lexington

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 1,258 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: developments in cork #758662
    lexington
    Participant

    @kite wrote:

    :confused: What is going on on this forum Lex?
    Things have never been so quiet, the title is changing, the time display suggests that we are all burning midnight oil…Just finding this all hard fo follow.

    kite – the development front was going through a little lull there for a period, but things are starting to pick up now again coming up to Christmas. As for participation, that really is the discretion of users – the number of hits to the thread would seem to dictate that it is continuing to be read regularly by a number of persons (many not registered), however it terms of contribution – it’s up to people I suppose to take that on themselves. The same happened once or twice before, when there’s no real big news, things aren’t as frequently responded to.

    As for the title, you’ll have to direct your enquiry to Paul Clerkin – presumably the title element ‘architecture’ was not perceived as warranted(???), Admittedly the new title is a little confusing, and maybe a revised title like “Cork: Development” would at least provide some sense of identifiability with respect to the preceding thread title. Similarly, you’ll have to ask him about the time displays – I don’t generally take note of them but I know other users have mentioned the same issue on other threads. I don’t know, sorry. :confused:

    Interestingly, between the ‘LADSOCL’ thread and this thread, a combined hit volume of 248,219 views has been achieved with a combined 3,042 posts. That’s no bad achievement in terms of participation and says a great deal about the popularity of the threads and the Archiseek.com forums as a whole. ๐Ÿ™‚

    All the best,

    Lex ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    in reply to: developments in cork #758660
    lexington
    Participant

    ‘developments in cork’

    is there a new sub-forum being devised???

    e.g. developments in south-east
    developments in cork

    in reply to: developments in cork #758657
    lexington
    Participant

    @Aidan wrote:

    Lexington, about the location for this proposed pharma plant, there has been some activity (testbores etc) in a field on the right of th dual carraigeway as you head for Midleton (where the Ploughing Championship was held a number of years ago). Is this the site in question?

    Quite genuinely, I don’t know the precise location. I was informed of the proposal by a well-respected member of the Cork Harbour Pharma Industry and was never issued a precise location – but was simply told it will be with easy accessibility of the Cork – Midelton Dual Carriageway and by extension, Little Island.



    mickeydocs – indeed the AIB/BNY operation is destined for a 20,000sq ft lease (of 20 years) at Cork Airport Business Park. You have to admire the success of the facility in attracting some very tasty names. ๐Ÿ˜‰


    in reply to: developments in cork #758652
    lexington
    Participant

    @Aidan wrote:

    Also, theres a piece in todays Irish Times about the pharma plant being rumoured for Carrigtwohill – Amgen is the named party, and the figure of 1.3bn is mentioned as an investment. Apparently a preliminary decision has been made to go with the Cork location, and a final decision is expected ‘early next month’.

    That’s right Aidan – I commented on the pharma proposal back in post #1023 here -> https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=42697&postcount=1023

    @lexington wrote:

    A รขโ€šยฌ1bn euro investment into a massive, state-of-the-art pharmaceutical manufacturing facility is earmarked for a site near Carrigtwohill, only a few minutes drive from the city and located near the N25 “Midelton” Dual-Carriageway. Negotiations are finalising with the IDA at present, and if successful, the proposal (one of the largest single pharmaceutical investments in the State) may create up to 500 jobs. The identity beind the massive plan has not yet been revealed, however, according to a prominent and well-respected source within the existing pharmaceutical industry around Cork Harbour, informed speculation cites Wyeth Pharma as the name behind the proposal. More details when they emerge.

    It will be a great boost for Cork and will have a foot in the bio-logics area. My understanding now is that it is simply a matter of ironing out the details with the IDA ahead of a formal announcement.



    As for the Blackpool Railway stop, the focus is set on the former Kilbarry Station, north-east across the road from Blackpool S.C. I understand movement to start being made on the location mid-2006 (all things going well) – and may include a larger development elements. Speculation was ripe that the Shipton Group may develop the site to include a full-integrated stop as part of a scheme likely to include small retail, cafe provision and some other elements I’m not too sure on. The station would link to the S.C. nearby – by pedestrian bridge(???). Essentially the scheme would be funded privately with public benefit afforded in decent rail access to metropolitan and city centre/docklands Cork from Blackpool. Not quite sure how that plan is working out, but either way the project has been prioritised by CCC as noted in their November 2005 Economic Monitor.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758649
    lexington
    Participant

    The OPW have indicated their intention to announce the successful Revenue Commissioners tenancy bid for next week. The contest has been a long and tough one with some good proposals forwarded. The likes of The Shipton Group, Kenny Group and McCarthy Developments had all forwarded pitches, however, in the end only 2 proposals came down to the final tie with a proposal set for the former ‘Susie’s Field’ quarry off Assumption Road in Blackpool, now looking set to bring home the ‘trophy’. Ascon Rohcon Limited who have championed a planning permission attained by auctioneer/developers Joe Carey & Frank Sheahan are claiming to be dead-cert in having attained Revenue Commissioner tenancy. The subject proposal attained permission in July 2003 following a lengthy planning process beginning back in 2001. Designed by Jack Coughlan & Associates, the scheme was granted with permission for 397 basement car-parking spaces over 2 decks and 13,511sq m of additional commercial space of which the bulk is open plan office space. A provision of 250sq m of retail space will be made for local services use. The new building will extend to 4-floors over the basement car-parking with the structure’s profile generally aligning with the quarry slopes.


    Susie’s Field site indicated in purple. Not shown is the new link road between the Blackpool By-Pass and Pope’s Road which also graces the western periphery of the site.

    If Theo Cullinane (of Ascon) is endorsed by the OPW announcement next week, it will mean up to 600 of the Revenue Commissioners staff will leave Sullivans Quay in the city centre and travel to the northern suburb breaches. Should the case be verified, construction on the project is likely to commence early in 2006. It will mean the loss of McCarthy Developments contestancy who provided a highly attractive docklands alternative of 8-storeys along Centre Park Road, designed by Murray O’Laoire (see below). As part of the deal, Ascon Rohcon & Joe Carey/Frank Sheahan will also acquire the valuable 0.75acre Government Buildings site at Sullivans Quay which, subject to some site foundation modifications, is capable of providing a landmark commercial scheme which would have adequate scope for a new city centre cinema facility (in lieu of the Capitol Cineplex closure and its prospective redevelopment see here -> https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=43573&postcount=1128). Any redevelopment of Sullivans Quay will demand a superb architectural standard utilising the exceptional vista afforded down the soon-to-be renewed Grand Parade (designed by Beth Gali & Associates).

    Also on the subject of Ascon Rohcon, who are now pushing further into development activity in Cork city centre, the group are linked to a holding on Albert Quay which adjoins the recently purchased Doyle Warehousing facility (0.5acres) sold recently to Howard Holdings for an estimated รขโ€šยฌ9m to รขโ€šยฌ10m.


    Paul Kenny’s proposal, designed by Wilson Architecture – no longer in the RC bid running.


    McCarthy Developments’ Centre Park Road proposal designed by Murray O’Laoire.

    It is unfortunate that the 2 proposals depicted in the images above have not attained RC tenancy, from a city centre urban renewal perspective. However, does this mean the projects are lost entirely? Not necessarily. McCarthy Developments, who hold full planning on their proposal, may yet decide to proceed with it on a more ‘independent’ basis – as for the Kenny proposal, a number of options remain with this scheme, including a phased development or change of use of certain elements to create a more mixed use approach – should its appeal prove successful. :confused:

    in reply to: developments in cork #758647
    lexington
    Participant

    @garret wrote:

    i saw that in de paper
    looks horrific
    the vista into the city from tivoli will be destroyed
    will it go ahead
    is there a way to object
    i thought there was a plan for a walkway areound to the marina from blackrock castle

    The application has yet to be subjected to the planning process, therefore, at this stage there is no indication as to which direction a decision will go. The proposal was, however, subject to extensive preplanning discussions.

    A masterplan draft is being prepared by Cork City Council for the enhancement of the Blackrock Harbour area which, as I understand will include waterfront amenity provision the likes I believe you may be referring to.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758645
    lexington
    Participant

    Cork is embarking on a phase of expansion and renewal – some describing it as the most exciting revival of the city in modern times. As a location to develop and invest, the likes of Mark Fitzgerald (CEO of Sherry FitzGerald Group) are hailing it as having the potential to represent one of the best urban revival operations in Europe. Fintan Tierney of DTZ Sherry FitzGerald has earmarked Cork as one of the best investment opportunities in the country. Hamilton Osbourne King’s Paul McNeive has noted his company’s commitment to the city citing it’s intention to be at the cusp of what offers the company and its clients one of the best operational opportunities available. The confidence in the city and metropolitan area has been reflected by moves from major construction companies like Michael McNamara Construction, Coffey Construction, PJ Walls and arrivals expected soon by the likes of Laing O’Rourke (who are investigating setting up its first regional office outside of Dublin in Cork city) and P. Elliot, whose expansion south to Nenagh is seen as a happy-medium to take advantage of southern opportunities but with one company insider noting, Cork is very much on the long-term list. Major design practices have moved in to the city in recent times like Scott Tallon Walker, O’Mahony Pike and Henry J. Lyons & Partners. And too developers not traditionally active in the Cork region are involving or soon to involve in exciting projects over the coming future. CSO predictions cite the Cork region is in a position to take advantage of a population spurt of anywhere up to 100,000 by 2015. All in all, the forecast looks good – with perhaps the biggest threat lurking in the shadows of property value inflation. So all this progress is positive news – but as the city embarks on this revival path, it now has to consider how it intends to distinguish itself as an individual city and character…much of this can be achieved through good, considerate design. Are we there yet? No, not at all, but we now have an opportunity to get there.

    The historical humdrum nature of development activity in Cork has never really offered it the chance to establish a unique character in the modern age – up until about 2002, new structure formation failed to kick into the frequency it is now starting to enjoy…the biggest redevelopment challeges now stand ahead. To date, there has been some success and some, well, not so successful projects in emergence. Cork needs to develop a distinctly Corkonian character in the prospective design of its new buildings but one which is not afraid to interpret new ideas and architectural approaches. A distinct ‘character’ (and of course opinion will vary) does not mean monotonously repetitive design layouts, but rather designs which utilises facets of the city’s history, culture, people and surroundings (i.e. river, natural materials etc) as inspirations for their realisation. It is in realising such features that Cork can be pitched with a unique flavour to prospective investors, employers, businesses, residents and so on with a strong leg to stand on. In seeking out this ‘character’ represented through our buildings, we should not be afraid to explore new avenues of design and utilise the various offerings of different approaches to provide new ways of realising this identity – regardless of height, usage or location, the opportunity to ascertain and develop this identity remains. Does this mean there is no room for other influences? Certainly not, but as I said, individual character does not mean restriction to any one architectural discipline or style. We should strive to build on the highest existing standards – and by doing so, incorporate these new standards as immediately recognisable facets of the character which we seek to build.

    Are the buildings below stepping stones toward creating an individual architectural identity in the modern age for Cork???


    Eglinton Street – designed by Wilson Architecture


    Phase 1 of Camden Court – designed by James Leahy & Associates


    Coppinger Court – designed by Magee Creedon Architects

    (P.S.: I’m not stating ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to the designs posted above, nor am I implying a vantage one way or the other regarding them – they are simpy posted for deliberation. Any other examples are most welcome.)

    in reply to: architecture of cork city #757057
    lexington
    Participant

    @Devin wrote:

    Buckley Bros.
    It is disgraceful that Buckley Bros is going to be removed. I know the owner has to get on with their business, but could he/she not leave the current one in situ underneath a new front at least?

    Butlers Irish Chocolates are steaming ahead with the recladding of the former Buckley Bros. shopfront. It remains vitrolite, but in a more fashionable ‘black’ tone now. This is fine but the original ‘green’ colouration and metallic signage was far more unusual and had a retro-charm about it. With a little refurbishment, the shopfront could well have lasted into the future and as Graham Hickey once noted, it could – for the sake of Butlers’ sales pitch – remind one of ‘mint chocolate’! :p

    in reply to: developments in cork #758643
    lexington
    Participant

    @Leesider wrote:

    now that Douglas has been brought up what is the current situation with this?? is construction due to start any time soon or is it still in the planning phase?

    Are you referring to the ‘town centre’ development by The Shipton Group?

    Planning already exists on Douglas Village S.C. for a substantial redevelopment, designed by Wilson Architecture, which will facilitate increased retail space and a multi-storey car-park so as to allow and new east-west routeway and alleviate many of the rancid traffic concerns facing Douglas.

    However, this will likely see some alteration and allowance for a link-up with the redevelopment site constituent of the former Permanent TSB premises, Cinema World premises, Shell Petrol Station and the green site to the east of Cinema World. Douglas Court S.C., also in the possession of The Shipton Group, will benefit from a link-up to the remainder development plans. Bowen Construction are also understood to be on-board with the scheme. As best I am aware, issues are being ironed out with Cork County Manager Maurice Moloney and CCC, with a planning application scheduled within the prospective future – so in answer, construction on the overall scheme is a bit away I’m afraid.


    in reply to: developments in cork #758640
    lexington
    Participant

    ๐Ÿ˜‰ Developers Paul O’Brien (Mount Kennett Investments) and John Costello have withdrawn their planning application for the redevelopment of the recently closed Capitol Cineplex on Grand Parade. The project was designed by Sabine Wittman’s Dungarvan-based The e-Project. The withdrawal now adds fuel to the fire of speculation that investor Joe O’Donovan and a group of other smaller investors, who have recently been active in a series of property acquisitions along Grand Parade, St. Patrick’s Street and Oliver Plunkett Street – are now seeking to incorporate the valuable Capitol Cineplex site into a propsective scheme which will likely house a large higher-order retail scheme, perhaps some limited residential elements and other commercial features. Other acquisitions by the investors are understood to have included 50 Patrick’s Street and adjoining premises, the Oyster Tavern on Market Lane (and neighbouring units), the Central Shoe Stores on Grand Parade (rumoured to have been sold not so long ago for a whopping €14.5m and there is speculation that the Qube complex on Oliver Plunkett Street sold for circa €10m. A prospective proposal could well seek to delicately incorporate The English Market (as with some major European developments which have carefully adjoined traditional markets). The possibility of the Capitol Cineplex premises incorporated into the proposal would now offer the developers a chance to provide a major contemporary frontage onto Grand Parade and an unrivalled vista down the length of Washington Street. The facility has scope to comfortably house a new city centre department store such as the likes of Arnotts or even the John Lewis Partnership who have been actively assessing Irish expansion opportunities.

    Also see:
    1. https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=39356&postcount=475
    2. https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?p=41409&highlight=Joe+O%27Donovan#post41409



    *UPDATES*

    ๐Ÿ™‚ O’Flynn Construction have been granted their appeal subject to revised conditions regarding the contest of development fee contributions cited as part of their successful permission for the Eglinton Street development. The Board found favour to amend Condition 24 which concerned a contested calculation of development fees. Construction on Eglinton Street is now expected to commence in early 2006.



    ๐Ÿ˜Ž Dairygold Co-Op’s property developmemt wing, Alchemy Properties has been granted permission by CorkCoCo for the phased demolition of Dairygold Co-operative store, the provision of temporary cladding to part of the existing store, construction of temporary road, temporary external storage area, construction of a 4Home DIY store, ancillary offices, staff facilities, garden centre, external generator and compactor, ESB substation, car parking and all ancillary site works all at their premises along the Cork Road in Midelton.

    Additionally the company was also granted permission on a seperate application for the same site for a retail development consisting of 4 no. retail warehouse units.



    ๐Ÿ˜Ž Dunnes Stores have been permitted on appeal, the development of a new ‘town centre’ development for Carrigaline comprising of a supermarket (3,007sq m), new public library (382sq m) and 3 additional retail units all at a site in Kilnaglery. The proposal was appealed by 3 parties including Barry Collins who owns the busy SuperValu operation in the town centre and who is planning a large-scale town centre development with The Shipton Group’s Clayton Love Jnr, under the special purpose vehicle Piton Properties.


    in reply to: New Developments in Galway City #761807
    lexington
    Participant

    @PTB wrote:

    Does anybody have a picture of the new cinema development that was much acclaimed or the NUIG building with the large copper panon the outside. Saw a picture of it once and it looked very nice.

    This? It is nice.

    And The Eye.

    lexington
    Participant

    @anto wrote:

    What’s your opinion on the Cobh Cathedral thread Lex? You usually have an opinion on all things Cork ๐Ÿ™‚

    Any of the rest of you Cork dudes have an opinion. What’s the opinion on the streets down there?

    Personally I think it would be terrible if this National Treasure was damaged.

    Well like I said at the start of the thread – I can’t understand the logic behind tampering with something that is not only beautiful as it is, but holds such important historic value for the sake of something rather inessential. See -> https://archiseek.com/content/showpost.php?p=41225&postcount=6

    in reply to: developments in cork #758638
    lexington
    Participant

    ๐Ÿ˜Ž Quinlan Private, as part of a larger รขโ€šยฌ103m acquisition of property assets put on the market by KBC Asset Management, has acquired the retail premises occupied by Argos (part of what was formerly the Queen’s Old Castle Centre) at Daunt Square, the junction between the western end of Patrick’s Street and Grand Parade. The remaining properties as part of the deal are centred around Dublin and include the likes of Oldbrook House on the Lower Pembroke Road and Block P6 of the Eastpoint Business Park.


    @iloveCORK2 wrote:

    Lexington, you know the way you said they were going to extend the shopping centre northwards, well isn’t the multi-storey carpark and apartments in the way. U have any plans/photos of the extension of how the extension well look, so as to visualise it. Thanks

    I think we may have got our wires crossed – I was referring to Mahon Point SC. Designs there, as best I am aware, have yet to be realised entirely. Movement on that was posited at 2009, so it’s somewhat off yet.

    The Ballincollig S.C. expansion is earmarked for the west, sorry, on a siet beyond the existing surface car-park. An application for that is about 5 months away, pending. ๐Ÿ™‚

    lexington
    Participant

    @Devin wrote:

    &#8230]

    @lexington wrote:

    How is that the last straw? The fact is, at the time of the proposal, the car-park is in existence and under the management of Cork City Council. Timeframe for site development, subject to planning, is at the discretion of the property owner. Furthermore, please address the context of the overall quayside development plan and what would you alternatively propose? Comments regarding its standing nature is like commenting on a proposal half-way through construction without consideration for the empirical agenda. How would a lower rise building affect the visual depth of the quayside? Do you not concede that it would look woefully more disproportionate? How would such structures address the North Wall of the Opera House? Surely the prominency of the ugly facade would continue to dominate?

    And the number of words was appropriate to the lengthy post first initiated and with respect to the comments I sought to make. The points made by republicofcork are valid opinion but factually flawed as well. As for prolonging the debate – the very fact you disagree with me means it still remains. The explanation of ‘opinion being invalid’ was contradictory – were it so, your opinion would be invalid equally.

    :rolleyes:

    Well that was my reply, but frankly some people are so fixed they’ll never be able to see another side…time to move on…

    …and Devin I could argue with you all day, but I doubt it would result in any mutual benefit. We’ll agree to disagree on this one.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758634
    lexington
    Participant

    I’ll be honest, beyond one or two projects – such as the Evelina Children’s Hospital (interestingly, which was used as a comparitive in the planning application for Paul Kenny’s Treasury development along Patrick’s Quay by Wilson Architecture) and Wildscreen in Bristol, my familiarity with Hopkins Architects was limited. I’ve been looking into the practice increasingly so and I have to say, I’m impressed!

    Hmmm, interesting! ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Well worth a look – any opinions?

    Visit: http://www.hopkins.co.uk

    in reply to: Drogheda: Scotch Hall Experience #763343
    lexington
    Participant

    @Rory W wrote:

    That’s because the Railway station is before you come to the Bridge!!!:D

    Scotch Hall website
    http://www.scotch-hall.com/

    Re: website – ‘Scotch Hall Experience: SHE has arrived!’

    Clearly a moment of inspiration with the Director of Marketing following a visit by his mother-in-law. ๐Ÿ˜€

    I think the weather in the image above doesn’t do Drogheda any favours either, looking forward to visiting SH on my way up to Dundalk.

    lexington
    Participant

    @Devin wrote:

    You did your fair share of this when you first joined the forum.

    @lexington wrote:

    ….maturity dictates one can see past these things…

    …of course for some people it still poses a problem! :rolleyes:

    To reply Devin, as I’ve said before, this forum is about debate and learning…you learn a lot and you change with it as you do. I’ve never shyed away from someone else’s perspective, but I’ve learned to not be so hardlined about my own when addressing others and in reading what others have had to say, it teaches you something about how attitudes are more favourably portrayed. Your track record isn’t unbleamished either, only just recently, I think DUCK would agree given your response to his query about 1 off housing. How can you expect persons to more clearly understand your positions when you distance yourself with comments such as that? What I would rather is that instead of to-ing and fro-ing is that you consider republicofcork‘s points made earlier in this thread and then consider them with respect to the points I made in response and then offer your own deliberation – again noting the issues raised by both sides – that would be far more interesting that cheap-whipping and would do the debate, the thread and your position a great deal of service…so without the need to quip back, please, engage in the discussion – share your perspective on the issues under discussion…otherwise there was little point in offering any comments on this thread in the first place. I’m much more interested to hear what you have to say in active debate.

    in reply to: developments in cork #758628
    lexington
    Participant

    @iloveCORK2 wrote:

    Also you have got to remember what lexington said, that there are plans to extend the centre westwards over the current deck carpark, am I correct in saying that Lexington?? Or is it eastwards.

    Northwards! :p

    ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: New Developments in Galway City #761803
    lexington
    Participant

    @Craig Davis wrote:

    Are cities such as Galway & Limerick making the same mistakes now that were committed a generation ago & subsequently learned from in Dublin? Is there an attitude of any development is good development?

    I think Limerick has put in a relatively good show along its southern bank quaysides. Bishops Quay and Steamboat Quay spring to mind. Approaching along the northern quays from Shannon, the docklands area looks so much better than the once did not so long ago.

    lexington
    Participant

    @burge_eye wrote:

    strange how these Cork based threads always seem to end in bickering and acrimony. It reminds me of those old silent movies where a massive fight breaks out and the 2 people who started it crawl out the bottom and walk away unscathed – Frank and Owen maybe?

    Whose bickering? Debate is about airing views and they don’t always converge. Devin and republicofcork are entitled to express their opinion. I would only ask that when people do choose to voice such that they do so in a sense that does not ill-portray their character, sometimes, we all need (myself included) to be reminded of that. Don’t mistake debate for dirt-slinging…if people choose to go that route, that’s their issue but one should always stand their ground.

    As for Cork-based threads etc etc – I think you should read through some of the other threads, I think you’ll note that such discussions span a multitude of topics and are not always pleasant. A good example was the back-and-forth between Diaspora and alan_d at one point, but I know understand that it’s all history – maturity dictates one can see past these things. And they have. I will always argue my position, one should always defend themself, and if I don’t like what someone says I will point it out and retort but all the same I don’t hold any ill-concepts of those that challenge me. That’s what makes for good discussion. If persons wish to portray childish behaviour, their actions represent themselves.

Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 1,258 total)