Reply To: an taisce-and rumours of them going bust

The government axed 63,000 euro in funding. So to cut their overheads they were forced to reduce their already overworked staff.

A case of political contributions buying influence if ever there was one.

For the record I have no problems with psuedonyms once they are not a deliberate attempt to mask and preserve a contributors credibility built up from other contributions.

It is hoped that funding will materialise to lure back the high quality services of Clerkin & Bowler.