vvvvv4

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: U2 studio entries #727145
    vvvvv4
    Participant

    I would say that the slenderness ratio is just ridiculous. 60m is the highest for Dublin. what if a tower with 40m high? the tower is only 10mx10m and we still need to put 2 elevators and stairs and some circulation space?
    Besides the north side of this u2 tower is just water, it’s not gonna cast any shadow on any buildings. what kind of sense to have a stupid slenderness ratio?

    in reply to: U2 Competition – call for entries #734932
    vvvvv4
    Participant

    Can you provide the e-mail add?
    thanks

    in reply to: U2 studio entries #727097
    vvvvv4
    Participant

    I have to say this is the worst competition I have ever seen, poorly organized.
    I have the same problem of the min. 9500 sqm and slenderness requirement. I don’t see all the entries they selected have a solution. Those requirement was a joke!!!

    in reply to: U2 studio entries #727090
    vvvvv4
    Participant

    I think maybe it’s a good idea to post other entries here since I don’t see they are gonna make a book of all entries.

    in reply to: U2 studio entries #727037
    vvvvv4
    Participant

    Hopefully it doesn’t happen. FG is repeating his curved metal piece everywhere right now which is very sad.

    in reply to: U2 studio entries #727010
    vvvvv4
    Participant

    what’s going on? It’s already late June. no results, not even an explanation on the their website.

    in reply to: U2 in ‘favourites’Â’ row over studio #724942
    vvvvv4
    Participant

    Originally posted by Andrew Duffy
    I can attach a scan of the image from the Times if Paul is OK with it.

    Can you email me that pic?
    My email is
    vvvvv4@yahoo.com
    thanks.

    in reply to: U2 in ‘favourites’Â’ row over studio #724938
    vvvvv4
    Participant

    shadow wrote:
    ….Also since the technical requirements of the brief were quite strict, perhaps over restrictive does this mean that they were used to justify restricting the opportunites so that others might transcend these requirements….

    if this is true, what a joke!

    can anyone post the news?

    in reply to: U2 in ‘favourites’Â’ row over studio #724936
    vvvvv4
    Participant

    It’s gonna be a ridiculous competition if we think it should be given to somebody just because he/she has a big name such as gehry. Is it fair to all the competitors?

    if they really want a big name for this building, why don’t they just ask gehry, zaha, koolhass or whoever has a big name to have this project rahter than hold a competition.

    P.S. this competition is the most confusing competition I have ever encountered. no clear schedule, hardly get a reply from them after you ask them questions via e-mail. difficulty of meeting the planning requirements.very expensive entry fee……

    I totaly agree with shadow.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

Latest News