Re: Re: Dunne vs the nimbys

@AndrewP wrote:

Actually, if the Ballsbridge site is 11 acres, that doesn’t seem a huge space saving. I presume services for what would be a village of up to 2,000 people would take up another huge chunk of land though. So you’re talking about no new land being used as opposed to what? 40 acres?
I live in a low-density, underpopulated, relatively central area and wouldn’t have a huge problem with a scheme like this nearby. But I’m a northsider and take a more pragmatic view of these things…:)

it’s 7 acres