urbanisto
Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
urbanisto
ParticipantWell they did re-jig the interior of the station to face towards the ramp – which would suggest a repositioning of the entrance to the new LUAS stop.
urbanisto
ParticipantI wonder what effect the removal of the ramp will have on Connolly Station itself. There will obviously be a new ground level entrance. I never noticed but did they make provision for this when they redesigned the station a couple of years ago.
urbanisto
ParticipantIrony indeed… and there are probably many more examples …like our current Lord Mayor who just dying to get to cut the ribbon on the Spire and get his mug in the papers in time for the local elections…
urbanisto
ParticipantYou say that everytime Paul…. its quite funny. You can almost hear the exasperation!
urbanisto
ParticipantThese have been missing for ages haven’t they… it would be nice if they complemented their replacement with some samrt new paving on the bridge and get rid of that tarmac… I mean – the main thoroughfare if the city with a tarmac pavement!
urbanisto
ParticipantI remember seeing a link to the orignal documents on an earlier thread so have a look back through the archives..
urbanisto
ParticipantTo be fare it would have cost a fortune…. the Free State just about managed to get its act together after the Civil War. Large scale redevelopment in Dublin would have been unthinkable. Even so many of his proposals seem to have fed through…however badly.
urbanisto
ParticipantIt is a bit dreary looking isnt it. Although its funny as it was a major achievement when it was laid!.. pedestrianisation and all that. I remember a cringe moment on the BBC Holiday programme where the presenter said in a fake Irish accent ‘ this is an Irish pedestrianised street’ with the backdrop being a car filled ‘pedestrianised’ Grafton Street.
I think a stylish contemporary look for the street although I think a move away from white granite and stainless steel might be refreshing…surely our collective genius can come up with something that is both modern and lively! Also a move into some of the rundown properties on South William Street and the business premises on Nassau/Dawson St would be good to create a proper retail ‘quarter’. The bigger shops are forever complaining about the lack of suitably sized stores in the area.
urbanisto
ParticipantI knew about LUAS neing privately operated… I hope DART goes the same way. All this proliferation of agencies and companies controlling transport. No wonder its a mess…all the moeny gets swallowed up in these fiefdoms.
I work in a UK rail company so I know enough about the problems of their privatisation, But I still maintain that another model for privatisation would work for the limited Irish networks. It would still require subsidy and strong regulation but it would be a vast improvement on the current political party set up.
Maybe something along the lines of a Dublin Transport Authority to replace CIE and the RPAetc and licence out the various services to independant operators.
urbanisto
ParticipantIm not sure of the logic of a Line C..window dressing I expect to make it look as if the government are investing in three and not two lines.
As for the Airport spur..I am sure this was the plan when the DART was setup. I certainly recall it being mentioned many times until the extension to Malahide came about. I think it was eventually dropped when we could set our sites on bigger fish like a dedicated LUAS line (likely by 2012) or Metro (yeah right!).
A dedicated line makes more sense as the volume of extra traffic on the DART would cripple the (currently substandard) service.
I think they should privatise the DART and LUAS. It not like the UK where there is a huge network which need central control. These one off systems are so more easily managed, Perhaps have Iarnrod Eireann converted into a rail network management company owned by the government and sell of the services on those lines. The same for mainline (aka intercity) services.
urbanisto
ParticipantI persume your being sarcastic Andrew
urbanisto
ParticipantExcellent news! A department store would be perfect here. DCC have spent alot on a major upgrade to the street and I think taking out the office block would be very desirable. The only thing this street lacks unfortunately is sunlight which makes it unsuitable for outdoor establishments such as cafes. or stalls. It can be quite chilly on coller summer days.
As for the lack of native retailers in the area – I agree but I reckon thats capitalism for you. Arnotts could try a move but I think its unlikely any Irish group would have the resources to take on a development of this size.
It is good to see so many UK (and International – H&M are Swedish, GAP are US) retailers interested in Dublin. It will be interesting to see what difference this development together with the proposed new store on College Green will have to the area.
Personally, I think a lot has been invested in the Nassau St – George St quarter over the past few years and it is really paying off. The area look better and better.
Good bye to Eircom…perhaps they will dump their O’Connell Street offces as well and leave that free for something more retail/ arts orientated.
urbanisto
ParticipantThe Leinster Lawn carpark was supposed to be temporary – hence its professional finish. The plan is for an underground carpark. The Lawn will then be reinstated and I believe the same applies to the concourse at the ‘city’ side.
As it is part of the same project which incollves renovating Kildare House on K St we should see some action soon.urbanisto
ParticipantI think its close neighbours including and around Hawkins House would qualify for that gong Graham. O’Connell Brdige House is nothing when compared to the planning mess that allowed Tara Street and Hawkins Street get into such an awful state.
urbanisto
ParticipantThey must be getting to work on the internal lighting and the final finish…. I wonder what the timeframe is for it all.
Still on O’Connell Street – has anyone seem what type of street furniture will be included on the street. I think we has some wierd fuzzy mockups of kiosks but what about lighting etc?
urbanisto
ParticipantI never thought mcuh of this building… its too monolithic looking, especially for D’Olier Street. I would have been much better situated on the southside of Matt Talbot bridge (whats that quay – City?). But I suppose we must put up with what we have, its such a shame though.
I agree with the obvious difference that recladding has had. It looks much better.
There is a current recladding project going on at the top of Pearse Street – beside the GArda Station. It was an ugly concrete clad 60’s yoke… any ideas or pics as to what it will end up like. I thinks its called Joyce House.
urbanisto
ParticipantI can’t wait to see the change in the streetscape once the Connolly Station ramp has been removed. It should have a dramatic effect. Is the back wall coming down as well the one that breaks off the viw into the IFSC. This has such a bad effect of sectioning off the docklands area from the rest of the city.
Also the bridges look pretty good don’t they…at least the one thats finished and not forgetting the Taney Bridge. I think there is a marked difference in the standard of design for LUAS as compared to the last major public transport development in Dublin – DART – for example.
urbanisto
ParticipantPerhaps they’ll do it in the summer when the weather calm down a bit..its the rain that causing the dirty railings I’d say.
urbanisto
ParticipantAnd lovely blue skies…it must be the stuff of fantasy
urbanisto
ParticipantNow THAT sounds like rubbish!
- AuthorPosts
