Mob79

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 89 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Look at de state of Cork, like! #733943
    Mob79
    Participant

    @kite wrote:

    .Anyone wondering why is is difficult to convince people that they have nothing to fear regarding high rise buildings should take a look at O. Mitchell FG TDs views on high hise at http://www.corksouthwest.com News page.

    That site is gold, “Show your support for our efforts to end the building
    of High-Rise FLATS
    (Future SLUMS?)”
    and a 4 story slum is ok? He’d be better off looking for solutions than shouting populist slogans.

    in reply to: Modern Irish domestic architecture? #756339
    Mob79
    Participant

    @phil wrote:

    There was a shell of a 1930s house on the Foxrock dual cariage way until quite recently. I went in and had a wander around it about 6 months ago or so. I had no camera with me, but I noticed that there was a planning application to knock it and build two town houses on the site instead. I am not sure if it is still there or not. Anyone seen it lately?

    I think it was in The Irish Times property supplement all done up, not sure though. There seems to be plenty of little modernist houses around the country, just hidden away.

    in reply to: Croke Park #756028
    Mob79
    Participant

    Lots of people seem to have a problem with this, i think it looks good though!

    in reply to: Look at de state of Cork, like! #733781
    Mob79
    Participant

    Cork does seem pretty devoid of public spaces looking at those aerial photos though.

    in reply to: Look at de state of Cork, like! #733778
    Mob79
    Participant

    Do you know whats going to be there instead of block A?

    in reply to: The Bay #755922
    Mob79
    Participant

    There was an interesting aerial photo of the docks (grand canal basin) in the property section of the irish times a few weeks ago, its all coming along now, very large area, noticably low rise though.

    Mob79
    Participant

    Somebody would pipe up about it’s proximity to the castle i’m sure. Any other highrise planned bar the 2 existing?

    Mob79
    Participant

    He’s been drinking!

    Mob79
    Participant

    @dave123 wrote:

    i the glass tower on riverpoint is really awesome! i think there knocking the awful yellow building onto the right as you look at the picture…

    Or are they recladding it, i think the computer mock ups showed as being part of the scheme!

    Is anything going planned alongside the Clarion, back in riverside towards the junkyard or whatever it is, can’t imagine to many customers in the clarion are overjoyed at that view.

    @backspace wrote:

    ‘Less faffin, more pictures, i’m not seeing how it’s all coming along shannonside.’….

    this is work in progress on the quays- BKD i think.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=251401

    wahay pictures, thanks. Looking good.

    Mob79
    Participant

    Less faffin, more pictures, i’m not seeing how it’s all coming along shannonside.
    Limerick looks like a city, galway looks like a medium/small sized town drowning in suburbs, sorry, but thats how it is, regardless of wealth population yadda yadda.

    in reply to: Government-by-numbers #752851
    Mob79
    Participant

    @JPD wrote:

    You are totally correct, give me a one-off anyday at least that way you can choose your neighbours

    And this is why the alternatives to housing estates needs to be explored rather than open up a free for all.

    in reply to: Government-by-numbers #752848
    Mob79
    Participant

    @flysrmd11 wrote:

    A point I’d appreciate some feedback on: What is it with everyone removing natural hedgerow (often with mature trees) and replacing it with ugly walls. Leaving the hedgerow, in most cases one would hardly notice the house therefore greatly reducing the eyesore factor. Your thoughts/

    Oh everyone’s got to have a 6 ft wall these days, with turrets if possible, it shows how important you are.

    in reply to: Cafe Bars the new architectural challenge #752905
    Mob79
    Participant

    Alcohol with your food or washing food down with lots of liquid isn’t good for digestion though,…….. just thought i’d ruin everything.

    in reply to: Government-by-numbers #752840
    Mob79
    Participant

    Is that the westport – louisburgh road, shame on me for even slightly defending it, but it is a highly populated main road. Last time i ever defend something like that…. promise

    in reply to: Government-by-numbers #752839
    Mob79
    Participant

    B but but the dormer windows are designed to mimic the local topography…..

    in reply to: Cafe Bars the new architectural challenge #752901
    Mob79
    Participant

    I don’t those that are causing trouble and fights on the streets will really be interested in these establishments anyway, i don’t think mcdowell has the first idea what the real problems are.

    in reply to: Government-by-numbers #752830
    Mob79
    Participant

    Something humorous i noticed recently was a photo in a free local rag of the 10 pages advertising : 2 pages news variety shoved through the letterbox. The photo was in an article about illegal dumping, something which has to be tackled, but this particular photo was of a couch in a ditch of a forestry road, the caption read “not so suite for the tourists” geddit, baddum chhhh. What about the thousands of huge crass vulgar houses on every hilltop in the area, i’d imagine an illegally dumped couch pales in comparison.

    in reply to: Government-by-numbers #752827
    Mob79
    Participant

    @JPD wrote:

    As usual more scare tactics, it might be a problem, there might be extra traffic, there might be a few that are not pleasing to the eye. Are there any reasons not to build in the country that can actually be proven?

    They don’t attract development, it’s the towns with a population base that attract business etc and then all the countryside feeds off this, they contribute nothing.
    Does that answer it simply enough??
    You’re starting to annoy me, “all you D4 people” blah blah blah
    @JPD wrote:

    It seems that you city folks do not understand rural life, all that people want is a job, a family and a house. There is little demand for complicated facilities. I don’t get the constant attacks on water as ALL THESE HOUSES HAVE SEPTIC TANKS THAT ARE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY COUNCILS. I think it is just begrugery that some people have to pay less for a house than you do.

    Sorry but i want alot more in life than a job and a house, don’t speak on my behalf as a “country person”, maybe you should check out what’s out there to be experienced.
    @JPD wrote:

    All you Dublin 4 types keep saying is they look ugly to your vision of the Countryside and that bins can be collected cheaper from the Streets of Dublin 4. As for roads have any of you left the main roads in some Counties? You could dissapear into some of the craters I have seen.

    What’s making these craters????, trucks trundelling up and down the road constantly spreading debris and muck everywhere (there’s no point in wainting walls anymore) coming to and fro the newest disgusting tasteless mansion being thrown up by some yahoo with more money than taste!!!!,
    overuse from every car in a 10 mile area driving into town where threre job is!!!
    You can’t walk or cycle in some places now, i felt safer cycling around dublin city centre when i lived there, eejits tearing around country roads.
    Don’t you realise the alternatives, even look to original settlement patterns, ringforts etc led on to clochans, not dispersed living, if designed properly rural living could be so much more pleasent if you could cluster houses tastefully, services could be provided cheaper and you would have all the benefits of having close neighbours while also having privacy if designed properly (ie not a housing estate and not 5 mansions with 1 acre lawns stapled together)
    I think the answers are in improving the standards of housing developments in villages, steering away from housing estates towards more individual and intesting buildings with character, whatever happened to side streets and alleyways, and also encouraging new forms and models of clochans in the countryside, imaginatively designed to provide people with a great quality of life that doesn’t put stress on our resources and that could be added onto with new building. Maybe councils should look into this and team up with architects planners etc and develop modern models of living around older concepts.

    Just checked on google there, by clochan i mean a traditional gathering of houses, farmhouses in the past, not a circular dry stone house.

    in reply to: Cafe Bars the new architectural challenge #752896
    Mob79
    Participant

    @Thomond Park wrote:

    Unfortunately the regulations are prescriptive to 130 sq m whilst Beweys is 920 sq m at ground level alone, the idea behind the regulations is to discourage super-pubs and ensure that people have some food while drinking.

    Maybe a few few different ones could be set up in different rooms like the food court thing on liffey street.
    That said i’ve never been in bewleys.

    in reply to: Sustainability??? #751243
    Mob79
    Participant

    Inefficient, Car dependent, low density – can’t be served by public transport, ugly, wasteful, not thought through! can’t keep going about things as we do……..

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 89 total)