Re: Re: Wiggins Teape

No, there’s no Pauline conversion here. I appreciate fine buildings and I am as appalled as anyone else when a historic or architecturally important building is razed. However I am not a NIMBY. Most development is good and a lot of opposition to it is thoughtless.

I just feel this site is getting off the point. Instead of discussing architecture (good and bad) it’s getting bogged down in conservation and anti-roads issues. What does the M3 and Tara debate have to do with architecture anyway?