Re: Re: well what about the developments popping up in the shannonside ?

@KeepAnEyeOnBob wrote:

justnotbothered:

I was under the impression it was 1930s the current building was built, the original building indeed having been much older. 50s/60s seems very unlikely, there’s no way it was only 20/30 years old back in the 1980s for example.

Dan:

How does the procedure for that work?

Nope, pretty sure there was a spate of fires in that area in the late 1950’s, the Roches building was one that burnt down, was rebuilt in the 1960’s. I don’t think it’s worth keeping either way, it’s an alright building but the area could be improved by a better one.