Vega City
- This topic has 47 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 22 years, 10 months ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- November 25, 2003 at 10:59 am #737315
GregF
Participant……and here’s some exclusive images of their presentation…….http://www.irelantis.com
November 25, 2003 at 2:30 pm #737316GrahamH
ParticipantFingal was described as ‘the food basket of Dublin’ – I like that.
November 25, 2003 at 2:57 pm #737317-Donnacha-
Participant“The food basket of Dublin”, eh? Why – because its so expensive?
November 25, 2003 at 4:07 pm #737318-Donnacha-
ParticipantI’ve seen the propsal the council were given and they had no option but to bin it. Vague and sloppy doesn’t begin to describe the graphics, which look like they were drawn by a five year old with a thick marker on the back of a napkin.
And the written material has less detail than your average planning application for a garage extension.
This is coming from people who have seven billion euros in their pockets?
This was a joke from start to finish.November 25, 2003 at 4:19 pm #737319Anonymous
InactiveResidual development analysis has traditionally been conducted on the back of a cigerette box.
What baffles with this one is their site acquisition strategy. To quote a master ” Site acquisition at the right price is the key to successful development” Hughes 2000
November 26, 2003 at 5:04 pm #737320Sue
ParticipantCheck out last weekend’s Sunday Business Post for some really craven coverage of this proposal. They quoted “sources” as saying that major entertainment corporations were backing the proposal. Clearly the “sources” were Louis Maguire and Owen O’Callaghan. The Irish Indo also acted as cheerleaders for the scam. Shows how you can pull the wool on gullible journalists and get them to hype up even the daftest of projects. But of course Paul Clerkin has already proven how gullible some of these hacks are. I keep expecting Maguire/O’Callaghan to turn around and say they were taking the p too!!
November 26, 2003 at 6:58 pm #737321ro_G
Participantdid they actually get around to buying any land from farmers on the promise of this?
November 26, 2003 at 7:13 pm #737322Anonymous
InactivePromised about three times the value of the land as agricultural land, but ‘subject to contract’ terms of the contract being that all necessary planning consent was secured by the promoters. In the absence of that NADA
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

