Stephens Green Paving
- This topic has 33 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 21 years, 2 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
April 29, 2003 at 10:21 am #706170
GrahamH
ParticipantI know it may be difficult to belive, but there is the faintest possibility that someone from the CC was reading this site, and not only that, but took action on an issue!
Remember the naff red non-slip paving laid at the corners of the Green at the pedestrian crossings, slap bang in the middle of the new granite paving?
Well, its all being ripped up again and is being replaced with granite versions that blend seamlessly into the paving.
Highly unlikely we had anything to do with it but sure we can live in hope…
(I walked along the north side of the Green in the bright morning sun, and with the leaves on the new trees it is now officially the most beautiful part of the city, again well done OPW!)
-
April 29, 2003 at 10:34 am #726540
urbanisto
ParticipantIm not sure the CC would have had anything to do with this Graham as the paving on the Green was all undertaken by OPW.
I agree that the newly paved areas look fab! Any idea what the LUAS side will look like? -
April 29, 2003 at 11:15 am #726541
J. Seerski
ParticipantCan someone please explain to me why Stephen’s green has been surrounded with granite paving (when gravel was adequate – and the need was not urgent) and that after 6 years since the plan O’Connell Street is still not paved in granite? The new crap around the Spire is all concrete – so if there is granite laid, it will mean more waste – why wasn’t the granite laid in the first place….
O’Connell Street is in dire need of rejuvination. Yet other parts of the city (Stephen’s green, Sth William St. etc.) get new granite paving first! Southside bias, me thinks……
-
April 29, 2003 at 11:26 am #726542
urbanisto
ParticipantAaah! Never! 🙂 Us Northsiders get our fair share!
The Green is probably not the best example of this as it is OPW owned, but O’Connell Street is a puzzle alright. After all we were told (in fact I was told in a letter from the IAP office at DCC) that the Spire would be in place in Jan (which it was) and that the three stage repaving programme would start directly after. Even taking into accpunt St Patricks Day taht would mean the works starting at the beginning of April. But May beckons and we are still waiting for them to solve the lighting problem on the Spire! As this stage I think an official unveiling would be a joke!
-
April 29, 2003 at 1:21 pm #726543
JJ
ParticipantYou are correct Stephen, the green is owned and maintained by the OPW so they have installed the new granite and refurbed some of the bollards ( no plans to reinstate the chains though as far as I know).
The Luas side will be in the same Pportugese granite and the same contractors will do the surfacing I understand so its all matched. The new LUAS platform will be in a differing granite to clearly define the stop.
Has anyone seen the surfacing being put in down in Arran Quay and Smithfield by the Luas. I think it looks very well.
JJ -
April 30, 2003 at 1:35 pm #726544
Aken
ParticipantThe CC are getting things right for a change? OMG i feel dizzy!
-
May 6, 2003 at 12:11 pm #726545
Anonymous
InactiveDoes anyone know what has happened to the original granite curb stones which were around St. Stephen’s Green? There is still some left on the west side as it is still under development for the Luas, but apart from that it seems to be gone.
-
May 6, 2003 at 12:36 pm #726546
CTR
ParticipantI heard that the OPW looks after the green and surrounding paving but the City Council is charged with the other sides (ie Shelbourne, Loreto, Iveagh House, RSCI sides’ paving / lighting & street furniture. Is this true?
The walks around the Green’s perimeter should be renamed with their original official names I think.
-
May 6, 2003 at 2:02 pm #726547
J. Seerski
ParticipantMethinks it looks awful, sanitised and too sharp. A gravel path would have sufficed.
-
May 7, 2003 at 7:12 pm #726548
GrahamH
ParticipantIt is a bit clinical alright, esp the clean-cut circles around the tree bases, but the sheer scale of this quality material far outweighs this.
I see that already the paint is chipping off the metal yokes on top of the new bollards, and the gravel at the tree bases is thinning out considerably.
Will the trees on the western LUAS side be replaced? Surely not.
-
May 7, 2003 at 8:11 pm #726549
Anonymous
Participantwhy shouldn’t the trees be replaced? I didn’t think that any of the old trees needed replacing but now that they have, the same should be done on all sides … the new lime trees look great btw.
-
May 8, 2003 at 10:08 am #726550
Rory W
ParticipantA gravel path – here in the middle of the city – in this weather? (to be said in 13th Duke of Wimden voice)
Nah the new path, trees, halogen lamps look great – well done opw.
Now if we could just shoot people that spat out chewing gum on it….
-
May 8, 2003 at 10:31 am #726551
GrahamH
ParticipantStephens Court has a good vantage point for snipers.
So I’m told…
-
May 8, 2003 at 11:22 am #726552
urbanisto
ParticipantI shouldnt imagine the DCC will be in too much of a hurry to refurb the other side of the Green (yes it is their turf) to bring it to the standard of the other side… their too busy putting up those horrible poles everywhere…some even have signage on!
I think the Green would look fab with similar paving and trees on the other side and some smart new public lighting. I also think reinstating the names of the origianl walks is an excellent idea.
My only grip with the current refurb is the area in front of the Wolfe Tone statue. The cobblelocking is nice but there is just too much of it. It look windswept. I think some planting or maybe a water feature wold have broken up the space more effectively.
As for the LUAS side – why not continue the tree line? There will be plenty of space. After all one of the main plus points of light rail is its avbility to sit easily on its surroundings and make a minimum impact.
-
May 8, 2003 at 11:35 am #726553
GrahamH
ParticipantI mean there are attractive established trees there at the moment, and are all evenly spaced and would fit into new paving just as well as new trees.
Esp considering the new trees around the Green ran into something like 2 million euro. (not that I begrudge them, they’re fantastic) -
May 8, 2003 at 11:37 am #726554
urbanisto
ParticipantThey had to be cut down, Graham as they were diseased (dutch elm I think) The new trees are disease resisitant limes I think.
-
May 13, 2003 at 9:29 pm #726555
Aken
Participant2 million euro for trees? Are these those Money trees i’ve been hearing about?
-
May 14, 2003 at 1:33 pm #726556
emf
ParticipantI agree about the cobbling in front of the Wolfe Tone monument. Its just a bit too much of an unbroken area. I like water features a lot I have to say, Unfortunately in Dublin they just seem to turn into litter bins! I like the idea of the one at the end of King St (If only someone had used a spirit level!!)
-
May 14, 2003 at 2:10 pm #726557
Anonymous
Participantwhere did you get that figure for the trees Graham ? 2 million euro seems a little excessive !!!!
-
May 15, 2003 at 10:27 am #726558
Anonymous
InactiveOriginally posted by Graham Hickey
Remember the naff red non-slip paving laid at the corners of the Green at the pedestrian crossings, slap bang in the middle of the new granite paving?Well, its all being ripped up again and is being replaced with granite versions that blend seamlessly into the paving.
I thought that these non-slip areas were to aid people with visual impairments to know when they were at a pedestrian crossing. They are also used at bus stops. Are they normally either red or yellow in colour in order to stand out more and therefore be easier to see?
-
May 15, 2003 at 11:04 am #726559
urbanisto
ParticipantYes but the debate was whether they actually needed to be in these colours or whether they could be in the same colour as the paving slab and just rely on the tactility to perform their function.
I have seen similar paving in the Uk that matches the surrounding paving. Asthetically it looks much better.
-
May 15, 2003 at 11:09 am #726560
Anonymous
InactiveI see. I was just wondering if the colour was anything to do with the function as these colours would possibly be easier to see. Thanks.
-
May 15, 2003 at 11:57 am #726561
urbanisto
ParticipantI suppose they would be… I wonder what the science is behind it.
-
May 15, 2003 at 1:05 pm #726562
GrahamH
ParticipantThe trees were definitly into the millions, they’re semi-mature, and had to be specially imported from the UK, as this was apparently the only place where ‘city trees’ could be purchased, ie, trees that could withstand the Green’s heavy clay and the traffic pollution.
I think I read it in the Times or Independent at the time.
-
May 15, 2003 at 2:29 pm #726563
urbanisto
ParticipantI recall seeing on ‘Nationwide’ an article about the trees for O’Connell St and they were being grown in Wicklow somewhere. They looked quite mature as well. They’re probably too big now…..
-
May 15, 2003 at 5:36 pm #726564
emf
ParticipantI spoke to a landscaper who said €500-600 would be average for this type of tree!!!!
-
May 15, 2003 at 7:42 pm #726565
Anonymous
Participantyep, i work with a landscaper and he said the same, the figure can’t be right …
-
May 16, 2003 at 12:30 pm #726566
GrahamH
ParticipantAdmittedly, it seems more than a little steep to me too but it was definitly the figure I read, and I remember being amazed at the time, so much so that I told someone else and they were equally bowled over.
Unless the paper quoted the overall pricetag for the Green’s paving as the price for the trees, which seems the most likely explanation. -
May 16, 2003 at 12:42 pm #726567
urbanisto
ParticipantOver priced Government contract? Surely not?
-
May 16, 2003 at 1:32 pm #726568
emf
ParticipantThere are 25 trees on each side and assuming that the Luas side hasen’t been planted (I can’t remember if it has) that works out at €37,500 for all the trees at €500 a pop!!
-
May 16, 2003 at 1:42 pm #726569
bluefoam
ParticipantI remember when the new buildings at Carlow IT were done, hearing that the interior trees cost in the region of £100,000.
-
May 19, 2003 at 9:48 am #726570
paul_moloney
ParticipantWalking down South King St on Saturday, all the black stone “benches” are gone and the fountain is turned off; to be honest, it looks better turned off, now merely resembling a drain rather than a broken _pissoir_.
Shouldn’t there be an Archeire Name and Shame column for these civic flops?
P.
-
May 19, 2003 at 10:16 am #726571
urbanisto
ParticipantDid anyone ever hear what happened on Sth King St and why the benches were removed. I must admit I saw the fountain switched on and it wasn’t that bad…probably because it had an adequate flow… but it could have been better.
Last May B H I took a stroll through Dublin in the Spring sunshine when everyone was out and about enjoying a day off work. I went down the Boardwalk and was almost tempted to have a coffee (except the coffee stalls have closed and are now covered in graffiti). I wandered down to Capel St bridge to have a look through the ‘book market’ but there was none. Then on in into Temple Bar to see of there was anything going on in Meeting House Square. All that space and that fab stage! But nothing except a windswept and sunless spot with an overpriced restaurant. Even the photographic gallery was closed. I continued on down through the ‘Cultural Quarter’ to the other square which was full of people enjoying the sun as expected. But watch out from parts falling from those big light structures…they’re all broken….
I would say there is plenty to put in a ‘Name and Shame’ section paul!
-
May 19, 2003 at 11:51 am #726572
Anonymous
InactiveI mailed the City Council about the removal of those benches three times and got no reply. I have heard rumours that it was done by the traffic department so I plan on ringing them soon.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.