O’Connell Bridge Advertising
- This topic has 6 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by Paul Clerkin.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
July 19, 2008 at 6:50 pm #710073RocqueParticipant
Guys, any idea how we can get rid of those building-front adverts on the North side of O’Connell Bridge? You know the grimey throwbacks for Bailey’s, Irish Nationwide and (good old) Windsor Car Rentals. Every time I look at them I am depressingly transported back to 1985 (and they were shabby eyesores even then I’d say).
I know nothing of the laws or regulations that govern this kind of thing, but I wouldn’t above a bit of old-fashioned sabotage if it comes to it…
P.S. The removal of advertising from the Loop Line railway bridge is great. Was this voluntary civic-mindedness from Iarnrod Eireann? Why were ads restored to the Pearse St bridge? Looks awful.
-
July 20, 2008 at 10:22 am #802359adminKeymaster
Ageed the Loop line looks a lot better and at its pivotal position it was indeed worthy to clear the view towards the Custom House of attention grabbing advertising; Pearse Street is a less concerning location in that it is a less important view and probably worth as much to CIE in advertising revenue which would be based on traffic levels.
On the buildings at O’Connell Bridge having advertising hoardings it is very disapointing and clearly something that it would have been preferable to nip in the bud in decades past. However the costs of compensating the building owners who under planning laws could effectively receive the full financial value of their losses would in all probability exceed the benefit to the public good in monetary terms. Frank McDonald in the Destruction of Dublin is on record as claiming that the value of the then Guinness sign (Now Heinekin) on O’Connell Bridge House exceeded the value of the rents for the remainder of the building.
Given the rents that media companies pay for new sites at high profile locations and the lack of enforcement of property owners who take that chance I can understand why they do; it is an area that requires tightening up.
-
July 21, 2008 at 7:59 am #802360AnonymousInactive
Well, as long as they keep the Heineken sign, i’d be happy.
I hate Heineken, but I love that sign.
-
July 21, 2008 at 11:31 am #802361AnonymousInactive
It was for Sony when mentioned in the Destruction of Dublin and that’s the way I remember it for years – then it was Tennants (when they went mad spending to try to make us drink that muck) then it became the Heineken sign we all know today
But does anyone remember the horezontal ad banner across the top of the building for Jameson?
-
July 21, 2008 at 1:32 pm #802362AnonymousInactive
And the Big HB Ice cream add in the middle of that building on the corner of Westmoreland and d’Olier…..was neither fluorescent nor neon, just a mass of small bulbs that masked about 4 floors of the building!!
-
July 21, 2008 at 2:28 pm #802363AnonymousInactive
Yeah….I love the Heino sign. Such an identifiable feature of Dublin. I cant think why the French never thought of one for the Eiffel Tower 🙁
My favourite ads are the ones for “Dublin City Council Roads Department” strapped to the broken bollards along the bridge…they’re classy.
(Sarcasm quota exceeded for today)
-
July 29, 2008 at 7:07 pm #802364Paul ClerkinKeymaster
1950sActually the French had ads for Citroën on the Eiffel Tower for many years. From 1925 to 1934, illuminated signs for Citroën adorned three of the tower’s four sides, making it the tallest advertising space in the world at the time.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.