The Abbey for the Docks

Home Forums Ireland The Abbey for the Docks

Viewing 31 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #708291
      GregF
      Participant

      Just heard on the news that the Arts and Sports Minister John O’Donoghue has announced that the Abbey Theatre is to relocate to the Docklands after all.

      So what sort of a National Theatre will we get, another conspicuous modern landmark for the city?
      I really really do hope that Scott Tallon Walker will get the contract to design and build it …pleeze, pleeze, pleeze………NOT!

    • #763967
      jimg
      Participant

      Wasn’t this announced ages ago? They’re going to fill in George’s Dock (I think? – the one that has that barge on it where they had the Footsbarn tent a while back) and build it there.

    • #763968
      ctesiphon
      Participant

      Announced a while back, confirmed today.:(

    • #763969
      notjim
      Participant

      They obviously didn’t give full consideration to my proposal that they culvert the liffey opposate the customs house and build the abbey there; or, they locate it in the middle of town near all transport links by siting it on Stephen’s Green. In other words, isn’t this the stupidest thing?

    • #763970
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      any artists impressions floating around ?

    • #763971
      adhoc
      Participant

      Haven’t seen any of the theatre, but I came across this.

    • #763972
      ctesiphon
      Participant

      😀 😀 😀
      That made me spill my tea on my keyboard. Thanks.

    • #763973
      ConK
      Participant

      It is a major loss for O’Connell Street and the North Inner City. The IFSC is a business district and is not integrated with the North Inner City the way O’Connell Street is. A financial services centre is not the place for a theatre. The docks at night is dead.

      This is from the govt website.
      http://www.dast.gov.ie/Pressroom/pr_detail.asp?ID=1143

      Abbey Theatre Redevelopment:

      The Government has decided that the new Abbey Theatre will be located on the site provided by the Dublin Docklands Development Authority at Georges Dock. OPW have completed the necessary site investigations at the site and have advised that it would be a suitable location for the new National Theatre. With the approval of the Government, the Minister is now arranging to have all options for procuring the theatre as a PPP project, including the incorporation of a separate international design competition, progressed as quickly as possible with a view to enabling him to report back to Government by end-February 2006. Commenting today the Minister said:

    • #763974
      GregF
      Participant

      Definitely the Loopline bridge should be remodelled so as to remove the curtain effect and link the two parts of the city. A lighter frame with an arch or something could be applied and light it up at night. Otherwise the new theatre will be isolated down there in suit land. Hope the new theatre will look radical. Employ big noise architects from abroad to design it.

      It’s all happening at the mo. Ye’d know we were heading into an election year.

      To recap, look at whats been given the go ahead lately……..

      …….all promises, promise

      Lansdowne Road
      The National Conference Centre
      The Abbey Theatre
      phase 1 of Sports Campus Ireland

    • #763975
      a boyle
      Participant

      A Kerry Man putting the Abbey in a bathtub , oh GOD!

    • #763976
      notjim
      Participant

      i have no real problem with the ifsc as a location; it isn’t that far from town and the newer parts, while not close to stunning, do at least manage quite an urban feel. i also imagine that it will look good in the basin, but i do feel it is vandalism, there is no end of brownfield and no end of undistinguished city center buildings where the theatre could have a real presence, why sacrifice the basin, its beautiful, its a genuine historic part of the dockland area and kind of special, a real loss.

    • #763977
      DublinLimerick
      Participant

      @adhoc wrote:

      Haven’t seen any of the theatre, but I came across this.

      God help us if this sort of comment sets the standard for debate on this issue.

    • #763978
      adhoc
      Participant

      Lighen up DublinLimerick. There’s little to debate as little has been revealed about this project, certainly no artists’ impressions, design competition deadlines, budget………

    • #763979
      a boyle
      Participant

      The posts so far don’t seem to realise that the Abbey won’t sit in the pond, the pond will be fill in. Thus a complete waste of a pond.

      Kerry Solictor go figure.

    • #763980
      Michael J. OBrien
      Participant

      Ridiculous decision. I think the obvious site for it is on the Cartlon cinema site.

      If they want to move it to the docklands give it a high profile river front site and not fill in open space in a area surrounding by huge office blocks. Most cities try to hold onto what is left of their green and blue spaces. Build this new building on a brown field site.

    • #763981
      fergalr
      Participant

      @Michael J. O’Brien wrote:

      Ridiculous decision. I think the obvious site for it is on the Cartlon cinema site.

      If they want to move it to the docklands give it a high profile river front site and not fill in open space in a area surrounding by huge office blocks. Most cities try to hold onto what is left of their green and blue spaces. Build this new building on a brown field site.

      Yes but all that would require sense.

    • #763982
      shadow
      Participant

      This is like watching a car accident in slow motion as the abbey creeps its way down river only to collide first with the Roche”parmesan shaker” national conference centre (new hybrid there, guaranteed a full house most nights) on its way to meet the Liebeskind “swiss wedge” art centre to rest finally in the middle of the Liffey. The question is, does cheese float?

    • #763983
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Its a dreadfull location in its self but nobody seems to be commenting about the loss of a perfectly good amenity, which has anly recently recieved a large cash injection to revamp it. In the summer time the officer works utillise the area no end. In my opinion nothing should be built there at all. The DDDA seem to at times squander money.

    • #763984
      jimg
      Participant

      crestfield, I believe there was plenty of indignation expressed concerning filling in the dock in the earlier thread. I think it’s a dreadful decision. I never go to Abbey productions anyway (and I normally see four or five plays a year) so I’m not as concerned about the precise location of the new Abbey but I hate the idea of filling the dock.

    • #763985
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Agreed, a shameful decision. The dock is one of the best amenity spaces in the city, and certainly the best of the north Docklands. Even as it is, the temporary structures often erected on the water should not be permitted – at the moment it’s full of garden sheds :rolleyes:

      It is so laughable, so ironic, so ridiculous above all, that the only site that can be found in the entire capital is a pool of water set aside as an amenity space in a business district.
      Not only is the proposal damaging to the 18th century dock, not only is it commandeering a valued breathing space in the IFSC, but it is also depriving the city centre of the theatre itself, not to mention the rejuvenating effect it could have on a rundown area.

      By all accounts the finished theatre will probably look stunning with something of a ‘moat’ effect around it, but architecturally it could have been equally successful elsewhere, and much more so on a host of other levels.
      The wrong decision.

    • #763986
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      They got it all wrong. Idiots. But then again, I didnt actually think they would put the abbey in the right place. A decent design will hopefully limit the damage.

      What they should do is fix the ugly loopline bridge.

    • #763987
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Such a proposal could only be justified in Hong Kong or Holland. Has the population density in Dublin increased so much since I was last there that they need to fill in a part of the docks?

    • #763988
      asdasd
      Participant

      Has the population density in Dublin increased so much since I was last there that they need to fill in a part of the docks?

      We dont know when you were here last, but to answer the question generically, no, not the population density, but yes the population has increased dramatically. Everyone is living in Kildare.

      I fear this decision will kill off Northern part of O’Connell street, for good.

    • #763989
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I was in Dublin a couple of months ago. I was thinking that things hadn’t changed so much in that time – mind you, the train service to Sligo still has a certain ‘indian-esque’ appearance.

      What is the cost-estimate for the infill? Surely it must be more than purchasing a normal site elsewhere? What is the justification for siting it here? It will really take away from the surrounding area.

    • #763990
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      @PDLL wrote:

      I was in Dublin a couple of months ago. I was thinking that things hadn’t changed so much in that time – mind you, the train service to Sligo still has a certain ‘indian-esque’ appearance.

      They dont call it the calcutta express for nothing 😀

    • #763991
      Morlan
      Participant

      Troubled Abbey Theatre gets €4m lifeline from Irish government

      Christmas has come early for Dublin’s Abbey Theatre. After a period of financial disasters, resignations and box office flops that has seen Ireland’s national theatre plunging ever more deeply into the red, Irish arts minister John O’Donoghue this month approved a one-off €4m aid package for the troubled venue. The money will allow the Abbey to wipe out its debts – which now total around €3.4m – and start 2006 with a clean slate.

      The spectacular turnaround in the Abbey’s fortunes is largely due to an aggressive modernisation programme led by Fiach MacConghail, a former adviser to O’Donoghue who took over as the Abbey’s director in May after the resignation of managing director Brian Jackson and the departure of artistic director Ben Barnes. Under MacConghail’s leadership, the Abbey has seen a radical restructuring of its administration and a complete overhaul of accounting practices.

      “I believe in the tooth fairy and Santa Claus now,” MacConghail told the Guardian. “The Arts Council set the board and the executive clear targets. They were tough to meet and we met them. But it was a white-knuckle ride.”

      The announcement has boosted morale at the theatre, where plans are underway for a relocation to a new building in Dublin’s Docklands area. However, MacConghail has warned that the theatre’s annual state funding will have to increase in order to prevent it from falling back into deficit.

      “The Abbey has now become more accountable and more transparent in the way it does business,” he said. “What will stop it going into debt in the future is a reasonable subsidy from the Arts Council.”

      The Abbey’s spiralling financial crisis began in 2004, its centenary year, when a programme marking the 100th anniversary of founder WB Yeats suffered catastrophic box office returns. This year it emerged that the company had lost €1.85m in 2004, almost double the figure first reported.

      “Clearing the deficit has shown great confidence,” MacConghail said. “Culturally speaking, the Abbey Theatre is very much locked into the psyche of the Irish nation. It’s in our DNA.”

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/news/story/0,11711,1671122,00.html

    • #763992
      GregF
      Participant

      See that the Abbey is to get another 25.7 million from the Arts Council over the next 3 years!
      Jasus, with that and a new home, it should most definitely be a success now.

    • #763993
      Rory W
      Participant

      Seriously – does anyone (Dermot Desmond aside) think moving the Abbey to this site is a good idea – I certainly dont

    • #763994
      GregF
      Participant

      Buiding it on that patch of water seems absurd. It would be better if it had more of a Liffey waterfront location. The new location seems rather cramped too. That horrible red brick building in front of it as seen from the Liffey quayside should be demolished so as the new Abbey can be viewed and adored clearly.

    • #763995
      Anonymous
      Participant

      yeah i’m not in favour of it either, why clutter george’s dock ?

      upper o’connell street was the only place for me, could have really benefited from the abbey, and now that the iap is nearing completion – they’re really going to have to look at building use on the street – new paving & street surfaces can only do so much …

    • #763996
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      This idea seems to getting the go ahead.

      http://www.irish-architecture.com/news/2006/000219.html

      If it is, which I find disappointing in the first place, I hope something is done to sort out the civic space between the three original IFSC buildings – IFSC House, the AIB building and La Touche House. I think it is one of the most depressing civic areas in the whole city. Its only redeeming feature might be the small circle of granite stones with benches around it.

    • #763997
      alonso
      Participant

      yep carlton site would have been ideal if it was big enough and not tied up in red tape bollix. Hopefully though by the time this is built Luas line C1 will be down to the point depot and maybe, just maybe, the Docks will have a little life about it after 6 pm…

Viewing 31 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Latest News