Re: Re: Derelict Sites Act & Buildings At Risk

Maybe… but what would you like included:

AT objected to development on this site that would have meant the retention and refurbishment of the historic building (say its a protected structure) and additional new development designed harmoniously with its context

AT objected to the demolition of the existing historic building on the site and the construction of new development

AT objected to alterations to the existing historic building that were unsympathetic or detrimental to its character…say uPVC windows.

AT objected to the refurbishment and conservation of the existing protected structure and its return to a compatible use.