LOB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 258 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Milan / Clones Railway Turntable Sheds #724454
    LOB
    Participant
    in reply to: The Spike #721845
    LOB
    Participant

    Michael Ross, I fear,has a severe case of Verbal Diarrhoea

    in reply to: The Spike #721708
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by Paul Clerkin
    last one for a while

    New bright luxury accomodation for Housemartins located in the city centre ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: Contempt!!!!!!! #723514
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by CiaranO

    I am not an architecture student, nor and architect but someone with a love of good archtiecture and a great interest in the developing fortune of ireland and its appearance.

    I feel this does not preclude me from giving an opinion on our state though and hope this will be respected here.
    CiaranO

    thats what the site is for
    dive in

    in reply to: The Spike #721557
    LOB
    Participant

    I think it’s “completed by1st or 2nd week in January”.

    in reply to: New Liffey pedestrian bridge #723302
    LOB
    Participant

    The proposal referred to previously was by Jim Horan as far as I remember.

    The only problem Paul, with a weir under the matt Talbot, would be no access to smaller boats west of that bridge. Dublin Port boats sometime venture up that far.
    Horan’s proposal incorporated a lock which wouldn’t work under the low Matt Talbot bridge.

    I believe that some of the bearings on the Matt Talbot bridge are so low they are submerged during high tides-hardly ideal

    in reply to: New Liffey pedestrian bridge #723299
    LOB
    Participant

    Unlikely,
    More straightforward design than in Foster’s bridge

    in reply to: New Liffey pedestrian bridge #723295
    LOB
    Participant

    If the bridge reminds me of any bridge its the Firth of forth Railway bridge (in terms of the principle behind it).
    The new bridge seems to be a balanced cantilever solution with 2 sections each pivoting a quarter (river width) in from each quay.

    this link will explain the principle
    http://www.pre-engineering.com/resources/forth/forthbridge.htm

    I would need to see a bit more detail but I think it is not bad. A reworking of a tried & tested system unlike the reworking of the suspension bridge principle in the Millenium bridge in London.

    in reply to: Underneath Dublin? #716389
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by MG

    How irresponsible is this? This is a functioning railway tunnel. At the very least you could get hurt or killed, and endanger the lives of others whether they be CIE employees or your companions. Grow up.

    Ditto

    in reply to: Loop Line Bridge – specifically the ads… #723109
    LOB
    Participant

    As far as I know the ads predate ’63 so planning permission would not have been saught.

    If it was proposed to change or replace them I would imagine it would be subject to planning.

    Not much of an incentive.

    in reply to: Underneath Dublin? #716386
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by fjp

    Hmm.

    involving the army bomb disposal unit :p

    in reply to: Underneath Dublin? #716384
    LOB
    Participant

    I presume they were for ventilation, preventing a build-up of gasses

    the old toilets were a regular for a bomb hoax.
    Remember being on O’connell street about 1985-6 when there was a controlled explosion in one of the Toilets.

    in reply to: Underneath Dublin? #716381
    LOB
    Participant

    Seems as good a way as any to get yourself killed

    in reply to: Dublin digital info #722993
    LOB
    Participant

    Answer here under constraints

    http://gmes.jrc.it/Aerial%20Photography%20in%20Europe/Ordnance%20Survey%20of%20Ireland.htm

    I would imagine that in the past most aerial photos were issued via the ordinance survey so therefore they could control the process.
    a lot of web based information is probably sourced outside the state (Terraserver) so therefore not as easy to control.

    in reply to: National Inventory of Architectural Heritage #722979
    LOB
    Participant

    4 so far
    Laois,Carlow,Fingal & South County Dublin
    I think 3 more will follow soon

    in reply to: Books that should be back in print… #718395
    LOB
    Participant

    this is another good site for sourcing 2nd hand books.
    Got a copy of Robert Ballagh’s book of photographs of Dublin through this (early eighties)

    http://www.buyused.co.uk/

    in reply to: Books that should be back in print… #718394
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by Paul Clerkin
    “Dublin An Urban History” byNiall McCullough is another that I think should be reprinted.

    Yeah & how did you get your copy?
    Jammy sod ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: Real Landmark for Dublin #722845
    LOB
    Participant

    Originally posted by alphasun

    Or rebuild Brunel’s pneumatic railway.
    alphasun

    excuse me for being a pedant

    I had my doubts about Brunel’s involvement in the Dublin one so i sourced this from a site on athmospheric railways

    “I note in passing that while I (as a fan of his) might like Isambard
    Kingdom Brunel to have invented the atmospheric system used on the
    South Devon, it is wrong to say that he did so, as is sometimes done.
    He did choose it for the line and actively promoted it (well, “actively”
    is redundant with Brunel). It was actually developed by Samuel Clegg
    and Joseph and Jacob Samuda.”

    in reply to: O’Connell St. Kiosks #722932
    LOB
    Participant

    I suspect that that image is a group of 6 “micro” buildings
    They will probably be in groups of 3 or 6

    in reply to: Ice skating in Dublin #722787
    LOB
    Participant

    quiet everyone!
    I think Paul is getting lost in a Bing Crosby “white Christmas” moment
    ๐Ÿ™‚

Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 258 total)

Latest News