debased with a poodle
- This topic has 65 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 22 years, 7 months ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- February 23, 2004 at 4:26 pm #706855
Anonymous
InactiveMaybe it’s me but can we make it lads that postings in future have to make sense, eh garath?
:rolleyes:
February 23, 2004 at 4:44 pm #741058Anonymous
InactiveI am not going to comment on the culprits, but I really agree with you Alan. I am finding some of the threads here lately hard to make any sense of!
Thanks
Phil
February 23, 2004 at 5:34 pm #741059ro_G
Participantindeed. as a casual onlooker i find it hard to concentrate on any post that exceeds 10-15 lines. particularly if the post is debating with itself before anyone else even has a read of it.
February 23, 2004 at 5:39 pm #741060helloinsane
ParticipantAnd then once you *do* start debating, the previous posts suddenly change, shrink and disappear… very disconcerting.
February 23, 2004 at 6:22 pm #741061blue
ParticipantYou’ve lost me …. :confused:
February 24, 2004 at 10:40 am #741062Anonymous
InactiveHey ro_G, you’re a glutton for punshment, obviously. Post exceeding 10-15 lines, eh?
Recently postings have my eyes bleeding after the first unintelligible sentence.
Losing interest fast, consequently…………….. and sadly
Architecture is easy, obviously it’s english that’s hard….oh and puting together a single, coherent thought
February 24, 2004 at 12:01 pm #741063sw101
Participantah now lads what with the oh and the when the left look you cant but read the when the country taisce blood red finger eaters generator bastarding LOL LOL LOL!!! (urinating dog)(urinating dog) left my heart in san green filly blow shove it concreting the bow where i country.
whas your problem then?
February 24, 2004 at 12:08 pm #741064FIN
Participantindeed.
February 24, 2004 at 12:19 pm #741065Anonymous
InactiveOriginally posted by sw101
ah now lads what with the oh and the when the left look you cant but read the when the country taisce blood red finger eaters generator bastarding LOL LOL LOL!!! (urinating dog)(urinating dog) left my heart in san green filly blow shove it concreting the bow where i country.Easy to see why you did Architecture and not English although if there was a degree in hate studies you’d just have to turn up for the exam, you’d get a 1.1
Originally posted by sw101
whas your problem then?With the thread in total its in the wrong section, it should be in Suggestions and Announcements
With this post in particular, it sounds like a spoilt kid whinging on about a former lecturer who found said kid ordinary at best.
February 24, 2004 at 12:22 pm #741066Anonymous
InactiveIndod.
Thanks again sw101, can now see clearly both sides of the argument.
Sorry, did you say Sydley?
……naw ah didly
February 24, 2004 at 3:39 pm #741067helloinsane
ParticipantThere’s nowhere near enough semi-random bold type or tenuous cross-linking in this thread.
I demand answers!
February 24, 2004 at 3:48 pm #741068Anonymous
InactiveI like the quotes in a box additions …….. so recently favoured by Diaspora, helloinsane.
The bombast , when he?she? tells you you’re in the wrong section also is particularly satisfying.
February 24, 2004 at 3:53 pm #741069helloinsane
ParticipantIt was an evolutionary response to an ever-changing environment.
Bombast, good word.
I would like to reiterate that I’m generally in favour of architectural debate, especially here. Any comments should be taken as helpful, if satirical, criticism.
February 24, 2004 at 3:56 pm #741070garethace
ParticipantNull
February 24, 2004 at 3:58 pm #741071Anonymous
InactiveAw hey, tell me about it helloinsane.
As the pig said……… debate good, bullshit bad.
“Mies on a T shirt” by the way…………very funny, you can’t be Canadian.
Laugh, I nearly spilt ma bawbees
February 24, 2004 at 4:06 pm #741072Anonymous
InactiveOriginally posted by helloinsane
I would like to reiterate that I’m generally in favour of architectural debate, especially here. Any comments should be taken as helpful, if satirical, criticism.Most posters are in favour of debate this site has seen many well conceived debates.
Originally posted by helloinsane
It was an evolutionary response to an ever-changing environment.Bombast, good word.
I must plead deficiency on the latter however.
The prize for ultimate Bombast goes to Alan D on the ‘When Sligo clipped the wings of Dunlop and Murray’ Thread.
1. The claim that there was a need for a Sligo-|Galasgow chamber of Commerce.
2. That the poor clients children would have nothing to inherit.
If stating that a thread attacking another contributor should have been posted as a suggestion is Bombastic, what is the attack itself?
February 24, 2004 at 4:15 pm #741073garethace
ParticipantNull
February 24, 2004 at 4:16 pm #741074Anonymous
Inactive…………ultimate Bombast, Diaspora ?.
Could that be a U Bombast, then?
February 24, 2004 at 4:16 pm #741075helloinsane
ParticipantOriginally posted by Diaspora
If stating that a thread attacking another contributor should have been posted as a suggestion is Bombastic, what is the attack itself?I read the tone as friendly, not attacking. Perhaps some modicum of criticism is justified?
February 24, 2004 at 4:25 pm #741076Anonymous
InactiveFeck me, where did that last post go Gareth?
Some poor bastard orbiting cyberspace in one thousand years time is gonna come across it……..just because you’ve edited its still somewhere in the ether……… still out there lurking. And what’s this null stuff all about………….short for numbscull?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

