Maskhadov

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729974
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    Question :

    Has anyone noticed that the new level of the street for O Connoll street is quite a bit higher (on the GPO side) when you get near Parnell street ?

    There is a big drop (with tarmac used to bridge the 1/2 metre drop) and I was just wondering was that kind of drop meant to be there ? I always though the street was more or less flat.

    in reply to: Smithfield, Dublin #712394
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    I took a walk around Smithfield yesterday and thought the new development was great.

    The area is a sucess.. it will just take time for people and shops to move in. The old buildings look terrible though.

    in reply to: ILAC centre #731978
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    it could be a lot worse in fairness

    in reply to: developments in cork #759076
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    have you a link for that proposal for the former convent site Kite?

    What is the problem with the apartments anyway ? nothing from what I can see.

    in reply to: developments in cork #759073
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    Hopefully the appeal is utterly rejected.

    in reply to: developments in cork #759071
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    what is the appeal for ? the apartments look good to me

    in reply to: Smithfield, Dublin #712387
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    this might not be popular but personally i would knock down all the above buildings and build them in line with the new buildings

    Maskhadov
    Participant

    Good question Thomond Park. I dont know the answer to that.

    in reply to: Dublin Airport Metro to have unconnected terminus? #749531
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    if they are utilising 24hour boring and the critical infastructure bill then they can get it completed by 2012. This kind of project is done in the rest of Europe with little fuss.

    in reply to: Parnell Square redevelopment #751081
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    how much of that framework has actually being implemented ? I think something like the above would be great for the entire area.

    Maskhadov
    Participant

    @anto wrote:

    Here, Here!! This thread is obviously turning into a pro development at all costs thread. Like that other Cork thread here. This is probably the last place that building should happen. A flood plain! Global warming anybody?

    “….Up to half of this wetland area, which is subject to flooding, would have to be reclaimed from the river with the construction of a massive dyke………..”

    The dyk should take care of that:)

    Maskhadov
    Participant

    I am looking forward to seeing some artist impressions of what this is going to look like. I hope its high dentsity. Something in line with the hotel would look well IMO.

    Maskhadov
    Participant

    €1.5bn development planned for Limerick site on banks of Shannon
    Karl Hanlon

    Plans to transform a wetland area in Limerick city along the banks of the Shannon with a €1.5 billion riverfront development are progressing swiftly, according to the consortium behind the project.

    Promoters of the development confirmed that Limerick City Council had welcomed the project “in principle” and that other statutory bodies would now be consulted to move it to the next stage.

    The project, which is being promoted by the Riverdeep Consortium, would mark the biggest development ever carried out in Limerick.

    If it goes ahead it would also become the biggest infrastructural development on the river Shannon since the construction of the Ardnacrusha power station in the 1920s.

    It is proposed that the massive development would be built on a narrow 50-acre site which stretches nearly a mile along the banks of the Shannon in Limerick city. Up to half of this wetland area, which is subject to flooding, would have to be reclaimed from the river with the construction of a massive dyke.

    Five piers would be built in separate units, linked by a boardwalk, with each unit featuring 12-storey high pods housing apartments, a hotel, offices, a shopping complex and a gymnasium.

    One of the biggest obstacles facing Riverdeep will be the preservation of a designated conservation area adjoining the site. However, it is understood the developers are proposing to set aside a significant budget to protect the area during construction.

    Engineer Ned Sheedy, who is fronting the Riverdeep consortium, said the project was very much in keeping with the city council’s stated aim of promoting Limerick as a riverside city.

    “There are a few hurdles to be negotiated, but this will bring life back into the city,” he said.

    The other members of the consortium have not been publicly identified, but it is understood it also includes local auctioneers and solicitors.

    It has not been revealed how the consortium aims to finance the development which property sources estimate could cost €500 million to build, with a finished value of up to €1.5 billion.

    “At this point in time we can’t disclose details of the financial operation, but financing this operation will not be a difficulty,” Mr Sheedy said.

    Following their meeting with council officials, the consortium must now open negotiations with the Office of Public Works, the Department of the Marine, the Department of the Environment and the EU.

    The council currently owns some of the land in the proposed site, while the title of the mud flats along the riverfront is currently unclear.

    Councillor Jim Long, who was approached by the developers for advice, said he would back the ambitious project as long as the consortium fulfilled all its statutory obligations.

    The Riverdeep consortium said that construction work could start within 18 months.

    http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ireland/2006/0228/3591426011HM2LIMERICKRIVER.html

    © The Irish Times

    I hope this project works out for the best. Cities need high density near the center but of course to a high standard while not being elitest,

    The fact that things are progressing quickly is great news!!

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729936
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    Just a question about O Connoll street. How come we dont have a fountain ? I think it would really add to the street landscape. Something like what Madrid have.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729932
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    The violance was very disapointing to see. I hate to type cast people but there is always trouble when nordies get into large groups. Dublin took a bit of bad press but nothing you wouldnt see in London with the anti war riots. €50,000 in damage isnt THAT much but any excuse for DCC to put back completion dates.

    I just hope than any future nordie parade is properly marshalled with full riot Gardai.

    in reply to: ESB Headquarters Fitzwilliam Street #775388
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    @Paul Clerkin wrote:

    If I was going to paint it, I would have went for a colour not some strain of beige….

    any of which are an improvement 😮

    Maskhadov
    Participant

    I think if the development is done in a careful and well thought out way I would totally back the proposal. Another area could be set aside for birds. The devil is in the detail as they said.

    in reply to: Smithfield, Dublin #712359
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    I think Smithfield looks great. I just wish that the buildings on the right and the very end could be knocked down and built in line with the new development. We have enough of Georgian in the city.

    in reply to: Parnell Square redevelopment #751078
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    Good news ! Is there a website about the Parnell Square redevelopment ? I thought I came across it once. It had PDF’s etc. Maybe that was the war rememberence thing.

    I think most of the streets around O Connell street need a make over TBH. Its a good start though.

    http://dispatch.mapflow.com/lav20a-i…ap_4380848.jpg doesnt work btw

    in reply to: Fast-Track Infrastructure legislation #767019
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    About 10 years over due. Good news anyway. I hope its a complete sucess. If Mc Dowell gets his end of things sorted it should be.

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 162 total)