Reply To: south docks….
I thought I made a perfectly valid point.
If you are aware of the planning system and have noted what’s been approved over the last number of years (well since the start of the boom) you may have noticed that safe little developments that are not too radical in appearance comprising of cosy red brick, eclectic in nature with references to the past and stunted in height get given the go ahead with no problem. This is somewhat dishonest in design terms, is’nt it. Looking at the the general public’s negative attitude towards recent proposed developments too one should ask is it justifiably well founded criticism on their behalf or sheer bloody ignorance.
To add, you don’t have to make absurd comments refering to certain psychotic or neurotic hang ups to further your point….. could that be described as immature student talk.
[This message has been edited by GregF (edited 22 February 2001).]