who_me

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 141 through 160 (of 213 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: developments in cork #759651
    who_me
    Participant

    God, between the PVC windows and that awful roof, could they possibly have done a less sympathetic job on the place? I’d have expected a higher standard, especially given it’s location in one of Cork’s “signature views”, with Parliament bridge and the Holy Trinity church in the background.

    in reply to: developments in cork #759497
    who_me
    Participant

    @Radioactiveman wrote:

    Finally for now, does anybody else think that the new wall and railings erected in front of The Counting House at Beamish and Crawford are a disgrace? The wall is just poured concret, the railings themselves are terribly designed which has resulted in the need to install chunky metal barriers between the top of the wall and the bottom of the railing. If you havent seen it already, take a look next time you’rte passing. It looks like a monumental cock-up.!

    I walk by every day, and they’re shocking. Hard to believe, but the old railings were better!

    For those that haven’t seen it, the lower part is a rough, bland concrete barrier (somewhat akin to the barriers you might see skirting F1 tracks), topped by an unpainted railing that’s far too tall, with a gap of about a foot in between. Seeing this gap, I was hoping that it was a work in progress, and they might be planning on adding a stone face to the wall, perhaps with potted plants or flowers on top under the railing, which might be nice.

    But no, they’ve since tacked on another square rail between the wall and railing which matches neither. A little bizarre.

    On the subject of Beamish; what restrictions exist on erecting floodlighting on a building? I live in an apartment block across the river from Beamish, and when I walk into my living room the floodlights hit you so hard you have to squint or look away. Do you think they’d be receptive to a polite request to adjust the angle slightly so it’s hitting the Counting House facade more directly, and not shining right into peoples’ houses?

    in reply to: developments in cork #759496
    who_me
    Participant

    @Micko wrote:

    If its gone, I hardly think train services to Bandon will ever reappear.

    It’s a pity, but inevitable. I’d love to see any part of this line restored – even much further out Skibbereen-Ballydehob along the river Ilen would be beautiful.

    Hard to believe there were so many railway stations in Cork city at one stage.

    in reply to: developments in cork #759291
    who_me
    Participant

    @lexington wrote:

    1.Additional Academy Street Images

    Are these pictures of a widened Faulkner’s Lane?

    in reply to: developments in cork #759099
    who_me
    Participant

    @PTB wrote:

    Sometimes I think that tis a bit of a pity that the waterways were filled in because it would be incredible to live in a city like Venice. Although that would have is own drawbacks. A Patricks street filled with water would make shopping difficult. And I hear that Venice has odour problems and is slowly sinking. But it would look incredible.

    I’ve often thought the same. Previously, it would have been unthinkable, but with the increasing pedestrianisation of the city centre, it’d be wonderful to see wouldn’t it?

    Ok, perhaps not if the water quality is as in the photo above, but still…;)

    in reply to: developments in cork #759068
    who_me
    Participant

    @Radioactiveman wrote:

    Incidently, work has started on Sth Main Street to replace the railings at Beamish and Crawford- directly in front of the Counting House.

    (Coming from someone whose front window looks out at the Counting House) thank God for that!

    I know the yard at the front of that building is heavily used, but I’ve always thought it was a pity the railings weren’t replaced and the yard made into a small park/garden. It’d show off the Counting House far better. Of course, you’d still have much of the rest of the brewery looking decrepit, particularly from South Main St., but at least it would be an improvement.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758998
    who_me
    Participant

    @phatman wrote:

    According to the Examiner yesterday, Paul Kenny’s Patrick’s Quay development has been greenlit by an Bord PleanÑla. Surprised there’s been no reaction here…Opinions??

    I’m actually a little surprised it got through, and mostly unscathed at that. I think it’s a stunning development, but it’s very tall, and likely to block views of the church behind it. Methinks there might still be a few groans and whines once people see it go up.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758814
    who_me
    Participant

    @anto wrote:

    If the Cork docklands are to become an extension of the city centre then development should be urban in form, i.e. there should be streets, squares etc. This building while quite dramatic seems to be set in a business park/campus setting. Green space can be incoporated in the form of parks or a linear park with cycle ways along the river bank. The docklands needs to be developed in a high density manner if things like light rail linking it to the city centre are feasible.

    True, though this is at the Eastern end of the South Docklands area, where it borders the attractive Marina/Atlantic Pond area. I think a project such as this would blend nicely between the urban dockland setting and the quiet, recreational Atlantic Pond.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758746
    who_me
    Participant

    @lexington wrote:

    😎 And just as a point of interest for anyone in the area, one of the 2 commercial units available at BrideView Developments recently completed development, Unity House on the site of the former McCarthy family’s Unity Garage between Alfred Street and the Lower Glanmire Road – is destined to be yet another Subway Sandwich Bar. Another franchised unit exists east along MacCurtain Street. This will give the operation bookends.


    Unity House

    Actually, now that you post the picture, it reminded me – I was passing Unity House a couple of days ago and the red brickwork is actually quite attractive, there’s a great variation in the colour of the bricks giving a far more textured look than you’d normally expect to see. (I don’t know if this will fade over time or not).

    in reply to: developments in cork #758704
    who_me
    Participant

    @lexington wrote:

    Now, a revised plan is to be lodged after assessment of the hotel market in Cork and with respect to viability issues given the permitted developments reduced bedroom numbers. It is understoof Derek Tynan & Associates have been retained to design a new scheme which will see the redevelopment of the Mill Business Centre as a new part 3-storey, part 5-storey open plan office building with river fronting amenity space all over basement parking for 15 spaces.

    Hopefully, by ‘revised’, they mean ‘redesigned from scratch’. That’s a dull, unimaginative design in any context, but in such a sensitive location, it’s completely out of place.

    (And I’m not just saying that because it’s across the road from my home! πŸ˜€ )

    in reply to: developments in cork #758550
    who_me
    Participant

    @lexington wrote:

    Cork: a city I’ve always liked a lot
    His own development at 21 Lavitt’s Quay is a mistake in that context. Not only is it grossly overscaled, but it celebrates the corner as if it was addressing two spaces of equal status – even though one is an 18th century river landscape and the other is merely a service lane.

    I understand his point, but I disagree with it completely.

    Certainly, addressing the quayside is of the upmost importance, yes (unlike the Opera House, Merchants’ Quay and many others). But, you have to remember one of the fundamental characteristics of Cork city is the rich web of narrow sidestreets (many of which now are pedestrianised, or pedestrian-priority).

    In my opinion, one of the biggest ‘mistakes’ we’ve made in Cork is allowing some of these narrow lanes to die (many have even been built over), by treating them like unwanted intrusions. This is most notable in the sidestreets off Patrick St (Bowling Green St, Faulkner’s Lane and Maylor St, though that has now improved enormously).

    By having large department shops (Dunne’s, Roches, Pennys) on the corners, which have no frontage onto the side laneways, you eliminate any prospect of future development along them, since what business would want to set up 50m down a dark alleyway.

    Instead, by having these grand corner features, they invite foot traffic into these laneways which brings them back to life. There’s no reason why the lanes mentioned above couldn’t be every bit as vibrant as the Hugenot quarter is now, if we don’t follow the development model he espouses.

    “In my opinion”, of course! πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: developments in cork #758531
    who_me
    Participant

    I have to admit I know nothing of the planning & appeal procedure; but surely it should be possible to have a preliminary stage where a summary judgement could be made, to prevent frivolous objections. And shouldn’t that be the only thing that matters – whether the reasons for the objection are reasonable, not the name on the form?

    in reply to: developments in cork #758504
    who_me
    Participant

    @Radioactiveman wrote:

    What with the imminent pedestrianisation of Oliver Plunkett St. and surrounding streets, I wonder will the metal poles be replaced with proper lights as originally planned. We’ve waited long enough for them I think.

    It would be nice wouldn’t it. If the “placeholder” poles weren’t all sticking in different directions, they wouldn’t be so bad. Actually, it’s amazing just how many lampposts & signs around the city are bent or buckled. Just how bad are drivers in Cork???

    in reply to: developments in cork #758503
    who_me
    Participant

    @alpha wrote:

    is cork county hall far from the city centre? i would love to see what it looks like in person these days. i will be down that way next month.

    About a 25 or 30 minute walk, I’d guess. Though you can see it easily enough from Sheare St. in the city centre – bring a pair of binoculars and save yourself the walk! πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: developments in cork #758462
    who_me
    Participant

    @Radioactiveman wrote:

    This is the best I can do for now I’m a fraid. The 3 blocks of the Frinailla development are highlighted in red. It is bordered by Watercourse Road, Bleasby Street and Houses on Chapel Lane. With Allinetts lane and Hillgrove lane running through the site.
    <img src="http://img493.imageshack.us/img493/2351/blackpoolmap1ng.th.gif&quot; border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at http://www.ImageShack.us” />

    Thanks Radioactiveman, much appreciated.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758458
    who_me
    Participant

    I’m not that familiar with the Blackpool areas – is there any map that shows the location & size of the Ladyswell development?

    in reply to: developments in cork #758401
    who_me
    Participant

    Here’s the latest picture of the mill being renovated at Parliament bridge. With the new roof structure, it appears to be a lot taller than the previous structure, but I believe they lowered the front wall so it’s probably about the same.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758381
    who_me
    Participant

    @lexington wrote:

    😎 The Bowen Group are to be refused planning on their proposal to develop 55-apartments over a 6-storey block, with 10 townhouses and some community related provisions on a strip of land to the eastern periphery of Musgrave Park Rugby Grounds. The Wilson Architecture designed project – led by Paud O’Mahony, also catered for 93 ground floor parking spaces. The ruling will come following recognition that the permission sought is in contravention with the Cork City Development Plan 2004, concerning loss of recreational grounds to development. This leaves Bowen Construction in a difficult position regarding options, and for Munster Rugby by extension.

    While I’m very much in favour of preserving the green areas in the city, this is a real kick in the teeth for Munster. I’m sure the development of that land would have provided a good deal of cash towards a much needed refurbishment of Musgrave and/or Thomond Park. This must surely decrease the value of the lands significantly.

    Incidentally, I just read elsewhere that Nemo Rangers have supposedly just sold their pitches (not very far from Musgrave Park). Do similar restrictions not apply there, or could someone have purchased them for recreational purposes? Highly unlikely, I’d have thought.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758342
    who_me
    Participant

    I don’t know to what degree this ban might help increase apartment prices, but it certainly won’t help. Prices will continue to increase at current rates as long as new developments sell as quickly and easily as they do now. (IMO, investors are skewing the market to some degree). Fewer stories means fewer (or worse, smaller) apartments within a reasonable distance of the city centre, and thus the buying frenzy can only get worse.

    FYI, 325K for a new 2 bed apartment in Cork is probably average or below, several developments I’ve seen are priced 385 to 390K if you include a parking spot.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758302
    who_me
    Participant

    @lexington wrote:

    I think Cork has developed and continues to do so, a very continental, cosmopolitan feel to it. Of course there is much more to go, but the refurbishments at St. Patrick’s Street, Oliver Plunkett Street and those proposed for Grand Parade and Cornmarket Street have all added to this. We should also note the revitalisation of the French Quarter which looks great these days – new pavings, speciality shops, cafes and restaurants opening out onto the street, narrow lanes, street decor etc etc all have made this a beautiful contrast to the main stream commercial areas that surround it. Walking down Careys Lane is often like walking into another city.

    Agree wholeheartedly, and it’d be great to think that a redeveloped Faulkner’s Lane and Bowling Green St would add to that again. Combine that with the extra foot traffic that the Academy St. development should draw off Patrick St., and it should really re-energise the area (I don’t know what that means either, but it sounds good.. πŸ˜‰ ).

Viewing 20 posts - 141 through 160 (of 213 total)