Luas Connolly Station latest images
- This topic has 26 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 8 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
September 7, 2004 at 9:43 am #707315
JJ
ParticipantHere’s a few recent images of the current state of affairs at Connolly Station Luas works. I particularly like the railings along Harbourmaster Place (although the colour’s a bit dull ). The canopies have now bleached to a much lighter shade.
JJ
-
September 7, 2004 at 9:45 am #745799
JJ
ParticipantImage below canopy as seen from terrace level. The trams are really quite ugly when seen from above !
-
September 7, 2004 at 9:46 am #745800
JJ
ParticipantDetail of HaArbourmaster Place railings.
-
September 7, 2004 at 5:22 pm #745801
Anonymous
InactiveStill cant get over the fact that this section cost €30 million.
-
September 7, 2004 at 9:10 pm #745802
Paul Clerkin
Keymastergot a side elevation photo? wasn’t the tented canopies supposed to step down to a lower level from the station concourse level? hard to see if they do in the first photograph
-
September 7, 2004 at 10:58 pm #745803
chewy
Participanti think this was mentioned before but i still don’t quite understand how these were designed with such thick poles? which now seemed it got an even thicker cladding around the vertical ones…
i thought it would have only looked right with slender poles supporting the canopies
-
September 7, 2004 at 11:59 pm #745804
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterPerhaps budget constraints meant the design got simplified?
-
September 8, 2004 at 12:32 am #745805
Anonymous
ParticipantWhat design?
Its bloody woeful, the Texaco childrens art comp has rarely seen worse!!!!!
-
September 8, 2004 at 5:17 pm #745806
JJ
ParticipantHere’s a side elevation taken a few weeks back before the cladding was applied.
As for the costs the RPA has claimed that the actual figure is closer to 12 million. Still a heap of money though.
Compaired to the original photomontages you can see that the structure has been made much bulkier and the support legs are fatter.
JJ
-
September 8, 2004 at 7:26 pm #745807
Niall
ParticipantSorry for sounding negative, but that is bloody awful!!!
-
September 8, 2004 at 11:42 pm #745808
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterOh dear, that is very clumsily done. Absolutely no finesse or style. That’s so disappointing as plans I saw some time back looked like it could be quite good.
-
September 8, 2004 at 11:42 pm #745809
Morlan
ParticipantYeah, ’tis pretty bad. Can’t wait for the Red line to open though.
-
September 8, 2004 at 11:44 pm #745810
Morlan
ParticipantDouble post – Paul, sort out your server!
-
September 8, 2004 at 11:45 pm #745811
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThat’s so disappointing – I saw plans of the design originally and it looked like it could be quite good – that isn’t.
-
September 8, 2004 at 11:45 pm #745812
Morlan
ParticipantDouble post
-
September 8, 2004 at 11:48 pm #745813
Irishtown
ParticipantIt’s horrible! To sloppy. Its like they were trying to make a statement but made too many little mistakes that when all put together just throws the whole design off. Thats awful!
Thanks for the photos, JJ.
-
September 8, 2004 at 11:53 pm #745814
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThat’s so disappointing – I saw plans of the design originally and it looked like it could be quite good – that isn’t.
-
September 9, 2004 at 9:12 pm #745815
Irishtown
ParticipantCan anyone post a picture of the original design?
-
September 10, 2004 at 10:12 am #745816
JJ
ParticipantThis is one I downloaded a long time ago from the old Luas/RPA web site. The new sites have far less photos and information.
You can see from this image that the traffic island has been changed. There was a line of trees with a bus pull in behind but on site they have just widened Amiens Street.
The canopy structure seems to have a lattice and the supports are in a different location.
JJ
-
September 13, 2004 at 9:46 am #745817
bigjoe
ParticipantDriving down Abbey Street this morning and just outside the Peacock theatre the chaps were digging a little trench across both tracks. This part is nicely bricked tiled so it will be interesting to see what state they leave it.
-
September 14, 2004 at 8:41 pm #745818
GrahamH
ParticipantThis side of the station is a mess as it is without this clunky cluttered addition. It doesn’t integrate into the area, and less still to the station. An opportunity lost, following in the footsteps of the terminal. Those sail yokes have a tendancy to get very grubby if not maintained too, so going by IE’s record they may end up looking even worse.
And just on this part of Connolly, think someone’s said it before but the 90s grey block that attaches itself to the right-hand side of the 1840s facade has to be the most insensitive not to mention ugliest and grottiest addition to any old building in the city. It is a disgrace, esp when seen from the ped crossing at Talbot St.
And the old facade is still in dire need of a proper restoration, perhaps it will be carried out with this project or soon after. -
September 28, 2004 at 12:18 pm #745819
d_d_dallas
ParticipantOn a simlar note from the Examiner today:
**Greens reiterate call for integration of LUAS tram lines :: latest
The Green Party has reiterated its call for the two LUAS tram lines in Dublin to be linked.
Party spokesman Ciaran Cuffe said the €100m cost of linking the two lines would be a small price to pay for an integrated tram system.
“I don’t think it’s too late and I think it would give fantastic benefits to a lot of people,” he said.
Mr Cuffe was speaking following the official opening of the Red Line between Tallaght and Connolly Station this morning.**
Eh – correct me if I’m wrong – but aren’t these two lines built to a different standard, thus integration near impossible?
-
September 28, 2004 at 12:25 pm #745820
Anonymous
InactiveI thought that Frank McDonald had said, in a recent article, that the rumour that the lines were of a different standard was a myth and in actual fact they were the same.
-
September 28, 2004 at 1:59 pm #745821
GrahamH
ParticipantWhy would they be a different standard?
The newly opened ‘cave’ underneath Connolly looks fantastic with the stone clad walls – so unusual. The stone of the infamous disputed boundary wall looks equally good.
-
September 28, 2004 at 3:00 pm #745822
notjim
Participantso isn’t the point just that the green line from the canal south has better clearance so as to allow it to be upgraded to a metro, so, there is no problem with integrating the two luas lines as luas lines but it wouldn’t be easy, nor of course sensible, to convert the red line to a metro.
-
September 29, 2004 at 12:26 am #745823
JJ
ParticipantQuite Right notjim.
The gauge of both Luas Lines is the same and its possible to run the 40m trams on both lines with no difficulty. The tracks on the green line are spaced wider apart to allow for wider bodied vehicles passing each other( means the platform edges may need to be shaved back or else the body of the tram at the base can be narrowed with a wider section above). Some Hannover trams are built like this allowing the same platform width but a wider body above providing more seating room.
Had a run on the line today. Disapponted to see the station at Connolly not fully open yet and ticket machines not giving sample tickets as with Green Line launch but overall looks like a good service.
JJ
-
September 29, 2004 at 1:00 am #745824
Anonymous
ParticipantGood man Ciaran,
Why are the Greens the only party with any realistic public transport policy in the current opposition?
The Luas E.I.S. written 1997 it makes me sick every time I look at it at the base of the Tailors Hall stairs.
This proposal makes perfect sense and doesn’t cost 2.4bn
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.