Capel steet to be ACA
- This topic has 22 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
January 7, 2009 at 7:30 pm #710341
lostexpectation
ParticipantCapel Street given conservation status
http://www.herald.ie/national-news/city-news/capel-street-given-conservation-status-1594114.htmlCAPEL Street is Dublin’s latest area to become an Architectural Conservation Area (ACA), bringing an end to its tacky signage and visible sex-shop frontage.
Dublin City Council (DCC) will make the street a protected ACA because of its architectural importance and will clean up the area as a result.
Councillor Emer Costello says the move “will bring improvements to the area”.
However, she expressed her concern at the fact that no owners were notified by letter about the ACA by the DCC.
Under the conservation order, owners will need planning permission if they are to change their advertising signs.
“The practice of advertising that turns shop fronts into bill boards is not desirable,” it is stated within the ACA report.
The report says banner-type signs and advertising sheeting covering any part of the front facade of a building in the street are not acceptable.
It adds: “Careful consideration should be given to the colours used on any advertising structures or signs.
“Substantial areas of inappropriate garish colours shall not be allowed as the background of any sign.”
Many locals have welcomed the move as it will enforce tighter planning controls on shop owners along the street,which is lined with charity shops, adult stores and ethnic supermarkets.
http://www.dublincity.ie/Planning/DublinCityDevelopmentPlan/Pages/Variation32.aspx
-
January 8, 2009 at 12:29 pm #805745
Anonymous
InactiveWell there goes Utopia!
-
January 8, 2009 at 2:52 pm #805746
Anonymous
Inactive. . . and . . bye . .bye . . Good Vibrations!
-
January 8, 2009 at 7:32 pm #805747
Anonymous
InactiveI dont think they can actually get rid of existing businesses, they can just prevent new ones opening if they are deemed unsuitable.
Why cant the entire city centre be an ACA???
-
January 8, 2009 at 8:23 pm #805748
Anonymous
Inactive@archipig wrote:
I dont think they can actually get rid of existing businesses, they can just prevent new ones opening if they are deemed unsuitable.
That’s about right, alright.
-
January 8, 2009 at 9:16 pm #805749
Anonymous
Inactiveah sex shops bring a bit of oul colour to a city – mostly red, black and pink (in my limited experience)
-
January 8, 2009 at 9:32 pm #805750
Anonymous
Inactive -
January 9, 2009 at 11:43 am #805751
Anonymous
InactiveThe type of retail unit is more of a planning issue so Im not sure an ACA would stop sex shops once they had shop fronts that were relatively well designed. Its all about the exterior appearance of the building, not the goings on inside!
-
January 9, 2009 at 11:59 am #805752
Anonymous
Inactive@blaise wrote:
The type of retail unit is more of a planning issue so Im not sure an ACA would stop sex shops once they had shop fronts that were relatively well designed. Its all about the exterior appearance of the building, not the goings on inside!
True, but often an area is made an ACA as a means of it then being designated as a Scheme of Special Planning Control (An area has to be an ACA before it can get designated for a Scheme of Special Planning Control). As has been mentioned, this cannot stop particular land-uses from continuing, but it can attempt to stop new ones from opening, and it is also aimed at altering the general land-use of the designated area in the long-term. I would be surprised if this area was not designated as an SSPC in the coming year or so.
-
January 9, 2009 at 12:24 pm #805753
Anonymous
InactiveIs it the case that Capel Street will not be designated an SPCA? I think I heard that catching the end of a news bulletin last week, but am not sure.
All of the hyperbole over adult shops is ridiculous anyway. Whereas it is undesirable to have a proliferation of such uses, a discreet number add variety to the retail offering, while contrary to popular belief, some of these stores host amongst the very best contemporary shopfronts in the city such as the new outlet on Eustace Street. The problem with them is that by definition they tend to be inward looking. Provided they address the street, and in an appropriate manner, there isn’t a major issue.
In any event, given the spectacular success of the O’Connell Street/Westmoreland Street/D’Olier Street/College Street/Hawkins Street/Bachelors Walk/Marlborough Street/Parnell Street/Parnell Square ACA (yes believe it or not they’re all actually an ACA), we can rest assured that Capel Street will soon rank amongst these illustrious, immaculately presented and rigourously controlled thoroughfares.
And a very good point archipig – there is no reason whatever why every major street in the city shouldn’t be an ACA. All an ACA does is promote basic presentation standards which arguably should be in force in any urban area.
-
January 9, 2009 at 12:42 pm #805754
Anonymous
Inactive@GrahamH wrote:
Is it the case that Capel Street will not be designated an SPCA? I think I heard that catching the end of a news bulletin last week, but am not sure.
If this is true, I stand corrected. I suppose I have just got so used to this being the process that DCC have followed with all the other ACA’s in Dublin City Centre, and from a newspaper report a few weeks ago about Capel Street that was the impression I got. I am not definite on this though, so will accept correction if it is not to happen.
-
January 9, 2009 at 2:38 pm #805755
Anonymous
InactivePerhaps enforcement should be enhanced before we go adding any more streets to this utterly pointless [in practice] list.
-
January 10, 2009 at 11:58 am #805756
Anonymous
InactiveI see the Sierra crew are out, just round the corner from the bottom of Capel Street on Ormond Quay Upper… a few granite curbs seem to be up…
-
January 10, 2009 at 12:08 pm #805757
Anonymous
Inactiveproabably a desperate need for more poles
-
January 10, 2009 at 12:12 pm #805758
Anonymous
Inactive@StephenC wrote:
proabably a desperate need for more poles
Thems paddys love their poles…
-
January 29, 2009 at 11:09 pm #805759
Anonymous
InactiveThe revamp of Capel Street creeps on at a moderate pace. It is amazing what a makeover can do. Those areas of the street that are complete look really well while the yet to be touched section is grim.
It seems Wallace have been witched for the ubiquitous Sierra..but in fairness they seem to work faster.I like the lamps and the refreshing absence of lines of bollards. Signage seem to be at a minimum although the ridiculous pedestrian crossings are overkill.
One gripe though is the area being completed at Grattan Bridge. Its being relaid exactly the same as the old…no attempt to reinvent the space or make better use of it. Surely a good spot here for one of the new map/signage units that are promised by JCDecaux.
Around the corner is an application for the site that includes St Mary’s Abbey although the develoment doesnt affect the Chapter House. Much of the derelcit buildings here are up for demolition. I’ll add some details later.
-
January 30, 2009 at 9:22 am #805760
Anonymous
InactiveAlthough the (truly enormous) development also appears to include the demolition of part of a symmetrical set-piece of Victorians on Capel Street itself, which is of obvious concern. Great news about the rest of the scheme though as it entails the redevelopment of signifcant amounts of wasteland and 20th century warehousing. The 10 storey element is a shot in the dark.
I like the new lamp standards, if not quite the lamps themselves. Their design is somewhat surprising actually in light pollution terms – plucked straight out of the 80s with their virtually unshielded globes casting light upwards. They also contain rather ridculous 20w domestic CFLs (I read the boxes as they were going in) which give off a dull glow. But the standards do mark a departure from the typically poor repros we’re used to in Dublin.
The rusty paving is beautiful and very well crafted. I would question the setting-in-amber mentality of preserving lines of kerbstones stranded in the middle of some of the new widened pavements, which just looks silly – this is a method that should apply to paving slabs only. The kerbs should be laid as the new kerb line.
Fully agreed about the Ormonde Quay corner. There was a bit of a hooha there the other morning when about five contractors were standing around shaking their heads at an entire stretch of newly paved area that had to be dug up again. Oops.
-
March 19, 2009 at 8:50 pm #805761
Anonymous
Inactive@GrahamH wrote:
Although the (truly enormous) development also appears to include the demolition of part of a symmetrical set-piece of Victorians on Capel Street itself, which is of obvious concern. Great news about the rest of the scheme though as it entails the redevelopment of signifcant amounts of wasteland and 20th century warehousing. The 10 storey element is a shot in the dark.
I see from a story posted elsewhere that DCC are insisting on a spot of real archaeology here and not just the usual armchair . . sorry . . ‘Desktop’ . . study!
A step in the right direction, or just another opportunity for them to plough through the ‘Billy’ layers to get at the good stuff in the medieval levels below :rolleyes:
On the possibility of more recent archaeology, I was told a story once in connection with this site which had to do with the 19th century bakery that sits above much of St. Mary’s Abbey. The bakery building belonged to Bolands before they moved to the bigger premises (of 1916 fame) at Grand Canal Street and Barrow Street. Apparently their great iron bakery ovens had been constructed in the basement of the building and while the building was susequently deemed to be too small for their expanding needs, the ovens were considered to be state of the art. In deciding to move to bigger premises, possibly to take advantage of the departure of Jacobs to Liverpool in 1913 (not sure about the dates) Bolands faced a huge dilemma on what to do with their ovens which were too big to take out. Not willing to let them fall into the hands of a rival, in the end, they decided to entomb the ovens by filling the whole vaulted basement with concrete.
This could just be a piece of Dublin lore, but on the other hand, it could just as easily be true, in which case it could be a nice little layer of history to uncover.
-
March 19, 2009 at 8:54 pm #805762
Anonymous
InactiveAnd present us with the same bloody dilemma!
Great story though. It’ll be interesting to see what comes of it.
-
February 13, 2010 at 11:28 pm #805763
Anonymous
Inactive13/2/2010
Chaos on Capel Street.
The fire that broke out in the street’s notorious ‘head shop’ on Friday morning has resulted in the complete destruction of the twin plot single-storey building on the corner with Little Strand Street which also hosted an adult store. The more substantial two-storey truncated building next door (white facade) has also been largely destroyed.
Initial impressions suggest the remains of an early corner chimneystack in the centre of the site, but it’s difficult to be sure. One thing is clear – effort was not originally expended on internal walls! There is nearly as much mortar as there is brick.
The remains of mid-19th century windows and shuttering to the adjacent premises.
Poor Capel Street needs this complete closure like a hole in the head, if you’ll excuse the pun. I don’t see why the right-hand pavement could not have been kept open for access. The place was utterly desolate for what was the busiest Saturday in Dublin since Christmas.
If there is one benefit to be derived from this, it is that the horrendous truncated buildings with established shopfronts and signage are dead and buried in what is now an ACA. It affords a heartening opportunity for a creative new building that is both infill and a corner-former. Here’s hoping every one of the typical solutions employed on such sites in the capital over the past decade is avoided in this instance.
-
February 14, 2010 at 6:24 pm #805764
Anonymous
InactiveAt least we know that the street can look fairly appeasing without all the nice kerbs hidden my 4×4’s..
-
February 15, 2010 at 10:10 pm #805765
Anonymous
InactiveThe irony that the shop with fireplaces didn’t burn down.
-
February 16, 2010 at 2:11 am #805766
Anonymous
Inactive@GrahamH wrote:
13/2/2010
I don’t see why the right-hand pavement could not have been kept open for access. The place was utterly desolate for what was the busiest Saturday in Dublin since Christmas.
Might have something to to with the half a million squids the Gardaà found in a safe under all the rubble.
Great photos by the way Graham. Its the first time I’ve seen the extent of the damage.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.