity that the brog and qube complex will be knocked though because I fear cork is losing too many pubs and clubs in recent years. Can anybody confirm that the roundy on daunt square is to be turned into a phone shop and what is happening with lebowskis on marlboro st. With the increased population we need more places for leisure and entertainment so the planners need to be carefull of getting rid of small pubs etc areound the city.

    • #757990
      lexington
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      I think the idea of including the english market would be a great idea and a totally different shopping experience possibly even calling the whole development the english market. Its a pity that the brog and qube complex will be knocked though because I fear cork is losing too many pubs and clubs in recent years. Can anybody confirm that the roundy on daunt square is to be turned into a phone shop and what is happening with lebowskis on marlboro st. With the increased population we need more places for leisure and entertainment so the planners need to be carefull of getting rid of small pubs etc areound the city.

      Joe O’Donovan’s Big Plan?

      If the Qube is knocked, you have to remember the other little purchases Joe O’Donovan has made recently, the former Christian Youth Centre at Paradise Place – which is ideally located in the heart of Cork’s nightlife district and The Coal Quay Bar on Cornmarket Street, next to the The Loft also bagged. Though the Loft & Coal Quay are more suited to a vertically extended retail centre, the Paradise Place premises is 8,000sq ft of potential nightclub in an unrivalled location. Mr. O’Donovan acquired this premises last year for 2.2m euros – well above the 975,000 euro guide price set by Dominic Daly Auctioneers.

      I think the incorporation of The English Market into an large retail facility could work well, and certainly bring greater prominence and traffic to the little jewel itself – however it will have to be done very very cleverly and will need big money spent on an intelligent and attractive design. Part of the complex is expected to connect with the Capitol Cineplex department store redevelopment plan – however one prays this is not the standard of design set, although revised plans are anticipated soon (subject to other backroom discussions). Surely fuel to the fire will only be added by the recent sale of Pound City through auctioneers Lisney – this 2,000sq ft (ground floor only) premises actually borders close to the rear of the Capitol Cineplex.

    • #757991
      altuistic
      Participant

      I think the idea of a multi themed retail facility here is a very attractive proposition. first off its frontage is excellent, going by what your post seems to propose lexington. A frontage on Patricks St, Grand Parade and Oliver Plunkett st is pretty impressive. The mix of uses seems most attractive too and could very well satisfy those better who are disenchanted with faceless retail malls like Blanchardstown and the like. Having the English market, the proposed department store (Arnotts is it?) for th Capital cinema plus whatever else appeals to me far more than say whats planned for Academy street, though i understand it will serve its purpose well no doubt. i am concerned about 2 things however, how this development will affect the market during construction and whether its impact external and/or internal is negative. I would be dead oppose to anything that takes away from the market, one of Corks most important and unique attractions. Any massing that impacts the facades or interior of the market should be resisted.

    • #757992
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Isnt Water street suppose to be due its appeal decision by now??

    • #757993
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @altuistic wrote:

      A frontage on Patricks St, Grand Parade and Oliver Plunkett st is pretty impressive. ………. I would be dead oppose to anything that takes away from the market, one of Corks most important and unique attractions. Any massing that impacts the facades or interior of the market should be resisted.

      Agreed, anything that endangers this Cork institution would be unnacceptable. The Market already has frontage onto St. Patrick’s Street. The Grand Parade and Oliver Plunkett street and this concept (it could hardly be called a development at this stage) might result in the market itself being smothered by new development. Almost like extending the market..but not, if you know what i’m getting at – the market would be a central core with these kind of leeches hanging off either end :p
      I don’t mean to dispell the notion entirely. The above is a worst case scenario. I partly guessed the PoundStore was being looked at for something like this. I’d agree with Lexington, a lot depends on the outcome of the Capitol’s redesign. If that isn’t up to scratch, people won’t be happy to allow further encroachment in the English Market locality!

    • #757994
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Isnt Water street suppose to be due its appeal decision by now??

      I believe that September the 19th 2005 was the day earmarked for a decision – however it is my understanding that Werdna are still awaiting confirmation of an Oral Hearing date with the Bord. That’s the last I heard from the Dock Road, but things may have since advanced. Fingers will be tightly crossed. 😮

    • #757995
      who_me
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      I think the idea of including the english market would be a great idea and a totally different shopping experience possibly even calling the whole development the english market. Its a pity that the brog and qube complex will be knocked though because I fear cork is losing too many pubs and clubs in recent years. Can anybody confirm that the roundy on daunt square is to be turned into a phone shop and what is happening with lebowskis on marlboro st. With the increased population we need more places for leisure and entertainment so the planners need to be carefull of getting rid of small pubs etc areound the city.

      It’s a real pity – the Bróg and Qube are (were?) unique in Cork, late night establishments 7 nights a week with no admission charge. The Bróg in particular, with it’s use of the alleyway access to the English market at night time – very interesting. Important to remember too – we’ve lost 5 venues (licenses?) here, not 2: The Hairy Lemon, The Bróg, the Cránnog, The Qube and Cocos.

      Very popular with foreign students/tourists. Even more so the Roundy / Rhino Rooms. It’s a very attractive little establishment at the top of Cornmarket St., when that’s looking a bit more respectable it’ll be a fine view. It’d make a great pub/cafe/small restaurant. Please not another phone shop – it’s not as if anyone’s scratching their heads wondering why to buy a phone these days!

    • #757996
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As we’re on the subject of the decline in pub numbers in Cork, here’s a piece from The Irish Independent of Friday 26th August last. I had meant to post it earlier, but now seems like an oppurtune time.

      The capital gains as Leeside loses 50pc of its pubs
      Ralph Riegel

      THE long-running rivalry between Dublin and Cork took a new twist yesterday when it emerged that the capital is taking pubs from the southern city.
      Dublin’s booming hotel, pub and off-licence sector has been achieved by a haemhorraging of drink licences out of other areas, particularly in Cork.
      The law whereby one pub licence must be “extinguished” before another pub or hotel bar can be opened has led to a situation where the number of pubs in Cork city has dropped by over 50pc in the past 20 years.
      Cork city currently has an estimated 250 pubs – down from around 400 in the mid-1980s. The decline in pub numbers is even more stark in Cork county, where an estimated 1,000 pubs now remain – down from between 1,800 and 2,000 pubs just 20 years ago.
      Rural parts of Waterford, Tipperary and Limerick have also been affected as Dublin’s pub boom continues.
      Con Dennehy, former chief of the Vintners’ Federation of Ireland in Cork, said that while pub numbers have declined in all parts of Ireland, Leeside has been particularly badly hit.
      “It really has been the end of an era here in Cork. Parts of the city that would historically have had a dozen or so pubs now have possibly one or two left. Some areas have none at all.”
      The closure of pubs – and the transfer of their licences to hotels, off-licences and pubs in Dublin – has been particularly acute over the past decade.
      “I suppose it was a simple question of economics – Dublin was offering great money for licences and it was increasingly difficult for small family pubs to maintain profitable operations in Cork city centre,” Mr Dennehy said.
      The Dennehy family pub, established on Cork’s Coal Quay in 1956, once competed alongside 12 other premises, but by the mid-1990s, Coal Quay was left with just Dennehy’s, though two new premises have since opened.
      Some parts of the city now have no pubs. The famous Lavitt’s Quay district, adjacent to Cork Opera House and various restaurants, once boasted five successful premises. Now it has just one.
      Even on famous “drinking” streets, such as Shandon Street and Barrack Street, pressure on pub numbers has inexorably led to the closure of premises.
      “I’d say that the number of pubs in the city has declined by between 30pc and 50pc over the past two decades, and the simple fact is that most of those licenses have gone to so-called “superpubs” in Dublin or off-licenses,” Mr Dennehy said.
      Yet, while Cork’s pub numbers have plummeted, the total square footage of licensed premises has actually increased as the small, family-owned pubs have been replaced with large modern pubs.


      Article Ends



      That article was adjacent to a piece which mentioned that Dublin’s new Clarion Hotel in the South Docks had bought and extinguished the liquor licence attached to the former pub of Thomas Scriven, Tower Street, Cork.
      To borrow a phrase from the newly crowned leader of the PROC Eddie Hobbs (All Hail!) we could soon be very lightly “pubbed” in this part of the country.

    • #757997
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The long awaited Cork School of Music project is finally set to go ahead after a six-year delay.

      A contract for the €60 million building was agreed this afternoon between the Department of Education and German building contractors, Hochtief Developments Limited.

      The new school of music, which will accommodate 400 full-time and 2,000 part-time students, is being built by public-private partnership and will be open for the beginning of the academic year in September 2007.

    • #757998
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      The long awaiting Cork School of Music project is finally set to go ahead after a six-year delay.

      A contract for the €60 million building was agreed this afternoon between the Department of Education and German building contractors, Hochtief Developments Limited.

      So I hear, work is due to get on site for the end of September, but I’ll believe it when I see it and a Sisk tower crane standing tall :rolleyes: . Here’s hoping! It’s long long over-due.

      Also see
      Department of Education Press Release
      RTE News

    • #757999
      who_me
      Participant

      Is that yet another new bridge I see in that picture?

      Sounds to me like an insidious form of land reclamation!! 😀

      Seriously though, great news, the design looks great.

    • #758000
      A-ha
      Participant

      Firstly, a light rail system should be kept out of the Glanmire area. Think of all the hassle it would produce! Also, Radioactiveman, I think that not as many pubs are needed nowadays, people have left the dingy backwash and started to go the “café culture” way. Like there aren’t enough coffee shops in Cork as it is, yet they keep opening, and apparently, due to popular demand. But I’ve never heard of The Hairy Lemon (laughing as he types) where was it???, it sounds like something from a Harry Potter book. Great news about the School of Music, at last a proper building to house the students without relying on pre-fabs. And, lastly, it would be great if the English Market was opened up more to the public, I think that some people don’t go in there because they think it’s really higgildy piggildy and are afraid of it. It’s one of my favourite places in Cork (besides the smell of fish in soy sauce), because, once again back to the Harry Potteresque thing, it reminds me of Diagon Alley for some reason (for those who watched/read Harry Potter). It’s old worldly and I just don’t think it gets the credit it deserves.

    • #758001
      Pug
      Participant

      werent frinailla due a planning decision today? any news?

    • #758002
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Actually, the other pictures are a little deceptive. This is the one, for me, that gives an indication of the true size of the building. It’s a big ‘un!

    • #758003
      pier39
      Participant

      im genuinely delighted by the news on the school of music. only hope it gets underway as soon as possible. this project has been stalled for too long and its a shame the students and city at large has been deprived of such a facility. the design always appeared a little bulky to me but i have to say it grows on ya and i think it will add to the city in its own unique way.

      as for the plans involving oliver plunkett st, patricks street, grand parade, english mkt and all that i have to say the idea is appealing but it will have to be most sensitive and careful about how its put together. all in all a good day.

    • #758004
      who_me
      Participant

      Incidentally Radioactiveman, lexington; there are differences between the School of Music shots you’ve both posted – do you know which are more recent?

    • #758005
      who_me
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Firstly, a light rail system should be kept out of the Glanmire area. Think of all the hassle it would produce! Also, Radioactiveman, I think that not as many pubs are needed nowadays, people have left the dingy backwash and started to go the “café culture” way. Like there aren’t enough coffee shops in Cork as it is, yet they keep opening, and apparently, due to popular demand. But I’ve never heard of The Hairy Lemon (laughing as he types) where was it???, it sounds like something from a Harry Potter book.

      The Hariy Lemon was a pub adjacent to the Bróg before it expanded (ground and first floor, on the left hand side), the Cránnóg was on the other side (ground floor only). I don’t know what happened to the licenses when they were subsumed into the Bróg.

      Ah, the nostalgia. The Bróg and the Liberty were two of my college day haunts, the Lib’s gond and the Brógs on the way out. Pity.

      I know we’re wandering off-topic here, but I think the problem is less about the basic number of cafes and bars, but the opening hours too. Most cafes seem to close up at 6 meaning the streets can get very quiet in the evenings, even in mid summer. And the Bróg and Qube were the only two establishments I know of which opened late 7 nights a week – a big complaint I hear from visitors about other bars in the city.

      Cork – thriving before 6 and at the weekend, deathly quiet otherwise.

    • #758006
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      the oval packs in alot of the old lib crowd these days

    • #758007
      lexington
      Participant
      who_me wrote:
      Incidentally Radioactiveman, lexington]

      Same images – just different angles. Also I think there is some variation in the montage colourations, but it’s the same building.

    • #758008
      lexington
      Participant

      Post removed for time being. Maybe re-post at a later date. Apologises.

    • #758009
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      anything interesting?

    • #758010
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Same images – just different angles. Also I think there is some variation in the montage colourations, but it’s the same building.

      Really? If you look at the first image in your post and the last in Radioactiveman’s, it’s hard to believe the perspective is so misleading – the roof’s lines look a lot cleaner in the images he posted.

      Edited – ‘cos brain doesn’t wake up until the late afternoon! 😮

    • #758011
      securityman
      Participant

      We definetly need the cafes to stay open later for a place to and relax chill out especially on a lovely evening like last night. Did anyone see Eddie Hobbs on tele last night fair play to him for showing nice parts of the city centre careys lane and french church st they looked well on tele.

    • #758012
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      anything interesting?

      Possibly – just info regarding a speculative site sale on Washington Street, but it is only that – ‘speculative’ – for the time being. Removed it because I don’t want it to go up without a little more ‘backup’.

    • #758013
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      CCC have also refused permission for James Ronayne’s 3 storey retail (3 units) and apartment (8) building on Thomas Davis Street, Blackpool. The report found that the proposed development would result in “over-development of the site (and) would produce a living environment of low amenity value.”


      This place is quickly turning into the shopping channel 🙁

      A bit rich considering they sold him the bloody site…. Noel Riordan stricks again!!!

    • #758014
      lexington
      Participant

      @Too many forms! wrote:

      A bit rich considering they sold him the bloody site…. Noel Riordan stricks again!!!

      I don’t think a CCC site sale can or should automatically guarantee planning approval. In this case, Mr. Ronayne submitted a proposal only altered slightly from his previous refused attempt for planning on this site. Both proposals were designed by O’Shea Leader. There are elements of the report in which I agree with the planner, for example, 2 of the units fell below the minimum standard of size for an apartment of this layout – and I would agree that such standards should be enforced (heaven knows there are enough tissue box accommodations in place). However it may also be argued such a fault could be amended by condition followed by revised drawings submitted for approval prior to construction. The design itself is moderate – nothing outstanding – but it did bar higher than many proposals which have successfully been processed through the planning system, and in this respect, I would not agree it was a satisfactory excuse for refusal. The plot to unit ratio worked out at something like 35.5 units to 1 acre – which given the urban nature of the location and zoning for such development, I wouldn’t argue as being excessive. The reasons stated of excessive height (10m, I think, correct me if I’m wrong), massing and scale could be argued – but I would agree with the unit size issues, although I believe these could have easily been amended, even through F.I.

      I agree that some of the subject planner’s deliberations confuse me at times, I suppose I personally find them difficult to call on occasion – however, I still don’t see any reason why this particular site can’t aim for something a little higher on the aesthetical chain either. Give Blackpool something to talk about. 😮

      On that, Sean Mhuileann is receiving it’s finishing touches – opinions? :confused:

    • #758015
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Possibly – just info regarding a speculative site sale on Washington Street, but it is only that – ‘speculative’ – for the time being. Removed it because I don’t want it to go up without a little more ‘backup’.

      not too many sites available on Washington Street at the moment.

    • #758016
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      not too many sites available on Washington Street at the moment.

      Well the talk regarded one premises that will come with FPP. The planning process was well documented on these forums. But it’s all purely speculative at this point. A sale may solve SOME tenancy issues and provide a nice little cash injection.

    • #758017
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Well the talk regarded one premises that will come with FPP. The planning process was well documented on these forums. But it’s all purely speculative at this point. A sale may solve SOME tenancy issues and provide a nice little cash injection.

      70’s tv cop series connection 😉

    • #758018
      Anonymous
      Participant

      On a recent visit to Cork I noticed the huge amount of PVC windows particurly around South Mall and Grand Parade. Could Cork be the PVC capital of Ireland?

    • #758019
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Riga Limited have been given permission to build the new vehicular and pedestrian access bridge to their new Jury’s Doyle Hotel site on the Western Road. The company had to re-apply for the bridge elelment of the development because the original bridge was not single-span in design.


      I notice Sidney McElhinney has finally started work at his site 7-11 Watercourse Road. This will be four floors in height with c. 20 apartments and retail and parking on ground floor. This development was reduced in height by planners because of its proximity to Maddens Buildings which are protected.
      Anybody have any images of the development?

      Since you asked lex, I like Seann Muilleann on the Mallow Road. Its big, its brass and it sits well along side Hewitts Mill. The one thing I have a problem with is the entrance area of the main building – the big one!
      Whoever designed it was obviously sitting in a car at the time. It really doesnt cater for the pedestrain very well. the pedestrian access is wedged beteen two large carpark access routes! It just looks a bit ugly down there. Looking up though its a very likeable design- nothing groundbreaking but fits well. I believe the original design had a straight front rather than the curved almost coliseum like facade it has now. Wouldn’t have been half as good.


      Does anybody know what is going on at the main gates of UCC on Western road? The left hand gate pillar now has a strange metal contraption on top of it – i watched people with scaffolding attach it there. Is it art? is it some sort of secret listening device? You tell me.

    • #758020
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Another high-rise plan is set to be lodged soon with CCC – this time the proposal is set for Victoria Cross.
      When I previously mentioned other high-rise plans were in formulation for Cork, I had some idea of this project however, I’ll be honest I was unaware it would be going for planning so soon. Developers Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy will apply to demolish their Crow’s Nest premises along with Victoria Terrace (1 to 4) and the M.P. Crowley premises to the rear of the famous pub’s car-park. The development will consist of a mixed residential and commercial building generally 6-storeys but with a landmark 15-storey tower all over a dual-deck basement car-park for 112 spaces, accessed from the Carrigrohane ‘Straight’ Road. The elements of the development contain 74 apartments (6 one bedroom, 64 two bedroom and 4 three-bedroom), 4 ground floor commercial units totalling 937.8m sq, a new ground floor pub, deli area and 1st floor restaurant which is believed will continue the Crow’s Nest operation. A terrace garden will be provided for residents on the first floor level. The development is positioned in an area zoned suitable for high-rise development – however it will be a tough planning ride given the nature of surrounding residencies and the protected structure status of Cork County Hall which the new tower will pose in front of. The Crow’s Nest premises, somewhat of a local institution, was almost destroyed by fire damage last year – some restoration efforts were put in place, but halted in light of this new development prospect. Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects are to provide the design with McCutheon Mulcahy acting as Planning Consultants on the project. Images and more details soon.


      View east to west of the Crow’s Nest and Victoria Terrace – with Cork County Hall in the background.


    • #758021
      who_me
      Participant
      mickeydocs wrote:
      70’s tv cop series connection ]

      😀 That was my guess too. I thought plans were already undeway there though, pictures were up here or in the other Cork thread.

    • #758022
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 Another high-rise plan is set to be lodged soon with CCC – this time the proposal is set for Victoria Cross.

      Nobody can possibly justify the destruction of Victoria Terrace. It’s no wonder the residents in the area are so pi**ed off

    • #758023
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Nobody can possibly justify the destruction of Victoria Terrace. It’s no wonder the residents in the area are so pi**ed off

      I’m not sure there the term ‘nobody can possibly justify’ is perhaps steadfast, but I do agree that it’s a cute little terrace – and apparently No.1 Victoria Terrace (according to Cork ‘folklore’ ][/URL]
      Ireland’s apparent smallest 2-storey house! No.1 Victoria Terrace.


      The Crow’s Nest redevelopment site with relation to Victoria Cross (seen in background is Victoria Mills, with Phase 2 under construction, and new UCC student accommodation under development by Fleming Construction).

      15-storey Crow’s Nest Redevelopment Plan for Victoria Cross



      Incidentally RM, the planner’s report on the OCP (Riga Limited)’s new bridge linking the Western Road to the new Jurys redevelopment praised the bridge’s architectural design – a nice nod to Henry J. Lyons & Partners.



      As for the Crow’s Nest again, it will be difficult for the design to stoop to the depths of Victoria Mills and new UCC accommodation – that’s not a knock at the respective developers – but those 2 developments have done the aesthetics of the area no real justice.

    • #758024
      jungle
      Participant

      In an area not too far from Victoria Cross… What is happening at Carmelite Terrace? I noticed all the houses have boarded up windows, so I’m guessing that some developer has got his hands on the lot of them and is planning something for the site.

      Carmelite Terrace is the terrace of houses between the Mardyke athletics track and the former greyhound stadium.

    • #758025
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Yes, from the very first image you posted I can see that any significant highrise would have an effect on the view of County Hall from the city. What with the amount being spent on its clean-up, do we really want to blot it out?

      As regards the historical/architectural significance of Victoria Terrace, it may be limited but when conserving our architectural past we should really avoid preserving the spectacular only. It is important that we preserve even the more mundane, domestic examples of Cork’s architectural heritage.
      This reminds me of reading a book of old photographs of Cork- the author noted that many pictures of the grand streetscapes contain many horses working away as one would expect. However, as far as he was aware- no pictures whatever exist of the vast stables which must have housed these horses.
      I’m getting off the point here, but what i’m trying to say is that just because its small and its no Brown Thomas, doesnt mean it’s open for demolition. The Crows Nest building too is a fine commercial building.
      Honestly, the local residents have been proved right if you look at the hideousness that is most of the Student high rises in the area.

      Jungle with regard to Carmelite Terrace- same thing happening here. Planning is being sought for their demolition and apartments to be put in their place. Some people have no cop-on at all!!

    • #758026
      lexington
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      In an area not too far from Victoria Cross… What is happening at Carmelite Terrace? I noticed all the houses have boarded up windows, so I’m guessing that some developer has got his hands on the lot of them and is planning something for the site.

      Carmelite Terrace is the terrace of houses between the Mardyke athletics track and the former greyhound stadium.

      See link below:
      Carmelite Place – Part Deux

      The design is by James Bourke with James Leahy & Associates, it peaks at 3 storeys (4 levels) to the north and lowers to 2-storeys (3 levels) to the south fronting the AIB. It is a little boxy but nonethelss a clever design – the jury is out on a firm opinion! :p

    • #758027
      who_me
      Participant

      On or about 15 storeys seems to be about the magic figure for new towers in Cork isn’t it? 😉

      It would be nice to see some more variety in height, I’d have thought, some taller, some shorter.

      Looking forward to pictures of this one though.

    • #758028
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Here’s some images of what the County Hall will look like when it’s done. Somebody was looking for it a few pages back I think.

    • #758029
      A-ha
      Participant

      If I’m being honest, I have to say that the little row of what looks to be almost invaluable houses on Victoria Terrace are awful. Small pokey little houses give me the creeps, I feel claustrophobic (spelling?) just by looking at them. But I also believe that some of Ireland’s most beautiful buildings were knocked, because people thought that they were hidious at the time. I feel very mixed at the moment about the proposed development. Surely people will look back in a few years at the houses and say awwww, aren’t they lovely, as apposed to were’nt they lovely. But I cant say they’ll do the same about the Victoria cross developments… fancy shoeboxes, whatever you want to call them. I hope though, that this new development will have some class to it and not just something that was thrown together in a few hours. Can’t wait to see pics.

    • #758030
      lexington
      Participant

      While we’re on the topic, here are some up-to-date images of Cork County Hall (CCH)’s redevelopment. Design is by Shay Cleary Associates, construction is by Rohcon, engineers and facade engineers are Arup Consulting. The project is on schedule for a November completion. Click on thumbnails for larger image.


      Eastern Elevation of CCH – looking west (new atrium and office building can be seen in bottom left)


      Close-up of the climate sensitive exoskelton being applied on the western elevation of the building. By completion, the adjustable panels will wrap around the entire building acting as a natural source of ventilation and insulation.

      Note: Images are large and may take some time to load, depending on the speed of your connection.



      On the subject, with consideration to the Crow’s Nest redevelopment, one most consider the proposal in an empirical perspective. The recent sale of the former Coca-Cola Bottling facility to the west of CCH will likely be considered/assessed/investigated for high-rise development as well – in terms of strategic urban planning, consider centralising our tall buildings in the 2 zoned areas of Victoria Cross and at the Docklands. :confused: Just a thought.



      And who_me – Cork’s tallest development proposal has yet to be lodged. 😉


    • #758031
      A-ha
      Participant

      – in terms of strategic urban planning, consider centralising our tall buildings in the 2 zoned areas of Victoria Cross and at the Docklands. Just a thought.

      The French have it worked out for us already as usual. A few years back, Tour Montparnasse was built in Paris’ city centre. After it’s completion, it was vowed that it was to be Paris’ first and last skyscraper. Although pretty in design, it stood out like a sore thumb against the classical and grand, gold leaf covered buildings of Paris. What did they do you say? They designated La Defénse (a Parisian suburb) to cater for all of the skyscrapers, as opposed to overshadowing the historical palaces and museums of Paris. Now, the city centre is high-rise free, apart from the original Tour Montparnasse and the obvious Eiffle Tower, leaving the zoned areas of the suburbs to cater for some of Europes tallest buildings.
      Tour Montparnasse1
      Tour Montparnasse2
      Tour Montparnasse3
      View From Top
      Have a look at the last picture, visible is The Eiffle Tower and in the distance is a cluster of skyscrapers, La Defénse.

    • #758032
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 O’Sheas (Builders) Limited have been granted planning for 60 of their proposed 73 units (proposal following revised plans subsequent of F.I.) along Farranlea Road by ABP following appeal. The appeal was brought to ABP by O’Sheas Limited themselves and on a third-party basis which included the Farranlea Road Residents Association and Fine Gael city councillor and former Lord Mayor, Colm Burke. The unit numbers permitted fall pretty much in line with CCC grant conditions. The O’Shea site is located on their former building stores premises to the side and rear of the Top Car facility (not their showrooms nearby at Victoria Cross). The 60 residential units, a mix of apartment and dwelling house units, will be constructed in a series of blocks over a basement car-park for 70 vehicles, with a complimentary parking area at surface level for a further 20 spaces. RKD were responsible for the design and McCutcheon Mulcahy acted as planning consultants. O’Shea (Builders) Limited will construct the project themselves.



      😎 Cork County Council have permitted the development of a new hotel at Owenahinch, Little-Island. The 207-bedroom proposal is being developed by Irish & European Properties (Dublin) and will include a conference centre, swimming pool, spa and other leisure facilities, car parking, restaurant, bar and 2 retail units.

    • #758033
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 Another high-rise plan is set to be lodged soon with CCC – this time the proposal is set for Victoria Cross.
      When I previously mentioned other high-rise plans were in formulation for Cork, I had some idea of this project however, I’ll be honest I was unaware it would be going for planning so soon. Developers Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy will apply to demolish their Crow’s Nest premises along with Victoria Terrace (1 to 4) and the M.P. Crowley premises to the rear of the famous pub’s car-park. The development will consist of a mixed residential and commercial building generally 6-storeys but with a landmark 15-storey tower all over a dual-deck basement car-park for 112 spaces, accessed from the Carrigrohane ‘Straight’ Road. The elements of the development contain 74 apartments (6 one bedroom, 64 two bedroom and 4 three-bedroom), 4 ground floor commercial units totalling 937.8m sq, a new ground floor pub, deli area and 1st floor restaurant which is believed will continue the Crow’s Nest operation. A terrace garden will be provided for residents on the first floor level. The development is positioned in an area zoned suitable for high-rise development – however it will be a tough planning ride given the nature of surrounding residencies and the protected structure status of Cork County Hall which the new tower will pose in front of. The Crow’s Nest premises, somewhat of a local institution, was almost destroyed by fire damage last year – some restoration efforts were put in place, but halted in light of this new development prospect. McCutheon Mulcahy are acting Planning Consultants on the project. Images and more details soon.


      View east to west of the Crow’s Nest and Victoria Terrace – with Cork County Hall in the background.


      whoa! i leave the internet for 1 min and look what happens! hehe. i dunno im gonna need to see some pretty impressive pics to be convinced by this one!

      can any1 else forsee the problems on this one?? can you imagine it; early morning county hall, staff on the 14th floor look out their office window to be greeted by the sight of a hairy, balding middle-aged man dressed only in his y-fronts doing his morning stretches by his west facing apartment window…not that im saying i will be buying an apartment in the development, but the prospect is…a little uncomfortable. that is unless the apartment is that of an attractive 22yr old blonde swedish lingerie model, in which case im all in favour of this project and will be applying for a job at county hall as soon as the crows nest project gets the go ahead! 😀

    • #758034
      altuistic
      Participant

      Forgive my arrogance but i dont even feel the need to object to this one I am so confident it wont get through planning. 15 stories blocking a protected structure and overlooking a dozen or so homes and other apartments… did the developers really discuss this with the corporation before they decided to proceed with it?? One wonders. May 9 stories on the corner overlooking Victoria X would have made a nice statement were it well designed but hardly 15!!

      On that point i have been trying to calaculate how many new houses and apartments are approximately under construction or in planning for Cork city and around the city? Any ideas?

    • #758035
      A-ha
      Participant

      Why is the County Hall a protected structre?

    • #758036
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Why is the County Hall a protected structre?

      According to CCC documentation:

      ” County Hall is a Protected Structure, designed by Patrick McSweeney it was opened in 1968. It is a unique building, representative of 20th century architecture and it is of local, regional and national importance and this is reflected in its status as a Protected Structure.”



      @altuistic wrote:

      Forgive my arrogance but i dont even feel the need to object to this one I am so confident it wont get through planning. 15 stories blocking a protected structure and overlooking a dozen or so homes and other apartments… did the developers really discuss this with the corporation before they decided to proceed with it?? One wonders. May 9 stories on the corner overlooking Victoria X would have made a nice statement were it well designed but hardly 15!!

      I think you should reserve judgement until you have seen the design and studied it’s impacts appropriately. A number of issues arise here consequent of this application – one being how the new element will affect the sight lines of the area, and how it will affect Cork County Hall.

      First off, we must note the the Crow’s Nest site, including Victoria Terrace and the MP Crowley premises measures a total of 0.65acres or 0.266hectares – when viewed directly from, say, Victoria Mills, taking the archway of the student development as our centre sight-line, we can see the Crow’s Nest (CN) site is actually sided to the north of this corner area/divide between Victoria Cross and Carrigrohane Road. The parameters of the site restrict any development from wholly blocking the CCH sight line when view from this perspective straight on. At this point, we must remember that this tower element is only part of an overall development which generally reaches to 6-storeys.

      The sight lines indicated on the above map should be considered – with greatest impacts, on this map at least, found at positions 2 and 4 respectively. Longer perspective views will have their own impacts.

      What should also be considered, and this really is a matter for planners to ultimately decide, is whether or not the city (in this location) is willing to permit a project that will by reason of it’s height (and irrespective of its design) detract from the signature stance of CCH. Love it or loathe it, part of CCH’s appeal in any sense is its stand-alone nature – it’s an arrogant but endearing characteristic that shouldn’t make sense but we have allowed it to do so. That’s not a knock at the new proposal, but a topic worth considering. The new proposal’s relation to private residencies at Victoria Cross (to the north) and backing south toward Farranlea Road, will make it controversial. WIth CCH, it developed on a location that kind of stood out on it’s own and was surrounded by plentiful CorkCoCo owned premises to allow for a decent distance from private residencies – most residencies now found have developed in and around it, not the other way around. It is a similar feature that makes high-rise in the docklands so encouraging – but once again, I would argue, the more prominent a building is, the greater detail that must be given to its design. Not saying that shouldn’t apply to all buildings, but those that stick out should do so for all the right reasons. Eglinton Street was a positive start and should be seen as the minimum standard in high-rise design quality in Cork, I would stress. But as I said, I should hope to get images of the CN development up soon and leave it out there for debate.

      Unfortunately, only 4 units in this proposal seem to cater for the larger ‘family sized’ style apartment – I would hope to see more of these units promoted over future developments; Eglinton Street provides some apartments of up to 1,900sq ft which is a positive indeed. I will look forward to seeing developer’s take more conscious steps towards greater volumes of such similar and larger sized (1,900sq ft +) quality units.

    • #758037
      GrahamH
      Participant

      In relation to County Hall, is the original glazing being retained behind that louvered cladding?
      It seems to be from your images Lexington…

    • #758038
      mickeydocs
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      According to CCC documentation:

      ” County Hall is a Protected Structure, designed by Patrick McSweeney it was opened in 1968. It is a unique building, representative of 20th century architecture and it is of local, regional and national importance and this is reflected in its status as a Protected Structure.”



      Love it or loathe it, part of CCH’s appeal in any sense is its stand-alone nature – it’s an arrogant but endearing characteristic that shouldn’t make sense but we have allowed it to do so. That’s not a knock at the new proposal, but a topic worth considering. The new proposal’s relation to private residencies at Victoria Cross (to the north) and backing south toward Farranlea Road, will make it controversial. WIth CCH, it developed on a location that kind of stood out on it’s own and was surrounded by plentiful CorkCoCo owned premises to allow for a decent distance from private residencies – most residencies now found have developed in and around it, not the other way around.

      How did the Kingsley get past planning?

    • #758039
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 It was made known to me, approx. 4 weeks ago, that OCP had purchased the former TCH lands at Lavitts Quay from Howard Holdings for an estimated €8m (€3m more than what Howard Holdings paid TCH). The No.16 Lavitts Quay site, on which Howard Holdings had attained permission for a 114 bedroom Comfort Inn hotel of 7-storeys, was sold to OCP with plans to include the site in it’s retail masterplan which would include a link between Michael O’Donoghue’s Cornmarket Street development, a refurbished Paul Street S.C., No.16 Lavitts Quay and the Academy Street retail development which OCP intend to lodge planning for in October. I had held back this info from going public at request, but as it now seems the media have gone ahead with it anyway, so be it! :p OCP will be looking to lodge plans for a new development at the start of 2006 which will include extensive retail uses on the lower floors and a mix of office and apartments on the upper floors. To many this will be a sigh of relief giving their distaste for the RORSA designed hotel that was set to go in it’s place. The new building is expected to shoulder on a similar height to next-door OCP HQ @ 21 Lavitts Quay. Most importantly, OCP have also acquired R. Arthur’s premises on the corner of Lavitts Quay and Half Moon Street, now given the future proposal a proper quay-frontage and more holistic layout. The proprietors of the Matthews Centre had appealed the Howard Holdings project, it now seems it was a waste of their time and money to do so as Howard Holdings are now focusing on 2 other substantial projects, among them a significant docklands initative which I hope to bring some details of over the coming weeks.

      – and on retail projects, another city centre development is expected to make a further planning application in the near future to allow it extend its permitted retail area as part of an extended project. More details on that soon also.



      🙂 OFC have now publicised a list of their expected retail tenants for their Ballincollig Town Centre S.C. – scheduled to open in just over a month’s time, Tuesday 18th October 2005.

      As previously noted on this thread, Dunnes Stores will anchor the centre with 2 units being occupied – grocery and retail, New Look will occupy a further anchor unit of 10,000sq ft, Dixons, O’Briens Sandwiches, Jump Juice Bars, Easons, Carrig Donn and Hallmark will all also take tenancy and have been indicated here previously. However, in addition, expect to find

      Sasha
      Art & Hobby
      Roxy Records
      Cummins Sports
      Hickey’s Pharmacy
      Dr. China
      Pulse Accessories
      CarPhone Warehouse
      and FitzPatrick’s Jewellers.

      More tenants for the overall development will be announced soon.

      – also on BTC, I can indicate that the office campus at the development (130,000sq ft), will not contend for Revenue Commissioner tenancy as speculated.


      View toward BTC Office Campus (design by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli)


    • #758040
      securityman
      Participant

      Hi Lex will that be the complete line up for Ballincollig or will there be room for more shops also cos I think they will struggle after a while with that line up because Dixons are the only major draw and i expect them to locate in the city at some stage. I see that Market Square is due to open at the end of next month with Heatons, Game Stop, Costa Coffee, Pizza Hut and possibly lifestyle sports any news on that one lex. I also heard Pizza hut are opening a restaurant in phase two of blackpool retail park.

    • #758041
      lexington
      Participant

      @Graham Hickey wrote:

      In relation to County Hall, is the original glazing being retained behind that louvered cladding?
      It seems to be from your images Lexington…

      The original glazing was actually replaced – each panel was stripped and replaced floor-by-floor prior to the installation of the new lourves. Some of the framing was restored consequent of refurbishment grant conditions – as mentioned, the structure is protected.



      @securityman wrote:

      Hi Lex will that be the complete line up for Ballincollig or will there be room for more shops also cos I think they will struggle after a while with that line up because Dixons are the only major draw and i expect them to locate in the city at some stage. I see that Market Square is due to open at the end of next month with Heatons, Game Stop, Costa Coffee, Pizza Hut and possibly lifestyle sports any news on that one lex. I also heard Pizza hut are opening a restaurant in phase two of blackpool retail park.

      No securityman, that’s not the entire line-up yet. As for Pizza Hut locating in Blackpool Park – that, I genuinely don’t know. I hope Blackpool doesn’t become even more inundated with fast-food joints, already there are 2 McDonalds and 1 Dinos all within close proximity. Though it is nice to see the variety – concentration should be considered. Indeed there is a restaurant unit available for letting at Phase 2 of Blackpool Park, ranging from 1,700 to 2,100sq ft (approx), so it wouldn’t surprise me if Pizza Hut snap it up. It will probably be pretty successful given the location either way.



      @Pug wrote:

      werent frinailla due a planning decision today? any news?

      Frinailla were granted permisison following appeal for their Crawford Woods development in Glanmire. The project, designed by Deady Gahan Architects, will provide 81 new houses and 30 generously sized serviced sites over 32 acres. My images for this project are troublesome at the moment, so I’ll put them up as soon as it’s in order. In the meantime see Frinailla’s own website for details -> Crawford Woods

    • #758042
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      anyone got any info on the new town(s) proposed for monard/rathpeacon/blarney?

      any proposed time frame?

    • #758043
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anybody else think that OCP’s retail plans for Cornmarket Street, Paul Street, Half moon street and Lavitts Quay, Academy Street, Patrick Street and Emmet Place are spreading out of control?
      What about existing boundaries, laneways and city blocks? OCP seem to be buying up anything at all that they can tenuously link to Paul Street.
      Just a thought, don’t bite my head off :rolleyes:

    • #758044
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Does anybody else think that OCP’s retail plans for Cornmarket Street, Paul Street, Half moon street and Lavitts Quay, Academy Street, Patrick Street and Emmet Place are spreading out of control?
      What about existing boundaries, laneways and city blocks? OCP seem to be buying up anything at all that they can tenuously link to Paul Street.
      Just a thought, don’t bite my head off :rolleyes:

      I think people have a misconcpetion of this project to some extent. Essentially, the only 2 new retail elements that OCP are providing are Academy Street, which we’ve all known about for sometime, and the lower floors of Lavitts Quay – which itself forms part of a larger development anyway. OCP’s purchase of the Lavitts Quay/Half Moon Street site thus far is positive in that it now includes the vital R. Arthur premises which for so long hindered previous developments and design wholeness. With it’s inclusion, it should bring a greater sense of completion to the quayside in a wider context. The other elements included in the ‘link’ retail plan are Paul St. S.C. (to be refurbished) which exists anyway, and will offer a grocery element in Tesco – and Cornmarket Street, which is being developed by Rockfell Investments seperately. The linkage between Cornmarket Street, Paul St. and Lavitts Quay can be provided by simple walkways over the dividing laneways (Paul’s Lane and the side-street leading up toward Dalton’s Avenue) – their impacts are minimal, if at all, given the nature of these laneways. In fact, the links, if designed well could add a bit of life and character to these otherwise overlooked routes.



      @mickeydocs wrote:

      anyone got any info on the new town(s) proposed for monard/rathpeacon/blarney?

      The proposal is being jointly pitched by Fleming Construction and Coleman Brothers Developments – who, are also working together to develop the 400 units with Cork City Council, for Shanakiel. The majority of which will be for social/affordable use (supposed social/affordable). The Monard plan includes for 2,000 new homes – essentially a new town – and all it’s associated services. It just so happens, that Monard braces the new proposed €500m North Ring Road. Zoning issues are still under discussion.

    • #758045
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Wow that Crows nest development sounds really exciting, can’t wait to see the pics. Along with the Nat ross development and that news on Joe O’donovans city centre plan, they are the best new plans i’ve seen proposed for Cork in a few months.

      BTC line up seems only ok. Good for local community i’d say and Aldis is suppose to be getting under construction later this Autumn. Maybe when the full list is released for BTC it will look a bit better. Love Jump juice bars though so thats a good one for me! 🙂

      I think now that O’callaghan properties have the Lavits quay site, I hope they design something along the lines of their 21 Lavits quay building. Something really classy. The last few proposals were very poor. I think the retail plan sounds interesting. But Joe O’donovans plan sounds equally enticing.

    • #758046
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I think people have a misconcpetion of this project to some extent. Essentially, the only 2 new retail elements that OCP are providing are Academy Street, which we’ve all known about for sometime, and the lower floors of Lavitts Quay – which itself forms part of a larger development anyway. OCP’s purchase of the Lavitts Quay/Half Moon Street site thus far is positive in that it now includes the vital R. Arthur premises which for so long hindered previous developments and design wholeness. With it’s inclusion, it should bring a greater sense of completion to the quayside in a wider context. The other elements included in the ‘link’ retail plan are Paul St. S.C. (to be refurbished) which exists anyway, and will offer a grocery element in Tesco – and Cornmarket Street, which is being developed by Rockfell Investments seperately. The linkage between Cornmarket Street, Paul St. and Lavitts Quay can be provided by simple walkways over the dividing laneways (Paul’s Lane and the side-street leading up toward Devonshire Avenue West) – their impacts are minimal, if at all, given the nature of these laneways. In fact, the links, if designed well could add a bit of life and character to these otherwise overlooked routes.

      Lex, I take you point about these being seperate developments but you can’t deny that what is being assembled here is a large shopping network – now thats not neccesarily a bad thing given the disused state of a lot of the premises. On the othere hand, I think all sides will recognise the commercial advantages of linking these developments together (again not necessarily a bad thing). We already know that Cornmarket will link with Paul Street SC via St. Pauls and talk of a link to Academy would presumably be via a pedestrian walkway (aka foothpath). I think we’ll definatley see moves to link the Lavitts Quay development to Paul Street.
      Also, you’ve got to take into account OCP’s existing retail at North Main Street and the rumoured large scale retail development at the Loft site.
      You’ve got to wonder whether it will be possibly to rent retail space in this city from anyone other than owen o’callaghan 🙂


      See map below for general layout of retail plans int he area:

      Purple:
      C= Cornmarket St. Development
      A= Academy Street Site
      L- Lavitts Quay Site
      P= Paul St. SC

      Blue:
      N= North Main St. SC
      X= Loft Site

      My 200th post! Woohoo!!!

    • #758047
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      An Bord Pleanala has granted permission for Cork City Council to take control of 67/68 Shandon Street (see brown buildings on left in above picture) in order to prevent it remaining as a derelict site.
      The site has been an eyesore in the area for some time amidst a dispute between owner and occupier as to whether or not it should be redeveloped. It seems that CCC will now put an end to this dispute.

    • #758048
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Lex

      The proposal is being jointly pitched by Fleming Construction and Coleman Brothers Developments – who, are also working together to develop the 400 units with Cork City Council, for Shanakiel. The majority of which will be for social/affordable use (supposed social/affordable). The Monard plan includes for 2,000 new homes – essentially a new town – and all it’s associated services. It just so happens, that Monard braces the new proposed €500m North Ring Road. Zoning issues are still under discussion.[/QUOTE]

      Isn’t Monard seperate from the Blarney areas that Flemings and Colemans bought. As far as I know, they are all in the same area generally but isn’t the Monard the new town and the Blarney extension by Flemings / Colemans linked to the rail line?

      By the way, did anyone see the Examiner saying that the oral hearing for the Water Street devleopment is Oct 11-13…..

    • #758049
      lexington
      Participant

      @yorktown wrote:

      By the way, did anyone see the Examiner saying that the oral hearing for the Water Street devleopment is Oct 11-13…..

      I see that, in the Metropole I believe. Should be most interesting.

      Regarding Monard, perhaps I should be more specific (or less depending on how you view it) and refer to it as the ‘Monard Area’ – as the proximities are notably close and I chose Monard as the term to cover the general area of development as distinct from Blarney Village and it’s immediate environs itself. 😮



      ]15-Storey Crow’s Nest Redevelopment Plan at Victoria Cross[/URL]



      🙂 Good to see construction work finally getting a move on the Cork School of Music site along Union Quay. John Sisk & Sons Ltd have moved in on site – with primary construction work commencing formally on September 12th 2005. The work will last 24 months (approx.) and be conducted in 2 phases, the 1st of which includes the demolition and clearance of the existing CSM building.

    • #758050
      who_me
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      And who_me – Cork’s tallest development proposal has yet to be lodged. ]

      I really hate you when you’re being cryptic! 😀

      Is this a previous development we’ve heard about, or something new and secretive? (or is this just a logical ‘no matter how tall the buildings are now, sooner or later a taller building is going to be built?’) Don’t keep us in suspense!?!

      Can’t wait for the Eglington development to start up – it’s refreshing to see larger apartments on the market, though God only knows how much a c. 2,000ft apartment will cost. Well out of my price range anyway I’d imagine.

      And I have to bring up a small whine here – providing parking spaces seems to be a requisite for new apartment blocks such as these, but it’s annoying that they are sold separately. Which just means that many people who can just afford the apartments can’t afford the extra 40 – 70 thousand euros for one parking space and so still end up looking for parking elsewhere in the area. I’d love it if the developers were forced to include the parking spots with the apartments.

      As for County Hall – admittedly the renovations look like a huge improvement, but I wouldn’t exactly be crying if it were completely obscured. If the Crow’s Nest (great name for a skyscraper?!?) goes ahead, would that spark off further similar developments in the area?

    • #758051
      lexington
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      I really hate you when you’re being cryptic! 😀

      1. Is this a previous development we’ve heard about, or something new and secretive? (or is this just a logical ‘no matter how tall the buildings are now, sooner or later a taller building is going to be built?’) Don’t keep us in suspense!?!

      2. As for County Hall – admittedly the renovations look like a huge improvement, but I wouldn’t exactly be crying if it were completely obscured. If the Crow’s Nest (great name for a skyscraper?!?) goes ahead, would that spark off further similar developments in the area?

      In this case I’m not specifically referring to any one project – however, there are proposals being prepared (including Horgan’s Quay) and another project is in the making, though at this stage with no finalised height (when it is known, I’ll post it up).

      As for the Crow’s Nest (which I agree, is a great name for a taller building) – there is a possibility that a taller structure will also be assessed on a site to the west of County Hall.

      I would be anxious to see development limit within the current boundaries around Carrigrohane – what I mean by that is, not expand beyond existing city lines, as I would ultimately like to see the Carrigrohane Straight Road renovated like something not too distant from the Phoneix Park Road in Dublin. If Mr. Richard Wood does grant CCC with the 285 acres of park land he has promised (subject to the North Ring Road routeway), I’d like to see this land, plus all the adjoining green spaces as far as the Lee Fields and Casement Park provide a natural amenity area for the city – it’s own Phoenix Park as such, it would provide a wonderful entrance into the city from the west/Ballincollig and provide some superb recreational space to the people of Cork city, it’s suburbs and environs. An upgraded Carrigrohane Road with perhaps some cobbled roadway linings, cast-iron latterns lining the length of the road from The Angler’s Rest junction to County Hall and arch-like tree covering the length of the route way to boot. Horse-riding treks, open green space, woodland tracks, waterfalls, horticultural area, treehouses etc could all be provided within the confines of this huge park.

      😮 Well, a man can dream.

    • #758052
      who_me
      Participant

      Very interesting lexington, especially alongside the plans to turn the South link landfill into a public park too. Great seeing some thought going into preserving green areas as the city expands.

    • #758053
      dowlingm
      Participant

      I wish the Corpo would show the same protection for City Hall, instead of surrounding it with monstrous visual intrusions like the multistory carpark behind it…

    • #758054
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Frinailla Ltd. have started to demolish parts of their site at Watercourse Road without planning permission and before ABP have ruled on the appeal which local residents brought against the decision to grant permission by CCC.
      I’m astonished that Frinailla couldn’t wait 1 month for a decision (which may well be in their favour) before proceeding. This move will no doubt cause uproar amongst local residents who made submissions and appealled all 8 (at last count 🙂 ) planning applications which have been made by the developers. There is also a high profile campaign being carrried out by former workers in the Meat factory portion of the site who are looking for redundancy payments from their former employer.
      Despite the obvious need for re-development in this area, I do not like this type of underhand approach which Frinailla seem to be employing. I doubt whether the decision to begin demolition on a soaking wet Friday was made at random. I’d be confident that little or nothing would be left by Monday morning. Frinailla have really let themselves down with this one!

    • #758055
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Frinailla Ltd. have started to demolish parts of their site at Watercourse Road without planning permission and before ABP have ruled on the appeal which local residents brought against the decision to grant permission by CCC.
      I’m astonished that Frinailla couldn’t wait 1 month for a decision (which may well be in their favour) before proceeding. This move will no doubt cause uproar amongst local residents who made submissions and appealled all 8 (at last count 🙂 ) planning applications which have been made by the developers. There is also a high profile campaign being carrried out by former workers in the Meat factory portion of the site who are looking for redundancy payments from their former employer.
      Despite the obvious need for re-development in this area, I do not like this type of underhand approach which Frinailla seem to be employing. I doubt whether the decision to begin demolition on a soaking wet Friday was made at random. I’d be confident that little or nothing would be left by Monday morning. Frinailla have really let themselves down with this one!

      I think you may be a little wrong on this one, and i dont know much about planning as such but as far as I know they can demolish buildings proven to be either unsafe with council consent or following local authority grant where the appeal is for the actual development construction and where the buildings have been deemed not to be of any historical or architectural significance. As far as i know they are actual allowed do this…but feel free to correct me cos i looked into this when the O’flynns demolish the old sorting office before getting planning on Eglinton street.

    • #758056
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I see what you’re saying Ewan, but
      (a) As far as I’m aware, the appeal was related to both the demolision and construction of the proposed building.
      (b) The building already demolished could not have been unsafe due to it being in constant public use up until a few weeks ago.
      (c) The developers are very unlikely to have had Council consent since a warning letter was sent to Frinailla by the Council when these early demolitions were first rumoured.

      The ABP decision is due on the 13th October.

    • #758057
      Anonymous
      Participant
    • #758058
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      http://www.peoplesrepublicofcork.com/images/articles/Hobbs/

      Well, I know what I’m doing for the weekend 🙂

    • #758059
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I see what you’re saying Ewan, but
      (a) As far as I’m aware, the appeal was related to both the demolision and construction of the proposed building.
      (b) The building already demolished could not have been unsafe due to it being in constant public use up until a few weeks ago.
      (c) The developers are very unlikely to have had Council consent since a warning letter was sent to Frinailla by the Council when these early demolitions were first rumoured.

      The ABP decision is due on the 13th October.

      Well i dunno, but I don’t understand why they would do something like that if they know its going to cause trouble…unless their friends with Jim mansfield and the T&C partnership! :rolleyes: I’m sure theres a perfectly good reason.

      I was walking along Cornmarket street earlier and see the works on the Guy and company site is proceeding nicely. Buildings to the side of the Musgrave building have been demolished and the red-brick facade seems almost freestanding now. Think a post said here that excavations were due to be finished this month and construction work would go ahead thereafter.

      I think 2006 will be a good year for Cork development. 2005 was good but i think we’ll see some big changes next year as some of the projects put forward this year come into action. By the end of this year i’m sure we’ll see new tower cranes over the School of music. Parnell place hotel, Cornmarket street, Ladyswell(?), maybe Grand parade plaza???? (at long last!), UCC Boole library, and another over Jurys? Hopefully it’ll be bright in the night skies of Cork this Christmas!!!! 😀

      And the start of next year? More cranes over Eglinton street, Paul kenny’s Revenue commisioner building (i hope), Water street (I also hope) and maybe the Clontarf street and Deane street office buildings? I get excited seeing our city develop in a good way and always think the sight of these cranes is the most visual demonstration of these changes and their impending arrival!

    • #758060
      t.scott
      Participant

      well if eglington st, school of music etc. are anything to go by, the future is not too shabby for cork and its great to see the city going up if ever so slowly!!!

    • #758061
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      And the start of next year? More cranes over Eglinton street, Paul kenny’s Revenue commisioner building (i hope), Water street (I also hope) and maybe the Clontarf street and Deane street office buildings? I get excited seeing our city develop in a good way and always think the sight of these cranes is the most visual demonstration of these changes and their impending arrival!

      Have to say I’m looking forward to hearing the outcome on the above projects – of the buildings in the running for the RC tenancy, I do think the Kenny proposal is by far the most striking given it’s design and location. The Water Street Oral Hearing is awaited anxiously and I hope it works out positively, as for Clontarf and Deane Street proposals, the former is currently in Further Information, but I believe is a genuinely interesting proposal and should add interestingly to this exciting development area. Deane Street is due a decision next Tuesday, September the 13th 2005. We should also note the advent of proposals at Albert Quay and Anderson’s Quay.


    • #758062
      lexington
      Participant

      Settling weeks of speculation and rumours, it is now confirmed that Paul Montgomery & Edmund Kenneally look set to operate a new 734sq m, dual level bar at Castlethorn Construction’s €300m Dundrum Town Centre in Dublin. The premises will have elevational/street frontage and similar to Scotts on Caroline Street, operate a busy food service during the day. Bannon Commercial acted as brokers on the deal with the Montgomery/Kenneally Partnership expected to pay in the region of €350,000 p.a. in rent. Unconfirmed reports suggest the name of the premises will operate as ‘Winters’. The rumours had been prompted by a source involved some time ago, but can now be officiated – the operators are involved in popular Cork venues Reardens and Scotts, as well as having development interests at Victoria Cross (Victoria Mills), Cobh, Douglas, Boreenmanna Road and a number of other projects.

    • #758063
      A-ha
      Participant

      Surprise surprise…. would’nt ya know Cork would win the all Ireland again. Bad luck for Galway though, but the better team won in the end. I presume it will be quite in here tonight (and tomorrow morning too), lol.
      Come on the Rebels! 😀

    • #758064
      securityman
      Participant

      Its good to see the lads opening a bar in Dundrum because there is enough pubs down this end of the country run by Dubs

    • #758065
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Unfortunately the images of the Crow’s Nest redevelopment will have to wait for a little while yet. However, in their absence I can tell you a brief description of the development which includes 74 1, 2 & 3-bedroom apartments throughout a 6 to 15-storey building, 112 basement car-parking spaces over 2 levels, a new restaurant, bar and 4 commercial units all on a .266 hectare site (0.65 acres) including the premises of the Crow’s Nest and one dwelling to it’s immediate south, 1-4 Victoria Terrace and MP Crowley Machinery Storage premises (for images see initial post highlighting this development – approx. 2 pages back). The building is designed chiefly by Tom Hegarty with Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects (RORSA) and reaches a height of approx. 50m (54m including the spire). The building is finished with a predominantly grey and green colour scheme with material finishes including zinc cladding, steel, glass and stone. The tower element is relatively T-Shaped in nature with the lower end of the T facing Victoria Cross – balconies adorn the south and northern elevations. In some ways, the building actually reminds me of the Kenny Group proposal for a 14-storey hotel at South Main Street (50 Grand Parade) designed by James Leahy & Associates, meshed with Cork County Hall. I hope to have images in the future and will allow you judge for yourselves. My own opinion…well I’ll keep that to myself for the time being I think. 😉



      🙂 I have been impressed with James Leahy & Associates of late, and the project led by architect James Bourke for John & Michael O’Dwyer’s plans along Hanover Street at 20 and 22, reaffirms the practice’s edgy and inspired designs of late. The 6-storey scheme is being lodged in 2 seperate applications providing a total of 23 new 1 & 2 bedroom apartments, a commercial unit and roof gardens. This colourful scheme makes extensive use of black slate cladding, timber, stainless steel etc and has an attractive feature ventilation flute at roof level – the flute is blue glass which illuminates interally at night making for a nice aesthetic feature at roof-top. Given the variation in general residential floor heights and office floor heights, the scheme at 6-storeys is somewhat lower than the 7-storey office scheme at Clarke’s Bridge which adjoings this development, designed by Coughlan de Keyser and which is currently in Further Information. A very attractive little scheme that should breathe new life into this otherwise overlooked street-scape.



      *UPDATES*

      😮 A decision is due on Oyster Developments’ plans to construct a 7-storey office building at Deane Street tomorrow (Tuesday, 13th September 2005). The building represents the 1st of 2 phases to redevelop this premises to the rear of No.8 Parnell Place and bracing the revamp Bus Station parking bay. The 2nd phase, which will include the renovation and incorporation of No.8 Parnell Place (a P.S.) into the development, is awaiting a decision for later on this month. The project is designed by Sabine Wittman of The e-Project and images of the project may be found earlier on in this thread. The e-Project is also involved in a revision of the project proposed by John Costello & Mount Kennett Investments, which seeks to redevelop the Capitol Cineplex on Grand Parade as a new 30,000sq ft Department Store (to which Arnotts was rumoured to be attached) and 18 over-head apartments – however, the design and finishes were deemed insufficient, among other things. Significant Further Information on the project was requested by planner Michael Lynch.



      😮 Denis Scannell has applied to develop 2 new 2-storey commercial and office unit blocks at Hollyhill Shopping Centre – it will comprise part of what is believed to be a redevelopment of the northside S.C. in coming months. :confused:



      🙂 An application for a redevelopment of the Muskerry Service Station, a prominent 0.6acre site along the Western Road (next to UCC and a substantial redevelopment by OCP of the former Jurys Doyle Hotel lands) which sold earlier this year through CBRE Gunne from vendors Esso Ireland for a figure in excess of €8m – is believed to be not far off. The service station, which was due to close this October, is now not expected to seize operations until a later date, supposedly late December 2005. Assessments are being carried out on the site with a planning application speculated to follow in the not too distant future.

    • #758066
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @securityman wrote:

      Hi Lex will that be the complete line up for Ballincollig or will there be room for more shops also cos I think they will struggle after a while with that line up because Dixons are the only major draw and i expect them to locate in the city at some stage. I see that Market Square is due to open at the end of next month with Heatons, Game Stop, Costa Coffee, Pizza Hut and possibly lifestyle sports any news on that one lex. I also heard Pizza hut are opening a restaurant in phase two of blackpool retail park.

      is market square the new development in midelton or mallow?

    • #758067
      securityman
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      is market square the new development in midelton or mallow?

      Mallow, I was down on site today and it looks a nice set up on the first floor there is a number of shops and a cinema on the next level is residential and there is car parking spaces for 450 underneath. It is set to open next month there is also retail and residential across from the main square included in this is Heatons. I know who the main tenants are but it is to be kept secret until everything is sorted out with contracts etc but its no suprise.

    • #758068
      A-ha
      Participant

      Whats the story with Fota Retail Park…. I heard all sorts about it ages ago but nothing since then. Is it even built yet, if so, who occupies it? Motor Mall and large DIY and Toy store chains linked to it. It’s also supposed to be linked to the railway line at Carrigtohill when it gets a new train station.

    • #758069
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Whats the story with Fota Retail Park…. I heard all sorts about it ages ago but nothing since then. Is it even built yet, if so, who occupies it? Motor Mall and large DIY and Toy store chains linked to it. It’s also supposed to be linked to the railway line at Carrigtohill when it gets a new train station.

      See the link below:

      Fota Retail Park

      Developers: Dan Mulvihill & Joe Carey
      Architects: Deady Gahan Architects

    • #758070
      lisam
      Participant

      I passed by the proposed retail park on Saturday, Construction work has begun. From the development map found on the link posted by Lex it looks as if they have started on the motormall

    • #758071
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      Can you help me with this question, What is ment by “Implications to part 5 planning”

    • #758072
      lexington
      Participant

      @shrink2cork wrote:

      Can you help me with this question, What is ment by “Implications to part 5 planning”

      Part V of the Planning & Development Act 2000 was enacted on November 1st 2000 and generally refers to the issues of a 20% provision to Social/Affordable uses. The Section has generally to do with providing a housing balance, it applies to proposals set on zoned residential or mixed-use lands – though developments of units equal to 4 or less, are generally exempt. So too may certain developments, irresepective of unit numbers on sites equal to or less than 1 acre (0.2 hectares – this was amended to 0.1 hectare as of April 2002). Exemption certificates may be attained from the Local Authority subject to negotiation – failure to attain an exemption certificate can be appealed to the Circuit Court. Generally developers must highlight how they intend to deal with Part V of the Act at the time of agreed pre-planning negotiation or in their application. Land transfers from the developer to the L.A. may in some cases be used to satisfy Part V requirements.

    • #758073
      phatman
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      Mallow, I was down on site today and it looks a nice set up on the first floor there is a number of shops and a cinema on the next level is residential and there is car parking spaces for 450 underneath. It is set to open next month there is also retail and residential across from the main square included in this is Heatons. I know who the main tenants are but it is to be kept secret until everything is sorted out with contracts etc but its no suprise.

      Well, by the way you’re talking i’m gonna take it Dunnes are making the move from the main street. Like you say, no surprise, unless i’m mistaken.

    • #758074
      phatman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😎 Cork County Council have permitted the development of a new hotel at Owenahinch, Little-Island. The 207-bedroom proposal is being developed by Irish & European Properties (Dublin) and will include a conference centre, swimming pool, spa and other leisure facilities, car parking, restaurant, bar and 2 retail units.

      For anyone who is confused or unaware, this hotel is not being developed at Little Island near Cork City, but in West Cork, at Owenahincha, where there is also an area known as Little Island. I was looking at the planning on the Council website, and surprisingly enough they didn’t stress this, they simply left it as ‘Little Island’, misleading a few people i’m sure.

      Also, the developers behind the proposed apartments at Victoria Cross, ie. on the former car showroom site, towards Orchard Road, seem confident of securing the go-ahead, they’ve already erected a sign advertising a ‘proposed apartment development’, a tactic that seems to be employed more and more recently by developers, amounts to little more than propaganda in my opinion. However, i quite like this scheme, should lend a bit more architectural merit to the area in light of some of the more recent additions.

      Btw, wasn’t aware of Hegarty’s presence in Victoria Cross, what are they up to across the road, next to the Fleming development?

    • #758075
      Radioactiveman
      Participant


      @phatman wrote:

      Also, the developers behind the proposed apartments at Victoria Cross, ie. on the former car showroom site, towards Orchard Road, seem confident of securing the go-ahead, they’ve already erected a sign advertising a ‘proposed apartment development’, a tactic that seems to be employed more and more recently by developers, amounts to little more than propaganda in my opinion. However, i quite like this scheme, should lend a bit more architectural merit to the area in light of some of the more recent additions.

      I believe that’s Frinailla again…they do seem to be taking a very agressive attitude to their developments lately. This is the second time they’ve erected advertising signs before planning decisions have been made and their unauthorised demolition on Watercourse Road is continuing seemingly unmolested by those charged with upholding the Planning Laws. A complete block of buildings ajacent to Watercourse Road Garda Station was demolished this morning at approximately 6am.
      In my view all of these actions show at best, a severe lack of respect for the law of the land and a worst, a deliberate campaign to undermine planning laws.

    • #758076
      lisam
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      For anyone who is confused or unaware, this hotel is not being developed at Little Island near Cork City, but in West Cork, at Owenahincha, where there is also an area known as Little Island. I was looking at the planning on the Council website, and surprisingly enough they didn’t stress this, they simply left it as ‘Little Island’, misleading a few people i’m sure.

      But if you look it up under the planning enquiry system rather than in the weekly reports it states what area it is in

    • #758077
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      Thank you Lexington for your help

    • #758078
      A-ha
      Participant

      Oh my God…. I’m like so outraged! The flights due to commence next month from Cork to New York have been cancelled due to a €95 surcharge in fuel. Like, what the fu*k??? I’d pay the extra €95 if it was me! Over 4000 people had booked their flights and will now get a refund. On a brighter note, two new flights will be added to Cork Airport including Dublin and London Gatwick, both from Ryanair. Like we need another flight to London anyway. easyJet already operate the Gatwick route and Aer Lingus operate the Heatrow route with Ryanair operating the Stansted route. By the way, if you want to make a complaint, not because you had booked flights, but because you are a Cork citizen, then ring Slatterys, the operators of the Cork-New York route on 066 9159755. That’s their office, I suspect the phones will be flying off the hook. Although I doubt the CAA will take the news lying down.

    • #758079
      Anonymous
      Participant

      i’d say that would be a slap in the face alright. i have family living in cork who fly to new york and hate that long drive to shannon. and that’s before the queues. i’d be furious if it were me living in cork. i myself believe that cork airport needs to grow.

    • #758080
      lexington
      Participant

      Ridiculous!

      Slatterys Press Release

      However Ryanair have made a positive(?) stride regarding Cork. See link below.

      Ryanair Press Release concerning Cork

    • #758081
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      is market square the new development in midelton or mallow?

      Market green is the new development in Midleton

    • #758082
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Cork’s first permanent ice-rink (albeit a synthetic one) has been cleared for development at the North Main Street S.C. The ice-rink received permission by OCP and will be operated by 2 local businessmen. The ice-rink will be located on the 1st floor of the S.C. at the former Tall Order Diner and will reach a size of approximately 2,000sq ft, accommodating 76 hours of operations per week and 40 skaters at any one time for sessions of 30 minutes each. Also included will be a theme diner. The scheme was designed by Patrick A. Cashman & Associates who have also worked with OCP on the design for their new HQ, recently completed, at 21 Lavitts Quay.



      😎 Meanwhile David Crowe’s Oyster Developments have seen Further Information requested of their 1st Phase office scheme at Deane Street. This phase seeks to construct a new 7-storey office building designed by Sabine Wittman’s The e-Project, based in Dungarvan. The 2nd Phase, also currently in planning, will include the conversion and refurbishment of No.8 Parnell Place for office use, this will adjoin the new office building in Phase One. 4 large window openings are proposed as part of Phase 2 on the northern facade of No.8 Parnell Place, a protected structure.


    • #758083
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I see subway (yum!!) have moved into the basement of the building at the corner of St. Patricks Hill and MacCurtain Street. Presumably a listed building and I’m unsure whether they have planning for a change of permission from the existing public house. Let me know if I’m wrong though!!

    • #758084
      who_me
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I see subway (yum!!) have moved into the basement of the building at the corner of St. Patricks Hill and MacCurtain Street. Presumably a listed building and I’m unsure whether they have planning for a change of permission from the existing public house. Let me know if I’m wrong though!!

      😉 Why do I get a sense of deja vu?

    • #758085
      lexington
      Participant

      Sean Mhuileann

      Just some images of Sean Mhuileann Phase 2 as it nears completion. Unfortunately, the 4th block is a little out of sight. The substantial Section 23 apartment development was developed by Joe Carey & Frank Sheahan, designed by J.E. Keating & Associates. Phase 1 was constructed by PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd with Phase 2 built by Rohcon.



      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I see subway (yum!!) have moved into the basement of the building at the corner of St. Patricks Hill and MacCurtain Street. Presumably a listed building and I’m unsure whether they have planning for a change of permission from the existing public house. Let me know if I’m wrong though!!

      Planning does exist, Alan O’Herlihy sought permission on a change of use last May (2005).


    • #758086
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Planning does exist, Alan O’Herlihy sought permission on a change of use last May (2005).

      Good man Lexington.

    • #758087
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 The James Leahy & Associates designed plan for Pitwood Limited, which comprised of a new 116-bedroom hotel on the Corbett Bros.-owned site at Parnell Place and Beasley Street, has been taken to ABP on appeal following a grant by CCC. The substantially revised proposal features a unique Beasley Street elevation (see image below) and is to incorporate the protected facades at 17/18 Parnell Place. The revised proposal also took heed of a reduction in height so ao impact on the protected structure at 97 South Mall (TCH HQ).



      😎 And as previously noted on this thread, Werdna’s Water Street Oral Hearing dates with ABP are set for the 11th to the 13th of October in the Gresham Metropole Hotel along MacCurtain Street with a decision date rescheduled for November 24th 2005. From contact I’ve had with one party involved, though anxious, if the appeal is favourable in it’s outcome – Werdna will be enthusiastic about getting to work on the project – no date was given, but I would suppose early 2006. When asked about what the outcome would be should the Bord not offer the developers their hoped for decision, the source said it would be a matter for ‘re-evaluation’, with no clear opinion expressed. Many fingers will undoubtedly be crossed. 😮

    • #758088
      lexington
      Participant

      :confused: Following the successful votes by Cork County Council regarding rezoning of the Mallow GAA grounds and lands near Midelton, Castlelands Construction looks set to proceed with their proposed development of 200 houses in Mallow and are preparing an application for well over 700 new homes in Midelton. The Midelton zoning is permitted following a promise by Castlelands to provide 8m euros toward the development of a new fly-over near the Ballincurra junction to alleviate the projected gridlock of the area. As part of the Mallow deal, Castlelands will provide the Mallow GAA with land for new grounds near the town. Castlelands dealings with the GAA however are not believed to be strictly limited to Mallow, as speculation continues to mount regarding their involvement with a docklands development in the city. However an unconfirmed rumour also indicates that Castlelands may have also been assessing the 11-acre Ford Motor Co. site currently the subject of bidding. As I said, this has not been confirmed and is mere speculation.



      🙂 International construction firm Laing O’Rourke are looking to set up an office in Cork within the next few months. The firm already has offices in Dublin and Galway, and is also assessing setting up and office in Limerick. A reliable company source noted that Laing O’Rourke has identified Cork as being an exciting expansion opportunity and noted that the move represents their vote of confidence in the Leeside market. LOR will be seeking to competitively win contracts on a number of fronts – more details on that when they become available.



      😮 River Island have indicated that they are actively seeking for an additional but larger sized unit in Cork. A company insider stated that the Academy Street development nearby didn’t present an immediate attraction to the company, but it would assess their options nonetheless. Preference has been expressed for any new unit to be at least twice the size of their existing city centre operation on Patrick’s Street.

    • #758089
      A-ha
      Participant

      Another Subway in Cork. The company must find Cork a profitable market. I’m glad it isn’t another McDonalds or something, in case you haven’t heard, it’s bad for you. Yes, I agree, Subway, ummmm and healthy! What a load of you know what, I can’t imagine Ryanair filling 3 loads of 200 seater aircraft every day on fligths from Cork to Dublin. But, even better news, I’ve heard rumors that easyJet wanted to make Cork their main hub for the Republic of Ireland, they have already made moves, according to two Sunday newspapers, for starters, they decreased the amount of flights from Shannon to London and trebeled the amount of flights from Cork to London since they began operations. Come to think of it, I’m surprised an easyInternetCafé hasn’t opened up in one of the Subways yet (they have some deal thing), I bet it won’t be long before you see one in the airport when the Subway opens in there. Fingers will also be crossed for Water Street. 🙂

    • #758090
      A-ha
      Participant

      Ooops, I posted the same message twice. :p

    • #758091
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anybody know the exact nature of the appeal to ABP re. the hotel on Parnell Place?
      I didn’t personally love the thing, but i can see no reason to appeal to, especially given the fragile nature of the facades onto Parnell Place 🙁

      On the whole Ryanair thing, we shouldnt really be that thankful to them. In my view they’re moving into Cork in order to p*ss off Aer Arann. And they’ve also announced plans to fly to two more London airports!! Woopdedoo, the world and his mother is flying to London. If they were that interested in making Cork a Real hub they would have introduced new destinations in Europe, not ones which are already being served.

      Anybody know when the ABP decision on AIB Blackpool is due?

    • #758092
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      anyone know the location of the rezoned midleton lands discussed earlier in the context of castelands – i know its south of the N25 (?) but how close are the lands to the ‘ballinacurra’ roundabout – its a terrible planning decision to encourage large scale development south of the road – and it apparently was pushed by a number of councillors as well as maurice moloney – the key thing was that the developers promise to fund a flyover – how come the logic of land use zoning has been corrupted so much that underfunded local authorities are effectively bribed by private interests to provide infrastructure that the state should be providing?

      btw – does anyone think that the sean mhuileann (?) development in blackpool looks CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP – pure 1990s tax-incentive red brick underwhelming designs – probably will be redeveloped in 10-15 years – almost as bad as the other development on commons road – cannot remember the name (advertised as dreamland)

    • #758093
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Bunch, this Castlelands development is at Baneshane, theres a model of the estate in Sherry Fitzgerald in Midelton apparently. Haven’t seen it, but I gather the fly-over is to be on the Cork side of the existing one, at Waterrock. No idea how thats going to tie in to the existing road, or the propsed northern relief road.

      I gather that work has started on a new development just South of Ballinacurra. Should make traffic on the roundabout even more fun in the morning.

      That roundabout on the N25 was never supposed to be there in the first place, the original design was for a flyover, but it would have involved demolishing some houses (on the right as you approach the roundabout from Ballinacurra) so the decision was taken, on grounds of cost, to go with a roundabout. It also explains why the roundabout is such a strange shape.

      Edit for complete innaccuracy and to add link.

      http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer/2005/06/07/story953507280.asp

      Whoa! Just googled Peachdeen, and found that the 67 houses are to be built in Lissanly – anybody know where?

    • #758094
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      Does anyone have an update on Peachdeen Limited proposed housing development at Clonye, Co.Cork ??? (05/399) The Architects are PRC Skehard Road Blackrock Cork.

    • #758095
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      btw – does anyone think that the sean mhuileann (?) development in blackpool looks CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP – pure 1990s tax-incentive red brick underwhelming designs – probably will be redeveloped in 10-15 years – almost as bad as the other development on commons road – cannot remember the name (advertised as dreamland)

      Its a far sight better than the other Keating associates design at Camden wharf. And as far as tax driven developments go its far better than that monstrosity at Victoria mills.

      Does anyone know who will be building Eglinton street? will the O’flynns be doing it themselves??? And who were the architects/planners for the Howard holdings masterplan in the docklands?? anyone?

    • #758096
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Does anyone know who will be building Eglinton street? will the O’flynns be doing it themselves??? And who were the architects/planners for the Howard holdings masterplan in the docklands?? anyone?

      As far as I am aware, the tender for Eglinton Street hasn’t gone out yet but is expected to do so soon.

      As for the Howard Holdings Masterplan, word is that Murray O’Laoire were involved but I have no confirmation on that.



      🙁 I see Fleming Construction were refused planning on their 60-berth marina for the Fota Island Resort. Hmmm.

    • #758097
      Leesider
      Participant

      question regarding the appeal for Water St. if they are successful will the tower element be allowed or is this an appeal for the scaled back version without the 17 storey tower?

    • #758098
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Leesider, as I recall they were granted a drastically scaled back version so I imagine the first party element of the appeal is to reinstate the original plan. I believe there were third party appeals too so even the scaled back version could be rejected outright.

      For those interested some pics of a rarely seen view – inside Jacob’s Mill which after 40 years of dereliction is undergoing renewal and to my mind is the most emblematic development in the city.

    • #758099
      pier39
      Participant

      theyre coming to cork like! i think we all know this will be inevitable. hehe 😀

    • #758100
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The proposal by Cork City Council (and I believe it has been expressed by Cork County Council for certain locations around the city and suburbs) to bring into policy a condition obligating new city residential development units to be provided with bicycles by developers has been met with mixed reactions across some spectors in the development and development related community.

      Personally, I don’t have a problem with it. For a long time I’ve wished to see the city centre island subject to large-scale pedestrianisation (at least during peak times 9.30am to 7pm for example). The city centre is ever more so becoming a congestive block of endless traffic backlogs. A figure conducted by UCC Geography Department in 2003 averaged peak-time traffic in the city at approx. 11.2 kph (will double check that figure!) – off the top of my head I can’t remember the like figure for Dublin. This figure has undoubtedly reduced in the past 2 years. Part of CCC policy aims to create the city centre as a more sustainable living environment, attracting long-term, predominantly owner-occupiers into the city after years of suburban exodus. The 2002 CSO Census statistics confirmed that the city centre population had decreased like-for-like on the 1996 findings (April 25th 2006 is the next scheduled census). At the same time, significant increases in Cork’s suburban and perhiphery populations were also documented. Population projections for the South-West Region (Cork city, county and Kerry) were, by 2021 expected to increase by 124,000 souls (to 705,000) based on CSO Projections dated May 25th 2005, however that finding has since been revised upward given recently released population (organic and inorganic) growth statistics. Recent ESRI and CSO reports both indicated their expectancy that Cork city and environs will absorb a substantial volume of this increase. One NUI Economist (who asked not to be quoted by name) indicated he could see, by 2012, Cork city’s (suburbs, some of which are considered CorkCoCo jurisdiction, and city centre inclusive) population increase by as much as 20,000 to 25,000. An approximate growth average of 3,571 every year from now until September 2012 or a respectable 2.9% (approx.) per annum (taking 22,500 as the median value) – it must be remembered however, that this does not take heed of fast growing population rates in Commuter Belt settlements like Midelton, Ballincollig (agruably a suburb – whose population by 2018 is expected to rise to 40,000), Mallow, Carrigaline, Crosshaven, Blarney/Tower, Glanmire (which consequent of recently lodged or proposed developments should increase district population by a possible 6,000 ~ 4,000 of which could well be facilitated at the 2 OFC proposals alone), Rathcormac and Macroom etc. Incorporating these figures into the overall frame, paints a very healthy growth pattern. The dependency of these commuter settlements on the city paints a positive picture for development in Cork city when considered alongside city centre statistics. However, what is important to consider in this context are key factors such as infastructure, patterned growth arrangements and especially jobs – or perhaps more specifically, job types and their associated wage packets.

      From an infastructural perspective, the development of commuter rail-lines (as proposed for Mallow, Blarney, possibly Blackpool and along the Midelton Commuter belt including existing structures at Cobh) is vital – from an environmental, sustainability, traffic management and economic perspective (especially individual and family economic perspectives). However, bulk growth in the southern region of the city must be accounted for as well. Current infastructural and public transport services are just, if at all, coping at peak times. Generally speaking, average wealth bases in the southern divide of the city exceed those of the north – this would suggest, in some respects, higher disposable incomes and by logical deduction, higher numbers of cars – Carrigaline is recognised as being the most car dependent town in Ireland. Actual volumes do become more balanced in real terms when consideration is applied to influx traffic consequent of commuter flows from the larger, more numerous commuter settlements to the north (and in this sense, we may consider Charleville, Mitchelstown, Fermoy etc among them) – even so, stronger emphasis will need to be applied to providing sufficient infastructural capacities in the south region, and more roads are not the way to go. Private input will be essential in the absence of required public spending – where public ‘monetary supply’ does not maintain level with demand.

      But back to jobs – in order to sustain any viable growth, a sufficient money base/market is required. This is ultimately determined on jobs/wage units. Tertiary sector based employment generally tends to have a lower economic output/productivity than say industrial or manufacturing – in this sense attracting foreign bodies for providing predominatly tertiary-rooted operations (e.g. finance etc) will have to be justified on an output, skill and/or niche basis. R&D is a valuable component is establishing niche characteristics – and provides a competitive, if only ‘temporary’, edge over competitors (i.e. other locations). Sufficient anti is required strategically to continue defining Cork as a unique and desirable operations base with respectable wage levels. Retail employment, as a third sector employer, will more often than not, fail to sustain sufficient long-term employment with strong wage levels – with the exception of management/administritive positions. However, as the largest market sector in the country – it remains an invaluable economic contributor. Throughout other sectors, the aforementioned characteristics of niche, skill and competitive output will be required more and more to support sufficient wage levels and to support other employment sectors such as retail, leisure, finance etc. Furthermore, the volume of these higher wage units distributed across the growing population will need to be increased. Indigenous or MNC, the difference other than that of domestic and regional/national products is minimal. For example, as demonstrated by Glen Dimplex/Morphy Richards, when push comes to shove – if a labour market, even a domestic one, proves unsustainable or does not reach a sufficient/desired pay-off, operations are shifted off to China! Generally, unless there is a large concentration of the like, administration and finance-based activities, do not employ the same volumes as the productive dimensions do (although that can vary business to business 😉 ).

      I could blab on for hours – but in conclusion, with the growth in population – the increased activity in city centre residential development, it is posited that city centre activity and occupancy levels will and are rising. CCC seemed, in the case of Eglinton Street for example, to have come to the acceptance that large-basement car-parking facilities for big residential schemes can be justified given the long-term nature or lower traffic movements (with respect to location) of the vehicles involved. I would agree – but with higher population volumes, come higher general movements. With infastructural elements not yet nearing their optimum, car travel still remains the dominant means of transport – whether suburban or commuter. The continually growing volumes mean higher congestion rates. Until a sufficient public accessible transport system comes into effect, any alleviation of traffic input is welcome. If this means removing one element, even city sourced traffic – to some extent (some people will never bother and the other sticking point is Irish weather) – by introducing/providing bicycles with new residential schemes, than the better we are for that. And healthier hopefully!

      However, if developers do fund a bicycle per unit, CCC must be expected to do their part providing dedicated, safe cycle-lanes – some with parallel retractable canopies in times of bad weather (thus encouraging the use of bicycles even in poorer weather) – and proceeding with important public transport implementations.

      Figure Sources:
      CSO
      ESRI
      CCC
      CorkCoCo
      NUI

    • #758101
      A-ha
      Participant

      wow, how long did it take you to write that??? I can’t see people using bikes much in Cork, unfortunetly we don’t have a climate like the South of France and can’t imagine people hopping on their bikes and heading off to work every morning on a cold December morning. Pedestrianisation would be a brilliant idea for the city centre, except for buses and taxis. It’s astonishing the amount of population growth that will take place in Cork suburbs over the next few years, 40,000 in Ballincollig alone, thats like the size of Waterford! Someone will have to do something about public transport to the west of the city, the suburban rail to the east and north of the city is already relied upon by thousand each morning, but all Ballingcollig can rely on are buses, it’s not good enough. But I would prefer to see city centre public transportation improved, before taking care of the western suburbs. And Radioactiveman, I agree, the only reason Ryanair started flights to Dublin is because they lost out on operating the service in Kerry due to Aer Arann winning the contract.

    • #758102
      A-ha
      Participant

      Oh, and I hope everyone hasn’t forgotten about the “Most beautiful building in Cork” forum. It does still exist and it would be no harm to keep it up and running. 🙂 :p

    • #758103
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 The National Software Centre/Software Development Centre Limited is set to apply to develop the 2nd Phase of it’s Campus at Mahon – not far from Mahon Point. The original centre was designed by Wilson Architecture and built by John Paul Construction. The 4-storey, 54,000sq ft building houses a number of firms including the Cork BIC (Business Innoation Centre), Nortel Networks, Checkpoint Technologies and Wain Morehead Architects among them. The ultimate plan for the campus was to see 8 blocks, housing up to 500,000sq ft of office space and a new multi-storey car-park. O’Callaghan Properties (OCP) have their own plans for over 100,000sq ft of offices nearby at Mahon Point. This development will include a further 4-storey block, with mezzanine level and provision for 50 car-parking spaces – it will be located just off the existing block. Wain Morehead Architects will be handling the application on behalf of the SDC, with Arup in a consulting engineers role.

    • #758104
      A-ha
      Participant

      I read in the Examiner today that planning permission has been given for the construction of a €2.5million crematorium for Rocky Island, the first crematorium to be built outside of Dublin. And yes, for those of you that remember, it is the one that I was always raving on about! Also an article about the present terminal at the airport and what it will be used for when the new one opens, presumably it will be used to cater for Ryanair and other low cost airlines. A CAA spokesperson said that no talks have been made yet, but given that the existing terminal still has a good life left in it (only refurbished in 1994) it would be a shame to use it just for offices. Ryanair says that whatever terminal it will end up using, all it requires are fast turn-around times.

    • #758105
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I am curious. I know Manor park homes are taking on board the redevelopment of Horgans quay. but who will be the FIRST big player to take on a significant south docklands site redevelopment? And when?? and how ambitious will they be?

      And lex was saying that a new website for the development at the Ursalines college in Blackrock was due to be launched. I saw an ad in one of the Sunday papers and it gave the website address at -> http://www.edenblackrock.ie

      The add showed some pics of the proposal too, i think designed by O’Mahony pike architects. Personally I think it looks rather boring. I hope O’Mahony pike offer something a little better than that at Horgans quay.!!

    • #758106
      lexington
      Participant

      A number of lesser-known, or supposedly less controversial developments – especially in the Blackrock area of Cork have caught my eye of late. A recent excursion down the Old Blackrock Road found the O’Callaghan Properties development at the former Rochelle School site, designed by Dennehy + Dennehy, nearing completion with John Paul Construction on-site. The development has materialised well in the flesh and marks a further turn by OCP in aiming higher in the design standards of their projects. The project is fitting of its location and possesses a simple tastefulness about it without ever over-powering its surrounds. I especially like the balcony and parameter railings which adorn the proposal.

      COMPLETED IMAGE LATER



      Further down, along the main Blackrock Road, Bowen Construction are putting the final touches to the development of 60,000sq ft of office space over predominantly 4-levels in a project by SHUL Developers, designed by Wilson Architecture, at Tellenganna Lodge. However, the development can only truly be appreciate from the Monahan Road perspective. It’s a shame potential amenity green-space has been lost to the area, but the developers, design team and contractors have done a good job on a project that has also materialised positively in the flesh. Finishing materials and cladding works are now being applied to the new office building, with landscaping efforts also ongoing. From Monahan Road, the project looks over the southern docklands region from its commanding position atop a sloped perch. The development in some ways seems to be casting it’s eye over what will become an exciting new urban quarter for the city at the docklands. In this respect, Tellenganna Lodge represents one of the first major docklands commercial projects to reach completion.


      CG Image of the development – Northern and Eastern elevations showing.

      COMPLETED IMAGE LATER



      Also, a recent tour, in part, of Ballincollig Town Centre has left me generally impressed with what O’Flynn Construction (OFC) have undertaken and consequently, achieved thus far. The architectural consideration afforded the “Old Quarter” residential element of the €500m town centre development is indeed of a higher calibre than many other housing estates that emerge around the city and its environs. The shopping centre is emerging perhaps a little better in the flesh (my phrase of the day it would seem!) than many would previously have anticipated with the new office campus, deisgned by RORSA, proceeding swiftly at the old Military/Barracks Square.


      Old Quarter boulevard rendering


      5-bedroom Style A Housing Type at Old Quarter


      Completed Style C House @ Old Quarter

      MORE COMPLETED IMAGES SOON



      Also on Ballincollig, Aldi Stores Developments are moving on their apparent ‘town centre’-style development at the former John A. Woods premises near the entrance to the Ballincollg Gun Powder Mills, adjacent to OFC’s BTC Office Campus. The development will include a new Aldi discount foodstore with first floor offices, 11 further retail units, 12 apartments, signange, car parking and all ancillary site development works.

    • #758107
      corkdood
      Participant

      Does anyone here know if there are plans afoot for development in the Camp field near Collins Barracks in the City? From what I hear the department of defence was planning to sell some if not all of the land to the city council but that was a few years ago and I do not know what has transpired since. Can anyone shed some light?

    • #758108
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Cork County Council are to apply to CCC for the development of a new County Library HQ building on their County Hall lands. The new building will rise 6-storeys over basement and house a new archive and book processing unit, new library areas, exhibition area and office accommodation on upper floors. A 2-storey wing will extend for the main building structure and enclose a new courtyard area. The development is to be constructed on the surface car-park area to the west of the existing Cork County Hall protected structure, with the car-park being relocated. As part of the application, CorkCoCo will also seek to add a further level to the newly constructed multi-storey car-park, as part of the wider redevelopment of the premises, nearby. Shay Cleary Architects will be heading up the design.

      – this development is significant in that, should it be granted, the partial obstruction (and I don’t use that word in a negative sense) of the western facade by the new building could pave justification for future proposals to the east and west of the tower which may be of a high-rise nature (especially to the west, where recently freed up development land provides a unique opportunity to develop a significant gateway high-rise). That includes the recently proposed 15-storey tower structure at the Crow’s Nest site off Victoria Cross.


      View east to west of the Crow’s Nest and Victoria Terrace – with Cork County Hall in the background.



      corkdood – I haven’t heard of anything myself. Anyone?

    • #758109
      corkdood
      Participant

      I was walking yesterday along the city quays at low tide and it must be said the river is not a pretty sight when the water levels are low.
      The quay walls are encrusted with green weed and the riverbed is strewn with rubbish and clutter including trolleys etc. I think most of us agree that the river should be more of a focal point in our city and this may come to pass when the redevelopment of the docklands gets into gear.

      However the river itself is in need of attention to maximise the potential of the city. I am aware that the much maligned main drainage works have improved the water quality in the river to a large extent. However to the casual observer looking into the river it really doesn’t seem that much has changed.

      It struck me yesterday that if only the city council had the vision to construct a version of the Thames Barrier to control water levels in the Lee in order to maintain a steady water level along the quays ensuring that the ugly green quay walls were always covered. What a pleasant place the city quays would become. The stench of rotting green seaweed would be merely a memory. Boatingand pleasure trips on the river could become a viable reality. The development of a boardwalk along the river would be feasible and Corkonians could be proud of the Lee instead of holding their noses when they traverse the city’s bridges at low tide. It would also encourage tourism and enhance the image of the city.

      Do we as a city have the vision and the wherewithall to bring such a project to life? It is a dream of mine to see such a project brought to fruition in my lifetime. What do others think?

      PS If I recall correctly as part of the Cork 2005 programme of events a Lee Swim was to be held during the summer through the city centre. To my knowledge this event never went ahead. Perhaps the smell scared away the swimmers!

    • #758110
      lexington
      Participant

      @corkdood wrote:

      It struck me yesterday that if only the city council had the vision to construct a version of the Thames Barrier to control water levels in the Lee in order to maintain a steady water level along the quays ensuring that the ugly green quay walls were always covered. What a pleasant place the city quays would become. The stench of rotting green seaweed would be merely a memory. Boatingand pleasure trips on the river could become a viable reality. The development of a boardwalk along the river would be feasible and Corkonians could be proud of the Lee instead of holding their noses when they traverse the city’s bridges at low tide. It would also encourage tourism and enhance the image of the city.

      Do we as a city have the vision and the wherewithall to bring such a project to life? It is a dream of mine to see such a project brought to fruition in my lifetime. What do others think?

      In the 2001 Cork Docklands Development Strategy Draft prepared for CCC by Urban Initiatives just such a system was proposed. The location was set for the breadth between Water Street and Marina Park. It was noted however that such a system would be costly and may be a visual disamenity as far as the river is concerned. Furthermore, it would hinder the scale of vessels entering the existing Port of Cork space along the quays during construction and following completion. Personally, I believe with the PoC relocating the majority of its activities to the Deep Water Berth at Ringaskiddy, the requirement for large scale vessels docking in the city would be less required. The predominant nature of vessels within this location should be restricted to leisure usage, water-buses and the occassional foreign naval visit. Interestingly, with Custom House Quay seeking to be redeveloped, the NADP 2005 proposed a extension pier to the eastern head of the CHQ site to allow berthings of perhaps such vessels, whilst allowing the quayside itself to be redeveloped.

      I think were such a scheme to be proposed, the combination of such a barrier system could be incorporated into the Water Street Bridge scheme – minimising any visual impact and providing an aesthetically pleasing ‘mask’ in the shape of the Water Street Bridge.

      Indeed such a scheme would be costly, but I think in strategic terms, the investment would be well worthwhile from issues of flooding, regulation, hygiene, amenity value and related economic and socio-economic benefits. The River Lee is perhaps Cork’s most valuable, yet under utilised resource. The city and the city’s docklands extensive waterfronts are a real prize. Clearly the scale of such a barrier would not be equivalent to that of the Thames and I would be very much of the mind that CCC, the DoE and Dept. of Marine should sincerely consider this option.


      Water Street Bridge Proposal

      Interesting Link: Thames River Barrier

    • #758111
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      A few points regarding Corkdood’s and Lexington’s posts:

      I’d agree with Corkdood’s initial statement that the city would benefit hugely from a realignment towards the river. Boardwalks developed similar in style to City Quarter where no on street quay wall exists and where they do, rejuvenated paving and lighting could make the most of these magnificant limestone structures.

      I know CCC are in the very early stages of coming up with a plan to clean/repair and survey the remaining walls but naturally this would be above the tide mark. A ‘thames barrier’ type project for the river, while ideal, is hardly realistic in the medium term due to the enormous costs involved.

      Just to clarify something, The Lee swim DID take place this year, in August. The race started at St. Vincents bridge on North Mall and finished at the Clarion Hotel, a total distance of 2,000 metres. Jack Higgins, former Cork City Manager had always promised to swim in the river once the main drainage scheme was completed and true to his word, he did so prior to the race getting underway. See here for images.

      What amazes me is that with all the CCC representatives in aand around St. VIncents Bridge that day, not one took it upon themselves to organise the removal of the ugly plastic sign which hangs from the county side of the bridge – a leftover from the construction work on Shandon Bridge- maybe an indication of the heed CCC pays to the river?

      Undoubtedly, the river should be opened up for the enjoyment of both citizens and tourists alike. Dublin Docklands Development Authority has the right idea with its recently launched ‘Spirit of Docklands’. The 52-seat low profile boat was specially made to travel under Dublin’s bridges. Landing stations for the boat will be at the IFSC and off the boardwalk at the Ha’penny Bridge and O’Connell Bridge. The tour service will operate daily with journey times expected to take up to 50 minutes.

      I’ve spoken brefore of the need for a proper CORK DOCKLANDS AUTHORITY to be created to oversee and encorouge development in Cork Docklands and maybe such a body could also take control of the river itself to ensure it is used to its full potential.


      We can only hope!!

    • #758112
      who_me
      Participant

      If I’m not mistaken, there were plans proposed (around the time the tunnel was being planned) for such a dam and double lock system, but further downsteam at the current location of the tunnel. Because of the double lock, traffic wouldn’t be delayed even when shipping is passing through. And of course, it also would allow the city centre water level to be regulated.

      Also on the subject of the river walls, is that large pipe “stuck on” to the river wall opposite O’Sullivan’s Quay (the Fás building) a new arrival? Not only is it a ugly eyesore, but there already has been one collapse in the river wall where the pipe’s support are attached.

      Whatever about cleaning up the quaysides, let’s make sure they’re sound first!

    • #758113
      corkdood
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      A few points regarding Corkdood’s and Lexington’s posts:

      Just to clarify something, The Lee swim DID take place this year, in August. The race started at St. Vincents bridge on North Mall and finished at the Clarion Hotel, a total distance of 2,000 metres. Jack Higgins, former Cork City Manager had always promised to swim in the river once the main drainage scheme was completed and true to his word, he did so prior to the race getting underway. See here for images.

      I stand corrected and well done to Jack Higgins for being as good as his word. Is it just me or has the PR machine for Cork 2005 been a disaster.

      Interesting to hear that the idea of a tidal barrier has been proposed already. Of course the control of city centre flooding would be an important bonus of implementing such a system. I’m sure city centre retailers and residents would be in favour of that!

    • #758114
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      A ‘thames barrier’ type project for the river, while ideal, is hardly realistic in the medium term due to the enormous costs involved.

      I disagree, the long term costs to homes and businesses that are most often subject to flooding, over a long-term period justify such an investment – and that’s how the barrier should be viewed, an investment. With rising water levels and increased levels of adverse/freak weather conditions, Cork cannot afford to continue over the next few decades without such a system. Much of the city centre island is actually below sea-level. The installation of such a barrier may also aid issues of flood insurance cover that many homes and businesses are without due to the regularity of such circumstances. Now indeed, there are many other side issues that are responsible for flooding, but by reducing the impact and removing the source elements of some of these causes is indeed favourable. Recent events in the city centre are surely an indication of what damage can actually be caused in the absence of some form of decent resistance structure. Furthermore, a controlled water level will allow for increases in investment and development opportunities from water uses such as transport, to marinas, berthing fees income etc etc. The long-term payoff is well worth the investment if it is done correctly. A transport mechanism, utilising the river, may also in part alleviate road-wear and traffic congestion – which all impacts on infastructural maintenance as well as health implications and associated costs respectively.

      Ruling out such a strategy with consideration to the medium term is hardly logical, after all, it is a long-term investment and would be undertaken as so in any event.

    • #758115
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I disagree, the long term costs to homes and businesses that are most often subject to flooding, over a long-term period justify such an investment – and that’s how the barrier should be viewed, an investment.

      Apologies if I seemed to be dismissing this project out of hand. A barrier such as this will, I have no doubt, be completley necessary within this century. Cork should get a project like this and I would be very much behind it. What I was getting at, is that it may be dismissed since there is no way central government will provide funding such a scheme since it will not produce votes in the short term. Politicians and the people who hold the purse strings will be the main ‘barrier’ to this scheme.

    • #758116
      A-ha
      Participant

      I haven’t a doubt in my mind that Cork will one day have some sort of barrier/dam to keep out the sea, I just hope it wont be too late. And I’m sure Cork won’t be the only city with a barrier…. any town or city that is built around the sea or a tidal river will have to have some protection from it. Especially an island country like our’s….. we’re gonna have to take a page out of The Netherlands book, constantly fighting off the sea. Read an article in the paper the other day, suppposedly, all of the ice in the north pole will have disappeared by 2070. It’s really creepy when you think about it…..

    • #758117
      A-ha
      Participant

      Oh, and for any of you who have been to Paris and did a Seine cruise, you would have noticed that the river is so clean you could drink from it. The bridges are spotless and there isn’t even the slightest smell from the river. There are 10 million people living in Paris…. how do they manage to keep their river so clean?? Their sewage is probably cleaner then the Lee, although that wouldn’t be hard.

    • #758118
      Pug
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      there is no way central government will provide funding such a scheme since it will not produce votes in the short term. Politicians and the people who hold the purse strings will be the main ‘barrier’ to this scheme.

      I agree 100%, having travelled a lot, Ireland for a wealthy country sets fairly low benchmmarks to be achieved and then when the politicians actually do something its seen as progress. Case in point is building the Kinsale flyover years after the roundabout was built.

      Back to the point of this thread or I’ll get edited. Personally I think this is a great website and the info thats available is brilliant, just to hear whats going on. I think the advent of 10/15 storey towers around Cork is excellent eg, Eglinton Street and Crows Nest (did the developers have an inkling that the County Library might go up behind them and set a precedent for the height? a friendly councillor??)). What is poor is the freedom of councillors, who have no greater experience than most professionals, to rezone huge swathes of land for poor planning – Hello Rathcormac.

      Went up to the Rossdale / Woodville HOK marketed development in Glanmire recently, its a brave break from the normal 3 bed semi but fair play, it looks like a great design.

    • #758119
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anyone know the date of the AIB Blackpool ABP decision?

    • #758120
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Quote <>

      A-ha is this for real? I lived there 1990-96 and it would be a long time before I would drink from the Seine! I’ve never even seen a fish I would eat in it. A few comments:
      Most of the bridges were cleaned up as part of a Millennium project and have been treated with anti-graffitti coatings so they can be easily cleaned.
      The river does smell, but not often, because the volume of water is huge when compared to da Lee and the current is much faster, particularly in Spring when it gets the winter ice melt.
      Most of the sewage is piped far downstream to a processing plant.

      Incidentally, Paris drinking water comes from the Champagne to Chablis region, is full of calcaire/lime and does not work with Barry’s.
      Most of the water used to sluice down the boulevards is part-purified river water that goes straight back into the river.
      House numbers in Paris start from the river and increase with distance from it.
      That’s the quota of useless info for today!

    • #758121
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @A-ha wrote:

      Read an article in the paper the other day, suppposedly, all of the ice in the north pole will have disappeared by 2070. It’s really creepy when you think about it…..

      A relative of mine works in a research station in the artic monitoring the icebergs and reliably informs me that they are disappearing quicker than snuff at a wake. Given that probably 90% of our population lives near the coast, the Government might have to rethink its spatial strategy. At this rate, Athlone will have become the capital city quicker than it will have become a gateway city.

    • #758122
      altuistic
      Participant

      I think were i too drink from the Seine i may as well admit myself to the nearest hospital in expectancy!!

      Its been a while since I’ve heard any talk on the event centre? has anyone any news on it?? I would have thought following the Marquee event this summer, of all those encouraged by the success of the arrangement, McCarthy Developers would be the most interested in trying to get a permanent fixture off the ground. the Showgrounds seemed like an ideal location to me.

    • #758123
      pier39
      Participant

      @altuistic wrote:

      I think were i too drink from the Seine i may as well admit myself to the nearest hospital in expectancy!!

      and if you fell into the river youd also be inseine!!! 😀 seriously i am my own best company.

      anyway as far as the event centre goes i do know that there was once a plan for blackash but thats scrapped now. another event centre was pitched for the showgrounds but that seems stagnant now for what i gather, all the talk i hear says other developers are circling it and the gaa like vultures. the ford site would be sweet too but that would require “the big money” and i dont know if the land value + development and operational costs would make such a project there viable unless it was incoporated in with other development uses. apparently manor park homes & treasury holdings promised to look into the centre for horgans quay but was that simply just a polite gesture to the city council before they turn around and say hey, sorry, but it aint gonna happen? paul montgomery was looking to it at one stage, maybe he got achatting with mickey o’d and sort somethin out for horgans quay???

      thats enough brain power for me for one day. think ill ly down for awhile.

    • #758124
      Pug
      Participant

      castlelands+new gaa buddies = showgrounds plan I’d say 😎

    • #758125
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Here’s another view of the Victoria Cross development from Frinailla Ltd. Looks good.

      <img src="http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/5125/vclogo7ua.png&quot;

      With regard to the event centre, I know there are still two possibles in the running- Horgans Quay and Showgrounds. I’m not up to date on either so, how far each has progressed (if at all) i don’t know.

    • #758126
      A-ha
      Participant

      Saw in the Echo today the shops due to open in the new Ballincollig Shopping Centre. Here’s a list if anyone didn’t manage to get it; Dunnes (fashion and food), Easons, Dixons, New Look, Hallmark Cards, Carphone Warehouse, Roxy Records, Cummins Sports, Sasha, Royal Bank of Scotland, Hickey Pharmacy, Ballincollig Credit Union, Jump Juice, Nu Schu, Dr. China, Impulse Accessories, Art and Hobby, Fitzpatricks Jewellers, Carrig Donn, Paddy Power, O’Briens Sandwich Bar, Paco Store and Burger King. Another bar and restaurant and an opticians are also to open but are not yet named. I think the variety is ok, Dixons and New Look will probably be the main attractions to the centre but no doubt all of the other outlets will do well too. It opens on Oct. 18.

    • #758127
      Pug
      Participant

      ay ideas whats being done to the building on your left just as you come over the bridge from georges wuay and turn right on to south mall? Property Team the estate have a sale agreed sign up on it and there is scaffolding and workers floating around it

    • #758128
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      A PRIVATE consortium has offered to build a €250m power plant outside Cork city – which, at 400 megawatts, will boast output over 300pc greater than the existing ESB facility in the city.
      The project – proposed by Mountlawn Ltd for an industrial site at Little Island – aims to cater for the booming electricity demands in the Cork and south Munster region.
      It is also underpinned by the soaring power demand from industries in the Little Island, Cork city, Ringaskiddy and Midleton areas.
      Two years ago, the ESB installed two portable generation units at their Cork-Aghada power station to boost output in the region.
      However, the private plant must first secure the endorsement of the Commission for Energy Regulation before it can proceed to the planning stage.
      A decision on the proposed Little Island plant is unlikely before 2006.

      Irish Independent

    • #758129
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Any word on what this power station would be fuelled by?

    • #758130
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Lush have been cleared to proceed with the appropriate alterations to the premises at 96 Oliver Plunkett Street, on which the company has a long-term lease, and will now open it’s first stand-alone Cork store.



      Ryanair move forces Aer Arann to slash Cork-Dublin flights
      12:59 Wednesday September 21st 2005

      Aer Arann has announced plans to reduce the number of flights it operates between Cork and Dublin by two-thirds.
      The company said it was forced into the move as a result of Ryanair’s move to operate three return flights every day on the same route.

      Aer Arann said it could not compete with Ryanair’s 99-cent-a-seat offer for the flights, but added that no jobs were at risk because of the cutbacks.

      Irish Independent

      🙁 I don’t think Aer Arann get it…



      @Aidan wrote:

      Any word on what this power station would be fuelled by?

      The station would be gas fed Aidan.

      What I would be interested in is to see how this station, should it be granted, impacts on Marino Point in the docklands. I doubt the ESB would invalidate the station there but nonetheless, one wonders. :confused:

    • #758131
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Thanks Lex, thought so.

      As for Marino point, how old is it? If the machinery/gen sets are getting on, it may be cheaper to close it, rather than compete with new (private) plants like this. Specially as gas prices go up.

    • #758132
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Energy consumption increases year on year in this country. We don’t have the luxury of picking and choosing which power plants operate. We need them all and then some!

    • #758133
      Leesider
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂
      🙁 I don’t think Aer Arann get it…

      Excuse my ignorance here Lex but why do you think that Aer Arann don’t get it??………..presume you think there is potnetial for both of them to operate on the service??

      What annoys me about Cork airport at the moment is that the big 2, Ryanair and Aerlingus don’t appear to have much interest in it except for jumping on other routes that have been proven successful by other airlines (Aer Arann, Jet Magic). They don’t seem to realise the potential that Cork has for other mainland European routes. Good to see Jet2 come on board but again it’s a British route (Newcastle)!

    • #758134
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      What annoys me about Cork airport at the moment is that the big 2, Ryanair and Aerlingus don’t appear to have much interest in it except for jumping on other routes that have been proven successful by other airlines (Aer Arann, Jet Magic). They don’t seem to realise the potential that Cork has for other mainland European routes.

      You’ve hit the nail on the hear there Leeside. Aer lingus and Ryanair are only interested in Cork Airport to keep other budget airlines from taking off there (excuse the pun). They come in, destroy the market in a few years and then drop back again once the competition is fought off.
      Note also O’Leary from Ryanair has said that the proposed 2nd terminal at Dublin airport is overprised and that they could build one cheaper. That may be so, but ryanair, on the main, fly into sheds in the middle of nowhere. Do we want a decent terminal or a budget one?


      Does anybody know whats going on at the Museum in Fitzgerald Park. The new extension is open and working well. The place is even open on Saturdays now (can’t believe it took them that long to figure it out!).
      My question is, what is happening to the old museum? Is it to be refurbished for more museum space?

    • #758135
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Do we want a decent terminal or a budget one?

      Simple answer? Both.

    • #758136
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      This is competition of the worst kind.
      There were 9 flights a day to Dublin. Soon there wil be 3. And this is good for the consumer how?

      Clearly this route will be cross-subsidised and make a loss until Aer Arran move out altogether, leaving Ryanair free to charge whatever they feel like,

      Shades of “Go” out of Dublin from a few years back?

    • #758137
      jungle
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      Excuse my ignorance here Lex but why do you think that Aer Arann don’t get it??………..presume you think there is potnetial for both of them to operate on the service??

      IMO they don’t get it because they are giving up the one competitive advantage they have over Ryanair – their frequency. Sure, they probably had to scale back, but their flight timings aren’t going to pick up much business traffic now. They’d have been as well off pulling off the route as going back to 3 flights a day.

    • #758138
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      they are giving up the one competitive advantage they have over Ryanair

      Perhaps not. If they held on for a year with frequent flights, they could well end up losing a lot of money on the route. By reacting immediately, they keep some form of foot hold in Cork, but one they can hold onto for a long period of time. If Ryanair want to persist, they can, but their predatory move has already been counter acted, and negated to an extent.

      Is there any role for the aviation regulator in this?

    • #758139
      who_me
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      For those interested some pics of a rarely seen view – inside Jacob’s Mill which after 40 years of dereliction is undergoing renewal and to my mind is the most emblematic development in the city.

      I’m really looking forward to seeing that finished, hope the external finishing materials will be nice. To me, that’s almost one of Cork’s ‘signature views’, looking through the trees on O’Sullivan’s Quay, at the quirky buildings overhanging the river, Parliament bridge and this building in the background.

      Pity nothing’s been done with that quayside yet – even if it just meant new railings and footpath.

    • #758140
      lexington
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      Excuse my ignorance here Lex but why do you think that Aer Arann don’t get it??………..presume you think there is potnetial for both of them to operate on the service??

      Well yes I do. First off, I’m a strong advocate of market lberalisation and competition – in capitalist terms, Ryanair is something of an icon – however, as a self-proclaimed supporter of competition, an important part of any healthy market is choice. A firm I input into had a niche development scheme that had the potential to soak up the market place for it’s targeted sector – quite comfortably, through the idea I was involved in, the firm could have approached the market and cleaned it. However, it was realised that doing so would strategically disbenefit the creation of new markets/demand niches consequent of this activity. One must realise that given room to breathe – a one market creates alternate options, “trends” which allow for further innovation and market advantage which allow a firm feed off of and grow. Essentially, competition is beneficial for all concerned and market dominance by one firm can create a monopolistic situation which often provides stagnant or lumbering market stimulation. Ryanair’s advocation for competition, then actions which are essentially destructive growth options, are self-contradicting in nature. Indeed, a firm should strive to assert its position as high up the food chain as possible – and cut throat competition is indeed that, cut throat – but preying on fledglings is not strictly healthy competition. What Aer Arann originally recognised, but now seems to have forgotten, is that the predominant usage of the Cork-Dublin route (weekdays at least) is formal (over 53%) – generally, what is demanded of a service is flexibility, and in this sense, frequency. A business person, say, wishes to be at the meeting desk before 9am in Dublin, so he catches the 7am flight up, and be home on the last flight out at 10pm. Ryanair are offering 3 flights a day (Cork to Dublin: 06.45, 09.15, 16.40 and Dublin to Cork: 08:00, 11:05, 17:55). Aer Arann services 9 weekday flights a day (Cork to Dublin: 07.00, 08.00, 0900, 1000, 1200, 1500, 1700, 1800, 2000 and Dublin to Cork: 0730, 0830, 0930, 1330, 1430, 1630, 1830, 1930, 2230). Frequency is Aer Arann’s best asset here – they can achieve this by utilising small, quick turnaround aircraft like the ATR42 and AT72 which packs in about 60 passengers at the most. Ryanair are using larger 189-seater 737-800’s whose higher capacity can offer reduced fares but also limits their frequency options. Aer Arann also distinguish themselves on other little things like, easy-on easy-off boarding, free newspaper on early morning “business flights” etc etc, it all factors in – can you see Ryanair offering a free IT on their 0.645 flight to Dublin?! It’s the corporate sense that attracts many business personnel and the associated freequency that allows them travel up or return at a time suited to them – this may sometimes be confused with snobbery, but that’s a simplified, perhaps naive assumption to make. 0.99c one way fares (plus taxes, fees etc) aren’t the be all and end all. Aer Arann may have made a ‘safe’ bet, but essentially, in hanging out their white flag in advance of the battle, they have handed Ryanair a percentage of their market share on a silver platter without Ryanair even having to do anything. That’s not ‘healthy’ competition.

      Ryanair and Aer Lingus quite frankly, have little genuine interest in Cork Airport – they’re publicised ‘commitments’ are much more subject to circumstance and picking up the slack created by other airlines before them. Perhaps the greatest initiative Aer Lingus has shown Cork was the launch of its Warsaw service – recognising the sizeable Polish population in Cork and taking advantage of it’s potential. Aer Arann and Easyjet have perhaps shown a little more ‘genuine’ interest in Cork – for the former, Cork was a serious growth base and contributed significantly to that airline’s organic development. A innovative airline carves new pathways, a lazy airline just picks up the slack. Competition is about distinction and innovation, not replication and stagnation. Remember Samsung for years replicated the innovation of Sony – but its serious growth phase sparked as a result of organic R&D fuelling distinction and ultimately its quality. The hope is however, if Ryanair experience success on these new routes, it will fuel their interest in developing further – hopefully continental routes – from Cork. The pessimist says however, if they had been so successful on their London routes, why weren’t such expansion proposals more forthcoming in the past? (And I have considered market and fee issues).



      d_d_dallas – I agree that the ESB would not likely wind-up Marina Point, if anything, we are approaching an energy defecit. Industries in Little Island, the city centre, growing population and general increase in electricity usage all adds to the pressure.

    • #758141
      Leesider
      Participant

      good response and I have to say I agree with most of it. Whether Aer Arann should have kept on all their flights is debateable but dropping it to 3 from 9 seems a bit over the top. In fairness Ryanair will appeal to a different type of client, ie. those getting connecting Ryanair flights from Dublin, match goers etc.. Aer Arann will still appeal to the business tripper due to the above reasons given by lexington!

      Have heard alot of crap from Ryanair as regards developing the regions but yet they have never come into Cork, not in the way you would have expected them to. Maybe they are waiting for developments with the old terminal and are just testing the waters with the new routes as regards the CAA. For a semi state body aerlingus always disappoint me as well with their lack of ambition with Cork……..one can only assume politics plays a big part here!!

      …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

      Just wondering what is the state of play with the Jury’s site?? Have the cranes gone up or is it just demolition work at the moment?? Haven’t been down to the motherland in a while!

    • #758142
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I think to expect Ryanair to develop the regions is not really realistic; Michael O’Leary is 100% in his PR when talks about delivering on his strategy of increasing aviation usage in general and delivering to his shareholders in particular. I am delighted that Ryanair have developed a Dublin Cork route as it proves that demand exists and it will hopefully mark the begining of the end for subsidied regional aviation in this country. I have just returned from Latvia where the local low cost carrier has developed Riga airport from 500,000 pax to 2,500,000 pax in the space of 3 years.

      Subsidising Aer Arran to fly a small number of government officials and business people to places like Donegal, Knock and Galway is quite simply unsustainable and is gross mis-management of the public finances. In contrast a City like Cork is experiencing sub-standard route development which is also unsustainable.

    • #758143
      A-ha
      Participant

      I’m not sure what to make of it all. On one hand, I hate to see the larger companies like Aer Lingus expressing an “interest” in Cork, when they really don’t give a toss (with the exception of Warsaw as previously noted), but on the other hand, Ryanair can offer fares for less then half the price of Aer Arann, however, it’s obvious that Ryanair didn’t start the route in Cork’s interests, it only did it to get it’s revenge on Aer Arann for taking the Kerry-Dublin route right from under their noses. Ryanair is marketing the route so it can compete with Irish Rail, I’d prefer to take the train any day…. they are more frequent and it brings you straight into the city. How much is a taxi from the airport to the city centre in Dublin? Flying will probably cost you in and around €100 by the time you get into the city, and considering check in times and what have you, the train seems faster aswell (fast for Irish standars anyway). But I have always hated Aer Lingus since they managed to close down JetMagic. The airline flew to places like Milan, Brussels and Nice and other places unknown to Cork before them. Aer Lingus then began operating flights to Milan and Nice, selling fares for half the price and more frequent until JetMagic had to finally close down. What’s Aer Lingus next move….. they fu*king close down the routes. They are such a horrible airline and I wouldn’t fly with them if they begged me. I know they did recently open up the Nice route again, but still, it took them long enough. I miss JetMagic, I never got to fly with them, but I know they gave you free champagne in large leather seats, lol, I bet thats why they called their Frequent Flyer programme “Cloud 9”.

    • #758144
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      But I have always hated Aer Lingus since they managed to close down JetMagic. The airline flew to places like Milan, Brussels and Nice and other places unknown to Cork before them. Aer Lingus then began operating flights to Milan and Nice, selling fares for half the price and more frequent until JetMagic had to finally close down.

      JetMagic wasn’t a bad concept – and it is one that could have been quite viable, however the airline management made a number of fatal errors. First off, the lack of core development routes – to encourage usage, an airline must provide well scheduled link routes – destinations that allow for connections as well as serve a final destination demand, for example, Frankfurt-am-Main, Paris CDG, London Heathrow/Gatwick, Amsterdam Schipol, even Zurich – these are well developed hub destinations that allow leisure and business travellers make onward connections. They serve a dual purpose. The airline should ideally provide early morning flights, to allow for connections, and evening return flights, to allow time for connecting passengers to make the flight home. Flying to London City, though ideologically sound, in actuality was flawed – JetMagic’s strategy did not provide the necessary times to satisfy business travellers. Also, the demand was generally insufficient and more often than not, you’ll actual find higher business traveller demand off-hat to Heathrow than City. Also, JetMagic should have competitively encouraged travellers to utilise Cork as a hub for their onward journeys – pitching the relatively fast transit times afforded by the airport’s size – in comparison to say, Dublin and Belfast. JetMagic spread with a number of secondary routes too fast when it should have focused and developed sustainable routes – Barcelona, Alicante and Nice were good calls. I don’t think you can blame Aer Lingus for JetMagic’s downfall. I think this is an excuse that provided an easy culprit to satisfy some people. For all the experience JetMagic’s management brought with it, it made core mistakes in it’s development. The airline should also have facilitated larger capacity aircraft (eg. Airbus A318 etc) on the aforementioned core connection routes – the Embraer aircraft were perhaps sufficient on some routes. There are numerous other reasons and causes for the airline’s demise – however this is not the platform and I think I for one have discussed enough airline business for a while.

      Back to the thread nature…

      Leesider – Bowen Construction have erected their 1st tower crane on site and the hotel element is proceeding. The western section is being erected while the basement car-park elements are being founded. The remaining area of the hotel will be built over the basement once complete. A 2nd tower crane will be erected for Block B, fronting the river, later on. Basement excavations will proceed first before this enacts. Bowen intend to have the hotel completed on schedule for next Autumn (2006). The total project will take a 3 years to complete.

    • #758145
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Given that we are on the subject of Cork Airport, what is the reaction to the new terminal? Last time I passed through, the cladding and glazing were almost complete. It does look good, but this should be a given considering the cost. HOK were the principal architects I believe, and I imagine the interior is well designed and functional. Originally, the plans called for the addition of a new control tower and a taxiway paralell to the runway, but these were ditched (probably not much need for them in any case).
      Leaving aside the fact that the airport was built on top of a hill (fog, crosswinds, etc), there is limited room to expand the runways! And a new upgraded CAT III nevigation system would be expensive to implement given the geographic location.
      Operationally, my real hope was EasyJet would expand their services and develop a base in Cork, and I am sure that Ryanair had them in mind when going on the Gatwick route. Aer Lingus have drastically improved their service in Cork over the past two years and they certainly cannot be blamed for the collapse of Jet Magic. I think Aer Arann got too complacent and their service standards were slipping in any case. Frequency was their real advantage but since that will soon deteriorate, the train looks like the best option once the hourly service starts off. Interesting times lie ahead.
      Finally, an American friend recently flew into Cork, hired a car, and all was going swimmingly till they hit ‘The Magic Roundabout’. He called it the ‘the gates of hell’ but survived to tell the tale. I pity anyone, local or visitor, who has to navigate that. Surely it is the worst road design in Ireland.

    • #758146
      lexington
      Participant

      Furthering on from my early post on Joe O’Donovan’s acquisitions of late, it has also now been confirmed that in addition to the freehold sale of Pound City, through agents Lisney which was also stated in the earlier post, adjoining premises No.55 Patrick’s Street has also been purchased by the investor. This new premises will add nicely to Mr. O’Donovan’s other purchase on Market Lane, The Oyster Tavern.

      To re-cap the news see the previous post here ->: Joe O’Donovan’s Big Plan?



      Also, previously noted early in the thread, the sale on the Coca-Cola Bottling premises on Carrigrohane Road was only now confirmed to staff through SIPTU. The sale was handled by Lisney and is believed to have fetched in and around the 5m euro mark.

      See that post here: Coca-Cola Premises Sale



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Frinailla are set to apply for the conversion of a storage unit along Allinet Lane which adjoins their CitySquare (Ladyswell) project (due for ABP decision on October 13th 2005) – the proposal will see the unit revamped to include 2 new apartments.

      🙂 Aldi Stores are set to apply to CorkCoCo to develop a new store on a 1.26acre site, formerly Dean and Chapter Land of Cobh, in Cloyne.

    • #758147
      jungle
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      Finally, an American friend recently flew into Cork, hired a car, and all was going swimmingly till they hit ‘The Magic Roundabout’. He called it the ‘the gates of hell’ but survived to tell the tale. I pity anyone, local or visitor, who has to navigate that. Surely it is the worst road design in Ireland.

      Do you know I find the one at Bishopstown Court worse. If you’re going from Bandon towards Douglas and go in the indicated lane, you end up going back to Bandon…

      As regards the aviation issue. Aer Lingus were the first airline on a number of their routes out of Cork – London, Paris, Amsterdam, Faro/Warsaw, Munich and Malaga.

      Aside from the business-model problems associated with JetMagic, they were simply woefully undercapitalised. They would have needed twice their capital level to keep their business going until they were hitting sustainability.

    • #758148
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      just wondering does anyone know is there any concrete plans for the loft site because it says in the cornmarket street master plan that development of this site should corispound with the development of the guys site?I also read recently that owen o callaghans plans for an evant centre at mahon point are looking good after they carried out a feasability study on the site?

    • #758149
      lexington
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      just wondering does anyone know is there any concrete plans for the loft site because it says in the cornmarket street master plan that development of this site should corispound with the development of the guys site?I also read recently that owen o callaghans plans for an evant centre at mahon point are looking good after they carried out a feasability study on the site?

      The Loft site will be redeveloped at some future stage, incorporating the Coal Quay bar. It is earmarked for higher order retail use and will likely extend vertically while incorporating the existing, protected limestone facade. Herlihy’s sold the Loft site for a sum believed to be in or above 2.5m euro, while Joe O’Donovan also purchased the Coal Quay bar next door for a figure understood to be about 4m euros.

      As for OCP plans on an Event Centre at Mahon Point, it seems doubtful. Consider site size, access, land type, proximity to residential (400 new units being developed by McCarthy Developments at Jacobs Island directly next-door), parking etc etc. Although I do agree that the waterfront nature of the site would be attractive, it would be an exceptionally tight/tricky fit. The original plan was for a predominantly public-string (EU etc) funded trade centre.

    • #758150
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      The Loft site will be redeveloped at some future stage, incorporating the Coal Quay bar. It is earmarked for higher order retail use and will likely extend vertically while incorporating the existing, protected limestone facade. Herlihy’s sold the Loft site for a sum believed to be in or above 2.5m euro, while Joe O’Donovan also purchased the Coal Quay bar next door for a figure understood to be about 4m euros.

      As for OCP plans on an Event Centre at Mahon Point, it seems doubtful. Consider site size, access, land type, proximity to residential (400 new units being developed by McCarthy Developments at Jacobs Island directly next-door), parking etc etc. Although I do agree that the waterfront nature of the site would be attractive, it would be an exceptionally tight/tricky fit. The original plan was for a predominantly public-string (EU etc) funded trade centre.

      I dont think i’d like the idea of any event centre at Mahon point. For one traffic is bad enough as it is without 4000 more cars having to add to it. I think it should be kept as close to the city centre and docklands as possible. The new Water street bridge should help facilitate the plan at the showgrounds.

      As for Cornmarkt street, i think a development at the Loft/Coal quay bar could be really nice but it would have to be respectful and really classy. I think a little postmodern Romanseque could do the trick here. Maybe, i dunno.

      Any sign of work starting on the Grand parade plaza yet??? I thought it said in the news like, last April work was due to commence in a few weeks. Its amazing the amount of other big projects that have come and gone in the space this project has lain idle, surely excavations must be long over! I though i saw them pouring in concrete for the basement carpark ages ago.

    • #758151
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      As for Cornmarkt street, i think a development at the Loft/Coal quay bar could be really nice but it would have to be respectful and really classy. I think a little postmodern Romanseque could do the trick here. Maybe, i dunno.

      One site on Cornmarket Street, which has potential for a nice infill mixed use – possibly retail in the main – development is that infill site between the Paintwell Limited premises and The Loft. Currently it serves as a parking area and pedestrian corridor onto North Main Street. The site backs onto the rear of a number of structures facing North Main Street. A clever, stylish development could potentially be realised here – whilst maintaining and promoting the pedestrian corridor route between the 2 streets (Cornmarket and North Main Street). Consideration will have to be applied to the Bodega structure, given its nature, but depending on the shoulder height proposed for any redevelopment of the Loft & Coal Quay Bar, conceivably, a new building of 6-storeys (on par with the Rockfell proposal across the street) could be constructed here with a nice mixed of retail, leisure, restaurant and perhaps some residential elements on the upper floors.


      Infill site just out of frame – to the right of Paintwell Limited premises.

    • #758152
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Aer Arann cutting service from 9 – 3 a day is partially a reaction to Ryanair but also because of a big expansion on the Isle of Man to Liverpool and Manchester.

    • #758153
      Planogram
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      Given that we are on the subject of Cork Airport, what is the reaction to the new terminal? Last time I passed through, the cladding and glazing were almost complete. It does look good, but this should be a given considering the cost. HOK were the principal architects I believe, and I imagine the interior is well designed and functional. Originally, the plans called for the addition of a new control tower and a taxiway paralell to the runway, but these were ditched (probably not much need for them in any case).
      Leaving aside the fact that the airport was built on top of a hill (fog, crosswinds, etc), there is limited room to expand the runways! And a new upgraded CAT III nevigation system would be expensive to implement given the geographic location.
      Operationally, my real hope was EasyJet would expand their services and develop a base in Cork, and I am sure that Ryanair had them in mind when going on the Gatwick route. Aer Lingus have drastically improved their service in Cork over the past two years and they certainly cannot be blamed for the collapse of Jet Magic. I think Aer Arann got too complacent and their service standards were slipping in any case. Frequency was their real advantage but since that will soon deteriorate, the train looks like the best option once the hourly service starts off. Interesting times lie ahead.
      Finally, an American friend recently flew into Cork, hired a car, and all was going swimmingly till they hit ‘The Magic Roundabout’. He called it the ‘the gates of hell’ but survived to tell the tale. I pity anyone, local or visitor, who has to navigate that. Surely it is the worst road design in Ireland.

      Aer Arann may in theory offer more frequent services, but texting me earlier today as I disembarked to say that my return flight this afternoon was delayed by an hour is not the way to win business.

      I need dependability, and punctuality: both are attributes that Ryanair have in abundance compared to Aer Arann. Throw in speedier trips, more comfortable modern planes rather then the old Air Liberte cast offs that Aer Arann use, and finally fares that are half the price and frankly for business people it’s a no brainer.

      And you can get the aircoach from the Airport to the centre of Dublin (which let’s face it, is a quite small city by European standards) for €4.

    • #758154
      lexington
      Participant

      The submission date is gone and the OPW are expected to make a decision on the winning bid for the new Revenue Commissioners offices in Cork. The RC will seek to relocate to approx. 80,000sq ft of new offices, with a possible option on more, housing up to 600 staff relocated from their existing premises at Government Buildings on Sullivans Quay. A tender was opened for submissions on new office space for the RC at the start of the year (2005) with an original March deadline set for submissions – this date was subsequently extended until September 24th. The proposed deal between the OPW and the successful bid includes a land-swap of the 3/4 acre Government Buildings site on Sullivans Quay which homes the 8-storey office block, which suffers from subsidence issues. The developer who attains the site will acquire not only a long-term, valuable tenant for their office development, but also a superb city centre site capable of a large-scale, landmark development only a stone’s throw across the southern Lee Channel from Grand Parade.

      A number of bids were submitted to the OPW – however I can reliably tell you that 3 bids in particular have been given very serious consideration, among them, Cork’s largest ever proposed office development at St. Patrick’s Quay by Paul Kenny, designed by Wilson Architecture. The Kenny development is currently the subject of a 3rd party and 1st party appeal.

      The other entries include McCarthy Developments, with an 8-storey, 100,000sq ft office building designed by Oisin Creagh of Murray O’Laoire Architects, along Centre Park Road. The Shipton Group with a large-scale 80,000sq ft area of office space currently under construction at Blackpool Retail Park (however, it is understood that the Group are proceeding with the marketing of this project irrespective and have a number of interested parties lined up). Frank Sheahan & Joe Carey have also offered a site of theirs between Blackpool and the city centre. OFC are believed to have pitched their BTC office campus – but the OPW have expressed a preference for a city centre site and given a 2km max. distance from Kent Station as a qualifying dimension.

      The Kenny development (which was tailor-made for the RC) would seem the popular favourite among many (given its landmark design, locational relevance and proximity to Kent Station – an OPW requirement) however, the ready to go nature of offers proposed, like that of McCarthy Developments and The Shipton Group may sway a final decision. The final decision will be a landmark coup for the winning developer, open up the option of another large-scale and exciting city centre development and quite possibly decide the fate of some prospective developments already proposed.


      (McCarthy Developments Centre Park Road Office Development)

    • #758155
      Leesider
      Participant

      as regards the patrick’s quay development do you see this going ahead if they don’t get the Revenue deal?? Would be a shame to lose this development.

    • #758156
      lexington
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      as regards the patrick’s quay development do you see this going ahead if they don’t get the Revenue deal?? Would be a shame to lose this development.

      With over 120,000sq ft of office space, subject to appeal success, it would be a big gamble as a stand alone all-in-one go project. However the development consists of 2 buildings interlinked. Mr. Kenny, may decide to build the development in phases and facilitate a more extended tenancy allocation period providing a greater degree of sustainability. One must consider that this project would be up against a number of other very large office projects coming on stream. However, given the tailor-made nature of the building, it is really up for question. One only Mr. Kenny I think could best answer. He has put a substantial investment it getting this project off the ground, from acquiring the neigbouring premises to refusing offers for his site of up to 8 and 10m euros. So if that’s a guide as to his confidence or his commitment to the project, you can interpret it yourself best. I do know the project is well thought of by the OPW.

    • #758157
      Pug
      Participant

      anyone know whats going on the site directly opposite the side entrance to The Turners Cross tavern around the corner from the church? Supples are in there :confused:

    • #758158
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      anyone know whats going on the site directly opposite the side entrance to The Turners Cross tavern around the corner from the church? Supples are in there :confused:

      A new sheltered housing scheme for Cork City Council, including: Construction of 18 no. apartments incorporating 17 no. apartments on three floors and a community facility at ground level with 1 no. apartment overhead. Jack Healy, City Architect is behind the design.



      *UPDATES*

      😮 Cumnor Construction have sought to increase their permitted Sunday’s Well apartment development, designed by Jack Coughlan & Associates by 5 further apartment units, from 22 to 27. 5 additional parking spaces are to be provided as well as increases in the size of 7 permitted units.

    • #758159
      Pug
      Participant

      cheers for that info re turners cross lex, you’re a beautiful human being

    • #758160
      who_me
      Participant

      Has anyone seen the designs for the Eden development in Blackrock? Considering the hefty price tags (385,000+ for a mid-sized 2 bed apartment), I thought the design is nothing special. It actually looks a lot to me like ’70s council housing, except in good nick!

    • #758161
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      cheers for that info re turners cross lex, you’re a beautiful human being

      Flattery will get you everywhere with me! ]who_me[/B] I agree the design is nothing special – especially considering the price tags, which is a pity really. Very basic. Indeed the finishes may be good quality, but unfortunately they are not satisfactorily reflected on the outer design. Just my own opinion.

    • #758162
      Pug
      Participant

      where does one find views of Eden hall in Blackrock? HOK website doesnt show :confused: it

    • #758163
      lisam
      Participant

      Lisney and Hooke & Macdonald are the slling agents for Eden in Blackrock. There is a dedicated website for the project but its not up and running properly yet. http://www.edenblackrock.ie

      Eden Hall is the student accomodation at the Tennis Village on the Model Farm Road.

    • #758164
      lexington
      Participant

      @lisam wrote:

      Lisney and Hooke & Macdonald are the slling agents for Eden in Blackrock. There is a dedicated website for the project but its not up and running properly yet. http://www.edenblackrock.ie

      Eden Hall is the student accomodation at the Tennis Village on the Model Farm Road.

      And the Frank Ennis & Associates designed scheme at Eden Hall can be looked at here -> Eden Hall. The developers are Myraoak (David Corr, Joe McCarthy et al). Certainly, weighing up the various student developments around Cork, Eden Hall seems much more the ‘well-rounded’ project, with a generally strong design and mixed of activities from leisure to recreational to accommodation. Brian McCarthy Construction seem to have done a good job on the finishes also. Niall Fitzsimons were Consulting Engineers. The only bother about it, I would claim, is its peripheral location – although CIT is not too distant away.

    • #758165
      Hoborg
      Participant

      We all knowledgable CAD people know, how one designs building like that:
      1. Take some old dwg of fairly decent apartments
      2. Mirror it in relation to X
      3. Copy to the left
      4. Mirror again along Y
      5. Job ready

      Cheers,

      Hoborg

    • #758166
      lexington
      Participant

      Apologises for the delay – but please find the RORSA designs for Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy’s Crow’s Nest redevelopment plan. The development includes 74 apartments over a dual-deck 112 space basement car-park; the building generally 6-storeys in height will include a 15-storey, 50m tower element, restaurant, bar and 4 large commercial units at ground floor.

      I’ll let you decide for yourself. (Excuse the first image)


      Perspective of the development from O’Neill Crowley Bridge (scanner blur/light penetration)


      Carrigrohane/Northern Elevation Persepctive.



      *UPDATES*

      😎 Bernard Crowley and Gerald Paul have submitted Significant Unsolicited Further Information on their original plans to construct a 6/7 storey building of 67 apartment units over basement car-park (44 space) and gym. Numerous objections have been lodged against the proposal destined for the former Riverside Farm on the Model Farm Road. The Dennehy + Dennehy designed building is located to the west of Rossbrook housing estate and across the road from the new Eden Hall Student development by Myraoak Limited, designed by Frank Ennis & Associates. The new proposal has made a number of reductions and alterations to floor-plans. Among the changes is a drop in height to 6-storeys max. The building then slopes lower backing toward Rossbrook to the east and south.


      View of the western elevation along the Model Fram Road.



      For those of you interested – I will update my last post on bidders for the new Revenue Commissioners office premises with an image of the McCarthy Developments (Tom and Michelle McCarthy) proposal (already cleared through planning) of a 100,000sq ft 8-storey office development along Centre Park Road (adjoining Centre Park House – McCarthy Developments HQ) on the former Goldcrop site. The building is designed by Oisin Creagh of Murray O’Laoire. To see images of the other rival bid, that of Paul Kenny, those images can be found earlier in this thread.


      (McCarthy Developments Centre Park Road Office Development)

    • #758167
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Centre park road looks very nice. Sleek, modern, etc.

      Crows nest….well….doesn’t!
      Forget about its effect on a listed building (which makes it a big no, no) it looks a bit like a spanish block of holiday apartments to me. It would also have made more sense to group tall (but not as tall as presently proposed) buildings leading up to County Hall from either side. Would put the emphasis on County Hall.

      Using LEXINGTON’S IMAGE, I’ve highlighted just how much of an obstruction it will be to County Hall. I suppose we could argue whether or not County Hall should be oscured. I for one think it shouldn’t.
      County Hall (what’s left of it) is highlighted in red.

    • #758168
      who_me
      Participant

      I quite like the Crow’s Nest plans. I have to admit though, I’m firmly in the “let’s hide the County Hall” camp!

      I’m not sure how we can group tall buildings together (as many people favour) if we also need to space them out to prevent views being obstructed. We have to pick one or the other – I’ve a coin ready to flip if anyone’s interested! 😉

    • #758169
      A-ha
      Participant

      Oh my God…. is that supposed to be a multi story car park? If they are going to block out County Hall, they might as well do it with something attractive… not a dirty old grey concrete building. I’m not all against it though, a few changes and it should look ok, but I’m sure someone will point it out to the planning authorities sooner or later. As for the building on Centre Park Road…. it’s really nice, very European, looks as if it was sent stright over from Brussels. And Eden Hall… student accomadation…. hmm, which do I prefer, Eden Hall or Victoria Mills…. hmm , that’s a hard one. It’s stunning, looks as if alot of time and money went into it, unlike it’s glorified shoebox friend Victoria Mills.

    • #758170
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Is it just me or does anyone else think Reddy O’riordan staehli have dived lately these days. Is it the Reddy influence?? I dunno but i think the last thing they produced that was maybe somewhat decent was the new St. johns college. Everything else seems to have been boring boxy and bland. The Crows nest development is another clear example that joins the ranks of the Lavitts qy hotel (both designs!), CUH extension etc for bland design. Ive no problem with a tall building going up on the Crows nest site, in fact i think it should be taller to act as a proper landmark and not try and block off County hall half assed but properly, but if this is the design standard theyre going to produce, forget about it!

      ps. Centre park road building looks very sleek indeed. Think McCarthys will go ahead and build it even if the Revenue go to Saint patricks qy??? Still prefer the Kenny proposal though, think its much better suited and REALLY hope it goes ahead. 🙂

    • #758171
      A-ha
      Participant

      I agree, you can’t beat the Kenny proposal for St. Patricks Qy. I really like it so so much, What’s the storey with Water Street? I haven’t heard anything about it in ages.

    • #758172
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I agree, you can’t beat the Kenny proposal for St. Patricks Qy. I really like it so so much, What’s the storey with Water Street? I haven’t heard anything about it in ages.

      An Oral Hearing date has been set for October 11/13th 2005 in the Gresham Metropole Hotel on MacCurtain Street, 10AM. A decision will then be made by ABP on November 24th 2005. Should a positive decision be forthcoming, Werdna will seek to get the project rolling not too long afterwards.

      ewankennedy, indeed I also would have a preference for the Kenny proposal – however the McCarthy Developments plan for Centre Park Road is a good quality proposal and I would like to think McDev would proceed with it irrespective of the OPW decision.

    • #758173
      A-ha
      Participant

      Thanks lex, and Nov. 24th… thats like ages away, but seen as I waited this long, I might aswell hang on again for another two months. What do you think the outcome will be? Me fingers are crossed as usual, Oh and for anyone thinking of using the tunnel tomorrow…. don’t! My sister was stuck in there for over an hour this morning, for a journey that usually takes thirty seconds… an hour is abit much for anyone, all the police told everyone to turn off their engines ‘cos they were in the tunnel for so long…. Damn farmers clogging up all the roads. I had a doss day at school though, five or six of the teachers couldn’t make it in with all the traffic.

    • #758174
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Looking at the photos and considering the development in the location it is going to be in I would have to say a big NO to the Crow’s Nest plan. If it does go ahead, trying to get in and out of the development in a car would be close to impossible considering the volume of traffice that uses the Carrigrohane Straight.

      Also, thinking about it’s location in terms of height, lets say if it did go ahead, you would have a building 50 metres in height and then the Victoria Mills student accomodation and then the County Hall giving a total imbalance of height. At least with the County Hall the concourse area with the new building seens roughly the same height as the Victoria Mills student accomodation. Granted though it suddenly gets a hell of a lot taller. It still fits in well and I think the redeveloped County Hall will look fantastic when it is finished.

      I love projects that have the same ideas like the Water Street and the Eglington Street projects but I think a fine line has to be drawn as to where these buildings should be built and I really don’t think the Crows Nest is a suitable location. Besides if I had my way, all those appartment complexes in the area should be knocked down. They really don’t complement the area at all. They all look as if they have be thrown together, which is a shame. And that’s my opinion on that.

    • #758175
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      i dont see a problem with ‘higher’ buildings at Victoria Cross/County Hall area. There is a precedent there for height, it is a very strong visual gateway to the city – the Cork High Buildings Study identiofied three locations in the city where tall buildings could be accommodated – Docklands, Blackpool and County Hall/Victoria X area. I think the argument put out against developments based on the fact that they block other buildings is somewhat overstated and meaningless in an urban situation.

      Cities, by definition, are a concentration of structures in close proximity and there are few examples of buildings that command uninterrupted views from every angle, aspect and distance. The proposal at Crows Nest should not simply be judged in terms of its impact on County Hall – which, remember, was one of the most whinged-about buildings in the city – the proposal should be assessed on its own merits as well as its relationship/impact on surrounding areas.

      BTW – is Eden Hall one of the cheapest looking buildings I have ever seen? Cheap, 1990’s, pastiche crap. Give me Victoria Mills any day. Re Water St – I have a feeling the board will leave the decision as it is – possibly overuling the inspectors report – just a hunch

    • #758176
      Pug
      Participant
      lisam wrote:
      Lisney and Hooke & Macdonald are the slling agents for Eden in Blackrock. There is a dedicated website for the project but its not up and running properly yet. http://www.edenblackrock.ie
      QUOTE]

      Not sure how i managed to get everyone talking about Eden Hall Student Village but does anyone have pictures of the Eden in Blackrock??

      As for the Crows Nest plan well, two ways to look at it. One, building doesnt look the greatest, a sticklebrick with concrete on it. Two, Cork has at last moved to the point where we are arguing about the designs of fairly tall buildings for this city. All we have to do now is get the transport sorted. An hour to come in from douglas this morning in a car.

    • #758177
      Radioactiveman
      Participant


      An Bord Pleanala have refused Allied Irish Bank permission to demolish their existing branch at the junction of Watercourse Road and O’Connell Street in Blackpool and replace it with a new branch building.
      The development had previously been granted permission by CCC on 3rd May this year but was appealled to ABP by Kathleen Lynch TD on the 25th May.
      The design by BCG Architects was contemporary and would have replaced a building which is showing its age. 17 staff parking places and an ATM facility was also included. Third party submissions to CCC were concerned with the severe alteration to the building line at Watercourse Road, as the proposed building would encroach onto what is now open (although privately -owned) space; Drainage issues were also a concern to local residents.
      The proposed design was two-storey stepping down to single storey at the corner of the two boundary streets and was clad in sanded limestone with polished limestone highlights. The CCC report concluded that the development “meets the challenges of the site in an inventive manner and satisfies the objectives of the Development Plan in relation to high quality design.”

      This is unfortunate, I’d agree with CCC on this one, the design was simple, imaginative and would have fitted the area, while at the same time giving it a deservedly modern boost. I am as yet unaware of the reasoning behind ABP’s refusal but will be interested to find out. I’ll need a lot of convincing.

    • #758178
      Mob79
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      BTW – is Eden Hall one of the cheapest looking buildings I have ever seen? Cheap, 1990’s, pastiche crap.

      What is with the ground floor parking! unbelievable somebody could think thats an acceptable solution, and then there’s the glass columns…..

    • #758179
      who_me
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      Not sure how i managed to get everyone talking about Eden Hall Student Village but does anyone have pictures of the Eden in Blackrock??

      I have the brochure here, but no scanner at the moment. If no one else has them, I’ll try and and get some up this evening.

    • #758180
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      How it be reconciled having CCC designate Victoria Cross an area suitable for tall buildings but by desiring the preservation of the view of a building in the RPS (i.e. County Hall) effectively block tall buildings in the area!!!

    • #758181
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Cork County Council have granted Gerard Corkery planning permission for 127 new residential units (32 semi-detached, 38 terraced, 14 duplexes and 28 apartments) along with a creche, new sports facility (including club house, 3 new pitches, tennis courts and basketball court) all at lands at Poulavone, Carrigrohane near Ballincollig. Dennehy + Dennehy are responsible for the design.

      🙂 Meanwhile O’Flynn Construction have been granted planning to develop a new 100 bedroom hotel not far away at their Ballincollig Town Centre development. The proposal will include a restaurant, public bar, board room, leisure centre, function room, chilled yard, generator, switch room and E.S.B. sub-station, car parking, 2 no. vehicular acesses, removal of boundary wall and ruin, vehicular accesses and associated site development works.

      😎 O’Shea Leader have head up design and engineering on the Blackline Properties proposal for Carrigaline of 66 no. dwellinghouses with garages for 9 no. dwellings, 6 no. apartments at Ballea Road in
      Carrigaline – which also received permission.

      🙂 John Gately has been permitted planning for 8 2-storey holiday homes and a new leisure centre at his Vienna Woods Hotel in Lotamore, Glanmire. The leisure centre will include a fitness element along with swimming pools, sauna, steam room, jacuzzi, creche and gym.

      🙂 Michael McNamara Construction are shortly set to erect their 1st tower crane over the €32m 60,000sq ft Boole Library Extension at UCC. The library is designed by US-based SBRA and Wilson Architecture. It will include a new Postgraduate Research area and new archive storage areas, as well as new study and research areas for general student usage. The library is scheduled for completion by the 2007 Academic Term. A further tower crane will be erected at a later date.

    • #758182
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      A planning application is about to be submitted to CCC for the demolition of no.’s 37, 38, 39 and 40 Shandon Street (pictured). It will be proposed that a mixed use development be built in its place. This will include a Cafe at street level, a number of medical/dentist units and a large number of apartments.
      Number 39 has been derelict for as long as I can remember, number 40 has been badly maintained since Castle Cleaners moved out a few years ago and 37 and 38 could do with a bit of TLC.
      Nevertheless, I don’t know if i’d favour demolition in this case. Certainly not for all of the buildings.


      From left to right, numbers 37, 38, 39 and 40 Shandon Street.


      Derelict number 39.


      Close up of number 37.

    • #758183
      lexington
      Participant
      who_me wrote:
      I quite like the Crow’s Nest plans. I have to admit though, I’m firmly in the “let’s hide the County Hall” camp!

      I’m not sure how we can group tall buildings together (as many people favour) if we also need to space them out to prevent views being obstructed. We have to pick one or the other – I’ve a coin ready to flip if anyone’s interested! ]

      I think Cork County Hall has a certain symbolic appeal to it as well – it has an arrogant beauty about it, however, that said, I would not oppose the development of a tall structure within its surrounds. My problem with the Crow’s Nest proposal is that it’s not a particularly aesthetically pleasing one, in my own personal opinion. If it wants to justify it’s height and location, it needs to prove it through design The Crow’s Nest site is a unique one, the current proposal fails to take advantage of this – why can’t the design avail of the Victoria Cross corner curvature, providing nice round, glass fronted curves and providing better incorporation of its finishes into an overall slender form. A distinctive shape could stretch taller than the current plan because a sleek design could justify such distinctive merits. For some reason this proposal reminds me of the Treasury Holdings Barrow Street proposal designed by Anthony Reddy. I have no objection to the principle of the proposal, but the design just doesn’t do it for me – which is a shame because RORSA are well capable of doing better than this. 🙁

    • #758184
      lexington
      Participant

      Given Bucholz McEvoy Architects contention for the RIAI Gold Medal, I thought it may be worth looking at the firm’s recent Cork completion, the UCC Environmental Research Insitute (ERI) built off campus on lands donated by CCC near the city’s Lee Road WaterWorks. The 3-storey building provides 2890m sq of laboratories, offices and meeting rooms with an adjacent car parking to house approx. 60 researchers. The project started on site in January 2004 and was completed in mid-2005. Micheal Martin, then Minister for Health & Children, officiated at the unveiling of the foundation plaque for the Environmental Research Institute on 19th July 2004. John Sisk & Son Ltd were responsible for the construction, while M.C. O’Sullivan Ltd acted as Consulting Engineers.


      (View of the Southern, River Facing Elevation)


      (Lee Road [Northern] Elevation)

    • #758185
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Following on from the succesful appeal to ABP regarding AIB’s Watercourse Road branch, the report has become available specifying the reasoning behind the refusal.
      The successful appealent argued that the proposed development was alien to the area of mostly 19th century buildings, it would detract from the open space at the junction of Watercourse Road and O’Connell Street, more consideration should be taken considering the site is of historical significance (Seamus Murphy had his workshops there) and that there is severe drainage issues.

      The ABP inspector supported the assertion that the new building would be alien to the area, while arguing that the existing building was of little value and should also be removed. The inspector noted that this is an oppurtunity “to provide a building, which would harmonise with the character of the area.”
      The removal of a landscaped area in front of the existing bank was also seen by the inspector as a reason to refuse: “an area of attractive landscaping, containing trees and shrubs behind a metal fence, deemed to be an area for anti social behaviour and a gathering ground for litter by the applicant, would be lost. This I feel would be unfortunate. More preferable, in my view, would be to incorporate this area into an approach to the entrance to the bank premises. The area, which faces south and represents a sun trap against the gable to the public house, could be offered to the Council as a public amenity, sitting out area.”

      This is an idea which no doubt will find a lot of favour with local residents. Especially if Seamus Murphy could be honoured by some appropriate plaque or sculpture in this area.

      At the end of the day the appeal was upheld for one reason:
      “The site of the bank premises occupies a prominent corner site at the junction of Watercourse Road and O’Connell Street in the Blackpool area of Cork City. Whilst it is an objective in the Cork City Development Plan 2004 to encourage the renewal of the Blackpool area, it is considered that the proposed single storey / two storey contemporary flat roof design of the bank premises would detract from the predominantly two to three storey design and traditional character of other residential and commercial properties in the area. In addition, the proposed bank premises would also result in the loss of an attractive area of soft landscaping and taken together, it is considered that the proposed bank premises would seriously injure the visual amenities of the area.”

      I have to say, having watched this planning process with interest, I was shocked that ABP upheld the appeal. While the reasons given are valid enough, they seem to indicate a much softer side of ABP 🙂

      I wonder will the same approach be taken when dealing with Frinailla’s Lady’s Well Proposal down the street?

    • #758186
      altuistic
      Participant

      Very disappointed in this design. I don’t approve of this being constructed. At the very least I would not settle for anything over 9 floors at this site, even still the existing Crows Nest bar is a pleasant building as it is and don’t see why it should be compromised. I am confident that this proposal will not meet planning approval in its current form. Something mindaltering and amazing would really be needed to convince me of this development.

    • #758187
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I have to say, having watched this planning process with interest, I was shocked that ABP upheld the appeal. While the reasons given are valid enough, they seem to indicate a much softer side of ABP 🙂

      I wonder will the same approach be taken when dealing with Frinailla’s Lady’s Well Proposal down the street?

      I don’t know if I’d say “softer”. Personally I don’t agree that those reasons should qualify for a refusal. Makes you wonder sometimes if ABP have a quota to meet! 😀 But seriously, the hard landscaping to the Watercourse Road elevation is hardly “attractive” and the if the 2/3 storeys of the surrounding areas are the benchmark for this proposal – then the existing building is far more out of place than the refused. Hmmm. Makes one wonder.

    • #758188
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      if the 2/3 storeys of the surrounding areas are the benchmark for this proposal – then the existing building is far more out of place than the refused. Hmmm. Makes one wonder.

      Exactly the pointed ABP made. The inspector supported the idea of demolishing the present bank, but suggested that this oppurtunity should be taken to replace it with something that IS in keeping with surrounding buildings. I suppose thats a fair enough point and we cant really complain- what they’re saying is that we want a really good building for this important site. I dont think anyone would disagree. Now we need to come to an agreement about what constitutes a really good building 🙂 We could be here a while!

      Seriously Lex, if you were to make a “guesstimate” – How will Lady’s Well get on at ABP? Anybody else want to hazard a guess?

    • #758189
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Seriously Lex, if you were to make a “guesstimate” – How will Lady’s Well get on at ABP? Anybody else want to hazard a guess?

      I dare speak! 😀 If I was hedging my bets, I’d still probably put more money on a “grant with revised conditions”. Hopefully conditions that don’t NOR the proposal and knock another floor off the project. 😉 It’s a good project – CCC know it (hence the little intervention), the community knows it (except for a certain few) and I think ABP will trump it on the crunch date. I just hope I’m not proven wrong. 😮

    • #758190
      Pug
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I wonder will the same approach be taken when dealing with Frinailla’s Lady’s Well Proposal down the street?

      Thats an amazing decision to refuse the building. How will a new development stay in keeping with the old buildings in the area. Do they actually want to hold on to the 19th century designs?? I’d be wrried if I was Frinailla if thats the line the ABP are taking. Whats the point in extensive pre planning talks with City Planners then if ABP will just wander in and pander to local politicians?

      In fairness to Kathleen Lynch now, she has managed to keep an eyesore still standing in an area already in DIRE need of a revamp.

    • #758191
      who_me
      Participant

      Pictures of Eden development in Blackrock, as promised. Apologies for the quality, they’re taken from a brochure with a camera phone!!

      I wouldn’t call them ugly at all, but considering they’re possibly the most expensive new development in Cork (per sq. foot) in the last few years, I was pretty underwhelmed.

    • #758192
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      Pictures of Eden development in Blackrock.
      I wouldn’t call them ugly at all, but considering they’re possibly the most expensive new development in Cork (per sq. foot) in the last few years, I was pretty underwhelmed.

      What is it about O’Mahony pike architects style?? I’ve been looking at their other projects like up in Dublin and they all seem to me the same. Very simple, very bland but they do bland and simple very well, its like their architecture is lost in the past somewhere. The Eden design just looks so boring. theres no flair or excitement to their architecture. Is this what we can expect from Horgans qy? :confused:

      The architects that have impressed me most lately are Wilson architects, James Leahys, Coughlan Dekeyser and maybe Murray O’Loaire.

      PS. (and Hogans are really good too sometimes!)

    • #758193
      lexington
      Participant

      Ambitious developers Frinailla are to lodge plans for an impressive new redevelopment plan on the strategically located site, formerly that of the Dennehy family, at Dennehy’s Cross. The Dennehy Garage premises were sold to Frinailla earlier this year in a deal estimated to be valued at around the €20m euro mark – since that time, architects O’Mahony Pike have been enlisted to devise a landmark scheme of 163 mixed residential units (59 x 1, 86 x 2 and 18 x 3 bedroom) with 218 car-parking spaces provided over 3 half levels and numerous commercial units (1000m sq) designed for uses such as cafes, retail and other local, community based service activities (including a new post office, pharmacy, restaurant, beauty salon, convenience retail, florist etc). The project should bring back many of the local facilities lost to the area over the years consequent of changing market patterns. The landmark scheme will be submitted to CCC Planning Authority tomorrow (30th September 2005) and will seek to revitalise what has become a worn scene in the Dennehy’s Cross locale. Dennehy’s will seek to relocate operations to a new purpose built facility in the coming future. The subject application will concern only the eastern site premises at this time – a subsequent application will be lodged for proposals on the south-western site premises at some future point – the design of which will be noticeably befitting of its immediate surroundings.


      Aerial view of the site (west to east) as it exists.


      A comparison, before and after, for the Victoria Cross Road block elevations (west).


      Stunning view of the southern elevation leading up toward Dennehy’s Cross along Magazine Road. (Large image, beware!)


      New resident ‘green avenue’ – viewed east to west – dividing the 2 blocks.

    • #758194
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Wow, I never realised that Dennehy’s Cross site was so big.
      The development looks nice. Not too tall, and that pointed edge on the southern elevation looks great.
      I’d be a little concerned about what looks like an alleyway on the western elevation but other than that i like it.

      Me liking something Frinailla does – now there’s one for the books. 😀

    • #758195
      pier39
      Participant

      great looking piece. im more of a curves and twists person myself (a la gehry or calatrava) and omp have a very simple sort of approach to their designs but they do simple well and the dennehys cross project shines in that context. love the use of exaggerated sharp angles, they bring a little distinction and fun to a generally standard design. good use of the site too. the green corridor breaks up the blocks nicely a provides for nice sunlight penetration at varying times of the day. pity omp didnt show the same flair at blackrock.

      and radioactiveman i think frinailla are steadily becoming more design conscious and it shows. nice to see. ocallaghans and oflynns seem to be heading that direction too and its very positive for cork as a whole. if obrien/oflynn and fleming catch up now too we’ll be flying it!!! 😉 i hope frinailla keep demanding more of their design teams and aim for more innovative shapes and forms, as for all the other big developers. it’ll be important for their business and development environments more and more so as things progress because i think the public at large are themselves becoming more design conscious and demand higher standards from developers.

    • #758196
      Pug
      Participant

      dennehys cross looks smashing in fairness – i definetely think Cork has come on in leaps and bounds in such a short while. A decent bus service now with a tram system for the main streets (missed opportunity Patrick St) and a nightlink and we will be set.

      The amount of money floating around is unbelievable. People have to have money to buy them and Frinailla need money to build them and will still come out with handsome profits.

    • #758197
      brainscan
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      What is it about O’Mahony pike architects style??

      Well I think they will answer their critics with this project. 🙂 Fabulous looking development for an area that could really need a bit of rejuvination. I live close by and i would be great to have a village type amenity close by that is not totally student orientated. I just hope the CAHRA brigade wont throw a spanner in the works 🙁

      Well done to Frinailla for showing some imagination.

    • #758198
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 A very interesting little development on historic Sheare’s Street – Michael Bradley has enlisted Magee Creedon to design a new 4-storey building in place of the prominent single-storey fast-food unit. The building is to comprise of a retail unit over basement and ground floor levels, 1st floor office space and an apartment over 2nd and 3rd floor levels with a roof-top garden. The building is a unique idea on such a small premises and given its location, let’s hope Magee Creedon provide a building to be admired.

      🙂 Frinailla can expect a decision date for their Dennehy’s Cross development come November 24th 2005 (same as Water Street appeal outcome), however it remains to be seen whether this date holds. Hmmm. 😉

    • #758199
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Not so long ago I noted that Dunnes Stores would be looking to build on its discussions with CCC by lodging an application for the redevelopment of it’s “birth” store premises along St. Patrick’s Street. Well, Dunnes Stores are now ready to lodge that very application for a massive €30m redevelopment of the historic premises. Dunnes will seek to demolish all existing structures on its 0.024 hectare site bounded by Bowling Green Street to the west, William O’Brien Street to the east, Drawbridge Street to the north and Saint Patrick’s Street to the south – however the St. Patrick’s Street facades at numbers 103, 104 and 105 will be retained and incorporated into this impressive new scheme. Permission will seek to construct a new 6-storey over basement commercial and retail building with convenience retail (predominantly grocery, off-licence etc) at basement level and comparison retail over the remaining 5 levels – among which, a new public restaurant facility will be provided. The gross floor area of the new project will total 13, 863m sq and is located across Bowling Green Street from a new €150m retail, residential and office development set to be lodged by O’Callaghan Properties later in October. This project signals the 1st of at least 3 new major retail development projects earmarked for the Patrick’s Street area over the coming months and years. Design on the project is by Bertie Pope & Associates.


      The Dunnes Stores redevelopment site can be seen hightlighted in blue.

      (Images and further details soon.)

    • #758200
      altuistic
      Participant

      I’ll be honest, its not what I was expecting. I live nearby and was quite frankly dreading the prospect of this development. As a standalone proposal it looks quite pleasant but i would be concerned at how it looks when viewed from the crossroads. A part of me is undecided on this but i don’t see this proposal detracting significantly from our area. Personally i’m a little more concerned at how the other proposal for the car showrooms will look as it is deeper in the bosom of some very sensitive homes. Cleary a 5 storey type building in this location would be utterly unsuited no matter how good the design is. I’ll await anxiously and will need a lot of convincing. But for the time being, i suppose I’m pleasantly surprised to some extent and see how this could be a valuable rather than negative addition to the area. Owner occupiers will be important to tag though.

    • #758201
      Pug
      Participant

      on the ball lexy, the county library has put in a planning application for the Carrigrohane Road for a 6 storey building

    • #758202
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Dunnes will seek to demolish all existing structures on its 0.024 hectare site bounded by Bowling Green Street to the west, William O’Brien Street to the east, Drawbridge Street to the north and Saint Patrick’s Street to the south – however the St. Patrick’s Street facades at numbers 103, 104 and 105 will be retained and incorporated into this impressive new scheme.

      I was just about to throw a big hissy fit until I noticed the facades are being retained! 🙂 At least one of them is quite attractive!

      This should be a great boost to the area, should it go through. Am I right in thinking Bowling Green St. itself will be redeveloped and some retail units may front onto this street? If so, that could add significant new retail frontage to the Patrick St. area, which could use some to counter spiralling rents, to be honest.

    • #758203
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Today, Friday 30th September 2005, has been something of a triple bonus day for large-scale development in Cork. First came the announcement of Frinailla’s exciting Dennehy’s Cross redevelopment, then news of a €30m redevelopment of Dunnes Stores’ Patrick’s Street premises into a brand new 6-storey retail centre of some 13, 863m sq, now Blarney-based John Cleary Developments have confirmed that they are lodging plans for a new 13, 831sq m (just under 150,000sq ft) retail and office development at the former Sifco premises near Mahon Point. The development will rise 5-storeys over a dual level basement car-park for 301 spaces, with a further 68 spaces at surface level. The proposed offices will be located over 4 no. ground floor retail showrooms ranging between 700 and 704 sq m gross floor areas – this essentially leaves approx. 11015 sq m of office space available, or 118,564sq ft – more than adequate for say, a tenant such as the Revenue Commissioners? I’ll look into those details early next week. The design is by Coughlan de Keyser Architects. John Cleary Developments have also attained planning permission for a substantial motor-mall on the former Sifco site, and marketing is in full swing.


      Image of MotorMall already proposed by John Cleary Developments for the former Sifco site.

    • #758204
      A-ha
      Participant

      I really like those plans for Dennehy’s Cross. I like the picture of the Southern Elevation. Any updates on the airport? Who was it that usually posted a few pictures now and then? jungle? Urghh, I’m after forgetting! Anyway, I’m keen to see how everything is coming into place. Post anything at all if ye can. Thanks.

    • #758205
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Dunnes have a massive site on St. Patrick Street, a lot of which is going to waste. Its good to see that plans are emerging which will utilise fully this space and further buffer Cork’s main street from the effects of ou-of-town shopping malls.
      However i’d have two main worries:
      1. That proper use would be made of Bowling Green and William O’Brien Street- French Church street would be a good example of the type of development required here. Merchant’s Quay ‘Backs to the street’ philosophy needs to be avoided at all costs. In fairness, from what i can gather, this is in hand.

      2. I’d hate to see the St. Patrick’s Street facades with the new development sitting on its shoulders- in other words, the six-storey proposed should be built back far enough to maintain the building heights on the street.

      Other than these two issues, I cant see this development doing anything but good for Pana 🙂

    • #758206
      lisam
      Participant

      The Retail showrooms and offices are to the rear of the Sifco Site. The Car Showrooms are still going ahead at the front of the site.

    • #758207
      POM
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 Today, Friday 30th September 2005, has been something of a triple bonus day for large-scale development in Cork. First came the announcement of Frinailla’s exciting Dennehy’s Cross redevelopment, then news of a €30m redevelopment of Dunnes Stores’ Patrick’s Street premises into a brand new 6-storey retail centre of some 13, 863m sq, now Blarney-based John Cleary Developments have confirmed that they are lodging plans for a new 13, 831sq m (just under 150,000sq ft) retail and office development at the former Sifco premises near Mahon Point. The development will rise 5-storeys over a dual level basement car-park for 301 spaces, with a further 68 spaces at surface level. The proposed offices will be located over 4 no. ground floor retail showrooms ranging between 700 and 704 sq m gross floor areas – this essentially leaves approx. 11015 sq m of office space available, or 118,564sq ft – more than adequate for say, a tenant such as the Revenue Commissioners? I’ll look into those details early next week. The design is by Coughlan de Keyser Architects. John Cleary Developments have also attained planning permission for a substantial motor-mall on the former Sifco site, and marketing is in full swing.

      The Kenny bid is still the superior proposal in terms of design and location. Plus it has the advantage of planning. The appeal will be the next hurdle. The McCarthy proposal is a good one but do the Revenue Commissioners really want to relocate to Centre Park Road? Maybe a few years down the line but now? Mahon is too peripheral and is disadvantaged time-wise. If it is a stand alone project, then it has Mahon Point offices and NSC to contend with, but will probably successfully soak-up tenants over time.

    • #758208
      sw101
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      I wouldn’t call them ugly at all, .

      the other views look alright, but this elevation is horribly disproportionate. the townhouses on the roebuck development are dealt with much better.

    • #758209
      lexington
      Participant

      Same images as posted by who me, just a little clearer – may help some with their interpretation of the development. Design is by O’Mahony Pike, on lands bought by Lyonshall Limited (Kieran Coughlan and Claire O’Riordan) at the Ursuline Convent in Blackrock, subsequently developed by Pierse Homes and Cobh-based Firestone Developments. Marketed by Hooke & MacDonald (Dublin) and Lisney (Cork). According to Pierse, Phase 1 has sold out and subsequent to the demand, units in Phase 2 have now been released.

      Personally, I’m a much bigger fan of OMP’s work for Frinailla at Dennehy’s Cross, but I’ll let you decide for yourselves. 😮

    • #758210
      A-ha
      Participant

      When is Harvey Norman due to open? I can’t imagine them taking much longer. I heard Hickeys are closing down six of it’s stores in Cork due to the increased competition from B&Q and Atlantic Homecare. It should free up some city centre retail space, maybe even room for redevelopment, interesting to see how things will turn out, although I am sorry to see the company come to an end.

    • #758211
      jungle
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      When is Harvey Norman due to open? I can’t imagine them taking much longer. I heard Hickeys are closing down six of it’s stores in Cork due to the increased competition from B&Q and Atlantic Homecare. It should free up some city centre retail space, maybe even room for redevelopment, interesting to see how things will turn out, although I am sorry to see the company come to an end.

      Where are Hickey’s stores?

      Douglas SC, Oliver Plunkett St/Maylor St, Savoy SC, Ballyvolane SC…

      Is that the company closing down or are they just shutting unprofitable stores?

    • #758212
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Douglas SC, Oliver Plunkett St/Maylor St, Savoy SC, Ballyvolane SC…

      I think you’re confusing HIckey’s DIY and Hickey’s Fabric stores. As far as i’m aware they are two totally unrelated companies.
      Hickey’s DIY have shops in:
      Maylor Street/Oliver Plunkett Street,
      Wilton SC,
      Douglas SC,
      Ballyvolane SC
      and Watercourse Road.

      Oppurtunities for redevelopment would be immediately apparent at Maylor Street/Oliver Plunkett Street and Watercourse Road- another boost for this rapidly changing suburban hub.
      They also have a store in Limerick, trading under a different name (which escapes me now). This will also close.

    • #758213
      Leesider
      Participant

      that’s the company closing down! They have a shop in Wilton as well, it will be interesting what happens the one on Maylor St.

    • #758214
      lisam
      Participant

      They are 2 separate companies.

      The one in Maylor Street should attract a lot of interest as it has an entrance onto Oliver Plunkett Street.

    • #758215
      tomthevet2003
      Participant

      Newsom’s is the shop in Limerick and that will also close

    • #758216
      A-ha
      Participant

      There are no current dates yet to when the stores will close. The company says it will close when it sells off it’s large amount of stock. Yes…. Hickeys Fabric have nothing to do with the DIY chain. The company said it couldn’t compete with the increased competition from B&Q, Atlantic Homecare and Woodies, amongst others. Still, there must be other reasons behind the closure. I can’t imagine a whole chain of stores to shut at the drop of a hat just because the larger chains dictate the price of goods, downsize maybe… but never closure. I presume whatever land they own will be put up for sale, definetly good retail opportunities to be had. Still waiting on any news on the airport if there is some. Any pics. available?

    • #758217
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The design by Magee Creedon for Michael Bradley’s proposed development at 44 Sheare’s Street is a most interesting one and is bound to attract a lot of talk. The proposal is mooted for a tiny corner premises, currently home to a single-storey fast food premises, once popularly known as the “Grub Tub” and later on, “Daytrippers”. The development calls for a 4-storey building over basement with undergound and ground level retail facilities, 1st floor office use, associated with the retail element, and a 2-storey duplex apartment for 1 bedroom. The copper-clad design is very Magee Creedon, with the split level roof-top also providing for a roof-garden. The design reminds me somewhat of a haul-tower on a submarine! It’s an interesting, if not, imaginative use of a small site – though the design is unique to this historic area, it could be quite a nice, individualistic addition.



      Also, I hope to be able to post news on the successful Revenue Commissioners bid shortly.


    • #758218
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 Not so long ago I noted that Dunnes Stores would be looking to build on its discussions with CCC by lodging an application for the redevelopment of it’s “birth” store premises along St. Patrick’s Street. Well, Dunnes Stores are now ready to lodge that very application for a massive €30m redevelopment of the historic premises. Dunnes will seek to demolish all existing structures on its 0.024 hectare site bounded by Bowling Green Street to the west, William O’Brien Street to the east, Drawbridge Street to the north and Saint Patrick’s Street to the south – however the St. Patrick’s Street facades at numbers 103, 104 and 105 will be retained and incorporated into this impressive new scheme. Permission will seek to construct a new 6-storey over basement commercial and retail building with convenience retail (predominantly grocery, off-licence etc) at basement level and comparison retail over the remaining 5 levels – among which, a new public restaurant facility will be provided. The gross floor area of the new project will total 13, 863m sq and is located across Bowling Green Street from a new €150m retail, residential and office development set to be lodged by O’Callaghan Properties later in October. This project signals the 1st of at least 3 new major retail development projects earmarked for the Patrick’s Street area over the coming months and years. Design on the project is by Bertie Pope & Associates.


      The Dunnes Stores redevelopment site can be seen hightlighted in blue.

      (Images and further details soon.)

      lets just hope that mr pope brings us something phenomenonally more tasteful than his student accommodation attempt at victoria cross for flemings!!! this is pana after all boys!

      also i havent seen the magee creedon design on sheares st yet myself but they usually bring something imaginative to their work so i look forward to seeing how it looks.

      also sorry for stealing anyones thunder here but i heard mccarthys are frontrunners for the revenue beauties, even so im secretly holding out for kenny on this one! 😉

    • #758219
      securityman
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      When is Harvey Norman due to open? I can’t imagine them taking much longer. I heard Hickeys are closing down six of it’s stores in Cork due to the increased competition from B&Q and Atlantic Homecare. It should free up some city centre retail space, maybe even room for redevelopment, interesting to see how things will turn out, although I am sorry to see the company come to an end.

      Harvey Norman is going to open on the 20th of October well thats what they are hoping for I was in there yesterday and they are kitting the place out at present it will be open 7 days a week like their competition. Its good news for woodies to as it brings more people to the area.

    • #758220
      lexington
      Participant


      🙂 International retailler Schuh is hoping to open its first Cork store on Patrick’s Street in the near future. The fashionable shoe specialist is applying to CCC for permission to change use on 122 Patrick’s Street to retail use, the installation of a new shop-front, new facade paint scheme and all associated signage. The premises has been recently the subject of a significant structural revamp by Denis Cullinane Limited and let by DTZ Sherry Fitzgerald to the new high-profile tenant.



      🙁 Meanwhile Strikemount Limited, the SPV behind plans to develop a crematorium on Rocky Island, has been taken to ABP following a third party appeal by the Ringaskiddy Residents Association, this follows a successful grant by Cork County Council in permitting Cork’s first such facility.



      😎 John Casey of J & N Murphy Limited have be granted leave to appeal concerning Pitwood Limited’s plans for the Corbett Family owned site at Beasley Street and fronting 17/18 Parnell Place. The James Leahy & Associates designed project was originally proposed to develop 121 bedrooms over 5-storeys, but subsequent of Revised Plans/Further Information, this plan was reduced to 116-bedrooms and a significantly altered Beasley Street facade (see image below). For those of you unfamiliar with Section 37 of the Planning & Development Act 2000, follow the link here.



      😎 Michael Crowley has applied to attain permission on his lands along the Kilumney Road in Ballincollig for a development of 221 new dwellings; including 21 detached houses, 86 semi-detached, 102 townhouses and 6 duplexes. Permission is also sought for 10 serviced sites, creche and amenity provisions.


    • #758221
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Lexington

      I would prefer to see the RevComm and other government departments concentrating their development needs along existing or shortly provided transit corridors – let’s face it if they won’t it’s a bit much expecting the private sector to do so. Putting something at Mahon Point seems very car-centric as the planned transit route in the green route document doesn’t continue beyond Mahon and isn’t due until 2008. Building at Blackpool or Tivoli would bring badly needed regeneration to that area especially if located near IE’s planned railway stations for Mallow/Midleton suburban, or along the Carrigrohane Road QBC.

    • #758222
      lexington
      Participant

      Previously I may have hinted that Manor Park Homes (MPH) headed up by Michael O’Driscoll may have had ‘issues’ with the CCC request to develop a 5,000-seater event centre on the 17-acre lands at Horgan’s Quay – well this has become public with a submission by planning consultants Tom Phillips & Associates on behalf of the developers. Both MPH and CIE are not happy with the NADP (North Area Docklands Plan) published by CCC earlier this year. Indeed MPH have agreed in principal to some of the outlines stated by the council, but following assessments by consulting engineers and design consultants, MPH has concluded that such a centre as part of its development, is not sustainable. Their proposal instead states that a smaller, 2,500 seater centre may be somewhat more feasible on its site, however, in order to do so, it is requesting that CCC allow for a greater provision of retail and leisure uses to support the centre. Such a centre of this size will of course not be immediately welcome as it would provide direct competition to Cork Opera House, and clearly, the city would find it exceptionally difficult to sustain 2 like-sized venues. Despite this fumble, MPH have been very proactively proceeding with other elements of their €500m plan to redevelop the quay. Architects O’Mahony Pike, led by architect Richard Collins, have been jointly working on designs for the scheme with John Gannon of Tom Phillips & Associates acting as Planning Consultants. Other firms are also inputing into the effort. An application which had been supposed for late October earlier in the year, is now understood to be delayed with no set date yet available. CIE are currently waiting a final clearance on funding (as is my understanding at the current point in time) to redevelop Kent Station and provide a new central bus terminus – a gentleman with the company has stated that unlike the previous procrastination, he expects funding to become available very soon at which point CIE will immediately proceed to lodge an application on their €25m euro redevelopment scheme. MPH are expected to work in tangent with plans for under 1,000 high density residential units, a significant retail quarter (subject to CCC approval), leisure provisions, offices and a new plaza area all in what will be a significant 3 phase operation. A waterfront provision for leisure use is also for consideration in coherrence with CCC intentions. However, some elements of this scheme will be subject to discussions currently on-going. It is understood CCC will be discussing the NADP and associated submissions at next Monday night’s council session and will be capable of passing or altering plans up until October 24th 2005. We anxiously await.

      Regarding the Event Centre, 2 other plans are still in formulation/completion – one of these plans has been rumoured to involve 2 well known Cork business figures (that’s not including OCP’s own Mahon Point plan), who up until recently were believed to have stalled their proposals, though talk would now suggest this is no longer so. The other plan has conceived a design and location already but is assessing other issues regarding its development at the moment. Both those proposals are capable of hosting up to 6,000 patrons for various event types. Deadlines are fast approaching and the heat is on more so now than ever. The next few weeks could be interesting.

    • #758223
      Devin
      Participant

      I see Jimmy Page is opening an exhibition of St. Finbarr’s architect William Burges’ work tomorrow night at St. Finbarr’s. Apparently Page is a big fan of Burges’ work. I’d love to have gone to that as I’m a big Led Zeppelin fan (and St. Finbarr’s!) but can’t because I’m away 🙁 . I had an invite and all.

    • #758224
      lexington
      Participant

      Wednesday, September 28, 2005

      Rock star becomes cathedral Page boy

      ROCK legend Jimmy Page is to launch a celebration of the work of the architect behind one of Cork’s most famous landmarks.

      The Led Zeppelin guitarist will be in the city as part of a tribute to William Burgess — who designed the landmark St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral.

      Page — who along with Zeppelin frontman Robert Plant sold millions of records like Whole Lotta Love and Stairway to Heaven — is a fan of Burgess’ work and will open the exhibition entitled Conserving the Dream in Cork’s public museum on October 6.

      St. Fin Barre’s Dean Rev. Michael Burrows said the exhibition would be the cathedral’s most significant contribution to the city’s year as European Capital of Culture.

      Examples of recently restored documents, stained glass window cartoons and plaster working models from the cathedral will be on view.

      The Rev. Burrows said: “These documents and models are examples of the remarkable archival richness of the treasures of St. Fin Barre’s.

      “It is thanks to the generosity of a benefactor it has been possible to restore these examples for exhibition and also a foretaste of what could be put on view if further restoration were to be done.”

      Burgess was appointed architect to build a new cathedral in 1862 after a competition.

      Its foundation stone was laid in 1865 and the building was consecrated in 1870 but the landmark towers and spires were not completed until 1879.

      It is built of Cork limestone and a Bath stone interior with red Cork marble.

      There are about 1,260 pieces of sculpture alone in the cathedral and the Resurrection Angel on the pinnacle of the sanctuary roof was a gift from Burgess.

      Source: IrishAbroad.com

    • #758225
      lexington
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      ]

      Just to update you on this, I was told today that the sale on this site was publicised today, so with that I should probably tell you that the successful bidders on the site were Howard Holdings. The fate of the remaining properties is currently not yet known, but the would offer OFC a nice waterfront vantage considering their permitted Eglinton Street development is relatively land-locked on the 3-acre former sorting office site to the immediate south. Either way, the Howard Holdings acquistion gives the company an enviable dominance either side of the river channel with their City Quarter project along Lapps Quay and now WebWorks and Doyle premises on Albert Quay.

      – as for the Careys Tool Hire site to the east, much speculation has arisen regarding its development. Early on, it was believed that CTH had been making moves to consolidate its extensive premises through activities such as the purchase of the Sextant Bar adjoining it – and with a view to perhaps proposing their own commercial development. However this has yet to be confirmed and CTH may consider selling their site to a developer in 1 or more lots. It terms of business expansion CTH have considered a move from the city centre to more spacious and accessible premises – the progress of this is currently unknown, but it is believed a site or sites have been earmarked for consideration. The purchase of the Sextant allows CTH offer a valuable quay and corner/road frontage in what is the next evolutionary physical step from the city centre-out-to-docklands expansion.


      View of Albert Quay from Michael Collins Bridge – facing south-east.
      (Navigation House can be seen to left with CTH centre and Sextant Bar to right)


    • #758226
      lexington
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 Not so long ago I noted that Dunnes Stores would be looking to build on its discussions with CCC by lodging an application for the redevelopment of it’s “birth” store premises along St. Patrick’s Street. Well, Dunnes Stores are now ready to lodge that very application for a massive €30m redevelopment of the historic premises…The gross floor area of the new project will total 13, 863m sq and is located across Bowling Green Street from a new €150m retail and residential development, designed by Gehl Architects [Copenhagen] & Project Architects [Dublin] (also responsible for Mahon Point, Hartys Quay and Jacobs Island) set to be lodged by O’Callaghan Properties later in October. This project signals the 1st of at least 3 new major retail development projects earmarked for the Patrick’s Street area over the coming months and years. Design on the project is by Bertie Pope & Associates.


      The Dunnes Stores redevelopment site can be seen hightlighted in blue.

      Also, just in the interests of accuracy, it may be worth accounting for the fact that some sources are now indicating that the lodgement date for the Gehl Architects/Project Architects design on Academy Street for O’Callaghan Properties may be later than anticipated or quoted above – possibly early November. However that is yet to be confirmed.

    • #758227
      securityman
      Participant

      Its good to see a name like schuh coming to cork! I see that ESPIRIT are going to Douglas SC

      As for the Manor Park Homes proposal well I think its pointless building something with that capacity what we need is an alternative to the point depot not to the INEC in Killarney. Dublin is the only place with decent venues this shouldnt be the case Cork is the capital of Munster it should have enough people to fill an arena that can hold 6,000 easily with the right acts plus hold exibitions that usually go to the RDS in Dublin. It would be nice for the Dubs to get a weekend away and take in a concert like the rest of the country.

    • #758228
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I agree, it would be a disaster if the event centre that is eventually built is only able to hold 2,500 people.the markee in the showgrounds cleary showed that there is demand for a big venue to be built in cork,any chance you can push someone on this lex?!and its about time names like shuch and harvey norman started coming into cork, my only question is what took them so long,and
      long may it continue.footlocker and the likes will hopefully follow shortly!

    • #758229
      Leesider
      Participant

      in my opinion footlocker are shite, the likes of mahers and cummins are alot better! this is just my opinion but some of the shops we have are better than the multiples that come in!

    • #758230
      lexington
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      I agree, it would be a disaster if the event centre that is eventually built is only able to hold 2,500 people.the markee in the showgrounds cleary showed that there is demand for a big venue to be built in cork…

      MPH’s assessment of the Event Centre was probably more of a ‘niciety’ to establish good favour with CCC consequent of the procrastination on the Horgan’s Quay site and in light of its planned applications and intentions for the site. MPH were not smiling ear-to-ear following publication of the NADP but have, as I understand it, agreed to many components contained therein. It will be important for CCC to show flexibility on the plan, however without compromising the standard of development. MPH will likely push for increased retail provision among other things in their proposals for Horgan’s Quay – an event centre would really be just a fly in the ointment rather than a willing development component for them. With 2,500 being the proposed capacity, clearly this is unacceptable. Indeed Horgan’s Quay is idealistically a great location for such an event centre, but realistically, it is a very restrictive and difficult site to develop such a centre – that’s not to say it is impossible. However, I would agree that perhaps the Munster Agricultural Showgrounds (MAS) offers probably a better alternative for such a centre and that CCC should now seriously start getting their act together on the Water Street Bridge to facilitate comfortable movement between Kent Station/Horgan’s Quay and the MAS. A centre of 5,000/6,000 should be seen as the minimum capacity acceptable. I don’t think CCC should be so steadfast on Horgan’s Quay as to settle for second-best or to hinder the progress of the quay’s redevelopment whilst trying to get their way, and without considering the other attractive options. Mahon Point is not a realistic alternative from a development or traffic management point of view and I agree it should be kept as near as possible to the city centre. But that’s just my opinion.

    • #758231
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Also, just in the interests of accuracy, it may be worth accounting for the fact that some sources are now indicating that the lodgement date for the Gehl Architects/Project Architects design on Academy Street for O’Callaghan Properties may be later than anticipated or quoted above – possibly early November. However that is yet to be confirmed.

      hopefully gehl will bring a little style to this project design. project architects can go either way as far as im concerned and im counting on that they go all out for academy st cos its a highly significant development in any respect and this should be a signature building for the ocallaghan portfolio. im hoping ocallaghan properties recent tendancy to seek higher design quality is reflected and topped by this effort, respecting both its location and significance as well as respecting its composite and surrounding buildings, many of which are historic and architecturally rich in nature.

    • #758232
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The above is water trough on Douglas Street in Cork City.
      I’m looking to form as complete a list as possible of all such troughs in the city.
      Anybody have any ideas?

    • #758233
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Just to update you on this, I was told today that the sale on this site was publicised today, so with that I should probably tell you that the successful bidders on the site were Howard Holdings. The fate of the remaining properties is currently not yet known, but the would offer OFC a nice waterfront vantage considering their permitted Eglinton Street development is relatively land-locked on the 3-acre former sorting office site to the immediate south. Either way, the Howard Holdings acquistion gives the company an enviable dominance either side of the river channel with their City Quarter project along Lapps Quay and now WebWorks and Doyle premises on Albert Quay.


      Can we expect a date anytime soon for an application on the Albert quay site? Howard must have really fought this one out which shows the strength of their interest in the docklands in Cork. Also someone said before they had a masterplan by Murray O’loaire architects made up, i take it they have further plans for the larger docklands area? I think Howard are probably the right guys for a big development job in the docklands and if City quarter is anything to go by they’ll produce first class stuff too! Cant wait to see what they have planned for Albert quay, another job for Scott Tallon walker??? And what of the in between sites? Think they’ll sell up to Howards or will O’flynns or Ascon (??) do something of their own. I suppose if i was making the decision for O’flynns i’d probably by very attracted to the idea of a nice waterfrontage. Who else do you think will be a big player in the south docklands?

    • #758234
      altuistic
      Participant

      Its unfortunate to hear about the closure of Hickeys. Its always saddening to hear about a well established local business being put up against the wall. i only hope whatever the future holds for its staff, it is a positive one. And perhaps a successful redevelopment of the maylor street premises will allow for the creation of new indigenous enterprise and employment.

    • #758235
      lawyer
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      The above is water trough on Douglas Street in Cork City.
      I’m looking to form as complete a list as possible of all such troughs in the city.
      Anybody have any ideas?

      There is, or was, another trough outside McLaughlins -opposite St. Patrick’s Church.
      I pass there most days but cannot be sure if it is still there.
      There is also one at St.Luke’s Cross.
      Have a look at the minutes of the council meeting on 12.09.2005 on the Cork City Council web site.
      Page 6 [Item 9.7]
      Apparently, if funds are available, they intend taking an inventory of horse troughs in the not too distant future.

    • #758236
      lexington
      Participant


      🙂 Tomorrow sees the opening of Cork’s first permanent skating rink “Skidz” which is set to open on the 1st floor of North Main Street S.C. – the 2,000sq ft synthetic ice-rink will also include a healthy-eating diner and offer sessions of 30 minutes to prospective skaters for a sum of €5.75 – including skate rental. For more details see Skidz



      😮 Next Wednesday and Thursday look set to be potentially interesting decision days for Cork development.

      First, on Wednesday 12th October 2005 a decision is expected on the Corbett proposed development at Carmelite Place off the Western Road. An interesting design by James Bourke of James Leahy & Associates seeks to realise 22 new apartments over varying heights, averaging 3-storeys at the controversial location, all over basement car-parking. Surprisingly only 1 submission was made regarding the proposal – previously Dermot O’Keefe’s 4-storey student development plans had attracted considerable controversy and was refused by both CCC and on appeal to ABP. The relative ‘calm’ over this project perhaps reflects the designs more considerate and low-key approach, whilst nonetheless maintaining a distinctive architectural character of its own – even if it is a wee bit boxy.

      Second, Niall & Sheila Doris of the Beverly Smyth Group await a decision on Thursday 13th October 2005 (subject to a possible Further Information request) on their plans to redevelop the Nat Ross site along Monahan’s Road in the southern docklands. Their site falls within an area deemed suitable for appropriate high-density residential development – this is reflected in the proposal, designed by Jonathan Horgan of SDA O’Flynn, for 104 residential units over 5 linked blocks (ranging from 4 to 10-storeys) and inclusive of 5 seperate, 2-storey terraced houses. The apartment elements will stand over 30,000sq ft of business & technology offices, as well as a large basement car-parking facility. 7 submissions have been made with respect to this generally positive €50m project. The scheme represents one of the first major investment steps in the successful redevelopment of the Southern Docklands region. Other proposals set or in the wings include that of McCarthy Developments Goldcrop-site redevelopment, adjoining their Centre Park House HQ (along Centre Park Road), which will see an 8-storey 100,000sq ft office building over basement car-park (the proposal is also very comfortably positioned for Revenue Commissioners tenancy), a possible redevelopment of the Mundo Furnishings premises by owner Patrick Herlihy and at least 4 other serious proposals. Nat Ross Redevelopment Images found in earlier post.

      Of course both projects and their decision dates will be subject to Planning Authority moves.



      Also next week, the “nail-biting” continues with the commencement of the ABP Oral Hearing regarding Werdna Limited’s Water Street proposal, designed by Sean Kearns of Murray O’Laoire Architects. The hearing will take place at the Gresham Metropole Hotel along MacCurtain Street from 10am on Wednesday 12th October to Thursday the 13th of October. This project has been through the throws and the reels of the planning process, in all its lows, and fingers will be very tightly crossed that ABP portray wisdom in giving this scheme a positive greenlight. A final decision will be made on the appeal come November 24th 2005. The best of luck to John Crean, Sean Kearns, Mark McMahon and all those involved! 😉


      Water Street proposal along Cork’s North Docklands.

    • #758237
      A-ha
      Participant

      Is someone able to go to the Water Street thing or is everyone working? As always, my fingers will be crossed, but just in case, I’ll cross my toes too. Glad to see Schuh opening up in Cork and also securityman, I’m really happy about ESPRIT opening in Douglas, it’s the first I’ve heard of it opening in Cork. It should do well as it’s Cork’s first. And about the event centre…. we shouldn’t settle for anything less than 5000 seats. If we’re not going to get that, then we might as well just stick with the Opera House!

    • #758238
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 According to Capitol Cineplex manager, Patrick O’Brien, the prominent Grand Parade premises is to seize operations come December 2nd 2005. Operator Ward Anderson will focus on their new, successful 13-screen Omniplex facility at Mahon Point S.C. and may consider a further option in Cork at a later date. Over 50 years on the site, a redevelopment deal was struck between Ward Anderson and Limerick-based developers John Costello and Paul O’Brien (of Mount Kennett Investments) to demolish the valuable premises and reconstuct a new 30,000sq ft department store/retail outlet and 18 overhead apartments. The design for the new structure was by Dungarvan-based The e-Project, but subsequently has met design worries in planning – a significant reassessment of the proposal is currently being undertaken and believed to be near ready – however further issues have arisen since with the propsect of a substantial retail development by a consortium involving investor Joe O’Donovan at properties to the rear and side of the Capitol Cineplex site.

      Those who woe the loss of this historic cinema facility (which probably equals the same amount of persons that will celebrate it! :p ) may take comfort in knowing the further cinema facilities are planned for Cork city down the line. That aside, one site I believe has substantial potential for a nice city centre multiplex facility – as a part element of a larger commercial development – is the site on Sullivans Quay currently occupied by Government Buildings. This site will likely be the subject of a landmark redevelopment at the hands of the successful Revenue Commissioners bidder – a possible proposal could comfortably facilitate a substantial new one-stop entertainment venue with multiplex, ice-rink, nightclubs, bars, retail etc among other elements. Just a thought!

      Speaking of ice-rinks, today saw the launch of Cork’s first synthetic facility called “Skidz” at the former Tall Order restaurant premises on the 1st floor of North Main Street S.C. The facility is being operated by Rod Mellor and Bill Cremin (who I hear have attained deals on extending the franchise to Kerry and Dublin already). The facility is, to be brutally honest, underwhelming – which is a disappointment because it is a great idea. It feels very slapped together and is certainly under-sized. Perhaps the operators will consider developing a more elaborate theme element to the premises over the coming future with good use of light, theme-materials such as artifical “ice-berg” and “igloo” type structures – as is, it is still the Tall Order restaurant with a small L-Shaped creche sized (200 sq m) skating area. Great for small kids no doubt, however there exists a market for a larger, proper ice-facility. Cork could stand to benefit from a larger multi-purpose facility like that at Yerba Buena Gardens/Metreon in San Francisco which has a multiplex, retail and late-night entertainment facility all mixed into a convenient area. A late night skate on the rink before catching a movie and then off to the nightclub anyone? 😀



      😎 The Montgomery Kenneally Partnership & John F. Supple Contractors have notified their intention to develop 74 new affordable homes for private sale in line with Section 8 of the Planning & Development Act 2000 at the rear of the Churchfield Leisure Complex in Gurranabraher. Also announcing a Cork City Council associative housing provision, Deermount Construction will seek to develop 48 or so new homes for private sale also in Gurranabraher at Chaepl Field, nearby.

      John F. Supple Limited and The Montgomery Kenneally Partnership are also involved in a further social-affordable residential scheme at Cogan’s Field along the Boreenmanna Road, currently under construction, for 157 new units designed by Derek Tynan & Associates. 50 of these units will be provided for social-affordable use with 55 apartments and 52 housing units for private/market sale. As for the design…well I let you decide, I have my own feelings on Derek Tynan practice designs and I keep thinking someone must miss the Blackpool flats, but make up your own mind -> here.



      🙂 Frinailla have also lodged Significant Further Information regarding their plans for the redevelopment of the former Plumbing Utilities Store along Victoria Cross Road, just south of Top Car Motors. A decision is now expected for the 1st November 2005.

    • #758239
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      “A late night skate on the rink before catching a movie and then off to the nightclub anyone? “

      There are already enough dodgy moves on the dancefloors of Cork with or without Skidz! 😮

    • #758240
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 I know this is a little late, but to acknowledge the opening of the new Henry J. Lyons & Partners Architects offices along South Mall last Spetmeber (2005), I have posted a few images of the Lancaster Quay (Jurys) redevelopment by O’Callaghan Properties below (for your viewing pleasure! 😉 ) – one must note that the images are a little out of date, given that ABP omitted the central 9-storey tower (Block A) element from the project, and some reductions were also made to the neighbouring blocks also. Nonethless, if you can use your imagination, you’ll be able to get some picture of how the project will fair (currently under construction). The entire project will take 3 years in 3 phases, with the first phase steaming ahead – this will include the new 6-storey 4-star 182-bedroom hotel for Jurys and 80 apartment units (Block B). OCP may seek permission to develop a reduced block on the omitted Block A site at a future date – as the option was left open to do so by ABP, however any element will indeed be lower than the original proposal to reduce impacts on St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral as viewed from the quays. Henry J. Lyons & Partners are currently working on other Cork projects such as the €200m golf and holiday resort by X-CES Projects near Kinsale, with the hotel element expected to be operated by Hyatt Hotels; a residential scheme at Knocknaheeny and numerous other schemes. Their arrival on the Cork scene follows the likes of similar moves by O’Mahony Pike Architects (also on South Mall) and Scott Tallon Walker (Cotter Street). It should certainly heat up the architectural market in Cork over the coming months.


      View facing South-East from Lancaster Quay – Jurys Hotel element can be seen to the right.



    • #758241
      pier39
      Participant

      ya know, if abp had shown some real insight, they would have cut that block (dont know which one, the one visualised up in those images with the sloping facade) by about 2 storeys and shift block a to the west by a few metres rather than cutting it and allowing the rest of the development proceed as proposed. that would have been a far more intelligent method of maintaining the views of st. finbars cathedral and maintaining the quality of the overall development in its original form.

      however if abp grant water st it all its glory i’ll take my criticism above back!!!! hehe.

      by the way speaking of henry j lyons, has anyone seen their plans for the redeveloped aer lingus hq in dublin airport??! wow!!!!!! thats what i want to see in the cork docklands!!!!!! great use of multi coloured lighting to at night really adds to the magic of the overall design and brings life and depth to the structure.

    • #758242
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      any chance of pics of that aer lingus building?

    • #758243
      lexington
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      any chance of pics of that aer lingus building?

      I’ve posted a new thread with images of the Aer Lingus HQ redevelopment. See New Aer Lingus HQ thread for those visuals. It is a dramatic looking development indeed. Another interesting Henry J. Lyons & Partners design is on the Earthquake Property proposal for Knockrabo in Dublin – well worth investigating.

    • #758244
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Along with everything else going on this week in terms of decisions, ABP are due to rule before Thursday on Frinailla’s Lady’s Well development. Should be an intersting one which ever way it goes.

    • #758245
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I’ve posted a new thread with images of the Aer Lingus HQ redevelopment. See New Aer Lingus HQ thread for those visuals. It is a dramatic looking development indeed. Another interesting Henry J. Lyons & Partners design is on the Earthquake Property proposal for Knockrabo in Dublin – well worth investigating.

      great looking piece(s)! nice pics there too lex, have a few of my own too but they do it well justice! like i said if anybody wants to know what i want for christmas, its that in the southern docklands of cork. the knockrabo development is a great lookin too. well done to the the henry j boys and perhaps we may see one or 2 of these kind of high imagination designs of theirs grace cork in the future now theyve an office here and all. 😉

    • #758246
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      ya know, if abp had shown some real insight, they would have cut that block (dont know which one, the one visualised up in those images with the sloping facade) by about 2 storeys and shift block a to the west by a few metres rather than cutting it and allowing the rest of the development proceed as proposed. that would have been a far more intelligent method of maintaining the views of st. finbars cathedral and maintaining the quality of the overall development in its original form.

      I see what you mean and i agree. The removal of Block A was a bit of a farse. The second pic gives a pretty good idea of this. Removing the tallest (possibly one of the more interesting elements) makes ya worry bout Water street. But i read somewhere over the weekend that a planner involved with Water street said he was confident of a good outcome as the developers had made appropriate proposals and adjustments to satisfy most objections while maintaining the integrity of the project. I hope so cos it would be a great loss to the city if it didnt get the proper grant. All the best i say,

    • #758247
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Tonight, Cork City Council will be voting on whether or not to approve and/or alter elements of the recently published North Docklands Area Plan 2005. Numerous submissions on the plan have been made, not least that of Manor Park Homes (MPH) who in response to a call to develop a new event centre on the prominent Horgan’s Quay site, have indicated their belief that a requested capacity for 5,000 seats + is unviable and have offered to investigate a moderate 2,500 seater venue on condition that CCC support increased retail provision on the development site. This request has already been rejected. It will be interesting to hear the details of tonight’s meeting and I’ll try and update you on them tomorrow,

      🙂 Also, for those of you interested in Frinailla’s recently lodged Dennehy’s Cross proposal (posted earlier) – visit the dedicated website here.

    • #758248
      lexington
      Participant

      As promised, here are 2 images of the Dunnes Stores redevelopment along St. Patrick’s Street, designed by Bertie Pope & Associates – which is, surprisingly, not all that bad. The Bowling Green Street (Western) elevation is a remarkable improvement to the street, and the Drawbridge Street (northern) elevation is indeed an improvement, if a little blocky on top, but nonetheless I think the overall context of the design carries this sufficiently. Recessed upper floors step back from the St. Patrick’s Street facade with an interesting curve-glass deck frontage afforded just out of sight from the street. 102 and 105 are given new new frontages. See for youself below.


      St. Patrick’s Street elevation, upper floors and curved glass frontage just in sight.


      Drawbridge Street elevation, as seen from Emmet Place. The Grand Circle Lounge and J&P premises can be seen to the right – both of which will form part of the Academy Street redevelopment by OCP (of similar height to redeveloped Dunnes).



      North Docklands Area Plan 2005

      Last night’s council meeting (10th October 2005) saw a vote taken to amend the NDAP which will essentially give the Port of Cork a bigger say in the development of the North Docklands – a politically motivated move all the same. Generally, the plan was passed. Manor Park Homes (MPH) amendment request for increased retail provision had been rejected prior to the meeting – other proposed amendments including Building Heights, the removal of wording in the NDAP which calls for ‘Major Office Development’, a new secondary routeway to benefit traffic movements to and from proposed new National Route, reduction in Event Centre size (also rejected), the repositioning of the pedestrian bridge proposed (however this bridge will now be removed from the plan on calls from the Port of Cork) etc. The MPH plan for Horgan’s Quay is not that far removed in terms of layout from previous proposals including that in the NDAP. A new retail, commercial and leisure (incl. restaurants, cafes etc) corridor will be provided south of the existing Kent Station terminal as a natural extension of Alfred Street. A new hotel is earmarked for the corner of Kent Station square – which will likely be of ‘landmark’ status. Residential blocks will then extend the waterfront promenade as far as Water Street. This remains the basic plan, with MPH calling for building heights ranging between 4 and 14 storeys in height. A source with one of the involved agents said that this does not rule out the option of at least one structure of a taller nature which may qualify as a landmark building as designated within the NDAP. It remains to be seen. The same source also indicated that at this moment in time, no set date had been agreed on for lodgement of a planning application despite rumours and media reports to the contrary.



      😎 Also after viewing the Coughlan de Keyser design for John Cleary Developments’ circa 13,000sq m office and retail showroom development on the former Sifco premises at Mahon, have to say, it’s not what I would regard as CDA’s most imaginative, but nonetheless looks like a generally inoffensive proposal. How it will fair versus office developments at Mahon Point and the NSC will depend; issues of traffic management will also undoubtedly be a large consideration in the planning process given Mahon Point and surrounding areas well known congestion issues.

    • #758249
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Those Dunnes images look very promising. The St. Patrick Street facade is really nice and I’m glad to see that the existing facades aren’t dwarfed by new development to the rear. I did think the application called for retention of 103, 104 and 105 facades so its odd that 105 seems to be altered in the image. Nevertheless, with 102 and 105 matching it does serve to round off the development nicely.
      I’d agree with lexington regarding bowling green street. Nice simple idea but let down by a very blocky top storey. Something that is easily remedied though!
      Although this might seem a strange thing to say, I think what will make or break this development is its treatment of William Street and Bowling Green street. I’d love to see some images of those. In particular street level. These streets should be pedestrianised and ‘free standing’ shops should be catered for here. If you go for the dual door approach of merchants quay, the street access will be closed off in favour of doors to the shopping mall itself- result is the lane remains empty.
      What is tenancy going to be like here?
      Is Dunnes taking the whole thing or will they be merely an anchor tenant of a shopping mall type development?

    • #758250
      securityman
      Participant

      For those interested here are some of the names lined up to open in mallow shortly as part of Flemings Market Square Development

      Dunnes Stores
      Heatons
      Game Stop
      Pizza Hut
      Costa Coffee
      Lifestyle sports
      Mods and Minis
      BPM records
      Horgans Pharmacy
      Chartbusters
      Exit
      s-wear
      O’Donovans Off Licence
      Flor Griffen

    • #758251
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      The same source also indicated that at this moment in time, no set date had been agreed on for lodgement of a planning application despite rumours and media reports to the contrary.


      cant say im surprised about the no planning date. think ccc would be foolish to not negotiate on building heights a standard 7 storeys would be utterly boring and difficult to make financially sustainable. as for the offices i agree with manor park here. they should concentrate that sort of development on a phased basis according to the market demand across the river in the south docklands anyway.

      as for dunnes, i have to say it looks pretty darn good. im actually impressed. should do those streets no end of favours. never thought id say it but well done bertie pope and well done dunnes. a big pretty lemon in the middle of our city! yummy!
      still academy street is gonne have to top that ten fold given its prominence, stature and location. oooo the tension!

    • #758252
      lexington
      Participant


      🙂 Harvery Norman Leasing Limited are set to lodge for planning permission on the former Woodies DIY store along the Kinsale Road. The infamous Australian electrical and utilities retailler are seeking permission for alterations to the circa. 45,000sq ft premises to facilitate a new store, their first in Cork, and 3rd in nationwide. Permission for new signage is also sought, signalling the dawn of a flood more of those annoying Go Harvey Go! radio advertisments on Cork local radio. There’s a downside to good things sometimes you see! 😉



      Water Street Oral Hearing

      A source at the ABP Oral Hearing for Werdna Limited’s Water Street development has informed me on some of the morning’s proceedings. A relatively brief statement was made by Senior Planner Ronnie McDowell on behalf of Cork City Council and it’s position at the commencement of the hearing. Following this, only one resident with the Lower Glanmire Road Residents Association, who appealed the project on a 3rd party basis, is understood to have taken the floor. Following her statement, the applicant representatives were given the opportunity to state their case. First, project architect Sean Kearns with Murray O’Laoire provided the Bord representatives with an overview of the project and its nature, this was followed by an address by Planning Consultant John Crean of Cunnane Strattan Reynolds who provided a comprehensive insight into the development nature from an urban planning perspective and some justifications for its approval. Sean Kearns later outlined a history of the project from its inception, including details of the original plan which called for a 500-unit development arranged in a U-Shaped pattern to face the river and possessing a feature 26-storey tower to act as a significant landmark for Cork. In this outline, Mr. Kearns detailled the timeline and nature of discussions between the applicants and Cork City Council, and their planning consultant Kelvin Campbell with Urban Initiatives. According to the source, the applicants made what appeared to be a relatively solid argument and highlighted notable lapses in CCC planning logic including contradictions in the reasons for condition imposition and details of the proceeding North Docklands Area Plan 2005 publication – contradictions included planning and development intentions for CastleView Terrace, to name but a few. It is hoped that the ABP take note and consider such points in their deliberation which will follow on November 24th 2005. More details later.

      This account is based on source input and is not suppose to represent any specific bias should it so appear.

    • #758253
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 McInerney Construction has been greenlit for the development of 202 new homes, 24 apartments and 21 service sites at their lands in Newtown near Cobh. The project was designed by Dennehy + Dennehy.



      😮 Meanwhile James Ronayne has reapplied to CCC for permission on his site at Thomas Davis Street in Blackpool. Previously Mr. Ronayne was refused planning for a 3-storey building with ground floor retail and 8 overhead apartments. Again, permission is sought for a 3-storey building with 3 ground floor retail units and 8 overhead apartments – this will be Mr. Ronayne’s third attempt on the site.



      :confused: Corbett’s (J&M) have withdrawn their application for the redevelopment of the Carmelite Terrace near the Western Road. The developers had applied to developed the terrace in a 3-storey, 22-unit apartment development over basement car-park – designed by James Bourke of James Leahy & Associates. No resident submissions were lodged against the proposal which was withdrawn a day before the scheduled decision.


    • #758254
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I can’t say I’m disappointed with the decision to withdraw the plans for Carmelite Terrace. However, whether this will save the buildings as they stand, I very much doubt it.

    • #758255
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I can’t say I’m disappointed with the decision to withdraw the plans for Carmelite Terrace. However, whether this will save the buildings as they stand, I very much doubt it.

      I looked into sustainable redevelopment options on these houses some time ago – subsidence and drainage issues are big factors here, not least numerous structural complications. Of course these can all be addressed, however the economic cost of this does meet a viable development alternative. A number of factors have influenced this scenario, beyond refurbishment and foundation cost issues – land value is one of those factors. In terms of attaining a sustainable profit, the amount of money required to maintain these properties in a long-term habitable state plus the cost of site acquistion does not satisfy the individual sale of these houses as owner-occupier facilities. Furthermore, their conversion to interconnected student or worker habitats, supplemented by extensions to the rear of these adjoining premises also starts running into financial dark waters. I agree that they are notable structures in their own right – but given planning policy constraints, their retention by private sources whilst generating a sufficient profit does not tally up. However, should certain policies and zonings be readdressed, options do exist that may offer a successful retention of these premises – with modifications, however the predominantly residential nature of the surrounding area may make such options increasingly complicated.

    • #758256
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Niall & Sheila Doris have seen Further Information requested of their proposal to redevelop the Nat Ross premises along Monahan’s Road on the so-called ‘crescent’ of Cork’s South Docklands area. The proposal, designed by Jonathan Horgan with SDA O’Flynn seeks to develop 104 new homes (99 apartments over 5 linked blocks ranging in height between 4 and 10 storeys with 5 seperate 2-storey terraced houses) and circa. 37,000sq ft of business & technology office space all over a large basement car-park.



      😎 Following an appeal by Carrigaline-based Ruden Homes regarding planning conditions, the company now looks set to develop the 537 permitted homes of their original 554 unit housing proposal for Lehenagh Beg/Lehenagh More near Togher. The development, in the shadow of Cork Airport’s flight-path, will also provide a retail units, creche and additional amenity facilities at the large scale plan.



      😎 The appeal against BrideView Developments 27 permitted apartments on a site just under 1 acre at Carrigaline Middle, positioned by the main Cork Road, has been dropped clearing the way for initiation of development on the site.

      – speaking of BrideView, their Unity House development along the Lower Glanmire Road & Alfred Street is receiving the finishing touches, and generally looks well as an entrance into an area cited for some major redevelopment over the coming future.

    • #758257
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:


      🙂 Harvery Norman Leasing Limited

      As was said before Harvey is not exactly competitive on price; combine this with apr rates in excess of 20% and one steers well clear. Any images of the retail warehousing?

    • #758258
      lexington
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      :

      Also, I hope to be able to post news on the successful Revenue Commissioners bid shortly.


      As par my previous post (#705), I just want to update you on some news that’s been doing the realms for the past few weeks but I remained reluctant to post. It concerns the Revenue Commissioners and confirms that the wonderful Kenny Group proposal designed by Wilson Architecture is out of the race for provision of the new office space. As previously confirmed, the Shipton Group are also long out on their Blackpool Park proposal (currently under construction) – leaving McCarthy Developments and the pitch by Frank Sheahan & Joe Carey still in the running. It is also believed Ascon Rohcon is now working with the latter boosting their bid somewhat – however Tom McCarthy still has every reason to be confident.

      It’s a pity that Paul Kenny has withdrawn what would have been a wonderful addition to the Cork city landscape, whether or not Mr. Kenny will maintain the design and start pitching it at a decentralising Government agency or large corporate body remains to be seen.


      Paul Kenny’s highly praised proposal, designed by Wilson Architecture – now no longer in the RC bid running.


      McCarthy Developments’ Centre Park Road proposal designed by Murray O’Laoire, in the final 2 remaining bids.

    • #758259
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      €100m project will ‘set scale’ for quays

      The Irish Times

      A new €100 million residential development on one of Cork’s quays will set the scale for future development of the city’s docklands, an An Bord Pleanála oral hearing was told yesterday. Hugh Murray of Murray O’Laoire, lead architect of the project, said it was essential that the Water Street development by Werdna Ltd on Cork’s north docklands was the correct height. “This project is going to set the scale for all future developments. I feel passionately that if we set it too low, we will make a mistake for the rest of the waterfront in the city,” Mr Murray told the hearing chaired by An Bord Pleanála inspector David Dunne. Werdna Ltd is appealing two conditions attached by Cork City Council to a revised 304-apartment proposal for Water Street submitted after the council refused permission for a 400-apartment complex.

      I have to say, I don’t think Water Street is the best we can do as regards “setting the scale” for future developments in the Docklands. CCC clearly has no great problem in giving permissin for tall buildings- as evidenced by their green light for the Eglington Street development and the willingness of other developers to submit towers as part of their plans (e.g. Crows Nest).
      What CCC have always said, and I agree with them on this one, is that these very tall buildigs should be landmark buildings. Murray O’Laoire cannot argue that this is a landmark building solely because of its height alone – a landmark building should be distinctive and sould stand on its own.
      To be tall a building must be landmark and to be landmark a building has to be more than tall!!

    • #758260
      lexington
      Participant

      O’Flynn Construction’s Ballincollig S.C., as part of its larger Ballincollig Town Centre development on 93-acres of the former Murphy’s Barracks. opens next Tuesday 18th 2005. The company has launched an official website to compliment the opening. See for youself at Ballincollig Shopping Centre.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Howard Holdings will seek permission for a further 124sq m of additional office space at their WebWorks development currently under construction along Albert Quay. The provision additional floor-space is consequent of consultations with Enterprise Ireland and will be provided at the 3rd floor level should it be granted. The WebWorks was designed by Scott Tallon Walker and is being built by John Paul Construction.

    • #758261
      A-ha
      Participant

      Oh my god…. I can’t believe what I’m reading about Paul Kenny’s RC building. That was one project I really wanted to see get built. That’s disappointing! And I agree, yes I would like to see the Water Street development get the go ahead, but I think we could do abit better in terms of setting a scale. Can’t wait to check out Ballincollig SC; apart from the Dunnes like, I think it will be a nice shopping centre overall and it should do really well too. What’s happening with the airport? Any pics. available?

    • #758262
      A-ha
      Participant

      Nothing to do with Cork, but is anyone able to tell be the background of the MI6 building in London? It’s very imaginative and creative, and I’ve never seen a building like it before. Would be nice to see more creativity going into Irish buildings like they have done in the UK.

      British Secret Service HQ

    • #758263
      Anonymous
      Participant

      it is very strange looking. i like the stonework yes but that’s about it. that green cladding is awful.

    • #758264
      Andrew Duffy
      Participant

      It’s a nasty pile of postmodern nonsense. To my eyes it’s marginally more offensive than the decaying 60s curtain walled object beside it.

    • #758265
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Anybody any news on Frinailla’s Lady’s Well which was on appeal to ABP?
      Decision was due yesterday.

    • #758266
      PTB
      Participant

      I see in the Irish Examiner that it seems that Spike Island is to become the new prison for the Cork region. The hugely overcrowded prison on the northside will close due to the chronic drugs problem where drugs were being thrown over the prison walls, with some people actually placing ladders up aganst the walls to drop drugs in. Apparently the new prison will be seviced by a bridge from the mainland which would be aproximately 400-500 meters by my own reckoning. Good spot for a prison no doubtbut those who wanted to open a museum there are surely dissapointed.

    • #758267
      PTB
      Participant

      I was at the county hall last saturday week and I did not see the statue of the two men looking up at the county hall. Did I just not see it? Or has it been put into storage for the duration of the revamp of the building?Does anybody know?

    • #758268
      Anonymous
      Participant

      whenever i hear about spike island i think about alcatraz. in a way they are very similar. two prisons on an island…

    • #758269
      A-ha
      Participant

      I wonder has it anything to do with Cork being twinned with San Francisco. What will happen the prison in the northside…. it’s a rotten old dump, it’s what you expect from a prison in Soviet Russia. Nobody should be subject to having to piss into a plastic bucket in the middle of a room that the in-mates must spend 20 hours a day in. And PTB, I haven’t been out in County Hall in ages, but I would suspect that the statue was taken away for the time being.

    • #758270
      lexington
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      :confused: Corbett’s (J&M) have withdrawn their application for the redevelopment of the Carmelite Terrace near the Western Road. The developers had applied to developed the terrace in a 3-storey, 22-unit apartment development over basement car-park – designed by James Bourke of James Leahy & Associates. No resident submissions were lodged against the proposal which was withdrawn a day before the scheduled decision.


      😎 Corbett’s will seek to reapply for their proposal at Carmelite Place – the application reiterates intentions for a 22-unit apartment development over basement car-park with a readdressed statement on height ranging for 3 to part 4-storeys. Design is again by James Bourke of James Leahy & Associates.

    • #758271
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Anybody any news on Frinailla’s Lady’s Well which was on appeal to ABP?
      Decision was due yesterday.

      I’m answering my own question here, but FYI, An Bord Pleanala’s decision on Frinailla’s Lady’s Well has been put back to November 2nd.

    • #758272
      securityman
      Participant

      Does anyone have an Idea when the second phase of Blackpool Retail Park is due for completion as it seems to be moving on nicely at present. I hear that Pizza Hut and Eddie Rocketts are among those moving in this time around.

      I was passing by OCPs building on Lavitts quay the other day and saw activity in the large retail outlet is this Vibes and Scribes as expected.

      Harvey Norman have the signs up so they should be ready to open next week I’d say.

      I hear the Ramada hotel is opening in the Blarney Golf Resort before Christmas any pictures.

    • #758273
      lexington
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      I hear the Ramada hotel is opening in the Blarney Golf Resort before Christmas any pictures.

      The plan is to have the doors open in December indeed, Bowen Construction have been making very steady progress on the overall scheme with the 63-bedroom, 4-star Ramada Hotel & Suites nearing completion. A leisure centre, restaurant and bar all form part of the proposal.

    • #758274
      mhenness
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      For those interested here are some of the names lined up to open in mallow shortly as part of Flemings Market Square Development

      Dunnes Stores
      Heatons
      Game Stop
      Pizza Hut
      Costa Coffee
      Lifestyle sports
      Mods and Minis
      BPM records
      Horgans Pharmacy
      Chartbusters
      Exit
      s-wear
      O’Donovans Off Licence
      Flor Griffen

      Looks like Game Stop have actually moved onto the main street in Mallow and not the Market Square development.

    • #758275
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I was just thinking today and im surprised that there is no drive true restaurants around mahon point.Giving the amount of traffic that passes there every day and the fact that the food court closes early enough and there is land fronting the road (evan the sifco site) it would surely be good buisness to use the land for this use?This is another example of where Cork developments just fall behind on something!I was also wondering what is happening with the mannix site on washington street as it just hit me today how ugly it makes that part of the street look?and one last thing,i read in the paper the other day again about how ballincollig sc could have let 3 times the amount of space with the demand but if this is true why is the line up not as impressive as it should be?the same gos for patrick st,if theres so much demand why are these empty properties not taken up when they come available?

    • #758276
      lexington
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      I was just thinking today and im surprised that there is no drive true restaurants around mahon point.Giving the amount of traffic that passes there every day and the fact that the food court closes early enough and there is land fronting the road (evan the sifco site) it would surely be good buisness to use the land for this use?This is another example of where Cork developments just fall behind on something!

      The land to the west of Mahon Point is in line for redevelopment by O’Callaghan Properties as part of their overall masterplan for the area. A hotel element, as well as business and technology accommodation elements have also been planned.

      The Sifco site is being redeveloped by John Cleary Developments for use as Car Showrooms and a 130,000sq ft office and retail development (recently in for planning), designed by Coughlan de Keyser.

      @daniel7 wrote:

      I was also wondering what is happening with the mannix site on washington street as it just hit me today how ugly it makes that part of the street look?

      There is no scheduled movement on the Mannix site – which is a shame. Issues regarding tenancy leases and financing are undoubtedly a part hinderance. However, there are rumours that the site may go up for sale with F.P.P. It’s a wait and see scenario I believe.

      @daniel7 wrote:

      and one last thing,i read in the paper the other day again about how ballincollig sc could have let 3 times the amount of space with the demand but if this is true why is the line up not as impressive as it should be?

      There is an element of truth in that – part of it is all marketing drive. However, I think retaillers copped on a little late – I understand O’Flynn Construction (OFC) will be lodging a further application to extend the shopping centre west and I have every confidence that they will fill these additional units with perhaps ‘bigger draw’ names. Then again, they have 70,000sq ft of additional retail space available in the ‘town centre’ element of the scheme yet to come available. Took a walk around the centre the other day, and it has materialised much better in the flesh I’m glad to say. The whole scheme will look very well when complete.

      @daniel7 wrote:

      the same gos for patrick st,if theres so much demand why are these empty properties not taken up when they come available?

      The problem with Patrick’s Street is rent vs available space. There are many retaillers anxious to take up space in Cork, but many of the mentioned units are too small to justify the rent demanded or too small to meet store requirements full stop. Nonetheless, units are being picked up gradually by retaillers which traditionally seek small to medium sized units – most recently is the example of Schuh taking on the former ‘Favourite’ store, recently refurbished at 121 Patrick’s Street. Other units, such as ‘Pound City’, the former ‘McCarthy Travel’ unit and Photo Store have been acquired by a group with which Joe O’Donovan is involved and who have larger plans afoot.

    • #758277
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 It seems plans are emerging well for the Shipton Group/Douglas Central Properties and their plans to create something of a new ‘Town Centre’ development in Douglas. With work steaming ahead and looking very impressive at Blackpool Park to the north of the city, the Shipton Group are co-ordinating the realisation of their impressive €100m Douglas proposal with Bowen Construction and architects (undisclosed for the time being) as talks continue between the developers and County Manager Maurice Moloney, as well as consultations with Cork City Council. The scheme will seek to redevelop 3 seperate land holdings at Douglas Village Shopping Centre, Douglas Court S.C. and land between the 2 centres which includes the existing Cinema World and former Permanent TSB premises. A new multiplex cinema will be provided at part basement level, numerous commercial and apartment units as well as a new link street with a number of retail, cafe and restaurant activities. Redeveloped elements at both shopping centres will proceed and a new link will span all 3 elements of the substantial scheme. A new relief road will be provided (much need) to the Douglas area running east to west from the South Ring Dual-Carriageway.

      More details will be announced in the future.



      :p Today saw the official opening of Ballincollig Town Centre’s Shopping Centre element. At the official opening ceremony, I have to say Michael O’Flynn seemed to be well happy. However, as for 70% of all the stores being open…maybe more like 40%. All the same, the centre looks well and the mix of tenants isn’t all that bad – though it doesn’t exhibit perhaps all the ‘draw’ names, it offers equally respected tenants that vary from the standard names we’ve come to expect in Shopping Centres – e.g. Roxy Records instead of Golden Discs all the time! 😀 And that makes for an interesting alternative. Hopefully further lettings and prospects regarding the Shopping Centre’s expansion will bring more exciting names to the centre. All the best to OFC!



      😉 Also, for those curious as to the identity of backers involved with Mountlawn Limited (who recently lodged plans with Cork County Council for a new 400MW power station on Little Island) – a private consortia including Bernard McNamara and his construction firm Michael McNamara Construction are believed to be behind the scheme. The proposal also further enforces McNamara Construction’s agressive push into the Cork city market with other contracts won for Phase 2 of Cork Airport Business Park, the new Boole Library extension at UCC (which will shortly see 2 tower cranes erected) and suspected preliminary involvement with a new docklands scheme.



      😮 David Crowe’s Oyster Developments has been granted permission on Phase 2 of its proposed Deane Street development. Phase 2 consists of the conversion of No.8 Parnell Place (a PS) – which currently serves an a Outdoor Sports store – to office use. Additionally, permission for internal changes, the introduction of roof light and the introduction of four large openings on the northern elevation was also sought – however the provision of these window openings in the North Elevation were removed by condition given that the may adversly affect the potential redevelopment rights of CIE with respect to the current Bus Station. The e-Project provided architectural services on the proposal and are also responsible for the design of Phase 1 at Deane Street which seeks to develop an adjoining 7-storey office building. It is believed that Mangerton Construction will act as main contractors.

    • #758278
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      I was just thinking today and im surprised that there is no drive true restaurants around mahon point……This is another example of where Cork developments just fall behind on something!

      This could equally be taken as a plus point for Mahon Point. When you think about, Drive through restaurants are pretty ridiculous concepts- you pay exactly the same amount of money for the same amount of food and then you park up in a carpark or on the side of the road to try to swallow a big mac without dropping special sauce all over your new car seats!
      Drive in restaurants are the invention of car-centric, waist-band expanding countries who think that getting out of their car for food is an infringement of their civil liberties.
      If you want food, get out and go to a restaurant, be it McDonalds or whatever, get out of your car and go into the restaurant…is it that hard??

    • #758279
      altuistic
      Participant

      The Blarney Gold course hotel seems very underwhelming,

      More ridiculous pishposh in the paper today about Dennehys cross. If it werent for the obituraries…

    • #758280
      lexington
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      – also regarding OCP’s Academy Street development, OCP have apparently struck a deal with the Reidy-family (owners of Le Cheateau bar) whereby the bar will be retained in its current usage as is, but which will allow OCP utilise its valuable layout to able its Academy Street development further. See previous posts.


      As reported long ago in the LADSOCL thread – and following media reports – I can confirm that Le Cheateau will be part of the Academy Street redevelopment as stated above. This is despite some long-term media reports to the contrary.

    • #758281
      Tim Hennessy
      Participant

      Any images of the plans for the proposed retail development at Academy Street / Emmet Place / Patrick Street

    • #758282
      lexington
      Participant

      @Tim Hennessy wrote:

      Any images of the plans for the proposed retail development at Academy Street / Emmet Place / Patrick Street

      In terms of a suitable photo-montage – no, not yet for posting anyway. I’m not entirely clear on the schedule of things here – but I will hope to have some images up in and around the time of lodgement.

    • #758283
      tomthevet2003
      Participant

      Lex

      I believe that no deal is done with the reidy family reagrding le cheateaux, and it was also reported in yesterdays evening echo that OCP have confirmed this and that le chateaux will remain.

      I still believe that OPC will need part of the property i.e. the back bar which runs behind both sasha and the 2005 office in order to proceed but again dont believe that anything is happening here yet

    • #758284
      lexington
      Participant

      @tomthevet2003 wrote:

      Lex

      I believe that no deal is done with the reidy family reagrding le cheateaux, and it was also reported in yesterdays evening echo that OCP have confirmed this and that le chateaux will remain.

      I still believe that OCP will need part of the property i.e. the back bar which runs behind both sasha and the 2005 office in order to proceed but again dont believe that anything is happening here yet

      Unfortunately I didn’t see that article in the flesh but was notified through correspondence that details were to be published. I haven’t seen any drawings/outlines etc etc of plans which include the bar – but details of its inclusion in some form have been submitted on a number of occassions by reputable sources, albeit vague. But if you have an inside track on the situation, I’ll take your word for it – I’m going by information afforded me. I take your point about the back-bar, indeed, it would be an important link, however I would argue that it is not essential for Patrick’s Street access, that can be utilised given other properties acquired – including the Taboo Bar and building currently occupied by The Jean Scene – as well as Faulkner’s Lane etc etc.

      Below is a very rough outline of the Le Chateaux premises – in yellow. Note the back-bar area’s important layout fronting out onto Faulkner’s Lane.

    • #758285
      Tim Hennessy
      Participant

      In relation to Fermoy, a town that is to witness siginifcnat development in the next number of years due to the new bypass that is expected to open this time next year. rumours have been unfolding about certain developments in the town, The old Barrys timber yard site at the east of the town centre was recently sold. Seeminlgy the site is earmarked for a retail development including Dunnes Stores. Could anyone confirm the previous or what the future holds for the previous site.

    • #758286
      indubitably
      Participant

      STEPHEN ROGERS

      Property Correspondent

      LE CHATEAU bar is to retain its
      frontage onto Patrick Street and will be incorporated into the massive Academy Street redevelopment.

      O’Callaghan Properties is expected to lodge its application for the 300 million facelift of the city centre street within the next few weeks.

      There had been speculation that Cork’s main street might lose the only pub with direct frontage onto it.

      However, a spokesman for the developer today confirmed that while the planning application was being finalised, Le Chateau would still have the enviable plot it currently occupies.

      It had been believed O’Callaghan Properties had paid a massive fee to acquire the pub, although this was always denied by the developer.

      O’Callaghan Properties have now acquired or done land deals on the majority of the properties affected by the planned redevelopment, which will create 200,000 square feet of retail space, 30,000 square feet of office space and 100 apartments.

      There will be no big anchor tenant in the retail element, but a number of high-order retail names will each take up to 20,000 square feet of space, with several European chain stores already expressing interest.

      It is expected that once planning permission is secured for the plans, more than likely early in the new year bar objection, the development work will start.

      One of the first to move out of its premises on the city centre street will be the printing section of the Irish Examiner and Evening Echo, whose new home is close to completion by O’Callaghan Properties in MahonPoint.

    • #758287
      indubitably
      Participant

      Sorry meant to say here is that article

    • #758288
      lexington
      Participant

      @indubitably wrote:

      Sorry meant to say here is that article

      Thanks for that.

      Clearly the nature of the structure (Le Chateau) warrants retention – not simply because of its use but its history. I’m interested to see how Gehl Architects and Project Architects work this structure internally into the overall development. My understanding is that there is a lot more interest in the back-bar linkage than the actual bar itself, as little can be done with that structure as a whole. Will be interesting to see internal drawings. Generally however, the consensus among involved parties have commented that the project is looking well.

    • #758289
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Just saw photomontages of the Dunnes thing on Patrick Street that Bertie Pope is proposing……sorry, but does anyone else think that it looks like some huge ship has stuck itself in the back of the existing buildings on Patrick Street? Perhaps the worst presented building and proposal that I have seen….I really like the 2 floors of cladding sticking up on the roof…

    • #758290
      lexington
      Participant

      @yorktown wrote:

      Just saw photomontages of the Dunnes thing on Patrick Street that Bertie Pope is proposing……sorry, but does anyone else think that it looks like some huge ship has stuck itself in the back of the existing buildings on Patrick Street? Perhaps the worst presented building and proposal that I have seen….I really like the 2 floors of cladding sticking up on the roof…

      I knew it reminded me of something… 😀 The recessed upper storeys on the Patrick’s Street elevation do look like a cruise-liner bridge, but that said I favour the design as is over some horrible red-brick or ‘mock-period’ monstrosity. At the very least, the design is not pretending to be anything other than what it is…and a ship. ][/URL]
      Massing at roof-top can be just seen in this image of the northern elevation.

      It may look standout-ish now, but thinking of it in the context of the Academy Street block, that redevelopment should lessen the impact. In a sense, there is a greater onus on the OCP proposal given its prominence, sight-lines and surrounding/constituent structures.

    • #758291
      ToMuchFreeTime
      Participant

      Big Fan of the forum I’ve been watching it for a good while now but never got to signing up
      but hey here i am now just a few quick things to say/ask

      1. I hope cork dont lose out in getting an events arena cause its badly needed and i would think
      around kent station would be a good area for it because it would help draw people from not only out side the county but outside munster with its conveneance along with better public transport to the venue

      What is worrying me about this is the fact that limerick is planing there own 8,000 seater arena as well
      which could hurt the cork bid for a big arena if they get in there before us. heres a linkhttps://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=40823&postcount=414

      2.I love the plans for dennys cross but worry about objections throwing the project off course specialy with the history of objections for the area to anything over 2 floors!!!

      3. Whens the plan coming out for the north docklands being redeveloped by howard holdings ??? looking forward to that 🙂

      p.s. ye’ll be hearing alot more from me 😉

    • #758292
      who_me
      Participant

      I was reading back over this and the old Cork thread, and am curious about several projects that were mentioned but have gone quiet:

      Eglington St. – This has planning, but any idea when construction starts? The WebWorks building in front of it is already shooting up, and – together with the pictures posted here – give some idea of the scale of this project.

      Crosses Green hotel – this (amazingly, in my opinion) secured planning. Any idea if/when construction is due to start, or is it more likely the site will be sold with full planning permission.

      Kinsale Rd. hotel – a planning proposal was withdrawn if I remember correctly. Anyone have any idea why? Even gossip welcome! 😉

      Academy St. – Can’t wait to see what’s planned for here. Given its location and size, I’d imagine this one will be really under the microscope.

      Grand Parade Plaza – Wasn’t construction due to start before now?

      Any pictures/plans of the North Docklands?

      Office building on Clontarf St. – the one on that tiny triangular site. Any more news?

      And, finally, are there any even tentative plans for the Water St. bridge?

      (Sorry for all the questions!)

      Edited: for grammar reasons..

    • #758293
      lexington
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      I was reading back over this and the old Cork thread, and am curious about several projects that were mentioned but have gone quiet:

      Eglington St. – This has planning, but any idea when construction starts? The WebWorks building in front of it is already shooting up, and – together with the pictures posted here – give some idea of the scale of this project.

      Eglinton Street is out to tender – currently under 1st party appeal concerning conditions. Bowen Construction among others have tenders in on the project. Construction is set for early 2006.

      @who_me wrote:

      Crosses Green hotel – this (amazingly, in my opinion) secured planning. Any idea if/when construction is due to start, or is it more likely the site will be sold with full planning permission.

      Received planning (another ugly DT brick – sorry, but I just don’t like it!) and the 3rd Party Appeal was withdrawn. No details of a scheduled construction.

      @who_me wrote:

      Kinsale Rd. hotel – a planning proposal was withdrawn if I remember correctly. Anyone have any idea why? Even gossip welcome! ]
      AbsoluteHotels.com may seek a different location.

      @who_me wrote:

      Academy St. – Can’t wait to see what’s planned for here. Given its location and size, I’d imagine this one will be really under the microscope.

      Application scheduled now for November. Gehl Architects (Copenhagen) & Project Architects (Dublin) are behind the design with Niall Fitzsimons Limited as consulting engineers.

      @who_me wrote:

      Grand Parade Plaza – Wasn’t construction due to start before now?

      A further plannig application (additional apartments and retail space) on this site is expected in the future – concerning the former Goat Broke Loose premises etc. As for construction dates – ?????

      @who_me wrote:

      Any pictures/plans of the North Docklands?

      I have a preconception by O’Mahony Pike Architects (masterplan drawings) and will try and get it up over the next week or so. These drawings are not final designs but rather a idea on how the redevelopment proposal by Manor Park Homebuilders is scheduled to be laid out.

      @who_me wrote:

      Office building on Clontarf St. – the one on that tiny triangular site. Any more news?

      Still in Further Information – one of my pet favourite projects, by DAT Partnerships, hoping the design isn’t lost in any revised plans. Daniel Luxton with Coughlan de Keyser is behind the design.

      @who_me wrote:

      And, finally, are there any even tentative plans for the Water St. bridge?

      Final report being assessed.



      @ToMuchFreeTime wrote:

      3. Whens the plan coming out for the north docklands being redeveloped by howard holdings ??? looking forward to that

      Howard Holdings aren’t involved with the North Docklands Masterplan. It is believed they may have commissioned Murray O’Laoire Architects for a plan concerning the South Docklands – which will probably not be released public. Manor Park Homebuilders are involved with CIE on the North Docklands (Horgan’s Quay), O’Mahony Pike are the architects and no application date is scheduled. Discussions are on-going with CCC and the Port of Cork concerning the NDAP.

      Regarding the Event Centre – 3 developers are assessing possibilities for Cork. The obvious one is Manor Park Homebuilders, however they have expressed preference for a 2,500 seat venue only, which in itself they claim would need significant retail support to make viable. I don’t believe that. MPH aren’t really very interested in building such a centre. The size of the centre isn’t really an issue – an event centre in Cork could have a comfortable capacity of 8,000 and still be viable, as it is not the size of the centre that strictly counts – its the diversity of uses and the flexibility to cater for a variety of events. For example, the centre should be able to take large concerts or be subdivided into smaller venues for smaller performances. It should be able to take conferences of varying sizes – with partitions allowing a number of smaller conferences to operate at any one time. It should be able to take the ‘Disney on Ice’ style event when required, Eurovision(??? :p ) etc etc And on ‘days off’ perhaps have an ice-rink capacity (a full proper ice-rink) which can open up to the public and host events also (e.g. corporate outings, school tours etc). Perhaps the odd visit from the Belfast Giants in an ice-hockey tournament? Perhaps allow for the creation of a home ice-hockey team in Cork to compete in tournaments – the event centre operator can attain rights to associated merchandise etc etc. With a little imagination and versatility – you quickly find capacity is not necessarily the issue. Its the frequency and diversity that you can afford the centre – and then deriving revenue streams from a variety of functions, not just 1 or 2. The ice rink idea for example will allow for year-round use – filling possible event gaps. Build cost is another important component, good design can aid this issue – plus, appropriate underground parking may help recoup some cost issues in the long-run.

    • #758294
      who_me
      Participant

      Thanks Lexington, greatly appreciated!

    • #758295
      mhenness
      Participant

      @mhenness wrote:

      Looks like Game Stop have actually moved onto the main street in Mallow and not the Market Square development.

      Subway are also setting up right next to Pizza Hut in Market Square! If you ever needed convincing that Ireland is becoming Americanis(z)ed look no further…Starbucks here we come!

    • #758296
      securityman
      Participant

      I suppose that is true that we are becomming americanised but then again these places are all over the world and you cant stop them coming in if there is a demand. As for Starbucks I think they are in college green in dublin or else they are about to move in there. I’d be very suprised if they dont go for a spot in Patrick St although there is a lot of competition in the market at the moment with Costa Coffee, BBs, O’Briens, Gloria Jeans and all the other coffee shops too many too mention.

    • #758297
      GregF
      Participant

      As the European City of Culture year is nearly over for Cork, would Corkonians say that it was an overall success ?
      What achitectural jewels have sprung up adding to the cities architecture?
      Do Corkonians feel fully urbanely urbanized now in a European sense?

    • #758298
      sw101
      Participant

      @GregF wrote:

      As the European City of Culture year is nearly over for Cork, would Corkonians say that it was an overall success ?
      What achitectural jewels have sprung up adding to the cities acrhitecture.
      Do Corkonians feel fully urbanely urbanized now in a European sense?

      as a man in exile i only saw a couple of benefits in terms of architecture. the libeskind/arup pavilion in fota was a delightful addition. the works to oliver plunkett street and patrick street look great, good to see them completed in time(ish) to give a good impression of cork’s main thoroughfares.

      anyone who is disappointed by the whole affair, i’d love to know what you were expecting or hoping for, and what you think might have been done differently.

    • #758299
      mhenness
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      I suppose that is true that we are becomming americanised but then again these places are all over the world and you cant stop them coming in if there is a demand. As for Starbucks I think they are in college green in dublin or else they are about to move in there. I’d be very suprised if they dont go for a spot in Patrick St although there is a lot of competition in the market at the moment with Costa Coffee, BBs, O’Briens, Gloria Jeans and all the other coffee shops too many too mention.

      Of course you’re right. Franchising is a big thing pretty much everywhere these days and of course we have some Irish franchises that have hit the States also (but maybe not with the same scale). It just so happens that many franchises originate from north America. I think franchising will become one of the drivers of our services industry as it becomes an ever more important part of our economy in Ireland and as lower end manufacturing declines.

    • #758300
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 X-CES Projects have been granted planning for their (reportedly) €200m development at Hangman’s Point, not far from Kinsale. The proposal, designed by Henry J. Lyons & Partners and scheduled to be contracted to Bowen Construction will consist of a new Hyatt Hotel of approx. 200-bedrooms, convention and leisure centres, equestrian event centre, 18-hole champion golf-course, 180 resort lodges, golf academy and other ancillary provisions. The significant proposal will now have to brace itself for the possibility of appeal. Other obstacles yet face the project also, including a considerable bat ‘problem’ associated with the lands! 😮



      😎 Richard Walsh & Dick Kiely have been awarded a grant by ABP on their plans to develop 22 no. residential units comprising of 6 no. 1 bedroomed apartments, 11 no. 2 bedroom duplex units, 2 no. 3 bedroomed apartments and 3 no. 2 bedroomed detached town houses at Grianbru, Dennehy’s Cross. The project, which will range between 2 and 4-storeys, also includes 1 no. 175m2 cafe/restaurant and 1 no. 99m2 retail unit with 33 basement car-parking spaces. The project, designed by Kiosk Architects, was approved by the Bord following an initial refusal recommendation by the Planning Inspector.


      Aerial View (S to N) of the Grianbru site/Dennehy’s Cross – outlined in red.



      🙁 Also, John Casey (J&M Murphy) has lodged a third party appeal, for his successful grant regarding ‘leave’, against Pitwood Limited’s plans for a 116-bedroom hotel designed by James Leahy & Associates at Beasly Street and fronting 17/18 Parnell Place. The appeal concerns 2 conditions associated with the CCC grant. Mr. Casey believes those conditions may adversely his premises. This unfortunately delays a much need project – especially with respect to the facades at 17/18 Parnell Place.

    • #758301
      lexington
      Participant

      @GregF wrote:

      As the European City of Culture year is nearly over for Cork, would Corkonians say that it was an overall success ?
      What achitectural jewels have sprung up adding to the cities architecture?
      Do Corkonians feel fully urbanely urbanized now in a European sense?

      I think Cork has developed and continues to do so, a very continental, cosmopolitan feel to it. Of course there is much more to go, but the refurbishments at St. Patrick’s Street, Oliver Plunkett Street and those proposed for Grand Parade and Cornmarket Street have all added to this. We should also note the revitalisation of the French Quarter which looks great these days – new pavings, speciality shops, cafes and restaurants opening out onto the street, narrow lanes, street decor etc etc all have made this a beautiful contrast to the main stream commercial areas that surround it. Walking down Careys Lane is often like walking into another city.

      In terms of architecture, though there have been some contributions, some of the more exciting proposals are still doing the planning rounds or have yet to be proposed. In this sense, the best I feel, has yet to come.

    • #758302
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I think Cork has developed and continues to do so, a very continental, cosmopolitan feel to it. Of course there is much more to go, but the refurbishments at St. Patrick’s Street, Oliver Plunkett Street and those proposed for Grand Parade and Cornmarket Street have all added to this. We should also note the revitalisation of the French Quarter which looks great these days – new pavings, speciality shops, cafes and restaurants opening out onto the street, narrow lanes, street decor etc etc all have made this a beautiful contrast to the main stream commercial areas that surround it. Walking down Careys Lane is often like walking into another city.

      Agree wholeheartedly, and it’d be great to think that a redeveloped Faulkner’s Lane and Bowling Green St would add to that again. Combine that with the extra foot traffic that the Academy St. development should draw off Patrick St., and it should really re-energise the area (I don’t know what that means either, but it sounds good.. 😉 ).

    • #758303
      rebel_city
      Participant

      Hey everyone,

      I stumbled across this site a few weeks ago, and I’ve spent hours reading the last hmmm…32 pages of msgs! I’m living in Dublin at the moment, and travel back to Cork every 6 – 8 weeks or so, and each time I am impressed with the extra bit of development that’s going on. The Kinsale flyover has started and I think that for anybody visiting Cork for the 1st time and coming from the airport it will look impressive and modern. Dundrum here in Dublin seems to be doing very well, and a contact I have working in one of the Spanish retailers there said it’s doing very well. I heard somewhere that MahonPoint wasn’t doing as well as expected, but more recently I have heard that it’s doing well. I really hope that Debehams is there to stay, as their departure would look bad for other retailers thinking of setting up in the Cork market. I was in Galway a few weeks ago and was surprised to see that Habitat was there, actually it was more jealousy! Jealousy that a city the size of Galway has a shop that we don’t have in Cork! Also someone said that H & M is opening in Limerick, again why Limerick before Cork! The msg about Limerick getting an 8000 seater venue is disturbing as it would take the focus off Cork! I mean, great for Limerick, but Cork is the 2nd biggest city and I want to remain that way, and catch up with Dublin as much as possible! Looking forward to having a snoop around Ballincollig Town Centre when I’m down for the Jazz weekend, and cannot wait for both Academy St. and Cornmarket Street to take off! Speaking of taking off, cannot wait for the airport either, fingers crossed trans-atlantic flights begin soon!

    • #758304
      securityman
      Participant

      coming back to Starbucks I read in the Examiner today that they are looking at Bennetons shop on Cook St as there first venture to the capital of culture

    • #758305
      A-ha
      Participant

      Starbucks would be great to have in Cork, just to say that we have one…. but beside the difference in the colour of their cups… what is the main difference between Costa, Starbucks and Gloria Jeans? I am anxious to see someone going into the former Irish Rail office on Patrick Street…. it’s abit cramped, but it could still be put to some sort of use (Starbucks maybe). A Hyatt Hotel in Cork, I’m glad to hear it! It should provide some competition with the Clarion. Although with a golf course, I presume that it will be more for golfing weekends more than anything else. Isn’t there supposed to be a Hilton going out in Mahon Point, I havent heard anything about it in ages, is it still on?

    • #758306
      rebel_city
      Participant

      That shop on the corner of Particks Street and Cook Street would be a better location, the shop currently there is tacky and belongs on North Main Street Don’t know how they are making enough sales to justify the rent!

    • #758307
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Starbucks would be great to have in Cork, just to say that we have one…. but beside the difference in the colour of their cups… what is the main difference between Costa, Starbucks and Gloria Jeans? I am anxious to see someone going into the former Irish Rail office on Patrick Street…. it’s abit cramped, but it could still be put to some sort of use (Starbucks maybe). A Hyatt Hotel in Cork, I’m glad to hear it! It should provide some competition with the Clarion. Although with a golf course, I presume that it will be more for golfing weekends more than anything else. Isn’t there supposed to be a Hilton going out in Mahon Point, I havent heard anything about it in ages, is it still on?

      I don’t think the opening of a new store chain in Cork, or any market, should be celebrated on the basis of ‘we have one’ – it should be seen a representation of the confidence that an international group realises in the market. rebel_city asks why Limerick/Galway before Cork – it’s not necessarily an issue of the bigger city gets it first – retaillers assess markets on a number of fronts. When a business invests a substantial level of capital into a new market it has to consider a number of issues – not least distribution, available retail space, the size of that retail space in a location deemed acceptable, rent or freehold values, demand etc etc. H&M and TK Maxx are making strides regarding the Cork market – so hold onto your hats. 😮

      As for rebel_city‘s other point, on MahonPoint – when Liffey Valley S.C. opened in Dublin first, similar woes and fears were expressed. The same too for Dundrum. However, as I’m sure you will likely find with Ballincollig S.C. after a few months – similar fears will be expressed also. Large S.C. generally start off with hype – a hype that translates into large volumes of consumers at first, but overfamiliarisation leads to a latter withdrawal in numbers, this dip represents the period in which a centre finds its place in the market (“teething”), some centres have it worse than others – but I think you’ll find, more often than not, a niche is found and these centres settle into a comfortable operating scenario. Now not all retaillers will be happy – but the market will generally determine their position subject to a centres niche position over the long-run.

      Though every hotel is in competition with the next to some extent – I think you’ll find hotel markets segment to varying clientele. The Hyatt’s location is removed from the city – though on some levels in will compete (such as conferencing and touring holidays etc) – I think you’ll find it will be of more competition to the likes of the hotel plans earmarked for the Old Head of Kinsale, and possibly the Howard Holdings hotel plan for Emmett Quay in Kinsale town centre – which will be in the Frankie Whelan stable as well I believe. The Clarion’s main competition will be, for example, the new Jurys on Lancaster Quay, the Kingsley etc.

      .

    • #758308
      altuistic
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😎 Richard Walsh & Dick Kiely have been awarded a grant by ABP on their plans to develop 22 no. residential units comprising of 6 no. 1 bedroomed apartments, 11 no. 2 bedroom duplex units, 2 no. 3 bedroomed apartments and 3 no. 2 bedroomed detached town houses at Grianbru, Dennehy’s Cross. The project, which will range between 2 and 4-storeys, also includes 1 no. 175m2 cafe/restaurant and 1 no. 99m2 retail unit with 33 basement car-parking spaces. The project, designed by Kiosk Architects, was approved by the Bord following an initial refusal recommendation by the Planning Inspector.


      Aerial View (S to N) of the Grianbru site/Dennehy’s Cross – outlined in red.

      While i must say i like the plan for Dennehy’s Garage…I am not pleased about the appeal decision for the former Post Offic and house at Grianbru. Disappointing for me personally. I think it borders too close to housing in the area and that the student accommodation to the rear was sufficiently close. I dont really have a problem with most other development down along the Victoria Cross road that direction. I just hope this block appears better in life than what i’ve seen of it.

    • #758309
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 With excavations now winding up, CainWhite have moved on site at Rockfell Investments’ Cornmarket Street development to begin foundations piling procedures. Footpaths to the front of the site, on the Cornmarket Street elevation are being dug up and other procedures on site are gearing up from the commencement of the primary construction phase. Small delays associated with excavations did materialise but a tower crane could be seen on site, according to workers, within a month. Frank Ennis & Associates are responsible for the 170,00sq ft of retail space and 65 apartments over 66 space basement parking which constitutes the project.


    • #758310
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Bernard Crowley & Gerard Paul have been permitted the development of a new apartment development at the former Riverside Farm along the Model Farm Road (south of Eden Hall). The new proposal, designed by Dennehy + Dennehy, is subject to 19 conditions and follows an initial refusal by the planner – this refusal was later overturned by the Director of Planning and City Manager following revised plans.

      As part of the grant, the developers are required to sufficiently adjust and realign the Model Farm Road with borders their development to the North – this comes following concerns associated with the capacity of the road’s traffic handlings abilities. Furthermore, noteworthy provision of a park-like amenity area, open to the public, shall be provided for. Some reductions have also been implied on the original development plans for 67 apartments, creche and gym over basement car-parking in a building ranging for 5 to 7 storeys. The building will peak at around 6 storeys and, as par the original design, slope lower as it proceeds south.

      With approx. 48 objections, including those subsequent of Further Information, the proposal will now likely face appeal.

    • #758311
      rebel_city
      Participant

      I heard that the silo/grain storage buliding on the quays is to become apartments, is this true? It has huge potential and would give a good impression to anyone travelling down from Dublin or from Waterford and entering the city.

    • #758312
      lexington
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      …Howard Holdings are now focusing on 2 other substantial projects, among them a significant docklands initative…

      You may remember I recently noted that Howard Holdings were focussing on a substantial docklands initiative [post #527] – well, news came through last night, and I was told only a few minutes ago that the media were scheduled to announce part details on this issue – I can now confirm that Howard Holdings have purchased the 11-acre Ford Distribution Centre at the very heart of the South Docklands.

      The vital docklands site went quietly on the market at the end of the summer with a guide price of an estimated €20m – the final sale agreement is believed to be €5m in excess of this . At least 4 solid bids were placed on the site, some speculation had suggested that Castlelands Construction may have been initially interested but failed to carry through any successful offer. Howard Holdings, whose CEO Greg Coughlan (a native of Ballydehob), has always made known its intention to play an active role in the redevelopment of Cork’s docklands. The company, who recently made a successful purchase of the former 0.5acre Doyle Warehousing on Albert Quay for a suspected €10m final offer price, and who sold their acquired No.16 Lavitts Quay premises to OCP for a price tag of in and around €8m – are now rapidly establishing themselves as Cork’s premeir development company associated with Docklands development. Howard Holdings are also understood as to having devised a South Docklands Masterplan – which I was told they have a substantial interest in helping realise. Their successful bid on the Ford site solidifies their intentions – the company will now commence an assessment of the best specific development options associated with the site. Talks will commence with CCC, but an application is not expected in the medium term – it is likely that the company will await the publication of the South Area Docklands Development Plan next year before forwarding with any proposals.

    • #758313
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Cool! I’m glad Howard got this one, i think they could really bring something special to this site. Oooh i cant wait to see what they have planned.

    • #758314
      PTB
      Participant

      The apartment development on the model farm road appears to be covered in green camoflage netting.Developers will do anything to avoid those anti-highrise potesters.

    • #758315
      A-ha
      Participant

      And what about the Hilton supposed to be built in Mahon Point? Is it still on?

    • #758316
      lexington
      Participant

      Howard Holdings are placing themselves in a very progressive position – the company is deciding to take action on all the talk regarding docklands potential and is ready to make something of it. Following the acquisition of the 11-acre Ford Distribution site, Howard are now engaging in discussions with Cork City Council, the GAA and the Munster Agricultural Society about attaining the important Showgrounds lands, or at least, the development rights to these easily developable properties. Further to that, Howard Holdings have conducted and continue to conduct talks with Tedcastle Holdings and their well place lands to the north of the Ford site, facing the River Lee. Should these lands be successfully attained, Howard will be in a prime development position with the largest single development opportunity (in terms of land holdings) in the South Docklands Area, thereby solidifying Howard’s long-term intentions to be the prime development company associated with the Cork docklands. Upwards of €400m is being loosely figured by the company with regard to development opportunities on the 3 mentioned land holdings, and that may not be all. This aggressive approach by Howard will also put pressure on other developers to successfully secure lands and development options within the South Docklands should they wish to plan a significant role in the future of what is essentially the largest, exciting and potentially most rewarding development opportunity in the south of Ireland. With 166 hectares forming part of the overall docklands development strategy, moves are swinging into play very smoothly now. Manor Park Homes, Werdna and the Kenny Group have secured the 3 primary sites associated with the North Docklands Area (however there are plenty of exciting opportunities yet to be realised along the Alfred Street/Railway Street corridor), and now Howard are pushing forward with securing a major land mass to the south. Other key landowners include IAWS, Southern Milling, Odlums, Omnistone, Careys Tool Hire and Shell.

      The following months will undoubtedly see who will be established as the key docklands development holders. Indeed a myriad of issues will yet need to materialise before large-scale movement is realised – not least local authority discussion and plan actualisation, but also issues of attaining sustainable investment and employment opportunities and other market realisations. One thing is for sure however, with the Howard Holdings name moving so proactively toward land holding acquisitions, the heat is now on. Whether for investment or development, the drive is a clear issue of opportunity and confidence. The important thing for developers will be that land values remain reasonable – this will also be important for existing landowners who would be foolish to price themselves out of a good opportunity for them as well. Over the coming months, a clearer picture should be painted on who is going to have a say on how the future of the docklands is shaped.

      However, in terms of development, a ‘goldrush’ scenario will not benefit the docklands, developers or the city at large, but rather a considerate and well phased redevelopment by noteworthy, key players that will afford imagination, design quality and sustainable progression of what is essentially a new ‘city’. Steady as she goes.

    • #758317
      A-ha
      Participant

      I found some interesting pictures of Heathrow’s new Terminal 5 today when I was looking around on the net. I saw a few pictures that looked familiar when compared to Cork’s new terminal. Have a look at some of these pictures, the second one might be an insight into what the interior of our new terminal will look like when completed.

      Heathrow1
      Heathrow2
      Heathrow3

    • #758318
      lexington
      Participant

      to be updated soon.

      This update concerns the piece kindly published here.

    • #758319
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      to be updated soon.

      That is cheerleading at its worst

    • #758320
      lexington
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      That is cheerleading at its worst

      I simply put that statement up because I withdrew an earlier post until it is approved and had notified that the subject post would be updated later as other members had complained that I use not to indicate to them when I had updated or was going to update posts with additional information. I now always (well 95% of the time) indicate at the bottom of my posts when and for what reasons I have updated a post. It seems like an awful waste of space not to utilise a post properly, so I will be getting back to it (hopefully) at a later stage should the post I initially made find approval – if it doesn’t, so be it. Better safe than sorry. :p

    • #758321
      lexington
      Participant

      In a competition held jointly by Cork City Council and the RIAI to design a suitable redeveloped central library for Cork in the 21st Century – 3 entries were jointly awarded the €10,000 1st Prize, sponsored by developer and auctioneer Joe Carey of REMAX Cork City & County. Over 400 expressions of interest were made with regard to the project, and 230 supposed entries were made from all over the world.

      The winning entries were:

      – Eugene Cheah & Colleagues from Victoria, Australia
      – Johan Voordouw & Colleagues from Manitoba, Canada

      and

      – Pasel Kuenzel Architects from Rotterdam, The Netherlands

      The Panel of Judges consisted of Jack Healy, Cork City Architect, Gary Mongey of Box Architects, Norma McDermott, Director of An Chomhairle Leabharlanna, and Joe Kennelly, Director of Services, Cork City Council. John Graby, Director of Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland (RIAI) stewarded the competition and the assessment process.

      For further details see the RIAI Website

      For a list of other shortlisted entries, see here.

    • #758322
      POM
      Participant

      Some interesting ideas emerged out of the Library competition. The Eugene Cheah idea is very interesting and fronts out onto the middle of the revamped Grand Parade as a stand alone structure from the existing central library building. Though the idea is intriguing, much of the designs are unrealistic. Some proposals even proposed relocating the library out to the docklands as part of the new city centre. This would offer the Cork Corporation with a wonderful land sale ooportunity but I doubt they would be too willing to move from their current ringer of a location.

      My favourite idea however did not make the final 3. This was the Embaixada proposal. Now that’s imagination. Could you conceive the controversy something like that would cause in Cork? Maybe it’s needed.

    • #758323
      lexington
      Participant

      Designed by Nuno Griff of Embaixada

      Runner-up in Cork City Ideal 21st Century Central Library Competition.

    • #758324
      lexington
      Participant

      An alternative perspective on the proposed motion before Cork City Council tonight, proposed by Councillor Dave McCarthy, and which seeks to impose a development ban on developments over 3-storeys across Cork’s suburbs. The campaign has been given a lot clout lately in the local media – and so be it, but here’s an alternative perspective on the motion. Click here.

      It’s no harm to have a little balance. I hope to bring you news on the outcome of the motion tomorrow. In my own opinion, it is one that makes little social, economic or sustainable sense. A number of opponents have indicated their disapproval of the motion including Director of Planning Jim O’Donovan and Fine Gael Councillor and Former Lord Mayor Colm Burke.



      Meanwhile, CCC have posted notification on amendments to the North Docklands Area Plan and by extension, the Cork City Development Plan 2004. Details of this are available on an earlier post.



      Also, for those of you familiar with Babelmag, it’s latest addition contains an interesting argument in favour of the Victoria Mills design – if I come across it, I’ll put the text up for your deliberation.



      Bishopstown Area Development Plan

      Another topic of discussion among CCC tonight is the proposition of a Bishopstown Area Development Plan, forwarded by Councillors Brian Bermingham and Jerry Buttimer – indeed, I agree with the councillors and its supporters on the materialisation of such a plan, and hope it will provide some form of relevant guideline (and I stress ‘guideline’) with regards prospective development in the area over the coming years. That’s not to say development must be stalled in light of this plan’s formulation, but it should produce a constructive foresight on its completion.

      Also calls by some local residents in the area for new local service amenities, such as parks and cinemas etc on the Dennehy’s Cross site are noted. I do not perceive the provision of a ‘cinema’ for example on the Dennehy’s Cross site – but for residents to enjoy such amenities, they need to have a relevant market base. As is, this market does not even support basic provisions such as a butchers, post office etc and that the development opposed by some will actually create a more sustainable environment for such amenities in the future. I support their efforts to attain such facilities – but I hope that they would understand that residential developments in the area will support such facilities realisation rather than inhibit it. Given the nearby student population base and emerging developments in the area – a small cineplex and associated facilities should be quite possible for all residents in the area at some prospective future date – however, there is another site near Dennehy’s Cross which I would deem much more suitable for such development (which could include a public park) – but the site would be subject to the current land-owner’s sale discretion.

    • #758325
      anto
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 With excavations now winding up, CainWhite have moved on site at Rockfell Investments’ Cornmarket Street development to begin foundations piling procedures. Footpaths to the front of the site, on the Cornmarket Street elevation are being dug up and other procedures on site are gearing up from the commencement of the primary construction phase. Small delays associated with excavations did materialise but a tower crane could be seen on site, according to workers, within a month. Frank Ennis & Associates are responsible for the 170,00sq ft of retail space and 65 apartments over 66 space basement parking which constitutes the project.


      not too impressed with that I have to say, Doesn’t exactly respect the grain of the street,

    • #758326
      lexington
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      not too impressed with that I have to say, Doesn’t exactly respect the grain of the street,

      Well it is only the 1st step in a larger scale rejuvenation process of the whole Cornmarket Street area. A new development/action plan has been published by CCC – and private development plans on 2 other fronts are also being examined. The plan is too realise Cornmarket Street as a natural extension of the Core Retail Area that is Patrick’s Street.

    • #758327
      lexington
      Participant

      😡 In a momentously ill-considered decision, Cork City Council voted 15-8 in favour of imposing a development ban last night of structures proposed over 3-storeys, despite the warnings of City Manager Joe Gavin and Director of Planning Jim O’Donovan. Though the councillors that supported the motion and residents of the wetsern suburbs backing the ban may think they have won a victory, Joe Gavin warned that they may in fact damage themselves in the long-run. Regarded as a populist, short-sighted motion – it now limits investment options in the area and more specifically limits the ability of Cork City Council to have a more definite final say in the outcome of development projects proposed for suburban areas as more and more projects will likely be deffered to An Bord Pleanala for final deliberation. Existing and emerging patterns in the area may be used as arguments for justification in development proposal greenlighting. If backers of the motion believe this is too their benefit, they may be wise to defer their attention to recent appeal decisions concerning Grianbru, Farranlea Road and Victoria Cross.

      Councillor Fergal Dennehy asked Cork City Council to lead the way in designating specific areas for so-called high-rise development – if he browses the Cork City Development Plan 2004 – 2009 he will note that Victoria Cross is already designated as one area capable of supporting such structures.

      This motion will likely refer many higher calibre development opportunities to areas such as Douglas, Donnybrook, Ballincollig and other such areas exempt from such policy – in effect, the residents and councillors have simply made it more difficult for the likelihood of their desired local services and amenity provisions to be realised given the limits now imposed on private and public investment in the designated areas. The residential units proposed would create a large supportive market, however the reduced options on density now limit the ability to provide such a base and will displace development options. A very poor decision to which no long-term benefit will materialise for any involved party.

    • #758328
      jungle
      Participant

      Do you have a list of councillors who voted for or against?

      I think some emails are in order, but I don’t want to hassle any who voted against.

    • #758329
      lexington
      Participant

      I don’t necessarily wish to issue a list of votes – it’s probably not fair, but many councillors have made their position public and you can deliberate from that yourself no doubt.

    • #758330
      rodger
      Participant

      I suppose the bottom line to this is that An Bord Pleannala will have to make the final descision on any applications.All our elected representatives have done is put property beyond the reach of most buyers.Well done lads,the little man loses again.

    • #758331
      malec
      Participant

      Hi. Any news on the waterstreet development?

    • #758332
      pier39
      Participant

      its a right farse. as joe gavin said, where are the suburbs exactly??? this uniform policy undermines cork corporation as a local authority and only gives abp more controle over development issues in cork. and what of land values? in order to justify the cost of sites unit prices will fly up. how exclusionary. isnt part of the reason behind part v of the planning act to create a mix of tenancy in larger residential developments to stop the formation of the ghettos them residents are screamin over??? well in isolating the type of persons who can afford accommodation in the suburbs arent the councillors and lobby residents propelling the formation of such? i thought our public representatives were suppose to look out for the greater good of all their constituents not just their own selfish interests. im so disappointed. like brian birmingham said its not as if developments in the suburbs have been slapbang in the middle of housing estates, they have been on otherwise derelict or former warehousing industrial sites which were eyesores or wastes. the impact of the developments have been exageratted tremendously. fair play to him and colm burke for being among the few councillors with some decent common sense and with their constituents genuinely at heart.

    • #758333
      lexington
      Participant

      In brighter news…

      🙂 Howard Holdings have been awarded the Judge’s Choice Award in the Better Building Awards for their City Quarter project on Lapps Quay – which includes a 200+ space dual level basement car-park, reconstructed quayside with boardwalk and docking pontoon, 190-bedroom Clarion Hotel, 13 luxury apartments, 80,000sq ft of third generation office space and a number of restaurant and commercial units, all designed by Niall Scott of Scott Tallon Walker. Apparently Wagamama on South Main Street, designed by Dan Mulvihill & Associates, was awarded 2nd place. Greg Coughlan received the award on behald of Howard Holdings and indicated the company, who recently were announced as successful buyers of the 11-acre Ford site in the south docklands, and Doyle Warehouse on Albert Quay, had a number of exciting plans under formulation for the Cork city area.
      Cork Lord Mayor Deirdre Clune presented the award to Mr. Coughlan along with Gerald McCarthy of the RIAI.



      🙂 James G. O’Mahony’s Rosridge Properties have been outlined planning permission by Cork County Council for the development of a new 100-bed private hospital by Garranedarragh near Bishopstown. A new facility for Enable Ireland is also granted as part of the permission.



      @malec wrote:

      Hi. Any news on the waterstreet development?

      A decision by ABP is due for November 24th 2005.

    • #758334
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Regarding the “High-rise” ban- no good can come of it! This is a badly thought out motion and really was appealling to the lowest common denominator (NIMBY) residents groups.

      A few questions which people may be able to answer:

      1. Who owns the houses immediatly before the traffic lights outside UCC main gaites- on the left as you head out of town, one of them is called “Finbarr House”. They are beautiful structures but are in a woeful state of repair. The gardens of at least two have been used for years by Main-drainage workers i believe. Anybody know who is responsible for these?
      2. When can we now expect a submission for the Academy St. development? Will it be delayed to consult with Dunnes re the neighbouring development?
      3. Since CCC have saved themselves the trouble of putting up Christmas Lights on Patrick Street this year (they’re still up from last year) will there be a move to improve on last year’s pretty underwhelming display?

    • #758335
      A-ha
      Participant

      Is there a residents group for the construction of “high-rise” buildings…. if some people have a group against them, why cant we have a group for them? I wanna give a good smack to anyone involved in banning these buildings. Do they relise that what was the suburbs 50 years ago is part of the city centre today. One day the council will have no other option then to chuck this new ban out the window….. even the so called suburbs have suburbs in Cork. This ban wont last at all.

    • #758336
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Regarding the “High-rise” ban- no good can come of it! This is a badly thought out motion and really was appealling to the lowest common denominator (NIMBY) residents groups.

      A few questions which people may be able to answer:

      1. Who owns the houses immediatly before the traffic lights outside UCC main gaites- on the left as you head out of town, one of them is called “Finbarr House”. They are beautiful structures but are in a woeful state of repair. The gardens of at least two have been used for years by Main-drainage workers i believe. Anybody know who is responsible for these?
      2. When can we now expect a submission for the Academy St. development? Will it be delayed to consult with Dunnes re the neighbouring development?
      3. Since CCC have saved themselves the trouble of putting up Christmas Lights on Patrick Street this year (they’re still up from last year) will there be a move to improve on last year’s pretty underwhelming display?

      The implications of the ban are far more extensive than people realise. First, off, the City Council will have to draw up and assess where suburbs logically begin and end – this in itself automatically creates a clear divide among regions and residents of the city at large. Second, it creates exclusionary isolationalism which is not sustainable and in direct conflict with the certain sections of the Planning & Development Act 2000. Third, it is a rich-man’s motion – for so-called champions of the ‘working class’, their representatives have really let them down, that includes Sinn Fein, the Labour Party, the Socialist Party and the likes of Dave McCarthy et al. The preception that investment will continue as is, unaffected by the ban, is naive. As house prices increase, those on the lower end of the wage bracket will be forced to seek home elsewhere, even if they have lived in areas like Bishopstown all their lives. Consequently, the demand will force the accelerated consumption of green areas in and around the city as development is shifted to cater for new homes and more sustainable prices. Fourth, what happens as the city develops and suburban boundaries are reassessed? Will the entire city by subject to sprawling blcoks of monotonous 2 and 3 storey homes and apartment blocks? Such a ban cannot last in the interests of sustainability. The policy is the most ill conceived, self centred policy considered at the hands of CCC in many years and shows complete disregard for the broader public. And that’s not scare-mongering, I can do that too, but this is fact. Councillor McCarthy’s argument that the new residential developments equate to those being demolished in the likes of Togher and Blackpool is fecious – the standard and quality of those flats don’t even compare to the issue proposals. And even the social/affordable housing redeveloped at the former Blackpool flats extends to 6-storeys, commonly regarded as a superb example of s/a development.

      – As for Academy Street, OCP have already held discussions with Dunnes Stores, a planning application is expected for November as scheduled.

    • #758337
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      And people want to give more power to local government?

      Question, is this actually binding? I mean do CCC have to, by default, turn down planning for all developments within the ‘suburbs’ over 3 stories? I presume the final word would rest with ABP, but in that case, do they then have to take this ‘ban’ into account?

      What happens to the Dennehys cross proposals, for example?

    • #758338
      altuistic
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      The implications of the ban are far more extensive than people realise. First, off, the City Council will have to draw up and assess where suburbs logically begin and end – this in itself automatically creates a clear divide among regions and residents of the city at large. Second, it creates exclusionary isolationalism which is not sustainable and in direct conflict with the certain sections of the Planning & Development Act 2000. Third, it is a rich-man’s motion – for so-called champions of the ‘working class’, their representatives have really let them down, that includes Sinn Fein, the Labour Party, the Socialist Party and the likes of Dave McCarthy et al. The preception that investment will continue as is, unaffected by the ban, is naive. As house prices increase, those on the lower end of the wage bracket will be forced to seek home elsewhere, even if they have lived in areas like Bishopstown all their lives. Consequently, the demand will force the accelerated consumption of green areas in and around the city as development is shifted to cater for new homes and more sustainable prices. Fourth, what happens as the city develops and suburban boundaries are reassessed? Will the entire city by subject to sprawling blcoks of monotonous 2 and 3 storey homes and apartment blocks? Such a ban cannot last in the interests of sustainability. The policy is the most ill conceived, self centred policy considered at the hands of CCC in many years and shows complete disregard for the broader public. And that’s not scare-mongering, I can do that too, but this is fact. Councillor McCarthy’s argument that the new residential developments equate to those being demolished in the likes of Togher and Blackpool is fecious – the standard and quality of those flats don’t even compare to the issue proposals. And even the social/affordable housing redeveloped at the former Blackpool flats extends to 6-storeys, commonly regarded as a superb example of s/a development.

      Maybe i’m missing something here, but just a few points…and first let me say that i neither condone nor agree with the motion but…

      a. arent housing prices growing as it is anyway? Why is such a ban a neccessary catalyst for increasing house prices?

      b. some of the prices on these apartments as it is are outrageous – 325000 for a 2 bedroom apartment? Thats almost as much as a house in some places.

      c. if a development is in breach of a development plan, don’t the appeals board usual refer to a local authority’s development plan concerning patterns of development in its deliberation?

      But that said I agree that it is a stupid motion.

    • #758339
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      That whole area is heading to be easily the most dreary Lucan-esque community-free and services-free part of Cork. A tatty shopping centre, hospital and endless rows of semi-d’s… let them have their 3 storey ceiling. It would take alot more to improve the area anyway. Let developers spend their money in other parts of metro-Cork and then we’ll see how attitudes change. In any case it is fair to say that for the most part there are few places in the Western Suburbs that would prove suitable for exceeding this limit (Dennehy’s Cross aside).

    • #758340
      lexington
      Participant

      @altuistic wrote:

      Maybe i’m missing something here, but just a few points…and first let me say that i neither condone nor agree with the motion but…

      a. arent housing prices growing as it is anyway? Why is such a ban a neccessary catalyst for increasing house prices?

      b. some of the prices on these apartments as it is are outrageous – 325000 for a 2 bedroom apartment? Thats almost as much as a house in some places.

      c. if a development is in breach of a development plan, don’t the appeals board usual refer to a local authority’s development plan concerning patterns of development in its deliberation?

      But that said I agree that it is a stupid motion.

      There are a couple of scenarios to assess – the 1st, development land values remain in line, but consequently, given the cap – are restricted in the number of units the site could otherwise accommodate. If granted, to cover costs sufficiently and still profit, a developer will have to increase unit prices – that’s assuming demand for such land remains the same.

      Indeed some apartment prices are very steep – however compare this to the average cost of housing units on, for example, the Model Farm Road – average house prices here work out at about €425,000. From a buyers perspective, that’s €700 to €800 more per month on a variable 20-year mortgage versus repayment on a €325,000 mortgage of the same nature (indeed it is a hefty price for 800sq ft, but it can make all the difference for some individuals). The option of an apartment in the same area can provide a much more attractive alternative. However, where site size and assoicated costs do not justify the development of housing, and requires high density style development to justify these such costs, you’ll find that a density/height cap restricts the number of units provided – either way, pushing unit costs up. This will displace certain region of a prospectively larger market catchment. Clearly an uncatered for section of the market will exist, and developers will take advantage of the opportunity, but will be forced to located development elsewhere in locations were site size vs land value allow for the sustainable construction of large developments within the cap. Obviously, given a constrained site size, with a required number of units will mean the displaced of the proposal over a larger area. Even if a planning authority restricts site capacity, the residual demand will be satisfied elsewhere and this will still encompass the consumption of another site. Market ‘law’ suggests that these such sites are generally found in peripheral, ‘green’ locations. From the CCC’s perspective, the height cap stands to see them lose out on development contribution fees as projects are relocated elsewhere – i.e. CorkCoCo jurisdiction. Indeed, a certain level of the market will always seek that apartment along the Victoria Cross Road – but the market catchment is substantially reduced.

      Indeed, some developers may still apply for a 5 or 6-storey block – but under the new cap, CCC will be obliged to either refuse, or reduce the project to within policy permittant lines, possibly rendering the development unviable. An appeal to ABP, will ultimately allow ABP a greater say in the end result – and empirically, a greater say in Cork development full-stop should more and more developments be required for referral to the Bord (that’s assuming development supply remains the same). Generally ABP consider Development Plan policy, but they also assess a project within the context of its environment, and the overall suitability of that project within this context. This can over-ride policy in some cases, should the environment exist in contravention of a Development Plan amendment. i.e. If every other building is 5 to 6-storeys and CCC refusal is based on a later applied amendment stating a cap of 3-storeys, the context of the proposal would suggest its planned 6-storeys is more suited to the overall pattern of development in the area. That is one potential outcome.



      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      let them have their 3 storey ceiling. It would take alot more to improve the area anyway. Let developers spend their money in other parts of metro-Cork and then we’ll see how attitudes change.

      The problem is that the motion stated ‘suburbs’ – inclusive of broader suburban areas other that Bishopstown. The predominant pattern of development has been associated with the Victoria Cross corridor which is more than suitable for such development. Other isolated developments have included Westend and the Rossbrook area. The problem with the cap is that it will also limit the capacity to improve the area and the elements which you state as being in the ‘found wanting’ basket.



      Aidan – my understanding is that existing applications will not be affected by the cap as they were proposed in advance of the motion.

    • #758341
      rebel_city
      Participant

      As far as I can remember, supposedly Councillor McCarthy, a number of years ago proposed a tram system from the city centre to Knocknaheeney (sorry if it’s mispselt!). This was just a random example of an idea which was clearly not thought out properly. I cannot believe that CCC voted in favour of this ban for the suburbs. I hope they read the comments made by Lexington, and change their mind. Clearly Councillor McCarthy gave his side of the argument and the rest just said, well ok then. I really thought their would be stricter rules / laws governing they voting system within the CCC, or some system in place so that not just any old thing is passed. Bad day for Corks suburbs, where ever they are!!

    • #758342
      who_me
      Participant

      I don’t know to what degree this ban might help increase apartment prices, but it certainly won’t help. Prices will continue to increase at current rates as long as new developments sell as quickly and easily as they do now. (IMO, investors are skewing the market to some degree). Fewer stories means fewer (or worse, smaller) apartments within a reasonable distance of the city centre, and thus the buying frenzy can only get worse.

      FYI, 325K for a new 2 bed apartment in Cork is probably average or below, several developments I’ve seen are priced 385 to 390K if you include a parking spot.

    • #758343
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Since the anti-“anything over three storeys” crowd obviously managed to get their opinions heard through a lobby group, is there anyway that those of us are against this motion can make our voices heard? Sign a petition, form a lobby or similar? Anyone got any ideas? I, for one, would like my opposition made known.

    • #758344
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      re: the “last nights note by the councillors of gloom”

      just to clarify things in my mind here- is it not true that the current city development plan is still the statutory plan for cork city and suburbs?

      last nights vote was a motion and not a vote on an actual amendment to the plan? surely 15 councillors cannot alter a development plan over the course of a monday nights rambling…what’s the situation?

      btw – an bord pleanala can overrule a development plan

      the three storey ban would potentially conflict with government guidelines on residential density 1999 and government policy precedes local authority statutory plans. it would also conflict with government policy on sustainability.

      these so called public representatives are being disingenuous and it is quite sad to see this happen really – this proposal has no public interest and is being encouraged solely by motivations of certain local candidates towrads a general election in 2006/2007. what a pathetic bunch

    • #758345
      rodger
      Participant

      Perhaps this is just electionering on behalf of our elected representatives.The local media are giving plenty of coverage so its free exposure to the Councilors if the issue goes away then no more free press.So why stop?

      This opens a pandoras box.The politicians are empowering people,1st its the Western Suburbs then who knows even the docklands development may be compromised.Land owners will not sell their land under market value.Cork City can only go one way and that is UP.

    • #758346
      lexington
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      re: the “last nights note by the councillors of gloom”

      just to clarify things in my mind here- is it not true that the current city development plan is still the statutory plan for cork city and suburbs?

      last nights vote was a motion and not a vote on an actual amendment to the plan? surely 15 councillors cannot alter a development plan over the course of a monday nights rambling…what’s the situation?

      btw – an bord pleanala can overrule a development plan

      the three storey ban would potentially conflict with government guidelines on residential density 1999 and government policy precedes local authority statutory plans. it would also conflict with government policy on sustainability.

      Indeed the motion last night leads the way for an amendment to be made to the Cork City Development Plan – making it statutory policy…however…

      …the wording of the amendment is not as easy as some councillors may think, and it will, as Joe Gavin noted – take some time.

      Furthermore, there are complications as bunch quite rightly noted regarding this policy and guidelines set out by the DoE. This may yet constitute a legal issue.

      The amendment will have to go through Council again before it is passed. Such amendments will be subject to submissions and these must be noted by Council. Feel free to make well argued submissions – I’ll notify you when the CCC make notification. In the meantime, prospective development for the area can proceed in line with existing policies until such a time that this is written into the Development Plan or a challenge is settled.

      The vital flaw with the proposal is that it doesn’t make any sense – neither economic, social and planning sense. CCC stands to lose out more on this proposal more than anyone else – however it can side-step around it as well. In its division of suburbia, appropriate designations can maintain areas suitable for development. It will be the jobs of the planners and management to identify these designations.

    • #758347
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Investor Joe O’Donovan has moved again with the purchase of the Central Shoe Stores premises on Grand Parade for an estimated €14.5m! The acquisition joins his rapidly expanding collection of premises in the area which includes the Qube Complex on Oliver Plunkett Street, which reportedly sold for €10m and properties along Market Lane and St. Patrick’s Street which include the premises housing the former Pound City store, McCarthy Travel shop and Image Photography. The acquisition gives Mr. O’Donovan and his backers an enviable linkage of buildings from St. Patrick’s Street to Oliver Plunkett Street (only parted by the English Market) and now fronting Grand Parade with the purchase of Central Shoe Stores. A deal with Mount Kennett Investments (Paul O’Brien and John Costello) is believed to be under negotiation – but this is yet to be confirmed. The potential now exists for Mr. O’Donovan to proceed with a large-scale retail and commercial development of impressive proportions. The accumulated sites now offer any prospective development with an envious position fronting Cork’s 3 primary retail corridors which see unparalleled levels of pedestrian activity. Patrick’s Street alone can, at a peak, see up to 200,000 to 225,000 movements per day – plus Oliver Plunkett Street and Grand Parade. A delicate integration with the English Market may yet be on the cards.


      Given the angle of this image, a proper outline is difficult. Green indicates suspected properties acquired by Joe O’Donovan et al, red and yellow = possible link-ups.



      🙂 It seems that Lisney Auctioneers will act as selling party for Top Car Motors along Victoria Cross Road as it seeks to relocate to John Cleary Developments’ MotorMall project at Mahon Point. Both Top Car sites – at Victoria Cross and along Farranlea Road – are due for sale and offer a superb redevelopment opportunity for any prospective developer.


    • #758348
      t.scott
      Participant

      last time i was home i was more impressed with oliver plunkett st than the patrick st overhaul. maybe the eglinton st development will change a few minds for the better!!?!!

    • #758349
      corkdood
      Participant

      Has anyone heard anything about MCO’Sullivans Engineers vacating their premises in Innishmore Ballincollig. I heard a rumour that they are to move to Mahon. If its true it would free up another site in Ballincollig for development..

    • #758350
      altuistic
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      From the CCC’s perspective, the height cap stands to see them lose out on development contribution fees as projects are relocated elsewhere – i.e. CorkCoCo jurisdiction. Indeed, a certain level of the market will always seek that apartment along the Victoria Cross Road – but the market catchment is substantially reduced.

      A case of Cork Corporation’s loss is the County Council’s gain. Given that a lot of suburban periphery is governed by the county council, isnt it quite possible that will be see no real low-rise style suburb as such?? in fact, it seems to me it could make the city look very disproportionate and at the county councils gain.

    • #758351
      lexington
      Participant

      €20bn transport plan to be brought before Cabinet

      The Department of Transport has set out a €20bn transport plan, which it wants to present to the Cabinet early next week.

      It will detail all the States major transport projects until 2017.

      According to newspaper reports this morning, the Minister for Finance Brian Cowen has given the Department of Transport the green light to forge ahead with its ten year strategic transport plan.

      The plan, which is due to begin in 2007, will include many projects that have already been put to the public domain.

      For example, in Dublin the Luas will be extended to the docklands and northern suburbs and plans for a metro connecting Dublin airport with the city centre are also included.

      Commuter rail connections will be reopened between the capital and Meath, between Cork and Midleton, and Galway and Ennis

      Also included in the plan is the completion of the inter-urban motorway scheme and the development of the western road corridor.

      Source: online.ie



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Bowen Construction are today erecting their 2nd tower crane over the Jurys/Lancaster Quay redevelopment by O’Callaghan Properties. With the large basement car-park and associated areas now fully dug-out and nearing completion – the crane will aid work on the development of Block B, providing 63 riverside apartments – along with the Jurys Hotel currently under construction, this will form Phase 1 of the a 3-year development effort.



      😎 OSB Group have been greenlit for most of its proposed 213 residencies at Carrignafoy, Cobh. Also as part of the project, designed by James Leahy & Associates, a retirement home and creche with children’s playground will be provided.

    • #758352
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      With regard to the decision by councillors not to allow developers to build anything over three storeys is a disgrace. If they are suggesting such a cap because of the fact that anything over three storeys is unsightly-well the only thing that is unsightly that is over three storeys is cooperation buildings…. Not private developer builders. SO I can understand them if they are referring to their own developments-but since they don’t build anything anymore, well I suppose they are hoping private developers will sort out they’re ever growing list of applications for social and affordable housing, they shouldn’t have introduced such a cap.

      Reason: Land prices are SO HIGH these days and the only way for developers to recuperate the amount they have paid for land is to build up… Be it 7 stories, 13 stories or 17 stories-literally the only way is up, as the song goes. So if developers are paying a high price for land and there is a cap imposed on what they build then who gets landed with the heavy bill… Oh ya, the consumer… Councillors if your reading this please understand-Cork has the opportunity and ability to become a metropolitan city, a city we can ALL be proud of, but understand, putting unwise rules in the way of progress and development, will hinder Cork’s development, and will make it an unattractive place for companies to invest and redevelop in.

      That’s all I’ve got to say…

    • #758353
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      :rolleyes: “Commuter rail connections will be reopened between the capital and Meath, between Cork and Midleton, and Galway and Ennis”

      The government must have announced the reopening of the Cork-Midleton rail line a dozen times already. They are serial announcers….an election must be on the way!

    • #758354
      jungle
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      :rolleyes: “Commuter rail connections will be reopened between the capital and Meath, between Cork and Midleton, and Galway and Ennis”

      The government must have announced the reopening of the Cork-Midleton rail line a dozen times already. They are serial announcers….an election must be on the way!

      They’ve announced it on numerous occasions, but they still haven’t provided any funding. Next week’s bill should do that.

    • #758355
      lexington
      Participant

      @iloveCORK2 wrote:

      With regard to the decision by councillors not to allow developers to build anything over three storeys is a disgrace. If they are suggesting such a cap because of the fact that anything over three storeys is unsightly-well the only thing that is unsightly that is over three storeys is cooperation buildings…. Not private developer builders. SO I can understand them if they are referring to their own developments-but since they don’t build anything anymore, well I suppose they are hoping private developers will sort out they’re ever growing list of applications for social and affordable housing, they shouldn’t have introduced such a cap.

      Reason: Land prices are SO HIGH these days and the only way for developers to recuperate the amount they have paid for land is to build up… Be it 7 stories, 13 stories or 17 stories-literally the only way is up, as the song goes. So if developers are paying a high price for land and there is a cap imposed on what they build then who gets landed with the heavy bill… Oh ya, the consumer… Councillors if your reading this please understand-Cork has the opportunity and ability to become a metropolitan city, a city we can ALL be proud of, but understand, putting unwise rules in the way of progress and development, will hinder Cork’s development, and will make it an unattractive place for companies to invest and redevelop in.

      It should be noted that the motion applies to the loosely termed ‘suburbs’ – it is not a cap citywide. Either way, it is a terribly inept decision and will only serve to damage the long-term sustainable development of the city if imposed. Having said that, in their definition of the city’s boundaries regarding suburbs, CCC are perfectly entitled to outline the city centre, docklands and special regeneration/development zones (SRZs) as exempt from such a cap. An SRZ would encompass areas such as Blackpool, Victoria Cross, Ballyvolane, Tivoli and Mahon (among others) as being core development regions where regeneration is in the interests of sustainable and viable development. Taking Victoria Cross for example, this would include from the city centre up to Dennehy’s Cross along the Victoria Road corridor where the majority of available development options consist of unsightly warehousing, derelict or abandoned stores/houses etc. Without such a provision, the successful economic regeneration of areas like Blackpool, may be hindered in future. Whether CCC adopt a SRZ policy in the wording of any amendment (subject to confirmation of its legality) is a different issue. Caps would be impose thereafter, however pockets of SDZs may be provided for in areas associated with CUH, CIT, Wilton S.C., Sunbeam, Mahon Point etc etc. An SRZ/SDZ regards a designated area which justifies scale development by reason of its economic environment or existing capacity and context. That economic environment may be associated with purposes of economic revitalisation for example. An context may be associated with the fact that existing scales of a similar nature exist within an area or have the capacity to exist in a non-detrimental manner; or context may also consider an area, limited by its own physical restraints, is required to provide scale development subject to public service demand and lack of economically viable alternative options (e.g. like CUH, CIT, UCC etc etc)

    • #758356
      Tim Hennessy
      Participant

      Last week I submitted a query in relation to rumoured development in the old Barry’s timberyard site on the east of Fermoy town centre. Proposals for the site seemingly consist of a retail development including Dunnes Stores. Can anyone confirm the future plans for the queried Fermoy site?

    • #758357
      lexington
      Participant

      While Bowen Construction completed the erection of their 2nd tower crane over the Lancaster Quay site, Michael McNamara Construction were working away at erecting towers cranes over Cork Airport Business Park (new hotel) and UCC’s Boole Library. It is understood, as part of McNamara’s aggressive push into the Cork market, CEO Bernard McNamara (also believed to be involved in the consortium behind a proposed 400MW power plant on Little Island) may have also been in discussions with a docklands landowner about a possible project in Cork’s new urban quarter district. Though nothing is understood to have been solidified, it is understood breif discussions on options have been addressed. It will be interesting to see if anything comes of this – and I will update and/or correct this information subject to any further news.

    • #758358
      A-ha
      Participant

      Who will operate the Cork-Midleton rail service? I’ve heard that it is to be a private company taking over the operation, with Irish Rail still retaining ownership of the track. Any ideas on who it could be?

    • #758359
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 4 exciting applications are scheduled for deliberation next week – all on Novemeber 1st 2005…

      First off is Frinailla’s Victoria Cross proposal. Originally proposed, the project designed by Geraldine McNamara of Richard Rainey & Associates, sought permission for 25 apartments and commercial unit over 6 (part 7) storeys and a basement car-park, with basement storage. Further Information was requested of the proposal on the 24th August 2005 and received by planners on the 5th of October 2005. The revised plans were subject however to 2 submissions. A decision is set for next week – see an image of the proposal (as originally lodged) below.



      The next 2 applications are part of a same development by landowners John & Michael O’Dwyer along Hanover Street. Their attractively designed scheme by James Leahy & Associates will seek permission for 23 mixed 1 & 2-bedroom apartments over 6-storeys with some retail and parking provisions. The applications concern the seperate premises associated with the project (which border one another) – with one seeking permission for 9 units, and the other seeking permission for 14.



      Last but not least, Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy – though mooted for a due date on November 1st, will likely see this delayed with a request for Further Information. Designed by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli, the proposal concerns the redevelopment of the Crow’s Nest premises, Victoria Terrace and MP Crowley Machine Hire premises along Carrigrohane Road and Victoria Cross. Permission for 74 apartment units, 4 commercial units, a new public house and restaurant over double-deck 112 space basement car-park was sought – the development sought to be distributed over a generally 6-storey block with 15-storey (50.4 metres) tower element. 6 objections and 1 submission was lodged against the proposal. The objections regarded traffic, height, overlooking, associated loss of privacy, tenancy and overdevelopment of the 0.266 hectare sight, while the submission concerned issues of design and the current designs impact on Cork County Hall as a protected structure. Noel O’Riordan is the planner handling the application. It is supposed, though not yet confirmed, issues that may arise in a Further Information request will seek the developers to justify the project height through design – as it posited that its current form does not accomplish this (?) I’ll update you when I know for certain.



      …and finally…

      I would hope to leave this topic after the following until such a stage as progress is made regarding its outcome…

      …Jim O’Donovan, CCC Director of Planning, has apparently stated his opposition publicly, in line with the sentiments of Cork City Manager Joe Gavin and Cork Lord Mayor Deirdre Clune, former Lord Mayor Colm Burke and Fine Gael public representative Brian Bermingham – to the proposed cap on suburban development of over 3-storeys. The legal standing of the motion continues to be questioned as it directly conflicts with national policy on sustainable growth. Despite the various threats by Councillors, notably Dave McCarthy, their efforts are only detailling one occurence – the loss of both councillors and city management’s input into what goes on it their city (that is if the motion is found to legally justified). What is a pity is that residents and their councillors seem to think that what they are doing is for the betterment of their area. The perception that why planners, city management, some public representatives, developers, architects, engineers, consultants, economists and other professionally trained individuals associated with the field oppose the motion is based on greed, is naive. It is simply not in the public good. Metaphorically, the situation with residents and some councillors is the equivalent of a patient attending a doctor’s clinic and stating that they wish to continue smoking; the doctor advises and warns the patient not to smoke or otherwise they’re health will suffer as a result. The patient ignores the advice and continues smoking irrespective. So the patient continues and a few years down the line is diagnosed with lung cancer. This is the same in a sense – councillors and lobbying residents are being warned by those who have been professionally trained and appointed not to proceed with such motions – not because it’s a greed thing, not because its the done thing, but because (like the scenario with doctor) it is in the long-term interests of the community at large (whether those informed can see it or not) and not for short-term gain. As for the democracy of it all, the very motion itself isn’t actually all that democratic when considered holistically. Also, taking the metaphor of the smoker who continues despite advice – the smoker may gain a short-term satisfaction from ignoring the warnings, but ultimately succombs to the consequences of his/her actions. In ignoring the advice, the smoker acts selfishly because the fail to consider how their later health detriment not only affects them, but others (their loved ones for example). The height cap motion stands to disbenefit not only the residents of the affected areas, but also others – and all because of a short-sighted action.

      We should consider Mancur Olson’s book “The Rise and Decline of Nations” – it is noted therein, that the downfall of economies and nations (or this case areas) is the result of too much influence enacted at the hands of lobby groups and their champions. Their actions are self-interest and lead to the detriment of well-being in others. Democracy, which some lobby groups associated with ban so vehemently champion, provides for the freedom and tolerance for all elements to co-exist. It is the nature of democracy that sometimes, one group has a larger following than the other (say Catholicism versus Hinduism in Ireland), but it does not seek to over-dominate the other and respects its place as an individual element of any democratic society. Just something to consider.

      Issue over until such a time as further news comes available.

    • #758360
      kite
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      Do you have a list of councillors who voted for or against?

      I think some emails are in order, but I don’t want to hassle any who voted against.

      A list of councillors that voted on this motion can be found on http://www.corksouthwest.com
      Councillors e mail address can be found on http://www.corkcorp.ie
      No harm to let them know what we think.

    • #758361
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Cork-Midleton rail service will be an IE operation.

    • #758362
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Michael & John O’Dwyer’s plans for 23 apartment units on 2 adjoining premises at Hanover Street have seen Further Information requested on their James Leahy & Associates designed scheme. 2 seperate applications for 14 and 9 apartments respectively, over retail and with some parking, were lodged last September the 7th 2005. The scheme adjoins a site at Clarke’s Bridge destined for a landmark office development by Adrian Power, with design there afforded by Coughlan de Keyser. The project there is still in Further Information but is expected to be addressed soon.



      😎 Meanwhile, the Crow’s Nest Partnership (Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy) have seen an extension on their due date implemented. A decision on their Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects designed scheme of 74 apartments in a 6-storey, part 15-storey, block over 4 commercial units, restaurant, bar and 112 double-deck basement car-parking at the former Crow’s Nest premises on Victoria Cross is now not scheduled until the 1st of May 2006.



      🙂 And as mentioned in my last post above, Frinailla are expected to receive a decision on their plans for Victoria Cross today. The Richard Rainey & Associates designed scheme seeks to redevelop the former Plumbing Utilities Store bordered by Top Car Motor Dealership (at .45 acres, now on the market through Lisney for €3.8m) and Ashbrook residential complex. Consequent of Further Information, the Frinailla proposal will continue to house 25 residential units, but has been reduced in height by 1 floor to a peak of 6-storeys. The attractive commercial unit has unfortunately been removed. Basement parking over 2 levels for 43 spaces are proposed also as part of the development.

    • #758363
      Radioactiveman
      Participant


      A file picture of the building being secured

      Two units of Cork CIty Fire Brigade are in North Main Street this lunchtime, apparently proping up a building which was thought to be about to collapse. I’m unsure what prompted the move, but the building in question (adjacent to Cassanova’s restaurant and near The Vision Centre) has been derelict and hoarded for a number of months. There are one or two buildings in a similar condition on the street, seemingly abandoned.
      Meanwhile Ryan’s Pub has reopened on North Main Street (adjacent to Mahers sports). The building was demolished except for the facade and rebuilt. It looks good!


      Finally, some movement on Bachelor’s Quay could be in the offing. The Rehab Group have applied for permission to convert the former “Bachelors on The Quay” restaurant/bar into a resource / special needs centre. A few minor alterations will be made to the lower facade of this hideous building. This change of use applies to the old bar portion of the development only and the other two(?) retail units on the site remain empty and unfinished approximately seven years after they were built 😡 .
      It could be argued that these vacancies are directly connected to the poor architectural design of the development itself. If you compare this to a similar type of scheme down river at OCP’s Lavitts Quay, we see Vibes and Scribes opening their second store in Cork. This store will specialise in art books and art supplies and their store on Bridge Street will continue to operate.
      Going back to the Bachelor’s Quay change of use, i’m not sure that CCC will be overly happy to allow this area move out of retail/entertainment in favour of education and training, we’ll have to wait and see – obviously something has to be done to kickstart use of these units. The least the developers could do is to window these units – at least they would look half-way presentable!!


      Meanwhile, expect a decision this week (Nov 2nd) from ABP regarding Frinailla’s Lady’s Well development in Blackpool.

    • #758364
      Quest
      Participant

      Anyone any thoughts on the Market Square Development in Mallow?

      Questions I would like answered if possible are…

      Why are Flemmings so overdue when O’Flynns can deliver in Ballincollig on time?
      Who are confirmed tennants and who are rumoured (and how many units are not taken yet)?
      Who is taking the cinema and when is it due to open?
      What are peoples thoughts on the building itself? (Local opinion is divided but on the whole quite unimpressed)
      What are the plans for the ESB unit at the top of O’Brien St/Muddy Hill?

      The building is extremely imposing, especially when you cross the bridge over the blackwater in the centre of town going north and can only be described as being of ‘castle like’ appearance and proportions.

      Also, while we’re on the subject of Mallow, what’s been proposed/approved/planned etc for the 4Home site on Park Road in Mallow. Local jungle drums sugest another shopping centre development. Is this the case?

      So many questions, I know… grateful for any answers…

    • #758365
      lexington
      Participant

      @Quest wrote:

      Anyone any thoughts on the Market Square Development in Mallow?

      Questions I would like answered if possible are…

      Why are Flemmings so overdue when O’Flynns can deliver in Ballincollig on time?
      Who are confirmed tennants and who are rumoured (and how many units are not taken yet)?
      Who is taking the cinema and when is it due to open?
      What are peoples thoughts on the building itself? (Local opinion is divided but on the whole quite unimpressed)

      Economically it’s good for the town and I think, long-run it will be a positive addition.

      As for the design – the Fleming Group, when it comes to their project designs, have never left me particularly inspired. Perhaps their best effort is found along George’s Quay in Cork city (Trinity Court), where design demands are becoming a little more hardlined.

      Tenants – in part can be found earlier in this thread here.

      Gate Cinemas – that of The Gate Multiplex, Cinema World and Market Green in Midleton will be operating the cineplex.

    • #758366
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Frinailla have been greenlit for their proposal of 25 apartment units at Victoria Cross, on the site of the former Plumbing Utilities Store, directly across the road from Victoria Station S50 project currently under construction. Originally proposed as a 6-storey (part 7-storey) building with 25 apartment units, featuring a penthouse 1,400sq ft unit, large commercial unit and basement car-park – the project was revised following Further Information to generally 5, part 6-storeys – retaining the same number of units, but unfortunately omitting the commercial unit. The proposal will be located over a 43-space double-deck basement car-park – and include basement storage areas. Designed by Geraldine McNamara of Richard Rainey Architects – the plan received 2 objections following the issue of Revised Plans – an appeal may yet follow. Images of the original proposal may be found below.

      Frinailla are expectant of a decision by ABP regarding their CitySquare (Ladyswell) plan for 153-residential units and substantial commercial elements tomorrow (November the 2nd 2005), however a decision may indeed be delayed as of tonight.



      Manor Park Homebuilder’s Horgan’s Quay Masterplan

      Discussions continue between Manor Park Homebuilders (MPH), Cork City Council and the Port of Cork regarding Horgan’s Quay. John Gannon of planners Tom Phillips & Associates and Richard Collins of architects O’Mahony Pike are working consistently on behalf of the developers and a number of progressions have been made in recent times.

      It is believed that, although MPH’s proposals to reduce the Event Centre element to a capacity of 2,500 – as well as seeing plans for a large scale retail element both rejected, progress regarding building heights, the nature of the proposed new National Routeway, issues associated with Plot Ratios and discussions on quayside usage with the Port of Cork (PoC) have made some headway. As par submissions from the PoC, the North Docklands Local Area Plan (NDAP) as amended will see the proposed pedestrian bridge from Horgan’s Square to Kennedy Quay omitted, but it is understood the Port are willing to allow for quayside encroachment subject to further discussions.

      A number of concept plans have been submitted to CCC in advanced preplanning discussions. MPH have promised to provide buildings of the highest architectural character through architects O’Mahony Pike – and have earmarked, in alignment with the NDAP, 3 key landmark sites possibly suitable for taller structures, one of which will likely be a hotel near Station Square. MPH had requested to abolish uniform height caps of 7-storeys on the quayside (beyond the identified landmark sites) and provision for height variations between 4 and 14-storeys – with taller buildings designed on a considerate north-south axis thus minimising visual impacts from the Montonotte Ridge, although it was noted that any such impacts would be minimal in any realisation – guide heights peaking at approx. 50metre were stated (though not set in stone).

      As for the Event Centre, CCC have been approached by at least 3 other alternatives (1 of which will only see talks just advancing, if not, about to) being posited. Capacities at these centres are expected to comfortably support the 5,000 seat capacity envisioned by CCC. With 2 performing multi-use functions for year round activity. This may work to MPH’s favour pending a successful outcome.

      An image of a working development model for Horgan’s Quay, as proposed by O’Mahony Pike Architects, may be seen below (as promised in an earlier post).

    • #758367
      pier39
      Participant

      a uniform height at horgans qy would be bland and very boring. lets hope the odd tall building gets the all clear. a nice design would go down well.
      good news on victoria cross. i see top car is doing the market at the moment. its a nice site with good frontage but clearly the taller elements of any desugn there would have to consider impacts to the eastern section of the site which borders housing. did a drawing on this site out of my own boredom donkeyears ago and think its important to use the curvature of the roadfrontage. a nice little riverwalk to the east could go down nice.

      also a buddy of mine says work shouldnt be too long on the clontarf st site. a new design says he. height reductions to the south there be. and why be i talkin like a pirate??? argh. 😀 perhaps the result of my excessive red bull intake.
      its november so academy st shouldnt be too long i take it! dying to get a good gawk at that thing.

      now im off to do whatever it is i do…………………………

    • #758368
      lexington
      Participant

      Housing Award

      Highly-Commended

      Project: Student Housing, Victoria Cross, Cork

      Architects: DerekTynan Associates, Dublin

      Contractor: Bowen Construction Ltd, Cork

      The repetitive and cellular nature of student housing has not been allowed, in this instance, to give rise to a bland and boring project. The “zig-zag” building creates a dynamic series of spaces on a beautiful site between two rivers. The varying building height culminates in a fitting dramatic cantilever at the apex of the site. We admired the rigorous detailing of the exterior wall plane; the structural dynamics; and the quality of construction. Some 10,000 sq m of apartments, associated communal facilities and a semi-basement car park have been carefully folded into a visually-vulnerable site with care and precision.



      Heritage Award

      Award Winner

      Project: Lifetime Lab, Former City Waterworks, Cork

      Architects: Jack Coughlan Architects, Cork

      Contractor: John F Supple Ltd, Cork

      New uses for old buildings can create a positive tension whose successful resolution can add rather than subtract from the end result. This is the case in the former Cork City Waterworks where the dilapidated 19th century buildings have been re-invigorated for educational purposes. Cork City Council and UCC deserve full credit for their imagination as clients and design-brief makers. The architect and contractor have matched that imagination with the successful restoration of an important landmark building.

    • #758369
      ToMuchFreeTime
      Participant

      Does any one have any thoughts on the new transport plan released yesterday??
      For such a big plan there doesn’t seem to be much information available on it.

      It looks like alot of the plan is centred in dublin which is a shame because we should be
      promoting other parts of the country as places to live and help promote the so farr failed sacial plan.

      any ideas on what projects on due for cork other that the rail system.
      I think there should have been more in it for cork it would help present it as a real
      option to live other than dublin!!!!!!!!!!111

    • #758370
      rebel_city
      Participant

      I totally agree. I’m living in Dublin at the moment, and traffic is pretty chaotic at the best of times. There should be more for Cork. All I heard was that they will be reopening the Cork – Midleton line. But we’re heard that enough times already. On the news it said that there are plans for an underground metro in Dublin. It would be really cool to have one, but can you just imagine the planning, delays, under estimated budgets etc. Look at the port tunnel, it can’t even take super trucks! Even small things for Cork like a better bus service, or even a Nitelink service at the weekends like in Dublin would be fantastic. But we’ll have to wait and see if this new plan is election speak or real promises!

    • #758371
      corkdood
      Participant

      As you said detail is sketchy but all I’ve heard of is the reopening of the Midleton rail line. Does this mean the plan to reopen stations at Blarney and Monard has been put on the back burner?

    • #758372
      lexington
      Participant

      @ToMuchFreeTime wrote:

      Does any one have any thoughts on the new transport plan released yesterday??
      For such a big plan there doesn’t seem to be much information available on it.

      It looks like alot of the plan is centred in dublin which is a shame because we should be
      promoting other parts of the country as places to live and help promote the so farr failed sacial plan.

      any ideas on what projects on due for cork other that the rail system.
      I think there should have been more in it for cork it would help present it as a real
      option to live other than dublin!!!!!!!!!!111

      It is Dublin-centric, but there are a number of issues here – first off, Dublin and the Greater Dublin Area (GDA) home 33% of the nation’s population – in implementing a Transport Plan like ‘Transport 21’ you can’t ignore the needs and requirements of that population. The catch is, that peripheral and commuter development can stand to further promote unsustainable growth patterns in that region. This would fly in the face of NSS agendas. So what do you do? Leave a bad situation get worse, or help aid it and run the risk of furthering that problem in the future?

      Though I welcome the plan – it is a little bit the victim of its predecessors and other associated policies. The country is too centralised. It’s a nice idea in theory – but geography has much to do with also. The settlement patterns in this country make a simplistic transport plan the thing of myth. You have regionally important urban centres at Sligo, Galway and Limerick all dotting the Western sea-board with service populations of 200,000 (Sligo and the wider North Western Region), 200,000 (Galway Region), 220,000 (Limerick and Midwest Region) – they need to be serviced and linked too. A prime example of the over centralised nature of this country is evident in it’s rail network – to travel by rail from Galway to Cork, one must first travel to Dublin. I am a little disappointed that the proposed Western Rail Corridor in Transport 21 has not taken a more strategic view and provided a full-length rail link as far as Cork. In terms of economics, perhaps, a more viable option exists in a Cork-Limerick intercity/commuter service (not necessarily proper Intercity services – Arrow type services would comfortably suffice).

      The Commuter Rail Network provision is positive – links to Midelton and Mallow (with necessary service stations to be provided in areas like Blarney, Carrigtwohill and perhaps at the Park&Ride mooted for Dunkettle) will be vital. Cork is interesting in that it is developing large ring commuter towns at places like Midelton, Carrigaline (the most car-dependent town in Ireland), Macroom and Mallow – among others – which feed the city increasingly so. Cork city itself is restricted in its growth capacity due to Local Authority, geographical and zoning issues – which furthers the argument for building up in areas like the Cork City Docklands (to try and bring more families and businesses back into the city). These towns should all be in line for sufficient commuter rail services – with populations in places like Ballincollig, Carrigaline and Midelton all projected to reach 40,000+ by 2020, viability is not really a question so much as should be a positive consideration. By the time Transport 21 is complete – these towns and their commuters to Cork city will be choking the existing infastructure. As they say, prevention is better than the cure. Also, Cork’s population in the city is more heavily concentrated in the south – 2.5km traffic james either side of the Kinsale Road Roundabout are not the answer – I accept the provision of the new flyover, but the traffic volume on the South Ring is hindered by capacity – this will only serve to get worse as the population grows. Feeder towns like Kinsale, Carrigaline, Crosshaven, Bandon, Halfway, Innishannon etc should all be considered in terms of infastructural access too – and I don’t believe the car is the long-term strategic answer to this.

      What the Transport Plan should consider is the creation of viable growth alternatives outside Dublin. Though the political and some economic arguments associated behind decentralisation and industry provision historically support dispersal over broader areas (e.g. West, North West etc) – to support a viable economic development option, balanced axis and sustainable alternative – I do believe the Transport Plan should be addressing now necessary infastructural support to allow for the sustained and balanced regional development of somewhere such as Cork. The Metropolitan Region of Cork population grew by 10% in the period 1996 to 2002 (versus a 3% city centre DED decline – although those figures a arguable) and is set to grow by a further 10% over the next 5 years. The sustainable concentration of this growth is not favourable without proper facilitation.

    • #758373
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      In reality, the percentage of people in the state living in the GDA (were it accurately represented) would be closer to a half. Moreover, it has seen a huge increase in population in the last 15 years, far ahead of what public services could keep pace with. The plan is Dublin centric because (a), the state is, and (b) public transport requires economics of scale and critical mass to be justified. The WRC, on the other hand, has neither, is is included in this plan purely for the optics.

      The critical issue ignored in the NSS and Transport 21, but not in the Buchanan Report, is that in a country the size of Ireland, there are a very limited number of urban centres that can hope to generate self sustaining critical mass. In reality, there are two outside of Dublin. Targeting critical infrastructure at these would facilitate the development of these ‘growth poles’ and allow a more sustainable rate of growth for Dublin. Due to the vagaries of PR-STV and our parish pump politics, no competent politician is going to say this however. And instead we are left with a situation whereby Dublin gets the lions share of the funding (because it has been allowed to sprawl unchecked), and everywhere else gets some sweeties too, mainly because they’ve been good little boys and girls. The recent announcement merely contributes to that spiral of centralism.

      The problem now is that Dublin (and that boondoggle in the west) is going to suck up funding for the next 10 years, while Cork sits and becomes a very real problem as it grows under its own steam. There are steps that can be taken in the short term, (why does Cork not have its own transport authority or even bus company for example, or higher density development in the city itself) in the longer term, Cork is going to need what is politely known as macro economic transfers. And that is not just for some grand strategic vision (as in the next CASP), but for the basic necessities of getting around. At current rates of growth, Cork County will have a population of over half a million shortly, and will maintain (roughly) its percentage of the population of the state. Where is the matching funding to support that growth?

    • #758374
      Pug
      Participant
      Quote:
      why does Cork not have its own transport authority or even bus company for example/

      Quote:
      thats spot on in fairnes, I was just back from Berlin when I heard about the transport plan and laughed in pity at MArtin Cullen as he re announced all the major transport announcements for the last few years. Cant believe we STILL dont have proper transport i.e. no bus after half eleven at night.
    • #758375
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      Berlin had its U-Bahn,S-Bahn & Trams destroyed 60 years ago. Here we ripped out Corks & Irelands infrastructure with very little foresight for the future.Even if we had the tram system that we had in 1931 it would be a massive tourist attraction if nothing else similar to San Francisco’s.Cork City Council and County council is full of transport plans,area action plans,development plans,special area plans etc gathering dust in there.Martin Cullens plan is a hospital pass for him – it wont happen,on time or on budget.Remember the voting machine fiasco.You can travel within a few blocks of most destinations in Berlin as a high density city even out to the suburbs.We now are going to have a 3-storey low density city in Cork apart from 2 or 3 areas.
      Our elected TD’s,councillors and planners have a lot to answer for.

    • #758376
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 The Bowen Group are to be refused planning on their proposal to develop 55-apartments over a 6-storey block, with 10 townhouses and some community related provisions on a strip of land to the eastern periphery of Musgrave Park Rugby Grounds. The Wilson Architecture designed project – led by Paud O’Mahony, also catered for 93 ground floor parking spaces. The ruling will come following recognition that the permission sought is in contravention with the Cork City Development Plan 2004, concerning loss of recreational grounds to development. This leaves Bowen Construction in a difficult position regarding options, and for Munster Rugby by extension.

    • #758377
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      You can travel within a few blocks of most destinations in Berlin as a high density city even out to the suburbs.We now are going to have a 3-storey low density city in Cork apart from 2 or 3 areas.
      Our elected TD’s,councillors and planners have a lot to answer for.

      Do you think the councillors realise what theyre doing is wrong and just thinking about the next vote? Or are they so filled up with their own sense of self-righteousness that they cant see they are making a critical mistake??

      By the way how does the Transport plan affect Horgans quays redevelopment? Or does it at all?? Is funding now in place to redevelop the station as Mr Cullen promised back in June? He said an application along with the Manor park homes plan would now proceed back then??

    • #758378
      altuistic
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      Housing Award

      Highly-Commended

      Project: Student Housing, Victoria Cross, Cork

      Architects: DerekTynan Associates, Dublin

      Contractor: Bowen Construction Ltd, Cork

      The repetitive and cellular nature of student housing has not been allowed, in this instance, to give rise to a bland and boring project. The “zig-zag” building creates a dynamic series of spaces on a beautiful site between two rivers. The varying building height culminates in a fitting dramatic cantilever at the apex of the site. We admired the rigorous detailing of the exterior wall plane]

      Gobsmacked isnt the word!!! ‘Repetitive’, ‘cellular’ not allowed? are we looking at the same building??!!

    • #758379
      phatman
      Participant

      I sense Lexington is having a bit of a laugh…well I hope he is..

    • #758380
      kite
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      I sense Lexington is having a bit of a laugh…well I hope he is..

      :confused: Somehow i dont think he is, a story in todays IE by Tom Barker seems to back up what Lex said.
      Gives the councillors that voted for the 3 storey cap an excuse to say “we are right ???”

    • #758381
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😎 The Bowen Group are to be refused planning on their proposal to develop 55-apartments over a 6-storey block, with 10 townhouses and some community related provisions on a strip of land to the eastern periphery of Musgrave Park Rugby Grounds. The Wilson Architecture designed project – led by Paud O’Mahony, also catered for 93 ground floor parking spaces. The ruling will come following recognition that the permission sought is in contravention with the Cork City Development Plan 2004, concerning loss of recreational grounds to development. This leaves Bowen Construction in a difficult position regarding options, and for Munster Rugby by extension.

      While I’m very much in favour of preserving the green areas in the city, this is a real kick in the teeth for Munster. I’m sure the development of that land would have provided a good deal of cash towards a much needed refurbishment of Musgrave and/or Thomond Park. This must surely decrease the value of the lands significantly.

      Incidentally, I just read elsewhere that Nemo Rangers have supposedly just sold their pitches (not very far from Musgrave Park). Do similar restrictions not apply there, or could someone have purchased them for recreational purposes? Highly unlikely, I’d have thought.

    • #758382
      pier39
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      While I’m very much in favour of preserving the green areas in the city, this is a real kick in the teeth for Munster. I’m sure the development of that land would have provided a good deal of cash towards a much needed refurbishment of Musgrave and/or Thomond Park. This must surely decrease the value of the lands significantly.

      Incidentally, I just read elsewhere that Nemo Rangers have supposedly just sold their pitches (not very far from Musgrave Park). Do similar restrictions not apply there, or could someone have purchased them for recreational purposes? Highly unlikely, I’d have thought.

      point accepted but in fairness its not wilsons best design by any stretch. difficult site yes, loss of the cash for munster rugby yes, but it doesnt suit the site. besides it would have meant a loss of all those nice trees. im very sure munster rugby have a few tricks up their sleeves re musgrave park for us yet. theyre a talented bunch of lads at wilsons and if the issue is addressed again im sure they can come up with a nice lil gem.

      and now for a joke why not…

      what do you call 2 apples???

      a pair!!! (or pear!!!) whichever reads funnier. hmmm it seemed a lot funnier when my friends when my friends were crawling out of the pub over the jazz weekend. 😀

    • #758383
      rebel_city
      Participant

      I saw a few posts back that there may be development on Clontarf Street. For some reason I can’t remember where that actually is. I’ve tried looking at maps online and still cannot locate it! Can someone let me know, and also what development is planned for there if any? Cheers.

    • #758384
      Pug
      Participant

      look, we all know the transport system is rubbish and it kills me to see a givernment patting themselves on the back for proposing plans (not even implementing them yet) with vague timelines to put in a transport network that is 20 years late. And Noel Dempsey putting up posters of himself pictured in front of an ageing, decrepit rail engine is the epitomy of what FF are proposing. Only way to get rid of them lads is not to vote for them.

      Anyhow, lets get this thread back to its purpose before Lex goes off in a huff (lex, if this website ever closes down, I have one waiting for your dazzling info).

      ANyw word on Frinailla and their watercourse road? Disgraceful to see those councillors voting against that higher than 3 storey thing as well, would love to see their average age.

      Anyone know whats going on with that building on your left next to Fred Zeppelins as you go over the bridge from georges quay to turn left on to South Mall? presume its office.

    • #758385
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 When Reliance Bearings Company put their premises of just under 0.5acres at Anderson’s Quay on the market in early summer of this year – much speculation amounted what would become of this prime site at the epicentre of Cork’s emerging and vibrant new office quarter. Up to 4 solid bids were secured by Hamilton Osbourne King who were handling the sale – which guided at approximately €5m. Interest came from as far as Dublin, but in the end, the property was sold for a figure over €2m in excess of the guide to O’Callaghan Properties (OCP).

      It has emerged, and which was published in the press today as I understand it, that OCP have enlisted Wilson Architecture to provide the design on a landmark office development of over 100,000sq ft. Reports that OCP had entered discussions with Tommy Maher regarding his adjoining premises to the west (which he purchased from OFC previously), the CSPCA and the proprietors of the Tyre Fitting premises. The possibility that OCP will commence discussions with the Simon Community premises to the east, would open the potential for an impressive development site. The office building is expected to peak at up to 6-storeys and be built of a large basement car-park for between 130 to 150 cars with retail usage on the ground floor.

      Perhaps impressed with Wilson Architecture efforts across the river at St. Patrick’s Quay for Paul Kenny, OCP will now seek to replicate a similarly impressive quayside structure. The Anderson’s Quay development will be flanked by new developments at Clontarf Street (revised drawings expected to be submitted soon), Deane Street and Lapps Quay. A planning application on this new proposal is not likely until sometime early in the new year.



      :confused: Curiously, it would seem – though it was believed refusal was to be enforced on Bowen Construction plans for 55 apartments & 10 townhouses to the east of Musgrave Park, the company has been permitted a time extension until August of 2006. This extension will allow the developers and their architects (Wilson Architecture) formulate a discussion period with planners and in which options and any revised plans may likely be issued.



      @Pug wrote:

      Anyhow, lets get this thread back to its purpose before Lex goes off in a huff

      :p Not an issue – besides transport is an important factor in any area’s development and associated infastructure ultimately has an impact on the type of new structures produced, and by extension, their design.

      As for the corner building on South Mall/Parliament Street – Michael Corbett is renovating the premises as far as I’m aware.



      @rebel city wrote:

      I saw a few posts back that there may be development on Clontarf Street. For some reason I can’t remember where that actually is. I’ve tried looking at maps online and still cannot locate it! Can someone let me know, and also what development is planned for there if any? Cheers.

      The site is located between Clontarf and Deane Streets, it is the small triangular site visible on one of the images in the first section of this post. DAT Partnerships are seeking a 9-storey office development on the site, designed by Daniel Luxton of Coughlan de Keyser. However a revised design is to be submitted which includes height reductions to the southern elevation.

    • #758386
      POM
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:


      .

      You can get a good sense of how the area is developing from the above photo. Factor in the proposed developments, including the O’Callaghan one on Andersens Quay (it is my understanding that it will not include the Simon Community premises), Dean St, Clontarf St., Albert Quay and Eglington St and you can picture how much this area has come on – for the better in my opinion. I know its up for lease but what are the chance Catherin Neville will let you on 4 Lapps Quay and allow for a redevelopment opportunity there? I’d very much like to see the warehousing to the rear facing onto Oliver Plunkett Street Lower redeveloped as part of a larger project including 4 Lapps Quay. An extension to No.5 Lapps Quay to the rear wouldnt go astray either.

    • #758387
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      Great photo of that area which always had potential for riverside development. If only the custom house buildings could be restored and opened up for bar/cafe/art gallery/restaurant/tourism type retail where the 2 branches of the Lee meet.These buildings are excellent and neglected for so long.Imagine if these were in a prominent location in Dublin ?
      Is there or will there be enough demand for all the new office space in this area considering that O’Flynns AnPost site scheme is also due to start next year.

    • #758388
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Cork City Council have announced a tender for the preparation of an Economic Study for Docklands Development. It will involve the review of strategic planning and development policy along with an economic review and sectoral opportunity analysis including a review of the latest economic information and forecasts, evaluation and identification of potential target markets and assessment of the competitive positioning of the Cork Docklands Development opportunity.

      Details of the study tender may be found here.



      🙂 Plans to construct two separate two storey commercial blocks incorporating commercial / office units on the existing car-park grounds of Hollyhill S.C. have been granted. Approx. 728 sq m of space will be provided, with the application in the name of Denis Scannell, Clonakility. It should add a much need touch to the existing facility.



      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Is there or will there be enough demand for all the new office space in this area considering that O’Flynns AnPost site scheme is also due to start next year.

      The office element of Eglinton Street is only 30,000sq ft (approx) divided among 7-own door units.

    • #758389
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😀 When Reliance Bearings Company put their premises of just under 0.5acres at Anderson’s Quay on the market in early summer of this year – much speculation amounted what would become of this prime site at the epicentre of Cork’s emerging and vibrant new office quarter. Up to 4 solid bids were secured by Hamilton Osbourne King who were handling the sale – which guided at approximately €5m. Interest came from as far as Dublin, but in the end, the property was sold for a figure over €2m in excess of the guide to O’Callaghan Properties (OCP).

      It has emerged, and which was published in the press today as I understand it, that OCP have enlisted Wilson Architecture to provide the design on a landmark office development of over 100,000sq ft. Reports that OCP had entered discussions with Tommy Maher regarding his adjoining premises to the west (which he purchased from OFC previously), the CSPCA and the proprietors of the Tyre Fitting premises. The possibility that OCP will commence discussions with the Simon Community premises to the east, would open the potential for an impressive development site. The office building is expected to peak at up to 6-storeys and be built of a large basement car-park for between 130 to 150 cars with retail usage on the ground floor.

      Perhaps impressed with Wilson Architecture efforts across the river at St. Patrick’s Quay for Paul Kenny, OCP will now seek to replicate a similarly impressive quayside structure. The Anderson’s Quay development will be flanked by new developments at Clontarf Street (revised drawings expected to be submitted soon), Deane Street and Lapps Quay. A planning application on this new proposal is not likely until sometime early in the new year.


      would be nice if ocallaghans took in the simon site as well. it may give the simon community the money and opportunity to fund a nice high quality city facility in an alternative location and allow for the quayside at andersons to be revitalised. probably wont happen but who knows mr ocallaghan has surprised us all before!!! it also brings ocallaghans into the frame in a part of the city both howard and oflynns were quick to move on. howard have something of a near monopoly in the district with oflynns not far behind (by the way hear oflynns are taking the unlimited liability path! oooo!) very anxious to see how albert quay turns out. will oflynns and/or ascon get a say or will howard dominate the quayside as they pretty much down at city quarter? i cant wait to find out! the area is finally starting to look like a real city. and whats impressed me most is how it still seems to have managed to maintain its cork character. a credit to the design and development teams. the city should look well this end in a few years. what do careys have up their sleeve back on albert quay??

    • #758390
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      Well if you compare Howards City Quarter and O’Flynns Lapps Quay development there is a massive difference in design and quality of finish in both schemes.City Quarter is OK .City Quarter is poor at the riverfront corners with a glass block drum rising full height in the one area where you would get great views down river. Lapps Quay could be on the beachfront in Miami with the awful colours and curtain walling.Plus the boardwalk should have been extended to City Hall bridge as we still have cars parked head on to the river in 2005.The planners should have got with O’Flynns and the other users there to upgrade this area as a condition of planning etc.

    • #758391
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Lex, is the last report listed in the bibliography of that tender document publicly available? (“The Competitiveness of Cork: An Economic Analysis”)

    • #758392
      ivuernis
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Housing Award

      Highly-Commended

      Project: Student Housing, Victoria Cross, Cork

      Architects: DerekTynan Associates, Dublin

      Contractor: Bowen Construction Ltd, Cork

      The repetitive and cellular nature of student housing has not been allowed, in this instance, to give rise to a bland and boring project. The “zig-zag” building creates a dynamic series of spaces on a beautiful site between two rivers. The varying building height culminates in a fitting dramatic cantilever at the apex of the site. We admired the rigorous detailing of the exterior wall plane]

      It’s a travesty that this ever got planning permission. I am at a loss to understand how this ever got the go-ahead in the first place when other smaller developments in the city, i.e. between 3 and 6 stories, routinely get knocked back. It is like something out of a Soviet-bloc communist-era country. If I had my way I’d take a wrecking ball to this blot on the landscape of the city with ferocity and glee. Registered and posted for the first time to get this off my chest as I pass this eyesore nearly everyday and it pains me to have to look at it.

      @lexington wrote:

      Heritage Award

      Award Winner

      Project: Lifetime Lab, Former City Waterworks, Cork

      Architects: Jack Coughlan Architects, Cork

      Contractor: John F Supple Ltd, Cork

      New uses for old buildings can create a positive tension whose successful resolution can add rather than subtract from the end result. This is the case in the former Cork City Waterworks where the dilapidated 19th century buildings have been re-invigorated for educational purposes. Cork City Council and UCC deserve full credit for their imagination as clients and design-brief makers. The architect and contractor have matched that imagination with the successful restoration of an important landmark building.

      On the other hand, I love what there doing with the old waterworks. Highly commendable indeed. Does anyone think a pedestrian bridge from nearby the waterworks on the Lee Road across to the Lee fields would be a good idea?

    • #758393
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      Zig-zag building at Victoria cross ??? The design which can only be appreciated from a height of 500ft maximises the land use as a 3-d money diagram for its owners.Appalling Peckam style blocks with materials which wont even weather the monstrosity.This type of development gives high-rise a bad name.Inconsistant mysterious planning policies as usual.

    • #758394
      Leesider
      Participant

      Does anyone know where I can get indept reports on the property market in the city centre concentrating on supply and demand from a residential perspective? Any help would be greatly appreciated! it’s for a college work in case ye were wondering 😉

    • #758395
      lexington
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      Lex, is the last report listed in the bibliography of that tender document publicly available? (“The Competitiveness of Cork: An Economic Analysis”)

      As far as I am aware, yes, it can be attained via request. Contact Cork City Council on 021-4966222 to double-check that.



      Leesider – Lisney and Hamilton Osbourne King conduct regular property market assessments with associated releases usually every quarter. It would be no harm to walk into Lisney’s offices on South Mall or contact them on 021-4275079 and/or cork@lisney.com

      Also, check out their website – which usually posts vague but regular property outlook updates under the section entitled Publications. Click here.


    • #758396
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anyone know what the eventual decision was by ABP on Frinailla’s Lady’s Well development?

    • #758397
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Does anyone know what the eventual decision was by ABP on Frinailla’s Lady’s Well development?

      A decision is now not due until November 7th 2005, as ABP have pushed back the decision date yet again.

    • #758398
      Leesider
      Participant

      Cheers Lex, thanks for that!

    • #758399
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      delighted that victoria mills building received recognition for what it has achieved. some of the tabloid style criticisms (soviet block blaa blaa blaa) were getting a bit tiresome – we need contemporary, imaginative and bold design statements in this city – not more cheap red brick/fake balcony pastiche (everywhere) and no more early 1990s postmodern rubbish (5 lapps quay).

    • #758400
      ivuernis
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      we need , imaginative and bold design statements in this city – not more cheap red brick/fake balcony pastiche (everywhere) and no more early 1990s postmodern rubbish (5 lapps quay).

      I totally agree.

      However, I don’t think the Lego-bricked Victoria Mills is the improvement that’s required or needed.

    • #758401
      who_me
      Participant

      Here’s the latest picture of the mill being renovated at Parliament bridge. With the new roof structure, it appears to be a lot taller than the previous structure, but I believe they lowered the front wall so it’s probably about the same.

    • #758402
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      Anyone know when that Busmans portacabin is being removed from Patricks street.It was meant to go months ago and it really spoils the look of the street in that area.

    • #758403
      rebel_city
      Participant

      I read on the Echo months ago that it was going to be removed but still sign of it moving. We could tell the tourists that it’s an antique! Just wondering with all the plans for the docklands, is the train station still going to be incorporated into the grand plan? I heard that the station was going to be switched around, meaning that the entrance would be south facing, opposite to now.

    • #758404
      lexington
      Participant

      @rebel_city wrote:

      Just wondering with all the plans for the docklands, is the train station still going to be incorporated into the grand plan? I heard that the station was going to be switched around, meaning that the entrance would be south facing, opposite to now.

      It will be reoriented and expanded to a size similar to that of Dublin’s Heuston Station. Kent Station’s development value is posit at around €20 and will be realised in tangent with the phased larger Horgan’s Quay redevelopment by Manor Park Homebuilders. Numerous informative posts are found throughout this thread – use the Search tool at the top of the page.


      Horgan’s Quay Masterplan (working model)



      *UPDATE*

      😎 John F. Supple Contractors have today erected a tower crane over their joint venture scheme with the Montgomery/Kenneally Partnership at Cogan’s Field along the Boreenmanna Road. The venture is constructing 157 residential units over 8 blocks – designed by Derek Tynan & Associates. 50 units will be provided for social provision. The partners are also seeking a similar type of project at Chapel Field in Churchfield, currently the subject of much controversy.

      Images of the Cogan’s Field project can be found here.


    • #758405
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Lexington, do you know if the Cork Commuter Rail (including the Midleton link) can go ahead before Kent Station is redeveloped? That image you’ve posted above seems to show the existing station building (its a PS, and can’t be touched) only, and no mention of the new station further east or the associated car park.

      I don’t have a copy of the Faber Maunsell Report, or any of the IE doc, but I seem to remember that there were through traffic issues with Kent Station, what with Commuter Rail and inter city sharing the same platforms.

      (thanks for the ref to Cork CoCo)

    • #758406
      Jennyol
      Participant

      Any of you guys – you seem to know everything! – know about a new course in Urban Planning at UCC or CIT – asked around but seems top secret now or something????

    • #758407
      A-ha
      Participant

      Heard that Argos are to open out in MahonPoint. Any date yet? Oh, and about that Transport21 thingy or whatever it’s called, what do they mean when they said that Cork Airport was also mentioned for investment in the future? Maybe the third and fourth airbridges?

    • #758408
      lexington
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      Lexington, do you know if the Cork Commuter Rail (including the Midleton link) can go ahead before Kent Station is redeveloped? That image you’ve posted above seems to show the existing station building (its a PS, and can’t be touched) only, and no mention of the new station further east or the associated car park.

      I don’t have a copy of the Faber Maunsell Report, or any of the IE doc, but I seem to remember that there were through traffic issues with Kent Station, what with Commuter Rail and inter city sharing the same platforms.

      (thanks for the ref to Cork CoCo)

      According to Transport21 the extended Midelton Line should come into full operation for late 2008/2009 (as best I remember, feel free to correct that). It is hoped that MPH and CIE should have applications lodged on Horgan’s Quay for sometime in 2006 – according to an individual involved in the project, no date is set as a number of issues have yet to be ironed out regarding the development (not least quayside discussions with the PoC, settlement on issues of heights and densities etc etc). The plus side is that OMP, the associated consulting engineers (whose name for some reason escapes me :rolleyes: ) and TPA have a lot of work behind the project established and a number of options have been presented to CCC. Final designs and layouts etc – should be run through the mill over the coming months – how many months that will take, I don’t know, but let’s say for argument applications are lodged late 2006, undoubtedly we can expect submissions, further information (perhaps 2 sets) and if it’s not appealed third-party, conditions could be appealed on a 1st Party Basis. So let’s be reasonable and give the project 1 and half years in planning. That’s late 2007/2008 before the project gets a clear. If the DoT keep their word, Midelton Line work should be well under construction by then. If MPH steam into the project, we’re saying Phase 1, Kent Station and the new National Route work (which will go hand-in-hand) should be complete about 18-months later – give or take. So by mid-to-late 2009 Kent Station should be reoriented and able, and completion will run relatively in sync with the Midelton Extension completion (perhaps a little later – however temporary measures will be implemented to facilitate such an occurence). Through commuter traffic is facilitated by aligned tracks running south of the existing terminus and between the new concourse to the south – which will (if MPH have their way) integrate as part of a larger mixed-use project forming part of the Alfred Street extension.


      Kent Station reoriented to face water – new concourse adjacent to the new National Route

      Regarding the existing Kent Station Terminal, true – it is a PS and is in line for retention, however it can be adjusted subject to justification, and indeed it will have to be in some capacity. Works are soon to be underway to revamp the station to facilitate the medium-term as a matter of interest.

      Regarding the terminal, the North Docklands Local Area Plan states:
      “The remnant of the 1860s railway station is extremely important from an industrial archaeological viewpoint as it is the earliest and only surviving side entry railway terminus building in Ireland. Its significance is that it provides invaluable evidence of the former layout of the original railway station. The implications of its significance need to be further considered in any redevelopment of the site. The central range of 5
      rooms forming the Station Masters Office remain (Rynne, 2002) of the former station.”

      If you compare the layout stated in CCC’s NDAP, and prior to that the CCDS 2004, the O’Mahony Pike drawings I posted earlier – are near on the button. Clearly the product of extensive dialogue between the 2 parties. See the CCC proposed layout below.

      Important to this project and to the larger Docklands Development Strategy (North and South) will be the progress made by the Port of Cork in relocating it’s activities to its lands near Ringaskiddy – and by extension, the efficient, on-time completion of the N28 Dual-Carriageway link Cork city to Ringaskiddy will be important for the PoC. A Stakeholders Forum is being established by CCC (to be operated by the Docklands Development Division at Naviagtion House) to ensure an efficient dialogue for all parties involved in the North Docklands Development, and the South Docklands. This will hopefully satisfy the PoC’s complaints that it has not been provided a sufficient level of updating and overall input into docklands progress. Though CCC dispute Mr. Keating’s claims, I don’t think anyone can argue the vital importance to future docklands development (and its associated economic importance) that the role of the PoC will play in staging movement out to Ringaskiddy. Startegy Assessment Reports have been commissioned by the PoC on the move – at a cost of approx. €200m, it’s no small undertaking. It’s in everybody’s interest that the move goes efficently and swiftly. For the PoC’s own expansion and progressive interests, the move is a most important realisation for them. I would, in the long-term, be of the view that both CCC and CorkCoCo, in conjunction with the DoT/RPA etc should look very seriously into providing a competent rail-link to Ringaskiddy from the city (possibly with stops at Carrigaline – the most car dependent town in Ireland), Rochestown and linking up with the old rail corridor via Mahon Point and into the city, via the docklands. It makes good economic, environmental and social sense.



      Jennyol, on the Urban Planning course – I genuinely have no idea. Have you tried contacting UCC and CIT first-hand?

    • #758409
      A-ha
      Participant

      I would, in the long-term, be of the view that both CCC and CorkCoCo, in conjunction with the DoT/RPA etc should look very seriously into providing a competent rail-link to Ringaskiddy from the city (possibly with stops at Carrigaline – the most car dependent town in Ireland), Rochestown and linking up with the old rail corridor via Mahon Point and into the city, via the docklands. It makes good economic, environmental and social sense.

      It’s a brilliant idea lex, but knowing our Government, it wont happen. I’d love to force the Minister of Transport to read all of our ideas, maybe then he’ll know what infrastructre really is. I would like to see an independant Cork City bus service set up (like Dublin Bus) and also the Cork Commuter Railway (like Dart). If it was in control of local people they would have a better idea of our public transportation needs.

    • #758410
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I would like to see an independant Cork City bus service set up (like Dublin Bus) and also the Cork Commuter Railway (like Dart). If it was in control of local people they would have a better idea of our public transportation needs.

      “Local People” were responsible for passing a motion trying to cap suburban building heights at 3-storeys :rolleyes: A complete ride in the face of sustainable economic, social and enviromental development.

      That said, we do have some very competent individuals in Local Governement and Management – another few would be no harm either 😉

      Something I am very supportive of is establishing a sufficient, well regulated commuter transport system across Cork. Very often this is dismissed given Cork population base – well, I argue that. The metropolitan population and geographical layout is quite capable of supporting such a system – the trick is to make a system people will use and to develop it in such a way that it is a preferable transport option over say, the car (but of couse individual modes of transport will always be some persons 1st choice irrespective) – but above all, make the system cost-efficient, regular and efficient. The Midelton Commuter line is a first step. Stops at Carrigtwohill and Dunkettle will be important to support the growing populations there and the Park-and-Ride proposed at Dunkettle. I do think, a few years down the line – with sufficient docklands development undertaken and the extension of the city centre south-east, a Blackpool stop would be a quite feasible option. But the big challenge will be providing a suitable light rail-based infastructure for the south – that includes the line I mentioned in my previous post originating at Ringaskiddy (via Carrigaline, Rochestown/East Douglas, Mahon Point, Blackrock, South Docklands), another from perhaps South Docklands, along South Link stop at Black Ash, Bishopstown, Bishopstown Court (to facilitate P&R from West Cork commuters), Ballincollig. A wider-scale pedestrianisation of Cork city’s existing centre (or rather a regulated access arrangement – i.e. pedestrian priority from 7am to 7pm Mon to Wed, 7am to 9pm Thurs, Fri and 8am to 6pm Sat) encompassing Grand Parade, Cornmarket Street, North Main and South Main Street (in its redeveloped capacity), Liberty, Grattan, Sheares and Adelaide Streets. St. Patrick’s Street, the French Quarter, Emmet Place, Drawbridge Street, Maylor, Caroline Streets, Parnell Place and South Mall. Obviously, this pedestrian priority strategy would have to take place on a phased basis according to infastructural development – starting with St. Patrick’s Street, Academy Street, Oliver Plunkett Street – then Grand Parade following its redevelopment completion.

    • #758411
      A-ha
      Participant

      Thinking about it recently after seeing that horrible photo of Victoria Cross, would you blame the locals for wanting to cap suburban building heights at three storeys. I think that Victoria Cross scared people sh*tless. It’s a manky building and if I thought that I’d have to look at a group of those out side my sitting room window, I’d die. But obviously, the residents aren’t with it if they think that people will stand for more of those shoeboxes to be built. It was a once off…… I hope, and I can’t see buildings like that getting the go ahead in Cork again. Anyways… what about the Airport? What is this large investment it is to get?

    • #758412
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Thinking about it recently after seeing that horrible photo of Victoria Cross, would you blame the locals for wanting to cap suburban building heights at three storeys. I think that Victoria Cross scared people sh*tless. It’s a manky building and if I thought that I’d have to look at a group of those out side my sitting room window, I’d die. But obviously, the residents aren’t with it if they think that people will stand for more of those shoeboxes to be built. It was a once off…… I hope, and I can’t see buildings like that getting the go ahead in Cork again.

      I assume you’re referring to Victoria Mills designed by Derek Tynan & Associates?

      You must remember CCC Planners were presented with a variety of model alternatives during preplanning discussions – the one which exists was the agreed option. Generally, and this is a preference issue, I do not like Derek Tynan & Associates’ work as a rule. That isn’t a knock to the firm’s talent in the least, structurally, many of their projects – including Victoria Mills – are actually very very clever. However from an aesthetic perspective I (I personally) think Victoria Mills does not compliment its location from a wider perspective (but that’s not to say, to many others, it is not a very good project). There are a myriad of arguments regarding perception – however this is my personal opinion and is not to conflict with the opinion of others. That said, a height cap is non-sensical – with respect to the example you cite, the logic of such a cap in application to Victoria Mills is arguing that it is disliked based on its height? Or rather, that its (as some residents may argue) its supposed “ugliness” is emphasised by its height? I disagree, I think its height is quite suitable for its location. The devil, as they say, is in the detail – or rather, its design. It’s not the paper’s fault the contract is cruel. Assessing its purpose, the site size on which it is built is pretty special – the building’s height in part has allowed it achieve a capacity without consuming the entire site in concrete and allowing for open spaces which take advantage of its pretty river setting from ground level. People forget that these student developments (which are winding down somewhat now) take students (a % of them that is) out of investor housing, which does in turn edge at the fabric of the original housing’s material use which is owner-occupancy (including families). In that sense, purpose built, quality student accommodation is a positive contribution. Had the 3 storey cap been in place at the time of Victoria Mills conception, the likelihood is that the site (were it granted) would be consumed in a low-rise block (if the developers deemed it viable) which could still have the same basic design. Other arguments for height include viability in light of land values and the associated broader economic impact that has. By extension, take CUH and its new Maternity Wing and proposed Cardia/Renal Unit – both 6-storeys, given the restricted site, structural issues and breakmark capacity issues – it is quite likely, such vitality needed provisions would have been severely compromised under a cap – if built. Blanket caps restricted development capacity and associated benefits – but I’ll let you review those issues in previous posts. You can be sure, if height wasn’t an issue – some people will always find an issue to raise war over, whether that’s usage, proximity, colouration, location, design, whatever…there’ll always be something.

      As for Victoria Mills being a ‘one-off’, I don’t think its that simple. Personally think we have to keep pushing the architectural boundaries. Cork is well positioned to seek higher standards and I think some developers are responding. There is no such thing as a bar too high as I see it. In this push for new and higher standards, various developments will present various interpretations – some we will like, some we won’t like so much. The trick will be to produce, not monotonous (God no!), but sympathetic architecture which either adds positively to an area or sets a new precedent. Small steps to this have been produced so far, we must now encourage developers and architects alike to be willing to experiment in conceptualisation stages allowing for a positive realisation. It’s a small pet wish of mine to drag Cork to a level in which all citizens and visitors alike can find a sense of satisfaction in the buildings that surround them – and in some cases awe. It’s a long hard road, but the goal should be to make visitors from other cities come to Cork and leave thinking, “That’s how it should be done!” as oppose to the other way around. 🙂

    • #758413
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      With all the talk above the train station and the rail services to Mildlton, it is actually hard to believe that Cork once had 5 train terminals! (Kent station, Albert Quay, Cork – Crosshaven terminus behind Carey’s Tool Hire, Summerhill (above the present Kent…used to be terminus of the Youghal line before they built the bridge over lower glamire rd., and Capwell on Summerhill South Rd, which used to be the Macroom/Coachford line terminus). At least I think the above is correct.
      I remember reading in the Land Use & Transportation Study (LUTS) years ago that one of the plans was to extend the commuter rail service into town by the bus station (using the existing rail allignments down by St. Patrick’s Church and over Brian Boru Bridge to the bus station). With the exception of the rail components, most of the LUTS plan was thankfully put in place over the years.

    • #758414
      A-ha
      Participant

      I know what you mean….. it is hard to believe. It’s such a shame that the railway bridge that went over the Lee isn’t used anymore. 🙁

    • #758415
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Thanks for that Lex, the timing seems about right. Depends on the design MPH bring to the table, and the degree of public outrage involved …

      That first image of the North Docklands you posted seems to suggest that the ‘new’ station will be built to the south of the existing one, ie it will provide new facilities but will use the platforms of the existing station for at least some services.

      I had a very peripheral involvement in this a number of years ago, and at that time the thinking was that any new station would have to involve new platforms to the east of the existing station, not least due to the curvature of the platforms (which are still, technically, in breach). This implied that the station would be, in effect, entirely new, and most likely built ‘over’ the track (on a European model with an elevated concourse and stairs/escalators down to the platforms below). This would have left even more room on the river side of the station for a public plaza, bus stops, a taxi rank and ‘kiss and drop’ points, along with what ever private construction was envisaged. Things change, obviously. We’ll just have to wait and see

    • #758416
      anto
      Participant

      any plans to reopen the old rail line that runs near parc ui chaoimh? It used to run out to rochestown crosshaven I think. remember walking along it near blackrock, the line is till there. sometimes i think rather than open this middleton line which will just lead to more dispersed housing that light rail should be provided to the inner suburbs like douglas and bishopstown etc. Hopefully higher density living would develop along the route (might involve a bit of demolition or infill)

    • #758417
      t.scott
      Participant

      as fas as i know the albert quay station was also the west cork terminus. that would be a spectacular line to see reestablished and i have often wondered if it could be done. obviousily access to the city centre would need a new route but i have often wondered why nothing has been done with the old line that goes under the dual carriageway to the jack lynch tunnel.
      at least that line is still for the most part intact and i think that is the line that passes pairc ui caoimh.an unbelievebable asset to the city would be to have a luas/dart/arrow service from the centre out to mahon point ringaskiddy, carrigaline and so on. we should be grateful that with all the attention the docklands and quays are getting this might become something given serious consideration.
      i always thought there was a line above kent station and i assume this is the summerhill station. i didnt know there was a line from cork out to macroom but it is mind boggling to realise how many incredibly stupid short sighted decisions have been made in the past. apparently the west cork line was ripped up intact (the railway) and stuck on a freighter and exported to nigeria by the then govt. (as far as i know) despite the objections of the local people
      i would like i said love to see the west cork railway rebuilt. i have long felt this would be a brilliant tourist attraction and for the local population a really great beneficial service. nice dream i guess but it would be amazing to see the chetwynd viaduct and other bridges along the line back in use. always thought crossing the bridge over the bandon river would have been a cool sight (from the train) and the supports/abbutments are still visible.
      who knows maybe someday someone with a few spare billion will give it a go!!?!!

    • #758418
      lexington
      Participant

      Indeed, consequent of a successfully redeveloped docklands, a location along Kennedy Quay could more than adequately facilitate an Arrow-style rail-stop heading out passed Pairc Ui Chaoimh and utilising what was once the old rail line, but now an amenity walk, out to Mahon Point via Blackrock and across the Douglas Estuary to Rochestown and onto Carrigaline and Ringaskiddy. It would be a suburb asset not only to the city, but the county. The economics, with consideration to a well developed South Docklands, adds up when one further factors in Mahon Point, Carrigaline and Ringaskiddy. For developers, being able to offer prospective tenants door-step rail access to Cork’s major residential, industrial and commercial centres would be a great sales pitch and undoubtedly support values. From a traffic management perspective, it provides an option on one of Cork’s most heavily trafficked and congested corridors. For the Port of Cork it would mean a transport source beyond roadways to facilitate and support its new Ringaskiddy facilities – factor in the likes of Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sandoz and so on, the attractiveness of such a line becomes increasingly evident. It’s a pity the idea has been drawn up even as a consideration in the CDDS 2004. A Kennedy Quay station (even something similar to the likes of the Luas stop at St. Stephen’s Green with maybe a turning circle a la Market Street in San Francisco) would be a wonderful touch at the heart of an expanded city centre. Imagine taking the rail in from your home in Carrigaline Town Centre in the morning to work at the office on Kennedy Quay, stopping off at the expanded Mahon Point to do some shopping on the way home and then later than evening tripping back in with your son to a match at Pairc Ui Chaoimh in the evening (if it’s still around!!!). The corridors are there, come on let’s use them! 😀



      😮 As another Michael McNamara tower crane went up today over the Boole Library at UCC, another, more prominent one was removed – reportedly Rohcon’s 275ft tower crane over Cork County Hall was the country’s tallest for a period nearing about a year and a half. Now PJ Hegarty’s have the 2 tallest in the city at Blackpool Park. The removal signals the near completion of Cork County Hall’s 62m euro redevelopment designed by Shay Cleary Architects. The same design firm are behind the plan for a new 6-storey County Library HQ on the grounds of Cork County Hall. 2 objections have been lodged against the proposal which is expected for a decision within the next month.

    • #758419
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Cork City Council are now seeking to engage consultants to carry out a study into the economic oppurtunities for Cork and especially the Docklands.
      Amongst the uses already proposed for the docklands include:

        6 million sq.ft. of new non-residential uses, including offices, university, retail, cultural and leisure facilities;

      • Approximately 6,000 new homes, including high density apartments, student accommodation and family units;
      • A new university/college campus with science park;
      • New parks, public spaces and pedestrian routes, a new Marina, moorings and recreation areas;
      • A new public transport system including new rail station concourse and bus station;
      • A new road bridge crossing of the River Lee and pedestrian bridges close to the City Centre and
      • Consolidation of the Civic Quarter around City Hall at the heart of the expanded City Centre.
    • #758420
      carrigdhoun
      Participant

      Has anyone got any details on the type of Hotel development under construction at Rathmore, Kinsale presently. I was amazed to see that no less than 4 tower cranes are erected on site. The best view of the development is from Oysterhaven on the road between the Sailing Centre and the Irish Coast Guard building. This development should not be confused with the €200 million Hotel/Golf course proposal for Ballymacus, Kinsale which going through the planning process.

    • #758421
      St Luke
      Participant

      Dear Jennyol

      A new planning course in UCC will indeed begin in October 2006. The course will be first of its kind outside Dublin in Ireland, and they are currently seeking accrediation from the Irish Planning Institute and the Royal Town Planning Association. A symposium on planning and development in UCC is on the cards for next March – when the course will start recruiting students.

    • #758422
      lexington
      Participant

      @carrigdhoun wrote:

      Has anyone got any details on the type of Hotel development under construction at Rathmore, Kinsale presently. I was amazed to see that no less than 4 tower cranes are erected on site. The best view of the development is from Oysterhaven on the road between the Sailing Centre and the Irish Coast Guard building. This development should not be confused with the €200 million Hotel/Golf course proposal for Ballymacus, Kinsale which going through the planning process.

      Design by Hyde Partnership Architects – I’ll get back to you on the other details later! 😉


    • #758423
      Pug
      Participant

      Has the Watercourse Road Frinailla plans been pushed out again?

    • #758424
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      Has the Watercourse Road Frinailla plans been pushed out again?

      I know this doesn’t help, but I can’t seem to find any definitive answer either. I think this decision has been delayed long enough. Can we have a decision ABP??

      ~~UPDATE~~
      My sources tell me that the decision has been put back for at least a further two weeks.

    • #758425
      lexington
      Participant

      The results of the Government’s City Neighbourhood Awards are out – and Cork has had another fruitful year scooping 3 prime awards.

      Congratulations are due to Cork City Council and Saint Patrick’s Street traders –

      St. Patrick’s Street was named Best Street in Ireland, for the 2nd year running.

      Congratulations are also due to O’Callaghan Properties/Mahon Point Shopping Centre Management –

      who scooped the prize for Best Retail Building

      while accolades are also due to University College Cork, which saw the Lewis Glucksman Gallery named as the Country’s Best Modern Building.



      post was due for yesterday but couldn’t access site

    • #758426
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      The results of the Government’s City Neighbourhood Awards are out – and Cork has had another fruitful year scooping 3 prime awards.

      Congratulations are due to Cork City Council and Saint Patrick’s Street traders –

      St. Patrick’s Street was named Best Street in Ireland, for the 2nd year running.

      And whats that we see slap-bang in the middle of the picture of St. Patrick street ? – Ireland’s Best Street!!!
      – Why its Bus Eireann’s sh**ty little porto cabin which they promised would be gone ages ago.
      Is there any real timeframe for its removal? I know various people have said an alternative is being designed, but in fairness, how long does it take to design, build and install a small, reasonably attractive kiosk?


      Some interesting images from Cork County Council of the demolition works ongoing at the former Irish Steel (ISPAT) site at Haulbowline, Co. Cork:

      BEFORE
      <img src="http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/7365/before3cp.th.jpg&quot; border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at http://www.ImageShack.us” />

      AFTER
      <img src="http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/9725/after2ks.th.jpg&quot; border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at http://www.ImageShack.us” />

      At the end of July a contract was awarded by Cork County Council to consultants White Young Green to carry out a ground investigation on the steelworks site. This involved the digging of trial pits and the sinking of boreholes (some off-shore) by sub-contractor Glovers, with numerous samples being sent away for analysis. The site works were completed at the end of September, though some water samples are still being drawn from boreholes. The consultants will now review and analyse the data and prepare a report of their findings. This will begin the process of assessing the possibilities for re-development of the site.

      The Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government contracted, in mid August, to sell the steelworks buildings and remaining plant and machinery to Hammond Lane Metal Company. Their sub-contractor Eastwoods commenced the demolition of the buildings at the south end of the island, comprising the former rolling mill and shipping building. This work is now well advanced, and the first shipment of scrap metal is being accumulated. Buildings at the north end of the island, comprising the former melting shop, caster and service bay are being cleaned by the contractors and a large quantity of dust is being collected in big bags and stored under cover pending safe disposal. No demolition will be carried out on these buildings until the cleaning is complete. The baghouse where furnace dust was filtered will be the last major building to be cleaned and dismantled.

      A programme of dust monitoring was implemented prior to the start of demolition. This has shown that dust deposition in four locations on and around Haulbowline island has been well within guidelines. In addition, two high-tech dust monitors installed adjacent to the steelworks on the Naval Base are being used for early identification of periods of unusual dispersal of fine (PM-10) particulates. There have been several occasions when, as a result of increasing wind speed and PM-10 levels, the contractor has been asked to cease work and await more favourable conditions. This approach ensures that air quality standards are not breached.

    • #758427
      LOB
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      With all the talk above the train station and the rail services to Mildlton, it is actually hard to believe that Cork once had 5 train terminals! .

      found this map on the Cork City council website. 5 terminals shown
      http://www.corkcorp.ie/ourservices/rac/library/corkpast/maps/images/pdf/1893_Guys.pdf

    • #758428
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @St Luke wrote:

      Dear Jennyol

      A new planning course in UCC will indeed begin in October 2006. The course will be first of its kind outside Dublin in Ireland, and they are currently seeking accrediation from the Irish Planning Institute and the Royal Town Planning Association. A symposium on planning and development in UCC is on the cards for next March – when the course will start recruiting students.

      What department is organising it – it could be interesting?

    • #758429
      Pana01
      Participant

      I’m tired of discussing the vile portakabin on Patricks St. In today’s Examiner, there’a a report on it, along with colour photo. Amazingly, it’s been there since July 2002, a total of 3 years and 4 months. A pledge has been made to have a trendy replacement in place before christmas.

      Why does everything take so long to resolve? And, more importantly, why do we need a hut on Pana in the first place? I know the old one was taken away, but is it necessary to have a replacement? Why can’t the busmen find a place within the refurbished Bus Station, a couple of minutes walk away? The owners of H Samuel, Golden Discs and AIB must be thrilled at the prospect of the busmen dropping into the hut for the ould cuppa, chat and changeover from here to eternity.

      Someone from city hall should have the balls to tell them to move. They’re an embarrassment to Pana.
      And while I’m on the rant – why are there so many cars parked in loading bays in town on Saturdays, especially Oliver Plunkett Street and Patrick Street? Too many parked cars and taxi ranks, ruining the new look of the street, not to mention Caroline Street, beween the Old Oak and Scotts is crammed with cars and jeeps at all times. Unsightly.

    • #758430
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Blarney-based Coleman Brothers Developments are proceeding with an application for a significant development on the lands of a former Grain Mill at Carney’s Cross in Ballynacorra, near Midelton. Pitched as a ‘Village Renewal’ development, the inventive proposal is seeking to realise up to 110 apartments in 3-blocks ranging in heights of 2 to 4-storeys; the conversion of the existing stonemill buildings to 28 further apartments; the creation of a new village square with commercial and community related elements; childcare facilities catering for up to 56 children, and 307 car-parking spaces, of which, 295 will be at basement level. A new roundabout at Carney’s Cross, and public art sculpture will also seek provision. The proposal approachs the site and broader community in a thoughtful manner and should help support what is an vastly growing area of development and prime feeder community to Cork city.

      Coleman Brothers are also active on a number of other significant proposals – including a new residential proposal near Na Piarsaigh G.A.A. Club on the city’s Northside, a new ‘town’ scheme near Monard (near Blarney) in conjunction with Bowen Construction and Fleming Construction which will includes upwards of 2,500 new homes being built (if successful in planning), a new 45-unit scheme near Mahon Point and a number of other schemes in completion or at pre-planning.



      😎 Not far away, MicInerney Homes have succeeded in a grant by Cork County Council for 73 new residential units at Bloomfield, Midelton. Their development at Cherry Orchard/Copper Hill, is designed by Dennehy + Dennehy, and will now include an additional 17 dwelling houses, 37 apartments and 19 duplex units. By extension, a grant is permitted for a larger scheme of 526 new dwellings by the company at Broomfield West/East in the same locale.


    • #758431
      indubitably
      Participant

      UCC say they have never heard of this new town planning course. What faculty will it be in? And how definite is it that it will go ahead?

    • #758432
      redabbeyredux
      Participant

      Indubitably – I’d check with the Geography Department. It was through them that I heard about this – they already include optional land use and planning subjects at undergraduate level.

    • #758433
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      Little to Show for Corks year as European Capital of Culture – The Irish Times 10 November 2005.
      Scathing article by Frank McDonald ( who else?) after a positive article in the same esteemed journal earlier in the year. In a nutshell hates all the Howard Holdings / O’Callaghan Properties attempts around our City loves the Glucksman.The Cork City Council inertia and double standards baffle us all and its good to have an outside view on our beautiful city and its administrators.
      I hate to say it but he’s right about everything.

    • #758434
      kite
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Little to Show for Corks year as European Capital of Culture – The Irish Times 10 November 2005.
      Scathing article by Frank McDonald ( who else?) after a positive article in the same esteemed journal earlier in the year. In a nutshell hates all the Howard Holdings / O’Callaghan Properties attempts around our City loves the Glucksman.The Cork City Council inertia and double standards baffle us all and its good to have an outside view on our beautiful city and its administrators.
      I hate to say it but he’s right about everything.

      Methinks Mr.McDonald must have had sour milk on his cornflakes when he penned that article. The same gent had nothing but praise for Cork some months ago.

    • #758435
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Oh dear, the sleep I will lose knowing that writer is being bitter about something.

    • #758436
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Link to Irish Times Article

      I dont’t know about “nothing but praise” but the article in question is broadly fair. A regular reader of this thread and The Times will be aware of the authors views on most of the projects mentioned. Some of which I’d strongly agree with, others I wouldn’t but he did seem to focus on the negative, forgetting many of the better buildings in Cork and in the planning process. I guess, though, thats what the article was about!

      It’s easy to knock projects (I do it myself occasionally) but its much harder to make a case for what we should be doing! After all, everyone’s tastes are different. Incidently, the author may be mistaken in part of his article dealing with the future development of Lavitts Quay- from what I hear, the hotel is out the window.


      Tommy Barker writing in the Irish Examiner suggests that the decision on Frinailla’s Watercourse Road Development will be made this week. The suspense is killing me :p

    • #758437
      lexington
      Participant

      lexington has been slacking off the past few days, but it’s been a hectic week. Things on the development front should pick up again in the not so distant future all going well…in the meantime..

      🙂 Yesterday saw Fleming Construction make a joint announcement with the Sheraton Group regarding the operation of its 5-star resort hotel under construction at Fota Golf Resort. Indeed, Sheraton, who also operate the Westin in Dublin, will head up control at the Hogan & Associates designed 3-storey 133-bedroom hotel and spa. The hotel will be the first internationally operated 5-star hotel in the region and is set to open in Spring 2006.

      Sheraton Hotel Fota Golf Resort Image

      For more details on the Fleming Group’s extensive Fota Golf Resort development see here.



      🙂 John Sisk & Sons Ltd have erected a tower crane over the Cork School of Music site on Union Quay today signalling full-steam ahead for primary construction activity of the long-awaited €60 million PPP project undertaken by Hochtief and designed by Murray O’Laoire Architects. Completion is scheduled for the academic term of 2007.



      Frank MacDonald’s Irish Times article

      Link here. (Thank you Radioactiveman ).

      Unfortunately, I don’t have the time to dissect the article, but I agree it was probably a case of sour milk over the cornflakes – to quote kite.

      However, I just wish to take issue with 1 or 2 things very briefly –

      I think undue aggro is afforded O’Callaghan Properties in the article. People are very quick to knock Merchant’s Quay (MQ) for example – in terms of its architecture. I agree, it is perhaps not the most attractive city centre structure – in fact, I believe (and I may be amended on this one), Mr. O’Callaghan himself noted that it’s design was a product of its time (and one which far preceeded the actual construction dates as well) and the economic climate associated with it. Some may not find this excusable, but I would ask them to consider the context in which it was built, and take note that on completion in 1989, MQ was Cork’s largest urban regeneration project, valued at approx. IR£30m. 3 years prior to it’s opening, Cork was trenched in economic duldrums following not only the closures of plants by Ford and Dunlop, but also the knock-on effects this had for many other businesses around Cork. When Mr. O’Callaghan and the Heron Property Company undertook the initiative at Merchant’s Quay, it was indeed a big risk considering the climate – however the centre and it’s construction provided a vital economic boost and source of employment to a region which needed a little light in some pretty dark days. The coup of attracting tenants like Marks & Spencer, Laura Ashley and so on, was icing on the cake and fair credit to Mr. O’Callaghan and his team. Significantly, OCP projects have over the years continued to pay more attention to design and adjusted with the perceptual and economic climates which accompany their projects, such as Jurys, such as 21 Lavitts Quay and so on. There is always the possibility that MQ will receive a makeover in the coming future, a vertical extension perhaps?, and this may amend external facades. But when people go to knock MQ and OCP, remember what an important and risky project it was to undertake and the lease of life it helped afford the city. The same can be said for Mahon Point (an Ambrose Kelly designed project). Without the prosperity we are so lucky to enjoy today, our increasingly prevalent appreciation for better and more imaginative design, may not be so – say, ‘forthright’.

      As for Howard Holdings’ efforts at Lapps Quay, I think the product speaks enough on its own standing. 🙂



      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Tommy Barker writing in the Irish Examiner suggests that the decision on Frinailla’s Watercourse Road Development will be made this week. The suspense is killing me :p

      The decision has actually been made RM and I will do my best to let you know more as soon as I can.


    • #758438
      dowlingm
      Participant

      I remember what preceded MQ. Better owt than nowt.

    • #758439
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Agree with Lex and Mdowling on this one. Merchant’s Quay was the only big project at the time. I remember talking to a city planner and his point was that it was not an ideal design, but it was better than what was there and they were hoping it would kickstart the redevelopment of the city center. To be fair, they had a point. Does anyone remember the old warren of alleys and car parking there prior to redevelopment! The entire quay was a mess.
      As for the other criticisms, some are valid, while others are in my view an exaggeration. Thankfully, the public at large tend to be more aware of the importance of design and things have improved considerably. But his description of HH’s Lapps Quay development is a bit rich….do you remember the open expanse and blank wall of the old Dan Seaman motor ‘showroom’? 😮
      Finally, although the McDonald article was a critical, it is good that these things are highlighted in the press and for that I am grateful. The more debate the better.

    • #758440
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      lexington has been slacking off the past few days, but it’s been a hectic week. Things on the development front should pick up again in the not so distant future all going well…in the meantime..

      🙂 Yesterday saw Fleming Construction make a joint announcement with the Sheraton Group regarding the operation of its 5-star resort hotel under construction at Fota Golf Resort. Indeed, Sheraton, who also operate the Westin in Dublin, will head up control at the Hogan & Associates designed 3-storey 133-bedroom hotel and spa. The hotel will be the first internationally operated 5-star hotel in the region and is set to open in Spring 2006.

      Sheraton Hotel Fota Golf Resort Image




      Frank MacDonald’s Irish Times article

      Link here. (Thank you Radioactiveman ).

      Unfortunately, I don’t have the time to dissect the article, but I agree it was probably a case of sour milk over the cornflakes – to quote kite.

      However, I just wish to take issue with 1 or 2 things very briefly –

      I think undue aggro is afforded O’Callaghan Properties in the article. People are very quick to knock Merchant’s Quay (MQ) for example – in terms of its architecture. I agree, it is perhaps not the most attractive city centre structure – in fact, I believe (and I may be amended on this one), Mr. O’Callaghan himself noted that it’s design was a product of its time (and one which far preceeded the actual construction dates as well) and the economic climate associated with it. Some may not find this excusable, but I would ask them to consider the context in which it was built, and take note that on completion in 1989, MQ was Cork’s largest urban regeneration project, valued at approx. IR£30m. 3 years prior to it’s opening, Cork was trenched in economic duldrums following not only the closures of plants by Ford and Dunlop, but also the knock-on effects this had for many other businesses around Cork. When Mr. O’Callaghan and the Heron Property Company undertook the initiative at Merchant’s Quay, it was indeed a big risk considering the climate – however the centre and it’s construction provided a vital economic boost and source of employment to a region which needed a little light in some pretty dark days. The coup of attracting tenants like Marks & Spencer, Laura Ashley and so on, was icing on the cake and fair credit to Mr. O’Callaghan and his team. Significantly, OCP projects have over the years continued to pay more attention to design and adjusted with the perceptual and economic climates which accompany their projects, such as Jurys, such as 21 Lavitts Quay and so on. There is always the possibility that MQ will receive a makeover in the coming future, a vertical extension perhaps?, and this may amend external facades. But when people go to knock MQ and OCP, remember what an important and risky project it was to undertake and the lease of life it helped afford the city. The same can be said for Mahon Point (another Ambrose Kelly-school designed project). Without the prosperity we are so lucky to enjoy today, our increasingly prevalent appreciation for better and more imaginative design, may not be so – say, ‘forthright’.

      As for Howard Holdings’ efforts at Lapps Quay, I think the product speaks enough on its own standing. 🙂


      The decision has actually been made RM and I will do my best to let you know more as soon as I can.


      Merchants Quay was another opportunity lost on a massive scale for Cork in such a prominent position and the problem with “build something instead of nothing at all” policy. Driving down the city’s quays all it offers is the massive neon backlight signage of “Dunnes Stores”.Remember Ambrose Kelly is’nt an architect.

    • #758441
      Leesider
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Merchants Quay was another opportunity lost on a massive scale for Cork in such a prominent position and the problem with “build something instead of nothing at all” policy. Driving down the city’s quays all it offers is the massive neon backlight signage of “Dunnes Stores”.Remember Ambrose Kelly is’nt an architect.

      still a damn sight better than the quay accross the way with the metropole!! how long are we going to have to wait for something to be done there?

    • #758442
      jungle
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      still a damn sight better than the quay accross the way with the metropole!! how long are we going to have to wait for something to be done there?

      And not a patch on the Kyrl’s Quay Car Park/North Main St Shopping Centre river frontage.

    • #758443
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Merchants Quay was another opportunity lost on a massive scale for Cork in such a prominent position and the problem with “build something instead of nothing at all” policy. Driving down the city’s quays all it offers is the massive neon backlight signage of “Dunnes Stores”.Remember Ambrose Kelly is’nt an architect.

      Look, I don’t think you’d find anyone willing to give MQ a design award but if you look at the history of development in this city and consider the feeling that was prevalent at the time it was designed and built, one could argue that the success of Merchants Quay (at least in a commercial sense) served as a real catalyst for the city.
      I believe in the medium-term that a redevelopment of the centre, along with the quay front itself is on the cards, which is most welcome but i do think that maybe, just maybe the loss of the old quay might have been worth it in terms of the example it gave for the city as a whole.
      I’m not saying another MQ is acceptable. The people of Cork now will not accept poor architecture- thats an indication of how far we’ve come. But, taken in context, the old quay would not have survived to this day without total redevelopment anyway- it was always going to be replaced. What we;ve got can and should be improved upon. One of the main problems is not the shopping centre, but the quayside, footpaths, public lighting etc, It all needs a lift and hopefully that’s something OCP and CCC can work on together in the near future.


      Lexington… I’ll await you’re news on Frinailla’s Lady’s Well. I’ve been following this for a while and what ever way it goes, it’ll be an interesting one. Thanks.

    • #758444
      Leesider
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      And not a patch on the Kyrl’s Quay Car Park/North Main St Shopping Centre river frontage.

      at least there are plans for that area, (Kyrl’s Quay) anyone have news on that btw?? ANything going to planning soon?

    • #758445
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Just a question…has anyone noticed a sort of white residue staining across the redbrick facades of Camden wharf? What is that and how did it get there? it looks awful!!!!! Driving toward Blackpool I saw the Sean muillean apartment complex, i think by the same architect and also redbrick, stained with the white residue as well but not to the same extent. It seems only on those 2 buildings and its rotten!!!

    • #758446
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Just a question…has anyone noticed a sort of white residue staining across the redbrick facades of Camden wharf? What is that and how did it get there? it looks awful!!!!! Driving toward Blackpool I saw the Sean muillean apartment complex, i think by the same architect and also redbrick, stained with the white residue as well but not to the same extent. It seems only on those 2 buildings and its rotten!!!

      I brought up the same point ages ago in the old thread I think. I’ve got no knowledge of construction, etc. but was told that its all to do with the mortar that’s used and that its natural and will go away, etc.,etc.
      That doesn’t detract from the fact that it looks crap and happens to every red-brick building in the city. Camden wharf is a particularly obvious example.

    • #758447
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The Software Development Company has been granted permission for the development of a further office block of some 2488m sq at its lands, the NSC Campus, in Mahon. Wain Morehead Architects handled the application which was praised by Senior Planner Ronnie McDowell for its attractive design stating “There is no objection from a design aspect to the attractive building proposed” in the official planning report. The 4-storey block will be constructed adjacent to the existing NSC Campus block. 50 car-parking spaces will accompany the development.



      🙂 An application for planning is expected soon by the HSE to develop a new BreastCheck Clinic off South Terrace (on the site of the former Irish International Trading Corp. premises), adjoining the South Infirmary Hospital along the Old Blackrock Road. Designs on the €7m facility have been finalised and permission will be sought with the intention of having the centre ready for mid-2007. A further healthcare development has been pitched for the South Infirmary in the future, but details will have to remain capped on that for the time being.



      Leesider – regarding Kyrl’s Quay, the lands which had been subject to the design competition are possessed by various owners, private and including CCC. Though I understand the lands have been assessed, I am not aware of any concrete undertaking to redevelop the lands. Personally, I don’t think the winning Conroy Architecture proposal, would be my choice – but that’s a matter of preference all the same. I think there were some far more imaginative entries which would serve the site better – should one of these models be adopted in any possible redevelopment.


      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Lexington… I’ll await you’re news on Frinailla’s Lady’s Well. I’ve been following this for a while and what ever way it goes, it’ll be an interesting one. Thanks.

      Should have information for you on Monday. Decisions are only being posted out today – it is suspected to have been a successful grant, however, under which conditions I don’t know.


    • #758448
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I brought up the same point ages ago in the old thread I think. I’ve got no knowledge of construction, etc. but was told that its all to do with the mortar that’s used and that its natural and will go away, etc.,etc.
      That doesn’t detract from the fact that it looks crap and happens to every red-brick building in the city. Camden wharf is a particularly obvious example.

      Efflourescence – Deposits of soluble salts which appears on the surface as brickwork dries out out for the first time.The mortar used is only a minor contributor to the problem.

    • #758449
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Thanks Lex, I’m hearing a similar story. Decision going in the post this evening apparently.

    • #758450
      ivuernis
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 The Software Development Company has been granted permission for the development of a further office block of some 2488m sq at its lands, the NSC Campus, in Mahon. Wain Morehead Architects handled the application which was praised by Senior Planner Ronnie McDowell for its attractive design stating “There is no objection from a design aspect to the attractive building proposed” in the official planning report. The 4-storey block will be constructed adjacent to the existing NSC Campus block. 50 car-parking spaces will accompany the development.

      I work in the NSC and I think it’s a kip of a building. It looks ok from the outside and the ground floor is plush but the offices upstairs are no good. The building is either too cold in the winter or too hot in the summer thanks to a poor heating system and air-con that’s not worth talking about. Add to that the fact that there are no facilities for cyclists (showers, covered bicycle stand) even though myself and others have asked many times for such a provision. Cork City Council has a shareholding in Software Development Company which owns the NSC so it’s probably not going to get knocked back in the planning dept is it which probably explains why there are 8 mobile phone masts on top of the building since the last count. Rant over.

    • #758451
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Looking forward to hearing the result of Frinailla’s Lady’s Well development… Will be interesting to say the least.

    • #758452
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Frinailla Developments have been greenlit by ABP following an exhaustive appeal process which saw the decision date delayed on a number of occasions. The regeneration project which has been cleared will make way for approx. 60,000sq ft of commercial space, community facilities, underground car-parking and residential units. Some alterations have been made to the project in the grant, a block, forming part of the overall development has been removed however reductions previously made in conditions posed by CCC have been reinstated bring apartment figures to approx. 120. This all brings conclusion to one of the most highly anticipated development project decisions for Cork this year. John Paul Construction have been active in clearance activities along the Watercourse Road site, with main work scheduled for the not too distant future.

    • #758453
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      <img src="http://img488.imageshack.us/img488/7786/ladyswell23ef.th.jpg&quot; border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at http://www.ImageShack.us” /> <img src="http://img488.imageshack.us/img488/8965/ladyswell19ow.th.jpg&quot; border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at http://www.ImageShack.us” />

      Glad to see this long planning procedure has finally come to an end. For anyone interested, below is a summary of the whole process:

      Most of the given conditions are standard. ABP has however requested the removal of a central block of apartments to the rear of the central plaza building (large 5-storey structure in Lexington’s image above). The space created is to be added to the open space in the development and is to landscaped accordingly.
      Therefore, some apartments will be lost to the development.

      Frinailla’s Lady’s Well

      Frinailla originally applied for this development on Watercourse Road in Blackpool in August of 2003. That scheme was submitted as three individual planning applications. At that time, the whole development was proposed as a mixed-use development with c.250 residential units, a large number of commercial units (totalling 3379m2), a crèche/childcare facility, and a private gym for residents use.
      The whole development stretched from Murphy’s Brewery Corner to the Garda Station on Watercourse Road taking in Coral SeaFood, McSweeney Meats, Trotters Secondhand store and The 147 snooker Club, as well as a large number of buildings to the rear.
      The original development called for a maximum 9 storey range of buildings over basement car parking finished in a mixture of materials including frosted glass, metal meshing and ‘pelicolour’ cladding.
      Fears were raised at local and City Council level and further information on this development was submitted on the 18th November 2003. This further information served to reduce the highest buildings proposed from 9 storey to seven storey but did little to improve the design problems.
      This first set of applications was refused permission by CCC on the 18th December 2003 and all three were appealed to An Bord Pleanala (28.205801, 28.205802 and 28.205803 respectively).
      In the appeal to ABP Frinailla offered to reduce their development to six storeys, should ABP see fit. This was in order to satisfy resident’s concerns over excess height. However, the development was turned down by ABP on the 20/07/2004. Reasons such as scale, height and character within the existing streetscape were all cited as reasons for refusal.

      On the 6th October 2004, Frinailla ltd. applied to Cork City Council to demolish all of the buildings on the site in two separate applications (04/28865 and 04/28866). This was to facilitate sub-surface investigations. These applications were accompanied by no plans for redevelopment and were refused by CCC on those grounds. These decisions were also appealed to An Bord Pleanala in December of 2004 but withdrawn when the most recent applications were also before ABP (see below).

      A month before CCC’s decision on the above demolition applications, Frinailla applied to CCC for the latest round of developments on the 19th November 2004. This time the application came in two parts (04/29029 and 04/29030).
      Overall, the development sought was a mixed use, residential/commercial/public one ranging from one to five stories in height. It contained: 153 residential units, 510 m sq of office space, a bank of 267 m sq, seven retail units totalling 635.5 m sq, a public library (966 m sq), crèche (504 m sq), Medical Centre (282 sq m) and a convenience retail unit (529 m sq).
      The development also proposed a public plaza opening onto Watercourse Road and the retention of a warehouse building at the edge of the site. It was intended to renovate this building and make it the head office of Frinailla Ltd.
      Again, it could have been argued that the development was out of character with the area in terms of height, finishing, etc., however in my view, the new development was much better than that submitted the previous year (see pictures above). This being said, CCC planners had previously stated that 4 storey was the maximum they would consider at this site.
      Questions were also raised about the feasibility of a Public Library at this location, especially considering there was had been no attempt made to involve Cork City Library Service in the planning of it.
      Further information was submitted on the 4th March 2005, this time photomontages were included. The developers argued convincingly that the 5-storey element proposed would help to define the public plaza and public library space. However, in the same submission, the developers withdrew the option of a library (referring to a statement by the City Librarian confirming that the relocation of St. Mary’s Road Library was not an immediate priority) and replace it in their plans with further retail, a gym and further apartments.

      The planner dealing with the application recommended refusal on the grounds of: visual obstruction, inappropriate height, scale and massing, character, overlooking and a breach of the Cork City Development Plan by allowing excess retail in an area which is neither city centre nor a ‘neighbourhood centre’.
      At this point, it is reported that the Senior Planner and City Manager intervened and requested the planner to draw up appropriate conditions to grant permission. This was done, and the development was given the go-ahead by CCC, albeit with the 5-storey element reduced to 4-storey.
      This decision to grant was appealed to ABP by Kathleen Lynch TD, amongst others, who had made submissions from the beginning of this process. Originally, a decision from ABP was due in late August. This was delayed until 13th October, and this was further delayed until today due to ABP workloads.

    • #758454
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      Looks OK in the images and I wonder what the parking provisions are.
      What happened to John Pauls site at the former Grand Parade / Sir Henrys site as nothing appears to have started there in a long time. ?

    • #758455
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Adequate parking facilities are provided under ground- running under the entire length of the developement. Will cater for c. 250 cars.
      The development itself is certainly out of character with the surroounding area, although you may argue that this is a good thing. It is bold and brash and is, in effect a fresh start for this badly neglected site. The locale itself has been on the up lately though, so this development will be fitting into an area which has already had a lot of work done on it in terms of new apartment blocks,etc. Further out from the City, the massive Blackpool SC and RP is nearing completion.
      In terms of maintaining the scale, massing and design of the buildings surrounding this development, it is a failure. As a new start and something to replace what is a terribly delapidated site, it can only be a winner. Only time will tell how this development takes shape. 🙂

      Its interesting to note that the ABP report (due to be made available in the next few days) will show that the inspector involved reccomended upholding the third-party appeal and therefore refusing permission for this development! It was only through the intervention of the Director of Services that The Board decided to go against its own inspector and grant permission.
      Importantly, this means that Frinailla’s Lady’s Well project has gone through both CCC and ABP without ANY report reccomending permission be granted. Both reports reccomended refusal! It is only through intervention at levels above that of the planner/inspector that this development recieved permission. Curious to say the least! It seems the powers that be are smiling on Frinailla and rejecting the advice of their own planners and inspectors!

    • #758456
      rodger
      Participant

      Great news for Cork City regarding Water Course Road and I think well done to all involved.Compromise and common sense prevailed in the end.So Lex whats the next big proposal for Cork?

    • #758457
      lexington
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      whats the next big proposal for Cork?

      In what terms? Scheduled lodgement? Preplanning? Speculative?

      Some of which can’t be disclosed. Others, which are well known and anticipated like that of Academy Street are worth looking forward to. Last night’s CBA ceremony at the SilverSprings was an interesting affair. A much deserved congratulations to Mr. O’Callaghan and all at OCP on receiving the Cork Business of the Year Award.

    • #758458
      who_me
      Participant

      I’m not that familiar with the Blackpool areas – is there any map that shows the location & size of the Ladyswell development?

    • #758459
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      This is the best I can do for now I’m a fraid. The 3 blocks of the Frinailla development are highlighted in red. It is bordered by Watercourse Road, Bleasby Street and Houses on Chapel Lane. With Allinetts lane and Hillgrove lane running through the site.
      <img src="http://img493.imageshack.us/img493/2351/blackpoolmap1ng.th.gif&quot; border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at http://www.ImageShack.us” />

    • #758460
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      In what terms? Scheduled lodgement? Preplanning? Speculative?

      Some of which can’t be disclosed. Others, which are well known and anticipated like that of Academy Street are worth looking forward to. Last night’s CBA ceremony at the SilverSprings was an interesting affair. A much deserved congratulations to Mr. O’Callaghan and all at OCP on receiving the Cork Business of the Year Award.

      any docklands developments close to submission… how is mph plan for North Docks progressing… any news on Water Street?

      Thanks as always : 😀

    • #758461
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      any docklands developments close to submission… how is mph plan for North Docks progressing… any news on Water Street? : 😀

      The ABP decision on Werdna’s €70m Water Street project, designed by Sean Kearns of Murray O’Laoire Architects is scheduled for November 24th 2005 – Thursday week. Whether the decision is delivered on time or not, I don’t yet know.

      As for Manor Park Homebuilders’ plans on Horgan’s Quay – my understanding is that discussions are still proceeding on a number of issues.

      Regarding other docklands development –

      Niall & Sheila Doris’ proposal for the Nat Ross premises along Monahan’s Road is still in Further Information. The project is designed by Jonathan Horgan of SDA O’Flynn and comprises of 104 residential units (99 apartments over 4 blocks ranging between 4 & 10 storeys – with 5 2-storey terraced houses), 30,000sq ft of business and technology office space all over basement car-parking.

      A further commercial/office development is being planned for a 1-acre site along Monahan’s Road not too far away from Nat Ross. At this precise time, I’m not at liberty to specify details or location – but it is in the works.

      Mundo Furnishings facilities along Centre Park Road are being assessed for redevelopment by owner Patrick Herlihy, however, any movement dates on that site are not yet clear and suspected as ‘longer’ rather than ‘sooner’ term.

      Nearby McCarthy Developments proposal – which holds successful planning – on the former Goldcrop and Alliance Tyres site adjoining Centre Park House is in the final 2 for the race to host the valuable Revenue Commissioners tenancy. My understanding is Tom & Michelle McCarthy are quietly optimistic. McCarthy Developments may not be finished with the remainder of the site either… ]something[/U] for the time being anyway.

    • #758462
      who_me
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      This is the best I can do for now I’m a fraid. The 3 blocks of the Frinailla development are highlighted in red. It is bordered by Watercourse Road, Bleasby Street and Houses on Chapel Lane. With Allinetts lane and Hillgrove lane running through the site.
      <img src="http://img493.imageshack.us/img493/2351/blackpoolmap1ng.th.gif&quot; border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at http://www.ImageShack.us” />

      Thanks Radioactiveman, much appreciated.

    • #758463
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      I won’t comment on other possible movements for the time being until I hear more – hope that’s something for the time being anyway.[/QUOTE]

      Thanks Lex… that’s alot of interesting developments. Must say that I’ll be very interested in any future developments by Howard Holdings, City Quarter has really had a fantastic impact.

    • #758464
      bosco
      Participant

      Hi all, I’ve been reading this thread for a good while now; I’ve enjoyed and appreciated a lot of the contributions, it’s a great resource to know what’s going on in the city and county. I have strong opinions on many of the topics, esp. regarding strategic planning for the city, transport and the docklands, but I never seem to find the time to post my rants. Sometime soon, no doubt!

      Anyway, I see some of you were looking for photos of the new terminal development at the airport, so I hope some of these help.

      (Click on thumbnail to view photos)

      View from the approach road to the airport terminals, with the old terminal to the left, and the new to the right of the overhead gantries.

      Southern (old terminal) side of new terminal building.

      Northern elevation (taken from top of new car park)

    • #758465
      bosco
      Participant

      Eastern elevation (landside)

      Car Park and utilities building

      Other building work in progress – new aircraft hangar:

      New hotel in Business Park

      I’ll try and take some airside shots on a day with better lighting conditions, so you can appreciate all that glass 😉

    • #758466
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      🙂 Bosco, you are a star. Thanks for posting the photos. New terminal is an intersting building to look at and I presume it will be equally pleasant inside. Certainly, it can only be a huge improvement on what currently passes as the terminal building.
      By the way, anyone notice where they hid the fine statue of Christy Ring? At the side of the car park in the airport hotel 😮 I presume he will get a more prominent setting once the ribbon is cut on the new terminal.

    • #758467
      jungle
      Participant

      One issue I have with the new airport terminal is that it was designed for 2.5 million passengers. The airport is already at that level.

    • #758468
      rebel_city
      Participant

      No doubt the airport will open and there will be talks of expanding it to cater for more passengers. I’m happy to see an airbridge in one of the photos. I thought for a while that the bridges were taken out of the plan. When completed the airport will be a really good 1st impression for tourists coming to Cork and Ireland for the 1st time. I hear Subway and Lennox’s chipper will be taking up redency in the food hall. I laughed when Ist heard Lennox’s were going in there. But it’s a great idea, not only is it different to both Dublin and Shannon airports, it’s a bit of Cork city culture and life in the airport. It will do great business, all the Corkonians having their last bit of decent Cork grub before leaving for lands out foreign!

    • #758469
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      I think that there is a Mini English Market going in there also and Lennox’s will be hilarious different.
      Hope they get the transatlantic flights next.

    • #758470
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Bosco-your a legend. I love nothing more than seeing photos of work in progress-esp something like the airport. I love the photos. Like Jungle said already about the new terminal beign built to cope with 2.5 million passengers, I think once the new terminal is occupied the current one should be re-developed by Ryanair-I feel they need a proper base in Ireland since Dublin lost out with their recent decision to develop in Germany. Can you imagine Cork airport with two terminals before Dublin even pours the foundation for their 2nd terminal-a slap in the face for Irelands Capital and the Government for being so slow in implementing anything.

      Lennox’s will clean up in Cork Airport- it’ll be the job.

    • #758471
      ToMuchFreeTime
      Participant

      Ya i would like ryanair to take a more active role in cork airport as there is more than enought demand for it weather you be going out of the country on holidays or tourists coming in. I know alot of people from cork are heading to shannon because of the choice of cheap flights thanks to ryanair. I think this is a big lose to the cork area as cork has a bigger catchment area . 🙁

      such is the boom in tourism in the limerick area because of the cheap flights out of shannon that within the next 2 years 1,000 new hotel rooms will be added to the city capacity which is quiet a big jump.

      Facts On New Terminal

      Area 26,500 sq. metres

      Capacity for 3 million passengers annually

      32 check-in desks

      4 Air-bridges

      5 baggage belts

      I’ve also got a question i though the new terminal had a capacity for 3 million the below quote is taken from the air rianta cork web site . ye say the capacty is 2.5 million but this makes no sence as that figure is going to be achived this year . Correct me if i’m wrong but i think the new terminal has a capacty for 3million and the design incorporated alows for expancion at a later date 5+ years to 5+ million not sure how many air bridges are there though

      Any terninal is a huge inprovement than whats there as the current one has a capacity is officially 1.1 million passengers per annum
      I’d like ryanair to take the old terminal over other than it being turned into offices

      QUOTE:/
      The new terminal will utilise glass, steel and timber materials in a graceful, contemporary design, which maximises the effects of light and space under a single-span curved roof structure. The building is designed to manage a capacity of up to five million passengers per annum over time, with the potential addition of a new pier and side extensions when required.
      QUOTE:

      + does anyone know the actual opening date???

    • #758472
      A-ha
      Participant

      Bosco-your a legend. I love nothing more than seeing photos of work in progress-esp something like the airport. I love the photos. Like Jungle said already about the new terminal beign built to cope with 2.5 million passengers, I think once the new terminal is occupied the current one should be re-developed by Ryanair-I feel they need a proper base in Ireland since Dublin lost out with their recent decision to develop in Germany. Can you imagine Cork airport with two terminals before Dublin even pours the foundation for their 2nd terminal-a slap in the face for Irelands Capital and the Government for being so slow in implementing anything

      I couldn’t have said it better my self. Good on ya Bosco. I’ve been dying for those pictures for weeks and weeks. I have a question though…. which will be Terminal 1 and which will be Terminal 2, the new or the old part? I read in the Echo weeks ago that the old terminal will be used for more than just office use, i.e. an extra terminal. I would love to see Ryanair take over the old terminal (we’ll call it T1 for the sake of it) and also charter flights during the summer. With long delays most of the time, they’ll crowd up T2 if the use it. Also heard that with the new open skies agreement thingy between the EU and the US, it will alow more foreign airlines to use Cork. Maybe we might get our scheduled transatlantic flights after all. Shannon will loose out though, with only 1 in 4 flights going to stopover from 2006. Delighted with the pics. thanks again. Oh and while I’m at it…. where is the connection going to be from T1 to T2. It says in the plans that there will be some sort of sheltered link between the two. Any ideas?

    • #758473
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 It seems X-CES Projects will now have to face up to the deliberation of ABP concerning their €200m Golf Resort development – which will include golf resort residencies, a 185-bedroom Hyatt Hotel, 18-hole champion golf-course, equestrian event centre and other associated provisions – designed by Henry J. Lyons & Partners and scheduled to be constructed by Bowen Construction.

      😎 Also the subject of appeal, Bernard Crowley & Gerard Paul’s proposal for a 6-storey residential block (originally for 67 apartment units, reduced to 49 following CCC grant) over gym and part-basement car-park on the old Riverdale Farm site near Rossbrook and Eden Student Village along the Model Farm Road. The project is designed by Dennehy + Dennehy.

      🙂 Congratulations are due to Cork City Council – The Chambers of Commerce of Ireland (CCI) has named the council as Local Authority of the Year at its second annual CCI Excellence in Local Government Awards, which were presented at a ceremony in Clontarf Castle, Dublin last night (15th November 2005). The Council also won the RTÉ Arts, Culture and Recreation Award for its European Capital of Culture programme and the Waterford Crystal Partnership with Business Award for its Connect Cork initiative.

    • #758474
      jungle
      Participant

      The Cork Airport website states 3 million, so I’ll accept that figure. However, it doesn’t alter the fact that the airport will exceed it’s designed capacity within a couple of year of opening. Indeed, if the rumours of both Ryanair and Aer Lingus increasing their presence at Cork Airport next year are true, 2006 could even be the year that it happens.

      As regards the old terminal. I understand that an environmental impact assessment was not required for the new terminal because the old one was closing. If the old one were to be reopened, a full environmental impact assessment would be required.

      Incidentally, I can’t imagine that Ryanair will operate the old terminal. They have a simple business plan that they operate effectively. Running a terminal is not part of that plan. I could imagine it being operated by someone other than CAA for Ryanair (or more likely LoCos in general), but just not Ryanair.

    • #758475
      Torquemada
      Participant

      Great stuff with the airport pics Bosco..what exactly is the Cetral Utilities Building for?It seems separate from the Multi-Storey carpark..was the covered connection between the new terminal and the new car park also dropped in the DAA’s frantic last minute cost cutting?It would be a shame not to go to and from your car to the plane without getting soaked as you do right now!! 😮

    • #758476
      lexington
      Participant

      ‘Cork in midst of one of the most exciting phases of its history’

      Right of Reply

      A city constrained by a Frank McDonald credo would be ‘dismal and prissy’ says property developer Owen O’Callaghan, responding to a feature by him in last week’s Property

      “Can new development in Cork city be so devoid of architectural merit as to receive not a single star from Frank McDonald? (Property supplement, November 10th)

      By my reckoning, not one recent commercial development is deemed worthy of favourable comment from him. Even for Mr McDonald, this must constitute a record. There is a rich irony that his comments appear under a heading “Little to show for year as European Capital of Culture”.

      That particular designation, hard won by Cork City Council, reflected not only the city’s cultural claims but also the council’s rigorous attention to detail.

      In organising the EU adjudicators’ itinerary, the council – for very good reason – kept the panel of adjudicators far away from the areas of dereliction where now stand many of the buildings at the receiving end of McDonald’s baleful stare.

      Of course, new developments which end dereliction do not automatically deserve praise but most Corkonians welcome the quantum difference that has occurred in that context.

      It is difficult to follow Mr McDonald’s criteria for judgement.

      For example, the Glucksman Gallery has deservedly received paeans of praise over a period.

      This month, the gallery received a special Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government award in Dublin Castle, as best public space in Ireland.

      The same panel voted St Patrick’s Street, the Beth Gali-designed streetscape, the best in the country for the second year running.

      Mahon Point, excoriated by Mr McDonald, was voted the best shopping centre in Ireland by the same panel, on the basis of a range of criteria, including urban design. (Incidentally, Liffey Valley which presumably he doesn’t like either, was not designed by Project Architects, as he says, but by one of the top UK architectural firms, Lyons Sleeman Hoare).

      Mr McDonald “excuses” O’Callaghan Properties development in Merchants Quay, built at the height of the city’s 1980s recession and generally accepted as providing the catalyst for city centre development, on the basis it was “of its time”.

      What arrogance and by the way, what can anything be but “of its time”?

      He reserves particular bile for our development at 21, Lavitts Quay, which recently won the “Best New Cork Building Award” from a panel representative of architectural and town planning expertise, to neither of which can Mr McDonald lay claim.

      The building was nominated for a Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government award, as best public space and, incidentally, was considered flexible and attractive enough to be used by Cork 2005 for a number of its major city centre events during the year.

      He goes on. Howard Holdings’ acclaimed City Quarter development fails to stand muster. Neither does O’Flynn Construction’s bold new building at Lapps Quay find favour – nor does much else.

      Mr McDonald believes quayside development in Cork should have sharp edges. Those who go a different route are guilty of “mistakes”.

      On what basis? Heaven preserve us from such a formulaic mindset.

      There is a wonderful energy and confidence about Cork at present. The diversity of building design makes a notable contribution to that feeling.

      How awful it would be to live in a city constrained by a Frank McDonald credo which would shout “sharp edges only on the quays”; “curved rounded finish allowed off quay”; “heights limited to two/three-storey in city centre”. What a dismal and prissy prospect.

      Deep down, I suspect Mr McDonald is uneasy about commercial and business development, preferring it wouldn’t take place at all.

      In recent years, Cork has emerged from being a city where nothing happened to one in which there has been an unprecedented level of development and economic prosperity.

      The city’s previous atrophied state largely arose from Frank McDonald-type “values” being forced on a city that was full of dereliction and wasted promise.

      Now, the Cork metropolitan area is on the cusp of tremendous opportunity.

      The Cork Area Strategic Plan, the National Spatial Strategy and the Docklands Re-development Project provide parameters for development that will yield much for Cork and its people.

      Perhaps Mr McDonald’s real difficulty is that Cork is in the midst of one of the most exciting development phases in its history. Its pace of development, the organisation of its infrastructure, the management of its traffic, contrasts sharply with Dublin.

      That the city has done all this without showing the deference the capital and its incestuous media have shown to Mr McDonald must, I suppose, be a sore point.

      There is a thin line between offering an opinion and pontificating and he has long since crossed that line.

      My hope is that developers and those local, national and international architects criticised by Mr McDonald will do the right thing – simply ignore him and get on with the valuable and creative work in which they are engaged.”

      Owen O’Callaghan is managing director, O’Callaghan Properties

      Irish Times 2005



      😀

    • #758477
      Saucy Jack
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      🙁 It seems X-CES Projects will now have to face up to the deliberation of ABP concerning their €200m Golf Resort development – which will include golf resort residencies, a 185-bedroom Hyatt Hotel, 18-hole champion golf-course, equestrian event centre and other associated provisions – designed by Henry J. Lyons & Partners and scheduled to be constructed by Bowen Construction.

      😎 I heard from the horses mouth that X-CES are very confident of getting a positive result from ABP but have major concerns with the construction costs especially the infrastructural element.It is probably going to be reduced and phased to suit a smaller budget.

    • #758478
      lexington
      Participant

      Sorry I’m late in posting this – quite the busy one lately, but here are some interesting statistics for your attention.



      November 16th 2005

      * Zone A rents in Patrick Street, the prime city area, have increased by up to 120% over the five-year survey period.

      * Fashion uses continue to dominate all areas within the city, particularly Patrick Street, where they account for 44% of all units.

      * Pedestrian flows on Patrick Street, measured at both Penneys and Evans, were significantly higher than at the time of the last survey.

      * Increase in the number of service units

      * Increase in ladieswear units

      * Increase in menswear units

      * Increase in ‘Jewellery’ units

      There have been some major changes in Cork during the period of the study. The Mahon Point and Ballincollig Shopping Centres opened, Wilton Shopping Centre was sold, the first purpose built retail warehousing units were built in Cork at Blackpool, Mahon and Eastgate. Another landmark was the opening of park and ride facilities and the Ballincollig by-pass and the emergence of discount retailers Aldi and Lidl.

      Rents now range from:

      Patrick Street €3,750 per sq.m. Zone A

      Oliver Plunkett Street €1,600 – €3,200 per sq.m. Zone A

      Castle Street, Paul Street, French Church Street, Academy Street, Marlboro Street, Cook Street, Oliver Plunkett Street west of Princes Street junction and north of Caroline Street junction €1,100 – €1,600 per sq.m. Zone A

      North Main Street, Maylor Street €650 – €1,100 per sq.m Zone A

      Paul Hannon, senior retail negotiator in Lisney’s Cork office stated: “The Lisney Retail Use Survey has highlighted the extreme increase in rents in prime areas of the city, where Patrick Street in particular has shown increases of up to 120%.

      Irish Independent

    • #758479
      Anonymous
      Participant

      does cork county hall have more floor space compared to liberty hall?

    • #758480
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      ‘Cork in midst of one of the most exciting phases of its history’

      Hear, Hear.


      Work on the “Webworks” building on Albert Quay is continuing apace. It will provide c 4650 sqr m of office facilities for technology companies and is being developed by CCC and Enterprise Ireland. Here are two recent construction images.


      In relation to the recent decision by ABP to grant permission for Frinailla’s Lady’s Well development, it is interesting to read the reports of ABP inspector (David Dunne) which very strongly reccomended refusal for both parts of the development. In the end, the Board decided against these reports on the advice of Cork City Council Director of Services.

      ABP Report Lady’s Well Part 1
      ABP Report Lady’s Well Part 2


      Finally, it looks as if CCC have finally gotten around to cleaning the quay walls in the city centre- a job which has needed tackling for years. Workers are on site on Pope’s Quay, adjacent to North Gate Bridge. The small piece they’ve already completed looks great- all shiny and new 🙂

    • #758481
      lexington
      Participant

      Thanks for those images RM, very nice – indeed John Paul Construction have made great progress on the project. A further 123sq m of additional floorspace is currently in planning. It should be a great asset to the city.

      Indeed you are right that Enterprise Ireland are involved, although they will lease space to designated businesses on an ‘incubation’ basis. It is designed to give prospective enterprise quality premises and help aid their development with a specific view to IT/Tech industry but with Financial sector firms also involved. The project itself is actually being developed by Howard Holdings on EI’s behalf (so to speak). 😮

      Completed development photomontages are available here.

      The addition of Eglinton Street to the rear, a prospective proposals to the east of the quay will bring a real sense of continuity and ‘cosmopolitan’ air to this cleverly rejuvenated quarter.



      Also with respect to David Dunne’s report, he is also the inspector behind Water Street’s appeal – given the epic nature of this project’s planning run, I’ll be very curious to see what he has to say about the development come decision day – which is scheduled for November 24th 2005 (this day week), but as we all know, the exact date may not be met.

    • #758482
      jungle
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Finally, it looks as if CCC have finally gotten around to cleaning the quay walls in the city centre- a job which has needed tackling for years. Workers are on site on Pope’s Quay, adjacent to North Gate Bridge. The small piece they’ve already completed looks great- all shiny and new 🙂

      And while they’re at it, could they remove the horrible orange paint they’ve put near the ladders. If anyone other than the city council had done it, it would have been criticised as an act of vandalism.

      I know it’s supposed to be some kind of safety measure, but there are a few things I have to ask

      • How many other cities have felt the need to do this? I’ve never seen it anywhere else
      • How many lives have been saved by it?
      • Wouldn’t it have been better to paint the ladders rather than the quay walls?
    • #758483
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      And while they’re at it, could they remove the horrible orange paint they’ve put near the ladders. If anyone other than the city council had done it, it would have been criticised as an act of vandalism.

      It is supposed to be a safety measure and makes perfect sense. When on the river itself, whether in a boat or swimming, it was impossible to make out the ladders against a dark limestone wall. Painting the ladder would not have been sufficient.
      Its a good idea and was implemented well and should save lives.

    • #758484
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 An appeal has been lodged against Frinailla’s plans to develop a 6-storey, 25-unit apartment development (not intended for student usage) over 42-space dual-level basement car-park designed by Richard Rainey & Associates for the former Plumbing Utilities store along Victoria Cross Road. The revised plan was permitted planning at the beginning of this month. The appeal has been lodged by Mick Murphy with the Communities for Sustainable Development anti “high-rise” lobby group. Frinailla already have existing planning on the site, from its previous owner, for a student development – and the option remains open for them to embark on this less aesthetically pleasing proposal – should any appeal prove unsuccessful. In a sense, the appeal is leaving the local residents open to a less favourable option. Could the appeal money have been put to better use?



      😮 Next Wednesday remains the scheduled planning decision date for Michael Bradley’s proposal along Sheare’s Street, designed by Magee Creedon. The small but prominent proposal seeks to redevelop the very small single-storey former take-away premises at 44 Sheare’s Street and construct a 4-storey over basement building including retail provision at basement and ground floors, office space on the 1st floor and a duplex apartment unit for 1-bedroom with roof-terrace over the 2 further levels. The design is imaginative and will certainly give something for people to talk about should it receive permission.



      😮 John Cleary Developments are also scheduled for a decision date next week, on Thursday 24th November 2005, regarding their Coughlan de Keyser designed office and retail development on the former Sifco premises at Mahon. To be built to the rear of the proposed MotorMall, the development consists of over 113,000sq ft of office space over 4 levels and in excess of 20,000sq ft of retail showrooms over 4 ground floor units, all above 2 levels of basement car-parking for 301 spaces. No objections or submission were lodged against the proposal.

    • #758485
      corkdood
      Participant

      Any idea when Ruden homes of Carrigaline are to commence construction of their new development at Leghanamore? They got planning during the summer. Any news on a start date or what estate agent will be marketing the development?

    • #758486
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      🙁 An appeal has been lodged against Frinailla’s plans to develop a 6-storey, 25-unit apartment development (not intended for student usage) over 42-space dual-level basement car-park designed by Richard Rainey & Associates for the former Plumbing Utilities store along Victoria Cross Road. The revised plan was permitted planning at the beginning of this month. The appeal has been lodged by Mick Murphy with the Communities for Sustainable Development anti “high-rise” lobby group. Frinailla already have existing planning on the site, from its previous owner, for a student development – and the option remains open for them to embark on this less aesthetically pleasing proposal – should any appeal prove unsuccessful. In a sense, the appeal is leaving the local residents open to a less favourable option. Could the appeal money have been put to better use?



      Yep, and according to CCC website Mick Murphy and CSD have lodged an objection to the Carmelite Place 4, YES “four” storey proposed development…these people are becoming a REAL pain in the A**
    • #758487
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Marlboro Trust (Retail) Limited are seeking permission to develop a single storey discount foodstore on a 5.46acre site off the Old Youghal Road in Mayfield. The split roof design seems to hark at similar styles adopted by the likes of Aldi and Lidl…hmmm 😉 – the store will be provided over 1565sq m with 1075sq m of that applied for actual retail sales. 106 surface parking spaces are to be provided, along with 84 further spaces associated with an extension to the existing wholesale retail structure on the site – this latter provision also being made as part of the overall application.



      🙂 Triple D Warehousing have enlisted James Leahy & Associates to design a new scheme of 21 apartment units (9 2-bedroom and 12 1-bedroom) in a single 3-storey building over basement car-park. Their soon to be lodged application applies to their Longs Yard premises along Tower Street, near Barrack Street.



      🙂 Meanwhile Jeremiah O’Sullivan will seek to demolish the former Trident Safety premises at 16 Anglesea Street and redevelop a new 4-storey office building with ground-floor retail. The proposal lands within the boundaries of Cork’s emerging, extended office district.


      kite – no need to get all fussed up, although I entirely appreciate your frustration. What’s disappointing for me is the group’s lack of reasonable foresight. The group includes some very well educated and decent people with backgrounds like medicine, engineering, teaching etc among others – however, when it comes to the issue of development, their belief-structure is anything but ‘sustainable’ contrary to their title. It’s a pity that they misconceive the fundamentals – they cannot seem to reason beyond what they merely believe to be ‘developer’ greed and condemn/villify those that conflict to their logic – often forgetting and thus undermining the qualification and character of those professionally trained and operative within the fields of planning, design, development, finance and economics etc including the likes of Cork City Council. I don’t want to go down this whole road again, but at the end of the day, it’s their money that is being misdirected – think of all the good their fundraising efforts could do in satisfying the provision of say, playgrounds, maintaining greenspaces, setting up their own community facilities, entering constructive negotiation with developers (rather than confrontational efforts) to benefit their local area – something the members are more that capable of doing. With all that money funding appeals and objections – I feel their actions could be more constructively utilised, and if they ever choose to to work for a constructive rather than destructive outcome, you be well sure their wishes for community provision, better green areas, better traffic management etc etc would be a lot more swiftly adhered to. People only listen to someone giving out to them for so long, there comes a point when they just get fed up and leave the room. A response is much more likely to materialise where reason is shown. Oh well. :rolleyes:

    • #758488
      anto
      Participant

      I used to live on sheare’s street so i know that takeaway that is being redeveloped. No objections here. Remember when those Share houses for the elderly were considered cutting edge in the 80’s.? I supposse they’ve aged well enough and respect the urban grain of the area.

      I lived in the restored Fenns Quay that won praise from all quarters. One thing always annoyed me was the complete lack of sound prroofing in that scheme. Someone could sneeze on the ground floor and you’d hear it 2 floors up. They paid so much attention to conservation but not enough to solutions like a bit of sond insulation in the floor boards. We’d no carpets or curtains that woul’ve helped. Double glazing wasn’t an option but the sash windows were’nt very well made. Still, it was a good place to live very central anyway!

    • #758489
      kite
      Participant

      😮 Mary Leland in todays (19th) property section of the IE re. the Blackrock area plan states that…
      (The maximum recommended height of 3 storeys, however is still too TALL for for the village setting..)
      Can we now expect another vote by city councillors to impose a height cap of 2 storeys?

    • #758490
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😮 Mary Leland in todays (19th) property section of the IE re. the Blackrock area plan states that…
      (The maximum recommended height of 3 storeys, however is still too TALL for for the village setting..)
      Can we now expect another vote by city councillors to impose a height cap of 2 storeys?

      I’ve never heard anything but whinging from Mary Leland anyway, can we ever hope to expect anything else? Dont think so my friend. :rolleyes:

    • #758491
      kite
      Participant

      😡 Councillors bowing to pressure from CSD to impose a 3 storey height cap on housing….
      Cork airport to have ONLY ONE airbridge (Evening Echo today) just what is going on in Cork?

    • #758492
      lexington
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😡
      Cork airport to have ONLY ONE airbridge (Evening Echo today)

      Indeed the announcement that only 1 airbridge is to be provided in the interm is something of a disappointment, and somewhat conflicts with promises made earlier this year by both the DoT and CAA. 🙁

    • #758493
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Mary leland…..If I ever see her smiling face again on the paper……really recks my head….

    • #758494
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Interesting article in this weekend’s Financial Times about high rise living entitled ‘From rock bottom to sky high’. Not directly related to events in Cork obviously, but topical given the stance of the likes of CSD against “high rise” living in the city. Probably of more relevance to Dublin, but still a very interesting read (a full page article), Link is as follows:

      http://news.ft.com/cms/s/a73cf0f4-57c6-11da-8866-00000e25118c.html

      Part of the story I have copied below to give you a flavour.

      From rock bottom to sky high
      By Caroline McGhie
      Published: November 19 2005 02:00 | Last updated: November 19 2005 02:00

      Tour the key cities of the UK today and you might think you had slipped continents. Gleaming new ÂÂ towers fronted by billboards advertising luxury flats fit naturally in New York or Chicago, Tokyo or Kuala Lumpur, not London and Manchester, Swansea and Chatham. However, extraordinary as it may seem, the British are finally breaking away from their low-rise past, peeling off the old industrial cobwebs and erecting – and embracing – modern ÂÂ residential skyscrapers.

      Most of the world’s great cities have been in love with vertical living for decades, their glamorous high-rise apartment houses standing as expressions of wealth, power and success. Now, with more than 100 new cathedrals of glass and steel in the works, London is coming round to the idea too. Swimming pools at 400 ft? No problem. Bathtubs with views of the London Eye? Even better.

      This isn’t just a minor craze; it is a serious switch in the national cultural outlook. New, unpublished, research from estate agent Savills shows that 30,466 flats, in 127 towers with more than 20 storeys, are being constructed or are at the planning stage. Pile them up and that makes 3,444 storeys altogether. About 46 per cent of them are climbing out of schemes forged since 2004 and many of the newest are in the north-west, north-east, Yorkshire and Humberside. They are getting taller all the time. Since 2004, according to Savills, the average height of a new residential tower has increased from 24 to 27 storeys.

      Next month the wrapping comes off a soaring 50-floor block called Pan Peninsula in London’s Docklands, presented as a glittering spear of “world-class architecture” with “signature restaurants” and 700 flats. From the 50th-floor cocktail bar, the lights of the capital sprinkled at its feet will look like diamonds at night. It was designed by Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, architects of the Sears Tower in Chicago. Illustrations show it lit at dusk in purples and pinks against the darkening aubergine sky, exuding sex appeal.

      In Manchester, work on the 47-storey Beetham Tower began earlier this year. All 219 apartments have been sold, even though buyers can’t move in for another two years.

      And there are more soaring buildings in the pipeline. The Inacity tower, also in Manchester, would be taller still, at 60 storeys and 400 apartments. Even Edinburgh, that dour Scottish beauty, has hired architects Colin & Moggridge to see how skyscrapers could fit into its skyline, the first time it has looked at the issue seriously since 1968. Everyone is thinking big.

    • #758495
      browser
      Participant

      Hi all,

      I have not posted before but am a long time admirer of the site. Just wondering, with all the stuff in the papers about Cork City FC these last few days, if anyone knows the nature of the redevelopment of the Shed End. Is a stand replacing just the current small terrace or are they building a stand going the width of the pitch? As all the papers say it will be done in coming months there is, presumably, extant planning permission.

      Thanks in advance.

    • #758496
      lexington
      Participant

      @browser wrote:

      Hi all,

      I have not posted before but am a long time admirer of the site. Just wondering, with all the stuff in the papers about Cork City FC these last few days, if anyone knows the nature of the redevelopment of the Shed End. Is a stand replacing just the current small terrace or are they building a stand going the width of the pitch? As all the papers say it will be done in coming months there is, presumably, extant planning permission.

      Thanks in advance.

      I’ll be honest the Cork City FC intentions are not my strong point, but my understanding is that it’s being demolished to make way for a further seated stand with a 2,000+ capacity. :confused:

    • #758497
      Angry Rebel
      Participant

      According to the Irish Examiner the bulldozers have actually moved in already! Presumably they want to try and have it ready for next season…

    • #758498
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Planning was granted in 2003 for the demolition of “The Shed” and the construction of a new covered stand with changing rooms, meeting rooms, toilets and offices also included.
      I’ll try to bring you some images of the proposed development later.

      The “old” Shed

    • #758499
      corkdood
      Participant

      Any ideas on what may become of the grounds and buildings at St Finbarrs Farranferris on the north side of the city. The school is closing in May of next year after which I assume it will be sold. The grounds are quite extensive with two large playing pitches and other land in addition to the main school building.

      The main building looks tailor made for conversion to apartments. Just wondering if any deals have been done.

    • #758500
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @yorktown wrote:

      Mary leland…..If I ever see her smiling face again on the paper……really recks my head….

      :p Mary has consistantly been against any development in Cork in her column in the Irish Examiner & Sunday Independant.Basically everyone should have a view of St.Finnbars,Bring back the shawlies to Cornmarket Street and leave everything exactly as it is and if possible reverse development completely without any thought where an expanding young population shall live.i.e. sometime around 1950.Mary has a cosy home in Blackrock Cork city which was once open fields 150 years ago with orchards etc……..people have to live somewhere !!!

    • #758501
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      What with the imminent pedestrianisation of Oliver Plunkett St. and surrounding streets, I wonder will the metal poles be replaced with proper lights as originally planned. We’ve waited long enough for them I think.

    • #758502
      Anonymous
      Participant

      is cork county hall far from the city centre? i would love to see what it looks like in person these days. i will be down that way next month.

    • #758503
      who_me
      Participant

      @alpha wrote:

      is cork county hall far from the city centre? i would love to see what it looks like in person these days. i will be down that way next month.

      About a 25 or 30 minute walk, I’d guess. Though you can see it easily enough from Sheare St. in the city centre – bring a pair of binoculars and save yourself the walk! 😉

    • #758504
      who_me
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      What with the imminent pedestrianisation of Oliver Plunkett St. and surrounding streets, I wonder will the metal poles be replaced with proper lights as originally planned. We’ve waited long enough for them I think.

      It would be nice wouldn’t it. If the “placeholder” poles weren’t all sticking in different directions, they wouldn’t be so bad. Actually, it’s amazing just how many lampposts & signs around the city are bent or buckled. Just how bad are drivers in Cork???

    • #758505
      Anonymous
      Participant
      who_me wrote:
      About a 25 or 30 minute walk, I’d guess. Though you can see it easily enough from Sheare St. in the city centre – bring a pair of binoculars and save yourself the walk! ]

      i could do that. i only bought a pair of binoculars 2 weeks ago. i never knew that it could be seen from the city centre but i haven’t been to cork in a very long time. i went there when i was a wee lad.

    • #758506
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @alpha wrote:

      i could do that. i only bought a pair of binoculars 2 weeks ago. i never knew that it could be seen from the city centre but i haven’t been to cork in a very long time. i went there when i was a wee lad.

      From Patrick Street it should just be a 15 min walk to the main gates at UCC. You’ll get two for the price of one there- step inside the gates and have a good look at the award-winning Glucksman Gallery. Then look west from around about the main gates and you should see most of the County Hall. (A further 5 min walk west would provide even better views). Enjoy!!!

    • #758507
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      :confused: The pedestriansation of Oliver Plunkett Street should be great but those 5ft poles are a nuisance and look awful right now. The Light standards were meant to be installed months ago. Its like the portacabin for the bus drivers on Patricks St.semi-permanent fixtures.If you walk around the city regurlarly you can’t fail to notice all the surplus metal poles which impede movement on pavements etc. These defunct metal poles where the sign has been removed seem to have some protection status.There are literally hundreds of them.

    • #758508
      Anonymous
      Participant

      thanks for the info. i can remember the cashes store in cork city. i presume that is now brown thomas?

    • #758509
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Cado Systems have been permitted to develop a 4850sq m office block over 45-space basement car-parking at their premises along Bessboro Road, Blackrock. The new building, designed by RKD Architects will provide various units for business and technology uses.



      alpha – the views from the Lewis Glucksman Gallery are well worth the visit alone – and yes, it’s Brown Thomas now.


    • #758510
      ToMuchFreeTime
      Participant

      Did any one have a look at the echo today??

      Had a quick look as went in to shop today but didn’t have time to read it.
      The whole front page was taken up with a heading something similar to

      talks being held over 8,000 seater arena in showgrounds 😮

      Or somthing like that. :p
      Does any one have any more information on this as it’s recking my head as
      can’t get to shop as to busy. If it pans out this would be great news!!

    • #758511
      lexington
      Participant

      @ToMuchFreeTime wrote:

      Did any one have a look at the echo today??

      Had a quick look as went in to shop today but didn’t have time to read it.
      The whole front page was taken up with a heading something similar to

      talks being held over 8,000 seater arena in showgrounds 😮

      Or somthing like that. :p
      Does any one have any more information on this as it’s recking my head as
      can’t get to shop as to busy. If it pans out this would be great news!!

      The MAS have held discussions with parties – each at varying stages of advancement. One team is only beginning discussions on the prospect – it is understood Howard Holdings are positing the option as part of a wider scheme to CCC in talks about developing the land on a long-term leasehold basis (I don’t know straight off if they’ve had serious contact with the MAS themselves however, although I would imagine it is not too far away if not already begun). Another party, has had some attachment with the site in the past – however the level of advancement is unknown. The third party has designs on the site and commenced discussions with both MAS/CCC and a well known international operator.

    • #758512
      ToMuchFreeTime
      Participant

      Thats good to know at least there exploring all options for location for event centre
      other than the tiny 2,000 seater arena on offer at the train station but the sooner
      an area is picked the better i think.
      so they could plan the design for the center and start working on it any time soon.
      This building would be a very nice addition to the ever changing city. And bring alot more options to every one in the city in regards to concerts and conferences being held there. It would save alot of people a trip to dublin!!

      On another note drove past the new jurys site the other day and i’ve got to say i’m very impressed by how fast it is going up.

      Does any one know whats happening to the esso garage next to the jurys site as it was up for sale. not sure if sold or not??

    • #758513
      jungle
      Participant

      Is the new kiosk-like structure that appeared next to the busman’s prefab yesterday its permanent replacement or something totally unrelated?

    • #758514
      lexington
      Participant

      @ToMuchFreeTime wrote:

      Does any one know whats happening to the esso garage next to the jurys site as it was up for sale. not sure if sold or not??

      The 0.6acre Muskerry Service Station was sold earlier this summer through CBRE Gunne for €8.5m – the station was due to be closed in October but will now operate until late December (subject to change). An application was expected in December, but that remains to be seen.

    • #758515
      kite
      Participant

      :rolleyes: Jim O’Donovan, Director of services gave a robust defence of architectural standards in Cork in todays Irish Times letters page. He rightly mentions most, if not all of the good recent developments in Cork.
      He does however fail to give a mention to the building that was “highly commended’ by the Opus awards…The VICTORIA MILLS, surely an oversight??

    • #758516
      lexington
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      Is the new kiosk-like structure that appeared next to the busman’s prefab yesterday its permanent replacement or something totally unrelated?

      I saw it and I can’t say its a beauty. For a brief moment, the only thing that distinguished it from the Portacabin was the absense of graffiti. 😮 I had expected a structure more in line with the style of the nearby bus-stops, it’s pretty prominent.

    • #758517
      Leesider
      Participant

      sorry to annoy ye again for info, but I need to get my hands on residential info (past, present, future, facts & figures) regarding Blackpool and how it is developing! Anyone know where I can get info online?? Have got a bit of info from newspapers and the corpo website but need something a bit more facts and figures based. Please let me nkow if you know of anything, cheers Leesider!!

    • #758518
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Re Cork City FC and the redevelopment of the Shed End. I saw the plans previously and it is essentially something along the lines on the present Donie Ford stand (the stand running the lenght of the field with the TV gantry on top). Considering that “The Box” as it is fondly known was four muddy banks not that long ago, the redevelopment of the spectator facilities there has been impressive. Obviously, the days of expecting people to to come and stand on a grass bank in bad weather are fast disappearing. Nevertheless, and not to detract from the obvious improvements at Turner’s Cross, it is obvious that the designer of the stands is not an architect, or at least not a very good one. The Curragh Road stand is essentially a concrete terrace with seats bolted in. Sadly, they are extremely tight in terms of space, and not very comfortable. The Donie Forde stand is acceptable although that also is a bit of a squeeze, and the new stand replacing the Shed will no doubt be a vast improvement as well. I only wish the design actually had a bit more flair to it. A clock tower on the roof for example. Still, don’t get me wrong…the improvements there, and in other stadia around the country (both GAA, football, and rugby) are great to see.

    • #758519
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I saw that Frinailla invited Kathleen lynch to have some input into their discussions on material finishes to Ladywell despite her having objected. Interesting move i’d say.

      With all these serial objectors and talk of them lately wasnt there suppose to be legislation put forward to limit serial objectors?? What happened to that??

    • #758520
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      I saw that Frinailla invited Kathleen lynch to have some input into their discussions on material finishes to Ladywell despite her having objected. Interesting move i’d say.

      With all these serial objectors and talk of them lately wasnt there suppose to be legislation put forward to limit serial objectors?? What happened to that??

      I think that’s a bit harsh on Deputy Lynch. As an elected representative, it is her job to represent the views of her constituents– just like any other elected representative. Therefore, it is not a great surprise that she makes a large number of submissions on proposed developments in her constituency (both negative AND positive).
      That is all they are- submissions. If the planners believe there is no basis to the submission (or any submission) they can just ignore them and grant permision. There may be a number of crank, serial submitters out there, but it is surely up to the planners to make the final decision.
      Kathleen Lynch’s submission on the Frinailla project has meant that what has now been green-lit is many times better in terms of architectural standards than the “monolithic” monstrosity which was first proposed.

    • #758521
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I think that’s a bit harsh on Deputy Lynch. As an elected representative, it is her job to represent the views of her constituents– just like any other elected representative. Therefore, it is not a great surprise that she makes a large number of submissions on proposed developments in her constituency (both negative AND positive).
      That is all they are- submissions. If the planners believe there is no basis to the submission (or any submission) they can just ignore them and grant permision. There may be a number of crank, serial submitters out there, but it is surely up to the planners to make the final decision.
      Kathleen Lynch’s submission on the Frinailla project has meant that what has now been green-lit is many times better in terms of architectural standards than the “monolithic” monstrosity which was first proposed.

      I’m sorry, just to clarify something – are you saying because of her objection the project is better in architectural terms? Did she not object to the current proposal also and in light of the planning report expressed disappointment that the Board did not adhere the recommendation by David Dunne (Planning Inspector)? :confused:

    • #758522
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’m saying that from the outside looking in, had the first “draft” of this development been granted permission we would be in a worse position than we are in now. If you get my drift.
      i.e. The final draft is a compromise between the “monolithic” and frankly awful proposals in the first planning application and what some local residents and representatives would argue for (which of course is often a ridiculously low density, suburban, faux-antique mess). I’m not saying its a perfect system, but i think its ridiculous to suggest that any negative input from locals should be disregarded just because they are not developers or architects.
      And certainly, I think public representatives are of course likely to make submissions representing the views of constituents– that is their job- to represent their constituents views. I note that Kathleen Lynch has admitted her disappointment that the Board did not back up their own Inspector, but she has also accepted that it is the decision of the Board and she will respect that decision.
      Due process is all locals and local representatives want- it is not their fault that CCC and ABP are so underfunded that they cannot deal with applications and appeals in a more timely manner.
      Sorry for the rant- but I do feel there is a part of this thread which would prefer if the city was carved up between CCC and developers and residents should have no input at all.


      On an unrelated topic, I saw the new Bus Eireann office/porto cabin in Patrick Street today. Its not bad looking – bit tank-like but should stand the test of time, rain and drunk people. A great improvement on the old portocabin.

    • #758523
      lexington
      Participant

      A light-hearted (partially speculative) look at some retail development in the city…

      Following protracted demand for numerous retaillers about a lack of sufficiently sized higher-order retail accommodation in Cork city centre – it seems at last, the tide is turning. At a wider level, the retail scene in surburban Cork has also seen a notable turn.

      We begin with…

      Dunnes Stores at 102 to 105 St. Patrick’s Street – the company have submitted an extensive plan for the redevelopment of its ‘birth’ store along the street. The development, designed by Bertie Pope & Associates, is due for a decision on November 28th 2005, and will see the entire store and structures to the rear facing Drawbridge Street demolished, save for the facades along Patrick’s Street. A 6-storey over basement retail structure of some 130,000sq ft is sought permission to host Dunnes Stores’ flagship Cork store.

      Academy Street – O’Callaghan Properties have enlisted Project Architects (Dublin & Cork) and Gehl Architects (Copenhagen) to design a new, highly anticipated and prominent mixed-use structure occupying the former Irish Examiner offices and printing press, as well as various other acquired properties including the Johnson & Perrott Motor Dealership and Grand Circle Lounge at Emmet Place, Jean Scene building, 95 Patrick’s Street, Le Chateau and others along St. Patrick’s Street in a land acquisition effort approximated at in or above €80m. The site will house a 6-storey structre with apartments on the upper levels, office space and over 200,000sq ft of retail space housing up to as many as 40 units over a number of levels – over residential basement car-parking and loading areas. The retail element will host higher order, predominantly fashion based outlets and form the centre-piece of a larger retail scheme which will host elements at…

      …16 Lavitts Quay, the nearby site acquired by OCP from Howard Holdings – adjacent to OCP HQ @ 21 Lavitts Quay. It is understood that the upper floors will host residential and office elements – and should provide a nice sense of well designed quayside continuity in terms of height with consideration to 21 Lavitts Quay. This affords a nice link to…

      …Paul Street S.C. and Multi-storey car-park, which is subject for a noteworthy refurbishment. The existing elements of this centre offer a grocery element in the form of Tesco, to the overall higher-order retail link. A connection may also be afforded across Paul’s Lane to…

      …Rockfell Investments’ Cornmarket Street development, which is due for construction early next year. 9 large units will be provided over 120,000sq ft + of retail mall. Above which, 65 apartment units will be provided in a scheme designed by Frank Ennis & Associates.

      Recent acquistions by a consortium, involving Joe O’Donovan at St. Patrick’s Street, Market Lane, Grand Parade and apparently Oliver Plunkett Street suggest a site collection for a potentially large upper-scale retail development linking Cork’s 3 prime retail streets. A possible, delicate linkage may be afforded the English Market, providing a grand mix and arrangement of retail and commercial functions. A possible residential element may also be constituent. Speculation assumes discussions have been made with Paul O’Brien and John Costello on their plans for a redevelopment of the…

      …Capitol Cineplex. Plans lodged earlier in 2005 sought permission for a new retail building of some 30,000sq ft + with 18 overhead apartments in a scheme designed by The e-Project. Significant Further Information requests have yet to be met, fuelling talk that a possible link may be in line with the larger scheme mentioned above. Revised Plans may yet be issued, with a subsequent application for linkage provided later. But for now, purely, speculative.

      Grand Parade Plaza, a residential and retail scheme by Frinailla Developments had received full planning for 50 units, now fully sold according to sources at Global Properties. Excavation works are now complete. Approx. 3,000sq m of retail space is planned, with a high-profile tenant understood to be earmarked. The acquistion of the Goat Broke Loose Bar for €4m offers a potential expansion of additional retail and residential space for the project, and an improved street frontage. Further opportunities in the area exist.

      Manor Park Homebuilders are likely to seek a healthy presence of retail provision at their redevelopment of Horgan’s Quay. Although no planning date is yet earmarked, and quibbles regarding retail provision on the quayside do exist, it is likely MPH will include enough retail to act as an attractive community based provision, as well as an attraction for persons farther afield. Proposals are cited to be of the highest architectural quality and designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects.

      And now for the speculation, some well grounded, some rumour based…

      – Merchant’s Quay S.C. may seek an enhancement in the near future to steadfast its position as a city centre retail draw. Plans may indeed see a vertical extension to the eastern end of the centre increasing floorspace, retail accommodation and continuity. Some adjustments may encroach on the open car-parking area at the 4th level of the multi-storey car-park. External upgrades will likely feature as part of the task. Speculation type: Unconfirmed

      – Roches Stores may look to expand and redevelop part of their St. Patrick’s Street Department Store – and ‘birth’ store. Not long after completion of an extensive IR£20m expansion designed by NMA, work may include underground parking – recouping any losses following work to their multi-storey car-parking and indeed adding to space. Access would consist of a rearranged access point from Parnell Place and development works may indeed impact on their current loading area off Maylor Street. Speculation type: informed by 3 sources, not confirmed.

      – Howard Holdings are assessing expansion and redevelopment opportunities to their very valuable Wilton S.C. acquired late last year from Tesco with investor Joe O’Donovan for a figure at around €120m. Making it one of the largest investment acquisitions of 2004. Following consistent speculation (and matched by consistent denial stating that the property was for mere investment purposes), it is understood that a large-scale redevelopment of the centre is being assessed. Options on the scheme include vertical adjustments and expansion over existing car-park areas which will see additional retail space facilitated over basement car-parking. Roches Stores may also seek to expand their department store at the centre by bringing it in-line with their new store image. This will likely include additional levels. The site location is unrivalled – however concerns regarding traffic management and impact on city centre retail will undoubtedly be raised. Also, how would such a scheme affect Mr. O’Donovan’s other plans in the city centre???

      (Some details have been purposely removed – apologises)

    • #758524
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Sorry for the rant- but I do feel there is a part of this thread which would prefer if the city was carved up between CCC and developers and residents should have no input at all.


      Too right that residents are entitled to input – I would never argue otherwise. I think where the bulk of the resentment comes in is where you have consistent, blanket objections to everything proposed by certain groups which do not seek constructive co-operation but rather outright imposition – and often arguments are ill-founded and imbalanced. This style of activity dampens the causes of many others and I suppose unfairly promotes an attitude of resentment. I would always ask the objectors educate themselves at what excatly is being proposed. A nice example is an objection lodged against the Victoria Cross development on the Plumbing Store – with a respresentative of the objection later stating they didn’t have a problem with student apartments, but just felt there was enough. Interestingly that particular development is not specifically aimed at student occupancy. It’s little things like that – or blanket objections to anything 2 storeys or higher.

      One objection lodged against the Westend proposal stated they based their argument on the fact that Block D balconies overlooked their home – right into the garden in fact – a totally valid point. The proposal was concurrently amended to consider this. Objections are a democratic right – but like all rights, they must not be abused. As for public representative arguments – there’s no issue. And if Kathleen Lynch was objecting to a proposal as a representative of her constitutents, the entitlement is 100%. I was simply curious as to how you attributed the resultant scheme at CitySquare – my belief is that the input of objectors was assessed and planning directors determined the best outcome with respect to their understanding of the strategic development of the area. A big problem I feel suffered by resident objectors is the hinderance in asymmetric information (having said that, some architects/planners have been very considered with local residents including them in progress reports from a very early stage – such as that at Water Street). I have always believed this forum is a useful tool for persons to see the alternative perspective on designs and maybe, as a result, they could formulate a more rounded argument…perhaps??? 😮

    • #758525
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I was simply curious as to how you attributed the resultant scheme at CitySquare – my belief is that the input of objectors was assessed and planning directors determined the best outcome with respect to their understanding of the strategic development of the area.

      I agree with you 100 % Lexington. It is the planners who will determine the validity or otherwise of a particular submission and make decisions accordingly with the development of the area as a whole in mind. My point being that for this to happen, submissions must be made by locals and local representatives. I think (I hope at least) that planners know enough about CSD etc. to make informed decisions about their objections.
      People might rightly argue that these objections and appeals are slowing down development. But they are entitled to their say and is it up to ABP and CCC to ensure that all submissions are dealt with in a timely manner.

      Have you seen the portocabin lex?

      PS was on Oliver Plunkett Street today. The “pedestrianisation” is a total joke- cars everywhere. Joe Gavin was on the paper today saying that they will start enforcing it next week!! Thats ridiculous since it has bee pedestrianised since monday!! Have they never heard of bollards in CIty Hall??? :confused:

    • #758526
      rodger
      Participant

      RM.It is everybodies right to firstly object and then appeal a local authority descision.This should be done in an enlightened manner.You are right local polticians should represent the views of their constituents.
      Why then have Kathleen lynch TD Labour party ,and Cllr.Catherine Clancy Labour objected to the Development by that company at Dennehys Cross.Makes very little sense.

      All they are doing is stalling jobs, financial contributions,s & a housing,and the revitalisation of our city.
      Eight months ago these units would have cost about 275,000 euro now the average price in the area is up to 375,000 euro,thats an increase of 12,000,000 euros which joe public the voter has to pick up.

      Does anyone know if these are the only developments that they have objected to?
      One other thing is if people are so up in arms about some of the proposed projects in our City how come so few appeal?

      Any opinions RM?

    • #758527
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I appreciate your comments rodger, but…

      @rodger wrote:

      RM.It is everybodies right to firstly object and then appeal a local authority descision.This should be done in an enlightened manner.You are right local polticians should represent the views of their constituents.

      Agreed.

      @rodger wrote:

      Why then have Kathleen lynch TD Labour party ,and Cllr.Catherine Clancy Labour objected to the Development by that company at Dennehys Cross.Makes very little sense.

      Thay have NOT objected to this development. Nobody has ever suggested they did. I think you may be confusing this with another Frinailla development, i.e. Lady’s Well at Watercourse Road. Not only are the above two people public representatives for that area, they are also local residents.

      @rodger wrote:

      All they are doing is stalling jobs, financial contributions,s & a housing,and the revitalisation of our city.

      Whether you agree with ANY objector or not, I’m certain that nobody goes out with the intention of doing the above. To suggest so is ridiculous.

      @rodger wrote:

      Eight months ago these units would have cost about 275,000 euro now the average price in the area is up to 375,000 euro,thats an increase of 12,000,000 euros which joe public the voter has to pick up.

      I’d love to see the statistics behind these claims, but nevertheless, it is not “joe public the voter” who picks up these supposed cost increases. It is the buyer who does so. If your reasoning is correct, then developers must be delighted when they see an objection coming..more money for them.

      @rodger wrote:

      Does anyone know if these are the only developments that they have objected to?
      One other thing is if people are so up in arms about some of the proposed projects in our City how come so few appeal?

      Because they rely on their local representatives to do the job the tax-payers pay them to do, and represent them in these matters. I presume politicians would not make such submissions unless it was popular to do so. Of course, popularity does not make it right. 🙂

    • #758528
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      My point being that for this to happen, submissions must be made by locals and local representatives. I think (I hope at least) that planners know enough about CSD etc. to make informed decisions about their objections.
      People might rightly argue that these objections and appeals are slowing down development. But they are entitled to their say and is it up to ABP and CCC to ensure that all submissions are dealt with in a timely manner.

      The offer insight indeed – and don’t worry, I see where you’re coming from. ]Have you seen the portocabin lex?[/QUOTE]

      Yes – maybe I’m just naive, but I was hoping for something with a little more flair. Still an improvement.



      And just as a matter of clarity…

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Thay have NOT objected to this development. Nobody has ever suggested they did. I think you may be confusing this with another Frinailla development, i.e. Lady’s Well at Watercourse Road. Not only are the above two people public representatives for that area, they are also local residents.

      Labour Councillor Catherine Clancy did lodge an objection against Dennehy’s Cross – Cllr. Clancy resides in Blackpool. Another Labour Cllr., Michael Ahern also lodged objections to the said proposal.

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Whether you agree with ANY objector or not, I’m certain that nobody goes out with the intention of doing the above. To suggest so is ridiculous.

      It is costing the city of S/A housing – Councillor objections to a proposal in Togher for part S/A housing was refused following resident objection. Mostly due to the fact it contained elements over 2-storeys. The fact is proudly touted on a lobby group website (as below).

      The Manager wanted Councillors to give the “OK” to a developer to knock a house and replace it with a block of Flats with little car parking in Grenville,Togher Road, against the wishes of residents.

      However due to the intervention of Councillors Ciaran Lynch, Fergal Dennehy, and Jerry Buttimer who backed the residents and called for a debate and vote on the issue the democratically elected members of Cork City Council over ruled the unelected Manager on this occasion and changed the proposal to suit the residents of the area despite Joe Gavin’s warning that the developer may pull out of the deal.

      Hopefully this is a sign that Councillors will in future support the people that elected them and let the City Manager know just who is (or should be) running our City.

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I’d love to see the statistics behind these claims, but nevertheless, it is not “joe public the voter” who picks up these supposed cost increases. It is the buyer who does so. If your reasoning is correct, then developers must be delighted when they see an objection coming..more money for them.

      Some areas of the city have seen value increases of up to 15% within the 8 month period dated Jan 2005 to Aug 2005 – taking a house value of €275,000 in January 2005, that unit would now value at somewhere in and around €316,250 – not €375,000 on the dot (but of course exceptions do exist) and considering 4 months in LA planning plus another 4 months in appeal – in some cases, time is one of the biggest impediments to buyer ability. Unfortunate but true. 🙁

      All the same, your points are taken RM – thanks. 🙂

    • #758529
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Yes – maybe I’m just naive, but I was hoping for something with a little more flair. Still an improvement.


      Labour Councillor Catherine Clancy did lodge an objection against Dennehy’s Cross – Cllr. Clancy resides in Blackpool. Another Labour Cllr., Michael Ahern also lodged objections to the said proposal.

      I take your point about the porto-cabin, but i suppose it was a compromise between flair and function.

      You’re right about Cllr Clancy’s submission re. Dennehy’s Cross. Apologies to rodger. 🙂

    • #758530
      rodger
      Participant

      Hi Rm.Catherine Clancy did object to Dennehys Cross and the objection is counter signed by Labour TD.Kathleen Lynch,
      Just as a matter of interest is this there constituency?

      How do you feel about this?

    • #758531
      who_me
      Participant

      I have to admit I know nothing of the planning & appeal procedure; but surely it should be possible to have a preliminary stage where a summary judgement could be made, to prevent frivolous objections. And shouldn’t that be the only thing that matters – whether the reasons for the objection are reasonable, not the name on the form?

    • #758532
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      Hi Rm.Catherine Clancy did object to Dennehys Cross and the objection is counter signed by Labour TD.Kathleen Lynch,
      Just as a matter of interest is this there constituency?

      How do you feel about this?

      See post above rodger… try not to get too smart about it ]Rear[/B] of new Pharmacy building during construction.

    • #758533
      rodger
      Participant

      RM.Many people view this thread as a well informed and knowledgeable point of reference.It is important that all posts here are of a factual nature and are represented correctly to ensure the credibility and integrity of the other members.

      Thats all I have to say thanks.

    • #758534
      anto
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      See post above rodger… try not to get too smart about it ]Rear[/B] of new Pharmacy building during construction.

      Yeah, not great. Don’t like all those swing out windows either,

    • #758535
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 A €1bn euro investment into a massive, state-of-the-art pharmaceutical manufacturing facility is earmarked for a site near Carrigtwohill, only a few minutes drive from the city and located near the N25 “Midelton” Dual-Carriageway. Negotiations are finalising with the IDA at present, and if successful, the proposal (one of the largest single pharmaceutical investments in the State) may create up to 500 jobs. The identity beind the massive plan has not yet been revealed, however, according to a prominent and well-respected source within the existing pharmaceutical industry around Cork Harbour, informed speculation cites Wyeth Pharma as the name behind the proposal. More details when they emerge.



      😮 Tomorrow could be a notable day in terms of Cork development – the scheduled appeal decision for Werdna’s highly-anticpated proposal for Water Street, designed by Murray O’Laoire, is expected for tomorrow (Thursday 24th Novemeber 2005) – however, as well many of you know, the decision may flux in its final deliberation date. The planning process has been an epic one for the project and hopes are high that a successful outcome will prevail.



      😮 Also scheduled for decision (CCC) tomorrow is Frinailla’s plans for Dennehy’s Cross designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects. The proposal seeks to develop 163 high-quality units over a triple deck basement car-park and extensive local service amenities. 23 submissions have been made regarding the proposal and planner Gwen Jordan may yet request Further Information.



      😮 John Cleary Developments plans for a 130,000sq ft 5-storey office and retail development at the former Sifco premises near Mahon Point has seen its scheduled decision date pushed back by CCC until the 30th January 2006, no submissions rest against the Coughlan de Keyser designed scheme.



      🙁 And just one point, a media report today implied that a publication of a letter in it’s newspaper by the Cork/Kerry regions only serving Consultant Oncologist was the moving factor in pushing forward Cancer Treatment facility funding. Indeed the Taoiseach did reiterate the funding had been made – however funding for the new 6-storey Renal/Cardiac Unit at Cork University Hospital designed by Watkins Gray International and which will include a 30-bed oncology unit actually saw the required €47m cleared approximately 2 weeks ago (re: senior CUH management and the HSE). BreastCheck unit funding for the South Infirmary was also cleared with a €7m value in recent days.


      Renal/Cardiac Unit for CUH

    • #758536
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Rear of new Pharmacy building during construction.

      In fairness, that image is outdated somewhat and the building’s front (southern) elevation facing College Road is a fair deal more pleasant. That said, STW have done better and so have UCC.

    • #758537
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😀
      🙁 And just one point, a media report today implied that a publication of a letter in it’s newspaper by the Cork/Kerry regions only serving Consultant Oncologist was the moving factor in pushing forward Cancer Treatment facility funding. Indeed the Taoiseach did reiterate the funding had been made – however funding for the new 6-storey Renal/Cardiac Unit at Cork University Hospital designed by Watkins Gray International and which will include a 30-bed oncology unit actually saw the required €47m cleared approximately 2 weeks ago (re: senior CUH management and the HSE). BreastCheck unit funding for the South Infirmary was also cleared with a €7m value in recent days.


      Renal/Cardiac Unit for CUH

      That’s great news for CUH. just wondering does anyone have any idea if CUH are going to reinstate the helipad? That is really one thing CUH should have. It’s been gone since the redevelopment of the A&E ward and they currently use Cork airport for landing in. u think they would use the Pres rugby grounds instead since it is so close to CUH??

    • #758538
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 BrideView Developments have been refused planning by ABP for the development of 106 apartment units all within a single building ranging in height between 3 and 5-storeys and destined for location at Monsfieldstown in Rochestown. Though Cork County Council had greenlit the proposal (subject to revisions), and the Planning Inspector with ABP recommended permission – the Board decided to reject the proposal. The site occupies a prominent position, just north of the South Ring Road and to the South East of the Bloomfield Interchange – fronting the Douglas Estuary. Design was by Dublin-based McGrane & Partners.



      COLLIERS Jackson-Stops has expanded its presence in the Munster region, following the formation of a strategic alliance with Cohalan, Downing & Associates, one of Cork’s leading independent estate agencies.

      Managing director Declan Stone said: “Colliers Jackson-Stops has been active in Cork for more than 10 years and our alliance with Cohalan Downing & Associates will further strengthen our presence in the region. We are already working together on a number of significant projects.”

      Maurice Cohalan, managing partner, Cohalan Downing & Associates said:”Increasingly our clients require us to have access to the worldwide marketand through our strategic alliance with Colliers Jackson-Stops, we will nowhave access to Colliers International’s 252 offices world-wide.”

      Source: Irish Independent

    • #758539
      Pug
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😀
      a media report today implied that a publication of a letter in it’s newspaper by the Cork/Kerry regions only serving Consultant Oncologist was the moving factor in pushing forward Cancer Treatment facility funding. Indeed the Taoiseach did reiterate the funding had been made – however funding for the new 6-storey Renal/Cardiac Unit at Cork University Hospital designed by Watkins Gray International and which will include a 30-bed oncology unit actually saw the required €47m cleared approximately 2 weeks ago (re: senior CUH management and the HSE). Renal/Cardiac Unit for CUH

      Lex, apparently the Consultant Oncologist sent the letter 3 weeks ago as per The Examiner 😮

    • #758540
      lexington
      Participant

      Cork: a city I’ve always liked a lot


      Right of Reply . . . but poor urban design is having a negative impact on its fabric , says Frank McDonald, Environment Editor

      Owen O’Callaghan’s piece last Thursday’s in Property must be welcomed. Whatever about its scathing tone, I’m glad that he didn’t take his own advice to ignore what I wrote the previous week about the poor architectural quality of some recent schemes in Cork.

      We need more public debate in Ireland about architecture and urban design.

      And since property developers play such a significant role in commissioning new buildings, it is always good to get their views on the record – particularly as so few of them are prepared to speak out.

      Yes, the piece I wrote was negative, about Mahon Point and Merchants Quay shopping centres and the new development by O’Callaghan Properties on Lavitt’s Quay, as well as other schemes, such as the recently completed office block on Lapp’s Quay.

      Mr O’Callaghan accuses me of “pontificating”. Yet most of the architecture columns I have written in this supplement over the years have been positive, highlighting the good work done by architects in Ireland – including Cork, which is a city I have always liked a lot.

      I do not, as he suggested, hold any resentment of Cork and its success because I happen to be a Dubliner. Indeed, I have argued more than once that Cork should be at least twice its size (the same goes for Limerick and Galway), to counterbalance Dublin’s dominance.

      I have also condemned the Government’s outrageous decision to overlook Cork for decentralisation. Instead of recognising the city as a real asset by relocating 920 public servants there, they were to be dispersed throughout the county, from Clonakilty right around to Youghal.

      In previous articles on Cork, I wrote positively about the successful re-making of Patrick Street by Catalan architect Beth Ghali, the superb Glucksman Gallery at UCC by O’Donnell and Tuomey, and how Cork’s year as European Capital of Culture would focus attention on its potential.

      It is against that backdrop, on the strength of four trips to Cork this year, that I was dismayed to find evidence – in the form of poor quality buildings – that the tired old “anything is better than nothing” approach to urban renewal seemed to be asserting itself in the city.

      Every city has a character that makes it special, a genius loci or “spirit of place”. In Cork’s case, this is bound up with the River Lee and the way in which buildings address its quays, full frontally and with sharp edges. It is part of the essential Cork and cannot be discounted.

      This is not, as Mr O’Callaghan maintained, a “formulaic mindset”, but rather a recognition of the character of the city. New buildings fronting the river must, therefore, address the quay primarily; they should not be designed in a way that gives equal prominence to side streets.

      His own development at 21 Lavitt’s Quay is a mistake in that context. Not only is it grossly overscaled, but it celebrates the corner as if it was addressing two spaces of equal status – even though one is an 18th century river landscape and the other is merely a service lane.

      By doing so, it severs the continuity of the quay and erodes the character of the city. The same applies to the new office block on Lapp’s Quay and even to the Clarion Hotel, even though it is obviously very welcome as a new place to stay in the heart of Cork.

      On the issue of scale, I have never suggested that building heights in the centre of Cork – or of Dublin – should be limited to two or three storeys, as Mr O’Callaghan claimed was my “credo”.

      That would be nonsensical. But a little more respect for context wouldn’t go amiss.

      It will be interesting, and instructive, to see his plans for the Adelaide Street area. Will the shopping centre he wants to build there be inward-looking like Merchants Quay, or will it take on board new ideas in retail circles by retaining the tight urban grain with open-air malls? Yes, Cork has seen an unprecedented level of development in recent years.

      But its “previous atrophied state”, as he described it, meant that the city managed to retain much of its fabric and was relatively unsullied, until now, by bad architecture and even worse urban design.

      Source: Irish Times
      24th November 2005



      I understand that Pug – I was referring to the headline implication, sorry if I didn’t make that clear. 😮 However, that considered, funding was not merely provided in response to the letter – As Mr. McNamara with CUH will tell you, the hospital had been in discussion to secure that funding long in advance based on prior commitment and had been expecting the allocation to allow it begin construction on the facility for mid-2006.

    • #758541
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I have to say, Frank McDonald makes a valid point about sharp edges on the quaysides. Besides the fact that I really like the Lapp’s Quay development, I can see what he means about treating the quayside and the laneway as equal parties. When the proposed development next door goes into position, it might look better having sharp edges meeting across the laneway rather than curved edges spreading out. I can see where he’s coming from.

    • #758542
      BTH
      Participant

      Sorry to interrupt the cork thread but the same problem is starting to afflict the western quays in Dublin – See the Bargaintown development for the ultimate in completely pointless corner “features” – as if the narrow street it addresses is worthy of such aggrandisement.

      A very fair reply from Frank McDonald there, squarely answering some of O’Callaghan’s more hysterical claims…

    • #758543
      browser
      Participant

      Any news on this?

    • #758544
      lexington
      Participant

      @browser wrote:

      Any news on this?

      Decision is scheduled for today – but ABP often take a little leeway on the dates. As of this morning, I was told the Board are due to deliberate later today, which means a decision should be in the post this evening and out tomorrow. However, the decision may still be pushed back. The tension mounts. I suppose when it comes to ABP, you just wait… 😮



      BTH – you are perfectly entitled to engage, no apologises for ‘interupting’. The more input the better. 😉

    • #758545
      jungle
      Participant

      I agree with some of his points. The Lavitt’s Quay development does over-dominate the quayside. However, that may change as further development goes onto that quay. Also, Merchant’s Quay and Mahon Point are legitimate targets. I don’t agree about Lapp’s Quay, which is a development that I quite like*.

      When he refers to a development in Adelaide St, does he mean Academy St? I haven’t heard of any upcoming developments on Adelaide St.

      *I am worried about the timber facade. Looking at the apartment block by Bishopstown Shopping Centre (one of the first in the city to have timber on the facade), it’s clear that this finish doesn’t last fantastically well in Cork’s climate.

    • #758546
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Indeed Frinailla have seen Further Information requested of their Dennehy’s Cross proposal, designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects. The 163 apartment unit proposal will also include substantial local service amenities/commercial space, and a large triple-deck basement car-park. Among the Further Information requests is a call for a reduction in height of the northern block by 1 level, the increase in landscaping provision and an increase in the number of 3-bedroom constituent units – to promote family living.



      😎 Michael Bradley’s 4-storey project at 44 Sheare’s Street has also entered Further Information. The Magee Creedon designed proposal seeks to construct a basement/ground-floor retail unit, 1st floor office space, and a duplex apartment with roof garden overhead.



      😎 Also, Murrayforde Developments proposal for 11-apartment units over retail and community service units for Shandon Street – designed by James Leahy & Associates – has been refused.



      jungle – one feature I would like to CCC add to permit conditions regarding developments that finish with this sort of timber-cladding is a requisite that the developer or building management company undertake to maintain the coating of such cladding on a regular basis – in the interests of aesthetics. The same can be said for the Glucksman Gallery to some extent, however its woodland setting somewhat aids the natural progression of this finish blend in with the surrounds.

    • #758547
      anto
      Participant

      I think those hardwood timbers like Cedar or teak are supposed to turn a silver/gey over time and not need any coating. They’re not supposed to have that “varnished” look. I know it doesn’t alway work out that way but that’s the theory,

      . Also the silvery color isn’t to everybody’s taste as they may be used to the glossy varnished look but they just need to get with it!

    • #758548
      BTH
      Participant

      Western Red Cedar, European Larch, Iroko, Oak – Teak to a lesser extent – these are the timbers that can and should be left untreated externally. They may look a bit tatty after a couple of years but given a couple more they get the intended silvery grey weathered effect which I think looks fantastic – especially when combined with brick or stone. Varnishing or staining any of these is a huge mistake as it is the varnish that weathers badly and needs constant maintenance – not the timber.
      The Ranelagh School, The Timber Building and the Civic Offices in Tullamore are all great examples of well detailed untreated timber. I fully expect that in 5 years time the Glucksman will look just as well.

    • #758549
      Leesider
      Participant

      that is the developers/architects intention with the glucksman, after a few years it should age quite well and fit in with its surrounding woodland setting!

    • #758550
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Cork: a city I’ve always liked a lot
      His own development at 21 Lavitt’s Quay is a mistake in that context. Not only is it grossly overscaled, but it celebrates the corner as if it was addressing two spaces of equal status – even though one is an 18th century river landscape and the other is merely a service lane.

      I understand his point, but I disagree with it completely.

      Certainly, addressing the quayside is of the upmost importance, yes (unlike the Opera House, Merchants’ Quay and many others). But, you have to remember one of the fundamental characteristics of Cork city is the rich web of narrow sidestreets (many of which now are pedestrianised, or pedestrian-priority).

      In my opinion, one of the biggest ‘mistakes’ we’ve made in Cork is allowing some of these narrow lanes to die (many have even been built over), by treating them like unwanted intrusions. This is most notable in the sidestreets off Patrick St (Bowling Green St, Faulkner’s Lane and Maylor St, though that has now improved enormously).

      By having large department shops (Dunne’s, Roches, Pennys) on the corners, which have no frontage onto the side laneways, you eliminate any prospect of future development along them, since what business would want to set up 50m down a dark alleyway.

      Instead, by having these grand corner features, they invite foot traffic into these laneways which brings them back to life. There’s no reason why the lanes mentioned above couldn’t be every bit as vibrant as the Hugenot quarter is now, if we don’t follow the development model he espouses.

      “In my opinion”, of course! 😉

    • #758551
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The EPA has just announced that they have issued a license for the proposed incinerator in Ringaskiddy Co. Cork.Indaver propose to build the Ringaskiddy Waste Management Facility in two phases. In January 2004 Indaver received planning permission for the construction of Phase I of a waste management facility, in Ringaskiddy, which includes:

      1. 100,000 tonnes per annum incinerator for hazardous and non-hazardous industrial and commercial waste
      2. Waste Transfer Station for industrial waste
      3. Community recycling park for household recyclable waste

      This phase of the facility includes a hazardous waste incinerator, which would treat hazardous waste, generated in Ireland, which is currently exported to the UK and the continent for incineration. This facility would be suitable for treating non-hazardous industrial and commercial waste, which is currently being landfilled.
      Phase II of the project would include a 100,000 tonnes per annum facility for non-hazardous commercial and household waste. Indaver intends to apply for Planning Permission for Phase II once Cork City and County Councils have decided their waste management strategy for household and commercial waste, and the requirements of other waste producers have been defined. This facility would be suitable for treating non hazardous household and commercial waste which is currently going to landfill. Phase II will cost 30 million EURO to construct.

    • #758552
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @browser wrote:

      Any news on this?

      Water Street has been bumped for a decison on the 30th if any is interested…..

    • #758553
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      The Atlas of Cork City has now been published. There was an article on the book in the Irish Examiner today. The Atlas contains a section called Contemporay Transformations which looks at amongst other things planning and development. The Atlas is priced at €49 and has 480 pages in colour, 200 new maps have been drawn for the book. ISBN: 1859183808

    • #758554
      rebel_city
      Participant

      Thanks for the infor about the Atlas! Much appreciated. Will have to wait that bit longer for Water St. hopefully it’ll be worth the wait. I heard rumours that H&M or Dixons might be going into that development by te Goat pub on the Grand Parade

    • #758555
      dowlingm
      Participant

      I’m glad Indaver got approved, if only because now Ireland will be forced to deal with its own waste, either via incineration or reduction. About 11 years ago I used to write Trans Frontier Shipment documents to ship waste from Dublin to the UK because the facilities to deal with it didn’t exist in Ireland.

    • #758556
      kite
      Participant

      What was a puzzle to me, and im sure many others was why nothing was happining development wise on the Custom House Quay site in Cork.
      The answer came by way of an article in the IE on Thursday 24th Nov.
      According to the IE a company called Ochre Ridge Ltd. has begun a High Court case in Dublin claiming breach of contract in relation to issues regarding CHQ.
      Anyone got updates on this?

    • #758557
      mhenness
      Participant

      Does anyone know what is happening with the area where the old Philips service site used to be just down from Cornmarket St.? Any idea when something might be happening? Seems a pity that it’s just left there. It would make a big difference to the area if a nice development went up! 😉

    • #758558
      lexington
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      What was a puzzle to me, and im sure many others was why nothing was happining development wise on the Custom House Quay site in Cork.
      The answer came by way of an article in the IE on Thursday 24th Nov.
      According to the IE a company called Ochre Ridge Ltd. has begun a High Court case in Dublin claiming breach of contract in relation to issues regarding CHQ.
      Anyone got updates on this?

      Apologises – I had been spelling the company ‘Oakeridge’ for quite sometime. 😮 Indeed there is a snag here regarding the freehold on the site held by the Port of Cork and the lengthy leasehold of the Cork Bonded Warehouses held by JW Green. Reports last year had said OCP were investigating options on the site – but since that time, I’ve heard nothing. If I ever do, I’ll let you know. It’s a difficult site to do anything with really – the warehousing structures are protected and the cobbled quayside to the south warrants retention. Developable space may be afforded through demolition of the Cork Bonded Warehouses extension to the east and retaining the associated plot of land to the eastern tip. Of course any project at this point will have to quite spectacular – essentially it is one of the first visual recognition points associated with the city. It would provide an excellent ‘central’ waterbus station for the city and I would think the PoC would be anxious to retain docking capabilities for both Anderson’s Quay & CHQ – albeit on a reduced basis for smaller vessels like that of the Jeanie Johnston variety, ‘river-restaurant’ docking services, smaller visiting naval ships etc. Major imagination and the willingness to invest required here.



      mhenness – the Kyrl’s Quay site was subject to an Architectural Design Competition won by Conroy Architecture. Some talk about developing the site(s) has been whispered since – however nothing solid that I am aware of…

    • #758559
      Anonymous
      Inactive
      lexington wrote:
      😎 BrideView Developments have been refused planning by ABP for the development of 106 apartment units all within a single building ranging in height between 3 and 5-storeys and destined for location at Monsfieldstown in Rochestown. Though Cork County Council had greenlit the proposal (subject to revisions), and the Planning Inspector with ABP recommended permission – the Board decided to reject the proposal. The site occupies a prominent position, just north of the South Ring Road and to the South East of the Bloomfield Interchange – fronting the Douglas Estuary. Design was by Dublin-based McGrane & Partners.



      just wondering what will happen to this site now as i thought this was a very suitable development for the area?
    • #758560
      altuistic
      Participant

      @BTH wrote:

      Western Red Cedar, European Larch, Iroko, Oak – Teak to a lesser extent – these are the timbers that can and should be left untreated externally. They may look a bit tatty after a couple of years but given a couple more they get the intended silvery grey weathered effect which I think looks fantastic – especially when combined with brick or stone. Varnishing or staining any of these is a huge mistake as it is the varnish that weathers badly and needs constant maintenance – not the timber.
      The Ranelagh School, The Timber Building and the Civic Offices in Tullamore are all great examples of well detailed untreated timber. I fully expect that in 5 years time the Glucksman will look just as well.

      I understand that but the wood finish on those flats i think jungle mentioned in Bishopstown have gone an ugly ugly grey and look quite horrible. Shouldnt the corporation impose conditions on this type of development demanding their up keep? Surely the planners are educated enough to know the various timber types and which will need maintenance and those which will not. I wish i had a photograph to prove the point.

    • #758561
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Is Academy street going to be lodged soon? it was meant to be late summer, then november and now??? I think it was mentioned here before but cant find it.
      40 large fashion units isnt it? I assume the like of Zara, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, The Jean scene, Pepe jeans, Esprit, H&m will all be lining up for a city centre presence? Think it was said here before Abercromby and fitch had set up a european company…could Academy street play a blinder and get one of its first European stores??? That would be severly cool. What about Banana republic?

    • #758562
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Is it just me or is there a sort of development proposal lull at the moment?? think it was the same last year too and then leading up to Chirstmas there was a flood of applications. Anyone the wiser???? anything worth getting excited about?

    • #758563
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Is Academy street going to be lodged soon? it was meant to be late summer, then november and now??? I think it was mentioned here before but cant find it.

      Scheduled shortly as I understand it.

      As for the development lull, it’s a little quiet on the front but there’s enough going on beneath the surface – some which will hopefully surface soon.

      I look forward to proposals at Albert Quay – among others.

      Wednesday 30th November 2005 = Water Street appeal decision day too.

    • #758564
      A-ha
      Participant

      Fingers and toes will be crossed for that date as usual. Would be great to have another landmark building in the line up for the new year. Can’t wait for Academy Street. 2006 looks to be a promising year.

    • #758565
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 As of November 23rd 2005, the long awaited €47m Renal/Cardiac Facility destined for Cork University Hospital is out to tender. The closing date for tender offers is set for early January 2006 – with construction on the project, designed by UK-practice Watkins Gray Internatinal, set for summer 2006. The 6-storey project will take just over 18 months to complete and will hopefully be operational for mid-2008.

      The new facility, to be constructed on the western elevation of the original main CUH building, will provide 120 additional inpatient beds, including coronary care unit, day places, facilities for nursing highly dependent patients, outpatient facilities, treatment, diagnostic and rehabilitation facilities, cardiac catherisation laboratories and a non-invasive cardiology unit. In addition the new renal dialysis unit will provide greatly improved treatment, counselling, training and waiting facilities for both dialysis and CAPD patients.


      1st Image: View of the southern elevation – new Maternity Wing can be seen to the right.

      2nd Image: View of the Western Elevation – and new main public entrance to CUH.

    • #758566
      opus
      Participant

      A friend of mine working in the former Southern Health Board (they are not sure what to call it now 🙂 ) told me that if all the plans for CUH work out, it will be the biggest hospital in the country!

    • #758567
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      There was a good article in yesterday’s Irish Examiner regarding the rising number of vacant or even derelict retail units on St. Patrick Street, Cork. Up to 15, depending who you talk to!
      This is something which has been commented on by many contributors to this thread. I know, you can discount some units which are awaiting redevelopment as part of massive ‘shopping-centre’ type developments, but some are also being priced off the market- certainly for smaller, Irish company’s.
      As the articel put it, the landlord’s are at risk of killing the goose that laid their golden egg!
      The spawning of two “christmas shops” at the western end of the Street is an embarressment to the city and a street which was so highly praised in recent weeks.

    • #758568
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      There was a good article in yesterday’s Irish Examiner regarding the rising number of vacant or even derelict retail units on St. Patrick Street, Cork. Up to 15, depending who you talk to!
      This is something which has been commented on by many contributors to this thread. I know, you can discount some units which are awaiting redevelopment as part of massive ‘shopping-centre’ type developments, but some are also being priced off the market- certainly for smaller, Irish company’s.
      As the articel put it, the landlord’s are at risk of killing the goose that laid their golden egg!
      The spawning of two “christmas shops” at the western end of the Street is an embarressment to the city and a street which was so highly praised in recent weeks.

      Indeed I agree that some landlords run the risk of pricing themselves out of the market – rents being paid by Monsoon and Mango are exceptional, for example. However the number ’15’ is misleading – consider the units part of site assemblies at Patrick’s Street/Grand Parade/Oliver Plunkett Street and they as part of the Academy Street development. Also consider units subject to planning like that of Schuh. The Christmas shops, I agree look most distasteful, even from a decorative perspective the look rancid – having said that, the units in question (50 Patrick’s Street etc) are part of a site assembly and in temporary occupancy as a means of utilising the unit rather than vacancy. Still, their presentation is a let down.

      3 units the particularly stand to my mind are they at the corner of Patrick Street and Cook Street (former Diesel premises), the former Karen Millen premises beside the Savoy Centre and the former CIE offices near Daunt Square – although I understand the latter is subject to a negotiation. A big problem with Patrick’s Street is the insufficient availability of appropriately sized units (the likes which attract names that can generally justify higher rents) – Academy Street for example will be able to make an opportunity of this issue. Existing units are restrictive in size and overpriced per sq ft. Landlords will have to assess their asking price so that a comfortable return can be made, whilst allowing a greater spectrum of retaillers attain a Patrick’s Street footing – in the long run it will bring greater variety and sustainability.

      Take time to consider the reasons why Lush opted for Oliver Plunkett Street – though still a hefty lease, the space associated with their general stores size dictates that sale volumes (and with respect to their product nature) are limited with respect to deriving a justifiable expenditure on rent. Do you think – had the playing field been equal – Lush would have rathered a Patrick’s Street footing as oppose to Oliver Plunkett Street? Most probably – instead the associated rents of Patrick’s Street meant that taking a unit nearby at OPS would allow it reduce its rent while remaining within a relative proximity to the main thoroughfare.

    • #758569
      rebel_city
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Is Academy street going to be lodged soon? it was meant to be late summer, then november and now??? I think it was mentioned here before but cant find it.
      40 large fashion units isnt it? I assume the like of Zara, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, The Jean scene, Pepe jeans, Esprit, H&m will all be lining up for a city centre presence? Think it was said here before Abercromby and fitch had set up a european company…could Academy street play a blinder and get one of its first European stores??? That would be severly cool. What about Banana republic?

      RE:Abercrombie&Fitch setting up shop in Ireland. I worked in one of their stores in the states for a summer 2 yrs ago when I was on a J1 visa, and their strategy is focused soley on the USA. They don’t even have stores in Canada, which I would presume is a similiar market. My manage at the time told me that they focus on the States because that’s the market they know best. It’s clear to anyone who know’s the store and its clothes that it would do well here. But chances of them setting up their first European store in Cork are slim so say the least! There was rumours of them setting up in the Dundrum town centre, but it was false.

    • #758570
      lexington
      Participant

      @rebel_city wrote:

      RE:Abercrombie&Fitch setting up shop in Ireland. I worked in one of their stores in the states for a summer 2 yrs ago when I was on a J1 visa, and their strategy is focused soley on the USA. They don’t even have stores in Canada, which I would presume is a similiar market. My manage at the time told me that they focus on the States because that’s the market they know best. It’s clear to anyone who know’s the store and its clothes that it would do well here.

      A CEO & CFO were appointed to head up the new A&F European Division which was registered in January 2005 and Headquarted in Milan – the intention is to begin a steady European roll-out in the coming future. Ireland was identified early on as a preferential location however it is now likely that the first stores will set up first in the UK, perhaps in a joint intiative involving Jil Sander. A source with Hollister had suggested that up to 5 stores could be opened in Ireland over an undisclosed period, however no news of it has since emerged – although I do know the company are actively assessing their options with regard to the European market.

    • #758571
      lexington
      Participant

      The South Infirmary/Victoria Hospital are formulating expansion plans to the tune of an estimated €45m. The hospital, which enlisted Murray O’Laoire Architects to devise a site strategy on the hospital premises (including development sites purchased from the Irish International Trading Corp fronting South Terrace/Anglesea Street) will seek to expand its facilities over a phased basis, commencing with the development of a €7m BreastCheck Clinic (destined for the IITC site). A planning application is expected to be lodged with CCC over the coming weeks – according to a source with the HSE. Meanwhile, larger scale plans are being worked out – these will include new public wards, a new and enlarged intensive care unit – as well as new operating theatres. A private element is also envisaged with Goodbody Stockbrokers understood to be actively engaging with other private investors about development at the hospital. More details when they arise.



      🙂 Cork City Council have reversed the decision to implement 2-way traffic along a stretch of Lancaster Quay/Washington Street West. The decision which sparked major question marks has now been amended to allow one-way traffic flows exiting the city centre resume.

    • #758572
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @opus wrote:

      A friend of mine working in the former Southern Health Board (they are not sure what to call it now 🙂 ) told me that if all the plans for CUH work out, it will be the biggest hospital in the country!

      With perhaps the worst car parking……..just because these buildings are public facilities does not mean that they should be allowed to impact on the surrounding areas like they do due to overflow car parking.

    • #758573
      anto
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      There was a good article in yesterday’s Irish Examiner regarding the rising number of vacant or even derelict retail units on St. Patrick Street, Cork. Up to 15, depending who you talk to!
      This is something which has been commented on by many contributors to this thread. I know, you can discount some units which are awaiting redevelopment as part of massive ‘shopping-centre’ type developments, but some are also being priced off the market- certainly for smaller, Irish company’s.
      As the articel put it, the landlord’s are at risk of killing the goose that laid their golden egg!
      The spawning of two “christmas shops” at the western end of the Street is an embarressment to the city and a street which was so highly praised in recent weeks.

      you really should learn to use the apostrophe correctly! see above

    • #758574
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Forgot to mention that Oyster Developments have issued Further Information on their Phase 1 project for Deane Street – which was to consist of a 7-storey office building designed by The e-Project (believe it or not, David Crowe’s development company originally planned a 16-storey landmark tower!). The building will adjoin Phase 2 – which includes the renovation and change of use at No.8 Parnell Place (PS) to further office space over 4 levels; this phase has already received planning and received a temporary scare when CIE sought leave to appeal, but was ultimately denied. CIE is keeping its options open about a future redevelopment on its Bus Station premises along Anderson’s Quay (which adjoins the subject site). More details on the Further Information hopefully by the week end. Images are posted below of the proposal as originally submitted. A decision is due on December 14th 2005.



      @yorktown wrote:

      With perhaps the worst car parking……..just because these buildings are public facilities does not mean that they should be allowed to impact on the surrounding areas like they do due to overflow car parking.

      Sorry, the Mercy University Hospital takes the biscuit on that one…what parking???!!!! ]you really should learn to use the apostrophe correctly! [/QUOTE]

      The same could be said for your use (or lack thereof) of capital letters! 😀 Only messing anto. 😉

      (Or my use/abuse of ‘smile’ icons!)

    • #758575
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      you really should learn to use the apostrophe correctly! see above

      I see someone has been reading their Lynn Truss! Either that or you have way too much time on your hands and really should get out more 🙂
      p.s. I also spelt article wrong- the shame!!

    • #758576
      A-ha
      Participant

      I read in the Echo today that a Water Bus might soon be arriving in the Lee to attract touists to the city centre. It will turn from being a normal bus into a boat when it drives into the river, like ones found in Liverpool and Boston. It sounds like a good idea and it would be another tourist attraction for Cork.

    • #758577
      A-ha
      Participant

      Click on the link to see a similar type of water bus that may soon be arriving in Cork.
      .

    • #758578
      anto
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I see someone has been reading their Lynn Truss! Either that or you have way too much time on your hands and really should get out more 🙂
      p.s. I also spelt article wrong- the shame!!

      yeah you’re right i do need to get out more!

    • #758579
      anto
      Participant

      Anybody see the “Buning of Cork” on RTE last night? The Tans burnt down Patrick Street and its environs about 5 acres overall. City hall was burnt too. One thing they didn’t mention was that Patrick street was rebuilt very well. Some of the street’s most handsome buildings date from the reconstruction. Good job it didn’t happen in the 60s, Can you imagine the muck that would have been thrown up!

    • #758580
      lexington
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      Anybody see the “Buning of Cork” on RTE last night? The Tans burnt down Patrick Street and its environs about 5 acres overall. City hall was burnt too. One thing they didn’t mention was that Patrick street was rebuilt very well. Some of the street’s most handsome buildings date from the reconstruction. Good job it didn’t happen in the 60s, Can you imagine the muck that would have been thrown up!

      Indeed – my stomach spins at the thought. Thankfully the likes of…

      …Brown Thomas

      and Grants…

      …rose from the ashes.

      Now…if we could just swing a nice refurbishmnt of Grants, we’d b set. I previously outlined an idea to restructure the buildings interior as a means of providing additional retail space and making all levels of the building a living and breathing entity – with delicate conservation efforts applied to the exterior. Of all the important buildings along Patrick’s Street, Grants is the one I would list as a priority for renewal. What a shame. 🙁

    • #758581
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I also think Penney’s is a beautiful building dating from post-fire Cork:

      as is this little gem… can’t remember the name of the sweet shop that was here before everything went the way of the mobile phone shop!

      and agreed lexington, Grants is badly in need of refurbishment- so much under-utilised space. Any chance of it being included in the proposed Brog/Capital/Patrick St, development?

      For those interested, here’s a map of Cork City Centre showing the buildings destroyed on the night. You can match those to the present day buildings. Agreed – thank God it happened in the 20’s and not the 60’s.
      Conal Creedon should be congratulated on a great documentary.

    • #758582
      lisam
      Participant

      That sweet shop was called Cudmores.

      I thought this thread was about Cork Architecture & development, not about using the correct spelling or punctuation!

    • #758583
      pier39
      Participant

      @lisam wrote:

      That sweet shop was called Cudmores.

      what a place! i lost many a tooth to that institution. my smashed-window smile is a testament to their good work.

    • #758584
      lexington
      Participant

      The final decision on appeal of the highly-anticipated Water Street project had been expected today – after an initial delay in the scheduled decision which was due for November 24th 2005 – the decision date was pushed forward, however it is unlikely that it will be realised on schedule. The Board were expected to issue a decision on the McMahon Family controlled Werdna Limited’s 304-unit apartment proposal, which will also include approx. 30,000sq ft of business & technology uses, commercial/community service elements, a new waterfront promenade and 478 basement car-parking spaces. Designed by Murray O’Laoire, the original Water Street proposal sought over 500-units and a feature 26-storey tower, however on initial planning a 400 unit scheme with 19-storey feature tower was proposed – just in advance of a planning decision, Werdna withdrew their application on the indication of CCC that it would be refused. The scheme was reapplied for in February 2005 following substantial discussion with CCC – this time, a 304-unit scheme was proposed with 17-storey tower (@ 58m) and reorganised layout. Without any request for Further Information, the scheme was more than halved through condition in a highly controversial planning decision which ultimately led to appeal on both a 1st Party basis by Werdna as well as a further contest by the Lower Glanmire Road Residents Association. The appeal endured a 2-day Oral Hearing at the Gresham Metropole on MacCurtain Street where arguments for and against the €70m development were aired by all parties involved. Planning Inspector David Dunne resided over the hearing and his report is now a matter for the Board at ABP. Although a decision was envisaged for issue today, with confirmation of the decision tomorrow – it is likely that the Board will again seek clarification on some issues at hand before deliberation. This may see yet another delay in the final due date.

      The project design was head-up by Sean Kearns with Murray O’Laoire.
      John Crean acted as planning consultant with Cunnane Strattan Reynolds.
      Mark McMahon heads up Werdna Developments Limited.

      All the best! 😉

    • #758585
      POM
      Participant

      Reading the report for the Frinilla Blackpool development I am curious as to how Mr. Dunne will deliberate on Water Street. Hopefully sense will prevail.

      any thoughts?

    • #758586
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Well some would argue (including me) that Mr. Dunne was right on the money with his Blackpool/Frinailla report- hopefully he’ll do the right thing with Water St. (personally I’m in two minds about it so I’ll leave it up to someone who knows whet he’s doing ) and what ever decision he reccomends- let’s hope The Board will stand by their man!

    • #758587
      anto
      Participant

      Interesting that the rebuilding of Cork’s Patrick street and Dublin’s O’ Connell street was so successful considering that the economy must have been a shambles after the wars

      The economy of Cork in the 80s was also in crisis and we get Merchants Quay!

      btw how did Cork allow Burger King and McDonald’s occupy such prominent buildings on Patrick Street. Then again, could be worse, could be O’Connell street in Dublin!

    • #758588
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 BrideView Developments have received planning on their O’Mahony Pike Architects designed proposal for Lakeview House & Estate in Midelton. As proposed, the project included 429 no. dwelling units comprising of 101 no.dwellinghouses, 328 no. apartments over 1 to 5 storeys, 24 bed nursing home, creche with outdoor multi-use games area, 2 no. tennis courts, football pitch as well as basement and surface car parking. However, some alterations have been made to the granted proposal including reductions. The Lakeview Estate was purchased in 2004 by Declan O’Mahony for BrideView Developments at the cost of an estimated €19m. Perhaps the grant will offer some consolation to the recent refusal by ABP for BVD’s other project off the South Ring Road near Rochestown and which did comprise of 106 apartment units over a single building ranging in height from 3 to 5-storeys.



      😎 William Horgan has lodged plans with Cork County Council for (a) Construction of two storey office block (block 1) comprising for 4 no. self contained offices for high technology/enterprise works ancillary to the existing and proposed light industrial units, (b) refurbishments of 2 no. existing warehousing units (blocks 2 & 3) and the existing weigh bridge (c) demolition of shed and construction of 14 no. high technology/light industrial incubator units in 3 no. blocks (blocks 4, 5 & 6) all at the Lee Warehousing premises at Brooklodge in Glanmire.


    • #758589
      jungle
      Participant

      If the Water St. appeal is successful, is it the original or the revised proposals that would be built? To my mind the original was better.

    • #758590
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      very good point on the rebuilding of pana anto……the 1920s and 1930s were very difficult in economic terms yet we still managed to rebuild the street very successfully..

    • #758591
      lexington
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      If the Water St. appeal is successful, is it the original or the revised proposals that would be built? To my mind the original was better.

      The application lodged Feburary 2005 – i.e. the 304 unit proposal. Indeed I did like the original 400 unit, 2004 scheme myself – but should the outcome be successful, it is the former which will proceed.

    • #758592
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Did funding not come from British Parliament to rebuild the commercial buildings?

    • #758593
      lexington
      Participant

      Below are some images of the proposed development (a comparison between the resultant design consequent of Further Information and the original design) by Oyster Developments for Deane Street, a stone’s throw away from CityQuarter, Numbers 5 & 6 Lapps Quay and across the street from the proposal by DAT Partnerships for a unique 9-storey office development named CentrePoint. The Deane Street project is designed by The e-Project.

      The revised design features a reduced floor-area at upper levels and the removal of the canopy feature. Furthermore, elevational treatments have been adjusted – the northern facade will now comprise of a ‘plastered’ finish rather than the original variant brick finish.

      An Taisce have criticised the design saying, unlike its neighbour proposed for CentrePoint which maintains a number of redeeming architectural features, the Oyster Developments proposal is utterly devoid of any and makes an abrupt, faceless addition to an attractive emerging office district.

      A decision is due for 14th December 2005.



      *UPDATES*

      😉 @lexington wrote:

      🙂 Lidl have acquired a site along the Ballyhooly Road in Ballyvolane for which they intend to develop a discount food store (and possibly additional retail units) – no application has been made yet, so the specifics are not yet clear. It seems Dunnes Stores is still not safe even despite outbidding the Germal retaillers for a 1.9 acre site near its Ballyvolane S.C.

      As posted last April in the LADSOCL thread, the site acquisition by Lidl GmbH has now born an application for planning with CorkCoCo. Lidl intend to construct a new discount foodstore along the Ballyhooly Road near Ballyvolane. The store will measure 1659sq m, permission is further sought for a seperate single storey retail building of some 936sq m and a 2-storey neighbourhood building of 1550sq m all on a former garage premises.



      🙂 Managing Director of DTZ Sherry FitzGerald, Fintan Tierney, has highlighted Cork city as offering one of Ireland’s best property investment locations for 2006. His sentiments are echoed by a local economist who noted that 2005 has been a productive year but will be to 2006 what 2003 was to 2004 (??? :p ) – a build up year. He expects an increase in notable development activity or applications lodged for the forthcoming year. Though some voices hark disappointment that Cork’s reign as European Capital of Culture did not draw in the hoped for level of international investment, the economist has remarked that it is too early yet to account the effects of Cork2005. From my own point of view, I think Cork should now start getting pretty serious at pitching itself international as an attractive centre for business and investment – independent of State intiatives. A major drive should be put into gear.

    • #758594
      A-ha
      Participant

      Why is it that new buildings are never built in the style of places like Brown Thomas or Roches. They are extraordinarily beautiful buildings and instead of building timber cladded buildings with aluminium and plastic features….. wouldn’t it be nice to see more of those works of art built in the city centre where they would fit in more and give a boulevardian feel to the city.

    • #758595
      kite
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Why is it that new buildings are never built in the style of places like Brown Thomas or Roches. They are extraordinarily beautiful buildings and instead of building timber cladded buildings with aluminium and plastic features….. wouldn’t it be nice to see more of those works of art built in the city centre where they would fit in more and give a boulevardian feel to the city.

      🙁 Why?….GREED may have a lot to do with the rubbish we have to contend with in Cork. (MQ?)

    • #758596
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Why is it that new buildings are never built in the style of places like Brown Thomas or Roches. They are extraordinarily beautiful buildings and instead of building timber cladded buildings with aluminium and plastic features….. wouldn’t it be nice to see more of those works of art built in the city centre where they would fit in more and give a boulevardian feel to the city.

      Apparently it’s old hat and we’re suppose to have moved on…shame really because I still have a hankering for a decent bit of “modernista”. 😀

      Then again, if modern spins on old style amounts to this…

      …looks good right?

      The Marshes Shopping Centre, Dundalk 2005

      …pity its just a mask over a box… 🙁

      Again The Marshes

      (I’m robbing these images from Graham Hickey – they are his Copyright and can be found on the “Dundalk” thread.)

      One or two additions here or there wouldn’t go astray, but I wouldn’t like to see a blanket revival of such styles. Modernity needs its chance to evolve as well.

    • #758597
      BTH
      Participant

      The first image there may look nice superficially and it’s clear that some effort went into getting proportions and detailing right… But then they go and let themselves down with cheapo PVC windows with glazing bars behind the glass… Plus not sure what the style has to do with an Irish provincial town – it really does look like a town hall or courthouse in some U.S. backwater…
      Picture 2 really does speak for itself!!

    • #758598
      Devin
      Participant

      Yes, that’s it – I’m definitely getting an American mock-Georgian feeling from this … not what we want to be doing at all at all…
      Mock-Georgian is rampant in the U.S.

    • #758599
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      lexington, re Oyster’s Parnell Place proposal – which of those images relate to the revised proposals? i saw the original ‘tower’ proposed – and it looked nothing like these – much better in fact

      re: marsh’s in dundalk – i suppose it is a bit sad really – i don’t understand the philosophy behind designing a shopping centre along these lines – i thought that themed shopping centres were so 1990’s – no? or do the punters simply just want this – personally i think it’s a horrible concept – in saying that however, the proportions are good and the space outside is attractive – however after all that effort they are quite content with white uPVC and badly placed rainwater goods.

    • #758600
      browser
      Participant

      This decision was to be made yesterday I think. Any news?

    • #758601
      lexington
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      lexington, re Oyster’s Parnell Place proposal – which of those images relate to the revised proposals? i saw the original ‘tower’ proposed – and it looked nothing like these – much better in fact

      Sorry, the 1st image on either row = the Revised Proposal. The 2nd image on either row = the original proposal.

      The ‘tower’ your thinking of, are you sure it’s not CentrePoint? The 9-storey office building proposed for the small triangular site directly across Deane Street from this proposal? That building is designed by Daniel Luxton with Coughlan de Keyser and a revised proposal is expected soon in response to Further Information.



      Water Street Decision Pushed Back again!

      @browser wrote:

      This decision was to be made yesterday I think. Any news?

      I now believe that the decision has been pushed back until 10th March 2006!!! 😮

    • #758602
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      lexington – thanks – no it was definitely for the oyster site – by the e-Poroject

    • #758603
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Water Street Decision Pushed Back again!

      I now believe that the decision has been pushed back until 10th March 2006!!! 😮

      It’s ridiculous that we have to wait until the day on which the decision is due to be announced before ABP goes public with these types of delay. Are we to imagine that they were up in Marlborough St. yesterday afternoon and they were nearly finished…nearly had it all wrapped up ….just a few more minutes …..no, in fact I dont have it, it’ll be another four months!!! 😡

    • #758604
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Surprisingly, there’s no PVC in the Marshes – double-glazed timber everywhere.
      PVC is only permitted in historic buildings in Dundalk, and is actively encouraged in conservation areas.

    • #758605
      A-ha
      Participant

      March 2006…… you have got to be kidding me! What a pack of wasters those people are for delaying the project. It’s so fu*king stupid… it just really annoys me and I’m sure I’m not the only person. Oh by the way… American Town Hall/Court House hit the nail on the head, but at least they had they right idea in mind, even if it did turn out wrong. I also notice that Ryanair have launched four new routes from Shannon to Manchester, Wroclaw, Rome and Murcia, but will end operating the Hamburg and Stockholm service as they are not proving to be profit making for the airline.

    • #758606
      Devin
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      March 2006…… you have got to be kidding me! What a pack of wasters those people are for delaying the project. It’s so fu*king stupid

      Lol … what if the whole thing gets turned down altogether? … And there are feelings abroad that the architecture does not quite strike the right note for its setting.

    • #758607
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      March 2006…… you have got to be kidding me! What a pack of wasters those people are for delaying the project. It’s so fu*king stupid… it just really annoys me and I’m sure I’m not the only person.

      I’m sure it’s a decision that will frustrate some people but I’d rather it delayed and be granted than now decided and refused. 😮

    • #758608
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Sean Keohane’s Grangefield Developments are to lodge plans in conjunction with the Cork Boat Club for 119 apartments units over basement car-parking for 121 vehicles. The building will range between 3 and 5-storeys and is to be located on a 1.3 hectare site at Blackrock Harbour and on the premises of the Cork Boat Club which will be demolished allowing for the provision of a new club complex and floating pontoon, as part of the larger development. Also as part of the development, a new public boardwalk is to be provided and a 3-storey office building of 113sq m. Of the 119 apartments there will be 18 x 1-bedroom, 95 x 2-bedroom and 6 x 3-bedroom units – with balcones and roof-garden areas. The proposal will also seek to reclaim 1,954sq m of public foreshore. James Leahy & Associates are behind the design.

    • #758609
      republicofcork
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      :rolleyes: How long has this thing been going on??? 😮 Finally, the Cork School of Music (CSM) designed by architects Murray O’Laoire, looks set to roll. Originally, the 110,000sq ft + project was proposed back in 1999 and has since suffered a number of severe setbacks from planning to funding to contractual misendeavours. Jarvis had originally been appointed to the PPP educational project – at one point in 2004, movement looked set when Jarvis signed a contract with John Sisk & Sons Construction to build the project on their behalf, however, when Jarvis ran into financial difficulties, its PPP wing was sold to German-firm Hochtief. The Dept. of Education has since been in negotiations with the firm about commencing work on the belated building – now, an agreement would seem to have been reached. If all goes well, a construction date is set for sometime in September of this year with an 18 month build-period. The project should be functional and open to the college’s 3,000+ music students in time for the 2007 semester.

      This indeed, is another positive development (following yesterday’s announcement regarding Eglinton Street) in Cork’s architectural and educational wilderness. It is believed Sisk Construction will still remain appointed to the contract.

      Any opinions on its design?

      the design of the school of music looks good…..however…. it would have taken more talent to integrate the previous school building which was an incredible and rare structure from the post war period in cork. shame on all involved in this destruction. no argument can justify this level of disregard for the work of others and the sustainabiliyy of maintaining an existing high quality building in use. we say lay your egos off our environment. some humility and respect was called for here. you missed your chance. we can only hope that this new building may be finished to a high quality and not full of unresolved finishes that wont last half as well as its now destroyed predecessor.

    • #758610
      phatman
      Participant

      Are people just afraid to admit the new school of music looks crap? I just hope it turns out to be more appealing in the flesh

    • #758611
      kite
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      Are people just afraid to admit the new school of music looks crap? I just hope it turns out to be more appealing in the flesh

      😮 Guilty as accused….i thought this was a good idea at the time ?

    • #758612
      Devin
      Participant

      @republicofcork wrote:

      It looks overscaled – does this image represent the plan as finally approved? – another blow for Cork’s quayside.

      Well said republicofcork – there was a strong case for reusing the ‘50s building, and as far I remember there were 3rd party submissions to this effect at the time. And well done for going against shameless developer parade that tends to dominate some Cork threads.

    • #758613
      A-ha
      Participant

      It would look tonnes better if they just got rid of that concrete thing in the middle of the glass. It makes it look so industrious. Ryanair announced Dublin’s first low fares flight to Poland (Lodz) today….. Maybe Cork is in the pipeline next. Oh and if anyone is interested, they have a few good deals on at the moment. No Taxes or Charges to pay, they’ll pay them for you! Dublin €19.80 and London €21. Both flights are return from Cork and include all taxes and charges.

    • #758614
      ToMuchFreeTime
      Participant

      Does anyone have a picture of the building that was there before the works started on the school of music??

      It sure has got quiet around here latly??

    • #758615
      lexington
      Participant

      @Devin wrote:

      And well done for going against shameless developer parade that tends to dominate some Cork threads.

      There is a mentality that prescribes the word ‘developer’ as some sort of dirty word. This escapes my understanding. What is so shameful about providing an alternative angle? Is balance hearing one side of the coin at all times? Continuous critique – is that balance? Or is balance agreeing with the opinions of one side and not seeing merit in the other? I understand this forum and equally all threads to be open to all sorts – republicofcork is by no means the first who has spoken against the grain of others on this thread, nor do I suspect he will be the last. But that’s no bad thing, and I’m glad of it, because that provides a greater degree of balance. People are very quick to condemn developers for anything they disapprove of – what bemuses me is the lack of accountability bestowed by other parties. Developers are easy targets, they’re the “evil, money hugging Scrooge-types sitting in the dark castle at the top of the hill” :rolleyes: – but when people move so freely to criticise their works, they forget that a developer is the businessman, homeowner or group who have hired the services of the architectural profession to realise they’re projects. The architects and engineers that design the schemes. I don’t buy this argument that ‘developer tight purse strings ruin the potential of a scheme’ etc etc – those type of arguments – quite frankly, that insults the ability of design teams…good architecture is that which works within the constraints and utilises it’s imagination and innovation to realise something greater. Funding is no excuse for lazy architecture. Good design teams assess the challenge and are allocated the task of providing the best of their abilities – if they don’t do this, why is it automatically attributed to the developer? The developer is the person who employs these architects, engineers, surveyors, designers etc , which sustains their jobs and their profession – people are very quick under veils to knock the client and remove themselves on condemnation from their peers. Does the developer need to be standing over an architect with a stick to make sure he produces a good design? I thought part of commissioning a design team was recognising their skill and ability as fellow professionals and bestowing confidence in their capacity to produce. Otherwise, it simply insults the ability of those forwarded the responsibility to design. Remember, developers are not (in most cases) architects – that is why they employ the skills of others. The fact that many developers have taken an increasingly active interest in design (a classic example being the relationship between Edward Holdings and Douglas Wallace) is in someways a proverbial ‘bonus’ (depending on your perspective). It is so easy for us in this position to cheap whip – indeed some of it is warranted. I make no apologises on my position, my standing and position are warranted – as is the opinion of each user on this forum. Will I argue my position when challenged? Of course I will, but isn’t the basis of debate founded on this principle – and if it wasn’t, what a monotonous debate it would be. As republicofcork demonstrated, it is not a closed forum. I don’t agree with much of what he argues – but that’s what makes it so interesting. When people go to stereotype the developer and assign those dirty meanings to the word, try to remember the long list of those you are critiquing and remove the umbrella labelling. There is nothing shameful about taking a position – the same could be argued for the alternate perspective, and I don’t think the opponents of ‘developer actions’ would consider their position shameful.

    • #758616
      anto
      Participant

      touchy!:)

    • #758617
      lexington
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      touchy!:)

      I don’t see it as ‘touchy’, it’s just a response. 😮

    • #758618
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      . Remember, developers are not (in most cases) architects – that is why they employ the skills of others. The fact that many developers have taken an increasingly active interest in design (a classic example being the relationship between Edward Holdings and Douglas Wallace) is in someways a proverbial ‘bonus’ (depending on your perspective). It is so easy for us in this position to cheap whip – indeed some of it is warranted.

      Point taken about Holdings & Wallace, but then one has to deal with the likes of Montgomary & Derek Tynan and Co. supported by CCC planning Dept.(Victoria Mills)
      Are there any gamekeepers left, or is everyone in the poachers camp?

    • #758619
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The Shipton Group/Blackpool Developments are to apply for a new block of 6-storeys over commercial and 54 space basement car-park at their Blackool Park development. The Kelly Barry O’Brien Whelan designed scheme will seek an additional residential block of 30 apartment units on a site earmarked previously for hotel use.



      @kite wrote:

      @lexington wrote:

      . Remember, developers are not (in most cases) architects – that is why they employ the skills of others. The fact that many developers have taken an increasingly active interest in design (a classic example being the relationship between Edward Holdings and Douglas Wallace) is in someways a proverbial ‘bonus’ (depending on your perspective). It is so easy for us in this position to cheap whip – indeed some of it is warranted.

      Point taken about Holdings & Wallace, but then one has to deal with the likes of Montgomary & Derek Tynan and Co. supported by CCC planning Dept.(Victoria Mills)
      Are there any gamekeepers left, or is everyone in the poachers camp?

      Well, just to note the Montgomery-Kenneally Partnership/Derek Tynan relationship is not exclsuive – Mr. Montgomery has employed the likes of CMG Architects for projects at Reardens and in Douglas. Other professionals have also been employed.

      Though variety in architecture builds a more interesting fabric, clearly some is more favourable than others. As a personal preference, I have never been persuaded by the design philosophy of Derek Tynan & Associates. I understand Mr. Montgomery has noted a high degree of client satisfaction with the practice and given that the practice have achieved the desired results – from a client perspective, there is little reason I would assume, for him to abandon that. From a design point of view, architectural circles have found note with DTA projects like the Gate Multiplex and Victoria Mills – CCC has received an initiative award for the Gate urban renewal project and with praise stemming from the likes of Frank McDonald and Opus Architecture & Construction Awards – what’s to persuade champions otherwise??? My own feeling, beyond the construction and structural elements of projects like the Gate and Victoria Mills – the projects are lost on me. And then you have proposals like the one posted below for Crosses Green, also designed by DTA.

      But enough with the critiques from me – I sometimes perhaps seemingly dig DTA too often, and that’s not the case intended. Their designs just don’t do it for me personally. 😮

      With Edward Holdings/Douglas Wallace – my understanding is Hugh Wallace and Gerry Barrett, have a very good personal relationship and “challenge” each other on what they can produce – their relationship is such that they have a fair idea of what the other wants and how best to go about getting it.

    • #758620
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @Devin wrote:

      It looks overscaled – does this image represent the plan as finally approved? – another blow for Cork’s quayside.

      Well said republicofcork – there was a strong case for reusing the ‘50s building, and as far I remember there were 3rd party submissions to this effect at the time. And well done for going against shameless developer parade that tends to dominate some Cork threads.

      It certainly does look “bulky” in its massing and the choice of finishes do not help.

      Also I love the way in Cork we park cars right up to the quay walls all over the city thus depriving its citizens of any opportunity of a pavement with trees and seating etc.

    • #758621
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Long ago in the LADSOCL thread I indicated a possible redevelopment along St. Patrick’s Quay – now the owners of the Gresham Hotel Group are to apply to CCC for an extensive 25m euro redevelopment project along Saint Patrick’s Quay and at their Gresham Metropole Hotel premises, which lies between the quay and MacCurtain Street. Precinct Investments, which includes developer Bryan Cullen, builder and hotelier JJ Murphy and solicitor David Coleman, will seek to construct a new mixed-use development which will include the demolition of the much loathed St. Patrick’s Quay extension to the Metropole Hotel fronting St. Patrick’s Quay, the demolition will also include the removal of the recently added leisure centre. 61 residential units, 5 retail units, 87 basement car-parking spaces (over 4 split levels) and a 3556sq m extension to the hotel. In place of the aging extension, a 7-storey block is now proposed which will include conferencing facilities and 44 new bedrooms overhead – as part of additional developmet on the quay, 3 retail units with 34 overhead apartments divided between 2 blocks (5 & 6-storeys with 2-set back levels) including 10 x 1-bedroom units, 19 x 2-bedroom units and 5 x 3-bedroom units. The attractive red-brick building on the corner of Harley Street and St. Patrick’s Quay will be restored and converted to a live/work unit with commercial use at street-level and residential overhead. Fronting Harley Street, 2 retail units are to be provided with 15 overhead apartments in blocks of 4 & 6 storeys with 3-set back storeys – here 4 x 1-bedroom & 11 x 2-bedroom units will be provided. From Harley Street access will also be provided to a courtyard – to this, 1 block rising to 12-storeys over basement will provide an additional 11 x 2-bedroom and 1 x 3-bedroom units. The entire site encompasses 0.2732 hectares and includes the area occupied by the existing Metropole Hotel bounded by Harley Street, St. Patrick’s Quay, MacCurtain Street and the Everyman Palace. As part of the proposal extensive renovations to the existing PS at the Metropole will be included. O’Mahony Pike Architects are charged with the design. Images soon.


      Metropole site outline in red.

      A much needed rejuvenation of this quayside.

    • #758622
      phatman
      Participant

      All i’ll say is…woohoo!!!

    • #758623
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      That’s great news, and not before time. I’d liek to see a similar redevelopment next door at the eveyman- while of course maintaining the historic fabric of the existing auditorium.
      I look forward to seeing the images. It’ll hopefully kickstart this whole quay and maybe the one opposite too!!

    • #758624
      phatman
      Participant

      I gotta say the line-up in the shopping centre is a bit of a joke, from my point of view anyway, absolutely no big names at all.
      Any progression on tenants for the remainder of the units??

    • #758625
      rebel_city
      Participant

      Speaking of empty units. Mahon Point still has a number of empty units, which have been empty since its opening! Anybody have any idea whats happening there? Any news of the retailers interested in setting up on Academy Streey?

    • #758626
      A-ha
      Participant

      Dixons is probably the best “big name” in Ballincollig, other than that…. I got nothing else.

    • #758627
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      I gotta say the line-up in the shopping centre is a bit of a joke, from my point of view anyway, absolutely no big names at all.
      Any progression on tenants for the remainder of the units??

      Who cares if there are big names or not, people just want the everyday basics in a better setting. Look at Dundrum, big names like Harvey Nicks and House of Fraiser, but it’s ok for them to have such big names because there is such a huge catchment area for Dundrum that’s why the big names can justify their presence there. Also you have got to remember what lexington said, that there are plans to extend the centre westwards over the current deck carpark, am I correct in saying that Lexington?? Or is it eastwards. Also you have got to understand that the whole complex won’t be finished for a good few years. Office complex medical centre etc and there is the possibility for bigger names to come into the development when they extend it.. The whole Dundrum complex won’t be finished until 2009 and neither will be Ballincollig so give it time. The big names are obviously waiting to see how the centre does and there are so many shopping centres after opening in the last year, Midelton, Mahon Point, the extension for Wilton that the choice for consumers and shops alike as to where to shop/locate is huge and at the end of the day, even though it has a severe lack of parking, people prefer to shop in the city. Better selection.

      Anyone know if the Gardaí are going to leave their current premises and move into the Ballincollig Town Centre???

    • #758628
      lexington
      Participant

      @iloveCORK2 wrote:

      Also you have got to remember what lexington said, that there are plans to extend the centre westwards over the current deck carpark, am I correct in saying that Lexington?? Or is it eastwards.

      Northwards! :p

      😉

    • #758629
      -Donnacha-
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      Northwards! :p

      ]

      well i knew it couldn’t be southwards… so the only option i left out was northwards… :rolleyes:

      ah well I can’t be right all the time 😀

    • #758630
      pier39
      Participant

      delighted to hear about patricks qy. what an eyesore the place is. in time id like to see the quayside their build up sufficiently to counterbalance developmet across the water and bring a nice corridor effect and sense of continuity to the quays which should hopefully serve to emphasise the river rather than detract from it as is with patchy building types and overly dramatic varying rooflines.

    • #758631
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      delighted to hear about patricks qy. what an eyesore the place is. in time id like to see the quayside their build up sufficiently to counterbalance developmet across the water and bring a nice corridor effect and sense of continuity to the quays which should hopefully serve to emphasise the river rather than detract from it as is with patchy building types and overly dramatic varying rooflines.

      There is a surface car park behind very poor quality 2 storey buildings fronting on to St.Patricks Quay and 2 or 3 buildings on to McCurtain St.Its only a matter of time before this superb site comes up for re-development along with the O’Heas Opel garage site alongside the Metropole Gresham.Along with the rear of the Everyman theatre and some poor quality signage and shopfronts this south facing quay has lots of potential.

    • #758632
      phatman
      Participant

      @iloveCORK2 wrote:

      Who cares if there are big names or not, people just want the everyday basics in a better setting…

      Alot of people care if there are big names or not, simply put people aren’t going to be willing to travel if there isn’t the incentive or the attraction. And seeing as there is a sizeable catchment, and one which is set to grow alot, coupled with much improved access, I for one am surprised at the mediocrity of the tenant list. If i wanted everyday basics i wouldnt shop outside of Dunnes…looking for a bit more than that.

    • #758633
      altuistic
      Participant

      I must say I’m delighted at the prospect of the miserable Metropole Hotel block is being replaced. I can only hope the replacement is a far sight more attractive than the current odious brick. As for the rest of the quay i know those surface car parks you are talking about Saucyjack and i agree they have to potential to provide something very pleasant. Hopefully soon we wont have to gaze upon the dirty grey backs of aging buildings on McCurtain Street from Patricks street.

      As for Ballincollig shopping centre. I took my first visit there earlier today and on my trip spent most of my time in traffic trying to get to it. As a community shopping facility i think it works quite fine as I dont think it was meant to compete with somewhere like Mahonpoint but rather to serve the quickly emerging population around it. Ballincollig needed something like that. All the same theres nothing there that would make me want to choose travelling there over a trip to Wilton or town which are both closer to me and dont involve endless waits in traffic queus.
      Last weekend I visit Mahonpoint there as well I had to endured endless traffic lines. However once inside i have to say I’ve growing slowly warm to the place, sure it is very Americanized and very streamlined but its wide, spacious and its clear a lot of attention has gone into fitting the interior (and may not so much the exterior). I took my first trip to the cinema in about 2 years at the cinema complex there and must say it is a fine job but perhaps lacks the charm of those institutions at the Savoy or at Winthrop street or even the Capital cinema in its earlier days.

    • #758634
      lexington
      Participant

      I’ll be honest, beyond one or two projects – such as the Evelina Children’s Hospital (interestingly, which was used as a comparitive in the planning application for Paul Kenny’s Treasury development along Patrick’s Quay by Wilson Architecture) and Wildscreen in Bristol, my familiarity with Hopkins Architects was limited. I’ve been looking into the practice increasingly so and I have to say, I’m impressed!

      Hmmm, interesting! 😉

      Well worth a look – any opinions?

      Visit: http://www.hopkins.co.uk

    • #758635
      rebel_city
      Participant

      That site is really well done. I don’t like the GEK Headquarters building in Athens. But, I really like the library building in Norwich. Really innovative and modern.

    • #758636
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      Alot of people care if there are big names or not, simply put people aren’t going to be willing to travel if there isn’t the incentive or the attraction. And seeing as there is a sizeable catchment, and one which is set to grow alot, coupled with much improved access, I for one am surprised at the mediocrity of the tenant list. If i wanted everyday basics i wouldnt shop outside of Dunnes…looking for a bit more than that.

      Fair enough, name the shops your think that should be there and how feasible would they be for a place like Ballincollig?

      Lexington, you know the way you said they were going to extend the shopping centre northwards, well isn’t the multi-storey carpark and apartments in the way. U have any plans/photos of the extension of how the extension well look, so as to visualise it. Thanks

    • #758637
      phatman
      Participant

      @iloveCORK2 wrote:

      Fair enough, name the shops your think that should be there and how feasible would they be for a place like Ballincollig?

      Lexington, you know the way you said they were going to extend the shopping centre northwards, well isn’t the multi-storey carpark and apartments in the way. U have any plans/photos of the extension of how the extension well look, so as to visualise it. Thanks

      Well there’s obviously the footfall and the business if there’s a shopping centre of such a size there in the first place. Let’s face it, it’s a high profile development. For a start, I think i speak on behalf of everyone when i express disappointment at the presence of Dunnnes instead of Marks ‘n Sparks, as was initally speculated. If Marks saw the centre as a feasible prospect, then i think my point is somewhat proved. I would have liked to see more high-end fashion retailers present, maybe HMV or Virgin as the music stores, better restaurant/fast food elements etc, but maybe in the future.

    • #758638
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Quinlan Private, as part of a larger €103m acquisition of property assets put on the market by KBC Asset Management, has acquired the retail premises occupied by Argos (part of what was formerly the Queen’s Old Castle Centre) at Daunt Square, the junction between the western end of Patrick’s Street and Grand Parade. The remaining properties as part of the deal are centred around Dublin and include the likes of Oldbrook House on the Lower Pembroke Road and Block P6 of the Eastpoint Business Park.


      @iloveCORK2 wrote:

      Lexington, you know the way you said they were going to extend the shopping centre northwards, well isn’t the multi-storey carpark and apartments in the way. U have any plans/photos of the extension of how the extension well look, so as to visualise it. Thanks

      I think we may have got our wires crossed – I was referring to Mahon Point SC. Designs there, as best I am aware, have yet to be realised entirely. Movement on that was posited at 2009, so it’s somewhat off yet.

      The Ballincollig S.C. expansion is earmarked for the west, sorry, on a siet beyond the existing surface car-park. An application for that is about 5 months away, pending. 🙂

    • #758639
      A-ha
      Participant

      As regards to Ballincollig, I think I have to agree with phatman. Almost all of our suburban shopping centres are the same. There’s a Dunnes, a Sasha and a crappy music shop. I don’t see anything wrong with shopping centres wanting to attract new stores. Thats why I’m so happy that Esprit are in Douglas. There new and different, and thats why Mahon Point was such a big hit…. Debenhams and Zara, not Dunnes and Sasha.

    • #758640
      lexington
      Participant

      😉 Developers Paul O’Brien (Mount Kennett Investments) and John Costello have withdrawn their planning application for the redevelopment of the recently closed Capitol Cineplex on Grand Parade. The project was designed by Sabine Wittman’s Dungarvan-based The e-Project. The withdrawal now adds fuel to the fire of speculation that investor Joe O’Donovan and a group of other smaller investors, who have recently been active in a series of property acquisitions along Grand Parade, St. Patrick’s Street and Oliver Plunkett Street – are now seeking to incorporate the valuable Capitol Cineplex site into a propsective scheme which will likely house a large higher-order retail scheme, perhaps some limited residential elements and other commercial features. Other acquisitions by the investors are understood to have included 50 Patrick’s Street and adjoining premises, the Oyster Tavern on Market Lane (and neighbouring units), the Central Shoe Stores on Grand Parade (rumoured to have been sold not so long ago for a whopping €14.5m and there is speculation that the Qube complex on Oliver Plunkett Street sold for circa €10m. A prospective proposal could well seek to delicately incorporate The English Market (as with some major European developments which have carefully adjoined traditional markets). The possibility of the Capitol Cineplex premises incorporated into the proposal would now offer the developers a chance to provide a major contemporary frontage onto Grand Parade and an unrivalled vista down the length of Washington Street. The facility has scope to comfortably house a new city centre department store such as the likes of Arnotts or even the John Lewis Partnership who have been actively assessing Irish expansion opportunities.

      Also see:
      1. https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=39356&postcount=475
      2. https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?p=41409&highlight=Joe+O%27Donovan#post41409



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 O’Flynn Construction have been granted their appeal subject to revised conditions regarding the contest of development fee contributions cited as part of their successful permission for the Eglinton Street development. The Board found favour to amend Condition 24 which concerned a contested calculation of development fees. Construction on Eglinton Street is now expected to commence in early 2006.



      😎 Dairygold Co-Op’s property developmemt wing, Alchemy Properties has been granted permission by CorkCoCo for the phased demolition of Dairygold Co-operative store, the provision of temporary cladding to part of the existing store, construction of temporary road, temporary external storage area, construction of a 4Home DIY store, ancillary offices, staff facilities, garden centre, external generator and compactor, ESB substation, car parking and all ancillary site works all at their premises along the Cork Road in Midelton.

      Additionally the company was also granted permission on a seperate application for the same site for a retail development consisting of 4 no. retail warehouse units.



      😎 Dunnes Stores have been permitted on appeal, the development of a new ‘town centre’ development for Carrigaline comprising of a supermarket (3,007sq m), new public library (382sq m) and 3 additional retail units all at a site in Kilnaglery. The proposal was appealed by 3 parties including Barry Collins who owns the busy SuperValu operation in the town centre and who is planning a large-scale town centre development with The Shipton Group’s Clayton Love Jnr, under the special purpose vehicle Piton Properties.


    • #758641
      Pug
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      ]

      presumably though Clayton love wont move on Carrigaline for a while if he is concentrating on revamping Douglas?

    • #758642
      Leesider
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      presumably though Clayton love wont move on Carrigaline for a while if he is concentrating on revamping Douglas?

      now that Douglas has been brought up what is the current situation with this?? is construction due to start any time soon or is it still in the planning phase?

    • #758643
      lexington
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      now that Douglas has been brought up what is the current situation with this?? is construction due to start any time soon or is it still in the planning phase?

      Are you referring to the ‘town centre’ development by The Shipton Group?

      Planning already exists on Douglas Village S.C. for a substantial redevelopment, designed by Wilson Architecture, which will facilitate increased retail space and a multi-storey car-park so as to allow and new east-west routeway and alleviate many of the rancid traffic concerns facing Douglas.

      However, this will likely see some alteration and allowance for a link-up with the redevelopment site constituent of the former Permanent TSB premises, Cinema World premises, Shell Petrol Station and the green site to the east of Cinema World. Douglas Court S.C., also in the possession of The Shipton Group, will benefit from a link-up to the remainder development plans. Bowen Construction are also understood to be on-board with the scheme. As best I am aware, issues are being ironed out with Cork County Manager Maurice Moloney and CCC, with a planning application scheduled within the prospective future – so in answer, construction on the overall scheme is a bit away I’m afraid.


    • #758644
      Pug
      Participant

      nice big green field in there behind Barrys pub also! some value on that I would say.

    • #758645
      lexington
      Participant

      Cork is embarking on a phase of expansion and renewal – some describing it as the most exciting revival of the city in modern times. As a location to develop and invest, the likes of Mark Fitzgerald (CEO of Sherry FitzGerald Group) are hailing it as having the potential to represent one of the best urban revival operations in Europe. Fintan Tierney of DTZ Sherry FitzGerald has earmarked Cork as one of the best investment opportunities in the country. Hamilton Osbourne King’s Paul McNeive has noted his company’s commitment to the city citing it’s intention to be at the cusp of what offers the company and its clients one of the best operational opportunities available. The confidence in the city and metropolitan area has been reflected by moves from major construction companies like Michael McNamara Construction, Coffey Construction, PJ Walls and arrivals expected soon by the likes of Laing O’Rourke (who are investigating setting up its first regional office outside of Dublin in Cork city) and P. Elliot, whose expansion south to Nenagh is seen as a happy-medium to take advantage of southern opportunities but with one company insider noting, Cork is very much on the long-term list. Major design practices have moved in to the city in recent times like Scott Tallon Walker, O’Mahony Pike and Henry J. Lyons & Partners. And too developers not traditionally active in the Cork region are involving or soon to involve in exciting projects over the coming future. CSO predictions cite the Cork region is in a position to take advantage of a population spurt of anywhere up to 100,000 by 2015. All in all, the forecast looks good – with perhaps the biggest threat lurking in the shadows of property value inflation. So all this progress is positive news – but as the city embarks on this revival path, it now has to consider how it intends to distinguish itself as an individual city and character…much of this can be achieved through good, considerate design. Are we there yet? No, not at all, but we now have an opportunity to get there.

      The historical humdrum nature of development activity in Cork has never really offered it the chance to establish a unique character in the modern age – up until about 2002, new structure formation failed to kick into the frequency it is now starting to enjoy…the biggest redevelopment challeges now stand ahead. To date, there has been some success and some, well, not so successful projects in emergence. Cork needs to develop a distinctly Corkonian character in the prospective design of its new buildings but one which is not afraid to interpret new ideas and architectural approaches. A distinct ‘character’ (and of course opinion will vary) does not mean monotonously repetitive design layouts, but rather designs which utilises facets of the city’s history, culture, people and surroundings (i.e. river, natural materials etc) as inspirations for their realisation. It is in realising such features that Cork can be pitched with a unique flavour to prospective investors, employers, businesses, residents and so on with a strong leg to stand on. In seeking out this ‘character’ represented through our buildings, we should not be afraid to explore new avenues of design and utilise the various offerings of different approaches to provide new ways of realising this identity – regardless of height, usage or location, the opportunity to ascertain and develop this identity remains. Does this mean there is no room for other influences? Certainly not, but as I said, individual character does not mean restriction to any one architectural discipline or style. We should strive to build on the highest existing standards – and by doing so, incorporate these new standards as immediately recognisable facets of the character which we seek to build.

      Are the buildings below stepping stones toward creating an individual architectural identity in the modern age for Cork???


      Eglinton Street – designed by Wilson Architecture


      Phase 1 of Camden Court – designed by James Leahy & Associates


      Coppinger Court – designed by Magee Creedon Architects

      (P.S.: I’m not stating ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to the designs posted above, nor am I implying a vantage one way or the other regarding them – they are simpy posted for deliberation. Any other examples are most welcome.)

    • #758646
      garret
      Participant

      i saw that in de paper
      looks horrific
      the vista into the city from tivoli will be destroyed
      will it go ahead
      is there a way to object
      i thought there was a plan for a walkway areound to the marina from blackrock castle

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 Sean Keohane’s Grangfield Developments are to lodge plans in conjunction with the Cork Boat Club for 119 apartments units over basement car-parking for 121 vehicles. The building will range between 3 and 5-storeys and is to be located on a 1.3 hectare site at Blackrock Harbour and on the premises of the Cork Boat Club which will be demolished allowing for the provision of a new club complex and floating pontoon, as part of the larger development. Also as part of the development, a new public boardwalk is to be provided and a 3-storey office building of 113sq m. Of the 119 apartments there will be 18 x 1-bedroom, 95 x 2-bedroom and 6 x 3-bedroom units – with balcones and roof-garden areas. The proposal will also seek to reclaim 1,954sq m of public foreshore,

    • #758647
      lexington
      Participant

      @garret wrote:

      i saw that in de paper
      looks horrific
      the vista into the city from tivoli will be destroyed
      will it go ahead
      is there a way to object
      i thought there was a plan for a walkway areound to the marina from blackrock castle

      The application has yet to be subjected to the planning process, therefore, at this stage there is no indication as to which direction a decision will go. The proposal was, however, subject to extensive preplanning discussions.

      A masterplan draft is being prepared by Cork City Council for the enhancement of the Blackrock Harbour area which, as I understand will include waterfront amenity provision the likes I believe you may be referring to.

    • #758648
      garret
      Participant

      re proposed apartments on the river lee at blackrock village
      does anyone know the name of a good planning consultant who would help me to formulate an objection?
      Is the timing of the application a coincidence??

    • #758649
      lexington
      Participant

      The OPW have indicated their intention to announce the successful Revenue Commissioners tenancy bid for next week. The contest has been a long and tough one with some good proposals forwarded. The likes of The Shipton Group, Kenny Group and McCarthy Developments had all forwarded pitches, however, in the end only 2 proposals came down to the final tie with a proposal set for the former ‘Susie’s Field’ quarry off Assumption Road in Blackpool, now looking set to bring home the ‘trophy’. Ascon Rohcon Limited who have championed a planning permission attained by auctioneer/developers Joe Carey & Frank Sheahan are claiming to be dead-cert in having attained Revenue Commissioner tenancy. The subject proposal attained permission in July 2003 following a lengthy planning process beginning back in 2001. Designed by Jack Coughlan & Associates, the scheme was granted with permission for 397 basement car-parking spaces over 2 decks and 13,511sq m of additional commercial space of which the bulk is open plan office space. A provision of 250sq m of retail space will be made for local services use. The new building will extend to 4-floors over the basement car-parking with the structure’s profile generally aligning with the quarry slopes.


      Susie’s Field site indicated in purple. Not shown is the new link road between the Blackpool By-Pass and Pope’s Road which also graces the western periphery of the site.

      If Theo Cullinane (of Ascon) is endorsed by the OPW announcement next week, it will mean up to 600 of the Revenue Commissioners staff will leave Sullivans Quay in the city centre and travel to the northern suburb breaches. Should the case be verified, construction on the project is likely to commence early in 2006. It will mean the loss of McCarthy Developments contestancy who provided a highly attractive docklands alternative of 8-storeys along Centre Park Road, designed by Murray O’Laoire (see below). As part of the deal, Ascon Rohcon & Joe Carey/Frank Sheahan will also acquire the valuable 0.75acre Government Buildings site at Sullivans Quay which, subject to some site foundation modifications, is capable of providing a landmark commercial scheme which would have adequate scope for a new city centre cinema facility (in lieu of the Capitol Cineplex closure and its prospective redevelopment see here -> https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=43573&postcount=1128). Any redevelopment of Sullivans Quay will demand a superb architectural standard utilising the exceptional vista afforded down the soon-to-be renewed Grand Parade (designed by Beth Gali & Associates).

      Also on the subject of Ascon Rohcon, who are now pushing further into development activity in Cork city centre, the group are linked to a holding on Albert Quay which adjoins the recently purchased Doyle Warehousing facility (0.5acres) sold recently to Howard Holdings for an estimated €9m to €10m.


      Paul Kenny’s proposal, designed by Wilson Architecture – no longer in the RC bid running.


      McCarthy Developments’ Centre Park Road proposal designed by Murray O’Laoire.

      It is unfortunate that the 2 proposals depicted in the images above have not attained RC tenancy, from a city centre urban renewal perspective. However, does this mean the projects are lost entirely? Not necessarily. McCarthy Developments, who hold full planning on their proposal, may yet decide to proceed with it on a more ‘independent’ basis – as for the Kenny proposal, a number of options remain with this scheme, including a phased development or change of use of certain elements to create a more mixed use approach – should its appeal prove successful. :confused:

    • #758650
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Seems like interesting news for Blackpool. Maybe Joe Gavin was right- in 10 years time, we’ll all want to live there! Any mages of the ‘possible’ RC building?
      I think i know the site. Any chance of a map though?

    • #758651
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Is there intended to be a commuter rail stop in Blackpool? I know it’ll be in the railway order wherever that will be published, but has any locationed been mentioned to date?

      Also, theres a piece in todays Irish Times about the pharma plant being rumoured for Carrigtwohill – Amgen is the named party, and the figure of 1.3bn is mentioned as an investment. Apparently a preliminary decision has been made to go with the Cork location, and a final decision is expected ‘early next month’.

    • #758652
      lexington
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      Also, theres a piece in todays Irish Times about the pharma plant being rumoured for Carrigtwohill – Amgen is the named party, and the figure of 1.3bn is mentioned as an investment. Apparently a preliminary decision has been made to go with the Cork location, and a final decision is expected ‘early next month’.

      That’s right Aidan – I commented on the pharma proposal back in post #1023 here -> https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=42697&postcount=1023

      @lexington wrote:

      A €1bn euro investment into a massive, state-of-the-art pharmaceutical manufacturing facility is earmarked for a site near Carrigtwohill, only a few minutes drive from the city and located near the N25 “Midelton” Dual-Carriageway. Negotiations are finalising with the IDA at present, and if successful, the proposal (one of the largest single pharmaceutical investments in the State) may create up to 500 jobs. The identity beind the massive plan has not yet been revealed, however, according to a prominent and well-respected source within the existing pharmaceutical industry around Cork Harbour, informed speculation cites Wyeth Pharma as the name behind the proposal. More details when they emerge.

      It will be a great boost for Cork and will have a foot in the bio-logics area. My understanding now is that it is simply a matter of ironing out the details with the IDA ahead of a formal announcement.



      As for the Blackpool Railway stop, the focus is set on the former Kilbarry Station, north-east across the road from Blackpool S.C. I understand movement to start being made on the location mid-2006 (all things going well) – and may include a larger development elements. Speculation was ripe that the Shipton Group may develop the site to include a full-integrated stop as part of a scheme likely to include small retail, cafe provision and some other elements I’m not too sure on. The station would link to the S.C. nearby – by pedestrian bridge(???). Essentially the scheme would be funded privately with public benefit afforded in decent rail access to metropolitan and city centre/docklands Cork from Blackpool. Not quite sure how that plan is working out, but either way the project has been prioritised by CCC as noted in their November 2005 Economic Monitor.

    • #758653
      jungle
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      Is there intended to be a commuter rail stop in Blackpool? I know it’ll be in the railway order wherever that will be published, but has any locationed been mentioned to date?

      A location for the future Kilbarry station is shown in the second map in this document

      http://www.corkcorp.ie/ourservices/roads/pdf/urban_renewal_pg3_8.pdf

    • #758654
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Thanks lads.

      Lexington, about the location for this proposed pharma plant, there has been some activity (testbores etc) in a field on the left of the dual carraigeway as you head for Midleton from the Carrig side (where the Ploughing Championship was held a number of years ago). Is this the site in question?

    • #758655
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      anyone know where AIB/BNY will be locating in Cork… Airport Business Park?

    • #758656
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Yup, in phase 2 from what I ‘ve been told.

    • #758657
      lexington
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      Lexington, about the location for this proposed pharma plant, there has been some activity (testbores etc) in a field on the right of th dual carraigeway as you head for Midleton (where the Ploughing Championship was held a number of years ago). Is this the site in question?

      Quite genuinely, I don’t know the precise location. I was informed of the proposal by a well-respected member of the Cork Harbour Pharma Industry and was never issued a precise location – but was simply told it will be with easy accessibility of the Cork – Midelton Dual Carriageway and by extension, Little Island.



      mickeydocs – indeed the AIB/BNY operation is destined for a 20,000sq ft lease (of 20 years) at Cork Airport Business Park. You have to admire the success of the facility in attracting some very tasty names. 😉


    • #758658
      A-ha
      Participant

      Is anyone able to tell me who is going into the six units as part of Phase 2 in MahonPoint? Are they all due to be occupied or are some going to be vacant?

    • #758659
      POM
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      claiming to be dead-cert in having attained Revenue Commissioner tenancy. The subject proposal attained permission in July 2003 following a lengthy planning process beginning back in 2001. Designed by Jack Coughlan & Associates, the scheme was granted with permission for 397 basement car-parking spaces over 2 decks and 13,511sq m of additional commercial space of which the bulk is open plan office space. A provision of 250sq m of retail space will be made for local services use. The new building will extend to 4-floors over the basement car-parking with the structure’s profile generally aligning with the quarry slopes.

      :

      I think the word ‘dire’ falls well short in describing this project but perhaps we could not have expected more from the OPW. Heavens forbid them showing a little imagination and going the extra mile for somewhere like the St. Patricks Quay bid.

    • #758660
      lexington
      Participant

      ‘developments in cork’

      is there a new sub-forum being devised???

      e.g. developments in south-east
      developments in cork

    • #758661
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      ‘developments in cork’

      is there a new sub-forum being devised???

      e.g. developments in south-east
      developments in cork

      :confused: What is going on on this forum Lex?
      Things have never been so quiet, the title is changing, the time display suggests that we are all burning midnight oil…Just finding this all hard fo follow.

    • #758662
      lexington
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      :confused: What is going on on this forum Lex?
      Things have never been so quiet, the title is changing, the time display suggests that we are all burning midnight oil…Just finding this all hard fo follow.

      kite – the development front was going through a little lull there for a period, but things are starting to pick up now again coming up to Christmas. As for participation, that really is the discretion of users – the number of hits to the thread would seem to dictate that it is continuing to be read regularly by a number of persons (many not registered), however it terms of contribution – it’s up to people I suppose to take that on themselves. The same happened once or twice before, when there’s no real big news, things aren’t as frequently responded to.

      As for the title, you’ll have to direct your enquiry to Paul Clerkin – presumably the title element ‘architecture’ was not perceived as warranted(???), Admittedly the new title is a little confusing, and maybe a revised title like “Cork: Development” would at least provide some sense of identifiability with respect to the preceding thread title. Similarly, you’ll have to ask him about the time displays – I don’t generally take note of them but I know other users have mentioned the same issue on other threads. I don’t know, sorry. :confused:

      Interestingly, between the ‘LADSOCL’ thread and this thread, a combined hit volume of 248,219 views has been achieved with a combined 3,042 posts. That’s no bad achievement in terms of participation and says a great deal about the popularity of the threads and the Archiseek.com forums as a whole. 🙂

      All the best,

      Lex 😮

    • #758663
      PTB
      Participant

      The titles of this thread seek to get more boring all the time. Rember the good old days of “Look at de state of Cork, like!”. Now there was a name. Can we call this thread “Look at de state of Cork, like! 2” (I’ld put the 2 in roman numerals – more dignified) or have it changed when we move to a new thread like when we moved the old “Look at de state of Cork, like!”?

    • #758664
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      kite – the development front was going through a little lull there for a period, but things are starting to pick up now again coming up to Christmas. As for participation, that really is the discretion of users – the number of hits to the thread would seem to dictate that it is continuing to be read regularly by a number of persons (many not registered), however it terms of contribution – it’s up to people I suppose to take that on themselves. The same happened once or twice before, when there’s no real big news, things aren’t as frequently responded to.

      As for the title, you’ll have to direct your enquiry to Paul Clerkin – presumably the title element ‘architecture’ was not perceived as warranted(???), Admittedly the new title is a little confusing, and maybe a revised title like “Cork: Development” would at least provide some sense of identifiability with respect to the preceding thread title. Similarly, you’ll have to ask him about the time displays – I don’t generally take note of them but I know other users have mentioned the same issue on other threads. I don’t know, sorry. :confused:

      Interestingly, between the ‘LADSOCL’ thread and this thread, a combined hit volume of 248,219 views has been achieved with a combined 3,042 posts. That’s no bad achievement in terms of participation and says a great deal about the popularity of the threads and the Archiseek.com forums as a whole. 🙂

      All the best,

      Lex 😮

      Thank you for clearing up most of my queries Lex. Maybe Paul Clerkin could let us know why the thread title was altered, i feel the new title lacks something?

    • #758665
      A-ha
      Participant

      Je déteste le titre! That new title is awful…. at the very least it should include capital letters, a little excitment wouldn’t go a stray either. Can we change the title of this thread to Look at the…… That title was brill. What about the six units in Mahon Point. Anyone? lex?

    • #758666
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      What about the six units in Mahon Point. Anyone? lex?

      Shopping Centre or Retail Park?

    • #758667
      A-ha
      Participant

      The Retail Park.

    • #758668
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      The Retail Park.

      Currys and PC World will be taking up 2 of the units – but off the top of my head I don’t have the names for the other units.

    • #758669
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 I know this is something I’ve been touching on for quite some time now, and even now, I post this carefully – so take it ‘speculatively’. 😉

      In late 2004, Howard Holdings and investor Joe O’Donovan jointly purchased Wilton S.C. in the suburb of Bishopstown for a figure equal to approx. €124m from Tesco (who as it stands bought the S.C. 2-years earlier in 2002 from the Irish Pension Fund Property Unit Trust for an estimated €85m). The deal signified the largest single commercial investment purchase in Ireland that year and left Tesco with a profit understood to be in the region of €22m (following deductions of their expansion costs) – even sweeter for Tesco, the sale did not include their newly added 42,000sq ft store, nor the 9 new units that formed part of the centre’s expansion. In 2002, the entire S.C. pre-expansion, the centre is allegedly produced a rental income in the region of €2.8 million per annum, however rent reviews on most units were enacted in 2004 before the sale to Howard Holdings/Joe O’Donovan. Even so, with the loss of the Tesco and 9-new units, rental returns were not believed to be significantly greater than noted by the 2002 figures – with casual estimates pitched at anywhere between €2.9m and €3.9m (give or take). Both Howard Holdings and Joe O’Donovan claimed the purchase was merely for purposes of investment – however it is known that Roches Stores, one of the centre’s main tenants, had been assessing options on its store by means of expansion or renewal. Early reports suggested regular partner, Newenham Mulligan Architects had been contacted about drawing up ideas on how best such a renewal could be realised at the store as Roches commence a store-wide revision scheme to comply with the new store image established by the company’s Henry Street operation (as a consequence, speculation about a revision project is also ripe concerning the company’s Patrick Street store!) – the outcome of this investigation was undetermined. Beyond that, many analysts were curious about the level of expenditure afforded on the centre’s purchase given that even at the top rental income estimate, it would take approx. 30-years to clear borrowings – however, alternatively, Howard/Joe O’Donovan may seek to sell off the centre, but the level of profit attained from any prospective sale had many analysts wondering whether or not such margins would justify the amount of money originally spent on the centre’s purchase in the first place. It seem clear to many, that the purchase represented something far greater – a prime, large and well-positioned site with easy access to one of Cork’s busiest arteries (the South Ring) and in one of Cork’s most affluent suburbs – development potential was ripe.

      Since the purchase, a number of employees with various retaillers in the centre have reported what they believe to be ‘site investigations’. Indeed, such activity is also reported by another professional source but won’t clarify the nature of the investigations. Another source has outlined options but won’t specify which exactly is likely or not…? One option outlined states as follows:

      A large mixed-use development which will include an expansion to the core retail activities at Wilton Shopping Centre, Bishopstown, Cork. The redevelopment will concern the following: a retail expansion on a number of levels which will include

      1. additional units
      2. a new anchor unit for Roches Stores to be approached with a view to partial vertical expansion allowing the new facility to conform to the new Roches Stores operational philosophy – of which will include a number of concession outlets, new cafe, new cosmetics department, new home utilities department, new fashion provisions. The new facility will be catered for at the expense of the developers and let under a renegotiated long-term lease to the tenant.
      3. additional levels with allowance for further community associated activities/food outlets/further retail units etc
      4. a new supermarket (SuperValu) with an extended floorspace and individual access.
      5. underground car-parking (over 1,000 spaces to be relocated in basement facilities – possibly new loading facilities). [centre expansion will partially take place over existing car-park areas to the east and west of the centre]
      6. Refurbishment to the existing facilities of the centre.

      In addition, further redevelopment options will include:

      1. some office space
      2. community service facilities
      3. a revised infastructure to ease potential congestion – this may also include new access points.
      4. possible green-space provision associated with public usage – again perhaps over basement and store roof-top expansions utilsing the topography of the site efficiently.

      The other outlines are very sparse – but they do indicate that any redevelopment, which will be phased, will likely include more elements than simply retail. The possibility for some residential elements also exists.

      How will this affect Joe O’Donovan’s retail options in the city centre? (i.e. Grand Parade/Patrick’s Street) – it remains to be seen. How will planners react in light of the fact that the €150m expansion will add another heavy retail counterweight to the city centre in an area already heavily trafficked? There are a number of justifications that can be made for any prospective proposal – but before we get ahead of ourselves, we should perhaps wait and see what comes of all this talk.

    • #758670
      A-ha
      Participant

      Currys and PC World will be taking up 2 of the units – but off the top of my head I don’t have the names for the other units.

      Thanks lex, if you find out the others, let me know. 😀

    • #758671
      lisam
      Participant

      They only got planning for 4 retail units In Mahon Point Retail Park Phase 2. There are talks of Halfords moving in there too

    • #758672
      Leesider
      Participant

      Just saw that the planned UCC IT building has got funding from the government, hopefully this means a start date for construction will come soon. Anyone know when we can expect this?

    • #758673
      securityman
      Participant

      The word has it that Halfords, PC world and Argos are moving in I think currys have pulled out but not fully sure on that one. I believe Tesco are looking to build on to their existing premises in mahon point aswell to cater for more textile and clothing.

    • #758674
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Has anyone tried to get through to Cork County Council planners these days.. I spent an hour on hold this morning and am becoming very tired with the whole 9.30 to 10.30 Monday and Wednesday issue when its easier to get bird flu that get through to the main and planning switch. Given the level of contribuitions that the Council are taking off developers and the amount of funding they are getting, perhaps the echo (given that they read this web site) would do a story on how long it takes to get through……total contrast to the rest of the country…..

    • #758675
      lexington
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      Just saw that the planned UCC IT building has got funding from the government, hopefully this means a start date for construction will come soon. Anyone know when we can expect this?

      Design Team

      Scott Tallon Walker (Architects)
      Project Management Ltd. (Mechanical and Electrical Engineers)
      Arup Consulting Engineers (Civil and Structural Engineers)
      PKS (Quantity Surveyors)

      A contractor is yet to be appointed. Planning runs out in 2007.

      The proposed IT Building received planning in July 2002 and is to be located on a site on the Western Road which was formerly the Cork Greyhound Track. The strategic location of the site will present UCC with an opportunity to provide a western gateway to the campus on Western Road and its adjacency to the River Lee will allow a riverside walk to be built providing good access to other parts of the campus. The new Medical, Nursing, Therapies & Créche Complex at Brookfield will also be linked via a new bridge connecting the IT Building site to the Brookfield site. The Building comprises 3 floors with a total floor area of 15, 870m 2. Once completed it will accommodate the department of Computer Science and Microelectronic Engineering. The population of the Building will be in the region of 2,000 during the peak academic year.

    • #758676
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      can’t say the UCC IT Building floats my boat. Appears rather ordinary for what is a great site.

    • #758677
      POM
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      can’t say the UCC IT Building floats my boat. Appears rather ordinary for what is a great site.

      Underwhelming to say the least. Along with the possible Revenue Commissioner offices along the Blackpool bypass it represents another example of 2001 designs approved, yet to be realised and quite frankly would be better off not realised.
      For such a fantastic riverside site you’d think STW would have put a little more heart into it.

      On the subject matter of trying to contact the County council’s planners…disaster! I got so fed up last Thursay I just hung up…better off heading out to the Model Farm Road and asking to see them in person. A waste of everyones time in most circumstances, phone questions would only take a few mins.

    • #758678
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Underwhelming to say the least. Along with the possible Revenue Commissioner offices along the Blackpool bypass it represents another example of 2001 designs approved, yet to be realised and quite frankly would be better off not realised.
      For such a fantastic riverside site you’d think STW would have put a little more heart into it.

      On the subject matter of trying to contact the County council’s planners…disaster! I got so fed up last Thursay I just hung up…better off heading out to the Model Farm Road and asking to see them in person. A waste of everyones time in most circumstances, phone questions would only take a few mins.

      Just spent half the day trying to do the same today so eventually went out there after lunch to drop in a letter. The receptionist refused to accept the letter and redirected me to the planning desk where 7 people stood for 15 mins without anybody behind the counter.Eventually I gave the letter to a porter. What a watste of time.

    • #758679
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 O’Callaghan Properties are to apply for an additional block as part of their Lancaster Quay development on the former Jurys Doyle site. A new 7-storey block containing 30 apartments (12 x 1-bedroom units and 18 x 2-bedroom units) over retail and ATM facilities are destined for the site area previously designated to the 9-storey Block A – which was removed by ABP following appeal. The appeal conditions however did allow for the possibility of a further application on the site at a later date – and it would now seem OCP are taking the opportunity in hand.


      Image showing Block A – hightlighted in red – which was removed on appeal. The new 7-storey proposal is set to replace the original 9-storey block element


      Cork 2005: Solas – Journey of Light

      Apologises for the poor image quality. Some images of the Solas – Journey of Light event.


      Stages of Life – at OCP HQ 21 Lavitts Quay, the building’s various levels and sweeping glass facade are effectively used in a display that seem to chart varying stages of life’s development from Birth at ground level, to Childhood at 1st Floor Level to Adolesence at 2nd Floor Level. Attractively coated in varying light projections


      Shadon Lane – off Pope’s Quay to the north of Shandon Bride, was stunningly decorated in a pattern of simple candles which illuminated the tiny laneway and created an extraordinary sense of continental romance – if only my image was able to convey the atmosphere sufficiently without ‘Romeo’s’ inclusion to the left!!! 😀


      St. Mary’s Cathedral on Pope’s Quay looked nothing short of spectacular in a dressing of multi-spectrum light projections. The trees to the garden on the eastern elevation were individually dressed in primary colour light with a beautiful ‘Olympic Torch’ style fire in the foreground.

      The manner in which structures were brough to life via simple lighting techniques is certainly remarkable – and the effect was exceptional in this circumstance.


      See comparison of St. Mary’s Cathedral below: (the daylight images are copyright of Archiseek.com)



    • #758680
      A-ha
      Participant

      They should leave that light feature up all year round. Every building in London and Paris is lit up like that all the time….. why can’t we do it? It really does look outstanding. As for Mahon Point, I would have thought Argos would have gone for a smaller unit than the ones in the retail park…. I imagine they will be quite big if Halfords and PC World intend to go in there. I hope Currys still come, they would be nice to have…. and a very big name aswell.

    • #758681
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Cork Court House has without doubt one of the finest floodlighting schemes in the country – looks spectacular on the News every night now the Special Criminal Court has been forced to sit down with yez 🙂

      http://nemesis.co.jyu.fi/~mikyrjol/photos/digital/ireland_2005/cork_courthouse_2811.html

      Pity about the corner columns – nothing that can be done unfortunately.

    • #758682
      lexington
      Participant

      @Graham Hickey wrote:

      Cork Court House has without doubt one of the finest floodlighting schemes in the country – looks spectacular on the News every night

      Agreed – it does look pretty great. In some ways, one of the most unfortunate aspects of the Central Court House is its lack of a suitable vista. It’s a stunning structure which is deserving of a powerful perspective – I’ve always thought the site currently occupied by the Capitol Cineplex (and the future destination of a large retail development) would have been a wonderful location for a structure like the courthouse, providing a dramatic vantage down the length of Washington Street. Even so, I think the (costly!) renovations have been well employed. Great image too.

      I’ve been long wishing to take a photographic series highlighting ‘Cork at Night’ – I think it would allow people see an often neglected dimension to many of Cork’s fine but overlooked structures. Someday, when I have time…someday…:confused:

    • #758683
      jungle
      Participant

      Just a very minor correction.

      The church pictured is St Mary’s Dominican Church on Pope’s Quay. St Mary’s Cathedral is the church at the top of Shandon St.

    • #758684
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Thought the one at the top od Shando street was Saint Marys and Annes??

      Oh well…either way. 🙂

    • #758685
      jungle
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Thought the one at the top od Shando street was Saint Marys and Annes??

      Oh well…either way. 🙂

      You’re right. That is its full title.

    • #758686
      POM
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      They should leave that light feature up all year round. Every building in London and Paris is lit up like that all the time….. why can’t we do it? .

      Not every building in London is decorated like a nostalgic 60s discotheque. I agree that the lighting is visually attractive but I think much of the impact it provides comes consequent of the rarity associated with such lighting techniques. Were it in place all year the impact would be lost. Maybe an equally imaginative but moderately subdued effect would be satisfactory.

    • #758687
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I was just thinking the other day about the new stadium being talked about for munster in limerick and i know limerick is meant to be the home of rugby and all that but wouldnt it make much more sense financially for it to be built in cork not only because of the bigger population factor but they could share it with cork city who are the best supported team in the country and who it is known would like to move to a bigger more independant stadium!maybe it could be built just outside blackpool for the limerick crowd with all the development going on there!also just wondering does anyone have any info on the conference/event centre as its just geting anoying now with all the talk of it when there is such a need/market for it!(hopefully it will be an indoor arena like the odessy in belfast which i heard was planned for the showgrounds and which would be of much more benifit to the city)

    • #758688
      lexington
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      also just wondering does anyone have any info on the conference/event centre as its just geting anoying now with all the talk of it when there is such a need/market for it!(hopefully it will be an indoor arena like the odessy in belfast which i heard was planned for the showgrounds and which would be of much more benifit to the city)

      The time is nigh. 😀

      As for Munster Rugby, you can be sure the organisation are fully aware of some of the points you’ve mentioned. 😉

    • #758689
      rebel_city
      Participant

      I was looking for a website to see the cresent shopping centre in Limerick, but was unable to find one. The likes of zara, virgin, h&m have set up there, which is a positive sign of the times. I also came across a site http://www.coonaghcross.com which is poised to be the biggest shopping centre in munster I think. Wonder how opc feel about this one! is Limerick set to take over Cork as a major shopping hub!?

    • #758690
      rebel_city
      Participant

      Also, I was reading back over some of the previous posts and I got confused as regards the plans for Eglintine Street. The former An Post site is due to be developed into office space, a few stories high, and the proposed tall structure, approx 19 storys high, has been stalled/going ahead??

    • #758691
      Leesider
      Participant

      @rebel_city wrote:

      Also, I was reading back over some of the previous posts and I got confused as regards the plans for Eglintine Street. The former An Post site is due to be developed into office space, a few stories high, and the proposed tall structure, approx 19 storys high, has been stalled/going ahead??

      All elements of this development are going ahead including a 17 storey tower. You are probably thinking of the Water St project which is still in appeal.

    • #758692
      lexington
      Participant

      @rebel_city wrote:

      Also, I was reading back over some of the previous posts and I got confused as regards the plans for Eglintine Street. The former An Post site is due to be developed into office space, a few stories high, and the proposed tall structure, approx 19 storys high, has been stalled/going ahead??

      Project: Eglinton Street – 226 resdential units (as revised, originally 217), 30,000sq ft across 7 own-door offices, retail facilities including bulk and convenience goods, 550 underground car-parking spaces over 2-levels. Construction set to take place over 2 phases commencing in 2006, with a feature 17-storey landmark tower (70 metres) in the south-west corner of what was formerly the 3-acre An Post Sorting Facility. Purchased by the developers at a value estimated at €15m.

      Developer: O’Flynn Construction

      Architect: Frank O’Mahony w/ Wilson Architecture, No.5 Lapps Quay, Cork

      The project was subject to a 1st Party Conditions Appeal concerning development contributions. ABP found in favour of the developer, however the subject may yet be referred by Cork City Council to the DoE and appropriate legal authrorities (?).



      As for the retail issue – I think the future is looking good for Cork’s position as a primary retail and services centre, in no small part to O’Callaghan Properties. A couple of issues pose problems – not least among them ‘rent values’, naturally a landlord wll seek to maximise the possible return he/she can determine from their holdings, however I fear the exploits of some landlords may injure their own long-term activities if they’re not careful. A mre structured approach is favourable with gradual, sustainable progressions according to appropriate market conditions. Just because some tenants are willing to splash out on significant rents – this does not necessarily represent the broader sentiments of the market. Restrictive existing floorspace and excessive rental demands are maintaining some unwarranted vacanies – entrants need to be encouraged into the market (and with respect to the type of tenant willing to occupy limited floorspaces) and rental issues, once the situation is stable, can be re-evaluated. A strong city centre trading area is vital – I do believe that significant retail opportunities are capable and indeed necessary as part of an extended city centre in some docklands regions – however securing city centre dominance is a must. A city without a heart is no city at all. Steps are being made to secure this future – again, O’Callaghan Properties are close to applying for a large scheme at Academy Street occupying a block bordered by the said street, Emmet Place, Bowling Green Street and St. Patrick’s Street. Site assembly is estimated at €80m + with project development values estimated in the region of €130m to €150m. 200,000sq ft of retail space over 3-primary levels, 80 + apartments on 3 additional levels, some office provision and basement residential and loading parking. Further initiatives will concern Paul Street S.C. and Lavitts Quay/Half Moon Street. Rockfell Investments are forging ahead a retail and residential scheme at Cornmarket Street, Joe O’Donovan is believed to be assembling properties for another large scheme fronting Patrick’s Street, Grand Parade and possibly Oliver Plunkett Street – while other schemes are pitched for Grand Parade, Dunnes Stores on Patrick’s Street and so on.

    • #758693
      A-ha
      Participant

      is Limerick set to take over Cork as a major shopping hub!?

      Straight answer….NO. Cork has always had bustling streets in the city centre, not just the one or two main streets, like in Limerick. Every street adjacent to Patrick St. is as thriving as the next, with almost all spaces occupied with shops run by local families as well as international chains too. Oh, did anyone get to see the programme on RTE the other day about the English Market…. it was really good, but most of it was in Irish. And I read today in the Echo that the first Starbucks to open in Ireland outside of Dublin will be in Terminal 2 of Cork Airport when it is completed in early 2006. The due date for the airport to open is April 1st. 2006. Another thing I read in the Echo…. which I did not know, is that there is an underground link between the old short term car park and Terminal 2. Can’t wait until it opens!

    • #758694
      securityman
      Participant

      I agree with Cork still being number one in munster and possibly the number one in the country. However I think that they also need to look at getting another couple of car parks to meet the demand of visiting tourists because at times you could be wondering around all day for a spot and its not safe to leave your car on the street as the dreaded clampers might take it away. I even notice this to be a proble on a saturday night if you are being the designated driver you have to spend a half hour looking for a space as you cant leave it in the car parks as they close at 12 and thats not much use if your going clubbing. I also think the developments in the city centre are a must as the last thing we want is to end up like some citys in the states where the city centre is left with just offices and cafes. I noticed a prime example of this when I was in Orlando they have the best shopping centres around but nothing when you go Downtown. On a final note anyone notice all of a sudden there is a lot pubs opening up again

        The Classic is reopening with a night club upstairs on south main st
        Nearby on south main st another nightclub is due to open next year where the old scouts hall was
        The guys that own the East Village in douglas are opening a bar called SOHO on Grand Parade where Doyles was at one stage
        A new bar also looks like it will replace Lebowskis on Marlborough St with construction underway at present
    • #758695
      lexington
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      However I think that they also need to look at getting another couple of car parks to meet the demand of visiting tourists because at times you could be wondering around all day for a spot and its not safe to leave your car on the street as the dreaded clampers might take it away.

      Personally, I don’t think more city centre car-parks (other than basement facilities associated with residential or office developments) are desireable. We need to start focusing on the long-run – and that means keeping vehicles (other than emergency and deliveries) out of the city centre. Sustainable options of infastructure need to be employed – the one thing I find regretable not being included in either the CCDP 2003/4 is aim to, at the very least, conduct a major study into public transport alternatives beyond the references made to automated or dedicated green-bus routes. The Midelton Line is one thing, but I think, we need to think beyond that – where efficient light-rail links connect the extended/reconfigured city centre along the docklands with centres like Ballincollig, Bandon, Ringaskiddy/Carrigaline and of course the proposals for Blarney, Mallow, Blackpool, Midelton, Glounthane, Cobh and Dunkettle/Glanmire. Regular, efficient and safe services should serve commuter traffic which should ideally depot at facilities in Ballincollig in the east (i.e. Macroom, Killarney etc commuters), Dunkettle (like the P&R to serve commuters from Rathcormac, Fermoy etc) and so on. Further pedestrian provision needs to be promoted across the city centre island with greater emphasis placed on utilising river/quayside walkways/boardwalks – with full pedestrianisation in zones like Patrick Street, Grand Parade, Washington Street, North Main Street, South Main Street, Oliver Plunkett Street, Maylor Street, Parnell Place and the French Quarter at peak times 8:30am to 6:30pm Monday to Saturdays. But I’m afraid I’m firmly in the “reduce city centre vehicular traffic” camp. 🙂



      As for the bars, I previously noted Joe O’Donovan’s purchase of the YCMS premises at Paradise Place, he purchased the facility in late 2004 for €2.2m through Dominic Daly Auctioneers on a guide of €975,000. The 8,000sq ft has great potential for nightclub use and may compliment plans of his concerning Oliver Plunkett Street/Grand Parade/St. Patrick’s Street.

      Meanwhile, The Classic is still doing the legal rounds!

    • #758696
      lexington
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      …It is widely speculated that Mr. Montgomery, in conjunction with another prominent city-based developer, has had some involvement with this Horgan’s Quay plot. CIE had been most reluctant to allow the development of such a facility on its lands historically, it was felt that land provision (requested by CCC) would eat into the potential it sought to gain from its preferred development options – as envisioned with MPH. However, a resolution is assumed to be in the air, following the latest rounds of 3-way talks. A deal may yet see Mr. Montgomery engage with MPH in the delivery of an event centre here…


      According to media reports in local press today – further backing was put to the involvement of Paul Montgomery in developing a new event centre, in conjunction with Manor Park Homebuilders. I put note on that back in the LADSOCL thread. However, besides the OCP proposal for MahonPoint, there are 3 other active bids in the run for construction of a new event centre. More details will be brought to you on those – when I can, but given the sensitive nature of the proposals, it will all depend on timing.



      *UPDATES*

      😎 It is understood Oyster Developments are to be greenlit on their revised plans to develop a 7-storey office building at Deane Street – designed by The e-Project. The proposal design was subject to criticism by An Taisce, which representative Kevin Hurley noted as being devoid of any architectural distinction unlike its propsective neighbour across the road at CentrePoint on Clontraf Street which exhibit some architectural merit. The proposal will form Phase 1 of a 2 phase development which will include the incorporation of No.8 Parnell Place (a PS) already granted for renovation and change of use to retail office provision. Should no appeal follow, Mangerton Construction are could to be ready to move in on the site come early 2006. Permission was granted subject to the removal of the 2nd floor, revising the project floors to 6, from 7.

      [

      – meanwhile, David Crowe’s other interest at Blackrock Road (the former ESB substation site) for 7 x 2-bedroom apartments over 3 retail units (also designed by The e-Project) and which was subject to fierce objection (76 individual submissions including the likes of Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment Michael Martin) has received Further Information and revised plans for the proposal which is now due a decision on January 17th 2005.



      🙂 Howard Holdings have been greenlit for a 114sq m extension at 3rd floor to the norther elevation of their WebWorks development currently nearing construction at Albert Quay. Design is by Scott Tallon Walker with John Paul Construction as main contractors.

      For images see -> http://www.stw.ie/Projects/project.asp?id=189



      🙂 More good news for Howard Holdings as their proposal for Passage West was all cleared – CorkCoCo decided to grant their application for 16 no. duplex town houses, 16 no. apartments and 16 no. town houses at the grounds of the former Convent of Mercy, overlooking the Great Island Channel which leads from the Atlantic Pond to Cork Harbour proper. 66 parking spaces will also be provided as part of the development.



      😎 With the prospect of refusal at hand, John Keating’s proposal for the former Keating Bakery along the Tramore Road has been withdrawn. The plan had proposed construction of basement car park with a total of 60 spaces, 40 no. two bedroom apartments, four individual blocks comprising of 16 no. two bedroomed garden apartments, 16 no. three bedroomed duplex apartments. Colum P.Murphy & Co handled the proposal which was originally submitted for planning on the 23rd of June 2005.


    • #758697
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 The fast renewing suburb of Blackpool is now subject to yet another extensive new regenerative development – following extensive preplanning discussion, Mallow-based Rothbury Estates (linked to the the textile Reffond Group backed by businessman Martin Buckley) looks set to lodge plans with CCC for a massive €105m redevelopment scheme at the 4.34 acre former Sunbeam Factory site located between the Old Mallow Road to the east and Commons Road to the west.

      The mixed-use proposal will seek to realise a development encompassing a gross area of 64,761sq m – of which 19,297sq m will be occupied by 260 new residential apartment units broken down as follows: 37 x 1-bedroom, 197 x 2-bedroom and 26 x 3-bedroom units.

      The scheme will evolve over 3-blocks:
      Blocks 1, 2 and 3 will generally vary in heights of between 5 and 7-storeys with an 8th storey recess – however, Block 1 will also contain a feature tower rising to a height of 18-storeys making it one of Cork’s tallest buildings.

      Constituent of Block 1 – 77 apartments will be located on the lower-level of the block with 78 further units, all with balconies or roof-terrace provision, being catered for as part of the tower element. A large retail warehousing unit (2, 633sq m) and garden centre will be located a ground-floor level.

      Block 2 will home 56 additional apartment units over a further, though smaller retail warehousing unit of 1,813sq m.

      Meanwhile, Block 3 will include 49 apartment units over a convenience retail unit, leisure centre, play centre for children, creche and 3-storey cafe. Adjoining the block, a large 6-storey with 7th level setback office building will be provided – at 12,707sq m it will be among Cork’s largest prospective office provisions.

      The massive redevelopment scheme will be constructed over a dual-deck basement parking facility for 682 cars – further incorporated, a new riverside park will be provided along the River Bride (which will be subject to realignment) and a new vehicular and pedestrian bridge.

      The height of the buildings should come as no surprise given that the area has been designated in the Cork City Development Plan 2004 as being capable of handling taller structures to act as landmark figures to the Northern City Gateway – (as a matter of clarity is not the taller “high-rise” structure I referred to in the LADSOCL thread as being assessed for Blackpool all those many posts ago).

      The proposal, if successful, will solidify Blackpool’s fast emerging “destination” profile and add another significant boost to the area which has already benefit so well from the likes of development afforded by The Shipton Group at Blackpool Park and Shopping Centre. The Sunbeam Estate had been subject to a devastating fire back in 2003. Hope to have images up soon. Kinsale-based Richard Rainey & Associates are responsible for the design.


      The tragic fire which engulfed the Sunbeam Industrial Estate back in 2003



      *UPDATES*

      lexington wrote:
      🙂 Development possibilities are potentially ripe for the former Coca-Cola Bottling facility along the Carrigrohane “Straight” Road. Lisney are in the final stages of closing a deal on the 1.7 acre premises which is expected to ultimately sell at approx. &#8364]

      🙂 As posted on page 15 of this thread (Post #367) the Coca-Cola Bottling facility along the Carrigrohane “Straight” Road was sold via Lisney with a guide price of approx. €5m. The final sale figure is now believed to be in the region of €8m and was attained by Killarney-based David Crowe’s Oyster Developments (interestingly Mr. Crowe was also responsible for the purchase of the Coca-Cola facility in Killarney – just west of St. Patrick’s Church in the town centre – which he redeveloped as The Courtyard residential complex). The site is understood to be out for design tender with development plans expected to be lodged mid-2006. The opportunity exists for Oyster Developments to produce a significant landmark project which acts in a complimentary fashion to the area – with respect for not only Cork County Hall, but the prospect of a large new recreational park to the west along the Carrigrohane Road. Mr. Crowe had previously expressed the desire to develop a 16-storey tower at Deane Street – this was subsequently ruled out by CCC at prelanning stages – this new site acquisition however offers him with the opportunity to realise his earlier intentions, however, given the sensitive location of the site, eyes will be peeled on design standards employed with the new residential project.

    • #758698
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Yowzer! 😀 18 storeys eh…sounds like pretty big times still ahead for Blackpool. Great to see so much confidence being put in the area…maybe Joe gavin is right Blackpool could well be one of the best residential addresses in Cork come a few years, its amazing to see how development can progress and area. No poor effort either by the council in promoting it. now if we could just do the same for the docklands!!

      I dont like the Crows nest proposal in Victoria cross. It seems to bulky and ugly and unless something SERIOUS is done to change the design i don’t think it should be allowed a 15 storeys. Maybe 9 which would make it a nice counterbalance to Victoria mills the otherside of the junction and bring some sense of a pattern to building height here. A taller building could well be accomodated on the Coca cola site but the design will have to be something really really special and act as a proper landmark not another balcony ridden standard. Something special here please that acts as a proper landmark to the city from the west and respects County hall. The good thing about the Coca cola site is its L shape which could allow for a higher element to rise west to east on the south of the site and peak in the southeast corner before sloping down to the north allowing maintained views of County hall. And when i say slope I mean curves not edges!! :p

      Any pics of the Sunbeam thing lex?

    • #758699
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Oh wait sorry just saw the images soon thing. Whoops.

    • #758700
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      A taller building could well be accomodated on the Coca cola site but the design will have to be something really really special and act as a proper landmark not another balcony ridden standard. Something special here please that acts as a proper landmark to the city from the west and respects County hall. The good thing about the Coca cola site is its L shape which could allow for a higher element to rise west to east on the south of the site and peak in the southeast corner before sloping down to the north allowing maintained views of County hall. And when i say slope I mean curves not edges!! :p

      That’s my feeling too, the site should be utilised in this case to shape the building itself – an upwarded sloping west-to-east wing peaking in the southwest corner and then sloping downwards to the north allowing generally unobstrusive views to Cork County Hall when travelling east along the Carrigrohane Road from Ballincollig. It would be nice for a sleeker design here not riddled with balconies but smoothly curved elevations. Recreational provision may be allocated in communal grass roof-gardens or park landscaping around and atop of the building.

    • #758701
      rebel_city
      Participant

      Great Idea of having high rise at the gate ways to the city.I’m all about the impact and having high rise in Blackpool would be fantastic, especially at night coming down the Mallow Road. Likewise with the Coca-cola site. But at the same time, careful planning and thought out design has to be adhered to. No more Ballymun’s. These new highrise should stand the test of time.

    • #758702
      Pug
      Participant

      presuming it was built right, that would be an excellent use for the sunbeam site, about time Ireland went high rise, could really start making Cork stand out – love the idea of 12/15 storey buildings as the gates to the city

    • #758703
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Almost a year precisely has passed since Charles & Helen McCarthy lodged plans to redevelop their Mill Business Centre premises at Crosses Green with a controversial hotel designed by Derek Tynan & Associates (see image below)…

      …the 7-storey proposal of 96-bedrooms created much controversy given its height and proximity to St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral with concerns raised over the damaging effect it would bestow on the Southern Channel vista enjoyed from Sullivans Quay looking west. The plan was ultmately granted subject to a 2-storey reduction and revised bedroom number of 63. Now, a revised plan is to be lodged after assessment of the hotel market in Cork and with respect to viability issues given the permitted developments reduced bedroom numbers. It is understoof Derek Tynan & Associates have been retained to design a new scheme which will see the redevelopment of the Mill Business Centre as a new part 3-storey, part 5-storey open plan office building with river fronting amenity space all over basement parking for 15 spaces.

    • #758704
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Now, a revised plan is to be lodged after assessment of the hotel market in Cork and with respect to viability issues given the permitted developments reduced bedroom numbers. It is understoof Derek Tynan & Associates have been retained to design a new scheme which will see the redevelopment of the Mill Business Centre as a new part 3-storey, part 5-storey open plan office building with river fronting amenity space all over basement parking for 15 spaces.

      Hopefully, by ‘revised’, they mean ‘redesigned from scratch’. That’s a dull, unimaginative design in any context, but in such a sensitive location, it’s completely out of place.

      (And I’m not just saying that because it’s across the road from my home! 😀 )

    • #758705
      kite
      Participant

      If the rumour mill is correct then one of Cork’s MOST senior planning officials has been banished to some backwater Dept. called Community and Parks or something.
      Disgraceful if true. This guy was one of only a few that supported high rise buildings in Cork.
      Anyone with details ??

    • #758706
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      If the rumour mill is correct then one of Cork’s MOST senior planning officials has been banished to some backwater Dept. called Community and Parks or something.
      Disgraceful if true. This guy was one of only a few that supported high rise buildings in Cork.
      Anyone with details ??

      Ronnie???

    • #758707
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Ronnie???

      🙁 No, i heard it goes higher than him…one from the top!!

    • #758708
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      🙁 No, i heard it goes higher than him…one from the top!!

      J O’ D?

    • #758709
      kite
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      J O’ D?

      🙁 Yep, afraid so..confirmed in today’s IE.

    • #758710
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      😎 Frinailla are lodging plans with CorkCoCo for the development of 132 new homes at Castletreasure in Douglas. 44 3-bedroom homes, 10 4-bedroom homes and 1 5-bedroom homes are to be built alongside 77 apartments (11 x 1-bedroom, 60 x 2-bedroom and 6 x 3-bedroom) over 7 blocks ranging in height from 3 to 4-storeys.



      @bunch wrote:

      J O’ D?

      So I’ve heard – I think he is being moved to Community & Enterprise whilst Kevin Terry (City Engineer/Roads Dept) is being moved to Planning (feel free to correct me on that). I think Pat Ledwidge is taking over the Docklands Office from Dan Buggy.

      Mr. O’Donovan – along with City Manager Joe Gavin and planners like Ronnie McDowell, can be credited as being at the helm of the beginning of one of Cork’s most exciting development phases. Mr. O’Donovan helped clear such vital projects as Frinailla’s CitySquare proposal at Ladyswell to name but one example – and was instrumental in numerous other proposals that have helped Cork regenerate – often despite many realms of opposition. In part, he helped aid a revision of perceptions associated with Cork as a centre for investment by overseeing a planning department that was generally willing to work with developers, architects, planners and engineers to carve better standards of investment and working constructively to realise such proposals. I hope that Mr. Terry – and Mr. Ledwidge who takes office at the brink of substantial docklands redevelopment – can take their positions with a view to the long-term and embrace the years to come with open and thoughtful mindsets, as well as maintaining the demand for higher quality design and development compositions.

      I wish Mr. O’Donovan the best of success in his new department.

    • #758711
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      *UPDATES*

      Mr. O’Donovan – along with City Manager Joe Gavin and planners like Ronnie McDowell, can be credited as being at the helm of the beginning of one of Cork’s most exciting development phases. Mr. O’Donovan helped clear such vital projects as Frinailla’s CitySquare proposal at Ladyswell to name but one example – and was instrumental in numerous other proposals that have helped Cork regenerate – often despite many realms of opposition. In part, in helped aid a revision of perceptions associated with Cork as a centre for investment by overseeing a planning department that was generally willing to work with developers, architects, planners and engineers to carve better standards of investment and working constructively to realise such proposals. I hope that Mr. Terry – and Mr. Ledwidge who takes office at the brink of substantial docklands redevelopment – can take their positions with a view to the long-term and embrace the years to come with open and thoughtful mindsets, as well as maintaining the demand for higher quality design and development compositions.

      I wish Mr. O’Donovan the best of success in his new department.

      😎 And so say all of us.
      A measure of Jim O’Donovans professionalism,,,even CSD on their website homepage wish him well http://www.corksouthwest.com

    • #758712
      lexington
      Participant

      Before I begin this post, I must apologise for the size of the image posted – the image, originally .PNG format seemed to work fine when I received it, but after converting it to .JPG, when I enlarged it, the image blurred terribly, so I reduced the size again – however the blur remained(???) I tried converting it back to its original format but the blur has not changed. I will try scanning the image again soon, but for now…

      …this is a perspective of Precinct Investments redevelopment plans for St. Patrick’s Quay and the Metropole Hotel, designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects. The proposal seeks to construct a new mixed-use development which will include the demolition of the much loathed St. Patrick’s Quay extension to the Metropole Hotel fronting St. Patrick’s Quay, the demolition will also include the removal of the recently added leisure centre. 61 residential units, 5 retail units, 87 basement car-parking spaces (over 4 split levels) and a 3556sq m extension to the hotel. In place of the aging extension, a 7-storey block is now proposed which will include conferencing facilities and 44 new bedrooms overhead – as part of additional developmet on the quay, 3 retail units with 34 overhead apartments divided between 2 blocks (5 & 6-storeys with 2-set back levels) including 10 x 1-bedroom units, 19 x 2-bedroom units and 5 x 3-bedroom units. The attractive red-brick building on the corner of Harley Street and St. Patrick’s Quay will be restored and converted to a live/work unit with commercial use at street-level and residential overhead. Fronting Harley Street, 2 retail units are to be provided with 15 overhead apartments in blocks of 4 & 6 storeys with 3-set back storeys – here 4 x 1-bedroom & 11 x 2-bedroom units will be provided. From Harley Street access will also be provided to a courtyard – to this, 1 block rising to 12-storeys over basement will provide an additional 11 x 2-bedroom and 1 x 3-bedroom units. The entire site encompasses 0.2732 hectares and includes the area occupied by the existing Metropole Hotel bounded by Harley Street, St. Patrick’s Quay, MacCurtain Street and the Everyman Palace. An extensive refurbishment of the existing hotel fronting MacCurtain Street (a PS) will also be enacted.

      The 12-storey tower element, finished with red-brick materials, according to the architects is intended to act as a landmark/gate-way device in light of the prospective Harley Street Bridge proposed to link Merchants Quay and St. Patrick’s Quay. South across the river, the possibility of a facelifted facade at Merchants Quay is doing the rounds at the rumour mill.



      🙂 Joe Gavin, Cork City Manager, has according to a local press publication – confirmed news posted here on this Archiseek.com thread first – that investor Joe O’Donovan has been in active discussion with CCC about the redevelopment of his recently acquired properties at Grand Parade, Market Lane and Patrick’s Street (and possibly Oliver Plunkett Street) for use as a major multi-level higher order retail facility.

      Related posts may be found here:
      1. https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=39356&postcount=475
      2. https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=41409&postcount=835
      3. https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=43573&postcount=1128

      (P.S. If anyone has a copy of the article – I understand, in the Evening Echo – I would be greatly appreciative if they could post it up here. Thank you in advance! 😉 )

    • #758713
      POM
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Its difficult to comment on the design given the picture quality but even so the basic form is conveyed and all I can say is it is a fine example of lazy architecture. There is no fixed form to the new block with numerous disproportionate layers that would seem to be trying to break up bulk but in fact simply leave a dishevled unequal and messy composition. The elevations seem bland with no distinctive attributes other than the occasional window. Finishes seem equally bland and no more is this evident than in the tower element which exhibits utterly no distinct signature about it and amounts to nothing more than a highlighted symbol of all that is wrong with the rest of the proposal. According to the above post, the architects claim the tower acts as a gateway? Its position lost behind the remaining bulk does not lend itself to such status. If this were to act as a gateway, surely its position would front the quayside facing the bridge? Of course the period structure on the street corner prevents such an objective being achieved. Furthermore the tower exhibits excessively vacant elevations with no character or distinctive form and its attempt to compliment the existing hotel’s McCurtin Street elevation with red brick finishings is a wishy washy affair. The river frontage seems underutilised. What appears to be panel glazing on the quayside elevation is insufficient in my view. The proposal will need significant redesign to convince me.

    • #758714
      lexington
      Participant

      Here’s just an image of the quay as it exits (although a little out of date!) – the Metropole building (set to be demolished as part of the Precinct plan can be seen to the right, a predominantly ‘grey’ 6-storey structure (since repainted bright lemon). The quayside is immensely imbalanced in terms of its structures and also in terms of development – given its proximity to St. Patrick’s Street, the Horgan’s Quay redevelopment and emerging office quarter – the quayside is ripe for renewal. As it exists, the poor mix and variation of structures (like the single to 2-storey industrial facade fronts that hide larger vacant spaces – currently acting as level public car-parks) allow for unisghtly views from Merchants Quay, Andersons Quay, Parnell Place and Patrick’s Street to the grey and rather drab rear elevations of older buildings fronting MacCurtain Street. In this context, the Metropole development should be considered empircally with a view to the quay’s broader redevelopment (with the PJ O’Hea premises, Everyman Palace & quayside car-parks all prime redevelopment targets).

      I can make a larger image of the Metropole development available – but as I said in the earlier post, it is still very blurry par the problems I outlined.

    • #758715
      A-ha
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      There is no fixed form to the new block with numerous disproportionate layers that would seem to be trying to break up bulk but in fact simply leave a dishevled unequal and messy composition. The elevations seem bland with no distinctive attributes other than the occasional window.

      I couldn’t have put it better myself. Not a fan of the building at all. Too higgildy-piggildy for my liking.

    • #758716
      Pepsi
      Participant

      Is that a restaurant I see going on top of Cork County Hall?

    • #758717
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pepsi wrote:

      Is that a restaurant I see going on top of Cork County Hall?

      No – although that would be nice. There was talk of it at one stage but it is not to designated as a ‘Hospitality Suite’ by Cork County Council. So all the visiting politicians and initiative launches and so on now have a venue with a spectacular view. So if you’re a visiting royal you’re sorted! 😉

    • #758718
      bosco
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      On a final note anyone notice all of a sudden there is a lot pubs opening up again

        The Classic is reopening with a night club upstairs on south main st
        Nearby on south main st another nightclub is due to open next year where the old scouts hall was
        The guys that own the East Village in douglas are opening a bar called SOHO on Grand Parade where Doyles was at one stage
        A new bar also looks like it will replace Lebowskis on Marlborough St with construction underway at present

      I have to disagree with you there. There are a few new bars opening. But for every poncey new bar that opens in the city centre, we have lost a few pure gems of pubs in the city, suburbs and county.

      (To clarify, in my opinion at least – bar = stainless steel, chrome finish, UV lighting, uncomfortable faux-leather seating, complete absence of atmosphere. Pub = public house – nice place to relax, have a pint and read the paper or chat idly. The difference is significant!)

    • #758719
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      No – although that would be nice. There was talk of it at one stage but it is not to designated as a ‘Hospitality Suite’ by Cork County Council. So all the visiting politicians and initiative launches and so on now have a venue with a spectacular view. So if you’re a visiting royal you’re sorted! ]

      Thats a pity, i thought it was to be a public bar and resturant as well.

    • #758720
      A-ha
      Participant

      It would be a great idea. You could have an expensive meal and take in the view over the city of all the lights. I imagine it would be popular among tourists as well as locals. Maybe something like that is planned for Eglington St. It would certainly be a good idea.

      Oh, and really, can we change the title of the thread to something that includes capital letters, like “Developments in Cork”. Sorry for sounding like a weirdo, but it really annoys me.

    • #758721
      kite
      Participant

      😮 Newspaper reports that Dublin is considering a Manhattan style development in the docklands area really annoys me.
      Cork’s Docklands are ripe for this type of development, the City Manager and his team (Jim O’Donovan will be sorely missed) are pushing (dragging) the see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil dinosaurs that we have as City Councilors to the start line for years, but as is the case with CIE (event centre, ect) the cozy club of councilors do not want to step on toes or rock the boat. At this rate Cork will be the 4th or 5th city in Ireland in 5 years time.
      On a related point, does anybody know what the outcome of the CHQ site High Court case as reported in the IE some weeks ago was? This site would be crucial to any redevelopment of Corks Docklands.

    • #758722
      lexington
      Participant

      Just to update on the situation, recent info from a well attached source regarding the project’s redevelopment has stated that an application could be ready to go in 2006 – however for now, a number of issues were still going through the mill. Issues highlighted were the on-going discussions between Manor Park Homebuilders and CCC over a number of topics – not least a continued push for a stronger retail/commercial element and building heights. The commencement of a ‘Stakeholders Forum’ is seen an important point of discussion and the developers will be anxious to finalise agreement with the Port of Cork regarding Horgan’s Quay encroachment. As part of the development, MPH are hoping to push the site line south onto the quays to allow for better waterfrontage with the proposed new blocks and the provision of a quay length promenade and boardwalk facility with possible marina. They wish is to finalise these details early in the New Year and recent moves by the Port of Cork commence a phased relocation to Ringaskiddy are seen a positive move on all fronts. As for progress on building heights, in situ with the North Docklands Local Area Plan 2005 – MPH and OMP said that at least 2 with a possible 3rd high-rise element will be included – though not specified where, it is believed they will conform to locations set out by CCC at Horgan’s Square, the Water Street/Horgan’s Quay corner and a location further west along the quay. MPH had requested an allowance of building heights to range from 4 to 14 storeys, however this was rejected by City Manager Joe Gavin on the basis that extensive high-rise patterns along the site would ruin visual perspectives from the south of the attractive Northern Ridge. The source indicated that generally building heights would front at 7-storeys along the quay-front with heights recessing to the rear. A landmark element at Horgan’s Square would rise between 10 and 14-storeys although this height was yet to finalised and may likely compose of a hotel element. Also indicated, confirmation that alternate avenues were being discussed regarding an event centre – which may include a deal between MPH and Paul Montgomery. While those details were being devised, work would push on the other aspects of the development. The source did indicate that the timing of the application was all subject to the outcome of discussions, but MPH were committed to the quayside’s long-term redevelopment and were ideally hoping to have the first application in planning for late Spring of 2006. As said, this timeframe could adjust in light of discussion outcomes. The source said they expected planning to take at least a year and if successful would commence almost immediately on site by Summer/Autumn of 2007. No indication was made regarding CIE’s promise to have a redeveloped rail terminal in place by 2007 at Kent other than that the 2 sides were working closely together and that the new facility should be operational in tandem with the opening of the new Cork-Midelton commuter rail line (this is set for 2009).



      @A-ha wrote:

      Oh, and really, can we change the title of the thread to something that includes capital letters, like “Developments in Cork”. Sorry for sounding like a weirdo, but it really annoys me.

      I sent a message to Paul Clerkin about it – I know its a small thing, but it would be nice. Haven’t heard anything back. May be you’ll have more luck if you ask nicely. 😀

    • #758723
      A-ha
      Participant

      I just wrote to him and gave him a piece of my mind! Just joking. Asked him and am now waiting a reply. I hope they build a decent event centre, not some make shift thingy with 1000 seats. Just as a matter of interest, how many people can the Opera House hold? I think the KT Tunstall concert was in there a few months back. And why did they build that event centre or whatever it is in Mitchelstown? It’s miles away…. it’s almost easier to go to Killarney!

    • #758724
      lexington
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😮 Newspaper reports that Dublin is considering a Manhattan style development in the docklands area really annoys me.
      Cork’s Docklands are ripe for this type of development, the City Manager and his team (Jim O’Donovan will be sorely missed) are pushing (dragging) the see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil dinosaurs that we have as City Councilors to the start line for years, but as is the case with CIE (event centre, ect) the cozy club of councilors do not want to step on toes or rock the boat. At this rate Cork will be the 4th or 5th city in Ireland in 5 years time.
      On a related point, does anybody know what the outcome of the CHQ site High Court case as reported in the IE some weeks ago was? This site would be crucial to any redevelopment of Corks Docklands.

      Re: “Manhattan Style” development– I agree that Cork should avail of further high-rise provisions, however this must be done so with careful consideration and in the right locations. For example, the gateway locations east, north, south and west – and the south docklands. I believe highrise provision along the northern quays should generally be restrained with maximum building heights touching on 7-storeys (7 w/ 2 recessed levels in the case of Water Street) with no more than 3 (possibly 4) slender profile landmark towers in areas like Water Street, Horgan’s/Kent Square and an additional location further east – this is so perspectives of the charming Northern Ridge are minimally impacted (see below):


      View of Northern Ridge with Horgan’s Quay in view north of the river – image copyright of Devin

      To the south docklands, there is greater scope for such provision – but again slender profile is the key. Also, in developing such high-profile buildings, it would be my view that concentration and superior design quality is paramount. This means innvoation – not Praia de Rocha replicas. It means defining a character distinct to the city and region with taste and creating structures that justify themselves in the long-run on grounds of structural ingenuity, form and first-class exploration in design standards. However, that said, I do not believe a ‘Manhattan’ scenario is realistic or desireable – when I say concentration, I mean relative proximity of about 6 or maybe 7 key feature towers in the south docklands area, not a jungle of balcony-ridden, bare-faced tower structures. Cork should be confident enough to define its own high-rise character and not ‘follow the pack’. It should set the standards and not follow them.

      Re: Event Centre – as I refered to in earlier posts, progress is being made. Trust me that results will start showing sooner rather than later in the new year. The fact is, the heat is on and of developers are to successful in exploiting this market opportunity they know they need to be in there first and with the best proposal (financially, use-wise and design-wise) to convince the public and CCC over. Whatever about Horgan’s Quay – I personally believe the Munster Agricultural Showgrounds offers the best location for such a centre logistically, although ideally, of course, Horgan’s Quay would be an attractive location. Regarding the MAS, 3 solid proposals are in the making – with Howard Holdings having indicated a willingness to develop such a centre as part of their wider masterplan redevelopment of the Ford site and possibly Tedcastles and MAS sites]Custom House Quay[/I], no news yet concerning the long-running Ochre Ridge fiasco. The CHQ site is superb location wise – however it is a very difficult site to work with. Its acquisitionn will undoubtedly be a trophy for any prospective developer (I have hinted at a possible involvement here in the past, but heard little since) but an expensive one.

      A number of issues arise with this site. First, the Port of Cork HQ at Custom House, will quite feasibly remain in the possession of the PoC – the structure is protected and so too is the Cork Bonded Warehouse offices to its rear and Port of Cork warehousing running centre along the quay – their retention is not up for discussion.


      Rear of Custom House, Cork Bonded Warehousing office and Port of Cork warehousing (under lease to CBW) can be seen in this east-to-west persepctive.

      Furthermore, Custom House Quay and Anderson’s Quay (to a lesser extent) possess some beautiful cobbled stonework which pave the quaysides. Understandly, during any construction they will have to be removed, but their reinstation would be very much required.


      Cobbled stonework on Custom House Quay (first image) and Anderson’s Quay (second image).

      The renovation and conversion of the protected warehousing structures is warranted in any redevelopment, with perhaps the installation of sequenced glass skylights installed at roof-top level to allow an available source of natural light access the interior holds.

      The only available area particularly suited to mass redevelopment is the unkempt Cork Bonded Warehouses extension to the far east.


      The CBW extension is clearly defined on the eastern head of the site as distinct from the PoC warehousing.


      Aerial view of CHQ – note the variation in warehousing.

      The CBW extension could well be demolished with the remaining site area to the eastern head allocated for development. A number of factors emerge here – 1st: the site prominence, 2nd: the relationship of any new development to the PoC warehousing and 3rd: the type of development justified with respect to land values and viability issues.

      The value of the land (est’d at between €6.75m and €8.5m – which is quite reasonable given the site constraints) would perhaps dictate a taller structure. The problem here is that any taller structure would have to be of some pretty amazing design to justify its provision. The site prominence and relationship to PS all come into play here. Often the first viewpoint of Cork city centre island for visitors, the design of any new build will have to be of true, international landmark status – no ifs or buts. A waterbus docking or marina facility could perhaps be provided in some small part at the site tip – however river dimensions may complicate this. A boardwalk and docking pontoon could be provided off the cobbled quayside and clearly any parking associated with a redevelopment will have to be off-site.

    • #758725
      kite
      Participant


      Cobbled stonework on Custom House Quay (first image) and Anderson’s Quay (second image).

      The value of the land (est’d at between €6.75m and €8.5m – which is quite reasonable given the site constraints) would perhaps dictate a taller structure. The problem here is that any taller structure would have to be of some pretty amazing design to justify its provision. The site prominence and relationship to PS all come into play here. Often the first viewpoint of Cork city centre island for visitors, the design of any new build will have to be of true, international landmark status – no ifs or buts. A waterbus docking or marina facility could perhaps be provided in some small part at the site tip – however river dimensions may complicate this. A boardwalk and docking pontoon could be provided off the cobbled quayside and clearly any parking associated with a redevelopment will have to be off-site.[/QUOTE]

      😡 Whoever is responsible for this site, in this state should be in Jail.. there is no justification for this site, or the CIE site oppsite to be the SLUM looking gateway to Cork City

    • #758726
      Pug
      Participant

      any word on our OPW / Revenue friends and the blackpool site that seems to have beaten the pack? surely the Kenny or Goldcrop site would be more accessible to train station, Kenny site being literally around the corner and goldcrop site would have been so accessible if a footbridge ever goes from docklands to horgans quay? – having said that, the assumption raod site isnt miles away either.

    • #758727
      securityman
      Participant

      @bosco wrote:

      I have to disagree with you there. There are a few new bars opening. But for every poncey new bar that opens in the city centre, we have lost a few pure gems of pubs in the city, suburbs and county.

      (To clarify, in my opinion at least – bar = stainless steel, chrome finish, UV lighting, uncomfortable faux-leather seating, complete absence of atmosphere. Pub = public house – nice place to relax, have a pint and read the paper or chat idly. The difference is significant!)

      If a pub was doing any decent trade it wouldnt be closed in the first place unless the property was on valuable land. I think that more new bars in the city are good for tourism cos many of our european friends are used to modern bars and not public houses where the place is black with the dirt and the same guys sitting at the bar no matter what time you go in there. As for atmosphere go into any of these new bars and there is plenty of atmosphere and no grim faces to be seen.

    • #758728
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Regarding the St.Patrick’s Quay development at the metropole site, I have top say it really leaves me cold. Its far to busy and bulky. The ‘landmark’ tower is certainly not of landmark status and the rest of the quayfront is hopelessly bland and overbearing- it strikes me as something that may have actually looked half decent before various blocks were added to create this bulky look. Surely it hasn’t a hope of getting planning in this form.



      The Freeland Group (any details??) has sought to demolish 59-63 Dublin Street in Blackpool, adjacent to Blackpool Shopping Centre and replace it with a 2 storey financial serviced usage. The floor area of the developments is 701 sqm set out in three individual units.
      This begins the free-for-all demolition of dublin street (a 19th century residential streetscape) which was started by the decision of CCC to allow Blackpool Developments to demolish 45/46 Dublin Street in order to replace a fine residential building- part of a distint and important streetscape with a childcare facility.
      This brings up a larger issue which i’ve touched on before: nobody can deny that Blackpool SC/RP has been a welcome addition to the area. But, one most obvious downside of this (or perhaps it is unrelated) is that Thomas Davis Street no looks like a tip- with a huge numebr of derelict, vacant sites and Dublin Street is under severe pressure and is clearly being eyed up for demolition (see above). I would have expected CCC to try to protect the heart of Blackpool village while facilitating a new ‘town sentre developement’ (I hate that term) on the polefield. Any views?

    • #758729
      James Furlong
      Participant

      Hello all. I will shortly be seeking to appoint an architect for a small site of mine in the city area. From what I have seen of this place it seems like a good place to ask some professional opinion as you all seem so well informed. Any recommendations for a good architect and planner for a medium infill building design. I would like to think that we can provide an imaginative design to the site and would be thankful for any opinions.

      James Furlong

    • #758730
      Leesider
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      any word on our OPW / Revenue friends and the blackpool site that seems to have beaten the pack? surely the Kenny or Goldcrop site would be more accessible to train station, Kenny site being literally around the corner and goldcrop site would have been so accessible if a footbridge ever goes from docklands to horgans quay? – having said that, the assumption raod site isnt miles away either.

      should be a rail link from kilbarry to the city centre so this also probably brought the area into consideration.

      I have a question regarding the Fermoy bypass, passed by it today and they have the concrete dividers between each carraigeway such as they have on the Cashel bypass. Does this mean it isn’t going to be motorway?? Also I have seen the wire dividers have been put up on the Watergrasshill bypass, does this mean it is going to be upgraded to motorway? It is the exact same standard now as the motorway from Portlaoise to Naas. Either CCC or the NRA seem to have a fear of motorways in Cork!!!

    • #758731
      phatman
      Participant

      Concrete dividers don’t mean its not going to be motorway standard, if anything they mean it will be.
      And for the record, it is going to be motorway standard. Those wire dividers were adopted by the NRA for a while, but i think they’re being phased out, due to safety reasons – not as robust as metal or concrete ones, and motorcyclists were also complaining theire safety was being jeopardised, how im not exactly sure…

    • #758732
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @phatman wrote:

      Concrete dividers don’t mean its not going to be motorway standard, if anything they mean it will be.
      And for the record, it is going to be motorway standard. Those wire dividers were adopted by the NRA for a while, but i think they’re being phased out, due to safety reasons – not as robust as metal or concrete ones, and motorcyclists were also complaining theire safety was being jeopardised, how im not exactly sure…

      Have you ever seen a cheesecutter (wires) in action….soft body – high speed into wires?

    • #758733
      pier39
      Participant

      @James Furlong wrote:

      Hello all. I will shortly be seeking to appoint an architect for a small site of mine in the city area. From what I have seen of this place it seems like a good place to ask some professional opinion as you all seem so well informed. Any recommendations for a good architect and planner for a medium infill building design. I would like to think that we can provide an imaginative design to the site and would be thankful for any opinions.

      James Furlong

      thats kinda broad. what are you looking at residential office pub. what you mean by good architect?? shouldnt you be asking what you want to achieve and then find an architect best suited? as for planners theres mcutcheon mulcahy, brady shipman, rps and…cant think of any other ones with cork operations…sorry, think thats it. the old age is kickin in!!

    • #758734
      corkdood
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 😮 CCC in conjunction with Fleming Construction and Coleman Bros. Developments have made public notice of their intent to develop 405 new homes (287 social/affordable and 118 private) on the 24.5-acre lands at Shanakiel (former Convent/Hospital Grounds). The development will consist of 8 4-bedroom dwellings, 195 3-bedroom terraced houses, 16 3-bedroom duplexes, 16 ground floor 2-bedroom apartments – under the affordable category. With 1 2-storey 5 bedroom detached house, 4 4-bedroom houses, 6 3-bedroom, 36 3-bedroom terrace/semi-detached, 5 2-bedroom bungalows and 66 apartments over 10 2-storey blocks in the private element.

      Lexington, Just digging up an old post of yours from earlier on this year. Has planning permission been given for this development including the private aspect?

    • #758735
      lexington
      Participant

      @corkdood wrote:

      Lexington, Just digging up an old post of yours from earlier on this year. Has planning permission been given for this development including the private aspect?

      Yes – the project was cleared by CCC for a proportionately reduced scheme – I think approx. 360 units, clumsily I don’t have the exact figure to hand – but I believe construction should be ready for 2006.

    • #758736
      lexington
      Participant

      (Ref: C:A&D thread [“developments in cork”] Post #: 553)

      @lexington wrote:

      An application for a redevelopment of the Muskerry Service Station, a prominent 0.6acre site along the Western Road (next to UCC and a substantial redevelopment by OCP of the former Jurys Doyle Hotel lands) which sold earlier this year through CBRE Gunne from vendors Esso Ireland for a figure in excess of €8m – is believed to be not far off. The service station, which was due to close this October, is now not expected to seize operations until a later date, supposedly late December 2005. Assessments are being carried out on the site with a planning application speculated to follow in the not too distant future.

      The Muskerry Service Station along the Western Road – a hop west across the river from the former Jurys Doyle site currently being redeveloped by OCP – has shut its doors and a fence has been erected around the 0.6 acre site. The site was disposed of through agents CBRE Gunne as part of ExxonMobil (Esso) plans to focus on its core Irish markets – which centre around the Dublin city region. The site was understood to have changed hands for a figure in excess of €8m (equating roughly to a value of €13m per acre). The site was sold to a developer understood to be seeking the realisation of a predominantly residential project over basement. The building could well reach to 6-storeys (taking the nearby Jurys as a benchmark) and include a waterfront amenity provision around the river facing parameter of the site – however these details are purely speculative for the time being. An application, originally slated for December – is expected in the not too distant future.



      😎 And just as a point of interest for anyone in the area, one of the 2 commercial units available at BrideView Developments recently completed development, Unity House on the site of the former McCarthy family’s Unity Garage between Alfred Street and the Lower Glanmire Road – is destined to be yet another Subway Sandwich Bar. Another franchised unit exists east along MacCurtain Street. This will give the operation bookends.


      Unity House

    • #758737
      corkdood
      Participant

      Thank you Lex – reliable as always.

    • #758738
      A-ha
      Participant

      Aer Lingus announced over the week-end that they are to begin new services to Berlin, Tenerife and Birmingham direct from Cork from June 2006. Over the last few months, the airline has increased flights on it’s London Heathrow and Paris CDG routes from Cork and began new services to Munich, Nice and Warsaw.

    • #758739
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      that unity house development on alfred st/lwr glanmire road is awful –

      considering its location in relation to patrick’s church, the prominent position on what will become the primary link to the north docks/horgans quay, its visual importance and the opportunity of the site its a real disappointment – cheap materials, no apparent design philosophy, no response to the opportunity that the site presents.

      has anyone seen it in the flesh -its fairly substandard – does anyone know – was there an architect involved?

    • #758740
      Leesider
      Participant

      was just checking out google earth, would love to see an updated image of Cork and perhaps for it to cover a wider area, it just misses my house! Not sure what year the photo was taken but the amount of development that has taken place since has been huge. In the image the Ballincollig bypass is just being built, the shopping centre hasn’t been started, the new terminal at the airport hasn’t been started, the site opposite he Blackpool shopping centre is still wasteland, mahon point is only started, Wilton shopping centre is expanding, alot of other things I am sure other people could point out………oh yeah pana makeover has just started! Definitely a tool that’s worth checking out!!

    • #758741
      Pug
      Participant
      bunch wrote:
      that unity house development on alfred st/lwr glanmire road is awful –

      QUOTE]

      beats the decrepit garage that was sitting there rotting though!

    • #758742
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      that unity house development on alfred st/lwr glanmire road is awful –

      considering its location in relation to patrick’s church, the prominent position on what will become the primary link to the north docks/horgans quay, its visual importance and the opportunity of the site its a real disappointment – cheap materials, no apparent design philosophy, no response to the opportunity that the site presents.

      has anyone seen it in the flesh -its fairly substandard – does anyone know – was there an architect involved?

      I think that it was done by an engineer the name does’nt spring to mind but the firm was mentioned in the property section of the Irish Examiner about 4 weeks ago.
      St.Patricks house next door has planning for a further 2 storeys of offices / apartments which may happen soon which
      may help this important and until recently neglected area of the city.

      Its better than what was there but another Subway outlet going in there won’t do it any favours.

    • #758743
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      it is better than what was there but in my opinion when we describe or assess the quality/standard of a new building and end up saying “sure it beats what was there before” – it speaks volumes about what it has been replaced with. i’m not been smart but is that what we should be aiming for ?

    • #758744
      POM
      Participant

      I agree with bunch. I don’t dislike Unity House…however this site along with Clyde House on Brian Boru street offer what are essentially gateway sites to what will be a huge renewal scheme along the northern docks. As such the sites, in signifying the entrance to this new quarter, be utilised to offer effective statements. Unity House is fine and all, heck it could have been so much worse, but no, this is not the standard we should be aiming for and if this reflects the bar to which we can expect the rest of the north docks to follow then I’ll ask for the bill a little earlier than I’d rather. Unity House does not offer the statement it should given its prominent location, however in fairness to the engineers and developers involved it does respect established heights along its adjoining block and perhaps it will offer a structure increase as the blocks to its rear lay over to redevelopment. It also does not overly impact the nearby church which is a considerable commendment.

    • #758745
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      that unity house development on alfred st/lwr glanmire road is awful –

      I have to totally disagree with you Bunch! I think its one of the best designed developments in recent years. Its sleak, its smooth, doesn’t have an overbearing presence on St. Patrick’s Church, and fits the site snuggly and is respectful of the buildings adjacent to it.
      I really like this building! Surely I cant be the only one!! Am I?
      The subway outlet though, we could do without.

      Developer was Brideview Developments Ltd. and the architect, I believe, was Denis O’Sullivan.

    • #758746
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😎 And just as a point of interest for anyone in the area, one of the 2 commercial units available at BrideView Developments recently completed development, Unity House on the site of the former McCarthy family’s Unity Garage between Alfred Street and the Lower Glanmire Road – is destined to be yet another Subway Sandwich Bar. Another franchised unit exists east along MacCurtain Street. This will give the operation bookends.


      Unity House

      Actually, now that you post the picture, it reminded me – I was passing Unity House a couple of days ago and the red brickwork is actually quite attractive, there’s a great variation in the colour of the bricks giving a far more textured look than you’d normally expect to see. (I don’t know if this will fade over time or not).

    • #758747
      theblimp
      Participant

      Hi & Seasons Greetings! :p

      I noted with interest that the For Sale signs have gone up on that circa 130 acre parcel of land off the Ballincollig By-Pass. I know it was zoned leisure/recreational so has anyone got an insight into who’s now got it, and what they hope to do with it. I’d be rather peeved to learn that they plan to just sit on it for years and wait for a residential re-zoning

    • #758748
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Frinailla have been granted planning following appeal for their Springmount development in Glanmire, designed by Kiosk Architects. Originally lodged as an application for 65 duplex (40) and apartment (25) units, following revisions, the scheme was reduced to 49 units of which only 47 were granted by CorkCoCo. The scheme for the steep sloping 1.2 hectare site (which was sold through Global Properties for a price estimated at around €4m) was appealed by the Ballincrossig Residents Association. In his report, ABP Planning Inspector David Dunne noted, “Kiosk Architects have not taken the easy option of designing a standard and bland apartment scheme but have put considerable effort and skill into designing a development of merit on a challenging site.” A grant was afforded with respect to the revised proposal submitted during Further Information with CorkCoCo.



      😎 Midelton Town Council have appealed CorkCoCo’s decision to grant a project by BrideView Developments at the former Lakeview Estate at Castleredmond in Midelton. The estate, purchased through Cohalan Downing Associates for an estimated €19m by Declan O’Mahony’s development business, was the subject of a proposal for 429 residential units designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects (328 apartments across a single building ranging in heights of up to 5-storeys and 101 houses). The project, which also included a number of amenity elements, was permitted subject to a number of reduction inducing conditions – these of which have been also appealed by BrideView Developments on a First Party Basis.



      😎 University College Cork are to lodge plans to develop a 4390sq m, 4-storey laboratory building along Dyke Parade as part of the Tyndall Institute (former NMRC). The new building will link to to the existing Lee Maltings building (PS) via a glazed atrium street.

      – meanwhile, further west along the Mardyke Parade, UCC have been refused by ABP (despite the Planning Inspector’s recommendation) to develop a new 2-storey outreach centre (some 12,000sq ft) designed by Jack Coughlan & Associates. The building would include lecture theatres, a resource centre and cafe – with landscaped access to the new Mardyke Pedestrian Bridge (part of the “Banks of the Lee” project).


      Tyndall Institute

    • #758749
      lexington
      Participant

      Formally launched in May 22th 2002 – the UCC Biosciences Building, designed by Murray O’Laoire Achitects is scheduled for a 7-storey extension. The Biosciences Research Institute is a 6700 sq.m. building housing six post-graduate Bioscience Research departments drawn from all the Life-Science faculties at UCC, including Medicine, Anatomy, Food Science and Health, Biochemistry, & Biotechnology. UCC are seeking permission for an extension of 1505sq m over 7-floors. The additional floorspace will allow for a further laborartory and overhead office space to be provided.


      A view facing South of the Bioscience Building at UCC.

      The application comes following a further application for an extension to the Tyndall Institute along Dyke Parade and a refusal by ABP for the university’s proposal Outreach Centre along the Mardyke Fields.

    • #758750
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Any pre-Christmas surprises?? I thought OCP were suppose to be lodging Academy street at the start of this month. Planning office is closing today isnt it? Or is it tomorrow? Is it worth keeping our hopes up??

    • #758751
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      University College Cork are to lodge plans to develop a 4390sq m, 4-storey laboratory building along Dyke Parade as part of the Tyndall Institute (former NMRC). The new building will link to to the existing Lee Maltings building (PS) via a glazed atrium street.

      This follows the movement of Zoology department to new facilities in the cooperage buildings (PS) at Distillery Fields on the North Mall. This will be linked to the main campus via the ‘Banks of the Lee’ walkway and mardyke bridge…which I believe are due to open today!
      Mercy Hospital and UCC (joint owners) are currently working on an extensive site plan for the large Distillery Fields site which will see some very noticable and high quality architectural additions to the area.

      lexington wrote:
      meanwhile, further west along the Mardyke Parade, UCC have been refused by ABP (despite the Planning Inspector’s recommendation) to develop a new 2-storey outreach centre (some 12,000sq ft) designed by Jack Coughlan & Associates. The building would include lecture theatres, a resource centre and cafe – with landscaped access to the new Mardyke Pedestrian Bridge (part of the “Banks of the Lee” project).

      A very special building was required for this important site- unfortunately this just didnt cut the mustard!
      One amusing piece from the well written Inspector’s Report:
      “The question of access for retrieval of cricket balls is not a planning matter.”

    • #758752
      pier39
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Any pre-Christmas surprises?? I thought OCP were suppose to be lodging Academy street at the start of this month. Planning office is closing today isnt it? Or is it tomorrow? Is it worth keeping our hopes up??

      dont think theyre closed til tomorrow.

    • #758753
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Perhaps I’m missing something, but has anyone mentioned “The Atlas of Cork”?

      Its been largely written by the staff of the Geography Dept in UCC, and covers the development of Cork city from the Geology upwards. Its in the same format as The Atlas of Rural Ireland, and is comprehensive as hell. It even has a big colour picture of the Water Street development …

    • #758754
      lexington
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      Perhaps I’m missing something, but has anyone mentioned “The Atlas of Cork”?

      Received a present of it recently – very interesting stuff. Especially from a historical perspective.

    • #758755
      lexington
      Participant

    • #758756
      theblimp
      Participant

      … and many happy returns to you Lex, keep up the excellent work 😀

    • #758757
      A-ha
      Participant

      The city was jammers today, did everyone head off to the sales? Mahon Point was such an improvement for the NEXT sale than the one in Douglas. It was really packed, almost everything was gone by 7am. I hope everyone had a great Christmas and that they have a Happy New Year too.

    • #758758
      snoopdog
      Participant

      Hey everyone, sorry to change subjects but does anyone know what Mark Kelleher’s plan for bishopstown are? We have heard there was a new appeal for more apartments and town houses but i thought he was getting ready to build! His name + nice words aren’t exactly going together around here at the moment.By now, I think most people here are annoyed at the fact that he keeps coming back rather than actually objecting to what he’s doing, they’ve accepted that.I mean how many times is this?

    • #758759
      Leesider
      Participant

      Hope everyone had a good Christmas and that a prosperous new year is ahead!!

      Was driving down Washington St. the other night and 2 developments I have heard about a while back but which haven’t gone to construction phase yet, Mannix’s and the Kino, were brought to mind. Does anyone know when these are going ahead or even if they are going ahead??? Would do a lot for the street, just like the renovated courthouse adds that bit of class.

    • #758760
      anto
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      The city was jammers today, did everyone head off to the sales? Mahon Point was such an improvement for the NEXT sale than the one in Douglas. It was really packed, almost everything was gone by 7am. I hope everyone had a great Christmas and that they have a Happy New Year too.

      No wonder the “architecture” was dropped from the title of this thread!:D

    • #758761
      kite
      Participant

      @snoopdog wrote:

      Hey everyone, sorry to change subjects but does anyone know what Mark Kelleher’s plan for bishopstown are? We have heard there was a new appeal for more apartments and town houses but i thought he was getting ready to build! His name + nice words aren’t exactly going together around here at the moment.By now, I think most people here are annoyed at the fact that he keeps coming back rather than actually objecting to what he’s doing, they’ve accepted that.I mean how many times is this?

      😮 I feel than nobody knows what his plans are right now. He has so many applications in at the moment he must be confused himself.
      Speaking to some people that live in the area over the Christmas the local councilors should be thanking their lucky stars that they have 4 years to go before asking for votes out there again!!

    • #758762
      lexington
      Participant

      snoopdog – as for the Westend development, Mr. Kelleher is applying for a further provision on the development site consequent of reductions made during planning. The hope is to recoup some of the losses with redesigned and restructured elements.



      @anto wrote:

      No wonder the “architecture” was dropped from the title of this thread!:D

      A necessary comment anto?

    • #758763
      anto
      Participant

      suppose not. Happy New year!

    • #758764
      garret
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I just wrote to him and gave him a piece of my mind! Just joking. Asked him and am now waiting a reply. I hope they build a decent event centre, not some make shift thingy with 1000 seats. Just as a matter of interest, how many people can the Opera House hold? I think the KT Tunstall concert was in there a few months back. And why did they build that event centre or whatever it is in Mitchelstown? It’s miles away…. it’s almost easier to go to Killarney!

      What ever happened to the event/conference centre that was supposed to be built as the sweetner for Mahon Point???

    • #758765
      A-ha
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      No wonder the “architecture” was dropped from the title of this thread!:D

      I agree, it is no wonder. Also, since reading garrets last post I noticed that the title of the thread still hasn’t changed. Oh well, I think I’m after getting used to it by now. 😉

    • #758766
      kite
      Participant

      @garret wrote:

      What ever happened to the event/conference centre that was supposed to be built as the sweetner for Mahon Point???

      😮 My understanding of that is .. the GP councilor withdrew his objection to ABP with assurances that the event/conference centre would be built with all the traffic problems solved as well…. BUT ???

    • #758767
      pier39
      Participant

      any truth in the rumour some limerick developer is planning a pretty big development for the city in the new year?? i dont think theyve been active in cork before and dont have a name. some suggestions were chieftain or fordmount but i honestly dont know.

      oh yeah and a late happy christman/happy new year to everyone! 😀

    • #758768
      POM
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      any truth in the rumour some limerick developer is planning a pretty big development for the city in the new year?? i dont think theyve been active in cork before and dont have a name. some suggestions were chieftain or fordmount but i honestly dont know.

      oh yeah and a late happy christman/happy new year to everyone! 😀

      Robert Butler group???

    • #758769
      lexington
      Participant

      The New Year is upon us…

      …how does 2006 look? Well, in my opinion, pretty good as far as progress is concerned. Of course, it all depends on the variables…interest rates, income, planning etc. Cork is facing the New Year with a new Director of Planning Services and a heightened awareness of what it is that’s going on. I don’t think I need to recap the comings and goings of 2005 – I think the thread can be browsed through sufficiently for people to note all that themselves…and though some very positive progress was made, I see 2005 very much as a ‘foundational’ year for 2006, similar to how 2003 was for 2004. :p
      2006, it would seem, is lining up to be a very active one – and hopefully it will bring with it the better and the bolder… The development community, I believe, are waking up to the benefits and expectancies associated with design – some faster than others. At a national level, alliances like that of Edward Holdings and Douglas Wallace, for example, are exemplifying the importance of a good developer/design team relationship. Are we there yet? No…will 2006 help us get there? I hope so. Being perfectly aware of all the considerable variables that contribute to a ‘successful development’ – I continue to stress that good design should always be seen as an investment and not a restraint. Good design is increasingly demanded and expected by the masses as they’re awareness and recognition of architecture grows. The progress of this website is representative, in my view, not least of the contributions of its participants but also of growing public interest in the subject field. Of course issues of finance strongly dictate actions, even so, homes, workplaces, leisure facilities and so on are increasingly reflections of one’s lifestyle – and not simply the proverbial ‘roof over one’s head’ or ‘place to do business’ they once were; they are projections of a light in which one wishes to be seen – whether you are a homeowner, business, retailler, guest or whatever – and developers are slowly copping this…and if not, they need to be. Recent publications by the likes of Hamilton Osbourn King, Sherry FitzGerald and CBRE Gunne have all backed this mentality. The argument regarding perceptions of good architecture can ramble on ’til time tolls no more – the fact is, the new Ireland is demanding higher standards.

      Good architecture does not necessarily require ‘landmark’ buildings left, right and centre – the term ‘landmark’ is flaunted around far too casually these days – but it does require thoughtfulness, innovation, respect, foresight and identity.

      In 2006, developers have an opportunity to build on this new environment – the leading edge developers have recognised the demand and are acting on it, though their success will always be a matter for debate among the masses. Irrespective, the need to push higher is evident and steps made need to be encouraged and promoted – planning authorities and the public (market) are requesting more. Developers who associate themselves with good design are generally recognised, if not publicly – amongst their peers, partners and market reception. I would hope recognition of this continues to grow and see realisation in the coming year.

      So, in Cork, what is there to look forward to?

      Well… Eglinton Street is scheduled to commence construction within the early New Year, the highly anticipated Academy Street proposal is expected to see the Planning office within the coming weeks, a decision on Water Street is expected to be made in March, the Rothbury Estates application for Sunbeam will also do the rounds at Navigation House, construction on a new home for the Revenue Commissioners in Cork is expected to get go, an application for Anderson’s Quay and 16 Lavitts Quay, an outcome to the Crow’s Nest redevelopment proposal, the opening of Cork Airport’s new terminal, perhaps Manor Park Homebuilders and O’Mahony Pike Architects will lodge their first application on Horgan’s Quay in the not too distant future, later on in the year we could expect planning applications for Carrigrohane Road (Oyster Developments) and maybe the large retail plan for Grand Parade and surrounds, movement on Grand Parade Plaza, an application on Albert Quay, an outcome to the Precinct Investments plan at the Metropole, work getting a right move on Cornmarket Street, work continuing at Lancaster Quay, a city centre and a docklands surprise or two(!), movement on Victoria and Dennehy’s Crosses, a suburban retail/mixed-use initiative, Ladyswell (CitySquare), Clontarf Street, the long-awaited and badly needed Parnell Place/Beasly Street development currently held up in appeal, plans for Douglas Village redevelopment – and many more…

      …also, we can expect a bit of a shake-up among the generally ‘local associated’ development groups as increased outsider activity emerges in the Cork market.

      I hope 2006 will prove itself to be a positive year for the city in more ways than one – with acknowledgement of the pressure for good design through increasing numbers of distinguished architecturally sound proposals finding realisation. Not every building can or will be a Glucksman Gallery, but that doesn’t mean we can’t have – or should have – a few more. :p Let’s make 2006 a progressive stepping point in the furthering of better architectural and product standards.

      Let’s hope this year is a prosperous one, and noteworthy for all the right reasons.

      Happy New Year to you all.

      Lexington

    • #758770
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      with Cork moving the port out of the city to Ringaskiddy what are the plans for the old port location ? Are they going to develop a waterside development ?

    • #758771
      lexington
      Participant

      @Maskhadov wrote:

      with Cork moving the port out of the city to Ringaskiddy what are the plans for the old port location ? Are they going to develop a waterside development ?

      As you can imagine Maskhadov, the relocation process involved is an extensive one. Effectively, the transfer of many port activities to the Port of Cork lands at Ringaskiddy is a phase by phase process with an estimated cost of €200m. Most likely, and perhaps within the coming months – subject to discussion outcomes – the PoC will seize it’s limited operations along Horgan’s Quay on the northern docklands. This would clear the way for a €500m phased development along the 17-acre lands at Horgan’s Quay (controlled by CIE but which was passed onto to Manor Park Homebuilders for redevelopment purposes). The first application for this redevelopment is expected this year – in the project’s entirety, up to and possibly over 1,000 new high density homes are to built, a major commercial/retail core, redeveloped Kent Station for CIE with new Bus Station and reoriented terminal to face the waterside, 2 new plazas, a new National Route and 400metre boardwalk running the length of the quay – O’Mahony Pike Architects are working on this project. There is talk and work looking into an Event Centre element also, but that outcome remains to be seen. Further east along the northern quays, Werdna Ltd are still in appeal for 304 residential units with a 17-storey feature tower, new riverside promenade, commercial facilities, 30,000sq ft of business & technology space, 400+ basement car-parking etc all at a site off Water Street – designed by Murray O’Laoire. Water Street is also the subject of a new bridge to be facilitated by Cork City Council. To the west of Horgan’s Quay, various projects are in the pipeline. Along the southern docklands, progress is on-going behind the scenes – at the same time, a South Docklands Area Plan is under formation. For the time being, The Beverly Smyth Group have planning in for 104 residential units over a series of blocks, 30,000sq ft of Business & Technology uses and the like, McCarthy Developments have an 8-storey office building of 100,000sq ft designed by Murray O’Laoire ready-to-go and which had been in contention for the new Revenue Commissioners home in Cork. McCarthy Developments may also have other plans – as do Howard Holdings, whose recent €25m + purchase of the 11-acre Ford site issues another solid step in the company’s ambitions to redevelop a significant quarter of the Cork Docklands region in a project estimated at €500m+, the company are also in discussion to acquire a nearby 10-acre waterfront site owned by Tedcastles Holdings. Quiet discussions are on-going about 2 other significant waterfront sites (1 of which will probably relocate too) in the south docklands which I hope can be commented on later – also a further office development is being pitched for an acre site along Monahan’s Road, sometime in the New Year.

      All in all, workings are being issued, and the Cork Docklands has a long way to go – effectively, it is the creation of a new city and for its full realisation, will require many more years ahead.

    • #758772
      kite
      Participant

      By T. Barker IE 31-12-05.. Fleming Construction ventured to Dublin and spent €165 million on an eight-acre site at Sandyford, and in Cork they forged ahead at Fota, with a new hotel nearly built and holiday homes in the wooded estate grounds. For good measure, they splashed out €18 million on amenity land by Bishopstown, which will prove a shrewd buy and can help them re-locate city sports clubs from prime urban site. They will lodge for planning for the Nemo Rangers site in Douglas any day now, for high-end housing.

      Bishopstown GAA (Jerry Buttimer, P.M. Vic M) and Highfield RFC to re-locate to the sticks ??, 2006 will indeed be an interesting year….

    • #758773
      A-ha
      Participant

      The road from the bridge at the turn off for EastGate/Little Island up as far as the roundabout for the tunnel has been made three lanes in each direction. Will this be carried on further or is it just that stretch of road? I don’t see why that road hasn’t been given motorway status…. seen as most motorways in Ireland don’t have three lanes anyway, half the roads in Dublin aren’t even motorways by British/European standards. Is it the governments plan to give it to M status? Also, if the Port of Cork is moved to Ringaskiddy, does that mean that all ships will no longer come up the Lee? What about all the naval ships/cruise ships that enter Cork….. will they all be sent to Ringaskiddy? Hope everyone has a brilliant New Year!

      p.s. sorry i’m so full of questions today. :rolleyes:

    • #758774
      lexington
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      The road from the bridge at the turn off for EastGate/Little Island up as far as the roundabout for the tunnel has been made three lanes in each direction. Will this be carried on further or is it just that stretch of road? I don’t see why that road hasn’t been given motorway status…. seen as most motorways in Ireland don’t have three lanes anyway, half the roads in Dublin aren’t even motorways by British/European standards. Is it the governments plan to give it to M status? Also, if the Port of Cork is moved to Ringaskiddy, does that mean that all ships will no longer come up the Lee? What about all the naval ships/cruise ships that enter Cork….. will they all be sent to Ringaskiddy? Hope everyone has a brilliant New Year!

      p.s. sorry i’m so full of questions today. :rolleyes:

      Re: Motorways – I think the qualification for motorway standard is 2-lanes in either direction to a width of 300 metres across and of a certain build, generally its not simply a matter of lanes. However, the Cork Northern Ring Road and Fermoy By-Pass/Mitchelstown By-Pass are all being configured to this status apparently. However, some existing roads (incl. Watergrasshill By-Pass) I believe are already of the standard but without the designation. This isn’t my best area of assessment but that’s my primitive understanding…:confused:

      As for Ringaskiddy, the transfer does not restrict vessel traffic up the Lee, it’s more about upgrading PoC facilities, their ability to expand and at the same time freeing up development space in the city. The Water Street Bridge will be configured to allow vessel passage – and it is hoped some naval activity and visit ships will be accommodated through new quayside platforms which can double up as docking and boardwalk/amenity areas. Indeed one of the main features of a redeveloped docklands area will be to place more emphasis on maritime activity – that is, utilising the river – one of Cork’s most important natural assets. The provision of effective and efficient water-bus activity and recreational functions will be vital to the successful development of the area.

    • #758775
      bosco
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      The road from the bridge at the turn off for EastGate/Little Island up as far as the roundabout for the tunnel has been made three lanes in each direction. Will this be carried on further or is it just that stretch of road? I don’t see why that road hasn’t been given motorway status…. seen as most motorways in Ireland don’t have three lanes anyway, half the roads in Dublin aren’t even motorways by British/European standards. Is it the governments plan to give it to M status?

      Not everyone is allowed use motorways – Learner drivers, Cyclists, Slow vehicles etc. Therefore for every stretch of motorway, alternate routes must exist for these road users, and that’s why some motorway quality dual-carriageways have not been afforded official motorway designation.

    • #758776
      lexington
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      Was driving down Washington St. the other night and 2 developments I have heard about a while back but which haven’t gone to construction phase yet, Mannix’s and the Kino, were brought to mind. Does anyone know when these are going ahead or even if they are going ahead??? Would do a lot for the street, just like the renovated courthouse adds that bit of class.

      Indeed, the Mannix premises could well do with that redevelopment – seriously overdue and that break in shoulder heights brings a serious and ugly sense of discontinuity to what is otherwise a pleasant streetscape. The redevelopment would bring a sense a revival to this worn out site and act as a contemporary corner gateway as well as a nice occupaniant to the other recent addition at Wagamama/Captain Americas/Suas nearby. Mr. Mannix is most evasive on the topic and the project has a lot to do with others behind the scenes. Also, some of the site tenants are more than unhappy with the prospect of a new proposal – case in point, Mr. Leahy’s appeal. The rumour mill suggested that Mr. Mannix may actually sell the premises with F.P.P. when the time comes, rather than develop it – that could offer eager buyers a prime city centre development opportunity within a stone’s throw from Cork’s legal district and a series of major redevelopment plans at Cornmarket Street, Grand Parade and South Main Street.

      As for the Kino….:confused: Which is a pity because I think Tony Dennehy et al did a really nice job on this proposal – with the right lighting it could offer a striking addition to the street-scape. It would be nice to see this project get a move on in 2006 – its a shame it didn’t see light for 2005 during the Capital of Culture reign, but c’est la vie. See project image here – go to section titled Community and select the 3rd Icon titled “Proposed Cinema”. Flash required.

    • #758777
      lexington
      Participant

      😉 Also, just to comment on what I believed to be quite an excellent fireworks display on New Year’s Eve. I was lucky enough to have a superb vantage from a nice warm living room on that evening and spare no envy on the poor unfortunates who had to endure the barrell fulls of rain that surely soaked them prune-like. :p Even so, word on the street was, bar a 20 minute delay, the show was well worth it – and indeed it appeared so. All the same, it felt a little empty when the clock struck 12am and the sky remained clear of any significant colours.

      Perhaps in the coming years, punters can gather along the extensive boardwalks of Horgan’s Quay and Kennedy Quay and in the squares at Horgan’s Plaza or Kennedy Park in the redeveloped docklands and watch future New Year’s Eve spectacles launched from the eastern tip of Custom House Quay. What a sight that would be! 😉

    • #758778
      lawyer
      Participant

      There was indeed a fireworks display fom a barge moored at the eastern tip of the Custom House Quays.
      I think it might have been for the 1985 celebrations. As far as I remember, some fireworks came down into Kent Station and the flour mills causing some concern. Maybe that is why there has not been a repeat performance.

    • #758779
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      As you can imagine Maskhadov, the relocation process involved is an extensive one. Effectively, the transfer of many port activities to the Port of Cork lands at Ringaskiddy is a phase by phase process with an estimated cost of €200m. Most likely, and perhaps within the coming months – subject to discussion outcomes – the PoC will seize it’s limited operations along Horgan’s Quay on the northern docklands. This would clear the way for a €500m phased development along the 17-acre lands at Horgan’s Quay (controlled by CIE but which was passed onto to Manor Park Homebuilders for redevelopment purposes). The first application for this redevelopment is expected this year – in the project’s entirety, up to and possibly over 1,000 new high density homes are to built, a major commercial/retail core, redeveloped Kent Station for CIE with new Bus Station and reoriented terminal to face the waterside, 2 new plazas, a new National Route and 400metre boardwalk running the length of the quay – O’Mahony Pike Architects are working on this project. There is talk and work looking into an Event Centre element also, but that outcome remains to be seen. Further east along the northern quays, Werdna Ltd are still in appeal for 304 residential units with a 17-storey feature tower, new riverside promenade, commercial facilities, 30,000sq ft of business & technology space, 400+ basement car-parking etc all at a site off Water Street – designed by Murray O’Laoire. Water Street is also the subject of a new bridge to be facilitated by Cork City Council. To the west of Horgan’s Quay, various projects are in the pipeline. Along the southern docklands, progress is on-going behind the scenes – at the same time, a South Docklands Area Plan is under formation. For the time being, The Beverly Smyth Group have planning in for 104 residential units over a series of blocks, 30,000sq ft of Business & Technology uses and the like, McCarthy Developments have an 8-storey office building of 100,000sq ft designed by Murray O’Laoire ready-to-go and which had been in contention for the new Revenue Commissioners home in Cork. McCarthy Developments may also have other plans – as do Howard Holdings, whose recent €25m + purchase of the 11-acre Ford site issues another solid step in the company’s ambitions to redevelop a significant quarter of the Cork Docklands region in a project estimated at €500m+, the company are also in discussion to acquire a nearby 10-acre waterfront site owned by Tedcastles Holdings. Quiet discussions are on-going about 2 other significant waterfront sites (1 of which will probably relocate too) in the south docklands which I hope can be commented on later – also a further office development is being pitched for an acre site along Monahan’s Road, sometime in the New Year.

      All in all, workings are being issued, and the Cork Docklands has a long way to go – effectively, it is the creation of a new city and for its full realisation, will require many more years ahead.

      😡 You are spot on with your assertion that we have many more years to go before we see progress in the Docklands, see an article from the Irish Independent 2002, YES 2002.
      ps. any updates on the outcome of the High Court case re:Custom House Quay?

      Southern capital shows 3pc decline (Irish Independent)

      Thursday July 25th 2002
      THE population of Cork city will dramatically increase over the next few years when projects such as the docklands development come on stream, according to city manager Joe Gavin.
      Speaking after the publication of the preliminary census report, which showed Cork city had registered a 3pc decline in population, Mr Gavin said measures are being put in place to entice people back to the urban quarter.
      “We are actively encouraging developers to build comfortable town-houses and are constantly improving the public realm in an effort to reduce the decline in the city. The docklands development, for example, will make the urban environment more enticing.”
      The €254m development, close to the city centre, is set to create 6,000 new homes, including high-density apartments and office and retail space as well as culture and leisure facilities.
      Mr Gavin said first-time buyers will be drawn back to the city following the creation of a number of parks and a new marina.

    • #758780
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 I know this is a wee bit late, but even so, Rossdale Enterprises have lodged plans with CorkCoCo for the development of a new residential scheme along Commissioner’s Quay at Castleredmond in Midelton. The quayside scheme will see 35 new apartments erected over 2x 4-storey blocks and 1x 5-storey block all over a basement car-parking facility. The scheme, designed by Monkstown-based Dermot Coveney & Associates (whose other works include the redevelopment proposal for the Mannix & Culhane premises along Washington Street), will also include a new waterfront boardwalk amenity.



      😎 Castlelands Construction are due a decision tomorrow on their plans for 376 houses at Kilmoney in Carrigaline. The application, originally lodged with CorkCoCo last June (2005) was the subject of a Further Information request, and is applied to a site only a short thread away from the recently proposed plans by Astra Construction Services for 503 residential units (100 duplexes, 24 apartments, sheltered accommodation units [26], 353 houses), creche and associated amenity facilities – designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects.


    • #758781
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Kite………….

      “We are actively encouraging developers to build comfortable town-houses and are constantly improving the public realm in an effort to reduce the decline in the city. The docklands development, for example, will make the urban environment more enticing.”
      The €254m development, close to the city centre, is set to create 6,000 new homes, including high-density apartments and office and retail space as well as culture and leisure facilities.
      Mr Gavin said first-time buyers will be drawn back to the city following the creation of a number of parks and a new marina.[/QUOTE]

      Classic stuff…..hopefully Dan Buggy’s departure, Pat Ledwidge’s arrival and everything that Howards are doing doing the Docks will kick things off. Can’t see the Port of Cork doing too much and I wouldn’t hold my breath on the Albert Quay / Kennedy Quay end of things. All said and done, the Council’s (Manager’s) pronouncements are a hostage to fortune (bankers / developers and a certain SP)

    • #758782
      orion
      Participant

      In reference to Esso site sales in Cork ,I have heard Paul Montogermie paid under 6 million for the Western Road site.Derek Tynan a.k.a Victoria Mills is finalising plans but planners not happy for this site to achieve same height as Jury Hotel, as its on other side of river!
      Does any one know plans for Douglas and Wilton (Esso Site) and who bought them?’

    • #758783
      lexington
      Participant

      Bishopstown Esso was purchased for €2.2m and I can’t remember off the top of my head, but apparently Dunmahon went for €4m (?) – don’t quote me on that as I’m merely ball-parking – Dunmahon will see residential use. As for Bishopstown – not entirely sure, but given its proximities to housing at the rear, road access and relation to CUH, any scheme will have to remain pretty low-rise and will likely be residential with perhaps some medical/commercial units at ground-flor level.

    • #758784
      orion
      Participant

      Lex the two houses to the rear of the Esso site @Wilton have been bought by a developer ,it would make sence if this was the same purchaser as the Esso site.This would give a whole new aspect to redeveloping the site with regard height and usage next to CUH.

    • #758785
      orion
      Participant

      do

    • #758786
      lexington
      Participant

      @orion wrote:

      Lex the two houses to the rear of the Esso site @Wilton have been bought by a developer ,it would make sence if this was the same purchaser as the Esso site.This would give a whole new aspect to redeveloping the site with regard height and usage next to CUH.

      That’s interesting, thank you. I didn’t know the 2 houses were developer purchased. It will certainly give the site much more scope and a nice linkage dircetly into CUH should medical usage be in part envisaged. Medics and patients alike could avial of a nice walkway between the 2 premises. Regarding height, although the eastern end of the side could accommodate a higher structure, respectful heights will have to generally be adhered to given that there is established housing and estate housing to the immediate west of the former Esso Wilton site.

    • #758787
      pier39
      Participant

      @yorktown wrote:

      Classic stuff…..hopefully Dan Buggy’s departure, Pat Ledwidge’s arrival and everything that Howards are doing doing the Docks will kick things off. Can’t see the Port of Cork doing too much and I wouldn’t hold my breath on the Albert Quay / Kennedy Quay end of things. All said and done, the Council’s (Manager’s) pronouncements are a hostage to fortune (bankers / developers and a certain SP)

      a case of howards yet again dragging the city’s docklands kickin and screaming into the 21st century. :rolleyes: well fair play to them, at least someones getting off their hooch and doin something about it. everyone else seems to be hymning and hawing. now if manor park just get their heiny in motion we’d be singing.

    • #758788
      lexington
      Participant

      Want to see what I want for Christmas 2006? 😀 Take a look below.

      Yes, that is Pairc Ui Chaoimh in the foreground. This is HTD Studio’s design for a masterplan undertaken by UCC (NMRC – now the Tyndall Institute) on the near-on 16-acre Tedcastle Holdings site along the South Docklands. The site, zoned in the Cork Docklands Development Strategy 2001, as being for part educational-part commercial use is currently the subject of discussion between Howard Holdings and Tedcastles – the outcome of which has yet to realised. The 22,000sq m proposal envisaged above was set to host a spectacular new NMRC and Photonics centre among other uses – of which commercial and leisure would be constituent. The remainder of the site would be dedicated to a variety of uses, with recreational space being well catered for. The buildings act as a spectacular landmark entrance into the city’s docklands – especially the beautifully glazed, sweeping feature tower. Of course, you have seen this proposal before on the Archiseek.com Cork threads, the previous image I posted was that as posted below (albeit without any attached information):

      This design, in my opinion, sets a bar for the standard of development landmark projects should seek to achieve or surpass. The proposals architects are Thierry Paret and Kal Kandler.


      The Site – note Howard Holdings’ Ford site acquisition highlighted nearby.

      Do you think someone has the gusto to see something like this realised? Maybe even the same design – bring in the solicitors to sort out a few ownership glitches and off you go! :p The building could be adapted internally to a myriad of uses – whether offices, retail, some restricted residential, an educational institute inclusive, restaurants, cafes etc – all of the above?

      HTDSTUDIO
      Architects + Designers, Ltd

      Lissard, Burnfort,
      Mallow,
      Cork
      Ireland

      T+353-87-6342589
      F +353-22-29921

      It does go to show however what CAN be achieved in the Cork Docklands redevelopment and that the imagination is there.

    • #758789
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      it would be great if the GAA could re develop Pairc Ui Chaoimh

    • #758790
      anto
      Participant

      What will happen the original NMRC? (which is also a nice building)

    • #758791
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 DAT Partnerships have lodged Significant Further Information on its plans for CentrePoint, their Clontarf Street proposal, destined for a tiny triangular site (circa. 2,250sq ft +) bored by Oliver Plunkett Street Lower to the south, Deane Street to the west and Clontraf Street to the east – and which was purchased for a staggering figure just under €1m. Coughlan de Keyser Architects (Daniel Luxton) had been assigned for design on the project which originally intended to rise 12-storeys in height, but following the outcome of preplanning talks, was lodged at a reduced height of 9-storeys (with a gross floor space of under 30,000sq ft). The design drew much discussion given its unusual form which resembled something of a ‘torch flame’ (see below):


      Original CentrePoint proposal – eastern elevation.

      The application received a submission from Kevin Hurley of An Taisce stating that a recognition of design intentions, but criticism of its form and height among other things.

      In their request for Further Information, CCC noted their dis-satisfaction with the cantivelered nature of the design which overhung public footpaths – they additionally pointed out that the height of the building’s southern elevation negatively impacted neighbouring No.6 Lapps Quay and the visual continuity of the vista south-to-north along Eglinton Street, facing Lapps Quay. The CentrePoint project, in their view, seemed to dominated the other buildings in the area at CityQuarter and Lapps Quay. A request for height reductions at this elevation was sought along with revisions in the buildings impact with respect to public foothpaths.

      Whether one likes or dislikes the original design is one thing, however there was a clear willingness to explore forms other than those generally associated with the districts established buildings. I’ll bring details of the revised form soon and you can judge for yourselves the outcome of the latest design efforts.

      A decision on CentrePoint is due for the 30th January 2005 – the same date scheduled for a decision on John Cleary Developments large Sifco-redevelopment near Mahon Point. Coughlan de Keyser are responsible here too for the design on JCD’s 5-storey (circa) 130,000sq ft office and retail development…so it should be a big day for them!


      😮 For those wondering, a decision date on the Rothbury Estates application to redevelop the former Sunbeam Factory in Blackpool is currently expected for the 18th Feburary 2005. Design is by Richard Rainey & Associates and further details may be found here.


      anto – the existing NMRC is staying put, in fact an application will soon be lodged for an 4-storey, 40,000sq ft (circa) extension of the facility. Indeed it is a lovely structure. The proposals posted above are aspirational really – I was putting it up as a demonstration of what can be achieved in the docklands rejuvenation. It’s realisation – even if not for solely academic purposes (say as a broader mixed-use commercial development) in any event would be rather pleasant

    • #758792
      Torquemada
      Participant

      A belated happy new year to all!..
      Any word on the progress of the new airport terminal?Has it been completed and signed over to the CAA?

    • #758793
      lexington
      Participant

      Removed

    • #758794
      A-ha
      Participant

      Is it just the picture or has the design of the tower changed, it seems to look more curvy in the first picture. It might be the angle or a different design and how tall is the tower? I love it to bits, and hope it goes ahead. The tower reminds me of Bishopsgate Tower (http://www.skyscrapernews.com/imagesall.php?ref=2839&idi=The+Bishopsgate+Tower&self=nse&selfidi=2839TheBishopsgateTower_pic1.jpg&no=1) in London, although I’m sure it won’t reach 307m in Cork.

    • #758795
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      It all seems pretty low dentisty. There is a lot of green space.

    • #758796
      jungle
      Participant

      @Maskhadov wrote:

      It all seems pretty low dentisty. There is a lot of green space.

      That’s not necessarily a bad thing. There will have to be some allowance made for green space in the southern docklands. That’s more likely to happen in an area reserved for a public institution that in land for commercial development, where the developer will understandably be looking to maximise returns. The only pity would be that it’s at the extreme eastern end of the docklands, close to the existing park at the Atlantic Pond. It would be nice to counterbalance somewhere further west (although Victoria (Kennedy?) Park is pretty close to the western end of the docklands.

    • #758797
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      Its a shame that all the space isnt used up as much as possible. Most of country is low dentisty and we have enough green spaces. It probably wont but Cork has the potential to become a city of high rises (well only a few and compared to dublin). We really need a counter balance in this country to dublin and cork should be it !

    • #758798
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Speaking of high rises i took a look at the plans for the Sunbeam factory in Blackpool and I’m a little disappointed to be honest. The architect is Richard Rainy’s and i know theyve done some good stuff but I feel this probably isnt one of them. The tower is 63 metres high so i guess thats a little shorter than County hall, its oval shaped and on a north south axis so it from the Mallow road you get a view of the side. The tower is located toward Blackpool retail park and i don’t understand why they didn’t put it to the northern end of the site at least that way it would have acted as a landmark but instead it seems lost behind the other blocks. Maybe the architects were thinking it the taller buildings should all be kept grouped?? Even so the tower would be much better to the north of the site and i think the balconies seriously detract from the building. I always think these tall buildings should be tall sleek smooth and graceful but i don’t think this oen does that. The height is fine but the design isnt really.

      BTW, really like the docklands tower posted above!!

    • #758799
      jungle
      Participant

      @Maskhadov wrote:

      Its a shame that all the space isnt used up as much as possible. Most of country is low dentisty and we have enough green spaces. It probably wont but Cork has the potential to become a city of high rises (well only a few and compared to dublin). We really need a counter balance in this country to dublin and cork should be it !

      I’ve no problems with high-rise (including buildings that are much taller than proposed). If anything high-rise should allow for some open space between buildings. Although the country as a whole has a large number of open spaces, they are a rarity in the centre of Cork (more so than Dublin even).

      Also, from large cities like London or Paris to cities more similar in size to Cork, like Cardiff or The Hague, you’ll find that the areas of cities that have significant green space available are the ones with the highest value residential and commercial properties.

    • #758800
      A-ha
      Participant

      Just because it’s tall doesn’t mean it should be given “landmark” status, especially if you’re suggesting that the design is crap. Everyone in Ireland must have some belief that if a building is tall, then it’s a landmark that everyone should love. But it isn’t the case and I’d prefer to have a beautifully designed bungalow as a landmark rather than a 100 storey pile of rubble. And I agree jungle, green space is good in a city like Cork. The city is turning into suburb after suburb and it’s only in a few years down the line that we’ll realise how lucky we are to have wide open spaces in our city centre.

    • #758801
      phatman
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Just because it’s tall doesn’t mean it should be given “landmark” status, especially if you’re suggesting that the design is crap. Everyone in Ireland must have some belief that if a building is tall, then it’s a landmark that everyone should love. But it isn’t the case and I’d prefer to have a beautifully designed bungalow as a landmark rather than a 100 storey pile of rubble. And I agree jungle, green space is good in a city like Cork. The city is turning into suburb after suburb and it’s only in a few years down the line that we’ll realise how lucky we are to have wide open spaces in our city centre.

      Good or bad design. a tall building is a landmark, either way: its going to stand out. But of course, better good than bad.

    • #758802
      POM
      Participant

      One practice I’d be very interested seeing tackle a large city centre office development or high rise is Magee Creedon. I’d love to see their spin on things.

    • #758803
      kite
      Participant

      A city councilor informed me that RTE were interviewing members in the City Hall last week on planning issues in Cork.
      RTE it seems are researching planning in Cork at the behest of the CSD after visiting their website at http://www.corksouthwest.com and hearing of the building height cap vote passed by city councilors some weeks ago.
      Might be no harm to e mail RTE at http://www.rte.ie and let them know that there is more than the CSD that have an opinion on planning in the city?

    • #758804
      PTB
      Participant

      @Maskhadov wrote:

      It all seems pretty low dentisty. There is a lot of green space.

      I’m actually quite surprised that anyone would bemoan the fact that green space is being created. Cork is a city without a great amount of green, open spaces. I quite appreciate the fact that the architects have decided to allocate that much parkland rather than cramming the site with buildings and making more money out of all the office space.

    • #758805
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      It would be nice however to see a skyline of signifance. Especailly near the water.

      Maybe they can incorporated the highrise in other parts of the city.

    • #758806
      POM
      Participant

      @PTB wrote:

      I’m actually quite surprised that anyone would bemoan the fact that green space is being created. Cork is a city without a great amount of green, open spaces. I quite appreciate the fact that the architects have decided to allocate that much parkland rather than cramming the site with buildings and making more money out of all the office space.

      I quite agree. Cork is devoid of any substantial greenspace. If anything the greenspace surrounding the proposal accentuates the design and does so quite pleasantly. The architects have done a considered job.

      As for the RTE programme, what a preposterous scenario. More doolally.

    • #758807
      anto
      Participant

      @PTB wrote:

      I’m actually quite surprised that anyone would bemoan the fact that green space is being created. Cork is a city without a great amount of green, open spaces. I quite appreciate the fact that the architects have decided to allocate that much parkland rather than cramming the site with buildings and making more money out of all the office space.

      If the Cork docklands are to become an extension of the city centre then development should be urban in form, i.e. there should be streets, squares etc. This building while quite dramatic seems to be set in a business park/campus setting. Green space can be incoporated in the form of parks or a linear park with cycle ways along the river bank. The docklands needs to be developed in a high density manner if things like light rail linking it to the city centre are feasible.

      Cork city lacks parks that’s true, Fitzgerald park is just a bit off city centre to be Cork’s Stephen’s Green and the peace Park is a bit small. I’m not sure low density office blocks surrounded by a few acres of lawn are much use though, look at City West in Dublin!

      High density needs a master plan and great design.

    • #758808
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      I

      As for the RTE programme, what a preposterous scenario. More doolally.

      🙁 I agree, but some are saying that “doolally” was the cause of a senior member of the city planning team being removed “fired” from his job in the past few weeks…What damage will more DOOLALLY do if left unchecked?

    • #758809
      PTB
      Participant

      @Maskhadov wrote:

      It would be nice however to see a skyline of signifance. Especailly near the water.

      Maybe they can incorporated the highrise in other parts of the city.

      Again Maskhadov I disagree with you. This development is proably the first part of the docklands developments that you would see on your way into Cork coming in by Tivoli. Were a large structure to be built here it would, I believe, appear very harsh, coming fron the low trees to a large structure. The current design would ease a transition into taller structures, yet would maintain a landmark look.

    • #758810
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      That sounds reasonable PTB providing there were highER rise buildings somewhere in the city.

    • #758811
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I was trying to add it up in my head how many genuine tall building (i mean 12 storeys and up) proposals Cork has got so far. Correct me if I’m wrong.

      Eglinton street which is 17 storeys and 70 metres.

      Water street which is 17 and 58 metres (is that right or was it changed again??)

      Crows nest which is 15 and 50 metres i think was said

      Sunbeam which is 18 and 63 metres

      Metropole which is 12 and I don’t know how many metres.

      Think lex said before that there could be another high rise out along the Straight road the other side of County hall but it wasnt known yet.

      Though I don’t think there should be high rise everywhere there def should be some more of a higher density along the south docklands at least. There should be at least one or 2 defining structures (ya know like 20 storeys or something) which DO act as proper landmarks and are not just tall for the sake of tall. As for Cork’s track record so far i think Eglinton street and Water street stand out as the best, the other designs have little to no flair about them at all and seem to me more like flashier Ballymuns. I think the high rise, in Cork, should not be balcony ridden tower blocks, they should be smooth tall and narrow structures which maybe internalise their balconies like Eglinton street. Balconies sort of make high rises look like holiday apartment blocks and i havent seen many blocks like that which i’m fond of!!

    • #758812
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Though I don’t think there should be high rise everywhere there def should be some more of a higher density along the south docklands at least. There should be at least one or 2 defining structures (ya know like 20 storeys or something) which DO act as proper landmarks and are not just tall for the sake of tall. As for Cork’s track record so far i think Eglinton street and Water street stand out as the best, the other designs have little to no flair about them at all and seem to me more like flashier Ballymuns. I think the high rise, in Cork, should not be balcony ridden tower blocks, they should be smooth tall and narrow structures which maybe internalise their balconies like Eglinton street. Balconies sort of make high rises look like holiday apartment blocks and i havent seen many blocks like that which i’m fond of!!

      😎 Absolutely right. The docklands would make a great mini Manhatten if some design thought was put into it. If the city council allow owners/developers to build in a haphazard manner and then try to figure out how to make all “the dots” join up Cork could indeed end up with a flashy Ballymun.
      I would also agree that CCC have to be careful where they allow high rise buildings, allowing the likes of Victoria mills to be built gives people bullits to fire every time a high rise building is proposed.
      Somebody should be held accountable for that VM fiasco.

    • #758813
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @orion wrote:

      In reference to Esso site sales in Cork ,I have heard Paul Montogermie paid under 6 million for the Western Road site.Derek Tynan a.k.a Victoria Mills is finalising plans but planners not happy for this site to achieve same height as Jury Hotel, as its on other side of river!
      Does any one know plans for Douglas and Wilton (Esso Site) and who bought them?’

      Think Derek Tynan architects will deliver on this site?? Its a prominent location and will need a sensitive design…or is it another Crosses green hotel on the way? I liked the use of black limestone on the hotel but the design was utterly awful. Am I getting my hopes up too high?

    • #758814
      who_me
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      If the Cork docklands are to become an extension of the city centre then development should be urban in form, i.e. there should be streets, squares etc. This building while quite dramatic seems to be set in a business park/campus setting. Green space can be incoporated in the form of parks or a linear park with cycle ways along the river bank. The docklands needs to be developed in a high density manner if things like light rail linking it to the city centre are feasible.

      True, though this is at the Eastern end of the South Docklands area, where it borders the attractive Marina/Atlantic Pond area. I think a project such as this would blend nicely between the urban dockland setting and the quiet, recreational Atlantic Pond.

    • #758815
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Here’s a few questions, maybe somebody can help me with:

      1. Does anybody have images of the proposed development by Rothbury Estates at the former Sunbeam site in Blackpool?

      2. What is the current state of play with St. Nicholas’ Church near the Revenue Building on Sullivan’s Quay? Does UCC still own it? If so, what is it used for?

      Thanks.

    • #758816
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Saw the Rothbury thing. Don’t get in a panic its nothing amazing…still dont understand why they put the tower where they did.

    • #758817
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      re; rothbury sunbeam application. saw that also – have to agree with ewankennedy – the location of the tower element seems completely random, and looks lost in respect of everything else on the site – the whole thing looks a bit of a mess to be honest. no real logic either in the choice of an oval shaped building for the corner of the site or the positioning of that oval shaped building in a north-south axis?

    • #758818
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      🙁 I agree, but some are saying that “doolally” was the cause of a senior member of the city planning team being removed “fired” from his job in the past few weeks…What damage will more DOOLALLY do if left unchecked?

      Oh be careful there kite, we dont want the Irish Examiner accusing us of ‘prompting’ more rumours i.e. last Thursday.

    • #758819
      James Furlong
      Participant

      No news for us lexington? Your very quiet these days. Read something today in the paper about the showgrounds? Any details.? Keep up the good work, this is a very good website.

      James Furlong

    • #758820
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @James Furlong wrote:

      No news for us lexington? Your very quiet these days. Read something today in the paper about the showgrounds? Any details.? Keep up the good work, this is a very good website.

      James Furlong

      Very strange that Lex is’nt about these days – Skiing I hope !

    • #758821
      tomthevet2003
      Participant

      Has anybody any news on the Academy Street Development – I though planning permission would have been applied for at this stage:rolleyes:

    • #758822
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Fleming Construction have offered to build a new 6,000- 10,000 seat events arena similar to the Odyssey in Belfast as a new home for the Munster Agricultural society, currently located adjacent to Pairc Ui Caoimh. Thats according to a report in today’s Irish Examiner by Tommy Barker.
      The multi purpose arena would be built at Curraheen, off the Ballincollig bypass and would be swapped for the Society’s 22 acres at the Marina. Fleming had bought 126 acres in curraheen last year, zoned amenity.
      According to the report, the development at Curraheen would include:
      6,000 elevated seats
      Extra seating at floor level
      Restaurants
      Bars
      A floodlit outdoor arena
      Show rings
      stables
      Car parking.

      Yesterday, Jope Gavin re-affirmed his view that adjacent to Kent Station was the best location for an events centre in Cork. and said that the council was strongly opposed to green spaces and sporting facilities being handed over for development. The council is Landlord of the Marina site, which is leased to the Society.

      Read the article here.

    • #758823
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Oh be careful there kite, we dont want the Irish Examiner accusing us of ‘prompting’ more rumours i.e. last Thursday.

      😉 Point taken, would not want the messengers shot…

    • #758824
      Leigh Teabing
      Participant

      2. What is the current state of play with St. Nicholas’ Church near the Revenue Building on Sullivan’s Quay? Does UCC still own it? If so, what is it used for?

      I think it is owned Barry Supple and is to be occupied by Probation Officers & Parole Officers working on behalf of the OPW.

    • #758825
      kite
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Very strange that Lex is’nt about these days – Skiing I hope !

      :confused: I think Lex may have moved many of his GREAT posts to….http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2054862371&page=2

    • #758826
      PTB
      Participant

      What on earth is all that about?

    • #758827
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Yes, I’m not sure what has happened to Lexington these days, but I’m sure he’ll let us know in his own good time!!


      Cork City Council have opened (for UCC students and staff) the first phase
      of the walkway which runs from the Mardyke to the western boundary of the
      UCCMercy University Hospital (MUH) lands at the North Mall. UCC has
      constructed a connecting link walkway which provides access to their North
      Mall Campus.
      The overall project when completed by City Council (expected end January)
      will extend the entire length of the riverbank through the jointly owned
      lands and terminate at the entrance gates to the North Mall adjacent to
      Distillery House. This is being facilitated through close co-operation
      and land transfers between the University, Cork City Council and Mercy
      University Hospital.
      The walkway is a key part of teh UCC physical master plan and will provide
      easy pedestrian access to current and future developments at the North
      Mall.
      The City Council have committed to providing public lighting on the
      pathway which will be installed in the coming months.

      A map of the walkway is located here.

    • #758828
      Leesider
      Participant

      question for you radioactiveman, where did you get the above image? Would be very interested in seeing similar quality photos for the rest of the city

      Strange that Lex is using a different forum, but at least he hasn’t stopped altogether

    • #758829
      anto
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Yes, I’m not sure what has happened to Lexington these days, but I’m sure he’ll let us know in his own good time!!


      Cork City Council have opened (for UCC students and staff) the first phase
      of the walkway which runs from the Mardyke to the western boundary of the
      UCCMercy University Hospital (MUH) lands at the North Mall. UCC has
      constructed a connecting link walkway which provides access to their North
      Mall Campus.
      The overall project when completed by City Council (expected end January)
      will extend the entire length of the riverbank through the jointly owned
      lands and terminate at the entrance gates to the North Mall adjacent to
      Distillery House. This is being facilitated through close co-operation
      and land transfers between the University, Cork City Council and Mercy
      University Hospital.
      The walkway is a key part of teh UCC physical master plan and will provide
      easy pedestrian access to current and future developments at the North
      Mall.
      The City Council have committed to providing public lighting on the
      pathway which will be installed in the coming months.

      A map of the walkway is located here.

      Wow, That sounds great! I used to work near there and often wished there was river walk that linked the city to FitzGearld Park and or the Lee Fields. It’s a lovely part of the City. Hopefully people will respect it and not liiter/leave beer cans etc. Hopefully!!

      Well done to all concerned!

      Great Picture Radioactiveman!

    • #758830
      POM
      Participant

      Interesting in that picture Radioactiveman that you can see the Good Shepherd Convent in the background. I believe there is an application for a new upmarket housing project on that site soon.

    • #758831
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Yes, Frinailla now own the Good Shephards, after a disasterous fire which ruined the central section some years ago. I believe movement on this site is imminent, with high quality residential use being the core feature.

      Note, credit is due to UCC buildings and estates office for the aerial photograph above.

    • #758832
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      :confused: I think Lex may have moved many of his GREAT posts to….http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2054862371&page=2

      Thanks for the link kite. Hope they don’t mind me pickpocketing below.

      From lexington originally:

      BEGINS:

      Revenue Commissioners Move Confirmed



      As indicated in the 1st Post on this thread, the OPW have today confirmed the move by the Revenue Commissioners (and their approx. 600 staff) from Government Buildings along Sullivans Quay to soon-to-be-built offices off the Blackpool By-Pass/Assumption Road.

      See post here -> http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showp…75&postcount=1

      The winning bid has come from auctioneer/developers Frank Sheahan & Joe Carey in conjunction with Ascon Rohcon (who have the option of buying out the almost 2-acre site from the formers). The developers secured planning in 2003 for a 4-storey office development, designed by Jack Coughlan & Associates back in 2001, for Susie’s Field – not far from their recently complete Sean Mhuillean apartment complex (designed by J.E. Keating & Associates). Construction on the project will commence almost immediately following the ironing out of issues concerning the move between the OPW and bidders – a scheduled completion is set for mid-2007 and relocation by the RC to commence after Summer 2007. As part of the winning bid, the developers will now secure a highly attractive and valuable site of 3/4 acres along Sullivans Quay (Government Buildings) which will now be up for substantial redevelopment – given the site currently suffers from issues of subsidence. Any prospective development here could accommodate a landmark mixed-use development with extensive commercial and leisure provisions to boot. Ascon have been pushing further into development in Cork over the last few years and now have their sights set on a number of potential city centre developments which could include a sites along Albert Quay (an assembled half-acre premises which may see the planning office later this year) & Sullivans Quay. The focus will now be on Sullivans Quay, undoubtedly expectations will be high given the prominence of the site with respect to Grand Parade.


      ENDS

      Me again:
      This represents to me all that is indicative of the OPW. Its a shortsighted move meaning that now 600 or so Revenue staff, most residing in the south side of the city will have to make the daily trapse through the city centre to the northside. Its a logistical nightmare, and the impact on traffic will undoubtedly be significant as if it weren’t bad enough as it is. Were my hopes set to high that the OPW might show some foresight and relocate to somewhere like Saint Patricks Quay? Even a move to Centre Park Road, were many Revenue staff have been temporarily relocated would have made more geographic and logistical sense. Instead we can see another nice green area in the city’s northside lost to a monstrosity of a four storey building. All said I have to commend Ascon for fighting off some tough competition and am anxious to see what they’ve planned for one of the city’s most interesting sites at Sullivan Quay. Will imagnation be shown or can we expect another lot of apartments? Surely the location demands better than that.

    • #758833
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Regarding the OPW move to Assumption Road, Blackpool. Check out the property and ‘local news’ pages of todays Irish Examiner for some photomontages of the new building- inside and out.
      There’s no question of this site being a ‘nice green area’ being destroyed by development. I rememeber when it was all ‘nought but green fields’- but believe me we dont want to go back in that direction. What with the redevelopment of the Assumption convent and the neighbouring apartment complexes, this will be the icing on the cakefor Blackpool’s redevelopment.
      The fact that 70% of the revenue staff are from the soutside is a non-issue. The new site is, at most a 20 min walk, 5 min bus or car ride away, and with the Kilbarry rail station due to open in the next few years (hopefully!) the revenue staff cant have too much to complain about.

    • #758834
      POM
      Participant

      And whats your feeling on the design?

    • #758835
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      This design was around since 2003 (I think) when permission was granted for the office block. Its only in recent time that it has been offered to OPW.
      The design is straight lines, lots of glass facing into Blackpool Valley. Its scale and massing will complement the old mill building to the south and, because of the rising road level on the northern side of the site, should not impinge greatly on the assumption convent building or residents in that area. Im not sure of the buildings effect on the new homes being built directly above the site.
      I like the design, in terms of height (four storey) it will fit nicely into slope and should fill out that side of the valley. Internally it appears from images i’ve seen, to be bright, airy and very ‘customer-friendly’.
      A building which will have a positive effect on the area over all, I think.

      I will attempt (no promises) to upload images of same.

    • #758836
      POM
      Participant

      I don’t know about that Radioactiveman. I think the height is right but the design is faceless. But thats just me.

      lexington again:
      An Bord Pleanala (ABP) have made a clear indication that a tall structure on the 4-acre Water Street (for which Werdna Limited are in appeal for 304-apartment units over blocks generally 9-storeys and 1 feature 17-storey tower) is inappropriate. The Water Street design team, Murray O’Laoire Architects, are now being offered the opportunity to provide a redesign on the project with a decision due for the end of March 2006.

      Anyone have opinions on that? I hear the developers are being told to cut it down to 6 floors and to remove the tower.

    • #758837
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I believe the developers were told by ABP that a “landmark” building is permitted on the site, but that “landmark” does not equal “tall”. A point I raised way, way back.

    • #758838
      PTB
      Participant

      I’ve noticed some goings-on in the building on Paul street opposite the Bank of Ireland, The stone one thats set off of the street. Does anyone know whats going in there, or what the building is?

    • #758839
      anto
      Participant

      Did Lex have a falling out here? What’s the story? This was His thread!

    • #758840
      A-ha
      Participant

      I agree, it’s a loss without him. Has anyone any updates on County Hall? Isn’t it due for completion soon. I can’t wait for it blossom into a polished diamond after been a rough one for so many years. I presume there will be some kind of “official” opening when it is completed. News coverage would be nice, but I doubt it. When lex comes back, he has some serious splainin’ to do…. how dare he leave this thread without our permisson, hehehe.

    • #758841
      phatman
      Participant

      @PTB wrote:

      I’ve noticed some goings-on in the building on Paul street opposite the Bank of Ireland, The stone one thats set off of the street. Does anyone know whats going in there, or what the building is?

      The Cornmarket Street development of course! The building you refer to is at the rear of the site.

    • #758842
      kite
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      Did Lex have a falling out here? What’s the story? This was His thread!

      :confused: Don’t know but he is badly missed. The way this thread is going one would get more up to date info in a history book.

    • #758843
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      :confused: Don’t know but he is badly missed. The way this thread is going one would get more up to date info in a history book.

      Lads and ladies… what is happening with this thread… It’s falling away to nothing.. 🙁

      Has any1 checked out the new site Lexington is calling his own… :confused:

      http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=50688669#post50688669

      And the last time he posted a message was two days ago, so he is obviously ok and alive, but not supporting this thread anymore. 😮

      Lets all move to boards.ie 😀

      Must say though it’s a lot harder to navigate around the site compared to archiseek… 😮

    • #758844
      kite
      Participant

      @iloveCORK2 wrote:

      Lads and ladies… what is happening with this thread… It’s falling away to nothing.. 🙁

      Has any1 checked out the new site Lexington is calling his own… :confused:

      http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=50688669#post50688669

      And the last time he posted a message was two days ago, so he is obviously ok and alive, but not supporting this thread anymore. 😮

      Lets all move to boards.ie 😀

      Must say though it’s a lot harder to navigate around the site compared to archiseek… 😮

      🙁 A source in the local newspaper told me at lunchtime today that the reason Lex may have dropped off this thread may be due to a 4 way dispute between a Government Dept.,the CSD,the Webmaster, and himself.
      As for moving to the boards.ie site, judge for yourselfs..i find it contains yesterdays news and is very amateurish compared to Archiseek.
      Any chance you will come back Lex?? its not the same without you.

    • #758845
      PTB
      Participant

      That site looks like a cheap knock-off of archiseek. Or is archiseek an excellent knock off of their site?:confused:

      Anyhow Lex looks a bit isolated there among those people. I never knew how much we depended on him to keep this thread going. It almost dropped off the recent threads list last night.:(

    • #758846
      Morlan
      Participant

      PTB, they use the same forum software ‘vBulletin’, that’s why it looks the same.

    • #758847
      A-ha
      Participant

      I doubt many of you will be interested to know, but Cork International Airport handeled a total of over 2.730 million passengers in 2005. This places it ahead of Shannon Airport (2.4m passengers), making Cork Ireland’s second busiest airport. Good thing Terminal 2 is almost nearing completion, as far as I know it’s still on schedule and due to open in April.

    • #758848
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      🙁 A source in the local newspaper told me at lunchtime today that the reason Lex may have dropped off this thread may be due to a 4 way dispute between a Government Dept.,the CSD,the Webmaster, and himself.
      .

      Oh? Any more details?? What paper and whats it about?

    • #758849
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Oh? Any more details?? What paper and whats it about?

      :confused: I dont know how much truth is in the story but what i was told by the reporter was that Lex had a disagreement with the other 3 regarding some of the content on this thread. The dropping of the word Architecture from the thread title had something to do with the “barny” as well.
      The reason i have any doubts about the above is that the Webmaster never posted any details on the matter, and CSD make no mention of any disagreement with Lex or Archiseek on their website.
      The same reporter said that Lex may be moving to a new job this month, this may explain why he dropped off this thread..but why post on another forum??

    • #758850
      vkid
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I doubt many of you will be interested to know, but Cork International Airport handeled a total of over 2.730 million passengers in 2005. This places it ahead of Shannon Airport (2.4m passengers), making Cork Ireland’s second busiest airport. Good thing Terminal 2 is almost nearing completion, as far as I know it’s still on schedule and due to open in April.

      Don]http://www2.limerickpost.ie/dailynews.elive?id=7027&category=Daily-Sat[/url]

    • #758851
      vkid
      Participant

      oops..can’t delete this post

    • #758852
      A-ha
      Participant

      The Examiner and the Evening Echo.

    • #758853
      vkid
      Participant

      as in this…

      14/01/06
      Cork Airport passengers up 21%

      CORK International Airport has reported that 2.729 million passengers used the airport during 2005, a rise of 21.1% on the previous year.

      The London market rose 27.1% – accounting for 67% of the overall British market. Overall, 1.57m passengers travelled on British routes.

    • #758854
      pier39
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      The Examiner and the Evening Echo.

      theres your problem right there. hehe. only messing.

    • #758855
      vkid
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      theres your problem right there. hehe. only messing.

      was going to say that myself but said i wouldn;t :p

      I think Shannons traffic is still larger due to the huge increase of Ryanair traffic in the last year, a doubling of US military traffic(which i’m not sure is included in the 3.3 million as they are transit only and not terminal passengers – could be wrong though) and new routes to the US from different airlines (Continental/American and US Air) along with new European routes outside of Ryanairs expansion, In Sept Shannon had well exceeded 2.5 million for the first 3/4 of the year.

      Is there an article that actually states that, because what i posted above is all that was on the examiner site and that would be major news but have seen it nowhere else ?

    • #758856
      A-ha
      Participant

      I presume thats why it was in the newspaper. I’ll have a look for the article and get back to you tomorrow. I looked it up on the internet, just to double check, and Wikipedia said the exact same as the Echo and Examiner. Oh, and Re: County Hall from one of my earlier posts., what’s the update on it?

      p.s. don’t forget to tune into RTE 2 Monday night at 9.30. I believe Knocknaheeny (did I spell it right?) is being featured in the Des Bishop Show., should be funny.

    • #758857
      vkid
      Participant

      Maybe you;re right. but i wouldn’t trust wikipedias info to be fair. Firstly they list Shannon traffic based on 2004 numbers. TRaffic in Shannon hsa grown immensley this year. The also say Shannon is the main transatlantic airport in ireland and Cork acts as one of Ryanairs main European hubs so its a arseways anyway. There’s only 4 routes listed out of Cork with Ryanair on their site and one of them is Dublin as opposed to 20 routes from Shannon. The only piece on examiner.ie is what i posted. Just curious anyway..no biggie.

      Have a look at this though from Nov 25th..

      http://www.shannonairport.com/AR_Shannon/Live/Lv_Pres_View_NewsItem.asp?intStory_ID=95

      and the Wikipedia stuff below.

      Shannon Airport (IATA: SNN, ICAO: EINN) is Ireland’s main transatlantic airport. 2.4 million passengers travelled through Shannon in 2004, making it the third busiest airport in Ireland. Shannon is situated in County Clare in the mid-west of Ireland, just 15km from Limerick City. The airport is operated by the Dublin Airport Authority. This company also administers Dublin Airport and Cork International Airport. Shannon Airport mostly handles transatlantic flights and flights to Britain. Shannon and Dublin are the only two European airports with U.S. border preclearance facilities

      Cork International Airport is one of Ireland’s principal airports, situated on the south side of Cork City in an area known as Ballygarvan. The airport is currently operated by Dublin Airport Authority. Cork Airport handles scheduled and charter flights to domestic and European destinations as well as cargo services and general aviation. As the airport had over 2.730 million passengers pass through its doors in 2005, it makes it Ireland’s second busiest airport, after Dublin. Aer Lingus and Aer Arann are the largest operators at Cork Airport by number of aircraft movements. Aer Lingus and Ryanair are the largest operators by number of passengers. It acts as a main European hub for both Ryanair and Aer Lingus.]

    • #758858
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Re Shannon Airport, the troops are included in their passenger numbers apparently, as are all those passenger en route to the US from Dublin who have to do their gov mandated stopover in SNN. A bit of a joke really, but hey, whoever said stats was an exact science!
      More relevant to this thread, the design of Shannon Airport’s terminal building won an RIAI architectural award a few years back. A bit utilitarian for my liking, but I guess that is subjective. It certainly was an improvement on what they had before. I certainly hope that the guys in Cork can keep their new terminal in good nick…I often wonder do they have cleaners up there given the rubbish that is usually strewn around the place.

    • #758859
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Cork City Council has granted permision to CorkCounty Council to build a new freestanding County Library headquarters building comprising of a six storey element with a two storey wing enclosing a landscaped courtyard over a basement arranged around two smaller courtyards all to the west of the existing Cork County Hall building, which is a protected structure.
      The County Hall redevelopement is nearing completion and I’ll hopefully have some images in the next few days.

    • #758860
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      @kite wrote:

      🙁 A source in the local newspaper told me at lunchtime today that the reason Lex may have dropped off this thread may be due to a 4 way dispute between a Government Dept.,the CSD,the Webmaster, and himself.

      LOL, you’re having a laugh aren’t you. That’s complete and utter rubbish.
      Care to reveal your source on that – wouldn’t be the Irish Examiner would it?

    • #758861
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      ah, the Irish Examiner…that bastion of good journalism!! 😮

    • #758862
      kite
      Participant

      @Paul Clerkin wrote:

      LOL, you’re having a laugh aren’t you. That’s complete and utter rubbish.
      Care to reveal your source on that – wouldn’t be the Irish Examiner would it?

      🙂 Glad that is cleared up. Like i said, the reason i had my doubts about the story was that neither CSD nor yourself made any reference to it.
      Lex is still missed though (whatever the reason)

    • #758863
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      who / what is CSD?

    • #758864
      kite
      Participant

      @Paul Clerkin wrote:

      who / what is CSD?

      🙁 CSD are a lobby group in Cork opposed to high rise housing in the Bishopstown area.
      They have a website where you can get more info on them at http://www.corksouthwest.com
      Sorry about the misinformation regarding Lex. i was only telling it as i heard.

    • #758865
      Pug
      Participant

      all, did you note that where all the work is being done on the former Guys premises in Cornmarket St, that the digging has apparently resulted in residents in the area being relocated due to safety fears? (I am reduced to the Evening Echo as a source becuase Lex has absconded – whew! I am backed up by the Examiner).

      Come back Lex, all is forgiven

    • #758866
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      in fairness some of the pictures on http://www.corksouthwest.com/visuals.htm are shocking :O

    • #758867
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Maskhadov wrote:

      in fairness some of the pictures on http://www.corksouthwest.com/visuals.htm are shocking :O

      In what way? You should probably know some of those are false or manipulated like the one of the proposed Jurys hotel is false and others are outdated.

    • #758868
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      In what way? You should probably know some of those are false or manipulated like the one of the proposed Jurys hotel is false and others are outdated.

      😮 I agree that the photo of Jurys is manipulated, but Victoria Mills out of date? maybe you are right..VM was out of date the day the plans were drawn up.
      What is that dogbox like structure in the Shandon photo?, i thought that was manipulated as well until i passed there today and saw it for myself. Any wonder planning in Cork had a bad reputation?

    • #758869
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😮 I agree that the photo of Jurys is manipulated, but Victoria Mills out of date? maybe you are right..VM was out of date the day the plans were drawn up.
      What is that dogbox like structure in the Shandon photo?, i thought that was manipulated as well until i passed there today and saw it for myself. Any wonder planning in Cork had a bad reputation?

      Thats Coppinger Court by Magee Creedon. Personally I think it is one of the better designed projects to have met the city in recent years. Quite rightly it picked up an RIAI award for best sustainable building. It may be worth taking a looking around, if you can, the development before judging it. Its a great playful and sensitive design given its difficult location. http://www.riai.ie/gallery.html?type=regional&year=2004&item=6

    • #758870
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I agree with you on that one, POM, Coppinger Court is a good building……..

      BTW, went and had a look at the Guys site today, you get pretty good views of it from the top of Paul Street Car Park and it looks like the problem in relation to the adjoining houses is one of the old warehouse gable old belonging to the fomer Guys factoryfalling away from the terraces behind. I don’t know if the problem is that the wall is bring the houses with it or the houses were being propped up by the wall…..anyway, the Marian Shrine thing on the wall is in trouble as it appears that the Guys wall was built up to accomodate it……

      TV crews were down there as well…….

      Anyone know who the engineer is on site?

    • #758871
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Thats Coppinger Court by Magee Creedon. Personally I think it is one of the better designed projects to have met the city in recent years. Quite rightly it picked up an RIAI award for best sustainable building. It may be worth taking a looking around, if you can, the development before judging it. Its a great playful and sensitive design given its difficult location. http://www.riai.ie/gallery.html?type=regional&year=2004&item=6

      :rolleyes: Yep, that project looks great in the above mentioned website as i am sure it does in real life from Shandon. Its a pity that the roof looks like a protruding wart when walking along the quays.

    • #758872
      A-ha
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      More relevant to this thread, the design of Shannon Airport’s terminal building won an RIAI architectural award a few years back. A bit utilitarian for my liking, but I guess that is subjective. It certainly was an improvement on what they had before. I certainly hope that the guys in Cork can keep their new terminal in good nick…I often wonder do they have cleaners up there given the rubbish that is usually strewn around the place.

      I can’t believe your talking about architecural awards in Irish airports and the state of them. You have one of the nicest airports on your door step. Chek Lap Kok is fantastic. It’s really spacious and the roof is really groovy. Has it won any architectural awards? They say the old Hong Kong airport was spectacular to fly into, but don’t know anything else about it….. or it’s design.

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      The County Hall redevelopement is nearing completion and I’ll hopefully have some images in the next few days.

      Thank you.

    • #758873
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Well, it would be quite a stretch to compare Cork Airport (or SNN for that matter) to any of the large airports here in Asia. Most of the airports over here are relatively new, well designed (norman foster did the HK one), and have had their development costs underwritten by their respective governments. Hong Kong, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur are all top class airports, complete with rail links to the city center. I can check in at the downtown HK station, hop on the train, and be at the terminal exactly 23 mins later. Hard to beat.
      Irish airports (with the exception of DUB) are a mere drop in the ocean with regards to passenger throughput. Given that, you would think that travelling from Cork would be relatively hassle free experience. Instead, I get to experience the wonders of the magic roundabout. Whatever about the architecture of the new terminal (it DOES look good), the airport is simply in the wrong location. We seem to have a habit of that in Ireland…Knock is in a ‘foggy boggy’ no man’s land and Cork is perched on a frequently fog bound hill!

    • #758874
      orion
      Participant

      It’s a sad day for archiseek when Thursdays Examiner is the only source of development news in Cork.
      Mr Lexington where ever you are come back……..PLEASE……

    • #758875
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Lets not knock the Examiner here, todays edition tells us that a planning application is due to be lodged shortly on Eddie Kenneally and Paul Montgomery site at the former Esso station on Western Road.
      Apparently Derek Tynan is in talks with senior planners about designs for the site, thought to be 4 or 5 storey apartments. Fans of Tynan’s Victoria Cross student apartments will be pleased. Fans of good taste won’t be!!:D


      Derek Tynan’s Victoria Cross Scheme



      Ellesmere Properties Limited have withdrawn their appeall from An Bord Pleanala for the construction of a seven storey building incorporating a 125 no bed hotel, retail units, offices, modifications to 16 Lavitts Quay (a
      protected structure) and car parking at a site bounded by Lavitts Quay, Half Moon Street & Paul’s Lane, Cork.
      The site is now expected to be developed by OCP as part of their plans for the existing Paul Street Shopping Centre and in line with their ‘flagship’ developement across Paul’s Lane on Lavitts Quay.


      An earlier proposal for the same site.

    • #758876
      A-ha
      Participant

      I’ll keep it brief, and for lack of a better word…. it’s manky! Even the college students living there think the place is a joke. Although the inside is supposed to be top class.

    • #758877
      A-ha
      Participant

      Radioactiveman…. how are those pictures of the County Hall coming along? It’s been so quiet here lately…. just because lex is gone, doesn’t mean we should abandon the place all together. Where is everyone… kite, ewan, anyone?

    • #758878
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I’m still here…:)

      Didnt the South infirmary hospital lodge plans for the new Breastcheck extension there recently?? I figure O’Callaghans will lodge Academy street soon cos its the end of January like they had said they would.

    • #758879
      macai
      Participant

      Hi Guys, not to be taking away from the subject of the thread..

      But I wonder did anyone see Joe Duffy’s latest cork bashing in one of the sunday papers yesterday

      He was referring to the new airport terminal development and comments from lord mayor Deirdre Clune regarding funding of same

      He was more or less stating The CAA should not start debt free, and expect dublin to pick up the tab for the new terminal as “dublin users don’t need to use cork airport” and “dublin airport is struggling to find the funds for a new terminal themselves” so why should we be loaded with the 160m in dublin.

      I wonder has Joe forgotten a certain government promise!

      Also in the same paper just a few weeks ago, he lashed out at the new county hall development stating it was an “ugly tower” all i’d say is look at liberty hall joe!

    • #758880
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Anyone see that Flor Griffn appealed that Oyster Developments scheme at Parnell Place but the appeal was thrown out as invalid, supposed to have been a couple of things wrong with the appeal………

    • #758881
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Hmmm its very quiet here..
      I really hope the Clontarf street project gets the go ahead. Like i said before I think the 9 storey height in this case is suited given the site. Think a decision is set for the end of this month. Also when is there going to be movement on Albert quay? Theres 2 sites there set for offices I think and it will really round off the quays in this area well. Referring back to a few posts by lex i think Ascon and Howards are involved there and construction on Eglington street is beginning at the end of Feb. Looking forward to it. Think Careys are next in line?? Great site but how will the deal with the Sextant pub there on the corner? Is it protected?

    • #758882
      lawyer
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Hmmm its very quiet here..
      I really hope the Clontarf street project gets the go ahead. Like i said before I think the 9 storey height in this case is suited given the site. Think a decision is set for the end of this month. Also when is there going to be movement on Albert quay? Theres 2 sites there set for offices I think and it will really round off the quays in this area well. Referring back to a few posts by lex i think Ascon and Howards are involved there and construction on Eglington street is beginning at the end of Feb. Looking forward to it. Think Careys are next in line?? Great site but how will the deal with the Sextant pub there on the corner? Is it protected?

      I dont think the Sextant is protected. In any case, Careys bought it some time ago.

    • #758883
      POM
      Participant

      Looking forward to see what Howard and Ascon have planned for Albert Quay indeed. I heard Ascon might go in for planning by the summer but I always figured Howard would look to buy their site out…probably not given the price they paid for the Doyle warehouse, might not make sense. I just hope STW don’t give us another grey shocker. Anyone else been tallying up their buildings around Cork? Anglsea Street – grey, School of Pharmacy – grey, Webworks – grey…I think Lapps Quay is the only project of theirs with a bit of colour and life to it. If they pursue that cold grey look again Albert Quay could turn out to be very boring. Maybe another firm are working on thr project, but if its STW I just hope the inject a little life and style into the quay to compliment the fine job across the river at Lapps Quay.

      Anyone know who is handling the Ascon design for Albert Qy? Tony Dennehy? Jack Coughlan? Other???

      I don’t think the Sextant is protected but it would be nice to see it incorporated in ay new scheme in some sort of novel way.

    • #758884
      kite
      Participant

      Forgive me for going back to a group I am sure many see as a major pain in the backside but the CSD crowd have posted a letter on their website that they claim they sent to Joe Gavin (Cork City Manager) asking him to explain residents rights under the planning act.
      If what they claim is correct it may explain how Victoria Mills (another pet hate of many, and mine) was ever allowed to be built?
      Check out the letter on the news update page on http://www.corksouthwest.com

    • #758885
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      that csd website is like something a group of angry teenagers would produce -its pathetic.

      i see jerry buttimer is quoted on the examiner again today (who provide him with a platform quite regularly) complaining about the mark kelleher proposals in bishopstown – now I dont know anything about the proposed development or its design but the Councillor’s response is predictable and says an awful lot about standards of public representation-

      “Fine Gael Cllr Jerry Buttimer said the planning system was undemocratic and called for a moratorium on major developments in the area” “”The planners and developers are fast turning parts of the city into ghettos. We are creating living space for transient communities, with no emphasis on building community or promoting sustainable living” “How can it be correct that one anonymous person or two makes a decision in relation to an area, and ignores the concerns of local residents”

      Jerry Buttimer is part of Cork City Council and understands how the planning system works and as a city councillor played an important part in adopting the city development plan – which is a reserved function of elected councillors – so the planning policies and objectives as detailed in the general land use sections of the city development plan and the specific objectives for the south west suburbs were democratically adopted – as part of those policies + objectives – the principle of sustainable development and proper planning is encouraged ie increasing density, reducing unnecessary travel, maximising land and infrastructure resources. i just think his attempt to remove himself from the system by portraying it as undemocratic is a bit dishonest and what i would describe as public misrepresentation

      planning applications will go through the relevant and statutory processes – i assume residents and others submitted objections at local planning level – and can appeal the decision to ABP – that is their democratic right – those objections/appeals have to be considered as part of the decision making process (once they are not vexatious, irrelevant etc) – these planning applications are assessed by various persons who are qualified to make infomed judgements (planners, engineers, architects, etc) – i really dont understand why when an individual or group dont like a decision – its undemocratic + when a decision goes their way -its vindication

    • #758886
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @kite wrote:

      Forgive me for going back to a group I am sure many see as a major pain in the backside but the CSD crowd have posted a letter on their website that they claim they sent to Joe Gavin (Cork City Manager) asking him to explain residents rights under the planning act.
      If what they claim is correct it may explain how Victoria Mills (another pet hate of many, and mine) was ever allowed to be built?
      Check out the letter on the news update page on http://www.corksouthwest.com

      Kite

      Read that letter on the CSD webshite and really think that it shows them to up to be the goons that they are….the section of the Planning Act to which they refer and suggest that their “rights” have been ignored relate only to land owners…..they don’t own the lands so they are not entitled to pre-planning consultations. I don’t think having an “interest” in a site in legal terms extends to belonging to a bandwagon group of Councillors all trying to out do each other in the headlines in order to grab the votes of an aging population…..

    • #758887
      kite
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      that csd website is like something a group of angry teenagers would produce -its pathetic.

      i see jerry buttimer is quoted on the examiner again today (who provide him with a platform quite regularly) complaining about the mark kelleher proposals in bishopstown – now I dont know anything about the proposed development or its design but the Councillor’s response is predictable and says an awful lot about standards of public representation-

      “Fine Gael Cllr Jerry Buttimer said the planning system was undemocratic and called for a moratorium on major developments in the area” “”The planners and developers are fast turning parts of the city into ghettos. We are creating living space for transient communities, with no emphasis on building community or promoting sustainable living” “How can it be correct that one anonymous person or two makes a decision in relation to an area, and ignores the concerns of local residents”

      Jerry Buttimer is part of Cork City Council and understands how the planning system works and as a city councillor played an important part in adopting the city development plan – which is a reserved function of elected councillors – so the planning policies and objectives as detailed in the general land use sections of the city development plan and the specific objectives for the south west suburbs were democratically adopted – as part of those policies + objectives – the principle of sustainable development and proper planning is encouraged ie increasing density, reducing unnecessary travel, maximising land and infrastructure resources. i just think his attempt to remove himself from the system by portraying it as undemocratic is a bit dishonest and what i would describe as public misrepresentation

      planning applications will go through the relevant and statutory processes – i assume residents and others submitted objections at local planning level – and can appeal the decision to ABP – that is their democratic right – those objections/appeals have to be considered as part of the decision making process (once they are not vexatious, irrelevant etc) – these planning applications are assessed by various persons who are qualified to make infomed judgements (planners, engineers, architects, etc) – i really dont understand why when an individual or group dont like a decision – its undemocratic + when a decision goes their way -its vindication

      Jerry Buttimer, enough said..Berni “wheres me teeth”Murphy, we really can pick them in Cork???

    • #758888
      orion
      Participant

      Jerry Buttimer in today’s Examiner calls for “a moratorium on major devlopments ” in his ward.
      Its a pity his veiws only extent to Bishopstown and not to his GAA buddies Devlopment @Victoria Mills.
      Is this guy for real in thinking the planning processes final decision to grant must be a democratic decision imagine that trying to work in todays Celtic Tiger economy.
      God help us if this guy every tries for the Dail,what a clown.

    • #758889
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @orion wrote:

      Jerry Buttimer in today’s Examiner calls for “a moratorium on major devlopments ” in his ward.
      Its a pity his veiws only extent to Bishopstown and not to his GAA buddies Devlopment @Victoria Mills.
      Is this guy for real in thinking the planning processes final decision to grant must be a democratic decision imagine that trying to work in todays Celtic Tiger economy.
      God help us if this guy every tries for the Dail,what a clown.

      Its all political attention seeking and image enhancing behaviour.Total gimp unworthy of any votes – EVER.
      We’ll see him go very quiet when Bishopstown G.A.A. and Highfield come up for development in the next few years.Total nonsense as ever in todays Irish Examiner fron Fine Gaels Mr.Buttimer.

    • #758890
      ToMuchFreeTime
      Participant
      Well i got to say driving around the city these days is quiet Surreal these days with construction sites spring up all around the city it’s great to see cork booming and may i say about time because we didn’t get our fair share of the celtic tiger in the early years. but we are sure catching up fast.:D 😀 😀
      and with the huge amount of space the docklands can afford us the city is going to be almost unreckonisable within 5-15 years and for the best. there is some massive plans in the pipeline such as

      Eglinton Street starting next month and major retails development plans going to be lodged soon for the city centre i.e. Academy Street etc. Also the jobs front looks good with 1,400 new high paid jobs been announced in two days theres huge confidance in the city at the moment. and a very good write up in the lastest loney planet guide about cork. alls looking good

      another thing i heard the population of cork city is ment to be down again with a huge amount of people now living outside city boundaries but still within the urban make up of the city. why doesn’t city hall look for a boundry extention which is badly needed, and would help making planning for the city for the future and bring in extra money . limerick , waterford and a few others are activly looking for extentions. in waterfords case i dont know why they are looking for an extention and they have huge sways of green fields within the boundry which isn’t the case with cork.:confused:

      One last thing just a bit of fun who do you think will put planning into city hall first

      1. The retail development on grand parade to incorporate a number of shops and one old shabby cinema

      OR

      2. The redevelopment of the train station and everything that goes with it (History of draging feet)

      Time frames anybody????

    • #758891
      kite
      Participant

      @orion wrote:

      Jerry Buttimer in today’s Examiner calls for “a moratorium on major devlopments ” in his ward.
      Its a pity his veiws only extent to Bishopstown and not to his GAA buddies Devlopment @Victoria Mills.
      Is this guy for real in thinking the planning processes final decision to grant must be a democratic decision imagine that trying to work in todays Celtic Tiger economy.
      God help us if this guy every tries for the Dail,what a clown.

      😮 Every time i see Cllr.Buttimer i expect to see a ring in his nose, thats all he is short,the way the residents and csd seem to lead him on to do their bidding.

    • #758892
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😮 Every time i see Cllr.Buttimer i expect to see a ring in his nose, thats all he is short (excuse the pun) the way the residents and csd seem to lead him on to do their bidding.

      I am of the same frame of mind about our councillors but its not just Jerry Buttimer…and I think people posting such perhaps watch their choice of wording when expressing disappointment at their public representatives.

      As for who will have the application in first, Horgans Quay or Grand Parade retail scheme…God knows the former has been ongoing for nearly 9 years. I’ve no faith in CIE or the Government to deliver with their private developer…as far as I’m concerned we’ll probably see the retail scheme under construction before we ever see a crane over Horgans Quay.

    • #758893
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      We deserve the Cllr’s we have…after all we elected them! The problem is that local politics is seen as nothing more than a talking shop or a stepping stone for election to higher office. So common sense and rational argument tends to be relegated in favour of overblown hyperbole designed to bloat their egos and gain the maximum of newsprint. The amount of hot air generated by these Cllr’s could be the answer to the international energy shortage..and eco-friendly too:)

    • #758894
      kite
      Participant
      POM wrote:
      I am of the same frame of mind about our councillors but its not just Jerry Buttimer…and I think people posting such perhaps watch their choice of wording when expressing disappointment at their public representatives.

      Point taken. But good old Jerry buttimer was on the bandwagon again yesterday according to todays Examiner, supporting art students (a good cause im sure) along with Sinn Fein and GP. Anything to get his name in print?

    • #758895
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I notice that “industrial units” are now being advertised for lease at a Watercourse Road site which was at the centre (literally and geographically) of a recent planning saga. This site had been a pivotal part of Frinailla’s City Quarter/Lady’s Well development (for which they recieved permission prior to Christmas) after a lenghty planning process at CCC and ABP level.
      ABP ruled that a large central block of apartments be omitted from the plans and granted permission for the remainder. It is thought that this loss of residential space has impacted financially on the deal between the site owner and the development company. It is speculated that this will have an impact on the timeframe within which work can begin. CCC has recently advertised that Alinett’s Lane (which runs through the site) will be closed from next month to August 2007 to allow construction to take place.



      As people might be aware, the shortlist has been drawn up for the ART BOX competition orgainised by Cork City Council and administered by RIAI.
      The competition aims to create a mobile performance and exhibition space. As a space The Art Box will be used for a range of different events. These would include:
      Film Screenings,Art Exhibitions, both installations and hung art work, Lectures, Performances, ranging from theatre, recitals, cabaret to dance, Public Meeting space, Festival Club or meeting point or Workshop space.

      Shortlist:

      Entry no. 9 – White Table / Price + Myers 3D Engineering, London
      Entry no. 36 – O’Mahony Pike Architects, Cork
      Entry no. 52 – Murray O’Laoire Architects, Limerick
      Entry no. 60 – eldridge Smerin, London
      Entry no. 67 – Peter Feeny Architects & 3P.Urban.Process, London

      Final results are due in early Feb.

    • #758896
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Here’s 2 questions…are we EVER going to see Horgans quay get a move on? And is Grand parade plaza ever going to begin construction??

    • #758897
      kite
      Participant
      Radioactiveman wrote:
      I notice that “industrial units” are now being advertised for lease at a Watercourse Road site which was at the centre (literally and geographically) of a recent planning saga. This site had been a pivotal part of Frinailla’s City Quarter/Lady’s Well development (for which they recieved permission prior to Christmas) after a lenghty planning process at CCC and ABP level.
      ABP ruled that a large central block of apartments be omitted from the plans and granted permission for the remainder. It is thought that this loss of residential space has impacted financially on the deal between the site owner and the development company. It is speculated that this will have an impact on the timeframe within which work can begin. CCC has recently advertised that Alinett’s Lane (which runs through the site) will be closed from next month to August 2007 to allow construction to take place.

      :confused: Is that area zoned for industrial use given that CCC are due to vote to rezone land in Churchfield to allow lidl to build a supermarket on land zoned for industry?

    • #758898
      POM
      Participant

      Horgan’s Quay

      Last June if I remember correctly Martin Cullen announced the government had approved the redevelopment of Horgans Quay with Manor Park Homes. The press statement noted that an application was now ready to enter planning. Nearly 7 months later and nothing. As for tweaking the project out, in fairness, they’ve had 8 years to do it…is this just yet another political hush ’em up? How many more months/years do we have to wait for a project that is already long overdue and will undoubtedly take a long time to great through planning let alone construction??? It seems a constant frustration.

    • #758899
      kite
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Its all political attention seeking and image enhancing behaviour.Total gimp unworthy of any votes – EVER.
      We’ll see him go very quiet when Bishopstown G.A.A. and Highfield come up for development in the next few years.Total nonsense as ever in todays Irish Examiner fron Fine Gaels Mr.Buttimer.

      On the subject of Highfield RFC and Bishopstown GAA, has anyone updates on how far advanced plans are to relocate both to Cork County?;)

    • #758900
      POM
      Participant

      Anyone hear how John Cleary got on today for his Mahon office building??

    • #758901
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Reports today suggest that the Office of Public Works (OPW) is about to commission a study into the flood risk posed to Cork City and harbour areas in the future. The study, which is expected to be completed during 2007, is also due to suggest a variety of work which may be done to ameliorate this problem.
      One source suggests that a ‘Thames Barrier’ type structure may have to be built at Roches’ Point to adequately protect the city from flood damage in the future.


      Thames barrier

    • #758902
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Anyone hear how John Cleary got on today for his Mahon office building??

      Think it got planning but they knocked 2 floors off it. It was 5 storeys now its 3. About 8000sq m or something from 13,000sq m, not sure.

    • #758903
      corkdood
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      One source suggests that a ‘Thames Barrier’ type structure may have to be built at Roches’ Point to adequately protect the city from flood damage in the future.

      I remember speculating about such a system last year on this very board. Although I envisaged it being a smaller affair located at the end of the city quays to maintain a constant water level in the city for both aesthetic and flood prevention reasons.

      It will be a problem that will have to faced in time to come as the sea level rises due to global warming etc.

    • #758904
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Anyone have any ideas on who will out of the homegrown boys be a big docklands player?? I mean theres a limited amount of land there and i know Howards and Flemings have all indicated their interest big time but what about the likes of O’Flynn construction and the Loves and such. I thought theyd be well in there for a large docklands masterplan. It so far seems to be ruled by outsiders like Manor park and the Werdna and Nat Ross…??

    • #758905
      jungle
      Participant

      According to RTE, the Mardyke pedestrian bridge has finally been opened today

      http://www.rte.ie/news/2006/0201/cork.html

      Is this for everyone to use now, or was this just a formal opening with the bridge still restricted to UCC staff and students?

    • #758906
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Here’s an image of the new Mardyke bridge:

      also, here’s an image of the FIRST official ‘opening’ of the bridge on 17th June 2005!!!!
      Former Lord Mayor Sean Martin is there with the usual gang, blatantly codding us by suggesting that the bridge was in fact open to the public!
      The first time the public got near the new bridge was when it was opened to UCC students and staff on the 11th of January 2006! Today’s opening (phase two) allows the public to continue through Distillery Field to the North Mall. Unfortunately, as of ten minutes ago, phase two of the walkway was once again closed to the public!! Genius, sheer f***king genius!!


      The phantom ‘opening’

      If you want to see a nice aerial view of the new walkway and bridge, click here.

      If you want to see a map of the new walkway and bridge, click here.

      And to see the FIRST official ‘opening’ in all its glory, click here.

    • #758907
      kite
      Participant

      It seems there may be a reappraisal on the cards with regard to the Crows Nest proposal.
      All aspects of the proposed development are being looked into, viability (due to the amount of unsold apartments in the area), planning headaches (residents, CSD ect) and the appetite for such developments from the new director of planning.
      It looks like the 15 storey landmark building may not go ahead.
      It may just reopen as a pub-restaurant as before.
      Pity Lex is gone so quite, he was always able to give a ya or na to such rumours with great accuracy.

    • #758908
      lawyer
      Participant

      Is lexington still in this world?

    • #758909
      kite
      Participant

      Today’s Cork Independent reports that a motion to go before CCC calling for a light rail system from the airport to the city centre from Cllr.Dave McCarthy (Fianna Fail) drew sniggers from other councilors.
      These begrudgers should put up or shut up. Most of us would disagree with Cllr.McCarthy’s support of the recent vote on the height cap but it is this type of “dogged can do attitude” that is sadly lacking in other politicians (local and national)

      The Taoiseach said of Cllr.McCarthy when he was Lord Mayor of Cork that the first phone call he received every morning was from McCarthy asking for money for Cork, this is evident all over the Northside of the city where the best sporting and leisure facilities in Ireland are found.
      Love him or hate him, one has to say, that guys got balls.

    • #758910
      A-ha
      Participant

      Yeah, saw a little bit about that in the Echo on Tuesday. It’s a shame the councillors are so small thinking that he got sniggered at. Try and think outside the box! You’d think the Lord Mayor would agree with him, she is very big into the airport development. Was at the airport the other day, it looks really well. It’s very glam and I like that it’s all lit up and bright… it can be seen from the runway at night…. not like the tinted glass thing that’s there at the moment. It looks really futuristic. Also, the Kinsale Road flyover looks well, and looks to be on schedule? When is it due for completion?? Oh and for anyone that didn’t see the Echo on Tuesday, it also said that the toll for cars on the Fermoy by-pass will be €1.60…. I don’t care what they do as long as they don’t toll the tunnel!

    • #758911
      kite
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Yeah, saw a little bit about that in the Echo on Tuesday. It’s a shame the councillors are so small thinking that he got sniggered at. Try and think outside the box! You’d think the Lord Mayor would agree with him, she is very big into the airport development. Was at the airport the other day, it looks really well. It’s very glam and I like that it’s all lit up and bright… it can be seen from the runway at night…. not like the tinted glass thing that’s there at the moment. It looks really futuristic. Also, the Kinsale Road flyover looks well, and looks to be on schedule? When is it due for completion?? Oh and for anyone that didn’t see the Echo on Tuesday, it also said that the toll for cars on the Fermoy by-pass will be €1.60…. I don’t care what they do as long as they don’t toll the tunnel!

      😡 Like you say, “small minded”..no wonder Cork is way behind development wise.Some of these snigger buggers must think that we are not entitled to a modern city.
      I wonder do Werda Ltd. (hope that spelling is correct) regret trying to break into the Cork market (Water St.) taking on the big wigs in the city with all the nods and winks that makes our world in Cork go round??

    • #758912
      bog standard
      Participant

      Great greetings to you Archiseek members! It’s wonderful to see that Cork has its very own vibrant and even controversial!! thread, particularly one that provides architectural discourse within a broader political and developmental context.
      To add twopence to the current topic: Recently passing through the gothic-nightmare-otherworld of Charles de Gaulle airport I was saddened to note that all commuters were forced to pay slightly extortionate (by metro standards) fares to and from the city. Travel tax? Airport cash-cow? It is unfortunate that this is one of the first impressions given to visitors.
      Similarly, I was embarrassed when asked by a relative visiting Cork whether a bus sevice operated from the airport- yes a sort of half time service? not in the evenings? once every? get a taxi? Whether a bus service or a light rail service or a skytrain or a space shuttle an effective regular and economical public transport service would repay itself hundred-fold, in my opinion, because of the first impression it would provide to visitors of a modern accessible humanist city, and the ensuent millions of new visitors attracted “in cork sure theres a feckin space shuttle that takes you from the airport into the the snug in the long valley” they’d tell their friends.

    • #758913
      dowlingm
      Participant

      couple of things

      presume some of you have seen the article about Cork Airport in the Indo
      http://www.unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=9&si=1542848&issue_id=13545 (reg required)
      seems like a farce to me!

      light rail to the airport – have you seen the gradient up to ORK? Over that distance? Not a chance I’m afraid without some very expensive tunnelling and viaducting.

      I have a question though – what’s this I read in de Paper about the Carrigtwohill dev plan being varied to facilitate the amgen development. Anyone know why they couldn’t have used already zoned land?

    • #758914
      jungle
      Participant

      Gradient depends on the route taken. A system that went out to Douglas, through Grange and up to the airport would not hit the direct gradients up the hill to the airport.

      However, there are more practical destinations for light rail – Ballincollig, Mahon – that would attract more users, so the airport should be a longer term goal.

      As mentioned, the bus to the airport need sorting out first. It needs to go at least every 15 to 20 minutes to be practical. It shouldn’t just head to the bus station, it should loop around the city centre, serving UCC and the railway station as well.

      It should also be possible to get a bus from places other than the city centre. How about creating a 6A bus route and sending every third No 6 up to the airport. Douglas and Grange would get a service every half hour to the airport. A similar thing could be done for the number 9 from the Ballyphehane side (although that bus scarcely runs).

      It’s important to remember that a large number of people who would use the airport bus service would be employees at the airport or the business park. A lot of those people live in the Grange area.

      But then, come to think of it, when did Cork last get an increase in the bus fleet? Even the newest buses seem to have 2002 or 2003 plates on them.

    • #758915
      Pug
      Participant

      the transport network in cork is a complete and utter disgrace. if its true that councillors sniggered at the a “light rail system” we should all despair – please let us stop electing these people. Coming from Carrigaline it is easier for me to get to work by NOT using the kinsale roundabout and drive through all the suburbs, there is no buses after 11.15pm which is an utter disgrace, the green route from grange is a joke as it restricted all the traffic coming from douglas causing MORE congestion, at grange cross they are just about to finish roadworks that will just about bring the traffic to the situation it was (i.e. crap) BEFORE they built a very large and pointless wall and they had to buy land to do it (i.e. waste of time and money) – A light rail is a NECESSITY from Cork to Ballincollig, Blackpool, Glanmire, Douglas/Carrigaline, Grange/Airport and at the four gateways to the city there should be a hub to link up to Intercity buses / possibly trains.

      we are light years behind and with the cost of having to buy out a toll bridge in dublin which provides nothing to the rest of the country, we are likely to remain there. 😡

    • #758916
      kite
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      the transport network in cork is a complete and utter disgrace. if its true that councillors sniggered at the a “light rail system” we should all despair – please let us stop electing these people. Coming from Carrigaline it is easier for me to get to work by NOT using the kinsale roundabout and drive through all the suburbs, there is no buses after 11.15pm which is an utter disgrace, the green route from grange is a joke as it restricted all the traffic coming from douglas causing MORE congestion, at grange cross they are just about to finish roadworks that will just about bring the traffic to the situation it was (i.e. crap) BEFORE they built a very large and pointless wall and they had to buy land to do it (i.e. waste of time and money) – A light rail is a NECESSITY from Cork to Ballincollig, Blackpool, Glanmire, Douglas/Carrigaline, Grange/Airport and at the four gateways to the city there should be a hub to link up to Intercity buses / possibly trains.

      we are light years behind and with the cost of having to buy out a toll bridge in dublin which provides nothing to the rest of the country, we are likely to remain there. 😡

      😮
      All valid and true points. However we seem to be faced with a double edged sword in Cork in relation to a dedicated public transport system to the airport and outer “city” areas such as Carrigaline, Ballincollig ect. Councilors argue that we need to increase the city population to do away with the need to use cars or public transport to get to the heart of Cork (other than the 3rd world buses we already have), this head in the sand policy makes them afraid to commit to a proper Luas type system. It would also make them very unpopular with their buddys in the “Cork click” who have a vested interest in stopping making it easy to live in the County and commuting to Cork City.
      Any public rep. local or national who would dare suggest that we deserve better is going to be in for a hard ride I suspect?

    • #758917
      Niall123
      Participant

      Just a few questions about stuff going on at present in Cork.

      1. The developments over near the train station. is it true that a small indoor stadium with a capacity or somehwere around 8,000 to 10,000 is to be built. Would be great if true, would cater for basketball, concerts and a future possible Ice Hockey franchise ?

      2. What is to become of the area directly accross the river from the developments in lapps quay. you know the run down buildings accross the road from the Sextant Bar ?

      3. Anyone know or guess whats going to happen to the Revenue’s offices on Sullivan’s quay when the Revenue eventually moves out ?

      4. Whats that huge building being renoved at the start of Father Mathews’s quay going to become. Can’t find any source of info about it on the internet.

      5. The development on the coal quay. I know it going to be a shopping complex but has any large retail tenant been found yet ?

    • #758918
      PTB
      Participant

      I think that a light rail following on or about the route of the old Carrigaline railway should be a priority for cork county council.It would service Blackrock, Mahon, Rochestown, Passage West, Monkstown, Carrigline and maybe Ringaskiddy. Then onwards through the city centre to Ballincollig at the other end. And if it’s going through Ringaskiddy it may as well be actual rail considering the port authority is re-locating the port down there, but that would need a tunnel under the lee to connect it to the rail network. Regardless of that some sort of rail is needed for Carrigaline since about 87% of it’s folk go to work in a car – the highest rate in Ireland, and it’s on use building more roads. Carrigline is on it’s third relief road now I think.

    • #758919
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Just a few questions about stuff going on at present in Cork.

      1. The developments over near the train station. is it true that a small indoor stadium with a capacity or somehwere around 8,000 to 10,000 is to be built. Would be great if true, would cater for basketball, concerts and a future possible Ice Hockey franchise ?

      2. What is to become of the area directly accross the river from the developments in lapps quay. you know the run down buildings accross the road from the Sextant Bar ?

      3. Anyone know or guess whats going to happen to the Revenue’s offices on Sullivan’s quay when the Revenue eventually moves out ?

      4. Whats that huge building being renoved at the start of Father Mathews’s quay going to become. Can’t find any source of info about it on the internet.

      5. The development on the coal quay. I know it going to be a shopping complex but has any large retail tenant been found yet ?
      3rd February 2006 04:43 PM

      1. as far as i know manor park homes only wants to build a small arena on this site capable of holding around 2-3000 which wont happen in my opinion as it is pointless really and would be of no greater benefit to the city.o’flynns have proposed to build an arena of that size alright in curaheen in exchange for the showgrounds site in the docklands but it remains to be seen what will come of that.and owen o’callaghan has said recently that he is now fully committed to his proposal at mahon point for an event centre.what we all want now is for one of the proposals to be picked and start construction as this is vital for cork to incourage investment and to capitalise on our european capital of culture status.

      2.not sure really but there is rumours of ocp having bought this site i think.any development would have to be built around the chq buildings as they are protected structures but the yellow bonded wharehouses could be knocked.

      3.dont know but im guessing that it will be a big enough development of retail/apartments.

      4.as far as i know it is to become a food emporium.

      5.not sure but i think i heard habitat and a few more(cant rem) were as good as confirmed.

    • #758920
      Niall123
      Participant

      Cheers for that.

      Will be keeping an eye on the Water Street Development too. Looks stunning and hope it goes through.

    • #758921
      A-ha
      Participant

      I said it before and I’ll say it again…. Light rail is not the way in our city. Can you imagine them digging up our newly refurbished Patrick St. to put down a few tracks, espeically after all the trouble it caused in Dublin. Trolley Buses would be the best option… one tiny little overhead cable, smaller than that of the Luas and no fumes… even better no tracks, which means they can go anywhere in the city. They are dirt cheap to run and highly efficient. And we should be thankful for what we have, just think of the thousands that come to work every day by train from Cobh and the other east suburbs, which will also run all the way to Midleton, Carrigtohill etc. by 2008. Not to mention the amount of people from Mallow that commute to work by train. We are luckier than other Irish cities in that we actually have a suburban train linking up the satellite towns of Cork, which I’m sure places like Limerick and Galway would die for. I read more about the planned WaterBus service in the Echo the other day to run from Passage into the city. Sounds like a good idea.

      See Page 7 for a picture previously posted of a Trolley Bus in use in the U.K.

    • #758922
      Niall123
      Participant

      BTW, anyone knows what the state of play with the Water Street developments ?

      I was reading a post by Lexington earlier saying how the entire Port of Cork is going to be moved out to Ringaskiddy. Does this also include the full port out around Tivoli ? That area is enourmous and I can’t really see where all the money or will for a complete redevelopment of this area will come from.

    • #758923
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      once port and port related traffic is completely removed from the city centre quays, Tivoli will be the furthest port location upstream and according to the Port of Cork, a decreasingly attractive site for the container activities it currently facilitates – i think the long term intention is to relocate much of the tivoli shipping and container activities to the new Ringaskiddy development. i’ve always thought of tivoli as a huge opportunity for the city – after the docklands, it is the only large, central land resource within the city –

      imagine the land value of tivoli in 5 years time – a huge, flat, south facing site only minutes from city centre, facing the river and with good downstream river views; good road connections in and out of the city and countryside; along a railway line which may have a 15 minute service to kent station – great potential for a station there -also a good site for servicing by passenger river ferry to city centre –

      the city council should really think about tivoli – witihin the context of its value as a scarce land resource that could accommodate a large population.

    • #758924
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Bunch – Tivoli is a big site, about 55ha. And it fulfills an important function now – there aren’t many places in the state where a (relatively) deepwater container port is co-located with a heavy rail link*. Also, there is a lot of space to be filled in the docklands. If it does get fully developed, it’ll take 10-15 years to finish that area. After that point, of course, then Tivoli begins to make perfect sense – however thats a long way away, and the economy could be in a very different place then. Its definitely one to be borne in mind, but I wouldn’t go planning on that basis just yet.

      *Now, if you were to suggest a heavy rail link to Ringaskiddy and beyond, I’m all for it. Then you could start running Arrow style services Midleton/Carrigaline, Carrigaline/Mallow. But that is more than a little fanciful.

      what’s this I read in de Paper about the Carrigtwohill dev plan being varied to facilitate the amgen development. Anyone know why they couldn’t have used already zoned land?

      They were offered a number of IDA ‘developed’ sites in the area, already zoned for industry; they didn’t want them. They were either too small or didn’t have the transport links they wanted. They will have their own overpass and theres been mention of a railway siding also. The initial announcement was for in the region of 1,200 jobs. There has been mention since that the site will be able to accomodate much more than that (as in well over 2,000) if thing go well.

      Amgen is an interesting one, there has been rumours about it for nearly 5 years – it went quiet there for a while, and there were stories that it was going to take the Wyeth route (ie go to Dublin). Seems to have ended well though.

    • #758925
      Niall123
      Participant

      That’s what I’m thinking too. No heavy rail link to Ringaskiddy.

      Having a rail link to Carrigaline would be nice though.

      Question is though, what route would it take. The old mahon line has been closed off and is now used as a public walkway. Really is a pity. A rail line going that way, could have easily served, parts of Blackrock, Mahon Point SC and parts of Rochestown. An oportunity lost.

    • #758926
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      The old mahon line was too narrow anyways – it could just about take a luas style tram setup IIRC.

      I know very little about this kind of thing, but it strikes me that there are only two main options – one would be to bring a line south out of Ceantt, and cross the river in the city (probably in the Horgans Quay area itself). That option would be very expensive (would probably need to be elevated anyways) but would allow commuters direct access to the city centre. The other option would be to cross the river further east (at tivoli perhaps).

      It would probably make more sense to forgo heavy rail south of the Lee if you had the money to spend post 2020, and build a Luas type system for commuter rail – if nothing else it could cross the lee on existing roadbridges. The containerised rail issue would probably have to be dealt with elsewhere – the NET Nitrate site would have been ideal.

    • #758927
      Niall123
      Participant

      Overall, I just hope that Cork goes for some form of integrated transport setup, unlike Dublin which is basically a mish mash of all sorts of ideas.

      Lets for a start hope that the short term redevelopment of the Bus Station was just that, short term and something to save face for with the Capital of Culture status.

      IMO, a move to put the Bus Station beside the train station is vital. Create one transport hub would be ideal. This would then intergrate the bus and rail network, and have the airport only needing to be linked to one transport depot.

      Extra rail needs to be laid down for a number of commuter towns. I don’t know what the logistics are, but a rail link from Cork to Fermoy would be a start. This would also service Watergrasshill and Rathcormac.

      Another rail route, going to Douglas, Carrigaline, Ringaskiddy and a branch off for the airport would also be a nice feature.

    • #758928
      kite
      Participant
      bunch wrote:
      once port and port related traffic is completely removed from the city centre quays, Tivoli will be the furthest port location upstream and according to the Port of Cork, a decreasingly attractive site for the container activities it currently facilitates – i think the long term intention is to relocate much of the tivoli shipping and container activities to the new Ringaskiddy development. i’ve always thought of tivoli as a huge opportunity for the city – after the docklands, it is the only large, central land resource within the city –

      imagine the land value of tivoli in 5 years time – a huge, flat, south facing site only minutes from city centre, facing the river and with good downstream river views]

      😎 Tivoli would indeed be a prime area to be developed in conjunction with the Cork docklands.
      Just one question, is Tivoli land under the control of Cork city or county?

    • #758929
      bosco
      Participant

      Any news on the proposed development for this site? http://flickr.com/photos/paulratigan/95524420/

    • #758930
      PTB
      Participant

      I’m not too keen on Trolley Buses. They look like some sort of freakish bus/tram that some mad engineer came up with some time in a dark castle in Germany. Exactly what are the benefits of Trolley Buses oves normal buses?

      And a rail line to fermoy would be a huge white elephant. There simply isin’t the population to justify it. There was a line that went from Mallow through Fermoy to Waterford but it was torn up thirty years ago. But it might be some way viable in thirty or forty years.

    • #758931
      jungle
      Participant

      I don’t think Trolley Buses offer any great capacity increase compared to a normal bus, so presumably their advantage is that they are electrically powered and cut down on pollution. Even so, I’d like the first priority to be having enough buses to operate every 10 minutes on the main routes.

      As for rail expansion. possibly the most practical expansion would be to construct a spur off the Cobh line into Glanmire, Riverstown, Sallybrook etc. Of course, if land had been set aside when all the new estates were being built, it would have helped. Instead, it would now have to find a way through all the houses and the pretty hilly geography around there.

      If they’d thought about it before building them, some kind of cut and cover tram lines could have been provided on the Blackpool bypass and the South Link Road. Now, it would probably cause too many headaches during construction.

    • #758932
      POM
      Participant

      Was visiting Mahonpoint today and it struck me the car centric shopping complex (I wish the corporation had shown some foresight getting a rail line from the docklands through here and out to Carrigaline) though finished nicely inside with a good build quality, the biggest fault of its design is its failure to utilise its wonderful waterside location. Its a pity the centre wasn’t orientated to avail of what are essentially stunning views over the Atlantic Pond instead of providing its best window frontages facing a car park and traffic clogged road.

    • #758933
      lawyer
      Participant

      That is Lough Mahon,
      The Atlantic Pond is near Pairc Ui Chaoimh and the Marina.

    • #758934
      kite
      Participant

      This evenings Echo would lead anyone to despair.
      To see Jerry Buttimer on the CSD bandwagon is to be expected, but Cllr.Mary Shields to jump to the attention of the anti development lobby group is deplorable.
      Cllr.Buttimer (Fianna Fail) and Cllr.Shields (Fine Gael) or is it the other way around?, does it make any difference? + all the other so called public reps in Bishopstown have let themselves down again by calling on a ban on anything higher than a townhouse.
      Somebody once mentioned on this thread that we should start a lobby group to counteract the propaganda of the CSD, anyone interested??, before Mary Shields wins the 2006 http://www.corksouthwest.com councilor of the year award from that other anti high rise councilor, Cllr. D. McCarthy?

    • #758935
      POM
      Participant

      @lawyer wrote:

      That is Lough Mahon,
      The Atlantic Pond is near Pairc Ui Chaoimh and the Marina.

      Sorry the old age is kicking in. 🙂

      As for a counter lobby group to such protestors, the thing is with these people is not to fall into the same bucket as them but to rise above it and carry on doing the best you can with a clear mind and clear conscience. I admit I don’t think much of some of their public representatives, after all, it is my understanding a councillors job is to represent the publics best interests not their own, but sooner or later they surely realise their actions will only have negative long term impacts on their constituents.

    • #758936
      A-ha
      Participant

      I’m not against High Rise in the slightest…. I would just prefer to see it in designated areas, for example, the docklands. I think it would be great to see a large number of high rises in the that area rather than one or two scattered throughout a housing estate full of two bed semis. I can’t wait until Eglington Street is completed…. I think it will have a really positive effect on high rise in Cork and have no doubt that it will open up a number of opportunities, especially at a time when the docklands and surrounding zones are all planning to be re-developed in the near future. I don’t have anything else to say as regards to the transport situation in Cork…. mainly because if I got going, I couldn’t stop… there is just so much to say and recommend when it comes to public transport in Cork. Also, read in the paper last week that Cork has officially the best selection of restraunts in Ireland from Moroccan to Polish, Cork has all the gastronomic delights…. nothing to do with development or architecture I know, but I think everyone at Scoozies, Nakon Thai, Chez Youen and Ballymaloe all deserve a congratulations.

    • #758937
      jungle
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Was visiting Mahonpoint today and it struck me the car centric shopping complex (I wish the corporation had shown some foresight getting a rail line from the docklands through here and out to Carrigaline) though finished nicely inside with a good build quality, the biggest fault of its design is its failure to utilise its wonderful waterside location. Its a pity the centre wasn’t orientated to avail of what are essentially stunning views over the Atlantic Pond instead of providing its best window frontages facing a car park and traffic clogged road.

      I’ve menioned it before, but I find the way shopping centres have been developed in Cork to be very poor. With the honourable exceptions of Ballincollig and Douglas, they do not integrate into the areas that they serve. They have all been allowed to develop into places that are only practically available to cars. Any pedestrian is forced to trek across massive car parks to get into them. It shouldn’t be too difficult to have the shopping centre opening onto the street with the car park behind it.

      And that’s before the design is taken into account (Definitely no honour for Douglas SC there 😀 ).

    • #758938
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      I’ve menioned it before, but I find the way shopping centres have been developed in Cork to be very poor. With the honourable exceptions of Ballincollig and Douglas, they do not integrate into the areas that they serve. They have all been allowed to develop into places that are only practically available to cars. Any pedestrian is forced to trek across massive car parks to get into them. It shouldn’t be too difficult to have the shopping centre opening onto the street with the car park behind it.

      And that’s before the design is taken into account (Definitely no honour for Douglas SC there 😀 ).

      Douglas has 2 large shopping centres across the road from each other which is a disaster.
      Mahon point loks airlifted in from Houston or some other “car hell” city.
      Merchants Quay turns its back to the River Lee and has all the qualities of the old Arndale centre before the Ira blew it up.
      Wilton worked for a while but is now hopelessy outdated and a good re-development ah-la Dundrum might work there.
      How many more Dunnes stores do we need – any superquin or M&S in the suburbs ???

    • #758939
      pier39
      Participant

      i think a rework at wilton is gearing up, much needed but im not quite sure with the council will make of it. they dont even want manor park building a retail centre at horgans qy which is practically the city centre so how theyll fair with another massive shopping centre in the suburbs is up for question. plus youve to consider the big plans afoot at douglas too. personally i think a large redevelopment at wilton wouldnt really affect the city centre. over the next few years the city centre will be more than able to hold its own with no less than 4 large retail schemes in the pipeline. wilton has an established base which it will retain and one which is very very easily capable of supporting an enlarged centre without damaging the city centre. my reservation here would be traffic. an imaginative management scheme would be needed to manage what is essentially one of the worst traffic blackspots in munster. the council really need to get their act together on serving the southern suburbs with some form of public rail system (road systems aka buses will not work here over the long term, a simple fact).

      as for m&s, it strikes me as weird that old toffee shop hasnt set up a suburb centre, god knows its a potential goldmine. with the company so anxiously expanding around dublin there is cash just waiting for them to hoover up in cork with the right location. there existing store in merchants qy is reportedly one of its best performing. i know there was talk that it looked at ballincollig briefly and maybe it would suit an expanded mahon point??????????? personally i would see maybe horgans qy or an expanded wilton sc as an ideal location for another m&s. i think the prospect of wilton would very much appeal to m&s as well.

    • #758940
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      So when is the next big city centre development that will make us all gasp?? We need a bit of excitement injected here. 🙂

    • #758941
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      So when is the next big city centre development that will make us all gasp?? We need a bit of excitement injected here. 🙂

      Exactly ! The images that were published for The Grand Parade Capitol Cineplex site look very poor.
      Cornmarket St. development does’nt look exciting.
      Academy St. may be a chance to do something good.About time that street was pedestrianised along with Drawbridge St and the network of streets behind the Savoy/Easons linking onto the Quay.

    • #758942
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Exactly ! The images that were published for The Grand Parade Capitol Cineplex site look very poor.
      Cornmarket St. development does’nt look exciting.
      Academy St. may be a chance to do something good.About time that street was pedestrianised along with Drawbridge St and the network of streets behind the Savoy/Easons linking onto the Quay.

      Yeah thankfully though that Capital cinema plan isnt going ahead anymore. And a new scheme is suppose to be proposed later this year with a new developer.

    • #758943
      jungle
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Douglas has 2 large shopping centres across the road from each other which is a disaster.

      Just to clarify.

      I certainly wasn’t citing Douglas in general as how shopping centres should work. My point was that Douglas Shopping Centre has an entrance which opens onto the main street in Douglas. As such, it becomes a part of the suburb. Douglas Court is up there with Bishopstown Court for the title of worst suburban shopping development in Cork.

    • #758944
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      Just to clarify.

      I certainly wasn’t citing Douglas in general as how shopping centres should work. My point was that Douglas Shopping Centre has an entrance which opens onto the main street in Douglas. As such, it becomes a part of the suburb. Douglas Court is up there with Bishopstown Court for the title of worst suburban shopping development in Cork.

      I’d love to see the planners report on that permission for Douglas Court.

    • #758945
      POM
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      I’d love to see the planners report on that permission for Douglas Court.

      The evolution of planning reports is very interesting. The consideration, depth, context and professionalism have greatly changed over the years. That’s not to knock the professionalism of earlier planners, but the standard and expectancy has been significantly anted up and this is reflected in modern reports. Having said that, you still get some comedians with conditions and rulings that perplex even the greatest of intellect.

    • #758946
      A-ha
      Participant

      I can’t wait for the next big shopping development to open up in Cork, especially as they seem to be opening up in the city centre, rather than the suburbs. Habitat, H&M, TKMaxx and more shops that fit the Bershka, Jane Norman and Zara type profile are all expected to open up in either Cornmarket St. or else Academy St. It’s true Marks and Spencer were supposed to open up in Ballincollig, but I believe they were outbid by Dunnes (lucky us). I think Douglas Court has always been top of the list for best suburban shopping centre, even more so since Esprit and the like have opened up there. Blackpool is a very well designed shopping centre with a good mix of shops, especially since the retail park opened up next door. When are PC World, Currys and Halfords due to open up in Mahon Point?….. I thought they were to open in January.

    • #758947
      Leesider
      Participant

      was wondering can anyone tell me where amgen is supposed to be locating?? I presume it is on the Midleton side of Carrigtwohill, also does anyone know where the train station will be built in carrigtwohill, will it e near the village centre or further out?

    • #758948
      lexington
      Participant

      The following are some backdated posts accumulated over the past few weeks. I promised some users to post these up – sorry they weren’t up sooner, but a number of factors are at play and I will not be able to continue posting here (or boards.ie) indefinitely over the prospective future. I appreciate sincerely some of the very kind words expressed in previous posts – thank you all most genuinely. Apologises for the brevity. 😮

      Lex



      *updates* 4/1/2006

      🙂 DAT Partnerships have lodged Significant Further Information on its plans for CentrePoint, their Clontarf Street proposal, destined for a tiny triangular site (circa. 2,250sq ft +) bored by Oliver Plunkett Street Lower to the south, Deane Street to the west and Clontraf Street to the east – and which was purchased for a staggering figure just under €1m. Coughlan de Keyser Architects (Daniel Luxton) had been assigned for design on the project which originally intended to rise 12-storeys in height, but following the outcome of preplanning talks, was lodged at a reduced height of 9-storeys (with a gross floor space of under 30,000sq ft). The design drew much discussion given its unusual form which resembled something of a ‘torch flame’ (see below):


      Original CentrePoint proposal – eastern elevation.

      The application received a submission from Kevin Hurley of An Taisce stating that a recognition of design intentions, but criticism of its form and height among other things.
      In their request for Further Information, CCC noted their dis-satisfaction with the cantivelered nature of the design which overhung public footpaths – they additionally pointed out that the height of the building’s southern elevation negatively impacted neighbouring No.6 Lapps Quay and the visual continuity of the vista south-to-north along Eglinton Street, facing Lapps Quay. The CentrePoint project, in their view, seemed to dominated the other buildings in the area at CityQuarter and Lapps Quay. A request for height reductions at this elevation was sought along with revisions in the buildings impact with respect to public foothpaths.
      Whether one likes or dislikes the original design is one thing, however there was a clear willingness to explore forms other than those generally associated with the districts established buildings. I’ll bring details of the revised form soon and you can judge for yourselves the outcome of the latest design efforts.

      A decision on CentrePoint is due for the 30th January 2005 – the same date scheduled for a decision on John Cleary Developments large Sifco-redevelopment near Mahon Point. Coughlan de Keyser are responsible here too for the design on JCD’s 5-storey (circa) 130,000sq ft office and retail development…so it should be a big day for them!



      😮 For those wondering, a decision date on the Rothbury Estates application to redevelop the former Sunbeam Factory in Blackpool is currently expected for the 18th Feburary 2005. Design is by Richard Rainey & Associates and further details may be found here



      *updates* 4/1/2006

      🙂 Coughlan de Keyser Architects have submitted revised plans on the proposal by DAT Partnership to develop a new 9-storey office tower on a tiny (circa.) 2,500sq ft triangular site bordered by Deane Street, Oliver Plunkett Street Lower and Clontarf Street. The original proposal resembled a torch-like flame which overhung the public footpaths and finished with a tinted glazed exterior. The revised plan has addressed concerns by the Planning Authority regarding the infringement of the public footpath – the new proposal is confined within the limits of the site yet remains up to 9-storeys in height. The design now resembles that more closely of a modern day Flatiron Building, with glazed finishes on all 3-corners – with the north positioned to benefit from attractive night-time lighting features, creating an active visual amenity the full height of the building at this highly prominent corner. A mild set-back is afforded the southern elevation, however the architects and planning consultants (CSR) argue that the site is worthy of a taller structure – and I would tend to agree, this site is unique in its position; essentially it is an ‘island’-like site and as such is stand-alone. Unlike the neighbouring sites in line for development at Deane Street and Anderson’s Quay – the Clontarf Street (CentrePoint) site offers an ideal landmark location which may be exemplified by its height. The new design is by no means a disappointment, perhaps at a personal level I enjoyed the unusual form of the original, however the new proposal, though a little more plain is still an interesting and attractive project. CDA have done well on what is essentially a very difficult site. A decision is due on January 30th 2005.



      🙂 Adrian Power has submitted further information and additional photomontages for his Clarke’s Bridge site which originally envisioned a 7-storey office building, again in the care of Coughlan de Keyser. CCC planners had raised concerns regarding the buildings height which are now understood to have been revised. DNG Harris Commercial are handling the project’s marketing.



      *updates* 8/1/2006

      😎 Fleming Construction have apparently offered to construct an event centre at lands abutting the Ballincollig By-Pass near Curraheen. The offer applies to the Munster Agricultural Society in exchange for its 22-acre lands (on long-term lease from Cork City Council) in the city’s docklands. Fleming Construction purchased the amenity zoned 126-acre lands along the Ballincollig By-Pass last year for a value estimated at €17m. Fleming Construction intend to construct a multiple purpose event centre with in excess of 6,000 seats (subject to various configurations), along with associated amenities, car-parking and an equestrian provision which could net the MAS its own independent income and host a variety of activities including concerts. It is Fleming’s intention thereafter to utilise the valuable docklands site for extensive redevelopment purposes. This will undoubtedly, however, run into some conflict with CCDP zonings and CCC intentions. Howard Holdings and at least one other group involving a prominent hotelier are also anxious to acquire the MAS docklands site.

      .



      🙁 An Bord Pleanala (ABP) have made a clear indication that a tall structure on the 4-acre Water Street (for which Werdna Limited are in appeal for 304-apartment units over blocks generally 9-storeys and 1 feature 17-storey tower) is inappropriate. The Water Street design team, Murray O’Laoire Architects, are now being offered the opportunity to provide a redesign on the project with a decision due for the end of March 2006.



      Revenue Commissioners Confirm Move (8/1/2006)

      As indicated in the 1st Post of this thread, the OPW have today confirmed the move by the Revenue Commissioners (and their approx. 600 staff) from Government Buildings along Sullivans Quay to soon-to-be-built offices off the Blackpool By-Pass/Assumption Road.
      See post here -> http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=50534375&postcount=1
      The winning bid has come from auctioneer/developers Frank Sheahan & Joe Carey in conjunction with Ascon Rohcon (who have the option of buying out the almost 2-acre site from the formers). The developers secured planning in 2003 for a 4-storey office development, designed by Jack Coughlan & Associates back in 2001, for Susie’s Field – not far from their recently complete Sean Mhuillean apartment complex (designed by J.E. Keating & Associates). Construction on the project will commence almost immediately following the ironing out of issues concerning the move between the OPW and bidders – a scheduled completion is set for mid-2007 and relocation by the RC to commence after Summer 2007. As part of the winning bid, the developers will now secure a highly attractive and valuable site of 3/4 acres along Sullivans Quay (Government Buildings) which will now likely be up for substantial redevelopment – given the site currently suffers from issues of subsidence. Any prospective development here could accommodate a landmark mixed-use development with extensive commercial provisions, although it is understood the developers have intent for predominantly office usage. Ascon have been pushing further into development in Cork over the last few years and now have their sights set on a number of potential city centre developments which could include a sites along Albert Quay (an assembled half-acre premises which may see the planning office later this year) & Sullivans Quay. The focus will now be on Sullivans Quay, undoubtedly expectations will be high given the prominence of the site with respect to Grand Parade.



      🙂 Cork County Council have been greenlit to develop a new 6-storey over basement library building to the west (approx. 37 metres) from County Hall tower. The development will consist of new archives, library and office accommodation overhead – finishings include stone cladding and beige panels similar to the materials used on the extension to County Hall on the east side of the tower. Additional car-parking will be provided by a vertical extension to the existing multi-storey on-site. Shay Cleary Architects are responsible for the design.


    • #758949
      lexington
      Participant

      McCarthy Developments Next Docklands Plan

      Previously at Archiseek.com (http://https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=38287&postcount=273) I mentioned that McCarthy Developments were in pre-planning about a further major city development. The proposal concerns Phase 2 of their Centre Park Road project, Phase 1 has already achieved 10,039sq m of office provision over 8-storeys over basement car-parking, deisgned by Oisin Creagh of Murray O’Laoire Architects (see image above). Phase 1 adjoins Centre Park House, a multi-tenant office block of 6-storeys which also serves as McCarthy Developments’ HQ, and faces Centre Park Road.

      Phase 2 will see the developers utilise the remainder of the 2.5acre site they purchased at this location back in 2004 – it is expected that up to a further 25,000sq m of office provision could be provided in what will likely be a mixed-use proposal, fronting Monahan’s Road. Combined, the 2 projects would provide undoubtedly Cork’s largest office development. It is understood Murray O’Laoire Architects have reached an advanced stage at planning with their clients. Though McCarthy Developments have lost out to the Blackpool-based Linn Dubh project (championed by Ascon, Frank Sheahan & Joe Carey) in attaining the Revenue Commissioners, it is understood that recent successes by the likes of O’Flynn Construction’s Ballincollig Town Centre office campus and the Shipton Group’s Blackpool Park office scheme, may encourage McCarthy Developments with respect to their market outlook.



      :confused: With Hickeys Home Furnishing’s retail operation tied up, it is believed DTZ Sherry Fitzgerald will likely be heading up the sale of the company’s valuable Maylor Street premises (approx. ground floor area of 10,000sq ft) near Patrick’s Street. Speculation cites that BrideView Developments may take a gander at the location given that it already has an agreement appropriated at 124/125 Oliver Plunkett Street which forms part of the larger former Hickey’s premises – the details of which are unclear. It may offer Declan O’Mahony & Co. a superb foot into providing a nice city centre retailling development should they wish… In any event, the premises is likely to be redeveloped with a core retail function. Those with an ambitious mind may even consider a site assembly with attractive sites dotting the length of Maylor Street as far as Parnell Place from Hickeys – the opportunity could exist to facilitate a development which would offer 1 of at least 2 major department stores eyeing up the Cork market for their first operation in the city centre – as far as location goes, the Maylor Street premises would offer an ideal spot – and an extended, assembled site would allow compliments to the main anchor with further retail units. In any event, the premises will be hotly contended when it comes to market.



      🙂 Citco are to create up to 250 new jobs as part of an expansion programme in Cork city. The international hedge funds group already employ a number of staff at its Cork Airport Buisness Park facility, but will now seek to increase its operational activity by occupying new offices at Tellenganna House, Blackrock – a significant office development under completion by Bowen Construction, designed by Wilson Architecture and developed by SHUL (backed by David O’Sullivan) – who will now consider options on the further development of 100,000sq ft + of commercial and office space along adjoining lands at Monahan’s Road, including a former coal yard.


      Camden Quay Development Opportunity

      It seems Cohlan Downing Associates are to announce the sale of the former Atkins-McKenzie Garden Centre along Camden Quay (most recently used as the provisional Cork Circuit Court). NorthGate Investments are understood to be offering the half-acre (approx. 20,000sq ft) site on the market for €9m. The attractive facade facing the quayside is protected and any redevelopment here will have to be sensitive given a number of issues which include the relationship to the facade and Georgian terrace to the east – furthermore, in terms of height and elevational treatment, consideration will have to afforded the terraced housing to the rear (north) of the site. NorthGate Investments had applied in 1997 to redevelop the site as a 170-bedroom hotel, however the application was never entirely realised through the planning process.



      The DAT Partnerships plan for Clontarf Street, which received a significant redesign recently at the hands of architects Coughlan de Keyser, has proceeded into a further round of additional information. The 9-storey office proposal is set for a tiny and difficult site bordered by Clontarf Street, Oliver Plunkett Street and Deane Street at the heart of Cork’s new business district.



      John Cleary Developments Cleared on Sifco Development

      :/ Blarney-based John Cleary Developments have been granted permission on their plans for a substantial office and retail development at the former Sifco premises near Mahon Point. The company lodged plans back in September 2005 for the construction of an office and retail development of 13, 831sqm (gross floor area over five floors with basement car parking over two levels (301 no. spaces) and surface car parking (68 no. spaces) and cycle parking (78 no. spaces) to a height of 37.1 metres. Following on-going planning consultations, and a submit of Unsolicited Further Information, the plan was reduced in height by 2 floors representing a large reduction in office floor space. The structure as granted stands now at 3-storeys over basement car-parking (which was also subject to reductions). The proposal was designed by Coughlan de Keyser Architects, who also design the developer’s MotorMall on the same site – that scheme should proceed in the late Spring/early Summer with Windsor Motors (based on the Carrigrohane Road) understood to be seeking accommodation at the facility.

      – Windsor Motors who were recently granted permission for the part demolition of an existing warehouse and construction of new automotive showroom, deisgned by SDA O’Flynn, at their Carrigrohane site, are now expected to be seek a market sale of their premises which is located in an area subject to a great deal of recent acquisition activity, not least David Crowe (Oyster Developments)’s purchase of the Coca-Cola Bottling facility nearby. Mr. Crowe is understood to have appointed a design team following a tender process and will now seek to propose a significant high-density development of a predominantly residential nature. The zoning of the area could qualify the proposal for that of a high-rise nature should it be deemed appropriate.

      – Sticking with David Crowe…

      …Oyster Developments have withdrawn their appeal against conditions imposed on the grant of their Deane Street project which saw CCC state a reduction of the proposal height from 7 to 6-storeys. The scheme, designed by The e-Project, will adjoin No.8 Parnell Place and provide up to 40,000sq ft of combined office space. Construction is understood to be schedule for commencement within the imminent future.



      *updates* 3/3/2006

      🙂 Finbar Gannon is to apply for a symbolically signifcant development at his premises, Saint Patrick’s House, located between Alfred Street and the Lower Glanmire Road. Mr. Gannon will seek to vertically extend the existing structure by 3 storeys, bringing it to 5-storeys – and with the new additional floors catering to residential usage (13 residential units – 6x 1-bedroom, 5x 2-bedroom and 2x 3-bedroom). The ground floor function will remain associated with commercial activities. The development is similar to a 2003 application by Mr. Gannon which sought a vertical extension of 2-storeys with 15 student apartments contained therein. The project is symbolically relevant in that it provides another encouraging step to this area of the North Docklands, already geared up with Jack Lynch’s Siemens Building (design by Oppermann Associates), BrideView Developments’ Unity House and the application by Paul Kenny for his St. Patrick’s Quay car-park nearby. The area will be in line for further significant development over the coming future. Kiosk Architects are the design team behind the subject project.



      🙂 Quality Healthcare Limited, the UK-based firm which purchased and renovated Shanakiel Hospital for private healthcare use, is now seeking additional planning for the provision of 18 new elderly care independent living units in 3 2-storey buildings. The proposal will be situated on the grounds of Shanakiel Hospital and include numerous provisions of pedestrian access, including one linking with Sunday’s Well Road.

    • #758950
      lexington
      Participant

      Horgan’s Quay – when?

      Well it’s a question that’s been on people’s lips for nearly 8 years – when? Ever since Manor Park Homebuilders (headed up by Corkman Michael O’Driscoll) purchased development rights to the 17-acre Horgan’s Quay site back in 1998, the anticipation has been high regarding the future of this vital landbank. O’Mahony Pike Architects were appointed as the winning design team jointly by Manor Park and Treasury Holdings for the project following their competitive submission on proposals for the site. Anyone who has followed associated posts regarding the site will be aware of its ups and downs, but with the final draft of the North Docklands Area Plan realised (amendments and all) and commitments made by the Port of Cork to relocate primary activities to its extensive and far more practical land holdings in Ringaskiddy…the question is when? As it stands, Port of Cork activity along the northern docklands quays is increasingly less signifcant versus harbour activities at Tivoli and even the South Docklands – this is recognised. By the time any application goes through planning, it is likely that most north docklands activity will have seized – and subject to agreement, this will allow Phase 1 construction proceed. By the time construction has be complete on this phase, South Docklands activity will hopefully have reduced enough to allow provisions such as the Horgan’s Quay Marina see installation. A number of issues arise here – and it will require full commitment by Cork City Council, Cork County Council, the Port of Cork and the Government – that is, seeing through an application by CorkCoCo for new port facilities at Ringaskiddy, the commencement of work on the upgraded N28 as far as Ringaskiddy (to facilitate freight transport) and a commitment to providing a rail capacity as far as Ringaskiddy (via Carrigaline perhaps) to support freight and passenger traffic flows: such provisions will be vital to support a facility (the Port of Cork) that contributes immeasurably to the economic well-being of not least the south-west region, but broader Irish economy.

      Following NDAP amendments, a stakeholders forum has been established regarding the North Docklands – this forum, regulated by the CCC Docklands Office (now under the hand of Pat Ledwidge), will co-ordinate discussions between parties with a vested interest in the North Docklands Area (including developers, CIE, Port of Cork, CCC, residents and local business). In realising a successful planning application for Horgan’s Quay, this forum will require some utilisation – especially between Manor Park/CIE and the Port of Cork.

      There are other sticking points however, including the restrictive retail cap implied by the NDAP following amended wording. Both Manor Park & CIE are anxious to produce a significant element of such an element. CCC are reluctant – there are arguments for and against such a provision, both with some exceptionally valid points, however this will be discussed at a later stage. Building heights are another issue – in my personal view, a limit on heights should perhaps be adhered to in the interests of protecting Northern Ridge perspectives (vital to the character of Cork and its topography), however this does not exclude the option of taller landmark buildings (provided strong and characteristic design standards) and designated, well-spaced locations.

      And what of the event centre that we hear so much about? Indeed such a centre would be ideal at a location like Horgan’s Quay – however, it practicality seems to be smoked by idealistic ambitions (not that we should not strive for such, but there comes a point of realistic recogition). Manor Park have proposed an ‘opera house’ style venue of between 1,000 and 2,000 seats – clearly this is significantly below the ideal/required and would conflict with the established venues at Cork Opera House and the Everyman Palace. What is required is a significant capacity centre of between 6,000 and 10,000 seating/standing places – the fact is, Manor Park aren’t really interested in building such a centre – why not hand the area over to increased public space? Something lacking in the north docklands area. The Munster Agricultural Showgrounds sticks out as a promising location given issues of traffic management (which should be aided with easy linkage to Kent Station if CCC get the Water Street Bridge project rolling), space and catalystic renegeration in this docklands quarter. Currently 3 teams are committed to providing options on such a centre at this Showgrounds location. Perhaps their public confirmation of such plans will aid the realisation process at Horgan’s Quay somewhat. It would work well for both parties, the event centre developer and Manor Park.

      Richard Collins of O’Mahony Pike Architects is involved in the Horgan’s Quay project; John Gannon is handling the role of Planning Consultant with Tom Phillips & Associates. The word is that, all going well, an application should well see the light this year (2006) for Horgan’s Quay – but with so many variables in operation, some doubt could remain.


      *UPDATES* (8/2/2006)

      😀 Paul Kenny’s The Treasury development originally intended for Revenue Commissioner contention, has been successful through the appeal process. The project was appealed on both a 1st Party (regarding contribution fees) and 3rd Party Basis (by Bell Scott Engineering & McLaughlins). The project was granted by the Bord (ABP) subject to reductions in height which involved the removal of the entire 4th floor at Block One (the south facing Patrick’s Quay section – although this will not affect the dramatic curved facade) and the removal of the 5th floor of Block Two (which backs onto the Lower Glanmire Road to the north). The floorspace of the approx. 12,000sq m office and retail project has been markedly reduced. Parking, in line with CCC implemented conditions, restraints at 150 basement spaces. Though the Wilson Architecture project lost out on the Revenue Commissioners bid, favourable market conditions leave the option open for Mr. Kenny to proceed with the development should he so wish at some future stage. The former Kirwan lot on the corner of Ship Street and Patrick’s Quay (which forms part of the subject site) is currently up for lease, this would suggest that development plans are likely to be put on hold for the interm.


      😀 Rejecting their own planning inspector’s recommendation, ABP have wisely granted permission on Monaghan-based Pitwood Limited’s plans for a a 116-bedroom luxury hotel on the Corbett Brothers owned Beasley Street site – which notably fronts Parnell Place via the protected facades of No.17/18 Parnell Place. The Bord over-ruled CCC and Planning Inspector implied conditions regarding the removal of the curved entrance feature at 93 South Mall, which corners onto Beasley Street. The entrance, as visible below, offers a dramatic feature and alteration of the existing ground-floor streetscape along this section of South Mall.

      The James Leahy & Associates designed hotel scheme was granted planning by CCC back in August 2005, however this grant became subject to an issue of Leave to Appeal by John Casey. The appeal was allowed, apparently much to the dismay of Cork City Council and in particular City Manager Joe Gavin. On February 1st 2006 the Bord sought fit to grant permission to the scheme – hopes are high for the project on the 0/18 hectare site to get in gear as soon as possible given the delicate state of facades at 17/18 Parnell Place. The new hotel will seek to be of luxury standard, filling what many perceive as being a viable market gap in this location, and include a first-class spa & well-being facility with up to 121 basement car-parking spaces over 2 decks accessible from Beasley Street. The hotel will extend to 5-storeys and is designed, following local authority planning stage revisions, to minimise impacts on both the important 97 South Mall (former Provicial Bank) building – now TCH HQ – and 17/18 Parnell Place.



      🙂 Howard Holdings have erected their striking quill-like sculpture outside the main entrance to the Clarion Hotel at CityQuarter, Lapps Quay. The sculpture was commissioned at the behest of Howard Holdings MD Greg Coughlan as a gift to the people of Cork – following a planning grant by CCC, the proposal was controversially taken to appeal by An Taisce member Tomas O’Scannlain, but this was quickly dismissed by ABP. The sculpture is currently enrobed in a 4-sided shrowd prior to the official unveiling ceremony on February 16th 2006. On the shrowd, the Howard Holdings logo is printed and below it, stated cleary runs the slogan “Committed to Cork” – yet again, Howard Holdings are standing out as one of the most progressive developers in the city today; they fire panache, imagination and can-do to their projects often despite some gruelling adversities and pull it all off with style. 😀

    • #758951
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      HE’S BACK!!! And thank god for that. Lex, you were sorely missed. But so glad to see ya back again.

    • #758952
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      ….even if it is only for the odd post every now and then.

    • #758953
      kite
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      HE’S BACK!!! And thank god for that. Lex, you were sorely missed. But so glad to see ya back again.

      😎 And so say all of us..maybe i can put away the book i was forced to read while Lex was away.(reading his posts is a lot more fun)

    • #758954
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      HE’S BACK!!! And thank god for that. Lex, you were sorely missed. But so glad to see ya back again.

      #

      Welcome back Lex – informative as ever.

      Anybody know whats happening with The Grand Parade site at the old Grand Parade Hotel – there has’nt been any activity there in a long time ?

    • #758955
      jungle
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I can’t wait for the next big shopping development to open up in Cork, especially as they seem to be opening up in the city centre, rather than the suburbs. Habitat, H&M, TKMaxx and more shops that fit the Bershka, Jane Norman and Zara type profile are all expected to open up in either Cornmarket St. or else Academy St. It’s true Marks and Spencer were supposed to open up in Ballincollig, but I believe they were outbid by Dunnes (lucky us). I think Douglas Court has always been top of the list for best suburban shopping centre, even more so since Esprit and the like have opened up there. Blackpool is a very well designed shopping centre with a good mix of shops, especially since the retail park opened up next door. When are PC World, Currys and Halfords due to open up in Mahon Point?….. I thought they were to open in January.

      It’s not the mix of shops that I have been complaining about with regard to suburban shopping centre deveopments.

      Consider Douglas Court. Pedestriand access is appalling and people are unlikely to combine a trip to Douglas Court with a trip to the rest of Douglas. Partially, this is because of the still undeveloped land that lies between Douglas Court and Douglas East, but even if this was developed, Douglas Court will still be set back across its car park with two internal roads for pedestrians to cross in addition to the main Douglas Relief Road. Similarly, I can’t imagine anyone popping across to Blackpool village from Blackpool SC. Both developments are in their respective suburbs, but are not part of it.

      I’ll give Mahon Point the benefit of the doubt, because it doesn’t have a significant suburban centre to connect to.

      I can understand why developers would want this set up. After all, why would shopping centre operators want to provide free parking when people go and shop elsewhere. However, that’s where the planning report should come in to force more integration into existing retail environments.

      On a side note, welcome back Lex, it’s good to see your information here again (albeit temporarily).

    • #758956
      POM
      Participant

      Indeed nice to see the info popping up again. There’s a bulk of information there and I have many questions but 2 things stand out and thats the greenlighting by Pleanala of Paul Kenny’s proposal there for Saint Patricks Quay and the granting of the hotel by Pitwood. Both exciting schemes. I was lucky enough to have a very early participation in the former but whether or not it will go ahead is a wonder. I’d like to think it will given that, even though it will no longer host the Revenue, I think its high profile enough to stand on its own 2 feet. Not only would it be a great addition to Cork, I think it could serve Mister Kenny nicely as well.

    • #758957
      corkdood
      Participant

      wb Lexington. It’s good to see your posts here again

    • #758958
      Pug
      Participant

      ah wilkommen back lex my man(or woman), a veritable diatribe of property info there to amuse us – no doubt posting up here was starting to be a full time job! even if you have a short time left, keep us informed until the bitter end.

    • #758959
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Good news!! Even if just for a little while.

      Myabe someone can tell me whats the story with Water street?? ABP asked for a redesign didnt they? Does that mean no tall element at all? A decision is due in March right? Surely the drawings would have been submit to the planning inspector at this stage? Any ideas on what the new scheme will be like??

    • #758960
      kesey
      Participant

      Lex, it’s great to see you around the house again.

      The problem with getting a stream of information is that when it is shut off, you feel deprived. Anyway, we’ll enjoy what ever info and comment you provide while you are available.

      Best wishes with whatever grand plans you may be hatching:)

    • #758961
      lawyer
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      was wondering can anyone tell me where amgen is supposed to be locating?? I presume it is on the Midleton side of Carrigtwohill, also does anyone know where the train station will be built in carrigtwohill, will it e near the village centre or further out?

      The AMGEN site is on the Midleton side of Carrigtwohill, about 2 kms from the village on the left hand side. It is where the National Ploughing Championship was held some years ago.
      I assume they will redevelop the old railway station which is a bit of a walk from the main street, down beyond the church.
      The railway line passes along the boundary of the AMGEN site so whether they will have/need a connection, I do not know.

    • #758962
      A-ha
      Participant

      wow… talk about information. It’s good to see you came back lex, but I hope you won’t be gone for too long. ewan, I wouldn’t hold your breath on Water Street…. the original decision date whether it would go ahead or not was over a year ago. It’s such a shame too, I really had my heart on the original project, but I’m tired of waiting, although I still keep my fingers crossed. Also, wasn’t there talk of building two stations in Carrigtohill a few months back – one in the town and the other in a newly built business park. I can’t imagine them not building one tiny platform outside the Amgen plant, even it was only in use in the mornings and afternoons during rush hour…. but then you’ll always be surprised in Ireland when it comes to transport. I just can’t see 1,500 cars driving into Carrigtohill every morning.

    • #758963
      jungle
      Participant

      There’s a few factors they’ll take into account when deciding whether to build a station for AMGEN.

      • Will the extra passengers gained be greater than the lost passengers because of the extra journey time to Midleton?
      • Will it still be possible to get a train to Midleton and turn it round in 1/2 an hour? If they can’t it would mean buying extra trains.
      • How will it affect the ability of trains to pass on the Midleton spur? The line from Glounethaune to Midleton will be single-track only. The current plan is to have a frequent service with trains passing in Carrigtohill station. On this plan a 15 minute frequency could be maintained. An extra station could scupper this idea

      I’m sure Irish Rail could add a few more to those as well.

      If they can get a satisfactory answer to all those questions, then it’s likely that the station will be built with funding coming from the overall development. The cost of a railway station is not extortionate. Monasterevin cost £2.5million for the entire fit-out with car-park and wheelchair lifts etc. Obviously, this figure will have risen, but it’s small money in the context of the overall proposal.

    • #758964
      A-ha
      Participant

      When is Eglington Street due for completion? I can’t wait to see the finished product, but don’t have a clue when it’s supposed to be done. Also, when is the Kinsale Rd. roundabout flyover meant to be finished? They have made alot of progress over the last few weeks, I presume it’s on schedule.

    • #758965
      kite
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      When is Eglington Street due for completion? I can’t wait to see the finished product, but don’t have a clue when it’s supposed to be done. Also, when is the Kinsale Rd. roundabout flyover meant to be finished? They have made alot of progress over the last few weeks, I presume it’s on schedule.

      :rolleyes: The Kinsale Road roundabout flyover is due to be operational way ahead of schedule (March-April 2006) but the official opening will not happen until the boss from Dublin desides that the best photo opportunity presents itself..(2007 election and all that bullshite)

    • #758966
      A-ha
      Participant

      wow, didn’t know it was that soon, I was thinking more along the lines of summer 2007. Yeah… someone is always trying to swing votes…. we’ll be hearing about the Midleton Railway and Terminal 2 at the airport until ‘ol Bertie is 6 feet under. What about Eglington Street?

    • #758967
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Hey Lex… thanks for getting back to us. It certainly hasn’t been the same.
      I haven’t been in Cork for quite a while…
      Has Eglinton Street started?
      How is the Coal Quay comning along… any news of the update to the market and the new park not to mind the Guy and co development?
      Has construction started on the Jurys site… is Jurys to reopen?
      Have O’Flynn got the go ahead for Dunkettle?

      Thanks all for any answers.

    • #758968
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Has Eglinton Street started?
      How is the Coal Quay comning along… any news of the update to the market and the new park not to mind the Guy and co development?
      Has construction started on the Jurys site… is Jurys to reopen?
      Have O’Flynn got the go ahead for Dunkettle?


      (image previously posted by Lexington)
      Eglington Street has not started yet. All the planning wrangles have, I believe been sorted and the project is due to get off the ground in the next couple of months. Adjacent to this site, the new Webworks building and the new civic offices at city hall are in progress. The former is almost complete.

      The Coal Quay required an extensive archaeological survey be carryed out before work proper could begun. That is now complete and work is progressing, with a long way left to go. A structural issue with nearby houses did not cause any significant delays.


      Construction on the jury’s site is well underway. with the hotel block well ahead of the remainder of the developement.


      There was an ABP oral hearing in Cork last week relating to O’Flynn’s development of Dunkathel House and surrounding lands. That decision is due in March (I beleive).

    • #758969
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      Is Beth Gali’s Patrick Street re-paving being extended to the Grand Parade ?

    • #758970
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Yes it is. Some work has already been done between daunt square and the junction with Washington Street and work at the other end of the street is due to begin very shortly.

    • #758971
      elvis
      Participant

      :confused: any one seen this ?? comments – lex u there

    • #758972
      POM
      Participant

      Whoa they’re some big pics. 🙂

      Saw this passing the other day. Very industrial looking but I imagine once it is complete it will be a new style for the street. Should look well at night. Now if we could only do something about Singers Corner. Any night pics elvis?

    • #758973
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Whoa they’re some big pics. 🙂

      Saw this passing the other day. Very industrial looking but I imagine once it is complete it will be a new style for the street. Should look well at night. Now if we could only do something about Singers Corner. Any night pics elvis?

      It looks a lot better in reality than the image. Singers corner looks like it has’nt been painted since 1870 and ready to topple over and with Finns corner on the opposite corner both look dire and urgently require modernisation.
      Castle Jewelers on Cornmarket Street also must have the worst signage & paint job in the City – Pink & blue.

    • #758974
      POM
      Participant

      Well the northside has lost out on another important investment after our illustrious city councillors voted against rezoning a patch of land by the Eircom switch centre near the Kilmore Road from light industrial to retail. The land would have provided a new Lidl supermarket and community centre. As far as I know Joe Gavin was pushing for this, but some of our councillors apparently decided against it because of a support campaign the supermarket had going the week previous…so??? The only people who are going to be short changed our the residents of the area. One councillor supposedly feared teenagers would have better access to alcopops…???…could not the same problem be said for the off licence and SuperValue nearby? More of it. Is it just Cork or are they like this in other cities too?

    • #758975
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Yeah, I’d agree, that image doesn’t really do the Grand Parade development justice. It does look very striking in reality and should make Tobin Street and teh Triskel much more accessible from that side.

    • #758976
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Tomorrow will be a big day for Frinailla and Dennehy’s Cross, with the development at Dennehy’s Cross Bar up for decision at CCC level.
      The development will lead to the demolition of all structures on the site to make way for a mixed use resedential, retail and commercial development ranging in height from 5 – 8 storeys. Consisting of 163 no. resedential units including 59 no. 1 bedroom apartments, 86 no. 2 bedroom apartments and 18 no. 3 bedroom apartments. The proposed development also includes units designed as: a restaurant of 118.5sqm , a convenience retail unit incorporating a post office, a pharmacy of 137sqm, a 93sqm off-licence, a 183sqm video library, a 45sqm florist and 77sqm beauty salon. Parking for the development will be provided in a 3 level basement car park consisting of 218 spaces and the proposed development will include imodifications to the existing Dennehy’s Cross Road Junction.
      There are a large number of submissions regarding this development, including one on behalf of a lobby group which has been active in the area for a numebr of years and would seek to limit the height of new developments in the area. The south western regional fisheries have also made a submission, as have a large numebr of residents.

    • #758977
      kite
      Participant
      Radioactiveman wrote:
      Tomorrow will be a big day for Frinailla and Dennehy’s Cross, with the development at Dennehy’s Cross Bar up for decision at CCC level.

      There are a large number of submissions regarding this development, including one on behalf of a lobby group which has been active in the area for a numebr of years and would seek to limit the height of new developments in the area. The south western regional fisheries have also made a submission, as have a large numebr of residents.

      🙂 According to the CSD website http://www.corksouthwest.com Frinailla have got permission for this development.
      I dont know where they got the information or how true is is, if it is true im sure this will not go forward without appeal to ABP

    • #758978
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The City Manager has said that Cork City could have a new Central Library facility within two years. He has announced plans to redevelop the Grand Parade site (possibly in conjunction with a private developer) to provide the city with a state of the art public library facility. The Grand Parade site is a prime, central site, but the space is under-utilised and any future development could include private commercial uses, alongside a re-imagined library space. A temporary site for the library while work is ongoing and the possiblity of moving permanantly to a nearby site also need to be considered.

      The Grand Parade site contains a listed building and it is thought that CCC will look for 55,000 to 60,000sq ft of library space to be provided by the chosen developer.

      Thsi news comes after last year’s competition run by CCC, RIAI and COrk 2005 to find the ideal city library. More than 400 architects expressed an interest in the competition, and 230 complete entries were received from architects all over the world. The Judges awarded equal first prize to 3 entrants. Johan Voordouw & colleagues from Manitoba, Canada, Ralf Pasel & Frederik K

    • #758979
      lexington
      Participant

      Today seems to warrant a few updates. A nice surprise is scheduled for the end of the week.

      Lex




      *UPDATES* 13/02/2006

      🙂 It is understood the City Manager Joe Gavin is likely to offer Cork City Central Library along Grand Parade to a successful developer in exchange for new library premises which reflect the requirements of a modern city centre library.

      The highly valuable site will be of great interest to developers seeking to gain or expand their foothold within this quarter and offers a superb redevelopment opportunity as a standalone or larger project. In exchange, Cork City Council will likely seek a new modern premises well positioned to deal with a confident, regenerated Cork. An approximate requirement of 55,000 to 60,000sq ft will be sought by CCC – further to that, temporary accommodation made available to the library service during construction activity will also be required from the developer. A nice opportunity now exists for CCC to avail of a prime new library facility, centrally located in an area such as the docklands, at the heart of an expanded city centre.

      The Grand Parade site, which includes a protected facade, will have no shortage of interested bids with certain parties already actively considering plans on the quarter. This may leave room for a new mixed use precinct including substantial retail, residential and other commercial/leisure opportunities.



      🙂 There is speculation (and I note that word) that developer Joe McCarthy, who was involved in the realisation of Eden Hall student complex along the Model Farm Road with partner David Corr, has acquired a further site nearby the said development – formerly used to house dis-used cars among other items – and is designing plans on the land for a further development. Although the nature of the development has yet to be established, it could well be residential given its proximity to nearby properties. This news is unconfirmed, but worth noting.

    • #758980
      lexington
      Participant

      Dennehy’s Cross Project Greenlit! [14/02/2006]

      😀 Frinailla Developments have seen their proposals for the north-eastern section of a €20m (approx.) site they acquired at Dennehy’s Cross cleared under a revised format and subject to conditions. The project originally saw 163 mixed residential units proposed across 2 blocks and over ground-floor commercial/community units with 218 basement car-parking spaces provided over 3-levels. The proposal, designed by Conor Kinsella with O’Mahony Pike Architects, has been granted subject to modifications which include the reduction of several apartments through the removal of the 8th storey of the northern block . A further phase of the Dennehy’s Cross project, on the south-western side of the crossroads – which will include up to 40 further units – is scheduled for application in the coming future. This 1st Phase grant will now await the prospect of appeal, considering objections lodged by some parties. In any event, work on the project will not commence prior to October 2006 when the site is formally handed over by the Dennehy family into Frinailla’s possession.


      Aerial view of the site (west to east) as it exists.


      A comparison, before and after, for the Victoria Cross Road block elevations (west).


      Stunning view of the southern elevation leading up toward Dennehy’s Cross along Magazine Road. (Large image, beware!)


      New resident ‘green avenue’ – viewed east to west – dividing the 2 blocks.

    • #758981
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES* [15/02/2006]

      :confused: Rothbury Estates, headed up by businessman Martin Buckley of the Reffond Textile Group, have withdrawn their substantial appllication to redevelop a 4-acre + area of land at the former Sunbeam Industrial Park. The site, which formerly housed textile activities controlled by Reffond, was damaged beyond repair in a devastating 2003 fire. Mr. Buckley subsequently initiated plans to redevelop the site enlisting Richard Rainey & Associates to draw up designs on a massive 64,761sq m scheme which included 260 residential units, a 100,000sq ft office building, retail warehousing, leisure centre, riverside park, creche and basement car-parking for 682 spaces over 2-levels. The proposal spread across 3 main blocks varying in heights of up to 8-storeys with Block A including a feature 18-storey (60 metre) residential tower.

      (For more details see here.)

      It is understood the planning application was withdrawn following disagreements between planners and the development team on the nature of the scheme. Rather than face refusal, the project has been withdrawn and will be subject to a number of revisions with a re-submission of the scheme hoped for later this year.



      😮 Precinct Investments have seen their plans to redevelop the Metropole Hotel’s unsightly Patrick’s Quay block and adjoining leisure centre as a series of residential units, designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects, pushed back until March 1st 2006. The application, was originally due for a decision this week, however CCC have realised the wish for an extended due date. Further details on the nature of the project are available here.

      The project was subject to 2 objections, among them the Leeside Leisure Partnership (who operate the Metropole Leisure Centre) – they claim that they retain an operating lease on the centre which does not expire until 2008 and that they were not informed of any redevelopment plans.


    • #758982
      lexington
      Participant

      Stoneview Masterplan

      😎 Today joint developers Coleman Brothers, Fleming Construction & Blarney Business Park (involving Bowen Construction) launch a public viewing session of a draft masterplan for their massive Stoneview proposal. The scheme which envisages the creation of 2,500 new homes centred around a new village core (with all associated retail, services and commercial provisions) has been designed by teams from Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects and Dublin-based Conroy Crowe Kelly Architects. The huge scheme will also include a new railway station for commuters along the main Cork-Mallow/Dublin line and an associated Park and Ride – Irish Rail are understood to be working hard on the project with its installation possibly ready within a timeframe of 2 years. The broader project however will more than likely take up to 10 years in various staged phases for which the first application (that catering to the infastructural provision) due for lodgement with Cork County Council later this month (February 2006). Following submission of a masterplan, subsequent applications will follow, perhaps as early as by the year end. Substantial amenity provision will be afforded with various tracts of land in both soft and hard formats included – centrally, a new greenspace provisionally dubbed ”Central Park” will bridge 2 of the prime residential zones. Plans by Fleming Construction for a new 100-bed private hospital, which form part of the overall plan – with a site to the north-west of the subject land earmarked – are currently with a design team.


    • #758983
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Today seems to warrant a few updates. A nice surprise is scheduled for the end of the week.

      Lex



      🙂 There is speculation (and I note that word) that developer Joe McCarthy, who was involved in the realisation of Eden Hall student complex along the Model Farm Road with partner David Corr, has acquired a further site nearby the said development – formerly used to house dis-used cars among other items – and is designing plans on the land for a further development. Although the nature of the development has yet to be established, it could well be residential given its proximity to nearby properties. This news is unconfirmed, but worth noting.

      😉 Ahhh dont hint at future surprises and keep us guessing (today is only Wens. after all !!)

      Would the McCarthy and Corr site be the same one that was (is) owned by Bernard Crowley that is with ABP at the moment ?
      Thanks again Lex for being first with the news.

    • #758984
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      There seems to be some really exciting buildings in Cork happening. I just hope they all make it !!

      Thanks for the posts Lex

    • #758985
      POM
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      *UPDATES* [15/02/2006]

      :confused: Rothbury Estates, headed up by businessman Martin Buckley of the Reffond Textile Group, have withdrawn their substantial appllication to redevelop a 4-acre + area of land at the former Sunbeam Industrial Park. The site, which formerly housed textile activities controlled by Reffond, was damaged beyond repair in a devastating 2003 fire. Mr. Buckley subsequently initiated plans to redevelop the site enlisting Richard Rainey & Associates to draw up designs on a massive 64,761sq m scheme which included 260 residential units, a 100,000sq ft office building, retail warehousing, leisure centre, riverside park, creche and basement car-parking for 682 spaces over 2-levels. The proposal spread across 3 main blocks varying in heights of up to 8-storeys with Block A including a feature 18-storey (60 metre) residential tower.

      (For more details see here.)

      It is understood the planning application was withdrawn following disagreements between planners and the development team on the nature of the scheme. Rather than face refusal, the project has been withdrawn and will be subject to a number of revisions with a re-submission of the scheme hoped for later this year.

      Saw this in the planning office a while back, its a funny scheme, I’m not quite sure about how its laid out. As a proposal in itself it seems like it could be very good for Blackpool. Design wise it is perhaps a little blocky and there is room for a little more flair. Usually Richard Rainey produce pretty quality stuff and I suppose I was a little let down by the results on this project. I think a landmark tower would go down well at this location but the way it’s proposed in this scheme is baffling, I don’t understand the proposed axis or orientation of the tower and its form is unsuited. At the very least, I would have thought the tower should be orientated facing the Mallow Road as it approaches the valley north to south. The tower is oval shaped and would be far more striking were in a taller, narrower, sleeker structure. In order to accentuate its nature, I would have suggest the lowering in heights of the surrounding blocks and the increase in tower height by at least 2 to 3 further storeys, it should lose the balconies and perhaps replace them with glazed features to give the tower a sleeker look. As proposed the tower was utterly lost in the overall bulk of the scheme.

    • #758986
      A-ha
      Participant


      Image previously posted by lexington.

      What’s the story with this project? Something on such a large scale, you’d expect to hear about it non stop, but I haven’t heard any updates about it in weeks. What’s the latest? I love the whole curved roof feature, not to mention the high rise element….. it’s so well designed.

    • #758987
      Pepsi
      Participant

      I like that too.

    • #758988
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Yeah its great. Think it was only aspirational though. Maybe some smart minded developer will take note of it and reforumlate the usage but keep the design. Such a cool project.

      Heres the link for that post, https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?p=44477&highlight=HTD#post44477

    • #758989
      kite
      Participant

      😮 Fine Gaels Jerry Buttimer is living up to his reputation as an “imformed” city father in today’s Cork Independent, calling the planning approval of one bed student apts. on the Dennehys Cross garage site outrageous.
      Somebody in the Fine Gael party should really have a word in his ear before he causes anymore embarrassment to Cork. The Dennehy’s development is going to be 1-3 bed private Apts. councillor.

    • #758990
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Frinailla are set to lodge plans for an exciting new scheme on the lands of the former Good Shepherd Convent in Sunday’s Well. Having only this week secured planning on their much acclaimed Dennehy’s Cross project, Frinailla are now set to apply for a new upmarket residential scheme on the 3 hectare lands of the former convent, whose main buildings were so devastingly damaged in 2003 by fire. Purchased from developer Pat Hegarty for approximately 20m euros, Frinailla have enlisted Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects to head up a proposal of 274 new units across a myriad of formats on the site – among these, new 3-storey dwelling homes of up to 2,000sq ft! The former convent buildings themselves will be subject to extensive refurbishment and rejuvenated in the form of 26 stylish new apartment units. 10 new apartment blocks will be constructed ranging in heights of 3 to 8-storeys – of which some will be positioned to the rear of the George Ashlin design convent buildings. A range of 1,2,3 and 4-bedroom homes will be on offer at the new project, which holds an estimated project value of approx. €100m – as occupiers of the new proposal, residents will enjoy a premises with unrivalled views south across the city from the northern valley slopes of this prestigous site – as well as plentiful amenity space within the project’s confines. Up to 350 parking spaces will be provided across 3 basement levels.


      Amongst the trees – the edge of a timber clad wooden block with the George Ashlin-designed Convent Buildings in the background

      – not content with having produced some of the more attractive residential projects proposed in and around Cork city, Frinailla are now also working on further exciting city projects of which details will be made known in the coming future.



      🙂 One of the most exciting development sites to hit the Cork city market this year so far is now up for grabs through auctioneers Dominic Daly & Co. The 0.5 acre site along Kyrl’s Quay is being pitched for exciting new development prospects and will likely form part of a site assembly process. The Cork Timber, Slate & Cement yard, lodged between the Bridewell Garda Station, a small Cork City Council site and North Main Street/Kyrl’s Quay Multistorey car-park is now up for sale and falls within an area which had been subject to a redevelopment design competition held jointly by CCC and the RIAI – the Kyrl’s Quay Design Competition was won by Scottish-based practice Conroy Architecture. Any assembly of the Kyrl’s Quay area is not subject to utilising any of the designs posited by the competition – but it does offer examples from which to draw, including guidelines which state a preference for any future development to be of substantial height as to block undesired views of the multi-storey car-parking block to the south. Given the sensitive nature and history of the site, superb design standards are a must. The attraction of the current site available on the market is that it offers and significant piece of the puzzle in any assembly. Cork City Council have indicated a willingness to discuss the sale of its area holdings which include the aforementioned small terrace and former Phillips storgae block fronting the quayside subject to approach – of course the successful bidder of the RH Parker & Sons site (Cork Timber, Slate & Cement Co.) site will clearly be in a stronger position to negotiate on any further acquisitions.

      🙂 O’Callaghan Properties are understood to be ready for the lodgement of their highly anticipated Academy Street project designed by Project Architects and Gehl Urban Design Consultants (Denmark). The scheme will provide for approx. 200,000sq ft of higher order retail space, 100 new apartments and almost 30,000sq ft of prime office space in blocks ranging to 6-storeys. The proposal will retain many of the existing facades in place along the valuable site area which is bordered by Academy Street, Saint Patrick’s Street, Bowling Green Street and Emmet Place – facades up for retention include that of the Irish Examiner offices. As part of the plan, Faulkner’s Lane which runs through the centre of the site north-to-south will be revamped and altered in width to accommodate retail frontages and other accesses. An application is expected within 2 weeks.

      This post will be updated later to include images and further news.

    • #758991
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      this is hilarious

      Warning on high-rise fire hazards
      Michael O’Regan

      High-rise buildings could be a fire hazard, John Dennehy (FF, Cork South Central) warned.

      Much of the building boom consisted of such developments, he said. “No doubt we have all seen Towering Inferno and said it was a great film, very exciting and so on, but it is only a film. Arising out of that, there are many serious questions. I ask whether, in regard to the county hall in Cork, the trade union building, Liberty Hall, and many other buildings, we have the ability to fight a fire in them. We certainly do not have the fleet of helicopters that were available to the fire chief in the film.”

      Mr Dennehy, who was speaking during the resumed debate on the building control Bill, said he was very concerned that commercial arguments would take precedence over fire safety requirements.

      Bernard Durkan (FG, Kildare North) said there was a “terrible blight” on modern development. Up to 10 or 15 years ago, the quality of development was exceptionally high. “That is not the case any more. Now we have what is known as the duplex system. This is essentially the construction of one house on top of the other, with an external stairway leading into the upper house.” He said such houses did nothing for the people who lived in them.

      Peter Kelly (FF, Longford-Roscommon) said the Bill required that architects be registered. “The public will welcome this, as I do.”

    • #758992
      kite
      Participant

      @Paul Clerkin wrote:

      this is hilarious

      :confused: Ah now, you must be taking the pi**. Did J.Dennehy really say that? Is it in any of the papers?

    • #758993
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Ireland’s first major crematorium outside Dublin is to be built in Cork – at Rocky Island in Cork harbour at a former British navy arsenal. The €2.5m crematorium was approved by ABP yesterday folleowing Cork County Council’s earlier decision to approve the development.
      Strikemount Ltd. will build the facility to cater for the demand in Munster for cremations, which, until now, had to go to Dublin. The island is linked to the mainland by a bridge from a spot close to where Indaver are building their toxic waste incinerator. It is linked to Haulbowline Island by another bridge. Part of Haulbowline is currenly being decommisioned and cleaned up after years of industrial use- as Irish Steel. The other part of the Island houses the headquarters of the Irish Navy.

    • #758994
      phatman
      Participant

      According to the Examiner yesterday, Paul Kenny’s Patrick’s Quay development has been greenlit by an Bord Pleanála. Surprised there’s been no reaction here…Opinions??

    • #758995
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Did J.Dennehy really say that? Is it in any of the papers?

      Its in today’s Irish Times (17/2/06).

      Just jockying for position for nominations to run in the next GE. Its a competition for who can look like the greatest gombeen.

    • #758996
      POM
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      *UPDATES* (8/2/2006)

      😀 Paul Kenny’s The Treasury development originally intended for Revenue Commissioner contention, has been successful through the appeal process. The project was appealed on both a 1st Party (regarding contribution fees) and 3rd Party Basis (by Bell Scott Engineering & McLaughlins). The project was granted by the Bord (ABP) subject to reductions in height which involved the removal of the entire 4th floor at Block One (the south facing Patrick’s Quay section – although this will not affect the dramatic curved facade) and the removal of the 5th floor of Block Two (which backs onto the Lower Glanmire Road to the north). The floorspace of the approx. 12,000sq m office and retail project has been markedly reduced. Parking, in line with CCC implemented conditions, restraints at 150 basement spaces. Though the Wilson Architecture project lost out on the Revenue Commissioners bid, favourable market conditions leave the option open for Mr. Kenny to proceed with the development should he so wish at some future stage. The former Kirwan lot on the corner of Ship Street and Patrick’s Quay (which forms part of the subject site) is currently up for lease, this would suggest that development plans are likely to be put on hold for the interm.


      Here you go phatman.

    • #758997
      phatman
      Participant

      Sorry, I have lost touch a bit with this thread, and also seem to have forgotten how ahead of things we can be round here. And how behind things the Examiner can be.:D

    • #758998
      who_me
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      According to the Examiner yesterday, Paul Kenny’s Patrick’s Quay development has been greenlit by an Bord Pleanála. Surprised there’s been no reaction here…Opinions??

      I’m actually a little surprised it got through, and mostly unscathed at that. I think it’s a stunning development, but it’s very tall, and likely to block views of the church behind it. Methinks there might still be a few groans and whines once people see it go up.

    • #758999
      POM
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      I’m actually a little surprised it got through, and mostly unscathed at that. I think it’s a stunning development, but it’s very tall, and likely to block views of the church behind it. Methinks there might still be a few groans and whines once people see it go up.

      IF…….it goes up. And I really hope it does. Can you imagine driving along the quays and seeing this beauty all lit up at night. It’s interesting Mr Kenny carried this project the whole way through appeal despite losing out on the Revenue plan. It suggests he’s keeping his options open.

    • #759000
      A-ha
      Participant

      Yeah…I’m so glad it has been greenlit, it should make such a lovely addition to the area, as you said POM, especially at night. Can’t wait to see the pics. of Academy Street and I really like what I see in the Good Shepherd Convent, even more so with the BMW parked outside the front door, it looks so classy. Can I ask what’s happening with the Hilton Hotel supposed to be built in Mahon Point? When is it due to open… or even be built?

    • #759001
      phatman
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      I’m actually a little surprised it got through, and mostly unscathed at that. I think it’s a stunning development, but it’s very tall, and likely to block views of the church behind it. Methinks there might still be a few groans and whines once people see it go up.

      That actually is the one reservation I have about the development, the effect on the view to the church behind.
      It mightn’t be an issue looking across from Parnell Place, but further down the quay past the bus station will unfortunately lose part of that lovely view of the ridge. But I’m still optimistic about the development, should be a striking addition to the riverscape, and it is as sensitive a design as I could have hoped for, at least facing the river. Any images of the Lower Glanmire Road persepective?

    • #759002
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Regarding The Good Shepherd Convent,
      I’d like to see how the new buildings relate to the old ones from a distance, e.g. Mardyke Walk or UCC campus. The new developemnt looks nice and stylish- it’s is their positioning with respect to the Convent buildings themselves which will be the important factor.

    • #759003
      kite
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Regarding The Good Shepherd Convent,
      I’d like to see how the new buildings relate to the old ones from a distance, e.g. Mardyke Walk or UCC campus. The new developemnt looks nice and stylish- it’s is their positioning with respect to the Convent buildings themselves which will be the important factor.

      The views you suggest would be a factor. The design looks great to me..so much better than the albeit acceptable design of Friniallas proposal for Dennehy’s Cross. Are the same architects involved in both?

    • #759004
      Micko
      Participant

      Just on the academy street project.

      The lane that goes between Emmets place and patrick street, I really hope they do a similar job on this like the 2 lanes leading onto Paul Street. Could see this lane being transformed into another restaurant/ pub hub in the city. Mix it in as part of the Hugenot quarter too.

    • #759005
      altuistic
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      The views you suggest would be a factor. The design looks great to me..so much better than the albeit acceptable design of Friniallas proposal for Dennehy’s Cross. Are the same architects involved in both?

      I dont know if I would say that. I personally feel the Dennehys Cross design looks very well. Its sharp angular profile looks most well, very defined. The Sherphers convent look seems very slight. I would have reservations about the wooden finish. If its a case of the timber greying or discolouring in the most awful manner like that thing next to Dunnes in Bishopstown i would stress for some sort of condition to maintain its upkeep.

    • #759006
      Micko
      Participant

      BTW, anyone know anything else about the proposed redevelopment of the Metropole Hotel.

      I saw a picture earlier on in this thread of doing a huge redevelopment, taking in other buildings with a frontage on patricks quay.

    • #759007
      lawyer
      Participant

      Decision due March 1st.

    • #759008
      Micko
      Participant

      Talking of the Metropole, I wouldn’t mind seeing some sort of plan for McCurtain street.

      At the moment it has one hotel, a theatre, a few restaurants and a nice few pubs. SOme beautiful buildings there too. the building housing isaacs restaurant is nice, (the back with the waterfall is very classy).

      Pity though that the street is left down by that awfully ugly Zanussi building beside Isaacs, not to mention the general seediness added by Cash Converters and the sex shop bang in the middle of the street.

    • #759009
      POM
      Participant

      double post

    • #759010
      POM
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Talking of the Metropole, I wouldn’t mind seeing some sort of plan for McCurtain street.

      At the moment it has one hotel, a theatre, a few restaurants and a nice few pubs. SOme beautiful buildings there too. the building housing isaacs restaurant is nice, (the back with the waterfall is very classy).

      Pity though that the street is left down by that awfully ugly Zanussi building beside Isaacs, not to mention the general seediness added by Cash Converters and the sex shop bang in the middle of the street.

      Indeed that Zanussi Building is fair bad. Downgrades one of the most splendid city centre streets. Another street that needs serious addressing is the lower end of Oliver Plunkett Street, behind the Clarion. The paving is ridden with potholes, it is dirty, unkempt and a favourite for antisocial behaviour. It takes what is suppose to be and will be Corks new business district down a few notches. The city council should seriously look into it fast.

      I mention that above as I was travelling the streets of Cork today. A couple of things struck me like the emerging shape of the second phase of Camden Court there on Carrolls Quay. I think pics are posted of it earlier in this thread. Though still shrouded in scaffolding already it is turning out to be one of Corks better and most striking apartment buildings. I can’t wait to see the finished product as it looks very impressive. More of this please.

      I noticed that the rooftops of 21 Lavitts Quay are the latest haunt for the crowds of seagulls in and around the Lee. Any chance we’ll see Owen O’Callaghan out sometime soon with a rope, harness and a power hose in hand to rectify the consequences of hosting such visitors??? 🙂 A tidy up may be due.

      Good to see this thread with a bit of life in it again.

    • #759011
      kite
      Participant

      @altuistic wrote:

      I dont know if I would say that. I personally feel the Dennehys Cross design looks very well. Its sharp angular profile looks most well, very defined. The Sherphers convent look seems very slight. I would have reservations about the wooden finish. If its a case of the timber greying or discolouring in the most awful manner like that thing next to Dunnes in Bishopstown i would stress for some sort of condition to maintain its upkeep.

      :confused: I take your point about that shambles next to Dunnes in Bishopstown, the reason that type of cladding was allowed at the time is that it would be maintainance free..bleech with the sun ect.ect…how wrong can you be?
      For Joe Gavin to call this one of the “finest” buildings in Cork says a lot?.. anybody got photos of Galway when this gent was running that town?

      Sorry for the edit, no photos, but thanks to Kevin for the following newspaper articles…

      Spiralling costs and no end in sight to the Eyre Square nightmare
      The Irish Times

      “Fallujah square”, as Galway’s city centre is sometimes called these days, has been dogged by controversy since plans for its latest redesign were presented to city councillors in January 1999. As one angry businessman remarked yesterday, the siege-like sandbags around its 17th century Browne doorway in the middle of the square,”say it all”. A local councillor has remarked that the Eiffel Tower in Paris was built at a faster rate. At the time, former city manager Joe Gavin was very enthusiastic about transforming Galway’s city centre, which was once a medieval jousting ground and market, hosted US president John F. Kennedy’s historic visit, and was last redesigned in the 1960s. The distinctive limestone figure of writer P

    • #759012
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @POM wrote:

      Saw this in the planning office a while back, its a funny scheme, I’m not quite sure about how its laid out. As a proposal in itself it seems like it could be very good for Blackpool. Design wise it is perhaps a little blocky and there is room for a little more flair. Usually Richard Rainey produce pretty quality stuff and I suppose I was a little let down by the results on this project. I think a landmark tower would go down well at this location but the way it’s proposed in this scheme is baffling, I don’t understand the proposed axis or orientation of the tower and its form is unsuited. At the very least, I would have thought the tower should be orientated facing the Mallow Road as it approaches the valley north to south. The tower is oval shaped and would be far more striking were in a taller, narrower, sleeker structure. In order to accentuate its nature, I would have suggest the lowering in heights of the surrounding blocks and the increase in tower height by at least 2 to 3 further storeys, it should lose the balconies and perhaps replace them with glazed features to give the tower a sleeker look. As proposed the tower was utterly lost in the overall bulk of the scheme.

      any chance you could get these pics up?anyone have contact detils for the planning office,are they allowed send you out planning applications?

    • #759013
      kite
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      any chance you could get these pics up?anyone have contact detils for the planning office,are they allowed send you out planning applications?

      CCC, planning dept. can be contacted at Navigation House, Albert Quay, phone 021 4966222, email planning@corkcity.ie. I think photocopys cost about 20 cent per page

    • #759014
      A-ha
      Participant

      Aer Arann has announced that it will begin two new routes from Cork. A weekly service from Jersey and a three times weekly service to Angers. The new services from Cork to Jersey and Angers in the Loire Valley, France will begin operating on 2nd May 2006. This brings the total number of routes offered by Aer Arann in Cork to 9.

    • #759015
      kite
      Participant

      New art space wins Cork competition
      The Irish Times

      A mirrored box made from reinforced plastic has been chosen as the winner of Cork City Council’s design ideas competition for a mobile performance and exhibition space. Designed by Peter Feeny Architects and 3P Urban Process, London, it was described by the competition jury as “a very elegant proposition” that would cost no more than €750,000 to build. Seventy-three entries were received for the competition, run by the Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland. The runners-up were Murray O’Laoire and O’Mahony Pike.

      http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ireland/2006/0220/4119500390HM2ARTINBOX.html

    • #759016
      Pug
      Participant

      I was crawling along traffic yesterday on the ring road in Limerick and got to look at the Quays where the Clarion hotel and the docks road has a lot of new developments – it looked pretty impressive to be fair – Cork could do with taking an example and improving on it!

    • #759017
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      CCC, planning dept. can be contacted at Navigation House, Albert Quay, phone 021 4966222, email planning@corkcity.ie. I think photocopys cost about 20 cent per page

      I once asked to copy a small (approx 12 x A4) document in the planning office (Cork City Council) and was told that it would be €10!!! That’s right: 10 Euro!
      Apparently that is the minimum charge for photocopying- even if its just one page you’re after. I made a complaint but I dont think much has changed since. So much for “a cost not exceeding that of making a copy”.

    • #759018
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Re: the John Dennehy quote

      While expressed in a rather dumb fashion it is an interesting question – does Cork have adequate fire cover for buildings of county hall size. One would think they do, and if so it removes that issue from the hands of the NIMBYs…

    • #759019
      kite
      Participant

      @dowlingm wrote:

      Re: the John Dennehy quote

      While expressed in a rather dumb fashion it is an interesting question – does Cork have adequate fire cover for buildings of county hall size. One would think they do, and if so it removes that issue from the hands of the NIMBYs…

      :confused: My understanding of this matter is that ONE of the reasons the Crows Nest decision has been kicked to touch is that one group that made a submission on that project raised this issue, and asked if planners should be sued if somebody was killed or injured in a fire above the current limits of the Cork fire service.

    • #759020
      pier39
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      :confused: My understanding of this matter is that ONE of the reasons the Crows Nest decision has been kicked to touch is that one group that made a submission on that project raised this issue, and asked if planners should be sued if somebody was killed or injured in a fire above the current limits of the Cork fire service.

      utter rubbish. county hall has been around for years. liberty hall, victoria house among others. scare mongering topsoil. why beat around the bush the group is csd. kite what are your feelings on the group?

    • #759021
      dowlingm
      Participant

      but that’s the point pier39. Just because county hall is there doesn’t mean fire cover is too – the CC/Corpo *may* be in breach of their obligations. If they are, it could stymie development across the city.

    • #759022
      kite
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      utter rubbish. county hall has been around for years. liberty hall, victoria house among others. scare mongering topsoil. why beat around the bush the group is csd. kite what are your feelings on the group?

      😉 Now, now ladies put your handbags away, my feelings for the CSD group should be clear from my past posts. I keep an eye on what they are up to on a regular basis (as i do with many other groups), ignore them at your peril?
      I read the csd objection in Navigation House with regard to the Crows Nest development, height/fire requirements were an issue in their submission.
      Who was it said about keeping your friends close and your enemies closer??
      Don’t shoot the messenger pier 39, otherwise we will be playing into their hands.

    • #759023
      kite
      Participant

      @dowlingm wrote:

      but that’s the point pier39. Just because county hall is there doesn’t mean fire cover is too – the CC/Corpo *may* be in breach of their obligations. If they are, it could stymie development across the city.

      😎 Thats absolutely right dowlingm, the County Hall was built in a time that an outside toilet and cut up newspaper to wipe the necessary was a luxury, if some unfortunate got injured or burnt to death in that building(County Hall) then it was but down as an act of God….now with people getting 500,000 grand for breaking a fingernail !!…like Bob Dillon said, “The times they are ‘a changing”

    • #759024
      L1
      Participant

      Can anyone locate images for the Artbox competition. I took part & would really like to see some projects. There is very little on the web, a selection is on exhibition at Millenium Hall in Cork until 22nd only. I don’t think there is a catalogue.

    • #759025
      POM
      Participant

      I would think that indeed the query is a bit of scare mongering in order to satisfy a campaign agenda, however consider that fire services even in places like New York do not possess ladders that extend 80 floors! The question is not so much about equipment, although it is in part a requirement, it is more so abut 2 other factors – building design and training. Cork City Council’s requirement is to facilitate its fire service with the appropriate training to know how to deal with emergencies associated with taller buildings, and in fact, I understand Cork’s Fire Service have been given some training in this field. The real issue is how taller structures are design to handle fire safety issues. Many taller buildings are built around central concrete cores with internally secure stairwells seperated between the various levels with fire-proof door systems. Of course these systems are limited in their capacity, but often very effective and the “trouble” effect associated with buildings of up to 25 storeys is no different to that of say a 5-storey hospital where residents are often disabled, bed-bound or otherwise restricted. Various sections of the hospital divided into containment cells in the event of a fire. With taller buildings these cells can exist as well. I’m not entirely familiar with the Crows Nest design but from what I’ve seen from the photos it seems to be designed around such a core. If questions are being raised about fire safety, its not about ladders and hoses so much…its about training and design. Part of a planning authority’s job is running through such safety requirements with in-house Fire Safety Officers and I do believe Cork’s system is fairly tight knit, requirements are run through various independent agency designed standards like those of Cantwell Keogh and Associates etc etc. Once a building satisfies these issues it should be well beyond acceptability. Corks Fire Service will of course require additional training as time progresses. I understand that buildings like County Hall and Eglington Street for example would have fire safety plans lodged with the city engineer and it will be up to the fire service to familiarise themselves with this. The arguments made about capabilities sounds good but it is somewhat short sighted.

    • #759026
      Pug
      Participant

      if a citys development and potential for decently designed buildings is decreed to by how good the fire brigade are, its time to give up.

    • #759027
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      if a citys development and potential for decently designed buildings is decreed to by how good the fire brigade are, its time to give up.

      These ignorant careerist politicians should be sent to Manhattan,London,Singapore etc………and see how long their careers last…..and their opinions derided in the rest of the developed world.
      Bring on the election.

    • #759028
      pier39
      Participant

      to pom, pug and saucy jack – ditto! its funny how these politicians and lobbyists snake bite so called ‘opportunists’ (so called) when their actions are the most evidently opportunist of all.

    • #759029
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 It seems those of you who have looked forward to seeing Paul Kenny’s highly acclaimed The Treasury building for St. Patrick’s Quay come to life may indeed be smiling with word that the project is to see construction within 4 to 6 months, with office space set to be pitched – as previously noted – to private sector occupiers. Originally intent for Revenue Commissioner usage, the proposal will be realised following its grant from ABP ending speculation that the project may have set aside in light of the failed Revenue bid. Optimistic market conditions will undoubtedly encouraged Mr. Kenny’s intentions. The Treasury will be pitched to private occupiers looking for a landmark premises at the heart of Cork’s emerging commercial core and stylishly linking the propsective redevelopment of Cork’s Northern Docklands with the established city centre. The new cellular and open plan offices which will be located across 2 linked buildings, varying in heights of 4 and 6-storeys, will also be opted for usage as call or administration centres. Tenders are expected to be issued for contracting work soon with a hoped start date somewhere between June and August of 2006. The new project will add powerfully to Cork’s quaysides and provide a dynamic addition to the Kenny Group and Wilson Architecture portfolios.

      See here.



      @altuistic wrote:

      dont know if I would say that. I personally feel the Dennehys Cross design looks very well. Its sharp angular profile looks most well, very defined. The Sherphers convent look seems very slight.

      I think part of the purpose of the Good Shepherds design is not to overwhelm or detract from the historic convent buildings. In this sense, the design is actually a most considered design – it recognises its relation to the George Ashlin buildings and rather than make a bold, loud statement which tries to compete with the convent structures, it takes a more humble, simplistic note while utilising little touches here and there to assert its own innovation.



      More exciting news expected before the weekend. All going well.

    • #759030
      PTB
      Participant

      Dose anyone have any images of the sculpture that was put up outside the City Quarter development? I read about it in the Echo but the pictures weren’t much good. While I’m typing about sculptures I may as well ask about the new sculpture in the Cork university hospital. I read that a fine sculpture called Firefly was errected there. Any pics?

    • #759031
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 It seems those of you who have looked forward to seeing Paul Kenny’s highly acclaimed The Treasury building for St. Patrick’s Quay come to life may indeed be smiling with word that the project is to be constructed within 4 to 6 months, with office space set to be pitched – as previously noted – to private sector occupiers. Originally intent for Revenue Commissioner usage, the proposal will be realised following its grant for ABP.

      See here.



      More exciting news expected before the weekend. All going well.

      Excellent news as I was thinking of the staus of the project when I passed early this morning.
      As similar type of scheme could also be realised for the Penrose Wharf buildings fronting on to Penrose quay.

    • #759032
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Charles & Helen McCarthy have seen their plans to redevelop the Mill Business Centre at a sensitive site on Crosses Green approved. In late 2004, the McCarthy’s originally applied for a 7-storey hotel proposal on some 96-bedrooms on the same site – this was later granted with a reduction of 2 floors and a revised room figure of 64. The latest plan envisages a new office development, 5-storey over basement car-parking for 15 vehicles, and encompassing some 50,000sq ft of mostly open-plan space. As with the previous proposal, Derek Tynan & Associates, also responsible for the Victoria Mills and Gate Multiplex schemes, have been retained for realising a design on the project. Largely similar to the original hotel proposal, the office building features a cubic structure with black limestone elevational treatments. The parapet height has been increased by 0.5m and window features to the southern elevation have been extended. A submission by An Taisce noted their concerns the proposal would effect on the vista east-to-west of St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral along the River Lee’s South Channel.



      😮 UCC have received the all clear to extend their Bioscineces Institute Building by some 1505sq m. The 7-storey extension will allow for further office and laboratory accommodation and will apply to the northern elevation of the building, located to the west on the grounds of Aras na Laoi, which was constructed between 2000 and 2001. Again, Murray O’Laoire Architects have been charged with the design. The original building was constructed by PJ Hegarty & Sons Limited.



      🙂 Considerable interest has been afforded the RH Parker (Cork Timber, Slate and Concrete) site along Kyrl’s Quay which extendeds to approx. 20,000sq ft (0.5 acres) and is up for sale through auctioneers Dominic Daly. The site could form part of a larger site assembly and is primed for redevelopment on what is a prime and prominent city centre location – one which was subject to a highly successful redevelopment design competition held in conjunction with the RIAI and Cork City Council (CCC). Indeed CCC are also significant land holders in this area and have indicated a willingness to dialogue with interested parties who seek to provide the city with a landmark redevelopment. Briefs in the design competition requirements called for features which included elements of significant height so as to mask the North Main Street Multi-storey car-park to the south. Any development should also provide for a gateway feature at the junction of Cornmarket Street (facing the new Shandon Bridge), public space and ideally make use of its water-frontage. A new development proposal should have active dynamics at both day and night times so as to give the quayside a sense of life. Discussions could also engage the Department of Justice so as to relocate their Garda operation at Bridewell whilst incoporating the station structure itself. It will be interesting to see how this potential redevelopment is realised. The design competition was won by Conroy Architecture, but that does not necessarily limit independent design options. Other entrants in the competition included the likes of HTD Studios (Mallow) and MacCurtain Street-based Kiosk Architects (see below):


      The eye-catching Kiosk Architects entry in the Kyrl’s Quay design competition.

    • #759033
      kite
      Participant

      @Paul Clerkin wrote:

      this is hilarious

      Quote:
      Warning on high-rise fire hazards
      Michael O’Regan

      High-rise buildings could be a fire hazard, John Dennehy (FF, Cork South Central) warned.

      Much of the building boom consisted of such developments, he said. “No doubt we have all seen Towering Inferno and said it was a great film, very exciting and so on, but it is only a film. Arising out of that, there are many serious questions. I ask whether, in regard to the county hall in Cork, the trade union building, Liberty Hall, and many other buildings, we have the ability to fight a fire in them. We certainly do not have the fleet of helicopters that were available to the fire chief in the film.”

      Mr Dennehy, who was speaking during the resumed debate on the building control Bill, said he was very concerned that commercial arguments would take precedence over fire safety requirements.

      Bernard Durkan (FG, Kildare North) said there was a “terrible blight” on modern development. Up to 10 or 15 years ago, the quality of development was exceptionally high. “That is not the case any more. Now we have what is known as the duplex system. This is essentially the construction of one house on top of the other, with an external stairway leading into the upper house.” He said such houses did nothing for the people who lived in them.

      Peter Kelly (FF, Longford-Roscommon) said the Bill required that architects be registered. “The public will welcome this, as I do.”

      🙁 Jumping on daddys bandwagon Dennehy Jnr. Cllr.Fergal has a question before city manager Mr.Joe Gavin for Monday night asking why planning permission was granted to Frinaillas Dennehys Cross development after they (councillors) voted for a height cap. This follows csd members meeting with some councillors in City hall this week looking again for a section 140.
      Just who is running the city, councillors OR csd?

    • #759034
      Micko
      Participant

      Anyone have any pictures of what the Grand Parade will look like after the renovations are complete.

      Something like Patricks street ?

    • #759035
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      🙁 Jumping on daddys bandwagon Dennehy Jnr. Cllr.Fergal has a question before city manager Mr.Joe Gavin for Monday night asking why planning permission was granted to Frinaillas Dennehys Cross development after they (councillors) voted for a height cap.

      You can’t enact the policy until it has been ratified and written/worded into the city development plan. Before this can be done the council have to define the suburbs. CSD and their councillors could do with exercising a little patience.

    • #759036
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      You can’t enact the policy until it has been ratified and written/worded into the city development plan. Before this can be done the council have to define the suburbs. CSD and their councillors could do with exercising a little patience.

      😡 Things just go from bad to worse, along with Cllr.Dennehy’s question for next Monday night Cllr.Mary Shields (who usually is a rock of sense) has a motion before councillors to ban all major development in Bishopstown until the area action plan for the area is completed.

    • #759037
      A-ha
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      You can’t enact the policy until it has been ratified and written/worded into the city development plan. Before this can be done the council have to define the suburbs.

      I totally agree….. why Ballincollig and the like is still under County Council contol is beyond me. It’s part of the city now and should be under the control of the city council….. or else, even set up its own Borough Council, it has a larger population than both Waterford and Kilkenny put together.

    • #759038
      pier39
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😡 Things just go from bad to worse, along with Cllr.Dennehy’s question for next Monday night Cllr.Mary Shields (who usually is a rock of sense) has a motion before councillors to ban all major development in Bishopstown until the area action plan for the area is completed.

      id have to argue your comment on ms shields but these people put simply are all mad in the head (thats an opinion people!!!)

      as for ballincollig aha id rather it stayed out of the city if it means its not going to subjected to the shite our councillors and lobbyists are getting up to. and im sorry but ballincollig is only 20000 with a project 40000 pop come 2018, still a bit off even waterfords pop alone.

      by the way they cant enforce the height cap on applications lodged prior to motion of which i understand frinillas dennehys cross plan was (thats illegal my friends) and they also cant enforce it when its not amended into the development plan. councillor dennehy is talkin more manure then a herd after laxatives in this case. also the actual motion itself is in contravention with programmes of sustainable development and until its legality has been clarified (and this can be taken to the high court if need be) its worth nothing more than the hot air that envisioned it. not codswallop, just a simple fact.

    • #759039
      kite
      Participant
      pier39 wrote:
      id have to argue your comment on ms shields but these people put simply are all mad in the head (thats an opinion people!!!)

      Ok, ill amend my comment on M.S. as she is obviously under the thumb of the CSD crowd along with an alarming number of other city councillors.
      I mentioned this before and got no support, but people opposed to this kind of political propaganda should rally together…before these people call all the shots.

    • #759040
      POM
      Participant

      The problem with that kite is that you get a group which seemingly represents the ‘greedy developers’ and thats not a very sympathetic movement. The issue with the height caps is that it isn’t sustainable as a proposal in any event, city management know this. Its legality is questionable and even if it is ratified, it simply means developers are going to lodge plans the same as always, simply using the city council as a novelty stop before forwarding to An Bord Pleanala. All the councillors have done is given An Bord Pleanala more power and their own council less say it what goes on it their community. Despite what lobby groups or city planners campaign, it ultimately hasn’t stopped anything, just made it more inconvenient for everyone involved (including lobby groups who will now obilgatorily have to pay 700 euros everytime they want to lodge an objection as their Cork city council objection won’t matter a penny in the long run).

    • #759041
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      The problem with that kite is that you get a group which seemingly represents the ‘greedy developers’ and thats not a very sympathetic movement. The issue with the height caps is that it isn’t sustainable as a proposal in any event, city management know this. Its legality is questionable and even if it is ratified, it simply means developers are going to lodge plans the same as always, simply using the city council as a novelty stop before forwarding to An Bord Pleanala. All the councillors have done is given An Bord Pleanala more power and their own council less say it what goes on it their community. Despite what lobby groups or city planners campaign, it ultimately hasn’t stopped anything, just made it more inconvenient for everyone involved (including lobby groups who will now obilgatorily have to pay 700 euros everytime they want to lodge an objection as their Cork city council objection won’t matter a penny in the long run).

      🙂 Point taken, i suppose you are right…when did the 700 euro charge to go to ABP come into effect? must have missed that one.

    • #759042
      Micko
      Participant

      Just a few questions here.

      At the moment, the official population of cork is something like 186,000 with its imediate suburbs. Just wondering, but does anyone know what area’s of cork are technically part of the city.

      IMO, places like Ballincollig, Glanmire, Sallybrook, Rochestown, Douglas, Donnybrook and Grange should all be brought in as part of the city and leave them out of COrk Co Co’s juistinction.

      If you were to bring all the suburbs in, including Ballincollig, anyone know what hte population would be ? 350,000 ish ?

    • #759043
      kite
      Participant

      Following on DTZ Pieda Consulting appointment to undertake an economic study for the docklands Cllr.Colm Burke (FG) has a motion before councilors as follows;
      “In view of the fact that UCC are planning to increase the number of students attending the collage from 15,000 to 21,000 that CCC should not grant any further planning permission in the Collage Road / Western Road area, and that all future development at the collage should be in the Docklands area of the city” (motion 14.16)
      Will this provide the kickstart the docklands needs?

      Some southside councillors are said to be considering putting a motion of “No Confidence” against city manager Joe Gavin on Monday 13th March if he fails to act on the height cap motion passed by city council last year. The motion may not go ahead however if the group does not get the support of two of the “anti high-rise councilors” David McCarthy and Jerry Buttimer who are opposed to such a motion.

    • #759044
      POM
      Participant
      kite wrote:
      Following on DTZ Pieda Consulting appointment to undertake an economic study for the docklands Cllr.Colm Burke (FG) has a motion before councilors as follows]

      Some of our councillors seriously need a past-time…badminton perhaps?

    • #759045
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Some of our councillors seriously need a past-time…badminton perhaps?

      😀 Yep, knitting, bridge, or licking envelopes (brown ones!!) are pass times that also spring to mind?

    • #759046
      PTB
      Participant

      Writing satirical political pieces and trying to pass them off as genuine press releases. There’s some top notch comedians in the offices of City hall and County hall.

    • #759047
      altuistic
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I think part of the purpose of the Good Shepherds design is not to overwhelm or detract from the historic convent buildings. In this sense, the design is actually a most considered design – it recognises its relation to the George Ashlin buildings and rather than make a bold, loud statement which tries to compete with the convent structures, it takes a more humble, simplistic note while utilising little touches here and there to assert its own innovation.


      Point taken.

      On a side note i find it rather positive to hear the Patricks quay office development is to go ahead even without the Revenue as tenants. i think it will add rather nicely to teh quayside. A nice contemporary addition. Any news on the Metropole plans?

    • #759048
      POM
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Just a few questions here.

      At the moment, the official population of cork is something like 186,000 with its imediate suburbs. Just wondering, but does anyone know what area’s of cork are technically part of the city.

      IMO, places like Ballincollig, Glanmire, Sallybrook, Rochestown, Douglas, Donnybrook and Grange should all be brought in as part of the city and leave them out of COrk Co Co’s juistinction.

      If you were to bring all the suburbs in, including Ballincollig, anyone know what hte population would be ? 350,000 ish ?

      With my mediocre insight, I think the last Census statistics indicated the city’s population was actually only 123,000. However the figure is misleading as it does not encompass some established boundaries and you are right that a more accurate population would include which are essentially suburbs like Douglas, Rochestown, parts of Ballyvolane, Glanmire and so on. The Metropolitan area and its associated commuter belt I think is more in the region of the 350,000 figure you stated. The probably with jurisdiction is an age old one. Do you think the county council are willing to sacrifice millions in budgetary grants and development rates to the city council without some serious serious negotiation???

    • #759049
      kite
      Participant

      I think part of the purpose of the Good Shepherds design is not to overwhelm or detract from the historic convent buildings. In this sense, the design is actually a most considered design – it recognises its relation to the George Ashlin buildings and rather than make a bold, loud statement which tries to compete with the convent structures, it takes a more humble, simplistic note while utilising little touches here and there to assert its own innovation.



      More exciting news expected before the weekend. All going well.[/QUOTE]

      🙂 The images of the Good Shepherds look great to me (an non professional)…….what about that exciting news Lex? i need to get to sleep, it is the weekend after all!

    • #759050
      Micko
      Participant

      Puts Cork in perspective considering the total great area of Belfast is only 550,000 ish.

      Saying Cork only has a population of 126,000 makes it look tiny.

    • #759051
      POM
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Puts Cork in perspective considering the total great area of Belfast is only 550,000 ish.

      Saying Cork only has a population of 126,000 makes it look tiny.

      Yeah but you have to remember thats a very limited area and does not capture the city proper. Also you have to consider Cork serves a population of 400,000 + and a within 40 mins drive a population of up to 500,000. The city is about 350,000 metropolitan so its not a teeny as you may think in that sense.

    • #759052
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      So what developments are you most looking forward to seeing being built in Cork??

      I’d have to say
      1. Horgans quay
      2. The Treasury
      3. Eglinton street
      4. Cornmarket street
      5. Grand parade plaza (if they ever decide to build it!! must be months overdue at this stage)

    • #759053
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      So what developments are you most looking forward to seeing being built in Cork??

      I’d have to say
      1. Horgans quay
      2. The Treasury
      3. Eglinton street
      4. Cornmarket street
      5. Grand parade plaza (if they ever decide to build it!! must be months overdue at this stage)

      🙂 Mine would be
      1.Eglinton St.
      2.Docklands
      3. Custom House Quay
      4.Grand Parade
      5. Lee Boardwalk

    • #759054
      PTB
      Participant

      I’ld love to see the Water street development being built. Though it has been scaled back a lot.

      I think that construction will begin on the Grand Parade plaza vrey soon. They already have started putting a new road system in place around Tuckey street. As for being overdue I think it was supposed to start some time now anyway.

    • #759055
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @PTB wrote:

      I’ld love to see the Water street development being built. Though it has been scaled back a lot.

      I think that construction will begin on the Grand Parade plaza vrey soon. They already have started putting a new road system in place around Tuckey street. As for being overdue I think it was supposed to start some time now anyway.

      :p Thanks PTB but the Grand parade plaza is the Frinilla scheme there near the monument, the old Grand parade hotel…they demolished it put up boardings and sold the apartments, excavated the site and a year later and nothing is happening!!!!! I know they bought the pub next to them to increase the size of the scheme but ya’d still think they’d have started some building work by now.

    • #759056
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:


      The eye-catching Kiosk Architects entry in the Kyrl’s Quay design competition.

      Never saw this entry. WOW!

    • #759057
      jungle
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      :p Thanks PTB but the Grand parade plaza is the Frinilla scheme there near the monument, the old Grand parade hotel…they demolished it put up boardings and sold the apartments, excavated the site and a year later and nothing is happening!!!!! I know they bought the pub next to them to increase the size of the scheme but ya’d still think they’d have started some building work by now.

      Talking of the monument…

      Before main drainage, it was surrounded by grass and flower beds. Now, it’s surrounded by tarmac. Are they wwiting for Grand Parade Plaza to be built before they put it right? Is there some other plan? Or is it just going to be left like that?

      BTW I also notice that we now have graffiti sprayed on the new stonework in the small square in front of the red abbey…

    • #759058
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      :p Thanks PTB but the Grand parade plaza is the Frinilla scheme there near the monument, the old Grand parade hotel…they demolished it put up boardings and sold the apartments, excavated the site and a year later and nothing is happening!!!!! I know they bought the pub next to them to increase the size of the scheme but ya’d still think they’d have started some building work by now.

      🙂 City Manager Joe Gavin has plans for the city library on the Grand Parade as reported in the Examiner last week that could tie in nicely with the Frinilla project. If they are in the running to take over the library it would make sense to hold off on development on GP until then.

    • #759059
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Cast your eyes upwards in the next few weeks in Cork and you’re likely to see a small but not insignificant architectural event!
      As part of it’s overall restoration and refurbishment, the “pineapples” are about to be replaced atop the steeple of St. Anne’s Church, Shandon. Scaffolding has recently been erected around parts of the tower to facilitate the work. The decorative pieces were removed last year when they were found to be structurally unsafe during cleaning work on the upper portion of the steeple.
      The ornaments which are being installed are not the original limestone, but are concrete copies. It will be good to see them back, the old girl hasn’t looked the same without her jewels!


      Fig 1: Shandon Steeple intact.
      Fig 2: Shandon, as seen recently- minus the pineapples!
      Fig 3: Work underway today on the steeple.

      The Shandon area itself is ripe for renewal, with CCC now in possession of the Butter Market Museum/trade centre. This will make for a very nice tourism feature to capitalise on the area’s huge tourist potential.

      Shandon Church, St. Anne’s Shandon dates 1722 but its tower was not erected until 1750. It has two limestone faces and two faces dressed in red sandstone. There are three terraced square towers topping it off which are very finely and gracefully proportioned. The steeple houses the famous bells of Shandon and the tower itself is one of the city’s best-known landmarks. The tower is crowned with the gilt ball and a fish in the form of a salmon, thirteen feet in length. The church replaces an older church of St. Mary which was destroyed in the siege of 1690.

    • #759060
      Micko
      Participant

      Anyone have pictures of what the Grand Parade Plaza is going to look like ?

      Can’t find anything on the Cork Corp website.

    • #759061
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Where is Lexington these days… Hope he hasn’t done a disappearing act again.

    • #759062
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Anyone have pictures of what the Grand Parade Plaza is going to look like ?

      Can’t find anything on the Cork Corp website.

      Hope this helps, I’m still working on the images 🙂

      The new Grand Parade’s key features will include: widened footpaths; vast paved open public spaces, especially around the National Monument; dozens of new benches; in-floor lighting; and the same type of street lamps which sparked controversy when they were installed on St Patrick’s Street.
      Talks are ongoing about installing a stepped boardwalk along the river at the southern end of the street.
      The War Memorial park at the southern end will also be enhanced.
      The low trees will be removed and new paved areas installed to make the area more attractive.
      The Berwick Fountain will be temporarily removed during construction, restored by expert stone conservators. It will be replaced in the same location and will be enhanced with feature lighting to become a focal point on the street.
      Traffic lanes will be reduced to three lanes, parking will be removed from the centre of the street, extra disabled parking spaces will be provided on Tuckey Street and up to 10 taxi spaces will be provided. Bus stops will remain.

    • #759063
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Tomorrow (March 1st 2006) is the scheduled decision date for Precinct Investments plans to redevelop the St. Patrick’s Quay portion of their Gresham Metropole Hotel. Lodged on the 12th December 2005, the scheme designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects, seeks to demolish what is largely viewed as an eyesore – that is, the southern extension to the hotel, as well as the relatively recent addition of the Leeside Leisure Centre. In their place, Precinct propose a multi-leveled redevelopment consisting of 61 new apartments, 5 retail units, 87 basement car-parking spaces (across 4 levels) and a 3,556sq m hotel extension; these elements will be facilitated by a new 7-storey block (inclusive of conferencing facilities and 44 new hotel bedrooms overhead), 2 further blocks (5 and 6-storeys with 2 setback levels – including 34 apartments [10x 1-bedroom, 19x 2-bedroom & 5x 3-bedroom]). The attractive red-brick building on the corner of Harley Street and St. Patrick’s Quay will be restored and converted to a live/work unit with commercial use at street-level and residential overhead. Fronting Harley Street, 2 retail units are to be provided with 15 overhead apartments in blocks of 4 & 6 storeys with 3-set back storeys – here 4 x 1-bedroom & 11 x 2-bedroom units will be provided. From Harley Street access will also be provided to a courtyard – to this, 1 block rising to 12-storeys over basement will provide an additional 11 x 2-bedroom and 1 x 3-bedroom units. The entire site encompasses 0.2732 hectares and includes the area occupied by the existing Metropole Hotel bounded by Harley Street, St. Patrick’s Quay, MacCurtain Street and the Everyman Palace. As part of the proposal extensive renovations to the existing PS at the Metropole will be included.

      Following the application, 2 submissions were ultimately filed with Cork City Council’s Planning Department; 1 was issued by An Taisce – they welcomed the redevelopment of the unsightly hotel extension currently in place, but raised concerns regarding the impact and scale of the new proposal on the existing protected hotel structure at MacCurtain Street and Harley Street cornerhouse. Furthermore, the submission objects to the inclusion of the 12-storey tower feature stating its inarticulate and bland design. A 2nd submission was issued by the Leeside Leisure Partnership, who operate the hotel’s leisure centre – which, in the application is scheduled for demolition without replacement. The Partnership claim they were uninformed of the development move and retain an operating lease until at least 2008.

      An initial decision date was earmarked for February 14th 2006, however this was subsequently extended until March 1st 2006. Precinct Investments is backed by developer Bryan Cullen, builder and hotelier JJ Murphy and solicitor David Coleman – they have also been associated with a bid for the Jurys Doyle Group before it was secured by JDH Acquisitions.



      😎 City Manager Joe Gavin has offered an indication that CCC may approach the Munster Agricultural Society with a CPO on their long-term lease of the lands, which are owned by CCC. The move is seen as a possible attempt to secure the lands as an area of high recreational accommodation with the new docklands regeneration – thus in line with the Cork Docklands Development Strategy 2001. Such a move would effectively determine an end to attempts by a number of development groups to construct a new event centre on part of the Showgrounds lands. Among the event centre groups involved, it is understood a prominent Munster hotelier had been a backing participant in one scheme proposal. At one point, Fleming Construction had offered the MAS a landswap deal for the highly attractive lands positing the provision of a new event centre near Curraheen to the western periphery of the city in exchange – an offer swiftly ruled out by Joe Gavin who continues to champion the facilitation of an event centre at Horgan’s Quay – controlled by Manor Park Homebuilders and CIE. The CPO proposal also dampens Howard Holdings prospects to acquire some developable rights on the MAS land – however they are now understood to have made moves on other properties near their former Ford Distribution site acquisition. The news is good for the likes of the GAA who may now be in a position to explore development and expansion options on their Pairc Ui Chaoimh stadium.

      – so what of the event centre? Manor Park Homebuilders initial proposition of a centre approximately accommodating 2,500 patrons was squarely rejected by CCC on its presentation (as part of a submission regarding the North Docklands Local Area Plan). Manor Park’s primary interest is the development of residential and commercial (notably retail) elements on the 17-acre Horgan’s Quay site. The company’s wish to facilitate an extensive commercial/retail precinct around the extended Kent Station (following a similar example of that at MacDonagh Station in Kilkenny by Chesterbridge Developments) was rejected by CCC on the belief that retail provisions should be focussed on community service roles rather than a large centre facility. Irrespective, Manor Park and CIE are understood to still favour a larger commercial role around the station area – the determination of this will realise itself closer to planning. In the meantime, it is believed MPH have engaged discussions with a locally based developer regarding the provision of an events centre – to a degree, this relieves MPH/CIE of the burden – offering a portion of their quayside site over to the role of a sufficiently scaled centre and allowing them focus on their favoured elements. The determination of plans is unknown, but understood to be under assessment. Progress on the plan seems to be mixed, with residential and other elements effectively advanced to a sufficient stage, but with ancillary issues now delaying immediate planning moves. In which manner planning aspects proceed is the matter for MPH/CIE, its agents and discussions between CCC and the Stakeholders Forum.



      🙂 CIE are to apply for an extensive refurbishment of the existing terminal building at Kent Station. Their plans will see a scaled revamp of the interior concourse with new retail units, heating, timber supports and glazed installations. New glazed divisions will be installed along the platform areas. An extension to the concourse entrance will be proposed; the demolition of an existing yard area for further parking provision (90 addtional spaces) along with new hard landscaping works to the station exterior grounds. The revamp has been on the cards for sometime, and will compliment future provisions planned for Horgan’s Quay as part of the larger redevelopment of the waterfront site. For CIE, this will mean the reorientation of main station access to face the water – served by a new primary route and ancillary support roads – with a new terminal facility facing south.



      Re: The ‘exciting news’ pre-weekend, I understand the proposal is imminent but has been offset by a few days since the weekend.

    • #759064
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      So what developments are you most looking forward to seeing being built in Cork??

      Too many to mention, including those we’ve yet to see in planning – but of those we have:

      Favourites like The Treasury and Eglinton Street seeing completion are up there. But also Frinailla’s projects at Victoria Cross, CitySquare and Dennehy’s Cross – and one of my pet favourites at CentrePoint (Clontarf Street). Other schemes include Parnell Place Hotel project – but there are many others too.


      Revised design on the Frinailla Victoria Cross Road project – currently in appeal.

    • #759065
      PTB
      Participant

      I hope they won’t remove the upturned cannon outside the peace park. It would be a crime if they did

    • #759066
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @PTB wrote:

      I hope they won’t remove the upturned cannon outside the peace park. It would be a crime if they did

      In the images and layouts i’ve seen (but alas have been unable to upload) the cannon is staying in place, at the corner of Grand Parade and Tuckey Street. There will be huge open plazas constructed at the gates of Bishop Lucey Park and around the National Monument at the south end of the street.
      The Berwick fountain will be the centrepiece of the street, having been removed and set back in place with considerable improvements to its current locale and lighting.



      With all this talk of the Grand Parade we are inclined to forget about its neighbour to the rear, South Main Street. This is the oldest street in Cork City and at the moment is in a terrible condition – particularly at its southern end.
      The area around South Gate Bridge (City Side) is an incredible eyesore – one which will of course be developed along with Grand Parade. But the public realm itself leaves a lot to be desired and the whole street could do with an overall- new footpaths, lighting etc. This should be designed to match North Main Street so as to create a distinctive look for this historic spine of the city.
      Incidently, work has started on Sth Main Street to replace the railings at Beamish and Crawford- directly in front of the Counting House.

    • #759067
      Pug
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      South Main Street. This is the oldest street in Cork City and at the moment is in a terrible condition – particularly at its southern end.

      I think this is in the hands of Paul Kenny as well isnt it? if so I am sure he will be slightly busy with Patricks Quay for a while!

    • #759068
      who_me
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Incidently, work has started on Sth Main Street to replace the railings at Beamish and Crawford- directly in front of the Counting House.

      (Coming from someone whose front window looks out at the Counting House) thank God for that!

      I know the yard at the front of that building is heavily used, but I’ve always thought it was a pity the railings weren’t replaced and the yard made into a small park/garden. It’d show off the Counting House far better. Of course, you’d still have much of the rest of the brewery looking decrepit, particularly from South Main St., but at least it would be an improvement.

    • #759069
      ToMuchFreeTime
      Participant

      I dont know if everyone on this form knows this as i just stumbled acroos a really good site about cork city where there ‘s a huge amount of maps a pictures of the city from the olden years ha .

      But they have stuff like a 1545: Plan of Cork city 1 photo

      Custom House Yard 2 photo

      to the more recent such as the 3photo.

      Sample of tidal waterway under city-centre streets. Most of these waterways were culverted in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This old waterway was exposed near the junction of St Patrick’s Street and Grand Parade during pavement refurbishment in February 2005.
      This is actually realy intresting when you think of it as cork was once just small islands criss crossed by the river lee as shown in the first photo and most the streets in the centre island (city centre) have the lee running under it .

      So here the web site if anyone wants to check it out.
      http://www.corkpastandpresent.ie/

      p.s. hope the pictures turn out right first time trying to upload.

      + i’m well looking forward to seeing what the plans are for grand parade specially after joe galvin
      said in the echo the other day that he is expecting 4 major retail , office and appartment plans to be lodged within 6 months for grand parade…. mmmmm

    • #759070
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      An appeal to An Board Pleanala has been lodged against the decision by CCC to allow Frinailla ltd. go ahead with its development at Denehy’s Cross. The development proposes a mix used of 163 no. residential units, along with retail/commercial use. The appeal has been lodged by Communities for Sustainable Development.

    • #759071
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      what is the appeal for ? the apartments look good to me

    • #759072
      Pug
      Participant

      @Maskhadov wrote:

      what is the appeal for ? the apartments look good to me

      the appeal seems to be to keep the site in the state it is now – why dont these people just fly to Berlin where you can have relatively small 3/4 story buildings that look magnificent.

    • #759073
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      Hopefully the appeal is utterly rejected.

    • #759074
      Micko
      Participant

      Any news on wether the redevelopment of the Metropole Hotel got planning permission yesterday ?

    • #759075
      kite
      Participant

      @Maskhadov wrote:

      what is the appeal for ? the apartments look good to me

      🙂 Frinaillas design for Dennehy’s Cross does look good although their proposals for the former convent site in Sundays Well seem to be far superior.
      One question, the Echo had a story last week that the CCC decision to grant on the Dennehy site has been referred / reported to the Enviornment Minister. Will / can, this delay the ABP outcome?

    • #759076
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      have you a link for that proposal for the former convent site Kite?

      What is the problem with the apartments anyway ? nothing from what I can see.

    • #759077
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 CCC have granted permission to Precinct Investments plans to redevelop the St. Patrick’s Quay frontage of the Gresham Metropole Hotel. While the protected element of the hotel fronting MacCurtain Street will be subject to an extensive refurbishment, the southern extension and leisure centre are set to be demolished and replaced with 44-new bedrooms, conference facilities, 4 split levels of basement car-parking (for 87 spaces) and 61 apartments over varying block levels. The details of the project may be found here, here and also here.

      The project was lodged in December of 2005 and was granted an extension on the original due date (14th February 2006) to facilitate consideration of Unsolicited Further Information until 1st March 2006. Some modifications were proposed in the information. As part of the grant conditions, CCC have imposed conditions limiting the height of the 12-storey tower element – this section will now be limited to a maximum height of 32 metres. The tower element has also seen condition requests calling for redesign so as to emphasise its articulation. Select metal cladding finishes are now to be replaced by glazing. In assessing the project, the planners report notes:

      “It is considered the proposed development provides a positive balance between retaining elements of value on site and the introduction of contemporary elements that successfully compliment each other.”

      In total 20 conditions have been imposed on the grant.



      Maskhadov:

      Images and associated details for the Frinailla proposal at Good Shepherd Convent may be seen here.

      While further images and details on the Dennehy’s Cross project may be found here.



      @Pug wrote:

      I think this is in the hands of Paul Kenny as well isnt it? if so I am sure he will be slightly busy with Patricks Quay for a while!

      Mr. Kenny has plans on this site, that unless another potential deal is realised in the meantime, he intends to lodge for planning within the prospective future.

    • #759078
      PTB
      Participant

      Sample of tidal waterway under city-centre streets. Most of these waterways were culverted in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This old waterway was exposed near the junction of St Patrick’s Street and Grand Parade during pavement refurbishment in February 2005.
      This is actually realy intresting when you think of it as cork was once just small islands criss crossed by the river lee as shown in the first photo and most the streets in the centre island (city centre) have the lee running under it .

      Are there culverts all the way along Patricks street, Grand Parade and South Mall? I was aware that culverts existed but thought it was on a smaller scale. T’would be interesting to take a boat through them sometime though I wouldn’t hold out any hope of finding any crocodiles in there like the urban myths.

      Sometimes I think that tis a bit of a pity that the waterways were filled in because it would be incredible to live in a city like Venice. Although that would have is own drawbacks. A Patricks street filled with water would make shopping difficult. And I hear that Venice has odour problems and is slowly sinking. But it would look incredible.

    • #759079
      Anonymous
      Participant

      The tower will need an extensive reworking along with most of the elements to McCurtain St it looks jumbled and a definite case of shifting excessive bulk around a confined site.

    • #759080
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      The tower will need an extensive reworking along with most of the elements to McCurtain St it looks jumbled and a definite case of shifting excessive bulk around a confined site.

      Could’nt agree more. If this gets built hopefully it will open the whole of the quay to good development as this south facing quay has great potential.

    • #759081
      Pug
      Participant

      my contacts in the building trade tell me that those 2 parcels of land up by the airport went on sale yesterday – one of those parcels is residential so they will be the only houses right next to the main road – a solr bought the land in trust but if anyone hears who bought it out of curiousity, let us know

      PS – as per the Examiner a Dublin estate agent bought the parcel of land zoned light industrial and the residential parcel buyer again as per The Examiner is rumoured to be O Brien O FLynn

    • #759082
      jdivision
      Participant

      They made e27.5 million. AMV was e15m

    • #759083
      Micko
      Participant

      Lexington: Any bigger pick of the new Metropole ? WOuld like to see a better view. I actually like the design and am suprised that there isn’t more talk about it.

    • #759084
      jdivision
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      my contacts in the building trade tell me that those 2 parcels of land up by the airport went on sale yesterday – one of those parcels is residential so they will be the only houses right next to the main road – a solr bought the land in trust but if anyone hears who bought it out of curiousity, let us know

      PS – as per the Examiner a Dublin estate agent bought the parcel of land zoned light industrial and the residential parcel buyer again as per The Examiner is rumoured to be O Brien O FLynn

      The Dublin estate agent acts for Gerry Barrett a lot. Bought that site on the outer relief road in Waterford for him. Could be him again.

    • #759085
      malec
      Participant

      That picture is a thumbnail from imageshack.us. All you have to do is remove the .th in the url and here’s the pic:

      By the way to me this is one of the worst proposals in Cork. It just looks like a lump of boxes thrown randomly into something that looks like a pile of rubbish. The overall shape seems overly complicated and unbalanced and because of its bulkiness is even more out of scale than what’s already there now. I wouldn’t mind something quite tall going there (ie about 8 stories) but would have to be more slender so it wouldn’t seem so out of scale.

      Just thought I’d mention that last week I was in Limerick and was stunned by what they’ve done with the quayside. The new riverpoint building and clarion hotel together are stunning and I really hope the few highrise buildings in the docklands will be of a similar standard. Paul Kenny’s The Treasury development is definitely a step in the right direction. It’s definitely one of my favourites

    • #759086
      POM
      Participant

      Though I’m delighted that the Metropole proposal is a s further step in hopefully what will be a large-scale and long overdue much needed redevelopment of Patricks Quay, I am somewhat disappointed by the O’Mahony Pike design here. When you look at a proposal like Dennehys Cross and then this, its hard to put the 2 in frame as being from the same firm. I see and applaud what the architects is trying to do here, allow for varying parapet heights so as to break up bulk and compliment surrounding structures. I agree with malec, the site could do with a tall feature, but the overall resulting articulation is poorly executed and creates a very disjointed 20 car pile up. It reminds me of the proposal for Sunbeam with the 18 storey element lost in a jumble of block heights. As par lex’s post, the planner has demanded a redesign of the tower and limit on height as well as some elevational alterations. Maybe this will aid the scheme. Anyone know how the problem with the leisure lease worked out? If its not settled the scheme probably won’t be able to move until 2008 (???).

      As for the other end of Patricks Quay. I agree, The Treasury is definitely a step in the right direction, striking yet not overbearing. Mr. Kenny’s efforts here have got me highly anticipating what he has in store for his Grand Parade site.

    • #759087
      A-ha
      Participant

      I saw this in the Echo last Tuesday and thought someone might find it interesting (sorry I’m so late posting it on here).

      CORK CITY COUNCIL is to request central funding for the provision of a light rail system from the city centre to Cork International Airport. Councillors approved a motion to this effect tabled by Cllr. Dave McCarthy at Monday night’s council meeting. Cllr. McCarthy urged the council to lodge a funding request with the Department of Transport.

      I wonder what will come of it? It would certainly be an improvement to the current transportation links to the airport, and I can’t see why it wouldn’t be extended at some later date to somewhere like Carrigaline.

    • #759088
      malec
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Though I’m delighted that the Metropole proposal is a s further step in hopefully what will be a large-scale and long overdue much needed redevelopment of Patricks Quay, I am somewhat disappointed by the O’Mahony Pike design here. When you look at a proposal like Dennehys Cross and then this, its hard to put the 2 in frame as being from the same firm. I see and applaud what the architects is trying to do here, allow for varying parapet heights so as to break up bulk and compliment surrounding structures. I agree with malec, the site could do with a tall feature, but the overall resulting articulation is poorly executed and creates a very disjointed 20 car pile up. It reminds me of the proposal for Sunbeam with the 18 storey element lost in a jumble of block heights. As par lex’s post, the planner has demanded a redesign of the tower and limit on height as well as some elevational alterations. Maybe this will aid the scheme. Anyone know how the problem with the leisure lease worked out? If its not settled the scheme probably won’t be able to move until 2008 (???).

      Basically tall and slender is better than short and bulky I think. Aswell as you said it would create a better impression if the tower was out in front, facing the river rather than hidden away (although 12 storeys seems a bit too tall though)

    • #759089
      Micko
      Participant

      @malec wrote:

      Basically tall and slender is better than short and bulky I think. Aswell as you said it would create a better impression if the tower was out in front, facing the river rather than hidden away (although 12 storeys seems a bit too tall though)

      Might start a high rise trend for McCurtain Street. I doubt think it actually looks that bad. Especially compared to the appartments at Victoria Cross.

    • #759090
      kite
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Might start a high rise trend for McCurtain Street. I doubt think it actually looks that bad. Especially compared to the appartments at Victoria Cross.

      I would agree that the design does not look too bad BUT i don’t think any proposal for this prominent site should be just ok, it should be exceptional, otherwise we will be going down the route of Merchants Quay, ie “Its a slight improvement on what is already there so let’s go for it”

    • #759091
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I’m curious, how come office buildings like Number 6 Lapps quay and City quarter filled up with occupiers fairly smoothly and yet 21 Lavitts quay still seems as though its office element is still relatively unoccupied even though it has a good location, parking and all that. Even Blackpool park and Ballincollig town centre who have much bigger office sections seem to have filled up pretty quick and they’re miles out and i think Blackpool uses the same estate agent as well???!!

    • #759092
      Micko
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      I would agree that the design does not look too bad BUT i don’t think any proposal for this prominent site should be just ok, it should be exceptional, otherwise we will be going down the route of Merchants Quay, ie “Its a slight improvement on what is already there so let’s go for it”

      God, i can only barely remember Merchants Quay of old from my childhood. Completely run down small shops. In fact, i i think every single shop was closed down from when I remember it. Any pics anyone ?

    • #759093
      POM
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      They made e27.5 million. AMV was e15m

      That’ll make for some new retirement home out in Mahon!!!

    • #759094
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The South Infirmary/Victoria Hospital have been given permission to demolish the existing two-storey showroom and warehouses at Infirmary Road and to erect a new cancer screening facility for ‘Breastcheck’, comprising four full storeys of accommodation and partial fifth storey containing plant, the extension of the public footpath from the eastern side of Infirmary Road along the southern side of Hibernian Road to form a paved pedestrian space with steps and ramp giving access to the main entrance to the building on Infirmary Road and vehicular drop-off on Hibernian Road, and the construction of a temporary garden bounded by walls and railings facing Infirmary Road.
      “Contemporary in design, the proposed finishes include brick, aluminum framed windows, metal louvre panels and metal balustrades.”


      Murray O Laoire Site Strategy Study of the future Breastcheck site (bottom left hand corner).

    • #759095
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Developers Tom and Michelle McCarthy are devising plans to convert their Jacob’s Mill development to use as a luxury 5-star 35-bedroom boutique hotel. The former mill has lain idle along Father Matthew Quay for almost 45-years and is currently being rejuvenated by contractors O’Flynn of Banteer on Mr. McCarthy’s behalf. The refurbishment design is being handled by Murray O’Laoire Architects with G+A Architects handling interior designs. The redevelopment was originally scheduled to accommodate apartment usage, however a subsequent application will seek a change of use to hotel operations – and the conversion of plans to accommodate 35 bedrooms. It is believed the 20 space parking structure will be retained. The hotel is earmarked to be titled ‘Jacob’s Country House Hotel’.

      😎 Fleming Construction are expected to lodge their plans for the former Nemo Rangers Football Grounds (GAA) along the South Douglas Road early next week. Fleming Construction, who acquired the site in a part land-swap deal, intend to develop a high-end residential development of 102 units with 82 terrace, detached and semi-detached houses accompanying 20 new duplexes. Access to the new scheme is expected to be accommodated from the Douglas Road which will require the demolition of 2 existing road-frontage dwellings.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Cork City Council have today announced their formal intention to seek offers on the development of a new Central Library. CCC are seeking a new premises ideally along or near Grand Parade, but will be open to any offers which deem worthy. A new 5,000sq m library premises of landmark design is sought to serve the city into the 21st century – it may form part of a broader mixed development or as a stand alone structure to be provided by the successful bidding developer. As part of the transaction, the existing Central Library premises on Grand Parade may form part exchange – given the prime city centre location, it is unlikely many will argue such an exchange. Should the library form part of a development on the existing Central Library site, the developer will be obliged to provide temporary accommodation for the facility in an accessible location.

      – the formal invitation by CCC provides Grand Parade with yet another major potential redevelopment opportunity. One would have to consider possible moves by established interests in the area such as Paul Kenny (The Kenny Group), Frinailla and others. The opportunity exists to offer a major mixed-use development in a location second to none. Given the nature of the scheme, should it include the central library on site, and its prominent location, a real opportunity exists now for a scheme of statement architecture which lends itself to the importance of the street on which it resides as well as adding another important structural landmark. Potential for a major retail, leisure, commercial and residential quarter could exist given the ripe redevelopment potential of many adjoining and surrounding buildings abutting the Central Library on Grand Parade and to the rear along South Main Street. Of course, development on that scale would demand attention to the many unique and protected structures that adjoin the site, but this should in no way damper imaginative opportunities.

      🙂 The South Infirmary-Victoria Hospital (SIVH) along South Terrace has been granted permission for the provision of its much needed BreastCheck facility on the former Irish International Trading Corp. site at 5D – 5F Infirmary Road. The 4, part 5-storey structure was designed by appointed agents for the national BreastCheck roll-out, Cullen Payne Architects. The scheme is not likely to come on-stream until mid-to-late 2007 at the earliest, however the grant represents a significant step in the facilitiy’s provision. 3 submissions were lodged regarding the application, including 1 from An Taisce and 2 adjoining property owners. The design of the rectangular structure has been generally welcomed, and arranged in such a way so as to accommodate future expansion at the SIVH. It is understood private parties are currently involved arranging a possible prospective healthcare development at the hospital.

      😎 Cork City Council today have launched notice of their formulation of a Bishopstown-Wilton Area Action Plan. The plan will be open for public consultation at Wilton Shopping Centre on Tuesday 14th March between 3 p.m. – 8 p.m. and Wednesday 15th March between 3 p.m. – 8 p.m.

    • #759096
      kite
      Participant

      😎 Cork City Council today have launched notice of their formulation of a Bishopstown-Wilton Area Action Plan. The plan will be open for public consultation at Wilton Shopping Centre on Tuesday 14th March between 3 p.m. – 8 p.m. and Wednesday 15th March between 3 p.m. – 8 p.m.[/QUOTE]

      :confused: Is this a good or bad idea?, does this mean that the CSD group are now getting a payoff in the way of an action plan for Bishopstown? Is all the bull and cribbing about development that this crowd but out out over the past few years now paying off?

    • #759097
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      :confused: Is this a good or bad idea?, does this mean that the CSD group are now getting a payoff in the way of an action plan for Bishopstown? Is all the bull and cribbing about development that this crowd but out out over the past few years now paying off?

      Not really. Blackrock had an action plan for its harbour. Blackpool had one too. I don’t see any harm in an action plan, its formulation isn’t a blueprint according to lobbyists. The plan will be assessing sectors of the Bishopstown area and devising the best framework for each.

    • #759098
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Not really. Blackrock had an action plan for its harbour. Blackpool had one too. I don’t see any harm in an action plan, its formulation isn’t a blueprint according to lobbyists. The plan will be assessing sectors of the Bishopstown area and devising the best framework for each.

      No city councilor in Blackrock or Blackpool as far as i am aware has called for a TOTAL ban on major developments in their area like Mary Shields FF (Bishopstown) has until the area plan is in place..brought about no doubt by the CSD and the unfair pressure the put on councilors of their area by the website they set up?, see what you think yourself, they can be found on http://www.corksouthwest.com

      Update 7-3-06: on this matter the IE have an article in todays paper http://www.irishexaminer.com/pport/web/ireland/Full_Story/did-sgXymJGTRSdVUsglO-LCk0lQvU.asp

    • #759099
      who_me
      Participant

      @PTB wrote:

      Sometimes I think that tis a bit of a pity that the waterways were filled in because it would be incredible to live in a city like Venice. Although that would have is own drawbacks. A Patricks street filled with water would make shopping difficult. And I hear that Venice has odour problems and is slowly sinking. But it would look incredible.

      I’ve often thought the same. Previously, it would have been unthinkable, but with the increasing pedestrianisation of the city centre, it’d be wonderful to see wouldn’t it?

      Ok, perhaps not if the water quality is as in the photo above, but still…;)

    • #759100
      browser
      Participant

      This was put back to March as I recall. Any news?

    • #759101
      theblimp
      Participant

      Lex – in relation to the Fr. Matthew Quay development, are you sure that the Tom McCarthy involved isn’t the ‘Kingsley Hotel’ Tom McCarthy as against the ‘McCarthy Developments’ Tom McCarthy? This one is always a bit confusing, but I think the ‘Kingsley Tom’ has the Jacobs on the Mall restuarant to the back of this proposed development – which might explain part of the proposed name. However the other Tom also has some hospitality experience having owned and run Blackrock Castle for a few years

      BTW – ‘Jacobs Country House Hotel’ – how come the middle 2 words there look completely out of place to me !

    • #759102
      Pug
      Participant
      theblimp wrote:
      Tom McCarthy Kingsley

      Quote:
      I thought it was that Tom MCCarthy as well. Its would be great to see a hotel there and presumably you could stay and walk out the front lobby to Sth Mall, while passing Jacobs restaurant on the way, which I would think they will incorporate into the hotel.
    • #759103
      tomthevet2003
      Participant

      Any news on the Academy Street development? I thought planning was to applied for by now.

    • #759104
      jdivision
      Participant

      Planning for Academy St is going in tomorrow. I’ve seen the images – It’s lots of glass to the Emmet Place elevation. i’m sure people will have concerns over scaling but I like it. The changes to Faulkners Lane will be positive. There’s a stacked shell type structure planned for the Academy Street, Emmet St end.

    • #759105
      jdivision
      Participant

      [attach]2146[/attach]
      This is the Metropole plan

    • #759106
      lexington
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      Planning for Academy St is going in tomorrow. I’ve seen the images – It’s lots of glass to the Emmet Place elevation. i’m sure people will have concerns over scaling but I like it. The changes to Faulkners Lane will be positive. There’s a stacked shell type structure planned for the Academy Street, Emmet St end.

      That was to be my ‘exciting’ news! :p

      @lexington wrote:

      Re: The ‘exciting news’ pre-weekend, I understand the proposal is imminent but has been offset by a few days since the weekend.

      ]Re: Water Street[/b]
      @browser wrote:

      This was put back to March as I recall. Any news?

      The ABP decision date was put back to March 26th 2006. Revised plans on the scheme will be up for evaluation.

    • #759107
      jdivision
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      Planning for Academy St is going in tomorrow. I’ve seen the images – It’s lots of glass to the Emmet Place elevation. i’m sure people will have concerns over scaling but I like it. The changes to Faulkners Lane will be positive. There’s a stacked shell type structure planned for the Academy Street, Emmet St end.

      Having said that, I think the copper cladding doesn’t look great on the Academy St element. Might have been better to continue the grey of the shell down to that level.

    • #759108
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      No city councilor in Blackrock or Blackpool as far as i am aware has called for a TOTAL ban on major developments in their area like Mary Shields FF (Bishopstown) has until the area plan is in place..brought about no doubt by the CSD and the unfair pressure the put on councilors of their area by the website they set up?

      Update 7-3-06: on this matter the IE have an article in todays paper http://www.irishexaminer.com/pport/web/ireland/Full_Story/did-sgXymJGTRSdVUsglO-LCk0lQvU.asp

      I was sitting in traffic today at Victoria Cross (surprise surprise) and looked over at those architectural ambominations rising up on the south side of the junction. It struck me that the city council cause more grief for themselves by granting these half hearted renditions. The extension to Victoria Mills is finished with the mostly dire coat of brown brick. Perhaps the idea was to cause variation in the building line but instead it utterly clashes. It would have been even somewhat less destructive were it to maintain the material finish of the first phase of the student development. What gets me is that by allowing this kind of junk go up it is only giving groups like that CSD crowd fuel for their fire and subsequently they go on the rampage which puts genuinely good designs like that at Victoria Cross and Dennehy’s Cross in the red. The council then have to deal with opportunist councillors riding the wave of ‘disapproval’ and create more grief for themselves in the long run…when all they had to do in the beginning was demand better. Yeah yeah yeah Victoria Mills may be good structurally and all that, I get it, but it is a faceless brick all the same. And its extension is worse. Its as if the architect sought to diminish the impact of the first section by devising a ghastlier addition to take away the attention. A 9 storey building is fine for the Victoria Mills location but it comes down to the design. Maybe the council, who as far as I know indicated their preference for the original Victoria Mills design, should revise their concept of good design. Bertie Pope’s design for Flemings next door isn’t all that better. Its a pity the good development like those proposed by Frinilla and that one across the road from Dennehys Cross are jeporadised by the mistakes of others and give lobbyists something to lobby about. Secretly they must be delighted.

    • #759109
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      I was sitting in traffic today at Victoria Cross (surprise surprise) and looked over at those architectural ambominations rising up on the south side of the junction. It struck me that the city council cause more grief for themselves by granting these half hearted renditions. The extension to Victoria Mills is finished with the mostly dire coat of brown brick. Perhaps the idea was to cause variation in the building line but instead it utterly clashes. It would have been even somewhat less destructive were it to maintain the material finish of the first phase of the student development. What gets me is that by allowing this kind of junk go up it is only giving groups like that CSD crowd fuel for their fire and subsequently they go on the rampage which puts genuinely good designs like that at Victoria Cross and Dennehy’s Cross in the red. The council then have to deal with opportunist councillors riding the wave of ‘disapproval’ and create more grief for themselves in the long run…when all they had to do in the beginning was demand better. Yeah yeah yeah Victoria Mills may be good structurally and all that, I get it, but it is a faceless brick all the same. And its extension is worse. Its as if the architect sought to diminish the impact of the first section by devising a ghastlier addition to take away the attention. A 9 storey building is fine for the Victoria Mills location but it comes down to the design. Maybe the council, who as far as I know indicated their preference for the original Victoria Mills design, should revise their concept of good design. Bertie Pope’s design for Flemings next door isn’t all that better. Its a pity the good development like those proposed by Frinilla and that one across the road from Dennehys Cross are jeporadised by the mistakes of others and give lobbyists something to lobby about. Secretly they must be delighted.

      😮 ABSOLUTELY right in everything you say POM, and for Architects to give VM an award is an insult to all, like you said CSD must be delighted.

    • #759110
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Staff at 21 Lavitts Quay were working after hours tonight in advance of O’Callaghan Properties highly anticipated Academy Street project. After some delay, the scheme is now headed to Navigation House where it will seek approval from planners – hoping to provide a prominent rejuvenation to an ambitiously assembled site right in the heart of Cork city centre.

      Ambrose Kelly’s Project Architects, in conjunction with Gehl Urban Design Consultants (Denmark), have been working and reworking the landmark scheme which will be divided over 2 blocks ranging in heights of between 4 (including mezzanine) and 9-storeys with a replenished and widened Faulkner’s Lane (now proposed at up to 8 metres in width) running between them – the lane, long (and disappointingly) left uncared for is currently in varying states of dereliction, it will now form a pedestrian friendly open-plan retail street with self-contained 2-storey over basement retail buildings (with residential units overhead). This is but one feature of the broader scheme which will encompass features which include 19 large comparison goods retail units (ranging in sizes of between 8,000sq ft and 25,000sq ft) and 91 new apartments. The gross retail area of the project will equal 17,923sq m with a net retail area of 10,971sq m (excluding mezzanine levels) – the 19 units will be located across the basement, ground floor, first floor and first floor mezzanine levels. The residential units will comprise of 17x 1-bedroom units, 54x 2-bedroom units, 15x 3-bedroom units and 5x duplex units – 2 gyms will also be included in the scheme. Demolition works include the removal of upper floor levels at the Sasha store on St. Patrick’s Street, the demolition of the former Ryan’s Pharmacy on St. Patrick’s Street and the provision of a new entrance at this location. Demolition of the Jean Scene building and a newly reconstructed facade will also be undertaken at Patrick’s Street. Facades at 1-6 Academy Street, 7 Academy Street & 8 Academy Street will be retained along with the AA offices at Emmet Place – further retentions are also included. 96 basement car-parking spaces are to be included for exclusive residential occupant use.

      The €150m scheme utilises extensive glazing, particularly at the Emmet Place elevation, as well as notable copper cladded elements. A feature most notable along the Academy Street/Emmet Place elevations is the stacking of shell-like zinc cascades.

      The bulk of the assembled 0.56 hectare Academy Street site (with total acquisition values estimated at between €85m and €100m) comprises of the soon-to-be former Irish Examiner offices and printing press. The building extends to 1,765sq m at ground floor level, with a further 1,022 sq m overhead at 1st floor level (+ printing press spaces), and was acquired by O’Callaghan Properties (OCP) in 2004 for an estimated €30m. Part of the deal included a site exchange feature which saw Thomas Crosbie Holdings (publishers of the Irish Examiner) acquire a site at O’Callaghan Properties’ Mahon Point scheme – this site was subsequently developed on lease from TCH by WebPrint Concepts as a new printing press facility (which now produces all TCH titles bar the UK-based Irish Post). Following this acquisition, OCP proceeded to purchased the former Johnson & Perrott showrooms at Emmet Place – in another similar land exhange deal, the Grand Circle Lounge (for a value believed to be in and around €1.2m), Taboo alternative bar, 97 St. Patrick’s Street and buildings along St. Patrick’s Street to the front of the section of Le Chateau bar extending onto Faulkner’s Lane. The block area had been identified for higher-order retail development by Cork City Council as part of its city centre retail strategy.

      Agents for the scheme include Project Architects & Gehl Urban Design Consultants (Design), Niall Fitzsimons & Co. (Consulting Engineers), Chris Southgate (Conservation Engineer), Bowen Construction (expected Main Contractors) and Hamilton Osbourne King (Commercial and Retail Advisors).

      With this scheme now destined to the throws of planning, attention will undoubtedly focus on the next big retail schemes earmarked for the city centre – including that of investor Joe O’Donovan and his assembled site linking St. Patrick’s Street to Grand Parade – which includes the former Capitol Cineplex, Central Shoe Stores and 50 St. Patrick’s Street.

    • #759111
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      Its not dissimilar in finishes,scale,massing,materials mix to their Lavitts Quay development and the apartment block at 9 stories is probably too high for the city centre core area. However overall this project must be welcomed as a massive boost to Cork city business and shopping re-inforcing Cork as the premier shopping destination outside Dublin.
      The new Faulkeners lane pedestrianised is great however Academy St.Drawbridge St. leading to the Quays must be pedestrianised also.

    • #759112
      PTB
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      [attach]2146[/attach]
      This is the Metropole plan

      Does anyone feel that the development would be better without that tower in the center of the building. It looks very out of place. Firstly it looks too short and it also is too slender on top of the bulky building beneath. I’m not too fond of the colour either. It reminds me of that building across from the Opera House – Camden Quay? – thats in red brick which looks quite dull.

    • #759113
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Well, its worth picking up a copy of today’s Examiner to see their excellent selection of images of the new Academy Street/St.Patrick’s Street development (does it have a name yet?).
      You can really understand the delays in submission with this one because it so obvious that a lot of thought and consideration has gone into it. The treatment of the protected structures along Acadent Street itself looks excellent and the developers have certainly kept to their word when they said that it would not have an overbearing effect of St. Patrick’s Street.
      The widening and pedestrianisation of Faulkner’s lane was a given and while the images look good, I’ll wait and see the details regarding street frontage (or should that be lane frontage) and access in this portion.
      The only thing I can fault the development on is what looks like an overly blocky and fussy roof element of the Johnsons and Perrott section of the site, visible from Emmett Place.

      Anyway, there just my first impressions! What does everyone else think?

      Has anyone see a photomontage of the St. Patrick’s Street facade?

    • #759114
      POM
      Participant

      My hang up is the Emmet Place frontage as well, its very bland and blocky when what was needed here was a proposal which utilised the superb vantage along Emmet Place from the quays. The frontage fails to capitalise on its location and I would, had I my way, push for an enhanced treatment and redesign. It stacks up poorly – in fact I would propose an adjusted replication of the zinc shell stepping as found on the corner of Academy Street and Emmet Place. This would bring more consistency to the frontage, provide a more gradual incline to the taller sections and give something a bit more exciting to look at visually. Also a sympathetic copper treatment would compliment the “doll house” building in the middle of this frontage better than glass on the eastern side. I can’t see 9 storeys getting through unhinged, I’d expect 2 storeys to be knocked off the higher apex sections. 7 storeys seems more reasonable. Other than that its not a bad design for such a complicated site and I especially like the northern section of the Academy Street frontage.

      And whats all this I hear on the radio that its a 450 million euro development??!! Exaggerration much? It makes for nice sensationalism but a scheme of this make-up with a 450 million euro value would be unviable. I think a more conservative 100 million euro…maybe 150 million as lex said would be a bit more realistic.

    • #759115
      jdivision
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      And whats all this I hear on the radio that its a 450 million euro development??!! Exaggerration much? It makes for nice sensationalism but a scheme of this make-up with a 450 million euro value would be unviable. I think a more conservative 100 million euro…maybe 150 million as lex said would be a bit more realistic.

      I think that’s the completion value if it was to be sold off as an investment after completion.

    • #759116
      jdivision
      Participant

      [attach]2150[/attach]

    • #759117
      lexington
      Participant

      😉 What are your own opinions of the design?

    • #759118
      jdivision
      Participant

      [ATTACH]2151[/ATTACH]
      Patrick St elevation. Lex, posted opinion on previous page. I like it but would prefer if the grey of the shell had been continued where the copper is. Don’t have any issues with scale.

    • #759119
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @jdivision wrote:

      [attach]2150[/attach]

      Is there some form of facade retention going on under the green copper roof in that image? This part of the building looks completely out of sync with the rest of it.

    • #759120
      lexington
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      Is there some form of facade retention going on under the green copper roof in that image? This part of the building looks completely out of sync with the rest of it.

      Partial retention of the former Irish Examiner offices facade along 1-6 Academy Street.

      Below is an image of one of the facades set for complete retention along Academy Street: No.8 Academy Street



      Saint Patrick’s Street elevation comparative:

      A.) Outline of elevations proposed for alteration as they stand (perspective east to west)

      B.) Proposed elevation (perspective west to east)

      This image originally posted by jdivision.

    • #759121
      phatman
      Participant

      I’m not too crazy about that St. Patrick’s Street elevation. I wonder how much of Pana’s gonna be dug up again.
      Looks good otherwise:)

    • #759122
      pier39
      Participant

      the saint patricks street elevation looks very off and a little bland. im confused about the necessity to break the line of established heights fronting patricks street. whats with the peaked feature?!!! must say i do like the academy st elevations and use of copper cladding. the shell features are interesting too but have to agree with some of the earlier critical comments about emmett place stacking and elevations. will nine storeys really pass????????

    • #759123
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The Patrick St aspect is bar the weakest of this scheme. Needs revision.
      As for the nine storeys – the design looks like they slabbed that on so that in appeal two can get knocked off with ease.

    • #759124
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      Partial retention of the former Irish Examiner offices facade along 1-6 Academy Street.

      Thanks Lexington. Nothing like a bit of urban taxidermy! I am not a big fan of facade retention. I think it is almost more instulting to the heritage of a building than complete destruction.

      I would like to have seen what the facade you have shown would have looked like with its original windows. That window in the centre of your photo seems to have been a doorway at somestage, was it?

      I think the Patrick’s Street elevations looks very strange, particularly if that is the doorway to the present structure that is retained? Overall, from what I can see from those photomontages, I think this development is going to look too bitty. It seems to be lacking in overall legibility.

    • #759125
      phatman
      Participant

      What I can’t figure out is why the Examiner Offices are protected at all. I mean, they look crap! Seriously, of what significance are they besides their high profile? One of the aspects of the redevelopment that I was looking forward to most was their demolition, and a major redesign of that side of Academy Street…

    • #759126
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I do think that a number of parts of the Examiner Offices are worthy of being retained. They may look a bit shabby at the moment but should contribute greatly to this new development.

      I’d have to agree that the St.Patrick’s street facade is a bit pointless- why knock the Ryan’s Pharmacy/Sasha portion to replace it with something that seems to be struggling to mirror it? I can see this being retained in the final plans when permission is granted.

      Anybody know what effect this development will have on Bowling Green Street? Will it get a similar treatment to Faulkner’s Lane? It certainly deserves it. I know Dunnes Stores are working on plans for their side of Bowling Green Street- how do they stand at present??
      Will the two developments work together to rejuvinate this street? or will they both have their backs to it?

    • #759127
      Pug
      Participant

      i’m with jdivision on that one, Emmet st side of the devt looks great, upper levels on Patrick St side are a bit too blocky and hopefully wont be cream/magnolia type colouring, could they not just bring the curve down on that side as well?

      it really is exciting to see Cork and its quays starting to develop, not far from academy st will be Precincts block across the water, next to Paul Kennys Treasury building, , right opposite then will be the ‘flatiron’ Oyster devts next to the bus station, bounce back aross the river and Kent station will be brand new next to the brand new conference/event centre at Horgans Quay, just after will be the Water Street buildings with the Grangefield development across the water, just next to the redeveloped Pairc Ui Caoimh / Showgrounds

      any architects out there with ability to do a quick map or photo of those developments if all built, could be an interesting exercise!

    • #759128
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      Personally I’d flatten it for the new development.

    • #759129
      jungle
      Participant

      Is the AA building retained behind that tree in the Emmet Place photo? If not what’s going between the Examiner Facade and the “doll house” building.

      The paranoiac in me reckons that tree is hiding something…

    • #759130
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      You can rest assured Jungle, tha AA building is being retained in all its teeny weeny glory!!

    • #759131
      A-ha
      Participant

      From what I see in the pictures, the whole thing looks really great, except the St. Patrick Street façade is a bit of a let down…. I’ve seen worse, but I’ve seen better aswell. What year can we expect to be going shopping there? 2010 at a push?

    • #759132
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      So all in all whats the general verdict? Good, bad, needs some revision??

    • #759133
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      So all in all whats the general verdict? Good, bad, needs some revision??

      🙂 The Patrick Street facade should get another look.
      9 storeys seems a little high but as someone said yesterday,”the top 2 floors look like they were added to be removed on appeal” otherwise the proposal looks great to me.

    • #759134
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Emmet Place looks amazing… wonder what the skateboarders will make of it 😉

      Patrick Street needs revision, but this was always going to be the case. Faulkners lane will be a welcome addition to Cork’s network of wonderful lanes and alleyways.

      I would also like to see the view from Bowling lane

    • #759135
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 In previous posts I noted that Gerry Barrett’s Galway-based Edward Holdings may have been eyeing up opportunities in the Cork market (such as the post below)…

      Post Dated: April 21st 2005
      @lexington wrote:

      …there may be some further light for the docklands with developer Gerry Barrett’s Edward Holdings recently making a curious glance over Cork’s potential. More on that when and if I can – if anything emerges at all.

      …it now turns out, Mr. Barrett has emerged as the winning bidder on the 4.25acre commercially zoned site north along the Airport Road, which recently went to auction through Cohalan Downing Associates. The bid was secured at E13.8m and was represented by Ed Douglas of DNG – who has previously acted on Mr. Barrett’s behalf. The site would make a prime development opportunity for a number of uses including offices, showrooms or even pehaps an addition to Mr. Barrett’s Monogram Hotel group which have operations in both Galway and Drogheda. However, I also understand, that this acquisition will not represent the sole extent of future Cork city interests held by the developer’s business – further options will be evaluated.



      🙂 Developer Paul Kenny is to apply for an exclusive development of 32 townhouses ranging in 2-storey to 3-storey formats, with overhead conservatories and roof-gardens, at the former John A. Woods site acquired by him and which now also houses the The Kenny Group’s Cork offices.

    • #759136
      tomthevet2003
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😀 Staff at 21 Lavitts Quay were working after hours tonight in advance of O’Callaghan Properties highly anticipated Academy Street project. After some delay, the scheme is now headed to Navigation House where it will seek approval from planners – hoping to provide a prominent rejuvenation to an ambitiously assembled site right in the heart of Cork city centre.

      Ambrose Kelly’s Project Architects, in conjunction with Gehl Urban Design Consultants (Denmark), have been working and reworking the landmark scheme which will be divided over 2 blocks ranging in heights of between 4 (including mezzanine) and 9-storeys with a replenished and widened Faulkner’s Lane (now proposed at up to 8 metres in width) running between them – the lane, long (and disappointingly) left uncared for is currently in varying states of dereliction, it will now form a pedestrian friendly open-plan retail street with self-contained 2-storey over basement retail buildings (with residential units overhead). This is but one feature of the broader scheme which will encompass features which include 19 large comparison goods retail units (ranging in sizes of between 8,000sq ft and 25,000sq ft) and 91 new apartments. The gross retail area of the project will equal 17,923sq m with a net retail area of 10,971sq m (excluding mezzanine levels) – the 19 units will be located across the basement, ground floor, first floor and first floor mezzanine levels. The residential units will comprise of 17x 1-bedroom units, 54x 2-bedroom units, 15x 3-bedroom units and 5x duplex units – 2 gyms will also be included in the scheme. Demolition works include the removal of upper floor levels at the Sasha store on St. Patrick’s Street, the demolition of the former Ryan’s Pharmacy on St. Patrick’s Street and the provision of a new entrance at this location. Demolition of the Jean Scene building and a newly reconstructed facade will also be undertaken at Patrick’s Street. Facades at 1-6 Academy Street, 7 Academy Street & 8 Academy Street will be retained along with the AA offices at Emmet Place – further retentions are also included. 96 basement car-parking spaces are to be included for exclusive residential occupant use.

      The €150m scheme utilises extensive glazing, particularly at the Emmet Place elevation, as well as notable copper cladded elements. A feature most notable along the Academy Street/Emmet Place elevations is the stacking of shell-like zinc cascades.

      The bulk of the assembled 0.56 hectare Academy Street site (with total acquisition values estimated at between €85m and €100m) comprises of the soon-to-be former Irish Examiner offices and printing press. The building extends to 1,765sq m at ground floor level, with a further 1,022 sq m overhead at 1st floor level (+ printing press spaces), and was acquired by O’Callaghan Properties (OCP) in 2004 for an estimated €30m. Part of the deal included a site exchange feature which saw Thomas Crosbie Holdings (publishers of the Irish Examiner) acquire a site at O’Callaghan Properties’ Mahon Point scheme – this site was subsequently developed on lease from TCH by WebPrint Concepts as a new printing press facility (which now produces all TCH titles bar the UK-based Irish Post). Following this acquisition, OCP proceeded to purchased the former Johnson & Perrott showrooms at Emmet Place – in another similar land exhange deal, the Grand Circle Lounge (for a value believed to be in and around €1.2m), Taboo alternative bar, 97 St. Patrick’s Street and buildings along St. Patrick’s Street which included Le Chateau bar (first noted on this web forum despite reports to the contrary). The block area had been identified for higher-order retail development by Cork City Council as part of its city centre retail strategy.

      Agents for the scheme include Project Architects & Gehl Urban Design Consultants (Design), Niall Fitzsimons & Co. (Consulting Engineers), Chris Southgate (Conservation Engineer), Bowen Construction (expected Main Contractors) and Hamilton Osbourne King (Commercial and Retail Advisors).

      With this scheme now destined to the throws of planning, attention will undoubtedly focus on the next big retail schemes earmarked for the city centre – including that of investor Joe O’Donovan and his assembled site linking St. Patrick’s Street to Grand Parade – which includes the former Capitol Cineplex, Central Shoe Stores and 50 St. Patrick’s Street.

      More images shortly

      Lex

      Le Chateau bar is NOT sold

    • #759137
      dkebab
      Participant

      I think this design is one of the worst proposals I have seen for Cork. It seems that people will throw up any old re hashed Jervis St crap and expect the citezens of Cork to lap it up gratefully. I am disgusted at the level of design of the project. It is tedious, ill-considered and ad-hoc. It is not unlike the horrific building occupied by Vibes and Scribes fronting Paul St. Car Park. I am ashamed that the people of Cork have such little respect for the urban fabric of such a unique city that they wouyld allow such obscene development to continue.

    • #759138
      ShaneP
      Participant

      One hundred percent agreed with you on that dkelab. Hideous stuff – even less attractive than Merchants Quay and that’s saying a lot.

    • #759139
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @dkebab wrote:

      I think this design is one of the worst proposals I have seen for Cork. It seems that people will throw up any old re hashed Jervis St crap and expect the citezens of Cork to lap it up gratefully. I am disgusted at the level of design of the project. It is tedious, ill-considered and ad-hoc. It is not unlike the horrific building occupied by Vibes and Scribes fronting Paul St. Car Park. I am ashamed that the people of Cork have such little respect for the urban fabric of such a unique city that they wouyld allow such obscene development to continue.

      I’d have to 100 % disagree with you there dkebab!
      One thing this development could not be accused of being is rashly designed or ill-considered. The length of time it took to prepare this development and the extensive pre-submission negotiations with Cork City Council, along with the track records of those involved in the design speaks volumes for the proposal.
      The design was always going to have detractors given its high profile position and the scope of the project overall, but on the whole, it has managed to protect the notable buildings on site, while at the same time open them up for retail uses which are badly needed if the City Centre is to continue to thrive and for St. Patrick’s Street to retain its position as best shopping street in the country.
      To suggest that the design damages the urban fabric of the city is also a strange statement to make in that it practically introduces a new street (Faukner’s Lane) which will be pedestrianised to add to the already highly popular “lane” culture in the city (as evidenced by the popularity of French Church Street, Paul Street, Princes Street, Cook Street, etc). The development retains and enriches the city blocks which have remained pretty much static since they were originally laid out.
      With regards to the design, enough variety has been introduced in order to ensure it does not present a monolithic ediface onto the lanes and streets- something which certainly cannot be said for Merchants Quay. The Glass features onto Emmett Place ensure that the historic buildings in this area are not overshadowed, but at the same time, any faux historic elements are rightfully avoided.
      This development certainly has a few issues to be ironed out- all developments do! The St. Patrick’s street facade- while not offensive, could do with a bit of tweeking and the overall height will undoubtedly come down. This aside, it is certainly not “one of the worst proposals” ever seen for Cork.
      Can you elaborate as to what you see are this development’s shortcomings dkebab?

    • #759140
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      This proposal is every bit of its time in the way that Merchant’s Qy was of its. The only positive I can see coming from this devt is the actual realisation of retail space in the city core.

    • #759141
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      So what do we do with this 1 acre of land in the middle of Cork City? Leave it as it is?
      Failing that we could build a time machine…. zoom into the future…find out what will look cool in 30 years time and then build that!
      You can’t expect any development to be anything but “of its time”…. we cant predict the future!

    • #759142
      jdivision
      Participant

      @dkebab wrote:

      . It seems that people will throw up any old re hashed Jervis St crap and expect the citezens of Cork to lap it up gratefully. .

      I don’t really understand the rehash of Jervis Street reference. :confused: They look completely different.

    • #759143
      Jim Comic
      Participant

      From Hot Press.com about new Cork Venue


      Rock’n’roll in Cork received a major boost today with the news that a new 1,000 capacity venue will open in the city in the near future.

      Hot Press has learned that the old Capitol Cineplex cinema complex is to be re-styled as a multi-room live and contemporary music emporium. “I think it could be the venue that Cork people have been dreaming about,” one local industry insider told Hot Press. “It’s a place with real character, that you can imagine all sorts of interesting things happening in.”

      According to sources, the venue is likely to have a limited life-span. The site has been earmarked for a major development, with apartments likely to be built there. However, those plans have apparently been shelved for a period of five years – allowing for the opening of what promises to be a unique venue.

      Hot Press understands that the new venture is being driven by the people behind An Cruiscin Lan, which has become one of Cork’s most respected venues for music. However, the new complex will have the advantage of being located on Grand Parade in the heart of the city – potentially a key factor when it comes to attracting crowds.


      anyone know anythng about this?

    • #759144
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @jdivision wrote:

      I don’t really understand the rehash of Jervis Street reference. :confused: They look completely different.

      Gotta agree, I don’t see the likeness to Jervis Street retail scheme with its great big multi storey stuck on top……anyway Jervis St has all the tracksuits and dubs that you could ever need, Patrick Street, well it kinda fits the area apart from a few bits that I’m sure the Planners will take out.

      BTW, the biggest problem with Jervis Street is the mess its made of the traffic in the area.

    • #759145
      anto
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      [attach]2150[/attach]

      looks ridiculous! Pays no respect to the context of the square. Why are these developers so greedy; maximising floor space to the max. I think all those curved roofes are unnecessarily fussy. Would prefer something with cleaner lines. I sense another Frank McDonald versus Owen O Callaghan clash in the Irish Times.

    • #759146
      POM
      Participant
      anto wrote:
      looks ridiculous! Pays no respect to the context of the square. Why are these developers so greedy]

      I think the curved roof features soften the impact on the established structures and nearby building heights by promoting a gradual climax rather than a hard edge vertical line. Where cleaner lines are employed to the east, the impact is far more noticeable – I think additional curve features would actually soften the impact on this elevation.

    • #759147
      corkdood
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      and for St. Patrick’s Street to retain its position as best shopping street in the country.

      I don’t think St Patricks Street has ever held that title!

    • #759148
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      I don’t really understand the rehash of Jervis Street reference. :confused: They look completely different.

      my real issue with Jervis street is that it ignores all but the henry street facade… it has an incredibly negative impact on Abbey street, which is why I’m very keen to see the Bowling Lane Street facade. This is why I’m also very enthusiastic about the revitalisation of a shabby city lane in what should be a vital link between Faulkner Patrick Street and Emmet Place.

    • #759149
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      I’ve got a question in relation to the height of Academy street… does anyone know if the proposed height is higher than the Savoy Centre?

    • #759150
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @corkdood wrote:

      I don’t think St Patricks Street has ever held that title!

      In fact it has held that title for a number of years. See press release from Department of The Environment below:

      CORK CITY DOES IT AGAIN!
      Patrick Street, Cork is Ireland’s “City Neighbourhood, 2004

      Minister of State Batt O’Keefe presents the 2004
      City Neighbourhood Awards

      For the second year in a row Cork City has walked away with top honours in the City Neighbourhoods Competition. Last year it was South Mall]Patrick Street has been named the winner [/B]by Batt O’Keefe, T.D., Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government at an Awards ceremony held in Dublin Castle today (15 November). The Right Honourable The Lord Mayor of Cork, Cllr. Se

    • #759151
      Pug
      Participant

      re your opinion dkebab, thats fiar enough everyone is entitled to one but the Cork planners have no comebacks re granting permission to developments – looks arent part of their criteria it seems – the general consensus on Victoria Cross is that its hideous so no planner can ever come back and shoot down a building becuase of its looks. Plus its OCP that have spent a copule of hundred million (which of course they will recoup in spades) but its still their money so when we all have that amount of money we can build what we like.

      I think its great for Cork and about time, we are years behind the rest of europe. All we need now is some vestige of a transport network. As for Patrick St getting best shopping street – I know they actually got it but that must have been a pure political thing – there isnt a hope that its the best in the country, sorry. Someone is trying to say Pana beats Grafton St and Henry St? nope. And a central shopping street getting ‘Best NEIGHBOURHOOD??’ – that says it all

      Article in the Examiner today that the triangle on the river where the Cork Bonded Warehouses are has been cleared for sale after a legal challenge was dismissed – I thought OCP had bought this anyway? I know Lex reported it somewhere in this thread already

    • #759152
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      Article in the Examiner today that the triangle on the river where the Cork Bonded Warehouses are has been cleared for sale after a legal challenge was dismissed – I thought OCP had bought this anyway? I know Lex reported it somewhere in this thread already

      Pug – I have made a few posts since then regarding the site…

      eg: https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=42921&postcount=1046

      …the talk was speculative. I haven’t followed it up since because I haven’t heard anything – the info came from someone closely attached to the one of the involved mentined parties and who was/is very reliable – otherwise you can be sure it would not have been posted. If details are provided that support the claims the mentioned firm still do have ideas on the site I will let you know – but lest the information by thrown accusatively, I’ll leave it for the time being.

    • #759153
      pier39
      Participant

      @dkebab wrote:

      I think this design is one of the worst proposals I have seen for Cork. It seems that people will throw up any old re hashed Jervis St crap and expect the citezens of Cork to lap it up gratefully. I am disgusted at the level of design of the project. It is tedious, ill-considered and ad-hoc. It is not unlike the horrific building occupied by Vibes and Scribes fronting Paul St. Car Park. I am ashamed that the people of Cork have such little respect for the urban fabric of such a unique city that they wouyld allow such obscene development to continue.

      a little dramatic. i think the scheme needs revision is areas like height, the patricks st elevation and emmet place. active uses on bowling green st will be essential. however the variance in massing, shape and size breaks up what could have been a monster in a highly sensitive area. the jervis st ref is lost on me. i know the height steps down approoaching pana but still think it will be visually obtrusive when view from the street.

    • #759154
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Overall Best City Street = Patrick Street, Cork

      Not undeserved

    • #759155
      altuistic
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      Not undeserved

      I agree with Thomond Park. Its not about the shop names or number of big brand generics. Its about the ambience of the place, the activity, pedestrian space and accessibility. i think the title was deserved. Sometimes i find Grafton Street cluttered and Henry Street very bland, with the exception of a few nice buildings like Roches. But i’m sure they will improve.

      On another subject our beloved Minister for Transport apparently says a Dublin Docklands railway station will be up and running by 2007. Now this isnt a knock at Dublin at all at all but more an observation on our politicians but didnt Minister Cullen promise to get Horgans Quay and Kent Station rolling at the start of last year and didnt his predecessor promise a debt free Cork airport? Did the current Minister intervene with the DAA decided to knock off airbridges at Cork airport from 4 to 1?? Not that I remember. No such cutbacks at the new terminal in Dublin which will cost 1.2 billion euros. Its amazing how Mr Cullens second rate attitude to Cork astounds me. Why must we put up with second rate?? Horgans Quay, our airbridges and promises on Cork airport debt are overdue!

    • #759156
      dkebab
      Participant

      Re: jervis st. I’m just say ing that the propaosal is like any other mediocre retail experience that has been designed in this country recently. I really think that one would have to be completely visually illiterate to argue that this design will have any positive impact on cork. It is such a pity that this is the drivel that we have to support. The design pays absolutely no heed whatsover to its context and the aa building looks like an ignorant pastiche in its mist. I can’t belive that people can argue for this proposal on the basis that this nprovides prime retail space in the city. Is that what we want in Cork? More high streBritish chain stores . This project looks onto the most important artscility in the city. An establishment. It faces Emmet place and the OPera House again landmarks of major importance in the city. THis design is blatanly ignorant to its context and again I liken it to the most horrifc development in Cork since the Celtic Tiger has clawed its ugly glazed fronted post modern neo classically intended rubbish into the fabric of the city; the vibes and scribes building fronting Paul Street car park. Do we put any value on our city?

      I think it is completely ignorant to consider that any new development in Cork is good simply because it is new and houses a Dixons or a Carphone warehouse. This project is utterly disgusting and I will make no apologies whatsover for this opinion. If one is to deem this dramatic I think it most unfortunate. When this is constructed it will shame us all.

    • #759157
      Pug
      Participant

      again fair enough dkebab – what would you have loved though out of curiousity? as for looking out on important landmarks Crawford Art gallery design to me is redbriak boring and the Opera House is awful apart from a glass front – the inside needs a complete revamp and a giant concrete wall facing on to the quays aint exactly an important landmark.

      Still dont agree about Patrick St and ambience – the ambience is created becuase cork is smaller than dublin and there are fewer people so there is room to walk around. Just in my own opinion i think it was completely politic stunt.

      As for Dublin getting Docklands station by 2007, what else do you expect? they can build the Kinsale Overpass quickly when they need to, they can finish off the Ballincollig bypass almost on time (I dont believe a word that it was completed 6 months early) but they cant seem to rebuild a cork railway station that resembles a Victorian Barn – I mean part of the planning application is heating. That says everything.

    • #759158
      pier39
      Participant
      dkebab wrote:
      Re: jervis st. I’m just say ing that the propaosal is like any other mediocre retail experience that has been designed in this country recently. I really think that one would have to be completely visually illiterate to argue that this design will have any positive impact on cork. It is such a pity that this is the drivel that we have to support. The design pays absolutely no heed whatsover to its context and the aa building looks like an ignorant pastiche in its mist. I can’t belive that people can argue for this proposal on the basis that this nprovides prime retail space in the city. Is that what we want in Cork? More high streBritish chain stores . This project looks onto the most important artscility in the city. An establishment. It faces Emmet place and the OPera House again landmarks of major importance in the city. THis design is blatanly ignorant to its context and again I liken it to the most horrifc development in Cork since the Celtic Tiger has clawed its ugly glazed fronted post modern neo classically intended rubbish into the fabric of the city]

      part of my reasoning for hoping to see revisions to height and the emmet place elevations is its impact on the queens anne and aa building. It rises to sharply and excessively for my tastes and dominates the area. however the academy st frontage seems pretty sympathetic without installing bland lines. given the requirements for this project what would you suggest to be a more effective design solution?

    • #759159
      lexington
      Participant

      The beautiful Queen’s Anne building at Emmet Place. Among my favourite in the city centre.

      There’s a wonderful sense of symmetry about the building.

    • #759160
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @altuistic wrote:

      I agree with Thomond Park. Its not about the shop names or number of big brand generics. Its about the ambience of the place, the activity, pedestrian space and accessibility. i think the title was deserved. Sometimes i find Grafton Street cluttered and Henry Street very bland, with the exception of a few nice buildings like Roches. But i’m sure they will improve.

      On another subject our beloved Minister for Transport apparently says a Dublin Docklands railway station will be up and running by 2007. Now this isnt a knock at Dublin at all at all but more an observation on our politicians but didnt Minister Cullen promise to get Horgans Quay and Kent Station rolling at the start of last year and didnt his predecessor promise a debt free Cork airport? Did the current Minister intervene with the DAA decided to knock off airbridges at Cork airport from 4 to 1?? Not that I remember. No such cutbacks at the new terminal in Dublin which will cost 1.2 billion euros. Its amazing how Mr Cullens second rate attitude to Cork astounds me. Why must we put up with second rate?? Horgans Quay, our airbridges and promises on Cork airport debt are overdue!

      Cork does’nt need to look like Leeds or Nottingham Grafton St. / Henry Street streetscape – keep as much as possible indidgenous and local as getting Starbucks and Dixons etc will only make us like anywhere else.
      Re:Govermnent funding for Cork I believe that the items addressed above and others will impact on government parties in the next election.
      Ryanair threatening to pull out of Cork airport.
      The government took so long on the school of music debacle /Kinsale road flyover.

    • #759161
      POM
      Participant

      @altuistic wrote:

      On another subject our beloved Minister for Transport apparently says a Dublin Docklands railway station will be up and running by 2007. Now this isnt a knock at Dublin at all at all but more an observation on our politicians but didnt Minister Cullen promise to get Horgans Quay and Kent Station rolling at the start of last year and didnt his predecessor promise a debt free Cork airport? Did the current Minister intervene with the DAA decided to knock off airbridges at Cork airport from 4 to 1?? Not that I remember. No such cutbacks at the new terminal in Dublin which will cost 1.2 billion euros. Its amazing how Mr Cullens second rate attitude to Cork astounds me. Why must we put up with second rate?? Horgans Quay, our airbridges and promises on Cork airport debt are overdue!

      Then again Martin Cullen has demonstrated his ‘abilities’ more than once: e-voting, Horgan’s Quay, Cork Bus Station, Cork Airport…anyone care to add to the list? In failing to act on Horgan’s Quay and Cork Airport, Minister Cullen is sending a clear message to the Cork electorate about his Government…I wonder is it such a wise one so close to general election?

    • #759162
      ivuernis
      Participant

      @dkebab wrote:

      I think this design is one of the worst proposals I have seen for Cork. It seems that people will throw up any old re hashed Jervis St crap and expect the citezens of Cork to lap it up gratefully. I am disgusted at the level of design of the project. It is tedious, ill-considered and ad-hoc. It is not unlike the horrific building occupied by Vibes and Scribes fronting Paul St. Car Park. I am ashamed that the people of Cork have such little respect for the urban fabric of such a unique city that they wouyld allow such obscene development to continue.

      I’d have to agree, it looks terrible.

      1. It’s far too big and imposing… especially the part where the Volvo garage is. Totally out of step with the other buildings in Emmet Place.

      2. The facade of the ESB shop on Academy Street is destroyed in the new building. All that needs re-doing there is the ground-floor facade. Leave the first floor facade on Academy Street and the side facing the Crawford alone. They’ve got a certain charm about them.

      3. The Examiner office on Academy Street is a beautiful building should also be left untouched and not lumped with that eyesore on top of it.

      Just my opinion.

    • #759163
      Radioactiveman
      Participant


      Originally posted by jdivision

      dkebab wrote:
      Re: jervis st. I’m just say ing that the propaosal is like any other mediocre retail experience that has been designed in this country recently. I really think that one would have to be completely visually illiterate to argue that this design will have any positive impact on cork. It is such a pity that this is the drivel that we have to support. The design pays absolutely no heed whatsover to its context and the aa building looks like an ignorant pastiche in its mist. I can’t belive that people can argue for this proposal on the basis that this nprovides prime retail space in the city. Is that what we want in Cork? More high streBritish chain stores . This project looks onto the most important artscility in the city. An establishment. It faces Emmet place and the OPera House again landmarks of major importance in the city. THis design is blatanly ignorant to its context and again I liken it to the most horrifc development in Cork since the Celtic Tiger has clawed its ugly glazed fronted post modern neo classically intended rubbish into the fabric of the city]

      Dkebab, I’m delighted you have such strong opinions about how the City should develop and what is and isn’t good architecture- thats what this forum is all about!!!
      But, like I and others have asked before– what do you propose in its place?
      Should it be left as is?
      what sort of architectural features would make it respect its surrounding location better (in your opinion)?
      I’m not knocking your opinion! I’d just like you to offer an alternative.

    • #759164
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Dont know what I think of the Emmett place section either. Youve been quiet on your opinion lex, well??

    • #759165
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The highly anticipated Eglinton Street project by developers O’Flynn Construction is beginning preliminary work with PJ Hegarty & Sons Limited appointed as main contractors on the multi-million euro contract, which includes what could emerge as Ireland’s tallest building (70 metres) for a designated period of time. Site evaluation works will commence prior to the extensive excavation of the 3-acre site, which was purchased in early 2004 by O’Flynn Construction from An Post for €15m – the land once served as the Central Sorting Office in Cork before the facility was relocated to a site on Little Island. Following the excavation, Hegarty’s will erect 2 tower cranes and begin work on the provision of up to 550 car-parking spaces be provided over 2 basement levels before proceeding with Phase 1 of the development; this will include construction of the 17-storey residential tower at the south-western section of the site and between 5 and 6-storey block running parallel to Eglinton Street on the western fringe of the site. Phase 2 will see the construction of the remaining blocks along the eastern site area. Though originally lodged to house 217 new apartments, with some 3-bedroom units extending to over 1,900sq ft, revisions to the scheme during planning brought this figure up to 226 (although some of these units were affected by condition). Furthermore, 7-own door office units of a total 30,000sq ft area and 5 commercial units will cater for mixed-retail uses including bulky, comparison and convenience. The landmark scheme has earned design-team Wilson Architecture (headed up by director Frank O’Mahony) praise for its simple yet eye-catching form which avails of material finishes which include limestone, copper and extensive glazing (with polarised elements to reduce glare).

      – the Eglinton Street site is located immediately to the rear of the former Doyle Warehousing site of 0.5acres fronting Albert Quay – reportedly purchased for a value in excess of €8.5m by Howard Holdings (who are also nearing completion on their Scott Tallon Walker designed WebWorks facility for Enterprise Ireland at the opposite end of the quay). To the west of the Doyle site, a further 0.5 acre assembled site is under the ownership of Ascon Rohcon. Both parties are understood to be furthering plans for prime 3rd Generation office schemes which could range in heights of up to 7-storeys. Whether negotiations between the 2 have been engaged about either a joint development or site acquisition remains to be seen. Theo Cullinane of Ascon had hinted at the time of his company’s successful bid for the Revenue Commissioners facility (at Linn Dubh along the Blackpool By-Pass) that a planning application on their Albert Quay site could see lodgement by Spring 2006. We’ll have to wait and see how this one determines.

    • #759166
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      I’ve got a question in relation to the height of Academy street… does anyone know if the proposed height is higher than the Savoy Centre?

      The height of the taller apexes on the western block peak at 34 metres – which is actually 2 metres higher than the recently permitted “tower” element which formed part of the Metropole redevelopment on St. Patrick’s Quay.

      The Savoy arches back to a peak of about 26 or 28 metres as far as I know. While the peak of the near-by Dunnes Stores redevelopment along Patrick’s Street reaches 30.8 metres.

    • #759167
      A-ha
      Participant

      Am I right in believing that Cork International Airport is to take the brunt of this €150,000,000 debt, or is it just something people are throwing around just to scare us? Check out the link: Ryanair News. Apparently Ryanair has plans to cease operations in Cork (and move them to Farranfore Regional of all places!) if something isn’t done about the rising airport tax, which is the highest in the country. I know we are all sick of hearing this, but sometihng must be done. According to Ryanair, Cork’s “Taj-Mahal- like” second terminal will result in large increases in airport taxes and charges. You got to hand it to their PR group, however much most people hate them.

      Also, love that image of Eglington St. I’m so happy that it’s going to be built. It really was one of my favourites to get the green light last year. I still get excited when I see that picture. Can’t wait until it’s built! And as said earlier, I love the whole Academy Street proposal, except that manky fronting onto St. Patrick St. :rolleyes:

    • #759168
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Dont know what I think of the Emmett place section either. Youve been quiet on your opinion lex, well??

      I think no matter what proposal is offered someone isn’t going to be happy, but its a matter of minimising the number of such people through good design. I think the Academy Street project has a number of interesting features – it is clear that thought and time has been put into the project. Whether everyone will agree that its the right thought and sufficient amount of time is another issue.

      When considering the proposal, people who complain about the impact of such a development on its immediate environment have to remember a number of things: First, Cork City Council earmarked this area for higher order retail development long ago with a view to it contributing to the projected demand of 300,000sq ft + in required city centre retail space. In considering the optional outcomes, undoubtedly there was an understanding that development options would be large scale. Second, as much as good design is so so important, from a perspective of its realisation, one has to consider the economics as well; the site was expensively acquired given a.) its prime location b.) current market values and c.) the necessary proportion of required space to make a significant contribution to the provision of required retail space and to make the scheme economically viable. Third, it is an exceptionally difficult site to work with given its environment – it is flanked by protected structures – essentially the site consists of space between protected structures and it would always be a challenge providing a viable proposal in a confined site and which respects the individual characters of all the adjoining important structures. The proposals current form is very much a result of attempts to consider its surrounding environment – hence the variance in massing and materials – which some people will always label as ‘cluttered’.

      As a stand-alone project – it offers some interesting features, most notably the redevelopment of Faulkner’s Lane as an active laneway and linkage – and also the Armadillo-like shell structures which rise behind the Queen Anne building (“Doll House”) on Emmet Place. I feel the photomontages do not serve justice to much of the development. Some of the architectural drawings actually highlight the nature of the scheme far more effectively – especially the relation of the new build to Emmet Place/the Queen Anne building. In fact, one of my concerns regarding the project was the impact it would have on the aforementioned structure. The shell-cascades, in my view, actually offer a rather sympathetic and smooth incline to the higher elements of the western block section. What you don’t see in the photomontages is a rather attractively designed amenity section for scheme occupants – with extensive tree planting, decking, communal areas and even a barbeque area all provided at roof level. This should, provide for a unique amenity feature to residents in an unrivalled city centre location. The use of copper cladding over the ‘arch-like’ retentions of 1 – 6 Academy Street – I think offer a.) a historical recognition and b.) a pleasant transition between old and new. The retention of facades at 8 Academy Street was a pre-requisite. The actual street frontage along Academy Street is actually pretty attractive in my own view – perhaps a little more of the 1 – 6 Academy Street facade could have been retained and incorporated but in any event I believe the extent of this would be limited either way.

      What is not viewable in the montages is a glass extension on the eastern wall of the Queen Anne building, which offers a continuation of proposed frontages along Faulkner’s Lane – although I didn’t view the architectural drawings of this in any detail, I would hope that its provision is such that it inflicts no permanancy on the PS long-term. I wouldn’t think it does – I’ll be interested to see how planners judge it.

      The Western Block of ‘The Saint Patrick’s Street project’ as it is formally called – is, in my view, the more striking of the 2, not least thanks to its 34m twin apexes. It is of my opinion that their height could actually form an attractive visual reference point in the city centre – however, were it my decision, I would like to see the apexes adopt a similar stylisation to that of the ‘tower’ element at Smithfield Market in Dublin – its overhangs could be finished with copper trimmings (which would compliment the materials used on lower levels) and exaggerated to emphasise their standing. The Saint Patrick’s Street frontage, in line with many of your comments, seems a little underwhelming – one would think this is perhaps to minimise impact and blend with the established street frontage, however the accentuation of a flat-headed ‘anvil’ apex and a parapet that stands above established building lines would seem to contradict this assumption. It is a tricky frontage given that it does not link into the main development at ground-floor but needs to “bridge” over the back-section of a non-constituent premises. I would still like to see a greater retention of the existing facades at this frontage as I think it will enhance the overall scheme’s relation to St. Patrick’s Street. The glazed elevation to replace 98 St. Patrick’s Street is welcomed and offers and introduction/gateway to the revamped Faulkner’s Lane.

      The Eastern Block peaks lower than that of the western element – and falls more in-line with heights set by the redeveloped Dunnes Stores block and arched roofline at the Savoy centre. The main queries here relate to the scheme’s relationship to Bowling Green Street and Emmet Place. As for Bowling Green Street, there is some active usage of the street – including vehicular access – which in any event is an improvement to the existing state of affairs. I will be anxiously to see whether Dunnes incorporate active use along the street as part of their redevelopment when they submit Further Information. Ideally, I would like to see CCC redeveloped the street with a more pedestrian friendly emphasis and linkage to Drawbridge Street (a street in need of a life-prompting boost too – potential exists for an ideal little boutique street, widen pathways and better active uses all round here). As for Emmet Place, the Eastern Block could perhaps benefit from a smoother incline off the square area. Its relationship to the Queen Anne building is less sympathetic – perhaps a replicated frontage, not unlike the junction of Academy Street and Emmet Place, with copper frontage and cascading zinc shells marking the gradual block ascendency. The panned glass elevation here offers some visual draw when considered in active use form, but I think a stronger statement is needed here and a more sympathetic incline with the removal of railings and promotion of curve-linear lines rather than hard edges which step back up to the upper storeys.

      I am without and would like to be able to present some of the architetural drawings/additional montages to you to demonstrate some key points – and perhaps clarify some of the concerns expressed by some individuals. Perhaps the images posted do not afford appropriate justice to the scheme. Despite what may be thought of, the project actually has a very limited impact on the quayside and long-range perspectives for such a large scheme – some of you expecting to see this project peaking out dominantly over surrounding views may be actually quite surprised.

      I think OCP, Project and Gehl have actually done a good job given the challenges presented – showing a willingness to embrace a variation of forms and utilisation of curved-lines rather than the standard horizontal and vertical aspects too often engaged by such scale projects. Arguments for restraint may be noted, and indeed some areas of the project exhibit this – the challenge was always going to finding a balance. Your individual opinions of this are your entitlement.

      A decision date (subject to further information and/or extension) is set for 2nd May 2006.


      – the project I’m looking forward to now, is what OCP have in store for 16 Lavitts Quay. An application is expected this year on the former Thomas Crosbie Holdings print storage site and other assembled elements, which include the R. Arthur premises at the corner of Lavitts Quay and Half Moon Street. OCP have recently erected fresh hoardings around the periphery of the site where a mixed-scheme is earmarked – which will embrace established heights set by 21 Lavitts Quay (another OCP project) and a possible prospective extension to Cork Opera House. The proposal will include retail and residential elements – with the retail element likely to consist of 4 large units capable of accommodating large comparison or bulky goods uses.

    • #759169
      Micko
      Participant

      Here’s a little image drawing from google maps.

      Is the red enclosed area a basic floor plan of the Academy street development or is it different ?

    • #759170
      lexington
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      I am not a big fan of facade retention. I think it is almost more instulting to the heritage of a building than complete destruction.

      I would like to have seen what the facade you have shown would have looked like with its original windows. That window in the centre of your photo seems to have been a doorway at somestage, was it?

      I think the Patrick’s Street elevations looks very strange, particularly if that is the doorway to the present structure that is retained?

      Whether facade or whole building incorporation, my attitude towards retention is, often but not strictly, many of the designated structures for retention are earmarked due to their architectural or historical importance. Generally, such structures have been around a respectable period of time and offer a linkage to a particular period in time – when a large-scale development is proposed, it is usually my feeling that in incorporating/retaining these structures, it should be done with a view that in 30 or 40 years down the road, when the development is up for renewal, possibly facing demolition (“sunrise/sunset”) – it relationship to the retained/protected structures should be such that any demolition will not impact on the subject elements. In a sense, the relationship to a scale development should be designed as a ‘temporary’ or ‘detachable’ one – so that the structures will be presentable to future generations in an uninfringed state.

      – that is of course, however, unless the new development is of such architectural/historical significance as to warrant its own protected status sometime in the future…however, I don’t think that’s the ambition of the Academy Street project. I would feel its goal is to provide an economic service encapsulated within an inoffensive and pleasantly-designed confine which demostrates some architectural awareness.



      Micko – I “stole” your effort, if you don’t mind: here’s a rough outline of the site (give or take a few tweaks).

    • #759171
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      i recently heard again that the city council is pushing for an events centre to be built at horgans quay and i was just wondering does anyone know why they are pushing for this site when they have much better options open to them.there is mahon point where they might be holding out for payments due to them if it is not built there which is fair enough but there is also the showgrounds and curraheen which are much better sites for access purposes and for the good of the development for the city aswell.when this centre is to be built it really has to have a capacity of at least 6000 – 10000 and it doesnt look like the city councils choosen site can accomodate this so why are they still pushing it?this really has to be acted on as soon as possible as there is talk of limerick building such a centre aswell and i really think cork has to get there first and curraheen seems to be the best option for the city where the builders are offering to build the centre in exchange for the showgrounds land which they would then use to kick start the docklands regeneration and would also probably come to an agreement with the gaa for the redevelopment of pairc ui coimh which otherwise doesnt look like happening and this would also be a big benefit to the city as it is needed aswell.

    • #759172
      altuistic
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      i recently heard again that the city council is pushing for an events centre to be built at horgans quay and i was just wondering does anyone know why they are pushing for this site when they have much better options open to them.there is mahon point where they might be holding out for payments due to them if it is not built there which is fair enough but there is also the showgrounds and curraheen which are much better sites for access purposes and for the good of the development for the city aswell.when this centre is to be built it really has to have a capacity of at least 6000 – 10000 and it doesnt look like the city councils choosen site can accomodate this so why are they still pushing it?this really has to be acted on as soon as possible as there is talk of limerick building such a centre aswell and i really think cork has to get there first and curraheen seems to be the best option for the city where the builders are offering to build the centre in exchange for the showgrounds land which they would then use to kick start the docklands regeneration and would also probably come to an agreement with the gaa for the redevelopment of pairc ui coimh which otherwise doesnt look like happening and this would also be a big benefit to the city as it is needed aswell.

      Seems to me the corporation are so blinded by the idea of an Odyssey, Belfast type venue with access to the railway station they are foregoing the most ideally suited site at the western end of the Showgrounds. There is ample greenspace in the rest of the showgrounds for a park area if thats the worry. Besides if the corporation carry through their promise of the Water Street bridge there should be no worry about access to an event centre at the showgrounds. Knowing Cork and i love the city dearly, all the hymning and hawing will lead to Limerick getting first mover advantage and yet again Cork will be left in the dust. This is a subject they really cant afford to be delaying on. Mahon point and Curraheen would be terrible locations.

    • #759173
      kite
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      i recently heard again that the city council is pushing for an events centre to be built at horgans quay and i was just wondering does anyone know why they are pushing for this site when they have much better options open to them.there is mahon point where they might be holding out for payments due to them if it is not built there which is fair enough but there is also the showgrounds and curraheen which are much better sites for access purposes and for the good of the development for the city aswell.when this centre is to be built it really has to have a capacity of at least 6000 – 10000 and it doesnt look like the city councils choosen site can accomodate this so why are they still pushing it?this really has to be acted on as soon as possible as there is talk of limerick building such a centre aswell and i really think cork has to get there first and curraheen seems to be the best option for the city where the builders are offering to build the centre in exchange for the showgrounds land which they would then use to kick start the docklands regeneration and would also probably come to an agreement with the gaa for the redevelopment of pairc ui coimh which otherwise doesnt look like happening and this would also be a big benefit to the city as it is needed aswell.

      My tuppence worth on the event centre is that the docklands would be the most suitable site, however, the city council seem to be allowing piecemeal applications for development in the docklands without having any masterplan in place.
      This type of approach will net the city a large amount of cash in development fees but will be of little value to the city in the long term.

    • #759174
      pier39
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      My tuppence worth on the event centre is that the docklands would be the most suitable site, however, the city council seem to be allowing piecemeal applications for development in the docklands without having any masterplan in place.
      This type of approach will net the city a large amount of cash in development fees but will be of little value to the city in the long term.

      the level of activity in the docklands remains below its potential. i can think of only a few schemes like water st, nat ross, centre park road and maybe eglinton st if ya consider that docklands. horgans qy is an ongoing saga so im not even counting that til i see an application in the planning office. as for the masterplan the council are long overdue on the south docks plan and published the north area plan with 3 apps already in or pending (applications which took up the bulk of the north quays). i think these plans are nice guidelines and good to have but dont think everything should be pent up while the council procrastinate on getting details together. the docklands will require thought and time but it also needs points of encouragement, the sort howard have provided with lapps qy. to think all progress should be put on ice until the council finally decide on a masterplan wont help the city.

      as for the event centre, putting it on horgans qy is a bit like trying to shove brick through a keyhole. it should be in the docklands but i dont know if longterm this is the place for it.

    • #759175
      kite
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      the level of activity in the docklands remains below its potential. i can think of only a few schemes like water st, nat ross, centre park road and maybe eglinton st if ya consider that docklands. horgans qy is an ongoing saga so im not even counting that til i see an application in the planning office. as for the masterplan the council are long overdue on the south docks plan and published the north area plan with 3 apps already in or pending (applications which took up the bulk of the north quays). i think these plans are nice guidelines and good to have but dont think everything should be pent up while the council procrastinate on getting details together. the docklands will require thought and time but it also needs points of encouragement, the sort howard have provided with lapps qy. to think all progress should be put on ice until the council finally decide on a masterplan wont help the city.

      as for the event centre, putting it on horgans qy is a bit like trying to shove brick through a keyhole. it should be in the docklands but i dont know if longterm this is the place for it.

      😮 Yes, i take your point, i don’t blame the stakeholders of the docklands for pushing development, i would lay ALL the blame with CCC who should have had a plan in place in 1999, now with piecemeal development being allowed they will be scraching their heads in a few years time wondering how they are going to make “all the dots join up”??

    • #759176
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      Whether facade or whole building incorporation, my attitude towards retention is, often but not strictly, many of the designated structures for retention are earmarked due to their architectural or historical importance. Generally, such structures have been around a respectable period of time and offer a linkage to a particular period in time – when a large-scale development is proposed, it is usually my feeling that in incorporating/retaining these structures, it should be done with a view that in 30 or 40 years down the road, when the development is up for renewal, possibly facing demolition (“sunrise/sunset”) – it relationship to the retained/protected structures should be such that any demolition will not impact on the subject elements. In a sense, the relationship to a scale development should be designed as a ‘temporary’ or ‘detachable’ one – so that the structures will be presentable to future generations in an uninfringed state.

      Yes agreed, but in this case, if I am not mistaken, it is only the facade of these buildings that is being retained. It seems evident that what is colloquially referred to as the ‘dolls house’ here is being retained in its entirety along with the smaller building beside it. However, it is only the facade of the Cork Examiner offices that is to be retained. This goes against your logic as set out above.

      – that is of course, however, unless the new development is of such architectural/historical significance as to warrant its own protected status sometime in the future…however, I don’t think that’s the ambition of the Academy Street project. I would feel its goal is to provide an economic service encapsulated within an inoffensive and pleasantly-designed confine which demostrates some architectural awareness.

      I think this basically sums up this development proposal, and is the aspect that worries me about it the most. I am not arguing agains the economic necessity of the development, but the way it just seems to be trying to fit it in to its surroundings by the use of retained facades, with the real structure sticking up behind is going to look quite messy in reality. It almost looks like there is some sort of monster trying to burst out of a fairly nicely decorated cage 😉

      However, I think the idea of opening up a new laneway is a good one. Will it be open 24 hours a day or will it only be open during hours of retail trade? What aspect of the project where Gehl architects involved in? I am assuming they would have had something to do with this laneway?

    • #759177
      corkdood
      Participant

      With regard to the event centre would it not be more feasible to use City Hall for these events?
      I remember 10-15 years ago it was often used for concerts, dance events etc. I am unsure of the capacity but would estimate 3-4 thousand. Why do they feel the need to build an event centre in water street when they already have this resource which needs to be marketed and promoted better to concert promoters and event organisers?
      Or do the city council feel that city hall is only appropriate for “high brow” Opera and Classical concerts?

    • #759178
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @corkdood wrote:

      With regard to the event centre would it not be more feasible to use City Hall for these events?
      I remember 10-15 years ago it was often used for concerts, dance events etc. I am unsure of the capacity but would estimate 3-4 thousand. Why do they feel the need to build an event centre in water street when they already have this resource which needs to be marketed and promoted better to concert promoters and event organisers?
      Or do the city council feel that city hall is only appropriate for “high brow” Opera and Classical concerts?

      City hall only holds 1100 as far as I know.
      An Odyssey multi purpose flexible arena suitable for large conferences,sports,ice events,concerts etc. that would have the type of numbers accommodation that would make it feasable for these events to be held in Cork.
      I am amazed that the Cork hoteliers,Vintners and business community are’nt pushing harder for this as they must be losing a fortune every year from potential customers heading to Millstreet,INEC Killarney and Dublin.

    • #759179
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Work seems finally to be beginning at Frinailla’s Grand Parade Hotel site, with contractors John Paul on site in the last few days removing exsisting scaffoldng and preparing the site.
      Also, I have heard that the Huguenot Graveyard on Carey’s Lane is about to be redeveloped along the lines of a coffee shop/exhibition space along with a neighbouring building. According to a source, an application for planning permission is due to be lodged in the next few days.
      more detail later

      –update– Huguenot Graveyard development
      According to a report in today’s Examiner, John Murphy of Table 8 restaurant is about to apply for permission to widen the existing entrance on Carey’s Lane, install a new staircase, balcony and wheelchair lift in the graveyard and to make alterations to the existing rear extension to the adjoining building. This is the third application of its type made for this site in the past 15 years. The group “Friends of the Huguenot Cemetery” have indicated that they’ll strongly oppose the plans.

      Permission was sought in 2001, for a four storey retail apartment development on the site by Mr. Murphy.Permission of a similar type was granted by CCC in 1998, but this was refused by An Bord Pleanala.
      After an archaeological investigation in advance of the 2001 decision, both Duchas and the City Archaeolgist reccomended refusal on the basis that materials of archaeological interest would be at risk.
      The City Archaeologist noted:
      “The development site comprises the only surviving component of the former Huguenot burial ground. The proposed development is incompatible with the conservation of this unique and important monument. The graveyard is the only historic feature, albeit obscure and largely unrecognised, surviving from this period of our history. It is the only surviving element of a group of people who greatly contributed to the development of Cork City.”
      At the time, CCC noted that: “Alternatives for the use of the site can be discussed with the applicant in view of this approach.”
      There is no doubt, that the development now proposed would, on the face of it, be much less obtrusive on the archaeological fabric of the site and could allow much desired access to the site by the general public. Nevertheless, this application is sure to generate a large amount of objections.

    • #759180
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 A residential scheme along Hanover Street, designed by James Leahy & Associates, is expected for a grant tomorrow adding immensely to what had become something of a worn down street-scape. The development, originally proposed with 23 apartment units (a mix of 1 and 2-bedroom accommodations) is to be realised over the 2 premises held along the street by John and Michael O’Dwyer. The design is of a pleasant, contemporary nature and peaked at 6-storeys in height as part of the original application, but has since been revised down. The O’Dwyer site adjoins another site, due soon for decision, that of Adrian Power who has proposed an office scheme designed by Coughlan de Keyser Associates which fronts the riverside next to historic Clarke’s Bridge, a stone’s throw from the city’s legal district along Washington Street. The office scheme was originally proposed as a 7-storey format back in July of 2005 and had been subject to 2 rounds of further information after concerns were raised on issues related to height and material finishes, which originally included copper cladding. These materials are understood to have since been revised – a decision on the project is scheduled for April 3rd 2006.

      – another Coughlan de Keyser project, that of CentrePoint along Contraf Street (for DAT Partnerships – a Dublin/Cork operation who has activities in a number of projects including residential schemes in Kerry), remains in Further Information. A second request for information was issued following revised submissions on development plans for a 9-storey office building at the tiny triangular site bound by Deane Street, Oliver Plunkett Street Lower and Clontarf Street.



      Updating Images

      Just as part of my ‘long-term’ ambition to improve the image quality in many of my posts (especially the older ones) – I am updating images associated with the following projects:

      The Treasury (Saint Patrick’s Quay)

      Developer:Paul Kenny
      Architect:Wilson Architecture

      Grianbru (Dennehy’s Cross)

      Proposed by:Richard Walsh & Dick Kiely
      Architect:Kiosk Architects

      How many updates I get through will depend on the time I have here.

      Previous Image Update included: Beasley Street/Parnell Place Hotel

    • #759181
      Devin
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Updating Images

      Just as part of my ‘long-term’ ambition to improve the image quality in many of my posts (especially the older ones) – I am updating images associated with the following projects:

      This one could be improved again by removing the wires, like this:
      .

    • #759182
      POM
      Participant

      @Devin wrote:

      This one could be improved again by removing the wires, like this:
      .

      A marked improvement. It makes you wonder why they didn’t consider that in the first place.

    • #759183
      corkdood
      Participant

      Whilst on the subject of overhead wires it seems to me that Cork as a city has quite a lot. Obviously in the past this was the way wires were run but these days surely most urban streets have ample culverts in pace to take wires beneath the road surface.

      Finally its always been a bug bear of mine that Cork City council used to leave the overhead wires traversing St Patrick Street in place all year round. These wires were used to support the christmas decorations.
      I was delighted when the street was redeveloped and the announcement was made that there were to be new decorations. However in their wisdom the city council now leaves the christmas decorations in place all year round. What is that about???????

    • #759184
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @corkdood wrote:

      Whilst on the subject of overhead wires it seems to me that Cork as a city has quite a lot. Obviously in the past this was the way wires were run but these days surely most urban streets have ample culverts in pace to take wires beneath the road surface.

      Finally its always been a bug bear of mine that Cork City council used to leave the overhead wires traversing St Patrick Street in place all year round. These wires were used to support the christmas decorations.
      I was delighted when the street was redeveloped and the announcement was made that there were to be new decorations. However in their wisdom the city council now leaves the christmas decorations in place all year round. What is that about???????

      Also the ammount of unused poles on pavements etc. all over the city is multiplying.
      Fairly neglegent allright – Check out the set of lanterns on St.Patricks Bridge next time you are in the city Centre, I thoght they might have been refurbished for 2005.A refurbishment similar to Parliament Bridge might happen some day.

      Also whats the story with the lighting pn Oliver Plunkett Street ??? As we have those temporary steel poles there for over a year now.

    • #759185
      jungle
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Also the ammount of unused poles on pavements etc. all over the city is multiplying.

      And there is no attempt to rationalise their use. The ugliest of the lot are the CCTV poles. Is there no way these cameras could have been put up using existing poles or attached to the side of buildings?

      If we’re going to get onto the subject of visual nuisances…

      Does anyone make any attempt to control the amount of roadfront signage put in. It seems to be particularly bad along the Kinsale Rd. It would make you wonder why anyone pays for legitimate advertising space.

      And the adverts themselves are unsightly. I’ll think particularly of the signs along Southern Rd and attached to the Southern Star. They are just too big for their location. I believe some North American cities (Vancouver from memory?) have much smaller permitted sizes than the ones we see around Cork.

    • #759186
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @Devin wrote:

      This one could be improved again by removing the wires, like this:
      .

      Surely this wasn’t done because it would give a false representation of the development. It would be akin to omitting one storey in the development just so it looks nicer!

    • #759187
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Surely this wasn’t done because it would give a false representation of the development. It would be akin to omitting one storey in the development just so it looks nicer!

      I agree Radioactiveman. Whilst I don’t think it is quite as bad as omitting one storey, I still think it is a false representation of the proposed structure.

    • #759188
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      I agree Radioactiveman. Whilst I don’t think it is quite as bad as omitting one storey, I still think it is a false representation of the proposed structure.

      Though removing the wires looks good and probably presents the project a little better, i would agree that the reason the original montages were presented with wires was to portray a sense of accuracy. Which is no bad thing given designers are often criticised for trying to twist the reality of an area by adjusting it digitally. I think its refreshing to see a more realistic presentation. Its a pity the montages dont show this projects relation to the Frinailla Dennehys cross project across the road.

    • #759189
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Cork City Council have refused Murrayforde Developments Ltd., permission to refurbish 37 and 38 Shandon Street and convert to 6 x i bed apartments with ground floor shop. In effect, the proposal was to remove party walls throughout the two buildings and to provide for one large retail outlet at ground floor.
      No open space of any kind was proposed for the apartments, which were all under the required floor area (45 sq m).


      As flagged by lexington a few days ago,
      Permission has been granted to John and Michael O’Dwyer for their apartment development at No. 20 Hanover Street. The proposal was brought down one storey to 5-storey after a further information request.
      The same developers also recieved permission for a five storey commercial/apartment development at 22 Hanover Quay.

    • #759190
      jungle
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Cork City Council have refused Murrayforde Developments Ltd., permission to refurbish 37 and 38 Shandon Street and convert to 6 x i bed apartments with ground floor shop. In effect, the proposal was to remove party walls throughout the two buildings and to provide for one large retail outlet at ground floor.
      No open space of any kind was proposed for the apartments, which were all under the required floor area (45 sq m).

      Are those the two dilapidated buildings you see as you look over North Gate Bridge?

    • #759191
      kite
      Participant

      Objectors to Frinailla’s Dennehy’s Cross plan are Communities for sustainable development, E.St.Ledger, D. Kidney, and Frinailla themselves ?
      Why would Frinailla go to ABP, they were only reduced by 1 floor.

    • #759192
      kesey
      Participant

      kite, as Frinailla are being taken to An Bord Pleanala they are shanghied for the duration anyway. They have little to lose, and a lot to gain, by attempting to get their abducted floor back.

      More power to them sez me, they put a nice plan together in Dennehys Cross.:)

    • #759193
      kite
      Participant

      @kesey wrote:

      kite, as Franailla are being taken to An Bord Pleanala they are shanghied for the duration anyway. They have little to lose, and a lot to gain, by attempting to get their abducted floor back.

      More power to them sez me, they put a nice plan together in Dennehys Cross.:)

      😎 Yes, the Frinailla proposal is good enough for all except those NIMBY’s in Bishopstown.

    • #759194
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      Are those the two dilapidated buildings you see as you look over North Gate Bridge?

      No, they are two of the four dilapidated properties on the east of Shandon Street, about half way up- bounded by Old Friary Place and Dominic Street.

    • #759196
      lawyer
      Participant

      Based on the planning application which Iarnrod Eireann lodged for Kent Station on March 1st it would appear that the major realignment planned for that station is either on the long finger or gone.

    • #759195
      lexington
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Yes, that is Pairc Ui Chaoimh in the foreground. This is HTD Studio’s design for a masterplan undertaken by UCC (NMRC – now the Tyndall Institute) on the near-on 16-acre Tedcastle Holdings site along the South Docklands. The site, zoned in the Cork Docklands Development Strategy 2001, as being for part educational-part commercial use is currently the subject of discussion between Howard Holdings and Tedcastles – the outcome of which has yet to realised.

      See full post here.

      As noted in the above post, plus numerous others dated in December and August of 2005, Howard Holdings have successfully negotiated a joint development strategy with Tedcastle Holdings regarding their prime circa. 16-acre docklands holding adjacent to the Centre Park Road and bound in the north by the River Lee and to the west by the Marina Point Power Station. Tedcastle Holdings had, in the past, indicated a willingness to develop the valuable site on its own at various stages, the company had enlisted designs on a number of possible masterplans, including one for 550 residential units across a series of 5 – 7-storey (part 8-storey) blocks and with commercial and educational provisions also in tow. These plans however fell into contravention of designated zoning issues. The deal with Howard Holdings represents a further step by the developers to seal its intention to acquire up to 50-acres of docklands land for future development – establishing itself as the “driving seat” developer in the area. Howard’s ‘hard mover’ approach has successfully secured the company with 2 of the most valuable and developable sites in the docklands area – the other site being the recently acquired former Ford site of approximately 11.75acres which the firm purchased for just under E30m earlier this year.

      – the otherside of the River Lee, the latest from Manor Park Homebuilders is that an application on the eagerly anticpiated Horgan’s Quay site is not expected in the immediate future as negotiations with parties, including those in the Stakeholder’s Forum are on-going.



      🙂 Closer to the city centre, it is understood O’Callaghan Properties have finalised (or are about to finalise) the purchase of the CSPCA (Cork Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) premises along Clontarf Street – with the CSPCA intending to relocate to new, larger premises. The acquisition follows the successful bidding by the company of the former Reliance Bearings site (of approx. 0.5 acres) on Anderson’s Quay for in and around E7m through auctioneers Hamilton Osbourne King. Further acquisitions are understood to be in flow at Thomas Maher’s Clontarf Street facility (which adjoins the Reliance site) and for the S.Tyres workshop on the corner of Clontarf and Oliver Plunkett Street. It was announced by OCP previously that it would seek the opportunity to develop an office scheme of some 100,000sq ft over 5-floors and ground-floor commercial space. Basement parking for over 100 vehicles would be provided in addition. Wilson Architecture have been indicated as the design team for the project.



      🙂 Across the river again, to the north, directly across from the OCP site assembly activity, Paul Kenny is to seek alterations to his permitted The Treasury office scheme (also designed by Wilson Architecture) along Saint Patrick’s Quay. The 100,000sq ft + office development is set across 2 blocks and was originally intended for Revenue Commissioners tenancy – the scheme which secured ABP approval – will now be pitched at the private sector for a mix of office based activities from legal to call-centres. An assortment of open-plan and cellular office space will be offered. Alterations to the scheme include the removal of permitted roof-gardens and the relocation of plant equipment to basement level – and for the replacement of the Parklex Panel System on the northern elevation with a Colour Render System. Opening windows to this elevation will also be replaced with fixed window features. Work on The Treasury project is expected to begin within the next 3 to 5 months.



      😎 A decision by ABP on the highly anticipated Water Street scheme is scheduled in 10 days time (26th March 2006). The scheme is understood to have undergone a number of revisions as part of its planning appeal process.

    • #759197
      A-ha
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      A decision by ABP on the highly anticipated Water Street scheme is scheduled in 10 days time (26th March 2006). The scheme is understood to have undergone a number of revisions as part of its planning appeal process.

      ……… one year later, it’s about time! I’m really glad that The Treasury is going ahead, I really like how it incorperates the existing buildings. Happy St. Patrick’s Day for tomorrow, unfortunately Irish weather will undoubtedly spoil tomorrow’s “Alice in Wonderland” themed parade down Pana, but hopefully will still attract the crowds (it never stopped us before). :rolleyes:

    • #759198
      altuistic
      Participant

      I attended the public presentation of the Bishopstown development plan submissions session at Wilton shopping centre over the week. My main point to them was, as a resident, Ive no real problems with areas along the Victoria Cross Road been suitably redeveloped. As it is theres a pattern emerging and much of what these new buildings are replacing are horrible old industrial sites anyway. Ive lost faith in the logic or reasoning of these resident groups that supposedly represent my areas interest. So i put it to them straight, I’m not going to fight for something thats needed. All i want from the corporation is the promise to protect the established areas like Model Farm Road and Wilton Road and i would like to see the formation of a new heart to the area. There really is none at the moment and i would like to see a pedestrian friendly town centre with a nice selection of shops, things like a nice small hotel or a theatre and more nicely cared for parks. Something like that. Theres too muc dependency on cars in the area. Id like to see some sort of rail system or a dedicated bus route (preferably an ecofriendly bus service). The area should be safe and easy for elderly and children a like.

    • #759199
      Micko
      Participant

      I’d personally like to see some sort of town centre along the lines of Douglas built for Bishopstown.

      Somewhere like the area around Dino’s would be good but is it ideally placed ?

    • #759200
      PTB
      Participant

      Did I see a bit of the north docklands development plan in the Examiner a day or two ago? I though that there would have been some mention of it at this thread. Has it slipped beneath the radar?

    • #759201
      lexington
      Participant

      Just as part of my on-going updates and improvements to images on the LADSOCL and “Developments in Cork” thread – I’m just issuing notice of updates on images regarding the Rothbury Estates proposal for Sunbeam Industrial Estate in Blackpool, designed by Richard Rainey & Associates. The plan has since been withdrawn and will be subject to re-evaluation. Rothbury Estates is back by businessman Martin Buckley who steers the Reffond Group, a textile manufacturing firm with operations in Mallow and formerly Sunbeam Industrial Estate. The company also has operations and interests elsewhere nationwide.

      Images:

      [Image A: Bird’s Eye perspective west-to-east.]

      [Image B: Montage south-to-north along the Commons Road with The Shipton Group’s “Heron’s Gate” project (part of Blackpool Park) to the right.]

      Associated posts may be found here and here.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 The former Atkins/MacKenzie Garden Centre along Camden Quay, long operated as a Court House by the OPW during refurbishment of the Circuit Court on Washington Street, was sold at auction on Thursday for a value estimated at around E12m to a private buyer. The 20,000sq ft site was set with a guide of E9m by auctioneers Cohlan Downing Associates on behalf of vendors NorthGate Investments (who had previously sought permission on the site for a 170-bedroom hotel).



      PTB – the North Docklands Area Development Plan has been well documented on this thread and its predecessor. The plan was simply subject to a formal launch of late, hence the recent media coverage. Please avail of the ‘Search’ feature on this thread to find related posts. 😮



      A belated Happy Saint Patrick’s Day to you all.

      – Lex

    • #759202
      POM
      Participant

      Thanks for those Lex. I’ve probably said this before on here but one of my main concerns about the Sunbeam project, and I think the picture above demonstrates this well, is its cluttered nature. In actual fact, I have no problem with the density, the development is intersected by roadways (not entirely visible in the picture above) which creates a nice urban canyon-ated feel to it. The development is like its own little urban centre within a centre and yet at the same time does particularly over dominated the surrounding area. I think in this way the height and massing is actual pretty effective. My issue is with the finish design. Its very cluttered and seems to take on board no distinctive form other than a messy, bland and rather boxy one. There is something rather boring about this development. There seems to be no great variation in finished materials, no colouration to complement the extended setting of the scheme and appears rather drab. The one feature that seems to stand out is obviously the 18 storey tower, but not for the right reasons. It is utterly lost in the rest of the project. What was needed here was a tall, sleek and slender design without the balconies!! The tower is a good example of how balconies can ‘cheap’-up a design. Extended glazing features and a more slender structure is needed. The towers orientation falls flat. Why they put it on an axis to address the city end of its setting is a mystery. A tall feature tower like this one would complement the area wonderfully if only it was appropriated properly. To achieve its supposed gateway status, clearly the tower should have been reoriented to face the valley mouth on the northern section of the site addressing the Mallow Road as it enters Blackpool and acting as a proper landmark. In its current state it just looks lost and a little silly. Having said all that, I do like the raised communal space which has been provided for potential residents. It gives them a shared space to occupy amongst themselves rather than trying to mesh it in with some sort of novelty public area. I like that a riverside public area is provided seperately. Hopefully the raised communal garden will promote enhanced interaction among the residents as a community and not lost in a complex of other activities. I hope the architects when redesigning the project, if it is to be resubmitted for planning, take note of at least some of these points, keeping the good elements and working to improve the others.

    • #759203
      kite
      Participant

      @altuistic wrote:

      I attended the public presentation of the Bishopstown development plan submissions session at Wilton shopping centre over the week. My main point to them was, as a resident, Ive no real problems with areas along the Victoria Cross Road been suitably redeveloped. As it is theres a pattern emerging and much of what these new buildings are replacing are horrible old industrial sites anyway. Ive lost faith in the logic or reasoning of these resident groups that supposedly represent my areas interest. So i put it to them straight, I’m not going to fight for something thats needed. All i want from the corporation is the promise to protect the established areas like Model Farm Road and Wilton Road and i would like to see the formation of a new heart to the area. There really is none at the moment and i would like to see a pedestrian friendly town centre with a nice selection of shops, things like a nice small hotel or a theatre and more nicely cared for parks. Something like that. Theres too muc dependency on cars in the area. Id like to see some sort of rail system or a dedicated bus route (preferably an ecofriendly bus service). The area should be safe and easy for elderly and children a like.

      I attended this meeting with my parents who live in Wilton.Despite my advice to them they are still 100% behind the CSD group in the area.However,reading the Echo last week it seems that the local councilors have returned to the saftey of the Bishopstown Community Association (BCA) where hopefully they will be less likely to come out spouting anti high rise rubbish.
      The CCC should use the opportunity of this local area plan to sideline the CSD and work with the BCA who would be less likely to start screaming and roaring every time a block of apartments is proposed.

    • #759204
      Leesider
      Participant

      First question is are Ridge Developments anyway involved with the O’Flynn development on Eglington St?? The reason I ask is that I heard that Ridge developments have received planning for a 17 storey tower in their Mahon Point development (first time hearing this so am doubtful if it’s true), and that it is a twin of the tower in Eglington St.!!!! Is there any truth to this??

      Also this time from a reliable source, that the GAA are actively looking for land around the Blarney area, as in it is almost certain they are going to move from the docks!! Interesting to see how this develops and who will acquire Pairc Ui Chaoimh!

    • #759205
      lexington
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      First question is are Ridge Developments anyway involved with the O’Flynn development on Eglington St?? The reason I ask is that I heard that Ridge developments have received planning for a 17 storey tower in their Mahon Point development (first time hearing this so am doubtful if it’s true), and that it is a twin of the tower in Eglington St.!!!! Is there any truth to this??

      Also this time from a reliable source, that the GAA are actively looking for land around the Blarney area, as in it is almost certain they are going to move from the docks!! Interesting to see how this develops and who will acquire Pairc Ui Chaoimh!

      PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd are the main contractors on the Eglinton Street project for O’Flynn Construction. Work is currently proceeding on site.

      McCarthy Developments are the developers of the Jacob’s Island residential complex near Mahon Point – Ridge Developments are the main contractors with that scheme. McCarthy Developments have previously received permission to extend the height of an element of their apartment section to the scheme by 2-storeys up to 8-storeys in height.

      As for the GAA and Blarney – rumour was that the GAA had been offered a site near Blarney for the construction of a new purpose built stadium as part of a land-swap agreement. The cited parties involved were said to be Castlelands Construction of Mallow who would then seek to redevelop the docklands land as a significant mixed-use scheme. Fleming Construction were understood to have approached the Munster Agricultural Society about a landswap deal – which would include a new purpose built event centre at Curraheen – while Fleming would seek to redevelop the Munster Agricultural Showgrounds. Both cases have been ruled out by the Cork City Council management – who have indicated the option of a CPO on the Munster Agricultural Society’s Showgrounds long-term lease as a means as protecting the area for recreational usage. This option would open up the possibility for the GAA to revamp and expand Pairc Ui Chaoimh. Howard Holdings are also understood to have approached Cork City Council (freehold owners of the Showgrounds) about options on the land. It is most likely CCC will seek to retain the bulk of the Showgrounds for amenity preferences only. Indeed, in a redeveloped docklands area, the need for a significant greenspace/park will be required and the Showgrounds offers a positive option for this. However, the western end of the Showgrounds site, derelict and semi-industrial in nature still offers the opportunity for redevelopment – as some parties would have it, a possible event centre?

    • #759206
      jdivision
      Participant

      @kesey wrote:

      kite, as Frinailla are being taken to An Bord Pleanala they are shanghied for the duration anyway. They have little to lose, and a lot to gain, by attempting to get their abducted floor back.

      More power to them sez me, they put a nice plan together in Dennehys Cross.:)

      They might also get the levies reduced, standard practice if you’ve been granted permission for a development and it’s appealed to ABP

    • #759207
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      just wondering will anyone on this site do me a favour?im doing a project in college on the changing face of cork and how it is catching up on the other irish cities as it did not take advantage of the celtic tiger building boom like they did at the time.would anyone be able to write evan something small for the opening page as i cant think of how to put it across properly and i know theres plenty of people on this site that could write something suitable?:confused:

    • #759208
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      just wondering will anyone on this site do me a favour?im doing a project in college on the changing face of cork and how it is catching up on the other irish cities as it did not take advantage of the celtic tiger building boom like they did at the time.would anyone be able to write evan something small for the opening page as i cant think of how to put it across properly and i know theres plenty of people on this site that could write something suitable?:confused:

      Hi Daniel, if you check back along the thread (maybe the previos thread) you will find that Lexington has already written a couple of articles that pretty much covers your project. Check it out… I have a feeling you’ll have to ask Lexington about the copyright 🙂

    • #759209
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      just wondering will anyone on this site do me a favour?im doing a project in college on the changing face of cork and how it is catching up on the other irish cities as it did not take advantage of the celtic tiger building boom like they did at the time.would anyone be able to write evan something small for the opening page as i cant think of how to put it across properly and i know theres plenty of people on this site that could write something suitable?:confused:

      Are you actually serious? What are you studying in College, a degree in plagiarism?;)

      On a serious note, as Mickeydocs said already, there is plenty of information on this site, and this thread in particular, that will help you come up with something yourself.

    • #759210
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Oyster Developments have submitted revised plans for their small but controversial proposal along Church Road in Blackrock. The e-Project designed scheme consisted originally of 7 apartments (2-bedroom units) over 3 ground-floor retail units. The plan, on a small former ESB site, received numerous objections from local residents and representatives including Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment Michael Martin TD. The revised proposal will now provide 5 townhouses, 1x 2-bedroom apartment and 2x 1-bedroom apartments.

      Meanwhile, David Crowe’s other ventures in Cork are at various stages of progression. Through Oyster’s affliate Mangerton Construction – Mr. Crowe has recently completed construction on a new 6-storey in-fill project along Fitton Street, again designed by The e-Project. Quay House, as it is named, is a conveniently located and attractive scheme incorporating 18-new apartments with a mix of 1 and 2 bedroom units – now selling through agents Cohalan Downing Associates.


      Quay House, Fitton Street

      Mr. Crowe’s other e-Project designed scheme is that of Deane Street where Oyster Developments has planning for a 6-storey office scheme – which, along with the adjoining No.8 Parnell Place PS – scheduled for a revamp and conversion to offices – will provide upwards of 40,000sq ft of space for one or more occupants. The project will proceed in 2 Phases, with work likely to commence on the Deane Street element within the prospective future.

      Also in motion, the formulation of plans on the strategic site that is the former Coca-Cola Bottling facility along the Carrigrohane “Straight” Road. Mr. Crowe purchased the site last year for an estimated E7m + and possesses an area of approx. 1.7acres. Plans for a notable, predominantly residential, scheme are being worked-out. Speculation had enquired whether Mr. Crowe would negotiate purchase agreements on Sean O’Reilly’s Statoil Petrol Station which juts in on the Coca-Cola site to the north-west – and possibly the City Print Works bordering the subject site to the east – however nothing has been confirmed. Strategically it could make sense. The opportunity for a taller structure exists on the Coca-Cola site, however, the outcome of this is arguable – we will perhaps have to wait for planning before such an option is known.



      A lot of very interesting news has arisen lately – some confirmed, other bits speculative ~ hopefully I can bring at least some details in the future.

    • #759211
      malec
      Participant

      I see that Quay House building every week from the window in Moores Hotel where I have my piano lesson and I have to say it looks quite good. In the render it just looks like more of the same but actually looks much better in reality,

    • #759212
      lexington
      Participant

      Some more image improvements and updates below. Trying to get through as many of these as I can before late May/early June.

      The images below relate to that of Sean Keohane’s Grangefield Developments plan to develop, in conjunction with the Cork Boat Club, 119 residential units over basement car-parking, a new public boardwalk and state-of-the-art facility for Cork Boat Club with gangway and linked pontoon. The project offers a wonderful rejuvenation and amenity opportunity for Blackrock Harbour, the remainder of which is now subject to a masterplan with O’Mahony Pike Architects on board. Nearby, Pierse Homes and Firestone Developments are forging ahead with the Eden project on the lands of the former Ursuline Convent. The E200m scheme will ultimately comprise of 550 new residences – also designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects, and built by Pierse Contracting. That scheme is being developed based on Lyonshall Limited plans (Kieran Coughlan and Claire Riordan) – Lyonshall are now embarking on a mixed scheme of approxiately 80,000sq ft near the Skehard Road (also on former Ursuline lands) which will include a discount retailler, library, office units, other retail units and a community based accommodation. Work on that proposal will proceed shortly,

      Back to the Grangefield Developments plan at Blackrock Harbour – the attractive scheme was designed by James Leahy & Associates, it has been subject to 37 individual submissions since lodgement with Cork City Council in early December 2005 – and its extended decision date is now earmarked for May 7th 2005.

      An image has been added to the original post, whose details may be found here.



      *UPDATES*

      😮 John Cleary Developments have applied for an amendment to Condition 2 of the planning permit for the development of a large office building at the former Sifco premises near Mahon Point. Designed by Coughlan de Keyser Architects, the scheme was reduced by 2 floors from an initial height of 5. The amendment calls for a grant to allow an additional, revised floor of approx. 20,000sq ft on the scheme.

      More updates later.

    • #759213
      kite
      Participant

      😎 Help please…what is the Eden development going on in Blackrock and what was that stunning looking building before being redeveloped?

    • #759214
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      kite,
      eden is just a pretentiously named collection of semi-d’s and duplexs on the grounds of the Ursuline Convent

    • #759215
      corkdood
      Participant

      I saw the tower crane in Hollyhill last night – it certainly is an unusual sight. The driver must have an amazing view of the city!
      Also the sod turning ceremony took place this week on the large affordable housing development in Shanakiel. Anyone know what the timeframe is for the private development by Coleman Brothers which is to be located adjacent to this?

    • #759216
      kite
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      kite,
      eden is just a pretentiously named collection of semi-d’s and duplexs on the grounds of the Ursuline Convent

      Thanks d-d-dallas, if they are building on the grounds what is to become of the main building?
      Was the building always a Convent?, it has the look of a former stately home.

    • #759217
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😎 Help please…what is the Eden development going on in Blackrock and what was that stunning looking building before being redeveloped?

      Here ya go. http://www.edenblackrock.ie/

    • #759218
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      Thanks d-d-dallas, if they are building on the grounds what is to become of the main building?
      Was the building always a Convent?, it has the look of a former stately home.

      It may have been bequeathed to them years ago and converted into a convent.
      As far as I know the old Ursiline Convent Building has permission for conversion to apartments.
      There is also a beautiful chapel which is going to be used by the Russian Orthodox Church to cater for
      their growing population of Eastern europeans in Cork.

    • #759219
      corkdood
      Participant

      Any news on the Water Street appeal?

    • #759220
      lexington
      Participant

      @corkdood wrote:

      Any news on the Water Street appeal?

      Consequent of the request for Further Information by ABP, a decision isn’t expected now until some time around the 11th April 2006.

    • #759221
      POM
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Consequent of the request for Further Information by ABP, a decision isn’t expected now until some time around the 11th April 2006.

      Delayed again? How many years is this thing in planning now? For their troubles alone at this stage I think they should be given planning!!! :p

    • #759222
      theblimp
      Participant

      Even though I’m living in the Ballincollig area it was only today that I passed in the Carrigrohane Road for the first time in ages (usually take the link roads). As a result of this journey I found meself nearly crashing into the Statoil on said road when I first caught sight of the extension to the Kingsley Hotel. Jaysus did they knock that one out while the planners weren’t looking or wha?

      Western elevation looks lilke several, poorly designed, blocks of flats, with zero character and little sympathy/understanding of the fact that this is the first building on that side of the road marking an arrival into Cork (boundaries not withstanding). With the Lee Fields just before it, it’s likely to remain that way, so surely there was an opportunity to make a ‘statement’. Likewise with the northern elevation – larger windows but again feckin boxy. At least it beats the southern elevation which has nothing at all!!

      Between this and the wonderful Victoria Cross mess, this whole area is starting to look like the land that design forgot, and it’s little reason that the locals are up in arms about further developments if this is what is being touted as contemporary architecture. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all against the anti-high-rise shower, but developers are doing themselves few favours by releasing this type of awfulness on the area.

      Disgusted? – I should feckin’ coco 😡

      ps – gone a little quiet in here again, hasn’t it?

    • #759223
      pier39
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      Even though I’m living in the Ballincollig area it was only today that I passed in the Carrigrohane Road for the first time in ages (usually take the link roads). As a result of this journey I found meself nearly crashing into the Statoil on said road when I first caught sight of the extension to the Kingsley Hotel. Jaysus did they knock that one out while the planners weren’t looking or wha?

      Western elevation looks lilke several, poorly designed, blocks of flats, with zero character and little sympathy/understanding of the fact that this is the first building on that side of the road marking an arrival into Cork (boundaries not withstanding). With the Lee Fields just before it, it’s likely to remain that way, so surely there was an opportunity to make a ‘statement’. Likewise with the northern elevation – larger windows but again feckin boxy. At least it beats the southern elevation which has nothing at all!!

      Between this and the wonderful Victoria Cross mess, this whole area is starting to look like the land that design forgot, and it’s little reason that the locals are up in arms about further developments if this is what is being touted as contemporary architecture. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all against the anti-high-rise shower, but developers are doing themselves few favours by releasing this type of awfulness on the area.

      Disgusted? – I should feckin’ coco 😡

      ps – gone a little quiet in here again, hasn’t it?

      thats funny because i was actually coming on here today to say the same thing. the anti-highrise thing is a load of nonsense but perhaps if design teams started put some imagination into their work there would one less bullet in the arsenal. i was coming home this evening and was filling my car up when i looked back and saw the kingsley. i was a little startled thinking it came from mola. the county hall extension is actually quite nice and perhaps understated given its subordination to the tower but the derek tynan muck at victoria cross and the bertie pope scandal have seemed to abandoned taste. the apartment hotel building at the kingsley is a bland faceless contraption which rudely abrupts the visual transition from the lee fields to urban patterns. its this kind of laziness that puts the well thought out efforts by rainey & associates and omahony pike at victoria and dennehys cross at risk and adds to the troubles unfairly to these potential recourses. very diappointed.

    • #759224
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @pier39 wrote:

      thats funny because i was actually coming on here today to say the same thing. the anti-highrise thing is a load of nonsense but perhaps if design teams started put some imagination into their work there would one less bullet in the arsenal. i was coming home this evening and was filling my car up when i looked back and saw the kingsley. i was a little startled thinking it came from mola. the county hall extension is actually quite nice and perhaps understated given its subordination to the tower but the derek tynan muck at victoria cross and the bertie pope scandal have seemed to abandoned taste. the apartment hotel building at the kingsley is a bland faceless contraption which rudely abrupts the visual transition from the lee fields to urban patterns. its this kind of laziness that puts the well thought out efforts by rainey & associates and omahony pike at victoria and dennehys cross at risk and adds to the troubles unfairly to these potential recourses. very diappointed.

      What “well thought out efforts by rainey & associates”, surely not that thing they tried on in the Sunbeam. I’m not one for slagging off designs (although I just did) but its a bit OTT to criticise the Kinglsey with lines like “abrupts the visual transition from the lee fields to urban patterns” given what was there before. While we all know it has a history, Lee Baths, Car Museum etc, the real eysore on the “Straight Road” is the view of the arse of the Environmental Centre on the Lee Road, which as I understand it is on the way to being another white elephant given that UCC have over specced what they want in the building…….

    • #759225
      pier39
      Participant

      @yorktown wrote:

      What “well thought out efforts by rainey & associates”, surely not that thing they tried on in the Sunbeam. I’m not one for slagging off designs (although I just did) but its a bit OTT to criticise the Kinglsey with lines like “abrupts the visual transition from the lee fields to urban patterns” given what was there before. While we all know it has a history, Lee Baths, Car Museum etc, the real eysore on the “Straight Road” is the view of the arse of the Environmental Centre on the Lee Road, which as I understand it is on the way to being another white elephant given that UCC have over specced what they want in the building…….

      i was referring particularly to the victoria cross effot which i think is rather subtle and has a pleasant soft material usage. agreed the sunbeam affair is a messy mish mash. as some other posters here have said before the location of the tower boggles the mind. do you think the kingsely apartment hotel is a good design? i also agree the bucholz mcevoy scheme is utterly dire. i would have expected more from them.

    • #759226
      lexington
      Participant

      The title says it all really… O’Flynn Construction’s plans to develop 629 new homes on lands constituent of their 124-acre purchase at Dunkathel House has been refused following appeal to ABP. The E200m scheme had been granted by Cork County Council for a reduced dwelling number totalling 527, however this was appealed on both a first and third party basis (the latter being by a local residents, Glounthan Residents Association). The proposal was to see approx. 24-acres of the lands around the historic house retained for recreational value with the remainder of the site dedicated to a residential scheme which would have included retail, community, equestrian and sporting provisions. As part of the appeal, an Oral Hearing procedure was conducted by the ABP Inspectorate. Permission was refused on grounds which included certain design and amenity issues, however, a prominent feature of the scheme’s refusal is accounted for by matters of “insufficient” associated infastructure. The Dunkettle area on the east side of Cork city is a well-known traffic black-spot – recent infrastructural updates, such as that at the Dunkettle Interchange (near the Jack Lynch Tunnel) would thus far seemed to have had little impact on relieving the areas traffic rows. Michael O’Flynn, MD of O’Flynn Construction has indicated that his company will likely seek a reapplication for the scheme once design issues have been amended. Talks will likely commence with Cork County Council about resolving infastructural difficulties associated with the planning in light of issues detailed by the appeal report.

    • #759227
      Planogram
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      The title says it all really… O’Flynn Construction’s plans to develop 629 new homes on lands constituent of their purchase of Dunkathel House has been refused following appeal to ABP. The scheme had been granted by Cork County Council for a reduced dwelling number totalling 527, however this was appealed on both a first and third party basis (the latter being by a local residents). The proposal was to see approx. 24-acres of the lands around the historic house retained for recreational value with the remainder of the site dedicated to a residential scheme which would have included retail, community, equestrian and sporting provisions. As part of the appeal, an Oral Hearing procedure was conducted by the ABP Inspectorate. More details on this and further updates later.

      629 homes would have led to an intolerable level of traffic congestion on the already creaking roads infrastructure in Glanmire. Happily ABP has recognised this.

      The Glounthane Residents had some particularly heavy hitting members on their committee as well, which would have helped their case no end.

      Unfortunately, the hump backed bridge by the AIB in Glanmire Village just cannot cope with any more traffic. Put in the infrastructure first, and then come back with the grandiose plans.

      As for Green Spaces, Glanmire is already more then adequately served in this area with further recreational grounds in the planning at Brook Lodge in addition to the existing Park and Riverside Walk. This proposed development would have ensured that the ribbon development between Glounthane and Carrigtwohill would have been connected to Glanmire and would have caused serious traffic problems.

      The recent announcement by Cork County Council that they intend putting Traffic Lights at the junction between Hazelwood and the old Dublin Road (the main road through Glanmire) and also at the Church Hill Junction, (by the Church in Glanmire) will hopefully result in a reduction of traffic off the N8 using Glanmire as a rat run to get to the City Centre at peak periods rather then using the bypass and Tivoli dual carriageway. This rejected development would have contibuted further to the areas traffic problems. The roads are full in that area now, and no new development should be allowed until such time as a proper infrastructure is put in place.

    • #759228
      Pug
      Participant

      wow! cant believe they refused. Must only allow a developer one project at a time. The traffic in fairness would have been a bit much in the mornings. Even next to a major road.

    • #759229
      Planogram
      Participant

      This is from the Irish Times, and outlines some of the reasons that the residents had for objecting.

      €200m Cork scheme appealed
      Edel Morgan

      A plan by the Cork-based O’Flynn Construction company to build a €200 million residential and leisure complex at the historic Dunkathel House at Glanmire in Co Cork has proven controversial with some people in the local area.

      The development is currently the subject of an appeal to An Bord Pleanála.

      Three parties – Glounthaune Community Association, Mitchel Barry, and Barry and Joan Murphy – have opposed the planning permission granted by Cork County Council for the venture.

      O’Flynn Construction, which purchased the 146-acre demesne two years ago for some €24 million, is proposing a 600-unit residential project which also incorporates a high-tech equestrian centre, a horticultural centre, an outdoor exhibition area and car-parking zones.

      The residential element would comprise a mix of two and three-storey terraced housing, as well as semi-detached and detached housing.

      The proposal is also to restore and conserve Dunkathel House, which was built around 1790, and convert it into a visitor centre, and to establish a riding school, a garden centre, shops and a crèche on the grounds of the estate.

      However, Glounthorne Community Association says it has concerns that infrastructure in the area – including the Jack Lynch Tunnel – is insufficient to cope with increased traffic from the development and says it is not confident that the long term future of Dunkathel House is safeguarded.

      It says that the local community has been left out of consultations over the development.

      “Fifteen conditions of planning permission have been left by Cork County Council to be subsequently agreed with the developer, which has excluded the community,” says the chairman of the association Philip Mullally.

      He says that the density of the development shows little respect for the house and its setting.

      Mr Mullally also said that he doesn’t believe the proposal to turn the house into a visitor centreis viable.

      “Glanmire is a small village with little or no amenities. The bypass freed it of heavy traffic but this development will choke it up again.”

      Dunkathel House was previously owned by the Russell family who disposed of the property after failing to secure sufficient support to develop it as a luxury hotel and leisure complex.

      A late 18th century neo-classical mansion, it was built on high ground overlooking the Lee estuary by a wealthy Cork merchant, Abraham Morris.

      It has a two-storey, nine-bay centre block joined by screen walls with wings extending back to form a courtyard.

      The architect is thought to have been Hargreave, a pupil of the Sardinian architect Davis Ducart who was responsible for Lota House and Kilshannig.

      It has a finely proportioned interior with Adam chimneypieces and a particularly elegant staircase of Bath stone.

      It also contains a unique collection of Victorian watercolours by Beatrice Gubbins, a former owner and resident of the house which is on public display on the first floor.

    • #759230
      A-ha
      Participant

      Can I ask if anyone went to any of those recent talks on the new commuter Cork-Midleton railway line? Would appreciate any info. if possible. Thanks.
      Also, Air Wales will cease all operations from April 23rd. This includes the airlines three routes from Cork – Cardiff, Newquay and Exeter. The company is holding discussions with other carriers over handing on its routes to them. Aer Arann has already been named to take over the former Cardiff route and it is expected that another airline will step in to fill the Exeter route, most likely to be sister airline bmiBaby.

    • #759231
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Aer Arann will be taking up the Cardiff and Newquay services.
      http://www.aerarann.ie/about_us/news.htm

    • #759232
      kite
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      Even though I’m living in the Ballincollig area it was only today that I passed in the Carrigrohane Road for the first time in ages (usually take the link roads). As a result of this journey I found meself nearly crashing into the Statoil on said road when I first caught sight of the extension to the Kingsley Hotel. Jaysus did they knock that one out while the planners weren’t looking or wha?

      Western elevation looks lilke several, poorly designed, blocks of flats, with zero character and little sympathy/understanding of the fact that this is the first building on that side of the road marking an arrival into Cork (boundaries not withstanding). With the Lee Fields just before it, it’s likely to remain that way, so surely there was an opportunity to make a ‘statement’. Likewise with the northern elevation – larger windows but again feckin boxy. At least it beats the southern elevation which has nothing at all!!

      Between this and the wonderful Victoria Cross mess, this whole area is starting to look like the land that design forgot, and it’s little reason that the locals are up in arms about further developments if this is what is being touted as contemporary architecture. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all against the anti-high-rise shower, but developers are doing themselves few favours by releasing this type of awfulness on the area.

      Disgusted? – I should feckin’ coco 😡

      ps – gone a little quiet in here again, hasn’t it?

      😮 That Kingsley extention is a joke like a disease carried on from the most revolting building in Cork (Victoria Mills), when the Kingsley look for the 5 star rating they want i hope they are told where to jump.
      Any wonder worthwhile projects like Dennehys is dragged down when junk like that is allowed

    • #759233
      POM
      Participant

      Just reading the Galway thread there. I think its brilliant for Galway with the news about the CIE lands being redeveloped and I’m very glad to hear it, but it simply highlights the fact to me that CIE are arsing around with Horgan’s Quay in Cork. Its amazing how fast they can move when they want to, yet 8 years later we’re still hanging around waiting for CIE and Manor Park to get a move on with no clear date for an application anytime soon. It really is a disgrace and an awful big let down for the whole city. It strikes me as a further representation the Government and its bodies have for Cork (i.e. School of Music, Bus Station, Cork Airport, Horgan’s Quay, Decentralisation). I know there are issues involved, but drive can sort out such issues fairly lively. Lex posted some images of early drawings by O’Mahony Pike on Horgans Quay here before. I hope that what is, if it ever does get lodged, will be a dramatic improvement on those efforts. I’m really hoping O’Mahony Pike show more Gallery Quay mixed with Dennehy’s Cross than Charlotte Quay here. Dramatic edges and extensive glazing opening out to face the river are needed here. Design issues aside, I continue to resent the prolonged and inadequate progress by CIE on Horgan’s Quay. Four million euro novelty revamps may look nice on paper but they are just that, novelty…just like the Bus Station revamp and just like the inability to provide Cork Airport with proper airbridges and then still expect it to carry the debt despite promises.

    • #759234
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I wish to echo the above sentiments,

      getting it right as opposed to fast is the only option for this site which has the potential to link both sides of the river in real terms as opposed to acting as a barrier to movement.

    • #759235
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Just reading the Galway thread there. I think its brilliant for Galway with the news about the CIE lands being redeveloped and I’m very glad to hear it, but it simply highlights the fact to me that CIE are arsing around with Horgan’s Quay in Cork. Its amazing how fast they can move when they want to, yet 8 years later we’re still hanging around waiting for CIE and Manor Park to get a move on with no clear date for an application anytime soon. It really is a disgrace and an awful big let down for the whole city. It strikes me as a further representation the Government and its bodies have for Cork (i.e. School of Music, Bus Station, Cork Airport, Horgan’s Quay, Decentralisation). I know there are issues involved, but drive can sort out such issues fairly lively. Lex posted some images of early drawings by O’Mahony Pike on Horgans Quay here before. I hope that what is, if it ever does get lodged, will be a dramatic improvement on those efforts. I’m really hoping O’Mahony Pike show more Gallery Quay mixed with Dennehy’s Cross than Charlotte Quay here. Dramatic edges and extensive glazing opening out to face the river are needed here. Design issues aside, I continue to resent the prolonged and inadequate progress by CIE on Horgan’s Quay. Four million euro novelty revamps may look nice on paper but they are just that, novelty…just like the Bus Station revamp and just like the inability to provide Cork Airport with proper airbridges and then still expect it to carry the debt despite promises.

      Absolutely spot on there – poor representation by all of our elected representatives in Cork.
      Opera House unfinished interior etc lack of central government funding ?
      Cork 2005 lack of central government funding.
      Bus station waste of money.
      Kent station – massive potential just sitting there.
      Cork Airport – 1 airbridge.
      Cork Airport 160million start off debt.
      School of music via an taisce delays and funding issues.
      Kinsale Road flyover etc delays.

      In another year they will be bothering us for votes again

    • #759236
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      School of music via an taisce delays and funding issues.

      I think the funding issues are the real reason behind this; another shining example of our inability to get PPP’s right in this country. The rent for the temporary accomodation to replace the Cork High Court sums it all up for me. :confused:

    • #759237
      kite
      Participant

      @Saucy Jack wrote:

      Absolutely spot on there – poor representation by all of our elected representatives in Cork.
      Opera House unfinished interior etc lack of central government funding ?
      Cork 2005 lack of central government funding.
      Bus station waste of money.
      Kent station – massive potential just sitting there.
      Cork Airport – 1 airbridge.
      Cork Airport 160million start off debt.
      School of music via an taisce delays and funding issues.
      Kinsale Road flyover etc delays.

      In another year they will be bothering us for votes again

      😮 And to top it all off the councilors in Cork now propose to force the manager to enforce the CSD / Shields / McCarthy / Buttimer etc,etc, height cap ban…so back to tached cottages and dancing at the crossroads eh ??

    • #759238
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Tp – your AnT defence radar is active today!

    • #759239
      Pug
      Participant

      councillors who object to high rise are disgrace – works perfectly well for other european cities e.g. amsterdam, berlin look fab at only 4-5 storeys high.

      Cork is laden with potential and its being squandered – all those roads being built are great but at least 10 years behind the times – Kinsale bypass is being completed years late and they will tell us it came in on time and under budget – the roads will be complete just in time for them to realise that light rail needs to be put in.

      being a non construction type person, Anyone see that steel sort of cage thing on the new glass city hall? presume thats there to hold the glass in place while they do something to it? surely wont be left there??

    • #759240
      lexington
      Participant

      1.Additional Academy Street Images


      Developer: O’Callaghan Properties
      Architects: Project Architects/Gehl Urban Consultants

      2.Albert Quay WebWorks

      Developer: Howard Holdings
      Architects: Scott Tallon Walker

    • #759241
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 The prospective redevelopment of a former Exhaust Repairs Workshop took a step closer today with a grant issued Adrian Power on his plans to develop a notable waterfront office building near Clarke’s Bridge (just a few steps from the Washington Street legal district). The development, designed by Coughlan de Keyser Architects, has undergone significant revisions in light of a number of planning department requests. Originally submitted as a 7-storey proposal with floor area of some 2134sq m – the scheme has now been cut back by 2-storeys and has seen its original material uses, which included an attractive slanting copper element fronting Hanover Place, re-addressed. CCC demanded a more simplified proposal, reasoning that the scheme’s prominent location, required such revision. Mr. Power’s plan adjoins a recently permitted scheme running along Hanover Street, proposed by John & Michael O’Dwyer and designed by James Leahy & Associates – that proposal originally sought a 23-unit mix of 1 & 2-bedroom apartments over 6-storeys – however, the application was reduced to 4-storeys on grant. The proposal to include a small boardwalk as part of the Clarke’s Bridge scheme was also omitted as part of the planning allowance – the planning department concluded that it served no justification given its impact on narrowing the river channel and its limitation serving the scheme’s ground floor commercial unit. Construction of the Hanover Street and Clarke’s Bridge projects is hoped to conducted together when work does move ahead. DNG Commercial are the marketing agents for the Clarke’s Bridge scheme which serves wonderful potential for legal occupancy or other associated office functions given its core location only a stone’s throw from Cork Court House.



      Cork Expo 2010

      The word ‘expo’ rings alarm bells in my head whenever I hear it… Thoughts of Hanover 2000 (which left its organisers and promoters [and ultimately the German taxpayer] $1billion dollars in debt) or even the recent Aichi Expo of 2005 don’t seem to sit well. Of course, an Expo on Urban Living in Cork is not going to be on the scale of a World Expo type affair – but that is not to say it doesn’t carry risks, any investment venture does… City Manager Joe Gavin has cited a focus on the docklands for the Urban Living Expo – indeed the prospect of an expo and its associated revenue generation could be a most enticing catalyst for movement on many aspects of the docklands – this is fine, in principle:

      There are a couple of things however an expo like this needs to consider –

      1. Imagination
      2. A sufficient, well funded and imaginative international and national marketing campaign… not just ads in the Irish Times once a week or leaflets distributed around Cork. I mean full/half page ads in The New York Times or Guardian – or Die Zeit and Le Monde.
      3. The scheduling of such an expo – is 2010 a realistic timeframe?
      4. The long-term environmental impact of such a project.
      5. The capacity fror such a project.



      1. Imagination does not mean over-sized “white elephant” budgets – in means utilising existing resources creatively; it means thinking outside the box; it means creating an environment for linked investors to input efficiently and effectively.

      2. Promotions should draw a wider audience – that means utilising and building on existing links like those provided by Aer Lingus to Continental Europe to draw a greater variance of potential visitors – and perhaps, by 2010, connections to New York and other European continental locations. The promotions should be edgy, attractive and fun – focused on urban living but highlighting broader aspects appealing to a broader variety of visitors.

      3. Is a 4 year time-frame realistic to showcase new ‘landmark’ buildings (given many large builidng projects take at least 18 months and with our current planning accommodation, applications of such scale can take up to a year).

      4. Can a sustainable and attractive programme of building projects (permanent and temporary) be initiated and complete by or during 2010 so as to appropriately compliment the expo theme? Projects need to be imaginatively and creatively designed (we’re talking landmarks in the real sense of the word, not the estate agent derivative 😉 – though of course not every[/i can be a ‘landmark’) – but equally, they need to be “imaginatively” considered and accommodated by planners where appropriate. Any major investment scheme will require foresight, strategic consideration of the long-term environmental and economic outcomes – they need to be produced in accordance with sustainable development. They should be produced in context of the market environment but reflect their worthiness from promotion and exhibition through innovative architectural, environmental and engineering design. It is an opportunity for local and national design teams to display their capabilities and work to an international stage. The docklands needs to be given the due time and consideration if its implementation is to be a success.

      5. Can Cork meet all the appropriate requirements to fulfill such an expo? Can it incorporate the necessary imagination, drive and co-ordination? Can it avoid the politics and consider the broader picture? Can it produce well thought out, well planned and inclusive proposals matched with sufficient investment and truly innovative angles on Urban Living? Can it innovate so as to lead by example? Can it effectively utilise the opportunity to energise this prospective city quarter well into the future? Can it provide the associated infastructure (rail, bed-spaces, landscaping etc)?

    • #759242
      kite
      Participant

      Cork Expo 2010

      The word ‘expo’ rings alarm bells in my head whenever I hear it… Thoughts of Hanover 2000 (which left its organisers and promoters [and ultimately the German taxpayer] $1billion dollars in debt) or even the recent Aichi Expo of 2005 don’t seem to sit well. Of course, an Expo on Urban Living in Cork is not going to be a World Expo type affair – but that is not to say it doesn’t carry risks, any investment venture does… City Manager Joe Gavin has cited a focus on the docklands for the Urban Living Expo – indeed the prospect of an expo and its associated revenue generation could be a most enticing catalyst for movement on many aspects of the docklands – this is fine, in principle:……….

      😮 No worries Lex, Mr Gavin gave city councilors a half line mombo jumbo on spending 230,000,000 last year, im sure he could justify 1 billion without breaking a sweat??

    • #759243
      jungle
      Participant

      I hate to take away from Lex’s thought provoking post there, but I’d like to make a further point on CIE.

      They are currently sitting on a pretty large, central site in the form of Capwell Rd bus depot. Selling this could free up valuable land close to the centre of Cork, enable them to move the bus depot to a more suitable location and the spare cash could be invested in renewing and expanding the city bus fleet.

    • #759244
      kite
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      I hate to take away from Lex’s thought provoking post there, but I’d like to make a further point on CIE.

      They are currently sitting on a pretty large, central site in the form of Capwell Rd bus depot. Selling this could free up valuable land close to the centre of Cork, enable them to move the bus depot to a more suitable location and the spare cash could be invested in renewing and expanding the city bus fleet.

      😎 Too right, it makes no sense to have the depot on Capwell Road. CIE also need to take stock of their City Centre site that Joe Gavin rightly wants to turn into a conference centre.

    • #759245
      malec
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      2.Albert Quay WebWorks

      Developer: Howard Holdings
      Architects: Scott Tallon Walker

      I have to say I’m not impressed at all by the new developments getting built around the city hall. I find the Albert Quay Webworks building looks a lot cheaper than I thought it would seeing those renderings. Also that new city hall extension is terrible. I thought it would look better once the glass was in place but was disappointed. I think the problem is the top of the concrete part. If they could knock off say, 3 metres off the top it would be fine. It’s just that concrete top makes it look unbalanced, also it can be seen sticking out over the city hall from the other side of the river. I’m still hopeful it’ll look better when fully complete but have my doubts.

      I hope the eglinton st tower will provide a huge improvement over the existing crap. The renders look great for it although I don’t think I should raise my hopes too much.

    • #759246
      POM
      Participant

      @malec wrote:

      I have to say I’m not impressed at all by the new developments getting built around the city hall. I find the Albert Quay Webworks building looks a lot cheaper than I thought it would seeing those renderings. Also that new city hall extension is terrible. I thought it would look better once the glass was in place but was disappointed. I think the problem is the top of the concrete part. If they could knock off say, 3 metres off the top it would be fine. It’s just that concrete top makes it look unbalanced, also it can be seen sticking out over the city hall from the other side of the river. I’m still hopeful it’ll look better when fully complete but have my doubts.

      I hope the eglinton st tower will provide a huge improvement over the existing crap. The renders look great for it although I don’t think I should raise my hopes too much.

      As far as the Webworks goes I do think it takes into account its relationship to Albert House. However its finished with that dire Scot Tallon Walker grey framing. The same they used on Anglesea Street and the UCC Pharmacy building. It clashes with the limestone Albert House very prominently, something not clear in the renders, which if anything make the finish and glass seem a little ‘bluer’ and matching. I think the Eglinton Street elevation is actually kind of nice and the build quality is pretty good. That said the Albert Quay view is a let down with the said brown-grey finish. Very dull and clashing. I’m going to hold out on the City Hall extension until its done. I never liked it but I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt until I see it complete. I think Eglinton Street will pick up the area ten-fold. The renders are nice but I think the basic design is pretty sleek itself and will enhance the area well. I’m holding out to see what Howard Holdings have in store for their other Albert Quay site too and hope they don’t go the Scot Tallon Walker route again…and if they do, I hope its more of the City Quarter vain than all the other STW stuff around the city.

    • #759247
      speakeasy
      Participant

      I feel so proud that I started the “Look at the state of Cork, like” thread in 2003, sparking off some good Cork debate! Even though I’m a bit ashamed that I never showed my face again until today, I really never thought there was so much interest or concern in Cork’s buildings and it’s great to see. It’s going to take me a while to read the thread but I’ll try! My title was even abbreviated to LATSOC! Brilliant!! I wish I had looked at this site before now, it’s great!

      It’s disappointing that the thread has been moved to one with a more sedate title because the intention of the original ‘cheeky’ title was to catch the eye of people from everywhere so that they’d be tempted to open it and join the debate, instead of Cork people just talking to themselves in the thread, so to speak. :rolleyes:

    • #759248
      kite
      Participant

      @malec wrote:

      I have to say I’m not impressed at all by the new developments getting built around the city hall. I find the Albert Quay Webworks building looks a lot cheaper than I thought it would seeing those renderings. Also that new city hall extension is terrible. I thought it would look better once the glass was in place but was disappointed. I think the problem is the top of the concrete part. If they could knock off say, 3 metres off the top it would be fine. It’s just that concrete top makes it look unbalanced, also it can be seen sticking out over the city hall from the other side of the river. I’m still hopeful it’ll look better when fully complete but have my doubts.

      I hope the eglinton st tower will provide a huge improvement over the existing crap. The renders look great for it although I don’t think I should raise my hopes too much.

      😮 I agree, have we really learnt nothing in the 30 years since Connelly Hall was built?

    • #759249
      opus
      Participant

      Anyone know what’s happening with the Kino cinema? They had a planning permission notice up for a while to close off the lane running just next to it but everything seems to have gone quite again.

    • #759250
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Cork Expo 2010……..just don’t try to park here, let alone do business…….

      Just read the Examiner this morning and noticed what I thought was an April Fool’s on page three……yes, it was the City Council’s notice about the new parking fines regime where you get a fine of €40 per offence but you only get a notice about it (and any others that you have recieved) about a month after…….think of it, a fine a day……..€1200 a month with no idea that the charge is out there…..

      Now while I accept that parking has to be controlled, the Council, and the DOE / Government with all their “stealth taxes” are in my view taking liberties here. Think of the following……

      City Council workers enjoy free parking in a number of facilities through out the city, Anglesea Terrace, Navigation House, Albert Quay all without the imposition of BIK (similar to Merrion Square in D.2 where many of you will have seen Leinster House Gardens, once a very pretty green space turned into a “temporary” surface car park back in 2001 for the civil servants)……I know, they say they deserve it with the poor pay, extended coffee breaks, jobs for life, good pensions and all that but when they start hampering trade and parking in the city they are hitting business and generally ripping people off; here’s spme examples. I ‘d have no problem with the new system if it were universally applied.

      The Council have consistently overlooked their leagal responsibilities in relation to car parking in the city. Over time, they have REDUCED the number of parking spaces throughout the city while at the same the same time applying development levies for the provision of spaces that developments do not provide. We have all seen it happen, pedestrianisation, yellow lines, etc, car parking spaces just dissappear but no replacement spaces are put in place (park and ride does not count). However, legally, the Council has an obligation that where they apply charges for the provision of car pakring and they do not provide it (as they have not) they can be brought to Court and be sued for the charge plus interest if they have not provided those spaces within 7 years of the pernission being carried out. While you won’t have a large developer chasing the Council (they’ed never get a permisison again) I think that as the Council is being so egar to get public money, the Echo may want to run a story as to how people can get it back…….

      The Council has also lost the plot recently in realtion to Financial Contributions for car parking. You will all have seen the Eglington Street Appeal where the Council got a smack on the wrist from An Bord Pleanala (and rightly too) for seeking to apply Development Charges on the site are devoted to car parking; this is despite the planning regulations stating that car pakring is an ancillary space and is not part of the gross floor area of a development (which is what they are allowed to calculate charges on). The Council had other ideas, they thought that their Section 48 Development Contribution Scheme allowed them to charge on parking because the document they adopted didn’t “state otherwise”. The Board has, as I understand it, has also slapped the Council on the wrist in relation to two other schemes where they did the same, one John Cleary scheme on the Old Mallow Road and also a Franilla scheme as I understand it.

      This all suggests that the Council is hungry for cash, but just won’t deliver services, development (bar Patrick Street and the Grand Parade – which were a bit slow to tell the truth) or anything only filling potholes, collecting rubbish and pushing paper. In addition, it also suggest that the Councils budgets and finances may have been based on getting money in from Development Charges / sources that are no longer there…..Council finances in trouble, liability for car parking under provision, poor accounting…….Stephen Rogers, there’s a story for the Echo (or maybe Examiner).

      Cork Expo 2010?……yeah right.

    • #759251
      Saucy Jack
      Participant

      @opus wrote:

      Anyone know what’s happening with the Kino cinema? They had a planning permission notice up for a while to close off the lane running just next to it but everything seems to have gone quite again.

      I think that there was an issue with a main sewer that had to be moved to facilitate development by C.C.Council
      with cost of works to be agreed and other funding issues with the development itself.

    • #759252
      kite
      Participant

      An Bord Pleanala have defered making a decision on the Frinailla heating and plumbing site Victoria Cross Road, they now hope to determine the appeal before 10th May.

    • #759253
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Speaking of Frinailla, after ironing out some financial issues with landowners, work has begun on the company’s Lady’s Well development in Blackpool. The majority of demolition work has been completed over the weekend and site testing/preperation work has begun. The company might find thinks though going, since the adjacent Garda Station was beset with huge problems in finding sufficient foundations on what was, surprise surprise, a water course!

      Elsewhere in the area, work is complete on the brand spanking new Cork Archives Institute building on Great William O’Brien Street on the rear of the old fire station. Work is currently ongoing to transfer the often fragile and important archive holdings from the former archives building on South Main Street to the new facility- with specialists from the UK having been brought in for the task. The new facility will open to the public on Tuesday 25th April 2006.

      The building sensitively deals with the site adjacent to Maddens Buildings (protected buildings). It remains to be seen what use CCC will put the old archives (Christ Church) to. Any ideas?

      More images later

    • #759254
      jungle
      Participant

      Damn it. I can’t delete the post

    • #759255
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 On March 13th, Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects submitted their second batch of Unsolicited Further Information to Cork City Council’s Planning Department following assessment of planner and submission concerns. The original project, submitted n August 2005 by the Crow’s Nest Partnership (Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy) sought to redevelop the fire-damaged Crow’s Nest pub and surrounding premises at Victoria Cross – including the MP Crowley and Victoria Terrace sites – with a 74-unit block generally 6-storeys but with a 15-storey tower fronting the Victoria Cross junction. The proposal was to be located over commercial units and a new bar/restaurant provision with dual-deck basement parking for 112 vehicles accessed of the Carrigrohane “Straight” Road.


      Northern Elevation of the Original Redevelopment Plan.

      Following lodgement, 7 objections and 1 submission were marked on the original application. Now with the submission date for the Revised Plans closed – only 1 new objection was issued against the significantly reduced and amended scheme.

      With a decision date due for May 1st 2006, the revised proposal has reduced its number of apartments by 20 to 54 (which comprise of a mix of 46x 2-bedroom and 8x 3-bedroom “family sized” units). Heights have been dropped by a full 5-floors to the tower element which now stands at 10-storeys and some reductions have also been afforded the main block which now stands at 5-storeys with a recessed portion. The tower, originally standing at 50.4 metres is now a more moderate height, roughly corresponding to the established heights set by Victoria Mills nearby, as it stands a small bit over 33 metres – this should reduce the impact on views to Cork County Hall and limit over-shadowing concerns. Basement car-parking has been up by just 1 space to 113 over 2-levels, again accessed from the Carrigrohane “Straight” Road. Designs on the commercial elements have also been somewhat rearticulated – the restaurant element is located over the ground-floor bar and possesses an attractive open-deck area with wrap-around balcony feature. The former seperation between tower and bulk apartment block has also been removed. Notably, the material finish has been altered – with a brighter finish to reflect its context more adequately. Tom Hegarty of RORSA was lead designer with McCutcheon Mulcahy acting as project Planning Consultants.


      View of revised scheme from Victoria Cross with Cork County Hall in the background.



      😉 I was going to note the Frinailla Victoria Cross update but kite beat me to it! :p


    • #759256
      kite
      Participant


      Northern Elevation of the Original Redevelopment Plan.
      (Quote.Lexington)
      Following lodgement, 7 objections and 1 submission were marked on the original application. Now with the submission date for the Revised Plans closed – only 1 new objection was issued against the significantly reduced and amended scheme.



      😉 I was going to note the Frinailla Victoria Cross update but kite beat me to it! :p


      [/QUOTE]

      🙁 Assistant Director of Planning Services AnnBogan has extended the date for further submissions to 13th April following a legal tussle with the CSD group who cried foul in relation to their rights under the P&D Act 2000

    • #759257
      pier39
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      🙁 Assistant Director of Planning Services AnnBogan has extended the date for further submissions to 13th April following a legal tussle with the CSD group who cried foul in relation to their rights under the P&D Act 2000

      thats rubbish…not your post, the action. they have no more rights than the next man on the street. the further information was printed in the press and given the same length of submission period as any other application. if the group werent quick enough off the mark to lodge a submission thats their own fault. maybe i should do the same everytime im late making a submission.

    • #759258
      kite
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      thats rubbish…not your post, the action. they have no more rights than the next man on the street. the further information was printed in the press and given the same length of submission period as any other application. if the group werent quick enough off the mark to lodge a submission thats their own fault. maybe i should do the same everytime im late making a submission.

      :confused: I agree, my parents are living in Wilton and are on the CSDs mailing list. They showed me the letter CSD got from Ann Bogan (CSD emailed it to people on their list) it seems from what the letter said that the Planning Dept. agreed that the time limit was not what should have been allowed under the Planning Act.
      The submission they made regarding the Bishopstown-Wilton Area Plan is posted on their website, these guys are really overstepping the mark. The submission can be found on http://www.corksouthwest.com

    • #759259
      pier39
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      :confused: I agree, my parents are living in Wilton and are on the CSDs mailing list. They showed me the letter CSD got from Ann Bogan (CSD emailed it to people on their list) it seems from what the letter said that the Planning Dept. agreed that the time limit was not what should have been allowed under the Planning Act.
      The submission they made regarding the Bishopstown-Wilton Area Plan is posted on their website, these guys are really overstepping the mark.

      id hardly give them that much credit. what the seem not to understand is planning applications made prior to their motions and bishopstown area plan have to be considered with respect to the time of their planning lodgement. if a new plan or motion is proposed in the time following it has no legal grounds. their complaints on the dennehys cross plan being granted are invalid. the application came before their illegal motion.

    • #759260
      malec
      Participant

      I was going to say this is just another half-arsed design but I quite like it now. I was thinking something more striking would be better in that area but this does fit nicely with county hall. It’s a bit too boxy and boring but if it wasn’t tthen maybe it would have clashed too much. I also think it looks better with the reduced height. I’ve nothing against tall buildings (in fact I love them) but I’d hate to see county hall’s stand-alone look go.

      I’m still waiting until we get a sexy 20-storey tower for the docklands. It’ll have to be something with curves, not square shaped. I’m thinking something along Paul Kenny’s The Treasury but in tower form 😀

    • #759261
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @malec wrote:

      I was going to say this is just another half-arsed design but I quite like it now. I was thinking something more striking would be better in that area but this does fit nicely with county hall. It’s a bit too boxy and boring but if it wasn’t tthen maybe it would have clashed too much. I also think it looks better with the reduced height. I’ve nothing against tall buildings (in fact I love them) but I’d hate to see county hall’s stand-alone look go.

      I don’t like the Crow’s Nest development. It’s far too boxy, it doesn’t really make enough of its location and, on this occasion at least, I’d much rather see what is already there refurbished and left as is. This new development will destroy the ‘standalone’ nature of County Hall when viewed from Western Road and Mardyke.

    • #759262
      Leesider
      Participant

      I think it actually looks alright, as was said earlier a sleeker design would be too much in contrast with county hall and actually take from the standalone nature of it. To me there is a continental style (maybe that’s just the clear blue sky;) ) to the design, alright a bit boxy but not bad!

    • #759263
      PTB
      Participant

      The Crows Nest development is still shite

    • #759264
      POM
      Participant

      @malec wrote:

      I was going to say this is just another half-arsed design but I quite like it now. I was thinking something more striking would be better in that area but this does fit nicely with county hall. It’s a bit too boxy and boring but if it wasn’t tthen maybe it would have clashed too much. I also think it looks better with the reduced height. I’ve nothing against tall buildings (in fact I love them) but I’d hate to see county hall’s stand-alone look go.

      I’m still waiting until we get a sexy 20-storey tower for the docklands. It’ll have to be something with curves, not square shaped. I’m thinking something along Paul Kenny’s The Treasury but in tower form 😀

      Though I think it is an improvement on the original, its still to boxy and just so bland it makes me sleepy. A curve glazed feature from the ground up, to accentuate the corner, wouldn’t go astray. The sharp edges could be retained by a central glazed feature would at least jazz the tower up a bit. Th height and new materials seem much more attractive…from a distance I don’t think this will impact County Hall too much but from Victoria Cross it would probably limit views big time. I can’t make up my mind on this one…which probably says it all really. I have a feeling people will cite this scheme as another one to add to their arsenal of stupid anti-highrise slurs.

      As for docklands tall buildings, I agree that design teams should start thinking outside the lines and embrace some subtle (or not so subtle) curves and twists to buzz up future high-rise proposals. Tall buildings in the docklands should make a statement. It should be a case of design influence versus restrictive requirements. And by that I mean more Turning Torsos, Il Curvo and Swiss Re buildings and less Santry Cross and Sunbeams.

    • #759265
      lowrise
      Participant

      Any One Know Whats Happening With O Sheas Site Farranlea Road, Rumour Machine Says It Has Been Sold To A Kerry Building Group.

    • #759266
      malec
      Participant

      The only reason I said it was OK is because it blends nicely with county hall, other than that it’s very average.

    • #759267
      lexington
      Participant

      John Paul Construction are steaming ahead with Frinailla’s CitySquare (Lady’s Well) development along the Watercourse Road in Blackpool. With extensive demolition works underway, joint agents FML and Global Properties are scheduled to shortly release the first wave of residential units – with names currently being taken for interested parties. The mixed-scheme will seek to inject new life into an old and worn-out part of Blackpool with Kiosk Architect’s design rising from the ground (well…basement car-park) over the months ahead. Well over 100 mixed apartment units and a range of community and commercial units will be made available on realisation of the project.



      Meanwhile, not far away, Ascon Rohcon are expected to start moving on some works at Susie’s Field, off Assumption Road and the Blackpool By-Pass over the next few weeks, for the provision of the new Revenue Commissioners offices titled Linn Dubh. The Jack Coughlan Associates designed scheme, first championed by Frank Sheahan & Joe Carey, will provide over 13,511sq m of office space over 397 space basement car-park (over 2 levels) and is scheduled to be ready for occupation in late 2007. Meanwhile, options on the future of Government Buildings at Sullivans Quay are being drawn up with details hoping to be released later this year.



      *UPDATES*

      😎 A 54-unit apartment scheme near Douglas is scheduled to be submitted for planning in the coming days with Patrick A. Cashman & Associates leading the design on the scheme, destined for Castletreasure. Mr. T. O’Connor hopes to realise 3x 3-storey apartment buildings with units between the blocks divided 17, 22 and 15 format.

      😎 Scott Tallon Walker Architects have applied to CCC with the intention of providing a mixed-scheme for Saint Patrick’s Place along Wellington Road in the city centre. The firm are seek the part demolition , redevelopment and extension to existing Victorian terrace (including remodelling of former Cork Grammar School) all on a 0.08 hectare site. The proposed development comprising of four storeys over lower ground floor and basement includes 10 no. apartments, 653.26 sq. m of office space and 308.27 sq. m of commercial showrooms at street level. The development will also include basemnet parking, individual apartment stores, plant landscaping, terrace areas and all associated site works.

    • #759268
      kite
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      id hardly give them that much credit. what the seem not to understand is planning applications made prior to their motions and bishopstown area plan have to be considered with respect to the time of their planning lodgement. if a new plan or motion is proposed in the time following it has no legal grounds. their complaints on the dennehys cross plan being granted are invalid. the application came before their illegal motion.

      🙁 Tonights Echo reports that Cllr. Bermingham FG. PD, or whatever banner he now goes under has joined the growing list of anti high rise muppets, a question to J.Gavin (city manager) for next weeks CCC meeting will demand he puts the height cap in place.
      Its all very well saying not to give the csd any credit but they are getting councilors on board on a daily basis and getting money from the likes of my parents who live in the area despite my objections to them.

    • #759269
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Is it time that those of us who support balanced, well designed and necessary highrise developments in suitable locations around the city formed some sort of group in opposition to these ludicrous motions being proposed? They are being proposed and supported because the individuals involved believe there are votes and public support to be won by doing so. It must be time that those who oppose such motions made their feelings known in some way?

    • #759270
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Outright bans never work

      unfortunately many politicians have realised that nimby = votes and some very ill considered positions emerge as a result. Whilst not all areas are suitable for even mid-rise buildings other locations are very well suited to tall buildings such as the docklands.

    • #759271
      kite
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      Outright bans never work

      unfortunately many politicians have realised that nimby = votes and some very ill considered positions emerge as a result. Whilst not all areas are suitable for even mid-rise buildings other locations are very well suited to tall buildings such as the docklands.

      😎 Right on the button Thomond Park, hopefully CCC will come out with a well balanced suitable plan for the docklands.
      If CCC admitted that they made a HUGE mistake in giving the likes of the Victoria Mills permission it would take a lot of steam out of this whole anti rise thing. Unfortunately CCC insistance in describing VM as a “landmark gateway” building is only adding fuel to the fire!!

    • #759272
      publicrealm
      Participant

      Has any building heights study been commissioned for Cork – like has been done for Dublin?

      If not then it might be a useful proposal and could take the ‘members’ out of the mix?

    • #759273
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @publicrealm wrote:

      Has any building heights study been commissioned for Cork – like has been done for Dublin?

      If not then it might be a useful proposal and could take the ‘members’ out of the mix?

      As far as i’m aware, locations along the “Straight” Road, The Docklands and the city approach through Blackpool have been identified as locations where highrise buildings are suitable- according to the latest Development Plan.
      But the question arises — what is a highrise building??
      CSD supporters would propose to ban all “highrises” over three storey. Now, I don’t know many people who would catagorise a four storey building as highrise!! Utterly ridiculous!!

    • #759274
      publicrealm
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      But the question arises — what is a highrise building??
      CSD supporters would propose to ban all “highrises” over three storey. Now, I don’t know many people who would catagorise a four storey building as highrise!! Utterly ridiculous!!

      As far as I can recall the 1999 DEGW study of Dublin suggests that ‘highrise’ is anything in excess of 50m – which probably equates with about 17 storeys?

      I read somewhere that Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown is about to commission its own highrise study – which seems strange – soon we may have studies for every townland, without regard to the visual impact on adjoining ones?

      In any event i would have thought that Cork was a prime example of where such a study is required.

    • #759275
      jdivision
      Participant

      @publicrealm wrote:

      I read somewhere that Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown is about to commission its own highrise study – which seems strange – soon we may have studies for every townland, without regard to the visual impact on adjoining ones?.

      Dun Laoghaire is commissioning that study because it was granting high rise and high density apartments in Sandyford (excess 120 apartments per acre from what I understand) and ABP started rejecting all of them.

    • #759276
      Anonymous
      Participant

      In fairness tall buildings in Cork other than the northside would have much medium distance lower visibilty than the foothills of the Dublin mountains;

      A study could do no harm as all parties to the process could make submissions in respect of their concerns for example the existing historical core and it least then everyone would know where they stand.

    • #759277
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      ABP have refused permission to Dr. Martin Moloney to redevelop St.Albert’s Nursing Home on Blair’s Hill (also known as Blair’s Castle and a protected building). The development sought was to demolish a rear extension and to construst a total of 26 apartments within the historical building and a new rear extension.
      The ABP report deemed taht the redevelopment proposed would not be appropriate for such a building and that significant overshadowing of neighbouring properties would also be an issue.


      Precinct developments ltd. have appealled CCC’s decision on their proposals for the partial demolition of the Metropole Hotel on MacCurtain Street and the construction of a mixed use development comprising a Hotel, retail elements and 61 apartments.
      CCC granted permission for the redevelopment but with conditions which limited the height of a proposed tower to 32metre and made a number of changes to the finishing.

    • #759278
      malec
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      As far as i’m aware, locations along the “Straight” Road, The Docklands and the city approach through Blackpool have been identified as locations where highrise buildings are suitable- according to the latest Development Plan.
      But the question arises — what is a highrise building??
      CSD supporters would propose to ban all “highrises” over three storey. Now, I don’t know many people who would catagorise a four storey building as highrise!! Utterly ridiculous!!

      By definition highrise means at least 12 floors, a 4-storey building is still a house.
      The problem I think is that CCC are letting too much crap go through which strengthens the “anti-highrise” people’s arguments. What I’m talking about is stuff like the new metropole hotel extension which is almost worse than what’s already there. Aswell after looking more closely at the crows nest development it does seem really average. Most people already hate the millions of student apartments going up near victoria cross and I realise now this is an important oppertunity that might convince people otherwise. A building with more of a landmark edge to it would be great, not necessarily tall but something with a fresh design.

      By the way I’ll take back what I said about the Alberts Quay Webworks building since I just passed it the other day and the side facing the city hall is quite good. The only thing that really bothers me is that grey wall on the east facing side. If they just put in more windows it would have been fine.

    • #759279
      paddyinthehouse
      Participant

      Malec, I think it should be pointed out that the east elevation of the Webworks is a party wall, and as such cannot have any windows. The sites to the east of the building will all be redeveloped in the coming years, so the blank wall will no longer be visible.

      Attached is a photo from Lapps Quay, showing the Webworks in context with the adjacent classical buildings.

    • #759280
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      wow big picture!!!

      Webworks and UCC pharmacy, along with UCC bioscievces institute all remind me of the utter horror that is most of Waterford Institute of Technology’s Cork Road campus. has the look of something that was built from a box, with cheap plastic material.

    • #759281
      jdivision
      Participant

      Last time I was home the scaffolding was still up. That is absolutely horrific. As bad as the O’Flynn buildings opposite. They should have been made use glass at least to the side elevation. Anybody hear of the rumour of the Garda taking office space in O’Flynn’s Eglington St and him buying the Anglesea Street site?

    • #759282
      kite
      Participant

      😮 Further to the high rise cap (crap) motion proposed by Cllr.D. McCarthy and passed by councilors last year, the CCC meeting next Monday evening is set to have the Manager asked when he proposes to implement this vote. (Cllr. David McCarthy)

      To add to this madness Cllr. M.Shields is calling for a vote for a “Material Contravention to the City development Plan to effect that all Planning applications for apartments over 3 storeys to be refused planning permission” (Motion 06/180)

      Cllr’s. Buttimer & Bermingham have put a motion before CCC for next Monday to alter the City Development Plan to include the wording of the City Manager as stated at the CCC meeting of 27/3/06 re “the building of apartments over 3 floors within residential areas not receive planning from CCC planners”.

      Cllr.”Merry” Buttimer is asking if Mr.Mark Kelleher is going to be penalized for not complying with planning conditions. (Catherham, Wilton)

      🙂 On a positive note Cllr. T. O’Driscoll has a motion to “That CCC calls to develop a light rail system between Ballincollig and the City Centre” (06/87)

    • #759283
      malec
      Participant

      @paddyinthehouse wrote:

      Malec, I think it should be pointed out that the east elevation of the Webworks is a party wall, and as such cannot have any windows. The sites to the east of the building will all be redeveloped in the coming years, so the blank wall will no longer be visible.

      Attached is a photo from Lapps Quay, showing the Webworks in context with the adjacent classical buildings.

      Oh right, didn’t know that. That photo shows the best angle, the other side looks like crap (not just the wall but the south facing side aswell)

    • #759284
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      Last time I was home the scaffolding was still up. That is absolutely horrific. As bad as the O’Flynn buildings opposite. They should have been made use glass at least to the side elevation. Anybody hear of the rumour of the Garda taking office space in O’Flynn’s Eglington St and him buying the Anglesea Street site?

      Are you sure its not O’Flynns offering office and car parking in part exchange for the car park site to the rear of Anglesea street Garda station??

    • #759285
      jdivision
      Participant

      could well be. Was told in a noisy pub! Thanks for the clarification

    • #759286
      kite
      Participant

      :confused: Would somebody be able to cllear this up once and for all, Eoin English reports in todays IE that Cllr.Dave McCarthy stormed out of last nights CCC meeting following a row with the Manager over the amendment of the height cap vote. Cllr. Mary Shields, according to Mr.English then got a motion passed “freezing” all planning in Bishopstown, Wilton, and Dennehys Cross until the bishopstown area plan is in place.
      Q: IF one applied for planning now and it was not dealt with by CCC planners because of the Cllr.Shields motion, could one SUE either the Councillor herself or the City Council as a whole?
      Surely people can expect to apply for planning allowed under the City Development Plan as it stands?

    • #759287
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      of course people can apply for planning in these areas – the council cannot freeze applications or decisions – if they are not decided within the time periods under the Planning and Development Act the applicant will get a default permission…we are really blessed with the integrity, intelligence and foresight of our councillors in cork – aren’t we?

    • #759288
      lexington
      Participant

      The appeal decision regarding Werdna’s revised Water Street scheme was scheduled for today, however, no details are yet known – knowing ABP, the results may yet again be offset by a few days. A clearer picture should be known later as I haven’t had the chance to look into fully yet.

      – also I will try and have some backdated updates posted later; I’ve been plagued with an unreliable network server and time constraints of late.



      ewankennedy – I’m not clear on the details of the Eglinton Street Garda Car Park you mention, it may be worth clarifying whether or not your information is speculative or not for your own sake. It would indeed make an attractive acquisition and deal for both O’Flynn Construction and the Garda Siochana; I’ll look into it.

    • #759289
      POM
      Participant

      From an urban design perspective, developing the parking area to the rear of Anglesea Street Garda Station is an attractive prospect. It would bring a nice sense of continuation along Eglinton Street and represent a significant gateway approach to the city centre and docklands. I don’t know whether the details you mention are true or not jdivision but if they are true O’Flynn’s would have an opportunity to build on the success of their Lapps Quay office buildings and add a nice complement to their Eglinton Street scheme in the process. The scope for a well-designed office building is excellent at this site – and should help to also mask views of the concrete faced multi storey car park on Eglinton Street also. The Gardai could stand to benefit with being offered a higher-capacity car parking facility at basement level on completion of the scheme which would aid them nicely whilst cashing in on an attractive site sale.

    • #759290
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      😎 Precinct Investments have lodged a First Party Appeal with ABP regarding their redevelopment plans for the Gresham Metropole Hotel along St. Patricks Quay. Their plan, well documented on this thread, call for the demolition of the existing quayside extension & leisure centre and provision of 40 + new hotel bedrooms, conferencing facilities, street retail units and 61 new apartments over approx. 80 basement car-parking spaces. The scheme was designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects and received a grant from CCC subject to material revisions and a rearticulated feature tower, originally proposed at 12-storeys but capped at 32 metres in height. Contention by the developers is understood to regard Development Contribution and associated conditions.



      😎 A group understood to include Limerick-based developer Paul O’Brien (Mount Kennett Investments) and David Crowe (of Oyster Developments and Mangerton Construction) have been identified as the successful bidders of the half-acre development site along Camden Quay, formerly that of the Atkins MacKenzie Garden Centre and temporary Circuit Court. The site was sold on behalf of Northgate Trustees (NorthGate Investments – who previously sought plans on the site for a 170-bedroom hotel before its use as a court) through auctioneers Cohalan Downing Associates for an estimated value of €12m – and includes a protected facade structure fronting the quayside which will require delicate retention in any prospective redevelopment.



      🙂 Alchemy Properties, the development wing of Dairygold, has issued Significant Further Information on its mixed-use “town centre” scheme in Mallow – meanwhile, it is due to lodge an application with CCC to demolish all structures on its now defunct CMP Dairies site along the Kinsale Road. The application will be submitted in advance of a prospective lodgement for a large multiple-use scheme, the details of which are due to commence discussion on. An application for the scheme is expected before the year end.

    • #759291
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      1.Additional Academy Street Images

      Are these pictures of a widened Faulkner’s Lane?

    • #759292
      lexington
      Participant

      Yes who_me – the first image is looking down the new, broader lane toward north toward Emmet Place, while the second image looks south toward Patrick’s Street.

    • #759293
      lexington
      Participant

      The boarders are up and the site is being readied – after much controversy among the residents of Westend, Curraheen and Bishopstown, the Kelleher-family are steaming ahead through their vehicle 3G Construction on the Frank Ennis Architects designed scheme formally known as The Courtyard. The gated community of pleasantly designed residencies is set for a Phase 1 launch in Autumn 2006 through agents Sherry FitzGerald. A limited mix of units will be available in layouts comprising of 4, 3 and 2-bedroom townhouses, 3 bedroom duplexes and 1 & 2 bedroom apartment units.

      Frank Ennis Architects have been employed by the Kelleher on previous exercises which include the redevelopment of the Bishopstown Bar before they sold the successful premises on for a reported €8million.

      The developers are now preparing plans for a scheme predominantly pitched at medical services clients on a site including the former Bishopstown Esso station near Cork University Hospital which they purchased for an estimated €2million +. The new scheme may extend up to 100,000sq ft in floor space.



      😎 John & Michael O’Dwyer have appealed their reduced scheme along Hanover Street – lodged in 2 component applications. The proposal, designed by James Leahy & Associates originally sought permission for a mix of 23 one and two-bedroom apartment units over 6-storeys – but was reduced on grant by 2 floors. A 3rd Party appeal on behalf of Capital Hill Limited (associated with well known local businessmen) has also been lodged against the project.


    • #759294
      Anonymous
      Participant

      New €117million train carriages blocked by unions

      Iarnród Éireann are delaying the introduction of new trains for the
      Dublin-Cork service due to industrial relations matters, Platform 11
      (Ireland’s rail passengers organisation) can reveal.

      The 67 Cork Dublin Express coaches have been testing since their
      delivery in July 2005, with a cost of €117 million to the taxpayer.
      The carriages will be used to eventually provide an hourly service on
      the Dublin-Cork route from December 2006, not December 2005 as first
      proposed.

      Although coaches normally need to undergo testing before entering
      service, Platform 11 is aware of no safety issues which prevent
      introduction of the new coaches, which are badly needed to ease
      overcrowding as well to finally removed unreliable steam-heated
      carriages over 40 years old that are still being used on some
      services.

      Iarnród Éireann plan to replace the role of train guards with a new position
      of ‘train manager’. Train guards are refusing to accept this change
      and are blocking the introduction of the new carriages, even though
      they can be seen daily by passengers on antiquated, cramped trains as
      they pass the Iarnród Éireann works in Inchicore.

      The new carriages were initially planned to be entered into service in
      December 2005, with successive Iarnród Éireann spokesmen pushing the
      date back first to January, then March.

      Platform 11 is calling on unions and Iarnród Éireann to find a solution to
      their squabbles so that rail passengers can benefit from the first new
      intercity carriages since 1984. Unions have a long history of resistance to
      improvements in service, from longer DART carriages to extension of
      services to Greystones and new trains on the Maynooth line. Equally as
      these carriages have been on order for years we do not see why Iarnród
      Éireann has not dealt with this issue at an earlier stage.

      ends

      FYI

    • #759295
      POM
      Participant

      I was driving home yesterday evening and decided to take a meandering route to take in some of the new building stock coming on stream around Cork.

      First off Victoria Cross: the mask of scaffolding seems to be coming off the new student developments there. One by Flemings and the other being the second phase of Victoria Mills. Surprisingly the University Hall scheme by Flemings and UCC, I think Bertie Pope was the architect here, is not as bad as its renders would suggest. Now having said that, its far from inspiring and unduly boxy but its finish colouring and use of timber cladding liven it up somewhat. The big question will be how long will the timber remain so shimmering. A poor development but in light of its neighbours, a little better. The second phase of Victoria Mills however is so far an utter joke. They somehow someway seemed to have managed to design a building that actually makes the first phase of Victoria Mills seem positively delightful in comparison. This is pure muck…and the coincidentally the same colour as muck, finished with a ghastly brown brick coat. This is pure lazy, facless architecture and this is another reason which makes you wonder what goes through planners heads. Think architect was Derek Tynans…bargain basement stuff.

      Despite all the giving out about the new Webworks near City Hall. On seconds looks its actually not so bad. I really like the Eglinton Street elevation and its relation to Albert House is considerate. I still don’t like the grey frame finish, but the building as a whole grows on you. I think it will look better a less prominent when the rest of the quay is redeveloped. The night time lighting along Eglinton Street is nice too.

      Though its only nearing its outer frame completion I have to say I think the new Jurys on the Western Road looks well. In the context of the entire scheme it should work fine. Its nothing spectacular but it is a simple, far more subdued project than I think many thought it would be. The finish materials are bright and a nice change to many of the useful finishes around Cork.

      However the project that caught my eye most was out in Blackpool. Hegratys are finishing the latest office building at Blackpool Retail Park. This prominent and large structure is a little blocky and over-bearing in parts but its so bloody bold you have to like it. Kelly O’Brien and Whelan architects have played around with shapes like the overhanging roof sections on the tower points of the building. Its exaggerant and probably shouldnt work. I’m sure many will argue it doesn’t – but I still think it represents one of the bolder office projects in Cork to be yet completed.

      Also thanks for that news Thomond. CIE continue to baffle me. And still no word on Horgans Quay either.

    • #759296
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Is it just me or are things quiet at the moment? Can only think of 2 projects of any real excitement that have been lodged since the start of 2006? Academy street and Good shepherd convent. I think it was kinda the same at the start of last year and then picked up nicely but it still seems quite. God knows it seems like now is the time to be building in Cork!!

    • #759297
      redabbeyredux
      Participant

      Too quiet Mr K. The Corpo website claims that Good Shepherd is due a decision today – anyone with the inside track on this?

    • #759298
      A-ha
      Participant

      I know I keep asking, but I never seem to get an answer…… What’s the story with PC World, Currys, Halfords and the Hilton….. all due to open in Mahon Point, but when? I see a Halfords sign up, but nothing when it comes to the others. Not long before the new terminal opens on May 10, fingers crossed that Cork will end up debt-free.

    • #759299
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Well a certain Cllr has been selected to run for the D

    • #759300
      kite
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      Well a certain Cllr has been selected to run for the Dáil by their party. Does this mean their interest in planning matters in the Bishopstown area has served its purpose? It will be interesting to see if the same issues become relevant when competing for a national role.

      🙁
      My father and mother are csd supporters, good old Jerry it seems asked for csd backing for the election but he was told where to go with his bleating as he is not “Hard Core” enough for these guys!!, God help this city.

    • #759301
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Was along Cornmarket street today and i’m still amazed at the snail-paced speed of work at the Rockfell development. Is there any movement on it at all? When I was at Paul street car park a few weeks ago they were just starting digging out the basement.

      And what about Grand parade plaza?? I thought it was supposed to be ready for 2007? They’re cutting it tight are they not? It seemed for a while work was moving but its stopped again. Last time I looked over the boarding on South main street the area dug out was all overgrown!!

    • #759302
      Niall123
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Was along Cornmarket street today and i’m still amazed at the snail-paced speed of work at the Rockfell development. Is there any movement on it at all? When I was at Paul street car park a few weeks ago they were just starting digging out the basement.

      And what about Grand parade plaza?? I thought it was supposed to be ready for 2007? They’re cutting it tight are they not? It seemed for a while work was moving but its stopped again. Last time I looked over the boarding on South main street the area dug out was all overgrown!!

      The sings say it won’t be ready till Dec 2007. Surely this is a typo ?

      Lets not even mention the food emporium on Father mathews Quay. Working on it now for at least 9 months and all I can see that they have done is gut the inside, done a bit on the structure and add an almost galvanise roof. Looks terrible too.

    • #759303
      kite
      Participant

      @Niall123 wrote:

      The sings say it won’t be ready till Dec 2007. Surely this is a typo ?

      Lets not even mention the food emporium on Father mathews Quay. Working on it now for at least 9 months and all I can see that they have done is gut the inside, done a bit on the structure and add an almost galvanise roof. Looks terrible too.

      😮 The Tom McCarthy development on Fr.Mathews Quay has me guessing as well.
      Why do developers all put these cow shed type roofs on buildings? Is it just that they are cheap, or do they have some function? (other then keeping the rain out that is)
      They have ruined their Kingsley Hotel with the same type of tin cladding.

    • #759304
      Leesider
      Participant

      On the front page of the business section of the sunday times there is an article stating that Manor Park Homes have signed an agreement with CIE over Horgan’s Quay. CIE will receive 200m over 10 years. No timeframe though on when work is supposed to start! Anyone have any info on this or is it just old news be rehashed???

    • #759305
      lexington
      Participant

      Apologies for the form – some of these updates are backdated:



      *UPDATES*

      😮 Manor Park Homebuilders (MPH) have taken another significant step in the progression of its highly anticipated Horgan’s Quay redevelopment. The development firm headed up by Michael O’Driscoll (a UCC graduate himself) and co-owned by DCC and businessman Joe Moran, have signed a development agreement which has cleared the way on both sides to get a move on with the 17-acre quayside development in Cork’s north docklands. The agreement will see CIE receive contributions of approx. €200m over a period of 10-years. Project architects O’Mahony Pike are understood to have made a number of revisions over recent months and that discussions between various associated parties have progressed. The project will now seek the development of approximately 1,300 apartments – a broad mix of units including family units, penthouses, 1 & 2-bedroom. A number of commercial elements will also be included – not least a new Kent Station terminal extension and linked commercial element facing the River Lee with some office space and retail (the volume of which is still being fine-tuned – with MPH still of the mind to provide a stronger presence of retail activity than underlined in Cork City Council’s North Docklands Area Development Plan, recently formalised). Progress is also believed to be in tow regarding the quayside boardwalk with the Port of Cork having gradually recognised that its usage of this quayside section is not of a volume overly significant so as to deter such an amenity provisions’ realisation. Though the move is positive – there are a few more issues yet to be resolved before an application can head to planning. On-going discussions, if progression continues well, could finally allow an application arrive at Navigation House within the next few months. The whole project will be undertaken on a phased basis and take upwards of 6-years to complete in its entirety.

      The agreement announced will make available substantial equity to CIE allowing it proceed with continued investment in its services, facilities and rolling-stock.



      😮 Howard Holdings and Tedcastles Holdings which recently formulated agreement on a pivotal docklands site – are understood to be engaging continued discussion of development options of the prime, water-facing location. The Rehill-family controlled oil distribution company had previously investigated development options on its valuable site east of Marina Point ESB Power Station – among the plans devised by the group included a scheme over over 550 residential units, commercial and educational elements. This scheme was rejected in principle by CCC given its contravention of desired zoning. Howard Holdings earlier acquired over 11-acres when it successfully bid for the former Ford Motor Co. Distribution site along Centre Park Road – the transaction value is posited in excess of €25m (with some media sources pitching it at €30m). CEO Greg Coughlan has indicated his company’s ambition to seek up to 50 acres of docklands land for development – although he is likely to have stiff competition – given that a number of players have enacted or are enacting moves to secure their input in Cork’s docklands future. It is understood Murray O’Laoire Architects are involved with Howard Holdings and their docklands ambitions, however should final plans are submitted its is believed that they may represent only one contributioing design party – that particular issue is open to your input. The Tedcastles site is capable of taking advantage of a significant landmark building given its waterfront location and ‘gateway’ point viewable from across the river by incoming vehicles to the city.

      – nearby, the recently valued IAWS lands closer to the city centre are being cited with a €150m tag in their entirety. It is understood however that a prominent IAWS party has had talks with a locally based agency associated with construction and development activities, however the details of the discussions are unknown. IAWS and adjoining Southern Milling own additional land-holdings around Ringaskiddy which may represent prospective opportunities to relocate their extensive docklands based activity – however as one party close to the action here noted, ‘it is a process that will require extensive co-ordination and patience’.

      – other design teams at work on various prospective docklands projects include the likes of Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects and of Wilson Architecture, who are at an advanced stage in the preparation of a Second Phase scheme for SHUL Developers, headed up by David O’Sullivan. SHUL intend to develop a further 150,000sq ft of office space on 3-acres of land fronting Monahan’s Road over 5 buildings. The former coal-yard adjoins the recently completed office building partially let to Citco at Tellengana – that scheme was also developed by SHUL and designed by Paud O’Mahony with Wilson Architecture. McCarthy Developments have designs themselves on a 2nd Phase scheme of commercial development backing onto Monahan’s Road on the remaining lands of their Goldcrop/Advance Tyres acquisition. The 1st Phase of the development, designed by Oisin Creagh of Murray O’Laoire Architects, included an 8-storey building of some 100,000sq ft – originally pitched to the OPW for a relocating Revenue Commissioners.



      😎 Cork Institute of Technology have advertised for the appointment of Lecturers and Assitant Lecturers in Architecture. The position is to be jointly supported by University College Cork and CIT as part of a B.Sc (Honours) Architecture Degree course starting in September 2006. The degree has been developed by UCC/CIT through consultation with the Royal Institute of Architects of Ireland (RIAI) and will be fully recognised upon completion. The course will be the first in Cork to offer prospective architects a chance to practice such a degree in the city.

    • #759306
      Micko
      Participant

      Just on the Horgans Quay development. Is the road now running along the quay going to be brough back from the Lee a bit and take up the space where the current CIE land is at present to allow both the dock area and some of the CIE land to be jointly developed ?

    • #759307
      lexington
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Just on the Horgans Quay development. Is the road now running along the quay going to be brough back from the Lee a bit and take up the space where the current CIE land is at present to allow both the dock area and some of the CIE land to be jointly developed ?

      The quay road will be removed…

      …a new National Route is to be built to the rear of the residential blocks, which will be set forward facing the water, divided by the provision of a new boardwalk and marina which will replace the existing quay frontage. The shift will allow the residential units maxmise advantage of aspects and available land – and hopefully improve the urban realm in the process.

    • #759308
      A-ha
      Participant

      I’m just glad they are finally doing something with the train station. It has very limited facilities and is loosing out on the Dublin route with more and more people opting to fly. When finished it can only compliment the new commuter services to the east and north of the city. When is work due to start…. early 2007? I can’t imagine it starting before then, but as usual when it comes to Cork developments fingers crossed. :rolleyes:

    • #759309
      browser
      Participant

      er…em… anything happening with the attractive looking (rusting) metal bollards of various different colours with wire hanging out and plastic caps that line our city’s second street? Wonderful and all as they are weren’t they merely the precursor of a Beth Gali designed state of the art lighting facility? They have now had this “temporary” arrangement in place for 18 months. Anyone know what the story is?:confused:

    • #759310
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I’m just glad they are finally doing something with the train station. It has very limited facilities and is loosing out on the Dublin route with more and more people opting to fly. When finished it can only compliment the new commuter services to the east and north of the city. When is work due to start…. early 2007? I can’t imagine it starting before then, but as usual when it comes to Cork developments fingers crossed. :rolleyes:

      in all fairness, why would you bother with Irish Rail?
      They offer an incredibly ineffective, inefficient and unsuitable service between the two major economic hubs of our state.
      €60 to travel 300 miles return (usually without a seat) in a horribly aged railway car just doesn’t make any sense to me.

      btw, anyone know where amazon plan to set up their new call centre in Cork?

    • #759311
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Try

    • #759312
      mhenness
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      in all fairness, why would you bother with Irish Rail?
      They offer an incredibly ineffective, inefficient and unsuitable service between the two major economic hubs of our state.
      €60 to travel 300 miles return (usually without a seat) in a horribly aged railway car just doesn’t make any sense to me.

      btw, anyone know where amazon plan to set up their new call centre in Cork?

      Did you not hear about the service upgrade to hourly trains between Cork and Dublin and also the new rolling stock that Irish Rail will be introducing? Sure, it still won’t be to continental standards but it should be a welcome improvement and hopefully an indicator of things to come?

    • #759313
      Pug
      Participant

      @mhenness wrote:

      Did you not hear about the service upgrade to hourly trains between Cork and Dublin and also the new rolling stock that Irish Rail will be introducing? Sure, it still won’t be to continental standards but it should be a welcome improvement and hopefully an indicator of things to come?

      Rolling stock? more like laughing stock. Carriages were due to be rolled out in Dec 05 – now it appears there may be ONE of the new trains MAYBE next month. Irish Rail should be privatised. Its the only way the company will work

    • #759314
      katmandone
      Participant

      I am completeing a research paper (protected structures; the impact upon modern urban development and design) and i am using the development of 93 South mall and 17 & 18 parnell place in Cork as a case study for the paper. i am finding it difficult to get contact information for the developer pitwood ltd, if someone has any contact details for them i would be very grateful. Similarly any imputs regarding the devlopment or topic would be welcomed.

    • #759315
      lexington
      Participant
      katmandone wrote:
      I am completeing a research paper (protected structures]

      See my private message for details katmandone.

    • #759316
      mhenness
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      Rolling stock? more like laughing stock. Carriages were due to be rolled out in Dec 05 – now it appears there may be ONE of the new trains MAYBE next month. Irish Rail should be privatised. Its the only way the company will work

      This does not mean that it isn’t going to happen and that the new services wont deliver improvements. You might be right about privatization of the Cork to Dublin line. I’m not sure about all services yet. That said the results of privatization are not clear. There are cases where state rail companies can deliver excellent services like DB in Germany. That said DB is operated as a private company but the state holds all the shares :-). I’m sure some form of privatization will eventually come. Even Germany’s rail services are coming up for competition in the near future. Without a doubt privatization of Irish Rail will not come without pain 🙂

    • #759317
      A-ha
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      Try £208.00 Stg for London to Manchester for a pricy 30 extra miles in distance and equally limited gaurantee of a seat

      Anytime I’ve gone on the train from London to Manchester it was about £60 (about €75) but they gave out tea and coffee and it took less than 2 hours. The benefits of electrified railways means you can get there more smoothly and much faster as opposed to Irish Rail’s post-war diesel engines. I wouldn’t give Irish Rail the time of day, or CIE as a whole. The transportation market should be opened up to more companies.

      Saw this on Yahoo, “Limerick City Status Threatened” http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18042006/80-132/rugby-exodus-threatens-limerick-s-city-status.html.
      According to Reuters, if Limerick’s populatin drops below 50,000, which it is increasingly close to, it will not be considered a city anymore and will loose out on crucial European Union funding.
      I know it has nothing to do with developments in Cork, but thought it was interesting. On a brighter note though, the Central Statistics Office has acknowledged that the area known as Metropolitan Cork by the Cork Area Strategic Plan has an estimated population of 251,510, which is to be officially recognised when Census 2006 is carried out next week.

    • #759318
      Anonymous
      Participant

      http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/

      Standard Open Single

    • #759319
      kite
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      Well a certain Cllr has been selected to run for the Dáil by their party. Does this mean their interest in planning matters in the Bishopstown area has served its purpose? It will be interesting to see if the same issues become relevant when competing for a national role.

      😮 Tonights Echo has a story that CSD may be going to run in Cork South Central in 2007.
      Cllr. Buttimer may spout drivel now and again to appease the “Anti” crowd but the Fine Gale Party will put him firmly in his box when needs be…CSD however may be more difficult to control?
      The Csd website claims that they are going to report the City Manager, Mr.Joe Gavin to the ombudsman for not putting the 3 story height cap in place, this is on http://www.corksouthwest.com on their news page.
      Can things get any worse??

    • #759320
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Niall & Sheila Doris of the Beverly Smyth Group have issued Significant Further Information on their plans for the Nat Ross site along Monahan’s Road. Designed by Jonathan Horgan with SDA O’Flynn Architects, the original scheme sought to construct 104 residential units over 4-blocks ranging in heights of 4 to 10-storeys, over 30,000sq ft of business & technology space and basement car-parking. A terrace of 5x 2-storey houses were also included as a buffer in the scheme. The revised proposal addresses concerns laid out by CCC Planners and will see a significant reduction in building heights which will now peak at between 4 and 6-storeys. Unit numbers have been addressed accordingly. Additional information on the original scheme is found here.

      A decision is now due for the 10th May 2006. More details soon.



      😎 Meanwhile Frinailla have seen a request for Further Information meet its plans for the redevelopment of the former Good Shepherd Convent site in Sunday’s Well. Frinailla have applied for the development of 274 quality new homes on the pivotal site – see further details here.



      😎 Hot on the heels of a grant for the development of a 5-storey office building by Adrian Power at Clarke’s Bridge, Bernard Crowley is now seeking to develop a 6-storey office development on a limited site at the Waterfront, just off Hanover Street. The permitted by cutback residential scheme by John & Michael O’Dwyer nearby has recently been lodged for appeal.

      More details/updates later.

    • #759321
      mickeydocs
      Participant
      Thomond Park wrote:
      http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/

      Standard Open Single £202 return not £208 as stated above]

      I’m travelling from Bruxelles to Paris in May. My ticket for the thalys has been booked for €40. I have a seat assigned. The journey will take approximately 1 hour.

      Now that is what I call service… and SNCB & SNCF are both state run 🙂

      SNCF sells it’s TGV all over the world.

    • #759322
      Anonymous
      Participant

      A long way from trying to get from Cork to Belfast a shorter distance that takes 6 hours if your lucky

    • #759323
      Pug
      Participant
      mickeydocs wrote:
      TGV’s sold all over the world

      Quote:
      alright, even though IRish Rail are one of my pet hates, lets talk about more important matters and keep this site to Corks Development like when Water St will get planning and how CSD even dream of fielding a candidate for the Dail based on buildings that should be lower than 3 stories. Had a look at their website and in fairness, they do have to put up with utter soul-less drivel (personal opinion) like the giant yellow brick from the ’70’s that is Victoria Cross but I completely disagree with CSD standpoint. Cork has great quays and could do 4/5 stories with 15 storey gateways like North Gate and South Gate etc.
    • #759324
      kite
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      TGV’s sold all over the world

      alright, even though IRish Rail are one of my pet hates, lets talk about more important matters and keep this site to Corks Development like when Water St will get planning and how CSD even dream of fielding a candidate for the Dail based on buildings that should be lower than 3 stories. Had a look at their website and in fairness, they do have to put up with utter soul-less drivel (personal opinion) like the giant yellow brick from the ’70’s that is Victoria Cross but I completely disagree with CSD standpoint. Cork has great quays and could do 4/5 stories with 15 storey gateways like North Gate and South Gate etc.

      Damm right, Victoria Mills is giving the CSD fuel for their fire. Going for the Dail on this issue is a joke just like “one issue Buttimer” is doing, but like i said before, at least we can be sure FG will keep him in place.
      The Echo reports tonight that CSD have reported the City Manager to the Ombudsman, who is going to keep them quiet?

    • #759325
      A-ha
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      Damm right, Victoria Mills is giving the CSD fuel for their fire. Going for the Dail on this issue is a joke just like “one issue Buttimer” is doing, but like i said before, at least we can be sure FG will keep him in place.
      The Echo reports tonight that CSD have reported the City Manager to the Ombudsman, who is going to keep them quiet?

      I’m not being sarcastic or anything, but Kite….. have you ever thought of running for local elections? It’s really clear that you are passionate about doing the opposite of whatever this CDS group does. Start a petition, set up a website, I’m sure there are a load of people on here and around the city that would support you, including me. Just because some group of nobodies are against “high-rise” (using the term loosely) developments doesn’t mean we all are.;)

    • #759326
      POM
      Participant

      I think you’re all giving these lobby groups too much credit and airtime. So much of what they say and their councillors say is such bunkum. Anyone who understands proper planning law will tell you that. They like quoting bits and bobs from select articles and legal scriptures but in the empirical context they all add up to very little. Politicians and councillors like entertaining all that sort of stuff because they think it swings votes – but at the end of the day it means little but gestures. Gestures that can’t last indefinitely given the practical contravention to sustainable development.

      I would really rather see us get back on track and discuss issues like builidng stock and future projects that will benefit/not benefit the city.

    • #759327
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      A decision on John Murphy’s application for the Huguenot graveyard on Carey’s Lane has been delayed until 27th of July. Permission was requested to widen the existing entrance on Carey’s Lane, install a new staircase, balcony and wheelchair lift in the graveyard and to make alterations to the existing rear extension to the adjoining building. This is to facilitate a restaurant on the first floor of the former French Church Building on French Church Street.
      This controversial development has attracted a total of 15 objections. Including those from An Taisce, Huguenot Heritage, A number of academics from Dept. Sociology UCC, and Dept. French UCC, Friends of the Huguenot Graveyard and others.


      And with the closing date for submissions on OCP’s Academy Street development and a decision due date of the 2nd of next month (expect this to fall back somewhat) there are a total of 20 submissions on file.

      Anybody know what’s happening to the former “Rhino Room” pub on Castle Street? It’s just got a new coat of paint. Has this anything to do with the extensive renovation of the building next door, facing onto Daunt Square?
      Also, while I’m at it, whats the latest on the eyesore at the corner of South Main Street/Washington Street? I thought planning had been granted.

    • #759328
      Pug
      Participant

      [quote=”Radioactiveman
      A decision on John Murphy’s application for the Huguenot graveyard on Carey’s Lane has been delayed until 27th of July. [/QUOTE”]

      If its allowed then it needs a really sensitive design around it. Not a hint about Water street either?

    • #759329
      pier39
      Participant

      im looking forward to seeing the designs for ocp’s lavits qy plan at number 16. wonder if theyll maintain a light coloured render to compliment 21 lavitts qy or contrast it. its relation to the opera house will be most interesting. im praying for a big of imagination here. what wilson come up with for andersens qy will be interesting too. can they hit another dramatic note like patricks qy? im very anxious about seeing work get moving on clontraf st and deanes street schemes. any news on the clontarf st office building? i think 9 storeys would make an appropriate statement for this site. my own concern would be its visual relationship to 6 lapps qy when viewed from eglinton st. i think this area needs rounding up and hopefully andersens qy wil help that further, just a shame its not including the simon centre nextdoor. also the bus station should be up for redevelopment in the future so i hear which would round the quay off nicely.

    • #759330
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      i think this area needs rounding up and hopefully andersens qy wil help that further, just a shame its not including the simon centre nextdoor. also the bus station should be up for redevelopment in the future so i hear which would round the quay off nicely.[/QUOTE]

      what’s happening on Andersen’s quay.

    • #759331
      Pug
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      also the bus station should be up for redevelopment in the future

      the bus station? again? dont tell me they are going to do it now when it could have been spared the half an effort and a coat of paint that went into it the last time?

    • #759332
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      i think this area needs rounding up and hopefully andersens qy wil help that further, just a shame its not including the simon centre nextdoor. also the bus station should be up for redevelopment in the future so i hear which would round the quay off nicely.

      what’s happening on Andersen’s quay.

      O’Callaghan Properties are seeking to develop a commercial development of predominantly prime office space on an assembled site to include the Reliance Bearing premises, CSPCA, Mahers and S. Tyres (apparently). The office scheme is being designed by Wilson Architecture.

      As for the Bus Station, CIE are maintaining the option of a future redevelopment of the site – there are no firm plans and it is doubtful anything will materialise for sure until after the new facility at Horgan’s Quay has been constructed. CIE had attempted an appeal against the Oyster Developments proposal to convert No.8 Parnell Place to office use – their arguments include that it may inadvertently compromise their intention to redevelop the Bus Station on Anderson’s Quay at a later date.

    • #759333
      supperflash
      Participant

      Thank s for your massage!

    • #759334
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @supperflash wrote:

      Thank s for your massage!

      They’re giving out massages in here???? I want one too 😀

    • #759335
      Pug
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      CIE had attempted an appeal against the Oyster Developments proposal to convert No.8 Parnell Place to office use – their arguments include that it may inadvertently compromise their intention to redevelopment the Bus Station on Anderson’s Quay at a later date.

      what a cheek – after years of waiting on Horgans Quay and a poor attempt at a bus station redevelopment they objected to a building that might affect them in the future? what a brilliant precedent that would have set.

      I posted a query before as to what was happening with the new City Hall – there was a horrible metal cage going up all around it – just noticed there that a big layer of glass is going up on the metal frame, looks pretty cool actually

      Seems to be nothing on water street yet

    • #759336
      securityman
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Anybody know what’s happening to the former “Rhino Room” pub on Castle Street? It’s just got a new coat of paint. Has this anything to do with the extensive renovation of the building next door, facing onto Daunt Square?
      Also, while I’m at it, whats the latest on the eyesore at the corner of South Main Street/Washington Street? I thought planning had been granted.

      Its reopening as a bar in the next couple of weeks one of the lads that was behind lebowskis is one of the partners the other is a former bar manager of the raven

    • #759337
      A-ha
      Participant


      WizzAir have announced a new route from Cork to Katowice in Poland. Flights begin 14 July with prices beginning at €9.99 one way excluding taxes and can be booked at http://www.wizzair.com.

    • #759338
      Anonymous
      Participant

      A quaint little spot it is too well was 12 years ago

    • #759339
      Pug
      Participant

      isnt academy st decision due next week???

    • #759340
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      isnt academy st decision due next week???

      The decision is due May 2nd 2005. Expect Further Information or an Extension however.

    • #759341
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Bord Gáis announces Co Cork plant plans

      Bord Gáis has announced plans to build a €300 million gas-fired power plant on a 25-acre site in Co Cork.

      The company has reached agreement to buy the site at Whitegate.

      The proposed 440-megawatt plant is subject to planning approval and a connection agreement with Eirgrid. Bord Gáis hopes it will be fully operational by 2009.

      The company said the development would provide it with a long-term source of power and allow it to expand its position as an electricity provider in the Irish market.

      Dave Kirwan, Head of Strategic Investments at Bord Gáis, said the Whitegate site represented a strategic and desirable location, as it was near an existing industrial development, with access to fuel storage facilities, seawater cooling and an electrical grid connection.

    • #759342
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I have a question. Has the Victoroa cross development by Frinilla been granted? I thought it was in appeal and the decision hadnt been made yet? Cos I was looking into it and told that a number of the apartments had already been sold?? The prices they quote me seemed astronomical for a 2 bedroom apartment!! Its pricing like that that makes people sceptical about the long term sustainability of the housing market.

    • #759343
      lexington
      Participant
      Radioactiveman wrote:
      Bord G&#225]

      I had heard about that and it makes me wonder all the more about the McNamara proposal for Little Island that was refused. Its a welcome announcement, however I continue to have the biting sensation that fossil fuel based power sources are not the way to go in this country. Sustainable alternatives like wind, tidal and geothermal to me continue to be the preferred option.

    • #759344
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      I have a question. Has the Victoroa cross development by Frinilla been granted? I thought it was in appeal and the decision hadnt been made yet? Cos I was looking into it and told that a number of the apartments had already been sold?? The prices they quote me seemed astronomical for a 2 bedroom apartment!! Its pricing like that that makes people sceptical about the long term sustainability of the housing market.

      Is it the Dennehys site you refer to?, 2 bed apts. have been sold for 430,000 euro, ok value given the location. (this price includes a car park space)

    • #759345
      A-ha
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I had heard about that and it makes me wonder all the more about the McNamara proposal for Little Island that was refused. Its a welcome announcement, however I continue to have the biting sensation that fossil fuel based power sources are not the way to go in this country. Sustainable alternatives like wind, tidal and geothermal to me continue to be the preferred option.

      Agree with you 100%. Don’t they give subsidies and incentives to farmers in the west if they put up wind turbines? I don’t think that enough property developers are putting green energy sources into new buildings as done in other countries. Many new apartments built in places like France, Germany and the UK are all fitted out with solar panels and pellet boilers, we just don’t do enough in this country to promote cheaper energy that is eco friendly. And as I’m on a roll, what is with the price of petrol….. €1.26 a litre is not on! Although I read somewhere last week that some of the city buses are to run on bio-fuel.

    • #759346
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      Is it the Dennehys site you refer to?, 2 bed apts. have been sold for 430,000 euro, ok value given the location. (this price includes a car park space)

      No kite I mean the site next to Top car motors. The prices go up to 695,000 euros for a 2 bedroom penthouse and around 420,000 for a standard 2 bedroom and prices dont include a parking space which are selling for 45,000 euros per space. It makes me wonder how long auctioneers and developers want the property market boom to last. Are they just trying to squeeze things for what they’re worth now cos they secretly not confident in the long term prospects of the market?? Of course thats dangerous talk. Seems to me that if they want the property boom to last longer a more restrained price approach would benefit all.

    • #759347
      A-ha
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Prices dont include a parking space which are selling for 45,000 euros per space.

      I think I would prefer a holiday apartment in Budapest overlooking the Danube for that price. Don’t forget Census Day tomorrow, you’ll be arrested and given a life sentence if you don’t fill in that official governmental looking form that doesn’t cover half of what it should.

    • #759348
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      No kite I mean the site next to Top car motors. The prices go up to 695,000 euros for a 2 bedroom penthouse and around 420,000 for a standard 2 bedroom and prices dont include a parking space which are selling for 45,000 euros per space. It makes me wonder how long auctioneers and developers want the property market boom to last. Are they just trying to squeeze things for what they’re worth now cos they secretly not confident in the long term prospects of the market?? Of course thats dangerous talk. Seems to me that if they want the property boom to last longer a more restrained price approach would benefit all.

      Wow, 45k for a car space sounds OTT to me. I thought CCC had some policy against selling car spaces separately to Apts?, maybe i got that wrong.
      As for the property boom..reading the newspapers yesterday and being told of the % increase in 12 weeks in house prices is almost as unbelievable as reading that petrol could go to 5E per litre.

    • #759349
      lexington
      Participant

      Cork City Council has indicated its intent to receive submissions by interested parties regarding the realisation of the South Docklands Local Area Plan currently under compilation by consultants DTZ Pieda. The plan is scheduled to be formalised later this year. The Cork Docklands covers an area of some 400-acres, of which the South Area, constitutes the primary bulk. The progress of Cork’s broader docklands area has had some, if limited success to date.

      North Docklands

      Beginning in the North – the docklands area formal may be said to start at Brian Boru Street and proceeding east. The first main site that strikes note here is the site under ownership (predominantly) by Paul Kenny. Mr. Kenny has employed Wilson Architecture in devising an exciting new office scheme at this location (fronting Saint Patrick’s Quay) – known as The Treasury (its progress has been well documented on this thread and its predecessor) which will proceed for construction within the next 4 to 5 months. The exciting design will be a strong selling point for the development which has already received much attention – it represents a strong example of how good design represents good investment.

      An interesting opportunity may exist for a further prospective development at the junction of Brian Boru Street and the Lower Glanmire Road at Clyde House – DFOD Consultants have initiated a move to new accommodation at the Shipton Group’s Blackpool Park – and the Irish Girl Guides may stand to benefit from new premises and a tidy cash injection. The site, though difficult to work on (given the need to maintain views running north-south to Summerhill and the Presbyterian Church), represents the gateway to the new North Docklands Quarter – concurrently, an argument can be made here for a landmark design to act as an appropriate entrance to the area. However, the cobble-stone paving adjoining Clyde House and refurbishment of the old rail corridor between the site and the Paul Kenny development will need to be utilised in some complimentary fashion.

      Moving east – Alfred Street will seek to be extended as part of the Manor Park Homebuilders (MPH) redevelopment of Horgan’s Quay. The street has found entrance points by the recently completed construction of Unity House by BrideView Developments and older but still interesting presence of Oppermann Associates’ design for Jack Lynch’s Siemens House – as part of Penrose Wharf. Kiosk Architects are handling an application by Finbar Gannon to vertically extend Saint Patrick’s House (fronting the Lower Glanmire Road). A steady progression in building heights (of up to 6-storeys) may be envisaged proceeding closer to Railway Street. A number of premises offer excellent redevelopment opportunities, not least the McCathy’s Motorpoint facility and former Johnson & Perrott used-vehicles centre which extends toward Penrose Quay frontage. A large 18,000sq ft site was purchased a number of months ago through Dominic Daly Auctioneers on the junction of Railway Street and Alfred Street for a reported €4 + million which may offer a strategically valuable redevelopment move – especially as part of a broader assembly. Heights and designs here will need to pay careful consideration to the Cork Steampacket Offices (protected structures) fronting Penrose Quay – which remains in itself a striking quayside structure (although some TLC wouldn’t go astray).

      Manor Park Homebuilders seem clear now, following recently reported finalisations on a 10-year equity deal with CIE, regarding Horgan’s Quay’s redevelopment. The long-delayed saga has been on-going for 8-years (longer according to some) – and has been beset by various interests. Discussions with Cork City Council remain on-going although an agreement is understood to have been reached regarding movement on an application – progress is hoped for by all concerned to see an application in the planning office by mid-year although some skeptics may challenge this prospect. O’Mahony Pike Architects have been employed to design the large scheme which will incorporate 1,300 new high density homes, retail facilities, new public areas, some office space, an extensive boardwalk and possible marina. The project will also see the construction of a new, reoriented railway terminal and ancillary bus facilities. MPH have expressed their hopes to see construction of buildings in the range between 4 and 14-storeys in height – however this was played down by CCC on formalisation of the NDLAP, so too were MPH’s retail ambitions for the 17-acre site (which may yet be re-evaluated). As for heights, the general aim by planners will be to retain within reason perspectives of Cork’s North Ridge – part of its unique topography. Room exists under the North Docklands Local Area Plan for at least 3 landmark building locations, which, subject to design may offer taller prospectives. Expectations on design are high and the sooner an application meets planning the better according to many. Options on the highly anticipated event centre, as noted in earlier posts, are understood to be under review with contact made with MPH from an interested party (hinted at previously by the local media in a December 2005 article as being Paul Montgomery).

      The McMahon-family controlled development agency Werdna Limited have been through the planning reels with their intentions for Water Street. Murray O’Laoire Architects have head the design here with the scheme’s well-documented 2nd incarnation fate soon to be known by An Bord Pleanala. An announcement long due. The project was granted at less than half its original scale by CCC in 2005, and ABP have since requested further revised drawings which were recently submitted and will see further alterations to the end-product. News on that very soon.

      South Docklands

      To date, schemes at No.6 Lapps Quay and CityQuarter have marked the most significant realised advances in the docklands area here. Howard Holdings’ have produced a strong scheme at Lapps Quay and have made their intentions on the rest of the docklands very clear with the acquisition of the former Ford site along Centre Park Road and co-operative arrangement with the Rehill-family regarding the Tedcastles site also along Centre Park Road. Closer to the city centre, Howard Holdings have just neared completion on a new WebWorks facility for Enterprise Ireland along Albert Quay – and acquired the east end of the same quay block from the Doyle Warehousing group. Options on the site are being advanced – Ascon are also understood to be addressing their holding. Theo Cullinane of Ascon had hinted that a planning application may be due on their (just) 0.5 acre Albert Quay site early this year, the outcome should be known soon.

      PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd have commenced prep work on the highly-anticipated Eglinton Street scheme by O’Flynn Construction and designed by Wilson Architecture. The much applauded design will produced the city’s tallest building and has given hope to prospective opportunities in the south docklands further east.

      A major point of importance which the DTZ Pieda Masterplan will need to address is the establishment of building heights in the South Docklands. The need for clarity on this issue will be instrumental in dictating the progress of future development in the area. Eglinton Street has shown that the provision of well-designed taller structures have a future in Cork’s skyline – the extent of this will be guidelined by the masterplan. Although planners will be of the capacity to consider each project on an individual basis. The sooner such a framework is established, the better for progression.

      To date, significant schemes along Monahan’s Road by Niall Doris and SHUL Developers will aid the changing face of this area. Niall & Sheila Doris’ residential and business scheme for their Nat Ross site, designed by SDA O’Flynn, recently submitted revisions of a reduced scheme now peaking at 6-storeys (formerly 10-storeys). The scheme now has a greater presence onto the road and is due for a decision in early May. SHUL Developers are at an advanced stage of preplanning on a further 150,000sq ft of commercial/office provision on a 3-acre former coal-yard site near their Tellenganna House development (recently completed) – both are designed by Wilson Architecture. A further office scheme is mooted for another coal plot to the west of the SHUL proposal.

      Monahan’s Road has potential, and as outlined in the Cork Docklands Development Strategy 2001, to be the area’s primary residential location. However, in providing a healthy mix of uses, limited/conducive provisions should not be prohibited from areas elsewhere. The IAWS sites between Centre Park and Monahan’s Road offer a superb opportunity to provide a broad mixed-use community area with extensive public and resident amenity areas. Important here will by CCC’s job in broadening and developing recreational areas along the length of the crescent waterway (largely hidden) that runs adjacent to Monahan’s Road. This water feature, with possible wooden decking walkway, should be emphasised – and would offer a nice break between structures.

      McCarthy Developments have drawn up plans for a large scale redevelopment of its Centre Park House and Goldcrop/Advance Tyres site which links between both Centre Park and Monahan’s Roads (both of which will need significant tree-lined upgrading by CCC to facilitate and compliment the broader redevelopments). The 8-storey, 100,000sq ft office scheme designed by Murray O’Laoire – originally sought as a contender for Revenue Commissioner tenancy – is of ‘status unknown’. However McCarthy Developments have noted their intention for a further 250,000sq ft commercial development addition to the site as Part of Phase 2.

      The IAWS (R&H) site fronting Kennedy Quay has the opportunity to offer a significant public plaza/square orientated to address the quays and city centre, surrounded by a myriad of commercial and cultural functions. In my opinion, R&H Hall – with some modifications internally and externally, with a thoughtful lighting scheme at night, always offered the opportunity for a wonderful new central city library. A spectacular skylight could naturally illuminate the interior of the library by day while balconies wrapped around the interior rim walls in an ascending format (stacked with book shelving). By night, light projections could illuminate the skylight and penetrate the night sky.

      A number of the existing silos could make way for demolition (i.e Souther Milling) – while the Odlums building presents a superb opportunity for a considerate facade retention and vertical extension.

      The 80,000sq ft Southern Fruit site was privately purchased in 2004 and offers a wonderful waterfront development opportunity. It aligns a complex site in that of Gerry Wycherly’s Marina Commercial Park. It is understood ‘eyeing-up’ has taken place here – if only speculatively – the Park, at its water’s edge, juts out into the river ever so slightly and possesses a superb tall-building opportunity. However, the design will require a reflection of true landmark value. The Park also happens to have the advantage of a strategic location opposite the Water Street Bridge which will land to the south on Park grounds. CCC have indicated 2010 as its intended provision date for the controversial proposal. A spectacular design will need to justify its position.

    • #759350
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      OT I know, but very quickly …

      I continue to have the biting sensation that fossil fuel based power sources are not the way to go in this country. Sustainable alternatives like wind, tidal and geothermal to me continue to be the preferred option.

      Sustainable techs are undoubtedly the way forward (particularly once we get at least one functioning interconnector up and running) , but due to the small size of each project it takes time to get a lot of capacity on to the grid. And with the economic growth we’re seeing, we need several new power plants in the very near future (before 2010) and at least one of them has to be in the South if the Cork harbour area is to keep the current rate of growth in high end industry. Combined Cycle Gas Turbine plants are the most efficient power generators available, and, per unit generated, are significantly cheaper than wind right now, which is why the government has to subsidise wind power. Equally, and because of this, there is also a huge amount of wind power about to come on stream, to the effect that we’ll probably beat our 13.2% target by 2010. But to use this power, we need a matching amount of power from conventional plants, like this one. Its not a case of either or, we need both.

      Anyway, back to Cork …

    • #759351
      lexington
      Participant

      ABP have approved plans by Howard Holdings to develop a new 102-bedroom hotel, with 8-apartment suites, double-deck basement car-parking, retail and boardwalk on Long Quay in Kinsale Town Centre. The hotel designed by Scott Tallon Walker is not clearly earmarked for any construction date yet but will provide a significant boost for the town when complete. The former mill site has seen a number of previous development attempts in the past including a 5-star hotel proposal by Cumnor Construction. More details soon.

    • #759352
      Hafez
      Participant

      Hey, Just wondering is there any news on what’s happening with the Esso site on the Douglas road. It has been sitting there since before christmas without much work at all. Is it going to stay a petrol station or car garage or will it be changed into something residential. Hopefully not, it’s a prime location for a petrol station and did absolutely huge business!

      Also, Any news on Pc World and Currys coming to Mahon Point. And what’s happening with the new industrial type place built by Pizza Hut and KFC in Little Island.

      Cheers

    • #759353
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The Conway-family controlled Frinailla Developments are to lodge plans for a site on the Tramore Road they purchased earlier this year from Kanturk-based John Keating. The former Keatings Bakery is now set to see 96 prime new residential units realised over 5-storeys and basement car-parking in an interesting design by Kiosk Architects. Of the 96 units, 16x 1-bedroom, 56x 2-bedroom, 10x 2-bedroom duplex, 12x 3-bedroom and 2x 3-bedroom duplexes will be included – provision for a new creche will also form part of the scheme. Before the purchase by Frinailla, Mr. Keating himself had plans to develop an apartment scheme over 4-individual blocks and basement parking – however the application was withdrawn in light of the sale.



      🙂 The prime office block that is Gardner House is to come on the market through joint agents Lisney and Davin Auctioneers, acting on behalf of Ellier Developments. The 6-storey office block is fully let with PriceWaterHouse Coopers occupying approx. 50% of the current floorspace. Gardner House occupies a gateway location at a pivotal corner facing the Cork Docklands at the eastern mouth of South Mall – the city’s primary business district. The building is guiding at €7.75m and represents a significant investment opportunity with p.a. rents in excess of €330,000 – and a review on rent due shortly. The review is likely to see yields increase from over 3.75% to approx. 5% over the course of the prospective future. Furthermore, those keen on maximising their investment may also take advantage of possible refurbishment opportunities to the building which could accommodate a possible recessed vertical extension of 1-floor (additional office space or even perhaps a restaurant facility???), recladded elevations and even a minor extension facing the quays to accommodate additional office space and possible retail/cafe/commercial provisions on the quayside in a CityQuarter-esque boardwalk/pedestrian quayside provision (subject to negotiation with CCC). The utilisation of this quayside would represent an attractive addition to this location in light of on-going development in the area and improvements to the urban realm. Such a development would be poised to take advantage of the significant business and student traffic in the area which will only enhance as the years proceed. One only has to consider proposals at Eglinton Street, Clontarf Street Area, Parnell Place, Albert Quay, the School of Music and so on to realise the potential for such improvement.

    • #759354
      Pug
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      🙂 The Conway-family controlled Frinailla Developments are to lodge plans for a site on the Tramore Road they purchased earlier this year from Kanturk-based John Keating. {/QUOTE]

      wow, nice move frinailla – always amazed how some people cant get planning and sell on a site and developers are very confident of getting planning then – saw site alright, superb access off south ring road.

    • #759355
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 O’Shea Leader Consulting Engineers are to redevelop a former warehousing site along Monahan’s Road in the south docklands. Monahan Road Development Limited, the SPV handling the project which was designed in-house, will seek permission to develop a 5-storey office building over basement car-parking on a site approx. 1-acre in total area which was sold through DTZ Sherry Fitzgerald for a figure believed to be in the region of about €2m. The development represents a further step in the rejuvenation of this area of the docklands – and the prospects of this were noted here many pages ago and also just recently in a brief review of the South Docklands a few posts up. Ascon Contractors are completing a further business & technology building of approx. 45,000sq ft only a small step away from the offices of O’Shea Leader at Cleve Business Park – meanwhile, SHUL Developers will be looking for planning in the coming future for an additional 150,000sq ft of office and commercial development on a 3-acre site nearby, with Wilson Architecture handling designs there. Meanwhile Niall Doris’ Nat Ross site is due for a planning decision on May 10th 2006 regarding his SDA O’Flynn designed (predominantly) residential scheme recently scaled back at the behest of planners.


      Bird’s Eye image of the subject site along Monahan’s Road

    • #759356
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      So are things moving again?? Suppose the market had got its groove back now and hopefully this will pave the way for more exciting building developments soon.

      Interesting to hear about Frinilla and the Keatings bakery. Any pics of the scheme yet?? I like Frinillas stuff. They seem to be a little more willing when it comes to deisgn but i still think Victoria cross is expensive. Anyone hear anything about Water street yet? Any photos of the changes to the scheme??

      And I read today that the Oyster bar is for sale again after a deal fell through with Joe O’Donovan. I cant wait to see the design for the shopping centre he has planned. If Academy street is going for larger units it leaves plenty of room for this plan to take in more medium sized retail spaces and maybe a department store like House of Fraser or Arnotts or something. Hope they take in the Post office building on Grand parade too, otherwise the centre will look lobsided when viewed down Washington street.

    • #759357
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Werdna Limited (Applicant)

      Werdna Limited (Appellant)

      05/29379

      Case is due to be decided by 06-06-2006

    • #759358
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      Werdna Limited (Applicant)

      Werdna Limited (Appellant)

      05/29379

      Case is due to be decided by 06-06-2006

      And it goes on and on and on…

      June? The appeal will have been in the process well over a year at that stage. And its spend the same going through Cork city council. 🙁

    • #759359
      jdivision
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      And I read today that the Oyster bar is for sale again after a deal fell through with Joe O’Donovan. I cant wait to see the design for the shopping centre he has planned. If Academy street is going for larger units it leaves plenty of room for this plan to take in more medium sized retail spaces and maybe a department store like House of Fraser or Arnotts or something.

      I could stand corrected here but a good source told me he doesn’t own very many of the properties he wants to include yet. Now that the plans are known it will have driven up the prices so remains to be seem what he can buy. Academy Street decision will be delayed by two months I’m told – Further info required.

    • #759360
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      I could stand corrected here but a good source told me he doesn’t own very many of the properties he wants to include yet. Now that the plans are known it will have driven up the prices so remains to be seem what he can buy. Academy Street decision will be delayed by two months I’m told – Further info required.

      Thanks jdivision. i think the O’Donovan plan looks to be one of the more exciting redevelopment schemes anywhere in Ireland given its location right between 2 of among the most prime streets in the country. I look forward to seeing how it turns out…and the Capital razed! 😉 But I would like to see the facades at the Central shoes place and the frontage on Patricks street kept in any new design.

      Did you find out anymore about O’Flynns seeking to buy the Anglesea street Garda station land to the rear on Eglinton street or is it all a bit of urban fluff??

      Oh and also when is O’Callaghans going in for planning with Lavitts quay does any body know?? After the hotel design I’m anxious to see what they come up with?

    • #759361
      corkdood
      Participant

      I hear reports today that the new terminal building at Cork Airport will not open until “early June”.

      I wonder what the delay is? Could it be due to unions throwing their weight around or are the shops/restaurants not going to be ready for May as planned?

    • #759362
      jdivision
      Participant
      ewankennedy wrote:
      Did you find out anymore about O’Flynns seeking to buy the Anglesea street Garda station land to the rear on Eglinton street or is it all a bit of urban fluff??

      Quote:
      his people are denying it
    • #759363
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Did you find out anymore about O’Flynns seeking to buy the Anglesea street Garda station land to the rear on Eglinton street or is it all a bit of urban fluff??

      his people are denying it

      Must be all a bit of urban fluff so after all. Its a pity cos it would be such a good proposition with O’Flynns getting a prime site just across the way from their Eglinton street. The guards getting a nice cash injection and possibly much need parking space at basement levels and the city gaining a more consistent building pattern in the area rather than a sore looking gap in such a prominent street corner. Thanks though.

      Speaking of the guards i wonder if any development at Kyrls quay will affect them in the Bridewell station. Lex said a few weeks back the iron providers site was up for sale. I read somewhere that it was selling for 5 million euro. Any one know how the dale is goin or have any details on it?? I hope any developer buying it takes in the corporation sites next door and that old Philips warehouse on the quay. It would make such an amazing development opportunity.

    • #759364
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Marks and Spenser’s are about to seek planning for extensive alterations to their shopfront on St. Patrick Street. This will include new windows, doors and signage.
      This is right across the street from where SCHUH are about to start work on their new store.

    • #759365
      Hafez
      Participant

      @corkdood wrote:

      I hear reports today that the new terminal building at Cork Airport will not open until “early June”.

      I wonder what the delay is? Could it be due to unions throwing their weight around or are the shops/restaurants not going to be ready for May as planned?

      Today’s Irish Times reports:
      Statement of Cork Airport Authority last night: “due to delays in the construction programme, access to the terminal for testing and training would not be possible until May 8th.” Hence opening of terminal for operational purposes not before early June. “As the terminal completion dates become more definitive, an operational date will be advised.”
      “Informed sources have told The Irish Times that the authority is pushing to have the building opened before the end of June, as trying to train and transfer staff in July and August would be extremely difficult.”

      So basically the training that should have and nearly could have been done in the last month was put off…. Only in Ireland

    • #759366
      A-ha
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Marks and Spenser’s are about to seek planning for extensive alterations to their shopfront on St. Patrick Street. This will include new windows, doors and signage.
      This is right across the street from where SCHUH are about to start work on their new store.

      It’s good to see that M&S are taking an interest in their store (which is the most profitable one in Ireland) by keeping it modern and up to date….. there are a lot more shops in Cork that are worse off, others will wait until there is a sign about to fall down and injure someone before they would update/replace it. When is Schuh due to open, the one in on O’ Connell Street is very popular.

      @Hafez wrote:

      Today’s Irish Times reports:
      Statement of Cork Airport Authority last night: “due to delays in the construction programme, access to the terminal for testing and training would not be possible until May 8th.” Hence opening of terminal for operational purposes not before early June. “As the terminal completion dates become more definitive, an operational date will be advised.”
      “Informed sources have told The Irish Times that the authority is pushing to have the building opened before the end of June, as trying to train and transfer staff in July and August would be extremely difficult.”

      So basically the training that should have and nearly could have been done in the last month was put off…. Only in Ireland

      What a joke that is, it probably won’t be open until September in the end. I heard that they were going to use it as an Arrivals Terminal only, for the first few weeks of it’s operation. I think some are refusing to go in there until the whole “who’ll pay the debt” thing has been sorted out.

    • #759367
      lexington
      Participant

      Passing UCC the other day – I thought I’d pop in and see how work was progressing on the UCC Postgraduate Research Library extension to the Boole Library. It struck me walking around the Boole Library building (which was thronged with stressed students ahead of their summer exams) how odd a structure it is. Designed by Murray Murray Petit Architects and constrcucted on the site of an old quarry by PJ Hegarty & Sons Limited in 1983, the library (the largest stock library outside of Dublin at almost 130,000sq ft over 5-levels), is an outstandingly blocky and often bland panelled contraption – and yet somehow despite all this, it to me at least, is quite an eye-catching piece. The northern elevation is attractively curtained by century-old trees – and acts as a nice buffer between the library and splendid Quadrangle building and gardens. The Boole is stacked to the south and west elevations with reverse recess levels jutting further out as the floors mount – the effect of such a heavy structure is particularly prominent to the south where it seemingly plunges to basement level ever-so-slightly revealed by the remnants of the quarry floor – now a depressed courtyard allowing access to the Boole lecture theatres at basement level. Here, a more restrained tree-pattern divides the Boole between it and the period housing terraces that line College Road. The hard-landscaping around the Boole is patterned with a striking red-brick ‘plaza’ area which wraps around the Boole Library building itself and offers a striking contrast to the grey-panel cladding of the library building – this cladding is selectively interjected with rows of glazing particularly evident to the south and west. Around the rim of the library level (Q+3) – acting as a break between the hard elevations and roof-top plant area (relatively concealed by the buildings mass) – an ever so slightly diagonally lined skylight provides a nice source of natural light to the interior study areas.

      The eastern elevation is currently the subject of the extensive construction work being undertaken by contractors McNamara Construction and designed jointly by Shepley Bulfinch Richardson and Abbott Architects (SBRA) of Boston and Wilson Architecture (Cork). UCC received public and private funding totalling €28.7M for the construction of the 7,700sqm of new library space – and so far, work has progressed well with a scheduled open date for September 2007. McNamara Construction have commenced work on the Q+3 level – and to their credit, kept the public areas around the site seemingly very well order given the complexities of the work.

      Construction images as of late March 2006.


      A view of the southern aspect of the new extension facing College Road.


      From the south tower crane facing north toward the heart of the college campus.


      Northern end of the extension, with the main Boole Library building in the background.


      The finished product – northern elevation fronting onto pedestrian “Student Avenue”.

      It is quite evident from assessing the form of the extension that its design has been heavily influenced with respect to prominent tree patterns dotted around the library area. The extension essentially weaves between historic tree locations. Finished elevations will be a mix of copper and red-sandstone materials.

      All images posted the copyright of University College Cork/Boole Library.



      Just touching on the subject of Michael McNamara Construction – the company, involved with Brooklyn Properties in realising Phase 2 of Cork Airport Business Park (which continues to attract some prominent tenants) is at an advanced stage of construction on the 149-bedroom (figuring including 12 suites) hotel element designed, as with the rest of Phase 2, by Ashlin Coleman Architects.

      The tower crane has been down for sometime now and completion is expected for late-May.

      Meanwhile, it is speculated (and I carefully note that word for the time being) and noted previously before, that Bernard McNamara’s construction and development group are evaluating possible development options closer in the city proper. Lest it fail to materialise in the form indicated to me, I will hold back on mentioning anything further and see how things play out. Remember, thats speculative.

    • #759368
      Micko
      Participant

      Lex, I was actually hoping that UCC were going to completely renovate the Boole library considering the addition to the side which they are making.

      They could at least do something to the outside which to me is just so ugly. New panelling wouldn’t be too expensive and would make the building look so much better, especially considering that its beside Aras Ui Rahilly which looks so much better.

    • #759369
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Hafez wrote:

      Hey, Just wondering is there any news on what’s happening with the Esso site on the Douglas road. It has been sitting there since before christmas without much work at all. Is it going to stay a petrol station or car garage or will it be changed into something residential. Hopefully not, it’s a prime location for a petrol station and did absolutely huge business!

      Also, Any news on Pc World and Currys coming to Mahon Point. And what’s happening with the new industrial type place built by Pizza Hut and KFC in Little Island.

      Cheers

      I read that the Douglas Esso was suppose to remain as a petrol station but I’ve heard different from a couple of people. It may even just include a bit of site reorganisation with commercial elements, and maybe still a petrol station, complimenting a larger development which would have residential parts to it too.

      Dunno about PC world or Currys but they are suppose to be going there sometime. and as far as I know Little island is being built by the O’Flynns. They say they have tenants lined up i think.

    • #759370
      anto
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Lex, I was actually hoping that UCC were going to completely renovate the Boole library considering the addition to the side which they are making.

      They could at least do something to the outside which to me is just so ugly. New panelling wouldn’t be too expensive and would make the building look so much better, especially considering that its beside Aras Ui Rahilly which looks so much better.

      I MUST disagree the Boole is one of the best buildings in UCC and has aged quite well. Maybe the interior could do with a revamp but the exterior is just fine. It’s such a solid building but fits into the quad quite well. I’m sure I’m not alone. The Ui Rahilly building that you refer to is one of the poorer additions to UCC and its cladding that you seem to likw so much is tat. Anyway leave the Boole alone! It’s a Classic!

    • #759371
      Hafez
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      I read that the Douglas Esso was suppose to remain as a petrol station but I’ve heard different from a couple of people. It may even just include a bit of site reorganisation with commercial elements, and maybe still a petrol station, complimenting a larger development which would have residential parts to it too.

      Dunno about PC world or Currys but they are suppose to be going there sometime. and as far as I know Little island is being built by the O’Flynns. They say they have tenants lined up i think.

      cheers for that 😮 😮

    • #759372
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @anto wrote:

      I MUST disagree the Boole is one of the best buildings in UCC and has aged quite well. Maybe the interior could do with a revamp but the exterior is just fine. It’s such a solid building but fits into the quad quite well. I’m sure I’m not alone. The Ui Rahilly building that you refer to is one of the poorer additions to UCC and its cladding that you seem to likw so much is tat. Anyway leave the Boole alone! It’s a Classic!

      Agreed, The Boole seems to have a lovely presence within the campus.

    • #759373
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’d agree, the Boole Library complex is a good building for its position opposite the Quad and also, I think, is neccesarily blocky due to its purpose as a library.
      The O’Rahilly building, is pretty poor. the exterior is quite garrish, but the interior is a disaster area- rooms are poorly designed and the place is a maze!

    • #759374
      lexington
      Participant

      …Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy have been granted permission to redevelop their site at the Crow’s Nest fronting Victoria Cross (inclusive of Victoria Terrace and the MP Crowley premises) and Carrigrohane Road. The residential scheme, over basement car-parking and commercial units (including a new bar and restaurant) was designed by Tom Hegarty with Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects and originally proposed at 15-storeys with a 6-storey lower section to the west; 74 apartment units with a mix of 1, 2 and 3-bedroom configurations formed the scheme’s main constituents. Following concerns related to design and height, a revised proposal was submitted on March 13th 2006 which now put forward a 10-storey tower element and 5-storey block with recessed level – it was this revision that was assessed and granted…however now, following further reductions by planners, the scheme’s tall element now stands to peak at a height of 6-storeys with the eastern section rising to 4-storeys with a recessed level. The planner involved had originally indicated the prospect of the ‘tower’ element rising to 8-storeys but this was reviewed on the outline of conditions.


      View of revised scheme from Victoria Cross with Cork County Hall in the background.

      A number of submissions were lodged concerning the project – points of note included the scheme’s impact on Cork County Hall as a protected structure, traffic, excessive height and overshadowing. With 9-storeys knocked off the height, the scheme stands with a substantially reduced presence. The prospect of appeal remains to be realised.

      For further details see here and here.

    • #759375
      Pug
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Crows Nest approved

      excellent, good to see buildings of that size, hopefully it will look better than Victoria Cross – CSD will go nuts.

    • #759376
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Crows nest is a very dissappointing decision. The fact that the ‘tower’ went from 15 storeys to 6 storeys is an indication of how unsuitable this development was for the site, and how planners recognised this. Unfortunately, the planners did not have the balls to reject the development in its entirety and instead imposed ridiculous conditions. The site would have been much better served had the Crow’s nest pub building and the terrace of houses to the west been refurbished and left as they were. It will be interesting to see how this does when it goes to appeal- something which must be an inevitability!

    • #759377
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      excellent, good to see buildings of that size, hopefully it will look better than Victoria Cross – CSD will go nuts.

      The problem is there are no ‘buildings of that size’ going in. At 6 storeys it’ll be just the same as everything else in the area. I wasnt for the original building and even the revised plan wasnt an ideal but at least a little bit of height, even at the 8 storeys would have given a bit of variety to heights or even complimented the 9 storey Victoria mills building to some extent. Now we just get a repeat of everything else. From the ground 6 storeys will block views from Victoria cross to County hall in any event. Given that, they might have as well left the extra 2 floors and given some variety to the area. It still wouldnt have affected the long distance views that given County hall its presence. Evenso the design above the 2nd floor facing Victoria cross did nothing for me. Seems like ridiculous conditioning. If you’re going to knock that much off you may as well just refuse it. Another Water street type scenario.

    • #759378
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      The problem is there are no ‘buildings of that size’ going in. At 6 storeys it’ll be just the same as everything else in the area. I wasnt for the original building and even the revised plan wasnt an ideal but at least a little bit of height, even at the 8 storeys would have given a bit of variety to heights or even complimented the 9 storey Victoria mills building to some extent. Now we just get a repeat of everything else. From the ground 6 storeys will block views from Victoria cross to County hall in any event. Given that, they might have as well left the extra 2 floors and given some variety to the area. It still wouldnt have affected the long distance views that given County hall its presence. Evenso the design above the 2nd floor facing Victoria cross did nothing for me. Seems like ridiculous conditioning. If you’re going to knock that much off you may as well just refuse it. Another Water street type scenario.

      🙁 8-10 storeys with a nice design would be good for this area. Like you say, every building being approx the same height is not going to be very pleasing to the eye.

    • #759379
      Pug
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      🙁 8-10 storeys with a nice design would be good for this area. Like you say, every building being approx the same height is not going to be very pleasing to the eye.

      point taken, you’re prob right – surely it can be made up for if the look of it on the outside makes some sort of statement. Has to be better than what was there in fairness.

    • #759380
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      🙁 8-10 storeys with a nice design would be good for this area. Like you say, every building being approx the same height is not going to be very pleasing to the eye.

      Well yes in moderation of course. The flipside of that is too much variation causes a skyline to look untidy. But the odd punctuation here and there where it is prominent enough is no harm. I mean the buildings on the south side of Victoria cross should have a balanced or patterned height but sites like the Crows nest could in theory accomodate buildings that punch 3 or 4 storeys above the average to make a balanced statement.

      At this site i’d rather a good design at 10 storeys than a so-so or lazy design at 6.

    • #759381
      kite
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      excellent, good to see buildings of that size, hopefully it will look better than Victoria Cross – CSD will go nuts.

      🙁 Im not so sure if CSD will be going nuts Pug, reading the conditions attached to the Crows Nest on the CCC website just now, i really NEVER saw such ridiculous conditions attached to any other planning proposal.
      Christ, if Mr. O’Connor, and Kennedy want to scrach their ass on this one they need seperate planning.
      I for one hope the developers take this to ABP.

    • #759382
      POM
      Participant

      The conditions seem a bit odd to me as well. I don’t understand the report. One minute it says an 8-storey building would be acceptable, the next it caps the height at 6-storeys. Either way, the fact that the tall element is now capped at 6-storeys and the lower block at 5-storeys, seems to me to suggest the building will run as one long monotonous block. Given that this was no princess of a design at any stage the conditions seem to have made it worse rather than enhance it. I agree with someone else’s comments earlier about if you’re going to reduce a scheme so much you may as well just refuse it. I can see this one going for appeal. Maybe they’ll ask for a better redesign and I’d rather a taller building with a bit of distinction rather than another 6-storey block like every other one in the city. Still it will be a shame to see the Crow go and those little terrace houses alongside it on the Straight Road.

    • #759383
      lexington
      Participant

      It seem the Kelleher-family are now to put their 1.1 acre assembled site near Cork University Hospital on the market – through agents Hamilton Osborne King. The site, which includes the premises once operated as an Esso station as well as 2 residential properties to the rear/north, was once considered for a private medical development of 100,000sq ft plus according to local media – however now, the strategic location is expected to make anywhere up to a pricey €15m. The sites location to the south-west corner of CUH lands represents a significant private medical redevelopment opportunity but has value beyond such a sole use as well.

    • #759384
      Pug
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      It seem the Kelleher-family are now to put their 1.1 acre assembled site near Cork University Hospital on the market

      i can see it on google map but broadband and lack thereof (isnt that a complete disgrace) prevents me from getting an image for you

      Is it the site on your left, if you were going towards the wilton roundabout? Directly opposite that little retail park?

    • #759385
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      i can see it on google map but broadband and lack thereof (isnt that a complete disgrace) prevents me from getting an image for you

      Is it the site on your left, if you were going towards the wilton roundabout? Directly opposite that little retail park?

      It is opposite (across the dual-carriageway from) the Statoil Petrol Station and Xtra-Vision store in Bishopstown. The former Esso station has since been dismantled.

    • #759386
      Pug
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      It is opposite (across the dual-carriageway from) the Statoil Petrol Station and Xtra-Vision store in Bishopstown. The former Esso station has since been dismantled.

      looks a bit bigger than 1.1 acres doesnt it? – fine site though

    • #759387
      kite
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Crows nest is a very dissappointing decision. The fact that the ‘tower’ went from 15 storeys to 6 storeys is an indication of how unsuitable this development was for the site, and how planners recognised this. Unfortunately, the planners did not have the balls to reject the development in its entirety and instead imposed ridiculous conditions. The site would have been much better served had the Crow’s nest pub building and the terrace of houses to the west been refurbished and left as they were. It will be interesting to see how this does when it goes to appeal- something which must be an inevitability!

      :confused: How many of the proposed 74 Apts. are going to be lost due to the CCC conditions?
      The CCC website does not say.

    • #759388
      lexington
      Participant

      A pivotal site of approx. 0.5acres along Kyrl’s Quay has seen auctioneers Dominic Daly agree sale for a value well in excess of its €5m AMV. The RH Parker & Sons site (Cork Timber, Slate & Cement Co.) site was sold privately to Murrayforde Developments – who will likely seek options on acquiring additional premises in the immediate area – which include important sites held by Cork City Council to the west and north of the site. Bridewell Garda Station possesses important corner frontage onto Cornmarket Street – a street destined for considerable renewal in the coming months with work finally steaming ahead on the former Guy & Co. site being developed by Rockfell Investments (headed by Michael O’Donoghue) in a mixed development which will provide 65 apartments, 120,000sq ft of retail space and 66 basement car-parking spaces for residential use (designed by Niall Coffey with Frank Ennis & Associates). In addition, Cork City Council are to undertake a rejuvenation of the street-scape in the prospective future which extends from Daunt Square in the south to the new Shandon Bridge in the north. Nearby, O’Callaghan Properties have designs on an assembled site at 16 Lavitts Quay, the majority of which was purchased from Howard Holdings (who previously proposed a Comfort Inn hotel on the same site), for a mixed development with possibilities of up to 100,000sq ft of comparison goods retail over 4 large units on lower levels and residential over-head. Redevelopment possibilities could materialise also at another noteworthy site on Cornmarket Street – but it is not known when options on this will proceed.

      The Kyrls Quay area was the subject of a major architectural design competition, won by Conroy Architecture, and has capacity for development of a significant landmark proposal (which could very well take advantage of work already done by many of the top entries to the design competition). Key points in the requirements for redevelopment designs, noted by Cork City Council, included a landmark, international quality design with consideration of the historical importance of its location and with elements of sufficient height so as to mask views of the bulky North Main Street multi-storey to the rear and sufficient public amenity space with consider utilisation of the nearby river/quayside.


      Satellite image of the Kyrl’s Quay area.


      Work proceeding at the Rockfell Investments site along Cornmarket Street.

    • #759389
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Sean Keohane’s Grangefield Developments have withdrawn their ambitious waterfront scheme on an assembled site by Blackrock Village. The attractively designed project, by architects James Leahy & Associates, sought permission to develop 119 residential units over basement parking on site – which was to include the premises of the Cork Boat Club and a reclaimed area of 1,954sq m. As part of the proposal, Cork Boat Club were to attain a striking and much needed new clubhouse with gangway and boating facilities – a boardwalk with public access was earmarked to wrap around the riverside perimeter of the proposal, taking full advantage of the waterfront location. A decision on the project, which was lodged on December 5th 2005, had been scheduled for May 7th 2006 – the application had received 37 submissions, and had been extended to accommodate further discussions with the planning authority. Consequent of these discussions, the application has been withdrawn in light of the prospect of a refusal. Rather than endure this, it is believed the scheme will undergo revision.


      Various images of the Grangefield Developments’ proposal for Blackrock as envisaged.



      😮 May 9th 2006 sees the scheduled decision by An Bord Pleanala for Frinailla’s Victoria Cross scheme of 25 upper-end residential units being made available through agents Global Properties. The scheme was designed by Gerladine McNamara with Richard Rainey & Associates, and is to be built over basement car-parking and storage.



      Sticking to ABP…

      😎 Adrian Power has appealed conditions on his office proposal for Clarke’s Bridge, designed by Coughlan de Keyser and originally submitted in a 7-storey format. The proposal took advantage of a prominent waterfront corner site only a stone’s throw from Cork’s Legal District. The proposal was subsequently reduced at the behest of planners – including a number of material reductions/alterations and a height adjustment, ultimately granted at 5-storeys. The original proposal included a number of pleasant finishes including a protruding copper clad elevation, red-brick, balconies availing of the riverfront aspect and a nice, small boardwalk area.

      😎 The 22nd of May 2006 is the scheduled decision date for the appeal of Bernard Crowley & Gerard Paul’s Dennehy + Dennehy Designs crafted apartment scheme at Riverside Farm, near the Tennis Village along the Model Farm Road. The scheme originally peaked at 7-storeys and included 67 apartments over 84-parking spaces and gym – the proposal was granted at 6-storeys and over 40 apartments.

    • #759390
      Ebeck
      Participant

      Following the announcement regarding Manor Park’s intentions for the Horgans Quay site, will they be responsible for the design of the new train station? What are the chances that we will get a signature piece of architecture for the city? We missed out on the Dunkettle river crossing so can we have a “Union Station” (San Francisco isn’t it?) please?
      If we ask nicely will they go to an architect of the stature of Calatrava / Piano / Gehry – (no disrespect to the current crop of Irish architects).
      Hopefully we will get a bold design at the very least – something that will surprise us. Anyway, I really enjoy this website and this thread in particular, keep up the good work.

    • #759391
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Mallow’s population to swell to 30,000
      By Sean O’Riordan
      A SENIOR civil servant has revealed that major plans are being drawn up in Mallow to cater for a population of 30,000 within the next 20 years, which is far larger than the National Spatial Strategy suggested.

      Tim Lucey, who is an assistant county manager with Cork County Council revealed yesterday that the local authority had already put in train a number of plans to deal with the future.

      These include building a new bridge across the River Blackwater, significantly increasing housing, developing southern link roads, creating industrial parks and the possibility of acquiring a Third Level institution.

      In addition Mr Lucey also announced that the county council had just purchased more than 13 acres of land on the southside of the town, which will be earmarked for industrial and commercial development.

      Mr Lucey said that Mallow, which is designated as a hub town, will grow rapidly. The last census showed the town had a population of 9,789 and 3,219 houses. The National Spatial Strategy proposed a population increase to 17,430 by 2020. But Mr Lucey said the town and its hinterland could hold up to 30,000 within the next 15 to 20 years.

      “Mallow should have a vision of developing to the 30,000 mark through phased zoning in the town and its immediate environ,” he said. “In terms of the number of households this means a requirement for approximately 9,600 additional dwellings by 2020 and beyond.”

      To achieve this target the council envisages maximising housing density. At present, the average density allowed in Mallow is 23 dwellings per hectare.

      This will be increased to 30 to 35 houses per hectare in the coming years. Mr Lucey said there was an additional requirement to zone 150 hectares of land for housing, which is almost double what is provided for at present.

      Land is also to be zoned for industrial use, with the aim of creating 10,000 new jobs in the area.

      “To put such job numbers into perspective, it is a realistic aim for a 50 acre technology or business park to support 3,000 jobs,” said Mr Lucey.

      “Killarney Technology Park has this target and Clonakilty Technology Park is well on the way to achieving 1,000 jobs.”

      Mr Lucey, who was addressing local business leaders at a breakfast meeting in the Hibernian Hotel, also spoke about the need for further educational developments.

      “The Special Local Area Plan will attempt to address this issue by earmarking a site with the potential for third level facilities, possibly on an outreach basis,” he said.

      from platform11 unfortunately source unknown

    • #759392
      lexington
      Participant

      @Ebeck wrote:

      Following the announcement regarding Manor Park’s intentions for the Horgans Quay site, will they be responsible for the design of the new train station? What are the chances that we will get a signature piece of architecture for the city? We missed out on the Dunkettle river crossing so can we have a “Union Station” (San Francisco isn’t it?) please?
      If we ask nicely will they go to an architect of the stature of Calatrava / Piano / Gehry – (no disrespect to the current crop of Irish architects).
      Hopefully we will get a bold design at the very least – something that will surprise us. Anyway, I really enjoy this website and this thread in particular, keep up the good work.

      Indeed a signature piece of architecture would be most welcome – especially at this vital location. However, a Calatrava, Gehry or even van Egeraat piece is not on the cards. O’Mahony Pike Architects are project architects – however, they promise superior standards of design (according the appropriate individuals).



      Thomond Park – the journalist of the piece works with the Irish Examiner.

    • #759393
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      🙁 Sean Keohane’s Grangefield Developments have withdrawn their ambitious waterfront scheme on an assembled site by Blackrock Village. The attractively designed project, by architects James Leahy & Associates, sought permission to develop 119 residential units over basement parking on site – which was to include the premises of the Cork Boat Club and a reclaimed area of 1,954sq m. As part of the proposal, Cork Boat Club were to attain a striking and much needed new clubhouse with gangway and boating facilities – a boardwalk with public access was earmarked to wrap around the riverside perimeter of the proposal, taking full advantage of the waterfront location. A decision on the project, which was lodged on December 5th 2005, had been scheduled for May 7th 2006 – the application had received 37 submissions, and had been extended to accommodate to accommodate further discussions with the planning authority. Consequent of these discussions, the application has been withdrawn in light of the prospect of a refusal. Rather than endure this, it is believed the scheme will undergo revision.

      😡 What a pity that proposal was withdrawn, it would have complimented the Blackrock Develoment Plan.
      On another topic Lex, is the old fruit and veg Co. on Kyrls Quay part of the plan for that area?

    • #759394
      Keen
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 The highly anticipated Eglinton Street project by developers O’Flynn Construction is beginning preliminary work with PJ Hegarty & Sons Limited appointed as main contractors on the multi-million euro contract, which includes what could emerge as Ireland’s tallest building (70 metres) for a designated period of time. Site evaluation works will commence prior to the extensive excavation of the 3-acre site, which was purchased in early 2004 by O’Flynn Construction from An Post for €15m – the land once served as the Central Sorting Office in Cork before the facility was relocated to a site on Little Island. Following the excavation, Hegarty’s will erect 2 tower cranes and begin work on the provision of up to 550 car-parking spaces be provided over 2 basement levels before proceeding with Phase 1 of the development]http://img107.exs.cx/img107/3143/night1mg.jpg[/IMG]

      – the Eglinton Street site is located immediately to the rear of the former Doyle Warehousing site of 0.5acres fronting Albert Quay – reportedly purchased for a value in excess of €8.5m by Howard Holdings (who are also nearing completion on their Scott Tallon Walker designed WebWorks facility for Enterprise Ireland at the opposite end of the quay). To the west of the Doyle site, a further 0.5 acre assembled site is under the ownership of Ascon Rohcon. Both parties are understood to be furthering plans for prime 3rd Generation office schemes which could range in heights of up to 7-storeys. Whether negotiations between the 2 have been engaged about either a joint development or site acquisition remains to be seen. Theo Cullinane of Ascon had hinted at the time of his company’s successful bid for the Revenue Commissioners facility (at Linn Dubh along the Blackpool By-Pass) that a planning application on their Albert Quay site could see lodgement by Spring 2006. We’ll have to wait and see how this one determines.

      Has anyone seen the site recently? Have they commenced groundwork yet?

    • #759395
      opus
      Participant

      @Keen wrote:

      Has anyone seen the site recently? Have they commenced groundwork yet?

      Last time I walked past, over a week ago, there were a bunch of earth moving machinery in there but didn’t look it was a full scale operation as yet.

    • #759396
      lexington
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      On another topic Lex, is the old fruit and veg Co. on Kyrls Quay part of the plan for that area?

      That site formed a component of the Design Competition Rejuvenation plan. As far as the recent site sale is concerned, it was not part of the deal.

    • #759397
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I dont have access to the Irish Times website but there is an article by Frank McDonald today in it about O’Callaghan properties plan for Academy street and its further information requests.

    • #759398
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Keen wrote:

      Has anyone seen the site recently? Have they commenced groundwork yet?

      I was walking by only yesterday and they are securing the parameter of the site ahead of its excavation i think. Its going to be one BIG hole in the ground before it becomes one tall figure in the skyline.

    • #759399
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Below is the article from todays Irish Times which gives a good summary of CCC response to the Academy Street proposals. I think it would be fair to say, that all of the points raised have been raised in this forum and certainly deserve to be answered before any decision is made. In particular, treatment of Academy Street and Bowling Green Street, along with the proposed demolition of the Examiner building on St. Patrick Street.


      Images originally posted by jdivision


      Council rejects development plan O’Callaghan Properties scheme in Cork ‘not acceptable in current form’
      Frank McDonald, Environment Editor, Irish Times

      Cork City Council has requested further information on plans by O’Callaghan Properties for a major retail and residential development in the heart of the city, saying it “is not acceptable in its current form”.

      The council’s planners are “concerned with the building heights proposed for the overall scheme”, which would step up to nine storeys, and say these heights “will have to be modified to mitigate its impact” on the surrounding area.

      They say the maximum building heights should be reduced by approximately 8m (26 ft) – equivalent to the omission of two floors – and that the “shoulder height” of buildings fronting streets should also be reduced.

      The proposed development covers two city blocks bounded by Patrick Street, Academy Street, Emmet Place and Bowling Green Street. It would provide 19 large retail units on four levels as well as 91 apartments and two gyms overhead.

      In their request for further information, the planners are seeking a revised visual impact statement, including a further series of photomontages showing how the scheme would look from various points.

      They want the developers to provide a scale model of the proposed development as well as details of its impact on the vistas of such landmark buildings as Holy Trinity Church, SS Peter and Paul’s Church.

      The planners have queried the proposed demolition of the former Cork Examiner building on Patrick Street.

      “Whilst not a protected structure, its attractive appearance contributes significantly in a positive fashion to the existing streetscape,” they say.

      While supporting the traditional block structure of the scheme, they are concerned that its treatment at ground-floor level would give pre-eminence to a widened Faulkener’s Lane at the expense of both Academy Street and Bowling Green Street.

      “The number of secondary staircases/lift cores proposed . . . and what appear to be rear doors as well as the narrowness of the shopfronts . . . is not acceptable and requires to be modified so as to ensure the continued vitality of Academy Street.”

      Owen O’Callaghan, who previously developed the Merchant’s Quay and Mahon Point shopping centres in Cork as well as Liffey Valley in Dublin, said he did not believe the further information request would affect the proposed development.

      His planning consultants, Cunnane Stratton Reynolds, maintain that the proposed apartments “will add a new dynamic to city centre living” while the shops would transform “dark and uninviting” Faulkener’s Lane into a “vibrant retail thoroughfare”.

      Project Architects, who designed the scheme in conjunction with Gehl Consultants of Copenhagen, have been told to “reduce the palette of materials” along Faulkener’s Lane and to submit detailed shopfront design guidelines for the shops fronting on to it.

      The further information request also makes clear that the scale, form and architectural treatment of one of the main buildings proposed for the Emmet Place frontage are not acceptable and its height and “unduly horizontal nature” will have to be reconsidered.

      Altogether, the council has received 20 objections to the proposed development. These have come mainly from retailers and property owners in the area who are concerned about the adverse impact of demolition and construction works.

      Given that O’Callaghan Properties is seeking to demolish buildings with a total floor space of over 11,000sq m (118,400 sq ft), the planners want to know how the potential adverse effects on nearby commercial properties would be mitigated.

      Only two of those who have made submissions – the Cork branch of An Taisce and Mary O’Keeffe, with an address in Dundrum, Dublin 16 – have dealt with the wider impact of the scheme, saying its height would alter the character of Cork city centre.

      IRISH TIMES

    • #759400
      damnedarchitect
      Participant

      Is Eglinton Street definitely going ahead? There is nothing on the Wilson website http://www.wilsonarchitecture.ie

    • #759401
      rebel_city
      Participant

      It will be interesting to see what come’s of the Academy Street dev. plans. I sometimes wonder if the designers actually design a building with extra storys so it will automatically have to be reduced by the council, because I’d reckon the council and other parites involved would never just pass the 1st draft, they would have to feel like they have the power and the last say. Therefore by adding extra storeys or features which are not really needed the council gets to act all high and mightly and the designers can predict this so their real design gets the go ahead anyway! Ok that point was a bit drawn out, but you catch my drift! As regards the Examiner building facade being kept to some degree, for some reason I can’t recall it in my head, will have to check it out over the Bank Holiday when I’m home in Cork! I was over in Birmingham recently, the city is very high rise. Granted some are ugly 1960’s post war council flats but there are alot of high rise offices and apartments. Seemed much more of a high rise than London! The Bull Ring is a new redeveloped shopping area in the city. It’s great, but I was laughing to myself cause most of the decent shops are already in Cork – good ol Mahon Point huh! No place like home 🙂

    • #759402
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      rebel_city, here’s a reminder of the Examiner Building on St.Patrick Street.

    • #759403
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Niall & Sheila Doris, directors of the Beverly Smyth Group – owners of Nat Ross Removals & Storage, have been granted their plans, designed by Jonathan Horgan with architects SDA O’Flynn, for the redevelopment of the Nat Ross Head-Office along Monahan’s Road in the South Docklands. Originally, the mixed scheme of 104 residential units (99x apartments and 5x 2-storey terraced houses), approx. 30,000sq ft of business & technology office space and basement car-parking – was to be constructed over 5-interlinked blocks ranging in heights of 4 to 10-storeys fronting the road. However, following significantly revised plans submitted on April 13th 2006 – responding to various planning concerns including density and height, the scheme has been scaled back to a range of between 4 and 6-storey blocks, with a respective ra-articulation of the scheme layout. However, despite the broadly welcome revision, the demand for increased amenity provision was imposed by Cork City Council planning authority by condition requiring that an open-space/landscaped courtyard be afforded through the omission of the eastern section of Block B, resulting in the removal of 11 further apartments. “This will also improve the general amenity prospects of Block A…” stated the planner’s report. Permission was granted for 95-apartments. A reduction in the number of originally proposed basement car-parking spaces (191) was also requested.

      Interestingly, the grant is subject to the outcome of a technical report being undertaken by the Health & Safety Authority regarding Goulding’s Chemicals Limited on nearby Centre Park Road.


      Outline of the scheme as originally proposed.

      Further details can be found here.



      😮 Monahan’s Road would seem to be among the most progressively emerging areas of Cork’s Docklands Redevelopment region. The South Docklands district here is defined by the crescent-shaped road running from the Victoria Road Roundabout in the west to Blackrock Road in the east – and has already been the subject of significant development applications (including the recently permitted scheme by Niall & Sheila Doris of the Beverly Smyth Group for their Nat Ross premises – see above), the most recent being that by Monahan’s Road Development Limited (O’Shea Leader Consulting Engineers) for a 5-storey business and technology office development to be built over basement car-parking on a circa. 1-acre site sold last year through agents DTZ Sherry FitzGerald for an estimated €2m.

      Now David McSweeney is set to see McSweeney’s Yard along Monahan’s Road be redeveloped as a 31-unit residential scheme over 5-storeys – including 18-apartments and 13 duplexes with Magee Creedon Architects handling the design.

      An application is also expected shortly on a new office scheme designed by Wilson Architecture near recently complete Tellenganna House – the same developers, SHUL Limited, headed up by David O’Sullivan, will seek to lodge for permission on additional commercial accommodation up to 150,000sq ft in space.



      @damnedarchitect wrote:

      Is Eglinton Street definitely going ahead?

      The scheme is commencing construction with PJ Hegarty & Sons Limited as contractors. Preliminary groundwork is underway.

    • #759404
      kite
      Participant

      😮 I was amazed to hear that the rental income to CCC for the English Market last year was 70,000 euro (TOTAL) while the CCC’s bill for painting the market alone was 72,000 euro for the same peroid.
      There are many units in the market than need to be subsidized, but there are also multi millionairess that should pay a fair rent. Joe Gavin is right to play hardball with some of these guys.
      p.s. Any news of Frinaillas Dennehys heating store on Victoria Cross Road?

    • #759405
      lexington
      Participant

      Interestingly a pivotal site under the ownership of O’Callaghan Properties (at 16 Lavitts Quay) – to the east of their 21 Lavitts Quay development, have been issued with a Vesting Order under the Derelict Sites Act 1990 by Cork City Council. The land is bound to the north by 15 & 16 Lavitts Quay, to the east by Half Moon Street, the south by the Matthews Centre and west by Paul’s Lane. Previously, permission had been sought on the assembled site for a new office building by Thomas Crosbie Holdings for a new Irish Examiner & Evening Echo HQ designed by O’Riordan Staehli Architects; it was later purchased by Howard Holdings as part of a broader land-swap deal (which saw the Irish Examiner & Evening Echo take up office space at the Howard Holdings’ CityQuarter development). Howard then retained Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects (RORSA) to design a new 7-storey 125-bedroom hotel for the Comfort Inn chain – however, following a grant, this plan was abandoned as O’Callaghan Properties (OCP) acquired the site in a deal suggested at approx. €8m – OCP then moved to acquire the corner premises of Mr. R. Arthur – allowing the site take a more complete form. It is understood OCP had intentions on the redevelopment of a mixed retail/cmmercial and residential scheme at this location.

      The order is now open to submissions.

    • #759406
      POM
      Participant

      Makes you wonder about the pre planning discussions. Or lack of them. Any one have an idea when plans for the site were suppose to commence?

    • #759407
      lexington
      Participant

      Given that this is post 1895 – I thought it may be interesting to post some details regarding the 2 Cork Development Threads (LADSOCL and Developments in Cork – as its continuation):

      LADSOCL:

      Total Posts:
      1,895

      Total Views:
      181,595

      Average views per post:
      95.8

      Developments in Cork:

      Total Posts:
      1,893

      Total Views:
      194,065

      Average views per post:
      102.5

      Combined Figures:

      Total Posts: 3,788

      Total Views: 375,660

      Note: These figures are based as of 12:15pm May 11th 2006; Posts numbers do not include initial/commencing posts – only replies, neither do they include this post and subsequent hits.

    • #759408
      phatman
      Participant

      Tis the season of the census I spose 😀

    • #759409
      Pug
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      a pivotal site under the ownership of O’Callaghan Properties (at 16 Lavitts Quay) – to the east of their 21 Lavitts Quay development, have been issued with a Vesting Order
      .

      for the un initiated, what happens when a Vesting Order is put in place?:confused:

    • #759410
      POM
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      for the un initiated, what happens when a Vesting Order is put in place?:confused:

      Generally theres a period open to submissions/objections on the order (which is like a notice of intent to compulsorily acquire a derelict site) under the Derelict Sites Act 1990. Submissions allow the case be considered and where a significant argument is found or commitment made by the owner to do something with the site – the order may be invalidated with the understanding the owner is going to do something with the site within a designated time. The same scenario happened a few years ago on the Parnell Street site which is set to become a hotel (and I still havent seen anything happening there in terms of construction which worries me a little). Presumably the council are concerned in part as to the condition of 16 Lavits Quay. It would seem to me such an order would mean O’Callaghan haven’t started preplanning on the site, otherwise intent would have been established. I assume O’Callaghan will be objecting to the order and will be under pressure to get an application in on the site soon.

    • #759411
      phatman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      It is quite evident from assessing the form of the extension that its design has been heavily influenced with respect to prominent tree patterns dotted around the library area. The extension essentially weaves between historic tree locations. Finished elevations will be a mix of copper and red-sandstone materials.

      I believe the form of the library as it fans out on the Northern elevation is intended to resemble an opening book, with the staggered sections being the pages. Also, the sandstone effect is based on that evident at St. Peter and Paul’s Church, just off Patrick Street. Seeing as the old quarries where this was procured have long since closed, as close an imitation as possible is being shipped from Germany.
      Just some useless info…

    • #759412
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Alchemy Properties – the property development subsidary set up by Dairygold to maximise its property resources and led by director Michael Hogan – has been greenlit for one of its first major development initiatives, a ‘town centre’ scheme located near the main Cork-Mallow Road on the western-end of Mallow’s core.

      Mallow Town Council saw fit to permit the partially revised scheme, with an estimated total value of €100m, yesterday. The project is designed jointly by RKD Architects (Cork) & UK-based Chapman Taylor Architects and could well produce up to 600 hundred jobs between construction and completion. Constituent of the plan is the accommodation of 16,000sq m of retail space, approx. 8,000sq m in retail warehousing, 4,000sq m in office provision, 3 public squares, leisure and entertainment facilities as well as a number of luxury apartment and other residential units – all on a 15-acre site, already home to a successful 4HOME store. 1,036 parking spaces will be provided with the scheme, 450 of which will be at basement level.


      Aerial shot of the subject site.

      The entire scheme is projected to have an annual turnover of €50m come completion. The project, originally submitted for planning in July 2005, is expected to see construction on site before the year end (2006).

    • #759413
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Frinailla Developments have been granted permission following appeal to An Bord Pleanala for their 25-unit residential scheme on a former Plumbing Utilities store along Victoria Cross Road. The scheme was designed by Geraldine McNamara with Richard Rainey & Associates and replaces a proposal by former site owner Robert White for a 5-storey student apartment block. Originally lodged at the end of June 2005, the initial plan called for a 6-storey, part 7-storey building of 25-apartment units and a ground floor commercial unit – displayed via an attractive glazed feature which, following requests for Further Information, was subsequently removed. The units will be constructed over 5-storeys (following a further reduction in height – via removal of the 2nd floor – by ABP), basement car-parking for over 40 spaces and storage accommodation. Apartments are being marketed through Global Properties and have attracted significant interest to date. Construction work is set commence within 4 weeks.

      Frinailla Developments, who have emerged as one of Cork’s more design focussed development companies, are expecting to see their other scheme in the area (nearby at Dennehy’s Cross) – which has also received much praise for its strong design standards by architects O’Mahony Pike – realise its appeal decision on the 28th of June 2006. Construction work on that scheme is set to get into gear for October of this year.

    • #759414
      lexington
      Participant

      Part of a city’s revival is not simply the supply of new building stock…its also about the maintenance of existing stock.

      Managing to embrace the wonderful sunshine gracing Cork city yesterday, I travelled the streets – there is a wonderful confidence and energy in the city…however in all this enthusiasm, we seem to be forgetting that progress is about self-improvement. It involves washing your clothes and not simply buying new items – for want of a better metaphor.

      Of course the critique is not an all-encompassing one, there are always exceptions, but it is a prevalent one:

      Starting at Bachelor’s Quay – a prominent apartment complex catches my attention first. The 1998 scheme is stained with numerous watermarks, limescale and grime – the complex is regarded as ‘controversial’ by many, its ground floor units have laid vacant for years, and the addition of sweeping green, grey and brown stains have not aided the building’s appeal. No more is this highlighted than along its norther, southern (Adelaide Street) and eastern elevations. The white paint finish is particularly vulnerable to the processes of time – and at one point on the southern elevation, upwards of 4-storeys are smeared with a ghastly green bleamish consequent of a broken drain pipe.

      It is encouraging to see that this complex’s neighbour (built at the same time) has addressed its maintenance issues with a fresh paint of coat and the removal of unsightly moss overgrowths from its roof-top drains. So too – the northern facade of an adjacent shopping centre has been improved with fresh paint coating, and store signs have been promptly amended where failures to their night-time illumination have occurred.

      Moving back west along Bachelor’s Quay, another apartment block – designed by Con Cahalane & Associates – is suffering PVC moss and graffiti issues, most notably around its ground floor parameter. A simply wash and paint job would immeasurably improve the aesthetic.

      Walking across the McGarry Ni

    • #759415
      Bourgeoise
      Participant

      Also along from Batchelors Quay opposite the North Gate Bridge “Super Macs” have repainted their unit and placed a large nasty advertising hoarding facing the bridge – amazing how building control in Cork lets poor signage across the city stay in place.

      Any news on that small triangular site near the Bus Station which had a 9? storey office scheme in for planning late last year ?

      Finally whats the deal with thos 5ft galvanised poles that have been place along the length of Oliver Plunkett Street – they have been there for well over a year now presumably awaiting some permanent light standard ?

    • #759416
      jungle
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Walking across the McGarry Ni Éanaigh Architects designed Shandon Bridge, it was disheartening to see a structure, which opened to so much fanfare last year (2005), has become the subject of inexcusable vandalism in the form of graffiti and ill-maintenance. The 2 canted 273mm diameter CHS arches have been blanketed with a variety of “Karen and Jason 4ever” slogans (among the more legible stains).

      Sadly, it’s not just this bridge. The new pedestrian bridge at the Mardyke is blighted with graffiti already.

      I mentioned this in an earlier post, but someone has spray painted on to the new plaza in front of the Red Abbey. Considering the cost of both these developments, it’s pretty disheartening to realise that there is no maintenance plan for either public area.

      The spray painting by the Red Abbey wouldn’t even be that difficult to remove, yet it’s been there for a number of weeks.

      Aside from the physical damage done, graffiti can lead people to feel less safe in an area and if Cork City Council are serious about revitalising inner city areas, they’ll need to consider a systematic programme to deal with it.

    • #759417
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Since it’s a Friday afternoon and i’m attempting to stay in a positive frame of mind, I won’t go on and on about this, but I have to echo most of the points raised by lexington. Simply put, a huge amount of property owners and users in this city down give a s**t what people think of them and their property. Even if you’re living/working in a dump, you should try to make the outside look respectable..it shows respect for your neighbours and yourself. I’ve often avoided/boycotted shops/bars/restaurants , etc. which dont look after their exterior and erect crappy signage without permission– i know, its hardly likely to make a big difference, but it makes me feel a teeny bit better of a friday afternoon.

    • #759418
      kite
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Since it’s a Friday afternoon and i’m attempting to stay in a positive frame of mind, I won’t go on and on about this, but I have to echo most of the points raised by lexington. Simply put, a huge amount of property owners and users in this city down give a s**t what people think of them and their property. Even if you’re living/working in a dump, you should try to make the outside look respectable..it shows respect for your neighbours and yourself. I’ve often avoided/boycotted shops/bars/restaurants , etc. which dont look after their exterior and erect crappy signage without permission– i know, its hardly likely to make a big difference, but it makes me feel a teeny bit better of a friday afternoon.

      😎 I tried to think of putting my feelings on Lex’s post into words but could not come up with anything appropriate….you put the words i was looking for in your post RM, well said.

    • #759419
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Rail services from Cork cancelled
      RTÉ online
      15 May 2006 07:26

      Iarnród Éireann has cancelled rail services out of Cork this morning because of a dispute with drivers over the introduction of new trains.

      A number of inter city and commuter trains from Heuston Station, Dublin, to Cork have also been cancelled.

      The company took the decision after it said two drivers in Cork refused to operate the new trains this morning.

      Advertisement

      The drivers have not been suspended but the company says it has told them they will not be paid until they operate the new trains.

      It is understood that a number of other drivers are now refusing to work in support of their colleagues.

      No trains have been operating from Cork so far this morning

      Hardly encouraging given its impact on the potential of the Midleton to Mallow development corridor

    • #759420
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Paul Montgomery is to submit an application concerning the site of the former Muskerry Service Station along the Western Road. The prime site of over a half acre was purchased last year for a price tag of between €6 – 7m through agents CBRE Gunne, who sold the land on behalf of Esso (as part of their non-core region asset sell-off). The site is understood to have been purchased jointly between Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Kenneally and Mr. Michael Cunningham – it is pivotally located between the city centre and University College Cork, and is positioned directly across a bend in the south channel of the Lee, opposite the fast emerging Lancaster Quay development by O’Callaghan Properties. The proposal for the Muskerry Service Station site is designed by Derek Tynan & Associates – and will include 2 buildings (1x 5-storey and 1x 6-storey) with a total of 59 apartments over basement car-parking for 54 vehicles.



      Further to the publication of the framework draft for the Bishopstown/Wilton Local Area Plan – I hope to post details of a prospective prosposal (though preliminary) in the near future (variables considered).

      Also, interesting news is in the works concerning the consideration of options by a Galway-based developer on a mixed-use scheme for Cork. Again it is preliminary, but hopefully if it materialises it will be a nice boost for Cork.


    • #759421
      Bourgeoise
      Participant

      Further to the publication of the framework draft for the Bishopstown/Wilton Local Area Plan – I hope to post details of a prospective prosposal (though preliminary) in the near future (variables considered).

      Along as these “objectors” are educated enough to realise that 3/4 storey is not “High Rise” and that Cork is a city expanding to include the Wilton / Dennehys Cross / Victoria cross area.
      Have these people not noticed the County Hall /University Hospital for the past 30+ years ?
      Has Derek Tynans Victoria cross scheme upset everybody in the area ?
      Cork City was the only metropolitan area in the country to actually lose population in the last census due to the lack of new apartments in the city.

    • #759422
      kite
      Participant

      [quote=Bourgeoise
      Has Derek Tynans Victoria cross scheme upset everybody in the area ?

      😉 The answer to your question would seem to be YES..
      The draft plan for Wilton/Bishopstown identifies high rise and a town centre for the area as the main issues submitted by the 64 groups, residents,etc.

    • #759423
      lexington
      Participant

      1.
      @Bourgeoise wrote:

      Any news on that small triangular site near the Bus Station which had a 9-storey office scheme in for planning late last year ?

      🙂 DAT Partnerships have submitted a second batch of Further Information on their plans to construct a 9-storey office building at a tiny triangular site (under 3,000sq ft) bordered by Clontarf Street, Deane Street and Lower Oliver Plunkett Street – the prominent site has been subject to 2 designs by architects Coughlan de Keyser and has will have spent over a year in planning (it was originally submitted in May of 2005) when its planning decision is realised. Currently the application, which received further information on May 19th 2006 is now scheduled for a decision on June 6th 2006. The scheme is still proposed at 9-storeys in height and consists of extensive limestone and glazed finishes with canopies overhanging windows on levels fronting Clontarf Street and Lower Oliver Plunkett Street. The architects indicate in their further information that they are willing to relocated the roof-top plant room to basement level, however such a move would adversely affect the finish to the north-facing glazed elevation (stairwell) by issuing a sharp cut-off rather than more even finish.

      – on just a personal note, regarding CentrePoint (the Clontarf Street project above), the architects argument for the building’s height is notable, however I would agree with them that this site in particular has capacity for a building of strong visual presence – although the revised proposal does not exhibit the distinction of the original plan – it remains a stark and noteworthy proposal whose north facing frontage would exhibit a striking sight when viewed from Brian Boru Street. The site represents something of an “island” in an emerging district and could be realised as something of a ‘pinnacle’ point amongst the new development and prospective development emerging in the area. It would be a shame to see it reduced and made another uniform height addition to what shows prospect of being an exciting urban quarter. I would like to think that planners would recognise this. The one sticking point I could empathise with is the impact the building’s articulation would impose on No.6 Lapps Quay when viewed from Eglinton Street – the available photomontages don’t seem to highlight this impact to any major extent – however it is clear that a slope reduction has been imposed at roof level approaching the southern elevation in the revised design, and height has been dropped, to minimise impacts. The height then rises (in the form of an enclosed plant-room) toward the northern elevation and rounding off the glazed facade which runs the height of the building. This stairwell, along with other aspects of the building, are proposed to be strikingly lit by night, which should highlight a sense of active use and act as a sort of ‘beacon’ in this new business district.



      2. Hooke & MacDonald’s Summer 2006 Property Outlook was formally launched yesterday (15th May 2006) highlight a number of key patterns in both Irish residential and commercial markets. Interestingly, the report forecasts that Cork (city and county) could see its housing completion rate peak on 10,000 units (up from approx. 8,500 units in 2005), representing over 11.5% of the forecasted national completion total. Dublin, by comparison – with 18,000 units expected by the report to see completion by the year-end – holds 21%.

      The projections represent a confident interpretation of the Cork market – with strong developer confidence bestowed on residential sector capacity and regional population and market trends. Interesting will be the outcome of Census 2006, especially with regard to population variations within the Cork city area versus Census 2002 records. Comparatively, commercial sector confidence has gradually picked up in the Cork region – however there remains significant areas of opportunity yet to be explored, with prospective activity in the city’s docklands region offering exciting potential to realise a number of development initiatives related to commercial, retail and leisure/entertainment uses.


    • #759424
      Micko
      Participant

      Anyone know anything about the Xchange bar and Compuworld store sites on Georges Quay ?

      Compustore have packed up out to Turners Corss while the Xchange bar closed up last week.

    • #759425
      kite
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Anyone know anything about the Xchange bar and Compuworld store sites on Georges Quay ?

      Compustore have packed up out to Turners Corss while the Xchange bar closed up last week.

      🙂 Maybe MoJo’s is coming back??
      On a serious note, that would be a prime site for re-development.

    • #759426
      POM
      Participant

      Cornmarket Street

      Reading a post earlier about the sale of the Kyrls Quay site is great and all but by the time all the other appropriate sites are acquired, who knows when development will start moving on the quay??? I drove down Cornmarket Street the other day and its nothing short of a third world street with suspension murdering paving, broken footpaths, potholes and dereliction abound. I sometimes can’t comprehend that this is suppose to be a prime city centre street? And where are all the promises the city council made regarding the realignment of Kyrls Quay or the installation of new market stalls? Or the improvement to the disgraceful street surface and pathways? I remember reading the action plan for the area and the scheduling on all these projects seems to be so far behind. It really is a disgrace. For such a prime street with potentially massive pedestrian windfalls from nearby Patricks Street, movement (development or promised realm improvements) has been insignificant. The most promising move here, besides the land sales has been the movement on the Guys site but even that seems to be lingering along.

    • #759427
      Pana01
      Participant

      According to yesterday’s Echo, the new airport terminal’s opening could be delayed for another 4 to 5 months. This is due to ‘construction delays’. In the meantime, to cater for the huge numbers of passengers over the peak summer months, a temporary canopy may be erected over the existing terminal. This is becoming a right shambles. Wasn’t the airport originally due to open before the launch of Cork 2005?

      On a more positive note, the Kinsale Road flyover is now due to open in October, a full seven months ahead of schedule.:)

    • #759428
      theblimp
      Participant

      With reference to the ongoing ‘difficulties’ at Cork Airport, it’s interesting to note that on the main contractors webpage (rohcon), they note a completion date of October 2005. (They also mention three airbridges!)

      http://www.asconrohcon.com/rohcon/rproject_details.asp?id=132&section1=2&sub_section=10

    • #759429
      Pug
      Participant
      Pana01 wrote:
      Kinsale bypass seven months ahead of scheduleQUOTE]

      Two aspects to that

      a) Is it the same ‘ahead of schedule’ as the ballincollig by pass which wasnt ahead at all, it was late but a bit of pr and adding a few months to the finish date before announcing it sorted that out !(sorry, i’m very cynical since 2 drivers were allowed halt the entire rail system)

      b) If they can finish that ahead of schedule that much then we can look forward to all other infrastructure projects in the future coming ahead ahead of schedule and under budget (seven months wages saved)!!

    • #759430
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Interestingly, the report forecasts that Cork (city and county) could see its housing completion rate peak on 10,000 units (up from approx. 8,500 units in 2005), representing over 11.5% of the forecasted national completion total

      Is that all? At the last census, Cork had around 12% of the national population – if the city region is becoming a counterbalance to Dublin, and is obtaining critical mass in its own right, you’d expect to see a higher proportion of completions than that.

      Is it true to say that much of the Cork region is only really starting to grow in terms of population now? I know the growth rate is ahead of the projections in the CASP, but the scale of development only seems to have ramped up in the last year.

    • #759431
      Bourgeoise
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Cornmarket Street

      Reading a post earlier about the sale of the Kyrls Quay site is great and all but by the time all the other appropriate sites are acquired, who knows when development will start moving on the quay??? I drove down Cornmarket Street the other day and its nothing short of a third world street with suspension murdering paving, broken footpaths, potholes and dereliction abound. I sometimes can’t comprehend that this is suppose to be a prime city centre street? And where are all the promises the city council made regarding the realignment of Kyrls Quay or the installation of new market stalls? Or the improvement to the disgraceful street surface and pathways? I remember reading the action plan for the area and the scheduling on all these projects seems to be so far behind. It really is a disgrace. For such a prime street with potentially massive pedestrian windfalls from nearby Patricks Street, movement (development or promised realm improvements) has been insignificant. The most promising move here, besides the land sales has been the movement on the Guys site but even that seems to be lingering along.

      The Guys site seems to be taking a long time to get out of the ground – I can only assume that there may be structural engineering issues with the site.
      Cornmarket street itself is appalling from the awful Castle Jewellers pink awful signage at the junction of Castle Street and Cornmarket Street to vacant sites with cars parked,shabby market stalls,cars parked all over the place down af far as the Bridewell with the dereliction on Kyrls Quay adding to the shabbyness of the area.
      Shopowners and property owners here are only slightly worse than the neglect that there is on Patrick Street itself which is meant to be one of the top shopping streets in the country after Grafton Street / Henry Street.
      The street itself does’nt seem to be that busy anymore and very little buzz around.Mayby after the main drainage works / pedestrianation disturbance there is’nt the draw of big name shops in the city when you have free parking and good shops at Mahon Point ? It has a downmarket feel lately and if you walk from Washington Street through Patrick’s Street through Bridge Street and down McCurtain St the high level of neglect is the overwhelming impression.
      On a more positive note all the smaller pedestrianisd streets in the city work very well with Maylor Street much improved.The streets at the Emmet Place – back of Savoy to Patricks Street and the Quay need the same treatment.

    • #759432
      jungle
      Participant

      With regard to Cornmarket St (Coal Quay). My mother had a fairly nasty fall on the uneven surface, while at the market, a few weeks ago. Fortunately, she is still relatively young, but I wouldn’t like to think of it happening to someone 10 years older. If it is going to be open to pedestrians on a Saturday, the surface needs to be someting that pedestrians can walk on. It also needs to have a bit of life on a day other than Saturday. Perhaps as an idea for Sunday’s in summer, they could look at having stalls that serve food on the street. This was done to a limited extent at an even in Bishop Lucey Park as part of Cork 2005 (I remember Banna Thai and Cork Coffee Roasters having stalls for example).

      To increase footfall in the city centre in general access must be approved. Many parking spaces have disappeared. Many more have (rightly) been converted to disabled spaces. This has restricted the ability of people to use cars to get into the city centre. Where is the publec transport to compensate for this restriction? While the Park and Ride is welcome, it is a long time since I’ve seen any improvement in the suburban bus service. Out of interest, if anyone knows, when was the last time new suburban buses were introduced in Cork? The most recent number plates that I see date to 2003. This means that we aren’t even renewing the existing fleet, much less improving services.

    • #759433
      a boyle
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      Is that all? At the last census, Cork had around 12% of the national population – if the city region is becoming a counterbalance to Dublin, and is obtaining critical mass in its own right, you’d expect to see a higher proportion of completions than that.

      Counterbalance ? that is a joke. greater dublin has 40% of the republic’s population. there is no counterbalance to dublin and there won’t ever be. Especially since the motorway network has been built radially. Don’t get me the wrong way i am a big fan of cork !

      the only way to develop a counter balance is to run a train from galway to cork, via shannon This would cost mental amounts of money. You would need two tracks the whole way , and there is only one at the moment. only galway limerick and cork combined could even think of affecting dublin. Even then it not be a sure thing.

      Cork was developped as a much nicer place by hanging on to the coattails of dublin , (better food, nicer nightlife, better transport, real industry). Although everyone is frighteningly insular still.

    • #759434
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      the only way to develop a counter balance is to run a train from galway to cork, via shannon

      The three cities you mention, combined, could well function as counterweights to Dublin. And yes, they need better links between them. But ‘the only way’ is an exageration. In any case, I’m not sure that the traffic between these cities would justify such investment even in the medium term (Cork-Limerick by train is quite straightforward now, for example). The ability of cities to ‘work together’ is limited in any case though. Its not a team sport.

      More likely, and more productive from a national perspective would be if each were to focus on areas of specialisation, and be planned accordingly. But I’m less than convinced that in a small country with a (thankfully) primate city, we can ever have the population to have more than two cities with the density of services and commercial activity to act as self supporting European centres. If you go any further, you risk falling into the dispersionist trap of the NSS.

      The Cork region as a whole does have the potential to function as a counter weight. The county as a whole will have a population approaching half a million at this census. Its hardly inconsequential in a country of 4.3mill. Only cities of substantial size already can hope to accrete the functionality to become self generating in a modern context. The only way that will happen, even given the existing population level, is with the provision of proper strategic planning and lead infrastructure. It will never approach the size of Dublin (I hope), but it could well take some of the population growth and take the pressure off services in the capital .

    • #759435
      lexington
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      Is that all? At the last census, Cork had around 12% of the national population – if the city region is becoming a counterbalance to Dublin, and is obtaining critical mass in its own right, you’d expect to see a higher proportion of completions than that.

      Is it true to say that much of the Cork region is only really starting to grow in terms of population now? I know the growth rate is ahead of the projections in the CASP, but the scale of development only seems to have ramped up in the last year.

      That figure is based on the number of projected house completions for Cork as stated in the Hooke & MacDonald Summer 2006 Property Outlook (10,000) versus the projected national completion rate in the same report (85,000) – the figure is more accurately at approx. 11.7% – when considering this, one most remember that the national completion rate has significantly increased year-on-year site Census 2002 and accordingly, so too has Cork completions. Given comparisons in population, the Cork figure is significant – where Dublin completions are greater by less than double that of Cork (8,000 units in excess of).

      My own feeling is – and has always been – that focused growth in Dublin is damaging not only to itself, but the broader nation strategically. Personally, I see Cork not as a “counterweight” in the literal sense (I think such a prospect would never be beneficial) but a centre of strategic growth. Cork’s population is growing, and will continue to grow, there is capacity for this – but in terms of trade and industry, similar to what you say Aidan it should grow as a centre of ‘excellence’ with increasing focusses on niche areas that distinguish itself from other cities (Irish and European) and consequently attract investment which identify the city as synonymous with a particular field or fields. To this end, it is my personal wish to see Cork draw on its pharmaceutical, healthcare and technology bases and build a strong and vibrant R&D culture – to date, the level of this is insufficient with predominant emphasis of the manufacture rather than innovation of output. To this end, education should be a core driver of such factors with both University College Cork and CIT (and perhaps further 3rd level institutions) centred central to such progression. This does not mean Cork should isolate itself to these sectors (never carry all your eggs in one basket) but should promote and develop itself a set of core competencies that formulate a ‘first preference’ identity. Though the location of Amgen’s manufacturing activities in Cork was welcome – creating up to 1,000 jobs – to me, the real jewel is the R&D wing (which went to Switzerland). Equally, Pfizer has the bulk of its manufacturing operations in Cork – but its new biotech research facility has been cited for Dublin. Cork has the country’s largest cancer research centre (the Cork Cancer Research Clinic) – yet the clinic is scattered in inadequate offices and facilities between UCC and the Mercy University Hospital. It would like to see Cork take advantage of the Docklands area by including some prominent so-called ‘white collar’ research facilities to compliment the broader commercial, retail, leisure and residential development there.

      Rather the compete with Dublin on issues of population etc etc – we should focus on developing what we have and gaining specialised interests which will promote future growth (this in turn should catalyse continued population, infastructural and institutional development). Cork should think outside the box and not copy those of everyone else – that means investment ahead of the game (installing a first class public transport system (rail!), creating a first-class living environment (green-spaces, protection of green belts, educational facilities, walkways, river-uses), protection of our natural environment and geographical assets (Cork is unique), promotional of the built environment (maintaining and improving existing building stock; promoting high-standards and a healthy-mix of architecture) – selling Cork as a distinct area to invest and live in.

    • #759436
      ToMuchFreeTime
      Participant

      I find it intresting the break down of population in the cork city area. in that it was the only urban area in the country to record a population decrease in last census.

      Now there was an article in the examiner yesterday that stated the main reason for this was lack of development land within the city boundarys (which i agree with other than docks). they went on to say that the city fathers are looking to extending the boundary into county council areas ( which i think is long over due as services would be easyer to plan)

      But the article says that some councilers are saying not an inch:mad: 😡

      Now my questions are these:confused:

      1. do you think that the county council will give in and surender loads of land around the city and end up losing loads in commercial rates

      2. Where do you think city fathers are looking to have the boundary lines drawn. such are they looking for huge amounts of land(Like waterford which is looking for land a few times bigger than the whole city) or just to include the established suburbs back into the city boundary??

      3.What do you think the population would be once the boundarys are re-drawn.

      4.:) PLUS does any one want to try and guess what the population of county and population of city will be once the latest cso figures are released. I’M guessing theres going to be huge increase due the huge amount of eastern europeans in the county/city

    • #759437
      jdivision
      Participant

      @ToMuchFreeTime wrote:

      I find it intresting the break down of population in the cork city area. in that it was the only urban area in the country to record a population decrease in last census.

      Now there was an article in the examiner yesterday that stated the main reason for this was lack of development land within the city boundarys (which i agree with other than docks). they went on to say that the city fathers are looking to extending the boundary into county council areas ( which i think is long over due as services would be easyer to plan)

      But the article says that some councilers are saying not an ince:mad: 😡

      Now my questions are these:confused:

      1. do you think that the county council will give in and surender loads of land around the city and end up losing loads in commercial rates

      2. Where do you think city fathers are looking to have the boundary lines drawn. such are they looking for huge amounts of land(Like waterford which is looking for land a few times bigger than the whole city) or just to include the established suburbs back into the city boundary??

      3.What do you think the population would be once the boundarys are re-drawn.

      4.:) PLUS does any one want to try and guess what the population of county and population of city will be once the latest cso figures are released. I’M guessing theres going to be huge increase due the huge amount of eastern europeans in the county/city

      Cork Corpo has been trying to expand city boundaries for at least a decade. Hasn’t happened so far and unlikely to happen, see Douglas traffic problems thread. I think the population will be up in the county, static in the city because of apartments in recent years. I think people overestimate the number of Eastern Europeans in cork. I think it’s just because a lot work in service industries they’re very visible.

    • #759438
      kite
      Participant
      ToMuchFreeTime wrote:
      I

      1. do you think that the county council will give in and surender loads of land around the city and end up losing loads in commercial rates

      2. Where do you think city fathers are looking to have the boundary lines drawn. such are they looking for huge amounts of land(Like waterford which is looking for land a few times bigger than the whole city) or just to include the established suburbs back into the city boundary??

      😎 City Council are to debate the issue of a boundary extention next Monday evening.
      Councillors D.McCarthy and J.Corr have motions in on the subject, asking the County Council nicely seems to be done away with in favour of the sledgehammer approch as they are asking for Section 56 (part 8) of the Local Government Act 2001 to be used to force the issue and are requesting the Minister for the Environment, Dick Roche to establish a commission to decide on the extention.
      I feel that Togher, Wilton, Douglas and Mayfield are all worth a look ??

    • #759439
      jungle
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😎 City Council are to debate the issue of a boundary extention next Monday evening.
      Councillors D.McCarthy and J.Corr have motions in on the subject, asking the County Council nicely seems to be done away with in favour of the sledgehammer approch as they are asking for Section 56 (part 8) of the Local Government Act 2001 to be used to force the issue and are requesting the Minister for the Environment, Dick Roche to establish a commission to decide on the extention.
      I feel that Togher, Wilton, Douglas and Mayfield are all worth a look ??

      I would be inclined to add a mile beyond the built up areas. Otherwise, there will just be the same set of problems in 20 years time.

      The suburbs you mention would be definites. The question mark would be over Ballincollig, which could also look to get a UDC in its own right.

    • #759440
      Ebeck
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      Rather the compete with Dublin on issues of population etc etc – we should focus on developing what we have and gaining specialised interests which will promote future growth (this in turn should catalyse continued population, infastructural and institutional development). Cork should think outside the box and not copy those of everyone else – that means investment ahead of the game (installing a first class public transport system (rail!), creating a first-class living environment (green-spaces, protection of green belts, educational facilities, walkways, river-uses), protection of our natural environment and geographical assets (Cork is unique), promotional of the built environment (maintaining and improving existing building stock]

      If only we were in control of our own destiny. The purse strings are held by Dublin and I doubt we would be given free rein. The airport terminal springs to mind.

    • #759441
      kite
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      I would be inclined to add a mile beyond the built up areas. Otherwise, there will just be the same set of problems in 20 years time.

      The suburbs you mention would be definites. The question mark would be over Ballincollig, which could also look to get a UDC in its own right.

      🙂 Agreed, on the western side of the city all lands to the east of the proposed northern relief road should be in the control of the city as an absolute minimum?
      Togher to the airport area + ballygarvan?
      Mayfield to Glanmire?
      Douglas to Passage?
      On another subject, does anyone agree that the planning submissions for the docklands area are being submitted in a piecemeal fashion by CCC without the benefit of a masterplan for the area?

    • #759442
      A-ha
      Participant

      Saw a notice in the Examiner today about all the flights to Cardiff from Cork. Apparently they will be leaving from the “North Terminal” (near the Cargo area) as opposed to the “Main Terminal” which will be used for arrivals. What “North Terminal” is in Cork…. are they talking about the new one? I thought it wasn’t to be used for another few months. I also agree that the city boundary should be extended right into the far suburbs. I think that a separate council should be set up for the whole Metropolitan Cork area. Towns like Midleton already have Urban Councils, but for Metro Cork to work in the future, there needs to be some form of Council that can work with all the UDC’s in the area as well as the CCC and CoCoCo, especially when it comes to matters such as planning etc.

    • #759443
      kite
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I also agree that the city boundary should be extended right into the far suburbs. I think that a separate council should be set up for the whole Metropolitan Cork area. Towns like Midleton already have Urban Councils, but for Metro Cork to work in the future, there needs to be some form of Council that can work with all the UDC’s in the area as well as the CCC and CoCoCo, especially when it comes to matters such as planning etc.

      😮 I agree 100% but for the fact that we would need to pay another 70-80% of deadbeat councilors for the Urban Councils, Metro Cork etc 30-50,000 euro PA including traveling expences to go to junkets on septic tanks…..in Cork??, that for 2 to 3 hours per week to add to their 1000 euro per week for the DAY JOB !!:mad:

    • #759444
      kite
      Participant

      😎 City Manager Joe Gavin has reached agreement with the site owner to purchase the remaining portion of the Huguenot Cemetery, Carey’s Lane.
      The Cemetery dates from1710 and is one of only two French Reformist burial grounds in Ireland, the second is located in Merrion Row, Dublin. These 2 sites are the only surviving Huguenot Cemeteries in Europe.
      The owner is to retain a strip of land 8ft wide as part of the proposed deal and is to apply for permission for a stairway to the first floor of a property he owns and wishes to develop as a restaurant.
      If all goes to plan the city will open this area to the public.

    • #759445
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 John Paul Construction were erecting a new tower crane today over Frinailla Developments’ CitySquare project at Ladyswell, along the Watercourse Road, which coincidently is now being launched through agents Global Properties and FML Properties. The 147 units (over basement car-parking and commercial/community facilities) are arranged over a variety of residency types from townhouses to duplex apartments capturing a near full-spectrum of preference types. Designed by Kiosk Architects, the scheme has been approximately 4-years in the making and when complete will offer a new and revitalised urban district to this, the city side of Blackpool (among Cork’s fastest regenerating areas). The family-friendly redevelopment will rejuvenate what has long been a derelict and unsightly location – and stands to further enhance the Blackpool area which will see a number of further developments come on stream in prospective months which will further promote this region as one of Cork’s most sought after and well served quarters (not least the new Revenue Commissioners offices off Assumption Road and the redevelopment of the Sunbeam Industrial Estate which will be subject to revised proposals in the coming future). Now sporting a new logo, Frinailla are progressing with a number of other exciting redevelopment schemes around the city including the highly anticipated Dennehy’s Cross and Convent Gardens (former Good Shepherd) schemes. The company was recently granted permission following appeal for its Orchard Gardens (Victoria Cross Road) scheme which was reduced by 1-storey to 5-storeys by An Bord Pleanala.


      CitySquare scheme images – now launched through Global Properties and FML.



      🙂 Dunnes Stores, through architect Berie Pope & Associates, are to submit revised plans (via Significant Further Information) on their proposed redevelopment project of the original Dunnes Stores premises along Saint Patrick’s Street. A number of issues were raised by Cork City Council’s Planning Department concerning the original proposal – including the roof-top plant areas and elevational treatments. The revised scheme will now again seek to demolish all on site structures (extending from Patrick’s Street to Drawbridge Street – with the exeption of facades 103 – 105 St. Patrick’s Street which will be retained and incorporated) and construct a 6-storey retail flagship. The scheme now proposes to add an additional basement level (which may allow for the relocation of some plant equipment from roof to basement), revised floor-layouts and revised elevational treatments.


      Images of the original redevelopment proposal for the Saint Patrick’s Street redevelopment project by Dunnes Stores – improved images hoped for soon.



      And before I forget, in honour of today…

      UP MUNSTER!

    • #759446
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      🙂 John Paul Construction were erecting a new tower crane today over Frinailla Developments’ CitySquare project at Ladyswell, along the Watercourse Road, which coincidently is now being launched through agents Global Properties and FML Properties. The 147 units (over basement car-parking and commercial/community facilities) are arranged over a variety of residency types from townhouses to duplex apartments capturing a near full-spectrum of preference types. Designed by Kiosk Architects, the scheme has been approximately 4-years in the making and when complete will offer a new and revitalised urban district to this, the city side of Blackpool (among Cork’s fastest regenerating areas). The family-friendly redevelopment will rejuvenate what has long been a derelict and unsightly location – and stands to further enhance the Blackpool area which will see a number of further developments come on stream in prospective months which will further promote this region as one of Cork’s most sought after and well served quarters (not least the new Revenue Commissioners offices off Assumption Road and the redevelopment of the Sunbeam Industrial Estate which will be subject to revised proposals in the coming future). Now sporting a new logo, Frinailla are progressing with a number of other exciting redevelopment schemes around the city including the highly anticipated Dennehy’s Cross and Convent Gardens (former Good Shepherd) schemes. The company was recently granted permission following appeal for its Orchard Gardens (Victoria Cross Road) scheme which was reduced by 1-storey to 5-storeys by An Bord Pleanala.

      :rolleyes: I am looking for a developer in Cork to get me planning permission for, a Casino, a knocking shop, a rendering facility for detainees before they are shipped to Camp Delta in Cuba, and a Mosque in Tel Aviv….any suggestions ??

    • #759447
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 A man in the headlines over the last week has been John Lally of Lalco Developments, principally thanks to his purchase of the former FAAC Electronics site in Sandyford, Dubin for €100m in the face of numerous other approaches by developers in the past. Mr. Lally has publicly stated his intentions to double his development portfolio value from approx. €600m to €1.2billion over the next 12 months and beyond. To this end, it is understood Lalco are actively in pursuance of additional sites in and around Sandyford – but have also discussed options on a mixed-use scheme in Cork. The discussions are understood to be preliminary in nature and remain unconfirmed – but it is believed Mr. Lally is sizing up possibilities on developing a scheme in Cork as part of his company’s expansion efforts.



      😮 US-carrier Delta Airlines are in discussions with Cork Airport about the option of opening up a US route from the airport, however the stage of progression associated with the talks is unclear. The airline has identified Cork as one of its possible expansion options – the route could bring significant benefit in terms of both tourism and investment should it materialise.

      *shortly I would hope to post some (restricted) details of an emerging aviation development associated with Cork – although preliminary in nature*



      😎 Businessman Ulick McEvaddy (of Omega Air fame) speaking at the National Infastructure Summit in Sandyford last Tuesday/Wednesday (16th and 17th of May 2006) issued his beliefs on the planning of infastructure in Ireland noting that he believes the country should approach the issue with a strategic outlook of 50 years and beyond. Mr. McEvaddy noted his belief that both Dublin and Cork city would require a metropolitan underground system over the next 50 years. The idea of such a system is casually laughed at and dismissed – indeed, under current economic thinking the financial justification for such a system in Cork is often void. However, perhaps this is short-term thinking. My personal view is that the city must and should consider a strategic, integrated public transport system (initiated by both public and private bodies) that will allow bus, rail, light-rail and even water-bus networks interconnect on single ticket sales. The prospect of a whole underground rail system in Cork is indeed excessive – and unrequired – but in providing efficient and utilised services, the prospect of certain areas (like beneath Wilton/Bishopstown/CUH area) being provided with intermittent underground would indeed be suited – before resurfacing at say, Bishopstown Court (which may have a linked Park and Ride for West Cork commuters) and proceeding over-ground out to Ballincollig. The systems could interlink with docklands serving water-buses (which could proceed from Kennedy Quay to Univeristy College Cork main campus – providing a connection between established and a prospective campus at the docklands) and commuter rail services at Horgan’s Quay to Midleton, Cobh, Mallow and Blarney.

      Along with the idea of a River Lee Flood Barrier (which will become essential in protecting both Cork city island and prospective developments/investments in the Docklands – which will become increasingly a particularly vulnerable area to flooding) – I believe we need to start thinking in this manner and stop dismissing such thought as unviable or unrealistic.

    • #759448
      Micko
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😎 Businessman Ulick McEvaddy (of Omega Air fame) speaking at the National Infastructure Summit in Sandyford last Tuesday/Wednesday (16th and 17th of May 2006) issued his beliefs on the planning of infastructure in Ireland noting that he believes the country should approach the issue with a strategic outlook of 50 years and beyond. Mr. McEvaddy noted his belief that both Dublin and Cork city would require a metropolitan underground system over the next 50 years. The idea of such a system is casually laughed at and dismissed – indeed, under current economic thinking the financial justification for such a system in Cork is often void. However, perhaps this is short-term thinking. My personal view is that the city must and should consider a strategic, integrated public transport system (initiated by both public and private bodies) that will allow bus, rail, light-rail and even water-bus networks interconnect on single ticket sales. The prospect of a whole underground rail system in Cork is indeed excessive – and unrequired – but in providing efficient and utilised services, the prospect of certain areas (like beneath Wilton/Bishopstown/CUH area) being provided with intermittent underground would indeed be suited – before resurfacing at say, Bishopstown Court (which may have a linked Park and Ride for West Cork commuters) and proceeding over-ground out to Ballincollig. The systems could interlink with docklands serving water-buses (which could proceed from Kennedy Quay to Univeristy College Cork main campus – providing a connection between established and a prospective campus at the docklands) and commuter rail services at Horgan’s Quay to Midleton, Cobh, Mallow and Blarney.

      Along with the idea of a River Lee Flood Barrier (which will become essential in protecting both Cork city island and prospective developments/investments in the Docklands – which will become increaingly a particularly vulnerable area to flooding) – I believe we need to start thinking in this manner and stop dismissing such thought as unviable or unrealistic.

      What ever does become of a future transport system for Cork, I hope that Cork doesn’t take the Dublin route of using a whole mish mash of transport systems.

      In my mind, Dublin is a bit of a joke. It has, normal rail to some suburbs, DART to other places, Dublin Bus, LUAS and will soon have some form of Metro.

      Cork should either go all LUAS or go all Metro. I would like to see it go all Metro if possible. It by far the cleaner option and keeps Trams etc off of the streets, helping to reduce traffic more than any LUAS system could. Sure, it would cost extra, but the benefits would be massive.

    • #759449
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮

      Along with the idea of a River Lee Flood Barrier (which will become essential in protecting both Cork city island and prospective developments/investments in the Docklands – which will become increaingly a particularly vulnerable area to flooding) – I believe we need to start thinking in this manner and stop dismissing such thought as unviable or unrealistic.

      😎 Right on Lex, like I said before, the docklands is ripe for proper development if some sort of master plan is put in place including (as you mentioned) the provision of a flood barrier.
      Joined up thinking is what is needed here, not piecemeal submissions to suit individual landowners to maximize profits to the detriment of the city as a whole?

    • #759450
      A-ha
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 US-carrier Delta Airlines are in discussion with Cork Airport about the option of opening up a US route from the airport, however the stage of progression associated with the talks are unclear. The airline has identified Cork as one of its possible expansion options – the route could bring significant benefit in terms of both tourism and investment should it materialise.

      *shortly I would hope to post some (restricted) details of an emerging aviation development associated with Cork – although preliminary in nature*

      That all sounds very exciting. Make sure you keep us updated lex! Also, on the subject of the airport, I just read today that Aer Arann are beginning flights to Nantes (Brittany) in France instead of Angers. It’s sort of old news at this stage, but I wonder are Aer Arann trying to compete on the Nantes route with Ryanair who fly there from Shannon. I think the route will be popular as it’s the only route to Brittany without getting the ferry to Roscoff. It also saves on driving time down to Shannon (and back again) aswell as the cost of driving and parking your car down there too.

    • #759451
      kite
      Participant

      :confused: According to the Cork Economic Monitor, published by the Planning and Development Directorate, Cork City Council under section 3.5.11 “Derelict Sites”, areas being developed under the Derelict Site Register include the Jacob’s Mill building at 4-5 Fr. Matthew Quay.
      Has anybody information on how this site was put on the Derelict Site Register, how (if) it was purchased off same etc?

    • #759452
      jungle
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Cork should either go all LUAS or go all Metro. I would like to see it go all Metro if possible. It by far the cleaner option and keeps Trams etc off of the streets, helping to reduce traffic more than any LUAS system could. Sure, it would cost extra, but the benefits would be massive.

      I think the best approach would be to develop a LUAS style system, but to use routes that could be cut-and-covered at a later date to take trams out of traffic if necessary. This approach has been used in a number of cities – Brussels, Antwerp, The Hague for example. It means that you get a network up and running more quickly than by digging out a metro network and realistically, I can’t imagine Cork needing more than the capacisty provided by a tram, it might just help if trams could be separated from other traffic in the long run.

      I would also be highly opposed to any tramlines on Pana. Sending them down the quays on the southside of the North Channel should be perfectly adequate.

      @A-ha wrote:

      That all sounds very exciting. Make sure you keep us updated lex! Also, on the subject of the airport, I just read today that Aer Arann are beginning flights to Nantes (Brittany) in France instead of Angers. It’s sort of old news at this stage, but I wonder are Aer Arann trying to compete on the Nantes route with Ryanair who fly there from Shannon. I think the route will be popular as it’s the only route to Brittany without getting the ferry to Roscoff. It also saves on driving time down to Shannon (and back again) aswell as the cost of driving and parking your car down there too.

      I believe this decision was related to problems with Angers Airport rather than any desire to compete with Ryanair. They also shifted their Manchester-Angers flights to Nantes.

    • #759453
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Some more images of the recently launched City Square Development by Frinailla. More details at http://www.citysquare.ie



      Its good to see that Cork City Manager Joe Gavin is to tell the Council Meeting tonight that the city has agreed to purchase the Huguenot cemetery in Carey’s Lane and restore it as a cultural and tourist attraction, while also allowing its present owner some room to develop his 1st floor property.


      The Council are also due to confirm details of a Munster ‘Homecoming’ probably tomorrow (Tuesday) night in Cork City. Munster Abu!!


      Munster – Champions of Europe

    • #759454
      jungle
      Participant

      Just a quick post to note that the new Cork-Dublin Express carriages were finally put into service today on the 9am train from Dublin to Cork. Gradually, they will start operating more and more services on the Dublin-Cork line.

    • #759455
      kesey
      Participant
      kite wrote:
      :confused: According to the Cork Economic Monitor, published by the Planning and Development Directorate, Cork City Council under section 3.5.11 &#8220]

      kite, many properties in Corkk have defective legal title – one or more past documents may be missing from the title, and as a result financing development of such a property can be difficult. There are a number of ways of perfecting title, most of which are as one would expect a right royal pain in the ass and designed to generate paperwork, hot air and little else. One good way is to have a property which you own (i.e have best title to) certified derelict by the City Manager. By so doing, he can effectively and in relatively short order, perfect a new title to the property in question. Such a property passes into the hands of the Council for the duration of the certification process. Then the City Manager hands it back to the owner.

      This process is not a process whereby the City council are selling off properties cheap to worthy(!!) buyers. The properties were not the property of the City in the first place.

      I’m not a legal guy, so if any of my statements are incorrect in fact, please correct.

    • #759456
      kite
      Participant

      @kesey wrote:

      kite, many properties in Corkk have defective legal title – one or more past documents may be missing from the title, and as a result financing development of such a property can be difficult. There are a number of ways of perfecting title, most of which are as one would expect a right royal pain in the ass and designed to generate paperwork, hot air and little else. One good way is to have a property which you own (i.e have best title to) certified derelict by the City Manager. By so doing, he can effectively and in relatively short order, perfect a new title to the property in question. Such a property passes into the hands of the Council for the duration of the certification process. Then the City Manager hands it back to the owner.

      This process is not a process whereby the City council are selling off properties cheap to worthy(!!) buyers. The properties were not the property of the City in the first place.

      I’m not a legal guy, so if any of my statements are incorrect in fact, please correct.

      🙂 Thanks for the info, i was just wondering what way the derelict site system worked.

    • #759457
      lisam
      Participant

      The team are being invited to a reception with the Lord Mayor and Councillors at 7pm. At 8pm they will be on stage at the corner of Parnell Place and South Mall and Michael Corcoran from RTE will be the MC. There will be no open top bus

    • #759458
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Was looking at the new section to the Camden court apartment scheme across the way from the Opera house. Its coming on nicely and it looks like, in my opinion, one of the best architectural apartment schemes in the city centre. It was designed by James Leahy architects, but i was on the RIAI website there recently and it says there is a James Bourke architects, is this the same James Bourke who worked with James Leahys? Or a different fellow altogether? If it is the same James Bourke has he started up his own new practice or what??

    • #759459
      kite
      Participant

      The Cork Economic Monitor, May 2006 states that retail performed strongly in 2005.
      Significant new activity is likely in the city centre over the coming years such as the former Irish Examiner site on Academy St.,Guy’s site on Cornmarket St. etc.
      Vacancy levels on Patrick St. are up 23% since April 2005 and vacancy levels on Oliver Plunkett St are also up but City Council does not see this as a worrying trend as a number of premises are undergoing renovation such as the former Hickey’s retail unit with a 931sq.m. footprint.

    • #759460
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @kite wrote:

      🙂 Thanks for the info, i was just wondering what way the derelict site system worked.

      Don’t think that the wording from the Economic Monitor was all that clear……the site was on the Register but just being on the internal register doesn’t mean that the site is declared a Derelict Site.

      The register is used to clean up title but in the case of the Jacob’s site, it was on the list from way back in the very early 90’s.

      BTW did anyone notice that the Further Information response went in on Dunnes Stores on Patrick Street – they’ve apparently got Douglas Wallace Opperman from Dublin in on the job to help out Bertie Popes design

    • #759461
      Micko
      Participant

      Anyone know whats the story with that Food Emporium development on Fr Mathews Quay ? Work started their more than a year ago now. So far all they’ve managed to do is gut it, put a new roof on and do most of the load bearing internal structures. That’s all. A year to do this. Is there a reason for the huge hold up ?

      Also, anyone know anything about the proposed redevelopment of Douglas Village Shopping Centre.

    • #759462
      kite
      Participant
      Micko wrote:
      Anyone know whats the story with that Food Emporium development on Fr Mathews Quay ? Work started their more than a year ago now. So far all they’ve managed to do is gut it, put a new roof on and do most of the load bearing internal structures. That’s all. A year to do this. Is there a reason for the huge hold up ?

      :confused: I was wondering the same thing Micko. Mr. McCarthy seems to have another “never ending” project on his hands with the ongoing redevelopment of the Kingsley Hotel….set to be a five star,,i don’t think so??

    • #759463
      lexington
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Anyone know whats the story with that Food Emporium development on Fr Mathews Quay ?

      Also, anyone know anything about the proposed redevelopment of Douglas Village Shopping Centre.

      It believe the intention is to now convert the scheme into a small boutique hotel rather than the original apartment and food emporium scheme originially envisaged – although the scheme will retain the idea of extending Jacobs on the Mall restaurant – whether than has an ancillary emporium element to it I don’t know.

      @yorktown wrote:

      BTW did anyone notice that the Further Information response went in on Dunnes Stores on Patrick Street – they’ve apparently got Douglas Wallace Opperman from Dublin in on the job to help out Bertie Popes design

      The jury is out on the revised elevational treatment and new contemporary frontage at 102 St. Patrick’s Street. The corner at Drawbridge Street and Williams Street is also very bare – and the grey treatment is rather dull. Whatever you may feel about the original, I think the approach to the Patrick’s Street frontage (with respect to the protected facades) was much more sympathetic to the existing street-scape.

    • #759464
      kite
      Participant

      Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy have been taken to ABP in relation to their Crows Nest developmnet.

    • #759465
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy have been taken to ABP in relation to their Crows Nest developmnet.

      I think that was probably a given in light of the extreme conditioning. It’ll be interesting to see what the Bord make of it.

      On the matter of the Dunnes Stores on Patricks Street, I’ll have to agree with you on that one Lex. Not having been a fan of the previous plan, I still think the revised design is a bit of a let down. There doesnt seem to have been any address of active side-street uses along Bowling Green Street or Williams Street – and the whole scheme now seems to be a blanket shade of miserable grey. I couldnt find details on the materials, am I to assume limestone finishes? The new elevation at 102 is utterly awful, I get the argument for natural light but it looks completely out of place and scale with the protected facades and over-dominates them in a boxy and unkempt fashion. To this end, the original proposal was perhaps a little boring but it was certainly more in keeping and sympathetic to the existing frontages in the area. And for all the nattering about massing, the curved (cruise-liner bridge!) set-back brought a bit of variation to the standard roof-lines, and offered potential for interesting street views. Perhaps the only positive notes I can think of is the relocation of most plant equipment and storage areas to basement level and the more varied elevations along the side-streets. The northern (Drawbridge Sreet) elevation is boxy and bland, especially the eastern corner which towers like a sharp and rather boring line up about 20 metres. I sincerely hope the colour scheme is revised and the planners get some sense in recognising the pluses the original scheme brought in conjunction with the pluses (the few!) brought by the revised scheme – hopefully the best of both worlds is the eventual outcome. Wishful thinking?

      Andother scheme brought to my attention was the plan for a 5 storey office building at Monahan Road. What a drab and boring building. Indeed the road frontage is desirable but this is achieved by a faceless wall of glazing capped by an overhang and supported by a series of narrow columns which would seem to beckon variety (though it fails). Either-side of the street frontage are wings which border exaggerated entry and exit points to the basement carpark either side. These wings are punctured with serial circular holes the height of the building. A drop-off point to the front of the building seems to exaggerate the width of the road (promoting an excess of tarmacadam over environment!) and dimishes pedestrian flow routes running east-to-west along the road. Something the council should be trying to promote. A central courtyard makes for perhaps the most interesting design aspect of the building with a variation in materials which includes limited patterned stone elevational finishes – its a pity the variety couldnt be extended to the wider exterior treatment of the building. Both east and west elevations are faceless grey walls with little distinction. Though the height and scale of the project would seem inline and respectful of its location (especially to residencies to the south), its street frontage and elevational treatments leave much to be desired.

    • #759466
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Robert Kennedy & Barry O’Connor have appealed the conditions associated with their grant on a redevelopment proposal for the Crow’s Nest bar and adjoining premises at Victoria Cross. The applicants had initially sought the construction of 74 apartments over 112-space basement car-parking on a site measuring just 0.266 hectares. The proposal was to be laid out over a block of 6-storeys with a feature tower of 15-storeys (50.4 metres) fronting Victoria Cross – designed by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects. Following a time extension, the proposal was revised down to 10-storeys peak with 54 apartments and a now seperate block of 5-storeys with set-back 6th storey – all over 113 basement parking spaces and commercial units (as with the original proposal these units included among them a new bar and restaurant). The revised proposal can been seen in the image posted below. Despite noting that the scheme be acceptable at up to 8-storeys in his report, curiously the planner ultimately conditioned the scheme down to 6-storeys. The applicants are now appealing this decision with ABP.


      View of revised scheme from Victoria Cross with Cork County Hall in the background.



      😎 Niall Doris has appealed conditions on his plans to redevelop the Nat Ross premises on Monahan’s Road with 104-residential units, over 30,000sq ft of office space and basement car-parking. CCC found light to grant the scheme subject to a revision in heights which were originally proposed at 10-storeys (peak) – allowed at 6-storeys, conditions were imposed to reduce parking space numbers and a removal of 11-apartments to cater for enhanced amenity aspects. 95-units were granted. These conditions as well as issues of Development Contributions are now to be appealed by the developer. The project was designed by Jonathan Horgan with SDA O’Flynn.



      😎 Bernard Crowley and Gerard Paul’s scheme of 67 apartment units for the Riverside Farm along the Model Farm Road – designed by Dennehy + Dennehy – has seen its scheduled decision date with ABP pushed back until the 29th of May 2006. The original decision date as mooted for May 22nd 2006. The scheme was originally proposed at a height of between 6 and 7-storeys over basement parking – however following revisions, a grant for 49-units, creche and part-basement parking was permitted.


    • #759467
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      😎 Robert Kennedy & Barry O’Connor have appealed the conditions associated with their grant on a redevelopment proposal for the Crow’s Nest bar and adjoining premises at Victoria Cross. The applicants had initially sought the construction of 74 apartments over 112-space basement car-parking on a site measuring just 0.266 hectares. The proposal was to be laid out over a block of 6-storeys with a feature tower of 15-storeys (50.4 metres) fronting Victoria Cross – designed by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects. Following a time extension, the proposal was revised down to 10-storeys peak with 54 apartments and a now seperate block of 5-storeys with set-back 6th storey – all over 113 basement parking spaces and commercial units (as with the original proposal these units included among them a new bar and restaurant). The revised proposal can been seen in the image posted below. Despite noting that the scheme be acceptable at up to 8-storeys in his report, curiously the planner ultimately conditioned the scheme down to 6-storeys. The applicants are now appealing this decision with ABP.


      View of revised scheme from Victoria Cross with Cork County Hall in the background.

      This development is also subject to a third party appeal. Todays Cork Independent reports that the CSD group have lodged a submission.

    • #759468
      browser
      Participant

      *shortly I would hope to post some (restricted) details of an emerging aviation development associated with Cork – although preliminary in nature*

      Can you enlighten us yet Lexington…am intrigued!:confused:

    • #759469
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Any images available of Dunnes revised plans?

    • #759470
      lexington
      Participant

      😡 Well yet again, ABP have pushed back the decision date for Werdna’s Water Street scheme. Designed by Murray O’Laoire Architects, the scheme has been continuously pushed back. Already this year dates had been set for April and June but now it seems the date will now be delayed until September of 2006.



      Note:

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 US-carrier Delta Airlines are in discussions with Cork Airport about the option of opening up a US route from the airport, however the stage of progression associated with the talks is unclear. The airline has identified Cork as one of its possible expansion options – the route could bring significant benefit in terms of both tourism and investment should it materialise.

      It seems the Cork Airport Authority have denied media reports (which I subsequently noted on here) that Delta Airlines were in discussion to review prospects on a possible US-link. The revelation is disappointing and yet another let down in prospects for a transatlantic route to the city. Pity.



      @browser wrote:

      Can you enlighten us yet Lexington…am intrigued!

      I’m looking forward to it – however I have to be careful with this one, and may perhaps unveil details before mid-June. However the issue is rather sensitive at the moment given the preliminary nature of the project. It does not, however, relate directly to Cork Airport.

    • #759471
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      😡 Well yet again, ABP have pushed back the decision date for Werdna’s Water Street scheme. Designed by Murray O’Laoire Architects, the scheme has been continuously pushed back. Already this year dates had been set for April and June but now it seems the date will now be delayed until September of 2006.

      😮 This delay is an absolute disgrace, any investor/developer from outside Cork must now be asking themselves if any large scale development in the city is possible without being a member of Cork’s chosen few?

    • #759472
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Iarnród Éireann has published advertisements in local and national newspapers today to commence the Railway Order process for the restoration of rail services on the Cork-Midleton rail line.
      Services proposed on the route would be initially peak services every 30 minutes between Midleton and Cork, with the potential to expand to every 15 minutes as demand increases. Off-peak services would operate hourly, and all services would be operated by commuter railcars. It is envisaged that the line would reopen in 2008.
      The project proposes:

      – upgrading track on the disused Glounthaune to Midleton line, through provision of a single track with a passing loop at Carrigtwohill

      – providing a new signalling system

      – provision of two new stations at Midleton and Carrigtwohill, including car parking facilities, lifts and footbridges

      – the replacement of five level crossings with four new overbridges and one underbridge, including overbridges on the Cork-Glounthaune section of line

      – other infrastructure work including bridge, boundary and drainage works
      The Railway Order process, the equivalent of a planning permission process for a rail scheme of this type, provides for a Public Inquiry to be established to establish the final scope of the project, and rule on Compulsory Purchase Order powers for Iarnród Éireann.
      Full details of the project will be on display in seven locations in Cork, Carrigtwohill and Midleton (see below) to allow the public and interested parties to study the plans and make submissions if they wish. Information will also be available on line at http://www.irishrail.ie/midletonproject .
      The Midleton line works are part of a wider programme of investment to expand Cork area commuter services. New stations are also planned at Dunkettle on the Cork-Cobh/Midleton line; and Blarney and Blackpool/Kilbarry on the Cork-Mallow line.




      originally posted by paddyinthehouse

      Original shopfront image originally posted by Devin

      An Taisce have appealled to ABP against the decision by CCC to grant permission for the retention of a new shopfront on Oliver Plunkett Street, Cork. The shopfront belongs to the new Butlers Chocolate store/cafe adjacent to the GPO. The ‘original’ Buckley Bros. shopfront used vitrolite- a material which is no longer produced. See ‘vitrolite shopfronts’ thread for more.


      It’s good to see the renewal of the streetscape on Grand Parade going ahead speedily. The first of the new stonework has been laid in the past few days and workers are currently dismantling and removing the Berwick Fountain temporarily.

      Finally for now, does anybody else think that the new wall and railings erected in front of The Counting House at Beamish and Crawford are a disgrace? The wall is just poured concret, the railings themselves are terribly designed which has resulted in the need to install chunky metal barriers between the top of the wall and the bottom of the railing. If you havent seen it already, take a look next time you’rte passing. It looks like a monumental cock-up.!

    • #759473
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Midleton line Railway Order process underway by Corporate Communications

      Iarnród Éireann has said that advertisements are to appear in local and national newspapers from today (Friday 26th May) to commence the Railway Order process for the restoration of rail services on the Cork-Midleton rail line.

      An integral part of the Transport 21 investment programme, the upgrade and restoration of the ten kilometre Glounthaune to Midleton line will enable Iarnród Éireann to begin commuter services between Cork and Midleton.

      Services proposed on the route would be initially peak services every 30 minutes between Midleton and Cork, with the potential to expand to every 15 minutes as demand increases. Off-peak services would operate hourly, and all services would be operated by commuter railcars. It is envisaged that the line would reopen in 2008.

      The project proposes:

      – upgrading track on the disused Glounthaune to Midleton line, through provision of a single track with a passing loop at Carrigtwohill

      – providing a new signalling system

      – provision of two new stations at Midleton and Carrigtwohill, including car parking facilities, lifts and footbridges

      – the replacement of five level crossings with four new overbridges and one underbridge, including overbridges on the Cork-Glounthaune section of line

      – other infrastructure work including bridge, boundary and drainage works

      The Railway Order process, the equivalent of a planning permission process for a rail scheme of this type, provides for a Public Inquiry to be established to establish the final scope of the project, and rule on Compulsory Purchase Order powers for Iarnród Éireann.

      Full details of the project will be on display in seven locations in Cork, Carrigtwohill and Midleton (see below) to allow the public and interested parties to study the plans and make submissions if they wish. Information will also be available on line at http://www.irishrail.ie/midletonproject .

      The Midleton line works are part of a wider programme of investment to expand Cork area commuter services. New stations are also planned at Dunkettle on the Cork-Cobh/Midleton line; and Blarney and Blackpool/Kilbarry on the Cork-Mallow line.

      The Cork commuter area investment plan is endorsed by national, regional and local planning, such as the Cork Area Strategic Plan (CASP), Strategic Rail Review and Special Local Area Plans, as well as Transport 21.

      A spokesperson for Iarnród Éireann said “ the development of the Midleton line is an integral part of a framework for land use, transportation, social and environmental policies in the Cork region which sees Cork take the lead in sustainable planning in this country. This will deliver a system which will benefit generations to come in Cork and in the Munster region. There has been tremendous public support for this major investment, and we would encourage the community and interested parties to avail of the opportunity to see the plans for the Midleton line in any of the seven locations, or online.”

      GLOUNTHAUNE TO MIDLETON LINE FAQs

      Q. WHEN WILL THE GLOUNTHAUNE TO MIDLETON LINE BE IN USE AGAIN?

      A. It is expected that trains will be running to Midleton before the end of 2008.

      Q. WHAT KIND OF TRAINS WILL RUN AND HOW OFTEN?

      A. The same kind of trains will run on the Cork to Midleton line as run on the Cork to Cobh line today. i.e. two-car commuter railcars. It is intended to commence the service by running trains half-hourly for the morning and evening peak demand periods and hourly during the day and off-peak. Services can expand further in response to demand.

      Q. WILL THERE BE DISRUPTION TO EXISTING SERVICES WHILE NEW TRACK AND OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT ARE BEING BUILT?

      A. There will be unavoidable disruption to existing road traffic in the vicinity of the existing railway line and two stations during the construction phase of the works at limited times during the development of the project. Iarnród Éireann will endeavour to minimise this, but the full extent of disruption will be confirmed following the public inquiry and detailed design work.

      Q. WHAT IS THE RAILWAY ORDER AND PUBLIC INQUIRY?

      A. The Railway Order is the equivalent of a planning permission process for railway line, stations and elimination of level crossings.

      It also covers Compulsory Purchase Order powers for Iarnród Éireann and gives Iarnród Éireann full operating rights over the new railway.

      Under the Railway Order, Iarnród Éireann will be displaying the full plans for the Project at various different locations for a period of 28 days. This is to allow all interested parties to view the plans.

      Any interested party then has the opportunity up to 14 days after the end of the display period to submit any views they have on the project to the Minister for Transport.

      All submissions, including the original plans, are then the subject of a public inquiry, chaired by an Inspector appointed by the Minister for Transport. The Inspector shall submit to the Minister a report in writing of the findings of the inquiry and any recommendations he/she considers appropriate having regard to the inquiry.

      The Minister will rule on the final scope of the project and CPO powers for Iarnród Éireann.

      Q. WILL THERE BE COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDERS?

      A. Under the Iarnród Eireann proposal, there will be certain areas of land required not currently in the ownership of the company. This includes land to facilitate the project which may be permanently acquired; land over which rights including rights of way may be acquired; public or private rights of way which may be extinguished; public or private rights of way which may be temporarily interrupted; and land of which temporary possession may be taken. All affected landowners will be contacted directly by Iarnród Éireann to advise them of the scope of impact proposed on their property.

      Q. DOES THE GLOUNTHAUNE TO MIDLETON RAILWAY PROJECT HAVE A WIDER SCOPE?

      A. The project is part of wider infrastructure plans required for the growth of the Commuter rail service for the County and will include new stations at Dunkettle, Blackpool and Blarney and various other works such as signalling and station upgrades.

      Q. WHAT IS THE TIMESCALE ENVISAGED FOR THE PROJECT?

      A. Assuming the Public Inquiry takes place in late summer 2006, detailed design and tender of the works are envisaged to take place up to the end of 2006, with construction taking place from early 2007 to late 2008.

      Q. WHAT ARE THE COSTS ENVISAGED FOR THE PROJECT?

      A. The final costs will be determined by the ruling of the Minister following the Public Inquiry, detailed design work and any inflationary pressures up to the signing of contracts.

      Q. WILL THE GLOUNTHAUNE TO MIDLETON LINE BE EXTENDED TO YOUGHAL AGAIN?

      A. Although there is no plan to re-use this line from Midleton to Youghal in the short to medium term; the County Planners have reserved the existing railway reserve for the potential reuse of the railway.

      Q. WHERE CAN I FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THE GLOUNTHAUNE TO MIDLETON LINE PROJECT?

      The full Railway Order documentation, including:

      – Plans of the Route

      – Alignment Plans

      – Structure Plans

      – Draft legal order and schedules to the order

      – Environmental Impact Statement, in full and summary form

      are on display from 26th May to 6th July 2006 at the following locations:

      Cork City Council, Planning and Development Directorate, Navigation House, Albert Quay, Cork

      Cork Central Library, Grand Parade, Cork

      Cork County Council, Corporate Affairs Department, 14th Floor, County Hall, Cork

      Midleton Town Council, Pearse Memorial Chambers, Youghal Road, Midleton, County Cork

      Midleton Public Library, Main Street, Midleton, County Cork

      Carrigtwohill Community Centre, Main Street, Carrigtwohill, County Cork

      Iarnród Éireann Travel Centre, Kent Railway Station, Lower Glanmire Road, Cork

      Information will also be displayed shortly in pdf format at: http://www.irishrail.ie/midletonproject

      Full copies of the documentation are also available to purchase from the Iarnród Éireann Travel Centre in Kent Railway Station, Cork; and the Project Office, Inchicore Works, Dublin 8.

      The Project office can also be contacted for those seeking information on the project at: 021-455 7255 and 01-7034228 or midletonproject@irishrail.ie

      Very good news

    • #759474
      POM
      Participant

      Great to hear a little bit of progress on the Midelton line. Now if we could just get an application in planning for Horgans Quay we’d be on a roll!

      On the matter of Water Street, I am aware that everytime the decision date is put back we give out and I know the whole rather it be delayed than refused idea but all the same the numerous and continual review and delay in the decision here must be frustrating to even the most patient developer and architect. It is disappointing. I simply hope the outcome is beneficial to all those involved and to Cork.

    • #759475
      THE_Chris
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:




      originally posted by paddyinthehouse

      Original shopfront
      image originally posted by Devin

      An Taisce have appealled to ABP against the decision by CCC to grant permission for the retention of a new shopfront on Oliver Plunkett Street, Cork. The shopfront belongs to the new Butlers Chocolate store/cafe adjacent to the GPO. The ‘original’ Buckley Bros. shopfront used vitrolite- a material which is no longer produced. See ‘vitrolite shopfronts’ thread for more.


      Thats so stupid I dont even know where to begin.

      – the replacement of five level crossings with four new overbridges and one underbridge, including overbridges on the Cork-Glounthaune section of line

      Hmmm. Just wondering why they need to replace the Cork-Glounthaune ones. Didnt think they were too bad?

    • #759476
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @THE_Chris wrote:

      Thats so stupid I dont even know where to begin.

      What are you referring to? The allowance of the shopfront to be retained or the appeal against it?

    • #759477
      Pug
      Participant

      It seems very very late or a token gesture by An Taisce to be appealing to ABP. They must see that particular shopfront all the time so why now so long after its done?

      and What is a ‘retention’ request anyway? Is is simply that someone builds something they are not supposed to and goes back after for planning permission?

      Either give permission at the time of planning or dont. And if someone builds something other than they were permitted to then fine them and put a black mark next to their name for their next planning permission request. Very simple.

    • #759478
      THE_Chris
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      What are you referring to? The allowance of the shopfront to be retained or the appeal against it?

      I think the shopfront should be left with the nice new frontage rather than harking back to the 1950s with that godawful green patchwork 🙂

    • #759479
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I suppose this is going to be a matter of taste, but I am quite a fan of vitrolite shop fronts. Whilst the Buckley’s one was not in great condition, it could have been refurbished. I also think that the new shopfront is more guilty of harking back than what it replaced, with its lettering etc. Alot of those Butler’s shopfronts are pure rubbish in my opinion. I assume that An Taisce are bringing it further to try and make a point. I don’t realistically see them having to reinstate the Buckley’s front, but I think anything that raises awareness of the importance of mid 20th century architectural heritage is a good thing.

    • #759480
      GrahamH
      Participant

      The appeal could be viewed as a token gesture, but it’s the store’s own fault for having ploughed ahead with the development before even getting permission. What do they expect?
      A pair of dodgy repro sash windows doesn’t make up for it.

    • #759481
      jungle
      Participant

      @THE_Chris wrote:

      Hmmm. Just wondering why they need to replace the Cork-Glounthaune ones. Didnt think they were too bad?

      Level crossings are undesirable from a safety perspective. What may be more relevant here is that once Midleton is opened, there will be 8 trains per hour passing over the track between Cork and Glounethaune at peak hours. On a busy road this could be a problem for traffic management.

      That said, I can’t think of any particularly busy road that crosses the railway line at a level crossing. Does anyone know which level crossing between Cork and Glounethaune will be replaced with a bridge? Presumably, the Cork-Cobh line will be shut for a while during construction work.

    • #759482
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Hopefully weekend closures which was the way the new bridges were put on during the DART capacity enhenancement works in Dublin; which if phased would only affect either of the two lines at any given weekend

    • #759483
      THE_Chris
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      Level crossings are undesirable from a safety perspective. What may be more relevant here is that once Midleton is opened, there will be 8 trains per hour passing over the track between Cork and Glounethaune at peak hours. On a busy road this could be a problem for traffic management.

      That said, I can’t think of any particularly busy road that crosses the railway line at a level crossing. Does anyone know which level crossing between Cork and Glounethaune will be replaced with a bridge? Presumably, the Cork-Cobh line will be shut for a while during construction work.

      Well I travel along it regularly enough, and I cant think of any either. All of the major roads are overbridges. The only level crossings along the routes are housing access near the station. I guess they could be putting one bridge in where the main entrance into that small estate thing is near the station. Serves about 20 houses.

      Perhaps they’re updating some though :confused: Didnt think any of them were falling down.

    • #759484
      lexington
      Participant

      @Graham Hickey wrote:

      The appeal could be viewed as a token gesture, but it’s the store’s own fault for having ploughed ahead with the development before even getting permission. What do they expect?
      A pair of dodgy repro sash windows doesn’t make up for it.

      From the planning report (related to the application under appeal):

      The background to this application is that the applicants had pre-planning discussions regarding a new shopfront for 30 Oliver Plunkett Street and it was generally agreed that as the existing frontage was in extremely poor condition and in view of the fact that the material was no longer available and unsuitable for the corporate image of the new tenant, it was agreed that a new shopfront and design would be provided. The background to this is set out in the Planning File T.P. 05/29330 which also records the original shopfront.

      However a permission issued which was considered unsuitable for the applicants and inappropriate for their proposals. At a meeting on the 17th June 2005, the position was clarified and it was explained that there was a serious commercial imperative in that the owner wished to retire and the sale of the property was dependant on the development proceeding.

      In the particular circumstances the Director of Planning agreed that the development would proceed and that a Planning application for retention of the completed development should be made.

      On recent inspection, it was noted that the new development has been completed to a very high standard and the new shop has added substantially to the appearance of the street. I consider the finished result to be quite acceptable and in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

    • #759485
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      The background to this application is that the applicants had pre-planning discussions regarding a new shopfront for 30 Oliver Plunkett Street and it was generally agreed that as the existing frontage was in extremely poor condition and in view of the fact that the material was no longer available and unsuitable for the corporate image of the new tenant, it was agreed that a new shopfront and design would be provided. The background to this is set out in the Planning File T.P. 05/29330 which also records the original shopfront.

      This quote basically sums up our attitude to architectural heritage in this country. It seems that features which may be of value are only deemed in that way so long as they are commercially viable. Nothing is deemed to be of any intrinsic value in and of itself anymore. Nothing is allowed to stand the test of time so that future generations can appreciate them. If the above is taken further it could be argued that McDonalds should be allowed to rip apart whatever building they have purchased because it doesn’t suit their ‘corporate image’.

    • #759486
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      From the planning report (related to the application under appeal):

      The background to this application is that the applicants had pre-planning discussions regarding a new shopfront for 30 Oliver Plunkett Street and it was generally agreed that as the existing frontage was in extremely poor condition and in view of the fact that the material was no longer available and unsuitable for the corporate image of the new tenant, it was agreed that a new shopfront and design would be provided. The background to this is set out in the Planning File T.P. 05/29330 which also records the original shopfront.

      However a permission issued which was considered unsuitable for the applicants and inappropriate for their proposals. At a meeting on the 17th June 2005, the position was clarified and it was explained that there was a serious commercial imperative in that the owner wished to retire and the sale of the property was dependant on the development proceeding.

      In the particular circumstances the Director of Planning agreed that the development would proceed and that a Planning application for retention of the completed development should be made.

      On recent inspection, it was noted that the new development has been completed to a very high standard and the new shop has added substantially to the appearance of the street. I consider the finished result to be quite acceptable and in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

      😡 I fully agree with phil (post 1973), in cities and towns that I am familiar with, Bath, York, St. Tropez plus I am sure many others, allow the likes of McDonalds either tiny signs on the front of their shops, or go so far as to limit them to a sticker in the window. If they don’t like it they are told lump it (they always “like” it!!!)
      The type of planning outlined above by Lex belongs more in the likes of Zimbabwe or some other 3rd world despot nation. If some companies insist on gaudy vulgar signs they should go to shopping malls and not destroy high profile streets
      Any wonder some are highly suspicious of planning in Cork.

    • #759487
      Anonymous
      Participant

      On the theme of other cities regulating signage I visited Dresden in 1992 and was struck by the McDonalds signage at a premises in the centre of the City and just how controlled it was in what was a very emerging state at the time.

      I was very disapointed to see the Buckley Bros signage go as this type of once common shopfront gets scarcer on a national level every passing day. I can understand the owner wishing to sell out but what dissapoints me is that the agents didn’t wait to find a less generic tenant as this part of the City surely would be regarded as almost as prime as it gets and prove extremely attractive to anumber of potential oocupiers.

      An Taisce are right to take this appeal as a very unique piece of Cork’s architectural heritage has been sacrificed to facilitate a generic chain that imatates Thorntons badly. 🙁

    • #759488
      phatman
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      On the theme of other cities regulating signage I visited Dresden in 1992 and was struck by the McDonalds signage at a premises in the centre of the City and just how controlled it was in what was a very emerging state at the time.

      I was very disapointed to see the Buckley Bros signage go as this type of once common shopfront gets scarcer on a national level every passing day. I can understand the owner wishing to sell out but what dissapoints me is that the agents didn’t wait to find a less generic tenant as this part of the City surely would be regarded as almost as prime as it gets and prove extremely attractive to anumber of potential oocupiers.

      An Taisce are right to take this appeal as a very unique piece of Cork’s architectural heritage has been sacrificed to facilitate a generic chain that imatates Thorntons badly. 🙁

      Em, I kinda appreciate your sentiment, but to me the old shop front was just another shabby part of a shabby street in general. I think Oliver Plunkett Street, along with North Main Street, retains the feel of a street in a country town, or the city back in the 80’s. Alot more effort could be made.

    • #759489
      A-ha
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      Em, I kinda appreciate your sentiment, but to me the old shop front was just another shabby part of a shabby street in general. I think Oliver Plunkett Street, along with North Main Street, retains the feel of a street in a country town, or the city back in the 80’s. Alot more effort could be made.

      I agree, I’m surprised that manky green signage stayed for as long as it did. I don’t know how anyone can say that they will miss it. It’s so vile and as said by phatman, a reminder of the city back in the 80’s, which weren’t really the most spectacular years of Cork’s history.

      Also, I read a piece today saying that Panorama Holidays are to begin charter flights to Sharm El Sheikh in Egypt, supposedly by the end of December in time for the winter sun season. These flights will be the first ever flights from Cork to Egypt.

    • #759490
      kite
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      Em, I kinda appreciate your sentiment, but to me the old shop front was just another shabby part of a shabby street in general. I think Oliver Plunkett Street, along with North Main Street, retains the feel of a street in a country town, or the city back in the 80’s. Alot more effort could be made.

      😉
      Don’t get me wrong, I think the new shopfront is a huge improvement on the Buckley’s one. I used the example of McDonalds as an example of good planning practice in not allowing multinationals, developers etc dictate to city planners.
      If I am reading Lex’s post correctly ??… The planning department of CCC issued a grant of planning with conditions, the company cried foul and the Director of Planning then recommended that they alter the shop without planning and then apply for retention??
      This is not what one could describe as best practice in planning.
      A slippery slope perhaps?

    • #759491
      Ebeck
      Participant

      A little leftfield maybe, I wondered if anything could be done to bring the Viaduct back into use ( not as a bridge!). It is a great looking structure and acts as a gateway to West Cork.
      Could a restaurant / museum / art gallery go on top. Just stick a pair of lifts on the stone piers on either side of the dual carriageway, enclose the top in glass and Bob’s your uncle……a beautiful attraction to draw the public and tourists in. There’s plenty of space for parking. I’m only half joking.

    • #759492
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’d rather see the viaduct carrying trains to west cork again but nonetheless, i’m intrigued by this idea. It certainly deserves to be cleaned and floodlit to act as a real gateway.

      On a totally unrelated topic…. the man who brought us the Glucksman Gallery, Prof. Gerry Wrixon has announced he is standing down as President of UCC from next January. Now, whatever your views on academic restructuring (yawn) you’ve got to hand it to the guy… he pushed the Glucksman idea against some fairly tough criticism and he deserves serious credit for that!
      In fact, under his tenure the architecture of d’ college has changed significantly. Think of the BioSciences building, the Pharmacy building, the extension to the Student Centre and the Boole complex, the new Mardyke Bridge, the plans for the new IT building and the impressive brookfield medical centre.

    • #759493
      Angry Rebel
      Participant

      The viaduct is currently floodlit, but they did a very poor job of it. The scheme doesn’t show the viaduct in a good light (sorry, awful pun 😮 ) and one of the poles is actually very dangerous for oncoming drivers as the dazzle and glare it creates is significant.

    • #759494
      Micko
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I’d rather see the viaduct carrying trains to west cork again but nonetheless, i’m intrigued by this idea. It certainly deserves to be cleaned and floodlit to act as a real gateway.

      Tell me one thing though, where is the original rail line that ran from the train station to the start of the viaduct. I’m a bit too young to remember it in action but I can’t work out through which parts of the city it ran and where it crossed the Lee.

      If its gone, I hardly think train services to Bandon will ever reappear.

    • #759495
      jungle
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Tell me one thing though, where is the original rail line that ran from the train station to the start of the viaduct. I’m a bit too young to remember it in action but I can’t work out through which parts of the city it ran and where it crossed the Lee.

      If its gone, I hardly think train services to Bandon will ever reappear.

      It ran down what is now the South Link Rd. Near to the current location of the Kinsale Rd Roundabout, the Macroom line and the Bandon Line split. The Bandon Line gradually went up the hill and ran through what is now the halting site at Forge Hill. Between Forge Hill and the Viaduct, the remains of the embankments can be seen, but on the city side it has been almost entirely built over. That wouldn’t necessarily be a problem as you could easily cut and cover down the Kinsale Rd.

      However, it would be necessary to consider whether it would be better to use a different alignment anyway. You could easily divert the line to run through the airport, but this would mean missing the viaduct. There are also problems with the line having been built on in Bandon.

      The real pity is that the Macroom line has disappeared. It went to Macroom via Capwell, Togher, Bishopstown and Ballincollig. Imagine if it was now possible to run trams on just the Cork-Ballincollig section of that.

    • #759496
      who_me
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      If its gone, I hardly think train services to Bandon will ever reappear.

      It’s a pity, but inevitable. I’d love to see any part of this line restored – even much further out Skibbereen-Ballydehob along the river Ilen would be beautiful.

      Hard to believe there were so many railway stations in Cork city at one stage.

    • #759497
      who_me
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Finally for now, does anybody else think that the new wall and railings erected in front of The Counting House at Beamish and Crawford are a disgrace? The wall is just poured concret, the railings themselves are terribly designed which has resulted in the need to install chunky metal barriers between the top of the wall and the bottom of the railing. If you havent seen it already, take a look next time you’rte passing. It looks like a monumental cock-up.!

      I walk by every day, and they’re shocking. Hard to believe, but the old railings were better!

      For those that haven’t seen it, the lower part is a rough, bland concrete barrier (somewhat akin to the barriers you might see skirting F1 tracks), topped by an unpainted railing that’s far too tall, with a gap of about a foot in between. Seeing this gap, I was hoping that it was a work in progress, and they might be planning on adding a stone face to the wall, perhaps with potted plants or flowers on top under the railing, which might be nice.

      But no, they’ve since tacked on another square rail between the wall and railing which matches neither. A little bizarre.

      On the subject of Beamish; what restrictions exist on erecting floodlighting on a building? I live in an apartment block across the river from Beamish, and when I walk into my living room the floodlights hit you so hard you have to squint or look away. Do you think they’d be receptive to a polite request to adjust the angle slightly so it’s hitting the Counting House facade more directly, and not shining right into peoples’ houses?

    • #759498
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      I agree, I’m surprised that manky green signage stayed for as long as it did. I don’t know how anyone can say that they will miss it. It’s so vile and as said by phatman, a reminder of the city back in the 80’s, which weren’t really the most spectacular years of Cork’s history.

      A-ha the shopfront dates from considerably before 1980 and I agree the loss of major employers of such as Verlome, Dunlop and Ford hardly endeared that period to the City.

      To understand Vitrolite you should consider that this material was the most modern and expensive material of its time i.e. the 1930’s through 1950’s and was displayed on many of Irelands main streets and secondary streets in major cities such as Cork.

      I will miss it as it formed part of the rich tapestry of buildings on Oliver Plunket Street from a number of periods which makes it one of Irelands premier leisure streets. I am sure that the shopfront could have been adapted to suit a similar usage as is common with cafes trading out of listed former butcher shops from the Edwardian period typically clad in bright terracota frontages that up to 15 years ago werem also regarded as manky or vile in many quarters. It is also clear to me that Butlers could have found an alternative premises from which to trade.

    • #759499
      kite
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Tell me one thing though, where is the original rail line that ran from the train station to the start of the viaduct. I’m a bit too young to remember it in action but I can’t work out through which parts of the city it ran and where it crossed the Lee.

      If its gone, I hardly think train services to Bandon will ever reappear.

      🙂 Forgive me if im wrong on this, i think that Albert Quay House / Howard Holdings Webworks building was the station for the Bandon line.

    • #759500
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Regarding Butlers, as I recall only down the road l’Occitane (itself a chain) moved in and made a virtue of some original features. There are countless examples internationally where “global corporate branding” is not an obstacle when dealing with local planning. The brand is altered to accommodate the environment it finds itself in. What’s makes Butlers so bloody special? At least it Butlers who moved in and not Vodafone.

    • #759501
      Micko
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      🙂 Forgive me if im wrong on this, i think that Albert Quay House / Howard Holdings Webworks building was the station for the Bandon line.

      Oh, so the line didn’t go all the way into Kent. Prob makes more sense. So the line ran down the South Link Road and then along the South Ring Road ?

      Did that train station also serve the Mahon line ?

    • #759502
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      I think this was metioned way back, but the Albert Quay webworks development currently being built by Howard was the old terminus of the West Cork line. The shunting yards extended into what was until recenlty the An Post sorting office and will soon be the Eglinton St residential tower. Interestingly, there was a link line connecting Kent Station to Albert Quay. This link traversed the Brian Boru Bridge (think that is the name, correct me if wrong) and an allignment to Kent.
      Capwell Station now serves as the Bus Eireann depot but used to be the terminus of the Macroom Line I believe.
      The Crosshave Line terminus is not far from Albert Quay and the original building is still in situ although used as a commercial premises presently. The Terminus for the Youghal Line was originall on Summerhill North but changed to Kent when that station opened.
      Think I have covered all the stations there, but please correct me if I am wrong with regards to any of the above.

    • #759503
      jungle
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      I think this was metioned way back, but the Albert Quay webworks development currently being built by Howard was the old terminus of the West Cork line. The shunting yards extended into what was until recenlty the An Post sorting office and will soon be the Eglinton St residential tower. Interestingly, there was a link line connecting Kent Station to Albert Quay. This link traversed the Brian Boru Bridge (think that is the name, correct me if wrong) and an allignment to Kent.
      Capwell Station now serves as the Bus Eireann depot but used to be the terminus of the Macroom Line I believe.
      The Crosshave Line terminus is not far from Albert Quay and the original building is still in situ although used as a commercial premises presently. The Terminus for the Youghal Line was originall on Summerhill North but changed to Kent when that station opened.
      Think I have covered all the stations there, but please correct me if I am wrong with regards to any of the above.

      Almost all the stations. There was a terminus for the Cork and Muskerry Light Railway on the site of what became Jury’s Hotel. This was a line to Blarney (by a different route from the Dublin mainline) and Donoughmore.

    • #759504
      Micko
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      The Terminus for the Youghal Line was originall on Summerhill North but changed to Kent when that station opened.
      .

      I’m guessing this is why there is an extension to the Youghal line which passes over the tunnel with the Dublin line ?

    • #759505
      theblimp
      Participant

      Lex,

      Your teasing of an aviation-related development has me intrigued – any chance the following link provides some insight?

      http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=228095

    • #759506
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      Lex,

      Your teasing of an aviation-related development has me intrigued – any chance the following link provides some insight?

      http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=228095

      Surely this is madness!!!
      It certainly doesnt fit in with this particular company’s M.O. Surely if they were going to enter that part of the industry, they would have picked somewhere slightly more desirable in Europe than East Cork. Besides, with the prospect of a second-hand terminal becoming available on the road to Kinsale soon at a very reasonable cost, it doesnt make sense.

    • #759507
      lexington
      Participant

      Gardner House

      Final bids for 1, South Mall (Gardner House) were scheduled for final submission last Friday 26th of May. The 6-storey, 1,624sq m office building is anchored by a number of well-known tenants such as PriceWaterhouseCoopers and Lisney (who have recently leased out a large ground-floor unit – the investment is being sold through Davin Auctioneers and Lisney on behalf of Ellier Developments with an AMV situated in and around the €7.75m – current rental yields are approx. 3.75% with scheduled reviews set to increased this percentage in excess of 5%. The building also provides the thought option of some further development work or simply a retention investment opportunity. A number of bids are understood to have input on the prominent building, however the details of these constituent bids are not clear to me.



      I’ll try and get some more news up later. Still recovering and not in the best of condition to post more for the time being.



      @theblimp wrote:

      Lex,

      Your teasing of an aviation-related development has me intrigued – any chance the following link provides some insight?

      http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=228095

      I really am not in a position to post specifics quite yet. Sorry.

    • #759508
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      I’m guessing this is why there is an extension to the Youghal line which passes over the tunnel with the Dublin line ?

      Spot on Micko. In fact, it was owned by the scouts and parts of the old platform were still there when I was a wee lad many moons ago.

    • #759509
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      This is a little off but I just wanna know out of pure curiosity, do O’Flynn construction have any designs on large docklands developments do ye think? Its clear Howards do and Flemings are supposed to have been trying to swing something. If anyone knows i’d be very interested to hear.

    • #759510
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Scott Tallon Walker Architects have been cleared for the redevelopment and extension to existing an Victorian terrace (including remodelling of former Cork Grammar School) at Patrick’s Place along the historic Wellington Road, as part of a mixed use development of 0.08 hectare site. The proposed development comprising four storeys over lower ground floor and basement includes 10 no. apartments, 653.26 sq. m of office space and 308.27 sq. m of commercial showrooms at street level. The development will also include basemnet parking and is situated just east of Broadcasting House, home to 96FM Radio, owned by the Ulster Television and Media Group. Though it is yet to be confirmed, it is speculated that Scott Tallon Walker Architects may seek to relocate from the current offices at Cotters Street (as part of the Copley Hall development by Howard Holdings) to the new office space provided as part of this development.



      🙂 Paul Kenny has been permitted a number of revisions sought by him and design team Wilson Architecture, for his The Treasury office development fronting Saint Patrick’s Quay. The scheme, originally permitted by Cork City Council on the 7th August 2005 was subject to appeal and again, granted. The revisions to the proposal sought included amedments to the already permitted roof garden; the relocation of roof plant to basement area and removal of screening; change of material on north elevation from Parklex Panel System to Colour Render System and replacement of opening windows with fixed type windows. Construction work on the scheme is believed to begin within the coming months.

      – on the matter of Paul Kenny, the developer’s other prime city centre site, that of 50 Grand Parade (currently serving as a Citi Car Park facility) is understood to be closing in on a new application – with no lodgement date yet finalised or at least known. Mr. Kenny is understood to be among the developers who have made approaches to Cork City Council regarding options on the existing Cork City Central Library on Grand Parade – for which submissions are due by Friday June 2nd 2006.



      😮 Oyster Developments have finally received permission for their 0.2acre site along Church Road in Blackrock. The site was purchased by the Killarney-based company from the ESB for a sum believed to be in and around the half-million mark – the premises formed part of a land disposal by the semi-state electricity company. Employing regular design team, The e-Project, Mr. Crowe of Oyster Developments sought permission for the development of 7 apartments over 3-retail units – the proposal was subject to 76 objections from residents and political representatives of the area. Following a series of Further Information rounds, the scheme has been permitted in a revised, soley residential format of 5-townhouses and 3 apartments (1x 2-bedroom and 2x 1-bedroom).

      – Oyster Developments are also currently active in formulating designs for a mixed, predominantly residential development location along the Carrigrohane Road (former Coca-Cola Bottling Plant of 1.7 acres which was purchased via agents Lisney for a figure believed to be close on €8m {though that sum has not be officially confirmed that I am aware – open to correction}). Initial speculation that the site could accommodate a taller build structure have been played down in light of discussions and not least the recent ruling of the now appealed scheme by Barry O’Connor and Robert Kennedy for the Crow’s Nest at Victoria Cross. Among the reasons cited for the rigourous conditions imposed was the need to protect the primacy of Cork County Hall as a landmark structure.



      😮 June 6th 2006 represents the scheduled decision date of the eagerly anticipated CentrePoint scheme at Clontarf Street. The scheme proposed by business-trio DAT Partnership (who are also active on a number of other schemes including residential projects in Kerry) and designed by architects Coughlan de Keyser will be in planning over a year when a decision is made. The proposal initially posited a futuristic, striking 9-storey office building cantilevered over the footpaths which border the tiny triangular site bound by Deane Street, Lower Oliver Plunkett Street and Clontarf Street – subject to concerns by Cork City Council on matters such as its cantilevered nature and heights of the southern elevation with respect to the buildings relationship to surrounding structures like No.6 Lapps Quay – a revised design was articulated. The new design toned down the futuristic aspect and focused on a more traditional, but equally striking construction finished at a reduced height (although still 9-storeys) and finished with limestone and glazing materials. The building is representative of a Flatiron Building type structure, with a curved-glazed stairwell rising almost the full-height of the building along the northern elevation. A number of lighting features are proposed to give the scheme a dynamic and active presence both day and night. Canopies overhang a number of the glazed features along the east and southern elevations, not dis-similar to those currently adorning the CityQuarter office building along Lapps Quay. Despite continued concerns related to height, the design team have maintained the need for the current height on economic and design grounds. Whether Cork City Council will be able to look beyond the emerging standardised height patterns will be matter for revelation on the decision day.

      – nearby O’Callaghan Properties are moving onward with designs for their Anderson’s Quay office project, understood to be at the design helm of Wilson Architecture. The site comprises of the former Reliance Bearings premises (0.5acres approx. extending from Anderson’s Quay to Lower Oliver Plunkett Street), the CSPCA premises fronting Clontarf Street – who will attain a new premises as part of the transaction, the S.Tyres workshop and Thomas Maher’s premises also fronting Anderson’s Quay (the latter having yet to be confirmed). The office scheme will supposedly be set over 5-floors above retail (perhaps offering a new Maher’s premises???) and basement car-parking for over 100 spaces. The scheme, when realised, should offer a nice finish to this fast emerging business and commercial district.

    • #759511
      kite
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      Lex,

      Your teasing of an aviation-related development has me intrigued – any chance the following link provides some insight?

      http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=228095

      😀
      Well guys I will keep any howls of laughter until later as I am old enough (unfortunately) to remember the people who said NEVER when an airport celebrating its 20th anniversary today was suggested?

    • #759512
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 June 6th 2006 represents the scheduled decision date of the eagerly anticipated CentrePoint scheme at Clontarf Street. The scheme proposed by business-trio DAT Partnership (who are also active on a number of other schemes including residential projects in Kerry) and designed by architects Coughlan de Keyser will be in planning over a year when a decision is made. The proposal initially posited a futuristic, striking 9-storey office building cantilevered over the footpaths which border the tiny triangular site bound by Deane Street, Lower Oliver Plunkett Street and Clontarf Street – subject to concerns by Cork City Council on matters such as its cantilevered nature and heights of the southern elevation with respect to the buildings relationship to surrounding structures like No.6 Lapps Quay – a revised design was articulated. The new design toned down the futuristic aspect and focused on a more traditional, but equally striking construction finished at a reduced height (although still 9-storeys) and finished with limestone and glazing materials. The building is representative of a Flatiron Building type structure, with a curved-glazed stairwell rising almost the full-height of the building along the northern elevation. A number of lighting features are proposed to give the scheme a dynamic and active presence both day and night. Canopies overhang a number of the glazed features along the east and southern elevations, not dis-similar to those currently adorning the CityQuarter office building along Lapps Quay. Despite continued concerns related to height, the design team have maintained the need for the current height on economic and design grounds. Whether Cork City Council will be able to look beyond the emerging standardised height patterns will be matter for revelation on the decision day.

      Certainly that is a plan i’m look forward to seeing come to life myself but not far away is the hotel plan for Parnell place. The Pitwood proposal. I’m particularly anxious to see that move for a number of reasons among them the condition of the protected facades which seriously need some TLC. I read ages back in one of the newspapers that the developer was in discussion with the council about getting a move on this as soon as possible. Does anyone know more?? I think this is probably one of the more urgent schemes needed to get a move on.

    • #759513
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      Just got in the mail, Cork City Councils South Docks Local Area Plan looking for submissions. They have already decided the make up and use of this urban quarter

    • #759514
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @shrink2cork wrote:

      Just got in the mail, Cork City Councils South Docks Local Area Plan looking for submissions. They have already decided the make up and use of this urban quarter

      So what have they decided so far? Any mention on building heights?? Uses??

    • #759515
      Pug
      Participant

      Shipton Group are on final phase of Blackpool, due to finish it out in July / August – will there be a move on Douglas / Carrigaline after that do you reckon?

    • #759516
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Today, Wednesday 31st May 2006, saw the final day for submissions due on the application by Frinailla Developments’ proposal to redevelop the much neglected former Keatings Bakery site along the Tramore Road, only a stone’s throw away from the South Ring Dual-Carriageway – offering superb access to either end of the city proper. Lodged toward the end of April, the residential scheme has received 9 seperate submissions from various parties (resident and local representatives alike) – the proposal seeks to rejuvenate the site with a mix of 96 spacious units over basement car-parking and a 399sq m creche. In all, the scheme will incorporate 16x 1-bedroom apartments, 56x 2-bedroom apartments, 10x 2-bedroom duplexes, 12x 3-bedroom apartments and 2x 3-bedroom duplex units. Frinailla have again enlisted Kiosk Architects, who have previously worked with the developer on schemes which include Springmount, Glanmire and CitySquare, Blackpool (under construction). Kiosk have emerged on the Cork architectural scene as a practice of both innovative and distinct character – among their best known completed works may be found along South Main Street in Cork city centre (i.e. the popular Wagamama/Captain America/Suas premises).

      For more details on the Tramore Road project see here.


      Aerial view of the former Keatings Bakery site – now the subject of a new proposal by Frinailla.


      An existing view of the derelict subject site.



      Images of the revival as proposed – a.) as seen fronting Tramore Road; b.) as seen from an internal courtyard.



      City Manager to leave Leeside?

      In this month’s edition of Business Cork magazine (May 2006), a news-brief speculates the possibility of Cork City Manager Joe Gavin taking up the post left by John FitzGerald as Dublin City Manager. The rumour remains unconfirmed by Cork City Council – and here it remains speculation. What does such a prospect mean for Cork? Under Mr. Gavin’s management, Cork has undergone one of its most prosperous revivals – a track record any future City Manager will (should such a post need filling) most certainly be measured comparatively and hopefully seek to sustainably and imaginatively maintain. Mr. Gavin previously held the post of Galway City Manager from 1994 – 2000 and also oversaw various positions in local authorities including those in Sligo, Kildare and Mayo.



      😎 Bernard Crowley & Gerard Paul’s plans to develop 49-apartment units, a gym, basement car-parking and ancillary facilities (designed by Dennehy + Dennehy Design) at the former Riverside Farm along the Model Farm Road has now seen its appeal due date pushed back until June 21st 2006. Further details are posted here.

      – meanwhile, Bernard Crowley’s latest application on a small store site just off Hanover Street (adjoining the recently permitted office scheme by Adrian Power at Clarke’s Bridge – currently in appeal) for a 6-storey office building designed by J.E. Keating & Associates is expected to receive a decision on June 7th 2006. Previously, Mr. Crowley had been refused permission to develop 4x 1-bedroom studio apartments on the small site. Interestingly, the latest application has received an objection from neighbouring property owners John & Michael O’Dwyer – Mr. Crowley subsequently added his own submission to the appeal currently under review on the O’Dwyer’s proposal for an apartment scheme, also along Hanover Street.

    • #759517
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      😮
      City Manager to leave Leeside?

      In this month’s edition of Business Cork magazine (May 2006), a news-brief speculates the possibility of Cork City Manager Joe Gavin taking up the post left by John FitzGerald as Dublin City Manager. The rumour remains unconfirmed by Cork City Council – and here it remains speculation. What does such a prospect mean for Cork? Under Mr. Gavin’s management, Cork has undergone one of its most prosperous revivals – a track record any future City Manager will (should such a post need filling) most certainly be measured comparatively and hopefully seek to sustainably and imaginatively maintain. Mr. Gavin previously held the post of Galway City Manager from 1994 – 2000 and also oversaw various positions in local authorities including those in Sligo, Kildare and Mayo.

      ]http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2001/53.html[/url]

    • #759518
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      So what have they decided so far? Any mention on building heights?? Uses??

      Can anyone answer that question?? I’d be very interested to know.

      Also i know I’ve asked this already but no one seemed to answer about O’Flynns having any plans for the South docklands??

      Oh one other thing will there ever be movement on the Mannix site on Washington street? It must have planning almost 2 years at this stage and still nothing. I think along with the Parnell place hotel it is probably one of the most need rejuvenation projects in Cork city centre? Its a shame this has got going. The same should be said for the long long overdue redevelopment of the Kino cinema further up the street. What is happening with these 2??

    • #759519
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Oh one other thing will there ever be movement on the Mannix site on Washington street? It must have planning almost 2 years at this stage and still nothing. I think along with the Parnell place hotel it is probably one of the most need rejuvenation projects in Cork city centre? Its a shame this has got going. The same should be said for the long long overdue redevelopment of the Kino cinema further up the street. What is happening with these 2??

      The Mannix project, as far as I am aware, is not a priority for the site owners. There are apparently issues with tenants on the site such as the Cork Gay Project and the Flower Shop at the corner of St. Augustine Street – I’m not clear on where these issues stand at the moment. There was speculation that the premises may go up for private sale for redevelopment with a 3rd party – but this would not seem to have materialised. Previously, it seemed certain involved parties weren’t even 100% sure themselves. However I agree, the current state of the site drags much of Washington Street down, the redevelopment would add enormously to the street-scape.


      The single-storey remains of the Mannix & Culhane premises – image copyright of CorkSpace

      As for the Kino, again I can’t give you a definite here, but I believe delays may be related to issues of funding. Of course I am open to correction on all points mentioned here.


      Images of the Kino redevelopment proposal designed by Dennehy + Dennehy Design.

    • #759520
      THE_Chris
      Participant

      That looks awful. Why do we want to see a pile of stairs from the roadside?

    • #759521
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      As for the Kino, again I can’t give you a definite here, but I believe delays may be related to issues of funding. Of course I am open to correction on all points mentioned here.


      Images of the Kino redevelopment proposal designed by Dennehy + Dennehy Design.

      🙂 Issues of funding and also I believe that one of the owners of Eden hall / Tennis village project owns some adjoining property that may be delaying progress.
      I agree THE_chris, a fire escape surrounded by glass is not an appealing design

    • #759522
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @kite wrote:

      @lexington wrote:

      😮
      City Manager to leave Leeside?

      In this month’s edition of Business Cork magazine (May 2006), a news-brief speculates the possibility of Cork City Manager Joe Gavin taking up the post left by John FitzGerald as Dublin City Manager. The rumour remains unconfirmed by Cork City Council – and here it remains speculation. What does such a prospect mean for Cork? Under Mr. Gavin’s management, Cork has undergone one of its most prosperous revivals – a track record any future City Manager will (should such a post need filling) most certainly be measured comparatively and hopefully seek to sustainably and imaginatively maintain. Mr. Gavin previously held the post of Galway City Manager from 1994 – 2000 and also oversaw various positions in local authorities including those in Sligo, Kildare and Mayo.

      ]http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2001/53.html[/url]

      The City Manager was in Dublin the other day for final interviews for the Dublin City Manager post……..

    • #759523
      kite
      Participant

      @yorktown wrote:

      @kite wrote:

      The City Manager was in Dublin the other day for final interviews for the Dublin City Manager post……..

      😉 Fingers crossed then??

    • #759524
      lexington
      Participant

      Tomorrow sees the final submission date for proposals on the highly attractive premises that is Cork City Central Library along Grand Parade. Intentions to receive proposals on the site were made known by City Manager Joe Gavin last February – the prospect of a joint redevelopment (including a new 55,000sq ft to 60,000sq ft library) or relocation of the library to a new city centre premises was invited. A number of developers have expressed interest in the valuable premises, among them Ascon, John F. Supple Contractors, Frinailla Developments, the Kenny Group and at least 2 other parties have expressed interest. Ascon have assessed plans in conjunction with Joe Carey and Frank Sheahan to relocate the library to the recently acquired Government Buildings site along Sullivans Quay (as part of a broader mixed-development to include offices). The existing Central Library building was completed on designs by Kelly Barry O’Brien Whelan Architects in 1975 and is set to be demolished as part of any new proposal. The prospect of the site’s acquisition will be one of prestige to the successful developer and open the way for a dynamic commercial development quarter, which may have some room for residential components also. Development at this site should serve to further enhance Grand Parade’s position as a primary retail extension to the Patrick’s Street area (along with Cornmarket Street), but may also build on emerging recreational and residential patterns nearby.


      The Central Library spans 57 – 61 Grand Parade, curiously the limestone facade pictured above remains unlisted on the Protected Structures record.


      The 1975 library frontage onto Grand Parade as designed by Kelly Barry O’Brien Whelan Architects.



      😮 Somewhat related to the details on Ascon above, hoardings were being erected and diggers excavating furiously today in preparation for construction work by the contractors on their Linn Dubh project at Susie’s Field, off Assumption Road and the Blackpool By-Pass. The project will be built to house the new Revenue Commissioners offices – consequent of Ascon’s successful bid in conjunction with Frank Sheahan and Joe Carey, who had attained planning for the office scheme through architects Jack Coughlan & Associates, back in 2003. As part of the winning bid, the developers have acquired Government Buildings on a 3/4 acre Sullivans Quay site facing across the River Lee’s South Channel onto a soon to be rejuvenated Grand Parade.



      😎 DAT Partnership have seen a request called of them by CCC for Further Information yet again regarding their CentrePoint proposal along Clontarf Street. A decision date had been set for June 6th 2006.

    • #759525
      Anonymous
      Inactive
      kite wrote:
      yorktown wrote:
      ]

      Perhaps its a case of better the devil you know………

    • #759526
      POM
      Participant
      kite wrote:
      yorktown wrote:
      ]

      Why do you feel that?

      On another matter, reading that write up by Frank MacDonald in the Irish Times regarding Academy Street, I’m curious as to why he is giving the scheme so much attention? He has written at least 3 articles this year to my mind on the proposal and its progress in planning. Is it because he genuinely has an interest in the project or is there something a little more questionable at hand (i.e. a little incident last year involving a to-and-fro between he and the subject developer)? Not that I’m complaining, I’m as interested in this scheme as the next man and think it will be good for the city, but even just reading the selected quotes I’m a little curious.

    • #759527
      jdivision
      Participant

      In case people missed Cork supplement in Sunday Business Post last week, second phase of Ballincollig town centre retail scheme is now in masterplanning. An additional 100,000 square feet of retail is planned, some of which will be retail warehousing. In addition, a deal has been agreed in principle with a retailer for one of the two large retail units at the Emmet Street end of O’Callaghan’s Academy St. scheme. H&M, Next, Zara and Arcadia are in talks regarding the two units. Arcadia would presumably put Top Shop in there. I wasn’t able to establish which of the retailers has signed the deal in principle – my preference would be to see H&M there and probably Top Shop, which is massively popular in Dublin. The Zara effect seems to have worn off already. Fingers crossed it’s not Next, blandness blandness everywhere.

    • #759528
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Paul Kenny has been granted permission on his plans to develop 32 houses between 2 and 3-storeys on the former John A. Woods premises along the Carrigrohane Road – not far from Cork County Hall. The land, which hosts The Kenny Group’s new Cork offices, measures approx. 2.63 acres – Mr. Kenny sought permission for 26 terrace houses with roof-gardens and conservatories adjacent to the steep “cliff” face on site, with amenity access to the ridge zone for occupants. A further 6 houses were proposed with access to the Curraheen River. Generally, private open space is provided in a combination of roof terrace and access to forest gardens along the escarpment or riverside – while public space is proposed to connect to the bridge and river walkway. The scheme is designed by Murray O’Laoire Architects and came highly praised by the planner who opened his assessment of the scheme stating, “Overall, the proposed development has much that commends itself…”; of the house and landscaping designs it is stated in the planning report, “The quality and size of the units is a significant departure from the norm” and “the quality of proposed landscaping is of a high order”. Again, Mr. Kenny seems to be showing continued evidence of a strong focus on design – another prominent project of his, that of The Treasury scheme along Saint Patrick’s Quay garnered strong praise for peers and planners alike, that scheme was designed by Wilson Architecture. Early word of designs Mr. Kenny is working on for his pivotal Citi Car-Park site at 50 Grand Parade (backing out onto South Main Street) are positive – though clear designs of the scheme have yet to be seen. There would seem to be a recognition that investment in good design pays off.



      😎 Blackpool Developments (The Shipton Group) are likely to appeal their scheme granted today for Blackpool Park. Originally, a 6-storey building over 54-space basement car-park with 30 apartment units and ground floor retail, again designed by Kelly Barry O’Brien Whelan Architects, sought permission for development to compliment the already successful and well-praised scheme. The planner sought it necessary to omit 3-floors from the scheme via condition.



      Western Road Apartment Scheme

      Mentioned first a few weeks back, Paul Montgomery’s plans for a residential scheme along the Western Road on the former Muskerry Service Station site are now scheduled for a decision on July 19th 2006. The scheme is designed by Derek Tynan & Associates (Or DTA Architects as the firm is now labelled) and comprises of 59 apartments over 2-buildings of varying heights between 5 and 6-storeys and basement car-parking for 54 vehicles. The scheme is designed to maximise vistas and perspectives of its riverside location with extensive glazing patterns on the east and southern elevations. The blocks are divided by a break in the forms allowing channelled perspectives from the road to the water’s edge. A mixture of hard, timber and soft landscaping is arranged on site. What is likely to draw controversy however is the treatment of elevations to the north and west which are extensively curtained by stone cladding with intermittent breaks in the form of fenestration. The cubic and steep verticals of these elevations are located close to the roadside and offer an imposing sight. Top floors are recessed. It will be interesting to see how planners consider the application.

      Unfortunately, access to images is limited – the example posted below is of poor quality but reflects the Western Road frontage (northern elevation) of the eastern block. Protruding glazed frontages to the east can be seen facing the river.

      Again apologises for the quality – piteously I don’t have available images to otherwise highlight the scheme in its entirety.

      – the other DTA scheme in Cork that is making talk is that of Victoria Mills’ second phase. The scheme is an extension of the controversial student accommodation development and offers 31 student apartments over basement car-parking and commercial floorspace. The architect has opted for a brown brick finish to the scheme rather than a continuation of the original phase and its lighter render. It has been almost a week since Ridge Developments, contractors on the scheme, have removed the tower crane. Below find some images detailing the scheme’s construction and more recent images following removal of the scaffolding.


      A perspective of the scheme as viewable from O’Neill Crowley Bridge approaching Victoria Cross.


      From the west: the 1st Phase of Victoria Mills can be seen in the background.


      Among the best assets the scheme has is its location next to the Curraheen River – the setting is quite attractive.

    • #759529
      lexington
      Participant

      Again, the site location is enviable – the landscaping of the 1st Phase of the development works rather well. The shots below highlight the relationship of Victoria Mills (or as some of its college-year inhabitants amusingly refer to it “Bricktoria Mills” 😮 ) to its setting. *Large Images*

      From an engineering perspective, the scheme garners much to admire – architecturally and presentation wise, it has caused much controversy. The 9-storey block cantilevers at the south-eastern elevation (suspending 7-storeys), hung by deep plate girders located at roof level. These beams span back over many bays providing restraint for the cantilevers.



      *Additional Updates*

      😎 On the matter of Victoria Cross, the other student development nearing completion, University Hall – developed by Fleming Constuction on behalf of University College Cork and designed by Bertie Pope & Associates – is set to see the opening of a new Centra store, secured through agents Hamilton Osbourne King, open in one of its ground floor commercial units. The news should be a welcome boost to area long deprived of functional community facilities – and should be a handy accompanient to the emergining student population.



      😮 Not far away, Cork County Hall’s 17th storey ‘observation and hospitality suite’ is destined to open as a fine-dining restaurant under the management of Masterchefs Hospitality, a Limerick-based catering and event management group. The facility (which includes additional elements of the renewed Cork County Hall), branded under ‘Cork County Hospitality’, will offer state-of-the-art conference facilities with a capacity for up to 1000 persons.

    • #759530
      POM
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Unfortunately, access to images is limited – the example posted below is of poor quality but reflects the Western Road frontage (northern elevation) of the eastern block. Protruding glazed frontages to the east can be seen facing the river.

      Again apologises for the quality – piteously I don’t have available images to otherwise highlight the scheme in its entirety.

      Can’t make too much of it out there. Havent been down to the planning office in a while, but must make a point next time I’m there to take a look at this. From the road at least it looks like one of those haunted mansions. That elevation is ghastly! Its like one big wall!!

    • #759531
      kite
      Participant

      [quote=”lexington

      😮 Not far away, Cork County Hall’s 17th storey ‘observation and hospitality suite’ is destined to open as a fine-dining restaurant under the management of Masterchefs Hospitality, a Limerick-based catering and event management group. The facility (which includes additional elements of the renewed Cork County Hall), branded under ‘Cork County Hospitality’, will offer state-of-the-art conference facilities with a capacity for up to 1000 persons.[/QUOTE”]

      😮
      Messrs. Tom Kelly and McCarthy of the “renewed”!! Kingsley Hotel missed out on the County Hall top floor pub / restaurant to the Masterchef group from Limerick as Lex pointed out.
      The Kingsley group had proposed a tired seating arrangement for the unit to allow all patrons a view of the lovely surrounding area (Victoria Mills excluded).
      These gents are having a tough time at the moment with the build and aesthetic quality of the Kingsley development, our Presidents driver stayed there this week when the President was in Cork for the freedom of the city, the Presidential Suite named after our Mary however remained empty on the night, maybe the anticipated reduction of star value is not to her taste?

      On another matter, I am delighted that the board of ABP overturned their own inspector and refused the destruction of St. Colmans in Cobh, however does anyone else get an uneasy feeling with the amount of times that this overturning of professional inspectors at ABP level and planners at City Council level is occurring in Cork? 😮

    • #759532
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      On another matter, I am delighted that the board of ABP overturned their own inspector and refused the destruction of St. Colmans in Cobh, however does anyone else get an uneasy feeling with the amount of times that this overturning of professional inspectors at ABP level and planners at City Council level is occurring in Cork? 😮

      You must consider that the Board themselves are professional planning associates – an inspector report is to provide an evaluation of the scenario and offer a recommendation, not a decision. Often you will see many inspectors include a section detailling recommended conditions should the Bord wish to grant the scheme in spite of their own inclination. Quite frankly, I think the Bord have made a number of wise decisions over the years – had the inspectors rule been implemented we woulld probably be years behind. A good example is the one you cite yourself about St. Colmans, thank Heavens the inspector’s recommendation was turned down!

    • #759533
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      You must consider that the Board themselves are professional planning associates – an inspector report is to provide an evaluation of the scenario and offer a recommendation, not a decision. Often you will see many inspectors include a section detailling recommended conditions should the Bord wish to grant the scheme in spite of their own inclination. Quite frankly, I think the Bord have made a number of wise decisions over the years – had the inspectors rule been implemented we woulld probably be years behind. A good example is the one you cite yourself about St. Colmans, thank Heavens the inspector’s recommendation was turned down!

      😮 I agree 99% POM, my concern is that the Inspector is the person that looks at the files / submissions , visits the site etc. where as the Board sit in an office in Dublin and feel free to overturn weeks of work on the inspectors behalf.. I feel a high profile case such as St. Colmans is one thing, but day in, day out decisions are quite another??

    • #759534
      lexington
      Participant

      And this is my last batch of images for the day…

      …a number of you have queried recently as to the progress of the Eglinton Street and Cornmarket Street projects by O’Flynn Construction and Rockfell Investments respectively.

      Below find images of the current site progression.

      1. Eglinton Street

      Developer: O’Flynn Construction
      Architects: Wilson Architecture
      Contractor: PJ Hegarty & Sons Limited


      Image 1 – views south toward the South-East corner, the location of the 17-storey tower. Image 2 – views north-east, views of Cork’s Northern Ridge can be seen in the background, as well as the warehousing sites fronting Albert Quay in possession of Howard Holdings and Ascon, set for future redevelopment thus completing this portion of the quayside.

      2. Cornmarket Street

      Developer: Rockfell Investments
      Architects: Frank Ennis & Associates
      Contractor: Munster Joinery

      *Renderings of either completed scheme may be found throughout this thread – simply utilise the ‘Search’ feature on the toolbar at the top of the page.*

    • #759535
      malec
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Just walked by this area this other day and decided take a look at the county hall since I hadn’t seen it with the renovations. I have to say I was impressed, it’s definitely got a much more fresh and modern look.

      This victoria mills phase 2 however, makes the first look like the world’s greatest masterpiece. I know this forum is to be kept civilised but the only description I can give is: “Worst pile of generic crap ever!! 😡 “
      The other student flats going up next to it are OK though, although I’m getting sick of all the wooden stuff going up everywhere.

      Great that eglinton street is now progressing. I didn’t need to see the pictures though since I can see the site from my window. :D. Should be great once the tower starts to rise.

    • #759536
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Cork City Council are now set to offer a prime river-facing site at Kyrl’s Quay through agents Hamilton Osbourne King. The former “Philips” site is located facing the northern channel of the River Lee at Kyrl’s Quay, just across Kyrl’s Lane from the recently acquired RH Parker site of 0.5acres by Murrayforde Developments. Undoubtedly Murrayforde will be among the interested parties seeking the acquisition of this latest site.

      The combination of both mentioned sites offer a wonderful redevelopment opportunity for any prospective developer who attains the chance to provide a mixed-scheme of retail and commercial accommodation – with some elements rising to mask the North Main Street multi-storey car-park to the south. Taking point from some of the Kyrl’s Quay Redevelopment Design Competition entries – pedestrian links over the quayside road may offer elevated walkways or platforms at the river’s edge – while upper levels between the sites may arch over Kyrl’s Lane, or even, subject to discussion with Cork City Council provide a cul-de-sac and subsequent public amenity space with gardens, timber-decking and so on.



      O’Flynn Construction Development Levy Challenge

      This week, the Commercial Court overturned An Bord Pleanala’s decision to amend development levies imposed by Cork City Council on O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street project. The levies amount to €1.8m in contributions associated with the contest on charges to basement car-parking floorspace. The decision by the court is questionable, as to is the imposition of such levies by Cork City Council in the first instance. There are currently a number of other cases currently in appeal to contest such development charges, including the likes of the Precinct Investments’ proposal for the Gresham Metropole Hotel/St. Patrick’s Quay. The argument made by many supporters of such levy imposition include that of the fact many developers nowadays charge for residential parking spaces at basement level – but what does such policy and its long-term consequences really imply?

      The scenario reminds me of one of the most famous cases thought to students of US Commercial Law – that of the Williams vs. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, 1963. The details of this case are protracted and complicated – but in basic, simplified form, it concerned the sale of numerous household items by the Walker-Thomas Furniture Company (via credit) to Mr. Williams over a series of 14 contracts. Each contract collateralized the goods associated with preceding contracts – so that, in the event Mrs. Williams defaulted on her repayments, all household goods purchased under the contracts could be repossessed. Mrs. Williams, a single mother of 7 children and of poor economic background, depended on the credit facility to allow her attain such essential household goods – she had been in contract with WTFCo since 1957. Following her failure to make repayments, the WTFCo repossessed all items involved – Mrs. Williams subsequently challenged the action in court. However, under District of Columbia law, the furniture company was found to have the reserved right to enact such contracts. The court found in favour of the WTFCo. – however on appeal, the decision was referred to the High Court where legislation was amended on the basis that such contracts were considered to be unfair and took advantage of persons with similar economic backgrounds like Mrs. Williams. As a result, DC law prohibited the provision of such credit agreements for future trading situations. Though this ruling may have seemed “fair” at the – and indeed, Mrs. Williams did benefit substantially from the ultimate outcome, chaos ensued. Without credit facilities provided under such aforementioned contracts – other persons, dependent on credit facilities to attain essential household goods were now unable to attain them. Concurrently, demand for cheaper goods increased, and with such demand, prices also rose so that further individuals were cut off from attaining essential goods and an entire segment of the community was now less well off. Therefore, as one party may benefit, broader elements of a society may feel the ripple effect of such actions.

      How this relates to the O’Flynn Construction case would seem to be that, although levy imposition may seem to benefit one party (Cork City Council) and justified in their eyes (and subsequently the Commercial Court’s eyes), strategically it opens up implications were society may be left worse off in the long-run – with the only real benefit being the short-term gain (cash injection) to Cork City Council. The ruling implies that the provision of basement car-parking should be levied versus, say, surface car-parking. Surface car-parking is recognised (especially in urban areas) as being (and increasingly so under current market conditions) less economically beneficial and a blot on the urban landscape – it often restricts a development’s capacity to contribute to the urban grain. Furthermore, where developers do charge for basement car-parking, the imposition of additional levies (essentially a tax) will, as with most public tax impositions, not be paid by the corporation – but by the market (i.e. the consumer). To this end, such development contribution taxes, as being imposed by Cork City Council on basement car-parking floor areas, propose to act as a negative skew to society in the long-run. The council and Commercial Court should remember that in their ruling, it is not ultimately the developer who is left with the burden of such contributions, but the consumer (i.e. the public). Where a market cannot absorb such additional expense, options by developers possibly include surface car-parking provision rather than neater basement facilities (an option even Cork City Council itself has recognised as being preferable and better in terms of urban development – this is exemplified in Cork City Council’s North Docklands Local Area Plan 2005, but then again, maybe they have their eye on those levies?)

    • #759537
      THE_Chris
      Participant

      That needs to be fixed. The old Philips place is a shocking mess.

    • #759538
      Micko
      Participant

      Lex, it will be interesting to see what they will do with the 2 lanes leading down the sides of Paul Street Shopping centre, especially the one down the side of Bully’s Restaurant.

      I really can’t see how the lane can possibley be improved as one side is the entire side wall of the shopping centre.

    • #759539
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      :

      O’Flynn Construction Development Levy Challenge

      I read that O’Flynns were teaming up with other developers to challenge the problem. Does this problem happen with other local authorities elsewhere do ya know??

    • #759540
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      I read that O’Flynns were teaming up with other developers to challenge the problem. Does this problem happen with other local authorities elsewhere do ya know??

      😮
      Lex, I remember you posted on this matter in the past, am I correct in my recollection that O’Flynn Construction applied for planning on this site with a car parking provision that went against the City Development Plan (too many) and were refused by planner Evelyn Mitchell.
      O’Flynns then protested and demanded a meeting with the planners and the City Manager stating in their view that a development of this nature could not proceed without the required car parking provision.
      Evelyn Mitchell was promoted to the Docklands Authority; Ronnie McDowell was assigned to handle the case and granted permission….and now O’Flynn’s are crying foul on planning contribution levies?
      A little of wanting your cake and eat it as well in my opinion.

    • #759541
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I am inclined to agree with Kite in relation to City Centre sites where the local authority must provide all the services themselves in the form of parks, roads, lighting water and waste water services.

      In relation to large new planned towns such as the one proposed for Blarney or Adamstown there may be an argument that developers are providing most of the infrastructure themselves such as parks, schools, water mains, roads, train stations etc.

      There is a debate in the UK on this in relation to reforming section 106 of the 1990 Town & Country Planning Act http://www.bllaw.co.uk/content/our_services/planning/news/n940_4.pdf

      I quite like section 106 as there is a healthy trade off between planners securing planning gain for the area and developers only being asked to contribute proportionally to what additional strain is placed upon the locality / regional infrastructure. In many cases developers are not happy with what they are asked to contribute and may make a first party appeal to the Secretary of State where they on balance tend to receive a fair hearing.

    • #759542
      lexington
      Participant
      kite wrote:
      😮
      Lex, I remember you posted on this matter in the past, am I correct in my recollection that O&#8217]

      kite – 550 basement car-parking spaces are provided at basement level, this capacity is designed to allocate at least 1 space per unit (up over 200) in line with City Development plan guidelines. Furthermore, capacity is provided for the office and retail elements (among which bulk/comparison goods are included) – these had been agreed in principle as par pre-planning discussions which had been 18 months in the making. Parking space also accounted for accommodation associated with O’Flynn Construction’s No.6 Lapps Quay office scheme nearby (which currently has no parking provision of its own). All-in-all 550 is quite a reasonable and understandable provision given the extent and nature of uses linked to the development. Without the accommodation, the potential exists for undesirable and dangerous curb-side parking in an already heavily trafficked area. The parking provision is therefore designed to attract parked vehicles away from congesting the street – accordingly, the provision of basement car-parking is now subdivided in crresponding sections, a point clarified with Cork City Council who had been assessing the proposal initially without particular consideration to the impacts linked to the ancillary project elements. In the initial assessment, it was proposed to reduce parking numbers more in line with the volume of residential units – failing to consider the impacts the ancillary elements would have on congestion (elements which were and are to be provided in line with Cork City Council’s own planning guidelines for ground-floor uses).

      Furthermore, the nature of the debacle relates not simply to this development – but has also been applied to other developments across the city such as the one I previously mentioned by Precinct Investments at St. Patrick’s Quay where 61 apartments were to be provided along with 40 + new hotel beds. Basement car-parking here amount to just over 80-spaces across 4 split basement levels – a similar levy was imposed. Its not so much a case of parking numbers being taxed, but more so the function.

      The requested DCL (Development Contribution Levy) in the Eglinton Street case amounted to €4,316,208 and was calculated by the inclusion of both basement parking levels as well as covered parking areas in the Gross Floor Area. The term “gross floor space” is defined in Article 3 of the Planning and Development Regulations, 2001 as “The area ascertained by the internal measurement of the floor space on each floor of a building (including internal walls and partitions), disregarding any floor space provided for the parking of vehicles by persons occupying or using the building or buildings where such floor space is incidental to the primary purpose of the building”.

      The project’s reckonable gross floor area is 34,956 m sq (36,406 less 1450 m sq.) instead of the inclusion of parking areas which amounts to 61,215 m sq., (62,665 less 1450 m sq.) – therefore the appropriate contribution amount should be correctly summed to € 2,385,74.00.

    • #759543
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      kite – 550 basement car-parking spaces are provided at basement level, this capacity is designed to allocate at least 1 space per unit (up over 200) in line with City Development plan guidelines. Furthermore, capacity is provided for the office and retail elements (among which bulk/comparison goods are included) – these had been agreed in principle as par pre-planning discussions of up to 18 months in the making. Parking space is also accounted for accommodation associated with O’Flynn Construction’s No.6 Lapps Quay office scheme nearby (which currently has no parking provision of its own). All-in-all 550 is quite a reasonable and understandable provision given the extent and nature of uses linked to the development. Without the accommodation potential exists for undesirable and dangerous curb-side parking in an already heavily trafficked area. The parking provision is therefore designed to attract park vehicles away from congesting the street – thus, the provision is now subdivided in related sections, a point clarified with Cork City Council who had been assessing the proposal initially without particular consideration for the impacts linked to ancillary project elements. In the initial assessment, it was proposed to reduce parking numbers more in line with the volume of residential units – failing to consider the impacts the ancillary elements on congestion (elements which were and are to be provided in line with Cork City Council’s own planning guidelines for ground-floor uses).

      Furthermore, the nature of the debacle relates not simply to this development – but has also been applied to other developments across the city such as the one I previously mentioned by Precinct Investments at St. Patrick’s Quay where 61 apartments were to provided in line with 40 + new hotel beds. Basement car-parking here amount to just over 80-spaces across 4 split basement levels – a similar levy was imposed. Its not so much a case of parking numbers being taxed, but more so the function.

      The requested DCL (Development Contribution Levy) in the Eglinton Street case amounted to €4,316,208 and was calculated by the inclusion of both basement parking levels as well as covered parking areas in the Gross Floor Area. The term “gross floor space” is defined in Article 3 of the Planning and Development Regulations, 2001 as “The area ascertained by the internal measurement of the floor space on each floor of a building (including internal walls and partitions), disregarding any floor space provided for the parking of vehicles by persons occupying or using the building or buildings where such floor space is incidental to the primary purpose of the building”.

      The project’s reckonable gross floor area is 34,956 m sq (36,406 less 1450 m sq.) instead of the inclusion of parking areas which amounts to 61,215 m sq., (62,665 less 1450 m sq.) – therefore the appropriate contribution amount should be correctly summed to € 2,385,74.00.

      😎 Don’t get me wrong Lex, I am not batting for either side on this issue.
      I fully support the provision of adequate car parking for any development because as you say on street parking is neither feasible nor appropriate in most parts of Cork.
      The City Manager imposes different criteria for different developments (depending I suppose on who is doing the asking) i.e. little or no car parking in developments such as the student blocks (students don’t drive cars according to City Hall management!!)
      When (if) Mr. Gavin moves to Dublin to a less stressful life (until the posse catches up again) some developers will hang out the bunting… some others may be hanging something quite different??

    • #759544
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Why is it some applications are subjected to round after round of further information requets and others pass by unnoticed? See images of Jacob’s Mills currently being redeveloped. This building more than many in the area requires sensitive treatment and is on one of my favourite quaysides of Cork. What is with the roof? To my mind the continued dereliction of the building would be preferable to the use of cheap and/or ugly materials.

    • #759545
      kite
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      Why is it some applications are subjected to round after round of further information requets and others pass by unnoticed? See images of Jacob’s Mills currently being redeveloped. This building more than many in the area requires sensitive treatment and is on one of my favourite quaysides of Cork. What is with the roof? To my mind the continued dereliction of the building would be preferable to the use of cheap and/or ugly materials.

      😡 Thank you, thank you d_d_dallas, i thought i was the only person (as per my earlier post) to notice the ugly, cheap, crap cow shed type roof on this landmark building, a copy of the shite the same owners are putting on what was a top class hotel in the city (Kingsley Hotel extention) maybe with a new Director of Planning services in Cork we will not have to tolerate this utter lower case planning?

    • #759546
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      you’re welcome!!!

    • #759547
      POM
      Participant

      The Jacob’s roof looks totally out of sync with the rest of the quay and looks cheap with a tin-sheeting type material. This is destined to be a luxury boutique hotel, I’ll wait to the see the finished product before commenting further. It is interesting the this and the Kingsley extensions were both designed by Murray O’Loaire Associates, both built by the same construction company and both owned by the same individual. I pass the Kingsley everyday on the way home and I still can’t get over how the aparthotel was approved without some sort of enchanced treatment. Are they planning on matching the paintwork at the Kingsley?

      Dallas you also raise an interesting point, how is it that schemes like the one proposed for Water Street are knocked and hassled the whole way through planning, then brought to appeal which its been in or rather will be in for over a year and will probably come out a lesser proposal at the end of it all, while other schemes like those mentioned whizz through without the same degree of grief.

    • #759548
      Micko
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      The Jacob’s roof looks totally out of sync with the rest of the quay and looks cheap with a tin-sheeting type material. This is destined to be a luxury boutique hotel, I’ll wait to the see the finished product before commenting further. It is interesting the this and the Kingsley extensions were both designed by Murray O’Loaire Associates, both built by the same construction company and both owned by the same individual. I pass the Kingsley everyday on the way home and I still can’t get over how the aparthotel was approved without some sort of enchanced treatment. Are they planning on matching the paintwork at the Kingsley?

      Dallas you also raise an interesting point, how is it that schemes like the one proposed for Water Street are knocked and hassled the whole way through planning, then brought to appeal which its been in or rather will be in for over a year and will probably come out a lesser proposal at the end of it all, while other schemes like those mentioned whizz through without the same degree of grief.

      There’s far too much focus on building height and not enough focus on the materials and looks of the building. The roof on that is a complete disgrace. And let I add that it took them at least 12 months just to get to the stage where they are at now.

    • #759549
      kite
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      There’s far too much focus on building height and not enough focus on the materials and looks of the building. The roof on that is a complete disgrace. And let I add that it took them at least 12 months just to get to the stage where they are at now.

      🙁 Unfortunately you will not see much progress on this site for the next few months as the owners other development (Kingsley Hotel) has a major EU delegation booked in for the 15th September so it’s all hands on deck here to ensure completion before that date.

    • #759550
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      🙁 Unfortunately you will not see much progress on this site for the next few months as the owners other development (Kingsley Hotel) has a major EU delegation booked in for the 15th September so it’s all hands on deck here to ensure completion before that date.

      It was my understanding work was put to a temporary halt in light of a forthcoming application to change the site’s use to a hotel instead of apartments and restaurant. Until that application has been lodged and granted it is pointless to proceed with work.

    • #759551
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      It was my understanding work was put to a temporary halt in light of a forthcoming application to change the site’s use to a hotel instead of apartments and restaurant. Until that application has been lodged and granted it is pointless to proceed with work.

      Maybe a bit of both POM?, at all costs Tom McCarthy and Tom Kelly want the Kingsley ready for the EU delegations visit on 15th Sept.

    • #759552
      Anonymous
      Participant

      A slightly more desirable deadline:

      Title: Glounthaune to Midleton Railway – Construction Stage
      Published by: Iarnrod Eireann-Irish Rail
      Publication date: 25-May-2006
      Application Deadline:
      Notice Deadline Date: 26-Jun-2006
      Notice Deadline time: 12:00
      Notice Type: Tender
      Has Documents: No
      Abstract: Iarnr

    • #759553
      jungle
      Participant

      The Environmental Impact Statement (Page 16) answers the question of the existing level crossing that will be replaced. It will be one of the ones on the Lower Glanmire Road that is used to access the houses behind the railway line. It’s quite an interesting looking new bridge that’ll be added there too…

      I’m glad to see that they’ll be using the old Midleton station. There was talk of developing a new station on the other side of Mill Road to avoid having to install a level crossing. While this approach would have been marginally less expensive and had a lower impact on road traffic, it would have made any extension to Youghal impractical, so using the existing station will keep options open.

    • #759554
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I was walking down Market lane today into the English market and saw the big SOLD sign on the door of the Instinct bar which was said to have been bought by Joe O’Donovan for his retail scheme. I was just wondering if anyone knows whether he has bought the post office on Grand parade next to the Capital cinema as well?? It would give the Grand parade frontage a much better look as if was just the Capital the development would look lobsided when you look down Washington street and totally off considering that general heights along this side of the street run between 4 and 5 storeys except the post office which is 2 storeys and looks out of place. I hope he has could it would improve the street and views toward the street substantially.

    • #759555
      Anonymous
      Participant

      There is one issue that needs to be watched on the Midleton extension and this is the park n ride site at Dunkettle which falls outside the scope of this planning application according to Mark Gleeson at Platform 11. So it is possible that the rail line will arrive on time but there is no firm timetable on the delivery of the park n ride site.

    • #759556
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Just posting this image of Lapp’s Quay because it looks so damn good! It was taken during the recent ceremony to bestow the Freedom of the City of Cork on The President, Mary McAleese.

    • #759557
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Double posting, apologies.

    • #759558
      jdivision
      Participant

      I hate O’Flynn’s office schemes there. i think it ruins the quay.

    • #759559
      jdivision
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      I was walking down Market lane today into the English market and saw the big SOLD sign on the door of the Instinct bar which was said to have been bought by Joe O’Donovan for his retail scheme. I was just wondering if anyone knows whether he has bought the post office on Grand parade next to the Capital cinema as well?? It would give the Grand parade frontage a much better look as if was just the Capital the development would look lobsided when you look down Washington street and totally off considering that general heights along this side of the street run between 4 and 5 storeys except the post office which is 2 storeys and looks out of place. I hope he has could it would improve the street and views toward the street substantially.

      Presuming An Post owns the building, I’m sure they’d be interested in taking a unit in the new centre plus a sizeable cash payment in return for the building, subject to planning. Think O’Donovan would be happy to do that too.

    • #759560
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      TP – I wonder how they will engineer a park and ride at Dunkettle giving the confined space there. In fact, access will be problematic as it next to probably the buseist stretch of the Glanmire road. The existing station platform (currently unused) is sandwiched between the Lee Tunnel entrance/exit and the Glanmire roundabout. Not sure how a pedestrian can access the revived station, unless there is a large overbridge for pedestrians. But even then, I wonder where they could put the park and ride. I was under the impression that the land opposite the station was part of the Dunkettle House development.

    • #759561
      Anonymous
      Participant

      It will certainly be problematic from a pedestrian point of view but my view would be that getting a large park n ride facility in there must be the objective even if it compromises pedestrian access. Ultimately there is a large population in places like Watergrasshill, Glanmire and Fermoy who are currently driving into the City and if a decent proportion of these vehicle movements can be eliminated it will give a large boost to the City.

      In many ways there is more to learn from the proposed site at Pace (Dunboyne) Co Meath in terms of function than a typical suburban station parking provision.

      In terms of usage do you think there would be more demand from dual mode commuters or from pedestrians using the station?

    • #759562
      jungle
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      TP – I wonder how they will engineer a park and ride at Dunkettle giving the confined space there. In fact, access will be problematic as it next to probably the buseist stretch of the Glanmire road. The existing station platform (currently unused) is sandwiched between the Lee Tunnel entrance/exit and the Glanmire roundabout. Not sure how a pedestrian can access the revived station, unless there is a large overbridge for pedestrians. But even then, I wonder where they could put the park and ride. I was under the impression that the land opposite the station was part of the Dunkettle House development.

      I’d imagine it would be on the site of the North Esk container terminal, which seems to be pretty much unused nowadays.

    • #759563
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      A park and ride would be critical as there is a large hinterland and people will certainly avail of the rail service – the stretch from Dunkettle into town is usually a mass tailback during the mornings. In addition, the premium on car parking spaces in the city is also an issue that would make the rail service more attractive. Although there are many housing developments nearby, they are relatively dispersed and unless there is a very comprehensive and frequent bus link, then park and ride is critical. Glounthaune is a good example of how a park and ride can be successful.
      The real driver of traffic in my view would be bus links from Kent Station into the city center as it is still a long walk when raining (although the switch to the proposed Horgan’s Quay entrance would negate this somewhat).
      Finally, as someone who used the Glounthaune rail service on a daily basis, the addition of new railcars and an hourly service saw an upsurge in usage. In the bad old days, the train would often break down, not appear, be delayed…and of course if you missed the train, you would have a nice two hour plus wait for the next one! No wonder people only used the train as a last resort.

    • #759564
      lexington
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      Presuming An Post owns the building, I’m sure they’d be interested in taking a unit in the new centre plus a sizeable cash payment in return for the building, subject to planning. Think O’Donovan would be happy to do that too.

      ewankennedy/jdivision – I certainly agree that inclusion of the Grand Parade post-office would be an considered addition to what is already amounting to be a landmark site. I am not aware if Mr. O’Donovan has or has not acquired the building in question, however, as far as I know – it is in private ownership, feel free to correct me if anyone has more insightful knowledge into that matter. One has to hand it to Mr. O’Donovan, he has been resilient and determined in his acquisitions and it has opened the prospect of a noteworthy project. What is known: Mr. O’Donovan has acquired sites at the Capitol Cineplex (which fronts Grand Parade and backs out onto Market Lane) from Mount Kennett Investments & John Costello for approx. &#8364][/URL]

      *Apologies, if I excluded 57 Patrick’s Street in the image above*

      It would be nice to see the Central Shoe Stores frontage retained, along with the frontages onto Patrick’s Street – with contemporary build encompassing the remainder of the site. Speculation has it that the scheme will contain a department store element to avail of a number of prospective parties understood to be circling options on the Cork market.



      Cork Metropolitan Rail Service

      Interestingly in the EIS for the Midelton-Glounthane line is Cork County Council’s proposed network of commuter and suburban rail services for the Metropolitan Cork area by 2020. It will be interesting to see if these materialise in such dynamic form. I, personally, remain a firm believer in strategy which reduces dependcies on vehicular traffic and in the provision of an efficient, clean and accessible public transport system within major urban areas. With Cork county population, under M1F2 scenario CSO projections (April 2005) for 2020/1 estimated to be well over 600,000 (where this figured is derived from the subtraction of Kerry population figure inclusion and represents a loose estimate) – surely such a system is warranted. The ability to deliver is questionable.

      The first image is Cork County Council’s own proposal for such a system:

      The 2nd is a possible alternative option I have simply messed about with:

      The primary variations here are related to the West Cork line – where the Macroom line originates at a city centre/south docklands station and proceeds along the South City Link to Black Ash P&R before skewing west toward Bishopstown/Wilton (where it goes underground) until it reaches the proposed Bandon Roundabout P&R – here, the line is divided heading west (blue) along the Ballincollig By-Pass to Ballincollig and Macroom, and south toward Bandon (grey).

      From Black Ash, a line heading South via Cork Airport to Kinsale may also be provided (green)

      Furthermore, the Docklands line (pink in the 2nd option) should utilise the existing corridor heading east and south east, currently serving as a walkway, toward Mahon Point/Jacob’s Island, and head south across the Douglas Estuary serving Rochestown/Douglas (possible undergound), Grange, Donnybrook, Carrigaline and Ringaskiddy (it is my view this line is perhaps among the most important after the Midelton Line to implement – not only would it aim to serve the relocated Port of Cork facilities at Ringaskiddy, but also Carrigaline as Ireland’s most car dependent commuter town).

      The idea here is to utilise as many existing corridors as possible with the minimal amount of infastructural and visual disruption.

    • #759565
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      does anyone know what the hold up with the new schuh store on patrick st is and in general the vacent premises on patrick st?also anyone know how far off joe o donovans scheme is and whats the story with the grand parade hotel site?the library site along with this and the citi car park will make for a much better grand parade when all complete!anyone make any submissions to do with the south docks plan yet,like telling the city council to think outside the box with high rise elements and not to give us a shity bland quayside?

    • #759566
      Anonymous
      Participant

      In public transport terms I think that Cork was ignored in the Transport 21 package essentially all it got was the reannouncement of the Midleton extension.

      Given that Transport 21 is supposed to be a fifteen year programme certain projects that look marginal now will become more viable over the coming decade and if Luas has taught us anything these type of projects take close to 10 years to deliver.

      There is no question in my mind that the South side of the City needs at least one if not two or three light rail routes if densities are to be tightened up. Given the contribution made by the City to the national economy at least a route to the airport and a start on the route to Bishopstown appears warranted.

    • #759567
      kite
      Participant
      daniel_7 wrote:
      does anyone know what the hold up with the new schuh store on patrick st is and in general the vacent premises on patrick st?
      😮
      Vacancy levels on Patrick St. are up 23% since April 2005 according to the Cork Economic Monitor published by CCC May 2006. Very disappointing news indeed.
    • #759568
      lexington
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      does anyone know what the hold up with the new schuh store on patrick st is and in general the vacent premises on patrick st?
      😮
      Vacancy levels on Patrick St. are up 23% since April 2005 according to the Cork Economic Monitor published by CCC May 2006. Very disappointing news indeed.

      The figure is distorted given a number of properties have been acquired as part of site assemblies (eg. Academy Street, Market Lane schemes) or organisational restructuring/consolidation (e.g. AIB, O2, Carphone Warehouse, Vodafone etc).

      Schuh will commence works in the not too distant future; the former O2 store near the Savoy is under Final Offer; units fronting Patrick’s Street (former Ryan’s Pharmacy) was acquired by O’Callaghan Properties for their Saint Patrick’s Street/Academy Street scheme; 55, 56 & 57 St. Patrick’s Street were acquired for Joe O’Donovan’s scheme – and are seeking short-term leases, however thats a tough trough to fill given most parties interested would be seeking longer term occupancies. To my mind, the former Bennetton/Diesel store near the Victoria Hotel is vacant – not wholly clear on its future.

    • #759569
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      The figure is distorted given a number of properties have been acquired as part of site assemblies (eg. Academy Street, Market Lane schemes) or organisational restructuring/consolidation (e.g. AIB, O2, Carphone Warehouse, Vodafone etc).

      😮
      I accept what you state regarding the site assembly on Patrick Street Lex, however given that CCC won the local authority of the year award, Patrick St. voted the “best” shopping street in Ireland and the millions spent on Patrick St + the years of disruption to traders it is disappointing to see so many shops empty??
      Also the likes of O2, Carphone Warehouse, Vodafone etc are a blight on any Main Street in my opinion.

    • #759570
      Micko
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Cork Metropolitan Rail Service

      Interestingly in the EIS for the Midelton-Glounthane line is Cork County Council’s proposed network of commuter and suburban rail services for the Metropolitan Cork area by 2020. It will be interesting to see if these materialise in such dynamic form. I, personally, remain a firm believer in strategy which reduces dependcies on vehicular traffic and in the provision of an efficient, clean and accessible public transport system within major urban areas. With Cork county population, under M1F2 scenario CSO projections (April 2005) for 2020/1 estimated to be well over 600,000 (where this figured is derived from the subtraction of Kerry population figure inclusion and represents a loose estimate) – surely such a system is warranted. The ability to deliver is questionable.

      The first image is Cork County Council’s own proposal for such a system:

      The 2nd is a possible alternative option I have simply messed about with:

      The primary variations here are related to the West Cork line – where the Macroom line originates at a city centre/south docklands station and proceeds along the South City Link to Black Ash P&R before skewing west toward Bishopstown/Wilton (where it goes underground) until it reaches the proposed Bandon Roundabout P&R – here, the line is divided heading west (blue) along the Ballincollig By-Pass to Ballincollig and Macroom, and south toward Bandon (grey).

      Lex, what’s the liklihood of all these line extnesions and reopenig ever happening.

      I’d imagine that there would be big problems with a Fermoy line as no previous line has ever existed. IIRC the Fermoy line came from Mallow.

    • #759571
      lexington
      Participant

      @Micko wrote:

      Lex, what’s the liklihood of all these line extnesions and reopenig ever happening.

      I’d imagine that there would be big problems with a Fermoy line as no previous line has ever existed. IIRC the Fermoy line came from Mallow.

      Quite frankly, I don’t really know. I think it will happen down the line (no pun intended) but its more a case of when. The fact is that the CASP and to a lesser extent LUTS strategies have laid the foundation for Cork city and county’s development with the city at the region’s core and the development of larger commuter towns satellite to the city at locations like Midleton, Monard, Carrigaline, Ballincollig (which is arguably a suburb at this stage) and so on. As these towns grow, the capacity of infastructure and consequently management capacity of commuter and domestic traffic will become excessively strained. This is evidently the case as it is. Although plans like the Cork City Development Plan 2004 did not specify the provision of an integrated light-rail network – its something quite evident in the minds of planners, essentially both Cork City Council and Cork County Council know its something the needs to be catered for as more roads are not the solution.

      I think strong cases can be made for all such light-rail commuter links – particularly however the Carrigaline/Ringaskiddy line. I think you’ll find the likes of the Port of Cork will champion such proposals – anything which will aid access and capacity to their new facilities at Ringaskiddy. Commuter wise, Carrigaline makes its own case. I think it will be important to develop any such line with strategic consideration for areas like the South Docklands, Mahon Point and Douglas.

      Macroom-Ballincollig-Bandon Roundabout-Bishopstown-Docklands represents another strong case for light-rail provision.

      The councils are aware of the need, as par their plans posted – the issue now is sanctioning swift strategy for attaining them. I don’t believe any significantly appropriate lobby for such proposals has been enacted. Which is a shame – we all know how long it takes any proposal like this to get moving outside of Dublin, our public bodies such be pushing for this now and forcefully so if we are to even see a glimpse of movement in the future.

    • #759572
      Pug
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      In public transport terms I think that Cork was ignored in the Transport 21 package essentially all it got was the reannouncement of the Midleton extension.
      .

      i agree completely on that one, its a disgrace. Only hope is, the plan was so bad and an election so near, it can be made an issue again. Some light relief at the moment given that the schools are off.

      Anyone see a bbc program on English designer/architect/engineer Thomas Heatherwick last night? makes the current trends look prehistoric.

    • #759573
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Werdna Limited has submitted an Environmental Impact Study to An Bord Pleanala regarding its much delayed Water Street project. Murray O’Laoire Architects are handling the design of the proposal which is now not formally scheduled for decision until September 2006. The revised scheme has been watered down (no pun intended here either) to a proposal half of its original conception – the project now encompasses 231 residential units, of which 12 are terraced houses. Basement parking has been cut to 399 spaces over 2 decks the 3 western finger blocks now peak at 7-storeys and the eastern section now includes a significantly reduced 9-storey block, now reoriented east-to-west. Given that originally this scheme was proposed as an attractive 500 unit (approx.) development with landmark 26-storey tower, reached planning at 19-storeys and 400 units, was revised to 304 units with 17-storey tower and has now reached a meek (by comparison) 231 units with 9-storey “tower”, it makes one think about the nature of our planning system.



      😮 Alchemy Properties, the property development wing of Dairygold, is scheduled for a decision today (7th June 2006) on its application to demolish, clear and being preparatory works on its prime 8-acre site along the Kinsale Road. The former-CMP Dairies site, which ceased bottled production in 2001 and gradually closed its doors in recent times, is now being assessed by Alchemy Properties for a large-scale mixed development which has been the subject of discussion with Cork City Council planners. Approximately 1.5km for Cork city centre, the site is located within a stone’s throw of 2 major Cork infastructural provisions – the South City Link Road and South Ring Road. It is also within easy access of Cork International Airport, the Black Ash Park & Ride and is directly across the road from Musgrave Park.

      Alchemy, led by Dairygold director Michael Hogan, envision a landmark scheme of apartments, commercial and retail units and hotel/leisure uses with a strong emphasis on design. The site, speculatively, even has capacity for taller structures of up to 7 or 8-storeys, on its south/south-eastern areas. A formal application on the site is expected to be made before the year-end.


    • #759574
      jdivision
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      does anyone know what the hold up with the new schuh store on patrick st is and in general the vacent premises on patrick st?
      😮
      Vacancy levels on Patrick St. are up 23% since April 2005 according to the Cork Economic Monitor published by CCC May 2006. Very disappointing news indeed.

      Lex and others have pointed out many of the reasons why vacancy levels have risen on the street but to my mind there remains another issue. Many of the units on Patrick St are no longer suitable for international retailers and the city council will have to begin to address this, be it through encouraging an amalgamation of the shops (such as in the O’Donovan scheme) or else recognising that the street needs to move in a new direction – such as indigenous boutiques or something similar. Whether they could ever afford the rent is something else!

    • #759575
      jungle
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I think strong cases can be made for all such light-rail commuter links – particularly however the Carrigaline/Ringaskiddy line. I think you’ll find the likes of the Port of Cork will champion such proposals – anything which will aid access and capacity to their new facilities at Ringaskiddy. Commuter wise, Carrigaline makes its own case. I think it will be important to develop any such line with strategic consideration for areas like the South Docklands, Mahon Point and Douglas.

      Reopening the Cork-Passage-Carrigaline line could make sense for commuters, but not for freight. The line was a single track line and the embankments etc. were not designed to take full weight freight trains. If it were to be used for access to the Port of Cork facilities in Ringaskiddy, it would effectively mean rebuilding a new line on the old alignment. You’d never get such a line through Monkstown or Passage either, so it would need a large tunnel from Rochestown to Raffeen.

      Reopening as a tramline would make a lot more sense. While there are many people who want to preserve the walkway through Mahon, I don’t see it as a big issue. Most of the line runs through a deep cutting. It wouldn’t be hard to put a roof on this to preserve the walkway. It could also mean that the walk wouldn’t be such a dark forbidding place in twilight hours.

      Still, the first priority in Cork city has to be a working bus service. There should be buses every 10 minutes along the principal routes 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14. It should be possible to buy a ticket that allows you to use multiple buses. It should be possible to buy a day ticket. It should be possible to get buses to the airport from somewhere other than the bus station (e.g. extend the 6). Buses that terminate in the city centre – 4, 6, 9, 14 – should all terminate at the train station instead. Services shouldn’t wait on Patrick St when they are operating a cross-city service. If we can’t get this bit right (and it wouldn’t even cost that much), there is no hope for light rail services.

    • #759576
      lexington
      Participant

      @jdivision wrote:

      Lex and others have pointed out many of the reasons why vacancy levels have risen on the street but to my mind there remains another issue. Many of the units on Patrick St are no longer suitable for international retailers and the city council will have to begin to address this, be it through encouraging an amalgamation of the shops (such as in the O’Donovan scheme) or else recognising that the street needs to move in a new direction – such as indigenous boutiques or something similar. Whether they could ever afford the rent is something else!

      That is undoubtedly a major factor – the fact is the footprint of the stores on offer sometimes do not justify the per sq ft rent demands. Moreover, international retaillers generally seek larger, open-plan spaces which allow them greater flexibility and enhanced trading capacity. It is that sort of thinking that has fuelled the layout of retail units forming part of O’Callaghan Properties’ Saint Patrick’s Street (Academy Street) development.



      jungle – indeed you are correct, I was perhaps hinting more along the lines of rail in a people-rather-than-freight capacity. By access to the Port I suppose I was referring to generally linkage with the facility whether employee, visitors etc etc. Apologies if I structured my words poorly. 😮

    • #759577
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Jungle – you make a good point about a rail connection to Ringaskiddy. A light rail/tram line is an ideal solution using the existing alignment as much as possible. Was just in a city in Northern China where they have extended some of the tram lines. The cost per mile was impresively low and the system works fine and was up and running in less than 4 months! Obviously not quite as advanced as the LUAS or similar systems but then again, it was not road based and thus signalling and other costs would be much lower. The trams themselves use lightweight bogies and have a capacity of around 50+.
      The Port of Cork should really have bought the Marino Point NET/IFI complex when it was up for sale. Not only does it have a prominent position in the harbour and have existing berthing facilities with room for expansion, but it had a rail connection (to the Cobh line) as well. All container operations could have been moved from Tivoli to Marino Point. An opportunity missed.

    • #759578
      jdivision
      Participant

      From The Sunday Business Post last Sunday:
      The South Infirmary Victoria and Mercy Hospital in Cork have held talks about a possible merger of the two facilities on a new site.

      As part of the process, terms of reference on the future population make-up of Cork and Kerry – where most of the hospitals’ referrals come from – are due to be agreed at a meeting this week. This will affect the eventual decision.

      ‘‘For the past few months, we have had discussions on the future of both hospitals, and the Health Service Executive (HSE) has been very supportive of that,” said Gerard O’Callaghan, chief executive of the South Infirmary Victoria.

      Both hospitals have development plans for their existing site.

      ‘‘For the long term, we felt it was right to look at building a larger hospital with better services,” he said. ‘‘We would end up with a more efficient model and benefits for all sides.”

      A number of developers and private-equity managers are expected to show interest in the project. They would be likely to offer to build a new hospital for the amalgamated hospitals on an agreed site and, in return, would be free to develop the sites of the existing hospitals.

      The South Infirmary Victoria occupies a prime site on the Old Blackrock Road, close to the city centre and St Finbar’s hospital.

      It is a teaching hospital for University College Cork and caters for both public and private patients.

      It has a total capacity of 255 beds and is the third-largest acute service provider in the Cork area.

      It also operates the second-largest accident and emergency department in Cork, dealing with about 30,000 patients a year.

      The Mercy Hospital is on Greenville Place in Cork city centre. It was founded in 1857 by the Sisters of Mercy. It also has strong ties with University College Cork.

      It is a 354-bed acute general hospital, providing in-patient, day-patient, out-patient and accident and emergency services, and is the second-largest hospital in Cork, employing 1,000 people.

    • #759579
      kite
      Participant

      🙂 Lex, you referred to an upcoming aviation story some posts back, any updates on this?

    • #759580
      Anonymous
      Participant

      The detailed level of analysis in the CASP plan illustrated here
      Clearly displays that the projects are viable in the medium term; unfortunately we tend to get confused between the medium term and the long finger at times.

    • #759581
      POM
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😎 Werdna Limited has submitted an Environmental Impact Study to An Bord Pleanala regarding its much delayed Water Street project. Murray O’Laoire Architects are handling the design of the proposal which is now not formally scheduled for decision until September 2006. The revised scheme has been watered down (no pun intended here either) to a proposal half of its original conception – the project now encompasses 231 residential units, of which 12 are terraced houses. Basement parking has been cut to 399 spaces over 2 decks the 3 western finger blocks now peak at 7-storeys and the eastern section now includes a significantly reduced 9-storey block, now reoriented east-to-west. Given that originally this scheme was proposed as an attractive 500 unit (approx.) development with landmark 26-storey tower, reached planning at 19-storeys and 400 units, was revised to 304 units with 17-storey tower and has now reached a meek (by comparison) 231 units with 9-storey “tower”, it makes one think about the nature of our planning system.


      There’s something very disheartening about that. An opportunity lost? I wonder if the city council think that by permitting one tall building as a novelty shows them not to be anti highrise and allows them cut everything else down to a mundane pattern of 5 and 6-storeys? In some cases they even allow a 9 storey…although both cases of that to my mind were subpar in their design (Victoria Mills and the Metropole). Even the proposal for Clontarf Street seems to be under threat from height standardization. I agree that it would be nice to keep the majority of buildings patterned within the same height along the quays in this location, but surely certain locations like the Clontarf Street site and perhaps the front head of Custom House Quay warrant an allowance for something a little more adventurous? It seems anything proposal with a little imagination gets the cut to a point where they are no longer imaginative. Of course planners will undoubtedly refute this – the public will cite the height is equal to greed equation, but I account that as a lack of understanding. Height can be used to nicely shape a city. Rather than seeing height as a threat to the character of Cork, the real imagination lies in creating new dynamic districts and quarters (in areas like the docklands) which embrace new departures in design and forms, but in a distinctly Cork way. Imagination is allowing a city and its various districts evolve sustainably and respectfully, while seeing far enough into the future to consider the accommodation of new precedents. It would be saddened to think that Cork may waste some fine opportunities when they come its way. Like one poster said recently its amazing how some projects get thrashed in the planning process while those the are the real blight/potential blight on the city sometimes pass by unnoticed.

    • #759582
      gatsby
      Participant

      hey folks, i’ve been following this thread for some time now and the recent comments on rail developments have finally prompted me to post. its encouraging to read the opinions that present an optimistic view of the city and its future.

      the idea of re-introducing light rail into cork is fascinating not only because it would have such a dramatic impact on city life but also because it is an obvious AND viable proposal.

      If the rail lines were actually constructed and these proposals became a reality, then i feel the next stage would involve a two-pronged branding strategy that would aim to;

      1) ensure consumer confidence that the service is Punctual, Frequent, Flexible and Clean. The affordability of travel would also be a significant factor but not necessarily a primary factor.

      • customers must have confidence that the train will be there (this isn’t the No. 8 on tracks!)
      • as JUNGLE pointed out the customer should be able to use different modes of transport without different kinds of tickets or stations
      • Cleanliness is BIG, perhaps a bigger issue than people realise. you’ll never get families or business people using it if its a grafitti-ed mess

      • Affordability of travel is important and there should be significant discounts for family passes and year long passes. costs per annum could be offset neatly by encouraging ALL people to buy a year long pass. like a gym membership many people will rarely, if ever, use it but we must sell them the idea that if they dont buy it they’re missing out. Its their reliable back up!

      2) create a lifestyle brand. that is that the integrated transport service is marketed as part of the new way of life in cork city.

      • This is the more interesting and long term aspect of the marketing approach. Its not about the morning and evening rush hours to and from the daily grind: its about people with lots of shopping bags meeting their friends for a coffee.
      • Its about business peole being taken home in comfortable surroundings (similar to an old Evening Herald TV ad)
      • An important point is that its not a new thing. In fact its tradition (ie the old trams of cork). so we’re not talking about some hypermodern appendage transplanted onto the city but rather, “the trams are coming home”.

      Such a service deserves a name that respects the indepence and pride of cork people, so i would suggest that Cork Area Rapid Transport (CART) would be a mistake on many levels. This service requires a name far more distinctive and ambitious. Although the proposed service is of a light rail type, i would propose the title:
      [align=center:p6fbs0jv]The Cork Metro[/align:p6fbs0jv]

      or as the campaign would market it as:
      [align=center:p6fbs0jv]”The Comet”[/align:p6fbs0jv]

      The tagline would be “Catch the Comet” and could be promoted prior to introduction in faux cinema trailers. (eg coming 2010, Catch the Comet)

      Maybe it seems i’m getting carried away with the whole idea but i think that its important to publicise and discuss these ideas now. Even if people begin to whisper that an integrated transport system in Cork is viable, then that is enough. Ideas will gather moment and and the abstract will shift to the practical.Crucially, why i decided to make this post was because i dont believe that the marketing stage necessarily comes after the design stage. If we can believe that this system is viable and if we continue to publicise that belief then it will become reality.

      i think what you guys do on this thread and the other cork threads is fantastic and it will eventually bear fruit.

      keep it up!!

    • #759583
      kite
      Participant

      😮 The group that bought the Top Car premises on Victoria Cross have, following the ABP decision to allow the Dennehy’s Heating and Plumbing (Frinailla) development go ahead, approached residents living on Orchard Road to sell their houses to assemble a bigger footprint in the area, one resident has already signed contracts to sell, another is due to sign on Friday, others are considering offers.
      I’m all for development in this area (Victoria Mills 1&2excluded) but I feel that encroaching on residential areas in this manner is wrong, the CSD group will have a field day with this news.

    • #759584
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Two Cork projects received awards at the RIAI’s 2006 Irish Architecture Awards at a ceremony in Dublin City Council’s Civic Offices held last night (Wednesday, 7th June 2006).

      The Best Conservation/Restoration Project Award was bestowed on Jack Coughlan Associates for their work on the Lifetime Lab project along the Lee Road:

      The Lifetime Lab project was initiated by Cork City Council on the site of the old Lee Road Waterworks and is described as being a mix inclusive of a“modern interactive exhibition centre, themed playground – all within beautifully restored buildings and equipment with scenic views over the River Lee.

      The old Cork City Waterworks was responsible for supplying water to the city of Cork over the past 3 centuries. The Waterworks is the best-preserved of its kind in Ireland. The old buildings and machinery have been carefully restored and are now being used to tell the story of how water was supplied to Cork City in the past.

      The other Cork winner was Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects for their work on the new Maternity Wing at Cork University Hospital.



      Aer Lingus Announce 3 New Routes

      Aer Lingus are to add yet again to their successful Continental European network from Cork following what the company describes as overwhelming demand and interest.

      Flights to Lanzarote (twice weekly), Madrid and Prague (both 3 times weekly) will commence operation in October following the basing of a further Airbus A320 at Cork Airport. The Prague flight is aimed notably in competition with the popular route already provided 6 times weekly by CSA Czech Airlines.

      Summer services from Cork to Berlin, Birmingham, Tenerife and Faro will now also operate year-round following their success.



      kite – I believe that’s the O’Brien family at work in Victoria Cross.

    • #759585
      Pug
      Participant
      gatsby wrote:
      the idea of re-introducing light rail into cork is fascinating not only because it would have such a dramatic impact on city life but also because it is an obvious AND viable proposal.

      If the rail lines were actually constructed and these proposals became a reality, then i feel the next stage would involve a two-pronged branding strategy that would aim to]

      I think this deserves a thread of its own, not because I think it doesnt fit here but because I think people have so much to say about transport issues in cork and the distinct lack thereof, that it would generate a whole new discussion – the site is superb for getting people animated about buildings with relevant and decent opinions from all so why not do it for the transport in Cork?

      Some sort of light rail/metro is absolutely VITAL for cork. We need our own transport plan instead of that Transport 21 rubbish. The CSAP set out the plans for transport links but the frustrating thing is there is never any action on it. In Examiner today, the NRA has cancelled the funding for the sarsfield and bandon rd flyovers – thats simply beggars belief as all the traffic from the kinsale rd will just mve on down there. The removal of Martin Cullen from office is also vital if anything is to get done. Stick Michael Martin in there and we might have some slim chance, not because I have anything to do with FF but because Cork needs some sort of senior representation in the Dail.

      Its whispered that B Crowley withdrew his plans for the 6 storey office in hanover st?

    • #759586
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I agree this thread is fast running out of space which to be honest is a little like the roads.

    • #759587
      browser
      Participant

      I agree entirely with PUG and Thomand Park – lets get a separate thread for this, if for no other reason than it will allow all the site’s visitors to note that this is an issue that is live and is being debated. As things stand only those who look at the cork thread (mainly Cork people) will read these posts.

      Also great news re new flights from Cork, credit where it is due to Aer Lingus.

    • #759588
      rebel_city
      Participant

      I totally agree with having another thread for Cork Transport issues. I’m based in Dublin, but everyday I check this site to see what’s going on back home. The more vocal people are about certain issues then the better the chance of them gaining momentum.

      As for the NRA pulling funding for the additional fly-overs – what a joke! Forward planning people! Hmmm..lets see, in a couple of years they’ll say oh traffic has moved from the Kinsale roundabout to Sarsfield, so lets build a fly-over there…etc!

      Thirdly, what’s going on up at the airport? Thought is was opening last October, then May! I’ve been looking at the Cork Airport website and there’s barely a mention of the new airport. etc., it’s a really poor website. A new site should be put up to coinside with the new terminal.

    • #759589
      phatman
      Participant
      Pug wrote:
      I think this deserves a thread of its own, not because I think it doesnt fit here but because I think people have so much to say about transport issues in cork… QUOTE]

      True, but aren’t we wandering a bit away from the architecture side of things here? But if no-one else has any oblections…

    • #759590
      phatman
      Participant
      Pug wrote:
      I think this deserves a thread of its own, not because I think it doesnt fit here but because I think people have so much to say about transport issues in cork…

      Quote:
      True, but aren’t we wandering a bit away from the architecture side of things here? But if no-one else has any oblections…
    • #759591
      Pug
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      True, but aren’t we wandering a bit away from the architecture side of things here? But if no-one else has any oblections…

      a comment so good you had to post it twice…

      I entirely agree, this site is for architecture really but if someone has an alternate site to throw up a thread on transport and add in a link here then we would be set

    • #759592
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Will cut and paste links to the major issues and previous contributions from this thread on Saturday if thats ok; nuts in the office at the mo

    • #759593
      kite
      Participant

      😀 Cork City Manager, Mr. Joe Gavin oversaw many tremendous developments in Cork over the past 6 years of his leadership of our city. He also rubberstamped some disasters in the city that we may pay dearly for in the future. I feel we however in fairness we should wish him well for tomorrow when a decision on the appointment of the position of Dublin City Manager is announced?

    • #759594
      phatman
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      a comment so good you had to post it twice…

      Lol, but is there any way to delete a post??I couldn’t seem to…anyway, I gotta agree with Kite in wishing Mr. Gavin the very best of luck tomorrow.

      Also, took a wander past the School of Music site today and couldn’t get over the progress that is finally being made there, making up for lost time I reckon. Surprised there hasn’t been any discussion of late about it on here.

    • #759595
      bosco
      Participant

      @rebel_city wrote:

      Thirdly, what’s going on up at the airport? Thought is was opening last October, then May! I’ve been looking at the Cork Airport website and there’s barely a mention of the new airport. etc., it’s a really poor website. A new site should be put up to coinside with the new terminal.

      Cork is really getting screwed from every angle. I’ve often wondered why the three airports had such a poor web presence, but lately it appears that the DAA website and those of Dublin and Shannon airports have been completely redesigned. Cork airport’s website however is still the shambles it has been for years.

      http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9070-2209563,00.html

      DAA’s new look

      When you are set to make €200m (or much, much more) from selling off a few hotels, spending €50,000 must seem like small potatoes. But it’s money well spent by the Dublin Airport Authority, which has upgraded its online presence from the internet equivalent of a down-at-heel pound shop.

      The clunky old site has been replaced with snazzy new sites for the DAA (dublinairport authority.com) and the capital’s airport (dublinairport.com), designed by Irish web designers Red Sky. Shannon has also got in on the act with a sexy new internet presence, but Cork airport remains lumbered with the same ugly old site.

      Maybe money’s a bit tight in the south since every last bob was spent on Cork’s new gold-plated terminal.

    • #759596
      Pug
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😀 Cork City Manager, Mr. Joe Gavin oversaw many tremendous developments in Cork – I feel we however in fairness we should wish him well for tomorrow when a decision on the appointment of the position of Dublin City Manager is announced

      if Joe doesnt get it does he has to leave the Cork job anyway? its not exactly a tribute to his enthusiasm for applying to leave is it? Nice salary for the Dublin job though, €150,000 to €200,000. And the other final candidate he is up against is the guy that took over from him in galway when he moved to cork!

      more scarily, does anyone have a top 3 candidates to take over from Joe in Cork?

    • #759597
      kite
      Participant
      Pug wrote:
      if Joe doesnt get it does he has to leave the Cork job anyway? its not exactly a tribute to his enthusiasm for applying to leave is it?

      and more scarily, does anyone have a top 3 candidates to take over from Joe in Cork?

      😮 Mr. Gavin sought and received an extension to his contract as city manager last year.
      I agree that he may have to leave Cork even if he does not get the job of Dublin City Manager as applying for the job coupled with the Local Government Ombudsman investigation into his management style and decisions makes him a lame duck.

    • #759598
      jdivision
      Participant

      If Joe Tierney gets Dublin job, then Fingal will be free and Gavin could take that

    • #759599
      kite
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      if Joe doesnt get it does he has to leave the Cork job anyway? its not exactly a tribute to his enthusiasm for applying to leave is it? Nice salary for the Dublin job though, €150,000 to €200,000. And the other final candidate he is up against is the guy that took over from him in galway when he moved to cork!

      more scarily, does anyone have a top 3 candidates to take over from Joe in Cork?

      😉
      The Cork City Managers job will be advertised by the Public Appointments Commission if or when Joe Gavin departs Cork.
      The frontrunner to succeed him within City Hall would be Dan Buggy; it would be difficult to see anyone else in the City Hall getting the job.
      I would like to see ex Dublin City Manager John Fitzgerald returning to Cork as manager if he is not going to retire fully from public life; he did wonders for Dublin over the past few years.

    • #759600
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @bosco wrote:

      Cork is really getting screwed from every angle. I’ve often wondered why the three airports had such a poor web presence, but lately it appears that the DAA website and those of Dublin and Shannon airports have been completely redesigned. [/url]

      Hello there Bosco

      Unfortunately there is a huge difference between design and delivery as the air-bridges in ORK sadly testify

    • #759601
      kite
      Participant

      Did Joe Gavin get the Dublin City manager job?, was at a meeting all afternoon so i did not get to hear any news.

    • #759602
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 The much needed and highly anticipated renewal of Cornmarket Street as a primary extension of the retail/commercial core took a step closer to realisation today as Cork City Council have officially opened tenders on the provision of professional Architectural/Engineering services related to the design and implementation of the vital scheme.

      The tender abstract reads:

      Design Services for the development of an urban design for Cornmarket Street, Cork, including an implementation strategy and detailed design of pavements, lighting, street furniture, landscaping and other features.Cornmarket Street is a mixed use market Street in the centre of the compact commercial core of Cork City. It is situated between the old Historic Centre and the main commercial centre and is located on the island formed by the north and south channels of the river Lee. This street historically and to this present day caters for small independent on-street traders mixed with well established business premises. The Street is currently the focus for an expansion of the central shopping area and has a long tradition of a street market cooexisting with other uses.

      The deadline for application is July 7th 2006 – it opens up the prospect for engagement and accommodation in creating a unique and distinctive streetscape for what will be a core commercial area in Ireland’s second city.

      Already signs of renewal are in place with the redevelopment of the Guy & Co. site steadily (very steadily) proceeding at the hands of Rockfell Investments (designed by Frank Ennis & Associates) and which will realise over 120,000sq ft of retail space with 65 overhead apartments.

      The acquisition of premises currently housing The Loft Furniture Store and The Coal Quay (i.e. the former City Market) by supposedly Joe O’Donovan also open the prospect of further higher-order retail development – however any development here will have to the pay the utmost respect to the truly beautiful Cornmarket Street facade. Also, the recent purchase of the 0.5acre site at Kyrl’s Quay by Murrayforde Developments (the RH Parker site) and advent of Cork City Council’s sale of the “Phillips” site fronting Kyrl’s Quay sets options on further retail and mixed-use accommodation in motion.

      A currently vacant site between the former City Market building and the Paintwell Building (beside the Bodega Bar) is another location ripe for development – the in-fill nature of such a project offers a substantial planning gain to the street, but should be provided with the retention and provision of improved public walkway/connections to North Main Street. A complimentary development site exists just off Cornmarket Street at Dalton’s Avenue with the presence of a Floral Distribution warehouse. Smart minds interested in this site will be sure to develop this location with consideration to the access point on the lane to the Cornmarket Street development by Rockfell Investments, therefore opening to pedestrian traffic through the scheme. An enhancement of Dalton’s Avenue should be high on the Cork City Council agenda – allowing an improved realm for residents of the beautiful Corporation Houses (which should continue to form a pivotal sense of this area’s character) and allowing the area become more attractive to pedestrians.

    • #759603
      kite
      Participant
      bosco wrote:
      Cork is really getting screwed from every angle. I’ve often wondered why the three airports had such a poor web presence, but lately it appears that the DAA website and those of Dublin and Shannon airports have been completely redesigned. Cork airport’s website however is still the shambles it has been for years.

      😡 Something needs to be done about the fiasco that is Cork Airport and the CAA.
      At the height of the summer season Easy Jet and Ryanair are pulling flights out of Cork.
      Today’s Irish Examiner reports that]http://www.irishexaminer.com/irishexaminer/pages/story.aspx-qqqg=ireland-qqqm=ireland-qqqa=ireland-qqqid=5651-qqqx=1.asp[/url]

      On the subject of websites, check out the Cork website compared to one of its connected airports, Nice, France.
      Someone has to be accountable for the embarrassment that is Cork Airport, heads should roll??

      http://www.cork-airport.com/AR_Cork/live/Lv_pres_GenTemplate.asp?strPage_Name=CK_Home

      http://www.nice.aeroport.fr/include/default.asp?l=2

    • #759604
      kite
      Participant

      :confused: Is Cork going to have a lame duck manager for the foreseeable future?
      John Tierney has been offered the job of Dublin City Manager.

    • #759605
      kite
      Participant

      😎 The Cork Docklands Economic Study reports that the co-location of a third level institution in the Docklands will enhance the opportunity for employers to forge links with third level institutions.
      While these links would be built and strengthened by both UCC and CIT, the actual presence of a third level campus would help promote the area to investors.
      A 120,000m2 campus would accommodate of the order of 7,870 students along with academic, technical and administrative staff in the Docklands. This would enhance the demand for residential and other commercial uses in the area. It would also add to the vibrancy of the Docklands during both the day and night time.
      The development of a campus is an immediate demand of UCC and thus could be potentially developed within the short to medium term. If located in the Docklands, then it would act to accelerate the development of the area.

    • #759606
      THE_Chris
      Participant

      mmm I dunno about putting another campus there…. seems a waste of prime land to me.

      Put a new college further out.

    • #759607
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The manager of Fingal County Council, John Tierney, has been selected to succeed John Fitzgerald as Dublin City manager, according to the Irish Times. Current Cork City Manager Joe Gavin had also been in the running for the position. It is unsure how this decision will affect Mr. gavin’s current position in Cork.

    • #759608
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Mr Gavin is a civil servant and it is quite normal to apply for ‘better’ jobs in the civil service without prejudicing your current position. Unlike the private sector, the recruitment process is transparent. If anything the fact that he applied and was selected for an interview should be seen as encouraging for both him and the job he is doing.

    • #759609
      POM
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      Mr Gavin is a civil servant and it is quite normal to apply for ‘better’ jobs in the civil service without prejudicing your current position. Unlike the private sector, the recruitment process is transparent. If anything the fact that he applied and was selected for an interview should be seen as encouraging for both him and the job he is doing.

      I agree. It is only natural he seek to move up the scale, I wouldnt necessarily regard that as a sign of apathy with relation to the Cork city manager job. Personally I am glad to see him stay in Cork for another few years at least. His short-listing for the Dublin job this time round will undoubtedly stand to him should he choose to go for it next time round. Now if he can just get this docklands thing moving full swing that will be a credit which will certainly boost his prospects up another few notches.

    • #759610
      kite
      Participant

      😎 Cork city Manager, Mr.Joe Gavin signed a compulsory purchase order last Thursday for the Cork Showgrounds plus a number of acres to the rear of Parc Ui Caoimh.
      CCC as landlords wish to recover these lands to help kick-start the Docklands developments. The lands, if the CPO is successful will be used for a number of amenity purposes but not a convention centre as the managers preferred site for such a centre remains the site at Kent Station.

    • #759611
      lexington
      Participant

      Should have a few bits and bobs soon – away for a wee while although I’m sure if the weather isn’t pretty I may pop back on.

      Cork City Council’s CPO of the Showgrounds lease is an interesting one. It seems Fleming Construction (among others) may not be as lucky as they wished with this prime site. But time is a funny thing.

    • #759612
      Micko
      Participant

      Blazin accross the Examiner this morning about the GAA purchase of some of the show grounds behind Pairc Ui Caoimh. Anyone know exactly what the GAA have in for Pairc Caoimh,

      I’ve heard of a 2nd tier being built where the covered stand it now and for the entire stadium to be roofed.

    • #759613
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The CPO for the Showgrounds is designed, in the first instance to allow for a large public park at the site, capable of holding outdoor concerts, circuses, agricultural shows and ‘live at the marquee’ type events, as well as allowing a use as a genuine public park- something which the current tenants have not been able to offer.
      As a secondary issue, the move should make it much more probable that an agreement can be made between GAA and CCC regarding the relatively small amount of space required by the former for a complete redevelopment of Pairc Ui Caoimh.
      In my mind, the Munster Agricultural Society were a very lazy tenant, unwilling to come to agreement with their landlords and neighbours for the good of the City as a whole. The Munster Showground site was grossly under utilised and is in need of a radical overhaul.
      The development comes as CCC are calling for submissions for their South Docks Local Area Plan.



      Also, news this morning that CCC have abandoned plans for a park and ride facility at Tinkers Cross, Mayfield. A recent report commissioned by the Council had reccomended that this was the best site for such a facility, however sustained public opposition put an end to plans.

    • #759614
      theblimp
      Participant

      I find all of this news about the Showgrounds very intriguing.

      Talk of the City Manager’s wish to develop the ‘amenity’ value of the land is, to me, a smokescreen. The landfill site on the South Link (de dump) has long been earmarked as the future location for circuses (what’s plural for circus!?), funderland, concerts etc. (there is a pedestrian culvert built under the dual-carriageway from the Park’n’Ride to the site to assist this aspiration). And why would any promoter wish to run a ‘Live at the Marquee’ event once Mr. Gavin’s pet project of an event centre on Horgan’s Quay is constructed? This is all most bizarre – the GAA only need a strip of land running along the southern boundary of the current main stand to facilitate their enlargement plans.

      Perhaps CCC are merely attempting to block Fleming’s desire to get their hands on the site – which is fair enough – but the question is why? What will be more interesting will be to see who REALLY benefits from this (if the CPO is successful) in the longer run

    • #759615
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      What will be more interesting will be to see who REALLY benefits from this (if the CPO is successful) in the longer run

      I think you’re being unduly cynical blimp. The plans for a massive public park at the showgrounds site have been around for a while in various forms and recognised in various dockland plans isued by CCC (see image above). Expect this to be rubber stamped in the forthcoming South Docks Local Area Plan.
      I would not be overly worried about the prospect of a city the size of Cork having two large public parks. Indeed, in the long term, another large park should be forthcoming to the west of the city. Cork is in dire need of such green, well-maintained public open space.
      It is not surprising that CCC would seek to accomodate the GAA at their current site, given the income generating reality and potential of a major sports arena- as opposed to mooted plans to shift operations to the Blarney area. In that light, it is obvious from recent refurbishment work at Croke Park and forthcoming work at Landsdowne Road, that to allow large scale (or even small scale) residential development around such venues is asking for trouble in the long run.

    • #759616
      browser
      Participant

      I must say I hope that CCC try and direct the GAA somewhat in the redevelopment of Pairc Ui Caoimh. The officership of the current Cork County Board are fairly conservative and I would worry they would only be interested in spending a couple of million on remedial work. The truth is the the Park is in need of a complete overhaul and possibly even should be knocked and rebuilt. It is presently a third world stadium with benches (sized for ants) instead of seats, etc. For this reason, I would actually love if the City Council would actually take their involvement a step further……

      My own view, and it is a bit of an obsession of mine, is that a state of the art 40,000 to 50,000 capacity stadium should be built on that site. Of this, at least 35,000 should be proper seating with corporate boxes etc. In fact if I had my way it would be all seated as I think the terracing that remains in, say, Croke Park really takes away from the overall appearance of it.

      I think a stadium of this size would be viable in Cork if we are ambitious enough. Cork is a remarkable city in terms of sporting ability and support. At the moment that support is not being utilised. I know there are the hardy souls that go to Cork GAA league matches (mind you less than the 30,000 that will trek up to Thurles for championship matches), the 3,000 to 6,000 that will go to Turner’s Cross each week and the similar amount who go to Munster Celtic League matches in Musgrave Pk but I think you could increase these figures exponentially if there was one unified, state of the art, stadium in Cork. Quite frankly if such matches were turned into “events” in a new stadium (a la the “Croke Parke effect”) you would at least double and possibly multiply attendances x 4/5. These matches could keep the stadium ticking over but its real purpose could be for other, bigger but less regular, events.

      I reckon that between hurling and football you could have at least 3 munster championship full houses a year. It would also be available for all-ireland quarter finals and the like. You could also have other one off GAA matches should as County Semis and Finals, Aussie Rules internationals and the like to provide other large attendances.

      Equally, if Cork City could reap the benefits of larger gate receipts, given their current success and given their monopoly of Ireland’s best sporting catchment area, there is no reason why they could not dominate Irish football and, in the medium term, get into the Group stages of the Champion’s league – the financial benefits of this should be obvious to all. Moreover the FAI could definitely be prevailed upon to bring an international friendly or two to leeside every year.

      On the rugby front again I think the venue could host Celtic league matches and the odd International and B international. Moreover, notwithstanding the proposed redevelopment of Thomond Park (which is the kind of half-measure redevoplment I fear will happen to Pairc Ui Caoimh), I think Munster European cup matches could be viable in Cork too especially if there are high yield coporate boxes. I know my employers, and many other companies, would snap up a box at this mooted venue in a heart beat if there was this kind of fare being served up (the idea of bringing clients to Heineken Cup matches or even The Champions League would whet any businessman’s appetite). Quite simply this kind of revenue would not be available to the IRFU, the GAA or the FAI in their current Munster bases.

      All of the above does not also factor in the ability to hold concerts at the venue in summer months. Enough said.

      Of course the BIG problem with the above is that the GAA own Pairc Ui Caoimh and will not want rugby and soccer there. However they cannmot build the kind of stadium described above on their own. Therefore what I would suggest is that the City Council seek to buy out the GAA and then lease back the land to be redeveloped as this new state of the art stadium. The private sector would obviously need to be involved and equally the main sports bodies would need to be involved financially as part stakeholders. I think this way the GAA rules diffiiculty would be circumvented. Equally the GAA would get a whopping sum they could invest as they please including the upgrade of Pairc Ui Rinn for smaller draw matches etc.

      I know the above is rough and ready and can be torn apart by a cynic. Yes Cork City aren’t likely to be in the CL this year or next (but you never know!), yes Turner’s Cross, Thomond Park and Musgrave Park are getting partial mark-overs, yes Frank Murphy won’t be on board (one suspects!), yes there will be many other problems. The bottom line is this though. There are 500,000 people approx in the county. That number is rising. Many areas in Europe with that population but only a fraction of Cork’s sporting heritage have stadiums of this size. Cork companies have vast marketing budgets they would happily spend on corporate boxes and corporate entertainment generally at such a venue. Equally the location itself (on the harbour with a rail line that can be reinsatated easily, 1 mile ftom the city centre) is perfect. Think big people. The problems arfe all surmountable. With the right planning it would work.

    • #759617
      Bourgeoise
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      I find all of this news about the Showgrounds very intriguing.

      Talk of the City Manager’s wish to develop the ‘amenity’ value of the land is, to me, a smokescreen. The landfill site on the South Link (de dump) has long been earmarked as the future location for circuses (what’s plural for circus!?), funderland, concerts etc. (there is a pedestrian culvert built under the dual-carriageway from the Park’n’Ride to the site to assist this aspiration). And why would any promoter wish to run a ‘Live at the Marquee’ event once Mr. Gavin’s pet project of an event centre on Horgan’s Quay is constructed? This is all most bizarre – the GAA only need a strip of land running along the southern boundary of the current main stand to facilitate their enlargement plans.

      Perhaps CCC are merely attempting to block Fleming’s desire to get their hands on the site – which is fair enough – but the question is why? What will be more interesting will be to see who REALLY benefits from this (if the CPO is successful) in the longer run

      The promoters of “Live at the Marquee” are Aiken promotions who are 100% an indoor concert / conference venue to be developed in Cork city so a marquee is being used because of the lack of viable venue.

      The under development of Pairc Ui Chaomh and the Munster showgrounds has to be a priority for all concerned and has massive potential for the GAA with proper modern facilities ah la Stade De France and Croke Park required in Cork.There also exists the possibility ofr a hotel with conference facilities on the site adjacent the decrepid stadium which in my opinion should be demolished to pave the way for a modern stadium capable of multiple uses and a roof should be considered considering our climate.

      Hopefully the public of Cork and beyond will benifit as it will contribute to the city along with the proposed conference centre on Horgans Quay.

    • #759618
      Micko
      Participant

      browser. Agree with you there. The whole thing needs to be knocked to the ground.

      As it stands, all the bench seats you talk of are actually gone and have all be replaced with bucket seats. They fucked up big time though. Its now almost impossible to sit in them due to a lack of leg room and I’m only 5 foot 9. Worse than that, to increase leg room, they cut the top off of each individual seat. What a joke it is.

      IMO, the whole thing should be razed to the ground and start again.

      I would actually go down the German route on all of this. Dortmund have a very good stadium setup. As it stands, they have terracing behind each goal which can easily be turned into seats for all seater events such as the world cup. All you have to do if flip up all the seats which disappear under the terracing when terracing is wanted.

      This would be ideal for a rebuilt Pairc Ui Chaoimh. Say, 55,000 capacity when terracing and 40,000 when all seater. Nice setup as we GAA fans like a lively terrace on match days and obviously UEFA and the likes don’t like terraces on match days.

    • #759619
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      With regard to the redevelopment of pairc ui caoimh i also think it would be of much better for the city if it was knocked and rebulit completly as it realy is a joke at the moment, where the trying to tell us that the uncovered stand is not for anyone over 5’10 or what? i dont think do that they will come on board with the soccer or rugby crowd and however i think is a mistake for cork city to be doing up turners cross as the chairman has always had the ambition of moving to there own purpose built stadium and this could of been realised if they came on board with munster and sold musgrave park and developed another 20,000-25,000 seater stadium on a grennfield site and I think the irfu made a mistake by not doing this as they would of made a much better return as cork city are the best supported team in the country and cork has a bigger population anyway! also to do with pairc ui caoimh when it is to be redeveloped i hope they look at the exterior of the stadium aswell especially on the covered stand side as this has alot of potential to have a striking landmark along the quayside coming into the city!maybe something like Munichs new stadium! aslo i was reading the paper last week and i read that theres not much movement going to be made on the doclands until around 15 years time, Im getting sick of the uncertanty around this and I really think that theres not enough effort being made to get the docklands of the ground. We really need to build this long awaited event centre before Limerick gets there before us and I really hope that they eventually go for a centre along the lines of Belfasts odessy with capacity for indoor sports aswell as it would be of far far better value to the city! Also just wondering is anyone else sick of this Governments view that Dublin is the centre of the world when thinking of recent developments like the airport debt and the bandon road and sarsfield road flyovers and also the north ring road which is also a vital development for the city to get off the ground (which alot of ye forgot to mention when talking of new public parks as this project could also bring a pheniox park type opportunity if the right route is choosen). They wont evan give us the funding for these few projects and thers talk of Dublin geting another ring road around the m50 on top of such thing as the luas, extendining tha dart, the metro and the list gos on.The goverenment keeps talking about Cork being a counter balance to Dublin but thats all it is, talk! Why dont they actually start doing something like start discouraging companies locating in Dublin!

    • #759620
      Micko
      Participant

      Does anyone really expect the GAA to knock Pairc Ui Caoimh and start a fresh with a top class stadium. I for one don’t.

    • #759621
      jungle
      Participant

      I’ll be careful about how I phrase this, but I am doubtful about how easy it would be to evacuate Pairc Ui Chaoimh in an emergency. I’d add my name to the list of people who would like to see it knocked and replaced with a new stadium on the site.

      I couldn’t see the GAA sharing with Cork City or Munster Rugby. However, if the last two organisations were prepared to share, Musgrave Park is not a bad option. The current ground has two further pitches next to the main one and a decent sized stadium could be developed on the site. It’s also in a good location, not far from the South Ring Road, but within walking distance of the City Centre.

    • #759622
      Bourgeoise
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      With regard to the redevelopment of pairc ui caoimh i also think it would be of much better for the city if it was knocked and rebulit completly as it realy is a joke at the moment, where the trying to tell us that the uncovered stand is not for anyone over 5’10 or what? i dont think do that they will come on board with the soccer or rugby crowd and however i think is a mistake for cork city to be doing up turners cross as the chairman has always had the ambition of moving to there own purpose built stadium and this could of been realised if they came on board with munster and sold musgrave park and developed another 20,000-25,000 seater stadium on a grennfield site and I think the irfu made a mistake by not doing this as they would of made a much better return as cork city are the best supported team in the country and cork has a bigger population anyway! also to do with pairc ui caoimh when it is to be redeveloped i hope they look at the exterior of the stadium aswell especially on the covered stand side as this has alot of potential to have a striking landmark along the quayside coming into the city!maybe something like Munichs new stadium! aslo i was reading the paper last week and i read that theres not much movement going to be made on the doclands until around 15 years time, Im getting sick of the uncertanty around this and I really think that theres not enough effort being made to get the docklands of the ground. We really need to build this long awaited event centre before Limerick gets there before us and I really hope that they eventually go for a centre along the lines of Belfasts odessy with capacity for indoor sports aswell as it would be of far far better value to the city! Also just wondering is anyone else sick of this Governments view that Dublin is the centre of the world when thinking of recent developments like the airport debt and the bandon road and sarsfield road flyovers and also the north ring road which is also a vital development for the city to get off the ground (which alot of ye forgot to mention when talking of new public parks as this project could also bring a pheniox park type opportunity if the right route is choosen). They wont evan give us the funding for these few projects and thers talk of Dublin geting another ring road around the m50 on top of such thing as the luas, extendining tha dart, the metro and the list gos on.The goverenment keeps talking about Cork being a counter balance to Dublin but thats all it is, talk! Why dont they actually start doing something like start discouraging companies locating in Dublin!

      Agree totally + to mention central governments lack of funding for the following :-

      Broadband access
      Roads -Bandon Road & Sarsfield road flyovers
      School of Music fiasco
      Cork Airport funding disaster
      Cork 2005 lack of funding
      Rail lines Midleton and transport in general
      Decentralisation – No Govt.Dept re-located to the second city.

      Apart from Jobs we have done very badly at Cabinet level and the next election will damage them I’d say unless something happens quickly.The Governments “Everybody move to Dublin” policy is the only one I can see right now its bad for both cities.

    • #759623
      theblimp
      Participant

      Bourgeoise – no disrespect but take a look at my post and you’ll see that I’m questioning why a ‘Live at the Marquee’ would exist AFTER a permanent structure is in place.

      Right then, on to a few other points raised. First off, I think it hugely unlikely that a municipal stadium would be built on the PuC site which would host GAA, Soccer and Rugby. Main reason here is the size of pitch required by the GAA would be far too large for Soccer and Rugby. Add in the likely size (40,000-55,000) and there’d be bugger all atmosphere for most matches – marketing triggers accepted. I just can’t see Munster Rugby (problem there anyway as Dolphin and Sunday’s Well have sporting leases at Musgrave Park) and Brian Lennox buying into it. Besides the Cork County Board gettin’ into bed with them feckin’ foreign sports !!!!

      Secondly I have something of a problem with Horgan’s Quay as the site for the event centre. My understanding is that, at present, the concerned parties are trying to ‘shoe-horn’ in as large a venue as possible into a very tight space. I believe somewhere between 5,000 and 5,500 is now ‘almost’ achievable. If so this will rule out any future growth opps., leaving the city with a facility that cannot cope for many large events, and is blocking the development of a more suitable venue. Furthermore it is my understanding that someone like Clear Channel (half-owners of the Point, and tons more across Europe and the World – in short a behemoth) would be brought in on an operating lease. While it’s understandable that an investor would wish to have someone with experience running the place I would ask you to take a look at what Clear Channel do during the Summer. Answer: They move most activity outdoors to maximise their revenue. If you think for one minute that this will change once they get the keys of a Cork venue then I’d argue that you’re wrong. From May to September the venue will house very little activity. So what’s the alternative? There is one, but unfortunately I can’t go into it here … not just yet anyway.

      Radioactiveman – yup, perhaps I am overly cynical, but I’ve had my eyes opened so much these past few years that I now tend to look for the story behind the story, rather than just accept ‘the story’.

    • #759624
      Anonymous
      Participant

      To come back to the transport issue (feel free to skip and continue discussion above)

      There are Four distinct rail issues in Cork that appear to require pressure.

      1 Delivery of the Midleton – Mallow Rail plan; to ensure it is built on time and has suitable and sufficient railcars
      2 Park and Ride facilities at Dunkettle and other sites to provide a dual mode alternative for the City Centre
      3 Connection to Airport and South City (light rail)
      4 Upgrade of Cork mainline to Dublin to cut journey times to 2 hours, which would also benefit connections to Limerick and later Galway

      The AGM of Platform 11 is on in the Central Hotel in Exchequer St Dublin 2 on Saturday I would like to see someone from Cork who knows the score attend and get involved to drive this agenda on. As Transport 21 for Dublin has proved along with the WRC campaign (which has a much weaker set of fundamentals) if you don’t ask you don’t get.

    • #759625
      Bourgeoise
      Participant
      theblimp wrote:
      Bourgeoise – no disrespect but take a look at my post and you’ll see that I’m questioning why a ‘Live at the Marquee’ would exist AFTER a permanent structure is in place.

      There is and was a lot of more outdoor events in Cork other than “Live at the Marquee” which is a temporary in door venue after all capeable of holding 5,500 people only.Cork has had successful outdoor concerts catering for larger crowds going way back so an indoor live venue won’t affect an outdoor concert / event park at PuC.Look at Marlay Park Rathfarnhan during the summer.MCD can only get 8,000 people into The Point and 20,000+ into Marlay Park.It would give promoters opportunities to organise weekend festivals etc. The assumption that an indoor venue would mean that no events happen outdoors during the summer months is nonsense.Look at the Killarney Summerfest with lots of outdoor concerts and the NEC having Riverdance and Joe Dolan all year around.Thats the way it happens over Europe which has massive indoor arenas and outdoor events during the summer.Its not all about 1 event.

      Lark by the Lee.
      Siamsa Cois Laoi
      Feile
      Heineken Green Energy
      Bud Rising
      Andrea Bocelli @Collins Barracks
      Live Concerts at The Grand Parade etc.

    • #759626
      Pug
      Participant

      @browser wrote:

      I must say I hope that CCC try and direct the GAA somewhat in the redevelopment of Pairc Ui Caoimh.
      My own view, and it is a bit of an obsession of mine, is that a state of the art 40,000 to 50,000 capacity stadium should be built on that site. Of this, at least 35,000 should be proper seating with corporate boxes etc. In fact if I had my way it would be all seated as I think the terracing that remains in, say, Croke Park really takes away from the overall appearance of it.

      browser I think you speak for thousands of people regarding the stadium above. HAving Horgans Quay in my opinion as an event centre is a joke, by all means if they want to maket it as a conference centre thats no problem but Cork needs a stadium. They are looking for submissions on the Cork docklands, why dont you just cut and paste exactly what you wrote above and send it to the CCC? Its very frustrating at Corks lack of development. We get all excited about new buildings that make it past the 6 storey mark which is a shame. Transport is rubbish, rail is years behind, roads are now cancelled funding and the touted major event centre can hold less than the Point Depot. Joke.

      Re a new top class stadium stadium all encompassing a range of sports I think we can only dare to dream. So frustrating, they even have a site already.

    • #759627
      theblimp
      Participant

      Bourgeoise – I really don’t want to get into a ‘post & reply’ exchange, suffice to say that in a way you’re actually supporting my proposition. Claiming (CCC) that Live at the Marquee-type events would be viable AFTER the construction of a permanent venue makes little sense. You have a choice of venues – same capacities, one is a modern permanent structure, one is a marquee with all the additional H&S this requires. Why would anyone choose the latter? As for outdoor activity – yes it would be great, but the two primary promoters in Ireland are too focused on Dublin and its environs for Cork to get a look-in.

      Let’s take a look at the examples you gave
      Summerfest: No outdoor concerts this year. MCD were contracted for a number of years and this contract expired last year – they decided not to renew, and to focus activities around Dublin
      Lark by the Lee: Long gone
      Siamsa: Likewise
      Feile: Same
      Heineken Green Energy: Again departed (although they were originally the first to use the marquee model at the showgrounds)
      Bud Rising: Indoors small-scale in Cork, occasional outdoor activity in Dublin
      Andrea Bocelli: A great success but only accomplished due to the single-mindedness and deep pockets of one Cork businessman who believed something needed to be done for Cork 2005. Unlikely to be repeated
      Activity on Grand Parade: Speak to anyone connected with the delivery of the 2005 production (for example – Dennis Herlihy, Safety Officer) and you’ll be told that it’s hugely unlikely to happen again.
      When was the last time we had an outdoor concert in PuC? A group tried to do it for Cork2005 but failed. If it couldn’t be done with the added attention of our year of culture it’s unlikely to happen in the near future.

      Fact is most outdoor activity is targeted at a Dublin audience, with some very rare variances such as Kilkenny and Galway. It’s the quick-buck mentality of the promoters and the fact that we have some of the highest ticket prices in the world should tell you all you need to know about them. I’m a passionate supporter of live entertainment and would love to see more activity in Cork – but it’s going to take something far more substantial than Mr. Montgomery at Horgan’s Quay, supported by Joe Gavin, to change the status quo.

    • #759628
      Bourgeoise
      Participant

      Historically I have shown that large / small outdoor concerts have been sucessfully run and promoted in Cork.
      The promotors do not have the suitable venue for large events full stop.
      The County population should be 500,000 plus after the next census not including the possibility of attracting people from all over Munster.
      I amongst others am amazed that Corks Hotelliers,publicans,Chambers of commerce etc are letting the possibliity of revenue from Corks citizens and tourists head to Dublin , Killarney ,Kilkenny,Galway & Stradbally etc for live concerts and festivals + the loss of revenue from visitors which would acrue from visitors to Cork for festivals,concerts,conferences and sporting events.Cork should think big and construct an Odyssey type venue in othe Docklands or else remain as the second city with very few visitor and tourist potential as a destination to counteract the Dublin attraction.Time for Corks business leaders to just do it as the O’Donoghoue family did in Killarney with the NEC.

    • #759629
      kite
      Participant

      Today’s Irish Examiner carries a story about the possibility of the Mercy and South Infirmary/ Victoria hospitals relocating to another site freeing up their present locations for other uses.
      Any ideas on what would be developed on these sites?
      What developer is involved in the land swap/relocation deal?
      Would the Mercy site suit UCC for campus expansion?

    • #759630
      Hafez
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      Today’s Irish Examiner carries a story about the possibility of the Mercy and South Infirmary/ Victoria hospitals relocating to another site freeing up their present locations for other uses.
      Any ideas on what would be developed on these sites?
      What developer is involved in the land swap/relocation deal?
      Would the Mercy site suit UCC for campus expansion?

      As far as I know they may be looking at a site in Glanmire for the new hospital. I think the present locations are vital but if they feel they could set up another CUH type hospital then I suppose it could work.

    • #759631
      jungle
      Participant

      As a counter-balance to CUH, somewhere on the North-Eastern side of the city would be the best option. In that regard Glanmire would be perfect. Do the Southern Health Board (or whatever their successors are called) own any significant land around Sarsfield’s Court?

      I wonder how this could affect the development of the breast-check centre.

      On the subject of the Mercy, why is the ground floor completely unoccupied (or not even built if you prefer…)? It’s not great for the area and even if it was let out for retail usage or for consultants offices, it could provide useful revenue for the health service.

    • #759632
      Pug
      Participant

      “the opportunity to develop a sport and recreation campus building on the infrastructure of Parc ui Caoimh and the Showgrounds should be appraised”

      as per the Docklands Economic Study on the web today.

    • #759633
      PTB
      Participant

      I just want to express serious doubt that there is space on horgans quay for a 5000 seat arena. I just cant see on fitting into that long sliver of land. Has there been and plans drawn up for now one might fit in?

      Secondly: Pairc ui Chaoimh. Is there enough space there either for a large stadium? Might it require some slight change in the orientation of the pitch? And would there be scope for a second tier because that would look pretty cool?
      I remember the time when ireland was bidding for the Euro 2008 championships with scotland. I rember that there were three stadiums proposed for ireland and they were all in dublin. Anyone from abroad would see how Dublin-centric this government was not to have made an effort to have provided a stadium outside of dublin, not even in the second city. It would have left the rest of teh country almost totally out of the thing. Irelands comtribution alone was paltry compared to Scotlands 8 stadiums and none of irelands three suggested stadiums were definite (Bertie Bowl, Croke Park and landstown road(disallowed due to terracing)). To be honest there is only one top-class stadium in Ireland. I would be great if there was a brand new stadium built with good capacity and a striking design that was open for all sports. That however is unlikely. Very unlikely. Cork GAA officials letting soccer and rugby use PuC at their wish? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ah etc.

      oh and if a staduim was to be built i think it would go through the planning process fairly smoothly due to the lack of residents in close proximity to the stadium

    • #759634
      rebel_city
      Participant

      The front page of the http://www.eveningecho.ie today has an article about a €100 redevelopment of PuC. I can’t copy the text on here as it is in a PDF format. It will be interesting to see what comes of this!

    • #759635
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The owners of the Millfield service station (Billy and Ciaran O’Riordan), adjacent to Blackpool Retail Park on the old Mallow Road are to apply for permission to replace the filling station with a mixed use development comprising a residential and a office/retail block with a height of 6 storeys. The site is in close proximity to Millfield cottages which are protected structures.
      The development will contain 54 apartments with landscaped roof gardens and public and private gardens at ground level. Plans are for 4 commercial units in a seperate block, along with 11 office units.

      Red arrow (to extreme left of image) indicates approximate site location.

    • #759636
      Micko
      Participant
      rebel_city wrote:
      The front page of the http://www.eveningecho.ie today has an article about a &#8364]

      Lets hope it is true. That amount of money would put up a nice stadium. Just think that the work done on Gaelic Grounds in Limerick only cost 9m.

    • #759637
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      € 100 !!!! You wouldnt get a bucket seat for that!! 😀

      Here’s the piece from the echo.

    • #759638
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I wonder how advanced the GAA are actually on redevelopment plans for Pairc ui chaoimh. If it just suggestive we could be years away yet. And i also have to agree that in principle Horgans qy seems great for an event centre but the site seems to small and any centre there would seem very congested. I still think that the Showgrounds site at the western end could be better used for such a facility and the rest of the place could be a park.

    • #759639
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      just read in the paper the other day that as part of the docklands strategy there is to be something to be incorporated into the plan to attract more tourism to cork like a interactive science museam or something stupid like that!i think that they should stick to something reliable and something that is proven to work. As long as they think creative when planning the docklands and not as if they were planning some small scale development(which alot of the planners in cork seem to do on most projects) and give us a highly attractive waterfront especially as there is planning for a 27 story tower in drogheda and incorporate a temple bar type development maybe around the station square(as cork is also badly behind when it comes to nightclubs) and these factors together would make cork a very attractive place to market for a short break city getaway!

    • #759640
      Pug
      Participant
      daniel_7 wrote:
      just read in the paper the other day that as part of the docklands strategy there is to be something to be incorporated into the plan to attract more tourism to cork like a interactive science museam or something /

      Quote:
      an interactive science museum
      a nationl design centre and
      a national maritime museum
    • #759641
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      just read in the paper the other day that as part of the docklands strategy there is to be something to be incorporated into the plan to attract more tourism to cork like a interactive science museam or something stupid like that!………..and incorporate a temple bar type development maybe around the station square(as cork is also badly behind when it comes to nightclubs) and these factors together would make cork a very attractive place to market for a short break city getaway!

      Whats so wrong with an interactive science museum? Every develped country has at least one, most many more….I guess we can always bring the kids to this ‘new temple bar’! No thanks.

    • #759642
      Bourgeoise
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      just read in the paper the other day that as part of the docklands strategy there is to be something to be incorporated into the plan to attract more tourism to cork like a interactive science museam or something stupid like that!i think that they should stick to something reliable and something that is proven to work. As long as they think creative when planning the docklands and not as if they were planning some small scale development(which alot of the planners in cork seem to do on most projects) and give us a highly attractive waterfront especially as there is planning for a 27 story tower in drogheda and incorporate a temple bar type development maybe around the station square(as cork is also badly behind when it comes to nightclubs) and these factors together would make cork a very attractive place to market for a short break city getaway!

      Certainly has to be some attraction other than the usual retail experience. Certainly a section of the national museum,maritime museum , aquarium or art gallery may help.
      Cable car to top of Patricks Hill with a new park might help bring back the trams anything to get interest in the place.
      Imagination has to be used with Cork and you can have huge nightclubs anywhere like the Temple Bar nightmare model.

    • #759643
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Marks and Spensers have been given permission for a new shopfront on St. Patricks Street. This is in keeping with recent refurbishment work done on the interior.

      I’m off on holidays!! Hope to have lots of exciting news when I get back!

    • #759644
      PTB
      Participant

      Sorry Bourgeoise, where is there space for a cable car up patricks hill??

      Like the idea of a maritime Musuem though

    • #759645
      theblimp
      Participant

      Just a little interesting add-on to my earlier comments. This year’s Live at the Marquee has moved, I understand, from the Showgrounds to Howard Holding’s recently acquired ‘Ford Site’ alongside. Now my sources could be incorrect (although I doubt it) but it is ALLEGED that Mr. Gavin was one of the parties involved in convincing Aikens that such a move would be in their interests (It is BELIEVED that JG negotiated the HH site for Aikens at no cost, whereas the Showgrounds would have involved a payment), thus removing a valuable cash injection to a voluntary organisation, and aiding a commercial developer at the same time – all at a VERY interesting time in that part of the city. IF true, then perhaps my earlier comments could be viewed in a more informed light !

    • #759646
      kite
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      Just a little interesting add-on to my earlier comments. This year’s Live at the Marquee has moved, I understand, from the Showgrounds to Howard Holding’s recently acquired ‘Ford Site’ alongside. Now my sources could be incorrect (although I doubt it) but it is ALLEGED that Mr. Gavin was one of the parties involved in convincing Aikens that such a move would be in their interests (It is BELIEVED that JG negotiated the HH site for Aikens at no cost, whereas the Showgrounds would have involved a payment), thus removing a valuable cash injection to a voluntary organisation, and aiding a commercial developer at the same time – all at a VERY interesting time in that part of the city. IF true, then perhaps my earlier comments could be viewed in a more informed light !

      😉
      The same names seem to crop up in Cork time and time again theblimp.
      I share your concerns…enough said!!

    • #759647
      Bourgeoise
      Participant

      @PTB wrote:

      Sorry Bourgeoise, where is there space for a cable car up patricks hill??

      Like the idea of a maritime Musuem though

      Up in the air boy ! 🙂 Cork needs a few dynamic ideas in art,architecture create interest and excitement in a city with so much potential.
      Or a tram system similar to Lisbon and San Francisco………???

    • #759648
      Pug
      Participant

      frinaillas keating site is up for a decision today isnt it?

    • #759649
      kite
      Participant

      ABP overturned the decision of their Inspector and granted permission to Messrs Crowley and Paul to develop Riverside Farm on the Model Farm Road.

      Cumnor Construction saw the overturning of an ABP inspector as well today to allow them develop the old convent site at the Ramparts, Kinsale.

    • #759650
      ISI
      Participant

      Passed by jacobs Mill today. It looks like they are putting in really nasty, small white PVC windows.

    • #759651
      who_me
      Participant

      God, between the PVC windows and that awful roof, could they possibly have done a less sympathetic job on the place? I’d have expected a higher standard, especially given it’s location in one of Cork’s “signature views”, with Parliament bridge and the Holy Trinity church in the background.

    • #759652
      kite
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      God, between the PVC windows and that awful roof, could they possibly have done a less sympathetic job on the place? I’d have expected a higher standard, especially given it’s location in one of Cork’s “signature views”, with Parliament bridge and the Holy Trinity church in the background.

      😡
      Good Planning practice
      X quality materials = Reasonable profits
      Sympathy to existing buildings

      As opposed to…..

      Bad Planning practice
      X cheap materials = Massive profits +??
      Not giving a damm to existing build structure

      (sorry, the copy and paste above did not come out as i tought it would)

    • #759653
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      …speechless…

    • #759654
      ISI
      Participant

      From Lexinton’s blog spot. This was the ‘vision’.

      “Developer Tom McCarthy and his wife Michelle McCarthy are devising plans to convert their Jacob’s Mill development to use as a luxury 5-star 35-bedroom boutique hotel. The former mill has lain idle along Father Matthew Quay for almost 45-years and is currently being rejuvenated by contractors O’Flynn of Banteer on Mr. McCarthy’s behalf. The refurbishment design is being handled by Murray O’Laoire Architects with G+A Architects handling interior designs. The redevelopment was originally scheduled to accommodate apartment usage, however a subsequent application will seek a change of use to hotel operations – and the conversion of plans to accommodate 35 bedrooms. It is believed the 20 space parking structure will be retained. The hotel is earmarked to be titled ‘Jacob’s Country House Hotel’.

      Could Tom and Michelle explain where white PVC comes in?

    • #759655
      ISI
      Participant

    • #759656
      kite
      Participant

      @ISI wrote:

      From Lexinton’s blog spot. This was the ‘vision’.

      “Developer Tom McCarthy and his wife Michelle McCarthy are devising plans to convert their Jacob’s Mill development to use as a luxury 5-star 35-bedroom boutique hotel. The former mill has lain idle along Father Matthew Quay for almost 45-years and is currently being rejuvenated by contractors O’Flynn of Banteer on Mr. McCarthy’s behalf. The refurbishment design is being handled by Murray O’Laoire Architects with G+A Architects handling interior designs. The redevelopment was originally scheduled to accommodate apartment usage, however a subsequent application will seek a change of use to hotel operations – and the conversion of plans to accommodate 35 bedrooms. It is believed the 20 space parking structure will be retained. The hotel is earmarked to be titled ‘Jacob’s Country House Hotel’.

      Could Tom and Michelle explain where white PVC comes in?

      😮
      The Midas touch seems to have deserted Tom McCarthy at the moment, his Kingsley Hotel project is gone down “UGLY Street” as well as Jacobs Mills.

    • #759657
      lexington
      Participant

      If any of the content below has been posted already (and I know some of it has) – please accept my apologies in advance; just posting for my own records as much as anyone else. Still jet-lagged and attempting a world record for longest a person has gone without sleep before hallucinating. 😉



      😮 Bernard Crowley & Gerard Paul have been greenlit to develop 49 new apartment units over a 6-storey building designed by Dennehy + Dennehy Designs. An Bord Pleanala cleared the revised scheme (with conditions) set for the former Riverside Farm site along the Model Farm Road opposite the recently redeveloped Tennis Village complex (now Eden Hall). As part of the scheme the developers will be obliged to make realignments to the what is currently a dangerous bend on the heavily trafficked roadway – thus providing a safer routeway for pedestrians and motorists alike. Additional details on this scheme may be found in earlier posts.



      😎 Frinailla’s plans to develop 96 residential units and a creche over basement car-parking for the former Keating’s Bakery site along the Tramore Road have seen Further Information requested of them. The scheme provides a mix of couple and family units between 1 and 5-storeys designed by Kiosk Architects.

      – meanwhile the other Frinailla/Kiosk Architects collaboration at CitySquare along the Watercourse Road in Blackpool is now watched over by a 2nd John Paul Construction tower crane. Interestingly is the banner which hangs for the new tower crane displaying the new Frinailla logo in place of the usual John Paul Construction symbol.



      😮 Billy and Ciaran O’Riordan, proprietors of the Millfield Service Station, have enlisted James Leahy & Associates to design their recently lodged scheme of 54 mixed apartments and seperate office block over basement car-parking and including all associated ancillary amenity areas along the Redforge Road located petrol station in Blackpool. The project will be divided over 2 blocks rising to 6/7-storeys. The scheme should help build on this fast emerging area currently anchored by the Shipton Group’s Blackpool Park scheme.



      😮 Much anticipation has pent up regarding Rockfell Investments’ Cornmarket Street scheme, however, a positive progression has been made today as William O’Brien Crane Hire were in action over the large site today erecting the first-section of a tower crane on behalf of Munster Joinery. Meanwhile, further progress is in swing along this prime potential street with Cork City Council having tendered for architectural and engineering design concerns regarding the street’s rejuvenation as previously posted.


    • #759658
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      “…their Jacob’s Mill development to use as a luxury 5-star 35-bedroom boutique hotel…”

      says it all. how can it be 5 star and yet be a boutique hotel? Don’t think there’s many of either around with such an atrocious and ignorant approach to reusing existing structures. ESPECIALLY on such an important vista on the South channel.

    • #759659
      ISI
      Participant

      I don’t know how this act of vandalism was allowed happen.

    • #759660
      ISI
      Participant

      I was down by the quay so I took a few photos of progress on the School of Music.

    • #759661
      lisam
      Participant

      jacobs – the original planning drawings specified timber windows!!!

    • #759662
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Interesting to see the Painting & Decorating company has moved retailling from a wonderful redbrick premises at the corner of Parnell Place and Lower Oliver Plunkett Street, formally called Nelson’s Quay. The business has relocated to a suburban business park and leaves open the possibility of a sensitive (very sensitive) renewal opportunity at this location. Arthur O’Connor who possesses a pivotal corner site directly opposite Nelson’s Quay (across Oliver Plunkett Street) has set about refurbishing the building’s upper floors into a residential townhouse – pity that this entire corner from the Barber Shop around the corner and back to Deane Street hasn’t seen redevelopment activity to date – as this area is out of sync and an eye-sore on what could be an better measure and more tasteful larger scale development. However that may soon change.

      😮 Also interesting is Gerry Barrett (of Edward Holdings/Monogram Hotels) and his involvement backing Topaz Energy’s acquisition of Statoil Ireland for the €285m. Topaz Energy, which is majority held by Ion Equity, and is already active in forecourt trading through its Shell Ireland operation will likely seek to merge activities between the 2 brands. As part of the acquisition, Topaz attains Statoil Distribution facilities in Dublin, Cork and Galway, among other centres. It would be interesting to see if merged trading activities free-up lands here for development. Notably, it could allow in activity transfers by Shell to more accessible Statoil facilities (such as those at the Tivoli Docks) – an example like that of Shell’s Cork Docklands facility could be a possibility. Currently Shell engages in costly distribution transfers of its deposits between facilities in Cork by vessels (petroleum is refined at its Ringaskiddy facility and transported to Centre Park Road for distribution – operationally it would make more sense to locate a distribution centre closer to the source of refinement or at a more accessible site; petroleum is offloaded on the quays at Marina Commercial Park and pumped across Centre Park Road to its distribution facility). It may make long term sense to wind up activity at the Docklands site in light of a new facility gained through the Statoil acquisition and allow the Cork Docklands site seek redevelopment. Would Gerry Barrett be interested in such an opportunity? Its all a speculative long-shot of course, but then again, Mr. Barrett has been sizing up opportunities in Cork over recent times and has made moves such as the purchase of a 4.25 acre commercially zoned site along the Airport Road for €13.8m. It is believed not to be his sole consideration in the Cork market over the coming future.

    • #759663
      Lincoln
      Participant

      Mill on Fr Matthew Quay development: “Jacobs “Mill

      what a horror show-! surely this does not conform to the conditions of planning! I believe that Murray O Laoire Architects who prepared the planning permission for the mill have had no involvement in the construction of the hotel buildng and that there is effectively no professional guidance on the project other than the structural engineer! this is like the bad ol’ days when the architect was regarded as only good enough to get the planning and then is not required when you have to build it .

      They should be injuncted and forced to build as per the planning conditions – this building is too important and prominent to let a developer get away with such shoddy treatment of our city fabric.

    • #759664
      who_me
      Participant

      @Lincoln wrote:

      Mill on Fr Matthew Quay development: “Jacobs “Mill

      what a horror show-! surely this does not conform to the conditions of planning! I believe that Murray O Laoire Architects who prepared the planning permission for the mill have had no involvement in the construction of the hotel buildng and that there is effectively no professional guidance on the project other than the structural engineer! this is like the bad ol’ days when the architect was regarded as only good enough to get the planning and then is not required when you have to build it .

      They should be injuncted and forced to build as per the planning conditions – this building is too important and prominent to let a developer get away with such shoddy treatment of our city fabric.

      Incidentally, what are the plans for the open section in the front wall? I assume it’s for a glass frontage, but it would be pretty horrible if it ended up being PVC bordered glass panes.

    • #759665
      lexington
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      Incidentally, what are the plans for the open section in the front wall? I assume it’s for a glass frontage, but it would be pretty horrible if it ended up being PVC bordered glass panes.

      The frontage, as par the granted plans, calls for a glazed frontage.

    • #759666
      POM
      Participant

      Hope you’d a nice holiday Lex.

      Just on the plans for the Muskerry Service Station at the Western Road. I had a little visit to view the plans for myself over the week. I saw today only 3 objections lodged on the project. Honestly I have to say of all the projects in planning at the moment this is perhaps the one that is ripe for controversy. It happens to be a rather awful dire contraption. The architects were marked as DTA Associates which I understand is Derek Tynan work again, the same team that gave us the awful Victoria Mills, the even worse extension to Victoria Mills and the equally terrible office building planned for Crosses Green. Again DTA seems on an ambitious mission to even top its other mistakes with what is essentially a half glass, half stone wall pair of blocks. From the photomontages it seems the buildings will jut close to the roadside blocking views down the Western Road of the infinitely more attractive new Jurys and create an eyesore viewing up the Western Road from the city along the river. It essentially rises up facing the road as a bare stone wall with only a few slits for windows. Awful awful stuff.

    • #759667
      kite
      Participant

      @Lincoln wrote:

      Mill on Fr Matthew Quay development: “Jacobs “Mill

      what a horror show-! surely this does not conform to the conditions of planning! I believe that Murray O Laoire Architects who prepared the planning permission for the mill have had no involvement in the construction of the hotel buildng and that there is effectively no professional guidance on the project other than the structural engineer! this is like the bad ol’ days when the architect was regarded as only good enough to get the planning and then is not required when you have to build it .

      They should be injuncted and forced to build as per the planning conditions – this building is too important and prominent to let a developer get away with such shoddy treatment of our city fabric.

      😮 I agree that Murray O Laoire Architects seem to be redundant in the redevelopment of the Jacobs Mill site.
      Tom McCarthy and Tom Kelly are taking the same “direct labor” type approach to the Kingsley hotel redevelopment, again with disastrous results.
      It must be embarrassing for Murray O Laoire, or any other professional company to have their names linked in any way with this type of development, (that said, wasn’t it a “professional” body that gave Victoria Mills an award last year?)

    • #759668
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      Hope you’d a nice holiday Lex.

      Just on the plans for the Muskerry Service Station at the Western Road. I had a little visit to view the plans for myself over the week. I saw today only 3 objections lodged on the project. Honestly I have to say of all the projects in planning at the moment this is perhaps the one that is ripe for controversy. It happens to be a rather awful dire contraption. The architects were marked as DTA Associates which I understand is Derek Tynan work again, the same team that gave us the awful Victoria Mills, the even worse extension to Victoria Mills and the equally terrible office building planned for Crosses Green. Again DTA seems on an ambitious mission to even top its other mistakes with what is essentially a half glass, half stone wall pair of blocks. From the photomontages it seems the buildings will jut close to the roadside blocking views down the Western Road of the infinitely more attractive new Jurys and create an eyesore viewing up the Western Road from the city along the river. It essentially rises up facing the road as a bare stone wall with only a few slits for windows. Awful awful stuff.

      Can someone please post some pics of the jurys site if they get a chance? It would be very much appreciated by an exiled corkonian.

    • #759669
      POM
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      😮 I agree that Murray O Laoire Architects seem to be redundant in the redevelopment of the Jacobs Mill site.
      Tom McCarthy and Tom Kelly are taking the same “direct labor” type approach to the Kingsley hotel redevelopment, again with disastrous results.
      It must be embarrassing for Murray O Laoire, or any other professional company to have their names linked in any way with this type of development, (that said, wasn’t it a “professional” body that gave Victoria Mills an award last year?)

      I don’t think the building projects are direct labour. O’Flynn Banteer Builders are working on both sites for the developer.

    • #759670
      lexington
      Participant

      I’m just putting this post up here to answer some questions I get asked quite often so as to clear up or inform those who seek details. Sorry if I step to one-side from prime topics for a moment.

      1. Aviation Development

      I posted a few weeks back of news on a possible aviation development related to Cork which I would try and make known before July. I have held back on details as I do not have clarity on a number of issues – again, I may post some details as ‘speculation’ in the absence of such details. However the development does not relate to Cork Airport or the Cork Airport Authority.

      2. Abercrombie & Fitch

      Apparently some persons have not forgotten the post I made last July (2005) regarding the prospect of an expansion by highly popular US-based fashion chain Abercrombie & Fitch into Europe and possibly Ireland. The details here have mixed and matched over the last few months following a stir up in management with the company, most notably the resignation of Chief Operating Officer Robert Singer in August 2005 after only 15 months with the company. It was Mr. Singer who had championed the expansion of the chain into Europe and aided the set-up of a European-division based in Milan and headed up by former Gucci executive Francesco Giannaccari. A&F had agreed terms to open its 1st European store at Burlington Gardens situated off Bond Street, Oxford Street and Saville Row in London. The unit which A&F had intended to occupy was tenanted by retailler Jil Sander. Under Mr. Singer, A&F sought to open up to 20 stores across Europe – Ireland had indeed been cited as a destination for up to 2 possible stores in the short-to-medium term although this was never formally confirmed. Other locations cited included additional stores in the UK (and specifically London), Spain, Italy and unspecified Scandinavian locations. CEO Mike Jefferies has indicated recently that A&F is still committed to expansion in the UK, Canada and selected European markets but will do so cautiously. As I understand it, again, Ireland is well positioned given the generally high mark-up by many recent international trading names established here. Along with the UK, Ireland is increasingly seen as a ‘safe’ location for expanding US chains such as Guess? Jeans who are eyeing up a unit in a prospective retail development by Paddy McKillen’s Clarendon Properties just off Grafton Street in Dublin. Based on information a few months old, were any expansion into Ireland initiated, Dublin would represent the initial trading location (preferably city centre) with additional moves made based on the store’s performance, however regional expansions were not ruled out – though the individual markets remained unassessed. Outside the UK, other possible locations shortlisted for investigation included Barcelona and Milan. No set timeframe for a roll-out is clear. Undoubtedly such a prized catch would represent nothing short of a coup for proposals in locations like Academy Street, Joe O’Donovan’s plans or even the plans of Manor Park Homebuilders. Wishful thinking perhaps? :rolleyes:

      The company operates 352 Abercrombie & Fitch (premium brand) stores, 163 Abercrombie (children’s clothing) stores, 289 Hollister Co. (slightly lower cost clothing) stores and 6 RUEHT stores across the US and Canada.

    • #759671
      kite
      Participant

      @POM wrote:

      I don’t think the building projects are direct labour. O’Flynn Banteer Builders are working on both sites for the developer.

      🙂
      What I meant by direct type labor is that Tom McCarthy’ Mills development and his and Tom Kelly’s Kingsley development are been directed by their own management team.
      Any snags or penalties fall back on the owners, not the builder, engineers etc. An unusual way of doing business on developments of this size I would think?

    • #759672
      lowrise
      Participant

      In connection with victoria cross area , could any enlighten me as to whats happening to topcar garage at orchard road.thanks.

    • #759673
      kite
      Participant

      @lowrise wrote:

      In connection with victoria cross area , could any enlighten me as to whats happening to topcar garage at orchard road.thanks.

      The family that bought the Top Car site has approached residents living on Orchard Road to get a bigger footprint in the area. One resident agreed a sale but the new owners of Top Car delayed signing final contracts until the ABP outcome on the heating and plumbing site nearby, the contracts on what I hear is a large site have now completed and the owners are following up on other purchase possibilities in the area.
      (Also see Lex’s post 2072 page 83 for more info on this)

    • #759674
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      This also shows thiugh that the nortside does really lose out on alot of development as a result of the north ring road delayment. This really is one of the most important developments for the city I think there should be more effort put into making this a top priority for the city!

      If the greatest reason for the ring road at a cost of €600m is that the North of the City doesn’t have enough motormalls then it would be a real waste of money. This is particularly relevant given that the airport had airbridges witheld on the basis of cost. The focus needs to be creating an impression for those who wish to enter the City and for projects in the City and not a project that keeps people out of the City.

    • #759675
      Torquemada
      Participant

      Hi All,
      Does anyone have an update on the situation at Cork airport?When is the new terminal now opening?Wasnt it meant to be aound now?Alos, any update on the funding of the new terminal?Has the 2independent” report now been published?
      Thanks

    • #759676
      jdivision
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      2. Abercrombie & Fitch

      regarding the prospect of an expansion by highly popular US-based fashion chain Abercrombie & Fitch into Europe and possibly Ireland. .

      From The Sunday Business Post in February of last year:
      The US fashion retailer Abercrombie & Fitch has held preliminary talks about opening a store in Ireland, The Sunday Business Post has learned. The retailer is planning a “substantial” expansion into Europe and retail sources said the prospect of opening here first would be attractive given the strength of the economy, robust retail sales and the similarities between the customer base here and in Britain.
      Abercrombie & Fitch targets mid-market consumers, typically aged between 16 and 25 and is one of the best known brands in American fashion retailing. Any Irish store would not open until late 2006 at the earliest. “They’re a very desirable tenant and they know it,” said one Irish retail source.

      I couldn’t say it at the time but they have held talks about opening in Dundrum Town Centre but they were described as “difficult”. Will check in again to see if there’s any more news there. Just to let you know Lex, Guess? opened in McKillen’s scheme last week. Think it may be a franchise though.

    • #759677
      Angry Rebel
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      The focus needs to be creating an impression for those who wish to enter the City and for projects in the City and not a project that keeps people out of the City.

      If you keep those who don’t need to be in the city out of it (e.g through traffic) it creates a more pleasant environment for those who do enter the city! 😉

    • #759678
      lisam
      Participant

      i wouldnt class Blarney, Little Island of Fota to be on the southside!!

    • #759679
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I think that both Local Authorities in Cork deserve recognition for the development of the CASP plan which very clearly plots out a sound platform for Cork to build upon. When one compares the way both local authorities co-operated on this with similar relationships in Limerick and Galway you get the feeling that you are talking about a region that can deliver. I hope that central government rewards proper planning with the funds to ensure the sustainable development of the City.

    • #759680
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Wednesday, June 28th 2006 – that’s the expected date for a decision by An Bord Pleanala regarding Frinailla Developments plans for Dennehy’s Cross. The scheme of 163 mixed residential units, commercial/community facilities and triple-deck basement car-parking designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects was first lodged with Cork City Council on the 30th September 2005 and granted on the 14th February 2006 subject to a reduction of 7 apartments from the northern block. The scheme garnered praise from numerous sources and was favourably commented on in the planner’s final report. Despite this, an appeal was brought against the renewal project – Frinailla too appealed conditions including those related to contribution fees on a first party basis. Though the final decision date may waiver, subject to ABP decision, the project should begin works come October 2006 when the Dennehy’s Cross site formally hands over to the developers. A further application is expected as part of a 2nd phase on the Dennehy’s Cross Garage showrooms at the south-west end of the crossroads later this year.


      The scheme, whose southern block is seen here fronting Magazine Road, will contain a mix of residential units and green-space/amenity area between the 2 blocks.



      who_me – the docks adjacent to the IAWS (R&H Hall) Silos, Kennedy Quay, are usually busy during weekdays but can be easily accessed on weekends by the public. As part of the redevelopment of the docklands, this area will provide a highly important element in that – almost more than anywhere else – it officiates a linkage between the city centre, the emerging civic quarter around City Hall and the South Docklands. Expect the building line to be brought forward, closer to the waterfront – with riverwalks/boardwalks running along the quayside hopefully line with restaurants, bars, nightclubs, cafes and shops.

    • #759681
      kite
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      😮 Wednesday, June 28th 2006 – that’s the expected date for a decision by An Bord Pleanala regarding Frinailla Developments plans for Dennehy’s Cross. The scheme of 163 mixed residential units, commercial/community facilities and triple-deck basement car-parking designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects was first lodged with Cork City Council on the 30th September 2005 and granted on the 14th February 2006 subject to a reduction of 7 apartments from the northern block. The scheme garnered praise from numerous sources and was favourably commented on in the planner’s final report. Despite this, an appeal was brought against the renewal project – Frinailla too appealed conditions including those related to contribution fees on a first party basis. Though the final decision date may waiver, subject to ABP decision, the project should begin works come October 2006 when the Dennehy’s Cross site formally hands over to the developers. A further application is expected as part of a 2nd phase on the Dennehy’s Cross Garage showrooms at the south-west end of the crossroads later this year.

      Work is due to begin on Frinailla’s site at Dennehy’s Cross (subject to ABP appeal) in October, but only on the site now occupied by the panel beating shop (Magazine Road).
      I am told that Top Car is to occupy the remainder of the site on a temporary basis until the Blarney Motor Mall is ready. Work on the main part of the Dennehy’s garage will therefore be pushed forward to 2007 (April at the earliest)

    • #759682
      POM
      Participant

      Lex just on your docklands post, I am particularly impressed by the way Howard have taken such a strong position with relation to the docks. Clearly their movement has allowed them secure some pretty important sites that no doubt others will be grinding their teeth with envy over the next few years. I’m glad that Howard are involved given the generally high finish of buildings they seem to have completed around Cork over the last few years.

    • #759683
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Was in Marks and spencers the other day and theyre currently revamping their Merchants quay store. I’m surprised they havent opened up another store in the city at this stage. I was trying to think of possible future locations that could work for them and was thinking Horgans quay and, or maybe a store in the south docklands would be very attractive locations.

      Anyone know anymore on how event centre plans are progressing on Horgans quay? I hope its a decent landmark structure not a boxy Point type building.

    • #759684
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Dunnes Stores’ planned €30m redevelopment of its founding store at 102 – 105 Saint Patrick’s Street has been given the go-ahead by Cork City Council in advance of the scheduled due date of July 17th 2006. The prime development involves the demolition of an entire assembled block fronting Saint Patrick’s Street and stretching back to Drawbridge Street – it is also bordered by Bowling Green Street to the west (across which O’Callaghan Properties have designs for their large Academy Street project) and William Street to the east – and the construction of a multi-level block over 2 basement levels. The initial design by Bertie Pope & Associates was lodged back in October of 2005 and called for a 6-storey over basement development with convenience retailling at basement level with comparison retail and restaurant over 5-levels, above which existed a further plant and storage level. The facades between 103 and 105 Saint Patrick’s Street were earmarked for retention. Concerns regarding bulk, massing and design were expressed by Cork City Council, subsequently Further Information was requested in November 2005 and answered in May 2006. Importantly, under the initial planning assessment note was given to the lack of live/active uses fronting Bowling Green and William Streets – a clearly stated objective of the Cork City Development Plan 2004.

      The revised design was undertaken jointly by Bertie Pope & Associates and Douglas Wallace Architects. Revisions to the scheme included a reduction in height with a significant volume of plant equipment relocated to an additional storage basement level. Alterations were addressed to the frontages of both Drawbridge and Saint Patrick’s Streets – including projected fenestration at the corners of Saint Patrick’s Street/Bowling Green Street and Drawbridge Street/William Street – these projections were removed by planning condition given their overbearing effect on the streetscapes. Revisions to the roof detailling have also been set for review by condition. Despite these alterations, the planning report commented, “Overall the Further Information response is regarded as achieving design improvements and alterations that will lead to an architectural and commercial development which enhances significantly the vitality and attractiveness of the city centre.”

      General development levies weighed in just short of €1m. When complete, the project will represent Dunnes Stores’ flagship facility in Cork and revitalise the historic premises which first lay home to the original Dunnes Stores opened by Ben Dunne Snr. in 1944.



      😮 Coughlan de Keyser Architects have lodged additional information with Cork City Council regarding the much anticipated CentrePoint project for Clontarf Street. The proposal by DAT Partnership seeks to realise a 9-storey office building on a tiny triangular site bordered by Lower Oliver Plunkett Street to the south, Deane Street to the west and Clontarf Street to the east. The latest batch of information (the 4th batch to date!) is in repsonse to Cork City Council’s request for further details highlighting that the previous round of information submitted was inadequate. The proposal has been significantly revised since its original inception and is now due scheduled for a decision on July 23rd 2006.

    • #759685
      lexington
      Participant

      This is taken from a recent rant of mine concerning Cork’s Future. In it, I noted a number of ‘problems’ I feared, if not overcome, would damage the successful realisation of Cork’s development and regeneration. Among these fears is Cork’s reputation as a ‘litter blackspot’. Again walking the streets of the city today I felt compelled to post this – litter is an issue that needs to be tackled from the ground (literally) up, starting not simply with physical work, but also educational. It is a mindset that needs to be changed radically and rapidly. I can’t help but sometimes blush with embarrassment at some eye-sores and littered places around the city.

      As one of my friends commented to me recently as we discussed the situation, “If my wife was as dirty as Cork, I wouldn’t be able for work in the morning”.



      1. Civic Pride/Maintenance – relates much more to the attitudes of persons and groups associated with the Cork region. As I walked Daunt Square and Saint Patrick’s Street yesterday afternoon (and I have mentioned this extensively before) I was still struck by the volume of litter bleamishing the pavements. This is an issue I think that is far too casually dismissed. Social and environmental conscience is a nice concept – everyone agrees or at least agrees with novelty efforts for reasons of public image – however I don’t think it is sufficiently taken to heart; this is evident by pacing Cork’s city centre streets and suburbs. The same old tired agruments emerge from businesses, public bodies and the public alike – “It’s too costly”, “I have to take care of my business first and foremost, I don’t have enough time or finance to meet the requirements for environmental care demanded”, “That’s what the street cleaners are for”, “The City Council already spend X, Y and Z a year on environmental programs and are curently doing A, B and C”. I am aware of all this but it still is not good enough and it is not working to what should be the appropriate standard. Environmental education needs to be forcefully drilled into the mindsets of children from nursery school non-stop until they reach their final year in Secondary School. Every litter bin in every street in Cork should be subdivided in paper, plastic, glass etc (of course some persons won’t give 2 hoots about this – so enforce it with strictly regulated, performance-pay-related Litter Wardens who can work in conjunction with the Gardai (give them a linked radio frequency) to document, enforce and punish individuals there and then with community service for example (street cleaning etc) depending on the extent of the offence). The existing numeracy, monitoring and nature of bring sites around Cork is inadequate. Too often persons shove mixed-rubbish bags into the same slot of a recycle bin because there is no accounting for disregard. The recycle centre in Trim, Co. Meath is perhaps a good model for an organised, monitored and well structured Bring Site – more of this please in Cork.

      Street-cleaning is often looked upon as a low-bracket job ~ an image which needs serious revision. I have observed some genuinely hard-working and attentive gentlemen and women on the streets of Cork fulfilling the roles of Sanitation Officers; however given the volume of city centre traffic (pedestrian and otherwise), the frequency of such work is insufficient. There is a need for more officers on the streets with the capacity to continuously clean paving (stains, chewing gum etc), collect and organise litter, weed unsightly vegetation non-stop 16 hours a day on all Cork’s major city centre streets (in various shifts of course) with awards based on volume and extent of work. Yes this is a costly operation but it is an essential one which should under no circumstances be given second stroke. Cork features too prominently too often on Ireland’s Annual Litter Black-spots list – walking the streets of the city today highlights the reasons why only too well.

      All building proprietors by strictly enforced law should ensure the upkeep and presentation of their buildings – everything from paint, stains, watermarks, broken pipes, slates, signage, unsightly vegetation growth (moss, weeds etc) – should be regularly reviewed by assigned agents under the direction of an independently appointed body; perhaps in conjunction with reports by the aforementioned santitation officers who will be most frequently on the streets to observe such failings. Where funds are genuinely unavailable to carry out immediate works, perhaps an interest-based loan system may be made by the City Council to proprietors for instant works.

      The attitude to our environment in Cork is as much a mindset issue as much as it is a capacity one. I’ve heard so many economic, social and not-my-problem arguments and I’m not convinced by any of them. Cork’s presentation and environment is the responsibility of everyone. The long-term benefits (i.e. tourism, investment etc) are overlooked so easily on the basis that they are strategic and not immediate. A pity that must end. It’s time to get your cleaning act in order Cork.

    • #759686
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Also, as I passed 2 young drivers today forking out money to the clampers for not changing their parking disks in time – I noted the chauffer driven vehicle of Cork Lord Mayor (newly appointed Labour councillor Michael Ahern) parked on a Loading Bay on Patrick’s Street at about 3pm. The Lord Mayor was doing the introductory rounds at the famour market – and his vehicle was untouched by Traffic Wardens and Gardai alike. Surely for a man on €80K a year as Lord Mayor, he could much better afford a parking ticket or clamp than part-timers or students.

      😮 Labour Party me arse…if this dude is “left wing” then Berti is a Monster Raving Looney RED!!
      The arrogance of some councilors is truly sickening. “Do as I say, not as I do” Eh?
      Come back to the party “Red Mick” (Barry), all is forgiven….

    • #759687
      lexington
      Participant
      kite wrote:
      😮 Labour Party me arse&#8230]

      Not quite the point I was making – I’ll remove that remark, lest it be misinterpreted. Its not a political point.

    • #759688
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Not quite the point I was making – I’ll remove that remark, lest in be misinterpreted. Its not a political point.

      😉 I understand, ’nuff said.

    • #759689
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      Am closing this thread….. mega threads like this are too unweildy

      for future reference i’d like separate threads per area… ie a cork docklands, cork ring road, patricks street etc

      over time i’ll split this thread and its predesscor into pieces

    • #759690
      Dickens
      Participant

      Accomplish tremendous Christmas party in London with marvellous dinner, amazing games for kids, enjoyable stage shows and polite staff.

    • #759691
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      X

    • #759692
      brainscan
      Participant

      I’ve just noticed this morning that major ground works are in progress on the site next door to Aldi on Tory Top Road, Formerly Heitons. I think it might be related to the original plannning for the site for residential and other uses as mentioned in one of lexingtons old *updates*.
      Pity he isn’t around to enlighten us.

      https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=37582&postcount=153

Viewing 2,179 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Latest News