Praxiteles

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 2,321 through 2,340 (of 5,386 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772169
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Erected by Pope Clement IX in 1669

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772168
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    On the subject of a definitive list of the instruments of the Passion, Praxiteles thinks that an authoratative list -if not a definitive list- may well be had from the statues erected by Gian Lorenzo Bernini on the Ponte Sant’Angelo in Rome. The instruments there depicted are:

    the lance
    the reed with sponge
    the cross
    the intitulation on the cross (INRI)
    the seamless garment
    the nails
    the veil of Veronica
    the crown of thorns
    the pillar
    the scourge.

    The sculptors:

    Angelo con la colonna (scultore Antonio Raggi, iscrizione “Tronus meus in columna”).
    Angelo con i flagelli (scultore Lazzaro Morelli, iscrizione “In flagella paratus sum”).
    Angelo con la corona di spine: l’originaria scultura di Bernini e del figlio Paolo non fu mai messa in opera sul ponte e fu collocata nel XVIII secolo nella chiesa di Sant’Andrea delle Fratte. La scultura sul ponte è una copia dello scultore Paolo Naldini (iscrizione “In aerumna mea dum configitur spina”),
    Angelo con il sudario o Angelo con il Volto Santo (scultore Cosimo Fancelli, iscrizione “Respice faciem Christi tui”).
    Angelo con la veste e i dadi (scultore Paolo Naldini, iscrizione “Super vestem meam miserunt sortem”).
    Angelo con i chiodi (scultore Girolamo Lucenti, iscrizione “Aspiciant ad me quem confixerunt”).
    Angelo con la croce (scultore Ercole Ferrata, iscrizione “Cuius principatus super humerum eius”).
    Angelo con il cartiglio: l’originale scolpito dal Bernini insieme al figlio Paolo, non fu collocato sul ponte e sarà spostato nella chiesa di Sant’Andrea delle Fratte nel XVIII secolo e sostituito da una copia di Bernini stesso con l’aiuto dello scultore Giulio Cartari (iscrizione “Regnavit a ligno deus”).
    Angelo con la spugna (scultore Antonio Giorgetti, iscrizione “Potaverunt me aceto”).
    Angelo con la lancia (scultore Domenico Guidi, iscrizione “Vulnerasti cor meum”).

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772166
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    @Fearg wrote:

    On the subject of statues..

    On a recent visit to Armagh Cathedral, I noticed some deterioration in the condition of the lady chapel reredos and the mosaics above, water ingress appears to be the problem with the mosaics.. not so sure that can explain the missing head on one of the statues though. Compare the 2 images below:

    March 2007:
    [ATTACH]8587[/ATTACH]

    Last Week:
    [ATTACH]8588[/ATTACH]

    Just what is going on here?

    Re the deterioration on the ribbing behind the altar: could this possible derive from having painted the ribs a nice glossy white?

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772165
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Johnglas: Here is the North Cathedral, Cork, showing the 1827 interior, by the Pain Brothers, with the retablos containing the statues by Hogan and the later High Altar.

    The 1827 High Altar was in wood and executed by Hogan. A panel depicting the Last Supper from the antependium of that altar is in the Crawford Gallery.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772163
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Johnglas: Praxiteles was actually referring to the Sanctuary arrangement in the Noth Cathedral as it existed between 1827 and 1963/4. The original High Altar -also by Hogan- was replaced at some stage in the late 19th. or early 20th century with a marble altar which is now against one of the side walls – we have a HIgh Court action taken by one of the faithful at the time of the 1997 gutting to thank for that. Hurley’s original plan was to discard it totally.

    The present sanctuary in Cork was inatalled in 1962/63 when the back wall of the 1827 Sanctuary was demolished – which explains the differemnce in ceiling levels between the present sanctuary and the nave. The 1828 Sanctuary did not have a window behind the High Altar. Rather, in a somewhat Spanish style- it had a Retablos which covered the entire back wall and was fitted with some 27 statues by Hogan. These disappeared when Boyd-Barrett hacked the place in 1962 but were “rediscovered” in the recent Hurley make over and have been placed on brackets around the Cathedral. We have a photograph of the 1827 arangement on this thread – in fact there are two photographs on the thread.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772161
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    The beginnings of the lunacy which includes painting out decorated interiors can be traced to Germany before the First World War. These were accellerated in the German inter-war years and came to full “fruition” in the chaos of Germany following the Second World War. The figure of Rudolf Scharez looms over all this this – even to the point of trying to create a new or re-defined sacred iconography which, of course, led to nothing other than a private language muttered to himself or shared with a few intimate “initiates”.

    The lunacy arrived in Ireland with the famous church architecture exhibition of 1962. Our friend Austin Flannery was not unconnected with the organising of that exhibition and its first fruits were to be seen in what happened in St. Saviour’s in Domnick Street, Dublin. Then the raft of indigenous exponents of the German luncay began: McCormack, Hurley, Heddermann and a whole host of lesser copiests.

    As with borrowed iead that come to Ireland, the German luncay movement fossailzed and, indeed, atrified into the most absolutist and fascist dogmatism which remains utterly imperbvious to any theological, liturgical, or architectural development to have have happened in the last 50 years. Let us be clòear abut it: the German lunacy temporally antecedes teh Second Vatican Council and untimately has nothing to do with the Second Vatican Council – either by way of influence or by way of implementation. The German lunacy did however selectively use the liturgical reforms of the Second Vatican Council to promote itself and to claim for itself an ecclesiastical approval as representative of the Second Vatican Council it simply does not have and never had.

    The points that Praxiteles makes here are well illustrated by the kind of fauve pioucessness retailed by Richard Hurley at the recent Ballincollig Conference organised by Cork County Council while Kevin Seasiolz, at the same Conference, claptrapped the rather descrited liturgical histiography of Jungmann that is usually trotted out to lend a fig-leaf od academic respectability to what is patently fictitious.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772159
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Here we have a further photograph of the sanctuary of the Oxford Oratory. The retablos of Saints behind the High Altar is evocative of a similar arrangement behind the High Altar in North Cathedral in Cork (statues by Hogan) which was willfully dismantkled and dumped by Boyd Barrett in a tremendous fit of lunacy. In common with Professor O’Neill, this firm too had the opportunity of destroying another Turnerelli masterpiece – this time, the funeral monument for Bishop Francis Moylan who died in 1815.

    Just imagine, all the polychrome saints were painted cream in 1954!!

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772158
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Here we have some further detail on the Oxford Oratory:

    http://www.oxfordoratory.org.uk/tour/sanctuary.html

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772157
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    The Oxford Oratory otherwise the former Jesuit church of St. Aloysius is currently undergoing major restoration work the object of which is to recover the original paint scheme of the ceiling and walls.

    It appears that in the 1950s, the Jesuites painted everything out in white, cream and brown. Thta also included the whitewashing of the marble revetment of the sanctuary.

    At present, everything of the white, cream and brown is being striped off to reveal the splendour of the original stencil work. We shall keep an eye on this development. Perhaps James1852 might know something of it?

    The Jesuit treatment of this church is just about as brutal as their vandalism at the Holy Name in Manchester – which also, mercifully, has passed into the hands of the Oratorians.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772156
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    IT Report on ABP’s annual report:

    Bord Pleanála reports backlog, criticises zoning
    JASON MICHAELAn Bord Pleanála today reported a backlog in the planning system due to the volume of applications and criticised what it said was inefficient use of land and infrastructure.

    Announcing the board’s annual report for 2007, chairman John O’Connor revealed that a record intake of 6,700 cases in 2007 left a “significant backlog” at year end that affected the timeliness of board decisions.

    There remains a backlog of some 1,000 cases despite the number in the first ten months of 2008 falling 16 per cent on last year’s level, and the number of cases in hand by the end of October dropping to 2,780, 250 less than the peak seen last March.

    An Bord Pleanála said that this year, just 25 per cent of appeals will be completed within the statutory time objective of 18 weeks but expressed the hope that progress can be made in this area next year.

    Among other trends for 2007, 32 per cent of local decisions appealed were reversed by the board; first-party appeals against refusal resulted in grants of permission in 29 per cent of cases, up from 26 per cent in 2006; while third-party appeals against grants of permission resulted in 37 per cent refusals, down from 43 per cent in 2006.

    The board also reported that it is “constantly” coming across zoned sites that are too far removed from developed areas, and too remote from public facilities such as footpaths and lighting, with no likelihood of public transport.

    It stated that much of the development witnessed “does not represent the orderly expansion of settlements in conjunction with the efficient use of land and infrastructure”. Major public investment in transport and utility infrastructure must dictate where future development takes place, the board added.

    “The idea that every place must get development no matter how thinly spread was never sustainable, but will be distinctly less sustainable in the future – either in the environmental or the economic sense.”

    Mr O’Connor, chairman, said the board also had concerns about the frequency with which decisions on individual developments “do not reflect the policies in the Development Plan or the Local Area Plan”.

    “The board can often be seen as a stronger defender of the Development Plan than the local authority who adopted it,” he said, adding: “This has serious implications for the credibility of the whole system . . . if councils are not seen to respect their own plans, developers and the general public are less likely to do so.”

    The chairman also urged local government in the State to take into account the new realities of economic and climate change, increased concerns about heritage loss and about unnecessary sprawl into good agricultural land.

    “This will inevitably mean de-zoning some of the indiscriminate and excessive zonings in existing Development Plans which are now completely out of line with current imperatives,” he said.

    Mr. O’Connor went on to note he was determined that oral hearings held by the board into strategic infrastructure and planning appeals are conducted “expeditiously” and without “undue formality” as the Act requires.

    Concern was expressed that some lawyers participating in hearings “are engaging in courtroom histrionics which may be good for the odd headline but have no place in a planning hearing”.

    The report stated that while lawyers can make a valuable input to hearings, “this conduct tends to prolong hearings unduly, distract from the real purpose of the hearing and can also hinder the inspector in getting to the root of the planning and environmental issues involved and reporting the facts to the board”.

    “These comments would also apply to certain non-lawyer participants on occasion.”

    Responding to the report, Labour TD Dublin South Central, Mary Upton, welcomed An Bord Pleanála’s observation that some decisions on individual developments by local authorities do not reflect the polices in the Development Plan or Local Area Plan.

    “If local authorities observed the conditions of their own development plans, much time and money could be saved,” Ms Upton said. “The planning process in Ireland has for decades been developer-led and designed so as to benefit the fat cats to the exclusion of the local residents who have to live and work every day in these areas.

    She continued: “I would urge An Bord Pleanála to continue to hold local planning authorities to account for contravening their own development plans. The cost of an appeal to a community or an individual is substantial. The cost to a developer is buttons.”

    © 2008 irishtimes.com

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772155
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    On the following, which appeared on the Irish Times on 25 October 2008, we observe the principle de mortuis nihil nisi bonum:

    Dominican scholar and activist who stirred up controversy

    AUSTIN Flannery OP, who has died aged 83, was one of the mildest-mannered persons ever to acquire a reputation as a revolutionary. He was a scholar who wore his learning lightly, and an editor whose role in making the Second Vatican Council a reality for Catholics in Ireland and elsewhere conferred on him a quiet but undisputed authority in religious matters.

    In any sphere of life, his intellectual and personal gifts would have secured him undoubted rewards. That he chose to dedicate these gifts to his community, his church and his country was all of a piece with his selfless character, enlivened – as it generally was – by an infectious sense of humour, and grounded in a strong social conscience.

    Born at Rear Cross in Co Tipperary in 1925, Liam Flannery – Austin was the name he took in religion – was educated at St Flannan’s in Ennis, where two of his contemporaries were Kevin McNamara, later archbishop of Dublin, and Tomás Mac Giolla, later president of Sinn Féin and two of its successor parties. He was not greatly enthusiastic about Flannan’s, however, and persuaded his parents to send him to Dominican College, Newbridge, where he completed his secondary education.

    His vocation to the Dominicans in 1943 then led him to St Mary’s, Tallaght, and onward to Blackfriars, Oxford (where he formed a lasting friendship with that other troublesome Dominican, Fr Herbert McCabe), and to the Angelicum in Rome.

    He was ordained in 1950, and subsequently taught theology for two years at Glenstal Abbey. In 1957, he became editor of the Dominican journal Doctrine and Life. The bare statement of the fact, however, hardly does justice to the subtlety and energy which informed his approach to this task, turning the magazine, of which he remained editor until 1988, into required reading for a whole generation of clergy and laity who came of age, intellectually speaking, in the era of Vatican II.

    The ferment that this event produced in Irish Catholicism in the late 1960s was often distilled skilfully in the pages of his magazine, where clergy and laity contributed to a debate characterised by charity as well as by intellectual rigour.

    It was similar in some respects to The Furrow, which had been founded by Fr JG McGarry at Maynooth in 1950, but also complementary to that extraordinary journal. Both publications were, in their own way, pillars of ecclesial renewal.

    Austin Flannery’s contributions, however, were not limited to the pages of the magazine. Encouraged by his friend Romuald Dodd OP, at that time religious adviser to RTÉ, he presented a series of late-night mini-programmes on that station in the Outlook slot, which changed it from a sleepy, pious, end-of-day moment into a storm-centre of controversy. One programme in 1968 in particular – in which he had the temerity, as it were, to invite the secretary of the Communist Party of Ireland, Michael O’Riordan, to discuss the then current housing crisis with him – provoked uproar in the Dáil.

    The minister for local government, Kevin Boland, described him as a “so-called cleric”, and the minister for finance, Charles Haughey, castigated him as a “gullible cleric”. He affected surprise that anyone should have taken offence but – as was often the case – the twinkle in his eye gave the game away. It was not that the programme set out deliberately to outrage anyone – although it was the first time, in seven years of Irish television, that a member of that party had been given an opportunity to appear on the medium.

    The bedrock value of his approach was its inclusive character: nobody who had something worthwhile to say should be excluded from public debate because they had been stereotyped or labelled as a member of a minority.

    Public controversies like these rolled lightly off his broad shoulders. More privately, he was involved with others – people like Seán Mac Réamoinn, Canon Charles Gray-Stack of the Church of Ireland, Jack Dowling, and James White (in whose flat above the Municipal Gallery of Modern Art many meetings were held) – in a discussion group known colloquially as Flannery’s Harriers.

    This group, at which brief papers would be read, followed by a discussion, was noted for its broad reach into all the Christian denominations, and for the ferocity with which the theological and intellectual points raised were sometimes pursued.

    Ten years after the end of the Vatican council, his major work Vatican Council ll: The Conciliar and Post-Conciliar Documents, was issued simultaneously by six publishing houses in Ireland, the UK and the USA: it was immediately to become the standard work for use by scholars dealing with these momentous events.

    But his scholarship was always complemented by an active engagement in contemporary events. He had been involved for many years in the Irish Anti-Apartheid Movement, of which he became successively chairman and, in 1981, president. In 1983 he was involved with many others in opposition to the Criminal Justice Bill of that year, an issue which was closely linked to his constant concern for civil liberties in a number of other important areas – prisons, social justice, and the powers being given to the police.

    Characteristically, his departure from Doctrine and Life did not mean the end of his work in this field. Other magazines like Spirituality, and Religious Life Review were developed to meet new needs, and became as successful as the one whose fortunes he had guided for three decades.

    Dominican Publications, of which he was in a special sense the progenitor, is a monument to his work. For those who knew him well – and he had an enormous circle of friends, not least in the media and communications – he was a man of many parts, but through all of them could be discerned the lineaments of the Tipperary in which he had spent his childhood, and the network of family and social relationships which remained central to his life.

    He is survived by his brothers Paul and Jim, sisters Phyllis and Sadie, sisters-in-law and brothers-in-law, a niece, Sister Edel OP, and nieces and nephews.

    Fr Austin Flannery: born January 10th, 1925; died October 21st, 2008

    © 2008 The Irish Times

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772154
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    @apelles wrote:

    my last post on this topic… think this is what i’ve been searching for..could be essential for anyone involved in any aspect of
    church artistry.

    Church Symbolism By F. R. Webber, Ralph Adams Cram.

    most of it can be viewed here..

    http://books.google.ie/books?id=1dd70E-chqwC&pg=PA96&lpg=PA96&dq=pugins+alpha+omega

    now i just have to see if its still in print.

    Plenty of copies are available here:

    http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?an=F.+R.+Webber%2C+Ralph+Adams+Cram&sts=t&tn=church+symbolism&x=0&y=0

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772152
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    I do believe this thread has featured a number of moodern churches and contemloraroy churches that have been well designed and built and which quite obviously form lart of the western liturgical and ecclesiastical/architectural tradition.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772150
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Did you try “Vir Dolorum”?

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772149
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    I do not think that you will ever have a definitive list as the devotion develoled over a leriod with different aslects being emlhasised in different llaces.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772147
    Praxiteles
    Participant
    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772146
    Praxiteles
    Participant
    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772145
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    See The Mass of St Gregory and again

    the image of the Man of Sorrows

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772144
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    And for th INstruments of the Passion see this:

    http://collecties.meermanno.nl/handschriften/showillu?id=12216

    a follower of Smon Bening, Low Countries

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772143
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    This may also be of use:

    http://www.artcyclopedia.com/featuredarticle-2001-04.html

    Se also some of the plates in Eamonn Duffy’s book, The Stripping of the Altars published by Yale University Press

    Also, see examples of Fra Angelico’s frescos in the cells oft he Dominican Convent of San Marco in Florence

Viewing 20 posts - 2,321 through 2,340 (of 5,386 total)