Reply To: Does anyone know the architect name for this building?

Oh and any argument based on buildings being “good” simply because they stick out like a sore thumb, regardless of the actual design quality is patently bull. Douglas may be a bit of a wilderness architectually but crap like the watergold building only makes matters worse. What really pains me is that a lot of money was obviously lavished on this development and I can only imagine the sort of considered, elegant building any decent architect could have come up with.

By the way, I have been holding my thoughts on this thread for a while until I actually saw the building in the flesh… Now that I have seen it I’m even more amazed (and slightly concerned) that anyone who has had an education in architecture could possibly see any merit in it at all… Sorry if that sounds harsh but thats how I feel!