Re: Re: A city constrained by a Frank McDonald credo would be ‘dismal and prissy’ –

@lexington wrote:

…of course for some people it still poses a problem! :rolleyes:

Indiscriminate cheerleading will always be a problem.

@lexington wrote:

…To reply Devin, as I’ve said before, this forum is about debate and learning…

Learning to be concise would be a start, like architecture debate is about quality and not quantity] you learn a lot and you change with it as you do. I’ve never shyed away from someone else’s perspective, but I’ve learned to not be so hardlined about my own when addressing others and in reading what others have had to say, it teaches you something about how attitudes are more favourably portrayed. Your track record isn’t unbleamished either, only just recently – again noting the issues raised by both sides – that would be far more interesting that cheap-whipping and would do the debate, [/QUOTE]

https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?t=2134&page=37

Would you please at least leave your posts intact as opposed to editing them 5 months later.