LOB
Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
LOB
Participantmight try here as well
Centre for Civil engineering Heritage
LOB
ParticipantMichael Ross, I fear,has a severe case of Verbal Diarrhoea
LOB
ParticipantOriginally posted by Paul Clerkin
last one for a whileNew bright luxury accomodation for Housemartins located in the city centre ๐
LOB
ParticipantOriginally posted by CiaranO
I am not an architecture student, nor and architect but someone with a love of good archtiecture and a great interest in the developing fortune of ireland and its appearance.
I feel this does not preclude me from giving an opinion on our state though and hope this will be respected here.
CiaranOthats what the site is for
dive inLOB
ParticipantI think it’s “completed by1st or 2nd week in January”.
LOB
ParticipantThe proposal referred to previously was by Jim Horan as far as I remember.
The only problem Paul, with a weir under the matt Talbot, would be no access to smaller boats west of that bridge. Dublin Port boats sometime venture up that far.
Horan’s proposal incorporated a lock which wouldn’t work under the low Matt Talbot bridge.I believe that some of the bearings on the Matt Talbot bridge are so low they are submerged during high tides-hardly ideal
LOB
ParticipantUnlikely,
More straightforward design than in Foster’s bridgeLOB
ParticipantIf the bridge reminds me of any bridge its the Firth of forth Railway bridge (in terms of the principle behind it).
The new bridge seems to be a balanced cantilever solution with 2 sections each pivoting a quarter (river width) in from each quay.this link will explain the principle
http://www.pre-engineering.com/resources/forth/forthbridge.htmI would need to see a bit more detail but I think it is not bad. A reworking of a tried & tested system unlike the reworking of the suspension bridge principle in the Millenium bridge in London.
LOB
ParticipantOriginally posted by MG
How irresponsible is this? This is a functioning railway tunnel. At the very least you could get hurt or killed, and endanger the lives of others whether they be CIE employees or your companions. Grow up.
Ditto
LOB
ParticipantAs far as I know the ads predate ’63 so planning permission would not have been saught.
If it was proposed to change or replace them I would imagine it would be subject to planning.
Not much of an incentive.
LOB
ParticipantOriginally posted by fjp
Hmm.
involving the army bomb disposal unit :p
LOB
ParticipantI presume they were for ventilation, preventing a build-up of gasses
the old toilets were a regular for a bomb hoax.
Remember being on O’connell street about 1985-6 when there was a controlled explosion in one of the Toilets.LOB
ParticipantSeems as good a way as any to get yourself killed
LOB
ParticipantAnswer here under constraints
http://gmes.jrc.it/Aerial%20Photography%20in%20Europe/Ordnance%20Survey%20of%20Ireland.htm
I would imagine that in the past most aerial photos were issued via the ordinance survey so therefore they could control the process.
a lot of web based information is probably sourced outside the state (Terraserver) so therefore not as easy to control.LOB
Participant4 so far
Laois,Carlow,Fingal & South County Dublin
I think 3 more will follow soonLOB
Participantthis is another good site for sourcing 2nd hand books.
Got a copy of Robert Ballagh’s book of photographs of Dublin through this (early eighties)LOB
ParticipantOriginally posted by Paul Clerkin
“Dublin An Urban History” byNiall McCullough is another that I think should be reprinted.Yeah & how did you get your copy?
Jammy sod ๐LOB
ParticipantOriginally posted by alphasun
Or rebuild Brunel’s pneumatic railway.
alphasunexcuse me for being a pedant
I had my doubts about Brunel’s involvement in the Dublin one so i sourced this from a site on athmospheric railways
“I note in passing that while I (as a fan of his) might like Isambard
Kingdom Brunel to have invented the atmospheric system used on the
South Devon, it is wrong to say that he did so, as is sometimes done.
He did choose it for the line and actively promoted it (well, “actively”
is redundant with Brunel). It was actually developed by Samuel Clegg
and Joseph and Jacob Samuda.”LOB
ParticipantI suspect that that image is a group of 6 “micro” buildings
They will probably be in groups of 3 or 6LOB
Participantquiet everyone!
I think Paul is getting lost in a Bing Crosby “white Christmas” moment
๐- AuthorPosts