pepe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 73 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: el architino #736483
    pepe
    Participant

    i find it offensive that you do not see the true value of ‘el architinos’ original artworks.
    ad i believe you will be hearing from his legal department regarding your comments
    his drawings are not produced using this imposter software, as a trained eye or the certificate of authenticity will prove.
    i recently had one of my originals valued by david dickinson and he said it was definitely a bargain!

    as for biro-web.com

    these are not works of art,
    anynone can see that the level of craftsmenship developed by el architno eclipses these doodles, whilst also containing magical ideas that make us all smile

    there is no value that you can put on happiness

    i sugggest you take your squiggles and continue to search for an abode.

    you wandering homeless person!

    in reply to: Way off topic: U2 News Half Column Copy:peaceful Protest #736514
    pepe
    Participant

    This campaign or protest is in no way endorsed by pepe, While pepe would welcome a proper statement from the jurors or indeed a juror. It is felt that any protest that may occur will be attended by only those people who feel that a call for transparency is neccessary. A small protest may be self-defeating as it may look like the only people interested in a fair decision are a handful in number.

    However a large protest might make a difference.

    The documents above contain information from a variety of sources pertaining to the “U2 Tower Competition” By downloading them you are making a concious decision to view this information.
    Much of the information has already been published in a wider form. The information is primarily there to enable you to make your own decision.

    pepe will not be held responsible for any actions of individuals who have viewed this information.

    Your actions are your own.

    Pepe seconds the motion that individuals should also:

    Utilise proper channels such as the RIAI and RIBA to facilitate a full and public statement by the DDDA.

    in reply to: Way off topic: U2 News Half Column Copy:peaceful Protest #736512
    pepe
    Participant

    Number 8 is the most important

    in reply to: U2 studio entries #727265
    pepe
    Participant
    in reply to: Way off topic: U2 News Half Column Copy:peaceful Protest #736511
    pepe
    Participant

    8

    in reply to: Way off topic: U2 News Half Column Copy:peaceful Protest #736510
    pepe
    Participant

    7

    in reply to: Way off topic: U2 News Half Column Copy:peaceful Protest #736509
    pepe
    Participant

    6

    in reply to: Way off topic: U2 News Half Column Copy:peaceful Protest #736508
    pepe
    Participant

    5

    in reply to: Way off topic: U2 News Half Column Copy:peaceful Protest #736507
    pepe
    Participant

    4

    in reply to: Way off topic: U2 News Half Column Copy:peaceful Protest #736506
    pepe
    Participant

    3

    in reply to: Way off topic: U2 News Half Column Copy:peaceful Protest #736505
    pepe
    Participant

    2

    in reply to: Were 3W the architects the DDDA were looking for? #736450
    pepe
    Participant

    Dont put all the eggs in one basket.

    There were over 40 entries that were disqualified for various reasons.

    It could be any one of these.

    Chances are they have not been contacted by the DDDA

    And Were no contacted by PWHC

    The only way for this to get resolved is for the DDDA to admit there was another initial winner.

    And to publish details of it on their website.

    That way everyone will know where they stand and wont have to waste time on lawyers fees for something that might turn out to be a wild goose chase.

    in reply to: Were 3W the architects the DDDA were looking for? #736444
    pepe
    Participant

    I believe there are more than a “few” questions

    in reply to: el architino #736475
    pepe
    Participant

    email me
    we need to have a proper chat in private!

    in reply to: Were 3W the architects the DDDA were looking for? #736441
    pepe
    Participant

    Why pay membership to any “professional” body if that body is a stiff one!

    DONT
    IF THEY ARE STIFF
    EITHER

    DEMAND A CHANGE
    if this doesnt work
    RUN FOR OFFICE
    if this doesnt work
    DEMAND A REFUND
    if this doesnt work
    REVOKE YOUR MEMBERSHIP

    you can get stuff built anywhere wihout an raia or any other proffessional member involved in the project.

    jesus i’m not even half way qualified and i have built stuff!

    in reply to: el architino #736474
    pepe
    Participant

    following the ddda continued denials of the existence of the 3W cult and without the neccessary supernatural powers neccessary to make contact with them.

    Althpugh many mediums/phsychics and mid readers were used in attempt to speak to the founders of the cult. After 10 years of unsuccesful attempts. The ddda reviewed schemes submitted in 2003. The now globablly famous imposter design was ressurected after a resurgence of spinning tops and their subsequent rise up the toy charts to become the childrens no.1.

    This return to simplicity and the significance of the spinning top occured after The Sony Playstation and all other virtual reality games having been outlawed after it was revealed that Sony were deliberately brainwashing the youth of today with constant images of a violent and sexual nature.

    The imposters Tower was the victim of the most savage “biro” attack ever seen. Alledgedy the work of el arcitino. Whose development of the illicit software allowed him to remove all the twisting structures structural columns with one swipe accross his three dimensional graphics tablet. The resulting collapse of the tower was the “original” cause of the 4th World War.

    Following forensic analysis of the BDCH tower it was noted that 3 sets of human remains were to be found in the concrete floor slabs, subsequent dan aalysis identified these as those of the three leaders of the 3w cult

    the images below were found in the 2U inc vaults in the dusty and debris fillled basement
    of the BDCH tower. they were discovered after travelling forward into time 2024 1 hour before the ill fated tower collapsed. The complex structural integrity security of the now trademarked libeskind “slurry walls” being installed as standard in every building provided an air pocket around the “vault”

    also found within the vault were 2 brown envelopes one containing strange note 100 denomination believed to be legal currency of the European Union (now known as the Global Union) and another containing contact details for the leaders of the 3W cult

    however upon investigation of the building in London indicated in the envelope there were no signs of the cults headquaters. only a hairdressing salon run by a selection of ejected members of the DodgyDealingDevelopmentAuthority board.

    El Architino was subesquently caputured and held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but with the combined efforts of the kidnapped magicians Darren Brown and David Blaine he managed to convince the authorities that the now aged convicts there would be better served by a new and radical casino development based on his rejected design for the U2Tower competition.

    The casino featured all previous national versions of roullete, within a global community of like minded souls.

    one member of the reformed rock band 2U was said to have a kind fondness for antarctic roullete, which involves sitting naked on a block of ice and spinning round and round continuosly until you become so dizzy that you slip into the surrounding jacuzzi

    The bidding for work on this project involved so many corporate dinners that el arcitino took over the McDonalds Corporation to provide food for his workforce.

    His original sketch sold for a record sum at Christies, eclipsing the combined value of alll other works of arts produced in the history of human culture.

    “YOU HAVE TO LAUGH”
    “OTHERWISE YOU GET ANGRY”

    became the most popular television show in the history of the world. A global network of sattelites broadcast 24 hours a day, featuring el architino rollin dubies on the beach in barbados and drinknin mojitos prepared by his business partner pepe.

    in reply to: el architino #736472
    pepe
    Participant

    The complex 3d programs and overlay plugins.

    are they the top secret new softwre produced by “bic”

    the new prototype of “biro” software developed in collaboration with the aliens contained at area 51

    if so we are on to you as this software has not been released onto the open market yet.

    whilst we will deny that there was any breach in our security, we acknowledge that your designs appear to be created with our technology.

    As such we have recetly launched our fleet of ufo’s and are attempting to locate your omnipresence

    We are not far behind you. but your so damn airy

    so keep moving.

    C.I.A.N.A.S.A.

    CIANARA

    in reply to: el architino #736470
    pepe
    Participant

    el archintino.

    that show was pants
    he chickened out on chamer number 5!
    how was it a success.

    I say fill all six chambers

    irish roullette!

    Or get david blaines box (with whoever you want inside) and dangle it over the liffey and then drop it in.

    P.S

    I want to publish a book of your cartoons.
    pleae get in touch

    in reply to: Were 3W the architects the DDDA were looking for? #736439
    pepe
    Participant

    ok
    so I guess the “original” winner (if they are infact 3W) need to get their national proffessional body.

    THE RIBA. to represent them!

    TO be honest I dont think this should become a showdown with proffessional bodies making claims to represent anyone.

    On a legal level.

    ok

    but this is not about legality.

    This is about design.

    The DDDA need to publish the “original entry” in full. On a website and at the exhibition.

    Confirm or Deny whether it is the design featured in the Times.

    At this point what do we have.
    “a nod from someone close to the jury!”

    This needs complete clarification on all counts.

    What if its not 3W design?

    then there is still somebody out there who lost out.

    In any event.

    I think what should happen is that when the original winner is identified.

    They should move on to a newly organised stage 2:

    Run by the RAIA (or anyone else whos interested) or U2 themselves

    Give the two teams a couple of grand and a month to develop their designs further.

    With no restrictions on presentation material.

    Animations etc allowed

    Have public presntations with question and answer sessions.

    Then have a complete and open public vote on which one people want to get built.

    Or maybe just rerun the whole competition from start to finish.

    There was a competition about 4 months ago run by the UIA for a logo.
    All entrants payed $10 and th initial judging was done by the entrants themselves.

    The 50 or 100 with the most votes from their peers went through to the second round with the judges.

    The judges also got to select any ones they really liked.

    But as we have seen this leads to complications and accusations even with a “anonymous” competition

    SO say its completely open to those people who entered.

    Round 1 selects the top 100 then round 2 cuts it down to 10 then there is daily voting and one gets chopped every 24 hours.

    aka “pop idol” could do a tv show “POP architect”

    now that ideas my copyright so if there are any tv execs from endemol then get in touch

    If Paul could get all the entries online then we havve a starting point.

    I am sure the UIA would be interested in re-using their web voting technology.

    and all entries should be accepted.
    Even those that were disqualified.

    The DDDA were approx 4 months late with their decision.

    Some people not finding out the status of their entries till six months later.

    only to find out that they were 1 second or 1 minute or 10 minutes late. Or there was a queue when they handed in the submissin. Or the DDDA’s clock was wrong and that they were disqualified.

    “No period of Grace Allowed”

    Which is apparently “sticking to the rules”

    but I ask what other rules have the DDDA adhered to?

    a) all of them
    b) not many
    c) none

    We need some solidarity within the architectural community.

    Print you T-shirts and get the exhibition opening.

    12 noon 9th of October

    in reply to: Were 3W the architects the DDDA were looking for? #736436
    pepe
    Participant

    From Archinect

    “We the undersigned believe that the ddda have acted with a complete lack of common decency in their dealings with the_entrants to the competition. A state of total and paralyzing incompetencey_ and an inability to tell the whole truth when asked even the simplest of_ questions. Many (the designers, the jury, the band and the people of Dublin’s) hopes and dreams were placed on the_table, the ddda has effectively swept aside these dreams and is attempting_ to cover their tracks with unpublished audits, and the threatening of legal_ action. They seem to be completely unaware of anything that they may have done wrong._ Refuse to admit that they have made mistakes, and ultimately have allowed_ lawyers to make the decision that should have rested with an independent_ jury or with the people of dublin. These people have no idea what it takes to_design something. The hours of work and simply the dedication and passion to work late nights and even all night to meet a deadline. They only understand_ two things. Money and Preventing key information being made public. The RAIA_ should not allow the DDDA to run another single architectural_ competition (ON ANY SCALE) in the
    future.”

    signed

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 73 total)