Architectural Conservation Areas – any experts out there ??
- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- October 8, 2009 at 10:42 am #710802
bhewson
ParticipantAre Local Authorities obliged to stick with ACA recommendations? Or are they just guidelines that the local authority can disregard. e.g. Installation of uPVC windows, Protection of Architectural Heritage….
What sanction/agency is out there to police whether local authorities respect the objectives of their own ACAs ? Have local authorities enforced planning/taken legal action based on an ACA objective – e.g. against installation of uPVC Windows?
- October 8, 2009 at 11:03 am #810149
Anonymous
Inactive@bhewson wrote:
What sanction/agency is out there to police whether local authorities respect the objectives of their own ACAs ?
You are the agency, this is the system.
You have to complain until you get tired, fed up, disheartened, or you move on.
- October 8, 2009 at 12:42 pm #810150
Anonymous
Inactive@gunter wrote:
You have to complain until you get tired, fed up, disheartened, or you move on.
Or succeed – some signage on O’Connell St springing to mind 🙂
- October 8, 2009 at 1:35 pm #810151
Anonymous
InactiveI’d forgotten about the possibility of success
- October 8, 2009 at 2:35 pm #810152
Anonymous
InactiveHi behewson. Local authorities are legally bound to enforce ACAs as they are a statutory instrument. Some are more proactive that others on the enforcement front in actually monitoring designated areas, however all are obliged to investigate complaints made to them about unauthorised development.
There are many examples across the country of LAs taking enforcement proceedings in respect of PVC windows and their ilk in ACAs. Whether or not specific types of development (such as the replacement of windows) is specified in the local ACA policy is irrelevant, as under the 2000 Act, property owners are compelled to apply for planning permission for any alteration that is deemed to alter the exterior character of a structure in an ACA. Ultimately this means that alterations specified in the DOE Architectural Heritage Protection Guidelines for Planning Authorities will be treated as the relevant guidance document in any legal proceedings.
Alas, the lack of awareness of ACA designation is by far the key factor in the defacement of buildings in these areas on a national level, not arrogant violation of the law as is commonly perceived. This of course in turn is tied into the wider dearth of knowledge or understanding amongst the public of the value of their built heritage in the first instance.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
