Praxiteles
Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- December 19, 2007 at 9:35 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770945
Praxiteles
ParticipantHugo van der Goes, The Berlin Nativity c. 1480.
December 19, 2007 at 9:30 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770944Praxiteles
ParticipantThe kneeling posture of Our Lady in the Portinari Altar Piece is practically similar to van der Goes other great Nativity, the Berlin Nativity, and representes an iconographic manner of depicting this subject proper to the school of Ghent.
In the Berlin Nativity, the face of Our Lady is taken to represent the passage in St. Luke’s Gospel wheich says that “she treasured all these things [that had been said of the Christ Child by the prophet Simeon] and pondered them in her heart”
On the other hand, the face of Our Lady in the Portinari Altar piece is taken to represent the tristesse of Mother of Sorrows who already knows at the birth of Christ what he has come into the for and how that would be accomplished.
December 19, 2007 at 12:42 am in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770943Praxiteles
ParticipantThe Portinari Altar Piece
Our Lady
December 19, 2007 at 12:31 am in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770942Praxiteles
ParticipantPortinari Altar Piece
House of David, tympan of the entrance door showing the Harp of King David and the abbreviated inscription
While Panofsky only mentions two abbreviated inscriptions, Praxiteles believes that a third abbreviated inscription is to be found in the lower left hand corner of the tympan which cannot be read because obscured by the ante standing building. However, the final letter may be an “X” for “Christus” from which we can infer that it is preceded by an “I” for “Iesus”.
Furthermore, while Panofsky mentions that the letters on the upper part of the tympanum are “PNSC”, Praxiteles thinks that this is incorrect. The letters “PNS” are centred on the top of the shield annd are in a clear script quite unlike the “C”. This “C” Praxiteles is inclined to think is a loop carved in the panel and probably has another on the opposite side which is not visible.
In this scheme of things the ttmpan should read: PNS + Harp + IX +MV
This should then give us : Patriarcha Noster Sanctus [Our Holy Patriarch or Father] + Harp [= David] + IX [= Iesus Christus] + MV [= Maria Virgo].
The expression “Sanctus Patriarcha Noster” is used by St. Ambrose in explicit reference to King David .
December 18, 2007 at 11:26 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770941Praxiteles
ParticipantThe Portinari Altar Piece:
Centre background: The House of David, which St. Gregory the Great in his Christmas homily describes as the House of God.
Erwin Panofsky mentions that there is an abbreviated inscription in the tympanum of the door which he gives as : P. N. S.C. above M.V.
He gives the followinga s the the full inscription: “Puer Nascetur Salvator Christus” and the MV he says is Maria Virgo – Of the Virgin Mary, A child will be born Christ the Saviour
Panofsky takes it that the inscription is taken from the Introit and Sequence of cChristmas Midnight Mass and inextricably links the Christ Child to the House of David.
December 18, 2007 at 9:54 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770940Praxiteles
ParticipantAdn this is likely be oe of the sources behind Hugo van de Goes Portinari Altar piece: the Homily of Gregory the Great preached in the Basilica of Our LAdy in Rome on CHristmas day ante 604 explaining the connection between Bethlehem Beth Lechem) or the House of Bread and Christ and the Eucharist.:
HOMILIA VIII.
Habita ad populum in basilica beatae Mariae Virginis, in die Natalis Domini.
37
LECTIO S. EVANG. SEC. LUC. II, 1-14.
In illo tempore, exiit edictum a Caesare Augusto, ut describeretur universus orbis. Haec descriptio prima facta est a praeside Syriae Cyrino. Et ibant omnes ut profiterentur, singuli in suam civitatem. Ascendit autem et Joseph a Galilaea de civitate Nazareth, in Judaeam in civitatem David, quae vocatur Bethlehem, eo quod esset de domo et familia David, ut profiteretur cum Maria desponsata sibi uxore praegnante. Factum est autem, cum essent ibi, impleti sunt dies ut pareret. Et peperit filium suum primogenitum; et pannis eum involvit, et reclinavit eum in praesepio, quia non erat ei locus in diversorio. Et pastores erant in regione eadem, vigilantes et custodientes vigilias noctis super gregem suum. Et ecce angelus Domini stetit juxta illos, et claritas Dei circumfulsit illos, et timuerunt timore magno. Et dixit illis angelus: Nolite timere. Ecce enim evangelizo vobis gaudium magnum, quod erit omni populo, quia natus est vobis hodie Salvator, qui est Christus Dominus, in civitate David. Et hoc vobis signum: Invenietis infantem pannis involutum, et positum in praesepio. Et subito facta est cum angelo multitudo militiae coelestis exercitus, laudantium Deum, et dicentium: Gloria in altissimis Deo, et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis.
Quia, largiente Domino, missarum solemnia ter hodie celebraturi sumus, loqui diu de Evangelica lectione non possumus. Sed nos aliquid vel breviter dicere Redemptoris nostri nativitas ipsa compellit. Quid est quod nascituro Domino mundus describitur, nisi noc quod aperte monstratur, quia ille veniebat in carne, qui electos suos ascriberet in aeternitate? Quo contra de reprobis per Prophetam dicitur: Deleantur de libro viventium, et cum justis non scribantur (Psal. LXVIII, 29). Qui bene etiam in Bethlehem nascitur: Bethlehem quippe domus panis interpretatur. Ipse namque est qui ait: Ego sum panis vivus, qui de coelo descendi (Joan. VI, 41, 52). Locus
38
ergo in quo Dominus nascitur, domus panis antea vocatus est, quia futurum profecto erat ut ille ibi per materiam carnis appareret, qui electorum mentes interna satietate reficeret. Qui non in parentum domo, sed in via nascitur, ut profecto ostenderet, quia per humanitatem suam quam assumpserat quasi in alieno nascebatur. Alienum videlicet non secundum potestatem dico, sed secundum naturam. Nam de potestate ejus scriptum est: In propria venit (Joan. I, 11). In natura etenim sua ante tempora natus est, in nostra venit ex tempore. Qui ergo aeternus permanens temporalis apparuit, alienum est ubi descendit. Et quia per prophetam dicitur: Omnis caro fenum (Isai. XL, 6), factus homo, fenum nostrum vertit in frumentum, qui de semetipso ait: Nisi granum frumenti cadens in terram mortuum fuerit, ipsum solum manet (Joan. XII, 24). Unde et natus in praesepio reclinatur, ut fideles omnes videlicet sancta animalia, carnis suae frumento reficeret, ne ab aeternae intelligentiae pabulo jejuna remanerent. Quid autem est quod vigilantibus pastoribus angelus apparet, eosque Dei claritas circumfulget, nisi quod illi prae caeteris videre sublimia merentur, qui fidelibus gregibus praeesse sollicite sciunt? Dumque ipsi pie super gregem vigilant, divina super eos gratia largius coruscat.
2. Regem vero natum angelus nuntiat, ejusque voci angelorum chori concinunt, et congaudentes clamant: Gloria in excelsis Deo, et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis. Prius quippe quam Redemptor noster nasceretur per carnem, discordiam cum angelis habuimus, a quorum claritate atque munditia per primae culpae meritum, per quotidiana delicta longe distabamus. Quia enim peccando extranei eramus a Deo, extraneos nos a suo consortio deputabant angeli cives Dei. Sed quia nos cognovimus Regem nostrum, recognoverunt nos angeli cives suos. Quia enim coeli Rex terram nostrae carnis assumpsit, infirmitatem nostram illa jam angelica celsitudo non despicit. Ad pacem nostram
39
angeli redeunt, intentionem prioris discordiae postponunt; et quos prius infirmos abjectosque despexerant, jam socios venerantur. Hinc est enim quod Loth (Genes. XIX, 1) et Josue (Josue V, 15) angelos adorant, nec tamen adorare prohibentur; Joannes vero in Apocalypsi sua adorare angelum voluit, sed tamen idem hunc angelus ne se debeat adorare compescuit, dicens: Vide ne feceris, conservus enim tuus sum et fratrum tuorum (Apoc. XXII, 9). Quid est quod ante Redemptoris adventum angeli ab hominibus adorantur, et tacent, postmodum vero adorari refugiunt, nisi quod naturam nostram, quam prius despexerant, postquam hanc super se assumptam conspiciunt, substratam sibi videre pertimescunt? Nec jam sub se velut infirmam contemnere ausi sunt, quam super se videlicet in coeli Rege venerantur. Nec habere dedignantur hominem socium, qui super se adorant hominem Deum. Curemus ergo, fratres charissimi, ne qua nos immunditia polluat, qui in aeterna praescientia et Dei cives, et angelis ejus aequales sumus. Vindicemus moribus dignitatem nostram, nulla nos luxuria inquinet, nulla nos turpis cogitatio accuset, non malitia mentem mordeat, non invidiae rubigo consumat, non elatio inflet, non ambitio per terrena oblectamenta dilaniet, non ira inflammet. Dii etenim vocati sunt homines. Defende ergo tibi, o homo, contra vitia honorem Dei, quia propter te factus est Deus homo, qui vivit et regnat in saecula saeculorum. Amen.December 18, 2007 at 9:12 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770939Praxiteles
ParticipantAnd the shepherds reaction to the news brought to them by the angles that Christ had been born in Bethlehem:
December 18, 2007 at 9:09 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770938Praxiteles
ParticipantAnd of the their heads:
December 18, 2007 at 9:07 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770937Praxiteles
ParticipantAnd some details of their hands:
December 18, 2007 at 9:04 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770936Praxiteles
ParticipantThe shepherds in the Portinari Altar Piece:
These are the most realistically depicted shepherds ever painted up to the time of van der Goes. They represent humanity, warts and all. According to St. Luke’s Gospel (2:9ff), it was to them that the angles first announced the birth of the Saviour. They were the first to be surrounded by the glory of the Lord
December 18, 2007 at 8:06 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770935Praxiteles
ParticipantHere is a close up of the flowers:
Erwin Panofsky in his Early Netherlandish Painting pointsout taht the alberello holds a scarlet lily signifying the blood of the Passion of Christ; the irises [in German Schwertiris of sword irises] refer to the prophecy of Simeon in the Temple at the Presentation of Our Lord (St. Luke’s Gospel) in which he foretold that a sword would pierce Our Lady’s heart (hence the Mater Dolorosa -and the Sequence for 15 September). Likewise, the colombine, its seven large blooms representing the seven sorrows of Our Lady ( * at the prophecy of Simeon; * at the flight into Egypt; * having lost the Holy Child at Jerusalem; * meeting Jesus on his way to Calvary; * standing at the foot of the Cross; * Jesus being taken from the Cross; * at the burial of Christ).
Unfortunately, Panofsky seems to have overlooked the three carnations in the glass with the columbine and make no comment as to their significance. But, in Flemish religious painting carnations, it can refer to the Passion of Christ or to the blood of the martyrs.
December 18, 2007 at 7:06 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770934Praxiteles
ParticipantAnd here we hae the ministering Angels of the Portinari altar piece. Except for the front angle who wears the cope of an assisting priest, the other angles in this group are vested as deacons for High Mass. Their attitude is that of sacred ministers who approach the Body of Christ on the Altar. Here, the approach the body of the infant Christ in exactly the same attitude. The border or the Angles’ cope reads: Sanctus, Sanctus, Sanctus (Holy, Holy, Holy).
Noticeably, all the ministers for High Mass are depicted except one – the Priest. He is not depicted because he is Christ. There is no altar for the Altar is Christ. The is no offering for Christ is the offering. Thus summing up the idea of Christ being Priest, Altar and Victim.
December 18, 2007 at 6:57 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770933Praxiteles
ParticipantThanks Rebanus for that enlightened commentary.
And here is a close-up of the famous sabot -which does indeed belong to St. Joseph who is about to shed the outher one.
December 18, 2007 at 10:47 am in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770931Praxiteles
ParticipantTo return again to the Portinari Altar Piece:
This time, to that sabot or clog sitting there in the lower left hand corner and drawing further attention to itself by the absence of its comrade.
The device of the the discarded sabot or wooden clog is also to be foung in Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini wedding picture.
In both cases, it is a direct reference to the Book of Exodus chapter 3, verse 5: the account of Moses and the burning bush where he is told by God to remove his shoes for he is on holy ground and in the presence of God.
Hugo vand der Goes, by rferring to this Biblical incident, obliquely makes a statement about the scene of beholding the Christ child born in teh Bethlehem stable. Here we have a thophany, or a manifestation ofthe Divine before which the proper attitude of man is that of reverence, awe and adoration – features all very evident in the expressions of the rough country shephers who have come to see the Chirst child and are depicted in the diagonally opposite corner of the picture.
December 17, 2007 at 10:38 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770926Praxiteles
ParticipantTo return a moment to the Portinari Altar piece and a detail:
Bang in the centre front of the main panel, van der Goes places a vase and a glass in which there are orange lilies, symbolizing the passion of Christ, three irises and some columbine -symbolic of the sorrows or dolours of Our Lady- and immediately behind them a barley sheaf, directly alluding to the 5 barley loaves of the only miracle -apart from the Resurrection- recounted in all 4 Gospels: that of the multiplication of the loaves and fishes.
While Matthew (14:17), Mark (6:37) and Luke (9:13) in Greek all refer to bread as ARTOI or ARTOUS, St. John’s Gospel specifically states that it was “barley bread” that was used [ARTOUS KRITHINOUS ] in. John 6:9 (a reference perhaps to the bread of the poor). The word KRITHINOUS appears here in verse 6 and again in verse 13 and nowhere else in the New Testament.
Also associated with this word is the word “EUCHARISTESAS” in verse 11, when Christ took the bread, he gave thanks, a word again adumbrating the Eucharist.
It is quite likely that van de Goses is symbolically alluding to all of this by placing a vase of flowers and sheaf of barley in front of the new born Christ chirld in the Pontinari Altar piece.
December 17, 2007 at 9:18 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770925Praxiteles
ParticipantWell, that is what is likely to happen -and is already happening- unless the general public takes up its pen and starts to write submissions to the the famous Draft County Development Plans – in the case of Cork Oounty Council submissions can be made until the beginning of February – and with all those long wintery evenings in January what better could you be dong with your time!
December 17, 2007 at 8:35 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770923Praxiteles
ParticipantTo move away from seasonal themes for a second: Cork County Council has juest published the draft of its new County Development Plan. Praxiteles is unsure what to make of it in general but is certain taht chapetr 7 on built heritage is by and large a load of crap and a waste of rain forest printing it.
In the last develoment plan, the in house onsession at the time was industrial heritage. This time around it seems to be demesne preservation.
On of the most shocking admissions of this plan is that the list of Protected Structures is barely over 1,000 items while the architectural inventory has identified something in the range of 6,000 structures throuighout the county which should be listed. Noticeably, inthe draft development plan, no target date is set to aligne the List of Portected Structures with the National Architectural Inventory. Also, Praxiteles has been unable to identify any variations to the List of Protected Sturctures adding substantila numbers of new structures during the life time of the present County Development Plan.
Indeed, the List of Portected Sturctures for the County of Cork is in such a mess and so incompetently compiled that there are large swaiths of the county -especially in the western baronies along the river Lee where practically nothing has been listed. Meanwhile, whjat has been listed is not infrequently misdescribed or practically impossible to locate. Rightly Cork County Council tells us that its interest in heritage does not extend beyond pious clap trap about the importance of heritage without, one has the feeling, ever having come to understand what heritage might be.
December 17, 2007 at 8:23 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770922Praxiteles
Participant@ake wrote:
The information plaque in the church says it was donated by the Sisters of the Holy Faith, The Coombe, Dublin, in 1998.
It also says the wooden altar had been designed by Pugin for nearby Tagoat, it’s fate being unknown
This is an important piece of information. I just wonder what happened tot he chapel fot eh Holy Faithe nuns in the Coombe.
December 17, 2007 at 8:19 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770921Praxiteles
ParticipantThe shrine of the Nativity as it is today.
The star marking the traditional place of Christ’s birth was placed there in 1850 by the Emperor Louis Napoleon III and its installment there was the direct catalyts for the outbreak of the Crimean war.
December 17, 2007 at 8:16 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #770920Praxiteles
ParticipantThe interior of the Basilica to-day.
- AuthorPosts
