Philippe Starck – Design is dead.

Home Forums Ireland Philippe Starck – Design is dead.

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #709970
      BostonorBerlin
      Participant

      For anyone interested heres a translation of Phillippe Starcks interview, in which among other things he states “Everything I have designed is absolutely unneccessary”.
      I suspect Monsieur Starck has been reading some Henry Thoreau who twigged this way back in the 1800’s
      One of Thoreau’s greatest themes was simplicity. He emphasized this principle over and over, especially in Walden, believing that modern materialism would lead to the destruction of the environment needed for humans and other living things.

      ZEITmagazin: Monsieur Starck, you have designed everything, from toothbrush to spaceship. What do humans really need?
      Philippe Starck: The ability to love. Love is the most wonderful invention of mankind. And then, one needs intelligence. Mankind, as opposed to animals, has managed to create a civilization based on intelligence. For this reason, no human can afford to not work on their intelligence. And humour, humour is important.
      ZEIT: And you can’t think of something material?
      P.S.: We don’t need anything material. It is more important to develop one’s own ethic, and to stick to these rules. There is nothing else one would have to worry about.
      ZEIT: You can’t be serious. Isn’t there so much else one needs in order to survive?
      P.S.: If you want to talk about objects: one certainly needs something to light a fire.
      ZEIT: Can you think of anything else?
      P.S.: A pillow maybe, and a good matress.
      ZEIT: So why, then, have you become an industrial designer in the first place?
      P.S.: That is an interesting question. And I haven’t found an answer to it for myself yet. Look, I have designed so many things without ever really being interested in them. Maybe all these years were necessary for me to ultimatively recognize that we, after all, don’t need anything. We always have too much (stuff, SIC).
      ZEIT: So all the things you have created — unnecessary?
      P.S.: Everything I have created is absolutely unnecessary. Design, structurally seen, is absolutely void of usefulness. A useful profession would be to be an astronomer, a biologist or something of that kind. Design really is nothing. I have tried to install my designs with a sense of meaning and energy, and even when I tried to give my best it was still in vain.
      ZEIT: So this is the balance you strike of all your creating?
      P.S.: Those people with more intelligence than me would have gotten to this point much earlier. Perhaps I wasn’t smart enough and had to learn it the hard way. Ever from the beginning I had the feeling that ultimatively, product design was useless. It is because of this that I have tried to change this job into something else; into something that’s more political, more rebellious, more subversive. So maybe the most important thing that I have created is not a new object, but a new definition for the word “designer”.
      ZEIT: You said that we are undergoing a transition towards Postmaterialism. What does this mean?
      P.S.: Society is pursuing a strategy of dematerialization: it is more and more about intelligence and less about material. Take a computer, for example. In the beginning, computers were big as a house. Now there are computers in the size of only a credit card. In ten years from now they are going to be in our bodies – bionics. In fifty years from now, the concept of computers will have dematerialized itself.
      ZEIT: So what else would designers create then?
      P.S.: There won’t be any designers. The designer of the future will be the personal coach, the fitness trainer, the nutritionist. That’s all.
      ZEIT: You have often stated that it was your goal to destroy design. How far have you gotten with that?
      P.S.: It is accomplished! When I started out, design objects were but beautiful objects. No one could afford to buy them; design stood for elitism, but elitism is vulgar. The sole elegance lies in multiplication.
      ZEIT: Please explain this.
      P.S.: If one is fortunate enough to have a good idea, one has the obligation to share this idea with others. That is how democracy works. When I started to design, a good chair would cost about $1,000. Should a family that needs six chairs and a table have to pay $10,000, just to be able to have dinner? What an obscene thought. Four years ago, I designed a chair that would cost less than ten dollars. If you just strike three zeros off the price you change the whole concept of a product.
      ZEIT: And yet you recently designed that motor yacht for a Russian millionaire?
      P.S.: Exactly this is part of my Robin-Hood concept. I do use such projects like a lab. It allows me to try out new technologies and render them useful for the mass market. For this particular yacht, I developed a hull that wouldn’t cause bow washes at 20 knots. I applied this concept to a solar boat, which in turn could be the prototype for a Venetian vaporetto.
      ZEIT: And you don’t want to stop designing?
      P.S.: I do want to, for sure. I am definitely going to stop designing in two years. I will be doing something else instead, I don’t know for sure. But I know that it will be a new way of expression; a weapon that will be faster, mightier and lighter than design. Design is really a terrible way to express oneself.
      ZEIT: So you will only be switching the job.
      P.S.: Exactly. I have been a producer of materiality. I do feel ashamed for this. What I want to be instead now is a producer of concepts. This will be much more useful.
      ZEIT: Is there any object that you like, then?
      P.S.: No.

      some food for thought for all you wannabe starchitects next time you use your fancy Alessi kettle…:D
      hopefully this means no more of those bloody Le Corbusier chaise longue in the plethora of property supplements

      Heres the source of the interview translation
      http://mademoisellea.vox.com/library/post/die-zeit-interview-with-philippe-starck-translated.html

    • #800587
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      BostonerBerlin, if I might ask you, what sort of architecture do you like?

      You see, I am forever intriuged by your ‘triumphant’ posts. If you dislike architecture as much as you seem to do, then what are you doing hanging around a website devoted to architecture?

      I have never noticed you saying anything positive about anything. Show us some of your favourite buildings and tell us what you like about them.

    • #800588
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      it’s very easy to be humble AFTER you’ve made your millions

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Latest News