Ocean33
Forum Replies Created
- Posts
I went along to view the entries on Saturday and have a few comments:
1. The so called cultural component of each entry is nearly farcical!! diaspora museum, centre for irish culture and rehousing the maritime museum. In my opinion none of these would attract significant numbers into the developments leaving the private offices and hotel to the money paying customers! (just as the developers would want!!)
2. The scale of the STW and HP entries is far too large and would only serve to split the seafront, destroying the view out over the bay for most of dunlaoghaire.
3. The amount of public spaces in each was dissapointing, the Liebeskind and SOM have integrated good usable spaces into their designs and linked them back to Morans park across Queens Road, ideal for (small) concerts etc.
4. the STW entry was as as innovative as any five story box down the IFSC! time to think outside the box lads!! On this basis I would disagree that some of the entries do not reflect the style of the area. Dunlaoughaire hasnt got any predominant style through it – its a mish mash of bad planning and unimaginative architecture!
Has anyone else visited the exhibition and seen the full presentations? BTW the foreign entries had far superior presentations and models, which may sway the public opinion.
where will the responsibility of the architect/engineer ever stop? if the arches are to be kiddie proof, the benches skater proof, the railings suicide proof!?!? if we’re to progress with innovative design in public amenities, the public themselves must surely accept some responsibility for their own actions and those around them!
Dublin City Council cant be allowed to throw up some ill conceived short term solution which will be left there til the bridge eventually falls into the filthy river.
