Re: Re: South Facing Glazing

@henno wrote:

so the function suffers for the sake of the aesthetic….. disgraceful…

what exactly is that supposed to mean?? are you suggesting that the form of a building should be dictated by a notional idea of how to meet the part L requirements?

contrary to popular belief it is possible to design a passive building without sticking any amount of crap all over it just to gain another BREEAM point.

bitasean’s attitude is not disgraceful, it is aspirational.