LOB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 121 through 140 (of 258 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spencer Dock #722719
    LOB
    Participant

    try
    http://www.spencerdock.ie

    though seems to be pretty vacuous stuff

    in reply to: The Greens and O Connell Street #721444
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by Rory W
    I’ll fetch my pipe

    more trees!
    have you no shame 😉

    in reply to: ridiculous #722698
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by Paul Clerkin
    I guess the world moves slowly inside the RIAI

    You reckon? 😀

    in reply to: Belfast developments #722651
    LOB
    Participant

    Please do
    keep us up to date on whats going on up north
    anyone else, anywhere else?

    in reply to: Ryanair terminal #722452
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by Paul Clerkin
    ryanair dont do images… its part of their no frills… you have to look at the site and imagine 😉

    ROFL

    Ok! thats woken me up

    in reply to: City Council Flats #721333
    LOB
    Participant

    I seem to remember that Desmond Fitzgerald was involved.
    not sure though will try to confirm

    in reply to: Archeire mention in October’s Architectural Review #721294
    LOB
    Participant

    The quality of the Archeire site, produced with much passion & no money is in stark contrast to the RIAI site, produced with no shortage of money & seemingly little passion.
    I find the RIAI site a trial to use

    in reply to: Blackhall Place Bridge #726754
    LOB
    Participant

    The photomontage from Blackhall place is a bit deceptive
    The built arches are quite significantly heavier in reality

    in reply to: former cinemas of ireland #716297
    LOB
    Participant

    Just some more info on this

    Site did contain a cinema (Built 1914)
    The proposal on the site was given a decision to grant by The Corpo in Nov2001 but was appealed by a resident of Benburb street & An Taisce.
    An Bord Pleanala refused Permission in May 2002. The proposal was to comprehensively record & document the former Cinema before demolition. [not a protected structure]

    There is more information on the Cinema & site in the report that accompanied the application including some photographs (foyer etc)& maps of this area going back to the 17th Century as well as an Archeological assessment. (all on microfiche)

    in reply to: model in wood quay #720405
    LOB
    Participant

    Just to bring this up again

    There is a more recent model of the scheme at Merrion Gates (Convent site)
    1:500 I think
    In the Atrium, Ground Floor behind the main staircase.

    in reply to: Horseshow House #720089
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by N3
    That remark about the John Hancock Tower was so inane. Why does nearly every discussion have to get onto the subject of height. Height on its own is not an aesthetic quality.

    How so?
    I was merely pointing out that a difference of scale is not necessarily a bad thing. a view not shared by An Taisce obviously.
    Where have you seen me advocating that height on its own is an aesthetic quality?
    Building Height is very relevant to Dublin at the moment so inevitably it will continue to crop up.

    Originally posted by N3

    The general standard of appraisal of architecture by many of the contributors to this website is embarrassing.

    By all means enlighten us with your opinions. the site is here to promote discussion, but hold off on the derisory comments.

    in reply to: Horseshow House #720087
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by ew
    – it would set a precedent whereby a protected structure could be adjoining a building almost twice it’s height.

    I don’t see why this should be a problem
    there are planty of other examples where a contrast in scale works well.
    Hancock tower being one (in the extreme)

    The result of this type of restriction is the rather mundane development on the North wall Quay.
    I wonder would An Taisce have objected to I M Pei’s other work in the Louvre
    what a Glass Pyramid??????

    in reply to: Southbank Development #721151
    LOB
    Participant

    5 years

    in reply to: Southbank Development #721148
    LOB
    Participant

    I thought this had been delayed because of problems with Dunloe Ewart, The original developer.

    in reply to: Tall chimney in the docks #721134
    LOB
    Participant

    From the DDDA site

    The Gasometers on the south quays have long been a landmark in the area. Gas, manufactured from coal was first used to provide public lighting in the early 1800s. By the 1820s three rival gas companies were operating in Dublin. In 1866 the Dublin gas companies merged to form the Alliance & Dublin Consumers Gas Company.
    The company had its headquarters at Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, on the south bank of the Liffey. This was a natural location for the gasworks, because it was beside the docks where coal boats unloaded. Stokers wearing clogs, shovelled coal into the retorts, where it was heated to extremely high temperatures and released the gas. The coal gas was then purified before being stored in a gas-holder or gasometer. Work began on erecting the first gasometer at Sir John Rogerson’s Quay in 1866. The main gas pipeline ran from Sir John Rogerson’s Quay to O’Connell Bridge, before branching out throughout the city.

    Be interesting to know whether those pipelines are still there (would assume so)

    in reply to: house in dalkey #721120
    LOB
    Participant

    Isn’t eddie Irvine building a new house on the site of a previous house around there?

    in reply to: Busaras Central Bus Station, Dublin #721088
    LOB
    Participant

    Try the Architectural Archive on Merrion Square

    http://www.iarc.ie/

    in reply to: Busaras Central Bus Station, Dublin #721084
    LOB
    Participant

    there are no longer grades of listing
    they are all “protected Structures” & this definition includes its setting as well as any structural or aesthetic considerations.
    The Restrictions are now in general more onerous than before.

    in reply to: Wood Bending – help! #721090
    LOB
    Participant

    for ply you might consider something like this as an alternative
    http://www.worldwidewood.dial.pipex.com/page7.html

    in reply to: Tara street gets go ahead #720891
    LOB
    Participant
Viewing 20 posts - 121 through 140 (of 258 total)

Latest News