hugh lane
- This topic has 12 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 2 months ago by GrahamH.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
May 31, 2004 at 10:03 pm #707131notjimParticipant
the hugh lane closed today (31 may) to allow for the extension to be built. i am super enthusiastic about this project because i love the hugh lane (a) and (b) the new extension will include a sean scully room, but, are there pictures of the new building, does anyone know what they will look like, does anyone have an opinion?
-
May 31, 2004 at 10:08 pm #743293chewyParticipant
so the hugh lane extension is too the right as you look at it in teh old ballroom…
what the deal with the buildings on left the school etc they’ve been empty for years are they being incorporated into the museum too
-
June 1, 2004 at 1:33 am #743294PaulCParticipant
“Dublin City Council is delighted to announce that it has recently voted in favour of the Gallery’s extension programme. Designed by architects Gilroy McMahon, the Gallery’s extension, on the site of the former National Ballroom, will be one of Dublin City’s most exciting and important cultural undertakings in recent years. As well as increased exhibition space and enhanced visitor facilities, the new extension will house in a specially dedicated room, the recent bequest to the city of nine paintings by the internationally renowned artist Sean Scully. This dedicated Sean Scully room is the only one of its kind in Europe. (Kimball Art Museum, Fort Worth, Texas, is the only other Gallery to have a dedicated room to Sean Scully.”
From the Hugh Lane website -
June 1, 2004 at 9:21 am #743295AnonymousInactive
Will the big Ballroom sign be left there?
-
June 1, 2004 at 10:30 am #743296notjimParticipant
this doesn’t show you much:
-
June 1, 2004 at 10:56 am #743297AnonymousInactive
kind of weird the way the branches of the tree flash in and out as the new extension does in that flashy photo isnt it?
-
June 1, 2004 at 2:35 pm #743298PaulCParticipant
Will the big Ballroom sign be left there?
I hope not.
It is not very attractive and will have nothing to do with the new expanded gallery.
Which at this stage has to be regarded as one of the most significant galleries in Europe. -
June 1, 2004 at 2:58 pm #743299notjimParticipant
lets not go too far PaulC
-
June 1, 2004 at 3:27 pm #743300kefuParticipant
Ballroom sign should be restored and left as the equivalent of a modern art installation.
It has genuine history for several generations of Irish people and I don’t think it would detract at all from an extended Hugh Lane. -
June 1, 2004 at 3:44 pm #743301AnonymousInactive
I agree Kefu, that is why I was asking the question. I hope it stays.
-
June 2, 2004 at 9:07 pm #743302IrishtownParticipant
Originally posted by phil
kind of weird the way the branches of the tree flash in and out as the new extension does in that flashy photo isnt it?I guess its showing that it will be finished in spring or summer? Thats why the branches are there with leaves? Maybe?
-
July 14, 2006 at 5:45 pm #743303notjimParticipant
So there has already been some discussion of this in the Parnell St thread: there there was some opposition to the effect the extension had on the gallery’s front elevation; I would agree that it is unfortunate and doubly so since it is the only part of the new extension visible externally.
I think the inside is fabulous, the rooms are so clean, the scully room is fantastic and the flow from the old part is well handled asthetically and natural from a circulation point of view. The framed view of the spike from the link is great.
Any views?
-
July 14, 2006 at 6:28 pm #743304GrahamHParticipant
I too was most impressed by the new galleries – though one point about circulation is that you don’t know whether to avail of the link from the existing right-hand ante-room of one of the old gallery rooms to the extension, or continue on in the traditional fashion to the far end of the old galleries and up through Bacon etc. Though in any event, there is still only one entrance to the extension so it’s easy enough.
There’s a fantastic string installation at the moment that I’d imagine some Archiseek engineers would like to have a gawp at 🙂 – very accurately executed if you look closely. The current-day artists’ work outside this room is equally stunning.
The stairwell is pretty simple: fresh, crisp, white. Just pleasant, nothing to write home about.The older galleries have also had a nice lick of paint, with the entrance hall being especially nice. But massively scarred by the most astonishingly bad conservation practice – giant garish white PVC security windows with big moulded plastic handles adorn the inside of the sashes of the main hall! What the heck were they thinking? 😮
The views of the Square from the extension were rather disappointing – I expected to be a bit higher up.
You’re also right up aginst the Ballroom wall, so that blocks out a chunk of the city too.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.