Praxiteles

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 2,281 through 2,300 (of 5,386 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772217
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    ……

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772216
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    And something else from Antiphon: A welcome English translation of the famous Gy/Ratzinger exchange. Poor fr. Gy was foolish enough to suggest that Ratzinger’s book on the liturgy did not reflect the teaching of the Second Vatican Council. The claim brought a direct reply: Here is Gy’s article:

    Cardinal Ratzinger’s The Spirit
    of the Liturgy: Is It Faithful to the
    Council or in Reaction to It?
    † Pierre-Marie Gy, o.p.
    “Cardinal Ratzinger Wants A Reform Of The Liturgy!” Under this
    title, La Croix, in its December 2001 issue, published an interview
    with the Cardinal, together with an account of his book The Spirit of
    the Liturgy.
    This book does not speak of a new “reform of the liturgy” or of a
    “reform of the reform,” but all its references to Vatican II (there are
    ten or so) concern the liturgy. Nevertheless, none of them mentions
    important aspects of the Constitution on the Liturgy Sacrosanctum
    concilium, with the single exception of “active participation,” which
    the Cardinal considers dangerous because it seems to involve “a risk
    that the Church may celebrate itself,” while on the other hand he
    says nothing regarding the importance that the Constitution on the
    Church Lumen gentium attaches to the Eucharist. In no case, when
    the book mentions liturgy and the Council, does it criticize liturgical
    practices subsequent to the Council, but rather, as a rule, pleads in
    favor of private Mass, and it shows no concern for how active participation
    deepens the piety of the faithful, nor for spiritual values such
    as that of the role (expressly mentioned in the council documents)
    of the faithful in the eucharistic sacrifice, or of communion under
    both species.
    This work, which claims to be a book of spiritual theology, does
    not refer to article 48 of the Constitution on the Liturgy, which is the
    initial article for the program of reform of the missal: “The Church,
    therefore, earnestly desires that Christ’s faithful, when present at this
    mystery of faith, should not be there as strangers or silent specta-
    This article originally appeared in La Maison-Dieu 229.1 (2002)
    171-78; Antiphon gratefully acknowledges the gracious permission of the
    original publisher, Éditions Cerf, and of Libreria Editrice Vaticana, to make
    available in an English translation this scholarly exchange.
    Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, L’Esprit de la liturgie (Geneva: Ad Solem,
    2001), trans. John Saward, The Spirit of the Liturgy (San Francisco: Ignatius,
    2000).
    Antiphon 11.1 (2007): 90-96
    91
    tors; on the contrary, through a good understanding of the rites and
    prayers, they should take part in the sacred action conscious of what
    they are doing, with devotion and full collaboration. They should be
    instructed by God’s Word and be nourished at the table of the Lord’s
    Body; they should give thanks to God; by offering the Immaculate
    Victim, not only through the hands of the priest, but also with him
    (Immaculatam hostiam non tantum per sacerdotis manus, sed etiam una cum
    ipso offerentes), they should learn also to offer themselves.” To see in
    this article of the Constitution on the Liturgy a risk of “self-celebration”
    would assuredly be an error in need of reform!
    This being the case:
    1. It goes without saying that the Cardinal’s book is of a private
    and not magisterial character. I will not here get into whether such a
    private document may not be accorded a quasi-magisterial character or
    whether its possible deficiencies could do harm in this connection.
    2. The present remarks are in no way an attack on the person of
    the author, assuredly one of the great theologians of our day.
    3. The book has met with serious criticisms in both Germany
    and Italy.
    Independently of criticisms that must be made of Cardinal
    Ratzinger’s book, one must without any doubt agree with him in
    emphasizing the absolute necessity of faithfulness to the rules and
    doctrines concerning the liturgy and the sacraments (in particular the
    Real Presence and the eucharistic sacrifice).
    As far as faithfulness to liturgical rules is concerned, one inadvertent
    mistake must be corrected involving the reciting aloud of the
    eucharistic prayer: this practice was allowed between 1967 and 1970,
    and has been obligatory since 1970.
    Second Vatican Council, Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy Sacrosanctum
    concilium 48, in The Sixteen Documents of Vatican II, ed. Marianne
    Lorraine Trouvé (Boston: Daughters of St. Paul, 1999) 62.
    For example, see Klaus Richter’s review in Theologische Revue 96
    (2000) 324-26.
    Rinaldo Falsini, “Lo spirito della liturgia da R. Guardini a J. Ratzinger,”
    Rivista di pastorale liturgica 5 (2001) 3-7. The defects of the French
    translation of Ratzinger’s book are attributable to the translators, with the
    exception, it seems, of the notion of a “new liturgical movement,” which the
    Cardinal made use of again at the traditionalist conference of Fontgombault
    (summer 2001).
    Sacred Congregation of Rites, Instruction Tres abhinc annos (4 May
    1967) 10.
    Présentation générale du Missel,12; Institutio generalis ex editione typica
    tertia, 32.
    92 piere-marie Gy
    More broadly, one must recognize that, in the domain under
    consideration, what is said about papal authority in liturgical matters
    – for the Latin Church and beyond – is insufficient, and that
    the theologian Ratzinger should have taken greater care to avoid the
    appearance of egocentrism with regard to the rules of the Church.
    Would it not have been appropriate to mention the reservation of
    liturgical law (droit) to the Pope by the Council of Trent, and the
    reaffirmation of this role both by the Constitution on the Liturgy of
    Vatican II and by current canon law?
    Moreover, it is hard to see why not a whisper is breathed about
    the way Paul VI constantly followed the work of the Consilium for
    the Implementation of the Constitution on the Liturgy (Consilium
    ad exsequendam Constitutionem de sacra liturgia), as was witnessed not
    only by Msgr A. Bugnini, secretary for the work of liturgical reform,
    but also by its principal architects. This attention to the ongoing
    work of the Consilium was so detailed that it does seem to merit the
    qualification – well known to Cardinal Ratzinger, as well as to Roman
    canonists past and present – of papal approval in forma specifica, that
    is, applying even to the details.
    The chapter on celebration ad orientem, which has been particularly
    remarked on by readers, is unsatisfactory both historically and with
    regard to the issue of active participation. On the historical side, it
    relies explicitly on Louis Bouyer’s Liturgy and Architecture (1991), in
    which this great voice of the liturgical movement, who is, however,
    not necessarily a great historian, thought he could apply to the entire
    West the eucharistic “orientation” characteristic of the liturgies in the
    regions east of the Mediterranean (these liturgies, in praying towards
    the East—awaiting the return of Christ – distinguished themselves
    from the prayer of the Jews, who turned toward Jerusalem), whereas
    in the churches of the western Mediterranean celebration with the
    priest facing the people is clearly attested, for example in Rome and
    Africa. Neither Bouyer nor Ratzinger have taken into account the
    fundamental work of the Bonn liturgist Otto Nußbaum, on the place
    of the celebrant at the altar, published in 196510 (although Ratzinger
    Annibale Bugnini, La riforma liturgica, 1948-1975 (Rome: CLV-Edizioni
    liturgiche, 1983); English trans. Matthew J. O’Connell, The Reform of
    the Liturgy, 1948-1975 (Collegeville MN: Liturgical Press, 1990).
    Louis Bouyer, Architecture et liturgie (Paris: Cerf, 1991, reprint of
    1967 edition); English trans. Liturgy and Architecture (San Francisco: Ignatius,
    2003).
    10 Otto Nußbaum, Der Standort des Liturgen am christlichen Altar vor dem
    Jahre 1000: Eine archäologische und liturgiegeschichtliche Untersuchung (Bonn:
    Hanstein, 1965).
    cardinal rat zinger’s The Spirit of the Liturgy 93
    began his academic career as a teacher at Bonn). Nußbaum’s work
    subsequently has been refined and completed for North Africa by
    the French scholars Yvette Duval and Noël Duval, the latter having
    written on the state of the question in La Maison-Dieu.11 For Rome12
    and Italy, it is clear, contrary to what Bouyer wrote and Ratzinger
    repeated after him, that celebration versus orientem was not introduced
    into the papal liturgy until Avignon, and that St Charles Borromeo,
    the archbishop of Milan and the nephew of Pope Pius IV, was careful
    to respect the tradition of the Roman basilicas. It is a mistake of
    certain historians of our day to see celebration facing the people as
    the result of the Protestant denial of the eucharistic sacrifice.
    This particular case of celebration towards the East is typical of
    the difficulty experienced by a number of contemporary theologians,
    even among the greatest, in maintaining both theological competence
    and attentiveness to history, whereas, contrariwise, a synthesis of the
    two characterized the meaning of Tradition in the conciliar documents
    of Vatican II and the conciliar liturgical reform.
    With regard to celebration facing the people in the liturgical
    reform of Vatican II, this was the immediate and spontaneous consequence
    of the dialogue Mass in the vernacular, recognized and
    authorized by Roman authority less than a year after the Constitution
    on the Liturgy and while the Council was still going on.13 This
    observation raises the question for historians whether, in Germanic
    countries, ignorance of Latin had a role in both the abandonment of
    dialogues and the development of celebration versus orientem.
    As the Cardinal himself says, “the subject of his book is not
    the celebration of the liturgy, but its spirit.”14 Before inquiring into
    the way in which he conceives and practices this distinction, it is
    appropriate to point out a number of matters on which no disagreement
    appears, namely the place given in the liturgy in our day to
    the vernacular language; conjointly, if I may say so, the renewal of
    biblical readings in the Mass; and lastly the importance of the Fathers
    11  Noël Duval, “L’espace liturgique dans les églises paléochrétiennes,”
    La Maison-Dieu 193.1 (1993) 24-25; see also, Revue des études augustiniennes
    42 (1996) 118.
    12 With regard to the Roman basilicas, one must now take into account
    the important work of Sible de Blaauw, Cultus et décor: liturgia e architettura
    nella Roma tardoantica e medievale: Basilica Salvatoris, Sanctae Mariae,
    Sancti Petri (Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1994) 95: this
    author believes that celebration versus populum is “the classic Roman disposition.”
    13  Sacred Congregation of Rites, Instruction on Implementing the
    Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy Inter oecumenici (7 March 1965) 91.
    14 Ratzinger, L’Esprit de la liturgie, 163.
    94 piere-marie Gy
    of the Church, whose renewed place in the Liturgy of the Hours I
    imagine he appreciates. This being the case, the spiritual nearness of
    Ratzinger’s book to that of Romano Guardini, published in 1918,
    poses an essential and delicate question: do not Guardini, and the
    active participation encouraged by St. Pius X, lead to a spirituality
    integrated with liturgical life? And, nowadays, does not an attempt
    to separate anew spirituality and celebration amount to a reluctance
    to enter spiritually into the liturgy of Vatican II?
    The Spirit of the Liturgy obliges one to wonder whether the Cardinal
    is in harmony with the Council’s Constitution on the Liturgy. Spiritually,
    the author antedates Vatican II. He is faithful to the piety of his
    Christian childhood and of his priestly ordination,15 but insufficiently
    attentive, on the one hand, to the liturgical rules currently in place
    (should he not, when he writes on this subject, give an example of
    attentiveness and fidelity?) and, on the other hand, to the liturgical
    values affirmed by the Council.
    His piety is marked, at the same time, by an attachment to the
    priestly prayers said in a low voice, that the faithful of his country
    began to follow in a missal around the beginning of the twentieth
    century (if they did not recite the rosary during the Mass). He seems
    unaware of the distinction, which is constant in the Tradition, between
    the private prayers of the priest and the prayers said by him as
    celebrant16—and he situates himself de facto in the untraditional line,
    15  See the precise autobiographical indications of his book Milestones:
    Memoirs 1927-1977, trans. Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis (San Francisco: Ignatius,
    1998), notably the difficulty he had as a seminarian in accepting history
    as a way of knowing the Tradition. For the year 1948 he writes, on p. 67: “I
    had kept up till then certain reservations about the liturgical movement; in
    many of its representatives I felt, on the one hand, a unilateral rationalism
    and an historicism based too much on form and historical authenticity and,
    on the other hand, a strange coldness towards the feelings which allow us to
    experience the Church as the country of our souls.”
    16 Institutio generalis Missalis Romani (2002) 33: “Sacerdos . . . tamquam
    praeses, nomine Ecclesiae et congregatae communitatis preces effundit, aliquando
    autem nomine dumtaxat suo . . . Huiusmodi preces, quae ante lectionem
    Evangelii, in praeparatione donorum, necnon ante et post sacerdotis
    communionem proponuntur, secreto dicuntur,” trans. International Committee
    on English in the Liturgy [ICEL], General Instruction of the Roman
    Missal (Third Typical Edition) (Washington DC: United States Conference of
    Catholic Bishops, 2002) p. 22: “The priest, in fact, as the one who presides,
    prays in the name of the Church and of the assembled community; but at
    times he prays only in his own name, asking that he may exercise his ministry
    with greater attention and devotion. Prayers of this kind, which occur
    before the reading of the Gospel, at the Preparation of the Gifts, and also
    before and after the Communion of the priest, are said quietly.”
    cardinal rat zinger’s The Spirit of the Liturgy 95
    begun at Trent, of the private Mass as the fundamental form of the
    Mass, which subsequently allowed music to cover over the canon of
    the Mass spoken in a low voice, a practice criticized17 by the 1970
    missal and that seems to be a bit missed by the Cardinal and by the
    Church musicians of his country. In any case, the spirit of the liturgy
    according to Vatican II insists on the fundamental liturgical form of
    the Eucharist, which is the Sunday Eucharist with the active participation
    of the entire community.
    I have already raised the issue of active participation, a concept
    enunciated for the first time by St. Pius X. What we should be doing
    is multiplying the aspects of the eucharistic celebration that the
    Constitution calls on us to emphasize by paying the closest possible
    attention to both the lex orandi and the Tradition, whereas the Professor
    Ratzinger of The Spirit of the Liturgy seems almost a little frightened
    by these two things.18
    In the final analysis, it is appropriate to admit that Cardinal Ratzinger,
    though a great theologian, is not on the same level of greatness
    when it comes to knowledge of the liturgy and the liturgical tradition,
    whereas precisely the latter quality characterized the works and the
    decisions of the conciliar liturgical reform. At the very beginning of
    the Council, the debate on the liturgy was inaugurated by a great
    speech of Cardinal Frings of Cologne, who was almost blind at that
    time, the text of which, read in the Basilica of St. Peter by the young
    Doctor Ratzinger, said that the Constitution on the Liturgy was the
    happy accomplishment of what Pius XII had wanted to do in order
    to reform the liturgy.
    May I add, aware as I am that I am a few years older than Doctor,
    now Cardinal, Ratzinger, that, in our twilight years, we are in
    17 Institutio generalis, 32: “Natura partium ‘praesidentialium’ exigit ut
    clara et elata voce proferantur et ab omnibus cum attentione ausculentur.
    Proinde dum sacerdos eas profert aliae orationes vel cantus non habeantur,
    atque organum vel alia instrumenta musica sileant,” trans. ICEL, p. 22:
    “The nature of the ‘presidential’ texts demands that they be spoken in a
    loud and clear voice and that everyone listen with attention. Thus, while the
    priest is speaking these texts, there should be no other prayers or singing,
    and the organ or other musical instruments should be silent.”
    18 There is here, as it were, a fear of ressourcement in the Tradition,
    whereas according to the spirit of John XXIII and the Council, ressourcement
    is a rejuvenation that makes it possible for the Church to confront new
    times (see the preamble to the Constitution on the Liturgy Sacrosanctum
    concilium, 4, and, even more, the Decree on the Adaptation and Renewal of
    the Religious Life Perfectæ caritatis, 2, which, as Fr Yves Congar, that great
    theologian, remarked to me, must be considered one of the keys to the entire
    Council).
    96 piere-marie Gy
    danger of retracing the intellectual path we traveled at the outset of
    our maturity? Some great theologians of Vatican II have not escaped
    this danger. In any case, we must all, liturgists or theologians, ask
    ourselves whether the liturgical spirituality of each of us is not still in
    need of reforming, in order to be truly faithful to the Second Vatican
    Council. Of this fidelity, we have a great example, with an exhortation
    adequate for an active participation of true spiritual profundity,
    in the apostolic letter Dies Domini,19 published one year before Dr
    Ratzinger’s book.
    Father Pierre-Marie Gy, O.P., was at one time both a member of the Centre National
    de Pastorale Liturgique and the Director of the Institut Supérieur de Liturgie. He was
    a consultor and relator of the Consilium for Implementation the Constitution on the
    Sacred Liturgy and a consultant of the Congregation for Divine Worship. He died
    on 20 December 2004.
    19

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772215
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    This article appeared in Antiphon some time ago:

    The Gothic Revival in Ireland:
    St Colman’s Cathedral,
    Cobh (1868-1916)
    Ann Wilson
    The Catholic cathedral of St Colman in Cobh is a large, elaborately
    detailed neo-Gothic building (Fig. 01). Overlooking Cork harbour, it
    is prominently sited and visible from quite a distance. Local people
    are generally very proud of it, and tourists often climb the steep hill
    to admire and photograph it. The historian Emmet Larkin has called
    it “the most ambitious building project undertaken by the Church
    in nineteenth-century Ireland,” and Frederick O’Dwyer states that
    it was “certainly the most costly Irish ecclesiastical building of the
    Victorian era.”
    When the cathedral was begun in 1868, Cobh, or Queenstown as
    it was then called, was a relatively prosperous place: it was Ireland’s
    principal emigration outlet. More than five million people emigrated
    from Ireland in the nineteenth century – mainly to the United States,
    Australia, and Canada – and a large proportion of them left from
    Queenstown. The town’s existing Catholic church, which was constructed
    in 1808 and enlarged afterwards, began to seem inadequate.
    A meeting of the Queenstown parishioners was therefore called in
    January 1858, and the following resolution was passed:
    Considering the very insufficient and in several respects unsatisfactory
    accommodation which our present parish church is capable of
    affording; and considering also the rising importance and increasing
    respectability of this town, it is incumbent on us as Catholics who
    revere our religion and are anxious to see it respected to provide a
    more suitable Church for the celebration of the Divine Worship.
    F. O’Dwyer, “A Victorian Partnership – The Architecture of Pugin &
    Ashlin,” in 150 years of Architecture in Ireland, ed. John Graby (Dublin: RIAI,
    1989) 55-62, here 55.
    Cloyne Diocesan Archives, Diocesan Centre, Cobh, County Cork,
    Cathedral Papers [henceforth Cloyne Archives], account of decision to build
    cathedral written by Fr J. Cullinan (1858).
    Antiphon 11.2 (2007): 14-42
    St Colman’s Cat hedral , Cobh 15
    By 1864 it had been decided that the proposed building would function
    not only as a parish church but as a cathedral for the diocese
    of Cloyne. The original thirteenth-century cathedral of the diocese,
    situated in the small, east Cork town of Cloyne, was owned by the
    Anglican Church. As the largest town in the diocese, Queenstown
    seemed a better location for the modern Catholic cathedral. The
    building would be dedicated to the diocesan founder, St Colman
    (AD 560-610).
    The old church was demolished and construction of the new
    building was begun in February 1868. The preparatory work was
    difficult and expensive; the widening of the roadway on the seaward
    side required the construction of “a high, long, and thick wall of solid
    mason work,” and, because the foundations were dug from steeply
    sloping rock, “it was necessary in some parts to sink 24 feet below
    the level of the future floor of the church, while in other parts a firm
    bottom was found at a depth of only 4 feet.” The first sod of the
    foundations was turned on 25 April 1868, and the foundation stone
    was laid on 15 July 1868. The foundations were completed by June
    1869.
    The Architectural Competition
    The cathedral committee, composed of respectable local citizens, was
    the official decision-making body in the building of the cathedral. The
    bishop usually presided at meetings, the parish clergy attended, and
    the current administrator acted as secretary. The committee decided
    in January 1867 to hold an architectural competition, and George
    Goldie (1828-87), J. J. McCarthy (1817-82), and the architectural
    partnership of E. W. Pugin (1834-75) and G. C. Ashlin (1837-1921)
    were invited to submit plans. The bishop of Cloyne, William Keane,
    was a friend of the Ashlin family and had been communicating already
    with Pugin and Ashlin about the proposed church, and Stephen Ash-
    Colman, son of Lenin and a member of a powerful Munster family,
    was a royal poet at the Court of Cashel who later embraced religious life. He
    became a disciple of St Brendan the Navigator and was granted a site for
    a monastery at Cloyne by the King of Cashel: Rick Prendergast, East Cork
    in Early Christian Times, Secular and Religious Trends (Calstemartyr, Ireland:
    Global Parish, 1994) 116. According to Patrick Thompson’s Guide to Cobh
    Cathedral (date and publisher unknown) 6, he established the monastic
    foundation at Cloyne in a.d. 560. His feast day is 24 November. He is
    usually shown, as in the statue on the west side of Cobh Cathedral, with a
    crozier and holding the model of a church.
    P. Twomey, “A Chronicle of the Building of St Colman’s Cathedral,
    Cobh” (unpublished, 1999) 9.
    Twomey, “Chronicle,” 38.
    16 Ann Wilson
    lin, a brother of the architect, was a priest in Cobh. Not surprisingly,
    therefore, both McCarthy and Goldie were worried about possible
    favouritism. Goldie wrote to Bishop Keane:
    I have not the advantage of being acquainted with the members of
    the Committee as Mr. Ashlin has and I will presume they intend
    fair play, but firstly I have good ground to know that the large
    portion of its members, with perhaps one exception, are men utterly
    incapable of judging on a question of art such as the design of this
    competition demands.
    He also hoped that the committee did not intend “a flagrant act of
    scandalous dishonesty” as happened in the case of the Church of SS
    Peter and Paul in Cork. This competition had taken place in 1859,
    and E. W. Pugin’s office had been awarded the commission, despite
    the fact that the drawings of another architect, John Hurley, had won
    first prize; George Goldie had been given second prize; and Pugin’s
    design had not even placed. Before they committed themselves to
    the submission of drawings for Cobh Cathedral, therefore, McCarthy
    and Goldie insisted that changes be made to the terms of the competition,
    which would “promote strictly fair play.” Pugin and Ashlin
    refused to agree to this, and a dispute resulted which was publicly
    aired in letters to The Irish Builder of 1 November 1867.10 McCarthy
    and Goldie were eventually asked by the building committee to accept
    the terms of the competition or withdraw. They withdrew, and
    preliminary plans for the cathedral by Pugin and Ashlin were passed
    by the bishop and the committee on 10 October 1867.
    E. W. Pugin, eldest son of the famous Gothic Revival architect
    A. W. N. Pugin (1812-1852), had taken over his father’s practice
    after his death, but he found Irish commissions difficult to organise
    from his base in England. He therefore decided in 1859 to take on
    his young Irish pupil, G. C. Ashlin, as a partner in order to run the
    Irish side of the business.11 The partnership lasted from 1859 until
    August 1868, dissolving “while the firm were at the height of their
    Cloyne Archives, G. C. Ashlin to W. Keane (14 November 1864).
    Cloyne Archives, G. Goldie to W. Keane (27 February 1867).
    O’Dwyer, “Victorian Partnership,” 60.
    Cloyne Archives, J. J. McCarthy to G. Ashlin (29 January 1867).
    10 The Irish Builder (1 November 1867).
    11 E. W. Pugin had already had an Irish-born partner from Armagh,
    James Murray, between 1856 or 1857 and 1859, but he had not specifically
    dealt with the Irish practice. For information on this, see Mildred Dunne,
    “The Early Career of George Coppinger Ashlin (1859-1869), Gothic Revival
    Architect” (M. Lit. thesis, Trinity College, Dublin, 2001) 60-61.
    St Colman’s Cat hedral , Cobh 17
    negotiations concerning St Colman’s Cathedral.”12 After the split,
    Ashlin took over their unfinished commissions. E. W. Pugin died
    suddenly in June 1875, aged only forty-two; Ashlin, however, lived
    to supervise the building to completion.
    The Bishops
    Ashlin worked with three different bishops on Cobh Cathedral. William
    Keane (1857-1874), instigator of the project, was determined
    to build a grand Gothic cathedral. This probably was owing in part
    to his many connections with France, where he would have seen the
    great French medieval cathedrals, such as Notre Dame de Paris. He
    studied for the priesthood at the Irish College in Paris, became a professor
    there, and later vice-president of the college. More significantly,
    perhaps, he would have noted that Catholic churches in Ireland had
    long suffered from inadequate funds, making do with cheap buildings
    for large congregations. He was ordained in 1828, the year before
    Catholic Emancipation. Under the penal laws, Catholic churches
    were required to be plain and unobtrusive, whereas Anglican houses
    of worship were usually prominently sited. Clearly the temptation
    for Catholics to build largely, obviously, and extravagantly, when they
    finally could do so, was very strong. As Douglas Scott Richardson
    comments, the newly confident and prosperous post-emancipation
    generation “far from being furtive about the location of their places
    of worship … began to build their churches near the top of a hill …
    if not actually on the crest, with a new sense of pride.”13
    Bishop Keane’s successor, John McCarthy (1874-1893), seems
    to have been far less enthusiastic about the building. He admitted
    in 1877 that he thought the cathedral had been “commenced on
    too magnificent and costly a scale for the resources of the Diocese,
    but it was too far advanced when it fell into my hands that I could
    make no change without spoiling it.”14 Nevertheless, despite having
    to undertake extensive fundraising during the depression of the late
    1870s and 1880s, he managed to get the cathedral to a state where
    the first Mass could be celebrated in it in 1879.
    Robert Browne (1894-1935) headed the diocese after Bishop
    McCarthy’s death. As president of Maynooth College he had received
    12  Dunne, “Early Career of Coppinger Ashlin,” 71-72.
    13  Douglas Scott Richardson, Gothic Revival Architecture in Ireland
    (New York: Garland, 1983) 22. Richardson’s Ph.D. thesis, defended at
    Yale University in 1970, is deservedly included in Garland’s Outstanding
    Dissertations in the Fine Arts series.
    14 Emmet Larkin, The Historical Dimensions of Irish Catholicism
    (Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1984) 26-27.
    18 Ann Wilson
    great praise for completing the decoration of the college chapel, and
    he arrived in Cobh keen to achieve similar results. He seems to have
    maintained his enthusiasm and personal involvement right through
    to the end of the project.
    Cost and Fundraising
    In 1868, Cobh Cathedral was expected to cost about £25,000. This
    estimate, however, was for a much more modest church than was
    eventually built, and one which was also not expected to take so long.
    According to The Cork Examiner,
    when the contractors had carried up the external walls of the cathedral
    to an average height of about 12 feet the Most Rev Dr. Keane began
    to look upon the building as being of entirely too plain a character,
    and in this view he was supported by the clergy and committee who
    thought that a cathedral ought to have greater embellishments than
    an ordinary parish church, and that at whatever expense a change
    in the character of the structure should be made.15
    In 1879, when the first Mass was celebrated in the newly roofed
    building, the expenditure totalled over £80,000.16 On account of
    the difficulty of raising further funds, work on the building was temporarily
    suspended that year, and it was not resumed until 1889.17
    According to a plaque in the south transept, the final cost of the
    church was £235,000.
    From information based principally on Cork Examiner reports, it
    appears that about two-thirds of the total cost was collected from
    the clergy and laity of the diocese.18 Approximately eleven percent
    15 “St Colman’s Cathedral, Queenstown,” The Cork Examiner (6
    August 1898).
    16 “Opening of the Queenstown Cathedral: Grand Ceremony
    Yesterday,” The Cork Examiner (16 June 1879).
    17 “St Colman’s Cathedral, Queenstown: Meeting of the Cathedral
    Committee,” The Cork Examiner (11 December 1879).
    18 Reports on the amount of money collected from various sources
    for the building are incomplete, inconsistent, and sometimes contradictory.
    The records in the Cloyne diocesan archives are patchy, with very little
    information preserved for some periods of the building. The approximate
    figures I have used are based mainly on the following published reports:
    “Queenstown Cathedral,” The Cork Examiner (10 January 1876); “St Colman’s
    Cathedral, Queenstown: The Annual Cathedral Meeting,” The Cork Examiner
    (3 February 1879); “St Colman’s Cathedral, Queenstown: Resumption of
    the Works,” The Cork Examiner (12 February 1889); “St Colman’s Cathedral,
    Queenstown: The Completion of the Sacred Edifice,” The Cork Examiner (5
    February 1902); “Opening of the Queenstown Cathedral: Grand Ceremony
    St Colman’s Cat hedral , Cobh 19
    derived from bequests and special donations, and just under twelve
    percent came from abroad. The remaining amount came from various
    sources; for instance, support was received from prominent Catholic
    clergy such as Archbishop Thomas Croke of Cashel.19 Letters soliciting
    funds were sent to practically all the landowners and businessmen in
    the area as well as to the shipping companies who used the harbour.
    A significant target for fundraising was the Irish community abroad.
    As Bishop Keane stated in his 1869 pastoral letter,
    We … feel justified in extending our present appeal beyond the
    limits of the Diocese, and even to those now settled in America or
    elsewhere, who, when about to embark in Queenstown for their
    distant home, come in thousands to prepare for the dangers of the
    Atlantic by receiving for the last time on Irish soil the sacraments
    of the Church.20
    One of the first priests sent to raise funds in America was Fr William
    Foley, who in 1870 wrote from San Francisco to Bishop Keane:
    San Francisco has had a very bad year. Money is more scarce than it
    used to be. The local priests are everlastingly collecting to liquidate
    the debts on their own churches and religious institutes…There are
    thousands of Irishmen just now without employment and destitute
    in this city and in the neighbouring towns. However, I intend to spare
    no pains to make my mission as successful as it may be made.21
    His next letter reports both on his successful collecting — “on average,
    £70 per week,” and his rather less successful introduction to the
    archbishop of San Francisco, J.S. Allemany:
    His Grace’s reception of me was anything but cordial. He did not ask
    me to sit down, but at once launched into language most intemperate
    on the unreasonableness of Your Lordship’s sending a priest here
    Yesterday,” The Cork Examiner (16 June 1879); and “St Colman’s Cathedral
    Consecrated,” The Cork Examiner (25 August 1919).
    19 Archbishop Thomas William Croke (1824-1902): born in County
    Cork, ordained 1849, became president of St Colman’s College, Fermoy, in
    1858. He became bishop of Auckland in 1870 and archbishop of Cashel
    in 1875: R. F. Foster, Modern Ireland, 1600-1972 (London, England: Lane,
    1988) 418. He was a friend of Bishop Keane, which may partly explain his
    interest in the cathedral project: “Letter from Archbishop Croke to Bishop
    J. McCarthy,” The Cork Examiner (26 January 1878).
    20 Cloyne Archives, Pastoral Letter (printed by John Lindsey, King
    Street, 1869).
    21 Cloyne Archives, W. Foley to W. Keane (6 October 1870).
    20 Ann Wilson
    when the religious institutions are all in debt … he accused me, as
    though I were a burglar, of taking away money which belonged to
    the church of the diocese.22
    In February 1871, Archbishop Allemany wrote to Bishop Keane requesting
    the removal of Fr Foley, and a telegram was later sent with
    the same message.23 Bishop Keane was slow to respond. Fr Lynch,
    also sent to America, was less persistent than Fr Foley, but he too
    received a poor reception in some areas. He wrote from New York in
    1870 complaining that “the Bishop of Brooklyn … treated me as if
    I were a criminal.”24 In Cincinnati in 1871 he was forbidden to collect
    or lecture anywhere in the area because the people were “mostly
    Germans and poor,” but he privately concluded the real reason was
    that the bishop was “anti-Irish.”25 Nevertheless, by 22 September
    1872 Fr Lynch had collected £1,946 and Fr Foley £1,320.26 While
    the church authorities in America were often not impressed with the
    Irish collectors, it seems that many of their congregations, once they
    heard the appeal, were very happy to give.
    A similar situation obtained in Australia. In 1875, Fr P. J.
    O’Callaghan reported from Kadina, in South Australia, that the bishop
    there “had some hesitation” about granting permission to collect, “as
    they are very much in debt themselves and are badly circumstanced
    in regard to churches and schools.”27 Similarly, Bishop Christopher
    Augustine Reynolds of Adelaide, in 1876, was unenthusiastic: “Every
    pound I got, after I had made £300, was, I have been told, as much
    regretted by him … as if I were drawing away their hearts’ blood.”28
    In 1876 Fr O’Callaghan wrote from Tasmania that he had received a
    kind reception there but could not get much money, as they had only
    begun to take down their own cathedral last week, on which they had
    spent about £20,000. It had been closed for some time because it was
    dangerous to worshippers owing to poor construction.29
    22  Cloyne Archives, W. Foley to W. Keane (29 November 1870).
    23  Cloyne Archives, Archbishop J. S. Allemany to Bishop W. Keane
    (13 February 1871).
    24 Cloyne Archives, Fr Lynch to W. Keane (8 October 1870).
    25 Cloyne Archives, Fr Lynch to W. Keane (20 January 1871).
    26 Twomey, “Chronicle,” 13.
    27 Cloyne Archives, P. J. O’Callaghan to J. McCarthy (1 December
    1875). Fr William Rice, administrator, Fermoy and Fr P. J. O’Callaghan, C.
    C. Fermoy were sent out to Australia and New Zealand in 1875.
    28 Cloyne Archives, P. J. O’ Callaghan to J. McCarthy (20 March
    1876).
    29 Cloyne Archives, P. J. O’Callaghan to J. McCarthy (26 August
    1876).
    St Colman’s Cat hedral , Cobh 21
    Nonetheless, many other clergy were favourable towards the collectors.
    Dr James Quinn, bishop of Brisbane, Australia, wished the
    project “a hearty success, because it is likely to be a worthy monument
    of the Faith and Charity of the old land,” and he included a donation
    of one hundred pounds.30 Bishop John Tuigg of Pittsburgh was very
    helpful in 1883 to newly arrived Cobh fundraisers. The collectors
    generally depended on clergy with Cloyne or Cork connections for
    hospitality and introductions.
    There was obviously a feeling among nineteenth-century Irish
    people that emigrants in America and elsewhere owed a certain loyalty
    and generosity to their country of origin. According to R. F. Foster,
    there was a sense of “being part of an international community, centred
    on a small island that still claimed a fiercely and unrealistically
    obsessive identification from its emigrants.”31 While Irish emigrants
    were expected to be loyal and grateful to their adopted country, they
    were never supposed to lose their Irish identity, and a distinct part of
    that Irish identity was by then perceived to be their Catholic faith.
    The Ecclesiastical Decorat ion Business
    The fundraising in Cobh was no different, except perhaps in scale,
    from that throughout the country. Catholic churches were being built,
    renovated, or extended in every part of Ireland at a phenomenal rate.
    It has been calculated that during the nineteenth century an average
    of two Roman Catholic churches a week must have been built in Ireland.
    32 This meant that church decorating could be a very profitable
    business. As Catholic Ireland became more prosperous, the demand
    grew for church furniture and decoration.
    These needs were often met by large specialised firms such as
    John Hardman and Company, based in Birmingham, and Mayer and
    Company of Munich. Most of the stained glass windows in Cobh were
    produced by these two firms (Figs 2, 3), but there are also examples
    of windows by the Irish-based firms Early and Co. of Dublin (Fig. 4)
    and Watson and Company of Youghal. The chancel floor (1892) (Fig.
    5) and shrine mosaics (1898) (Figs 6, 7) are by Ludwig Oppenheimer
    of Manchester; the more basic mosaic work of the nave, aisles, and
    transepts (1894-1897) by T. C. Edwards of Ruabon in Wales (Fig. 8);
    and Angelo Ferretti of Carrara in Italy carved the twelve marble statues
    of angels behind the high altar (1898). The high altar itself (1892),
    however, is by Earley and Powell, and most of the other altars were
    30 B ishop James Quinn of Brisbane, extract of letter to Bishop
    McCarthy, The Cork Examiner (26 January 1878).
    31 Foster, Modern Ireland, 372.
    32  Richard Hurley and Wilfrid Cantwell, Contemporary Irish Church
    Architecture (Dublin: Gill and MacMillan, 1985) 22.
    22 Ann Wilson
    made by J. A. O’Connell, a stone sculptor operating from St Patrick’s
    Art Marble Works on the Lower Glanmire Road in Cork. O’Connell’s
    letterhead stated that he did “statues, groups, busts, pulpits, fonts, etc,
    monuments, mural tablets, and carving of all descriptions, executed
    in the best style of art.”33 O’Connell did quite a bit of work in Cobh
    Cathedral, including the carving on the nave capitals, from 1892 to
    1898 (Fig. 9).
    Most of the major decorative work in Cobh was designed by Ashlin
    and commissioned on a one-by-one basis. Cheaper, off-the-peg religious
    objects, however, could also be imported via mail order (Fig. 10).
    Mayer provided this sort of product: a letter to Bishop Robert Browne
    in 1898 describes a ready-made, life-size Calvary group, “painted in
    natural colours” which could be placed on a real or artificial rockery,
    for £95. This price did not include the rockery, but it did include a
    twelve-foot oak cross, cases, and packing & carriage. Mayer also suggested
    to the bishop that other items on their list — a Holy Family at
    £35, or a Resurrection for £29 — might be useful to fill empty niches
    and at the same time be “distinct objects of devotion.”34 The bishop
    ordered a “Calvary group” (decorated in light tints), a “Sacred Heart
    Apparition,” and a “Holy Family” (both in fuller colours).35
    Use was made of local and Irish materials in the cathedral. The
    red sandstone for the foundations came from local quarries, as did
    limestone dressings for the later extensions to the building.36 Inside,
    a range of coloured Irish stones was used, including Connemara,
    Kilkenny, Fermoy, and Midleton marbles, mainly in the columns.37
    The inner walls of the church, however, are faced almost entirely
    with Bath and Portland stone; the ceiling and seating are made from
    California pitch pine (Fig. 11); and the screens, throne, canons’ stalls,
    and pulpit from Austrian oak.38 White Italian marble is used in all
    the altars and their reredos, and in the communion and baptistery
    rails (Fig. 12). As a result of improved transport late in the nineteenth
    century, it became much easier and less expensive to obtain imported
    materials for building and decoration, and Cobh is not at all unusual
    in employing such a variety of them.39
    33  Cloyne Archives, headed notepaper.
    34 Cloyne Archives, Mayer and Co. to R. Browne (8 January 1898).
    35 Cloyne Archives, Mayer and Co. to R. Browne (4 July 1898).
    36 Padraig O’Maidin, “A Cathedral for Cloyne,” The Cork Examiner (15
    July 1968); also “Topical Touches,” The Irish Builder (6 April 1907) 23.
    37 Thompson, Guide, 28.
    38 Thomason, Guide, 40.
    39 Matthew J. Mc Dermott, Ireland’s Architectural Heritage: An Outline
    History Architecture (Dublin: Folens, 1975) 103.
    St Colman’s Cat hedral , Cobh 23
    The Design Brief
    From the start of the project, Cobh Cathedral was planned as a neo-
    Gothic church: large, lavish, unapologetically Catholic, and Irish in
    its decoration and imagery. Its style is based mainly on late-twelfthand
    thirteenth-century French Gothic models such as those in Chartres,
    Amiens, and Rheims. Medievalism provided a link for Roman
    Catholics, and indeed for Anglicans, to pre-Reformation Christianity.
    Medieval cathedrals had been “conspicuous symbols of the might and
    cohesion of Western Christendom, the flagships, so to speak, of the
    Church Triumphant.”40 The Roman Catholic Church in Ireland saw
    itself as a continuation of this same Church, triumphant again after
    centuries of oppression:
    If Pugin and the Ecclesiologists saw the mediaeval period as a golden
    age, the temptation to do so was even greater among Irish Catholics,
    who looked back to a hazy era of religious and political freedom,
    when Ireland was an “island of Saints and Scholars.”41
    Cobh was also designed to look as richly decorated and elaborate as
    possible, and this involved opting for a profusion of ornament in order
    to create maximum impact. This approach is characteristically Victorian;
    as Simon Jervis remarks, “few Victorian designers saw any virtue
    in total plainness: on the contrary, they revelled in richness, elaboration,
    ornament and colour.”42 Throughout the Victorian period,
    the major method of achieving richness of effect was through
    decoration. Decoration was, in fact treated by many theoreticians
    as synonymous with art: a plain object could be rendered artistic by
    the addition of decoration.43
    This seems to have been the attitude of the designers of Cobh Cathedral,
    and an 1879 article in The Cork Examiner commented approvingly
    on the building:
    It may be observed that nowhere that ornament can be judiciously
    employed will it be neglected, the design of the architects in
    this respect, showing a minute ingenuity and fine taste that are
    40 Christopher Wilson, The Gothic Cathedral, The Architecture of the
    Great Church 1130-1530 (New York: Thames and Hudson, 1990) 189.
    41 Jeanne Sheehy, J. J. McCarthy and the Gothic Revival in Ireland
    (Belfast: Ulster Architectural Heritage Society, 1977) 14.
    42  Simon Jervis, High Victorian Design (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell,
    1983) 11.
    43  Jervis, High Victorian, 10.
    24 Ann Wilson
    admirable. Nowhere is monotony found. Moulding and cornice …
    and medallion are multiplied endlessly; what would else be blank
    spaces will be inlaid, or jewelled.44
    The function of this large, elaborately ornamented building was
    of course to praise God and to offer him a worthy sacrifice. It was
    undoubtedly meant to be seen also as a spectacular visual symbol of
    the new status and confidence of the Irish Catholic Church in the
    late nineteenth century. A 1903 postcard of Cobh shows the massive
    new Catholic cathedral, even without its tower and spire, completely
    overshadowing its Church of Ireland neighbour. The sort of competitiveness
    displayed in Cobh occurred throughout Ireland. Armagh,
    for instance, was originally dominated by its thirteenth-century
    Anglican cathedral, but in 1840 the foundation stone was laid for a
    new Catholic church. By the time this new cathedral was completed
    to J. J. McCarthy’s design, it completely dominated both the town
    and the older church.
    The frequency with which the Blessed Virgin Mary and numerous
    saints are depicted in various media on and in Cobh Cathedral is
    typical of Catholic churches (Fig. 13). There are many representations
    of Irish saints such as Patrick, Brigid, Brendan, and Ita (Fig. 14), and
    also of popular European ones such as Dominic, founder of the Order
    of Preachers (Dominicans) who, at that time, was thought to have
    instituted the Rosary, and the post-Reformation Spanish mystic Teresa
    of Avila. In the Star of the Sea rose window in the south transept,
    Mary is presented appearing in a vision to sailors (Fig. 15). She has
    the Child Jesus in her arms, both of them looking down on the supplicants,
    who in turn gaze up at them. She wears a crown, and she is
    surrounded by radiating golden projections on a red background like
    a huge fiery star. Her feet are not visible. While it also represents the
    Star of the Sea, a white marble statue of Mary on the exterior of the
    south gable treats the subject rather differently: here she is shown
    without the Child, her head adorned with a star-shaped halo rather
    than a crown, her arms outstretched, and standing on an upturned
    crescent moon, her feet on a serpent (Fig. 16). This image of the Virgin
    treading on a snake is inspired by the Catholic understanding of
    Genesis 3:15. It represents Mary’s triumph over evil and is associated
    with post-Reformation images of the Immaculate Conception, the
    dogma that Mary alone of all human beings (other than the God-man
    Jesus Christ) was conceived without original sin. The crescent moon
    is an ancient symbol of chastity, although it also indicates rule over
    44 “Opening of the Queenstown Cathedral,” The Cork Examiner (16
    June 1879).
    St Colman’s Cat hedral , Cobh 25
    the tides.45 Thus the statue manages economically to incorporate in
    a single image several Catholic beliefs about Mary: her intercessory
    status, her triumph over evil, her conception without sin, and her
    chastity, in conjunction with her role as a special help to sailors.
    The interior layout of Cobh also emphasises its Catholicism. It
    is simply planned, spacious and open, and offers a relatively unobstructed
    view of the most important part of the church: the altar. The
    chancel arch is extremely high and unobtrusive; shrines, confessionals,
    and side chapels are arranged in a way that neither interferes with
    this openness nor distracts from the eastern focus of the building.
    Capitals and string courses create horizontal lines that lead the eye
    to the chancel. The nave arcade, triforium passage, and clerestory
    all pass in front of the transepts, hiding them and emphasising the
    powerful visual sweep towards the altar (Fig. 17). The altar itself, of
    a type known as the “Benediction Altar,” is extremely elaborate and
    characteristic of the churches of E. W. Pugin and also of Ashlin.46
    Throughout the nineteenth century, there was a growing sense
    in Ireland of a specific national cultural identity, and it was often
    considered necessary to emphasize this on cultural products. The first
    and most obvious way of proclaiming the ‘Irish-ness’ of a work was
    for an artist to use recognisable symbols such as the shamrock, the
    round tower, or the harp.47 By the middle of the nineteenth century,
    these symbols had become fairly pervasive, and
    by the end of the century it would have been difficult to turn
    around in Ireland without being faced, in one form or another, by
    shamrocks, harps, round towers and wolfhounds – on tea services,
    glass, jewellery, book covers, work-boxes, on banners, in graveyards,
    and even, if you were a Catholic, in church.48
    Cobh Cathedral is no exception to this trend. Shamrocks appear all
    over the building: on the roof cresting (Fig. 18) and exterior carvings
    (Fig. 19), on the nave walls (Fig. 20), the nave and sanctuary floor
    mosaics (Fig. 21), the stained glass, and the capitals. In 1879, the
    Examiner commented that
    45 James Hall, Dictionary of Subjects and Symbols in Art (London:
    Murray, 1984) 327. The statue was erected over the south transept gable
    during Bishop McCarthy’s reign, around 1889.
    46 For a discussion on the interior layouts of Pugin and Ashlin
    churches in relation to the requirements of nineteenth-century Irish Roman
    Catholicism, see Dunne, “Early Career of Coppinger Ashlin,” 98-102.
    47 Jeanne Sheehy, The Rediscovery of Ireland’s Past, The Celtic Revival
    1830-1930 (London: Thames and Hudson, 1980) 9.
    48 Sheehy, Rediscovery of Ireland’s Past, 92.
    26 Ann Wilson
    a prevailing ornament in the edifice consists of frequent carvings
    of the national emblem – the shamrock – the late revered Bishop
    Keane having expressed a particular desire to have this ornament
    abundantly employed, remarking that it is the only plant which is
    emblematical at once of Christianity and nationality and, therefore,
    most appropriate to be used in the decoration of a church typical
    of a nation.49
    A great interest in Ireland’s past, both historical and legendary,
    developed in the nineteenth century; hence a number of societies dedicated
    to its investigation were formed. Cobh Cathedral contains many
    examples reflecting the results of these studies. Four heads on the
    corbels of the organ gallery, for instance, represent some of the earliest
    Irish composers of sacred music: Saints Sedulius, Ethne, Deirluadha,
    and Sechna. In the sanctuary, angels hold up the words from the first
    verse of the eucharistic hymn of St Secundinus, a contemporary of
    Patrick.50 Irish saints, of course, are represented throughout the building,
    especially St Patrick. One particularly striking and richly detailed
    image produced by Mayer in stained glass (1899) is in the baptistery,
    where it is paired with a window showing the scene of Christ’s baptism
    (1899). Patrick is shown baptising the two daughters of the high king
    of Ireland, King Laoghaire. Lady Gregory included this story in her
    Tales of Irish Saints, written in 1906, relating that Patrick baptised the
    two princesses, Eithne and Fedelm, and gave them Holy Communion,
    after which they died (Figs 22, 23).51 The same story is illustrated on
    one of the aisle windows of the Catholic cathedral at Armagh, which
    was decorated mostly between 1887 and 1904.
    Carved scenes on the nave capitals of Cobh Cathedral present the
    history of the Catholic Church in Ireland, as perceived by those who
    built and decorated the church. This history begins with the arrival
    of St Patrick and continues with scenes from the lives of early Irish
    saints such as Brigid, Columcille, and Columbanus. Brigid is depicted
    curing a leprous boy, Columcille writing the Book of Kells, and Columbanus,
    along with St Gall, ridding Switzerland of paganism. A
    depiction of a dean and canons trampling underfoot a “presumptuous
    warrant of Henry III” heralds an era of persecution and penal laws,
    and is followed by scenes such as the deportation in chains of a local
    49 “Opening of the Queenstown Cathedral,” The Cork Examiner (16
    June 1879).
    50 Thompson, Guide, 25.
    51 Lady Augusta Gregory, The Voyages of Saint Brendan the Navigator
    and Tales of the Irish Saints Forming a Book of Saints & Wonders (Gerrards Cross:
    Colin Smythe, 1973) 52.
    St Colman’s Cat hedral , Cobh 27
    bishop (Fig. 24).52 The capitals were carved in the 1890s, as were a
    series of small sculpted panels on the nave walls. These spandrels tell
    the same story as the capitals, beginning also with the saints of the
    early Irish Church. Persecution is again a prominent theme in such
    scenes as “the trial of Dr. Hedian, Archbishop of Cashel, for appointing
    Irish priests,” the “martyrdom of Archbishop O’Hurley,” and “Bishop
    McEgan hanged at Carrigadrohid” (Fig. 25).53 There are also images
    of “peasants praying before a headstone in a graveyard,” showing a
    ruined church and a broken crucifix, and “a priest celebrating Mass
    in a cave during the Penal times.” 54 The last two panels show Daniel
    O’Connell literally giving Catholic Emancipation to Ireland personified
    as a female figure with a harp (Fig. 26), and Bishop Browne
    presenting the cathedral, completed, to God (the latter depicted as
    a hand issuing from a cloud). These carvings have a somewhat naïve
    appearance; their execution is rough but detailed, with rather clumsy
    compositions resulting at times from attempts to convey large amounts
    of narrative information within small spaces.
    The historical imagery in St Colman’s Cathedral, Cobh, reflects
    the self-image of the nineteenth-century Irish Catholic Church,
    which, Desmond Keenan has noted, had three major components.
    First, there was a view of “an alleged glorious and holy past.”55 This
    is represented in the spandrel and capital carvings of the saints of
    the early Irish Church, where Ireland is shown as a ‘land of saints
    and scholars,’ sending missionaries to re-Christianize Europe. It was
    also expressed verbally in the sermon which was preached at the first
    Mass in the Cathedral:
    When the light of the Gospel was introduced into this country by
    our national Apostle, he found a people who seemed prepared by
    nature and a special Providence for the reception of the Catholic
    faith. Intelligent, pure, [and] generous they quickly learned to know
    God, to love Christ, and to make many sacrifices for him…. The
    fame of her cathedrals, of her abbeys and her schools travelled to
    distant lands, and never was there a people more devotedly attached
    to their churches than the Irish.56
    52  Thompson, Guide, 22-23.
    53  Thompson, Guide, 22-23.
    54 Thompson, Guide, 22-23.
    55 Desmond Keenan, The Catholic Church in Nineteenth-Century Ireland,
    a Sociological Study (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1983) 29.
    56 “Opening of the Queenstown Cathedral,” The Cork Examiner (16
    June 1879).
    28 Ann Wilson
    The second element Keenan mentions is a strong sense of oppression,
    and many of the later historical scenes on the capitals and spandrels
    depict suffering and persecution.57 At a cathedral meeting in 1876, Mr
    J. P. Ronayne, a member of the cathedral committee, was applauded
    for his statement that
    Ireland had been deprived of everything by English oppressors. They
    were persecuted for centuries, but they never parted with their faith
    which was the only thing that the sword and persecution, bribery
    and corruption could not affect.58
    The third facet of the self-image is expressed in the phrase “Catholic
    Ireland.” Although the population of Ireland was in fact only
    about three-quarters Catholic, the terms ‘Irish’ and ‘Catholic’ had
    become interchangeable by the end of the nineteenth century. Irish
    Catholicism and Irish nationalism had become increasingly linked
    throughout the century. This began with the struggle for Catholic
    Emancipation, which dominated Irish politics until 1829, when
    Daniel O’Connell, acting with the support of the Church, mobilized
    Catholics for political action through his Catholic Association. The
    result was the emergence of what David Hempton calls “a powerful
    fusion of religion and identity” which continued after Emancipation
    had been achieved:59
    Within Irish Catholicism the views and aspirations of bishops,
    priests, gentry families, tenant farmers, landless labourers,
    merchants, professionals and artisans were scarcely ever harmonized,
    but what they had in common was a shared set of grievances about
    the operation of the Protestant hegemony.60
    Thus Irish Dominican preacher Fr Tom Burke could say in 1872:
    “Take an average Irishman. I don’t care where you find him – and
    you will find that the very first principle in his mind is, ‘I am not an
    Englishman, because I am a Catholic.’” 61 In 1887 the Queenstown
    Town Commissioners formally addressed a visiting Papal Representative,
    assuring him of
    57 Keenan, Church in Nineteenth-Century, 25.
    58 “Queenstown Cathedral,” The Cork Examiner (10 January 1876).
    59 David Hempton, Religion and Political Culture in Britain and Ireland,
    from the Glorious Revolution to the Decline of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge
    University Press, 1996) 72.
    60 Hempton, Religion and Political Culture, 79.
    61 Keenan, Catholic Church in Nineteenth-Century Ireland, 28.
    St Colman’s Cat hedral , Cobh 29
    the devoted attachment, unchanged and unchangeable, of Ireland
    to Rome…. Our whole history for fifteen hundred years as a
    Catholic people has been marked by an attachment to our holy
    faith and a loving loyalty to our Holy Father that has seldom,
    if ever, been equalled in any country, and never certainly been
    surpassed.62
    This conflation of Irish and Catholic identity is as pervasive as
    shamrocks throughout Cobh Cathedral. The history of Ireland is
    presented as the history of the Church, and the Church’s early glory
    is Ireland’s glory; its oppression, Ireland’s oppression. Unbroken
    continuity is established between the Christian Church founded by
    Patrick and the one presided over by Bishop Browne. In the sequence
    dealing with persecution, Catholic bishops are portrayed as local
    heroes, risking their lives to minister to the faithful. The scenes of
    suffering conclude with the panel showing Ireland accepting Catholic
    Emancipation from Daniel O’Connell. Finally, the story of Christianity
    in Ireland, after years of oppression and hardship, reaches its
    climax with the presentation to God of Cobh Cathedral, this rich,
    magnificent – and Roman Catholic – building.
    The close relationship between the Irish Church and that of
    Christ is also established. Biblical scenes are shown as part of the
    same grand narrative as images of local events. The baptistery
    windows pair Patrick’s baptism of the princesses with Christ’s by
    John, giving both equal status, and the main tympanum partners
    Christ and the four evangelists companionably with a selection of
    native saints. Thus, the faithful were given a glimpse of their place
    in the grand scheme of things and a sense of not only belonging to,
    but forming an important strand of, a great international religious
    movement.
    As well as providing a practical, attractive and dignified space,
    Cobh Cathedral clearly makes certain statements on behalf of the
    Catholic Church in Ireland. As already mentioned, its Gothic design
    harnesses the cachet and power of medieval Christianity, and it lays
    claim to direct links with a glorious past, both Irish and European. It
    is a symbol of the new position of the Catholic Church in Irish society,
    and its imagery repeatedly emphasizes Roman Catholic teaching.
    It presents a particular narrative of the Irish as a staunchly Catholic
    people, chosen by God to suffer great hardship, such as persecution
    62  Cork Archives Institute, Cork, Entry in Queenstown Commissioners
    Minute Book, 06/11/1865- 12/03/1890 (14 September 1887).
    30 Ann Wilson
    by the English and famine, but due for equally great reward, emerging
    finally as a specially blessed and spiritual nation.63
    Ann Wilson is editor, with David Lawrence, of The Cathedral of St Fin Barre at
    Cork: William Burges in Ireland (Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2006).
    63  An earlier version of this article appeared in Irish Architectural and
    Decorative Studies, the Journal of the Irish Georgian Society 7 (2004) 232-65.
    The editor thanks the Irish Georgian Society for gracious permission to
    publish the article in its current version

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772214
    Praxiteles
    Participant
    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772213
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Another before and after tale: this time St Mark’s, in Peoria, USA:

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772212
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    And here we have a most interesting article from the November issue of the Adoremus Bulletin on the subject of Biblical Illiteracy by the art historian Timothy Vernon:

    In Search of Lost Symbols in Scripture
    On Comtemporary Biblical Illiteracy

    http://www.adoremus.org/1108ScriptureSymbols.html

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772211
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Some pictures of the new college chapel at Thomas Aquinas College in California:

    http://www.thomasaquinas.edu/news/pressroom/photos.html

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772210
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    News of a young Spanish painter with a large religious portfolio: Raul Berzosa Fernandez born 1979 in Malaga:

    http://www.raulberzosa.com/

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772209
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    @Praxiteles wrote:

    This piece was passed to Praxiteles from the smasher-lagru webpage:

    http://smasher-lagru.blog.com/

    The credit crunch and the associated recession needn’t be all doom and gloom. And I don’t mean
    Presbyterians losing their money – though that too.

    From the Mournes comes news that work on building a new church was halted by the collapse of a construction firm. Builders MG Coulter won the contract to rebuild Holy Cross church in Atticall, Co Down, three months ago but the company has now gone into receivership and demolition work has stopped.
    The church closed in October and the new building was scheduled to be opened next summer.

    Most of the firm’s 35 workers have been laid off, leaving a mound of rubble from the demolished
    building.

    The mound of rubble probably looks better than what they were going to get for their £600,000.

    Liturgical artist, Ivana Ripoff, said the rubble was an expression of the post-Vatican II model of
    church – broken, open and disordered, and that she was owed £50,000 for that insightful comment.

    In accordance with the liturgical norms for Ireland, the rubble cannot be moved without the prior
    agreement of the Diocesan Liturgical Committee, and the Art Sub-committee.

    Local parishioner, Peggy Gavealot, said “I blame Bishop McKeown”

    Is this the church in question?

    I wonder if our friend Brian QUinn might not be acting as a liturgical “consultant” on this one?

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772208
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Here is a request for artists to design and execute a decorative scheme for a new college chapel at a campus in California. Any takers:

    http://catholictrojan.com/callforartists/

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772207
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    St. Joseph’s Church, Macon, Georgia, USA:

    http://www.webgraphicsengineering.com/Macon/

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772205
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    This piece was passed to Praxiteles from the smasher-lagru webpage:

    http://smasher-lagru.blog.com/

    The credit crunch and the associated recession needn’t be all doom and gloom. And I don’t mean
    Presbyterians losing their money – though that too.

    From the Mournes comes news that work on building a new church was halted by the collapse of a construction firm. Builders MG Coulter won the contract to rebuild Holy Cross church in Atticall, Co Down, three months ago but the company has now gone into receivership and demolition work has stopped.
    The church closed in October and the new building was scheduled to be opened next summer.

    Most of the firm’s 35 workers have been laid off, leaving a mound of rubble from the demolished
    building.

    The mound of rubble probably looks better than what they were going to get for their £600,000.

    Liturgical artist, Ivana Ripoff, said the rubble was an expression of the post-Vatican II model of
    church – broken, open and disordered, and that she was owed £50,000 for that insightful comment.

    In accordance with the liturgical norms for Ireland, the rubble cannot be moved without the prior
    agreement of the Diocesan Liturgical Committee, and the Art Sub-committee.

    Local parishioner, Peggy Gavealot, said “I blame Bishop McKeown”

    Is this the church in question?

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772204
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    And here is another company of architects building contemporary churches:

    http://francklohsen.com/#/portfolio/ecclesiastical/our-loving-mother/

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772203
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    @Praxiteles wrote:

    A veritable treasure arrived with this morning’s post to Praxiteles – an anonymous letter containing a copy of a recent encyclical letter send to all and sundry by Danny “I AM a liturgist” Murphy. While, for the most part, it contains the usual drivil, our “liturgist” friend does however hazard an official – or quasi official – assessment not only of the famous Ballincollig Conference held on 3 October 2008 but also of the Conference held in the Gresham Hotel in Dublin by the Department of the Environment and featuring, it would seem, “a member of AN Bord Pleanala” who commented, it appears, in extenso, on the Bord’s decision in relation to Cobh Cathedral. The encyclical letter is also useful in that it makes reference to “a joint County Council – Cloyne HACK group” and apparently representatives of projects at Ballintotis, Aghada, Glanworth, Castletownroche and Ballyhooly were also discussed. We are also told “there is work to be done in collating the conclusions and matters arising from the Conferences in Ballincollig and Dublin on planning matters and places of worship and, also, with informing matters regarding the REORDERING of St. Colman’s Cathedral and other churches“.

    Here are some of the of the more relevant bits of the encyclical letter:

    in the attachment above, mention is made of canon 291 – inconnection with ecclesiastical architecture, reordering etc. Praxiteles is at a total loss to figure that one out. see for yoursel. here is the text of canon 291:

    Can. 291 Apart from the case mentioned in ⇒ can. 290, n. 1, loss of the clerical state does not entail a dispensation from the obligation of celibacy, which only the Roman Pontiff grants.

    Now, hust what has that got to do with it?

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772202
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    This is the substance of the 1965 Lercaro letter:

    “S. Em. le Cardinal fait siennes les directives suivantes adressées par le CARDINAL LERCARO, présidant le Consilium pour l’application de la Constitution sur la Liturgie, aux Evêques d’Afrique du Nord (D. C. no 1470, ler mai 1966, col. 805). Ces directives valent pour toutes les paroisses et communautés du diocèse.

    (Il est certain que l’autel face au peuple rend plus vraie et plus communautaire la célébration eucharistique et facilite la participation. Mais même ici, il est nécessaire que la prudence guide le renouveau.

    (D’abord, pour une liturgie vivante et participée, IL N’EST PAS NÉCESSAIRE [souligné dans le texte] QUE L’AUTEL SOIT FACE AU PEUPLE. Toute la liturgie de la parole, dans la messe, se célèbre au siège ou à l’ambon, face au peuple par conséquent. Pour la liturgie eucharistique, les installations de microphones, désormais courantes, aident suffisamment à la participation.

    (De plus, il faut tenir compte de la situation architecturale et artistique, laquelle, en bien des pays, est d’ailleurs protégée par de sévères lois civiles. Et qu’on n’oublie pas que bien d’autres facteurs, tant de la part du célébrant que des ministres et de l’ambiance, doivent jouer leur rôle POUR UNE CÉLÉBRATION VRAIMENT DIGNE.

    The same official position was reiterated on the 25 September 2000 by Cardinal Medina when he published an authoritative interpretation of article 299 oft he Institutio Generalis in the gazette of the Council for the Interpretation of Legal Texts, Communicationes.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772201
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Yes, the first official stance taken by the Holy See against the wrecking of church interiors is to be found in a letter entitled “le Renevau Liturgique” which was published by Cardinal Lercaro on 30 June 1965 and sent to all episcopal conferences. That was followed up by a second and more forceful letter entitled “L’Hereux Développment” of 25 January 1966 again sent to episcopal conferences and designed to stop the pillage then already well under way. The official text of both circular letters is to be found in Reiner Kaczynski, Enchiridion Documentorum Insaturationis Liturgicae, vol. I, Rome 1976, p. 137 (no. 414), and pp. 203-204 (n. 578). Cardinal Wright, Prefect of the Congregation for Clergy issued Opera artis on 11 April 1971. The official text is to be found in Kaczynski, op. cit., pp. 785-787 (nn. 2539-2547). Praxiteles is sure that the members of the Cloyne HACK will have copies of this essential work on their commodes.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772200
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Well, Bishop Peter Elliott mush have had Alex WHite and the Cloyne HACK in mind when he came out this one:

    “But not everyone is “re-renovating.” The artistic heritage of many churches is still threatened by those who, in the words of Msgr. Peter J. Elliot, still cling to “a kind of ‘Maoist’ mythology of a perpetual or ongoing liturgical revolution,” one that is derived from “a dated commitment to a permanent program of planned changes rather than to organic and natural development.”

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772198
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    @apelles wrote:

    Opera Artis…

    an excerpt from
    ..http://www.sacredarchitecture.org/articles/church_restoration_renovation_the_third_millennium/

    by Michael S. Rose

    Yet, in reality, the church renovators of those years merely acted on their own subjective desires rather than on the authority of the Council fathers. In fact, the Council had precious little to say about the architectural reform of our churches. Rather, Vatican II was dishonestly used as the catalyst for the reformation of Catholic church architecture. Addressing this abuse, the Vatican issued Opera Artis, a circular letter on the care of the Church’s artistic heritage, in 1971. It charged: “Disregarding the warnings and legislation of the Holy See, many people have made unwarranted changes in places of worship under the pretext of carrying out the reform of the liturgy and have thus caused the disfigurement or loss of priceless works of art.” In this document the Sacred Congregation for Clergy warned bishops to “exercise unfailing vigilance to ensure that the remodeling of places of worship by reason of the reform of the liturgy is carried out with utmost caution.”

    must of got lost in the post

    Indeed, Opera artis was not the first document to be issued on the church “renovation” in the “sporit” of Vatican II. Two previous lettre had been issued by the Congregation in June 1966 and January 1967. All to no avail – and the Cloyne HACK has not heard about that yet.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772196
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Danny “I AM a liturgist” Murphy’s rambling in the posting above mentions the General Instruction to the Roman Missal and specifically articles 22, 92 and 387. Well here is the text of thos articles:

    22 The celebration of the Eucharist in a particular Church is of utmost importance.

    For the diocesan Bishop, the chief steward of the mysteries of God in the particular Church entrusted to his care, is the moderator, promoter, and guardian of the whole of its liturgical life.33 In celebrations at which the Bishop presides, and especially in the celebration of the Eucharist led by the Bishop himself with the presbyterate, the deacons, and the people taking part, the mystery of the Church is revealed. For this reason, the solemn celebration of Masses of this sort must be an example for the entire diocese.

    The Bishop should therefore be determined that the priests, the deacons, and the lay Christian faithful grasp ever more deeply the genuine meaning of the rites and liturgical texts and thereby be led to an active and fruitful celebration of the Eucharist. To the same end, he should also be vigilant that the dignity of these celebrations be enhanced. In promoting this dignity, the beauty of the sacred place, of music, and of art should contribute as greatly as possible.

    92. Every legitimate celebration of the Eucharist is directed by the Bishop, either in person or through priests who are his helpers.78

    Whenever the Bishop is present at a Mass where the people are gathered, it is most fitting that he himself celebrate the Eucharist and associate priests with himself as concelebrants in the sacred action. This is done not to add external solemnity to the rite but to express in a clearer light the mystery of the Church, “the sacrament of unity.”79

    Even if the Bishop does not celebrate the Eucharist but has assigned someone else to do this, it is appropriate that he should preside over the Liturgy of the Word, wearing the pectoral cross, stole, and cope over an alb, and that he give the blessing at the end of Mass.

    387. The Diocesan Bishop, who is to be regarded as the high priest of his flock, and from whom the life in Christ of the faithful under his care in a certain sense derives and upon whom it depends,148 must promote, regulate, and be vigilant over the liturgical life in his diocese. It is to him that in this Instruction is entrusted the regulating of the discipline of concelebration (cf. above, nos. 202, 374) and the establishing of norms regarding the function of serving the priest at the altar (cf. above, no. 107), the distribution of Holy Communion under both kinds (cf. above, no. 283), and the construction and ordering of churches (cf. above, no. 291). With him lies responsibility above all for fostering the spirit of the Sacred Liturgy in the priests, deacons, and faithful.

    Praxiteles really cannot grasp the interconnection between these disparate recitations. I am afraid that our Danny is as much of a canonist as he is a liturgist.

    While the HACK position on the principle of ecclesiastical law has evolved from a point of near radical Lutheranism to one which now recognises the existence of “a general law” and also law eminating from an episcopal Conference. With a another bit of mental pressure we should be able to reach the only source for such law in teh Catholic Church: the person of the Roman Pontiff, who, in liturgical matters, as Head of the Roman Rite, has supreme, universal, and immediate jurisdiction in every diocese in the world. Just take a look at Redemptionis Sacramentum 14 where it is all spelled out in very simple terms for the mind-challenged among the liturgists. The significance of this is – and it is very noticeable that Danny does not mention it here, especially in the context of taking recourse in the civil tribunals – that any member of the faithful -and that really means anyone of the faithful- who wishes and for a good reason may challenge whatsoever a bishop my decide with regard to the liturgy in the tribunals of the Roman Curia – which, in the name of the Roman Pontiff and by his authority, will decide matters finally and, eventually, without further appeal. So, it is perhaps time that some of the faithful in Cork began to take ecclesiastical recourses against the futtering and delusionism of the Cloyne HACK. As far as Ireland is concerned, this is a much underused source of relief available to the faithful and the time has come to start encouraging its use against the nutcases presently stalking the land in the guise of liturgists. Then we will know who is master in the house!!

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #772195
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    And here we have a link to the web page of Gloria Thomas, a very interesting American religious art painter. See her portfolio for some really superb items:

    http://gloria-thomas.com/about.htm

Viewing 20 posts - 2,281 through 2,300 (of 5,386 total)