Luas Connolly Station latest images
- This topic has 26 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 22 years, 1 month ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- September 7, 2004 at 9:43 am #707315
JJ
ParticipantHere’s a few recent images of the current state of affairs at Connolly Station Luas works. I particularly like the railings along Harbourmaster Place (although the colour’s a bit dull ). The canopies have now bleached to a much lighter shade.
JJ
September 7, 2004 at 9:45 am #745799JJ
ParticipantImage below canopy as seen from terrace level. The trams are really quite ugly when seen from above !
September 7, 2004 at 9:46 am #745800JJ
ParticipantDetail of HaArbourmaster Place railings.
September 7, 2004 at 5:22 pm #745801Anonymous
InactiveStill cant get over the fact that this section cost €30 million.
September 7, 2004 at 9:10 pm #745802Paul Clerkin
Keymastergot a side elevation photo? wasn’t the tented canopies supposed to step down to a lower level from the station concourse level? hard to see if they do in the first photograph
September 7, 2004 at 10:58 pm #745803chewy
Participanti think this was mentioned before but i still don’t quite understand how these were designed with such thick poles? which now seemed it got an even thicker cladding around the vertical ones…
i thought it would have only looked right with slender poles supporting the canopies
September 7, 2004 at 11:59 pm #745804Paul Clerkin
KeymasterPerhaps budget constraints meant the design got simplified?
September 8, 2004 at 12:32 am #745805Anonymous
InactiveWhat design?
Its bloody woeful, the Texaco childrens art comp has rarely seen worse!!!!!
September 8, 2004 at 5:17 pm #745806JJ
ParticipantHere’s a side elevation taken a few weeks back before the cladding was applied.
As for the costs the RPA has claimed that the actual figure is closer to 12 million. Still a heap of money though.
Compaired to the original photomontages you can see that the structure has been made much bulkier and the support legs are fatter.
JJ
September 8, 2004 at 7:26 pm #745807Niall
ParticipantSorry for sounding negative, but that is bloody awful!!!
September 8, 2004 at 11:42 pm #745808Paul Clerkin
KeymasterOh dear, that is very clumsily done. Absolutely no finesse or style. That’s so disappointing as plans I saw some time back looked like it could be quite good.
September 8, 2004 at 11:42 pm #745809Morlan
ParticipantYeah, ’tis pretty bad. Can’t wait for the Red line to open though.
September 8, 2004 at 11:44 pm #745810Morlan
ParticipantDouble post – Paul, sort out your server!
September 8, 2004 at 11:45 pm #745811Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThat’s so disappointing – I saw plans of the design originally and it looked like it could be quite good – that isn’t.
September 8, 2004 at 11:45 pm #745812Morlan
ParticipantDouble post
September 8, 2004 at 11:48 pm #745813Irishtown
ParticipantIt’s horrible! To sloppy. Its like they were trying to make a statement but made too many little mistakes that when all put together just throws the whole design off. Thats awful!
Thanks for the photos, JJ.
September 8, 2004 at 11:53 pm #745814Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThat’s so disappointing – I saw plans of the design originally and it looked like it could be quite good – that isn’t.
September 9, 2004 at 9:12 pm #745815Irishtown
ParticipantCan anyone post a picture of the original design?
September 10, 2004 at 10:12 am #745816JJ
ParticipantThis is one I downloaded a long time ago from the old Luas/RPA web site. The new sites have far less photos and information.
You can see from this image that the traffic island has been changed. There was a line of trees with a bus pull in behind but on site they have just widened Amiens Street.
The canopy structure seems to have a lattice and the supports are in a different location.
JJ
September 13, 2004 at 9:46 am #745817bigjoe
ParticipantDriving down Abbey Street this morning and just outside the Peacock theatre the chaps were digging a little trench across both tracks. This part is nicely bricked tiled so it will be interesting to see what state they leave it.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

