Sir John Rogerson Qy
- This topic has 59 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 8 months ago by
GregF.
- AuthorPosts
- March 12, 2003 at 11:33 am #725224
d_d_dallas
ParticipantI think the competition being run by the DDDA for their U2 associated building has several things suspect about it – the fact that they don’t mention a 100m building around the corner is hardly surprising.
March 12, 2003 at 5:51 pm #725225d_d_dallas
ParticipantFound this in Google:
“PROPERTY
An Bord Pleanála has granted planning permission for a major development at Sir John Rogerson’s Quay in Dublin, the centrepiece of which will be a 96-metre tower block, making it Ireland’s tallest building. The applicant was the property company Dunloe Ewart but its chairman, Noel Smyth, says he now has to convince his board to proceed with the development. His plan is to start with an apartment block on one part of the site and it will be at least two years before the tower materialises. “…and since Noel Smith is long gone – the tower has probably left with him (sniff sniff).
August 12, 2003 at 8:38 pm #725226WillC
ParticipantDoes anyone have any news or inside information on this building? Are there any plans for a commencement date on construction?
Given the recent U2 building decision, this is my last hope for Dublin!
August 13, 2003 at 11:37 pm #725227GrahamH
ParticipantArgggghhh, you and your tall buildings Will!!!!
August 14, 2003 at 6:35 pm #725228Barry
ParticipantI thought the west elevation of the Zoe/Dunloe Ewart building implied some semblence of architectural form which would have been conducive to a landmark building, visually terminating the quay. The east elevation however reveals a confused hodge podge of forms and proportions. This, coupled with the stumpy “twisted torso” U2 “tower” at the quay edge merely demonstrate the incompetance of planners who have squandered 2 wonderful opportunities to develop a worthwhile building in this painfully conservative city…….Oh what they would have done in Paris!!
August 14, 2003 at 7:12 pm #725229WillC
ParticipantSorry Graham, just keen to see it developed thats all.
August 15, 2003 at 5:31 pm #725230npvd
Participantand so you should be keen. projects like these take far too long in ireland. the wait is terrible.
August 15, 2003 at 8:16 pm #725231text goes here
Participantthere could be a two year wait just like tara street.
August 15, 2003 at 8:22 pm #725232npvd
Participanttrue. tara street is a two year wait. as for the other, i don’t know but i’d say it will be some wait. that’s if it is even built!
July 3, 2004 at 4:18 pm #725233Anonymous
InactiveOriginally posted by d_d_dallas
Those are the Boland’s Mill etc… they are tall but featureless concrete walls.I read somewhere that there are plans for this site now.
The walls may be featureless but the form looks very well from College St looking up Pearse St.
July 3, 2004 at 4:42 pm #725234MG
ParticipantI believe Tara Street may have been cancelled.
July 3, 2004 at 5:21 pm #725235Anonymous
InactiveThere was a site notice on the property last week applying for alterations, although the changes sought looked quite minor it wasn’t dated.
July 3, 2004 at 5:52 pm #725236Irishtown
ParticipantHere are some Boland’s Mill pictures:




July 3, 2004 at 5:53 pm #725237Irishtown
ParticipantOriginally posted by Diaspora
There was a site notice on the property last week applying for alterations, although the changes sought looked quite minor it wasn’t dated.On the Tara Street site? Good. Maybe theres still hope.
January 5, 2005 at 9:25 pm #725238jackwade
ParticipantDoes anyone know anything more about the Sir John Rogerson’s Quay development? Has it officially been scrapped? Its still listed on OMS architects website.
January 5, 2005 at 11:06 pm #725239Irishtown
ParticipantAs far as I know nothing at all has happened with it. Someone correct me, though, if I’m wrong.
January 19, 2006 at 6:55 pm #725240Anonymous
InactiveNow that JR Quay is largely complete which of the buildings below do people feel would be most appropriate or should the Quay feature both?
@brunel wrote:
Image below

or
https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=45187&postcount=472
January 19, 2006 at 8:55 pm #725241BTH
ParticipantIts one or the other in my opinion – And I prefer the U2 tower by a LONG way. That rendering of the other tower looks revolting…
January 19, 2006 at 9:23 pm #725242Morlan
ParticipantU2 tower.
January 25, 2006 at 7:17 pm #725243GregF
ParticipantI’d have to go with the U2 tower. The image above from that view looks a cumbursome pile plonked on the quayside. It’s not very attractive. The newer rendering of the U2 tower makes it somewhat more elegant, what the building above lacks.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

