Vega City

Home › Forums › Ireland › Vega City

Viewing 8 posts - 41 through 48 (of 48 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #737315
    GregF
    Participant

    ……and here’s some exclusive images of their presentation…….http://www.irelantis.com

    #737316
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Fingal was described as ‘the food basket of Dublin’ – I like that.

    #737317
    -Donnacha-
    Participant

    “The food basket of Dublin”, eh? Why – because its so expensive?

    #737318
    -Donnacha-
    Participant

    I’ve seen the propsal the council were given and they had no option but to bin it. Vague and sloppy doesn’t begin to describe the graphics, which look like they were drawn by a five year old with a thick marker on the back of a napkin.
    And the written material has less detail than your average planning application for a garage extension.
    This is coming from people who have seven billion euros in their pockets?
    This was a joke from start to finish.

    #737319
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Residual development analysis has traditionally been conducted on the back of a cigerette box.

    What baffles with this one is their site acquisition strategy. To quote a master ” Site acquisition at the right price is the key to successful development” Hughes 2000

    #737320
    Sue
    Participant

    Check out last weekend’s Sunday Business Post for some really craven coverage of this proposal. They quoted “sources” as saying that major entertainment corporations were backing the proposal. Clearly the “sources” were Louis Maguire and Owen O’Callaghan. The Irish Indo also acted as cheerleaders for the scam. Shows how you can pull the wool on gullible journalists and get them to hype up even the daftest of projects. But of course Paul Clerkin has already proven how gullible some of these hacks are. I keep expecting Maguire/O’Callaghan to turn around and say they were taking the p too!!

    #737321
    ro_G
    Participant

    did they actually get around to buying any land from farmers on the promise of this?

    #737322
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Promised about three times the value of the land as agricultural land, but ‘subject to contract’ terms of the contract being that all necessary planning consent was secured by the promoters. In the absence of that NADA

Viewing 8 posts - 41 through 48 (of 48 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.