sw101
Forum Replies Created
- Posts
how is it radical? its viable and achievable with proper management.
a person who couldnt care less wouldnt suggest anything, merely point out the biased idiocy of your remarks. i on the other hand have a vested interest because of geographical, familial, and future interests in the issue. i am more aware than most of the frivolty of martin cullens proposals, and the unenforcable nature of national planning policies. planning officials operate under their own edicts, and ultimately this is allowable in the sense than local strategies must be adhered to to avoid centralisation of what is a distinctly rural issue.
your habit of accepting wholesale the word of policy and plans which are always made to be broken, and your acceptance of them as gospel while it suits you, undermines any arguement you have regards these issues to which you seem insistent on remaining almost entirely ignorant
Originally posted by Diaspora
If you don’t give two damns you shouldn’t post on the thread.
if you cant express a rational view then perhaps you might abstain also. i’ll post where i wish
Originally posted by Diaspora
As for the Sinn Fein remark it was made along the lines of it being a purely populist strategy.you’re an arse diaspora. truly
Originally posted by Diaspora
A one liner that hasn’t been costed but will have a massive impact both financially and environmentally. 😮and again ( )o( ) pucker up
you’ve said the “countryside is an amenity believe it or not”. its an amenity but an amenity that people live in, farm, bring their children up in, create employment in, produce goods, services and tax in. cluster development as a principle is fine. but to insist on clusters as a requirement to procure planning only promotes the activity of developers in rural areas, who can blindside locals and planners alike, and end up ramming dozens and hundreds of houses up on substandard sites, which are sold on to blow-ins and oppurtunistic outsiders who see a rental dollar to be made.
an option would be to have councils able to compulsarily purchase tracts of land, suitably located for small clusters of housing. then sell off plots to people, services provided, who can then either puchase approved plans and build accordingly, or apply for planning on their own for an appropriate alternative building. architects and urbanists could be employed in the initial stages so that informed decisions could be made from day one, and if policed properly by council officials and planners, everyone involved gets what they want;
structured and sustainable development.
decent standard of architecture and construction.
shared services and minimal environmental impact.
affordable and attractive options for locals to stay in their community and become part of that same communal structure, and also people who have valid reasons for relocating to an area could become better accommodated in that transitionOriginally posted by garethace
This web site is increasingly beginning to remind me of geography and GIS rather than actual architecture.I think to confuse the two to too much of an extent is a problem – expressed by the recent City Architect or City Geographer thread here at Archiseek.
At the end of the day, I know a very many architects nowadays are trying to be geographers and a very many geographers are trying to be architects.
It is a crazy and confused world we are growing up in people.
Very, very nice ESRI Volumes, tonnes of stuff.
http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume16/index.html
http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume17/index.html
http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume18/index.html
just wanted to quote this before we’re greeted by **null** in the morning.
HI, remember a puddle needs a depression or hole to form. a vacuos space you understand
i’m not gonna get into this arguement because i couldnt really give two damns.
but this…..
Originally posted by Diaspora
Even Sinn Fein are in favour of one-off houses, so it must be dangerous!!!!!………..is the most retarded comment i have read on this site.
Yeah,BTH, i kinda meant that for RichardC.
I’d love to see you try and explain how that stira ladder/stairs complies with part M 🙂
not the prettiest thing in the world but functional and legal, and no doubt less than 14 grand.
the link is http://www.stira.ie/misterstep/
i know, stira, but they’ve expanded their product range and these might suit you a bit better. hope this is of some help
that helix is just a bent ladder. seems very expensive for the product. the fact that the website has “architecture” in its name means the mark up can be unjustifiably hooj.
get a decent engineer who has experience in conservation. architects are crap at this stuff unless they’ve specialised. i recommend fourem, see em at http://www.fourem.ie. good lads.
if they cant help you i’m sure they’ll recommend someone else who can
is that what paypal is for? i’d be on for that. or i could post some of my change to “mr. clerkin, care of the internet” 🙂
alan,
about the minger comment, the super industrial light as a feather uber buildings produved by fosters office just arent to my taste. sorry i have an opinion (runs off to cry under the stairs)
its a shit box. too descriptive and exclusive. its underlying message is to engineers and builder clients who reckon they can do fancy houses, which is if you cant do a clever house, dont bother, just build a carbon copy of what your neighbour built 50 yrs ago and we’ll allow it. Anything even remotely out of the ordinary applied for without the involvement of an RIAI member will be chucked out on the basis that it isnt in keeping with the surrounds.
Mike Shanahan and associates are a bunch of conservative assholes who contradict themselves constantly in this cartoonlike colouring-pencil book
Originally posted by Diaspora
I have never expressed any opinion as to my or anyone elses popularity either positive or negative.
oh really? well this was a direct reply to my comments. care to elaborate?
Easy to see why you did Architecture and not English although if there was a degree in hate studies you’d just have to turn up for the exam, you’d get a 1.1[/B]
My problem is with people who incoherently lash out. [/B]
your problems run a lot deeper than that budday
garethace
Its nice to be able to exchange comments and point of interests as a slight aside to the drudgery of everyday work. Theres only so many specifications i can write and so many hours photoshopping i can slave away at before i need to see something of interest. someone highlighting an interesting building or asking a question, perhaps venturing a point of view for discussion……
your posts are extremely long, laborious and disjointed, making them difficult to read, unrewarding for those who reach the end, and nigh on impossible to reply to with out a hot head or tongue stuck firmly in cheek. your habit of nulling everything you write 5 minutes later is quite annoying too. if its good enough to post, leave it there. just dont leave all 5,000 words of it there. thats an essay, not a post as i see it.
why you and diaspora are getting up on your “everyone hates me” horse i dont know. people are just trying to lighten the tone and kindly point out that in recent times there have been many many many random thoughts expressed incoherently on this forum. its gets trying.
ah now lads what with the oh and the when the left look you cant but read the when the country taisce blood red finger eaters generator bastarding LOL LOL LOL!!! (urinating dog)(urinating dog) left my heart in san green filly blow shove it concreting the bow where i country.
whas your problem then?
