20 Storeys for North Lotts

Home Forums Ireland 20 Storeys for North Lotts

Viewing 7 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #710031
      theman
      Participant

      From the Commercial Property section, Irish Times 18th June,

      “The easing of the height restriction will allow three banks and several other major companies to move ahead with plans to relocate to the north docklands where developers have been waiting for the planning concessions, writes Jack Fagan .

      A NEW planning scheme and masterplan for the Dublin docklands, due to be unveiled next week, is to recommend that the maximum height for new buildings at the North Lotts, Grand Canal Harbour and Grand Canal Docks should be increased from seven to 20 storeys. Parts of the City Quay area are also expected to benefit from the changes.

      The easing of the height restriction will immediately allow three banks and several other major companies to move ahead with plans to relocate to the north docklands where developers have been waiting for the planning concessions.

      Most of the high-rise and high density office blocks will be at North Lotts where the landowners include Liam Carroll, Treasury Holdings and Sean Dunne. The two largest sites at Grand Canal Harbour in the south docks are owned by Treasury Holdings and Sean Kelly who bought the former Bolands Mills about three years ago. The Kilsaran-owned cement site at Grand Canal Harbour will also benefit.

      The first beneficiary in the busy north docks area will be Carroll who owns the seven-acre Brooks Thomas site next to Treasury’s Spencer Dock.

      He has agreed to develop a building of 32,515sq m (350,000sq ft) for Anglo Irish Bank and another one of 5,574sq m (60,000sq ft) for solicitors O’Donnell Sweeney.

      AIB Capital Markets is also in discussions with Carroll to rent a new high density office building on the site with a floor area of around 37,160sq m (400,000sq ft).

      The third bank involved, Bank of Ireland, is also in “exclusive discussions” with him to occupy a planned new 51,095sq m (550,000sq ft) back office at the rear of the Brooks Thomas site on Mayor Street.

      Carroll has attracted the three banks by offering artificially low rents for the first five years in the expectation that they will be reviewed to open market value at the first review.

      Without the change of maximum heights from seven to 20 storeys it is doubtful if he could have accommodated the three banks as well as other clients.

      Treasury also has large tracts of land in the area, including the former Tedcastles site and Spencer Dock, and they will obviously be hoping to attract other high profile tenants including KPMG, Deloitte, Citco Group, Arthur Cox and the IDA.

      Although Treasury has lodged a planning application with Dublin City Council for a 33-storey, 400-bedroom hotel alongside the proposed National Conference Centre in Spencer Dock, the decision by the Dublin Docklands Development Authority to limit heights to 20 storeys will make it all the more difficult for the developer to fulfil its ambitions.

      The docklands has become the prime location for large new office blocks in the city over the past five years. Since 2002, it has accounted for almost one-third of overall office take-up in the Dublin market.

      Paul Maloney, chief executive of the DDDA, says their success has clearly demonstrated how they can continue to attract major headquarter buildings.

      The new masterplan, which has been approved by the council and board of the DDDA, will provide for the expenditure of €4 billion in a public private partnership on vital improvements in infrastructure to accommodate major commercial and residential developments in the run up to 2020.

      The transport facilities will include a new Luas service, rapid transit bus services, four new bridges, and an interconnector underground station.

      The enhanced infrastructure will be required to service the increased office and residential densities to be allowed in designated areas of the docklands, Maloney said.

      He added that this would be accompanied by a massive investment in the community through jobs, housing, schools, and arts and culture including three new theatres.”

    • #801134
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      still don’t know why it was 7 storeys before.

    • #801135
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lostexpectation wrote:

      still don’t know why it was 7 storeys before.

      DDDA’s idea of good land use – right in the heart of Grand Canal Dock. What a waste. :rolleyes:

    • #801136
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      20 storeys -yawn, too little and way too late, no doubt we will get another office park design only this time 20 floors, it will then be revisted in another decade when sombody else will decide 30 floors was best

    • #801137
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I seconds that,i dont have faith in projects of this kind anymore,and quite honestly ive now just lost interest.We can only dream of what the celtic tiger construction boom could of been,and I’m not just talking about high rise,I mean any building of significance.The lack of quality development in docklands over the last number of years is inexcusable.

    • #801138
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Good to see the DDDA are doing something about it, though. From today’s Etenders website:

      “The Docklands Authority is currently significantly expanding its planning process in both geographical area and the quantum of its operations. Hence it requires to streamline its processes to ensure that it’s planning practices and protocols are characterised by maximum efficiency, best practices in stakeholder management, customer care and the utilisation of optimum technical processes.

      The scope of services will include an assessment of current processes and procedures in place and then a fully detailed report with recommendations on best practice processes and procedures that should be implemented. The full details of the scope of services required is outlined within the Request for Proposals tender document which can be obtained from the nominated contact person.”

      :confused:

    • #801139
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lostexpectation wrote:

      still don’t know why it was 7 storeys before.

      The justification was that the north Docklands “was designed as a seamless extension of the city centre”.

      @Morlan wrote:

      DDDA’s idea of good land use – right in the heart of Grand Canal Dock. What a waste. :rolleyes:

      The defence of this was that the area was planned on a philosophy of “street-based urbanism … encouraging family living at high densities with visual and aural contact from most apartments to children on the ground plane and careful attention to sunlight and daylight penetration to the public realm”.

    • #801140
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      This review has been underway since 2006, it’s taken two years to get to public consultation. Too long and probably too late with judicial reviews on Brooks Thomas and doubts over a site contained within that means it could be years before this happens

Viewing 7 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Latest News