Re: Re: Dartmouth Square Disgrace
It effectively was a public park for running dogs and hitting a sliotar as the gates were never maintained for at least another deade before.
The council were ‘holding over’ which means that their tenancy is intact and rights of renewal are still held by the tenant until vacation possession is held by the holder of the reversion.
There is nothing poor about anyone who can chuck €10,000 at a reversionary interest that the leaseholder considered to flawed to acquire.
It was a long shot for him and he has been found out and it is time for him to retire with what is left of his dignity and stop spouting on about the constitution