Paul Clerkin
Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- June 17, 2010 at 2:02 am in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #774083
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterNope…. it lasted longest from the 80s reno with a statue of the virgin instead of the font, even the railings lasted until the 21st century.. but now it looks like this

actually I think I was baptised there
I have drawings from the mid 80s i did of the interior details including fonts, railings etc… must find them
June 16, 2010 at 10:44 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #774080Paul Clerkin
KeymasterIn the 1920s photos – those stations have been gone for a long time – perhaps since the 60s. Am not even sure if there are a set now, my interior shots from 2008 don’t show any. There used to be a horrible two-tone relief set in the nave when I was a kid.

http://two.archiseek.com/2009/1891-st-macartans-cathedral-monaghan-co-monaghan/
The one thing that still stands out for me in the cathedral is the wonderful tones of the pine benches and the ceiling, and the contrast with the stonework. The roof is simply fantastic.
June 15, 2010 at 5:28 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #774076Paul Clerkin
KeymasterSt. Macartan’s Cathedral
Interior – early 20th Century
Baptistry
Paul Clerkin
Keymasteryeah
Paul Clerkin
Keymasterseems to allow multiple voting ok
Paul Clerkin
Keymasterdespite the obvious – it looks in pretty good condition considering
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThat sounds like a myth really…
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterJune 9th, 1959: Passenger terminal a welcome arrival for airport
FROM THE ARCHIVES: A NEW and not very inspiring, terminal building was opened at Dublin airport by Seán Lemass in 1959 alongside the well-designed original building. A special report on the opening described the new building, which became the arrivals hall, and the developments to date at the airport. – JOE JOYCE
THE FIRST page of what could be described as Chapter Two in the story of Dublin Airport was turned yesterday by the Minister for Industry and Commerce, Mr. Lemass, when he formally opened the North Terminal. This new reinforced concrete and glass structure is much more than an extension of passenger accommodation: with the new cargo terminal on the other side of the main building, it marks the end of a chapter, and the beginning of another. The character of the airport, which has remained without substantial change since the return of peace . . . is undeniably altered.
Chapter One started during the first dark months of the Second World War, in 1940, with the opening of the beautifully proportioned airport terminal at Collinstown. The building deservedly won a gold medal for its architect, Mr (now Professor) Desmond Fitzgerald, but it could not have materialised at a less favourable period in the course of civil aviation. It was not surprising that the new airport, proud looking, and by local standards of the day enormous, should have been called a white elephant by the cynics.
Mr Fitzgerald’s design was planned to handle a maximum of 250,000 passengers per annum – a fantastic goal at the time. Little more than 10,000 passengers actually used the building in its first year, and looking back now, it is interesting to wonder how many aviation enthusiasts were . . . convinced that some day the terminal would be fully utilised.
That day came all too soon. Within a few years of the end of the war the cynics were confounded: by 1951 Dublin Airport was handling 276,000 passengers a year.
The traffic continued to increase substantially each year, and it became obvious that in spite of several interior alterations designed to give more passenger handling space, another terminal was needed to avoid delays and inevitable chaos.
Studies by the Department of Industry and Commerce and by Aer Rianta, which manages the airport for the Department, led to plans being sketched out for a new passenger building on the northern flank of the main terminal. After the start of the Irish Airlines services between Dublin-Shannon and New York and Boston, it was expected that the North Terminal would become the building to be used for American and Continental flights, with all British and local services continuing to use the main terminal. No one will be sorry that this plan was dropped and that instead the new building is to be used for all arrivals.
Nothing makes an air passenger worry more than the thought that he may not be waiting in the correct place to hear the announcement about the departure of his aircraft.
There are several interesting innovations in the construction, which is of reinforced concrete with the cladding mainly glass. It is a simple, straightforward structure, with a large concourse, Customs hall, waiting rooms and snack bar, with offices for immigration, health and agriculture officers.
The Customs hall and waiting rooms are open areas divided by movable partitions to allow rapid alterations at minimum cost when changes are needed with future traffic growths.
It is at once a bright, airy building, if rather impersonal in the modern idiom. But the main impression the North Terminal will have on those passengers who will pass through it concerns the way in which they and their baggage are “processed†. . . The building was planned around getting the passengers from the aircraft at one side, through Customs and immigration to the road on the other side, as quickly as possible and without fuss.
June 3, 2010 at 3:01 am in reply to: Should the Clarence Hotel redevelopment get permission? #793382Paul Clerkin
KeymasterHas anyone ever been in the former Working Mens Club? Just wondering what kind of interior it had – probably 70s bar lounge
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterAlways figured the quickest way to brighten up a bungalow was to remove the first room where the hall doglegs – opening up the entire space
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterDiageo protest fails to sink canal harbour shop dream
Evening HeraldA MAJOR shopping and restaurant hub for Dublin city has been given the green light – despite objections from global drinks company Diageo.
The Canal Harbour Development Company was granted permission for a “mixed use” scheme of apartments, shops, bars and restaurants.
Also included in the proposal is an aparthotel, exhibition centre, gallery and a medical centre.
The 1.32-hectare site at Grand Canal Harbour in Dublin 8 consists of disused industrial and commercial buildings and a warehouse, which is a listed structure.
The company plans to demolish all the buildings except the warehouse and construct six blocks ranging from three to 12 storeys.
Dublin City Council’s granting of permission is likely to be followed by an appeal to An Bord Pleanala, given the level of objection to the scheme.
Dozens of opponents came out against the ambitious plan.
Heritage body An Taisce, while saying the site was suitable for a “high density scheme”, insisted the plans were “excessively crowded and constrained”.
It added: “The proposal conveys a sense of developing the former canal harbour (to) within an inch of its life.”
Diageo Ireland expressed its support “for the principle of a mixed use redevelopment of these lands”.
However, the company, the Guinness parent group, questioned the impact the towers might have on views from the company’s rooftop Gravity Bar, one of the city’s top tourist attractions.
In addition, a number of residents associations lodged objections.
Residents of Westcourt on James’s Avenue complained locals did not know how “construction traffic, pollution, noise and construction hours will be managed”.
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterHere’s a more unaltered one and a side entrance variant
June 1, 2010 at 2:13 pm in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #774041Paul Clerkin
KeymasterGot quite a long list of cathedrals now on archiseek
http://two.archiseek.com/tag/cathedrals/and churches
http://two.archiseek.com/tag/churches/denominations may vary 😉
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterYeah Gunter – it was something to do with coal – I remember that vaguely – very bland shopfront too.
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterAgreed Gunter, the staircase and entrance looks unresolved – detracts a lot from the design for me.
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterAgreed that it’s not as confident a design as Drew’s – what is interesting is with the exception of the shopfront how little really has changed on the building.

Paul Clerkin
KeymasterWhat I like about these two is the information it gives about the building to the south (no6?) and the original streetlevel entrance to the building as built
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThe built design and a runner-up design by Sir Thomas Drew for the corner of Westmoreland and Fleet Streets.

May 29, 2010 at 3:47 pm in reply to: Were there ever proposed replacements to Nelson’s Pillar? #812765Paul Clerkin
Keymaster
Fred Conlon, Derek Dockrell, Eileen McDonagh
John Doherty, Peter Twamley
John Keoghan
Michael Kinsella, Daniel McCarthy
Ronald Tallon, Michael Warren
Aiden O’Connor, David O’Connor, Gerda TeljeurMay 29, 2010 at 3:09 pm in reply to: Were there ever proposed replacements to Nelson’s Pillar? #812764Paul Clerkin
KeymasterSome awful suggestions in that book – haven’t looked at it in years – some would have dated horribly.
- AuthorPosts
