lostexpectation

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 141 through 160 (of 217 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730828
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    three cheers to the men that ran down that area for years, thank god they’re doing something now.

    in reply to: New Advertising in Dublin #776953
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/0417/ecocabs.html

    more plans to get advertising into public spaces, once a group of antiwar protesters were walking across the the park to get to the dept of foreign affairs, holding a banner they were going to use the park wardons told them to get out for advertising in the park?

    this so called ecocabs are just moving advertisments.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730787
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    who is responsibility for the 1976 atrocity?
    name and rank so we can put him on trial?

    in reply to: New Advertising in Dublin #776935
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    so a good result for the blocking the standing signs part from the main streets in the city center, but this deal includes building side billboards too?

    in reply to: Stop this nonsense! #777429
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    Don’t be so nice

    Verdict FAILED

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730733
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    is anyone else clicking on page 117 and getting nowhere?

    in reply to: D’Olier & Westmoreland St. #713966
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    so eh what did those roads look like before the WSC?

    I think the roads are too wide, certainly in the way they are used now., they don’t really go anywhere.

    I love seeing photos of people in the black and white days walking around being people doing stuff going places its extraordinarily surprising that they did that back then too.

    in reply to: Vertigo? U2 tower to be taller #750501
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    woah total confusion wonder who wrote it
    http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1290655,00.html?f=rss

    edited to add

    David Norris says it looks one of those prepackaged sandwiches you’d buy in centra… 🙂

    so this new image still has these vague lines, where did the image with the solid extension above the peak of the building come from

    Penny jones cribbing Larissa Nolan cribbing archseek…

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730650
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    what with the box, its terrible, the previous display case was built for the shape of the statue, this one obviously hasn’t been, its too narrow and too short and heavy on his head. I presume the box above his head has some massive light in it or something,
    yes and where the flowers and sign they, it looks like a fish tank for a 2 star hotel…

    how could they it get so wrong??? they should just cleaned the old case

    re millennium sculpture I think the religious had a point, it was the 200 anniversary of chirst supposed birth, that what we base our calender or, it could have some subtle christian influence rather then the meaning something and nothing to everyone blandness that is the spire.

    in reply to: Vertigo? U2 tower to be taller #750398
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    @massamann wrote:

    120m according to Brian Dobson (and who am I to argue?)

    Good to see the objectors already making their voice heard (on this evenings news). Not sure if I can go along with the Ringsend resident group that only wants maritime-connected buildings to be built in this area.

    I’m sure a brand-spanking new Whaling Station by David Chipperfield would fit right in, but it would bring environmental concerns of a wholly different sort….

    that was actually an surprising point, consider it for a second what maritime related buildings could you build there?

    maybe the the dublin port should expand into this so called commercial areas then they wouldn’t have to move, makes alot of sense

    did he say something about new york skyscrapers though, ?? those would be the buildings in the port authority area :rolleyes:

    has there any new sea related buildings been built down there at all? every city seems to have one of those ship shaped centres. or perhaps a yacht club like the building nominated for the stirling price, or simply a new ferry terminal or industrial shipping dock?

    in reply to: ILAC centre #732047
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    @GrahamH wrote:

    I couldn’t agree with you more Stephen – indeed I was about to get some pictures of these very stores.

    Incidentally, before the event disappears into the annals of time, the opening of the new Dunnes a few months ago was the most extraordinary spactacle the city centre must ever have witnessed since 1916 – only this time it was a consumer war. I just happened to be passing and went in to see the new store, not knowing there was 50% off all stock until getting inside. It is impossible to describe what utter mayhem there was]thousands[/b] of people in there: a swarming sea of shoppers slowing rippling across four levels. The shelves were almost empty, there was stock thrown everywhere, the security guards were standing around pretty much helpless, the queues for the checkouts were at least 100 deep across the store, lasting well over an hour, and the escalators and lifts were completely jammers. It was actually frightening at times, with an every-man-for-himself atmosphere pervading the store. Absolute madness – it was fantastic to see such a consumer orgy in all its glory.

    Spectacular marketing Margaret – gotta hand it to her.

    mostly women though right? scary thing women looking for a dunnes bargains

    in reply to: grangegorman allocated 262 million #718845
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    how about high rise here? high rise for universities?

    in reply to: The Tara Bypass – what they won’t tell you #756583
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    @hutton wrote:

    Yeah hang them, dirty bastards 😡 … Same types that showed up how the Carrickmines site was being obliterated by a junction that was contrived specifically to facilitate the Jackson Way rezoned lands. (Another BP approved project). :rolleyes:

    Anyhow, Pat Kenny is currently doing a show on this on Radio 1 –

    http://www.rte.ie/radio1/index.html

    pk being hostile and dismissive, if bin laden was on he wouldn’t give him such a hard time

    in reply to: Loop Line Bridge – specifically the ads… #723237
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    @weehamster wrote:

    Im afraid the loopline is going nowhere. 🙁

    There is another option (a very long longshot) which is replace it with a new, more slender bridge, possibly a suspension bridge with a single tower at Tara St station. :confused:

    integrating the station into the bridge structure..where they want a high rise anyway,. i like it brilliant idea…

    in reply to: National Wax Monstrosity #745748
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    a brief mention of the wa museum moving to grafton street? any more info

    http://www.visitdublin.com/SeeAndDo/Detail.aspx?id=249&mid=861

    in reply to: D’Olier & Westmoreland St. #713947
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    @Devin wrote:

    Good for showing all the beer cans in the Londis window, Grah – a disgrace!

    (A complaint to Planning Enforcement was made at the time.)

    hmm its doens’t look so bad to me, I guess the guinness colours/logo look sorta classic

    what does the original shop front look like, would something closer to that be what you are looking for

    in reply to: New Advertising in Dublin #776859
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    I wonder if you took the classic tourist snap of the whole church above would you get the metropole in the shot

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730535
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    @GrahamH wrote:

    All of it I think. It’s their HQ after all – acres of offices.

    i don’t think you’re catching my drift, isn’t there shops all along henry street in the wing adjoining the main gpo frontage…so that bit atleast is already shops…

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730533
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    @GrahamH wrote:

    The entire structure lostexpectation.
    Obviously only the front part is the 1818 original, with the enormous side wings stretching down Henry Street and Princes Street constructed from scratch following 1916. Henry Street was the first side to be developed in 1924-26, followed by Princes Street and then the public office completed in 1929. However basement parts of the original building appear to still extend underneath parts of the rebuilt structure and out under Princes Street

    The GPO Arcade is not the major cross-block in the middle as initial impressions may suggest, but rather the lower glazed block further west near the end of the building. See how Arnotts now feeds into it too. The top-lighting of all the 1920s stores is also evident.

    yeat ta for the info but I asking how much of is being used by an post?

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730524
    lostexpectation
    Participant

    how much of that substantial building is the GPO?

Viewing 20 posts - 141 through 160 (of 217 total)