Re: Re: Carlton Cinema Development

@ac1976 wrote:

Does anyone have a link to ABP’s letter?
I assume they rejected the park in the sky because it looked silly and was inaccesable being in the sky, Parks are usually at ground level.
I think there were also objections that the restaurants were at the top levles of the development aswell and hopefully ABP have rejected on these grounds.

It would be great to see this go ahead with some rivisions addressing these and the other issues brought up in the process.

Oh well god forbid we should do anything different – a park in the sky, just imagine! In Calgary, Canada, there’s a park indoors on the fourth level of the skyscraper, and it’s marketed as a tourist attraction and is very popular. A city park combined with a magnificent view over the whole city – how is this not a good idea?