The Abbey for the Docks
- This topic has 31 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 2 months ago by
.
- Posts
Just heard on the news that the Arts and Sports Minister John O’Donoghue has announced that the Abbey Theatre is to relocate to the Docklands after all.
So what sort of a National Theatre will we get, another conspicuous modern landmark for the city?
I really really do hope that Scott Tallon Walker will get the contract to design and build it …pleeze, pleeze, pleeze………NOT!Wasn’t this announced ages ago? They’re going to fill in George’s Dock (I think? – the one that has that barge on it where they had the Footsbarn tent a while back) and build it there.
They obviously didn’t give full consideration to my proposal that they culvert the liffey opposate the customs house and build the abbey there; or, they locate it in the middle of town near all transport links by siting it on Stephen’s Green. In other words, isn’t this the stupidest thing?
It is a major loss for O’Connell Street and the North Inner City. The IFSC is a business district and is not integrated with the North Inner City the way O’Connell Street is. A financial services centre is not the place for a theatre. The docks at night is dead.
This is from the govt website.
http://www.dast.gov.ie/Pressroom/pr_detail.asp?ID=1143Abbey Theatre Redevelopment:
The Government has decided that the new Abbey Theatre will be located on the site provided by the Dublin Docklands Development Authority at Georges Dock. OPW have completed the necessary site investigations at the site and have advised that it would be a suitable location for the new National Theatre. With the approval of the Government, the Minister is now arranging to have all options for procuring the theatre as a PPP project, including the incorporation of a separate international design competition, progressed as quickly as possible with a view to enabling him to report back to Government by end-February 2006. Commenting today the Minister said:
Definitely the Loopline bridge should be remodelled so as to remove the curtain effect and link the two parts of the city. A lighter frame with an arch or something could be applied and light it up at night. Otherwise the new theatre will be isolated down there in suit land. Hope the new theatre will look radical. Employ big noise architects from abroad to design it.
It’s all happening at the mo. Ye’d know we were heading into an election year.
To recap, look at whats been given the go ahead lately……..
…….all promises, promise
Lansdowne Road
The National Conference Centre
The Abbey Theatre
phase 1 of Sports Campus Irelandi have no real problem with the ifsc as a location; it isn’t that far from town and the newer parts, while not close to stunning, do at least manage quite an urban feel. i also imagine that it will look good in the basin, but i do feel it is vandalism, there is no end of brownfield and no end of undistinguished city center buildings where the theatre could have a real presence, why sacrifice the basin, its beautiful, its a genuine historic part of the dockland area and kind of special, a real loss.
@adhoc wrote:
Haven’t seen any of the theatre, but I came across this.
God help us if this sort of comment sets the standard for debate on this issue.
Lighen up DublinLimerick. There’s little to debate as little has been revealed about this project, certainly no artists’ impressions, design competition deadlines, budget………
The posts so far don’t seem to realise that the Abbey won’t sit in the pond, the pond will be fill in. Thus a complete waste of a pond.
Kerry Solictor go figure.
Ridiculous decision. I think the obvious site for it is on the Cartlon cinema site.
If they want to move it to the docklands give it a high profile river front site and not fill in open space in a area surrounding by huge office blocks. Most cities try to hold onto what is left of their green and blue spaces. Build this new building on a brown field site.
@Michael J. O’Brien wrote:
Ridiculous decision. I think the obvious site for it is on the Cartlon cinema site.
If they want to move it to the docklands give it a high profile river front site and not fill in open space in a area surrounding by huge office blocks. Most cities try to hold onto what is left of their green and blue spaces. Build this new building on a brown field site.
Yes but all that would require sense.
This is like watching a car accident in slow motion as the abbey creeps its way down river only to collide first with the Roche”parmesan shaker” national conference centre (new hybrid there, guaranteed a full house most nights) on its way to meet the Liebeskind “swiss wedge” art centre to rest finally in the middle of the Liffey. The question is, does cheese float?
Its a dreadfull location in its self but nobody seems to be commenting about the loss of a perfectly good amenity, which has anly recently recieved a large cash injection to revamp it. In the summer time the officer works utillise the area no end. In my opinion nothing should be built there at all. The DDDA seem to at times squander money.
crestfield, I believe there was plenty of indignation expressed concerning filling in the dock in the earlier thread. I think it’s a dreadful decision. I never go to Abbey productions anyway (and I normally see four or five plays a year) so I’m not as concerned about the precise location of the new Abbey but I hate the idea of filling the dock.
Agreed, a shameful decision. The dock is one of the best amenity spaces in the city, and certainly the best of the north Docklands. Even as it is, the temporary structures often erected on the water should not be permitted – at the moment it’s full of garden sheds :rolleyes:
It is so laughable, so ironic, so ridiculous above all, that the only site that can be found in the entire capital is a pool of water set aside as an amenity space in a business district.
Not only is the proposal damaging to the 18th century dock, not only is it commandeering a valued breathing space in the IFSC, but it is also depriving the city centre of the theatre itself, not to mention the rejuvenating effect it could have on a rundown area.By all accounts the finished theatre will probably look stunning with something of a ‘moat’ effect around it, but architecturally it could have been equally successful elsewhere, and much more so on a host of other levels.
The wrong decision.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
